G21B3/00 — Cold Fusion/LENR

The patent describes using shaped infrared laser pulses to control quantum states and induce fusion in fluid fuel at ambient temperatures. This violates established physics because the optical photon energies involved are millions of times smaller than the energy required to overcome the Coulomb barrier between atomic nuclei for fusion, with no plausible mechanism provided. The claims use correct optical terminology but obfuscate the fundamental energy scale problem.

The device claims to generate electricity from ionized fluid flow and unspecified 'fusion reactions' in a closed-loop system. It violates core thermodynamics by implying net energy output without a defined energy input, constituting a perpetual motion scheme. The mention of fusion is physically implausible given the described apparatus.

The patent describes a system claiming to produce helium and excess energy from deuterium oxide via electrolysis and radioactive stimulation. The proposed mechanism misuses quantum mechanics and lacks a credible physical basis for overcoming the Coulomb barrier for nuclear fusion at low temperatures, violating energy conservation. The terminology is obfuscatory, and the claimed 'excess energy' output is thermodynamically impossible without an unaccounted-for energy source.

The patent describes an electrostatic system claiming to induce nuclear fusion/synthesis, but it provides no credible physical mechanism to overcome the Coulomb barrier. It implies net energy production while obscuring the primary energy input, violating energy conservation. The use of correct physics terms like 'Carnot cycle' alongside an impossible core claim is characteristic of obfuscation.

The patent describes a process using invented, undefined terms and relationships to allegedly manipulate dimensions and fundamental particles. It provides no identifiable source of energy, no accounting for inputs and outputs, and uses correct physics terms (like fusion, Fibonacci series) in a vague, incorrect, or obfuscatory manner, violating fundamental principles of energy conservation and physical realism.

The patent claims a device that generates energy by transforming the elemental/isotopic composition of substances (including water and waste) in a plasma, implying over-unity performance. This violates conservation of mass-energy, as it claims net energy output from non-fuel materials without adequate input energy, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.

The device claims to achieve extended flight by heating air inside a sealed container, but provides no identifiable energy source for heating or propulsion, violating conservation of energy. It attempts to create propulsion from internal heated air release without explaining how this produces net thrust or where the thermal energy originates.

The claim describes a controlled hydrogen transmutation process that allegedly produces scalable net energy output. It violates the First Law of Thermodynamics by not accounting for all energy inputs required for compression, heating, and magnetic field generation. The described mechanism is inconsistent with known nuclear physics and uses obfuscated technical language to imply an impossible energy multiplication process.

The patent describes a plasma confinement device with intersecting plasma beams in a Z-shaped magnetic field, claiming it produces both thermal and electrical energy from light element fusion. However, it violates energy conservation by implying net energy extraction from plasma interactions without identifying the actual energy source or thermodynamic cycle, using obscure magnetic field geometry as a purported energy multiplication mechanism.

The patent describes a device that claims to produce net energy via low-temperature nuclear reactions. However, the proposed neutron generation mechanism is physically implausible, and the selected nuclear fuels (6Li, 10B) are not fissile and cannot sustain a power-producing chain reaction. The overall process would consume far more energy to initiate than it could possibly release, violating energy conservation.

The patent describes a system claiming to amplify energy and produce more electrical output than the control input. It fails to account for all energy inputs, implies energy creation from an unspecified internal source, and uses vague, technically complex language to obscure a fundamental violation of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.

The patent claims a 'supplemental thrust' from fusion using ambient cosmic rays and muons, which is physically implausible. The flux and interaction probability of these particles is far too low to produce a measurable energy gain, making this a violation of practical energy accounting dressed in correct-sounding terminology.

The claims lack any identifiable, lawful energy source and propose creating energy or fuel from water modification using undefined processes and pseudoscientific concepts, directly violating conservation laws and thermodynamic principles. The language is obfuscatory and incoherent from a physics perspective.

The patent describes a complex system combining cavitation, electrolysis, and gas discharge, but its core claim of excess heat generation relies on an unspecified 'electromagnetic condensation' of hydrogen, which is not a recognized exothermic process. The overall scheme suggests energy gain without identifying a sufficient external energy source, violating energy conservation.

The patent describes a 'nuclear transmutation system' where hydrogen isotopes with ≥10 keV energy are channeled through metal lattices, implying nuclear reactions without specifying the substantial energy input required to overcome Coulomb barriers or create such energetic particles. This violates energy conservation as it suggests nuclear-scale energy outputs without corresponding inputs.

This patent describes an electron beam projection device using hydrogen gas flow but fails to account for the energy required to generate, accelerate, and maintain electron beams, especially through dense media like water. The description uses technical terms (electron beams, acceleration spaces, hydrogen gas) but lacks physical mechanisms for energy input, making it thermodynamically incomplete and likely violating conservation laws.

The proposed system violates fundamental energy accounting principles. The natural flux of cosmic rays and muons is many orders of magnitude too weak to generate useful industrial power via random fusion events, and muon-catalyzed fusion is not a net energy source in nature. The energy required to operate the system would far exceed any conceivable output.

This patent describes a system claiming to produce excess heat from low-energy nuclear reactions using carbon-enhanced thermal excitation. The claims imply net energy gain through feedback control that reduces electrical input while maintaining reaction temperature, which violates energy conservation unless there's an unaccounted energy source. The description uses legitimate materials science terminology but makes thermodynamically questionable claims about sustained excess heat production.

This system claims to produce 'huge energy' and hydrogen through a 'low-energy nuclear reaction' where a metal catalyst reacts with warm water without any external energy input, which violates conservation of energy. The described process suggests energy creation from nothing rather than energy conversion from an identifiable source.

The patent claims an apparatus that generates 'excess heat' using deuterium and metals like nickel and palladium, but provides no legitimate energy source to explain the excess. Claim 7's 'zero voltage differential' makes operation thermodynamically impossible, as it implies energy extraction from equilibrium. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, resembling cold fusion or over-unity devices lacking credible physics.

The patent describes a device that allegedly generates electricity from 'output electromagnetic radiation' produced by inducing unspecified nuclear isotope mass shifts in a fuel. This violates energy conservation as it claims to produce net electrical output without a clear, sufficient external energy input, relying on pseudoscientific nuclear processes not supported by physics.

This device claims to produce nuclear reactions with different mass products through collisions between neutral particles and reactor walls, implying net energy release without sufficient energy input to overcome nuclear binding energies. The description uses plasma physics terminology but describes a process that violates conservation laws by suggesting nuclear transmutation can occur through low-energy mechanical collisions.

The patent describes a process that claims to fuse atoms and synthesize new elements by combining low-energy photons into high-energy ones and using an undefined 'equilibrium shift.' This violates the conservation of energy, as it proposes creating nuclear-binding-scale energy from unspecified, seemingly lesser inputs, and invokes fictional physical concepts to obfuscate the violation.

The patent describes a system that claims to produce net energy from 'cold hydrogen fusion' initiated by high-voltage electrical equipment and gas vortices, violating conservation of energy. It uses obfuscatory pseudoscientific language and proposes a self-amplifying energy multiplication process with no credible physical mechanism, falling squarely into perpetual motion territory.

The patent describes a device claiming to generate electricity from water and 'nuclear reactions' with implied energy multiplication (10A input to 50,000A output). It violates energy conservation by not accounting for the massive energy input required for water dissociation or nuclear processes, using obfuscated technical language to disguise a perpetual motion claim.

This patent describes a 'charged particle beam impact-type fusion reactor' that claims to achieve net energy gain from deuterium-tritium fusion using particle beams and recycling systems. It violates fundamental physics by ignoring the immense input energy required to accelerate particles to fusion-relevant energies and overcome Coulomb barriers, presenting an incomplete energy balance that suggests an impossible over-unity process.

The patent describes a device that allegedly produces heat via nuclear reactions in a metal hydride using only modest heating and electrical voltage. This claim violates established nuclear physics, as the energies involved are vastly insufficient to drive nuclear processes. The description lacks credible energy accounting and uses technical terms to obfuscate an implausible mechanism.

The patent claim describes generating energy by applying vibrations to a hydrogen mixture without identifying any external energy source beyond the vibrations themselves. This violates energy conservation, as it implies producing more energy than is input via the vibrational actuators. The description is physically incoherent and represents a classic over-unity energy claim.

The patent describes an energy production method claiming exothermic nuclear reactions in metal alloys under mild conditions, using invented nuclear physics terminology without identifying a valid energy source or respecting conservation laws. The claims imply perpetual net energy from unspecified isotopic transitions, constituting a thermodynamic violation.

The device claims to produce heat via deuteron fusion initiated by cavitation, a process not supported by physics, as cavitation cannot create the extreme temperature and pressure required for nuclear fusion. The apparent 'excess' heat would violate energy conservation unless all inputs (electrical energy to the piezo) are properly accounted for, which the patent abstract fails to do credibly.

The patent describes a method to generate energy via atomic/nuclear reactions initiated by low-energy electromagnetic radiation (<500 eV), which is physically impossible as it violates conservation of energy and the laws governing nuclear reactions. The claims involve unsubstantiated energy multiplication and storage mechanisms, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.

The patent describes a humidity-driven elastomer actuator claimed to generate electricity in a 'self-excited' cycle. This violates the First Law by implying energy creation from nothing, and the Second Law by suggesting isothermal work extraction from a humidity gradient without a compensating process. The description follows the classic over-unity pattern of hiding the true energy source.

The patent describes a device that extracts energy from a magnetic field to generate electricity, then uses part of that output to sustain the extraction process. This constitutes a closed-loop energy system with no identified net external input, violating energy conservation. The vague claims and circular energy flow suggest an attempt to obscure the lack of a primary energy source.

This patent describes a device claiming to produce enormous energy through 'cold nuclear transmutation' of hydrogen in palladium-loaded liquid stimulated by RF fields. It violates energy conservation by claiming huge energy output from minimal electrical input and room-temperature nuclear reactions without a credible physical mechanism.

The patent describes a system that claims to generate useful energy solely through the interaction of magnetic fields and components, with no identifiable external energy input. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) and the second law (no work from equilibrium). The vague, self-referential language is characteristic of perpetual motion claims.

The device claims net energy from carbon-carbon fusion using electrostatic acceleration in a vacuum chamber, but the required ion energies for significant fusion cross-sections are unattainably high in this configuration, and the probability of fusion from such a setup is effectively zero. The energy input to create and accelerate ions would vastly exceed any possible fusion energy output, violating energy conservation for any claimed net gain.

The patent describes a control system for managing multiple energy-producing reactors, but crucially fails to specify the original source of energy that powers the reactors' reactions. The method claims to use reactor output to activate other reactors and sustain the system, which, without a defined external fuel or energy source, constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).

The device claims to produce more thermal energy than is electrically input from a sealed, inert solid fuel. With no identifiable high-density energy source (chemical, nuclear, or ambient) and a sealed system, this constitutes a violation of energy conservation, characteristic of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.

The patent describes an electrical system using deuterium and tritium that claims to produce more electrical energy output than input through cascading circuits, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. It uses nuclear fusion terminology incorrectly while proposing an energy multiplication mechanism with no identifiable external energy source to account for the claimed excess output.

The device claims to extract net thermal energy from hydrogen through an undefined, non-standard nuclear process, while requiring significant electrical input for arcs and compression. The core mechanism violates known physics, and the energy accounting ignores the primary electrical input, making it a thermodynamic violation.

The patent describes a hydrogen/oxygen generation system using various discharge cells (plasma, RF, glow discharge) with pulsed/intermittent input power. It claims to control input power while generating useful hydrogen/oxygen energy, strongly implying an output greater than the electrical input without identifying any additional ambient or chemical energy source. This constitutes incomplete energy accounting and suggests a violation of energy conservation.

The claim describes using heated metal clusters in hydrogen to trigger nuclear transmutation of radioactive waste. This violates energy conservation, as the immense energy required to alter nuclear binding energies and overcome Coulomb barriers is not sourced from the described thermal/chemical inputs. It is a 'cold fusion'-type claim repurposed for waste treatment.

The patent describes a process that violates the first law of thermodynamics by claiming to create a high-energy-density fusion fuel ('ultra-dense hydrogen') through an unspecified catalytic process with negligible energy input. It then proposes achieving fusion break-even with unspecified irradiation, ignoring the immense, well-documented energy requirements for both fuel preparation and fusion ignition.

The claim of achieving nuclear fusion at low temperatures in a non-plasma state directly contradicts established nuclear physics, which requires overcoming the Coulomb barrier via high temperature and pressure. The description lacks any credible mechanism for this and obscures the fundamental energy inputs required, making it a thermodynamic violation.

The patent describes using a pile driver or hydraulic press to crush a pellet to achieve fusion, claiming massive net energy output. This violates energy conservation, as the mechanical work required to achieve true fusion conditions would vastly exceed any energy yield from such a crude apparatus. The described mechanism cannot overcome the fundamental Coulomb barrier for fusion.

The patent describes a device to compress plasma to a high-energy state and convert resulting particle energy to electricity, but fails to account for the massive external energy input required for plasma creation, confinement, and compression. The description suggests a system that could generate net energy from its own operation, violating energy conservation by omitting the primary energy source.

The patent describes a method for nuclear transmutation using light or electromagnetic fields to accelerate particles, claiming this can overcome Coulomb barriers and induce nuclear reactions. This violates fundamental conservation laws, as the energy required for nuclear reactions (MeV scale) is millions of times greater than the energy provided by optical photons (eV scale). The mechanism is thermodynamically impossible and misapplies classical electromagnetic concepts to nuclear physics.

The patent describes a pulsed electrolysis system claiming to generate heat energy exceeding the electrical input, violating energy conservation. The description uses complex terminology (super wave-ping patterns, ion surges, high-frequency short waves) but lacks a coherent physical mechanism for the claimed over-unity effect, falling into classic perpetual motion patterns.

The claim describes an ambiguous low-energy nuclear process without a credible physical mechanism, violates energy conservation by implying net energy gain from unexplained transmutations, and uses obfuscating terminology like 'preferable neutron orientation' and 'plasma-vortex' without clear scientific basis.

The device claims to extract and amplify thermal energy from the ambient environment using special chemical compounds, creating a self-sustaining cycle that produces more thermal energy than is input. This directly violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to perform useful work or create a temperature difference using a single heat reservoir without an external energy source.

The patent describes a system claiming to produce net electrical and thermal output from ultrasonic cavitation in heavy water, implying room-temperature sonofusion. This violates energy conservation as the electrical input to the transducers and control systems must exceed any fusion energy output, given the extreme inefficiency of acoustic inertial confinement fusion. The description uses obfuscated technical language and lacks credible physical mechanisms for net energy gain.

The described method claims net energy production from He-Be fusion in a simple plasma discharge device, which is thermodynamically and nuclearly implausible. The required conditions for sustainable fusion are not met by the apparatus, and the energy accounting is incomplete, violating fundamental plasma physics and conservation laws.

The patent describes a complex, multi-stage device claiming to generate electricity from ambient humidity/thermal gradients, but it fails to account for all energy inputs, implies energy multiplication through cascading, and uses obfuscated technical jargon without a clear, physically valid mechanism. This suggests a violation of energy conservation, as the described output likely exceeds the usable energy extractable from the identified ambient sources.

The patent describes a chain of unphysical processes starting with undefined 'overlapping' of particles to produce energy, then using that energy to trigger further reactions. It violates energy conservation by not accounting for the massive energy required to create the initial particles (especially antimatter) and assumes speculative, net-energy-positive cold fusion without justification.

The patent describes a system that claims to use ultrasound cavitation to trigger nuclear ('piezonuclear') reactions that release net energy. This is physically impossible, as cavitation cannot induce nuclear fusion or fission. The system would violate the first law of thermodynamics by producing more energy than is supplied, constituting a perpetual motion claim.

The patent describes a device that appears to generate electricity from a hydrogen-based system using metal catalysts and a temperature gradient. However, it violates core thermodynamics by ignoring the substantial energy input required to create the 100-1500°C thermal gradient and presenting catalysis as an energy source rather than a kinetic facilitator. The claims imply energy generation without a complete source.

This patent describes a device that claims to generate heat energy solely from deuterium gas permeating through a specialized container, with no identifiable external energy source. This constitutes a clear violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it purports to produce energy from a system with no apparent input of work, heat, or fuel. The mechanism is thermodynamically impossible.

The patent describes a physically impossible process using obfuscating terminology ('collision mass of subatomic particles') and completely ignores the massive energy input required to accelerate particles to relativistic speeds. It implies net energy gain from fusion without a credible mechanism to achieve the necessary conditions, violating energy conservation.

The patent describes a system that appears to violate the First Law of Thermodynamics by implying net energy production from deuterium fusion without quantifying the substantial input energy required to initiate such reactions. It uses correct physics terms (deuterium, He-4, transducer) but combines them in a way that obfuscates the immense energy inputs needed, making the claimed process thermodynamically impossible as described.

The patent describes a process claimed to initiate and sustain nuclear fusion reactions at keV energies using only 'thermodynamic forces' in a liquid lithium solution, with reaction rates allegedly enhanced by 11 orders of magnitude. This violates energy conservation and known nuclear physics, as it provides no credible mechanism to overcome the Coulomb barrier or account for the massive energy input required for fusion, instead relying on obfuscated pseudoscientific terminology.

The patent describes a process for 'cold fusion' that violates fundamental nuclear physics principles. The proposed mechanism of using alpha particles to initiate and sustain a controlled, net-energy-gaining deuterium fusion reaction at low temperatures is not physically possible, as it ignores the immense Coulomb barrier and the energy balance of the initiating radiation source.

The patent claims violate core physics principles by asserting the creation of atoms from water and low-temperature nuclear reactions using only modest electrical and mechanical inputs, which is impossible under conservation of mass-energy. The description obfuscates the actual energy source while implying output far exceeds explainable electrolysis.

The claim describes a solid-state fusion process that ignores the immense Coulomb repulsion between nuclei, which requires MeV-scale energies to overcome, not merely UV/X-ray excitation. It uses technically sounding but physically unjustified terms ('quantum collision states') to propose a pathway that violates well-established principles of nuclear and condensed matter physics.

The patent describes a cascading system of 'energy conversion devices' that claim to generate high-efficiency energy from other similar devices and environmental gradients, but it fails to account for all energy inputs. The language is vague and obfuscates the fundamental violation: you cannot have a net energy output from a system without a primary energy source exceeding thermodynamic limits.

The described apparatus lacks a plausible mechanism to achieve a net energy gain from nuclear fusion. The conditions are orders of magnitude insufficient for significant D-D fusion rates, and the claim violates fundamental physics by suggesting useful fusion energy can be produced in this setup without overcoming the Coulomb barrier.

The claim describes a system where input energy creates cavitation, but asserts the resulting heat output exceeds the energy from bubble collapse itself, implying an unaccounted-for energy source. Without a credible mechanism like nuclear fusion, this violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The use of terms like 'transmutation' obfuscates the lack of a valid physics foundation for the excess energy.

The patent describes a system where applying voltage to a hydrogen-infused metal in a special capacitor is claimed to produce recoverable energy, but it fails to account for all energy inputs. It implies creating net energy from the electrical input itself, which violates energy conservation unless a novel, proven energy source (like a nuclear reaction) is conclusively demonstrated, which it is not.

The patent describes a device claiming to generate energy from deuterium/tritium adsorption using AC voltage in heavy water, but provides no complete energy balance. It implies net energy production without identifying a sufficient energy source, violating conservation laws through incomplete accounting of inputs versus outputs.

This patent describes a deuterium electrolysis/ion acceleration system that claims to generate energy through deuterium ion recombination/collection. The system violates energy conservation by implying net energy output without identifying sufficient energy inputs, using obfuscated technical language about deuterium ions and metal hydrides to mask the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility.

The apparatus is fundamentally an electrical resistor. The claimed anomalous heat production, exceeding the standard Joule heating (I²R) from the supplied power, violates energy conservation. The described mechanism is physically incoherent and suggests creation of energy from within the conductor itself.

The patent describes a system that claims to produce and recover energy from a metal hydride base material loaded with hydrogen isotopes by manipulating an external voltage. This violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, as it implies net energy generation from a prepared material state without accounting for all energy inputs, effectively proposing an over-unity or perpetual motion scheme.

The patent describes a method that appears to violate energy conservation. It uses an external electrical supply to stimulate a metal hydride body but claims to 'recover' more energy than input, with no identifiable high-density energy source (like nuclear reactions) to justify a net gain.

The described method claims to produce nuclear fusion using only pulsed electrolysis of heavy water in a sealed container. The pressures and temperatures achievable from this setup are astronomically insufficient to drive deuterium fusion, violating well-established nuclear physics principles. The claim constitutes a violation of known physical limits.

The patent describes physically impossible energy amplification (e.g., boosting 2 eV magnetic 'photons' to 4.292 MeV via gamma-ray interactions), misapplies quantum field concepts, and lacks a coherent, conservative energy source, directly violating energy conservation and thermodynamic principles.

The patent describes using acoustic energy to create cavitation bubbles in liquid metal, claiming their collapse induces nuclear fusion. This violates established physics because the temperatures and confinement times achievable in cavitation are vastly insufficient for thermonuclear fusion, making net energy production impossible. The energy input to create the intense acoustic field is ignored in the output claim.

This patent describes a method for manipulating standing waves using layered cavities/plates with specific geometric arrangements, but provides no identifiable energy source or conversion mechanism that respects energy conservation. The claims about input sections having larger cross-sections than output sections suggest an attempt at energy concentration or amplification without thermodynamic justification, violating fundamental physics principles.

The device claims to generate heat solely through cyclic hydrogen absorption/desorption on nanostructures within a sealed vacuum, with no external energy input to drive the cycle. This violates energy conservation, as the endothermic desorption step would require more energy than the exothermic absorption releases, preventing net heat output. The system describes temperature control of a circulating fluid without identifying the source of work, making it a textbook perpetual motion machine of the first kind.

The patent describes a moisture-based power generation system that claims to use generated electricity to create additional condensation, which then produces more electricity in a feedback loop. This violates energy conservation as it implies energy multiplication without accounting for all inputs. The description uses technically vague language about 'additional power generation' while obscuring the fundamental energy source and thermodynamic limits.

This device claims to generate electrical energy from 'nuclear fusion reactions' between unspecified materials in a rotating chamber, but provides no credible energy input to initiate or sustain fusion, effectively describing a closed system that allegedly produces net energy—a clear violation of energy conservation.

The patent describes a system that compresses a fluid containing ions, but claims the reaction forces needed to perform this compression cancel internally on a special surface. This is a classic violation of energy conservation: the work of compression requires energy input, which cannot be circumvented by internal force cancellations. The mechanism is obfuscated with non-standard physics terms.

This device claims to generate neutrons through plasma interactions but fails to identify the primary energy source required for nuclear reactions. The description uses technical terms (vacuum systems, linear tubes, solid targets) but obscures the fundamental energy input needed to overcome nuclear binding energies, violating energy conservation principles.

The patent describes a multi-stage device that claims to amplify ambient vibration energy to produce a larger electrical output, implying a net energy gain without identifying an adequate external high-grade energy source. The description is vague, uses non-standard physics terminology, and lacks a complete energy balance, strongly suggesting a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.

The claim describes a closed energy cycle where electrical input for purported argon fusion is generated from the heat output of the same reaction, which violates energy conservation. The described process of fusing argon at low energies is not physically plausible, and the system effectively claims to produce net energy from nothing.

The patent claims a method to generate more heat output than the electrical (Joule) energy input by loading deuterium into a metal lattice. This directly implies a violation of energy conservation unless a new, net-positive energy nuclear process is proven, which contradicts established nuclear physics regarding low-energy fusion. The accounting ignores all other potential energy inputs and outputs.

This patent describes a two-stage nuclear fusion process claiming to produce helium-3 and then helium-4 using only a 'heating material' under atmospheric conditions. It violates fundamental physics by claiming net energy gain from fusion without the extreme temperatures, pressures, or confinement required, and provides no complete energy balance to show the input energy from the heating material versus the claimed fusion output.

This patent describes an ion source and accelerator claiming to produce nuclear fusion reactions, but completely fails to account for the substantial electrical energy required to heat filaments to thermionic emission temperatures and power acceleration grids. The described mechanism suggests energy multiplication through ion acceleration and fusion without respecting conservation of energy or the thermodynamic limits of fusion systems.

The patent describes using muons to induce nuclear transmutation from lighter to heavier elements, implying net energy release. This violates energy conservation because the energy required to produce and accelerate muons vastly exceeds any possible energy gain from such transmutations, and it ignores fundamental nuclear physics constraints like binding energy curves and Coulomb barriers.

The patent describes using exotic particles (muons/tauons) for nuclear transmutation but completely omits the massive energy input required to generate these particles. Muon-catalyzed fusion is known physics but requires more energy to create muons than the fusion yields. The claims use correct physics terms (muons, nuclear transmutation, deceleration) but propose an energy-positive system without accounting for particle production costs, violating energy conservation.

This device claims to achieve cold nuclear fusion through proton tunneling in rotating hydrogen clouds, violating energy conservation by extracting net energy from unexplained 'proton tunneling effects' and claiming superluminal conduction. The description mixes real phenomena (electrolysis, hydronium ions) with physically impossible mechanisms for sustained fusion energy output.

This patent describes an inertial electrostatic confinement device claiming to be a D-D neutron generator, but provides no energy accounting for the high-voltage system required. Such devices are legitimate research tools but require substantial input power to produce trivial fusion yields, and the patent's vague claims about applications suggest unrealistic expectations of net energy production.

The patent describes a heating device using hydrogen absorption/desorption in a multilayer structure but fails to account for the primary energy input required to drive the cycle. The inclusion of heat recovery loops and claims of high, stable output suggests an implied over-unity operation, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics. The description uses correct-sounding terms (hydrogen, heat recovery) but obfuscates the fundamental energy source.

The patent describes a complex system claiming to achieve nuclear fusion and element transmutation using muon-catalyzed fusion and particle beams. It violates fundamental physics by ignoring the massive energy required to produce muons and accelerate particles, presenting a circular process that suggests perpetual operation without a defined net energy input, and using obscure technical jargon to obscure the lack of a viable energy source.

The patent describes a device claiming to achieve nuclear transmutation and energy gain through neutron multiplication at low temperatures, explicitly stating output energy exceeds input energy. This violates energy conservation as no adequate external energy source is identified to account for the excess energy, and the described low-energy nuclear processes cannot overcome fundamental Coulomb barriers without immense external energy input.

The patent describes a 'neutron number multiplication' process claimed to achieve low-temperature, controllable nuclear transmutation with net energy output. It violates core physics principles by ignoring the immense energy required to create the initial neutrons and ions, while claiming progressive neutron flux increases (k>1) that, if true, would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (energy from nothing). The described low-temperature conditions are thermodynamically incapable of driving the claimed nuclear reactions.

This patent describes a 'low-temperature controllable nuclear fusion' system using accelerated protons/deuterons into target materials, but it violates fundamental physics by ignoring the multi-MeV energy inputs required to overcome Coulomb repulsion and by making unsubstantiated net-energy claims without complete energy accounting.

The patent describes an underground facility with a neutron source directing ions into a container of slag to allegedly generate energy for electricity production. It violates core physics principles by failing to identify the original source of energy input, making the system appear to create energy from ion bombardment alone without accounting for the energy required to create and accelerate those ions.

The device claims to generate electricity by simply absorbing hydrogen gas and separating its ions and electrons. This process requires more energy to split the hydrogen molecules than can be recovered electrically, violating conservation of energy. It effectively describes a battery without an anode-cathode redox couple, attempting to get energy from a non-spontaneous reaction.

This patent describes a mechanism claiming to create localized energy concentration through electrical discharges between objects, but fails to identify any external energy source or account for energy inputs. The described process of compressing gas and generating 'concentrated discharge waves' appears to violate conservation of energy by suggesting energy can be concentrated without adequate external work input.

The device claims to provide constant practical electricity by controlling wave numbers and adding power equivalent to reflected waves to forward waves, but identifies no external energy source and describes an internal feedback mechanism that appears to create energy from measurement and control operations alone, violating conservation of energy.

The patent claims violate fundamental nuclear physics by implying net energy can be extracted from fusion of deuterium or hydrogen-deuterium in condensed materials at low temperatures without accounting for the massive energy input required to overcome Coulomb repulsion. The claims lack any credible mechanism or energy accounting, placing it in the realm of cold fusion, which is not supported by accepted physics.

The patent describes a process claiming to generate energy from the nuclear fusion of molecular deuterium into helium under mild, non-plasma conditions, which violates fundamental nuclear physics. The energy accounting is incomplete, and the proposed mechanism has no credible pathway to overcome the Coulomb barrier, making it a thermodynamic violation.

The patent claims a system where inputting microwave radiation into nanotubes produces more thermal energy than was input, which directly violates energy conservation. No additional energy source (chemical, ambient, etc.) is identified to account for the gain, making it a textbook perpetual motion claim.

The patent describes a device that allegedly produces high-grade thermal energy from stimulated nuclear decays, but it fails to account for the substantial external energy required to accelerate particles or generate the fields needed for stimulation. The described process, if it works as stated, would violate the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by outputting more energy than is input, and the second law by producing high-grade heat from a low-grade or unspecified source gradient.

The described device is essentially a particle collider. The fundamental flaw is that the electrical energy required to accelerate particles to the speeds needed for significant mass-energy conversion (via nuclear reactions or pair production) always exceeds the useful thermal energy extracted from the collisions. It violates energy conservation by omitting the accelerator's massive energy input from the balance sheet.

The patent describes a 'cold fusion' system claiming to generate net energy from deuterium fusion at low temperatures, initiated by electrolysis and particle bombardment. It violates conservation laws by not accounting for the enormous energy inputs required to overcome nuclear repulsion and by suggesting a net energy gain from ambient conditions. The mechanism is thermodynamically impossible and obfuscated with vague quantum terminology.

The patent describes a device that allegedly uses xenon to catalyze deuterium into helium, releasing usable heat energy. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming enormous net energy output from a simple mixing process, and violates known nuclear physics, as deuterium fusion cannot be catalyzed by noble gases under the described mild conditions.

The patent describes methods for preparing materials to generate energy through hydrogen isotope interactions, but fails to identify any legitimate energy input source. The claims imply net energy production from material preparation and surface treatment alone, violating energy conservation by suggesting energy can be created through proper material conditioning without adequate energy input.

This patent claims methods for generating heat energy through electrical discharges in hydrogen/deuterium gas, implying net energy gain through 'constant temperature nuclear fusion.' The claims violate fundamental thermodynamics by suggesting energy multiplication without complete accounting of inputs and propose fusion processes that contradict established nuclear physics requirements.

The patent describes a device using heavy water, platinum/palladium electrodes, and ultrasonic cavitation to generate energy, but fails to account for the substantial input energy required to create the ultrasonic vibrations and cavitation. This is a classic over-unity claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying net energy creation without an identifiable source.

The claim describes a process that allegedly creates mass/energy from nothing by cycling between large-scale and quantum states using garbled mathematics. It violates the conservation of mass-energy and uses correct physics terms in a nonsensical, obfuscatory manner.

The patent claims violate energy conservation by describing 'amplification' of electromagnetic wave energy with no source for the added energy. It further makes the physically impossible claim that thermal radiation (~500°C) can provide the MeV-scale energies needed to separate nucleons from atomic nuclei like carbon or nitrogen.

The claim describes an apparatus for fusion but uses impossible material density claims and omits the fundamental physics of achieving net-gain fusion, focusing instead on gas storage. It presents a technical-sounding apparatus that does not address the core energy balance or the conditions required for fusion, making it a thermodynamic violation.

The claim violates fundamental plasma physics and thermodynamics by describing a self-sustaining fusion process without identifying the massive external energy input required to create the necessary conditions. It misapplies concepts from an unexplained natural phenomenon (ball lightning) to assert a net energy gain from proton-proton fusion under unspecified, presumably laboratory, conditions.

The device claims to produce usable power from nuclear fusion in water, initiated by acoustic resonance and fluid flow. This violates energy conservation, as the electrical input to the drives is the only clear energy source, and the described conditions are astronomically insufficient to trigger sustainable, net-energy-positive nuclear fusion.

The device claims to achieve net energy gain from 'micro-nuclear fusion' triggered by ultrasound and chemical micro-explosions, which violates known limits of nuclear physics (fusion requires extreme conditions not achievable this way) and thermodynamics. The energy accounting ignores the substantial input energy required to run the system versus the dubious, unproven fusion output.

The patent claim violates fundamental physics by proposing energy multiplication from undefined 'inspiration zones' and creating energy/matter from nothing. It uses correct scientific terms incoherently to obscure the fact that it describes perpetual motion schemes with no identifiable external energy input, directly contradicting the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics.

The described mechanism violates established nuclear physics. The proposed neutron-scattering process cannot create locally hot nuclei with sufficient energy for fusion, and the claimed enhancement from 'deep screening' at sub-eV temperatures is grossly overstated compared to the MeV-scale Coulomb barrier. The system's energy input to produce the initiating neutrons and radiation is ignored, making a net energy gain claim thermodynamically unsupported.

The device claims to generate electricity by using ambient cosmic rays to trigger deuterium fusion, but the energy flux of cosmic rays is far too weak and the probability of inducing net-energy fusion is virtually zero. The described process violates energy conservation by implying a massive energy multiplication from a negligible ambient source.

The device claims propulsion from ambient cosmic rays inducing fusion, but the energy flux of cosmic rays is millions of times too small to produce meaningful thrust, and the described interactions would not yield net directional force or energy gain. It violates conservation of momentum and energy by implying a net thrust can be extracted from an isotropic, low-intensity radiation field without an external energy input or significant gradient.

The claims violate fundamental conservation laws by proposing to generate high-energy outputs (electricity, gamma rays, neutrons) from proton internal processes without identifying a sufficient external energy source. The described mechanism misapplies physics concepts and ignores the MeV-scale energies required for nuclear particle interactions and transmutations.

The claim violates multiple core physics principles. Neutrinos cannot be focused like light, spinning charged disks do not create room-temperature superconductivity, and the proposed method to accelerate beta decay for net energy output ignores the conservation of energy. The system's required inputs would exceed any possible energy gain from the described nuclear process.

The device relies on a non-viable micro-fusion process triggered by ambient cosmic rays, which is physically incapable of producing the claimed propulsion energy. The claims implicitly suggest extracting enormous net work from a diffuse, low-intensity energy source while ignoring the fundamental inefficiencies and cross-section limits of the proposed nuclear reactions.

The device claims to produce helium isotopes via nuclear reactions induced solely by rotational collisions, which is impossible as nuclear fusion requires overcoming the Coulomb barrier (MeV energies), not achievable with the described electromagnetic confinement. The energy released is not balanced against the input energy, violating conservation laws. The terminology mixes plasma dynamics with nuclear processes in a physically incoherent way.

The patent describes a system where the primary energy input is RF power used to create a plasma. While hydrogen loading can be exothermic, the claims of using harmonic feedback loops to 'reduce input power' while maintaining output, combined with pseudoscientific mechanisms like 'microwave vortex swirl,' strongly suggest an attempt to achieve a net energy gain without identifying a sufficient, legitimate external energy source, violating energy conservation.

The proposed device violates energy conservation. While cosmic rays and muons are real, the energy required to create a muon is billions of times greater than the fusion energy one muon can catalyze before it decays. The system would absorb a trivial amount of cosmic ray energy as heat, not generate net useful power.

The device claims 'micro-nuclear fusion' from imploding bubbles of fuel, air, and water, but provides no physically plausible mechanism to achieve the extreme temperatures and pressures required for fusion. The description mixes correct terms (shock wave, plasma) in an incorrect context to obfuscate a violation of energy conservation, as the claimed fusion output is not justified against the electrical and chemical inputs.

The method violates energy conservation by implying a net energy gain from a naturally occurring, diffuse cosmic ray flux. The energy required to create the muons that catalyze fusion is vastly greater than the fusion energy they could release in this setup, making it a net energy sink, not a source.

The claim violates core physics laws by proposing energy creation (photon combining) and nuclear synthesis without a legitimate, quantified energy source or mechanism to overcome fundamental thermodynamic and nuclear barriers. The language is obfuscatory, using scientific terms incoherently to describe an impossible process.

The patent describes a fusion system where the confinement magnetic field is generated by a 'self-exciting dynamo' powered by the fusion heat itself, creating a circular energy argument that violates conservation laws. It ignores the massive external energy input required to achieve fusion conditions and assumes a bootstrap process that is thermodynamically impossible.

The claim describes a deuterium fusion device but omits the critical physics that overcoming the Coulomb barrier requires enormous input energy (e.g., temperatures > 100 million Kelvin). The described setup (accelerated streams, magnetic flux) is grossly insufficient for significant fusion, making the claim of net 'recoverable energy' a violation of energy conservation, as the output cannot exceed the unaccounted-for input.

The device claims to generate energy from proton-boron fusion inside a magnetron, but it fundamentally violates energy conservation. The electrical energy required to create the conditions for any negligible amount of fusion would be far greater than the energy extracted, and the described energy conversion mechanism is not physically coherent.

The patent claims to generate net power from creating 'lower-energy hydrogen,' which violates energy conservation. The energy required to produce the initial atomic hydrogen always equals or exceeds the energy released when it recombines, making a net power output impossible without an external, unaccounted energy source.

The patent's core claim of a device that generates more heat than the energy put into it is a direct violation of the conservation of energy. While cavitation can concentrate and convert energy locally, the total output cannot exceed the total electrical and any ambient energy inputs, which are not specified.

The claim describes a low-temperature, solid-state system that purports to initiate and control deuterium fusion using a temperature gradient and a catalyst. This violates established nuclear physics, as the conditions described are astronomically insufficient to overcome the Coulomb repulsion between deuterium nuclei for sustained fusion. The apparatus is thermodynamically a simple electrically heated vessel, with any 'excess' heat likely misattributed.

The claim describes a device purportedly generating heat from nuclear reactions using only deuterium gas and a nanometal catalyst, assisted by gas flow. It violates fundamental physics by implying a net energy gain from an unsubstantiated nuclear process while failing to properly account for the electrical energy input required to run the apparatus. The described mechanism has no basis in established nuclear or condensed matter physics.

The claim violates the first law of thermodynamics. Hydrogen atoms in their ground state cannot release energy by becoming 'lower-energy' atoms; they are already at the minimum. Creating an inverted population for lasing requires significant external energy input (pumping), which the patent fails to account for, making the described continuous energy production impossible.

The patent describes an apparatus that claims to produce net energy from nuclear fusion using a simple electrical discharge into liquid lithium, but it relies on a physically impossible 'recoilless' mechanism and provides no credible explanation for how the multi-MeV fusion energy output would exceed the electrical input required, violating energy conservation for a claimed net gain device.

The patent claims are based on non-existent quantum states of hydrogen and hydride ions. The proposed 'increased binding energy' species violate established quantum mechanics, and any system using them would require more energy to create the fuel than could be recovered, violating energy conservation.

This patent describes a cold fusion/LENR-type device claiming to generate nuclear heat from deuterium using electrochemical loading. It violates fundamental physics by asserting nuclear-scale energy release without any plausible mechanism to overcome the Coulomb barrier or account for nuclear reaction products, making it thermodynamically impossible as described.

The patent describes a nuclear-to-electrical energy conversion process that obfuscates the core physics. It claims deuterium fusion occurs under mild stimulation to produce 'vibrational motion,' ignoring the immense input energy required to initiate fusion and the fundamental conservation laws governing such reactions. The lack of quantitative energy accounting and the vague, non-standard mechanism strongly suggest a violation of thermodynamic principles.

The claim describes a closed system where an actuator both creates a pressure wave and is then driven by the amplified wave to generate electricity, violating energy conservation. The described mechanism is insufficient to achieve nuclear fusion conditions and suggests a perpetual motion device.

The patent claims an electrolytic cell that produces more heat energy than the electrical energy supplied, which directly violates the law of energy conservation. It fits the pattern of 'cold fusion' or low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) claims, which lack reproducible, peer-reviewed evidence of a net energy gain from a clearly identified source.

The claim describes a cold fusion process that, despite using standard electrolysis equipment, asserts the production of excess heat energy from nuclear fusion. This violates established physics because the described conditions cannot overcome the Coulomb barrier for fusion, and the patent provides no complete energy accounting to demonstrate a net gain relative to all inputs.

The patent claims violate fundamental physics by proposing a transducer that extracts energy or information from an undefined 'Information Universe' without specifying a real, quantifiable energy source. It obfuscates its violation of energy conservation by constructing a narrative with misapplied physics terminology and fictional frameworks.

The patent describes a system claiming to achieve net energy fusion using electrostatic effects in weakly-ionized plasma, but it fundamentally misunderstands how Coulomb barriers work. Electron clouds cannot meaningfully reduce nuclear repulsion to enable significant fusion rates at low temperatures, violating known plasma physics and thermodynamics of fusion.

The claim describes a device that, once triggered, purportedly sustains a chain reaction of energy-releasing events with no clear primary energy source, violating conservation of energy. The mechanism is couched in ambiguous pseudo-physical terms that do not correspond to any known, valid energy conversion process.

The patent describes a device that requires electrical input but claims to generate additional electrical output from an undefined 'scalar particle flow' using pseudoscientific mechanisms. This constitutes a violation of energy conservation, as it attempts to extract net work from a source not recognized by physics, using processes that are not quantitatively defined or physically valid.

The device claims energy from unproven 'Low Energy Nuclear Reactions,' but its described operation is consistent with the controlled combustion or decomposition of its chemical fuel (lithium aluminum hydride). The apparent 'excess' heat likely comes from this chemical energy, not a novel nuclear process, violating the principle of complete energy accounting.

The claim violates established physics by proposing a 'resonant catalysis' mechanism for fusion that has no basis in nuclear theory. It uses a list of arbitrary frequencies derived from quark masses as a scientific-sounding veneer for a process that does not address the core energetic challenge of forcing nuclei together.

The described process claims to produce heat by simply heating a sealed mixture, which is thermodynamically impossible. A sealed system with no ongoing external energy input or internal high-energy fuel cannot have a net energy output greater than input, as this violates energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.

The patent claim describes a plasma-based system for generating thermal energy but fails to account for all energy inputs, implying that the useful thermal output can exceed the electrical energy input. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The vague description and suggestion of high efficiency for direct heating indicate a perpetual motion claim of the first kind.

The patent describes a 'magneto-hydrodynamic generator' based on catalytic formation of 'hydrinos' (a speculative and unverified state of hydrogen). It fails to account for all energy inputs, relies on non-mainstream physics, and implies net energy generation from an unspecified source, violating energy conservation principles.

The patent misapplies quantum mechanical concepts (Bose-Einstein Condensates) to the problem of nuclear fusion, ignoring the fundamental Coulomb barrier and the immense energy costs of creating ultra-cold quantum states. It presents a qualitatively described mechanism that, upon analysis, violates no conservation laws directly but is based on a severe misunderstanding of physics and omits all energy accounting, making its claimed net energy output thermodynamically implausible.

The device claims to generate more heat energy than is supplied, which directly violates the conservation of energy. The described process of accelerating and colliding proton clusters consumes significant electrical energy but identifies no legitimate external energy source (like nuclear fuel) to justify a net gain, making it a classic perpetual motion claim.

The patent describes using high-voltage electrical pulses to generate powerful ionic currents in a metal, claiming this occurs without agitating the charge carrier. This violates energy conservation and the second law, as it ignores the inevitable conversion of electrical energy to heat (Joule heating) and the dissipative nature of ionic motion, implying a lossless or energy-multiplying process.

The patent describes a proton-proton fusion device for deuterium production that claims to generate useful electrical and thermal energy. This violates the first law of thermodynamics because proton-proton fusion under these conditions is endothermic and has a vanishingly small probability; the energy required to run the accelerators would vastly exceed any possible output from the reaction.

The claim describes using electrolysis and deuterium-depleted water to initiate a chain reaction that produces excess energy. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creating net energy from water without a sufficient external energy source, and uses obfuscated technical terms to disguise the violation.

The claim describes a complex resonant system but fails to identify the primary source of input energy required to sustain the hot plasma and drive the resonators. The proposed conversion of oscillations into net heat or electricity, without a clear thermodynamic gradient or fuel, violates energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics.

The device claims to produce ionizing radiation and electricity from the ambient thermal energy of a material's lattice without a sufficient external energy source or a required temperature gradient, directly violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. The description of a self-sustaining process with high-energy outputs constitutes a perpetual motion claim of the first kind.

The patent claims thermonuclear fusion at energies thousands of times lower than the known Coulomb barrier, which is fundamentally impossible according to nuclear physics. The method describes a process that ignores the required input energy to overcome nuclear repulsion, making it a violation of established physical laws.

The claimed process violates the conservation of energy and known nuclear physics. The energy provided by terahertz phonons is utterly insignificant compared to the MeV-scale energy required to alter nuclear isotopes, making the described neutron transfer physically impossible.

The patent describes a method to produce energy from nuclear reactions in hydrogen clusters, but provides no plausible physical mechanism to initiate such reactions without a massive external energy input, violating conservation of energy. The terminology is obfuscating, using correct nuclear physics terms (spallation) in an incorrect context to imply a novel energy source.

This patent claims a device that converts the ambient thermal energy of room-temperature nitrogen gas directly into electrical energy using electromagnetic resonance, without requiring a temperature difference or external power source. This is a direct violation of the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which forbids extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir. The described mechanism is thermodynamically impossible.

The patent claims a device that uses electric and magnetic fields to induce rotations and collisions that produce helium-3 from lighter nuclei, releasing energy. This describes nuclear fusion without a credible mechanism to overcome the Coulomb barrier, directly violating conservation of energy and known nuclear physics limits.

The claim describes a low-temperature, solid-state nuclear fusion process that violates well-established nuclear physics. The proposed mechanism of using electric fields in a dense, heated material to accelerate ions to fusion-relevant energies is implausible, as such ions would lose energy via collisions long before achieving the necessary velocity. The reliance on speculative concepts like Rydberg matter and unexplained high fusion yields constitutes a thermodynamic violation.

The claimed device violates conservation of mass-energy by proposing that low-energy microwave photons can induce nuclear mass changes and generate higher-energy output photons, a process with no basis in nuclear or quantum physics. The energy accounting is fundamentally incomplete, as the significant output heating implied cannot originate from the described inputs without an undisclosed, massive energy source.

The claim describes achieving nuclear reactions ('Kernschmelze') via mechanical pressure in a steel tube, which is physically impossible. The energy required to overcome nuclear repulsion is ~10^6 times greater than what can be stored in the chemical/metallic bonds of a strained steel tube. This violates conservation of energy and fundamental nuclear physics.

The claim proposes extracting nuclear energy using undefined 'quantum adhesion' and a plasma arc, but provides no legitimate nuclear reaction pathway or complete energy accounting. It uses invented, pseudo-scientific terminology to describe a process that violates established nuclear physics and energy conservation, as nuclei cannot be 'expanded' and have energy 'whipped off' by a plasma current to release binding energy.

The patent describes achieving proton-lithium fusion with a net energy output using proton energies thousands of times lower than required to overcome electrostatic repulsion. This is physically impossible according to established nuclear physics, making it a violation of energy conservation for the claimed operating conditions.

The patent describes a fusion device relying on unsubstantiated positive feedback and electron screening to achieve net energy, violating energy conservation by implying a self-sustaining cycle without sufficient external input. It ignores the massive energy inputs required for confinement, ionization, and overcoming the Coulomb barrier, compared to the tiny probability of fusion at claimed conditions.

The claim describes a low-temperature chemical/metallurgical process but asserts it produces energy via nuclear reactions. This violates established nuclear physics, as the described conditions cannot overcome the Coulomb barrier for fusion. The use of precise-sounding but irrelevant technical details (cluster sizes, deposition methods) obfuscates the core physical impossibility.

The claim describes an energy-producing 'nuclear reaction' between hydrogen and a polymer, which is physically implausible. No known nuclear process exists for these reactants, and the system would require massive energy input to overcome Coulomb barriers, violating energy conservation as described. The use of technical terms like 'LERN reaction' and 'gamma radiation' obfuscates the fundamental lack of a credible energy source.

The apparatus describes a high-voltage electrostatic setup but provides no physically valid mechanism to give nuclei the ~10 million Kelvin equivalent kinetic energy needed to overcome Coulomb repulsion for fusion. It misapplies 'confinement' terminology from legitimate methods (like inertial or magnetic confinement) to a static field that cannot perform net work on like-charged particles to achieve fusion conditions.

The patent describes a chemical combustion process and claims it induces nuclear fusion at low temperatures. This violates fundamental physics, as the Coulomb repulsion between deuterium nuclei cannot be overcome by chemical-scale energies or the listed catalysts, making the described mechanism impossible.

The patent describes a 'cold fusion' style process that violates core principles of thermodynamics and nuclear physics. It claims to use ambient heat to trigger reversible nuclear reactions that bypass standard decay processes, which is impossible as it would allow net energy extraction from a single thermal reservoir and contradicts established nuclear reaction mechanisms.

The patent describes a process that claims to generate net energy from nuclear reactions under mild conditions, but the proposed mechanism has no basis in established nuclear physics. The required proton energies for the secondary reactions are not plausibly generated, and the primary 'orbital capture' reaction is not a recognized nuclear process, making the system a violation of energy conservation.

The claim describes a method for generating energy and helium-4 via deuterium in carbon nanotubes under mild conditions. This constitutes a 'cold fusion' claim, which violates established nuclear physics as it provides no credible mechanism to overcome the Coulomb repulsion between deuterons. The described product ('non-ionizing' 1 keV He-4) is inconsistent with known nuclear reaction products.

The patent describes a process claiming nuclear energy generation from hydrogen adsorbed on metal nanostructures, but the mechanism is physically implausible. It uses correct-sounding nuclear terminology ('reazioni nucleari', 'cattura orbitale') for a process that appears to be chemical adsorption/ionization, violating known nuclear physics limits and lacking a credible energy accounting framework.

The proposed method violates fundamental physics by claiming chemical bonds and ambient thermal energy can overcome the immense Coulomb barrier for nuclear fusion, which requires MeV-scale energies. The technical description misuses statistical mechanics and provides no credible mechanism for the claimed catalysis.

The system's claimed energy source is the formation of 'hydrinos,' a pseudoscientific concept that violates the known quantum mechanical ground state of hydrogen and the conservation of energy. No valid external energy input is identified, making the proposed closed cycle a violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics.

The claim violates core physics principles by proposing a nuclear process that bypasses established requirements for criticality, confinement, and neutron economy, while invoking unverified phenomena like longitudinal gravitational waves. It attempts to obfuscate the lack of a credible energy source by using technical jargon from unrelated, non-peer-reviewed references.

This patent claims to extract energy by forcing electrons into states 'lower than the ground state,' which violates fundamental quantum mechanics where the ground state is defined as the lowest possible energy configuration. The described mechanisms use invented terminology without physical basis and would require creation of energy from nothing.

The device claims to produce neutrons from stable elements using only ultrasonic cavitation, a process orders of magnitude too weak in energy density to overcome nuclear forces. This constitutes a violation of the conservation of energy as applied to nuclear reactions.

The claim violates core principles of nuclear physics. The energy scale of chemical bonds and cavitation (eV to keV) is millions of times smaller than the MeV-scale binding energies within an atomic nucleus, making it impossible for ultrasound to induce nuclear transformations that alter radioactivity.

The patent describes a device claiming to produce nuclear transmutations and quantified radiation using piezoelectric plates and low-pressure gradients to act on nucleons, explicitly without preheating. This violates fundamental nuclear physics, as the MeV-scale energies required for nuclear reactions cannot be supplied by the described mechanical means. The text uses advanced physics terminology incoherently to obscure the impossibility of the core claim.

The core claim of exciting an electron into a neutron violates fundamental particle physics, and the proposed fusion process ignores the massive energy input required for neutron production and nuclear binding. The description uses quantum and nuclear terminology in a nonsensical way to obfuscate an impossible energy generation scheme.

The patent describes a device claiming to achieve nuclear fusion and transmutation using piezoelectric actuators and spin control, implying net energy gain. This violates the conservation of energy and known nuclear physics, as it provides no credible mechanism to overcome the Coulomb barrier or account for the multi-MeV energies required for nuclear reactions. The description is a classic example of obfuscation using technical jargon.

The claims directly violate established conservation laws and quantum field theory. The proposed 2 Hz stimulus is energetically negligible by a factor of 10^20 compared to the scales required for the claimed nuclear processes, making the described mechanisms impossible.

The claim describes using electron accumulation at geometric tips to shield ion repulsion, but this fundamentally misunderstands the energy scales involved. Room-temperature nuclear fusion of deuterium requires overcoming a massive Coulomb barrier, which cannot be achieved through simple electrostatic shielding without an immense, unaccounted-for energy input, violating established nuclear physics.

The device claims self-sustaining deuterium fusion chain reactions in a palladium lattice at near-ambient conditions, which violates established nuclear physics regarding Coulomb repulsion, reaction rates, and energy confinement. The proposed mechanism ignores the immense energy input required to initiate fusion and the fundamental barriers to achieving a net-energy-gaining, self-sustaining chain reaction in such a system.

The patent claims violate core physics principles by asserting that a simple packed powder column, when exposed to tritium gas, can produce 'spontaneous' electrical power, copious fast neutrons, and transmute heavy elements—all without an identifiable external energy source sufficient to drive such nuclear processes. It conflates surface chemistry concepts with high-energy nuclear phenomena in a physically incoherent manner.

The patent claims violate established nuclear physics by asserting low-energy, electrolytically-induced fusion between hydrogen and alkali metals, a process not observed under these conditions and incapable of explaining how the immense Coulomb barrier is overcome. It misapplies correct terminology (mass defect, special relativity) to an unsupported and discredited mechanism.

The patent describes a cold fusion process claiming to achieve sustained nuclear fusion at room temperature by confining deuterium in metal lattice fissures at impossibly high pressures. It violates established nuclear physics by asserting a mechanism to overcome the Coulomb barrier without the extreme temperatures or energy inputs required for thermonuclear fusion, placing it in the realm of perpetual motion claims.

The described mechanism violates nuclear physics principles. The energy of alpha particles produced (or used as triggers) is insufficient to overcome the Coulomb barrier for D-Li6 fusion, and a self-sustaining chain reaction in a dense metal lattice is impossible due to rapid energy loss of alpha particles. The claim uses correct terminology (fusion, alpha particles, lattice) to describe a process that cannot occur as stated.

The device claims to achieve nuclear fusion using only ultrasonic stress and an alternating electric field in a metal lattice at near-ambient conditions. This violates fundamental nuclear physics, as these energy inputs are utterly insufficient to overcome the repulsive Coulomb force between deuterium nuclei, making the claimed process impossible.

The patent describes a 'self-excited' fusion process in metal lattices that violates core physics principles. It proposes a chain reaction sustained by low-energy secondary effects (electron showers), ignoring the immense energy required to overcome the Coulomb barrier for fusion, making it a perpetual motion claim of the first kind.

The patent describes a method for nuclear fusion using metal microclusters at non-plasma conditions, which violates fundamental nuclear physics. Without an identified energy source to overcome the immense Coulomb barrier, the claimed process is thermodynamically impossible, representing a form of 'cold fusion' that lacks a credible physical mechanism.

The described method violates established nuclear physics. Electrostatic repulsion from removing electrons creates a net positive charge, which would explosively disperse positive deuteron nuclei rather than compress them. The energy scale of megavolt potentials is orders of magnitude below the ~100 million volt equivalent per nucleus required to overcome the Coulomb barrier for deuterium fusion.

The claimed method for fusing hydrogen nuclei using metal microclusters violates fundamental physics by implying fusion can occur at or near ambient conditions without a sufficient energy input to overcome the Coulomb barrier, making it a 'cold fusion' claim incompatible with established nuclear physics.

The patent describes a process of cycling the electric charge of metal particles in a deuterium environment, claiming this produces fusion energy. This violates fundamental physics as it provides no credible mechanism to overcome the Coulomb repulsion between nuclei, a thermodynamic impossibility under the described mild conditions. It uses correct terms like 'nuclear fusion' but applies them to an electrochemistry process that cannot achieve it.

The patent describes a 'cold fusion' type process using metal electrodes and low-voltage electricity. It violates fundamental physics because the electrical inputs specified (40-104V) are orders of magnitude too low to provide the particle energies required to overcome the Coulomb barrier for nuclear fusion. The description uses correct terminology (plasma, electrodes, absorption) to obfuscate this core impossibility.

The apparatus claims to produce net thermal energy from nuclear fusion using only fluid flow over palladium, with no identified high-energy input to initiate fusion. It violates energy conservation by implying a self-sustaining reaction from an unexplained source and misapplies physics terms like 'electrolyte ionization' without electrodes.

The proposed mechanism is physically impossible. A single electron cannot shield or overcome the powerful Coulomb repulsion between two protons in hydrogen nuclei to induce fusion. The patent uses vague quantum mechanical language to obscure a fundamental violation of known nuclear physics and electrostatic forces.

The patent describes a 'fusion battery' that claims to produce electricity from nuclear fusion induced in a polymer by RF waves, but the described apparatus and method lack any credible mechanism to overcome the Coulomb barrier or achieve fusion conditions. It uses correct-sounding physics terms ('phonons', 'tunnel eigenfrequencies') in a context that does not align with established nuclear physics, constituting a thermodynamic violation.

The patent describes a system claiming to achieve net energy gain from thermonuclear fusion in an electrolytic gas-discharge cell. This violates established physics, as the pressures and temperatures attainable in such a system are vastly insufficient to overcome the Coulomb barrier for sustained fusion, and no mechanism is provided to account for the immense energy input required to create true fusion conditions. The claims are characteristic of cold fusion proposals lacking credible scientific basis.

This patent describes a 'cold fusion' device, claiming to generate nuclear fusion and net energy by merely holding hydrogen isotopes in contact with certain metals at low temperatures. This violates fundamental nuclear physics, as it provides no credible mechanism to overcome the immense Coulomb repulsion between atomic nuclei, making the claimed energy production impossible under the stated conditions.

The patent describes a device that cannot function as claimed. Bombarding lithium hydride with neutrons from a radioactive source does not create a controllable, net-energy-gain fusion reactor. The proposed reaction sequence ignores fundamental nuclear physics constraints like reaction cross-sections, energy thresholds, and the balance between energy input and output, constituting a violation of energy conservation for the claimed purpose.

The patent describes using particle accelerators to collide like-charged particles (electrons or protons) to produce energy from 'mass defect,' which is a fundamental misunderstanding of particle physics and energy conservation. The process would consume far more energy to accelerate particles and overcome Coulomb repulsion than any conceivable output, constituting a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.

The patent describes a fusion device that violates established plasma physics and thermonuclear requirements. It claims a simple, self-sustaining fusion process achievable with basic electrostatic confinement and gas handling, which is impossible given the known constraints of the Lawson criterion and plasma behavior. The description uses correct terms (e.g., 'fully ionized gas,' 'fusion reactions') but applies them to a physically non-viable mechanism.

The patent's core premise violates fundamental quantum mechanics by claiming hydrogen electrons can transition to levels 'below the ground state,' which is impossible as the ground state is the minimum energy configuration. The proposed mechanism and energy yields contradict established physics, constituting a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind.

The claim violates core nuclear physics principles by proposing impossible reactions like neutron-neutron fusion and an unsupported electron-screening mechanism to drive fusion, while using correct terminology in a vague, obfuscating manner to imply net energy production.

The described method claims to achieve deuterium-deuterium thermonuclear fusion using only fluid cavitation and impact at speeds of 60-100 m/s. This is physically impossible, as the energies involved are billions of times too low to overcome the Coulomb barrier for significant nuclear fusion. The proposal violates well-established nuclear physics principles.

The patent describes a physically implausible process for inducing and controlling nuclear transmutations at room temperature using electronic properties of materials. The core concept of a 'muon surrogate' based on electron effective mass misrepresents quantum mechanics and cannot catalyze fusion or transmutation, violating established nuclear physics principles.

This patent claims to achieve hydrogen nuclear fusion ('thermal nuclear transmutation') through vacuum bubble collapse induced by electrostatic forces at ambient conditions. This violates fundamental laws of nuclear physics (the Coulomb barrier requires MeV-scale energies, not eV-scale electrostatic potentials) and thermodynamics, placing it in the realm of cold fusion pseudoscience. The technical details describe a cavitation/surface chemistry process incapable of producing nuclear reactions.

The patent describes an electrolytic cell that allegedly initiates cold fusion/nuclear transmutations via a plasma discharge, producing excess thermal energy. This relies on a physically unsupported mechanism (cold fusion) and implies energy output exceeding electrical input without a valid external source, directly violating energy conservation.

This patent claims energy extraction from hydrogen atoms transitioning to energy states below the quantum mechanical ground state (n=1), which violates fundamental quantum mechanics. The described process would require creation of non-physical energy levels and produces claimed energy outputs (multiples of 27.21 eV) that cannot originate from the described inputs without violating conservation laws.

The described apparatus claims to cause nuclear fusion at low temperatures using only electrochemical loading of deuterium into a metal lattice. This violates fundamental physics, as it provides no credible mechanism to overcome the strong Coulomb repulsion between nuclei, a process which requires MeV-scale energies, not the eV-scale energies of chemical bonds and lattice confinement.

The patent describes a heated anode electrolysis system and claims it achieves nuclear fusion of light nuclei. This is a thermodynamically impossible claim for the described apparatus, as it provides no credible mechanism to achieve the extreme conditions (temperature, pressure, tunneling probability) required to overcome the Coulomb repulsion between atomic nuclei and initiate fusion. It is characteristic of cold fusion claims that lack empirical validation and violate established nuclear physics.

The patent's core energy mechanism relies on 'hydrinos,' a pseudoscientific concept that contradicts quantum mechanics. The system claims to extract energy from a transition to a non-existent atomic state, which violates the conservation of energy and established physical laws.

The claim violates core physics principles. It misuses quantum mechanical terms (uncertainty principle, wave-particle nature) to propose a mechanism—collapsing a 'vacuum space' in the nucleus to release energy—that contradicts nuclear physics, where separating nucleons consumes energy. The described process is thermodynamically impossible as a net energy source.

The claim describes an apparatus where electrical energy induces rotation, and collisions between rotating neutrals and a reactant allegedly cause a nuclear mass change releasing energy. This posits an unknown and physically implausible nuclear process, violating established nuclear and thermodynamic principles. The use of correct terms like 'nuclear mass' obscures the lack of a viable reaction mechanism.