Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions being 'driven by any type of force' and 'demanding a small portion of force to keep it running,' implying an external input, but the mechanism claims to use 'kinetic energy' in a way that suggests self-sustaining or multiplicative performance.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical transmission system but makes vague, thermodynamically suspicious claims about achieving high performance from a small maintenance force. It fails to account for all energy inputs and losses, implying energy multiplication, which violates the conservation of energy. The mechanism cannot output more useful work than the total energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input vs. output power.
- Claims of high performance/work output from a 'small portion of force' for maintenance suggest an efficiency >100% when fully analyzed.
- Mechanism appears to be a complex arrangement of levers, gears, and chains with no novel energy source; any 'optimization' cannot exceed 100% efficiency due to friction and losses.
- Vague description of how 'kinetic energy' is continuously harnessed and reused without dissipation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is electrical energy to the motor. The design implicitly claims an additional energy source from the gravitational potential energy of the 'stones' on the gravity arms, which is cyclically reset by the mechanism itself without an external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate excess electrical energy by cyclically manipulating gravity arms and masses. This is a classic over-unity claim, as the energy required to reset the arms (lifting the masses) must equal or exceed the energy gained from their descent, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses its own motor to lift masses (via the tilt/link mechanisms), then claims to recover more energy from their fall than was used to lift them.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described cycling of gravity arms and stones constitutes a closed-loop gravitational system. Net work cannot be extracted from a cycle in a conservative field like gravity without an external, non-conservative inp
- Misapplication of flywheel: A flywheel stores rotational energy but does not create energy. The 'gravity arms' mechanism is an attempt to create a perpetual torque adder using gravity, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the initial rotary motion from a straight gear starts the process, but the system's sustained operation implies feedback loops where generated electricity is used to power motors that then drive more generation. No primary external energy source (e.g., fuel, battery, wind) is clearly identified for continuous operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a gear and motor system that, based on the claims, intends to generate electricity in a self-sustaining or amplifying loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a clear, sufficient external energy source to overcome inevitable losses. The feedback of generated power to drive motors that then drive more generation is a classic hallmark of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System description implies energy can be recirculated (e.g., 'DC motor will generate current for provide to DC motor') to sustain or amplify itself without sufficient external input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Describes a mechanism that appears to extract net work from a closed loop of gears and motors, implying perpetual motion.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Only mentions 'minimal external input' but does not account for all energy losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat) that would dissipate the initial energy.
- Obfuscated feedback loop: Claims like 'Re-generate DC current and provide to DC motors' and 'AC alternator is Generate current without use of DC input in rotor' suggest an attempt to bypass the need for a net energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary explicit energy input is the 'power source (22)' driving the excitation gear (8) and cam (9) to lift the lever. The system attempts to use gravitational potential energy from the pendulum weight and inertial energy from the flywheel as intermediate energy carriers.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanically complex system that attempts to use a pendulum, lever, and flywheel to multiply a small input energy into a larger output. This violates the conservation of energy, as the energy to drive the load and overcome losses must ultimately come from the initial 'power source (22)', with efficiency always less than 100%.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system claims the flywheel accumulates torque to drive a load, but the energy to accelerate the flywheel comes from the lever's return motion, which itself is powered by the initial cam-driven lift and gravity. The n
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies a cyclical process where a small input from the cam/gear lifts the pendulum, and the subsequent fall and lever motion generates enough energy to both re-accelerate the flywheel and produce exce
- Misapplication of inertia/flywheel: A flywheel is an energy storage device, not an energy source. Any torque it delivers to a load depletes its rotational kinetic energy, which must be replenished by the primary power source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focus is on the fl
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system implies energy is extracted from the piston's motion (via gears) while using a portion of that energy to power the electromagnetic bobbin and starter system. The only explicit external input is the initial start spring energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. It attempts to use gravity and a controlled magnet to create continuous motion, but the energy needed to power the control electromagnet must come from the piston's motion itself, leading to a net energy loss each cycle. No external energy source is identified to overcome friction and other losses, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system claims to produce continuous motion and generator output, but the energy to power the bobbin (electromagnet) for repulsion/attraction must come from the system's own motion, creating a net loss.
- No perpetual energy source identified: Gravity is conservative; net work over a cycle in a closed gravitational field is zero. The magnetic field (from permanent magnets or powered electromagnets) is also not an energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy lost to friction, electrical resistance in the bobbin, and mechanical losses is not accounted for. The system's own gear-driven generator would drain mechanical energy, not replenish it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'continuous
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert 'kinetic energy' but the described mechanism appears to be a self-contained rotating assembly with internal moving masses. No external kinetic energy source (wind, water flow, vibration) is specified. The system seems designed to extract work from its own internal motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system with no specified external energy source. The hydraulic pumping is powered by the rotation of the impeller, which would slow down due to this load, violating energy conservation. It attempts to generate useful output (hydraulic pressure) from its own internal motion without an input, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identifiable external energy input to sustain rotation.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described mechanism uses internal roller weights and pistons to pump hydraulic fluid, but this pumping work is derived from the rotation of the impeller itself, creating a parasitic load. The system would decelera
- Misapplication of mechanics: The complex geometry of bearings and displacement arms does not create a net external torque. Internal forces cancel out in a closed system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical energy from a rechargeable power source (battery) powers a motor/alternator to spin circular structures. The system claims to feed generator output back to recharge the battery and produce net usable electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion violation. It uses a battery to start a process where a generator supposedly powers an alternator that helps drive the system and recharge the battery, while also producing excess electricity. This is impossible due to conservation of energy; losses from friction, heat, and electrical resistance ensure the system cannot sustain itself, let alone produce net output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Closed-loop energy accounting violation: The generator output is coupled back to the alternator (Claim 1). This creates a feedback loop with no external energy input after startup, implying perpetual energy generation.
- No net energy source identified: The only explicit initial energy is the rechargeable battery. All other motion derives from this via motors and gears. The system describes energy magnification through gearing and flywheels, which cannot create energ
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: The apparatus is a complex Rube Goldberg machine that claims to generate usable electricity while simultaneously recharging its own power source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description ig
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (alter
Claimed Energy Source
The claim is that the 'downwards force or pressure of a solid weight' is the primary energy source. This implicitly relies on gravitational potential energy, which must be depleted as the weight descends.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator, which is valid only if the weight is periodically lifted using more energy than is generated during its descent. The description omits this essential reset step, making the claimed 'continuous' and 'perpetual' operation a violation of the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system requires the weight to fall, converting gravitational potential energy into work. Once the weight reaches the bottom, the process stops unless an external source does work to reset the weight to its initial he
- Violates energy conservation: The abstract describes weight as a 'continuous and perpetual' source, implying infinite energy extraction from a finite potential energy store without an input to reset the system.
- Misapplication of force/pressure: A constant force (weight) acting through a mechanism does not create net work in a cycle without a change in the system's configuration (i.e., the weight's height).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The core claims (1-6) describe a closed hydraulic loop (pump→fluid→motor→gearbox→generator) with no external energy input. Later claims (7-10) add hydrogen combustion and gravity-driven gears, but these are not the primary claimed invention and are appended to the core perpetual motion loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claimed invention is a perpetual motion machine: a closed hydraulic loop that purportedly generates electricity with no specified external energy input. Later claims add real energy sources (hydrogen combustion) or incomplete gravity mechanisms, but these do not rectify the fundamental violation in the primary claim, which describes a system that cannot produce net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core system (claims 1-6) lacks an identified primary energy source. A hydraulic pump requires work input to circulate fluid; that fluid then drives a motor, which drives a generator. The system cannot produce net electrical output without an exte
- Claim 7 attempts to add a hydrogen combustion engine as a driver, but this is presented as an addition to, not the core of, the invention. The hydrogen would be the true energy source, making the hydraulic/gear train merely a transmission system, not
- Claims 8-10 introduce gravity-driven main gears with ballast weights, implying an attempt to extract energy from a gravity gradient, but without specifying how the weights are reset or where the potential energy comes from to lift them, creating anot
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The fundamental cl
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The patent layers legitim
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is electrical power to the pulse-based electromagnets. The apparatus claims to use this input to sustain pendulum motion, convert it to rotary motion, and generate electricity via a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is an electrically-driven pendulum with a generator. It violates the conservation of energy because it lacks an external, ambient energy source. The electrical energy needed to power the electromagnets and overcome losses will always be greater than any electrical energy the system could possibly generate, making it a net consumer of energy, not a generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a driven pendulum. Electrical energy is used to power sensors and electromagnets to provide impulses. The energy extracted from the pendulum's motion (via the drive shaft) to spin the flywheel and generator
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: The apparatus is described as an 'electrical energy generating apparatus,' implying it produces net useful electrical output. However, it contains no external, ambient energy source (e.g., wind, thermal gradi
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent abstrac
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the motor (11). The apparatus claims to generate additional rotational kinetic energy from the motion of levers and iron blocks attached to the rotating wheels.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity machine claim. The motor inputs energy to spin a mass distribution (wheels with arms, levers, and blocks). The internal shifting of these masses cannot create new net kinetic energy; it only converts between rotational and potential energy within the system, with losses. The claim that this internal motion generates excess energy to drive a generator violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate more rotational kinetic energy output (to the generator) than the mechanical input from the motor.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The iron blocks and levers are part of the rotating system's inertia. Their motion relative to the rotating frame does not create net energy; it only creates internal forces and torques within the closed system.
- Misapplication of rotational inertia: Inertia is not an energy source. The kinetic energy of the blocks/levers comes from the motor. Changing their configuration within the rotating frame (e.g., moving them vertically) requires work and involves inte
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy input is not specified. The system is described as a closed loop where water circulates from a low primary reservoir back up to a high storage tank, implying the need for an external energy input to lift the water.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed-loop hydropower system that claims to generate electricity from circulating water. However, it provides no external energy source to lift water back to the highest reservoir, which is required to sustain the cycle. This violates the conservation of energy, making it a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to generate electricity from a continuously circulating volume of water, but provides no clear external energy source to return water to the elevated storage tank against gravity.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to move the diaphragm, reservoirs, and refill the high tank is not accounted for. The generated electricity appears to come from the gravitational potential energy of the water, but the system lacks a m
- Violates thermodynamic limits for a perpetual motion machine: The described operation, if intended to be self-sustaining, is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input appears to be a brief electrical pulse from a battery to energize solenoid valves when an end-of-travel switch is triggered. The system claims to be 'self-sufficient' and generate net electrical output via a hydraulic motor/generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. It describes a complex, self-contained hydraulic system with magnetic actuators and valves, claiming to generate net electrical power. However, it provides no legitimate external energy source (e.g., fuel, sustained electrical input, or ambient energy gradient). The system's internal hydraulic forces and springs cannot produce net work without an external input, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims 'self-sufficient' generator with net output, but no clear, sustained external energy input.
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: Implicitly treats the hydraulic fluid's static pressure or magnetic actuator's motion as a perpetual source of energy.
- Violates Thermodynamic Limits: Attempts to create a perpetual work cycle using only internal hydraulic forces and springs, with losses.
- Obfuscated Mechanism: Complex hydraulic/magnetic switching is described, but the fundamental source of energy to overcome friction, resistance, and other losses is not identified.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric pressure and gravitational potential energy of water/fluid. The described process attempts to create a pressure differential (vacuum and compressed air) by moving fluid-filled balloons between two heights and exposing tanks to atmosphere.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate useful compressed air and vacuum by moving fluid-filled balloons vertically in the atmosphere, but it ignores the significant energy cost of lifting that mass against gravity. The atmosphere is in near equilibrium, so no net work can be extracted from its pressure alone without an external gradient. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The net work to move the large balloons and fluid between heights P(G) and P(H) against gravity and atmospheric pressure gradients is not accounted for.
- No sustainable gradient: The system lacks a maintained external energy gradient (e.g., temperature, pressure, chemical). It attempts to create useful pressure/vacuum from an isothermal, equilibrium atmosphere.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to move the massive balloon packs (MLSABP) and their fluid contents vertically is ignored or assumed to be less than the work extracted from the resulting pressure differential.
- Misunderstanding of atmospheric pressure: Atmospheric pressure is not a source of usable energy by itself; it can only do work if a pressure gradient is sustained by an external energy source (e.g., heat creating a density difference).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (cooling the gas in the balloon) and gravitational potential energy. The system attempts to extract net work from a cycle of: 1) Buoyant ascent (balloon lifts turbine), 2) Power generation during ascent (wind turbine), 3) Controlled descent via cooling the lifting gas, 4) Power generation during descent (wind turbine again).
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity both on ascent and descent, creating a cycle. However, the energy needed to reset the system (cool the gas to descend) must come from somewhere, and this input energy will always be equal to or greater than the net work output over the full cycle, making it a net energy loser or, at best, a complex and inefficient battery.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law (Energy Conservation) for a closed cycle. The net energy output over one complete ascent-descent cycle cannot exceed the net energy input required to cool/heat the balloon gas and overcome losses.
- Violates the Second Law. The system attempts to extract work from the ambient atmosphere's thermal energy (by cooling the gas) without a lower temperature reservoir, effectively acting as a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy required to cool the lifting gas (to reduce buoyancy for descent) is not properly accounted for against the electrical energy generated during descent. This cooling energy likely equals or exceeds the gravitat
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on hanging objects moving down a slope, with intermittent rotational assistance. No external energy input (e.g., lifting the objects) is explicitly described to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous mechanical energy from gravity alone, but for objects to move repeatedly down a slope, they must first be returned to a higher potential energy state. The energy required for this reset is not accounted for, making the described cycle a net energy producer from nothing, which violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: net work cannot be extracted from a closed gravitational cycle without an external energy input to restore gravitational potential.
- Lacks a complete energy accounting: the energy required to lift the objects back up the slope (or rotate parts to reset positions) is not included as an input.
- Proposes continuous motion from a conservative force field (gravity), which is impossible without an external gradient or energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary energy source is gravity. However, the apparatus requires a lifting member (e.g., hydraulic cylinder, winch) to reset the lever arm to the raised position, which consumes energy. Claim 7 explicitly states the generator's output is used to power this lift.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator that requires energy to reset itself. The description of using its own output to power the reset mechanism creates a closed loop that, due to inevitable losses, cannot sustain itself or produce net excess energy, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system consumes work to lift a mass against gravity, then recovers a fraction of that work as the mass falls. Net output cannot exceed net input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes using generated electricity to power the lift (Claim 7), creating a closed loop. Friction and generator losses ensure net energy dissipation, not production.
- Misinterprets gravity as an energy source: Gravity is a conservative force field; no net energy can be extracted from a mass cycling in a gravitational field without an external energy input to restore its height.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the gravitational potential energy of water cycled within a closed system, with no external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed, vacuum-sealed system that uses only internal water weight and gravity to rotate a turbine and perform work continuously. This is a classic perpetual motion machine claim, as the energy required to pump the water back to the top of the wheel must come from the wheel's own output, leading to a net energy deficit. No external energy source is identified to overcome losses, making it a violation of the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system is claimed to be closed and vacuum-sealed, yet produces continuous net work output.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by using internal mechanisms to reset the system's state without an external energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores massive energy losses to friction, fluid resistance, and the work required to pump water uphill against gravity.
- Mechanism description is internally contradictory: claims to use gravity to create one-sided weight for rotation, but then uses the same gravity (G2G) to return the water to the top, resulting in a net-zero work cycle.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from servomotors (A, B) is the only explicitly identified energy source. The system appears to claim the pendulum's motion and gravitational potential energy will amplify this input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system claiming to generate more electrical energy than is supplied to its servomotors. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it identifies no external energy source to justify the claimed amplification. The pendulum and gears merely transform and transmit energy, always with losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims electrical output > electrical input without identifying an external energy source to account for the difference.
- System is a closed mechanical assembly; any work extracted via generators increases damping, requiring increased input to maintain motion.
- Violates conservation of energy: net energy cannot be created by passive mechanical components like pendulums, levers, and gears.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system claims to use a fraction of the electrical output from a generator to power the motor that drives that same generator, after an initial startup from an external source (battery, grid, or mechanical input). This implies the primary energy source is the electrical feedback loop itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It proposes a motor-generator feedback loop where the generator's output exceeds the motor's input, enabling perpetual operation with net power output. This is impossible due to energy conservation and inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claim that generator output power is greater than motor input power, enabling self-sustaining operation with net excess power.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Proposes a system that, after startup, can produce useful work (net electrical output) while only consuming a fraction of its own output as input, with no external energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats the feedback loop from generator to motor as a net energy gain, ignoring all losses (generator inefficiency, motor inefficiency, friction, electrical losses).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient water flow generated by the ship's own motion through waves. The system claims to capture water flow (QM) created by waves hitting the moving hull, use it to generate electricity via turbines, and then use the effluent water for hydraulic propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a hydrodynamic perpetual motion machine. It attempts to use the water flow generated by the ship's motion to produce electricity and propulsion, but the energy to create that flow comes from the ship's own kinetic energy. The system would increase total drag, requiring more net energy for propulsion than it could possibly generate, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The water flow (QM) used for power generation is created by the ship's motion. Extracting energy from this flow increases drag on the ship, requiring more propulsion energy than is recovered.
- Perpetual motion logic: Implies the ship's motion creates a usable energy gradient (water flow) from which net energy can be extracted to power the ship, resulting in a net loss when accounting for the increased drag.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats the captured water flow as a free energy input, ignoring that the energy to create that flow comes from the ship's propulsion system overcoming drag.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text references 'natural energy source harvesting' and 'extra terrestrial white energy', but the described core mechanism appears to be a motor powered by a battery pack, which in turn is supposedly charged by energy extracted from a flywheel system's own rotational inertia and acceleration/deceleration.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system where a battery starts a motor that drives a flywheel and generator, but the text implies the flywheel system itself can replenish the battery and provide continuous output. This is a classic perpetual motion violation, as it lacks a defined, sustainable external energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction and electrical resistance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Proposes using stored energy to start a motor that drives a flywheel/generator, with implied feedback to recharge the source, creating a closed loop with no net external input.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies extraction of 'uninterrupted flow of kinetic energy' from the hybrid mechanical battery (flywheel) without accounting for losses, suggesting perpetual motion.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct terms (inertia, kgm2, acceleration) but combines them incoherently to suggest energy can be created from design 'formations' and 'raw materials' like force and pressure.
- Ambiguous 'natural energy' input: Fails to specify a measurable, external primary energy source (e.g., solar, wind) that can replenish the system's losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial rotation of the input shaft. The device claims to generate additional output energy by using centrifugal force to shift weights and create an off-center center of mass, which purportedly drives the frame gears.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classical over-unity machine. It attempts to use internally generated centrifugal forces to create an off-center mass distribution that supposedly adds torque to the output, violating energy conservation. The system has no external energy source beyond the initial input, making any claim of net energy generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims output energy can exceed input energy without an external energy source.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: Centrifugal force is not an external energy source; it is a kinematic consequence of rotation in a non-inertial frame. The work to move the weights radially outward comes from the initial input energy.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The system is a closed mechanical assembly with no external potential (e.g., fuel, thermal gradient, ambient energy harvest) to justify net energy gain.
- Implied over-unity operation: The description suggests the off-center masses generate torque that adds to the output, creating a feedback loop that would, if true, produce perpetual motion.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: The analysis ignores that
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the air compressor(s) (subsistema de compressão de gás). The compressed air is injected into flexible floats to create buoyancy.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a buoyancy engine that uses compressed air to create lift. The energy required to compress the air exceeds the mechanical work extractable from the buoyant rise, making it a net energy consumer, not a generator. The description implies perpetual motion by obscuring the primary energy input to the compressor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work output from the buoyant force is generated by expanding compressed air. The energy to compress that air must come from an external source (compressor). The system claims continuous energy generation but provides
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is described as a closed-loop mechanism where buoyancy drives motion to generate electricity, but the compressor needed to re-inflate the floats would consume more energy than the buoyancy can produce. No a
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary energy source is the gravitational potential energy of the falling shuttle (mass * g * height). The system also uses an air compressor to reset the water column, which itself requires an energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a net energy output by comparing the electricity generated from a falling mass to the work needed to manipulate a water column, but it completely omits the dominant energy cost of returning the mass itself to its starting height. This violates energy conservation, as the system is essentially a gravity-powered generator with losses, which cannot produce more energy than it consumes to reset its own working mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1 explicitly states the control unit's purpose is to maintain Uo > Ui, where Uo is the electrical output from the falling shuttle and Ui is the work input to compress air to reset the water column. This is a direct claim of net energy output wi
- The system ignores the fundamental energy cost of lifting the shuttle (mass ms) back to the start point against gravity. The buoyant return only balances the shuttle's weight relative to the displaced water (Bmw), but the net work to restore gravitat
- The energy accounting is incomplete. The input work Ui is defined only for lifting the water column (mass mw). The energy to run the air compressor and overcome all losses (friction, viscous drag, electrical, etc.) must be supplied from the output Uo
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to use an induction motor (Claim 8) to rotate a turbine-like structure (torque vessel turbine) that floats in water and is loaded with weights. The implied claim is that gravitational/buoyant forces interacting with the rotating, weighted structure generate more torque/energy than the motor input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system uses a motor to spin a weighted, floating turbine, implying the gravitational and buoyant forces on the weights will generate more power than the motor consumes. This is a classic perpetual motion violation, as the net work from conservative forces in a closed cycle is zero, and no external energy gradient is identified to justify net power generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The induction motor is an explicit energy input, but the claims imply the gravitational/buoyant system generates net output power. No ambient energy gradient (e.g., flowing water, temperature difference) is identified to
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes a motor-driven rotating mechanism. For it to be a 'power generation' device, the torque from the weights/buoyancy must perpetually exceed the motor's drive torque, creating a net energy gain from wha
- Misapplication of forces: Gravitational and buoyant forces are conservative. In a rotating system returning to its starting configuration each cycle, the net work from these forces is zero. They cannot provide sustained net torque to overcome losses
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is ambiguous. The system's rotation is initiated by a force (Claim 6) and sustained by the controlled switching of a second magnetic field generator (200), powered by an unspecified power supply (500). The system claims to produce electricity from the resulting movement.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to generate electricity from motion induced by controlled magnetic repulsion/attraction. However, the energy required to power the control system and the second magnet must come from the power supply, and this input will always be equal to or greater than the extractable rotational energy due to losses, making net energy production impossible. It describes an over-unity system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical energy to power the second magnetic field generator and sensors is not subtracted from the claimed generated output.
- Violates energy conservation: The described mechanism suggests a closed loop where the generated electricity (via first drive element) can recharge the power supply, implying net energy gain from internal magnetic switching without an external gradie
- No perpetual gradient: The weight and magnet on the rotating length do not constitute a perpetual source of energy; the magnetic switching system merely converts electrical input into controlled magnetic forces.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a 12V electrical input, but the described mechanism implies the generation of net propulsion from internal forces within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a closed-system propulsion engine that eliminates reaction, which is a direct violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. No internal arrangement of magnets, gears, or starters can produce net thrust on a closed container without ejecting reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to eliminate reaction (Newton's 3rd Law) using internal magnetic repulsion, which is impossible for net momentum generation.
- Describes a closed system with no external interaction producing net thrust, violating conservation of momentum.
- Implies energy multiplication: a 6kg internal component propelling >10 tons for 30 seconds from a low 12V source, suggesting COP >> 1 without accounting for all energy inputs.
- Misapplies Einstein's mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²) in a context of propulsion, suggesting a fundamental misunderstanding.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims enormous ou
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is electrical power to a motor. The claim suggests additional energy is extracted from the gravitational force converted by the motion of the orbiting object.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert gravitational force into additional usable output by storing and reusing force in springs within a cyclical path. This violates energy conservation, as gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle without an external, depletable energy source. The described process suggests an over-unity mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to 'convert gravitational force' into storable and usable output, implying extraction of net work from a conservative force field without an external gradient.
- Describes storing force/energy in springs during one half of a cycle and releasing it to combine with new input, suggesting energy multiplication or recycling that violates conservation.
- Mechanism implies a perpetual or over-unity cycle where gravitational potential energy change in a closed loop is non-zero, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output forc
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from an external power supply unit to the motor. No other energy inputs are described.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a motor driving a generator through wheels/belts, a setup with inherent frictional and electrical losses. The claim that mechanical power is 'magnified' at the second axle violates energy conservation, as the only described energy input is the motor's electrical supply. No physical mechanism for power gain is provided.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'magnified mechanical power' without a defined mechanism for power gain.
- System is a simple motor-driven transmission to a generator; output electrical power cannot exceed input electrical power minus losses.
- No description of an external energy gradient or source to justify 'magnification'.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'magnified
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'magnify
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'without any external energy used' after initial startup from a small motor, implying self-sustaining operation from internally generated electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is described as generating its own operational energy after startup, which is a classic perpetual motion claim. Mechanical advantage from pulleys and levers cannot overcome energy conservation; any reduction in required motor power is paid for by reduced speed or distance, resulting in zero net energy gain. The system would stop due to losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system claims to generate energy for internal use without external input after startup.
- Violates second law of thermodynamics: proposes a mechanism that outputs more useful work (generator electricity) than the input work from the motor, with no identified external energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat) and assumes mechanical advantage systems (pulleys, levers) create energy rather than just trade force for distance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the 'small horsepower motor' (Claim 3). The text implies this is the sole input, as it states the system 'can produce electricity without any external energy used' (Abstract).
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to generate more electrical energy from a generator than is supplied by its drive motor, using only passive mechanical components like pulleys and sprockets. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating energy conservation, as no external or ambient energy source is identified to make up the difference.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by claiming to produce net electricity from a smaller motor input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; no thermodynamic gradient or ambient energy source is identified to justify energy multiplication.
- Claims mechanical advantage (pulleys) reduces the *power* required from the motor, confusing force/power. Mechanical advantage trades force for distance, conserving energy, not creating it.
- The system is a closed mechanical loop (motor -> chains/pulleys -> generator). Frictional losses ensure output < input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > control i
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like 'mechanic
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (buoyancy force) and initial rotational motion. No external energy input is described beyond an initial push to create rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract continuous work from the buoyant force of a float in a fluid. However, buoyancy is a conservative force; the net work over a complete cycle in a closed gravitational system is zero, as the energy gained during the float's rise is exactly paid back to submerge it again. The patent provides no mechanism to introduce external energy, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to convert 'flotation force' (a static buoyant force) into continuous driving force without accounting for the energy needed to reset the system.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described mechanism suggests a net work output from a closed-loop cycle in a conservative force field (gravity/buoyancy), which is impossible.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The system operates isothermally with no identified high- and low-temperature reservoirs to drive a heat engine.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of water in the upper reservoir. Claim 2 introduces a closed-loop water return system, implying the device could be self-sustaining.
AI Physics Analysis
The core mechanism (Claim 1) is a valid water wheel/see-saw that extracts work from falling water. However, Claim 2 adds a pump to return the water, creating a closed loop. The energy needed to pump the water back up is greater than the energy generated from its fall, making continuous operation without an external energy input impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 2 describes a water return system (pump) powered by the mechanism's own motion. The energy required to pump water back to the upper reservoir must exceed the work extracted from its descent due to inevitable losses (friction, hydraulic ineffici
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system treats the water's descent as a free energy source while ignoring the greater work needed to restore the water's potential energy.
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims 1-3 together describe a machine that would, if closed-loop, be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical or mechanical power required to operate the hydraulic power unit (1). The system appears to use this input to stretch a spring/flexible element (4) via a mechanical linkage, then release it to spin a flywheel and alternator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It proposes a cycle where a motor (hydraulic unit) stores energy in a spring, which is then released to generate electricity. This cannot produce net excess power, as the generation output will always be less than the input required to re-stretch the spring, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical output from the alternator must be less than the work input to the hydraulic unit due to losses (friction, alternator inefficiency, hysteresis). The patent describes a cycle with no external energy source
- Violates conservation of energy: The described cycle (hydraulic unit stretches spring, spring is released to generate electricity) is a closed loop with losses. To be sustainable, the alternator's electrical output would need to power the hydraulic u
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy input is electrical power to the electromagnet/stator coil. The description suggests the device generates a net 'resultant force' or 'upward force' from internal magnetic interactions and rotation, implying energy output exceeds electrical input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net thrust (levitation/propulsion) solely through internal magnetic interactions and rotation of its components. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its own center of mass using internal forces. The description obfuscates this fundamental principle with misapplied physics terminology.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'inertia thrust' and 'resultant force' generation with no external reaction mass, violating Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Describes transforming centrifugal force into an 'upward force'—centrifugal force is a fictitious, inward radial force in a rotating frame; it cannot be unidirectionally harnessed for net thrust.
- Suggests 'expansion of magnetic repulsive force' creates net work from internal forces; internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass.
- No complete energy accounting: rotational kinetic energy input and electrical input vs. claimed thrust output and inevitable losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'result
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Initial compressed air charge (via valve 13) and ambient air intake. The device claims to use a closed-loop system where a turbine drives an air compressor that feeds air back into the same pressurized circuit.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a textbook violation of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. It describes a closed-loop air system where a turbine is supposed to power a compressor that refills the same pressurized circuit, while also providing useful shaft work, with no net external energy input after startup. This is thermodynamically impossible due to inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims rotation 'sans aucun apport de ressource énergétique par l’humain' after initial start, but describes a closed-loop air system where a turbine drives a compressor. The compressor work
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The system lacks an external energy input to overcome inevitable dissipative losses (friction, viscous dissipation, thermal losses). The 'overflow vessel'
- Incomplete energy accounting: The initial compressed air charge is a finite energy store. The claim implies this store can be perpetually maintained or even used to do net external work via the free output shaft (26) while simultaneously powering the
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'no hum
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be electrical power (1680-5040 kW) supplied to traction motors via transformers and an overhead wire. No other energy source (e.g., fuel, significant ambient gradient) is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims an electromechanical system that outputs significantly more electrical power than it consumes as input, with no other energy source described. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The complex arrangement of components cannot circumvent this fundamental law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed output power (9570 kW to 20 MW) exceeds described electrical input power, violating energy conservation.
- No mechanism or additional energy source is described to account for the >100% apparent efficiency.
- System is described as a closed electromechanical loop (motors driving bogies which drive a generator), which cannot produce net power greater than input due to losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'consumes l
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct engineering
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary source is gravitational potential energy from lifting material via an electrically-powered elevator. Secondary claimed sources are magnetic repulsion and a shifting liquid/ball mass, which are internal to the system and cannot provide net energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. The only clear energy input is the electric motor lifting weights. The described mechanisms (gravity, magnets, shifting masses) are internal and cannot produce more work than the motor consumes. The system violates energy conservation by implying it can generate excess power from its own recycled weights.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electric motor powering the elevator belt is the only explicit external energy input. The work done to lift the material against gravity must be less than or equal to this input, per conservation of energy. The syste
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The magnetic repulsion and sealed contraption are internal non-conservative forces (friction, magnetic damping) that cannot add net energy; they only convert or dissipate energy within the system. Their described 'aid' sug
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: The apparatus is described as a closed-loop system (material is recycled) that outputs useful electrical power. For net power output, the energy generated must exceed the energy input to the elevator motor, which
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy from the storage device (e.g., battery). The claim implies the generator's output can recharge the storage device and provide excess, creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a standard motor mechanically driving a generator, but claims the generator can produce more electricity than the motor uses, recharging its own power source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as every energy conversion step incurs losses, making a net energy gain impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims net energy output > net energy input in a closed loop.
- Ignores all losses: Friction, electrical resistance, heat, and magnetic hysteresis in motor/generator are not accounted for.
- Pulley system only trades torque for speed (or vice versa), it cannot create energy; generator load creates counter-torque increasing the motor's required input power.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'excess electricity
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a perp
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary energy source. Claims to generate electricity from 'inertial cumulative energy' and 'recuperation energy' that enables rotation of flywheels in a single cycle, suggesting energy recycling/feedback.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a cascading flywheel system claiming to generate electricity through 'inertial cumulative energy' and recuperation feedback, which constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by suggesting energy can be multiplied within a closed cycle without sufficient external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying energy can be multiplied through cascading flywheels and recuperation
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain the system against losses
- Claims of 'inertial cumulative energy' and self-sustaining rotation via recuperation are thermodynamic impossibilities
- Proposed feedback of generated electricity to drive the system (claims 5-6) suggests a perpetual motion scheme
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (recup
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial rotation of the disk member to move the working fluid. The device appears to be a closed-loop fluid system where the drum's rotation is driven by fluid ejected from itself, suggesting a claim of self-sustaining or net energy generation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device description lacks an external energy source. The rotational output from the drum is powered by fluid accelerated by the disk, which itself would require an input of work. The claimed 'hammer effect' increases pressure forces transiently but does not create energy, making this a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No primary energy source identified; implies energy generation from internal fluid motion alone.
- Violates energy conservation: The 'hammer effect' is a transient pressure phenomenon, not an energy source. The work to accelerate the fluid for ejection must come from somewhere, presumably the initial disk rotation.
- The described feedback (drum rotation driving disk via indirect gearing) suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy gen
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implicitly from battery to run electromagnets and overcome friction). The description claims energy is obtained from gravity and permanent magnets, but these are conservative force fields that cannot provide net energy output over a cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net useful work (for battery charging) from gravity and permanent magnets, which are conservative force fields. Any work extracted during one part of the cycle must be repaid to reset the system, resulting in zero net energy output over a complete cycle when all inputs (including electrical energy to the electromagnets) are accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to obtain net energy from gravity and permanent magnets, which are conservative fields.
- Violates first law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of energy from within a closed mechanical-magnetic system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Input energy from battery to electromagnets is not properly accounted for in the claimed 'energy production'.
- Permanent magnets are not an energy source; they provide a field, but doing work against/with that field in a cycle results in zero net energy extraction.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity and initial input from solar/battery to servo motors. Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle is zero.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to generate continuous power from gravity by using motors to manipulate fluid between cylinders on rotating arms. However, gravity is a conservative force, meaning the net work done by gravity over any closed path is zero. The work required to reset the system (e.g., pumping fluid back up or repositioning masses) will always consume at least as much energy as is gained from their descent, violating energy conservation if net output is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Gravity cannot provide net energy input over a cycle; it is a conservative potential field.
- System appears to use motors to manipulate pistons/cylinders to create an unbalanced mass distribution, but the work required to lift/reset the masses will equal or exceed the work extracted from their descent.
- Claims continuous operation after initial start-up energy, implying perpetual motion of the first or second kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary explicit input is the battery powering the motors and ECU. The claimed working mechanism is the repulsive/attractive force between permanent magnets to drive the piston, which is a form of stored magnetic potential energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use controlled magnetic repulsion/attraction to produce rotary motion and generate electricity. However, because magnetic forces are conservative, the work required to reset the system (rotate the keys to 'OFF' position against magnetic attraction) will always equal or exceed the work gained during the 'ON' phase, violating energy conservation when a net output is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system uses motors to rotate keys/armatures to engage and disengage magnetic forces. This control input work is not accounted for in the output energy claim.
- Permanent magnet interactions are conservative. No net work can be extracted from a closed cycle of magnetic forces without an external energy input to reset the system (e.g., to overcome the attraction when bringing magnets back together).
- The alternator is intended to generate electricity, but the energy to drive it ostensibly comes from the magnetic piston, creating a circular energy path with no net external source beyond the battery.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description im
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover (e.g., motor, engine) provides the initial input energy. Claim 4 asserts the system additionally harnesses gravitational energy during the pulsed transmission process.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim violates the conservation of energy by asserting that a pulsed mechanical transmission can harness gravitational energy without a defined, cyclical change in potential energy. Flywheels and pulsing mechanisms only temporarily store and release the prime mover's input energy; they cannot create energy from gravity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 4 explicitly states the pulsed transmission 'harnesses gravitational energy' at the output shafts, implying energy extraction from a gravity field without a corresponding decrease in gravitational potential (e.g., mass being lowered).
- The system is described as having energy-storing flywheels and intermittent mechanisms, but these are passive components for storing and releasing input energy, not independent energy sources.
- The abstract and claim 4 suggest 'output > input' is possible by tapping gravity, which violates energy conservation unless a mass is cyclically raised and lowered using external work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of 'harn
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary claimed source is gravitational compensation during motion, but the system requires a battery-powered motor to drive the rolling assembly. This suggests the net energy input is electrical from the battery, with gravity as a passive, non-depleting force within a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The system violates the first law of thermodynamics. It requires battery power to operate its motor, but claims to be an autonomous generator. This indicates it is attempting to extract net work from gravity within a closed cycle, which is impossible as gravity is a conservative force and cannot be a perpetual source of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'autonomous power generation' but requires a battery-powered motor input.
- Violates energy conservation: Implies net energy can be extracted from a gravitational field without an external, depletable energy source or a height differential to exploit.
- No thermodynamic limit provided: The mechanism is obfuscated, but any claim of over-unity output from a gravity-powered system in a closed cycle is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the inductive heater (2) is the primary external energy source. The system claims this heater drives a Stirling engine (3), which then powers a hydraulic pump (4) and also generates electricity to power the heater itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a Stirling engine, heated electrically, is claimed to power a hydraulic pump and also generate enough electricity to power its own heater, creating a closed, self-sustaining loop. This violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, as it ignores the inevitable conversion losses and the Carnot efficiency limit of the heat engine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 4 describes a closed energy loop: Stirling engine output powers pump AND generates electricity to power its own heater. This is a classic perpetual motion claim.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat rejection from Stirling cold side, pump/turbine/alternator inefficiencies).
- Violates First Law: Net electrical output cannot exceed the net electrical/thermal input to the inductive heater after accounting for all conversion losses.
- Violates Second Law: The Stirling engine, as a heat engine, is subject to Carnot efficiency limits (η < 1 - T_c/T_h). Its work output is always less than the heat energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is electrical power to the motor. Claim 7 suggests a feedback loop where a fraction of the generator's output powers the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a closed loop of energy converters with storage. The claim of 'amplified power' directly violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the generator's output cannot exceed the motor's input minus inevitable losses. The feedback configuration in Claim 7 suggests an attempt at a self-powered device, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'amplified power' implies output > total input, violating energy conservation.
- System description is a series of mechanical energy converters (motor, pulleys, gears, flywheel, generator) which inherently lose energy to friction, heat, and other losses.
- Flywheel is an energy storage device, not an energy source; it cannot increase total energy in the system.
- Feedback loop in Claim 7, if intended for self-sustaining or net power gain, constitutes a classic perpetual motion scheme.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'amplified
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses standard mechanical
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is electrical energy to an electric motor. The device claims to generate additional energy via gravitational potential energy cycles, implying energy is extracted from the gravitational field without an external gradient or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a violation of energy conservation. It uses an electric motor to lift a mass, then attempts to recover more energy when the mass falls back, but mechanical advantage (pulleys, levers) cannot create energy. The cycle cannot output more energy than the motor inputs, making it an over-unity claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate gravitational potential energy efficiently, but gravitational potential energy is not an energy source—it is a form of stored energy. Lifting a mass requires work input equal to or greater than mgh (mi
- Misapplication of mechanical advantage: Pulleys and levers trade force for distance, conserving energy (Work = Force × Distance). They provide advantage in force but cannot create net energy. Any 'multiplication' of force during release comes from th
- No perpetual or net energy source identified: The system lacks an external, non-electrical energy input (e.g., a descending mass from a height, flowing water, or a thermal gradient). The only explicit input is the electric motor.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The abstract sugge
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Primary claimed source is a low-voltage single-phase AC input (230V 50Hz). Additional sources mentioned include solar panels and a vague 'perpetual motion base balance flywheel'. The core claim is that this input is augmented to produce 3-phase output at ratios from 1:3 to 1:100+.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to 'augment' electrical energy, producing far more output than input, using internal mechanical recirculation and a 'perpetual motion' flywheel. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as no sufficient external energy source is identified to justify the claimed gain ratios. The system's complexity obfuscates the fundamental impossibility of its core claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of 'perpetual motion base balance flywheel' violates conservation of energy.
- Claimed output/input ratios (1:3 to 1:100+) imply energy multiplication without an identified external energy source sufficient to account for the gain.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system description is a complex cascade of motors, gearboxes, pumps, turbines, and blowers but fails to identify any net external energy input (other than the initial electrical input and solar) that could explain th
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation): The described internal recirculation of energy (e.g., pump->turbine->shaft) cannot produce a net gain greater than the input minus losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a closed-loop mechanism where vehicles on an inclined surface drive a generator, with actuators adjusting the system. No external energy input (e.g., fuel, external electrical input, significant environmental gradient) is specified to overcome inevitable losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to generate power from vehicles moving on a closed inclined path. However, it provides no source of energy to reset the vehicles' position after they descend and power the generator, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The actuators and adjustments described would themselves consume, not produce, net energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified net external energy input to sustain motion against friction and electrical load.
- System describes a closed path for vehicles; perpetual motion is implied as the generator's load would decelerate the vehicles.
- Actuators that move the rotating rod and reciprocating weight require energy input, which is not accounted for in the energy output of the generator.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims imply power
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the system's own internal configuration (gravity, traction, moving parts) is the sole source of constant energy output, with 'zero fuel' input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to provide constant energy with zero fuel input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because any useful energy output, and the energy to overcome inevitable losses, must come from an external source. The described mechanical interactions cannot create energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (zero fuel).
- Claims 'constant energy' output from an initial configuration, implying perpetual energy generation.
- System will lose energy to friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions, requiring continuous input to maintain motion.
- Gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from a closed gravitational cycle within the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system claims to be a closed-loop hydraulic/pneumatic system requiring only an initial reservoir of water or oil. No external energy gradient (thermal, gravitational, chemical) is described as an input, implying it intends to generate net energy from its own internal pressurized fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed-loop hydraulic system claiming to be self-sustaining and generate 90% of its own energy needs. This is a thermodynamic violation because it lacks any external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses from friction, heat, and generator inefficiency, making net energy production impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims 'auto-sustentável' (self-sustaining) generation in a closed loop with no described external energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: No described heat source or entropy sink; a closed hydraulic system cannot produce net work without an external energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical energy to run pumps, motors, and controls must come from the generator's output, creating a circular dependency with inevitable losses.
- Claim 7 ('gerar 90% de sua suficiência energética') implies net energy production from an isolated system, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest perpetual motion from gravity alone, with no external energy input to sustain the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy continuously from gravity alone using an internal redistribution of weights. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from a closed cycle without an external source like a height differential or fuel. The description is mechanically vague but the core energy claim is impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims 'infinite process' and 'high energy generation' without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a mechanism to extract net work from a gravitational field in equilibrium (no gradient to exploit).
- Incomplete energy accounting: describes internal weight redistribution but ignores energy needed to reset the system cycle (e.g., lifting balls against gravity).
- Mechanically incoherent: description is too vague and contradictory to model, but core claim is thermodynamically impossible regardless.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Primary energy is explicitly stated to come from an external fuel- or grid-powered generator. The device attempts to use this energy to pump water within a wheel, with claims that gravity acting on falling water provides 'free electricity'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity attempt. The external generator supplies all energy. Pumping water to the top of the wheel consumes at least as much energy as can be recovered from its fall, plus inevitable losses. Gravity is not an external energy source here; it's a conservative force in a closed loop, so no net work can be extracted.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'free electricity' from gravity, ignoring that the water must be lifted against gravity to the top of the wheel, requiring at least as much energy as can be recovered from its fall.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system implies a net energy gain (output > external input) by using gravity on internally circulated water, which is a closed loop. The pumps must overcome the gravitational potential difference and all losses.
- Misapplication of reaction forces: Claim that water flow causes rotation (Claim 3) ignores that internal flow in a sealed system cannot provide net external torque; reaction forces are internal and cancel.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described. Initial external energy input starts the system, after which it claims to be self-propelled by feeding a portion of the generated electrical energy back to the fluid power mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is described as a closed-loop machine that, after an initial start, powers itself and an external load indefinitely. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to create net energy from nothing. The hydraulic and electrical components only convert and transmit energy with significant losses, making perpetual operation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims to produce both output energy for an external load and input energy to sustain itself from a single energy conversion chain with no net external input after startup.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores all losses (generator inefficiency, transformer losses, friction in gears/hydraulics, electrical resistance). Output energy cannot exceed the initial stored/input energy minus these losses.
- Misapplies force multiplication: A hydraulic force/area advantage provides torque multiplication, not energy multiplication. The work output from the hydraulic motor cannot exceed the work input to the pump minus losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy input described is the initial manual 'pulling one side of the auxiliary magnet downward' (step c). The system then claims to sustain continuous rotation and generate electrical output using only magnetic repulsion forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to produce continuous electrical energy from a one-time manual start, using only internal magnetic repulsions. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as there is no identified ongoing energy source to compensate for inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and radiation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation and electrical output from a single initial input, implying perpetual motion.
- No energy accounting: No identification of an ongoing energy source to overcome losses (friction, electrical resistance, magnetic hysteresis).
- Misapplication of magnetic forces: Magnetic repulsion is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted over a cycle from a static magnetic arrangement without an external energy input to reset the system.
- Implies creation of energy: The described oscillatory motion between repelling magnets, if lossless, would be a simple harmonic oscillator that eventually stops due to losses. The claim that it drives continuous rotation and generates net electrical
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy and buoyancy, but with an incomplete accounting of the energy required to reset the system (compress gas, reposition the mobile mass, and fold/unfold envelopes).
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create perpetual motion by using a mobile mass and gas-filled envelopes to create an imbalanced buoyancy force. However, the energy required to reset the system (move the mass, compress gas, fold envelopes) over a full cycle will always equal or exceed the work extracted from buoyancy, violating energy conservation. It is a gravity/buoyancy-based over-unity claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to produce continuous motion/net work from a closed gravitational/buoyancy cycle without an external gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to compress the gas in the 'folded' envelopes and to reposition the mobile mass against gravity is not properly accounted for versus the buoyant work output.
- No perpetual gradient: The system is a closed loop immersed in a uniform fluid; the buoyant force on one side is counteracted by the weight and compression work on the other over a full cycle.
- Misapplication of Archimedes' principle: Buoyancy provides a force, but net work over a cycle is zero unless the system's volume distribution is changed by an external energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the motor (1). The description implies the system's output (alternator 19) should exceed the motor's input power, suggesting an internal, unaccounted-for energy source is claimed.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a mechanical system that outputs more power than is input by the motor, which directly violates the conservation of energy. No additional energy source or thermodynamic gradient is described to make this possible, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to 'boost' or obtain 'a higher amount of power during output' from a single motor input.
- Violates 2nd Law of Thermodynamics: Implies a mechanical system can output more useful work (electrical from alternator) than the input work without an additional energy source or gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No ambient energy input (e.g., thermal, gravitational) is described to justify a power increase.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the gravitational potential energy of falling drive weights, with electrical input required to reset the weights via motors and gearboxes.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a gravity-powered generator that requires energy to reset its weights. The energy extracted from the falling weights can never exceed the energy input required to lift them, minus inevitable losses from friction and electrical conversion. The claim of continuous net electricity generation violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system consumes electrical energy to reset weights to a higher potential energy state, then claims to extract more electrical energy from their fall than was used for reset.
- Ignores losses: All mechanical components (gearboxes, bearings, generators) have significant frictional and electrical losses, making net energy gain impossible.
- Misapplies leverage and torque: High torque does not equate to high energy output; the work done by gravity on a falling weight is strictly limited by m*g*h, minus all losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'continuous
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity without using natural energy sources, implying a closed-loop system where compressed air drives a turbine connected to a generator, while an electric motor powers the compressor from the generator's output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that claims to generate 'green' electricity without using natural energy sources, using a closed-loop compressed air cycle. This is a textbook perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as the system's output is used to power its own compressor with inevitable losses, resulting in rapid shutdown without external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System appears to be a closed loop (motor->compressor->turbine->generator->motor) with no external energy input after startup.
- Violates second law of thermodynamics: No net work can be extracted from an isothermal compressed air system without a thermal gradient or external input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores massive losses in compression/expansion, generator/motor inefficiencies, and friction.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified 'practically inexhaustible pressure (or energy or motion) input' from the 'Creation' or 'arena', mediated by undefined 'pressure particles (NH particles)'. No identifiable, quantifiable external energy gradient or source.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent claim explicitly rejects the conservation of energy and other cornerstone physics laws, proposing instead to extract unlimited energy from an undefined background 'pressure' created by the universe's existence. It is a fundamental violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics, framed with invented terminology that obscures the lack of a real, quantifiable energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly rejects conservation of energy (postulate vii).
- Rejects Newton's Third Law (action-reaction).
- Rejects gravitational attraction, replacing it with unexplained circular motion and 'pressure particles'.
- Proposes energy creation from pressure without an external source, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
- Uses invented, undefined concepts ('pressure particles', 'arena', 'pressure-motion equivalence') that do not correspond to established physical models.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'pressure c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Explici
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics-like terms (
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient vibration (implicitly) and initial mechanical input to start motion. Claims 'permanent movement' and 'free power' imply energy is generated without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity through a permanently swinging pendulum assisted by magnets and gravity. This describes a perpetual motion machine, as the system lacks an identified external energy source to replenish the energy lost to friction and electrical generation, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'permanent movement' of pendulum and arches, violating energy conservation.
- Uses 'dissonant magnets' (likely repulsive) to sustain motion, implying a perpetual motion mechanism.
- Claims to 'maximize use of gravity' but gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from a pendulum's swing without an external input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Output electricity is claimed without identifying an adequate, sustainable input to overcome friction and electrical loads.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Atmospheric pressure differential created by vacuum pumps. The system uses pumps to alternately evacuate two chambers, then uses atmospheric pressure to push pistons and drive a linear generator. An 'inertial energy accumulator' (flywheel) is mentioned to provide additional power.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract work from atmospheric pressure by creating a vacuum, but the energy required to evacuate the chambers must exceed the work recovered. The claim of using an 'inertial accumulator' to provide additional power suggests an unaccounted energy input or a misunderstanding of energy conservation, making it a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to create the vacuum is not properly accounted for against the work extracted from atmospheric pressure.
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies net energy gain by using a flywheel to amplify power, which cannot exceed the input energy needed for pumping.
- Misapplication of inertial accumulator: A flywheel stores energy but cannot create net energy; its use suggests an attempt to obscure the primary energy input needed for the vacuum cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be extracted from the gravitational field of the planet, but the described system's net work output must ultimately come from energy input to create/maintain the fluid density gradient or to operate the fluid interface devices.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed-loop system where buoyant objects cyclically rise and sink, claiming a net gain in gravitational potential energy. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The energy required to move the object into the dense fluid region (against the pressure differential) or to maintain the fluid density gradient will always equal or exceed the buoyant work extracted, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims net increase in potential energy from a closed-loop buoyancy cycle.
- Ignores the energy cost of maintaining the pressure differential between the light and dense fluid regions.
- Fails to account for the work required to move the buoyant object into the dense fluid against the pressure differential at the 'fluid interface device'.
- Assumes buoyant lifting in a closed cycle can produce net work without an external energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
An external motor provides initial mechanical input to the first gear (wheel 1). The device claims to multiply this input force and rotational speed through a series of paired gears (crowns and pinions) of different diameters connected by chains.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a standard gear train, which can trade torque for rotational speed (or vice versa) but cannot increase both simultaneously. Claiming such an increase is a direct violation of the conservation of energy, as it would imply creating mechanical power from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims simultaneous multiplication of force AND rotational speed (torque AND angular velocity) from a single input, which violates conservation of energy (Power = Torque × Angular Velocity).
- Describes a simple gear train, which is a torque/speed converter, not a multiplier of mechanical power. The product of torque and speed at the output cannot exceed the input power minus losses.
- Implies energy gain or over-unity performance ('multiplica la fuerza y la cantidad de giro') from a passive mechanical system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of multi
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses standard mechanical
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is electrical work to run the gas compressor. The system also uses gravitational potential energy from lifting the pressure vessels, but this is not an external source; it is work done by the system's own conveyor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. It claims to generate electricity from the heat of compression, but that heat originates from the compressor's work input. The proposed closed loop, where this electricity powers the compressor, violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics due to inevitable losses and the limits of heat engine efficiency.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim is that heat from pressurization is converted to electricity. This heat is not an independent energy source; it is the result of the work done by the compressor. Converting that heat back to electricity is a heat engine process fundame
- The system attempts to use the vertical conveyor to create a gravitational potential energy cycle, but lifting the vessels requires work. Any energy recovered from their descent is less than the work used to lift them, resulting in a net loss.
- The description suggests the generator inside the vessel powers the compressor, implying a closed loop. This violates conservation of energy, as losses (heat to ambient, friction, generator/compressor inefficiencies) would cause it to stop.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent ignores
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert 'potential energy that exists in circular motion of any object' - circular motion itself is not an energy source. The only explicit input appears to be a driving machine attached to the platform (orificio 15), but the device claims to output more energy than input (gain of 1–4.81).
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to output up to 4.81 times the input energy by converting 'potential energy in circular motion,' which is a physical misnomer. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation by claiming to generate net mechanical work without an identified external energy source beyond the initial driving machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a gain factor >1 without identifying an external energy source.
- Misunderstands 'potential energy in circular motion': Objects in uniform circular motion have constant kinetic energy (speed constant) and no net change in potential energy unless in a gravity field. The described radial guides and tethers suggest a
- No thermodynamic limit analysis provided; claims pure mechanical energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
The system's only apparent energy input is the gravitational potential energy of the heavy balls. The lift assembly raises the balls, but its energy source is not specified. The platform for users suggests human weight/power may be intended to drive the lift, but this is not explicitly stated as the input.
AI Physics Analysis
This system is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion claim. It ignores the fundamental fact that the energy generated by the falling balls is less than the energy required to lift them back to the starting height, due to inevitable losses. The design obscures this by not specifying the energy source for the lift, creating an illusion of net power generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system claims to generate electricity from balls falling and driving a conveyor/generator, but the energy required to lift the balls back to the higher 'ball-dispersing position' is not accounted for.
- Violates energy conservation: The net work output (electricity) cannot exceed the net work input (energy to lift the balls). The described cycle extracts energy from falling balls without identifying a greater external energy source to reset the syst
- Obfuscated perpetual motion: The lift assembly's operation is mechanically linked to the user platform's movement, but no external energy source for that movement (e.g., human effort, a separate motor) is integrated into the energy balance.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system (rotor assembly) with arms and weights that are claimed to generate rotational motion, but no explicit energy input is described. The text suggests the device is 'self-rotating' (회전구동) and that weights on arms move in a way that drives rotation, implying energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'self-rotating rotor' mechanism with arms and moving weights that allegedly sustain rotation. It provides no identifiable external energy source and implies the mechanical configuration itself generates continuous motion, which directly violates the conservation of energy. This is a classic perpetual motion claim disguised as a complex mechanical assembly.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., motor, wind, thermal gradient).
- Describes a system of rotating arms with weights that supposedly drive a main rotor, suggesting a closed mechanical loop that would violate conservation of energy.
- Claims 'self-rotation' (íì 구ë) which is a perpetual motion characteristic.
- Mechanism description focuses on geometry and motion transfer without addressing the source of energy to overcome friction and losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output motion is d
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (ro
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily from a first battery (38) that receives energy from the exterior, which powers a first motor (27) and at least one second motor that activates turbines via a conductive ring (34). The system attempts to recapture energy via wind turbines driven by expelled air from its own internal turbines.
AI Physics Analysis
The system violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). It uses an external battery to power motors that drive turbines and flywheels, then attempts to recapture a portion of the spent energy via internal wind turbines, presenting this recaptured energy as an 'additional performance' rather than a net loss. This creates an illusion of energy multiplication from internal loops.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses electrical input to spin turbines and flywheels, then uses the expelled air from those turbines to spin secondary wind turbines/generators. The energy to compress/expel the air comes from the initial elec
- Violates conservation of energy: Claim 2 suggests an 'additional performance' (rendimiento adicional) from adding a second set of turbines and wind turbines, implying a multiplicative effect where output energy can exceed the initial battery input th
- Misuse of flywheels: Flywheels store inertial energy but do not create energy. The system uses them as intermediaries, but they require energy input to spin and incur rotational losses.
- Obfuscated perpetual motion: The architecture suggests a feedback loop where activating turbines spins flywheels to generate electricity, part of which might be used to sustain the process, with 'additional' wind generation from internal airflow pres
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical power to the water pump that circulates the fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The machine is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The pump must expend more energy to lift the fluid than can be recovered from the gravitational fall of the barrels due to inevitable losses, resulting in a net power loss, not generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The pump's work to lift fluid against gravity to fill the upper barrels is not compared to the generator output.
- Violates energy conservation: The system is a closed fluid loop. The gravitational work from descending barrels is exactly offset by the work needed to lift fluid back to the top, minus losses.
- Misapplication of principle: The rotating pinwheel is an inefficient gravity motor; the pump provides all motive force, making it a net energy consumer.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial external electric supply to a motor, then claims to use a portion of its own generated electricity to become self-sustaining while providing excess output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical system that, after an initial start, uses its own generated electricity to run, producing excess power. This is impossible as it violates the first law of thermodynamics; the mechanical transmission cannot create energy, and the system's losses ensure the output cannot exceed the total energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'increased power' and 'double power' from mechanical ratio changes without an external energy source.
- Asserts system can power its own motor and provide surplus electricity, violating energy conservation.
- Mechanical design (gears, sliders, cranks) cannot create energy; it only transmits and transforms it with losses.
- No accounting for friction, electrical, or mechanical losses in the energy loop.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described as a 'one-time drive' from an external air compressor, with subsequent motion claimed to be sustained and amplified by gravity and magnets.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that, after an initial push, claims to sustain and amplify rotation using gravity and magnets to generate electricity. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates the conservation of energy by implying a continuous net energy output from a finite input.
Specific Physics Issues
- System implies sustained or amplified rotational work output from a one-time input, violating energy conservation.
- Relies on gravity acting on weights in a closed cycle to provide net work, which is impossible without an external gradient to reset the system.
- Magnets arranged to 'create additional thrust' cannot provide net energy; they are conservative forces.
- Incomplete energy accounting: initial compressor work vs. claimed continuous generator output.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system (rotating discs with magnets) claiming to generate energy from its own rotation and magnetic interactions, with no clear external energy input specified beyond an initial push.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic rotational device claiming to produce more energy than input, violating energy conservation. It suggests self-sustaining operation and energy multiplication through magnetic interactions, which is thermodynamically impossible as it would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy multiplication (3:1 ratio) from magnetic interactions alone
- Implies perpetual or self-sustaining rotation without an external power source
- No accounting for energy losses due to friction, magnetic hysteresis, or electrical resistance
- Describes output energy increasing with distance in a way that violates inverse-square laws for magnetic fields
- Suggests the system can power itself and provide excess useful work indefinitely
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is the gravitational potential energy of two 700-ton weights descending. The system attempts to use one descending weight to lift the other via a complex hydraulic linkage, while also extracting electrical energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation. It claims to use one falling weight to lift an equal weight (which already requires all the energy from the fall) and simultaneously generate extra electricity, resulting in a net energy output greater than input. The complex hydraulics obfuscate this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to lift a 700-ton weight while simultaneously generating electricity, using only the descent of an equal 700-ton weight. The useful work output (lifting + electricity) exceeds the gravitational potential energy
- Violates the principle of mechanical advantage: The hydraulic system (driver piston, secondary pistons) is described as providing force multiplication (e.g., 70,000 tons). However, force multiplication comes at the expense of distance/volume moved. T
- Perpetual motion architecture: The description implies a cyclic process where the two weights alternately lift each other, with net electricity generation. This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim, as there is no external energy source to
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignor
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to harness 'intrinsic spin of elementary particles of magnetism' and magnetic repulsion/attraction, but provides no identifiable external energy input. The 'arm/crank' appears to be a manual input, but the claim suggests the system can increase efficiency beyond this input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to improve rotary motion efficiency by harnessing the intrinsic spin of magnetic particles, which is a fundamental property, not an energy source. Since magnetic fields are conservative and no external energy gradient (like a changing field or motion relative to an external source) is described, the apparatus implicitly violates the first law of thermodynamics by suggesting a perpetual source of motive force from permanent magnets alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying energy can be extracted from the static magnetic field and intrinsic particle spin without an external gradient or input.
- Misuses quantum mechanical concept of 'intrinsic spin' as a source of usable mechanical work.
- Confuses magnetic forces (conservative) with an energy source. Work done by magnetic forces in a closed system sums to zero over a cycle.
- Claims 'improvement of efficiency' without defining a baseline or identifying loss mechanisms being overcome.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Initial one-time external compression of air in a sealed chamber, followed by internal recirculation of that air using a fan to drive a turbine-generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity violation. It is a sealed system where the only energy is a one-time charge of compressed air. Using an internal fan to recirculate that air through a turbine cannot produce continuous net electrical output, as the fan's drive energy must come from the generator itself, creating a lossy loop that will deplete the initial stored energy without exceeding it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to produce continuous electrical output from a finite initial store of compressed air, using an internal fan powered by the generator's output to recirculate air. This is a closed-loop system with no
- Perpetual motion of the second kind: Attempts to extract net work from an isothermal, pressurized gas in a sealed chamber without a thermal gradient or consumption of the pressure gradient. The internal fan's work to move air cannot exceed the turbin
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description ignores that the fan (1) requires input power, which presumably comes from the generator (6), creating a parasitic load. The net output, after powering the fan and all losses, must be less than the energy
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to be a 'gravity potential energy cycle water energy recovery power station' but appears to rely on internal weight movements and water transfers without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a complex system of water chambers, weights, and pulleys that supposedly cycle to generate electricity, but it provides no external energy source to account for the continuous losses from friction, electrical resistance, and other inefficiencies. The claimed 'gravity potential energy cycle' violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., solar, geothermal, fuel).
- System attempts to create a perpetual cycle using internal weights and water flow.
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate net electricity from internal motions without an external source.
- Complex mechanical arrangement obfuscates the fact that lifting weights requires at least as much energy as can be recovered when they fall.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert gravitational potential energy from a 'shared gravity source' (共用重力源) into continuous rotational motion without depleting the source or requiring external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a 'gravity perpetual motion machine' that claims to convert a constant gravitational field into continuous rotational work. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as a static, unchanging gravitational potential cannot perform net work on a system in equilibrium without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous output work from a static gravity field without an external energy gradient.
- Violates first law of thermodynamics: System claims to output more energy than is input; gravity alone is not an energy source for perpetual work.
- Mechanically impossible: Describes a system that would settle into equilibrium, not produce sustained torque.
- No entropy sink: Describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores that a sta
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to produce more electrical output than input via a complex mechanical linkage system with levers, pulleys, belts, and a small electric motor as starter. No identifiable external energy source beyond the initial motor input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a complex mechanical linkage system that claims to output more electrical energy than is input by a small starter motor. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as no additional energy source is identified. The mechanical arrangement cannot create energy, only convert or transmit it with inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting provided
- Claim of 'consuming less power to obtain more power' directly violates energy conservation
- Mechanical system with gears/belts/levers cannot create energy, only transmit/lose it
- Structure appears to be an over-unity claim without a thermodynamic gradient or external energy source
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary energy source. Claims to use electrical input from a starting motor to power a 'Stirling engine' via a resistive heater, then uses the Stirling engine's output to generate electricity to recharge the starting battery.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a system that uses a battery-powered heater to run a Stirling engine, then uses the engine's output to generate electricity to recharge the battery. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation by claiming continuous operation without a net external energy input. The Stirling engine's efficiency is fundamentally limited by thermodynamics, guaranteeing net losses in such a loop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by proposing a closed-loop system where output energy is fed back to supply the input with no net external energy input.
- Stirling engine is a heat engine subject to Carnot efficiency limits (η < 1 - T_c/T_h). Using electrical resistance to heat it, then converting its mechanical work back to electricity, results in a net energy loss, not gain.
- System description is a classic 'self-charging' perpetual motion scheme with no identified external energy reservoir.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims the engine
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
No external energy source is identified. The device claims to operate on a closed loop where a motor drives a generator and the generator powers the same motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It describes a motor-generator feedback loop intended to be self-powering and able to accelerate or power an external load, which is physically impossible due to inevitable energy losses from friction, resistance, and heat. No external energy source is provided to compensate for these losses or to provide net output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming a self-sustaining, closed energy loop with net power output.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; any real system has losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat), requiring continuous external energy input to maintain motion, let alone accelerate or power a load.
- Misapplies mechanical leverage (the 'lever law') to imply an energy gain. While force can be traded for distance, power (force × velocity) cannot be created; the work input equals work output minus losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Output > control i
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a perp
Claimed Energy Source
Input mechanical work from actuation means (2). No other energy source is described. The device claims to multiply force using a mass wheel and crank mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical linkage claiming to multiply force through stages of mass wheels and cranks. As a purely mechanical system with no external energy source, it is bound by the conservation of energy. Any increase in output force must come with a proportional decrease in displacement or speed, resulting in no net gain in work or power. The claim of multiplicative stages suggests an over-unity energy violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims force multiplication without addressing energy conservation. A simple mechanical linkage (crank and mass wheel) cannot create energy or increase output power beyond input power. Force can be increased only at the expense of distance/speed, kee
- The description implies cascading stages can multiply force further, which would, if interpreted as a power gain, directly violate the conservation of energy.
- No thermodynamic process or external energy gradient (e.g., thermal, chemical) is identified to justify an output greater than input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses standard mechanical
Claimed Energy Source
Claims a primary hydraulic energy input, but implies an additional, unexplained gain from the gravitational interaction of rotating masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to improve energy conversion efficiency by over 25% using rotating masses and gravity. Since gravity is a conservative force, no net energy can be extracted from it in a cyclic process. The claimed gain violates energy conservation, as the work needed to control the mass positions would negate any apparent benefit.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims >25% gain in energy conversion compared to 'ordinary conversion' without identifying a new energy source or gradient.
- Attempts to use gravity within a rotating system to create a net energy gain, which is impossible in a closed cycle as gravity is a conservative force.
- Mechanism suggests varying the distance of masses from the rotor axis, but work done to move masses radially will equal or exceed any work extracted from their gravitational potential change over a full cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
The claim suggests the primary energy source is the gravitational potential energy of a falling mass, with a secondary input being the energy to return the mass to its starting position.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vehicle powered by a falling weight that strikes a flywheel. The fundamental violation is the claim that lifting the weight back up costs only 1/10 of the energy gained from its fall, which would create a net energy surplus. In reality, lifting a mass to a specific height requires at least as much energy as was released during the fall, making the proposed cycle impossible as a net energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation. The system claims the energy to lift the mass back to its starting height is only 1/10 of the energy gained from its fall, implying a net energy output from a closed cycle.
- Ignores the work-energy theorem. Lifting a mass against gravity to a given height requires at least the same amount of energy (mgh) that was released during the fall, minus any recovered work. The system cannot output more useful work than the net en
- Misapplies the concept of impulse/momentum transfer. While a flywheel can store kinetic energy from an impulse, the act of returning the mass to its starting height for the next cycle must account for the full change in gravitational potential energy
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > control i
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a mech
Claimed Energy Source
The system attempts to use gravity (steel balls), manual labor, an electric blower motor, hydraulic actuators, and unspecified magnetic prime movers. The core claimed 'pollution-free' power appears to rely on the gravitational potential energy of the steel balls, but they are cycled using a conveyor, requiring energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device violates the conservation of energy. The primary proposed driver—gravity acting on steel balls—requires more energy to reset the balls to the top position than can be extracted from their descent. The additional magnetic, hydraulic, and blower components either consume external energy or are described in a way that suggests impossible perpetual motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy to lift the steel balls back to the top via the conveyor is not accounted for in the net output.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The magnetic prime mover (claim 1c) and hydraulic pushes (claim 2) are described as aiding/ensuring motion without a clear external energy source, suggesting a violation of energy conservation.
- The system is a complex Rube Goldberg machine that adds multiple energy inputs (manual, blower motor, hydraulic) to mask the fact that the gravitational loop is not a net energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy, but the described mechanism requires servo-motors to rotate the eccentric weights. The servo-motors are the explicit energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel variant. It uses controlled motors to shift weights, claiming the resulting gravitational imbalance will drive rotation and generate useful work. However, the energy needed to control and move the weights always equals or exceeds any work extracted, violating energy conservation. No external gradient (like a falling weight or fuel) is identified to justify net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to generate motile force (rotation of the main module) from the synchronized rotation of internal weights. The torque to rotate the main module must come from the internal motors. Any net torque prod
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the electrical energy input to the servo-motors, control system, and encoders, treating only the gravitational potential energy change of the weights as the source.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The described synchronization aims to create a perpetual imbalance to rotate the main module, extracting net work from a closed cycle of weight positions within a conservative gravitational field.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from an electric motor battery. The core claim is that after initial motion, a second 'reverse' transmission shaft can send kinetic energy from the rear axle back to the front axle to sustain motion, creating a self-sustaining loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. It claims to sustain vehicle motion by mechanically feeding kinetic energy from the rear axle back to the front, creating a closed loop. This violates energy conservation, as the recirculated energy cannot overcome ongoing losses from friction and air resistance without continuous external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes a closed mechanical loop where kinetic energy is recirculated to do net work against dissipative forces (friction, drag) without an ongoing external energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: system cannot use its own kinetic energy to replenish its losses and maintain motion perpetually; this is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: treats the kinetic energy of the moving vehicle as a source that can be tapped without depletion, ignoring that using it to drive the axles would decelerate the vehicle unless replaced by an external source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output (sus
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. The only explicit input is the 'bi-directional engine' that rotates the long rods. The claim suggests mechanical work is created by changing the geometry of the balance, implying energy output from the system's configuration change itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to create useful mechanical work (lifting) by merely changing the angle between two rods in a balanced system. This internal geometric change cannot create net energy; any force advantage is gained at the expense of distance, conserving energy. The only energy input is the engine rotating the rods, and the output cannot exceed this input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims creation of 'additional force' and 'mechanical momentum added value' simply by changing the angle between rods, which is an internal rearrangement requiring work input but not creating new net output.
- Misapplies lever mechanics: Changing the angle between rods redistributes forces internally but cannot create a net torque or lifting force that wasn't input by the engine. The system's center of mass does not move to provide gravitational potential
- Confuses force with energy: Describes creating 'additional force proportional with the added length' but ignores that the distance over which that force acts (and thus the work done) is correspondingly reduced, leading to zero net energy gain.
- Misinterprets 'screw principle': Claims friction is 'dramatically reduced' in a way that implies a perpetual mechanical advantage, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'consum
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to claim self-sustaining rotation and electricity generation from an initial fluid motion within a rotating storage body, with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical assembly with internal fluid and sliding parts intended to generate electricity. However, it lacks any identifiable external energy source and describes a closed loop of motions that would inevitably lose energy to friction, making it a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim that violates both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., fuel, external mechanical input, thermal gradient).
- Describes complex internal motions (fluid, sliding parts, eccentric rotation) but provides no mechanism to overcome friction and other losses.
- Implies perpetual or self-amplifying motion: fluid drives sliding parts which drive external bodies which in turn drive the main storage body, creating a closed loop with no energy input.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting net work output without energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying a system can sustain organized motion and do work while dissipating energy to friction, without an external source to reduce entropy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe a complex system with rotating components (rotors, stators, magnetic elements) and energy generation, but no explicit primary energy input is identified. The text suggests energy multiplication or cascading effects.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of rotating magnetic assemblies that allegedly generate power, but fails to identify any primary energy source to initiate and sustain the rotation against inevitable losses. The language suggests energy amplification or cascading generation, which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creating energy from within the system itself.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., electrical, mechanical, thermal input) is specified.
- Describes energy generation/cascading from rotating magnetic assemblies without explaining the origin of the initial work input to overcome losses.
- Implies energy multiplication or self-sustaining operation, which violates conservation of energy if net output exceeds total input.
- Uses obfuscated technical language (Korean patent text with terms like 'magnetic force amplification', 'rotating magnetic body', 'generating power') making energy accounting impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description fo
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct-sounding phy
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat from the environment, plus electrical input to a pump and to a Carnot system (presumably a heat pump) to create and maintain temperature reservoirs.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce more electrical energy than the pump consumes by using ambient heat. However, it ignores the larger energy cost of creating the hot and cold reservoirs via the 'Carnotverfahren'. The overall process attempts to extract net work from a single-temperature environment, which violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims output energy > input energy ('wesentlich mehr Strom erzeugt wird, als man für dem Antrieb der Pumpe angewendet hat')
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores the substantial energy input required by the 'Carnotverfahren' (heat pump/refrigerator) to create and maintain the hot and cold reservoirs.
- Misapplication of the Carnot cycle: attempts to use it both to create a temperature difference and then as a heat engine, violating the Second Law by extracting net work from a single-temperature environment.
- Assumes expansion after a throttling valve (Verengung) in a closed cycle can provide net work, which is thermodynamically impossible in a steady-state cycle.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests the primary energy source is an external input (e.g., electricity) to power force-providing devices (hydraulic/pneumatic/leverage systems), but the abstract and claims explicitly state the goal is to capture energy 'in excess of that consumed' due to differences between input force and output force, and between lifting force and the 'force of mixing provided by gravity during the fall of the medium.'
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a system intended to produce more energy than it consumes by leveraging gravity and force differences in a circulating medium. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims an output greater than the total energy input, ignoring the energy required to reset the gravitational potential of the medium.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'energy can be captured in excess of that consumed' (output > input), violating energy conservation.
- Proposes to generate excess energy from the 'difference between a force input required and a force output provided' and from 'gravity during the fall,' implying a perpetual motion scheme where gravity provides net energy without an external source to
- Describes a closed-loop system where a generator powers the force devices that move the medium to power the generator, with implied net gain—a textbook over-unity violation.
- Uses vague, obfuscatory language ('embedded physics-powered energy', 'force of mixing') instead of clear energy accounting.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary energy source. Claims suggest electricity from a generator is used to power a motor that drives the same generator through a complex mechanical linkage system (lever, eccentric wheels, gearbox).
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a generator mechanically linked to a motor through a complex system of levers, sliders, and eccentric wheels. The abstract claims it can achieve self-supplied electricity, which implies a violation of energy conservation as there is no identifiable external energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction and conversion inefficiencies.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net external energy input identified
- System appears to be a closed mechanical loop with no energy gradient to exploit
- Claims of 'self-supplied electricity' (自供电) imply energy output > net energy input
- Friction and conversion losses in the mechanical components would dissipate energy, not create it
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air intake (implicit chemical energy in fuel for a standard 4-stroke engine, though not explicitly stated). The claim focuses on manipulating internal air mass between cylinder and absorber.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an engine cycle where air spontaneously flows from the cylinder to an 'absorber' during compression, claiming this reduces compression work. It then expands the combined air mass from both volumes, claiming more expansion work. This violates the First Law: the internal energy added to the absorber during compression is not new energy; any reduction in cylinder compression work is exactly paid for by the work needed to compress the air that moved to the absorber. No net gain is possible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims expansion work is 'significantly greater' than compression work due to decreasing air mass in cylinder during compression. The work saved during compression by mass transfer is exactly offset by the reduced int
- Ignores work required to create the initial pressure gradient for 'spontaneous' flow into absorber.
- Assumes internal energy of air in absorber is 'free' to add for expansion, but that energy was stored during compression; its inclusion does not create a net gain.
- Polytropic expansion from a combined larger volume will produce more work than a standard engine cycle for the same peak pressure, but only if the total compressed air mass and its total internal energy are higher, which requires more input work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on reduced
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (polyt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text suggests extracting energy from a resistive/retarding magnetic or electromagnetic source to 'potentialize' a motive source, implying creation of net work from an internal interaction without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an internal mechanical/magnetic interaction that claims to produce an asymmetric energy transfer where losses from one side boost the other, resulting in a COP > 1. This violates the conservation of energy, as no external energy source is identified to account for the net gain, and the explanation relies on obfuscated terminology rather than sound physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'asymmetric transfer' where losses from one source become additive to the opposed source, violating energy conservation.
- Proposes a Coefficient of Performance (COP) based on internal sign-coupling of 'subtractive quantities', a non-standard and physically meaningless formulation.
- Attempts to justify energy gain by redefining losses as additive to the opposite reaction, which is a semantic obfuscation of the energy accounting principle.
- Mentions the first law of thermodynamics but then describes a process that would circumvent it by using 'classical entanglement' of signs to generate net work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from an external panel (24) powers a motor (12) that drives the system. The claimed 'generation' appears to be a feedback loop where this motor turns alternators.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes an electrically powered motor driving alternators. This is a classic motor-generator loop that cannot produce net energy gain, as all outputs are fundamentally less than the electrical input due to thermodynamic losses. The patent language obfuscates this by implying the generated power can feed the motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: System uses electrical input to power a motor, then claims to generate electricity from alternators driven by that motor, ignoring losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: No net energy gain is possible from a motor-generator loop; output will always be less than input due to inefficiencies.
- Obfuscated perpetual motion: The description creates a circular reference where generated power is suggested to feed the motor, implying self-sustenance or net output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is the pressure difference between atmospheric air and a vacuum created by a vacuum pump. The system attempts to use the pump's work output to sustain its own vacuum, with net power extracted from atmospheric pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work solely from atmospheric pressure by using a self-powered vacuum pump to create a pressure difference. This is thermodynamically impossible because the work required to create and maintain the vacuum is always greater than or equal to the work obtainable from gas expanding into that vacuum, making the system a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The work to create/maintain the vacuum via the pump must equal or exceed the work extracted from atmospheric pressure pushing into that vacuum (isentropic expansion work).
- System is a closed loop: Claim 3 states the vacuum pump is powered by the motor's own output, creating a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats atmospheric pressure as a free, limitless source of work without accounting for the energy required to reset the system (remove expanded gas from the vacuum chamber).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be a single motor (4) driving a rotating disk (3). The device then uses a swinging lever (2) connected to another motor (5) to supposedly maintain the lever's tilted state, and a third motor (22) connected via a spring (23) to an energy storage device (6). No external energy source beyond the initial motor is clearly identified, suggesting an attempt to create a self-sustaining or energy-multiplying system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use a complex mechanical feedback system to generate and store energy from the motion of a single driven disk. The description implies energy multiplication, as multiple motors and an energy storage device are powered without a sufficient external energy source, directly violating the conservation of energy. The mechanism is a classic over-unity claim disguised as a mechanical invention.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system describes multiple motors and an energy storage device being driven by the rotation of a single disk, implying energy output exceeds the input without identifying an external source for the difference.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described mechanism suggests the swinging lever and spring system can perpetually drive an energy storage device while maintaining its own motion, which would require net energy creation.
- Mechanically dubious: The claim that a motor (5) pulling on a swinging lever can 'stabilize its tilted state' to enable energy harvesting is mechanically unsound; any work extracted from the lever's motion would dampen it, requiring continuous energy
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The initial rotational inertia and overcoming bearing friction are mentioned as the only inputs. The device appears to rely on gravitational potential energy changes of hanging weights and inertial effects within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a cyclical machine where the energy input needed to sustain motion and lift weights is less than the useful work output extracted from the weight falls. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating the conservation of energy. The device attempts to create net energy from gravitational and inertial effects within a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 6 explicitly states the input power for the continuous back-and-forth motion is less than the power needed to lift the weights conventionally through the same height. This implies an efficiency > 100% for a cyclical process.
- The system describes extracting 'mass pressure performance' from the falling weights to do useful work (e.g., pressurize fluids, move mechanical elements), but the energy to reset the weights for the next cycle is claimed to be less than the work ext
- No external energy input is described to compensate for energy extracted as useful work. The system is a closed mechanical-gravitational loop, violating conservation of energy for net work output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity (Earth's gravitational field) as the sole energy input, with mechanical lifting providing the initial potential energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to create a mechanical advantage through asymmetric lifting/lowering with one-way bearings, but fundamentally violates energy conservation by claiming net energy output from gravity alone. The total work done against gravity in a complete cycle must equal zero, making any 'force amplification' without additional energy input physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output force > input force without accounting for all energy inputs
- Misunderstands mechanical advantage: Two-point lifting reduces required force but doesn't change total work (force × distance)
- One-way bearings/freewheels don't create energy - they only allow motion in one direction while dissipating energy elsewhere
- Claims cascading can produce arbitrarily large forces from small initial inputs - impossible under conservation laws
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'downward f
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use ambient energy (humidity, thermal gradients) and polytropic processes to generate more energy than input, but lacks specification of primary energy input. Implies energy multiplication through cascading processes.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system using polytropic processes and ambient energy (humidity, thermal gradients) to allegedly produce more energy than is input. It violates the First Law of Thermodynamics by failing to account for all energy inputs while claiming an output greater than the controlled input, and uses correct physics terminology in a vague, obfuscating way to mask this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting - no quantification of all energy inputs vs. outputs
- Implies net energy extraction from ambient equilibrium without a sufficient gradient or entropy sink
- Uses thermodynamics terms (polytropic process) in a vague, obfuscating manner
- Claims cascading/stacking of processes to achieve output > control input without identifying the external energy source driving the cascade
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial gravitational potential energy of weights being repositioned within the system. The system's continuous operation implies it extracts net work from gravity alone without an external energy input to reset the weights to a higher potential energy state.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It attempts to generate continuous electricity by cleverly shifting weights on a wheel, but it provides no external energy source to restore the gravitational potential of the weights, violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No mechanism described to return weights to a higher gravitational potential without expending at least as much energy as is generated.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: Claims to generate electricity solely from gravitational force in a closed cycle, implying creation of energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a mechanism for weights to slide/be locked but ignores the energy cost of resetting the system's configuration each cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex interactions between 'magnetic energy', 'gravitational energy', and 'rotational energy' through various components (magnetic generators, rotors, converters), but fails to identify any primary external energy input. It appears to claim energy generation from internal interactions and feedback loops.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system of magnetic, gravitational, and rotational components that interact to supposedly produce useful energy. However, it fails to identify any external energy source to initiate or sustain the process, strongly suggesting it is a perpetual motion machine that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The description fits classic over-unity claims through internal feedback loops.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified.
- Describes energy generation from magnetic and gravitational interactions without an external gradient to drive the process.
- Implies energy multiplication or creation through cascading systems and internal feedback (e.g., using output to power input stages).
- Uses correct-sounding physics terms (magnetic energy, gravitational energy, rotation) in a context that suggests perpetual motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of output e
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses many technical terms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy multiplication through cascading interactions between 'magnetic energy' units, with no identifiable external energy input beyond initial arrangement.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy cascade system where 13 magnetic units allegedly amplify energy through interactions, producing more output than input without any external energy source. This violates energy conservation and describes a perpetual motion mechanism without thermodynamic justification.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: describes cascading amplification where output energy exceeds input energy without external source
- No thermodynamic gradient identified to drive claimed energy multiplication
- Vague mechanism using magnetic interactions to produce net energy gain
- Apparent perpetual motion: claims 13 magnetic units produce continuous cascading amplification
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims appear to describe a system where 13 'magnetic energy units' (ì¤ë ¥) are combined to produce water flow (ë°í´), which then generates more magnetic energy in a cyclic, amplifying fashion. No primary external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed-loop system where magnetic energy and water flow are claimed to mutually regenerate and amplify each other indefinitely. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing) and violates both the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The numerical claims are physically meaningless without defined units and a complete energy balance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a cyclic process where outputs (magnetic energy, water flow) are repeatedly used to regenerate and amplify the initial inputs without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Claims a self-sustaining, amplifying cycle with no identifiable entropy export or heat sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The text uses numerical ratios (500, 300, 13 units) but provides no physical units or clear definitions, making energy bookkeeping impossible. The described cascading/feedback loops suggest energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a process where 'vibration energy' is somehow amplified or multiplied through interaction with a 'vibration body' and 'resonance', suggesting energy output exceeds input without identifying an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract describes a vibration energy system where vibration is amplified or multiplied, leading to greater output energy than the initial control input. This directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies energy creation without identifying an external source to account for the increase.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims vibration energy amplification without specifying source for added energy.
- Implies creation of energy from within a closed or poorly defined system (energy multiplication).
- Uses correct-sounding physics terms (resonance, vibration) to obfuscate a core violation of energy conservation.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The explicit energy source is the gravitational potential energy of the water. However, the system requires a water pump to lift water to refill the bucket at the top. The patent abstract and claims are ambiguous about whether this pump is powered by the generator's output or an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The gravitational energy gained from the falling water is less than the energy required to pump that same water back up to refill the bucket. The system cannot generate a net energy surplus.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy required to pump the water back to the top reservoir is not subtracted from the generator's output. If the pump is powered by the generator, it is a net energy loss system due to inefficiencies.
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes a closed-loop cycle (bucket goes down full, empties, goes up empty). The net work extracted from one full cycle is zero or negative, as the energy to lift the empty bucket and the water (via the pump
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims focus on 'output' f
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of a working fluid cycled between upper, central, and lower reservoirs. The system appears to be a closed hydraulic cycle with no external energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed hydraulic system that uses the weight of fluid falling from an upper tank to drive pistons and a turbine, but it lacks any described mechanism to pump the fluid back to the upper tank. This makes it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce continuous work from an internal, finite energy source without replenishment.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mechanism described to return the working fluid from the lower reservoir back to the upper reservoir to complete the cycle without external work input.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described motion of pistons driving a crankshaft and turbine implies continuous net work output from a system that would, after initial filling, reach hydrostatic equilibrium.
- Missing entropy sink: The system, as a closed hydraulic cycle, would lose energy to friction/viscosity and eventually stop. No external gradient (e.g., thermal, pressure from an external source) is introduced to sustain it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a system where 'output voltage' is used to generate 'input voltage' through some form of feedback or cascading, suggesting an attempt to create energy from within the system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where output voltage is used to generate its own input voltage through cascading stages, implying energy creation without an external source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims a self-sustaining or amplifying voltage process with no clear external energy input to account for losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (output used to create input)
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal, etc.) is specified
- Describes a closed-loop voltage generation process that violates energy conservation
- Uses vague terminology ('voltage amplification', 'cascading') that obscures the energy accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat from an electronic device. The claim implies the quantum heat engine uses this waste heat to generate an electrical current that biases/helps power the same device.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system attempts to use a device's own waste heat to generate electrical current that powers the same device, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. The 'coherence capacitor' and spin-flip mechanisms obfuscate the core violation: extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir at equilibrium with its surroundings.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: The system proposes to convert waste heat from a device into useful electrical work to bias/power that same device, creating a feedback loop with no net external energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'coherence capacitor' involving nuclear spin flips is described as a 'memory resource' but its initialization and maintenance require energy input not accounted for. Spin polarization is not a free energy source.
- No temperature gradient specified: A heat engine requires a hot source and a cold sink. The description only mentions heat dissipating from the device to the engine, implying a single temperature reservoir.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The described system appears to claim that the energy output (electricity from generator) comes from the gravitational potential energy changes of adjustable masses on rotating arms. However, the energy required to adjust the masses and lengths (via fluid motor pumps and linear actuators) is not accounted for as an input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from gravity alone by cyclically adjusting masses and lever arms. This is impossible because gravity is a conservative force, meaning the net work done by or against it over any closed cycle is zero. The energy required to perform the adjustments (pumping fluid, moving actuators) will always equal or exceed any net energy gain from the gravitational motions, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The work required to pump fluid to change masses and to actuate arm lengths is not included in the energy accounting.
- Perpetual motion claim: Implies continuous rotational motion and net power output can be sustained by internal adjustments alone, without an external energy source.
- No net work from a conservative field: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a gravitational field is zero. The system describes a closed cycle of adjustments.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be terrestrial gravitational energy, but the described system is a closed hydraulic/mechanical loop with no external gradient or fuel input beyond initial potential energy of liquid.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'gravity motor' attempts to generate electricity by cycling liquid in containers within a submerged tank. The fatal flaw is that the energy required to pump the discharged liquid out of the tank and to reset the system (lifting empty containers, overcoming friction) must come from the system's own output, violating energy conservation. It is a classic over-unity design missing an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System attempts to use its own generated power to pump liquid back to height, creating a positive feedback loop with no net external energy input.
- No perpetual gradient: The gravitational potential energy of the liquid is extracted as containers descend, but energy is required to lift and refill the empty containers and to pump the discharged liquid out against external pressure.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output electricity while ignoring the work needed to reset the system (pumping liquid back to the top, overcoming friction, and lifting empty containers).
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Attempts to extract net work from a gravitational potential well without maintaining an external gradient or consuming a fuel.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial gravitational potential energy from raising the pendulum. The device claims to recover energy losses via magnetic attraction/repulsion and a rotating counterweight, implying a perpetual source of work from internal magnetic and mechanical interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It asserts that magnetic interactions and a rotating counterweight will not only compensate for all frictional losses but also provide excess energy to increase the pendulum's swing indefinitely, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). Magnetic forces are internal and conservative, so they cannot provide a net energy gain over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual pendulum motion (output work > input work over cycles) without an external energy source.
- Magnetic forces are conservative; no net energy can be extracted from magnetic interactions alone over a cycle.
- Mechanism ignores energy dissipation from friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions (e.g., 'sparragos choca contra las cejas').
- The rotating counterweight and magnet flipping require work input that is not accounted for in the energy balance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims to recover
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex system of 'energy bodies', 'energy fields', 'energy gates', and 'energy channels' that appear to generate or amplify energy through internal interactions without a clear external energy input. Mentions 'ambient energy' but provides no mechanism for harvesting it.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system with internal 'energy bodies' and 'gates' that interact to supposedly generate or amplify energy, but fails to identify any external source of energy to initiate or sustain the process. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying energy can be created from nothing within the device's internal configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.).
- Describes energy amplification and cascading effects within a closed system of components.
- Uses undefined, non-standard physics terminology ('energy body', 'energy gate', 'energy channel', 'seesaw principle').
- Implies creation of energy or a self-sustaining cycle without an external gradient or source.
- Lacks quantitative analysis of energy flows, efficiencies, or thermodynamic limits.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Focuses on internal energy
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Suggests a syst
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses physics-sounding terms ('ene
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy from transporting the powerless carrier to a high place, plus ambient wind energy from the carrier's motion.
AI Physics Analysis
This system is a disguised gravity-powered generator with significant loss mechanisms. The only net energy input is the work done to lift the carrier. The wind and wheel generators act as brakes, converting the carrier's mechanical energy into electricity less efficiently than simply using a generator directly on the wheels. The cycle cannot produce more energy than was used to lift the carrier, violating conservation if claimed otherwise.
Specific Physics Issues
- System extracts electrical energy from wind generated by the carrier's descent, but that wind's kinetic energy is derived from the carrier's kinetic/potential energy. This is a net-drag energy recovery system, not a net power source.
- The primary energy input is the work done to transport the carrier to the high place. Any electrical output from the wind or wheel generators comes at the direct expense of the carrier's kinetic energy, increasing its deceleration.
- The system as described implies a net energy gain from the cycle (lift carrier, let it descend while generating power), which violates energy conservation. The generation process creates drag, ensuring the output is less than the input required to li
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the motor (5) driving the 'rouleau compresseur' (4). The claim suggests the gravitational potential energy of the system's masses is harnessed to produce net output, but no external source (e.g., fuel, ambient thermal gradient, or descending mass from a height) is identified to replenish this potential energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It describes a closed mechanical system where a small motor is supposed to initiate motion that leads to a permanent imbalance and continuous rotation, producing more energy than consumed. This directly violates energy conservation, as no external source replenishes the gravitational potential energy used.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claim 4 explicitly states input energy is less than output energy over time.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Proposes a closed mechanical system that generates net energy from its own configuration without an external source.
- Misinterprets 'domino effect' and center-of-gravity shift: A shift in center of gravity within a closed system cannot produce continuous rotation without work input to reset the masses. The system would reach a new equilibrium and stop.
- Ignores energy required to reset the system: To achieve 'permanent disequilibrium' and continuous rotation, the internal roller would need to perform work to lift masses against gravity, which is not accounted for in the net energy claim.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is electrical power from Power Supply 1A to start motors (e.g., 3A52, 4A, 5B). The device claims to generate additional electricity from oil pressurized by the weight of the Load Wheel Assembly acting on tilted hydraulic cylinders, purportedly using gravitational force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an over-unity claim. It uses electrical input to run its components but describes an internal mechanical-hydraulic cycle where gravity pressurizes oil to generate electricity. This violates energy conservation, as the gravitational work is part of a closed cycle and cannot provide net energy output beyond the initial electrical input and inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses electrical input to run motors and pumps, but the described mechanism (weight pressing on cylinders to pressurize oil) is an internal work cycle. The gravitational force is conservative; no net energy can
- Violates energy conservation: The description implies the system's electrical output (to the grid) can exceed the electrical input, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The oil hydraulic motor/generator (5C) is driven by oil pre
- Misapplication of principles: 'Taking advantage of oil pressure and gravitational force' obfuscates that gravity alone, in a closed cycle, cannot be a net energy source. The tilt mechanism (hydraulic jacks) also requires energy input, increasing loss
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of power generation
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct engineering terms (h
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary energy input. The device appears to use water transfer between containers (water boxes, storage tank, collection tank) and pressure devices to supposedly generate rotational motion, but no external energy source is specified. The description suggests water is cycled internally.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'power machine' describes a complex system of rotating disks, water containers, and pressure mechanisms but fails to identify any external energy source. The claim that it can continuously provide power without pollution suggests a perpetual motion device that violates the first law of thermodynamics by extracting net work from a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Appears to be a closed-loop water/weight system claiming to output more work than input
- Violates conservation of energy - cannot generate net work from an internal cycle without an external gradient
- Complex mechanism obfuscates the lack of an energy source
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims imply energy is generated internally by 'Auftrieb' (buoyancy/lift) within moving attachments on the wheels, exceeding the input energy needed to overcome inertia and friction.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a wheel arrangement where moving attachments generate more energy (via 'lift') than is required to turn the wheels. This violates the conservation of energy, as it describes a closed mechanical system producing net work without an identifiable external energy input, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 2 explicitly states: 'mehr Energie durch Auftrieb in den Aufbauten generiert werden kann, als zum Drehen der Räder investiert wird' (more energy can be generated by lift in the attachments than is invested in turning the wheels). This is a dir
- The system attempts to balance torques internally to minimize input, but any net energy output (e.g., to drive a hydraulic cylinder) must come from an external energy source. The described 'Auftrieb' generation within closed, moving attachments is no
- The analysis confuses force/torque balancing with energy creation. A balanced, low-friction system still requires work input to produce work output; it cannot create net energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > input for
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies a perpe
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests mechanical energy input to a first driving gear, but claims the final output mechanical energy is amplified. No external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient) is identified to account for the claimed amplification.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a mechanical linkage and gear system that claims to amplify mechanical energy. As a purely mechanical system with no identified external energy source, it violates the conservation of energy. The claimed 'amplification' is thermodynamically impossible, placing it in the category of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'mechanical energy amplification' (机械能增效益) as a function of the mechanism itself, implying output energy > input energy without an identified external source.
- Describes a complex linkage/lever system connecting eccentrics and gears, but such a system is purely a transmission/conversion device and cannot create net energy.
- The core claim that the structure itself causes energy to be amplified during transmission violates the conservation of energy for an isolated mechanical system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The dev
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex interaction between a 'control energy source' and an 'output energy source', where energy from the output is somehow fed back to amplify the control source, leading to a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle. No primary external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where energy from an output is fed back to amplify its own control input, creating a self-amplifying loop. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, as it implies net energy creation from internal feedback without an external source, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by describing a positive feedback loop that amplifies energy without an identified external source.
- Describes energy multiplication ('energy is amplified') through internal cycling, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external power input.
- Uses obfuscated terminology (e.g., 'control energy source', 'output energy source', 'amplification structure', 'mutual induction structure') to describe what appears to be a perpetual motion scheme.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests motion is generated through complex mechanical arrangements of plates, springs, and inertial components, but no external energy input is specified. Claims imply self-sustaining or amplified motion from internal configurations.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate rapid motion through complex mechanical arrangements without specifying any energy input, implying self-sustaining or amplified motion that violates conservation of energy. The description uses technical-sounding terms obfuscating the absence of an energy source and suggests impossible motion amplification.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input
- Claims of 'extreme imbalance' generating continuous motion violate conservation of energy
- Implied amplification of motion ('amplified approximately ten thousand times') without energy source
- Vague mechanical descriptions that cannot circumvent thermodynamic limits
- Suggests perpetual or self-amplifying motion from internal arrangements
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests extracting rotational kinetic energy from the Earth's rotation via a stationary shaft at the pole, using a motor to create a relative fulcrum, and then gearing that relative motion to drive a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net energy from the Earth's rotation using a fixed structure and a motor, violating conservation of angular momentum. The motor's energy input to create a relative 'fulcrum' is ignored, and the gearing system cannot generate excess power from the Earth's rotation without applying an equal and opposite torque to the Earth, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates angular momentum conservation: A stationary shaft anchored to the Earth's crust at the pole cannot extract net work from the Earth's rotation without applying a counter-torque to the Earth.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The motor (F) provides the initial energy input to create the relative fulcrum, but the claim implies this leads to a net energy gain from the Earth's rotation.
- Misunderstanding of reference frames: A structure fixed to the Earth at the pole rotates with the Earth. Creating a 'fulcrum' against the Earth's rotation requires continuous work input to overcome friction and maintain the relative motion.
- No thermodynamic gradient identified: The system attempts to extract work from an isothermal, co-rotating body without a usable energy gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims include 'lever effect', 'circumference', and 'gravity' as inputs, but the core claim is a device that generates its own operating energy ('générant sa propre énergie de fonctionnement') and creates perpetual energy without conventional input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims a 'perpetual energy creator' and 'perpetual motion' device that generates its own operating power and outputs excess energy. This directly violates the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics. The description is physically incoherent and describes an impossible system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of perpetual motion and energy creation from nothing
- No identifiable external energy source; claims self-powered operation
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; no entropy sink or thermal gradient for useful work
- Misapplication of 'lever effect' as an energy multiplier rather than a force/distance trade-off
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims include self-generation ('générant sa propre énergie de fonctionnement'), perpetual motion, and transformation of gravity into startup energy, but no identifiable external energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims a perpetual motion machine that creates energy, violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), and describes mechanisms (levers, circumferences) that cannot generate net energy. The text uses correct physics terms like 'lever' and 'circumference' incorrectly to suggest energy multiplication without loss.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of perpetual motion and energy creation from nothing
- Claimed 'self-generation' of operational energy violates conservation of energy
- No identifiable external energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, sunlight)
- Vague mechanism ('effet de levier', 'rayons') cannot create energy, only transform or multiply force at the cost of distance/work
- Claimed output energy exceeds total input energy by design
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Text describes complex mechanical assemblies with springs, levers, and inertial components but provides no identifiable external energy input mechanism. Implied energy appears to come from internal 'inertial force promotion' and 'rapid rebound cyclic motion' without external source.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes an extremely complex mechanical assembly with springs, levers, and inertial components that claims to generate continuous motion through rebound cycles. It violates energy conservation by implying perpetual motion without any identifiable external energy source, using obfuscating technical language to obscure the fundamental physics violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Claims of 'inertial force promotion' and 'cyclic rebound motion' suggest perpetual motion
- Extremely complex mechanical description obscures fundamental energy accounting
- Implies energy amplification through rebound mechanisms without dissipation accounting
- Mentions 'extreme imbalance' and 'rapid cyclic motion' without energy source
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex mechanical arrangements with springs, levers, and masses, but provides no identifiable external energy input. Implied energy appears to come from internal elastic potential and gravity, suggesting a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanically complex device claiming to generate high-speed cyclic motion from internal elastic rebounds and inertial masses without any clear external energy input. The incoherent text and reliance on internal potential energy recovery violate energy conservation, as it implies sustained or amplified motion without energy addition, matching patterns of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of 'extremely heavy inertial mass' generating spontaneous high-speed cyclic motion
- Implies perpetual or amplified motion from internal elastic rebounds without energy input
- Text is incoherent and uses physics terms nonsensically (e.g., 'super-strong tensile steel sheet', 'super-long steel plate', 'extreme imbalance')
- Suggests motion 'in the air' without propulsion mechanism
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient humidity (water vapor) and electrical input for heating/control systems. Claims to extract multiple times more energy than provided.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce multiple times more energy than input by using ambient humidity, violating energy conservation. Condensation of water vapor at near-ambient conditions cannot provide significant net work output beyond the latent heat released, which is low-grade thermal energy not convertible to high-grade work without a heat sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law: Claims 'multiple times the energy provided' without identifying sufficient external energy source.
- Violates Second Law: Implies extracting net work from isothermal humidity condensation without a significant temperature gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Electrical input for heating and control is acknowledged, but output claims suggest energy multiplication.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Describes a sealed container with water condensation but no clear thermodynamic cycle to produce net work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear - appears to claim spontaneous perpetual motion from 'extremely heavy inertial mass' without identifiable external energy input
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to achieve spontaneous perpetual motion using 'extremely heavy inertial mass' and complex mechanical arrangements, but provides no identifiable energy source and explicitly claims non-stop cyclic motion without external input, directly violating conservation of energy. The description uses technically sounding but physically incoherent terminology to obscure the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy source described
- Claims 'spontaneous perpetual flow without rest' which violates conservation of energy
- Mentions 'amplification of reaction force by approximately ten thousand times' without energy input
- Describes cyclic motion without energy dissipation mechanisms
- Uses technical-sounding but physically incoherent terminology
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (buoyancy in a gravitational field). The device appears to be a buoyancy-based mechanism where floats in liquid-filled cylinders generate torque via connecting rods and gears.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate continuous rotational torque using buoyancy forces in vertically aligned cylinders. However, buoyancy in a static fluid is a conservative force; any work gained as a float rises must be paid back to submerge it again, resulting in zero net work per cycle unless an external energy input (e.g., changing fluid levels, adding/removing mass) is provided but not described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system extracts work from buoyancy forces without accounting for the energy required to reset the system's configuration.
- No net energy gradient: In a closed, static fluid system in a uniform gravitational field, buoyancy forces are conservative. Net work over a cycle is zero.
- Missing entropy sink/energy input: The description implies continuous torque generation from a static arrangement of cylinders and floats, suggesting perpetual motion of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims torque prod
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only Archimedes' buoyancy and gravity, with no other energy input, implying a closed-loop system that extracts net work from an equilibrium gravitational/buoyant field.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate net electrical work solely from buoyancy and gravity in a closed cycle, which is impossible as these are conservative forces. The described 'force ratio' and 'speed multiplication' cannot create energy; they only convert or redirect it, with inevitable losses ensuring the system stops without external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce electricity and re-arm itself using only internal forces.
- Violates 1st Law: System has no external energy input; buoyancy and gravity are conservative forces. Net work over a closed cycle in a conservative field is zero.
- Violates 2nd Law: Claims to create a perpetual 'disequilibrium' and motion without an external gradient or energy source to sustain it.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores energy losses to friction, water resistance, and electrical generation. The energy to push spheres 'against their buoyancy' (Claim 3) must come from an external source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is the gravitational potential energy of water and pistons moving in a closed cycle, with no external input described.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a closed hydraulic system where pistons and water reservoirs alternately drive each other's motion while also powering turbines. The electrical output energy has no identified external source, violating energy conservation. All described motions are internal to the system and would be lossy, causing it to stop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system attempts to generate net electrical output from a closed hydraulic/mechanical cycle with internal losses.
- No external energy gradient is maintained; the system's weights (pistons vs. reservoirs) alternately drive each other in a perpetual cycle.
- Ignores energy losses from turbine generation, friction, valve operation, and hydraulic resistance, which would dissipate the system's initial potential energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'autonomous
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Initial stored chemical energy in the battery. The system claims to produce more energy than it consumes by using a motor to drive a generator, with the generator's output partially fed back to recharge the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor-generator feedback system with magnetic coupling. It claims to produce more energy than it consumes, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics. The magnetic gear ratio increases rotational speed but cannot create energy; it trades torque for speed, and the total output power cannot exceed the input power minus all system losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claim that 'El generador debidamente dimensionado produce más energía de la que consume' is impossible for a closed system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a classic 'motor-generator feedback loop'. Losses from inverter inefficiency, motor resistance, generator inefficiency, bearing friction, and magnetic coupling losses are ignored.
- No external energy input is described to offset the inevitable losses, making sustained operation impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims describe converting 'low-grade energy' to 'high-grade energy' and then back to 'low-grade energy' in a cycle, suggesting energy amplification without identifying an external source beyond the initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cyclic process of converting low-grade to high-grade energy and back, claiming to produce useful work or additional energy. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme as it lacks an identified external energy source and violates both energy conservation and entropy principles.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying energy can be upgraded and recycled to produce net gain
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting low-grade energy can be converted to high-grade energy and used to produce more low-grade energy in a cyclic process without net entropy increase or external work input
- No identifiable external energy source (e.g., thermal gradient, chemical, ambient) to justify claimed transformations
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from the motion of falling/rotating flywheels triggered sequentially, with electrical output from a dynamo. No primary external energy source is identified; the description implies a self-sustaining cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-sustaining engine where flywheels trigger each other to spin a dynamo, producing electricity for its own needs and excess for external use. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims a net energy output from a closed mechanical system with no identifiable external energy input to compensate for losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims to produce 'extra' electrical power for external use from a closed mechanical cycle with no net energy input.
- No identifiable external energy source: The described triggering of flywheels by other flywheels is an internal energy transfer, not a source.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The description of mass blocks being 'restored' to a waiting position to fall again, powering a dynamo and producing excess electricity, describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'extra' out
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims perpetual motion through a complex mechanical system of counterweights, gears, and generators without identifying any external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'perpetual motion generator' using counterweights and gears, claiming it can reach a state of perpetual balance and motion. This directly violates energy conservation laws, as any real system has losses and requires an external energy input to sustain motion or generate electricity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Claims 'perpetual motion' (永動) as an output state
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient gradient)
- Mechanical system described would have inevitable frictional and electrical losses
- System appears to be a closed mechanical loop claiming to generate net electricity
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies mechanical input force is the only explicit source, but claims of 12x force multiplication suggest an attempt to create energy from the geometry of the lever system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a 12x force multiplication via lever geometry, which, if interpreted as a net gain in work or energy, directly violates the conservation of energy. Mechanical advantage trades force for distance; it cannot create energy. The system lacks any identified external energy source to justify such a gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 12x force multiplication via lever law without accounting for proportional reduction in distance/velocity, violating conservation of energy.
- Describes a complex lever/pulley/tension system but implies net mechanical advantage > 1 without identifying an external energy input to compensate.
- System appears to be a passive mechanical linkage; any force amplification at one point must come from trading distance/velocity, yielding no net increase in work output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims force multi
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system describes a U-shaped water channel with reservoirs, valves, and a generator, but no external energy input is specified. It appears to claim water can circulate and generate electricity perpetually using only internal water flow and pressure differences.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a U-shaped water channel with internal reservoirs and a generator, claiming to achieve 'hydraulic circulation' for continuous electricity generation. It violates energy conservation by lacking any external energy source to sustain the flow against losses, effectively proposing a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No identifiable external energy source to overcome friction, turbulence, and electrical losses.
- Violates thermodynamics: Claims continuous water circulation and electricity generation without an external gradient or input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes water flow and pressure changes but ignores energy dissipation and the need for continuous input to maintain flow against resistive forces.
- Implies perpetual motion: The description suggests water is recycled and drives a generator indefinitely, which is impossible in a closed system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to use an electric hoist/lift (10) to raise a weight (8), which then powers water flow through a sealed capsule (11) to drive a generator (3). The abstract suggests 'water power recycling' and implies the system can sustain itself or produce excess energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a closed loop where an electric hoist lifts a weight, which then drives water through a turbine/generator. This is a lossy energy conversion cycle, not a power source. For it to run continuously, the electrical input to the hoist must exceed the generator's output, violating the claim of achieving 'water power recycling' as a sustainable energy dream.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The described cycle (lift weight → water flows → generator → presumably power the lift again) cannot have a net energy output greater than the input. Energy is lost to friction, generator inefficiency, and pump/hoist
- No perpetual gradient: The system attempts to create a closed hydraulic/gravitational cycle. The water is lifted (implying work input) and then flows down to generate power, but the work to lift the water/weight must be supplied, creating a lossy cyc
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'electric power sharing and recycling system' and 'realizes humanity's dream of water power recycling' imply over-unity or self-sustaining operation without identifying an external, ambient energy source to compen
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'recycling
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (gener
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract energy from 'friction de l'air' (air friction/drag) around moving vehicle wheels, and in the third claim, implies a self-sustaining perpetual motion device powered by its own output.
AI Physics Analysis
The invention fundamentally misinterprets air drag as a usable net energy source for a moving vehicle. Extracting work from drag increases the total resistive force on the vehicle, requiring more input energy from the primary engine or battery. The claims of infinite autonomy and perpetual motion directly violate the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1: Misidentifies air drag/friction as a net energy source to reduce engine load. Extracting work from drag necessarily increases total drag on the vehicle, consuming more energy from the primary engine.
- Claim 2: Claims infinite autonomy by generating electricity from air friction around wheels. This violates conservation of energy; the generator creates additional drag, requiring more energy from the vehicle's battery/motor to overcome it.
- Claim 3: Explicitly describes a 'mouvement perpétuelle' (perpetual motion) and 'force infini' (infinite force) from a gear system, a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Treats aerodynamic
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The claim is that initial manual or engine input starts the system, after which it operates independently without any external energy or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical gearbox that, after an initial input, runs indefinitely and outputs more mechanical power (torque × speed) than was supplied. This directly violates the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics, constituting a classic perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming continuous operation without an energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to produce greater output torque AND speed than input, effectively creating energy.
- Describes a mechanical gear system, which cannot have an efficiency greater than 100%; friction guarantees losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient capillary action and gravity. The device claims to use capillary forces to lift water against gravity, then extract energy via turbines as the water falls back down, with the net energy output allegedly exceeding the control input for operating valves.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net power by using capillary action to lift water and gravity to drop it through a turbine. This violates energy conservation because capillary action is not an energy source; it is a static equilibrium phenomenon. Continuously breaking and re-forming the capillary meniscus to create flow requires more energy than can be recovered from the falling water.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The capillary force lifting the liquid is a surface tension phenomenon that does not add energy to the system; it merely converts surface energy into gravitational potential energy. The energy to create the meniscus and
- Misapplies the capillary height formula: The Jurin's law height is an equilibrium height, not a continuous pumping mechanism. To create continuous flow, the liquid must be removed from the top, breaking the meniscus and requiring work input to re-est
- No perpetual gradient: The system attempts to create a perpetual hydraulic head using capillary action alone, which is thermodynamically impossible. The act of releasing the liquid at the top (via a vent) and allowing it to flow back through the turb
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output ener
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest using ambient humidity (water vapor) as an energy source, with electrical input to initiate a process that supposedly extracts energy from humidity gradients to produce more electrical output than input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a device that uses an initial electrical input to harness ambient humidity, allegedly producing an electrical output equal to or greater than the input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) unless all energy inputs—including the latent heat and chemical potential energy from the humidity gradient—are fully accounted for. The description is vague and uses correct physics terms (humidity, vapor) in a context suggesting over-unity performance, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 100 units of electrical input yield 100% output (implying >100% efficiency or COP > 1) without accounting for all energy inputs from the ambient humidity gradient.
- Implies energy multiplication through cascading humidity-based cells without identifying the thermodynamic cycle or the ultimate low-temperature reservoir (entropy sink).
- Uses vague ratios (2:1, 4:1, 1:2, 1:8) and technical obfuscation with humidity/water vapor terms without a clear, physically possible conversion mechanism.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from motor; claims to become self-sustaining by feeding a portion of the alternator's output back to the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It is a complex mechanical linkage that, after an initial start, proposes to use part of its generated electricity to power its own motor. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it cannot create net energy, and the second law due to inevitable dissipative losses. No novel energy source is introduced.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to output more electrical energy than is required to run its own motor, with no external energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Describes a closed mechanical system with friction and electrical losses, yet claims perpetual, net-positive energy generation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes only the control input to the motor, ignoring all losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat, sound) that dissipate energy from the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text references gravity, pistons, and pedals, but no primary energy input is coherently defined. The system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent description is physically incoherent and describes a closed mechanical system with no clear external energy source. Its claims of increasing revolution and free power generation directly violate the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net energy input. Mentions of gravity and pistons are incoherent and not connected to an external source.
- Claims of increasing wheel revolution from piston gravity increase violate conservation of energy.
- Description is mechanically incoherent and uses technical terms incorrectly (e.g., 'soft', 'drum flow position', contradictory directions).
- Implies generation of 'free power' without an energy source to offset losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics/engineering
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent mentions a 'high pressure nitrogen balloon (hydraulic battery)' and a battery charged by a dynamo on the shaft, implying the only apparent energy input is from an initially charged pressure vessel and a self-charging electrical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It proposes a closed system where hydraulic/pneumatic pressure and a self-charging electrical circuit purportedly sustain and amplify motion indefinitely, directly violating energy conservation. The 'fuelless' claim and cascading for 'increasing power' are hallmarks of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) - Claims 'fuelless' operation with increasing power via cascading units (Claims 2 & 6).
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics - No identified external energy gradient to exploit; system appears to be a closed-loop hydraulic/pneumatic system with inevitable losses.
- Perpetual motion claim - Suggests a dynamo on the output shaft charges a battery to run pumps to recirculate fluid, creating a positive feedback loop with net energy output.
- Incomplete energy accounting - Ignores energy dissipated as heat via friction, viscosity, and other losses in the hydraulic and mechanical components.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a 'perpetual motion' device using gravity (weights), inertia, and springs to generate electricity. The primary explicit input is a 40W 12V micro-motor. Implicit inputs include gravitational potential energy from falling weights and possibly ambient vibrations.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity claim, asserting that a small motor can drive a system producing more electrical power than it consumes. The described mechanical arrangement (weights, springs, flywheel) cannot create or amplify energy. All such closed systems are subject to friction and losses, making sustained 'perpetual' operation impossible under the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a 40W motor can drive a generator producing 100W-200W under load, implying net energy output > input.
- No sustainable external energy gradient: The described mechanism (weights, springs, flywheel) cannot provide a continuous, replenishable source of energy without losses exceeding inputs.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Fails to account for all losses (friction, electrical resistance, air drag, hysteresis) that would inevitably dissipate the system's initial energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to operate with minimal or no external power input, suggesting energy comes from gravity acting on counterweights and internal mechanical interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a complex mechanical system using counterweights and linkages to produce continuous rotational output. It claims to operate with little to no external power, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described mechanism cannot generate net energy; it would simply wind down due to friction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous output motion with minimal/no external energy input.
- No identifiable primary energy source; gravity is a conservative force and cannot provide net energy over a cycle.
- Mechanism appears to be a complex arrangement attempting to use one part's motion to drive another in a loop, which inevitably loses energy to friction.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe a system where a 'moisture absorption power generation unit' (20) and an 'energy generation power generation unit' (40) interact to generate power from each other's operation, suggesting a self-sustaining or energy multiplication loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where two 'power generation units' mutually power each other's operation, forming a closed loop with no clear external energy source to overcome inevitable losses. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme that violates both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., fuel, sunlight, thermal gradient).
- Claims describe mutual power generation between two units, implying energy creation or a perpetual motion scheme (e.g., unit 20 powers unit 40, which then powers unit 20).
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting net energy output without a corresponding net energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying work can be extracted from an isothermal system (moisture absorption) without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims focus on in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from a battery (Akku 3) drives a motor (1) to spin a frame containing liquid-filled containers. Centrifugal force pressurizes the liquid to drive hydraulic motors (Ölmotoren), which in turn drive electrical generators.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to use centrifugal force—a kinematic consequence of rotation—to create a net energy gain. The electrical output from the generators is fundamentally derived from the input work of the drive motor, with inevitable losses from friction, fluid viscosity, and electrical resistance. The system cannot output more useful energy than is supplied to the drive motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system claims to generate more electrical energy from the generators than is required to spin the frame and overcome losses.
- Misinterprets centrifugal force as an external energy source; it is an inertial effect within an accelerating (rotating) reference frame and cannot do net work on the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done to pressurize the fluid via rotation comes from the drive motor. The hydraulic motors extract this pressure to generate electricity, but this extracted energy must come at the expense of the rotational kine
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary explicit energy input is the oscillating force from a drive motor (12) or linear actuator (16) applied to the swing frame. Gravity is implicitly used as a force to convert the pendulum motion of the frame into rotational motion of the asymmetric flywheel mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanically complex oscillator that uses gravity and an asymmetric mass. However, it claims 'force amplification' and 'potentiated torque' for generating electricity, which implies an energy output greater than the electrical-mechanical input. This violates the conservation of energy, as gravity cannot be a net energy source; the input motor must supply all energy for the output and losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'dynamic force amplification' and 'potentiated torque' implying energy gain or multiplication.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses gravity, but gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from it over a cycle. The work done by gravity on the mass during one half of a swing is returned during the other half, minus
- The system is essentially a complex pendulum/flywheel system. The output torque taken from the flywheel's shaft (5) to drive a generator (8) must ultimately come from the input work done by the drive motor to keep the frame oscillating, minus all los
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of 'pote
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is electrical energy to the drive motor (12). The device claims to exploit gravity and lever laws as an additional source, implying a net energy gain from the system's own internal motions and gravitational potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical oscillator (rocking frame with flywheel) driven by a motor. It incorrectly claims to amplify force or power by leveraging gravity and levers. Since gravity is conservative and internal oscillations incur losses, the system cannot produce more work than the motor supplies, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'dynamic force amplification' and 'potentiated torque' implying output work > input work.
- Proposes extracting net energy from a closed-loop interaction between a motor-driven rocking frame and an asymmetric flywheel, with gravity as a perpetual source.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (e.g., a descending weight, temperature difference) to justify net energy extraction beyond the motor's input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of amplifie
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (Brownian motion) and initial potential energy from asymmetric mass distribution are claimed to be insufficient to explain the described motion. The device implicitly claims to create energy from the geometry alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic unbalanced wheel design, a form of perpetual motion machine. While an asymmetric mass distribution creates a static torque, this cannot cause continuous rotation because the center of mass will settle at its lowest point, reaching equilibrium. Any claim of spontaneous, sustained rotation violates the first law of thermodynamics, as no net energy input is identified to overcome dissipative losses over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming spontaneous rotation from an equilibrium state
- Ignores that the center of mass of the system cannot move cyclically without external work input
- Fails to account for all forces and torques (friction, bearing losses, air resistance)
- Misinterprets static torque imbalance as a source of perpetual motion
- Assumes a configuration can produce net work over a full cycle without an energy gradient
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravitational force, but mechanism attempts to create perpetual motion through asymmetric mass distribution without external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to generate continuous electricity using only gravity and asymmetric weights on a wheel, which violates energy conservation. Gravity alone cannot provide net work over a complete cycle in a closed system, as it's a conservative force. The described mechanism would simply oscillate to equilibrium rather than rotate continuously.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - claims continuous rotation and electricity generation without energy input
- Attempts to create net torque from gravity alone using asymmetric weights - gravity is conservative force
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source identified
- Mechanical system would reach equilibrium position and stop
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system using 'magnetic force' and 'repulsive force' (원통, 회전원통) that appear to be arranged in feedback loops to generate electricity. It claims to produce more output energy than input, suggesting it attempts to extract net work from internal magnetic interactions without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a magnetic system that claims to generate electricity and heat through internal repulsive/attractive force arrangements without any external energy input. This constitutes a clear violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce net energy from a closed system with no identifiable energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims 'ë² ì´ë§ê³¼ 기ì´ì¥ì¹ê° íììë' (electricity and heat are produced) from a system that only uses its own magnetic components in a cyclical arrangement.
- No identifiable external energy source: The system uses only permanent magnets and their 'forces' in a closed loop, with no thermal gradient, chemical fuel, or ambient energy input described.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by generating net energy from internal magnetic forces in equilibrium.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output (ele
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied self-generation. Potential sources mentioned: human/vehicle weight via levers (gravitational potential energy), hydraulic jack actuation, but the core claim is that the machine generates the energy required for its own operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a machine that generates the energy needed for its own operation, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). While it mentions using gravity via levers, this is an external input, not self-generation, and cannot sustainably power the machine's operation without an additional primary energy source to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: A machine cannot create the energy required for its own continuous operation from nothing.
- No identifiable primary energy input is specified to account for losses; 'self-generation' of operating energy is a perpetual motion claim.
- Ambiguous mechanism obscures the energy accounting; using gravity/weight implies an external, finite input not accounted for in the 'self-generating' claim.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial battery. The system claims to sustain itself by using generator output to power the liquid pump, creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a classic over-unity violation: a pump powers a turbine which powers the pump. Due to inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and turbulence, the generator's output will always be less than the power required to run the pump. The system cannot sustain itself without the continuous input of external energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Output work from turbine/generator cannot exceed input work to pump minus losses.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: No net work can be extracted from an isothermal system (liquid at ambient temperature).
- System lacks an external energy gradient (e.g., height difference, temperature difference, chemical potential).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'sustain op
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of weights, plus an external or feedback electrical input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered oscillator. While gravity can produce torque to rotate the shaft, the system must be reset by lifting the weights back to their starting height, which requires at least as much energy as was generated. Using output energy to perform this reset, with the goal of making the system self-sustaining, violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 6, 7, and 10 describe a feedback loop where part of the output is used to reset the weights to their initial high-potential-energy position. This reset requires work equal to or greater than the gravitational work extracted during the downward
- The system cannot have a net energy output greater than the input needed to reset it. The abstract's claim of achieving a 'self reliable' system after an initial input is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- The patent text obfuscates the complete energy cycle by focusing only on the 'power generation' phase (weights falling) while hand-waving the necessary reset phase.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use air as the working fluid in a closed-loop system, with an electric motor driving a compressor to circulate air. The system appears to be self-powered after startup, with battery startup and then claimed self-sustaining operation.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to be a 'high-speed power-saving air generator' that uses gear ratios to multiply output power (2-20x) from a fixed electrical input, which directly violates energy conservation. The described closed-loop air system with compressor, piston, and gears cannot produce net energy output greater than electrical input minus inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims gear ratios (2-20x) create power multiplication (2-20x output power)
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a closed-loop air system where a compressor (powered by motor) pushes air to drive a piston, which then drives gears connected to the generator shaft, implying net energy output > electrical input
- Ignores losses: No accounting for compressor inefficiency, friction, electrical losses, or thermodynamic losses in the air cycle
- Misunderstands gear function: Gears trade torque for speed or vice-versa; they cannot create energy or increase power output beyond input minus losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously claims energy input from Earth's gravity acting on unbalanced rotating masses (M1 > M2) and from a 'child's swing lever law' effect. The system appears to use generator G1 to power a linear motor (SM) that assists the rotation, creating a feedback loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine. It attempts to create a closed energy loop where a generator powers a motor that helps drive the generator, while incorrectly claiming gravity and a fictional lever law provide a continuous net energy input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes a closed mechanical loop where a generator (G1) powers a motor (SM) that assists the motion driving that same generator, implying perpetual motion.
- Misapplies gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from it over a closed cycle by masses simply moving in a gravitational field. The potential energy gained on the upward swing equals the potential energy lost on the
- Invented 'Child's swing lever law': This is not a recognized physical principle that can provide a net energy gain. It appears to be an obfuscation implying mechanical advantage without an external energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy equation in the claim attempts to balance outputs (G1, G2, losses) against ambiguous inputs (gravity, the 'lever law' effect), but the inputs are not genuine external energy sources.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to rely on an initial push and then claims to sustain motion using a combination of a stretched rubber band (elastic energy) and gravity acting on unbalanced masses. No external energy input is described after the initial start.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine claim. It describes a system where motion is supposedly sustained by internally transferring energy via a rubber band and leveraging gravity, but it ignores the fundamental law of conservation of energy. All real-world losses make sustained operation impossible without continuous external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce continuous rotary motion without a net external energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy released from the rubber band to give the masses a 'push' was stored from the motion of the masses themselves earlier in the cycle. This is a closed loop with losses (friction, inelasticity).
- Misunderstanding of gravity in a closed cycle: Gravity is a conservative force. The net work done by gravity on the masses over one complete revolution is zero.
- No perpetual motion mechanism: The system lacks an external energy source to overcome inevitable dissipative losses from friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'stetige Dr
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only gravitational potential energy of Earth, with no other external energy input, to create a permanent torque surplus.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a gravity-powered motor claiming a permanent torque surplus. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation. No configuration of masses in a conservative gravitational field can produce net work over a complete cycle without an external energy source to reset the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims net energy output > input (Claim 3).
- Violates 1st Law of Thermodynamics: system cannot perform net work cyclically using only a conservative force field (gravity).
- Misunderstands torque generation: net torque over a full cycle in a gravitational field is zero for a closed system.
- Claims 'permanent torque surplus' from radial mass shifting, ignoring that work is required to move masses outward against centrifugal force or to reset their position.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily an external electrical motor. The claim of generating energy from gravitational force is misleading, as gravity is a conservative force; any potential energy gained on one side of the loop is lost on the other, requiring net energy input to sustain motion against losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to generate mechanical energy from a gravity-driven chain loop, but gravity is a conservative force. For continuous operation, the electrical motor must supply more energy than is extracted, as all real systems have losses. The claim of generating usable excess energy from this arrangement violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by implying net energy can be extracted from a closed gravitational loop without a net height drop or external gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system's motion requires continuous input to overcome friction, chain inertia, and other losses. The description of 'conserving its potential-kinetic energy levels' ignores dissipation.
- Misapplication of gravitational force: Gravity alone cannot provide net work in a cyclic process; the system describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and ambiguous. The text describes a complex interaction of 'energy particles', 'energy fields', and 'energy amplification' through cascading or stacking processes, but fails to identify a primary, external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient). It implies energy is created or multiplied within the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate or amplify energy through internal cascading interactions of unspecified 'energy particles' and fields, with no clear accounting for an external energy input. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it suggests creating energy from nothing or achieving output greater than all identifiable inputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source accounting
- Claims of energy amplification/cascading without a source violate conservation of energy
- Uses vague, pseudo-scientific terminology (e.g., 'energy particles', 'energy fields') instead of standard physical quantities
- Describes processes that seemingly create a net energy output from internal interactions alone
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Conventional electric grid powers a motor, which mechanically drives the generator shaft originally meant to be turned by wind turbine blades.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electric motor plugged into the grid, mechanically turning an electric generator. This is a net energy loss system due to inefficiencies in both motor and generator. The claim of sustainable generation without fossil fuels is invalid because the primary energy input is the conventional grid, which may itself use fossil fuels, and the system cannot produce more energy than it consumes.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy accounting violation: System uses grid electricity to power a motor to spin a generator. Output electricity cannot exceed input grid electricity minus inevitable losses.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims a 'cycle of electric energy' but describes a net consumer, not a net producer.
- Misapplication of technology: Uses wind turbine nacelle as a generator but removes the actual energy source (wind), replacing it with a motor powered by the grid.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity (Earth's gravitational field) and a 'high specific gravity solid' as a 'gravity source', combined with solid force transmission and liquid pressure transmission to amplify force.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'perpetual motion machine' claims to generate continuous mechanical power using gravity and pressure amplification, but provides no path for energy input to sustain motion. Gravity alone cannot provide net work without a mass falling through a height difference, and any pressure/force amplification must conserve energy (work in = work out minus losses). The described self-unbalancing mechanism would quickly reach equilibrium.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation - claims to output more mechanical work than input energy
- No identifiable external energy gradient to exploit
- Describes a self-unbalancing mechanism that would require energy input to reset
- Uses gravity as an 'energy source' without a height differential to extract net work
- Force/pressure amplification without accounting for work input (force × distance)
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a complex mechanical system claiming to produce continuous rotational output from internal weight-shifting and pressure components, with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical assembly that claims to produce continuous rotational power output without a clear external energy source, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy). The mechanism appears to be an attempt at a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is described.
- The system claims to produce continuous rotational output ('使主轴持续地转动') without an energy input, violating conservation of energy.
- The described mechanism of weights, pulleys, and pressure components suggests an attempt to create a self-sustaining motion, which is impossible without an energy source.
- The abstract claims it can operate without other power sources or with minimal power ('无其他动力或其他动力较小的情况下'), implying over-unity or perpetual motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient water buoyancy and gravity, with claimed continuous conversion between buoyancy work (lifting balls) and gravitational work (descending balls) in a closed cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to produce continuous mechanical work by cycling floating balls between high and low positions, but it ignores the fundamental fact that submerging the balls (to make them sink) requires as much or more work than can be recovered from their gravitational descent, making it a classic buoyancy-based perpetual motion machine that violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: net work output claimed from a closed hydraulic cycle with no external energy input
- Buoyancy force lifting balls requires work to submerge them elsewhere in the cycle - this work equals or exceeds any gravitational work recovered
- System operates against viscous drag and valve control losses with no identified primary energy source
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient sources (solar irradiance, wind kinetic energy) and an onboard 'magnetic motor/generator' claimed to produce electricity from permanent magnets.
AI Physics Analysis
The concept combines valid ambient solar power with two invalid systems: an onboard wind turbine that creates a net drag penalty in flight, and a 'magnetic motor' that is a textbook perpetual motion device. The combined claims violate energy conservation by treating parasitic or impossible systems as net energy gains.
Specific Physics Issues
- Magnetic motor/generator described is a classic perpetual motion claim; it cannot produce net power without an external energy input, as it would violate conservation of energy by extracting work from a static magnetic field.
- Onboard wind turbines ('éolien') would act as drag devices in flight; their extracted power cannot exceed the extra propulsive power required to overcome their drag, resulting in a net loss for propulsion.
- Energy accounting is incomplete, summing power outputs from solar, wind, and magnetic devices as if they are independent net gains, ignoring that the wind and magnetic systems are parasitic loads on the aircraft's primary energy source (batteries).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy from a first battery bank (4) powers a motor (3), which drives a mechanical system that spins an alternator (18) to recharge a second battery bank (19). No external energy input is described after the initial battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It uses a battery to power a motor that drives an alternator to recharge a different battery, with no external energy input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the alternator's output cannot exceed the motor's input minus inevitable losses from friction and electrical inefficiency.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to be self-sustaining (autosustentable) and produce electricity at 0% consumption cost, implying perpetual operation with net energy output.
- Incomplete energy accounting: All electrical output from the alternator must come from the mechanical work of the motor, which itself is powered from the first battery. Losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat in the motor, gearbox, belt
- No ambient energy source identified: The system is described as a closed electromechanical loop with a flywheel (volante de energía), which only stores energy temporarily and does not add net energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The moving mechanism (e.g., DC motor) must supply the 'first moving force' to shift the weight, but the patent does not specify an external energy input for this mechanism. The implied source is the generated electricity itself, creating a loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate electricity by moving a weight along a rotating arm, but it ignores the energy required to move that weight. The moving mechanism (like a DC motor) must consume energy, which would equal or exceed any extra electrical energy generated from the resulting torque, making it a net energy loss system or a perpetual motion machine if feedback is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done by the moving mechanism to reposition the weight is not accounted for in the net energy output.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system cannot generate net electricity greater than the energy input to the moving mechanism.
- Misapplication of torque: Moving a weight along a rotating arm requires work against centrifugal/Coriolis forces; this work input must exceed or equal the extra torque-generated output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to operate without fuel, but describes pressure differences between gas storage devices and atmosphere. No external energy input is specified, suggesting it attempts to extract work from atmospheric pressure alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a pneumatic motor that doesn't use fuel, but provides no legitimate external energy source. It appears to attempt to extract net work from atmospheric pressure alone, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks an energy input to sustain the claimed pressure differences and motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Claims to create useful work from pressure differences without explaining how those pressure gradients are initially established or maintained.
- Implies energy can be extracted from a single pressure reservoir (atmosphere) without a lower-pressure sink, violating the requirement for a pressure gradient to do work.
- Claims reduced energy losses and increased efficiency without a coherent energy conversion cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a closed mechanical system claiming to generate net propulsion from internal moving masses and centrifugal forces, with no external energy input specified beyond an initial impulse to start rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate directional propulsion in any medium (including space) using only internal moving masses and centrifugal forces. This is impossible as internal forces cannot accelerate a system's center of mass, directly violating Newton's laws and conservation of momentum. The claim of functioning in a vacuum without expelling reaction mass is a definitive violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: Claims to generate directional thrust without expelling reaction mass.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No source for continuous acceleration energy.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: A fictitious force internal to a rotating frame cannot do net work on the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial 'dispositivo motriz' (motriz device). The system then attempts to use the electrical output from a first generator to mechanically drive multiple secondary generators, whose output drives tertiary generators, via complex mechanical linkages (crank mechanisms, pulleys, weights, and hydraulic pulleys).
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a cascaded generator system that violates the first law of thermodynamics. The output from one generator cannot provide enough mechanical work to drive multiple subsequent generators after accounting for inevitable losses. The complex mechanical linkages do not create energy; they only transmit and dissipate the initial input from the primary motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes using the output of one generator to drive multiple other generators, implying multiplicative energy gain.
- No perpetual motion mechanism exists: The weights, pulleys, and hydraulic systems are passive force/ motion transmitters, not energy sources. Friction and electrical losses will drain the initial energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims focus on mechanical connections but ignore that every generator has losses (resistive, magnetic, friction). The work required to turn the secondary and tertiary generators must come from, and exceed, the useful el
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the battery (17). The system describes a hydraulic group (pump, motor, valve) powered by the battery, which drives a hydraulic cylinder. This cylinder, via a rack and pinion, is claimed to rotate a large flywheel with counterweights. Alternators engaged with the flywheel generate electricity, some of which is fed back to recharge the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an electromechanical system where a battery-powered hydraulic pump drives a flywheel that generates electricity to recharge the same battery. This constitutes a closed-loop energy system with no external input, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The system cannot have a net energy output as it ignores all inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and hydraulic inefficiency.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System output (alternator electricity) is claimed to recharge the input battery, creating a closed loop with no net external energy input to overcome losses.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The hydraulic actuator is meant to drive the massive flywheel, which then drives alternators. The electrical output from alternators is used to power the hydraulic system. This is a classic self-powered loop.
- No accounting for losses: Friction in gears, hydraulic losses, electrical resistance, and alternator inefficiencies are ignored. The system cannot sustain itself, let alone have net output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 1 and 5 imp
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial electric motor. The system claims to multiply the input force and return electricity to power the motor while providing excess for other uses.
AI Physics Analysis
The described machine is a mechanical system with levers and crankshafts driven by an electric motor. It claims to multiply the input force to generate excess electricity, but provides no mechanism to overcome friction or account for energy losses, making it a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim that violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims output > input via 'force multiplication' without identifying a new external energy source.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies a mechanical system can generate net work greater than input work, ignoring inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and heat.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a feedback loop (generator powers motor) but ignores all dissipative losses, implying perpetual operation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the weight sections, converted via the mechanism. No external input beyond an initial rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a type of overbalanced wheel that uses asymmetrically weighted arms and a guide to attempt to create continuous rotation from gravity alone. This violates the conservation of energy, as gravity is a conservative force; net work cannot be extracted over a cycle without an external energy input to reset the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to 'maintain' rotation but describes a mechanism that extracts work from gravity without restoring the weights to their initial potential energy state.
- Violates energy conservation: The described asymmetric motion (weights rotate only during rise, not during fall) suggests an attempt to create a perpetual torque from a conservative force field (gravity).
- Mechanism is an overbalanced wheel variant, a classic perpetual motion design.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system (centrifugal rotor with blades in oil chambers) that claims to produce rotational output without specifying any external energy input beyond possibly initial rotation. Mentions oil reservoirs and symmetrical configurations but no fuel, electrical input, or environmental gradient is described as the primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'self-rotating engine' with symmetrical centrifugal rotor assemblies in oil-filled chambers but fails to identify any external energy source. The system appears to claim continuous mechanical output from an initial rotation, which violates energy conservation as friction and viscous losses in the oil would dissipate kinetic energy, requiring continuous energy input to maintain motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is specified
- Claims to save resources and have low cost imply net energy output > input
- Mechanical configuration (rotors in oil) cannot generate net work without an external energy source
- Describes symmetrical power units that could imply self-sustaining or over-unity operation
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a rotating machine (centrifugal type) with oil reservoirs and channels, but no primary energy input is specified. The startup device (Claim 6) includes an electric motor and high-pressure oil tank, suggesting initial electrical input, but the claims imply sustained operation from internal fluid dynamics.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a centrifugal rotating machine with complex internal oil channels but fails to identify a sustainable external energy source. The system, if intended to run continuously after startup, would violate the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as rotational energy would be continuously lost to friction and fluid viscosity without replenishment. The design patterns match those of an over-unity or perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear primary energy source identified for sustained operation
- Claims describe complex oil channels and rotating parts but no mechanism to overcome friction and other losses without continuous external energy input
- Implies self-sustaining rotation from centrifugal forces and fluid circulation, which violates conservation of energy as losses are inevitable
- Device structure suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (output energy > input energy over a cycle)
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The abstract and c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of water in an elevated reservoir, with an attempt to recirculate water using a portion of the generated energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claims describe a system where water flows downhill through turbines to generate electricity and is then pumped back up to restart the cycle. The energy needed to pump the water back up must exceed the energy generated, making sustained net power output impossible. This is a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 4-10 describe a closed-loop system where water is pumped back to the reservoir. The energy required to pump the water back against gravity (overcoming friction and losses) must be greater than or equal to the net energy extracted by the turbin
- Claim 8 and 10 suggest using a portion of the generated electricity to power the return pump. This is a classic perpetual motion scheme: the system cannot output more useful energy than the gravitational potential energy lost by the water, and using
- The description is ambiguous about the system's boundaries. If it's a closed loop, it violates energy conservation. If it's an open loop using a natural source (Claim 7), it's just a hydroelectric plant, but the claims conflate the two scenarios.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claims ignore
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct components (
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe mechanical arrangements (pendulum, rolling ball, and liquid container mechanisms) but provide no identifiable external energy input. Mentions 'potential and kinetic energy mutual transformation' and 'natural adjustment of torque', suggesting an attempt to extract net work from internal energy redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity solely through the mutual transformation of potential and kinetic energy within mechanical arrangements (pendulums, rolling balls, liquid containers), with no external energy input described. This describes a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as internal energy conversions cannot produce net useful work output after accounting for inevitable friction and electrical losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input source specified
- Claims of 'mutual transformation' of potential/kinetic energy imply a closed system with inevitable losses
- Mechanisms (pendulums, rolling balls, liquid containers) are classic perpetual motion motifs that cannot produce net energy output
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying continuous generation of electricity without an energy source
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting useful work can be extracted from an equilibrium or internally cycling system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravity acting on counterweights (配重物) that slide down when positioned above the wheel's axle, then travel through curved tracks back to the top position.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic overbalanced wheel attempting perpetual motion. The claimed 24-hour continuous operation using only gravity-driven counterweights violates energy conservation, as resetting weights to their high position requires at least as much energy as they produce when falling. The system cannot output net work without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous 24-hour operation with no external energy input.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Attempts to create net work from gravity alone in a closed cycle.
- No consideration of energy losses: Friction, air resistance, and impact losses are ignored.
- Misunderstanding of gravitational potential: System cannot reset weights to higher potential without external work.
- Violates first and second laws of thermodynamics: Claims energy output greater than any identifiable input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
No external energy source identified. The device claims to generate electricity without any fuel, external mechanical input, or environmental gradient. It describes a closed-loop system where a generator powers a gas pump that maintains pressure to drive the generator.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a classic over-unity device that violates the conservation of energy. It proposes a generator that powers its own air compressor to create pressure to spin itself, claiming a net external power output. This is physically impossible due to inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system claims a net power output with no identified energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It describes a perpetual cycle where generated electricity is used to maintain the conditions (gas pressure) for its own operation, with inevitable losses unaccounted for.
- The system is a classic 'self-powered' perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The generator's output is partially used to run the gas pump, but the system claims to have excess power for external use while sustaining itself indefinitely.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a closed-loop system where a generator powers an electromagnet that drives a swing on a carousel, which in turn drives the generator. The only explicit input is an initial starting impulse ('bestimmbaren Energiegröße angestoßen').
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a clear perpetual motion machine claim. It describes a closed loop where a generator powers its own driver, with the added impossible claim that the system's magnetic field not only generates electricity but also provides net torque to accelerate the entire carousel, violating both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion ('rotiert dieser drehmomenterzeugende Energiekreislauf unaufhörlich')
- Violates energy conservation: Output work (accelerating carousel, generator electricity) exceeds the initial input energy in a closed loop
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: No net work can be extracted from an isothermal system at equilibrium; friction losses are claimed to be compensable without an external energy source
- Misunderstanding of generator physics: The magnetic field in a generator provides a reaction torque (load); it cannot simultaneously generate electricity and provide net motive torque to accelerate the carousel without an external energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'unaufhörli
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests using a pump to return water to an upper reservoir in a hydroelectric plant to maintain its operational level, implying a closed loop where outflow water is pumped back upstream.
AI Physics Analysis
The proposed system describes a hydroelectric plant where water is pumped back upstream to maintain the reservoir level, creating a closed loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the pumping energy required would be greater than the electrical energy generated from the subsequent water flow, resulting in a net energy loss, not a sustainable cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The energy required to pump water back to the upper reservoir equals or exceeds the electrical energy generated by letting it fall.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a 'renewable cycle' but ignores the primary energy input needed to run the pump.
- Creates a perpetual motion scheme: Attempts to use generated electricity to pump water back, sustaining the system without an external net energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes complex mechanical arrangements with springs, levers, and fluid flow, but no identifiable external energy input. Implies perpetual motion through 'spontaneous perpetual flow' and 'large energy support source' without specification.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanically complex device claiming 'spontaneous perpetual flow' of a heavy fluid, but identifies no external energy source. The incoherent text uses physics terms incorrectly to obscure a clear violation of energy conservation, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source
- Claims 'spontaneous perpetual flow' which violates conservation of energy
- Describes complex mechanical feedback loops implying energy multiplication
- Text is incoherent and uses physics terms incorrectly (obfuscation)
- Implies extraction of net work from internal cyclic motions without input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied perpetual motion from fluid flow and mass oscillation without external energy input. Claims suggest spontaneous, continuous fluid circulation and mass oscillation driven by rebound forces and fluid inertia.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical system claiming to produce continuous, non-stop fluid flow and oscillation without any external energy input. The text uses obfuscated technical language to describe what appears to be a perpetual motion machine that violates conservation of energy by suggesting spontaneous, sustained motion from internal rebounds and fluid inertia alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.)
- Claims of spontaneous, non-stop fluid flow and oscillation violate conservation of energy
- Describes complex mechanical interactions (rebounds, fluid impacts, oscillations) but omits energy dissipation (friction, viscosity, drag)
- Implies energy amplification through rebound forces and fluid inertia without accounting for losses
- Uses vague terms like '极重惯性质量液体' (extremely heavy inertial mass liquid) without clear physical meaning
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining motion from 'super-heavy inertial mass liquid' and complex mechanical arrangements without identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system claiming to achieve perpetual, self-sustaining fluid motion and mechanical oscillation without any identifiable external energy input. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims non-resting motion without an energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction, viscosity, and other dissipative forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of perpetual, non-resting motion violate conservation of energy
- Describes complex mechanical interactions (springs, levers, pendulums) but no mechanism to overcome inevitable energy dissipation
- Language suggests energy amplification ('reverse impact force' generating 'very large inertial mass flow') without thermodynamic justification
- Appears to claim extraction of net work from internal reactive forces in a closed system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial stored energy in compressed air reservoir and vacuum reservoir (created by prior work input). No external or ambient energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a pneumatic engine powered by a pre-charged pressure-vacuum gradient. Once that stored energy is depleted, no work can be extracted. The claim that it can power itself using 1-20% of its output to run perpetually violates the First Law of Thermodynamics, as it creates energy from nothing after the initial stored energy is gone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate electricity while consuming only 1-20% of its own output, implying perpetual operation or net energy creation.
- System is described as closed with no fuel input, so the only usable energy is the initial pressure/vacuum gradient, which will be depleted.
- No mechanism is described for restoring the pressure/vacuum gradient; the piston simply moves air from the high-pressure to the low-pressure side until equilibrium is reached.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests energy is generated from the 'rotation of the Earth' and 'Earth's magnetic field' (implied by terms like 원심력, 무게만). This is an ambient energy source, but the description lacks a mechanism for creating a usable gradient or for performing work without an equal or greater input to harvest it.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes generating power from the Earth's rotation and magnetic field, which is thermodynamically equivalent to extracting work from a single thermal reservoir or from an equilibrium system, violating the second law. The claims are vague and obfuscate the fundamental impossibility of generating net power this way without an external energy gradient or input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output from Earth's rotation/magnetism without specifying the necessary input work to create a non-equilibrium condition or to couple to that energy source.
- Violates thermodynamic limits: Implies extracting net useful work from a system (Earth) in equilibrium with its surroundings without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Vague mechanism: No clear, physically valid energy conversion process (e.g., a heat engine, dynamo) is described that respects conservation laws.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest perpetual motion through complex arrangements of elastic components, levers, and pendulums, with implied self-sustaining oscillation from 'inertial force' and 'rebound' without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical assembly of levers, pendulums, and elastic sheets claiming to achieve self-sustaining, perpetual motion in the sky. It provides no credible external energy source and its described operation violates the conservation of energy by implying energy can be created or endlessly recycled from internal rebounds and 'inertial forces'.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (electrical, chemical, potential, etc.).
- Describes a complex mechanical system claiming 'permanent non-resting motion' and 'self-excitation', which violates conservation of energy.
- Uses obfuscated terminology to describe what appears to be a system extracting net work from internal rebounds and elastic deformations without energy input.
- Claims 'amplification' of rebound paths and 'super high position' energy without explaining the source of that potential energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the system's own wheel weights, moving on a track, provide pressure to turn turbines. No external energy gradient (e.g., fuel, elevated water, wind) is identified as the primary input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system that claims to generate huge amounts of electricity while using only a tiny fraction to sustain itself. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. No credible external energy source is identified to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to use only 2% of generated electricity to run itself, implying a net energy output with no clear external energy input.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The system appears to be a closed mechanical loop. Friction and electrical losses would dissipate energy, requiring continuous external work to maintain motion.
- Perpetual motion claim: Described as 'always active' and producing 'eternal electricity' with minimal self-consumption, which is thermodynamically impossible.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: 'Output > control input' p
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Attempts to ext
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct terms (pressure, tur
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text describes complex mechanical arrangements (giant plates, elastic steel sheets, swinging masses, vibration amplification) but provides no identifiable external energy input. Implied energy appears to come from internal mechanical oscillations and 'inertial mass' without an external driver.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system claiming to achieve sustained aerial motion through amplified rebounds and oscillations, but identifies no external energy source. The claims of massive amplification and perpetual cyclic motion directly violate energy conservation, as the system cannot output more work than its input energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of 'amplification by tens of thousands of times' for rebound paths violate energy conservation
- Describes perpetual oscillatory motion without energy input
- Uses physics terminology ('inertia', 'elastic', 'vibration') in a confusing, non-operational way
- Implies extraction of net work from internal oscillations in a closed system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to be a 'gravity-driven motor' that is a 'continuous runner' (Dauerläufer), implying perpetual or self-sustaining operation from gravitational potential energy alone, without an external gradient to replenish it.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity continuously using only gravity-driven masses and gears, with no external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and other dissipative forces. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed mechanical system cannot produce net useful work from gravity alone without an external, replenished height differential.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Claims continuous energy output ('Dauerläufer') without identifying an external low-entropy energy source to compensate for entropy increase from losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes only mechanical components and control systems, but no input energy source to overcome friction and generate net electrical output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy yie
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe a self-sustaining fluid motion system using gravitational and inertial mass effects, elastic rebound, and oscillation, with implied energy extraction from the fluid's own motion and gravity without an identified external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system claiming to generate sustained, amplified fluid motion and mechanical oscillation using only internal rebounds and gravity, with no clear external energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim that violates energy conservation. The description is intentionally obfuscated with technical-sounding but physically incoherent terminology.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (violates 1st Law of Thermodynamics).
- Describes 'self-excited reverse flow' and 'permanent circulatory motion' implying perpetual motion.
- Claims of 'amplifying rebound loop path by tens of thousands of times' suggest energy multiplication without source.
- Uses obscure, jargon-heavy descriptions that obfuscate the lack of a coherent energy conversion process.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text describes a complex mechanical system with fluids, springs, masses, and impacts, suggesting it might claim to extract energy from fluid motion and inertial effects without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to produce spontaneous, continuous, and self-sustaining fluid flow and mechanical oscillation. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by not identifying an external energy source to overcome losses, and the second law by implying perpetual, non-dissipative motion. The language is deliberately obfuscated.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'spontaneous' and 'continuous' flow reversal and motion without an identified external energy source.
- Describes energy generation from fluid impact and inertial forces in a closed-loop system, implying perpetual motion.
- Uses obfuscated, repetitive language that makes the actual energy conversion process impossible to analyze clearly.
- No mention of energy input to overcome friction, viscosity, or other dissipative losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: No accounting for
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The description is a dens
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest perpetual motion from fluid inertia and elastic rebound without identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system claiming to generate perpetual, self-sustaining fluid motion and mechanical oscillation without any external energy input, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The description is obscured by incoherent technical jargon and makes physically impossible claims about energy amplification and indefinite motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of 'permanent non-resting motion' and 'self-excited' fluid flow violate conservation of energy
- Describes complex mechanical interactions but omits accounting for energy dissipation (friction, drag, inelastic collisions)
- Uses physically incoherent terms like 'super-heavy inertial mass fluid' and 'reverse flow' without thermodynamic justification
- Implies energy amplification ('amplified about ten thousand times') without source
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims involve 'magnetic bodies' (자성체) generating electrical energy from their own magnetic fields, with 'magnetic energy' being amplified or transferred between components without an identifiable external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where 'magnetic bodies' generate electrical energy, which is then circulated to power other magnetic bodies and a control unit, implying a perpetual energy amplification loop with no external energy source. This directly violates the first law (energy conservation) and the second law of thermodynamics, as it claims to extract net work from static magnetic fields without an energy gradient or input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes systems where magnetic bodies generate electrical energy, which is then used to power other magnetic bodies, creating a loop with no primary energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of useful work (electricity) from an equilibrium magnetic state without an entropy sink or temperature gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'Magnetic energy' is treated as a source that can be tapped indefinitely without depletion, ignoring that maintaining a magnetic field in a permanent magnet requires no energy input, and extracting energy from it would w
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses terms like 'magnetic body', 'magnetic energy', and 'control unit' in a vague, non-standard way that does not correspond to a known, valid energy conversion process (e.g., electromagnetic induction).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest perpetual motion through 'inertial mass fluid self-excitation' and 'reverse flow' without identifiable external energy input. Mentions 'amplification of reaction force by tens of thousands of times' which implies energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to generate perpetual, amplified fluid flow through self-excitation and cyclic deformation without any identifiable external energy input. The claims of force amplification and permanent motion directly violate energy conservation laws, using obscure terminology to obscure the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of energy amplification ('amplification of reaction force by tens of thousands of times') violate conservation of energy
- Describes 'permanent non-stop flow' without energy dissipation mechanism
- Uses undefined physics concepts ('super-heavy inertial mass fluid', 'self-excitation')
- Implies perpetual motion through cyclic deformation and rebound
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a process where a 'control input' generates a 'vibration' that is then amplified to produce a larger output, suggesting energy is being created or multiplied from within the system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract describes a vibration control system where a small input generates a larger output through resonant amplification, but fails to identify the external energy source required to sustain that amplification. This is a classic case of incomplete energy accounting, creating the illusion of over-unity performance (output > input) which violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies energy multiplication or amplification without an identified external energy source
- No accounting for the energy required to sustain the amplified vibrations
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting output can exceed total input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the work applied to the primary pushing head (8). The claim suggests internal mechanical reactions within the stacked pieces generate the additional output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce more total work output than work input by using stacked pieces to redirect forces. This is a classic violation of energy conservation; a passive mechanical system cannot create energy, it can only transmit or transform it, always with losses. The claim confuses force with work/energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics)
- Claims output work from multiple heads exceeds input work without identifying an external energy source
- Describes a mechanism that would, if frictionless, simply transform and redirect force, not create energy
- Implies force multiplication equates to work/energy multiplication, which is incorrect for a passive mechanical system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The abstract describes a 'condensation energy converter' where condensation energy somehow generates additional energy, implying energy extraction from ambient humidity without an identifiable primary input gradient or work input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device where condensation somehow generates excess energy, violating conservation laws. Condensation releases latent heat, but harnessing this for net work requires a temperature gradient and a cycle, not a one-way process. The claim effectively suggests a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law (energy conservation): Claims energy output greater than identifiable controlled input.
- Violates Second Law: Implies extracting useful work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient humidity) without a temperature or chemical potential gradient to drive condensation.
- No identifiable entropy sink or work input for the described condensation/energy conversion cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'Condensation energy' is not a net energy source; latent heat release during condensation requires prior vaporization work and a sink for the released heat.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining fluid flow and oscillation from 'super-heavy inertial mass liquid' without any identifiable external energy input. Mentions 'spontaneous rapid flow' and 'reverse flow' implying perpetual motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical/fluidic system claiming to generate spontaneous, sustained rapid and reverse fluid flow and oscillations using 'super-heavy inertial mass liquid' without any external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to create continuous motion from an internal, non-powered mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of spontaneous, sustained fluid flow and oscillation violate conservation of energy
- Describes 'amplification of rebound path by ~10,000 times' with no energy input
- Language suggests extracting net work from internal oscillations and fluid inertia without losses
- Implies a closed system that can sustain motion indefinitely
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining fluid flow and mechanical oscillation without identifiable external energy input. Mentions 'super-heavy inertial mass liquid' and 'spontaneous high-speed flow' but provides no thermodynamic source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical-fluid system claiming spontaneous, self-sustaining, and amplified motion without any external energy input, directly violating energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics. The description is physically incoherent, using invented terminology to obscure the fact that it proposes a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims perpetual, amplified oscillations and spontaneous fluid flow without energy input
- Violates second law of thermodynamics: claims 'self-excited' flow and 'inevitable rebound' without entropy increase or degradation of gradients
- Mechanically incoherent: describes complex assemblies of levers, masses, and fluids with claims of 'amplification by tens of thousands of times' and 'extremely long path' motion without friction losses
- Language is physically nonsensical: terms like 'super-heavy inertial mass liquid', 'super-light super-high lever', and 'inevitable rebound after curved deformation' are not standard physics and describe impossible behaviors
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: No identifiable en
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses modified physics ter
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining fluid flow and perpetual motion from elastic rebound and gravity imbalances without identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to achieve perpetual self-excited fluid flow and motion through elastic rebound and gravity imbalances, which violates both energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics. The description uses obfuscated technical language to conceal the absence of any identifiable external energy source required to sustain the claimed motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - claims perpetual fluid flow and motion without energy source
- Violates second law of thermodynamics - claims spontaneous, sustained flow from equilibrium
- Uses physically incoherent terminology (e.g., 'super-heavy super-light', 'self-excited perpetual flow')
- Proposes extracting net work from gravity and elastic rebound cycles without energy input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining cyclic motion from unbalanced masses and elastic rebounds without any identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve sustained aerial rocking/swaying motion through complex arrangements of masses, elastic elements, and sliding paths, but provides no legitimate energy source and describes amplification factors that violate conservation of energy. The description uses obfuscated technical language to mask what is essentially a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy source for sustained motion
- Claims of 'amplifying reaction force loop path by ~10,000 times' violates energy conservation
- Describes perpetual unbalanced rocking/swaying motion without energy dissipation mechanism
- Uses vague terms like 'super-heavy super-light' and 'extremely long path sliding' without proper physics definitions
- Implies continuous motion from elastic rebounds without accounting for damping losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining oscillation from elastic rebound and gravity without identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve self-sustaining or amplified oscillatory motion using elastic rebound and gravity without any clear external energy input, violating energy conservation. The description is intentionally obscure but implies energy multiplication through mechanical interactions, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external power source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy source for claimed 'self-sustaining' oscillation
- Implies energy amplification (10,000x rebound path) violating conservation
- Describes complex mechanical interactions but no accounting for energy dissipation (friction, air resistance, hysteresis)
- Claims perpetual or amplified motion from internal elastic forces alone
- Uses obfuscated terminology making energy flow impossible to trace
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes extracting energy from ambient air (humidity/water vapor) and using it to generate electricity that exceeds the control input, implying ambient air is the sole source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate more electrical output than its control input by extracting energy from ambient air humidity. This violates the First Law by not properly accounting for all energy inputs and the Second Law by implying net work can be extracted from a system in equilibrium without a usable gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims output energy > control input energy without accounting for ALL energy inputs from the environment.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Proposes extracting useful work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient air) at equilibrium, which is impossible. No temperature or chemical potential gradient is identified as the driving force.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Fails to specify the source of the potential (gradient) required to drive the energy conversion from humidity.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex mechanical structures (springs, levers, fluid flows) with claims of self-sustaining motion and amplification, but no identifiable external energy input is specified. Implied energy source appears to be internal mechanical potential energy and gravity, with claims of perpetual or amplified cyclic motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex assembly of levers, springs, and fluid channels claiming to produce self-sustaining, amplified oscillatory motion and fluid flow. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it provides no identifiable external energy source to overcome inevitable dissipative losses from friction, viscosity, and deformation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims of 'self-excited flow', 'permanent self-excited circulation', and 'amplification of reaction path by about ten thousand times' suggest energy output exceeding any clear input.
- Violates second law of thermodynamics: Describes a system that would perpetually oscillate and amplify motion without an external energy source to overcome friction and damping.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mention of energy input required to initiate or sustain the described complex oscillations and fluid flows against dissipative losses.
- Conceptually obfuscated: The description is a dense, repetitive chain of technical-sounding but physically vague terms describing interconnected oscillating components.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest spontaneous fluid flow and perpetual oscillatory motion driven by gravitational imbalances and elastic rebound without any identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system claiming to generate perpetual, self-sustaining fluid flow and mechanical oscillation using gravitational imbalances and elastic rebound without any external energy source, directly violating both conservation of energy and the second law of thermodynamics. The description is filled with physically ambiguous terms and lacks any credible energy accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - claims perpetual, self-sustaining fluid flow and oscillation without energy input
- Violates second law of thermodynamics - claims to extract net work from a gravitational potential without a compensating entropy increase
- Describes a closed-loop system with 'spontaneous' acceleration and 'permanent self-circulation' which is thermodynamically impossible
- Uses obfuscating terminology ('super-heavy inertial mass fluid', 'super-light super-high lever') that obscures the actual energy transfer mechanisms
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to change the 'unchangeable pattern' of energy conservation law. Mentions gravity (metal weights), inertia, and a small assist motor, but describes perpetual motion generation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly states it aims to change the law of energy conservation, which is a fundamental violation of physics. The described assembly of gears, weights, a small motor, and a generator lacks a clear, sustainable external energy source to account for claimed perpetual electricity generation, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims to change the law of energy conservation
- Describes a system with weights, gears, and a small motor that purportedly generates perpetual electricity
- No identifiable external energy gradient (like fuel, sustained wind, or solar) to account for continuous net energy output
- Uses correct physics terms (inertia, gravity) in context suggesting over-unity energy generation
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve extracting energy from ambient humidity gradients and converting it to electricity, but the described mechanism suggests energy output exceeds all identifiable inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly uses ambient humidity to generate electricity, with claims suggesting the output energy can exceed the control input energy. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) unless all energy inputs—including the latent heat and chemical potential energy from the humidity gradient—are fully and properly accounted for. The vague, cascading mechanism and implication of energy amplification are classic hallmarks of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the humidity gradient energy source
- Implied energy multiplication or cascading effect without a clear thermodynamic driver
- Vague description of the conversion process that could imply net work extraction from an isothermal system
- Claims of amplifying output energy relative to control input suggest violation of energy conservation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve a 'control input' and an 'output energy', suggesting an attempt to extract net work from ambient energy (environmental thermal energy) without a sufficient temperature gradient or identifiable external power source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism where a small control input yields a larger energy output, allegedly by interacting with ambient environmental energy. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, as it claims to produce net work from a uniform temperature environment, violating the Kelvin-Planck statement of the second law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics by implying energy extraction from a single thermal reservoir (environment) to perform work.
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'output > control input' pattern indicates ignored ambient energy inputs or mischaracterized outputs.
- Claims of 'energy amplification' or 'energy multiplication' are thermodynamically impossible for a closed system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text describes complex mechanical structures with springs, levers, and oscillating masses, but provides no identifiable external energy input. Claims suggest self-sustaining or amplified motion from internal elastic deformations.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve sustained or amplified oscillatory motion in the air using complex spring-lever-mass interactions without any clear external energy input. This directly violates energy conservation, as internal elastic deformations cannot produce net work without energy dissipation. The description is intentionally obscure, using technical-sounding but meaningless phrases to obscure the fundamental physics violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of 'amplified rebound' and 'long-distance cyclic oscillatory motion' without energy input violate conservation of energy
- Implies perpetual or self-amplifying motion from internal spring/lever interactions
- Extremely vague and convoluted description prevents proper energy accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests energy is generated from internal mechanical oscillations, bending, and elastic rebound of components without any identifiable external energy input. Claims of 'permanent cyclic oscillatory motion' imply perpetual motion.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to generate permanent oscillatory motion and output kinetic energy solely through internal bending and elastic rebound of components, with no identifiable external energy input. This constitutes a clear violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes a self-sustaining system with energy output exceeding any explained input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of 'permanent cyclic oscillatory motion' violate conservation of energy
- Describes energy output from internal bending/rebound without energy input
- Uses vague, obfuscating terminology that makes physical analysis impossible
- Implies energy multiplication through 'amplification of rebound path'
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining rotation driven by imbalance, elastic rebound, and momentum transfer without identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve self-sustaining rotational motion through complex arrangements of masses, levers, and elastic rebounds without any identifiable external energy source. It violates energy conservation by claiming amplification of rebound paths and perpetual motion from imbalance alone, using physically vague terminology to obscure the violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy source for claimed perpetual or amplified motion
- Claims of 'amplifying rebound path by ~10,000 times' violate energy conservation
- Describes self-sustaining rotation from imbalance without energy input
- Implies energy multiplication through cascading elastic rebounds
- Uses vague terms like 'super-heavy', 'super-light', 'super-high inertia' without clear physical definitions
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert water kinetic energy (flow) into rotational motion and then electricity, but describes a closed internal fluid system with no clear external energy gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve continuous, stable rotation and generate electricity by using an internal 'water power' mechanism with Z-shaped fluid channels, but provides no legitimate external energy source. This describes a closed system attempting to produce net work from internal fluid motion, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks an energy input to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input mechanism described.
- Claims 'high conversion rate' and 'zero emissions' without specifying input power.
- Describes a self-contained rotating system with internal fluid channels (Z-shaped), implying perpetual motion from internal fluid shifts.
- Appears to be a closed system claiming to produce net work (electricity) from its own internal configuration.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert gravitational potential energy (Earth's gravity) and magnetic field energy into continuous rotational motion without an identifiable external energy input to sustain the conversion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an autonomous motor claiming to produce continuous enhanced torque by converting Earth's gravity and magnetic field. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it proposes to extract net useful work from ambient potential fields without an external energy source to compensate for the extracted energy, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input to replenish gravitational/magnetic potential energy extracted
- Implies continuous extraction of work from Earth's gravity and magnetic field without an external gradient or input to restore the potential
- Mechanism for 'enhanced torque' suggests output energy exceeds required control input, violating energy conservation
- Lacks description of how magnetic and gravitational potentials are restored after energy extraction
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system describes a closed water loop (tank → pump → water wheel/turbine → back to tank) powered by electricity from batteries, which are charged by generators driven by the same water wheel. No external energy input (like solar, wind, or an elevated water source) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vehicle propulsion system using a closed-loop water cycle to generate electricity. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because the pump driving the cycle consumes more energy than can be recovered by the water turbine and generators, due to inevitable losses. No external energy source is identified to compensate for these losses, making it a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Attempts to create a self-sustaining loop where a pump powers a turbine that powers generators to recharge the batteries that run the pump. Total system losses (friction, electrical resistance, pump/ turbine/generator
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: No external work or energy gradient is maintained. The described closed hydraulic cycle cannot produce net work; it is a dissipative system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims independent operation from fossil fuels but ignores the initial battery charge as the sole energy source, which will be depleted by system losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'own genera
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions seawater, solar thermal collection, hydrogen peroxide decomposition, and electrolysis, but no coherent primary energy input accounting. Appears to attempt energy extraction from seawater concentration gradients while using solar energy ambiguously.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent description is a word salad of physics terms arranged incoherently, making energy accounting impossible. It appears to describe a system attempting to extract energy from seawater through undefined concentration gradients while using solar thermal energy ambiguously, violating clear energy conservation principles through obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Massive obfuscation of energy flows
- No quantitative energy balance
- Implies energy extraction from seawater without clear gradient source
- Uses correct physics terms (electrolysis, decomposition, compression) in nonsensical combinations
- Claims 'extremely high efficiency' without thermodynamic limit reference
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to propose a generator driven by an electric motor, which itself is powered by the 'central power supply plant' that supposedly causes no environmental damage. No primary energy source (fuel, renewable input, etc.) is specified for this central plant.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a generator driven by an electric motor, forming a closed electrical-mechanical loop with no specified external energy source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the generator's output must be less than the motor's input due to inevitable losses. The system cannot produce net power.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The described system is a motor driving a generator, which is fundamentally a lossy energy conversion loop. The output cannot exceed the input to the motor minus conversion losses.
- No identifiable net energy input: The 'central power supply' is described as having no environmental impact but its energy source is not defined, suggesting a closed loop.
- Obscured perpetual motion: The claim of switching in additional 'modules' to increase power without changing speed or input suggests energy creation from within the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'power gene
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct engineering
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining fluid flow driven by unbalanced mass distributions and elastic rebounds without identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical system claiming to generate sustained high-speed fluid flow without any identifiable external energy input, directly violating energy conservation. The description uses obscure technical language to obscure the fundamental impossibility of creating perpetual motion through internal mass distributions and elastic rebounds alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims of 'self-initiated high-speed flow' and 'long-term cyclic operation' without energy input violate conservation of energy
- Mechanisms described (elastic rebounds, unbalanced masses) would dissipate energy, not create net work
- Vague references to 'super-heavy' and 'super-light' masses suggest perpetual motion from internal configuration alone
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use water weight to compress air, then uses compressed air to lift water in a cycle, with electrical valves controlling timing. No external energy input is specified beyond potential initial water height/pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed hydraulic-pneumatic cycle that uses water weight to compress air and then uses that compressed air to lift water again, controlled by timed valves. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) as it claims to produce upward motion/work with no net energy input, and the second law as it has no external gradient or entropy sink to drive the cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce 'upward motion' (work) from a closed hydraulic/pneumatic cycle with no net external energy input.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cycle where water falling compresses air, which then lifts water back up, with valves controlling flow. This cannot yield net work output as losses (friction, viscous dissipation, heat) are inevitable and unacc
- Missing entropy sink: The system operates as a closed cycle attempting to extract work from an equilibrium state (water column at uniform height/temperature). No temperature gradient or external fuel is described to drive the cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description ig
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, with no external energy input described. The system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly intended to generate perpetual motion from gravitational potential energy changes within the system.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to be 'autonomous' and driven by gravity, but gravity is a conservative force; the net work done by gravity over any closed cycle is zero. The described mechanism cannot generate usable net work without an external energy source to repeatedly lift mass, thus violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate usable motive force and perpetuate its own motion without an external energy source.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: No net work can be extracted from a system in a conservative gravitational field over a closed cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a mechanism where one falling chain drives another upward, ignoring the work needed to reset the system (lift mass against gravity).
- Implies a perpetual gradient: Suggests a continuous, non-equilibrium state can be maintained without an external driver.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests mechanical input force is somehow decomposed to create an additional, independent output force (0.207F) that does work, implying energy multiplication from a single input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanical system where a single input force is decomposed, and through geometric arrangement, purportedly generates an additional, independent output force. This is a classic violation of Newton's laws and energy conservation, as it claims to get more useful work out than the work put in, with no hidden energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction pairs).
- Violates conservation of energy (claims output work > input work).
- Misapplies vector decomposition to suggest forces can be 'created'.
- Describes a mechanism where a single input force is 'received' in two different directions, with the sum of these received forces being greater than the input force, which is impossible for a passive mechanical system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims an external driving force (P1) but asserts the output power (P2) exceeds the sum of input power and all losses (P1 + P0). Implies energy is generated internally from the rotational inertia ('惯性动能') of a flywheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device explicitly claims its output power and work exceed the total input power and work, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). It incorrectly treats rotational inertia as an energy source rather than a storage mechanism, proposing a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims P2 > P1 + P0 and W2 > W1, a direct violation of the conservation of energy.
- Claims angular velocity and kinetic energy continuously increase under a constant or periodic external torque, ignoring that a net torque is required for angular acceleration and that energy input must equal the increase in rotational KE plus losses.
- Misapplies the concept of rotational inertia; inertia stores energy but cannot create a net energy gain. Extracting more work than is input requires energy from another source, which is not identified.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use atmospheric pressure and precise mechanical control to 'recycle and amplify' energy from water pumping operations, implying energy output exceeds electrical input to the water pump.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to amplify energy through recycling in a closed hydraulic system, which violates conservation of energy. Atmospheric pressure cannot provide net work in equilibrium, and the described mechanical system would have inevitable losses, making energy amplification impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming 'energy amplification' and 'recycling' that would produce net energy gain
- No identified external energy source (atmospheric pressure is an equilibrium state, not an energy source)
- System appears to be a closed hydraulic loop with pumps and turbines - such systems cannot have net efficiency >100% due to friction and losses
- Claims 'reduce pump energy consumption while大大提高 pumping efficiency' suggests over-unity operation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from 12V batteries, then claimed to be sustained by a closed-loop system of compressed nitrogen and liquid, with a claimed chemical reaction between nitrogen and liquid that multiplies pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It attempts to generate electricity from a closed-loop fluid system, ignoring the fundamental thermodynamic requirement that the work needed to re-compress the gas and liquid to restart the cycle will always exceed the work extracted from their expansion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims a closed-loop system where pressure is maintained and even increased ('la pression demeure', 'multipliant la pression') without continuous external energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The system's internal energy (compressed gas/liquid) is used to do work (spin turbine/generator), and the exhaust is collected, separated, and re-compresse
- Implausible Energy Multiplication: Claims a nitrogen-liquid chemical reaction creates pressure 'faster and higher than steam' without identifying a fuel or exothermic reaction to add energy.
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: The only identified *net* input is the initial 12V battery, but the claim is for continuous electricity generation. The energy to re-compress the nitrogen and pump the liquid back to the high-pressure reservoir is ignore
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims 'non-consuming energy source' (不消耗能源) and 'green pollution-free power generation system' suggest water circulation without external energy input, but system contains pumps, valves, and generators that require energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This system claims to generate electricity without consuming energy, describing a complex hydraulic arrangement with pumps, turbines, and water circulation. However, it violates energy conservation by not accounting for the substantial energy needed to operate high-pressure water pumps and overcome system losses, effectively describing a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation - claims continuous electricity generation without identifiable external energy source
- No thermodynamic gradient identified to drive perpetual water flow
- System contains energy-consuming components (high-pressure water pumps, electric motors) without accounting for their power input
- Implies perpetual motion through closed water cycle with net energy output
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores energy req
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct hydraulic te
Claimed Energy Source
Initial battery input only; claims energy amplification through unspecified 'compressed gas' feedback loop without external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This system claims to achieve perpetual motion and energy amplification by feeding generator output back through a motor with an unspecified 'compressed gas' amplification mechanism. It violates both energy conservation (output > input) and the second law of thermodynamics (perpetual motion), representing a classic overunity claim with no legitimate external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims net energy output > battery input without external source
- Violates second law: claims perpetual motion and energy amplification in closed loop
- No thermodynamic gradient or entropy sink identified
- Vague mechanism: 'turbine/wheel' supposedly amplifies kinetic energy using compressed gas from unspecified source
A - Incomplete energy accounting (ignores losses, claims out
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms (perpetual motio
C - Technical obfuscation (vague quantitative claims, misuse
Claimed Energy Source
Initial external energy input to lift impulse generators (hammers), then claimed internal recycling of kinetic energy from the rotor to re-lift the hammers, plus gravitational potential energy from the fall.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use falling hammers to impulsively drive a rotor and then use the rotor's kinetic energy to reset the hammers, aiming for sustained or escalated motion. This violates the conservation of energy, as the impact and reset cycles are lossy. The system cannot output more work than the initial external input provides.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming the system can use its own 'hochgeschaukelte' (escalated/pumped-up) kinetic energy to re-lift the impulse generators, creating a positive feedback loop.
- No accounting for energy losses from impact, friction, and air resistance. The process of lifting a mass using rotational kinetic energy is inherently lossy, making sustained or escalated operation impossible without continuous external input.
- Misapplies impulse/momentum transfer. While a hammer strike can transfer momentum, the energy required to reset the hammer (lift it) is always greater than the additional rotational energy gained from the strike due to inelastic collisions and losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'external +
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical energy input to electric motors that move components, with claimed 'excess kinetic energy' generation from gravitational force and geometry.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate 'excess kinetic energy' through asymmetric gravitational torques during an 'active' and 'passive' phase, but gravity is a conservative force—any work done by gravity during one part of the cycle must be returned when components return to their original positions, resulting in zero net energy gain over a complete cycle. The electrical input must therefore supply all net energy outputs and losses, making the claimed excess energy impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed 'excess kinetic energy' violates energy conservation
- No mechanism for gravity to add net energy over a cycle
- System appears to be a complex mechanism attempting to create a net work output greater than electrical input via gravitational torque variations
- Missing entropy/energy dissipation accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is not specified. The described mechanism appears to use magnetic attraction/repulsion and spring energy storage to inject energy into the pendulum, implying a closed system with no external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'anti-damping' mechanism that transfers energy between magnets and a spring within the pendulum system. Without an external energy source, this internal energy transfer cannot perpetually overcome damping losses, violating energy conservation. The claim of 'keeping a pendulum oscillation period constant' implies sustained amplitude without an input, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- System lacks an identified external energy source to compensate for damping losses.
- Describes a mechanism where magnetic attraction stores energy in a spring, which is then released to repel the pendulum via a third magnet. This is an energy transfer within the system, not a net input.
- Implies perpetual or undamped oscillation without accounting for energy dissipated by friction, air resistance, and magnetic hysteresis.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text references a 'weak energy' input, gravity, and manual starting, but claims the device creates perpetually superior energy from its own operation, implying energy generation from nothing.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims to create and multiply energy in a perpetual motion device, which directly violates the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics. The misuse of E=MC² and vague mechanical descriptions do not overcome this fundamental physical impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of perpetual motion and energy creation
- Misapplication of E=MC² (equating C² to V² for velocity)
- No identifiable external energy source to account for claimed continuous output
- Violation of First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Violation of Second Law of Thermodynamics (no entropy sink, claims perpetual motion from equilibrium)
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/contradictory. The device claims to be 'no energy source self-generating' (无能源源自发) while describing an air compressor (8) that presumably requires electrical input to compress air into a storage tank. The described startup sequence suggests compressed air drives a turbine (2) which turns a blade assembly (4) that drives a generator (3). No primary external energy source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate electricity with no external energy source ('no water, no wind, no sunlight'), which directly violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. The described mechanism relies on an air compressor to start the process, but the energy input to that compressor is ignored, creating an illusion of energy creation from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). Claims 'no water, no wind, no sunlight' can make the generator rotate automatically.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics. Describes a system that purports to start and sustain itself with no net energy input and no connection to an external energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting. The air compressor (8) is a critical component requiring significant energy input to compress air, which is not accounted for in the 'no energy source' claim.
- Perpetual motion claim. The title and abstract explicitly describe a 'no energy source self-generating' device, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is not identified. The system implies it will be self-driven by gravity after a minor starting impulse, suggesting gravity is the intended primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor, a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to sustain motion and produce recoverable energy after a small starting input, which violates the conservation of energy. No mechanism is described to restore the gravitational potential of the weights without expending at least as much energy as is gained from their fall.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims the system can continue to be driven by itself after a minor starting force, implying perpetual output from a fixed gravitational potential.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Gravity is a conservative force; net work cannot be extracted from a closed cycle in a constant gravitational field without an external energy input to reset the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'minor impact force pulses' and starting motor input are treated as negligible compared to the claimed continuous output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions manual or gravitational starting force, but claims perpetual energy creation and multiplication from a 'weak energy' input, implying energy is created or extracted without an adequate external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims a 'perpetual motion' device that multiplies a weak input into a perpetually superior energy output, which directly violates energy conservation. The description lacks any identifiable external energy source or gradient to justify the claimed energy multiplication, making it thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of perpetual motion and perpetual energy creation
- Claim of energy multiplication (output > total input) without identifying an external energy source
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (no entropy sink, implies 100%+ efficiency)
- Vague mechanism using inertia and circumference/radius, which cannot create net energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from a battery to lift weights vertically, with claimed net energy output from the subsequent gravitational fall and lever action.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cyclic gravity-powered machine where weights are lifted using battery power, then dropped to generate electricity. This is a classic over-unity claim, as the energy required to lift the weight against gravity is always greater than or equal to the energy recoverable from its fall, making net energy multiplication impossible and a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses a battery-powered motor to lift weights, then claims to recover more energy from the weight's fall than was used to lift it.
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies a cyclic process where the energy output from the falling weight (via lever, piston, water turbine, generator) exceeds the electrical input used to reset (lift) the weight.
- Misapplication of levers: A lever can amplify force or distance, but not energy. The work output (force × distance) cannot exceed the gravitational potential energy initially invested by lifting the mass.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary claimed source is electrical input to a 70 kW motor. The system claims this motor drives a gearbox which drives a wind turbine generator to produce 1.25 MW, implying the energy is created within the closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a classic over-unity (perpetual motion) device. It claims a 70 kW motor can drive a gearbox to mechanically spin a wind turbine generator to produce 1.25 MW, a clear violation of energy conservation. The system is erroneously treated as closed, ignoring that a wind generator's output power must come from the mechanical power input to its shaft, which in this flawed setup comes only from the smaller motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims 70 kW input produces 1.25 MW output (COP ~17.9) without identifying an external, ambient energy source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Proposes a net work output from a closed system with no identified temperature or potential gradient to exploit.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats the gearbox as an energy multiplier rather than a torque/speed transformer with inherent losses.
- Misapplication of generator specifications: A wind turbine generator's rated output (e.g., 1.25 MW at specific rpm/torque) assumes that input mechanical power is supplied by wind, not by another motor.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed: Electrical input to a motor (from grid, solar, diesel, etc.) drives a gearbox connected to a wind turbine generator to produce more electrical output. The system appears to use electricity to spin a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim describes using an electric motor to mechanically drive a wind turbine generator. This is a straightforward motor-generator pair with losses, not a source of net energy. The specific example of a 50kW input yielding a 500kW output is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims a 50kW motor can drive a 500kW generator at max output, implying a 10x energy multiplication.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats the generator's electrical output as a net gain without subtracting the motor's input power.
- Misapplication of components: Using a motor to spin a generator is fundamentally a lossy conversion (motor efficiency <1, generator efficiency <1), resulting in net loss, not gain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to generate electricity from the gravitational potential energy of falling 'heavy elements' (weights) that are repeatedly lifted using compressed air systems, with unclear energy accounting for the lifting mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate electricity from gravity by repeatedly lifting and dropping weights using a compressed air system. This violates the first law of thermodynamics because the energy required to compress the air and lift the weights must exceed the electrical energy generated from their descent, resulting in a net energy loss, not gain. The patent uses complex mechanical descriptions to obscure this fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses compressed air to lift weights, then claims to generate electricity from their fall. The energy required to compress the air and lift the weights is not properly accounted for against the electrical outpu
- Violates energy conservation: The description implies a net energy gain from a cyclic process (lift-fall-generate) without an identified external energy source sufficient to overcome losses.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses complex mechanical terms (guides, rods, clutches, dual-action actuators, air circuits) to describe what appears to be an attempt to create an over-unity system from gravity alone.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim is that initial force on lever arms initiates a 'complete feedback loop' that sustains motion. No external energy input (fuel, electrical, environmental gradient) is described to compensate for losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex gear train claiming to run continuously from an initial push, forming a closed kinematic loop. This violates energy conservation, as the system has no external energy source to overcome inevitable friction and other losses, making it a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous operation without an energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Describes a closed kinematic loop with friction and no net driving potential.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'feedback loop' is a kinematic constraint, not an energy source. All gears and chains are coupled, so any motion is subject to compounded frictional losses.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The description fits a classic over-unity machine where an initial push is claimed to sustain itself indefinitely.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'magnetic field energy of permanent magnets' converted via gravity forces, but magnets are static and no external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to create perpetual rotation using only permanent magnets and gravity by shifting its center of mass. Since permanent magnets store finite energy and magnetic forces are conservative, no net work can be extracted over a complete cycle without an external energy source, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: attempts to extract net rotational work from static permanent magnet configurations
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy input identified
- Claims automatic displacement of magnetic assemblies without energy expenditure
- Misapplies gravity as a perpetual energy source by shifting center of mass
- Ignoces that magnetic forces are conservative - no net work over a cycle
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously claims to convert gravity and atmospheric pressure into motional energy. The primary input appears to be compressed air, but the description suggests the system's own operation generates continuous energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to continuously generate energy by converting gravity and atmospheric pressure, forces from which no net work can be extracted over a cycle without an external energy source. The description lacks a clear, quantified primary energy input, making it a perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantified input (e.g., compressed air supply energy) is provided to compare to the claimed continuous output.
- Violates energy conservation: Implies perpetual motion by generating continuous energy from gravity and atmospheric pressure without consuming an external fuel or energy source to reset the system's state.
- Misapplication of forces: Gravity and atmospheric pressure are conservative forces; no net work can be extracted from them alone over a cycle without an external gradient or energy input to create a disequilibrium.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the gravitational potential energy of the 'predetermined high density point mass' within the rotor. No external energy input (e.g., fluid flow, thermal gradient, electrical motor) is described to reset the system or create a non-equilibrium condition.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-driven rotor but provides no mechanism for a net energy gain. To operate continuously, the system would require an external energy input to lift the masses, consuming at least as much energy as it generates, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'potential energy gain' and 'operational output energy' with no identifiable external energy source to create that gain.
- System appears to be a gravity-driven rotor; once the masses fall, work can be extracted, but no mechanism is described to return the masses to their initial height to repeat the cycle without consuming more energy than was generated.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying a net energy output without an equal input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial electrical trigger from the starter. The system describes a closed loop where generator output powers a motor that drives the gearbox that drives the generator, with no external energy input after startup.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine. After an initial start, it claims to sustain itself and generate excess electricity using only internal feedback (generator powers motor which drives the generator). This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it provides no continuous external energy source to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes a self-sustaining loop (generator → transformer → motor → gearbox → generator) with no net external energy input after the initial trigger, implying perpetual motion.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Omits all losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat, sound). The 'energy saving transformer' cannot create energy; it can only store/transform it with losses.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Attempts to extract continuous net work (generator output for external use per claim 5) from an isothermal system at equilibrium after the initial input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is an electrical rotational actuator (motor). The device claims to manipulate kinetic energy within flywheels using electromagnets, levers, and sliding masses to generate additional external mechanical energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical system powered by an electric motor. Its description implies that internal manipulation of flywheel masses can generate more mechanical energy than supplied by the motor, which violates energy conservation. The design attempts to create a 'work cycle' using centrifugal forces and impacts, but without an external, non-conservative energy source, it cannot output more work than the input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims an internal work cycle that 'provides external mechanical energy' without identifying a net external energy input beyond the actuator.
- Describes manipulating sliding masses against centrifugal force and releasing energy via impacts, implying energy multiplication within a closed rotating system.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external potential (e.g., actual varying gravitational field) is described to justify net work extraction beyond the input motor work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy of a falling weight (first body). The system attempts to use hydraulic transfer and magnetic coupling to reset the first weight using a second weight, implying a cyclic, self-resetting operation.
AI Physics Analysis
This machine attempts to generate electricity cyclically from gravity but provides no external energy source to restore the gravitational potential of its falling masses. The internal hydraulic and magnetic reset mechanisms cannot output more energy than they consume, making continuous net power generation impossible as it violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System appears designed for cyclic operation without an external energy input to reset the initial state. The hydraulic/magnetic mechanism to lift the first body using the fall of a second body cannot output more work than the gravitational potential
- The claims imply a continuous generation of electricity from an initial fall, but the described reset mechanism (using a second, heavier body to lift the first) is internally energy-constrained. For the cycle to repeat, the second body must be lifted
- The system obfuscates the need for an external energy input to restore the initial potential energy of the masses. It attempts to create a perpetual cycle using only internal energy transfers, which violates energy conservation.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignores that
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The described c
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from twisting/torque interactions between S and Z twist wires/coils, with implied ambient energy harvesting but no specified external gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to generate rotational energy (up to 200,000 RPM) from ambient sources using twisted wire interactions, but provides no complete energy accounting or identifiable thermodynamic gradient. It uses technically suggestive language while obscuring the fundamental energy source, strongly suggesting a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear accounting of input energy vs. output energy
- Claims of generating 100-200,000 RPM from ambient energy without a defined thermodynamic gradient
- Implied over-unity performance (output > input) without identifying the primary energy source
- Uses vague terms like 'twist energy' without connection to established physics
- Claims of efficiency increases (1-25%, 5-30%) without baseline input power definition
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest using buoyancy and gravity to move an object (omori/weight) cyclically in water to generate electricity, implying extraction of net work from a closed cycle with no external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a cyclic process using gravity and buoyancy to move a mass in water to generate electricity, but provides no external energy source to sustain the cycle against losses. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it attempts to extract net work from a closed, conservative force system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a cyclic system (sinking via gravity, floating via buoyancy) to generate electricity without identifying an external energy source to reset the cycle or overcome losses.
- Buoyancy is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a fluid at equilibrium is zero (Archimedes' principle).
- System appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, attempting to generate electricity from a cycle with no net energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: no mention of energy needed to separate the object from the buoyant medium, manage drag, or compensate for generator losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms (extracting net
Claimed Energy Source
Human muscular work (pulling cables, stepping on board) is used to lift balance weights, storing gravitational potential energy. This stored energy is then released to turn a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a human-powered generator with gravity storage. It does not create energy; it converts human muscle work into electricity with inevitable losses. The patent's framing as an energy 'generating' device obscures the required external energy input, violating the principle of energy conservation by implication.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is fundamentally a human-powered generator with an intermediate gravity storage step. The net electrical output cannot exceed the human work input, minus all losses.
- The description implies a cyclic process of lifting and lowering weights, but provides no mechanism for the system to reset or for the weights to be lifted with less energy than they deliver when falling.
- The claim of 'generating energy' obfuscates the true, external human energy source, suggesting a net energy gain from the apparatus itself.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent text omits the
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like 'potentia
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the gravitational potential energy of heavy objects lifted to a height. The apparatus attempts to use a portion of the electrical output from the main generator and from induction coils to power the motor that lifts the objects back up.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a gravity-powered generator, but its feedback mechanism violates energy conservation. The energy needed to lift the heavy objects back up is greater than the energy generated during their fall due to losses. Using generated power to run the lift motor cannot close this energy gap, making the claimed self-sustaining operation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a closed loop. The electrical energy generated from the falling objects is less than the energy required to lift them back to the starting height due to inevitable losses (friction, electrical resistance, g
- Violates energy conservation: The claim that power from the magnetic elements and generator can 'alleviate' the need for external power to the point of sustained operation implies net energy creation. This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion cla
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignores the f
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The described f
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of liquid in the elevated tank, and the gravitational potential energy of the 'squeezing weight mass' which must be lifted.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It uses gravity to do work (squeezing bags with weights), but ignores the greater or equal energy required to reset the system by lifting the weights and refilling the elevated liquid tank. The feedback control mechanism cannot generate net energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system requires work to lift the squeezing weight mass or to refill the elevated liquid storage tank. This input work is not accounted for in the claimed 'regeneration'.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described feedback mechanism (control ropes, seesaw) suggests a self-sustaining cycle that would output more energy than is input, which is impossible.
- No net energy gain: The work extracted from the weight falling and squeezing the bag cannot exceed the work required to lift that weight and refill the elevated tank against gravity.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system (lever arm with reciprocating motion driven by a motor) that claims to generate electricity. The primary input seems to be electrical energy to the motor, but the description implies the generated electrical output is greater than or independent of this input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical linkage (lever arm, cams, unidirectional clutches) connecting a motor to a generator. It claims 'power amplification' but provides no complete energy balance, implying the generator's output can exceed the motor's input. This is a classic hallmark of an over-unity device that violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of all energy inputs and outputs.
- Implied over-unity operation: System describes a motor driving a lever, which then drives a generator, with no clear reason why the generator's output should exceed the motor's input.
- Mechanical obfuscation: Complex arrangement of levers, cams, and unidirectional clutches does not create energy.
- No thermodynamic limit violation identified because no clear energy conversion process is stated, but the overall claim of 'power amplification' suggests a violation of energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be none (no river flow, no external energy). Implicitly relies on gravitational potential energy of water in the reservoir, but the described cycle attempts to create a perpetual motion machine using siphoning.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'perpetual motion machine' that uses a siphon to draw water from a low reservoir to drive a water wheel, which then lifts some water back to a high reservoir to restart the cycle. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to perform net work (lifting water) without any external energy input, and the siphon cannot create energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to lift water to a higher elevation without any external energy input.
- Misunderstands siphon dynamics: A siphon transfers liquid from a higher to a lower elevation using gravity; it cannot provide net energy to lift a portion of the water higher than its source.
- No continuous energy source identified: The system describes a closed cycle where water supposedly powers a water wheel to lift some of itself back up, resulting in a net energy loss each cycle due to friction and other losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert gravitational force into 'everlasting energy' via a liquid cycling circulation, but gravitational potential energy is not an energy source unless mass is lowered in a gravitational field. The description implies a closed-cycle system with no external input or height differential.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce 'everlasting energy' from gravity using a closed liquid cycle, which is impossible. Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a mass in a closed cycle without an external energy source to lift the mass back up, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'everlasting energy' which violates energy conservation
- No identifiable net energy input; gravitational force is conservative and cannot provide net work in a closed cycle
- Defines non-standard forces ('ci force', 'moment force') without clear physical basis
- Lacks description of how a sustained energy output is maintained without an external gradient or fuel
- Appears to be a closed hydraulic system, which cannot produce net power perpetually
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting (ignores need for input to
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms (extracts net wo
C - Technical Obfuscation (invents new force definitions, va
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'water energy generator' produces energy that is then used to power another 'water energy generator' in a cascading/regenerative manner, suggesting energy multiplication without an identified primary external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading system of 'water energy generators' where the output of one unit powers the next, implying energy amplification without an external source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it suggests creating net energy from a closed loop, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent perpetual motion/energy multiplication through cascading units
- No clear identification of the primary energy input (e.g., gravitational potential of water, thermal gradient)
- Violates conservation of energy by implying output energy can be fed back to produce more energy than the original input
- Describes energy being 'transferred' and 'amplified' between units without accounting for losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity without any fuel, water, wind, solar, etc., and to be 'self-regenerated' via a 'recycler', implying a closed-loop system with no external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce electricity from no fuel or environmental gradient and to 'regenerate' its own power, which directly violates the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics. Its described mechanisms cannot circumvent the requirement for an external energy source to perform net work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by claiming to generate power from no identifiable energy source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying a perpetual 'regeneration' of energy without losses or an external low-entropy source.
- Claims like 'load absorber for alternators' and 'torque booster' suggest creation of energy or work from nothing, as a small drive cannot propel a very large alternator without an external energy input exceeding the drive's capability.
- The 'recycler' is described as enabling independence from a primary source, which is thermodynamically impossible for a net power output device.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on electri
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct-sounding ter
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system (rotating shafts with adjustable joints containing liquid and floating bodies) that claims to produce continuous rotation without an identified external energy input. The abstract suggests it works '不受地理条件和能源条件限制' (unrestricted by geographical or energy conditions).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system using shafts, joints, floating bodies, and liquid. It claims to produce continuous power suitable for driving generators without being limited by energy conditions. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks an identified external energy source to replenish losses from friction and to sustain the claimed continuous output. The described buoyancy/gravity interactions within the rotating frame cannot provide net energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is described.
- Claims continuous power output ('源源不断的动力') without an energy source.
- Mechanism relies on buoyancy and gravity within a closed, rotating system, which cannot produce net work over a cycle.
- System will reach equilibrium as the floating bodies and liquid settle, requiring energy input to restart motion or overcome friction.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy from external source (battery/capacitor/solar). Proposed sustained operation from a portion of the generator's output fed back to the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
This system violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The flywheel stores but does not create energy. Using a portion of the generator's output to power the motor driving that generator creates a lossy cycle that cannot sustain itself. After the initial external energy input, the system would quickly stop due to inevitable conversion losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System proposes to use a portion of the generator output to power the motor that drives the generator, creating a positive feedback loop with no net external energy input after startup.
- Ignores losses: Every conversion (electrical→mechanical→kinetic→electrical) incurs significant losses (friction, resistance, heat). The feedback portion cannot sustain the system; it would deplete the flywheel's kinetic energy.
- Misapplication of flywheel: Flywheel is an energy storage device, not an energy source. It cannot add net energy to the system, only temporarily store and return it with losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims imply 'threshold' w
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a clos
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex magnetic motor/generator interactions (MM1, MM2, MM3, MF1, MF2, MF3) with claims of extracting energy from a 'gradient', but no primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is explicitly identified. The system appears to be self-contained with magnetic components driving each other.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex arrangement of magnetic motors and generators that claim to produce useful power by interacting with each other and an unspecified 'gradient'. The system lacks any identifiable external energy source, making it a classic magnetic perpetual motion scheme that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The elaborate design obscures the fundamental physics flaw: you cannot extract net work from a closed system of permanent magnets and coils without an external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to the closed magnetic system.
- Claims of generating power from internal magnetic interactions without an external gradient violate conservation of energy.
- The description suggests a perpetual motion scheme where magnetic forces are arranged to produce net work without energy depletion.
- Vague terminology ('gradient', 'energy multiplication') without quantitative thermodynamic analysis.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of output >
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical terms (mag
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the reciprocal actuation of the mounting table by an unspecified drive assembly. The claimed 'multiplied force' is derived from the lever and weighted body arrangement, which is an internal mechanical system, not an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The lever and weight system is a passive transformer of force and motion; it cannot output more useful energy than is supplied by the external driver moving the table. The patent claims violate the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system claims to generate energy from a 'multiplied force' without identifying an external energy input sufficient to produce that force and overcome losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: A lever provides force multiplication at the expense of distance, not energy multiplication. The work output from the power receivers cannot exceed the work input to reciprocate the table and lift the weighted body.
- Misapplication of mechanical advantage: The oscillating lever and swiveling weight are passive components that dissipate, not create, energy. Any 'jerk' or 'auxiliary force' from stoppers consumes energy from the drive.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on force m
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use a starting motor to initiate rotation of a flywheel with asymmetrically distributed weights. Claims suggest gravity (earth's gravitational pull) and the flywheel's inertia provide additional rotational energy beyond the motor input.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'gravity power generator' describes a motor-driven flywheel with an asymmetrical weight distribution. It claims gravity and the flywheel's inertia provide a net gain in rotational energy, which is impossible because the energy required to lift the weights on the upward part of the cycle always equals or exceeds any gravitational work extracted on the downward part, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate 'excellent rotational energy' from gravity and inertia without accounting for the energy required to lift the heavy side of the flywheel against gravity on each rotation.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a system where a flywheel with weights configured 'heavy first, light later' in the rotation direction supposedly creates rapid kinetic energy from gravity, ignoring that net work from a conservative force (gravi
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on output from gravity and inertia while ignoring the continuous energy input needed to overcome friction, air resistance, and generator load to maintain motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial mechanical drive. The patent claims a 'second force' derived from centrifugal force acting on weights, and that output energy is fed back to maintain the input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanically closed system. Centrifugal force is not an energy input; it is an internal reaction force that cannot provide net energy to the system. Using output to power the input cannot overcome losses, making sustained 'self-powering' operation impossible as it violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is a kinematic constraint, not an independent energy source. It cannot do net work on the system.
- The system is a closed mechanical loop with internal forces. Feeding output back to input cannot sustain or increase motion due to friction and losses.
- The description implies energy is generated from the orbital motion of off-center masses, which are driven by the input. This is an internal reaction force, not a net energy gain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/Unspecified. Claims to operate 'ganz oder teilweise unabhängig von äußeren Energieressourcen' (completely or partially independent of external energy resources) and provide 'ausreichend Energie' (sufficient energy) while only requiring acceleration or friction work in the direction of motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a system that purportedly provides energy and balances loads while being independent of external energy resources, requiring only acceleration or friction work in the direction of motion. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to output useful energy without a clear, quantified input. The language is highly obfuscated, preventing proper energy accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming to provide sufficient energy without clear external input.
- Proposes 'indifferent equilibrium' states that seemingly allow arbitrary work extraction or load balancing without an identifiable energy source.
- Claims 'environmentally neutral' energy provision that is independent of time and place, implying a perpetual energy source.
- Uses vague terminology ('indifferent working/shifting systems', 'arbitrary advantageous energy provision') that obscures the fundamental energy accounting.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text references 'Cosmos Physics', 'Matter and Anti-Matter', 'Field interactions', and 'Passive/Active energy conversion', but provides no identifiable, quantifiable external energy input or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract and claims use obscure and grandiose physics terminology ('Cosmos Physics', 'Matter/Anti-Matter', 'Field' interactions) without specifying a measurable energy source or input. This is a classic hallmark of an over-unity or perpetual motion claim that obfuscates the lack of a genuine energy input, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input accounting
- Vague references to matter/antimatter and field interactions without a defined mechanism
- Claims of 'energy conversion' without specifying the source gradient or work input
- Use of correct physics terminology (e.g., matter/antimatter) in a context that suggests a perpetual motion scheme
- Implies energy extraction or conversion without a thermodynamic cost or entropy export.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary energy input. Claims include: 1) A motor to rotate the turntable, 2) A 'power generation device' (claimed to be a generator) driven by the turntable, 3) A lifting device that pulls a secondary frame upward, allegedly altering the turntable's center of gravity to accelerate it.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a system where a rotating turntable drives a generator while an internal weight-shifting mechanism allegedly accelerates the turntable via changes in its center of gravity. This constitutes a closed-loop energy multiplication claim that violates conservation of energy and Newton's laws of motion, as it attempts to extract net work from gravitational potential changes within the system without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies a feedback loop where the generator's output could power the motor, with net excess energy from gravitational potential changes.
- Violates Newton's laws: Claims that lifting an internal weight (changing center of gravity) can perpetually accelerate the turntable without external torque.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The lifting device requires energy to raise the weight; this energy is not accounted for in the claimed acceleration and power generation.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The described cycle of shifting weights to change center of gravity and generate acceleration is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from falling weights, and/or elastic potential energy from springs. The device claims to use one falling weight to both turn a crankshaft and lift the other weight.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic attempt at a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. The energy to lift a weight always equals (in an ideal case) or exceeds (in reality) the energy gained from its descent, so no net work can be produced over a complete cycle. The system will stop due to friction unless externally powered.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work required to lift a weight to reset it equals or exceeds the work extracted from its fall, neglecting losses. The described system cannot output net work after a full cycle.
- No external energy input is described to overcome inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and other dissipative forces.
- The claim of 'continuous rotation' implies a perpetual or over-unity machine, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description ig
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies motion is initiated by an unspecified force on the lever arms, but then claims a 'continuous feedback loop' is sustained until that force is removed, suggesting the system is intended to run perpetually from an initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly described as providing 'perpetual motion' and relies on a closed mechanical feedback loop. It ignores all energy losses from friction and violates both the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics by claiming sustained operation without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual motion' without an identified external energy source.
- Describes a mechanical feedback loop implying energy can be recycled without loss to sustain motion.
- No accounting for energy losses due to friction in gears, bearings, or chain.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying sustained output from a finite initial input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying a closed system can perform work indefinitely without an energy gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on kinemat
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent claims energy is extracted from the Quantum Vacuum (Zero-Point Field) via acceleration variations of a fluid mass, with no other explicit input. The described system requires an initial pump to create the fluid stream, implying that electrical or mechanical energy is the initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce accelerating rotation and net output work from the quantum vacuum, but its described operation violates energy conservation. The initial energy to pump the fluid is ignored, and the proposed mechanism for extracting zero-point energy is not physically valid.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming net energy output from a single-temperature system with no identified external gradient.
- Invokes undefined and unphysical interaction between quarks/leptons in a fluid and 'quantum processes' to generate torque, contradicting established quantum field theory where the quantum vacuum cannot be used for net energy extraction in this manner
- Claims a self-accelerating rotor from a single fluid stream, which is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing).
- Confuses and misapplies concepts of angular momentum conservation; the described torque from a radial inward flow in a rotating frame is a classical Coriolis effect that requires external work to maintain the flow, not a source of new energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'no fuel in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
The claim asserts gravity is the sole input. However, the described mechanism's useful output ultimately comes from the gravitational potential energy of balls falling from the top of the device. This potential energy was initially provided by the work done to lift those balls against gravity, either by an external starter input or by the device's own internal mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It ignores the fundamental energy cost of resetting the system: the gravitational potential energy released by a falling ball must be replenished by lifting a new ball to the same height. No arrangement of levers, springs, or counterweights within a closed system can circumvent this requirement without violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Conservation of Energy: The system claims to generate 'mega output' from 'very little input' or 'no external input at all.' The energy of a ball falling from height is m*g*h. To reset the cycle, a new ball must be lifted to that same height
- Violates Thermodynamic Limits (Perpetual Motion): The claim describes a self-working system requiring no external input, which is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing).
- Incomplete Energy Accounting (PATTERN A): The analysis focuses on the 'little input' at the bottom to insert a ball, ignoring the massive energy required to lift balls to the top to maintain the gravitational potential difference. The counterweight/s
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and contradictory. The text describes using a 'control input' to generate a 'working output' that is then fed back to amplify the control input, suggesting a self-amplifying loop. It mentions 'input=output' energy equivalence but claims the device's output energy multiplies the input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device where a control input generates a working output, which is then fed back to amplify the control input in a loop, claiming the resulting output energy multiplies the original input. This is a textbook violation of energy conservation, constituting a perpetual motion claim with no clear external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication or over-unity (output > total input) without identifying an external energy source.
- Describes a feedback loop where output energy is used to power the input, constituting a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind (violates energy conservation).
- Uses obfuscating technical terms (e.g., 'control input', 'working output', 'energy equivalence') in a context that implies breaking thermodynamic limits.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (thermal, chemical, etc.) is described as the primary driver; the process is presented as internally circular.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics-like terms (
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on falling masses within the device's own rotating frame, with a 'temporary energy amplifier' from a lever mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered rotor that claims to lift its own falling masses back to their starting height without expending the energy gained from their fall, using an internal counterweight and lever system. This describes a closed cycle that would output net work (to drive a generator) from gravity alone, which is impossible as resetting the system requires at least as much energy as was produced, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to regain the full falling height 'ohne Aufwand' (without effort) after each revolution.
- Proposes a 'temporary fall energy amplifier' via a lever, implying energy creation within a closed gravitational cycle.
- Ignores that lifting the masses back to their initial height requires at least as much energy as was gained from their fall, creating a net-zero or net-loss cycle.
- Mechanism attempts to use internal counterweights and levers to circumvent the need for external work input to reset the system.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve a rotating body (봉체) with a weight (금속 추) that causes rotation, which then drives an AFPM generator. The system appears to claim to generate electricity from this rotational motion without a clear external energy input sufficient to overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a rotating body with an attached weight drives an axial flux permanent magnet generator, but fails to identify any external energy source to initiate and sustain the rotation against inevitable losses. This constitutes a classic over-unity or perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, environmental gradient).
- System describes mechanical rotation driving a generator, implying perpetual motion or energy multiplication.
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce useful electrical output without accounting for the energy needed to sustain the rotation against friction and electrical loads.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
No legitimate external energy source is identified. The device purports to generate energy from its own internal configuration (gravity, buoyancy, magnets) in a closed system, implying creation of energy from nothing.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims a 'perpetual motion' device that creates energy. Its described mechanisms (gravity, buoyancy, magnets in a closed loop) cannot produce net useful work without an external energy source, directly violating the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion, which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Attempts to use gravity and buoyancy in a cycle to produce net work without restoring the system to its initial state, violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
- Relies on internal forces (retractable hooks, magnets) which cannot provide net energy output as they are part of the system and involve equal and opposite reaction forces.
- Proposes stacking/cascading chains to 'increase performance,' a classic sign of energy multiplication without an external input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claims to generate electricity through unspecified interactions between 'vortex energy bodies' (추중량체) that somehow amplify each other's energy production without clear external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where 'vortex energy bodies' mutually generate increasing amounts of energy without any identifiable external energy source, violating conservation of energy. The use of undefined pseudo-scientific terms and claims of energy amplification between components without losses constitutes a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.)
- Claims of self-amplifying energy generation between components ('ìê°ë¦¬ê² ì§ì ì´ë' - mutually generating energy)
- Violates energy conservation - system appears to output more energy than is input
- Uses pseudo-scientific terminology ('vortex energy bodies') without defined physical mechanism
- Describes energy multiplication through component interaction without entropy increase or loss.
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert gravity and buoyancy forces into electricity, but no external energy gradient (like falling water or thermal difference) is specified. The device appears to be a closed system with internal fluid and moving parts.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity by cyclically converting gravity and buoyancy forces within a closed fluid system. This is a classic perpetual motion machine violation, as it has no external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction, viscosity, and electrical resistance, making sustained energy generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate electricity from internal cyclic motion without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from a system in internal equilibrium (gravity/buoyancy in a closed fluid loop).
- Describes a 'perpetual motion machine of the first kind' with an 'infinite working organ' (бесконечный рабочий орган).
- Incomplete energy accounting: No input energy specified; output is claimed electrical energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim states the rotor is rotated 'under the influence of gravity,' implying gravitational potential energy is the primary input. However, the system includes a control arrangement that modifies the center of rotation, which itself requires an energy input not properly accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a generator rotated by gravity, but its control mechanism must consume energy to modify the rotor's center of rotation. The description implies this control energy can be sourced from the rotor's own output, creating a circular energy flow that, if perfectly efficient, could only break even, and in reality would lose energy to friction and other losses. No external energy source beyond the initial gravitational potential is identified to sustain the cycle, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The control arrangement (e.g., rack and pinion, hydraulic pump) must do work to modify the rotor's effective center of rotation. This work input is not subtracted from the generator's output.
- Violates conservation of energy: The description suggests a cyclic process where gravity alone causes rotation that drives a pump to power the control system, which in turn modifies the rotor to extract more work from gravity than was used for contro
- Missing entropy sink: A system operating cyclically in a gravitational field with no other external gradient cannot produce net work without lowering the mass in the field or having another energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to achieve 100% efficiency by using 'temperature difference energy' and 'humidity difference energy' from ambient air, but describes a process where outputs feed inputs in a circular manner.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system claiming 100% energy efficiency and self-sustaining operation by circularly feeding outputs back as inputs. This directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creation of energy or perfect conversion with zero loss, which is impossible for any real process involving energy conversion or work extraction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 100% energy efficiency (output = input), violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) for any non-trivial system with losses.
- Describes a self-sustaining cycle where 'generated energy' is fed back to maintain the process, characteristic of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Uses vague terms like 'temperature difference energy' and 'humidity difference energy' without specifying a clear, finite external reservoir or gradient, implying extraction of work from an isothermal, equilibrium environment.
- The description suggests energy multiplication or cascading where the output of one stage powers the next to achieve >100% efficiency relative to an initial input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from the electric motor (7). The claim implies that after initial spin-up, the second flywheel (5) can 'self-rotate' and power an energy-gathering device (9) after the motor and electromagnetic clutch (8) are disengaged.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims that after a motor spins up two coupled flywheels, disengaging the motor and clutch allows one flywheel to 'self-rotate' and continuously power an external energy-gathering device. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it claims to produce net useful work from a system with no ongoing energy input after the initial spin-up.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a flywheel can power an external load ('energy-gathering device') indefinitely while itself maintaining rotation ('self-rotate'), implying perpetual output without input.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Suggests a closed system (motor off, clutch disengaged) can perform continuous useful work (operating the energy device) without an energy source, creating energy from nothing.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes an initial motor input but ignores all losses (friction, air resistance, electrical losses in the clutch). The 'self-rotation' and continuous operation of the energy device after motor shutoff is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert magnetic potential energy and gravity into kinetic energy, but describes a system where the energy source appears to be internal (magnets, weight of mass element) with no external input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be an autonomous motor that continuously converts magnetic and gravitational potential into usable work, with only a 'small part' used for its own operation. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to produce net work from internal, non-replenished potentials, violating both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims a small part of output is used for operation and the rest supplied for work, implying net energy creation from internal potentials.
- Violates 2nd law: attempts to extract continuous work from a static potential (magnetic field) and gravity without an external gradient or input to restore the initial state.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mechanism described to reset the magnetic interaction or gravitational potential after each cycle without expending at least as much energy as gained.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Describes complex frames and motions but no clear, thermodynamically sound energy conversion path.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily electrical input from an electric motor driving small pistons. The claim suggests energy regeneration from the system's own operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is fundamentally a fluid-mechanical transmission system. The claim that it 'regenerates the enormous force' creating the torque violates energy conservation, as the electrical motor is the only clear net energy input. The description obfuscates this by implying energy multiplication through internal fluid dynamics and spring action, which cannot exceed 100% efficiency.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of regenerating 'enormous force' and high speed implies energy output exceeding electrical input without an identified external source.
- System uses springs to store and release energy, but springs cannot add net energy; they only return a portion of stored energy with losses.
- Describes a closed fluid circuit driven by pistons and impacting a turbine; overall, it's a complex transmission system that cannot have an efficiency >100%.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text appears to describe a complex arrangement of components (A, B, C, D, E, H, F, G) with dimensional specifications and numerical operations, but no identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified. The claims seem to imply energy generation or amplification from the internal configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is a violation of fundamental physics. It describes no coherent energy source and uses a nonsensical mixture of numbers, dimensions, and component labels to create the appearance of a system where energy is seemingly generated or amplified through arithmetic operations on its own specifications. This is a classic hallmark of a perpetual motion claim disguised by obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described.
- Claims involve numerical operations (multiplication, subtraction) on dimensional measurements presented as if they generate or transform energy quantities.
- Apparent claim of '100-32.9%' efficiency suggests output exceeding input without a source, violating conservation.
- The description is technically incoherent, mixing dimensions (mm, degrees), component labels, and arithmetic without physical meaning.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies energy out
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical terms (eff
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy, with an initial input from electric motors for launching. The system claims to recoup and exceed this initial input by cycling heavy masses (rollers/blocks) on an inclined, wavy path.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to extract net work from gravity alone by cycling masses on a closed path, which is impossible because gravity is a conservative force. The claim that it can recoup its startup energy and produce excess power violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims net energy output greater than electrical input by extracting work from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Violates the 1st Law of Thermodynamics: Proposes a mechanism to do net work from a conservative force (gravity) in a closed loop, which is impossible.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores energy losses from friction, air resistance, and mechanical inefficiencies.
- Misapplies leverage: Levers and inclined planes trade force for distance, conserving energy, not multiplying it.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex process involving 'temperature difference energy', 'pressure difference energy', 'vibration energy', 'humidity difference energy', and 'ambient energy' being converted, but no primary external energy input is clearly identified. It claims to use 100 units of input to produce 100% output, suggesting energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that appears to harvest multiple ambient energy gradients (thermal, pressure, humidity) and claims to output 100% of an input energy of 100 units. This constitutes a 'free energy' or perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by not accounting for all inputs and outputs, and suggests extracting net work from ambient equilibrium, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of 100% efficiency or energy multiplication (100 input → 100% output)
- Incomplete energy accounting: ambient energy sources (temperature, pressure, humidity gradients) are listed but not quantified, and their harvesting is treated as a net gain without accounting for the work required to maintain or utilize those gradie
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying more useful energy output than the total identified energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting work can be extracted from ambient equilibrium without a sufficient thermodynamic gradient or entropy sink.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a closed hydraulic system using a piston to pump fluid from a lower to an upper reservoir, then presumably using the fluid's return flow to generate electricity. No external energy input is described to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed hydraulic system that claims to generate electricity by cycling fluid between upper and lower reservoirs using a weighted piston. Crucially, it provides no external energy source to reset the heavy piston to its upper position after it has fallen, violating energy conservation. The system cannot output net work without a net energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes moving a heavy concrete piston upward to pump water, creating a gravitational potential energy store. No energy source is identified to lift the piston back to its starting position to repeat the
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 2-5 describe a closed-loop pumping/generation cycle but omit the net energy input required to reset the piston after it has descended.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The described cycle of using water flow to generate electricity and then using a piston's weight to pump the water back up is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion of the first kind design.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text is primarily in Korean with some garbled characters, but mentions 'magnetic rotation' and claims energy amplification. No clear primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, or environmental) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a 'magnetic rotation' device that allegedly produces more energy than is input, which is a direct violation of energy conservation. The description is vague and uses technical terms without a coherent physical mechanism, failing to identify a legitimate external energy source to account for the claimed output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims energy amplification (output > input) without specifying all energy inputs.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies creation of energy from the magnetic rotation system itself.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient to exploit for work extraction.
- Vague quantitative claim: Mentions '#8 5000' which is unclear but suggests a large amplification factor.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Input force from a motor driving a rotating arm with a weight. No external or ambient energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a larger output force than input force at the same speed, which directly implies more output power than input power, violating energy conservation. The described mechanism uses internal centrifugal forces, which cannot create net energy gain from the system's own motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims conversion of input force to a 'larger output force' at constant speed, implying energy gain (Power = Force * Velocity).
- Centrifugal force is an internal, frame-dependent force; it cannot do net work on the system's center of mass to create a larger external output force.
- Mechanism describes transferring 'part of the centrifugal force' to an output, but force is not energy. Any work done at the output must come from the input motor work minus losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial electrical power to the 'priming assembly' and motor. The system claims to generate electricity from alternators driven by a gearbox connected to that same motor, implying a closed-loop where output electricity could be fed back to power the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where an electric motor drives alternators through gears. Without an external, continuous energy source, this configuration violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat would cause the system to stop. It is a classic over-unity claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system description implies self-generation without identifying an external, renewable energy source to compensate for losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described configuration suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, where an electrical motor drives alternators to produce electricity with no net energy input.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The system lacks an identified source of energy (e.g., fuel, wind, solar, thermal gradient) to perform net work.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electrical energy from a 'vibrational energy plate' (진동 에너지판) and 'magnetic energy plate' (자기 에너지판) without identifying an external energy input. Appears to describe energy circulation/regeneration within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electrical energy through internal interactions between vibrational and magnetic plates, with energy circulating and amplifying in feedback loops. No external energy source is clearly identified, and the described processes violate conservation of energy by suggesting net energy generation from internal conversions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., electrical input, thermal gradient, ambient energy harvest).
- Describes energy being transferred, converted, and fed back in loops, suggesting creation of energy from internal processes.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) - system appears designed for net energy output without proportional input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics - describes directional energy flows and conversions without an entropy increase or identified heat sink.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output energy is d
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract net rotational work from gravitational potential energy of masses moving in fluids of different densities, with no external energy input other than gravity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate constant torque by cycling weights between two fluids of different densities, but it fails to account for the energy dissipated by fluid drag and the work needed to move the weights through the cycle. The net work output over a full cycle is zero or negative.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System attempts to create a perpetual torque from a closed-cycle fluid displacement.
- Ignores work required to move the piston/weight in the denser fluid downward against viscous drag and to displace fluid through the transfer channel.
- Assumes the buoyant force lifting the weight in the less dense fluid provides net work without accounting for the equal or greater work needed to reset the denser-fluid weight's position.
- No thermodynamic gradient is maintained; the system is in equilibrium with a single gravitational field.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert 'low-grade energy' (ambient heat, humidity, vibration) into 'high-grade energy' (electricity) through magnetic interactions and energy exchange between multiple 'energy conversion modules' without identifying a primary external energy input or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that purportedly converts ambient low-grade energy into high-grade electricity through mutual magnetic interactions between modules. This constitutes a clear violation of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, as it claims to produce net useful work from an isothermal ambient environment without identifying a true external energy source or entropy sink, falling into the classic 'free energy' or perpetual motion category.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law (Energy Conservation): Claims output energy > control input energy without accounting for all energy inputs, especially the ambient energy supposedly harvested.
- Violates Second Law (Entropy): Claims to upgrade ambient thermal energy (low-grade) to useful electrical work without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere (no lower temperature reservoir identified).
- Uses obfuscatory terminology ('energy exchange modules', 'mutual magnetic energy exchange') to describe what appears to be a closed system of magnets and coils with no net external work possible.
- Describes a complex arrangement of magnets and coils that suggests perpetual motion of the first kind—creating energy from internal rearrangements.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex system with piezoelectric elements (1), a power generation unit (61), and energy storage components (81, 82). It appears to claim energy generation from ambient vibrations or movements, but the description suggests feedback loops and energy multiplication without a clear primary external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that uses piezoelectric elements and a power generation unit in a configuration that suggests regenerative feedback and energy storage loops. The text implies the system can generate and store more energy than it initially harvests from ambient vibrations, which violates energy conservation. The mechanism is obfuscated with technical terms but describes a classic 'over-unity' or perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system describes generating power and storing it, then using stored energy to generate more power in a loop, implying energy multiplication.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: The claims suggest a system that can output more energy than is input from the ambient environment over a cycle, creating a net energy gain from internal operations.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct terms like 'piezoelectric' and 'power generation unit' but describes a process where energy is seemingly created or amplified internally without sufficient external input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be an external energy input (W0) plus energy from centrifugal force acting on masses (M) moving along a closed mechanical loop. The device attempts to harvest energy from the masses' motion in curved path sections.
AI Physics Analysis
This machine claims to generate mechanical energy by harnessing centrifugal force from masses moving on a closed loop. However, centrifugal force is an internal, non-conservative force in a rotating frame; it cannot perform net work on a system over a complete cycle. The described energy addition from centrifugal force, separate from the input energy, violates the conservation of energy, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is not an external energy source; it is an inertial reaction force within the system. Work done by centrifugal force in one part of a closed loop is exactly recovered/opposed in another part (e.g., when changing radius).
- The system describes a closed mechanical loop with masses. Any energy gained from the masses moving 'downhill' in a gravitational potential (point A to F) must be exactly paid back to lift them from point F back to A via the 'material chute' (30).
- The description suggests adding energy from centrifugal force 'different from the external energy input W0', implying an unaccounted energy source, which violates energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Vehicle vibration/kinetic energy from road irregularities (implicitly from vehicle's engine/fuel), converted via piezoelectric plates and mechanical transmission to generate electricity
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to generate electricity from vehicle vibration using piezoelectric plates and mechanical transmission. While piezoelectric energy harvesting from vibrations is physically possible, the energy comes from the vehicle's motion, increasing drag and fuel consumption. The patent implies net energy generation without accounting for the vehicle's energy input, violating conservation of energy for the complete vehicle system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Vehicle vibration energy is parasitic loss from vehicle's propulsion system
- Energy conversion chain adds losses: vibration → mechanical transmission → generator → electricity
- No net energy gain for the vehicle system - electricity generated comes at expense of increased vehicle drag/load
- Implied perpetual motion: Suggests generating electricity from vehicle's own motion without accounting for the energy cost to the vehicle
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electric pump that lifts water from a lower tank to an upper tank. The claimed output is electricity from generators driven by the axle rotated by descending water-filled containers.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity violation. The system is a gravity battery: the pump stores energy by lifting water, and generators recover a smaller amount of energy as it falls. The net output cannot exceed the pump's input, so it cannot be a source of energy, only storage with losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The pump must expend more energy to lift the water than can be recovered from its gravitational descent due to inevitable losses (friction, generator inefficiency, pump inefficiency).
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a closed-loop water cycle. The pump's electrical input is the sole net energy input, but the claim implies a net electricity output from gravity, ignoring this input.
- No perpetual gradient: The system creates its own height differential using the pump, so gravity is not an independent energy source.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output from 'force
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from a 2 HP motor. The system claims to generate excess energy from the motor-driven winding and unwinding of steel springs, with the output generator feeding the motor and a battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. Springs store and return energy with losses; they cannot create energy. The claim that a generator can power its own driving motor and produce excess electricity violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims the generator can power the motor and a battery with leftover energy, implying a net energy output greater than the input.
- Springs are energy storage devices, not energy sources. The energy released from a spring cannot exceed the work done to compress/extend it, minus losses.
- No accounting for energy losses from friction, hysteresis in springs, gear/mechanical transmission, generator/motor inefficiencies.
- The system is described as a closed loop (motor->springs->generator->motor), which is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Claims 'output > control i
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Proposes extrac
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy input described is a 'high torque hydraulic motor' (Amendment Claim 1) to drive the mechanism. The system appears to be a closed mechanical/hydraulic loop intended to drive a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that uses a hydraulic motor to actuate levers that drive a generator. It fails to identify any external energy source, creating a closed loop where the generator's output would need to power the motor that drives it. This violates conservation of energy and is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy source is identified to power the hydraulic motor or actuator. The system is described as self-driving a generator, implying energy output without a net input.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system's description suggests it uses its own generated power to run its actuators, a classic perpetual motion scheme.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It describes a mechanism to produce work (electricity) without a corresponding energy input or entropy increase, implying 100%+ efficiency.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims a 'power ge
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on an eccentric rotor, with auxiliary power from the rotor itself or external sources. The device attempts to extract net work from gravitational potential energy in a closed cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'gravity engine' is a classic overbalanced wheel design. It claims that an asymmetrical weight distribution creates a perpetual net driving torque. However, gravity is a conservative force; the net work done on the weights over one complete revolution is zero, as they return to their original positions. Any initial motion will cease due to friction, violating energy conservation if net output is claimed without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Net work cannot be extracted from gravity in a closed cycle where the center of mass returns to its starting height.
- Incomplete torque/energy accounting: The analysis sums torques (M2, M1) but ignores that the gravitational force is conservative. The work done by gravity over one full revolution is zero.
- The claimed condition '∑M2 > sum of all resistive torques' for continuous motion is impossible without an external energy input, as frictional losses would dissipate the initial energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The described system appears to use a hammer/percussion device (打击器) to strike an L-shaped weighted lever, causing it to oscillate. The oscillation supposedly drives a rotating shaft connected to an energy-generating device. The only explicit energy input is the initial hammer strike. Gravity is used to maintain lever orientation, but no continuous external energy input is described to sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to generate continuous rotational energy from a single hammer strike using an oscillating weighted lever and gravity. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying sustained energy output without continuous input, and the second law by suggesting a perpetual motion mechanism without an external energy source to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No continuous energy input identified to overcome friction and damping
- System attempts to extract net work from a single initial impulse via oscillation, violating energy conservation
- Gravity is a conservative force and cannot provide net energy over a cycle
- The 'elastic recovery' of components still dissipates energy, requiring more input to sustain motion
- Describes a self-sustaining rotational motion from a single percussion event
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims suggest extracting electrical energy from ambient humidity gradients and temperature differences, but the described mechanism appears to attempt to generate net work from equilibrium or near-equilibrium conditions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to generate electrical energy from ambient humidity and temperature, but the mechanism appears to violate the first and second laws of thermodynamics. It suggests creating useful work from environmental gradients without accounting for the energy required to create or maintain those gradients, and uses obfuscated technical language common in perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for humidity/temperature gradient maintenance
- Implied extraction of net work from ambient equilibrium without a clear, sustained thermodynamic gradient
- Vague mechanism for 'energy multiplication' or cascading that likely violates conservation
- No identifiable entropy sink or clear heat rejection path for a continuous cycle
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'magnetic force' (자력) or 'magnetic field' (자장) appears to generate additional energy or motion from a 'magnetic core' (자심) and 'control force' (제어력), suggesting energy output greater than input without identifying an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system claiming to produce 8 times more output energy than input control energy, leading to self-sustaining operation. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it identifies no external energy source to account for the multiplied output, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is specified.
- Claims of energy multiplication (1 to 8 times) and self-sustaining motion violate conservation of energy.
- Describes a system where a magnetic core's force, once initiated, perpetuates and amplifies itself, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
- Uses vague terminology ('magnetic force', 'control force', 'core force') without clear physical mechanisms or quantitative boundaries.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanical arrangement of rotating/precessing masses and levers, suggesting the only intended input is an initial torque to start a self-reinforcing cycle. No external source (electrical, chemical, environmental gradient) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-feeding mechanical system that claims to produce useful torque from an internal arrangement of rotating and precessing masses, with no external energy source specified to compensate for losses. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain motion
- Claims 'auto-realimentação' (self-feeding) and 'amplificação artificial de massa' which imply energy creation or multiplication
- Describes a cyclic mechanical system with no mechanism to overcome inevitable losses from friction, air resistance, or internal deformation
- Uses obscure, pseudo-technical language that obfuscates the fundamental energy conversion process
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism appears to use a striker/impactor to initiate oscillation in a pendulum-like body, which then supposedly drives a rotating shaft connected to an energy collection device. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, ambient gradient) is specified. The striker itself would require energy input to operate.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy from a pendulum set in motion by a striker, with the pendulum's motion then driving a generator. This describes a classic over-unity or perpetual motion scheme, as the energy required to reset the striker and overcome friction must come from the system's own decreasing mechanical energy, leading to a net loss. No external energy source is identified to sustain the motion or produce a net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No identified source for net energy output.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a system where a pendulum's oscillation, initiated by a striker, drives a shaft to generate energy, which presumably would also power the striker, creating a closed loop with no external input.
- Missing entropy accounting: No mechanism to overcome friction and other dissipative losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy to operate the striker and overcome friction in the cam/lock mechanism is not accounted for in the claimed energy generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use electrical input to power electromagnets and motors, but ultimately claims to generate a directed gravitational force and produce net useful work without consuming any raw material, exploiting an 'inexhaustible, non-polluting, non-dangerous energy resource.'
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate directed force and electricity from an unspecified 'inexhaustible' source using electromagnets and flywheels, violating energy conservation by producing net output without adequate input. It invokes pseudo-scientific 'directed gravitational force' and ignores the need for reaction mass for propulsion, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'directed gravitational force' with no legitimate mechanism linking electromagnets and flywheels to gravity
- Asserts operation requires no raw material (fuel) while producing net thrust and electrical power
- Implies energy multiplication: output (thrust, electricity) > electrical input by tapping an unspecified infinite resource
- Proposes aircraft that fly without air sustenance (reaction mass), violating Newton's third law
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is a small motor/pump that moves a counterweight (MZ-1) back and forth. The system then attempts to use this motion to pump hydraulic fluid to lift a second, heavier mass (MZ-2) to a greater height, claiming the gained gravitational potential energy exceeds the input energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex hydraulic system that claims to output more electrical energy (from a turbine driven by a falling weight) than the electrical energy input to the motor that initiates the process. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The mechanism is a classic over-unity claim disguised by mechanical complexity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims the potential energy gained by MZ-2 is 'certainly greater' than the energy consumed to move MZ-1.
- Violates the work-energy principle: The work done to lift MZ-2 cannot exceed the work input from the primary motor, minus all losses. The described hydraulic linkages and 'seesaw' plane are force/distance transformers, not energy multipliers.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The analysis ignores all losses (friction, hydraulic, turbulence, generator inefficiency) and treats the system as lossless, focusing only on claimed force multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the input mechanical power on one shaft is multiplied to produce greater output mechanical power on another shaft, with no external energy source described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to output more power than is input, which directly violates the conservation of energy. A mechanical linkage, like a lever system, can change force and speed but cannot create energy or power; output power cannot exceed input power minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims increased output power relative to input power without an additional energy source.
- Misapplies lever principle: A lever trades force for distance (or vice versa) within constant work (energy/time); it cannot create power.
- No mechanism for power multiplication: Describes a kinematic linkage (lever, eccentric wheels) which can only transmit and transform power, not amplify it beyond input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'aumentar l
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity acting on a 'potentializing element' (likely a granular solid or liquid) loaded into pistons/chambers. The system includes a closed-loop where the element is collected at the bottom and transported back to the top by exhausters/fans.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion claim. The device attempts to use falling weights (with a circulating 'potentializing element') to generate power, but the energy required to reset the system by lifting the element back to the top is either unaccounted for or claimed to be internally supplied. This violates the conservation of energy, as no net work can be extracted from a mass moving in a closed cycle within a conservative gravitational field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work to lift the 'potentializing element' back to the top (via exhauster/dust collector system) must equal or exceed the gravitational work extracted during its descent. The patent claims this lifting is powered b
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical/mechanical energy needed to run the exhauster/conveyor system (21) to return the mass to the top is either ignored or claimed to be less than the output, which is impossible for a closed-cycle gravity syst
- Misapplication of leverage/mechanical advantage: Levers and counterweights (claim 5) can only redirect or temporarily store force; they cannot create net energy. The height (course) is not an energy source, but a potential difference that is exhauste
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claims to start with 'initial energy' and through 'energy conversion' and 'reasonable coordination' of multiple 'working methods', produce output energy greater than initial input after accounting for losses.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a system that claims to take an initial energy input, convert it through various methods, and produce a final output energy that is greater than the initial energy after accounting for all losses. This is a direct violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The description of forming a 'circulating' system where part of the output becomes new initial energy cannot create a net energy gain and is characteristic of a perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by claiming net output > net input after losses.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying a cyclic process can produce net work from a single thermal reservoir or without an entropy sink.
- Uses vague, non-standard terminology ('working methods', 'working angle', 'support point conversion') instead of defined physical quantities and processes.
- Describes a feedback loop where part of the output is fed back as new 'initial energy', which cannot create net energy gain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output ene
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics-sounding ter
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a self-contained system where an air compressor (B) drives a turbine (C), which powers fans and gears that ultimately drive the same compressor and produce external work. No external energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine. It claims a closed-loop cycle where an air compressor creates flow to spin a turbine, and the turbine's output is used to power the compressor plus additional fans and external work. This violates energy conservation, as the work output from the turbine cannot exceed the work input to the compressor minus losses, making sustained operation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The described cyclic process claims to produce net work output (via transmission wheel D) while also powering its own compressor and internal fans.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It describes a system that creates and maintains a pressure gradient in a chamber (W) using work derived from that same gradient, with no external energy input to compensate for inevitable losses from fricti
- Incomplete energy accounting. The system uses work from the turbine (C) to power the compressor (B) that created the air flow for the turbine, plus additional fans and external work, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Compressed air input (primary energy source) and gravitational potential energy of the floats in a liquid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a compressed air engine using buoyancy for motion. The only net energy input is the compressed air. The work to compress this air will always be greater than or equal to the useful electrical output due to inevitable losses, making any claim of 'free' or multiplied energy a violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The compressed air input energy is not properly accounted for in the output calculation.
- The system is essentially a compressed-air-driven water displacement pump/engine. The work done by buoyancy comes from the energy expended to inject and compress the air into the floats at the bottom, against the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid.
- The claim implies the generator output could exceed the energy required to produce the compressed air, which would violate energy conservation.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to claim that a 'control air' (새로바퀴) can lift a 3kg weight using only the buoyancy of a 'buoyant air' (중력바퀴), suggesting energy extraction from ambient air without an identified thermodynamic gradient or external work input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system where one volume of air ('control air') somehow causes another ('buoyant air') to lift a 3kg weight repeatedly. This implies perpetual work output without an identified source of energy input greater than the work done, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The mechanism is thermodynamically impossible as described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a 3kg weight is lifted (output work) without a clear, sufficient energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies net work can be extracted from an isothermal air system at equilibrium.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the energy required to create or maintain the 'control air' and 'buoyant air' states or their pressure/volume work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'mechanical non-reliance on external force and energy consumption' - essentially claims to generate continuous kinetic energy output from internal weight redistribution alone, with no external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It describes a mechanical system (balance beam with movable weights) that purportedly generates continuous kinetic energy output solely through internal weight-shifting and spring mechanisms, with no external energy input. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce net work from a system in equilibrium with its environment.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous kinetic energy output without any identifiable external energy source.
- Violates second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by using internal mechanisms (counterweights, springs, locking mechanisms) to reset the system, ignoring energy dissipation from friction, air resi
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a system where moving counterweights on a balance beam creates an imbalance, which then drives motion that is supposedly captured by a spring and used to reset the system. The energy required to reset the count
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to a hydraulic cylinder, which then drives a mechanical system to turn a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed system where an electrically-driven hydraulic cylinder mechanically drives a generator. The claim that this generator can power both the cylinder itself and provide external electricity violates the conservation of energy, as the total output energy cannot exceed the input energy minus inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system claims to generate electricity for both driving its own hydraulic cylinder and for external use, implying a net energy output greater than its input.
- No external energy source (fuel, wind, solar, thermal gradient) is described other than the initial electrical input.
- The mechanical arrangement (levers, counterweights, flywheels) cannot create energy; it only converts and transmits it with losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions ducted fans/compressors and aerodynamic forces, but describes a system where two bodies (A and B) supposedly enhance each other's propulsion through air circulation loops without clear external energy input accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes an aerospace propulsion system claiming to generate net thrust through internal air circulation between two bodies while canceling reaction forces, which violates Newton's laws and conservation of momentum. The description uses complex aerodynamic terminology but describes a mechanism that would require perpetual motion to function as claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's 3rd Law: Describes propulsion without equal and opposite reaction (claims to cancel or reduce counter-propagating forces).
- Violates conservation of momentum: Implies net thrust generation from internal air circulation between two bodies.
- Perpetual motion implication: Suggests sustained/automatic movement without net external energy input after initial start.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of electrical/mechanical input vs. thrust output; ignores losses.
- Misuse of angular momentum conservation: Attempts to use gyroscopic/rotational effects to generate net linear thrust.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implied) and gravitational potential energy of a fluid. The system appears to be a closed-loop where modules circulate between liquid and gas phases, driven by buoyancy and gravity, with a small pump to return leaked fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed circulation of modules using buoyancy and gravity to turn generators, claiming to only need to compensate for fluid evaporation. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce net electrical work without any external energy source beyond maintaining the fluid level, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims net electrical output while only input is to compensate for fluid evaporation and run a small pump. The system is a closed thermodynamic cycle with no external temperature gradient or fuel input.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes modules constantly circulating, driven by complementary 'repulsive and attractive forces' (likely buoyancy/gravity), to turn rotors and generate electricity. This is a classic over-unity claim.
- No identified net energy source: The gravitational/buoyant work is part of a closed cycle. The pump's work to return fluid leaks, powered by the generator, creates a parasitic loop with inevitable losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied source is permanent magnets interacting with a metal circumference, suggesting conversion of magnetic potential energy into mechanical work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed chain of permanent magnets attaching to a metal ring to perform work (lifting a weight). This is a classic magnetic perpetual motion scheme. The magnetic force provides a one-time attraction; extracting useful work requires breaking that attraction, which consumes at least as much energy as was gained. No external energy input is described to reset the cycle, making it a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit energy input identified
- Permanent magnets are not an energy source; their magnetic field is a conservative force field
- System describes lifting weight via magnetic attraction without accounting for the energy required to detach the magnet to reset the cycle
- Violates energy conservation as it claims to generate energy from a static arrangement of magnets and metal
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Appears to describe magnetic configurations (N-S, S-S arrangements) and claims energy generation from magnetic interactions without identifying an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes complex arrangements of magnetic elements (N-S, S-S configurations) and claims they generate useful energy. Since permanent magnets are conservative force fields, no net energy can be extracted from them alone without an external input like mechanical motion to change the magnetic configuration. The claim violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying energy creation from a static system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.) is described.
- Claims suggest energy generation from permanent magnet arrangements alone, which violates conservation of energy.
- Describes complex magnetic interactions and 'stacking' but provides no thermodynamic accounting.
- Text is highly obfuscated with technical-sounding but unclear Korean terminology related to magnetic poles and arrangements.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of energy o
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The claim states energy is produced 'durch Verlagerung von Masse' (by displacement of mass) without requiring external energy input, implying the device is its own internal energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-rotating generator that produces energy solely from internal mass displacement with no external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the law of energy conservation. The claim of independence from all known external energy sources confirms the violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by claiming to produce net energy output with no energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a mechanism that extracts usable work from an internal, non-equilibrium configuration without an external gradient or energy source to restore it.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (thermal, chemical, potential, etc.) is described to drive the mass displacement and subsequent generator operation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical transmission system (gears, flywheels, freewheels) that claims to amplify force. No primary energy source (human, engine, etc.) is explicitly identified, implying the system itself generates or amplifies energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'stepped variable force amplifier' using gears and flywheels with feedback paths. It claims to amplify force and be applicable to everything from bicycles to spaceships, but provides no identifiable external energy input. This suggests a violation of energy conservation, as a passive mechanical transmission cannot output more work than is input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies force/energy amplification without an external energy source
- Describes feedback loops ('Rückführung') that suggest energy recirculation for gain
- Claims application to vehicles and spacecraft without specifying the input work source
- Uses a flywheel as an element, which stores but does not create energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from a 'vortex' (부자) created by a temperature difference between a 'high temperature body' (다수개) and a 'low temperature body' (기체). The system appears to use this vortex to drive a 'power generation vortex generator' (동력구동벨트) which then powers a 'secondary body' (상기 롤러) to produce 'additional power generation' (회전구동력).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that uses a thermal gradient to create a vortex for power generation, then uses that generated power to activate a secondary system for 'additional power generation,' implying a net energy multiplication effect. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy) and violates both the first and second laws of thermodynamics by ignoring the necessary energy inputs and efficiency limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The description implies a positive feedback loop where a vortex, powered by a thermal gradient, generates electricity that is then used to create more power from a secondary body, result
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The process of extracting work from a thermal gradient is limited by Carnot efficiency. The claims of cascading/regenerative power generation without new energy input suggest overcoming this limit.
- Incomplete energy accounting. The 'control input' to initiate or sustain the primary vortex is not specified. All ambient thermal energy inputs and waste heat outputs are not properly quantified.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be driven by gravity and buoyancy in water, with an electric pump in the lower tank as the only explicit energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described machine appears to be a gravity/buoyancy engine that uses an electric pump. This is a classic over-unity violation: the pump's electrical input must exceed any net mechanical work extracted, as the system cannot create energy from the conservative gravity/buoyancy cycle alone. The design implicitly suggests energy multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electric pump's input work is not compared to the system's total output.
- Perpetual motion pattern: Attempts to create a self-sustaining cycle using gravity/buoyancy while ignoring pumping losses.
- Missing entropy analysis: No mechanism to overcome viscous dissipation and friction in the fluid cycle without continuous net energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex mechanical system with levers, gears, pedals, a flywheel, and permanent magnets, but does not identify a primary energy input. The rider's pedaling is implied but obfuscated. Claims of powering houses and factories suggest an expectation of net energy output exceeding any clear input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanically convoluted system with no clear primary energy source, yet implies it can provide power for external applications. This, combined with the use of permanent magnets and a focus on mechanical multiplication without accounting for losses, strongly indicates a violation of energy conservation, characteristic of a perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source is specified.
- Claims of energy generation for external use (houses, factories) imply over-unity or perpetual motion.
- Use of permanent magnets in a drive system suggests a misunderstanding of magnetic energy as a perpetual source.
- Complex mechanical arrangement with flywheels and gears cannot create energy, only store and convert it with losses.
- The description is technically incoherent, mixing garbled mechanical terms with grandiose claims.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and contradictory. Claims include 'rotating wheel with no source of energy', 'falling weight ball', and 'weight shift theory', none of which constitute a coherent, external energy input. The system appears to propose generating its own electricity from internal mechanisms without an external primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's core claims violate fundamental physics. A structure cannot hang in the air and generate its own electricity from 'a wheel with no source of energy' without an external energy input, as this breaks the law of conservation of energy. The described mechanisms for levitation and power generation are physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: 'rotating wheel with no source of energy' claims to generate electricity without an energy input.
- Violates Newton's laws: 'weight shift theory' is undefined and cannot provide lift or sustained flight without an external force/energy source.
- Perpetual motion: Implies a closed system (the hanging structure) can generate its own power indefinitely for transportation, air conditioning, and other needs.
- No credible mechanism for levitation: 'balancing the weight between the sidewalls and the ground' is physically meaningless for achieving stable flight.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output (ele
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses invented terms like
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of weights in a closed loop system. The description implies the system is self-sufficient, with no external energy input other than the initial configuration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate continuous electrical power solely from weights moving in a closed loop, violating the conservation of energy. The work gained from weights falling is always less than or equal to the work needed to return them to their starting height, especially when accounting for inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous, self-sufficient movement and power generation from a closed gravitational system.
- No net energy extraction: In a closed loop, the work done by gravity on weights descending is exactly canceled by the work required to lift them back to their starting height.
- Flywheel only stores/releases energy, cannot create a net energy surplus.
- Missing entropy sink/energy dissipation: Friction, electrical resistance, and other losses are not accounted for and would stop the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'self-suffi
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial electrical motor. The system claims to connect the generator's output back to power the same motor, implying self-sustaining operation or net electrical output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a generator powers the motor that drives it, forming a closed loop with no external energy source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and heat dissipation mean the system cannot sustain itself or produce net output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Output from generator is fed back to motor with no net external energy input after startup.
- Mechanical system with friction and electrical losses cannot have 100% efficiency, making closed-loop powering impossible.
- No ambient or external energy source is described to compensate for losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'produce el
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to require no external energy input, suggesting it extracts net work solely from gravitational potential energy and buoyancy forces within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to combine gravity and buoyancy to produce continuous mechanical power without any energy input, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described system would use its own internal configuration to move until its initial potential energy is exhausted, after which it would stop. It cannot output net work indefinitely.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to output mechanical power indefinitely without any energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Proposes a mechanism to extract net work from a system in equilibrium (gravity and buoyancy forces are conservative).
- No identifiable external energy gradient to drive continuous motion.
- Describes a system that would reach equilibrium and stop, not produce continuous power.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from motor (20), which presumably draws from an external power source or battery. No other energy inputs are described.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a motor driving an alternator through a complex gear train. Since a gearbox cannot create energy, the electrical output from the alternator must be less than the electrical input to the motor, making it a net energy consumer, not a generator. The description violates the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system claims the gearbox assembly 'generates' or 'enhances' mechanical energy, which is impossible. A gearbox only transmits and transforms (speed vs. torque) mechanical energy; it cannot create net energy.
- The description implies the alternator's electrical output is intended to be useful work, but the only input is the motor's work. This is a closed loop with inevitable losses, making net electrical output impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Using complex gearing (ch
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity as initial fuel and the inscription of accelerated circular motion for self-sustained operation with energy accumulation, implying a closed system extracting net energy from gravity without an external, depletable potential gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-powered gravitational generator that claims to produce excess electrical energy from gravity and accelerated circular motion alone. This is a classic perpetual motion machine claim, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to create energy from nothing within a closed system, and the second law by implying a 100%+ efficient cycle with no waste or entropy increase.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims 'excesso e acumulo de energia' (excess and accumulation of energy) in a self-fed system.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing) and possibly the second (no entropy sink).
- Misuses physics terms: 'M.R.U.V.C' (Uniformly Varied Circular Motion) and 'M.R.U.C' (Uniform Circular Motion) cannot be self-accelerated and sustained without continuous energy input.
- No identifiable external energy source: gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a closed gravitational cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct-sounding Por
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to attempt to generate power from an internal rocking motion initiated by push-pull components responding to signal emitters/sensors, with energy storage at one end. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified, implying it's intended to be self-sustaining or extract work from internal mechanical motions.
AI Physics Analysis
This device describes a mechanical system with internal components (beams, weights, springs, push-pull actuators) that respond to signals to create rocking motion, which supposedly drives an energy storage device. Without any external energy source specified, it constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation. The described internal motions cannot produce net work output to charge storage.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Mechanism describes using internal components (push-pull parts, rocking beam, weights, springs) to create motion that drives an energy storage device
- Implies sustained or amplified oscillation/output from internal feedback without an external power source to overcome losses
- Violates conservation of energy - cannot have net energy output to storage without an equal or greater energy input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract energy from the combination of Earth's gravity and a 'cosmic' gravitational variant via centrifugal force from a rotating body, using a constant circulating mass of water.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a circulating water system that claims to generate electricity continuously by combining gravity and 'cosmic' centrifugal forces. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as it provides no physical mechanism to restore the water's height without consuming at least as much energy as it generates, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a closed-loop system (falling, rotating, and rising water) that claims to output electrical energy without an identified external energy input to restore the water's potential energy.
- Misapplies Mach's principle and centrifugal force as an independent cosmic energy source; centrifugal forces in a rotating frame are not an external energy input but a manifestation of inertia.
- System described is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind: it claims to do useful work (generate electricity) indefinitely from a constant internal water cycle, violating energy conservation.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy require
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims net ener
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics terms (Mach'
Claimed Energy Source
Primary: Electric motor input. Claimed secondary: Centrifugal force from rotating mass (second weight) extending rotation time, implying energy gain from internal mass redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses a motor to spin a wheel containing a movable internal mass. It claims the centrifugal displacement of this mass extends rotation time, implying energy gain from internal forces. This violates energy conservation as no external energy source justifies extended operation beyond the motor's input.
Specific Physics Issues
- System attempts to extract net work from internal centrifugal forces without an external energy gradient
- Claims that displacement of internal mass 'extends rotation time' implies energy multiplication
- No ambient energy source identified to justify extended operation beyond motor input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. It appears to be a combination of gravitational potential energy (stored in elevated counterweights) and atmospheric pressure work (pushing pistons in a partial vacuum). The system attempts to use its own generated electricity to power the vacuum pump, creating a cyclical process.
AI Physics Analysis
This system violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics. It describes a closed cycle where the energy needed to reset the system (power the vacuum pump) would equal or exceed the work extracted, preventing net power generation. It mistakenly treats atmospheric pressure as a free source of unlimited work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system's net electrical output is claimed to be continuous, but the energy to reset the system (create vacuum and lift counterweights) must come from the system's own output, leading to a net loss or, at best, a brea
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description ignores the significant energy cost of creating and maintaining the partial vacuum against atmospheric pressure. The work done by atmospheric pressure on the piston is less than or equal to the work requi
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The system is described as a closed cycle that produces net work from a single thermal reservoir (the ambient atmosphere). It effectively attempts to extract net work from an isothermal system at equilibrium
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'continuous
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a battery-powered electric motor, with the system attempting to recirculate energy from a generator (Lichtmaschine) back to the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a system where an electric motor drives a complex mechanical linkage to turn a generator, with the output electricity intended to recharge the source battery. This constitutes a classic over-unity or perpetual motion claim, as it ignores inevitable losses and violates the first law of thermodynamics. No external energy source is identified to sustain the claimed 'uninterrupted cycle'.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 7 explicitly seeks 'vervielfachte Energie' (multiplied energy) and 'automatischen ununterbrochene Kreisablauf' (automatic uninterrupted cycle).
- Claim 10 describes a closed loop: battery → motor → mechanical transmission → generator → power converter → battery, implying perpetual operation with energy recirculation.
- The description confuses force multiplication (a kinematic/mechanical advantage) with energy multiplication, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The system ignores
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use electrical pulses to move 'gravity pistons' (iron/neodymium magnets) to create an imbalance, supposedly harnessing gravitational force to produce torque and output electricity. Implicitly suggests gravity itself is the primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate more electrical output than input by using pulses to create a gravitational imbalance, attempting to extract net work from Earth's static gravitational field in a cyclic process. This violates energy conservation, as gravity is a conservative force and cannot be a continuous source of energy without an external, non-conservative process or a change in potential energy of masses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims output energy > input electrical energy ('größere Ausgangsenergie als Eingangsenergie') without identifying an external energy reservoir.
- Attempts to extract net work from Earth's gravitational field without creating a cyclic change in potential (e.g., lowering a mass). The system, as described, appears to be a closed cycle attempting to use gravity as a perpetual source of motive powe
- The 'heat test' comparison (72W pulses vs. 30W DC) is meaningless for efficiency; it confuses power characteristics with energy accounting.
- Suggests scaling (diameter, segments) increases the 'imbalance' and output, implying energy multiplication from a fixed gravitational potential.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input to Motor (3), which is the sole explicit energy source. The device appears to claim amplification of this input through mechanical arrangements (lever and centrifugal unit).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical system with a motor driving a lever, which drives a centrifugal unit, which drives a generator. It violates energy conservation by implying the mechanical energy can be 'varied' or amplified through these passive stages. The output electrical energy cannot exceed the input electrical energy minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims energy is 'varied' from unit to unit, implying amplification without identifying a secondary energy source.
- Mechanical energy cannot be multiplied by passive components: Lever and centrifugal systems are force/distance trade-offs (conservation of energy), not energy multipliers.
- System is a complex Rube Goldberg machine converting electrical input to mechanical work to electrical output, with inevitable losses at each stage (friction, generator inefficiency).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies energy amp
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial starter motor (battery) driving a fluid pump. The system implies the pump drives pistons, which drive a crankshaft/flywheel, which then drives an alternator to recharge the battery and provide output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed hydraulic-mechanical system with no external energy source after an initial start. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because the inevitable losses from friction, pump inefficiency, and alternator inefficiency mean the system cannot sustainably power itself and generate excess useful work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a closed hydraulic/mechanical loop with no external energy input after startup. All energy for pumping, overcoming friction, and generating electrical output must come from the initial battery.
- Violates conservation of energy: The claim of an 'optimum energy generation engine' implies net energy output, but the described system is a lossy converter (pump -> cylinders -> alternator). The alternator cannot recharge the battery AND power the p
- No thermodynamic gradient or fuel: The device lacks a source of chemical, thermal, or environmental energy. It attempts to create a self-sustaining loop with net output, which is impossible.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claims focus on mechan
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The described s
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the input motor. The device claims to generate a mechanical advantage from the shifting center of gravity of an internal assembly (intermediate structure, eccentric bearing, and a portion of the main shaft) as it rotates.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical assembly attached to a motor's drive shaft. It describes internal moving masses and balancing mechanisms but provides no physical principle or external energy source to justify an increase in the net mechanical energy delivered to the load. This constitutes a violation of energy conservation, as it claims output > input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'incrementar la energía mecánica' (increase mechanical energy) without identifying a new energy input.
- Describes a shifting center of gravity within a closed system, which cannot create net energy or a sustained mechanical advantage.
- The 'action-reaction elements' (springs/magnets) and sliding shaft appear to be for balancing forces, not for adding energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims increased m
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'control input' causes a 'working fluid' to move, generating a 'working current' that is then amplified through a 3-stage process to produce outputs (light, heat, sound, electricity, rotation). No primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is explicitly identified, suggesting an implicit claim of extracting energy from the ambient environment or the working fluid itself without a sufficient gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system that produces multiple forms of energy from a small 'control input' through a multi-stage amplification process, with no identifiable primary energy source to account for the total output. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) through incomplete energy accounting and obfuscated technical language.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to account for the multiple claimed outputs (light, heat, sound, electricity, rotation).
- Implies energy amplification (3-stage process) without a source for the added energy, violating conservation.
- Uses vague, obfuscated terminology ('control input', 'working current', '3-stage amplification') that avoids standard thermodynamic analysis.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Initial stored chemical energy in batteries. The claim implies the water flow generated by the pump will power a turbine-generator to recharge the batteries.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use a generator on the pump's output to recharge its own batteries. This creates a closed energy loop where the generator's load increases the work the pump must do, ensuring total losses always exceed any recovered energy, violating energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The generator extracts energy from the water flow, which itself was created by the pump using battery energy. This adds a load, reducing net water flow or requiring more input power.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: The system is a closed loop (battery -> motor -> pump -> turbine -> generator -> battery). Losses from friction, electrical resistance, and turbulence ensure the generator's output is always less than the mo
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text appears to describe a mechanical/thermal system with angles (29°, 40°, 62°), forces, and displacements, but no primary energy input (electrical, chemical, fuel, ambient gradient) is explicitly identified or quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is presented as incoherent numerical gibberish mixed with angle and force notations, making physical analysis impossible. The lack of any clear energy source, combined with the obfuscated presentation, is a hallmark of a perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input accounting
- Numerical gibberish and obfuscation prevent meaningful analysis
- Claims of force multiplication and work output without a source
- Apparent attempt to create a perpetual motion or over-unity mechanism
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be an 'energy conversion output system' but the only explicit energy input appears to be the motor (61) driving the system. The description of counterweights (41), guide rails (51), and buoyancy fluid (21) suggests an attempt to create a self-sustaining or over-unity mechanism using internal mass redistribution and buoyancy forces.
AI Physics Analysis
This system attempts to generate useful output through internal mass redistribution and buoyancy forces without identifying any external energy source. The described mechanism of counterweights moving to extreme positions while driving a motor violates energy conservation, as the work needed to reset the system's internal configuration must come from the motor itself, creating a net energy loss, not gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting provided
- System appears designed to use internal motion of counterweights and buoyancy to perpetually drive itself or produce excess output
- Violates conservation of energy - internal forces (buoyancy, gravity on moving masses) cannot produce net work in a closed cycle without an external energy source
- Mechanism attempts to create a perpetual gradient or motion using only internal configuration changes
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text appears to describe geometric/angular relationships (29°, 40°, 20mm, 73mm) and numerical operations, but no identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is physically incoherent, presenting numerical and angular relationships without describing any actual energy source or conversion process. It uses technical-sounding terms (angles, dimensions) in a meaningless way to obfuscate the absence of a real physical mechanism, constituting a violation of fundamental energy accounting principles.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy conversion process described
- Claims are based on arithmetic and geometric manipulations, not physical energy flows
- Complete absence of energy accounting (inputs/outputs)
- Text is largely incoherent, mixing angles, dimensions, and numbers without physical meaning
- No mechanism for performing work or generating energy is described in physical terms
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions electrical inputs (9V, 1000Hz, 2000Hz) and a claimed 100:1 energy ratio or amplification, but no identifiable external energy source (like fuel, ambient heat gradient, or significant electrical input) is described that could account for the claimed output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a device achieving a 100:1 energy ratio or amplification using electrical inputs and resonance, which directly implies creating energy. Without a clear, external energy source (like a fuel, substantial thermal gradient, or ambient energy harvest), this violates the first law of thermodynamics. The use of technical terms like frequency and resonance obscures the lack of a physically permissible energy conversion process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of a 100:1 energy ratio or amplification implies energy output > energy input, violating conservation of energy.
- No description of a thermodynamic gradient, chemical reaction, or legitimate external energy source to enable net work output.
- Vague mechanism involving 'frequency' and 'resonance' without specifying how it overcomes thermodynamic limits.
- Incomplete energy accounting: only control input mentioned, with implied massive excess energy from an unspecified source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The described system's only explicit energy input is the electricity used to power the pumps that lift water from the lower cistern back to the higher one. The system claims this water then flows down through a duct to turn a paddle wheel and generate electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity claim disguised as a hydroelectric system. The pumps, which require an external energy input, must lift the water to create the gravitational potential energy that the generator harvests. Due to friction and other losses, the generator will always produce less energy than the pumps consume, making the system a net consumer of energy, not a producer.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The pumps must do work to lift the water against gravity. The energy recovered from the water falling cannot exceed the energy used to lift it, minus inevitable losses.
- Perpetual motion claim: The description of 'evermobile' and 'incessant' motion implies a closed cycle that produces net energy output, which is impossible.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The analysis ignores the massive energy input required by the pumps, focusing only on the output from the generators.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use gravity and a linear motor with pulsed DC to move permanent magnets, implying output > input without identifying an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to output more power than input by using pulsed DC to move magnets in a gravitational field, which violates conservation of energy. Gravity alone cannot provide net work over a cycle unless mass is lowered from a height previously gained using external energy, which is not described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims 'geringen Eingangsleistung... eine größeere Ausgangsleistung' (small input power causes larger output power) without a quantified external source.
- No thermodynamic gradient specified: gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle is zero without lifting a mass against gravity using external energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: input is 'pulsierenden Impulse' to a linear motor, but output allegedly greater. The energy to move magnets against magnetic and gravitational forces must come from somewhere.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve rotating magnets (크랭크) and coils (피스톤) arranged in specific configurations, suggesting an attempt to extract energy from magnetic interactions without an identifiable external input beyond initial rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic/electromagnetic system with complex coil and magnet arrangements that claims to generate directional power flows and multiplication effects. It violates the first law of thermodynamics by lacking a clear, sufficient external energy source and implies over-unity energy gains through internal magnetic interactions, which cannot produce net work without an external gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, mechanical, chemical, ambient).
- Describes complex magnetic/coil interactions implying energy multiplication (e.g., 4 coils powering 10 coils).
- Claims directional energy flow based on rotational position (6 o'clock vs 12 o'clock) without a thermodynamic gradient.
- Implies perpetual or over-unity operation through cascading magnetic induction loops.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes using a linear motor to move permanent magnets from a lower to an upper point on a rotor, implying the system's output is driven by gravity acting on the magnets. The only explicit input is the 'geringen Eingangsleistung' (small input power) to the linear motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce more output power than input power by using gravity, violating the conservation of energy. The key flaw is that the energy required to lift the magnets to the 'upper dead point' (against gravity) is not properly accounted for in the 'small input power,' making the claimed net energy gain impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a larger output power from a smaller input power ('geringen Eingangsleistung... eine größere Ausgangsleistung erbringt').
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done against gravity to lift the magnets (the primary energy input) is not accounted for. The linear motor's 'small input power' must supply this gravitational potential energy change, plus overcome all losses.
- Misapplication of gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from a closed cycle in a gravitational field alone. The system must expend at least as much energy to lift the mass as is recovered when it falls.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use initial external electrical input to start a self-sustaining loop where compressed air drives a motor that powers the compressor and generates excess electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to create a self-sustaining loop where a compressed air system powers itself and generates excess electricity. This is impossible because every energy conversion step loses energy to heat and friction. The system cannot output more useful energy than the original external input, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming net electrical output from a closed mechanical/fluid loop.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; every energy conversion (electrical→mechanical→pressure→mechanical→electrical) incurs irreversible losses (friction, heat, turbulence).
- The system is a classic 'bootstrapping' perpetual motion machine; the work output to run the compressor and generate excess electricity cannot come from the compressor's own output.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores all dissipative losses, treating the air motor's efficiency as enabling a closed loop with surplus.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from an external voltage source powering the start compressor. The system then claims to recycle the compressed air indefinitely to power the generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims a closed-loop air system can continuously generate net electricity, ignoring that the work needed to re-compress the spent air back to its original high-pressure state always equals or exceeds the work extracted from expanding it. The system cannot sustain itself, let alone produce excess power, without continuous external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system claims the same mass of compressed air can be repeatedly used in a closed loop to generate net electrical output.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The air motor exhausts air at a lower pressure and temperature after doing work. The recycling compressor must re-compress this low-pressure air back to high pressure, requiring more work than was extracted
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to re-compress the exhaust air in the recycling compressor is ignored or assumed to be provided for free by the system's own output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text ambiguously cites 'magnetic energy' and 'gravity of earth' as inputs, but describes a closed-loop system where motion is sustained by magnetic interactions and a rolling wheel on a runway, implying no net external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as an 'autonomous' motor using magnets and gravity, but the mechanism is a closed system with no identifiable net external energy input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims to produce continuous work without consuming fuel or leveraging a sustained external gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: describes a mechanism for continuous rotation without a clear, net external energy source.
- Misunderstands magnetic forces: permanent magnets in a static configuration cannot do net work over a cycle; they are conservative forces.
- Misapplies gravity: gravity is invoked but the described change in inclination suggests a potential energy source, yet the system's operation implies a closed loop that would eventually come to equilibrium.
- Obfuscated mechanism: the description is mechanically incoherent, making it impossible to identify a legitimate energy conversion process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'autonomous
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the motor (15) driving the unbalanced wheel. The system claims to produce electrical energy via alternators driven by the wheel's rotation, which is itself driven by the motor. No external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal gradient) is described beyond the motor's input and potential stored energy in compressed gas/combustible (Claim 7) for a transient acceleration phase.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor mechanically coupled to an unbalanced wheel that drives electrical alternators. This is a closed electromechanical system with losses, guaranteeing that the electrical output is less than the electrical input to the motor. The unbalanced wheel provides no net energy gain and the system violates energy conservation if claimed to be 'quasi-autonomous.'
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a motor driving a wheel driving alternators. Friction and electrical losses ensure net output < motor input.
- No mechanism for energy gain: An unbalanced wheel does not create energy. Its asymmetry only affects torque requirements but does not circumvent conservation of energy.
- Claim of 'quasi-autonomous' production implies sustained output exceeding input, which is impossible without an external, unaccounted energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent abstrac
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'constantly remaining potential energy' from a spring (Feder) and gravity as an 'internal energy resource', with only a small external input (F2) to overcome friction/inertia. Effectively proposes extracting net work from a closed, static potential energy field.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a perpetual motion machine. It claims to provide unlimited energy by using a small force to reposition a mass, then harvesting greater work from its descent. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the useful output cannot exceed the net energy input. The 'constantly remaining potential energy' is not an infinite source; it is a state that requires prior work to establish.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output work (generator) > small input work (F2).
- Misunderstands potential energy: The gravitational/spring potential energy is part of the system's internal energy, not an infinite external source. Lifting the mass (FG) from A to B stores potential energy; lowering it back can at best return that s
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cyclic process where a mass is lifted with minimal input, then lowered to drive a generator for greater output, with no net energy input to replenish the potential energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores that the potential energy used to drive the generator comes from the initial work done to lift the mass. The system cannot output more energy than was input to establish the height differential.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract net work solely from the gravitational force acting on a fluid circulating in a closed system (a wheel), with no external energy input other than an initial push.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate continuous electricity by cycling a fluid under gravity within a rotating wheel, but it completely ignores the fundamental physics that the net work done by gravity over any closed path is zero. The energy required to return the fluid to its initial height always equals or exceeds the work extracted during its fall.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a net energy output (>1 energy ratio) from a closed-cycle gravitational system.
- Ignores the work required to lift the fluid back to its starting height within the rotating wheel, which exactly cancels the work extracted during the fall.
- Misunderstands entropy: Claim 2 suggests the design avoids entropy without needing to slow the wheel, which is thermodynamically nonsensical.
- The described 'planar motion' and shifting center of gravity do not create a perpetual torque imbalance in a closed loop.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Only accounts for gravitat
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Attempts to ext
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct terms like 'entropy'
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of weights being lowered, with an implied but unstated external energy input required to return the weights to their elevated position.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a gravity-driven generator where weights slide down to produce torque. Crucially, it claims the weights are returned to the top by the rotation of the drive module itself, implying a self-resetting mechanism. This describes a classic over-unity or perpetual motion scheme, as the energy required to lift the weights must equal or exceed the work extracted from their fall, preventing net power generation after accounting for friction and other losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system extracts work from weights moving down, but the patent description is vague on how the weights are returned to the high position. The description 'durch eine Drehung des Antriebsmoduls (3) auf der Antriebswell
- No net energy source identified: The system is a closed mechanical loop. Gravity provides torque during descent, but work must be done against gravity to reset the system, resulting in zero or negative net work output when accounting for losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The described system appears to use an initial electrical input to lift a load (counterweight) via a ramp and an internal transport vehicle. The claimed amplification comes from the subsequent falling of that load to generate more electrical energy than was initially consumed.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity claim. It uses an initial energy input to create a gravitational potential energy store (the raised counterweight), then harvests that energy to generate electricity. Due to inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and other inefficiencies, the output electricity must be less than the initial input. The claim of 'amplification' violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system claims to amplify consumed electrical power. The only explicit input is the initial electrical energy used to lift the counterweight via the ramp/vehicle. The output is electricity generated from the falling c
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system ignores the energy required to reset the transport vehicle to its starting position on the ramp after each cycle. This reset energy is not accounted for in the 'amplification' claim.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The description of connecting multiple such amplifiers to increase power forms a cascading system that suggests energy multiplication, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve 'energy amplification' through a rotating body (7) interacting with X and Y components, suggesting output energy exceeds input without identifying an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to amplify or generate energy through rotational components and interactions between X and Y elements, but fails to identify any external energy source. This constitutes a violation of energy conservation, as it suggests creating net energy from a closed mechanical system without an external gradient or input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of energy amplification/generation without a source
- Implies creation of energy from rotational motion alone
- Uses vague terms like 'energy amplification' and 'amplified energy' without thermodynamic basis
- Appears to describe a mechanical system that purportedly outputs more energy than is input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of water (initial fill) and possibly external pumping to restore water height (implied but not specified).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-driven water system but claims 'constant' electrical production from a 'continuous cycle.' This violates energy conservation because the water's gravitational potential energy is finite; to run continuously, water must be returned to the upper height, requiring at least as much energy as is generated, plus losses. The design appears to be an unpowered perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a 'continuous cycle' and 'constant energy production' without identifying an external energy source to restore the water's gravitational potential.
- Describes a closed-loop water flow driven by gravity, which cannot provide net energy output after accounting for losses without an external input.
- Uses terms like 'suction effect' and 'turbulences' as if they create or add energy, rather than dissipate it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from lifting a mass. The device claims to use the difference in work/energy between slowly lifting a weight and the 'greater energy' realized when it falls and impacts a flywheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic gravitational over-unity claim. It incorrectly asserts that slowly lifting a mass requires less energy than the kinetic energy delivered when it falls and strikes a flywheel. In reality, the maximum output from the fall cannot exceed the input lifting work, making a self-sustaining cycle impossible as it violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The work required to lift the mass (mgh) equals the maximum kinetic energy gained during the fall (1/2 mv^2). No net energy gain is possible in a cycle.
- Misinterprets Newtonian mechanics: Claims lifting at constant velocity requires less 'energy' than the 'Wucht' (force/kinetic energy) gained during a fall from the same height. This is false; the impact energy cannot exceed mgh.
- Proposes a closed-loop system where the flywheel's output is used to re-lift the mass, which is impossible without continuous external energy input due to losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'energe
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The patent describes an input from a motor, pedals, or other prime mover applied to the first gear (1). However, the claim implies this input can be multiplied arbitrarily without loss of output rotational speed, suggesting a net energy gain.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a passive mechanical gear train. In such a system, a gear ratio can multiply torque, but it must reduce rotational speed proportionally, keeping input and output power (neglecting losses) equal. The claim that force can be multiplied arbitrarily while maintaining rotational speed is a direct violation of the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'force' multiplication without corresponding reduction in speed or displacement, violating conservation of energy.
- Asserts ability to multiply force 'todo lo que se quiera' (as much as desired) without losing 'cantidad de giro' (amount of rotation/angular speed), which is impossible for a passive gear train.
- Describes a complex gear and belt system but presents it as a power multiplier rather than a torque/speed trade-off transformer.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Human muscular effort (energy potential of the human body) is the primary input to pump water in a closed loop to drive a turbine-generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where human effort pumps water in a closed loop to spin a turbine and generate electricity. This is a thermodynamic violation because the energy required to pump the water back up to pressure will always be greater than the electrical energy recovered from the turbine, resulting in a net energy loss, not a sustainable generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System attempts to recirculate water in a closed loop to perpetually drive a turbine after initial human input.
- Ignores energy losses: No accounting for friction, turbulence, electrical resistance, or thermodynamic losses in pump, turbine, and generator.
- Misapplies hydroelectric principle: A genuine hydroelectric system requires a gravitational potential difference (height drop) from an external source, not a recirculating pump.
- The pump's work input must always exceed the electrical energy output from the turbine-generator due to system inefficiencies.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims permanent r
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The patent describes a rotating power gain device with multiple power gain units, motion devices, and rotation devices that appear to interact through locking mechanisms in an alternating cycle mode, suggesting energy is generated from the device's own internal mechanical interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system with rotating components and locking mechanisms that allegedly produces 'power gain' through internal interactions. This violates energy conservation as no external energy source is identified, and the described mechanism suggests extracting net work from the system's own motion—a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of 'power gain' without specifying energy source
- Complex mechanical interactions presented as generating net energy
- Implies continuous rotation/motion without energy dissipation accounting
- No thermodynamic process or gradient identified for energy conversion
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input to start a compressor that pressurizes a gas, which then expands to drive a piston connected to a generator. The system appears to be a closed-loop gas circuit where the expanded gas returns to the compressor's low-pressure intake.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed-loop gas system where a compressor, started by an initial electrical input, pressurizes a gas to drive a piston-generator. The expanded gas then returns to the compressor intake. This configuration violates energy conservation, as the continuous work needed to re-compress the gas after expansion must come from an external source, not from the generator's output alone. It is effectively a claimed perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy input is described to sustain the cycle after the initial start. The compressor requires continuous work input to re-pressurize the gas after expansion.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Claims to run a generator for a 'determined period' after an initial start, implying net electrical output from a closed system with only initial energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Proposes a cyclic process where gas expansion work (output) is used to generate electricity, while the spent gas is returned to the compressor to be re-pressurized, creating a perpetual cycle without a net exter
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy from liquid-filled bodies moving in a cycle, with ambient natural energy mentioned but not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a classic over-unity gravity-powered machine. It ignores the fundamental energy cost of resetting its own cycle—specifically, the work needed to lift water and/or the empty body back to the top against gravity. The net energy output over a complete cycle cannot be positive, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to generate continuous power from a closed cycle of lifting and dropping masses using a liquid. The energy required to pump the liquid back up to refill the 'up' body (or to lift the empty body again
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the primary energy input required to move the liquid against gravity from the bottom discharge point back to the top filling point. The 'liquid supply device' and 'discharging device' operations are no
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The described cycle of filling a body at the top (causing it to descend and do work) and then emptying it at the bottom (presumably to make it light for lifting) cannot yield net energy. The work to reset the system (lifti
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from water being lifted. The system's own description implies the water is cycled (drained at bottom, filled at top), requiring an external pump to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
This system is not a power generator but a gravity battery. The electrical output comes from water descending, but that water must first be pumped back up using more energy than can be recovered, violating no laws but falsely claiming net generation by omitting the primary energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the pump work required to lift water back to the upper tank
- System is a net consumer of energy; the generator output is less than the pump input due to inevitable losses
- Describes a gravity battery or pumped hydro storage, misrepresented as a power *generation* system
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims continuous generati
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is electrical power to run the pneumatic pump. The system also uses gravitational potential energy, but this is not an external source; it is cycled internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electrically-driven pump connected to a generator through a fluid/gravity mechanism. The energy to lift the weight by inflating the bag always equals or exceeds the work generated when the weight falls, resulting in a net loss. Claiming it is 'gravity-powered' obfuscates the true electrical source and suggests an impossible perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done by the pump to inflate the bag (compressing air against fluid pressure) is greater than or equal to the gravitational work extracted during the bag's descent.
- No net energy gain: The system is a complicated mechanism to convert electrical energy (for the pump) into electrical energy (from the generator) with inevitable losses.
- Misleading 'gravity-powered' label: Gravity provides the restoring force for one half of the cycle, but the energy to reset the system (lifting the weight by inflating the bag) must be supplied externally.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed source is gravitational potential energy from a heavy counterweight (lastro principal). However, to operate cyclically, energy must be repeatedly input to reset the system (e.g., lifting the weight back up or re-inclining the vertical lever). This reset energy is not accounted for as an input.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a gravity-powered generator claim that violates the First Law of Thermodynamics. It describes a mechanism to extract electrical energy from a descending weight but fails to account for the greater or equal energy required to reset the weight's position, making net energy production impossible without an external power source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system cannot output more net energy over a full cycle than the energy input to reset its gravitational potential.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes mechanisms for generating torque/rotation from a falling weight but omits the larger energy cost to return the weight to its high-potential state.
- Misapplication of torque: Torque from gravity is not an energy source; it is a force that converts stored potential energy into work. Once the weight descends, the cycle cannot repeat without external energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to two electric motor rotors, plus potential energy from gravity during the downward swing phase.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses two motors on a horizontal shaft that swing up (powered electrically) and down (using gravity). This is essentially a mechanically complex system that attempts to recapture gravitational potential energy, but the energy to create the potential comes from the motors themselves. The claim of an energy-saving effect violates conservation of energy, as the system cannot output more useful work than the total electrical energy input minus inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims energy-saving effect but ignores energy required to lift the motor rotors against gravity.
- Violates energy conservation: The system attempts to recover gravitational potential energy on the downswing, but the energy to create that potential (the upswing) came from the electrical input in the first place.
- Mechanical losses unaccounted for: Friction in gears, bearings, and transmission systems would dissipate energy, making net output less than input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex interaction between 'control input' and 'operating input' using Korean terms, suggesting energy amplification or cascading effects without identifying a primary external energy source beyond the initial electrical input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a system where a 'control input' somehow enables an 'operating input' to produce a larger output, implying energy amplification without a clear, thermodynamically permissible external energy source. This pattern of incomplete energy accounting, combined with obfuscated technical language, strongly suggests a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output greater than control input without identifying all energy inputs.
- Implies energy multiplication or cascading gain without thermodynamic justification.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('control input', 'operating input', 'energy amplification') that obscures the fundamental energy flow.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient to justify claimed performance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical power supplied from the generator to the drive motor. The device claims this is a 'partial' power, implying the generator's output exceeds the motor's input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a mechanical system where a generator, driven by the flywheel via a reduction box, powers the motor that initially spins the flywheel. This creates a closed energy loop with no identified external energy source, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The mechanical complexity obscures the fact that losses make perpetual or net energy output impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System output (generator) is claimed to power its own input motor with surplus, constituting a closed-loop energy multiplication scheme.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy source is identified to compensate for losses (friction, electrical resistance, waste heat).
- Implied over-unity operation: The description suggests a self-sustaining system where the generator powers the motor that drives it, which is thermodynamically impossible without net external input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated or amplified through interactions between 'magnetic force generating bodies' (자력발생체) and 'magnetic force generating cores' (자력발생코어) in a closed-loop configuration, with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of magnetic components arranged to allegedly generate electricity. It provides no clear external energy source and implies energy amplification through internal magnetic interactions, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The complex description obscures the fundamental impossibility of creating net energy from a closed magnetic system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes a closed-loop magnetic system allegedly producing 'output electricity' greater than any input, violating energy conservation.
- Uses magnetic terminology in a way that suggests energy creation from internal magnetic interactions alone, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output elec
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical terms (mag
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only gravity, with no other external energy input. The system attempts to create a continuous rotation by making weights extend radially outward on the descending side of the rotation (creating a larger torque) and retract on the ascending side (creating a smaller counter-torque).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a type of perpetual motion machine. While the asymmetric torque during descent seems promising, the energy required to reset the weights on the ascent (lifting them closer to the axle) always equals or exceeds the energy gained during descent, resulting in zero net work output over a full cycle if only gravity is used.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to produce electrical energy from gravity alone, but gravity is a conservative force. The net work done by gravity over one complete cycle is zero if the weights return to their starting height.
- Violates the principle of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind: It claims the shaft rotates 'sin otra energía que la de la gravedad' (without other energy than gravity), implying a net energy output from a closed-loop process with no net chan
- The hydraulic/pneumatic/electrical control system required to retract and extend the weights at precise moments itself requires an energy input, which is not accounted for as an input to the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest no external energy consumption ('ohne Verzehr äußerer Energie') and that work is performed using a constant internal potential load ('konstant wirksam bleibender innerer potenzieller Last') which is maintained without energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a system that performs displacement work against arbitrary resistances using a constant internal potential load, asserts a positive energy balance without consuming external energy, and claims the ability to return to its initial state without energy input. This directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims to produce useful work from an internal, non-depleting source with no identified external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'positive Energiebilanz' (positive energy balance) without identifying an external energy source.
- Claims to perform displacement work ('Verschiebearbeit') against resistance while maintaining a constant internal potential without loss ('ohne Potenzialverlust').
- Suggests the system can return to its initial state without energy expenditure ('ohne Energieaufwand in den Anfangszustand zurückkehren').
- Describes balancing opposing loads in equilibrium states, implying extraction of net work from an isopotential system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims positive en
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from either a battery (claims 4, 8) or a direct grid connection via rail-catenary (claims 5, 9), used to power an electric motor that drives a traction wheel to rotate the main circular structure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electrically-powered motor that spins a large rotating structure. Any generators attached to it will produce less electricity than is consumed by the motor, making it a net energy consumer, not a producer. The patent's claim that it generates sufficient kinetic energy for electric generators obfuscates this fundamental violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'develops sufficient kinetic energy to induce one or several electric generators' but ignores that the input energy to create that kinetic energy comes entirely from the battery or grid.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is a motor-driven rotating mass. Any electrical energy extracted from generators coupled to this mass must be less than the electrical energy input to the motor, minus all losses (friction, electrical, etc.
- No novel ambient energy source identified: The device is compared to wind turbines but lacks an external energy gradient (like wind) to exploit. It is a purely electrically-driven mechanical system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to use a feedback loop where output energy is partially fed back to the input, suggesting energy multiplication without identifying an external source beyond the initial electrical input (1E).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where an initial 1 unit of electrical input energy is supposedly multiplied through a series of converters and feedback loops to produce a sustained net output exceeding the input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to create energy from nothing within a closed loop, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming net output (2.16E) exceeds initial input (1E) in a closed-loop system.
- Assumes perfect or over-unity efficiency in energy conversion steps (80%, 90%) without accounting for inevitable losses.
- Describes an energy multiplication process (1E → 2.4E → 2.16E → sustained 1.16E output) that is thermodynamically impossible without an external energy source.
- Uses vague terminology (e.g., 'energy pressure', 'energy flow') instead of standard physical quantities.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical-sounding t
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed source is the repulsive force between permanent magnets, with an initial electrical input from a battery to an 800W motor to overcome the magnetic repulsion at the closest point.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity magnetic motor claim. The system attempts to extract net work from the conservative field of permanent magnets. The energy required to push the magnets together (against repulsion) is always at least as great as the energy recovered during repulsion, making perpetual or self-sustaining operation impossible. The claim of net electrical generation violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims generator output > motor input, creating a net energy gain from a closed magnetic system.
- Ignores energy accounting: The work done by magnetic repulsion is conservative. The energy gained on the repulsive stroke is exactly equal to the energy that must be supplied by the motor to push the magnets together again on the compressive stroke,
- Misinterprets force as energy: Lists forces (Kg, 1000 Kg) and incorrectly multiplies them by rotational speed to get a power-like quantity, confusing units and concepts.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Generator
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical terms (U./
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with water (40cm height, 3cm diameter), some rotating components (12 rotations, 20cm length), and weights (100g, 600g). It appears to claim energy multiplication where water flow or rotation somehow produces more output energy than input, but no primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system with water and rotating components that appears to claim energy multiplication (30% increase yielding 900 units output). Without any identifiable external energy source and with claims of net energy gain from what seems to be a closed cycle, this violates the first law of thermodynamics. The description is technically obfuscated with unclear measurements and relationships.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of energy multiplication (e.g., 30% increase leading to 900 units output from unspecified input)
- Violates conservation of energy - system appears to be described as a closed mechanical cycle producing net work
- Uses vague quantitative claims without defining units or baseline measurements
- Describes mechanical motions (rotations, water flow) without a thermodynamic driver or gradient
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to require only water as input, with the system's internal 'energy amplification' generating hydrogen via electrolysis without external primary or renewable energy. The water is split, hydrogen is burned to run an engine, which drives a generator, and the water is recovered.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a self-sustaining energy generator requiring only water, with outputs exceeding inputs. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating energy conservation. The described cycle cannot produce net useful energy (electricity, mechanical work, and excess hydrogen) from water alone, as all processes incur losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation): Claims output power > input power ('Energieverstärkung') and that hydrogen is produced via electrolysis 'ohne die Aufwendung von Primärenergie'.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Proposes a closed-loop system performing continuous work (electricity, mechanical, hydrogen output) with only water as consumable, ignoring inevitable waste heat and entropy increase.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The only explicit input is water, which is not a fuel. The chemical energy of the produced hydrogen must come from the electrical energy used in electrolysis, creating a circular dependency with no net external energy so
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to generate electricity from 'vibrational energy' in a structure, possibly from ambient thermal motion or unspecified gradients, but lacks specification of an external energy reservoir or gradient to drive the process.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electricity from structural vibrations, but provides no legitimate external energy source or gradient to drive the conversion. The mechanism implicitly suggests extracting net useful work from ambient thermal equilibrium motion, which violates both the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The use of technical terms obscures a classic perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law (Energy Conservation): Claims to generate electrical output without a clear, quantified input energy source. The described mechanism suggests extracting net work from an equilibrium or pseudo-equilibrium state.
- Violates Second Law (Entropy): No identifiable temperature or potential gradient to drive energy conversion. Mentions using 'vibrational energy' which, if ambient thermal motion, cannot be harnessed for net work without a colder reservoir (Maxwell's
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: Describes cascading/conversion processes (vibrational to electrical) without accounting for all input energy, suggesting 'energy multiplication'.
- Obfuscated Mechanism: Uses correct-sounding terms like 'piezoelectric element', 'vibrational energy', and 'resonance' but combines them in a way that implies perpetual motion or over-unity energy generation.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests the primary input is the one-time potential energy from lifting mass points, but claims this leads to a permanent imbalance and continuous generation of excess kinetic energy, implying energy is created from the configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that uses asymmetric loading and clever coupling to create a permanent torque imbalance, claiming this generates excess kinetic energy. This is a classical violation of energy conservation, as the net work output over any complete cycle cannot exceed the work input required to lift the masses and reset the mechanism. The system is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of 'excess kinetic energy' (überschüssiger kinetischer Energie) from a permanently unbalanced rotating system, which violates conservation of energy.
- Proposes a 'permanent 2D/3D imbalance' that continuously releases kinetic energy without an equal or greater energy input to sustain it.
- Uses the formula '-m·g·l < +m·g·l' to justify the imbalance, but this is a torque inequality, not an energy accounting. Torque imbalance can cause rotation, but net work over a cycle requires net energy input.
- Describes complex mechanical coupling and interval locking/unlocking, but provides no mechanism to reset the system without input work equal to or greater than the claimed 'excess' output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on torque
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be from gravitational and centrifugal forces acting on moving masses on a figure-eight track, implying extraction of net work from a closed mechanical cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate usable energy from a closed mechanical system using only gravity and centrifugal forces, which are conservative. No external energy source is identified to overcome friction and other losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind that violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input identified to sustain motion against dissipative losses.
- Violates thermodynamics: Claims a 'permanent disequilibrium' and self-sustaining rotation from a closed mechanical loop, which is impossible without an external gradient.
- Incomplete force analysis: Centrifugal force is frame-dependent and not an external energy source; any work done by/against it in one part of the cycle is recovered in another if the path is closed and conservative.
- Misapplication of concepts: 'Inversion of centrifugal force polarity' does not create net energy; it is part of a cyclical, conservative force field.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to claim energy generation from a 'magnetic field generator' (자장발생기) and 'magnetic field body' (자장체) interacting through a 'magnetic field path' (자장경로), with no identifiable external energy input beyond the initial setup.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system that claims to generate usable energy through internal magnetic interactions without any clear external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the law of energy conservation. The complex magnetic circuit description obfuscates the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility of the claimed energy multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Claims energy generation from magnetic interactions without an external driving force, implying creation of energy from a static configuration.
- Describes a complex magnetic circuit and 'magnetic field body' movement that ostensibly produces net work output without accounting for the energy required to establish and maintain the magnetic fields or overcome losses.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting a perpetual or self-sustaining energy multiplication process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate magnetic power (output) from magnetic flux changes induced by magnetic fields from 'magnetic flux self-excitation generators' (100, 110). Suggests a feedback loop where output magnetic energy is used to sustain or amplify the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system that claims to generate power through self-exciting magnetic flux changes, with no clear external energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind, directly violating the law of energy conservation. The terminology is obfuscatory, masking the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility of the claimed process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying energy can be created from a closed magnetic interaction loop.
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., electrical, mechanical, thermal gradient). The described 'magnetic flux self-excitation' lacks a thermodynamic source.
- Uses obfuscatory terminology ('magnetic power', 'self-excitation') that masks the absence of a net energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output powe
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Electric motor input driving a rotating body, with claimed additional energy extraction from gravitational potential energy of the same rotating body.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent explicitly violates energy conservation by claiming the rotating body outputs more energy than is input to the system, attempting to extract net work from gravitational potential energy without an external gradient or energy source. The described mechanical configurations cannot produce excess energy beyond what the driving motor supplies.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims output energy > input energy (能量输出大于输入的能量)
- Attempts to extract net work from gravitational potential energy without creating or maintaining an energy gradient
- No external energy source identified beyond the initial motor input
- System appears to be a closed mechanical loop with claimed energy multiplication
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be electrical input to motors spinning rotors, but the claim suggests the device generates a net linear thrust (force) from rotational motions alone, implying energy output exceeding rotational input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a directed linear thrust (force) solely through a specific configuration of rotating masses. This is a classic violation of Newton's laws of motion, as internal motions cannot produce a net external force on a closed system without an external reaction mass or field interaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) - describes generating linear thrust without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum - claims directional thrust from purely internal rotations.
- Incomplete energy accounting - treats rotational kinetic energy input as separate from a claimed linear force output, implying energy multiplication.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (e.g., gravitational, electromagnetic) to justify net force generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex interaction of components (coils, magnets, rotors, plates) with ambient energy (sunlight, wind, thermal/humidity gradients) and possibly an initial electrical input, but the accounting is incoherent.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that appears to use ambient energy sources but claims energy multiplication and cascading effects that are not thermodynamically sound. The description is vague and obfuscated, lacking a coherent energy balance, and implies output exceeding all identifiable inputs, which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Complete lack of quantitative energy accounting for inputs and outputs.
- Claims of generating multiple units of output energy from a single unit of input without identifying a sufficient external energy source.
- Describes energy extraction from ambient gradients but implies a multiplicative or regenerative effect that violates conservation.
- Uses correct physics terms (energy, coils, magnets, gradients) in a context that suggests a perpetual motion or over-unity mechanism.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a purely mechanical system with no explicit external energy input described. It claims to generate power through internal pressure and lever mechanisms without identifying a primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical gear and lever system claiming to produce industrial power, but fails to identify any external energy source. The mechanism appears to rely on internal pressure and lever multiplication to generate rotational motion, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it suggests creating useful work from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (violates energy conservation)
- Claims of pressure accumulation and power generation without an energy source
- Mechanical system described as producing net power output with no input work specified
- Implies self-sustaining or amplified mechanical motion
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system using 'magnetic energy' and 'electric energy' (중력 and 자력) that are somehow combined to produce 'output energy' (동력) greater than the input, with components like magnetic flux paths, magnetic bodies, and rotating bodies. No primary external energy source (electrical, thermal, chemical) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly combines magnetic and electric energy to produce a greater output energy, which is a classic perpetual motion claim. It lacks a clear external energy source, violates energy conservation, and uses technical terms (magnetic flux paths, rotating bodies) in an obfuscatory manner to suggest energy multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies creation of energy via combination of magnetic and electric energy without a clear external source.
- No thermodynamic limit specified: Claims energy generation without identifying the heat source or sink, or the conversion process limits.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes magnetic and electric components interacting to produce output, but does not account for the energy required to establish and maintain magnetic fields and electric currents.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes complex mechanical/electrical interactions (rotors, stators, coils, magnets) but fails to identify any primary energy input. Mentions 'energy generation' without specifying input energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex assembly of rotors, stators, coils, and magnets that allegedly generates energy, but completely fails to account for any external energy input. The system appears to claim energy generation from its own internal components, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes energy generation from internal components (magnets, coils, rotors) without external input.
- Implies self-sustaining or energy-multiplying operation through cascading components.
- Violates energy conservation - output energy cannot exceed total input energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be self-sustaining: initial electrical input from batteries/solar panels powers a motor/propeller to rotate a horizontal wing/lever; rotation spins alternators to recharge batteries and provide net excess electrical output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It describes an electrically motorized rotating arm that drives alternators. The system cannot produce more electrical energy than is supplied to its motor because the alternators create a mechanical load. All energy ultimately comes from the initial batteries, with continuous operation impossible due to cumulative losses from friction, drag, and electrical inefficiency.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation): Claims net electrical output > electrical input with no external energy source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: No thermodynamic gradient (heat, wind, solar) is identified to drive a continuous work cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores all losses (friction in bearings, wheels, gearbox; electrical resistance; aerodynamic drag).
- Mechanism is a motor-driven rotating arm, not a prime mover. The alternators provide a load, increasing torque required from the motor.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'potential energy and kinetic energy' in a novel way, but the described mechanism suggests an attempt to extract net work from an internal energy exchange without an identified external energy source or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that cyclically transfers energy between internal components, claiming this process can produce useful work output greater than the control input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a clear external energy source and suggests energy multiplication, a hallmark of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of primary energy input.
- Implies energy amplification or creation through internal cycling between components (e.g., 'potential energy' in component 1 is transferred to component 2, which then returns 'amplified' energy).
- No thermodynamic cycle or gradient (e.g., temperature, pressure, chemical potential) is specified to drive the process, violating the need for a net energy input to perform work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a process where a 'control magnet' (2 poles) is used to generate a 'working magnet' (4 poles), which then generates a 'superior magnet' (8 poles). This appears to be a cascading magnetic energy generation process with no identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading magnetic system that claims to generate increasing magnetic 'poles' or energy without a clear external power source. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the law of energy conservation, as it suggests creating energy from the magnetic configuration itself.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., electrical, mechanical, thermal).
- Claims energy multiplication (2 poles → 4 poles → 8 poles) without accounting for the work required to create or sustain magnetic fields.
- Implies a perpetual or over-unity process where magnetic configurations generate more energy than is input.
- Violates energy conservation; magnetic fields are conservative force fields and cannot do net work in a cycle without an external energy source.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described. Initial energy from external gas boiler (27) or battery (26) to heat water. Claims subsequent operation is sustained by 'anticipated energy' from the system's own generator (6), implying self-sustaining or over-unity operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a self-sustaining steam engine that uses its own generator output to power the pumps and heaters that maintain its operating cycle. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a net energy output greater than the net external input. The described pressure-vacuum cycle also cannot produce net work from a single heat source, violating the Second Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law (Energy Conservation): Implies a closed-loop system where the generator powers the pumps and heaters that maintain the cycle, which would inherently have losses. No net external energy input is specified for sustained operation.
- Violates Second Law (Thermodynamics): Describes using pumps to move vapor from a low-pressure (vacuum) chamber to a high-pressure chamber, then expanding it through a turbine to do work. This is a net work cycle with only a single thermal reservoir (
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: The 'anticipated energy' from the generator is treated as a free input to run compressors and heaters, ignoring that this energy must come from the turbine's output, creating a logically circular and lossy system.
- Perpetual Motion Mechanism: The description of permanent circulation and pressure maintenance using system's own generated power is characteristic of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The claim suggests the pyramidal conductor itself collects 'different forms of electromagnetic energy' from the ambient environment without identifying a specific, quantifiable source or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a simple closed conductor shaped like a pyramid, claiming to collect ambient electromagnetic energy to power loads. It violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes no real mechanism to rectify ambient energy or create a usable potential difference, and its closed loop cannot do net work on a load without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism or gradient (e.g., no specified frequency, field strength, or thermal difference).
- Claims to supply electrical loads from a simple closed conductor, implying net energy extraction without an external power source or rectification circuit.
- Violates energy conservation: a passive, closed conductor in equilibrium cannot provide net electrical power to a load.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions 'control power' and 'output power' with claims of energy multiplication between them, but no identifiable primary energy input. Implies energy extraction from ambient 'vibration' or gradients without specifying a measurable source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a 'vibration power generator' allegedly produces more output power than the control power input, implying energy multiplication. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it fails to identify any external energy source that could account for the claimed surplus, instead relying on vague references to ambient vibrations without a clear, quantifiable gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting: Claims output power exceeds control input power without identifying the ambient energy source providing the difference.
- Violates conservation of energy: Describes a system where a 'vibration power generator' creates a power surplus between a control circuit and output circuit, implying net energy creation.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Suggests extracting useful work from ambient vibrations or internal gradients without a sufficient entropy sink or a true non-equilibrium source.
- Obfuscated terminology: Uses terms like 'vibration power generator', 'control power', 'output power', 'vibration power condenser' in a vague, non-standard way that obscures the energy flow.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical/mechanical input to the drive means (aandrijfmiddelen) to start and maintain rotation. The system attempts to use a portion of the generator's output to power its own drive, creating a feedback loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to create a self-sustaining or energy-amplifying device by using a generator's output to power its own motor. Due to inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and conversion inefficiencies, such a feedback loop cannot sustain itself indefinitely and violates the conservation of energy. The asymmetric mass does not provide a net energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- System describes a feedback loop where generator output partially powers the drive mechanism. With losses (friction, electrical resistance, generator/ motor inefficiencies), this loop cannot sustain itself, let alone produce net excess energy.
- The offset center of mass creates a gravitational torque that varies with position, but no net energy can be extracted from a conservative gravitational field over a closed cycle. The control to activate the drive near the bottom point merely adds en
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims imply a self-sustai
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system where a single power input to a first power unit somehow generates power in multiple subsequent units (N and S poles), implying energy multiplication without an identifiable external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading system where one power input allegedly generates power in multiple subsequent units, implying energy multiplication without accounting for all energy inputs. This violates conservation of energy as the total useful output would exceed the controlled electrical input, with no clear external energy source to balance the equation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent energy multiplication (one input powers multiple outputs)
- No identifiable ambient energy input to account for claimed outputs
- Violation of energy conservation - total output power would exceed input if all claimed outputs are active simultaneously
- Vague mechanism that suggests creation of useful work from a single input without losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and incomplete. Claims to use 'ambient energy' and 'temperature difference' between components, but describes energy multiplication through cascading stages where output from one stage powers the next, suggesting energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate usable power by cascading energy conversion stages, using ambient temperature differences and internal feedback loops, ultimately producing more energy than is input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating energy conservation laws, as it lacks a clear, sufficient external energy source to account for its claimed output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by implying net energy output exceeds total energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting work can be extracted without a sufficient thermal gradient or by creating a perpetual gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ambient energy inputs (if any) are not quantified, and all losses are ignored.
- Describes cascading/stacking of stages to multiply energy, which is thermodynamically impossible for net gain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Mentions ambient energy sources (wind, solar, thermal, humidity gradients) but describes a cascading system where outputs from one stage become inputs to another, suggesting energy multiplication without identifying a primary external energy source sufficient to account for total output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex, cascading energy system using ambient sources but implies stages where output from one unit powers another, suggesting net energy multiplication without a sufficient primary energy input. This structure, combined with vague quantitative claims and obfuscated physics terminology, strongly indicates a violation of both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication/cascading without sufficient primary input
- No clear accounting for total energy input vs. total useful work output
- System description suggests outputs feeding inputs in a way that could imply perpetual motion or over-unity operation
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) if net output exceeds all identified inputs
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics if claiming to extract useful work from an isothermal equilibrium or without a sufficient entropy increase/thermal gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract describes a process where a 'vortex' or 'whirlpool' (낙하역) and 'vortex energy' (스프링) are used to generate multiple forms of energy (electricity, heat, wind, etc.) from a single input, suggesting energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes generating multiple forms of useful energy (electricity, heat, wind) from a vortex process, implying an output greater than the identifiable input, which violates energy conservation. The use of ambiguous terms like 'vortex energy' and the lack of a clear primary energy source are hallmarks of a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of primary energy source or input.
- Implied energy multiplication: Suggests generating 3 times the input energy (3íì ).
- Vague mechanism: Uses terms like 'vortex energy' without clear thermodynamic definition.
- Violates conservation: Outputs (electricity, heat, wind, etc.) cannot exceed total energy inputs.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex cascading systems (condensers, evaporators, turbines, generators, magnetic fields) but fails to identify a primary energy input. Mentions 'ambient energy' and 'magnetic field energy' but provides no thermodynamic gradient or mechanism for net energy extraction.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex system that appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It cascades various energy conversion components (evaporators, condensers, turbines, magnetic devices) but provides no clear primary energy input, suggesting it aims to extract net work from ambient conditions without a thermodynamic gradient, which violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source or input accounting
- Claims of cascading/stacking energy processes without explaining how initial energy deficit is overcome
- Uses terminology (condenser, evaporator, turbine, generator, magnetic field) in a way that suggests perpetual motion or energy multiplication
- Appears to claim net energy output from ambient conditions without a usable gradient or external work input
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying creation of energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'magnetic field energy' from Earth's magnetic field and 'gravitational potential energy' to generate electricity, implying extraction of net work from ambient gradients without an explicit external energy input to maintain the gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electricity by extracting energy from Earth's magnetic and gravitational fields. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to produce net useful work without an adequate external energy source, directly violating energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate electricity from Earth's magnetic field without depleting the source or providing an input to sustain the energy extraction process.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a usable energy gradient (electricity) from an equilibrium or ambient source without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes 'magnetic field energy' and 'gravitational energy' as inputs but does not account for the work needed to manipulate these fields or to maintain a non-equilibrium state for continuous power generation.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses terms like 'magnetic field energy', 'gravitational potential', and 'resonance' in a vague, non-quantitative way that suggests energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device is a purely mechanical gear/wheel transmission system. The only explicit input is the mechanical work supplied to the input shaft. No external energy source (chemical, electrical, thermal gradient) is mentioned.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical gear system that claims to increase force while maintaining equal input and output speed, which would mean increasing output power without an additional energy input. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as a passive transmission cannot create energy or power.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'force increase' with equal input and output speed, implying power (force * velocity) increase from a fixed mechanical input.
- Describes geometric progression of force increase (ratio 1.41) through cascading stages without identifying an external energy source to supply the increasing power.
- A purely passive mechanical transmission cannot create energy; it can only trade force for speed (or vice versa) while conserving power (minus losses).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'accroissem
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims involve three types of 'energy' (control, amplification, and output energy) with suggestions that amplification energy can exceed control input, implying energy multiplication without identifying an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an energy amplification system where 'amplification energy' allegedly exceeds 'control energy' input, suggesting energy multiplication without identifying an external energy source to account for the difference. The vague terminology and lack of complete energy accounting strongly indicate a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy amplification/multiplication (output > control input) without accounting for all energy inputs
- Vague description of energy conversion processes that could imply extraction of net work from an equilibrium state
- Claims about efficiency exceeding 90% without specifying thermodynamic limits or operating conditions
- Use of undefined energy types (control, amplification, output) that obfuscate energy accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve three types of 'energy' (control energy, stored energy, and rotational energy) interacting in a way that suggests energy multiplication from ambient sources without proper accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system with three interacting energy types that allegedly produces more output than the control input, violating energy conservation. The description is vague, uses physics terms incoherently, and fails to identify the complete source of the claimed excess energy, making it thermodynamically invalid.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (output > control input)
- Incomplete energy accounting for all inputs
- Vague mechanism suggesting extraction of net work from equilibrium or ambient gradients without specifying the gradient
- Use of correct physics terms (energy, rotation, storage) in a confusing, obfuscatory manner
- Implied over-unity performance without identifying the limiting thermodynamic cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the gravitational potential energy of falling masses (pm1, pm2). The system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly intended to reset and lift the masses using energy generated from their fall.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to produce permanent energy using only gravity and falling masses, but it cannot supply the energy needed to reset those masses to their initial height. The energy required to lift the masses will always equal or exceed the work extracted from their fall, making net energy generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The device claims to generate net energy (Ep) while only accounting for the initial gravitational input. The described mechanisms for auto-synchronization and overcoming friction would themselves consume energy, requi
- No perpetual gradient: Gravity is a conservative force. To cycle masses, they must be raised against gravity, requiring at least as much energy as is gained from their descent, minus losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the energy required to reset the system (lift the masses back to their starting height). It incorrectly attributes 'permanent energy' production to the assembly of mechanisms.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output from fal
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes interactions between 'permanent magnets' (영구자석) and 'electromagnets' (전자석), suggesting energy is somehow extracted from the magnetic field configuration itself, with claims of energy multiplication (4배 이상). No primary external energy source (electrical, thermal, chemical, ambient) is clearly identified as the input to be converted.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system using permanent and electromagnets, claiming to produce more energy than is input (energy multiplication). This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as no external energy source is properly accounted for. The mechanism attempts to extract net work from static magnetic fields, a classic perpetual motion scheme of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output energy exceeds control input without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a sustained energy gradient or useful work from a static magnetic configuration in equilibrium.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on magnetic interactions while ignoring all losses (resistive, frictional, radiative).
- Misapplication of magnetic principles: Suggests N-N and S-S magnetic repulsions can be arranged to perpetually drive a system.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions an external drive unit (Krafteinheit) to start the motor, with claims that a 'torque surplus' is fed back to this same drive unit. No primary energy source (e.g., fuel, electrical input, ambient gradient) is identified. The system appears to rely on gravity and internal mass redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor claiming to generate a torque surplus that is fed back to its own starter motor. Since gravity is a conservative force and no external energy source (like a height differential reset by an external input) is clearly defined, the claim violates energy conservation. The description fits a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a 'torque surplus' is generated and fed back to the drive unit, implying net energy output greater than input without an external energy source.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Gravity is a conservative force; net work cannot be extracted from a closed cycle of masses in a gravitational field without an external input to reset the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'external drive unit' is ambiguously both the input and the recipient of a surplus, obscuring the true net energy flow.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe energy amplification through cascading interactions between 'energy bodies' and 'energy fields', suggesting output energy exceeds input without identifying an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where 'energy bodies' interact with 'energy fields' to produce amplified output energy through cascading effects, with no clear external energy source identified. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting energy can be created or multiplied internally.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes energy multiplication/cascading that violates conservation of energy.
- Claims 'energy bodies' generate more energy than they receive, implying perpetual motion.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('energy body', 'energy field', 'amplification device') instead of standard physics concepts.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims suggest extracting energy from magnetic interactions between primary and secondary magnetic fields, with apparent references to ambient energy or magnetic potential energy, but no clear, legitimate external energy input is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system claiming to output more energy than is input by manipulating primary and secondary magnetic fields at 45-degree angles. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it fails to identify any legitimate external energy source to account for the claimed excess output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims energy output greater than control input without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a perpetual gradient or extraction of net work from an equilibrium magnetic system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes 'primary' and 'secondary' magnetic fields interacting to produce 'amplified' energy, ignoring the work required to establish and maintain magnetic configurations.
- Misapplication of magnetic concepts: Claims about 45-degree field alignments producing energy multiplication are thermodynamically unsound.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the electrical grid powering the AC motor. The system attempts to use a portion of this input power to drive a DC motor acting as a generator, with the goal of returning electricity to the same grid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an attempted perpetual motion machine. It uses grid electricity to run a motor that turns a generator, then sends the generator's output back to the grid. This cannot produce net power because the generator's output is always less than the motor's input due to losses, resulting in a net energy drain, not gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System output (power to grid) is a subset of the total input (power from grid), minus inevitable losses. No net energy gain is possible.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats the generator's output as a 'recycled' gain, ignoring that the generator's mechanical input power comes entirely from the AC motor, which is powered from the grid.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Implies creating useful electrical output from a single electrical input with no external energy source, equivalent to a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary claimed source is a small 'entrée' energy input to the crown (1), but the device is described as increasing this energy to produce a superior output from the central wheel (2). No external ambient source (thermal, chemical, etc.) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a mechanical cell that outputs more energy than is input, constituting a clear violation of energy conservation. The description is vague and obfuscatory, but the core claim of energy multiplication from a closed mechanical system is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of energy creation/output > input (Claim 1: 'le système augmente l'énergie, en permettant une énergie sortie supérieure')
- No identifiable external energy reservoir or gradient to enable net work output
- Mechanical system with no mechanism to circumvent friction and other dissipative losses
- Vague construction with no quantitative limits that would prevent perpetual motion
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed system attempts to use gravity (initial drop) and magnetic forces (to lift spheres back up) as the primary energy inputs. However, the description implies a closed-loop cycle where magnets perpetually lift the spheres after they fall.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a violation of energy conservation. It describes a cycle where falling spheres generate electricity, but magnets then lift them back up for free. The energy needed to lift the spheres against gravity (whether by magnets or any other means) must come from an external source and will always exceed or equal the recoverable energy from the fall, resulting in zero or negative net power output.
Specific Physics Issues
- The magnetic track lifting the sphere back to the top requires energy input equal to or greater than the gravitational potential energy gained by the sphere. This energy is not accounted for.
- The system, as described for continuous operation, violates energy conservation: the electrical output from the generator and the coil must be less than the work required to reset the system (lift the spheres).
- Use of mu-metal and electromagnets suggests an attempt to circumvent the need for work input to detach the sphere from the magnetic track, but any such configuration still requires energy to manipulate magnetic fields and will not yield net energy ga
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description ig
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary energy source is the gravitational potential energy of falling balls, with an auxiliary input from a chargeable power source to run the device's controls and mechanisms. The system attempts to create a cycle where the balls are lifted using buoyancy/force differences in liquid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It attempts to use a buoyancy/weight-shifting mechanism to create a perpetual cycle where balls fall to turn a generator, then are magically reset to the top using less energy than they produced. The system's own internal battery is supposed to be recharged by the output, creating a net energy gain, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system requires energy to reset the cycle (e.g., moving the piston, operating valves, pushing balls back into the liquid cabinet). This energy is supplied by the chargeable power source, which is charged by the devic
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies the mechanical energy from the vane wheel can recharge the power source with surplus to run the device and provide useful work. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as net ener
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: The buoyancy/pressure mechanism in the ball converts no new energy; it merely allows the ball to sink or float based on its state. The work to lift the ball against gravity (to regain potential energy) must be
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on fluid, but the machine purportedly pumps the fluid back to the starting position using its own weight, creating a closed cycle with no external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity gravitational perpetual motion machine. It incorrectly claims that the weight of pistons can pump fluid to a higher elevation to reset the cycle, with the fluid's descent producing excess work, ignoring that the work needed to lift the fluid equals or exceeds the work gained from its fall in a closed, lossy system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a net power output from a closed gravitational system.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create energy from a conservative force field (gravity) in a cycle.
- Internal work to pump fluid against gravity is not properly accounted for; claims piston weights 'cancel each other out' but this ignores the work needed to lift the fluid mass.
- Claim 8 suggests self-sustaining rotation, a hallmark of perpetual motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with two 100cm air columns, a 200cm 'vibration' or 'wave' element, and 'amplification' mechanisms, but no explicit external energy input is identified. The claims suggest energy multiplication from ambient air.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to amplify vibrational energy in air columns from 200 units to 400 units with no external power source, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described self-sustaining cycle also violates the second law by implying work can be extracted from a single thermal reservoir without a temperature gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output energy (400 units) exceeds input energy (200 units) without an identifiable external source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Describes a self-sustaining amplification cycle where vibrations/waves in air columns generate more vibrational energy than was initially present, implying creation of useful energy from a single thermal res
- Incomplete energy accounting: No measurement or accounting of the initial energy required to create the 'vibration' or to overcome friction/damping in the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'amplificat
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to claim generation of unidirectional thrust/acceleration from purely rotational motions of bodies with non-uniform mass distributions, without identifying any external energy input beyond the initial rotational kinetic energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to generate unidirectional propulsion through complex rotations of asymmetrical masses, but it violates conservation of linear momentum by attempting to produce net thrust without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field. The description uses rotational dynamics terminology to obscure the fundamental impossibility of creating net linear acceleration from purely internal motions in an isolated system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum: The system claims to produce a net linear thrust from internal rotations without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
- Violates Newton's third law: No reaction mass or external reaction point is identified for the claimed unidirectional force.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy input mechanism is described to sustain the claimed acceleration against losses.
- Centers of mass confusion: Claims acceleration arises from 'local centrifugal force differences' within a rotating rigid body system, which cannot produce net external force on a free body.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use floating balls/weights in a water column ('Wassersteigrohr') to drive a generator via a chain and lever system. No external energy input (e.g., pumped water, thermal gradient, moving air) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device using floating balls in a water column to drive a generator, but provides no source for the continuous energy required. The buoyancy force is conservative; to extract net work, the system must be returned to its initial state using at least as much energy as it produces, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net external energy input described
- System likely relies on buoyant force in a static water column, which cannot produce continuous net work without an external input to reset the cycle
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate electricity without accounting for the energy required to lift water, reset floats, or overcome losses
- Appears to be a gravity/buoyancy engine attempting perpetual motion
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air flow (wind) is the primary claimed input, but the description suggests the system attempts to use its own output airflow to create a self-sustaining or amplified input, implying a perpetual motion or over-unity mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a turbine system where the output airflow is recirculated to drive the input, aiming for self-sustained operation or amplification. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it ignores inevitable losses from friction, drag, and conversion inefficiencies, making a perpetual feedback loop impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system appears to use output airflow to drive the input turbine, creating a feedback loop without accounting for losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies a self-sustaining or energy-multiplying process where output can power the input with surplus.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Describes using drag and lift forces in a way that suggests extracting net work from a single equilibrium fluid flow without a true external gradient or sink.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical energy to the 'Schubsmotor' (thrust motor). The device claims this small input sustains the pendulum's motion, which then drives a generator to produce significantly more electrical output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion claim. It asserts that a small, periodic motor impulse can sustain a pendulum's motion indefinitely and that the generator driven by this pendulum can output more energy than the motor inputs, violating the first law of thermodynamics. No hidden or ambient energy source is described to account for the claimed net energy gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims violation of energy conservation (the law of Robert Mayer).
- Claims output energy from generator is 'deutlich mehr' (significantly more) than the electrical input to the motor.
- Describes a closed loop where a small impulse perpetually sustains motion of a large mass against inevitable frictional losses, with net energy extraction.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical grid or battery (to power the motor) and wind (when available). The claim of 24-hour production independent of wind implies the motor is the primary energy source during calm periods.
AI Physics Analysis
The system uses an electric motor to spin the turbine when there's no wind, consuming more grid/battery energy than it can possibly generate due to efficiency losses. The claimed 300% increase in power generation violates energy conservation, as it implies creating more energy than is supplied to the motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1 asserts a 300% increase in power generation. This is only possible if the energy input from the motor (from the grid/battery) is less than the electrical output from the generator during 'no wind' operation, which would violate energy conserv
- The system is presented as increasing the utility of the windmill, but during no-wind operation, it is simply a motor-generator set consuming grid/battery power to produce electricity, incurring conversion losses (motor, generator, gearbox).
- The abstract and claims conflate 'production' with 'net power generation'. The system may maintain rotational speed or electrical output, but this requires a net energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of a 300% increa
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (motor, genera
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary source. The system claims to use its own stored electrical energy to accelerate itself via drives, then 'recuperate' kinetic energy via inertia to recharge the batteries.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's core claim in Claim 6 describes a system that uses its own stored energy to accelerate, then recuperates that energy plus more from inertia, forming a closed loop of net energy production. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it lacks an external, net energy input to account for losses and claimed generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 6 describes a self-accelerating system where spent drive energy is 'mechanically recuperated' and fed back, implying a closed-loop energy gain.
- The system appears to propose extracting more electrical energy from the inertial mass's motion than was used to initiate that motion, violating energy conservation.
- The description of building kinetic energy 'in dependence of velocity, relative to the decrease in meters/sec squared' is physically nonsensical and obfuscatory.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind (primary claimed source). However, the system describes using electrically-driven air turbines to rotate the wind generator when natural wind is insufficient, and proposes using buoyancy force from water units as an energy source to power those turbines, implying a closed or self-sustaining loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a wind generator that can be artificially rotated by electrically-powered turbines. It then proposes using 'water energy units' that harness buoyancy to generate the electricity needed for those turbines. This creates a circular energy claim: using system output to power its own input, with buoyancy presented as a perpetual energy source. Since buoyancy alone cannot provide net work over a cycle without an external input to reset it, the system violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes using output electricity to power air turbines to drive the wind generator input, creating a circular energy path with no net external source.
- The 'water energy units' using buoyancy force imply extracting net work from a static buoyant force without an external energy input to reset the cycle (e.g., to submerge the buoyant elements).
- Claims 'summation of the displacement is equal to the additional buoyancy provided as energy' is thermodynamically meaningless; buoyancy is a conservative force field, and no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle in it without an external inp
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric pressure and gravitational potential energy of water column. The described system attempts to use the work of submerging an inverted container to compress air, then use that compressed air to drive a water-air wheel via buoyancy, with air claimed to return to the container.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a perpetual motion machine. The energy needed to push the inverted container underwater and compress the air inside is greater than the energy that can be recovered from the expanding air driving a wheel. The described closed-loop cycle, with air returning to the container, would require energy input to overcome pressure differences, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to generate net energy from a closed cycle with no external input after initial setup.
- Ignores work required to submerge the inverted container against buoyancy and to compress the air. This work input is greater than any work extractable from the expanding air/buoyancy cycle.
- The described 'return' of air to the pressure container via buoyancy would require the air to flow against the pressure gradient, which is impossible without additional work input.
- The system is a closed-loop fluid cycle attempting to produce net work, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'power generation unit' (구동회전체) uses a 'power generation source' (구동모터) to create a 'primary energy source' (제1자석), which then interacts with ambient energy to create a 'secondary energy source' (제2자석), ultimately producing a 'thermal energy output' (발전용 코일). The description suggests energy is being created or multiplied from ambient sources without a clear, finite external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading energy conversion process that claims to generate thermal energy output from ambient sources, but it fails to identify a finite external energy input or a legitimate thermodynamic gradient. The mechanism implies energy multiplication, which violates the conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics).
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input vs. output energy.
- Implied energy multiplication: The cascading process from primary to secondary to thermal output suggests output > controlled input without identifying a finite fuel or external gradient.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: The system claims to produce useful thermal energy through a cascading process with ambient energy, implying net energy creation from an equilibrium or near-equilibrium state.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient: Lacks description of a heat source and sink for a legitimate heat engine or heat pump.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a system where 'vibration energy' from a 'vibration energy source' is somehow amplified or cascaded to produce greater output than input, suggesting energy multiplication without identifying an external energy reservoir.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vibration energy system where energy appears to be amplified or cascaded, producing more output than the initial input, which violates energy conservation. The text uses technical terms like 'vibration energy source' and 'energy transfer' but fails to account for all energy inputs, suggesting energy multiplication—a hallmark of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies energy amplification/cascading without an external source
- No identification of ambient energy input to account for claimed output
- Describes 'vibration energy' being transferred and amplified in a way that suggests creation of energy
- Language suggests output energy exceeds the input energy provided to the system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a weight (100kg) becoming weightless (0kg) and generating energy from this process, suggesting extraction of work from a gravitational potential without an identifiable external energy input to account for the lifting or mass cancellation.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a 100kg mass becoming weightless and generating energy from this process, which directly violates conservation laws. No legitimate energy source is identified to account for the claimed output, and the mechanism implies extracting net work from a system without an external energy input to create the initial potential or cancel mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent creation of energy from a mass/weight cancellation process
- No identifiable external energy input to explain the claimed outputs
- Violates mass-energy conservation if mass is truly canceled
- Violates energy conservation if gravitational potential is exploited without an input to create that potential
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the kinetic energy of a heavy rotating mass (flywheel), initially imparted by electric motors. The system claims the motors can be powered by a portion of the generator's output, creating a self-sustaining loop with surplus.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a flywheel system but claims in Claim 2 that lower-power motors can drive it to produce greater electrical power from the generator, creating a surplus. This is a classic over-unity claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it provides no external energy source to account for the surplus beyond the initial motor input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 2 explicitly describes a closed-loop energy system where lower-power motors drive a heavy mass, whose kinetic energy is converted by a higher-power generator to power the motors and yield a surplus. This violates energy conservation.
- The system ignores losses from friction, electrical resistance, and aerodynamic drag. The generator's output cannot exceed the mechanical work input from the motors minus these losses.
- The floating rotor reduces bearing friction but does not eliminate losses or create energy; it merely changes the loss mechanism. The described process is a net consumer of energy, not a producer.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (kinet
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'latent energy and potential energy' to generate electricity, but describes energy extraction from ambient sources and energy concentration/amplification processes without identifying a legitimate external gradient or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electricity by utilizing 'latent energy and potential energy' through complex cascading processes, but provides no clear, thermodynamically valid external energy source or gradient. The description uses correct-sounding physics terms in a vague and obfuscated manner, strongly suggesting a violation of energy conservation through incomplete energy accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication or generation without sufficient external input
- Vague mechanism for converting 'latent/potential energy' into usable work
- Lack of identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient
- Language suggests output energy exceeds controlled input energy (incomplete accounting)
- No clear entropy sink or heat rejection mechanism described
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to use 'magnetic force' from a first magnetic unit to drive a second magnetic unit, implying energy amplification or transfer that outputs more energy than the control input, without identifying an external ambient energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system where the output from a second unit is partially fed back to drive the first unit, suggesting a self-sustaining or amplifying loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a clear external energy source to overcome losses, constituting a classical perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes transferring magnetic force from a 1st unit to a 2nd unit, then feeding back a portion (1/2 to 1/3) of the 2nd unit's output to the 1st unit to sustain/amplify operation.
- Implies a self-sustaining or over-unity system without an identified external energy input to compensate for inevitable losses.
- Uses vague terminology ('magnetic force', 'driving force') instead of quantifiable energy/power metrics, obscuring the energy accounting.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on interna
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a rotating system with magnets and coils, but no explicit external energy input is identified. It appears to claim energy generation from the magnetic interactions and rotation itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic rotational device claiming to generate energy, but fails to identify any external energy source. The system, as described, constitutes a closed loop of magnetic and mechanical interactions, which cannot produce net useful work output without an external energy input, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, mechanical, chemical, ambient).
- Claims 360° rotation and energy output without explaining the source of energy to overcome losses.
- Describes a system that appears to be a closed magnetic/mechanical loop, which cannot produce net energy.
- Uses vague terms like 'upper force' and 'lower force' without defining their physical origin.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'stored energy' and 'ambient energy' to produce 'output energy' greater than control input, but lacks specification of primary energy source. Suggests energy can be multiplied or cascaded through unspecified processes.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to produce more output energy than is supplied by the control input, allegedly by cascading or multiplying energy from stored and ambient sources. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes a net energy gain without a sufficient external source, and the second law by implying processes that circumvent entropy increase. The description is vague and uses technical terms to obscure the fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies net energy output > total energy input without identifying an external source.
- Violates second law of thermodynamics: Describes processes that seemingly extract net work from an equilibrium or create perpetual gradients.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Mentions 'stored energy' and 'ambient energy' but fails to quantify inputs and outputs.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct-sounding terms (energy storage, ambient energy, conversion) to describe an impossible energy multiplication scheme.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest a 'magnetic energy generator' that uses magnetic fields to produce electricity, but no explicit external energy input is identified beyond an initial magnetic field. The text describes extracting energy from magnetic interactions and feeding outputs back to inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy generation system with feedback loops that implies creating energy from a permanent magnetic configuration. It lacks any identified external energy input to compensate for losses, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The description fits the classic pattern of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source to sustain power output.
- Implies energy can be extracted from a static magnetic field without depleting it, violating conservation of energy.
- Describes feedback loops where output energy is used to sustain or amplify the system, characteristic of over-unity claims.
- Uses vague terms like 'magnetic energy generator' and 'magnetic energy' without specifying the energy conversion process or losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of water in a reservoir or flowing source, but the described closed-loop system appears to be a gravity siphon attempting to recirculate water after passing through a turbine.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a closed pipe loop where water flows down a long descending section through a turbine and is supposed to return to the inlet, but provides no energy source to lift the water back to the starting height. The energy generated by the turbine would be less than the energy required to complete the cycle, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to generate continuous power from a single initial lift of water, ignoring that the water exiting the turbine must be lifted back to the inlet height to complete the cycle, requiring at least as much
- Misapplies siphon principle: A siphon requires an elevation drop from inlet to outlet; a closed loop with the outlet at the same level as the inlet cannot sustain flow.
- No net gravitational head: For continuous operation in a closed loop, the average height of the water column is constant, providing no sustained pressure differential to drive the turbine.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims continuous
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical system with rotating plates, levers, and guides, but provides no explicit energy input mechanism. Implied energy appears to come from gravitational potential energy changes of the 'fan-shaped plates' moving between upper and lower positions, suggesting attempts to extract net work from gravity without restoring input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical system that appears to generate continuous rotational motion without any identifiable external energy input. The mechanism uses gravity-driven movement of fan-shaped plates between upper and lower positions, but provides no means to restore the gravitational potential energy expended, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind that violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- System appears to use gravity as a perpetual motion source without restoring energy
- Mechanical complexity obscures energy accounting
- Implied continuous rotation without energy input violates conservation of energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to use a 0.5HP motor as input but generate 12HP output through a mechanism involving weights ('추') and a complex arrangement of levers/boxes, suggesting energy multiplication without an identifiable external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce 12 horsepower from a 0.5 horsepower motor input, a clear 24-fold increase in power that violates the conservation of energy. The description is mechanically obfuscated but fundamentally describes an over-unity (perpetual motion) machine with no legitimate external energy source to account for the massive gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims 0.5HP input produces 12HP output (24x multiplication).
- No thermodynamic process or external energy gradient is identified to justify the claimed multiplication.
- Confusing description of torque, weights, and mechanical advantage obfuscates the fundamental energy accounting.
- Claims of 'over unity' (output > input) are explicitly made.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output powe
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical terms (HP,
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Text describes a process where a 'control input' (1st stage) is used to generate a 'power' (2nd stage), which is then fed back to amplify the original control input, resulting in 'more power' (3rd stage). No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is clearly identified for the net output.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device claims to use a control input to generate power, then uses that power to amplify the control input, resulting in more output power. This constitutes a positive feedback loop with no clear external energy source to account for the net energy gain, directly violating the conservation of energy. The vague, self-referential description is characteristic of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent energy multiplication/feedback loop without a clear primary energy source
- Claims of generating output power greater than the identified input power (implied COP > 1 without justification)
- Violates energy conservation by suggesting a process can be initiated and then amplified to produce net excess energy from its own output
- Uses obfuscating terminology (e.g., 'control input', 'power', 'amplification') instead of standard physical quantities
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the connected engine (7). The mechanism attempts to use the centrifugal force from rotating weights on a disc to provide additional lifting force.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates the conservation of energy. The rotating disc and weights are part of the engine's load, not an independent energy source. Lifting a heavier load requires more work, which must come from increased fuel/energy consumption by the engine, regardless of the mechanical arrangement.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation. Claiming to lift 'many times heavier' loads without a 'noticeable increase in consumption' implies output work > input energy.
- Centrifugal force is not an independent energy source; it is a kinematic constraint requiring centripetal force, supplied by the engine. The tension in the steel wire pulling the load originates from the engine rotating the disc.
- The system is a complex transmission/lever, not a multiplier. Any mechanical advantage in force comes with a proportional disadvantage in distance/speed, keeping power (energy/time) constant.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claim states the system operates 'ohne Energiezufuhr von außerhalb' (without energy input from outside). The described energy source is the pendulum's initial gravitational potential energy and the subsequent energy transfer via the lever/elastic band mechanism, which is claimed to be self-sustaining.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. The described internal mechanism (lever, rubber band, latch) cannot add net energy to the pendulum; it can only temporarily store and return a portion of the pendulum's own energy, with significant losses each cycle. Without external energy input, friction and other losses will bring the pendulum to a halt.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by claiming continuous motion without an external energy source.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; every transfer (lever, band, elastic) has losses (friction, hysteresis, sound, heat).
- The system lacks a continuous energy input to overcome dissipative losses.
- The 20:1 lever ratio reduces force but does not create energy; it merely trades force for distance, with losses.
- The 'initial release' is the only true energy input; the internal mechanism merely redistributes and dissipates it.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores all dissipative lo
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims a perpet
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical terms (le
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using 'ambient energy' and 'environmental energy' to generate electricity, but provides no specific, identifiable energy gradient or input mechanism that can perform net work.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes generating electricity from ambient environmental energy in a way that suggests output exceeds input, a classic sign of perpetual motion claims. It uses correct-sounding physics terms ('ambient energy', 'environmental energy') but provides no mechanism that respects the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which requires a usable energy gradient to perform net work.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input gradient (thermal, chemical, pressure, etc.) is specified.
- Claims to generate electricity from ambient conditions without a thermodynamic gradient to drive the process.
- Describes 'energy amplification' and 'output exceeding control input', which are red flags for incomplete energy accounting.
- The description is too vague to identify a legitimate energy conversion process (e.g., heat engine, photovoltaic, piezoelectric).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to generate increased kinetic energy from the system's own weight and load, implying energy output greater than input without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The internal configuration of weights and an eccentric axis cannot generate net energy; any torque variations are balanced by opposing forces, resulting in zero net work per cycle without an external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system cannot output more work than the energy input to initiate and maintain its motion.
- Violates Newton's laws: internal forces (weight, reaction forces) within a system cannot produce net acceleration of its center of mass or increase its total kinetic energy.
- Misinterprets torque and force: an eccentric mass creates an oscillating torque, but net work over a cycle is zero without an external energy input (like a falling weight or motor).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'increases
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be self-sustaining via feedback loop: initial battery powers motor → machine generates electricity → part feeds motor, part charges battery → perpetual operation with net output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use a small motor to oscillate balanced weights, then harness the motion through gears and flywheels to generate more electricity than needed to run the motor, becoming self-sustaining with net output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as no external energy source is identified to account for the claimed net energy production against inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims net energy output greater than input with no external source.
- Violates first law of thermodynamics: system cannot create energy from nothing.
- Misinterprets gravitational potential energy: moving masses up/down in gravity field requires net work input over a cycle.
- Claims 'weightless state' from balanced masses is physically nonsensical; gravitational force still acts.
- Ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, air drag).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'small moti
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to use a 'control input' (100) to power a 'vibration energy harvesting device' (200) which then powers another 'vibration energy harvesting device' (300). The description suggests energy is somehow amplified or circulated between components without an external source beyond the initial control input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a system where a vibration energy harvester powers another vibration energy harvester in a loop, claiming to produce usable 'vibration power' output greater than the initial control input. This violates both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract net work from ambient vibration without an external energy gradient and implies energy creation within a closed loop.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input beyond the initial control power. The system describes a closed loop where harvested vibration energy is used to power another harvester, implying energy multiplication.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The output 'vibration power' is claimed to be generated in a self-sustaining or amplified manner from a smaller input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The system attempts to extract useful work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient vibration) without a temperature gradient or entropy sink.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity from a 'magnetic body' (자기체) using ambient magnetic energy, but appears to describe a system where the output energy exceeds the control input without identifying a legitimate external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading system of magnetic devices that claims to generate more electrical energy than is supplied as control input, ultimately creating a closed, self-powering loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creation of energy from nothing, and the second law as it lacks an identified entropy sink or legitimate external energy gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear, thermodynamically permissible external energy source identified (e.g., thermal gradient, chemical, radiative).
- Describes cascading magnetic devices (자기체) that seemingly amplify energy, implying energy multiplication.
- Claims the final output energy (70) is supplied to the initial input (10), suggesting a closed-loop over-unity system.
- Uses vague terminology ('magnetic body', 'special magnetic body', 'control device') that obfuscates the actual energy conversion mechanism.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: 'Output > control input' p
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Implies extract
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct physics terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of weights placed at the top of the apparatus. The only explicit input is the work done to lift the weights back to the top to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity engine that extracts work from weights moving downward. For continuous operation, the weights must be returned to the top, requiring at least as much energy as is generated during descent, making it a net-zero or net-loss system. The patent fails to account for this reset energy, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a mechanism to convert gravitational potential energy to torque, but provides no description of how the weights are returned to the top to create a continuous cycle.
- Violates energy conservation for a closed cycle: The net work output over one complete cycle (weights down then back up) cannot exceed the work input to lift the weights. The description implies continuous generation without accounting for the larger
- Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind: The abstract claims 'continually adding weights,' which suggests an open system, but the claims describe a closed mechanical cycle for torque generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system where an 'energy storage device' (200) receives energy from an 'energy source' (100) and supplies it to an 'energy generator' (250), which then powers a 'load' (300) and also appears to feed energy back to the source or storage. No primary external energy input (e.g., fuel, sunlight, grid power) is clearly identified. The description suggests a closed-loop energy multiplication scheme.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a closed-loop energy system that claims to produce useful work while also replenishing its own energy source, constituting a perpetual motion machine. It violates both the first law (energy conservation) and second law (entropy) of thermodynamics by implying net energy creation within a closed system without identifying an external energy input or heat sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The claims describe a system where an energy generator (250), powered by a storage device (200), produces output energy that is used to power a load AND also to 'replenish' or 'amplify'
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The system is described as generating usable work while seemingly operating in a closed cycle without a net external energy input or a corresponding rejection of waste heat to a lower temperature reservoir,
- Incomplete energy accounting. The patent text is ambiguous about the initial energy input, the losses in each conversion stage (source->storage->generator->load), and the source of energy for the purported amplification or replenishment feedback loop
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The core claim is
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The patent uses technical
Claimed Energy Source
The rotating device (e.g., motor) provides the initial rotational energy to the top. The claimed energy output is from the dynamo, which is driven by a spoke wheel allegedly rotated via magnetic interaction with the spinning top.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a violation of energy conservation. It is essentially a motor spinning a flywheel (the top), with a generator (dynamo) magnetically coupled to it. The generator's output will always be less than the energy needed to keep the top spinning, due to inevitable losses. No mechanism for net energy production is described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses a motor to spin the top, then claims to extract additional electrical energy from that spin via a magnetic coupling to a dynamo. This is a classic energy conversion chain (electrical → rotational kinetic
- No net energy gain mechanism: The magnetic coupling between the top and the spoke wheel will create a drag torque on the top, slowing it down. The energy extracted by the dynamo comes directly from the top's rotational kinetic energy, which was suppl
- Implied over-unity operation: The patent's structure and lack of discussion of a continuous external power source suggest an intent for the top, once spun, to power the dynamo indefinitely or with net output, which is impossible due to friction and e
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description ig
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system where a crankshaft (1) drives connecting rods (2) and levers (3), and a belt/pulley system (6, 17) transmits motion back from the crankshaft to oscillate the levers. An electric starter motor (Claim 3) is only for initial startup. No external fuel, electrical input (after start), or ambient energy gradient is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system with a feedback loop where the output shaft drives the input levers. After an initial start, it claims to self-generate force and energy. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) as it describes a closed system with no net energy input, yet implies continuous or excess energy output. It is a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system description suggests a closed mechanical loop where the output rotation of the crankshaft is used (via belts/pulleys) to drive the levers that are themselves responsible for driving the crankshaft. This is
- No thermodynamic process identified: It is a purely mechanical system with no described conversion from a primary energy source (chemical, thermal, etc.) to work. Friction and losses would dissipate the initial starter energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim of being a 'force self-generator' and 'energy generating element' implies net energy output, but the described mechanism has no identifiable net energy input to sustain motion or produce excess work.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of generation ig
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind relative to the moving vehicle. The system implicitly claims to use the vehicle's own motion through the air to generate electricity to power the vehicle's drive.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to use a wind turbine on a moving vehicle to recharge its battery and power its drive. This is physically impossible for net gain, as the turbine's drag force will always consume more energy from the vehicle's motion than the turbine can generate, making it an inefficient brake, not a power source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores the dominant energy input required to overcome the turbine's drag.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies net energy can be extracted from the vehicle's own motion to propel itself, a form of perpetual motion.
- The turbine acts as a brake: The electrical energy generated comes from the vehicle's kinetic energy, increasing the load on the primary drive system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The system claims to use earth (soil) as a source of motion. The initial energy input is from a starter electric motor. The proposed perpetual operation suggests the electrical output from the generators would power the conveyor belts to lift the earth again.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity violation. It attempts to use generators powered by falling earth to both produce useful electricity and power the conveyors that lift the earth back up. Due to inevitable losses from friction, generator inefficiency, and transmission, the electrical energy recovered from the fall is always less than the mechanical work required to lift the earth, preventing self-sustained operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to be self-sustaining after startup, meaning net electrical output > electrical input to run conveyors.
- Ignores energy losses: Lifting earth against gravity requires work. The kinetic energy from falling earth (converted to electricity) is less than the work needed to lift it back up due to generator inefficiency, conveyor friction, and other losses.
- Misidentifies energy source: The earth is not an energy source; it is a mass being cycled in a gravitational potential well. No net energy is added to the system from the earth itself.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims mechanism r
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy generation from 'vibration' or 'oscillation' of a 'vibration plate' and 'oscillation plate' without identifying an external energy input gradient. Implies energy extraction from internal oscillations without an external driver.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate energy from the interaction of vibrating and oscillating plates without specifying any external energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it implies the creation of useful energy from internal motions that would naturally dampen without continuous input, directly violating both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input source (thermal, chemical, electrical, ambient gradient).
- Claims describe 'vibration' and 'oscillation' plates generating energy, implying a perpetual motion mechanism.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) - no accounting for energy input to sustain oscillations.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics - suggests extracting net work from an equilibrium or internal cyclic state without a temperature or potential gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The system proposes to use electricity generated by windmills to power fans that blow air onto those same windmills. The only external input mentioned is ambient wind ('with help from the wind'), but the core operation relies on a closed electrical-mechanical loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a textbook perpetual motion machine. The fans, powered by the windmills, cannot produce a wind strong enough to drive those same windmills to generate more electricity than the fans consume, plus additional surplus for consumers. It violates both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system's net useful output (electricity for the consumer) requires drawing more energy from the windmills than is needed to power the fans, after accounting for all losses (generator inefficiency, motor inefficien
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: It attempts to create a self-sustaining air flow using work derived from that same airflow, a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores the massive parasitic losses from converting electrical energy to fan thrust, and then back to electrical energy via the windmill.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The electrical input to the motors (2-2') that spin the counter-rotating masses. The system claims to extract and reuse kinetic energy via a generator (9) during part of the cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal, momentum-balanced rotating system. It cannot produce net propulsion for the vehicle because it lacks an external reaction mass. The claim that extracted energy can be reused to create increasing speeds each cycle violates conservation of energy, as losses would drain the system, not amplify it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net propulsion from an internal, momentum-balanced system (no external reaction mass).
- Implies energy can be extracted via the generator during deceleration and reused to accelerate the masses, creating a net gain or self-sustaining cycle.
- Suggests 'speeds add up each cycle' (Les vitesses s'additionnent à chaque cycle), indicating a belief in cumulative acceleration without sufficient external energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description fo
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The sys
Claimed Energy Source
Input rotation from an external engine (electrical, internal combustion, wind, etc.) via a driving pulley.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to split input rotational energy and recombine it via pulses to multiply both output torque and speed simultaneously, which would result in greater output mechanical power than input power. This is impossible for a passive gear and linkage system, as it violates conservation of energy. The claims confuse force/torque amplification (via levers/gears) with genuine power multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims simultaneous multiplication of torque and speed from a single input energy stream, implying net output power > input power.
- Describes splitting input energy and then recombining it in a way that allegedly multiplies both torque and rotational speed, which violates conservation of energy for a passive mechanical system.
- Uses inertial flywheels as an internal energy store, but claims continuous multiplication suggest perpetual extraction of work from this store without replenishment losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is extracted from a 'vibration source' (진동원) and converted through multiple stages (vibration generator → vibration amplifier → vibration converter), implying energy multiplication without identifying an external input sufficient to account for the output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vibration-based energy conversion system with amplification and feedback stages, but fails to account for all energy inputs. It implies energy gain through cascading processes without identifying a sufficient external source, violating energy conservation. The vague, self-referential mechanisms and lack of quantitative analysis are hallmarks of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy vs. output energy.
- Implies energy multiplication/cascading that suggests COP > 1 without identifying an external ambient energy source.
- Uses vague terminology ('vibration amplifier', 'vibration converter') that obfuscates the actual energy conversion process.
- Describes a closed-loop or feedback system where output vibration is used to sustain or amplify the process, risking a perpetual motion claim.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the mechanical input from the pulling/pushing device (e.g., rope, rack). The device claims to output more energy from this single input, implying an internal source or violation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly aims for and claims an efficiency greater than one (output > input) for a purely mechanical system with no described external energy source. This is a direct violation of the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims output energy > input energy (efficiency > 1)
- No secondary or ambient energy source is identified or described
- Mechanism is purely mechanical with no external gradient to exploit
- Violates the conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics)
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of generators being lifted by a transport chain, which is itself powered by an external motor (solar/wind/water).
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity gravity motor. The electrical energy generated as generators fall is less than the energy required to lift them back up, even with solar powering the reset. The system cannot produce a net energy gain from gravity alone, as gravity is a conservative force. The patent violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying a continuous, amplified energy output from this cyclic process.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a net energy consumer: The work required to lift the generator(s) back to the high potential energy position is greater than the electrical energy generated during the descent, due to inevitable losses (generator inefficiency, friction, ele
- Claims 'ungemein gesteigerte Stromenergiegewinnung' (immensely increased power generation) from adding more generators is misleading; each added unit increases the lifting energy demand proportionally.
- The system is fundamentally a gravity-powered generator with an external reset mechanism, which cannot have a net energy gain greater than the external input used for resetting.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (gener
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a device (N.D) that appears to use ambient energy (humidity, temperature, and pressure gradients) and internal magnetic/electrical interactions to generate output power that allegedly exceeds the control input, suggesting an attempt to harness environmental energy without a clear, quantified source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce useful output power exceeding its control input by cascading magnetic/electrical units and harnessing ambient gradients, but it fails to account for all energy inputs rigorously. This creates an apparent violation of energy conservation, as the described mechanism suggests energy multiplication without a legitimate, quantified external source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > control input without quantifying all ambient energy inputs (e.g., precise thermal, chemical, or humidity gradients).
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies energy multiplication or creation through cascading/stacking of magnetic or electrical units (e.g., 5, 10, 11 units).
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct physics terms (gradients, magnetic units) in a vague, non-quantifiable way to describe an over-unity process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor (implied). No other energy inputs are described.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system where a motor's mechanical power is allegedly multiplied using levers and linkages. This violates the conservation of energy, as levers can trade force for distance (or torque for angular displacement) but cannot create additional work or power from a single input. The system cannot generate 'greater power' than the motor supplies.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'increase of mechanical power generated by the motor' which violates conservation of energy.
- Suggests mechanical power/torque multiplication from a single source without accounting for corresponding reduction in speed or displacement (ignores work-energy principle).
- No mechanism described for introducing additional energy; system appears to be a closed mechanical linkage.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output powe
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'power mu
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text appears to describe a system where a 'control energy' input somehow produces a larger 'output energy' from an 'ambient energy' source, but no legitimate, quantified ambient gradient (thermal, chemical, pressure, etc.) is identified or properly accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text describes an energy multiplication scheme where a small 'control' input yields a larger output by tapping 'ambient energy,' but it fails to specify or quantify the ambient energy source, violating energy conservation. The use of disconnected numbers and technical-sounding but nonsensical phrases is characteristic of obfuscated perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > control input without specifying and quantifying the ambient energy source.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Implies energy multiplication (e.g., 6 input -> 41 output) without a complete input tally.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient: No description of a heat source/sink, chemical potential, or other gradient to drive energy conversion.
- Numerical gibberish: The strings of numbers (6, 5, 27, 41, 36, etc.) are not connected to any coherent physical model or units, making them meaningless.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the mechanical input from a prime mover (e.g., motor, engine) applied to the input sprocket. The device is a passive gear train.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a passive gear train, which cannot create energy. It can change torque and speed, but output power cannot exceed input power. Claims of a 3x power increase or energy savings directly violate the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'output three times higher than the applied force (input)' conflates force with power or energy, violating conservation of energy.
- Claim of 'optimizes the power input 3 times' and 'multifold increase in power output for any given input' directly asserts a power gain >1, which is impossible for a passive transmission.
- Device is described as a gear train, which can trade force/torque for speed, but cannot increase power (Power = Torque x Angular Velocity).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'power op
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a closed-loop system ('cycle-magnet-coil1-coil2-capacitor-diode-switch1-switch2-switch3-switch4-cycle') suggesting energy recirculation without an identifiable primary external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a closed-loop system that allegedly produces more energy (10 units) than is input (5 units), directly violating energy conservation. The technical description is vague and uses component names without a coherent operational principle, strongly suggesting an over-unity or perpetual motion claim disguised by circuit terminology.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (5 units input yielding 10 units output)
- Describes a closed-loop energy path with no clear external energy source to account for claimed gain
- Lacks specification of the energy conversion process to apply thermodynamic limits
- Uses technical terms (magnet, coil, capacitor, switch, diode) in a vague, non-quantitative configuration that suggests obfuscation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the gravitational force of Earth, but the described mechanism proposes to extract net work from a closed cycle of weights without an external, consumable energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine. It claims to use gravity to generate net work, but gravity is a conservative force; the energy to lift a weight back to its starting height for the next cycle always equals or exceeds the work extracted from its fall. The description of gaining 'extra weight' each cycle directly violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes continuous output (electricity) with 'no extra energy input'.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by having weights lift 'extra weight' in each cycle without an external energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores energy losses from friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions during weight transfer and rolling.
- Mechanically flawed: the described reset of weights (rolling back to start) would require at least as much energy as gained in the 'falling' phase, resulting in zero net work.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex system with components labeled as 'cooling unit', 'heating unit', 'cooling body', 'heating body', 'cooling medium', 'heating medium', and a 'temperature difference generating device'. No explicit external energy input is identified, though ambient thermal energy may be implied but not properly accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to generate or amplify a temperature difference using internal components without a clear external energy source, directly violating the second law of thermodynamics. The claims suggest a self-sustaining or amplifying thermal process, which is impossible in a closed system without an external driving energy input and an entropy sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear identification of primary energy input
- Claims of 'temperature difference generation' without an external energy source violate the second law of thermodynamics
- System appears to use its own temperature gradients to create more work/gradients, suggesting a perpetual motion scheme
- Language suggests 'energy multiplication' or cascading effects without an entropy sink
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest electrical input of 300W-700W produces output exceeding this, but no clear external energy source (like fuel, ambient heat gradient, or chemical reaction) is identified to account for the excess.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a motor-generator system claiming to produce 300W-700W of output power from an unspecified or inadequately defined input, implying energy creation. It uses a confusing list of technical terms without a clear, thermodynamically valid energy conversion process, strongly suggesting a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Output power claims (implied to be greater than input) are not balanced against all energy inputs.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies generation of electrical power without an adequate external energy source.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Mentions multiple types of 'power generation' (e.g., turbine, magnetic, thermal) but provides no coherent, physically valid conversion process.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a system where a 'generating rotor' (10) and 'generating unit' (11) produce electricity, which is then used to power a 'drive rotor' (5) and 'driven rotor' (4) that appear to create a feedback loop. No primary external energy source (fuel, solar, wind, grid input) is explicitly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where generating components and driving components are interconnected in a loop, with generated electricity powering the drivers. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, as it lacks any identifiable external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses, directly violating the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent perpetual motion/feedback loop: Generated electricity is used to power the drive mechanism that supposedly creates more generation.
- No identifiable net energy input. The system describes components powering each other in a closed loop.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation): Claims to produce useful power ('electric power generation') without a clear source of energy to be converted.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implies creation of a sustained gradient or useful work from an equilibrium state.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on interna
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests mechanical energy from rotating components (gears, rotors) is somehow amplified through feedback loops without identifying an external energy input beyond an initial control input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system of interconnected rotors and gears that claims to amplify rotational energy through internal feedback. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to generate more mechanical energy output than is input, with no clear external energy source, directly violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Describes a mechanical feedback system where output from one stage purportedly drives another to produce more energy than input, violating energy conservation.
- Claims 'amplification' of rotational energy through interconnected rotors and gears without a thermodynamic cost.
- Uses terms like 'rotational energy amplification' and 'feedback' in a way that implies energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with heat exchangers, working fluids, and claims of extracting heat from ambient sources, but suggests output heat can exceed input energy without accounting for all energy inputs. Mentions using heat from a high-temperature source, but the description implies energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a system that appears to be a heat engine or heat pump but uses obfuscated language to imply it can output more thermal energy than is supplied from an external source, violating the First Law. It also describes processes that seem to extract usable energy from an isothermal environment, violating the Second Law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output heat can be greater than external heat input, ignoring the energy required to create/maintain temperature gradients.
- Implies heat can be extracted from an isothermal environment without a temperature sink, violating the Second Law.
- Describes 'heat accumulation' and 'isothermal' processes in a way that suggests net work extraction from equilibrium.
- Vague claims about increasing power and efficiency through internal arrangements without identifying an external energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (heat) from the environment, with some electrical input to control the process. The device claims to extract thermal energy from a 'heat source plate' and convert it to electrical energy via a 'temperature difference generator'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to convert ambient thermal energy directly into electrical energy with an output greater than its control input. This violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract net work from a single temperature reservoir without a compensating heat rejection to a colder sink, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to generate useful electrical work from a single ambient thermal reservoir without a lower temperature sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'output > control input' but ignores that the extracted ambient heat is low-grade energy that cannot be fully converted to work without a temperature gradient.
- Describes a heat engine operating without a stated cold reservoir, implying a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a system that reuses the same water repeatedly, with water pumped against a turbine wheel. The only explicit input appears to be the pump motor. Implicitly, the system attempts to use shifting weights to generate additional rotational force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim. It attempts to generate electricity by pumping water in a closed cycle to drive a turbine, which is inherently lossy. The described weight-shifting mechanisms cannot provide net positive work per cycle without an external energy input to reset them, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate electricity by pumping water in a closed loop, which consumes more energy than can be recovered from the water jet hitting the turbine.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes shifting weights that fold in/out or move up/down to supposedly add net torque to the system each cycle without an external energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on the water jet and weight mechanisms while ignoring the primary energy input required to run the pump and reset the weight systems.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system describes a closed loop where an 'active rotating device' (dynamo) is powered either manually or by a battery to start a 'perpetually rotating system', which then powers a generator and a 'passive rotating device' via an energy storage system, ostensibly to sustain itself and provide excess output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a classic perpetual motion machine. It attempts to create a closed loop where a rotating system powers itself and generates excess energy, which is thermodynamically impossible due to inevitable energy losses from friction and resistance. No perpetual source of energy is identified.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming a perpetual, closed-loop energy generation system.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; any real system has losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat) that must be continuously overcome by an external energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The initial manual or battery input is treated as a one-time start-up cost, ignoring the continuous energy needed to compensate for inevitable losses to maintain rotation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical or mechanical input from batteries, photovoltaics, or piezoelectric motors.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes cascading gears or levers to transform an initial mechanical power into a 'more important' resulting power. This confuses force/torque multiplication with power multiplication, directly violating the conservation of energy. The output power cannot exceed the input power minus losses, regardless of the mechanical arrangement.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy multiplication through mechanical gearing/levers without accounting for conservation of energy.
- Assumes mechanical advantage (force/torque multiplication) equates to power multiplication, which violates P = F*v or P = τ*ω.
- No identification of an external energy source to justify increased output power; system is closed except for initial input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim lists only Korean terms for various types of 'generators' (e.g., solar generator, thermal generator, hybrid thermal generator) without specifying any energy input mechanism or conversion process.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is a nonsensical list of generator types with no description of a working mechanism, violating the fundamental requirement that a device must have a defined energy input. The structure mimics a patent claim but contains no physics, making energy conservation impossible to assess and strongly suggesting obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- Claims imply energy generation without a defined source
- Complete lack of operational or thermodynamic context
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert 'input energy' (ì¤ë ¥) into 'conversion energy' (íì ë ¥) with apparent multiplication, but no external ambient source is identified. Suggests energy is somehow amplified within the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that purportedly converts input energy into a greater amount of 'conversion energy,' implying energy multiplication without identifying an external source to account for the increase. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The abstract and claims are phrased in vague, non-standard terminology that obscures the fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies output energy can exceed total input energy.
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or mechanism to justify energy multiplication.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('conversion energy', 'conversion body') instead of standard physics terms.
- Describes a process where a 'conversion body' (íì í) outputs more energy than it receives from the 'input energy' source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses a complex, non-stand
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. The text describes air flowing through a system with multiple chambers and plates, suggesting it might be attempting to extract energy from ambient air flow or pressure differences, but no clear primary energy source (like wind, thermal gradient, or external work input) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to output more energy (240 units) than is put into it (120 units) through internal air circulation and plate interactions, with no identifiable external energy source. This constitutes a clear violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output (240 units) exceeds control input (120 units) without identifying an external energy source to account for the difference.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies energy multiplication or creation within a closed-loop air flow system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes internal flows and 'amplification' but does not account for all inputs (e.g., work to move air, overcome friction).
- No thermodynamic gradient specified: Lacks identification of a temperature, pressure, or chemical potential gradient from which net work could be extracted.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'two times the input power' of a control device (possibly a reference cell) to generate output, but appears to imply energy amplification without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device that uses twice the input power of a control device to produce an output, implying energy gain without specifying any external energy source to account for this gain. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it suggests output exceeding total energy input. The use of vague comparative metrics is a classic obfuscation technique.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., chemical, thermal gradient, ambient).
- Claims output based on a multiple of a control input, suggesting energy multiplication.
- Violates energy conservation: total output cannot exceed total energy input from all sources.
- Uses vague terminology ('two times input power', 'control device') that obscovers the energy accounting.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial rotational input and gravitational potential energy of masses. The device attempts to create a persistent torque asymmetry by using springs and guide paths to alter the radial position of masses during rotation, claiming this asymmetry yields net energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity gravity wheel. It uses springs and guided paths to create an asymmetric mass distribution, claiming this yields perpetual excess torque. However, gravity is a conservative force; the net work done on a mass over any closed path is zero. The energy needed to reset the masses and compress the springs always equals or exceeds any temporary torque gain, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a 'long-term rotation' and 'excess torque' from an internal reconfiguration of masses, implying net energy output greater than input without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual unbalanced torque from a closed-cycle gravitational interaction. The work done to lift masses against gravity in one part of the cycle cannot be less than the work gained from
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on creating geometric asymmetry in the mass path but ignores the energy required to compress the spring and guide the mass inward on the upward swing. This energy must come from the system's kinetic energy, reduc
- Misapplication of the concept of 'force arm': Shortening the force arm on the upward swing reduces torque *against* the motion, but it also reduces the radial displacement, which is linked to the change in gravitational potential energy. The net work
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'excess tor
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy, but with an implied cyclic extraction from a single, constant gravitational field without an external source to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by cyclically using weights in a gravitational field. The work needed to lift the mass to reset the cycle always equals or exceeds the work gained from its descent, making net energy generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes to extract net work from a constant gravitational field by moving masses cyclically within the field, violating conservation of energy.
- Claims 'energy renewal' and using 'less energy... to generate greater bending moment' suggests energy multiplication.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to transfer mass 'from bottom to upper side for storage' is not properly offset against the claimed output work.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical see-saw system that claims to generate energy from the motion of weights, with no clear external energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a mechanical see-saw system that claims to generate power from the motion of weights, implying a perpetual motion machine. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting net energy output without an external energy source, and the second law by ignoring inevitable energy dissipation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate 'power' from a closed mechanical system with no external energy input.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cyclic process where weights moving on a see-saw supposedly generate net work without energy dissipation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mention of energy losses due to friction, air resistance, or inelastic collisions.
- Misapplication of gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle in a gravitational field alone.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy through mechanical interactions (unbalance, moment) between 'N.S' magnetic poles, converting between 'attraction' and 'repulsion' magnetic forces, with implied energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system that allegedly generates energy through cyclic conversion between attraction and repulsion states of magnetic poles, implying net energy output greater than input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes a closed system performing work without an external energy source, constituting a perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies creation of energy from magnetic interactions without an external energy source.
- Violates thermodynamics: Suggests perpetual motion through cyclic conversion of magnetic forces with net energy output.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses terms like 'unbalance', 'moment', and 'N.S magnetic poles' in a context suggesting over-unity performance.
- No identifiable external input: The described magnetic system is closed, with no clear input of electrical, thermal, or mechanical work to account for claimed output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims energy gene
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'electric power supply unit' (UPS) to generate 'output power' that is greater than the 'control input' by somehow utilizing the 'phase difference' between 'input power' and 'output power' to create 'output power' from 'output power'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that claims to generate more electrical output power than its control input by manipulating phase differences, effectively proposing a power-amplifying feedback loop with no external energy source. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies the creation of energy from within a closed electrical system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (output > input) without identifying an external energy source.
- Relies on a vague 'phase difference' mechanism to generate power from power, implying energy creation.
- No thermodynamic cycle or identifiable gradient (e.g., thermal, chemical) to enable net work extraction.
- Describes a feedback loop where output power is used to generate more output power, a classic perpetual motion hallmark.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve 'energy amplification' (에너지 증폭) and 'self-operation' (자동) through arrangements of 'energy amplifiers' and 'energy receivers', suggesting output energy exceeds the control input without identifying an external ambient energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of 'energy amplifiers' and 'energy receivers' arranged to self-operate and amplify energy, cascading to produce more output. It fails to identify any external energy source, implying perpetual motion and a clear violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., thermal gradient, chemical, electrical).
- Claims of 'energy amplification' and cascading systems imply creation of energy or COP > 1 without a source.
- Describes perpetual motion of the first kind: a system that operates and produces work indefinitely from its own output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate 'rotational force' (영구 자석) from 'low temperature heat' (인력) and 'high temperature heat' (척력) inputs, with ambiguous references to 'low temperature heat source' (바람개비 형상) and 'high temperature heat source' (톱니 형상). Suggests cascading stages (부재) that produce more rotational force than input, implying energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly produces rotational force (work) from heat inputs in a cascading manner, implying energy multiplication. This violates the First Law (conservation of energy) as it lacks a clear external energy source accounting for the increased output, and the Second Law as it suggests extracting work without a proper heat engine cycle between a hot source and a cold sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The description of multiple stages (ë¶ì¬) producing increasing 'rotational force' implies net energy output > net energy input without an identified external energy source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics. Describes extracting work from a single temperature reservoir ('low temperature heat' and 'high temperature heat' are inputs, not a temperature gradient for a heat engine). A heat engine requires a hot source AN
- Incomplete energy accounting. No mention of waste heat, friction, or electrical/other energy inputs required to maintain the described processes.
- Obfuscated mechanism. Uses correct terms like 'heat source' and 'rotational force' but arranges them in a vague, cascading process that implies perpetual motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of cascadin
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terminology
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the electrical input to the motor. The claim suggests that a 'torque force' generated at the end of the axle of a rapidly spinning heavy wheel constitutes an 'excess energy' that can be used to power the system and more.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion claim. It mistakes a reaction torque—a force that inherently opposes the motor's action—for an independent source of excess energy. Spinning a heavy wheel stores kinetic energy; you can only recover up to what you put in, minus losses. The system violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims generation of 'excess energy' (überschüssige Energie) from a torque reaction force, which is not an independent energy source.
- Confuses force/torque with energy: A reaction torque at the axle bearings is a force, not a source of usable energy that can exceed input. Extracting work from it would slow the wheel.
- Misunderstands rotational dynamics: The moment of inertia from a heavy rim requires more energy to spin up. No mechanism exists to extract more work from the spinning mass than was put in to accelerate it.
- Perpetual motion claim: Explicitly states goal is 'die Funktion des Perpetuum mobile erreichen' using this 'excess' torque energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claims 'unlimited power generation' through 'self-rotating gear groups' between two fixed gears, with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a perpetual motion machine claiming unlimited power generation through self-rotating gears without any identifiable energy source. It violates both energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics by attempting to extract net work from a closed mechanical system with no energy gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - claims perpetual motion without energy source
- Violates second law of thermodynamics - claims to generate net work from equilibrium system
- No identifiable energy gradient or input mechanism
- Uses vague mechanical terms ('self-rotating gear groups') that cannot produce net energy
- Claims 'unlimited power' output without corresponding input
A - Incomplete energy accounting (output > control input)
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms (extracting net
C - Technical obfuscation (vague quantitative claims, mislea
Claimed Energy Source
Kinetic energy from the vehicle's wheel axle or a dedicated engine is claimed to be captured, transmitted, amplified, and modulated to rotate a gyroscopic disc.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to amplify captured kinetic energy to produce various net forces on a vehicle, which violates conservation of energy. A gyroscope can redirect forces but cannot create net acceleration or braking without an external reaction and energy input exceeding losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'amplification' of kinetic energy without an external energy source, violating conservation of energy.
- A gyroscopic disc produces torque when its axis is tilted, not a net translational force (impulse) for acceleration, braking, or downforce without an external reaction.
- System claims to generate multiple directional forces (acceleration, braking, downforce, centripetal) from a single rotational energy input, implying energy multiplication.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary: Battery/motor (Claim 2). Implicit: Potential energy from the heavy mass in the upper half of the cylinder, which is part of the initial setup.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a battery-powered motor spinning a cylinder (which contains a fixed counterweight), with the cylinder's rotation driving a generator. The claims of 'renewable' energy are invalid, as the only continuous energy input is the battery. The system cannot output more energy than the battery supplies, violating no laws but making a false claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- The device is described as remaining stationary in equilibrium when not 'activated' (Claim 1), implying the heavy mass provides no continuous motive force. The motor is required to maintain rotation speed against friction and generator load.
- The claim of 'renewable kinetic energy' is misleading. The kinetic energy output from the generator originates from the battery-powered motor, not from a renewable or self-sustaining source. The heavy mass is a fixed, one-time potential energy store
- The system is essentially a motor (powered by a battery) driving a generator through a geared cylinder. Overall efficiency must be less than 100%, and the battery will deplete. No mechanism for net energy gain is described.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The abstract and c
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'renewabl
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The initial energy comes from a DC battery. The system claims to sustain itself using 'thermal energy, kinetic energy, fluid dynamics, mass inertia and centrifugal forces' from a closed-loop fluid, but these are not net energy inputs; they are internal energy conversions with losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that, after a battery start, claims to sustain its own operation and recharge its battery using only a fixed volume of recirculating fluid. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to generate net electrical output without any external energy input to compensate for inevitable losses to friction, heat, and drag.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a closed-loop, self-sufficient DC system (Claim 10) where generator output recharges the starting battery after overcoming all system losses (friction, electrical resistance, fluid drag).
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats internal forces (centrifugal, inertia) as perpetual energy sources, ignoring that they require continuous net energy input to overcome dissipative losses.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: A closed-loop fluid system with no external gradient (e.g., heat, pressure, height) cannot produce net work; it will slow down due to entropy generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described. Primary claimed sources are gravitational potential energy from unbalanced weights (which must be reset), hydraulic/compressed air systems (requiring external energy input), electric/diesel engines (direct fuel/electrical input), and running/pumped water (gravitational/hydraulic energy). The patent conflates these with a vague implication that the wheel systems themselves are the primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's core concept includes a gravity wheel powered by unbalanced weights, a classic perpetual motion violation, as resetting the weights requires at least as much energy as is gained from their fall. By mixing this with legitimate, externally-powered systems (engines, pumped water), it creates an obfuscated claim that violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for resetting unbalanced weights (gravity wheel is a classic over-unity concept)
- Ambiguous description of hydraulic/compressed air systems obscures the external energy required to create pressure/flow
- Claim lumps together externally powered engines (diesel/electric) with purportedly self-sustaining gravity wheels, creating a misleading composite
- No description of how the 'closed circuit' water pump system avoids net energy loss
- Fundamentally describes a gravity wheel (perpetual motion machine of the first kind) which cannot output net work without an external source to reset the weights.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of weight members. The machine is a closed system that cycles weights, intending to extract continuous work from their descent without restoring them to their initial height using external energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. While gravity provides a force, the weights must be lifted back up to repeat the cycle, requiring at least as much energy as is produced during their fall. The patent describes only the energy-producing half of the cycle, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No mechanism described to return the weight members to their initial height without expending at least as much work as generated during descent.
- Violates the 1st Law of Thermodynamics: Claims continuous torque output from a closed gravitational system, implying creation of energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes the 'working zone' descent but ignores the energy cost of the non-working part of the cycle to reset the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient low-grade thermal energy (seas, air, ground, waste heat) and electrical input to the heat pump.
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to generate more power than it consumes by combining a heat pump and heat engine. This is impossible because the heat pump's electrical input is part of the total energy input; the heat engine can only output a fraction of the thermal energy upgraded by the heat pump, leading to a net loss, not a gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net power output exceeds electrical input to the heat pump, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Treats the combined system as having a net efficiency > 100% by ignoring that the heat pump's work input is part of the total system input.
- The heat engine's work output is fundamentally limited by the temperature gradient created by the heat pump, and the maximum combined efficiency is governed by the Second Law, preventing 'power in excess of what is consumed'.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial potential energy of the weights and the coupled energy storage device. The system claims to produce net energy by lowering one weight slowly while lifting N weights partially, using a ratio of rates (N = first rate/second rate).
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate net energy by manipulating the rate and distribution of weight lifting/lowering in a gravitational field, but the total gravitational work required to reset the system each cycle equals or exceeds the work extracted, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The work done by gravity lowering one weight through full height Δh is mgΔh. Lifting N weights each by Δh/N requires N * (mgΔh/N) = mgΔh. The claimed process therefore requires at least the same gravitational work output
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent implies the 'energy storage device' provides and receives energy, but for a closed cycle to produce net output, the system must violate work-energy principle. The ratio of rates is a kinematic detail, not an e
- Misapplies the concept of mechanical advantage: Using multiple lifting units to lift weights partially does not reduce the total gravitational potential energy that must be supplied to return the system to its initial state.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'exchange energy' w
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text implies the primary source is energy stored in superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) systems, with claims of self-sustaining operation and energy generation exceeding maintenance needs without an external primary input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a self-sustaining generator that produces tremendous net energy output from its own stored superconducting energy, violating energy conservation. It ignores the massive continuous energy required to maintain superconductivity (cryogenics) and vacuum, and all operational losses, making it a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims 'self energy generating' with 'tremendous' net output from a stored energy source, implying energy creation.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a closed-loop system that would perpetually do work (drive turbines, generate electricity) while only using its own stored energy, with no accounting for inevitable losses (resistive, friction, radiati
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: Ignores massive energy inputs required for initial cooldown to superconducting temperatures, maintaining vacuum, and powering control systems, wave generators, and pumps.
- Misapplication of Superconductivity: Superconductors eliminate electrical resistance but do not eliminate other loss mechanisms (e.g., friction in bearings, eddy currents in non-superconducting parts, AC losses). SMES stores energy, it does not gener
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a closed-loop fluid system with reservoirs, a turbine, and a pump. The only explicit energy input mentioned is the initial pressurization ('high pressure (N) from one point') and possibly the engine-pump (6B). No external, sustained energy source is identified to maintain the cycle against losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed fluid system that, after initial pressurization, claims to sustainably generate power using an internal turbine and pump cycle. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics because it lacks a continuous external energy source to overcome losses, effectively describing a perpetual motion machine. The energy to run the pump must exceed the work extracted from the turbine.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is described as two 'self-enclosed' reservoirs, implying a closed system with no net external energy input after initial pressurization.
- Claims 'sustainability of the exhaust energy' and obtaining power from an internal 'potential difference' without identifying a replenished energy gradient violate the First Law (energy conservation).
- The described cycle (pump moving liquid, turbine extracting energy) would be subject to friction, viscous, and other losses. The pump (6B) would require more work input than the turbine (3) could output, leading to net energy dissipation, not sustain
- Adiabatic condition mentioned does not create an energy source; it merely reduces heat transfer, but does not circumvent the need for an external energy input to sustain motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignor
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the energy is created ('new energy') from an unbalanced weight distribution in a sprocket-wheel-chain system, with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to create new energy from an internal, fixed weight imbalance, which is impossible. It is a classic overbalanced wheel concept, a type of perpetual motion machine that cannot work because the center of mass of the system cannot be perpetually displaced to create continuous torque without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics) by claiming to create energy from nothing.
- Violates conservation of angular momentum. The described unbalanced torque is internal to the system; no net torque can be generated to cause continuous rotation without an external input.
- Misunderstands lever action and torque. The described 'continuous lever action' from a fixed weight asymmetry cannot produce continuous work; the system will find a stable equilibrium.
- No entropy sink or thermodynamic gradient is identified to drive the process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the liquid initially in the elevated recipient (6). The description implies a cyclic process where the liquid is returned to the elevated position without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual energy source by using falling water to generate electricity and then using the resulting vacuum to suck the water back up to repeat the cycle. This violates the conservation of energy, as the energy needed to lift the water back to the top equals or exceeds the electricity generated from its fall.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The system describes a closed cycle where liquid flows down to do work (spin a turbine), is collected, and is then supposedly sucked back up into the elevated recipient by a 'depression'
- The 'depression' (partial vacuum) in the elevated recipient cannot magically lift liquid from the basin below; it can only allow atmospheric pressure to push liquid up a limited height (approx. 10 meters for water at sea level), and even that lifting
- The patent text obfuscates the need for an external pump to reset the system, claiming the depression itself drives the refill to create 'permanent electricity'.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > control in
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describes a mec
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be electrical energy from the grid/battery to start the electric motor. Claims imply a self-sustaining loop where part of the dynamo's output feeds the motor, suggesting the system aims to run on its own output.
AI Physics Analysis
The arrangement describes a system where an electric motor drives a dynamo (generator), with part of the output fed back to power the motor. This is a classic over-unity claim, as it ignores all conversion losses (friction, heat, resistance). No continuous external energy source is identified to overcome these losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims feedback from dynamo to motor but ignores losses from friction, electrical resistance, and waste heat.
- Violates energy conservation: Implies a closed-loop system generating net power without an external, continuous energy source.
- Misapplication of mechanics: Gears and torque transmission do not create energy; they only convert it with losses.
- Vague role of gravity/crane: Lifting components does not provide a continuous energy input; it's a one-time potential energy change.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit input is electrical power to the motor (1). The device claims to output more electrical power from the generator (16) than is input, implying the extra energy comes from the mechanical lifting and dropping of spheres (9) via levers and lifters.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It uses an electric motor to lift spheres, which then fall to turn a generator. The mechanical lifting process cannot return more energy than the motor consumed, due to inevitable losses. The claim of reproducing power in higher quantity violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output > input without identifying an external, non-electrical energy source.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a work cycle (lifting and dropping masses) that outputs more work than is input, equivalent to a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores losses from friction, electrical resistance, and inelastic collisions in the mechanical transmission and sphere-dropping process.
- Mechanical advantage misunderstanding: Using levers (Law of the arm) trades force for distance or vice-versa; it cannot create energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on a piston, but system requires resetting piston to top position using compressed air from the system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a self-sustaining, endless-loop power source using gravity. However, the energy required to reset the piston (using an air hoist powered by the system's own compressed air) must come from the system's output. Accounting for all losses, this creates an energy deficit, making perpetual operation impossible. It is a classic over-unity claim violating the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Energy to lift piston must equal or exceed gravitational energy released during descent when accounting for losses.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Claims a closed, self-sustaining loop with net energy output.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores that compressed air used to reset piston reduces net available energy for electricity generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary source. The system appears to use batteries and an inverter to power a motor that drives generators/alternators, with claims that additional solar/wind can be added. The core claim suggests the electrical output is more than triple the consumption of the motor, implying energy multiplication within a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims an electrical output more than triple the system's consumption, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The description is technically obfuscated but implies a motor-generator feedback loop, which cannot have a net gain without an external, accounted-for energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that electrical production is 'more than triple its consumption' violates conservation of energy for a closed system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identified net external energy input to justify a net power output greater than input.
- System description suggests a motor driving generators to produce electricity, which is inherently lossy (friction, resistance, heat). Output cannot exceed the mechanical work input to the generators.
- Ambiguous configuration makes it impossible to verify a legitimate external source is providing the net energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/input rotation from external sources (hand, water, wind) plus potential gravitational energy from loaded spools. Claims to amplify rotational moment without additional energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to amplify rotational moment using the 'difference of rotating moments from different sides relative to the axis of rotation,' which is essentially an internal rearrangement that cannot create net angular momentum or energy. This violates conservation laws, as the output rotational energy cannot exceed the input energy from the initial driving source (hand, water, wind).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy
- Claims to increase resultant rotational moment through internal configuration alone
- Implies energy multiplication without identifiable external energy source
- No thermodynamic limit acknowledged for the claimed amplification
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air (thermal energy) and electrical input to compressor and pump.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims the apparatus produces more usable energy than the total energy required to run it, which directly violates energy conservation. It attempts to use compressed ambient air as a heat source, but with the ambient environment also as the heat sink, no net work can be extracted—this is a classic perpetual motion of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net energy output > total energy input, violating First Law of Thermodynamics.
- Describes a heat engine using ambient air as the sole thermal source, violating the Second Law (no temperature gradient to drive a cycle).
- Process of compressing ambient air to 'extract heat' requires work input; any heat engine cycle converting that heat back to work is limited by Carnot efficiency relative to ambient sink, guaranteeing net loss.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system describes a battery powering a motor, which drives an 'energy amplifier' that somehow amplifies energy to power a 'generating motor' that recharges the original battery and powers the system. No external energy input is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed-loop system where a battery powers a process that allegedly amplifies energy to recharge itself and produce excess work. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims a net energy output greater than the stored battery input with no external source. The 'energy amplifier' has no identifiable, legitimate physical mechanism for creating energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a closed-loop system where output energy exceeds input with no external source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies energy amplification without an external energy gradient or work input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of losses (friction, resistance, heat).
- Obfuscated mechanism: 'Energy amplifier' function is not physically defined.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'energy a
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text is garbled and mixes Korean terms (e.g., 영구동력기 which appears to be 'electromagnetic vibration device') with nonsense characters, making the primary energy input impossible to identify from the provided text.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim text is corrupted and unreadable, which is itself a major red flag. The fragments that are interpretable suggest a device that amplifies input energy, which violates energy conservation unless a hidden external energy source is accounted for. The garbled presentation obstructs proper physics analysis.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is corrupted/unreadable, preventing technical analysis
- Claims mention output exceeding control input and a 3-stage amplification, suggesting energy multiplication
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or legitimate energy conversion process is described
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary energy source is the gravitational potential energy of water-filled hollow bodies rising in a water basin and then falling to drive a gear system. An auxiliary system uses pumped water from a lock chamber, stored in an upper reservoir, to run turbines.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. The buoyant work extracted from the rising bodies cannot exceed the work needed to submerge them, and the pumped hydro storage requires its own energy input. The claims of operation 'without external help' and 'free of charge' directly violate the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system claims the hollow bodies rise and drive machinery 'durch eigene Kraft ohne fremde Hilfe' (by their own power without external help), which is impossible. Buoyant force provides an upward force, but to create a continuous loop, work must be
- The claim that water pumped into the lock chamber (10) and stored (12) generates electricity 'zum Nulltarif ohne Energiezufuhr' (free of charge without energy input) is a direct violation of energy conservation. Pumping water to a height requires ene
- The description is a convoluted attempt to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, extracting net work from a closed cycle with no net external energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignor
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct concepts lik
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest extracting energy from 'humidity and temperature' gradients, but the described mechanism appears to be a closed-loop system attempting to generate electricity from ambient conditions without a maintained thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to generate electrical output greater than its control input by exploiting humidity and temperature, but it fails to account for the external energy needed to maintain the gradients. The described cyclic process suggests an attempt to extract net work from ambient conditions without a maintained external gradient, violating the second law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output power (6 units) exceeds control input power, implying energy multiplication without identifying a sufficient external energy source.
- Violates Second Law: Implies extracting net work from a single temperature/humidity reservoir or from an equilibrium state.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Describes using 'temperature difference' and 'humidity difference' but suggests these are created and sustained by the device's own operation in a cyclic manner.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve a 'magnetic field generator' (자기장 발생기) and 'magnetic energy' (자기 에너지) interacting with a 'permanent magnet' (영구자석) and 'magnetic energy amplification device' (자기 에너지 증폭 장치) to produce more output energy than input, suggesting energy extraction from the magnetic system itself without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system using magnetic fields and permanent magnets that claims to amplify and regenerate magnetic energy in a loop, ultimately producing more energy than is supplied. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it lacks an identifiable external energy source and claims net energy multiplication from a static magnetic configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input vs. output energy.
- Implies creation of energy from a static magnetic field (permanent magnet), violating conservation.
- Describes 'amplification' and 'regeneration' of magnetic energy in a closed loop without a primary energy source.
- Uses vague terms like 'magnetic energy amplification' without specifying the thermodynamic cost.
- Suggests a self-sustaining or over-unity cycle where output energy feeds the input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest magnetic energy conversion and amplification, but appears to rely on extracting net work from permanent magnets without accounting for the energy required to create/maintain magnetic fields or gradients.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy conversion and amplification system that appears to claim output energy exceeding controlled input by manipulating permanent magnets. This violates energy conservation because permanent magnets in static configurations cannot do net work without an external energy source to change the magnetic field configuration; any work extracted comes from the system's magnetic energy, which is finite and not replenished without input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for magnetic systems
- Implies energy multiplication or amplification without identifiable external energy input
- Uses vague terms like 'magnetic energy conversion' and 'amplification' without specifying thermodynamic process
- Suggests cascading/stacking magnetic elements to increase output beyond input, violating conservation
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text references magnets (N, S poles), coils, and rotation, suggesting a generator or motor, but no primary energy input (mechanical, electrical, chemical, or environmental) is specified. The abstract describes a configuration of magnets and coils but omits the driver.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract describes a magnetic coil configuration but fails to identify the primary source of energy input required to initiate and sustain rotation or electrical output. The terminology and structure suggest an attempt to extract net energy from permanent magnets alone, which violates energy conservation as magnets are energy storage devices, not sources.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of 'energy multiplication' or 'self-sustaining' operation are implied by the abstract structure and terminology
- Appears to describe a permanent magnet generator/motor configuration without accounting for the energy required to overcome magnetic cogging and resistive losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate 'output power' at the output of a 'power generator' using 'external energy' from a 'power source' and 'environmental energy' (ambient heat), but describes a closed-loop energy multiplication process.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a thermodynamically impossible closed-loop system that claims to use ambient heat to generate more output power than is input, then feed that output back to power the source. This is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine of the first and second kind, violating both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law (Energy Conservation): Describes a system where 'output power' is fed back to power the source, creating a self-sustaining loop with net power output. This implies energy creation.
- Violates Second Law: Attempts to extract useful work ('output power') from a single ambient thermal reservoir ('environmental energy') without a colder sink, which is thermodynamically impossible.
- Incomplete/Obscured Energy Accounting: The description is circular. The 'power source' is powered by the 'power generator', which is powered by the 'power source' and ambient heat, suggesting perpetual motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and ambiguous. The text describes a complex cascade of energy transfers involving 'gravity energy', 'magnetic energy', 'rotation energy', and 'self-rotation energy', but fails to identify a primary, net external energy input. It appears to claim energy multiplication through internal feedback loops.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading energy conversion process (gravity→magnetic→rotation) that feeds output back to the input, suggesting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy). It lacks a clear, net external energy source and violates conservation laws by implying energy multiplication through internal feedback.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The described cascade (gravity → magnetic → rotation → self-rotation → output) implies energy creation with no clear net input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual or over-unity process by feeding output energy back to sustain or amplify the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input power, losses, or efficiency. Ambiguous terms obscure the actual energy flow.
- No thermodynamic gradient identified: Claims to extract useful work from 'gravity energy' without specifying a consumable potential or gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'magnetic energy' from permanent magnets to generate electricity, but appears to treat permanent magnets as an energy source rather than a field source.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a magnetic generator that claims to use permanent magnets as an energy source to produce electrical output, then uses part of that output to enhance the magnetic field to produce more electricity. This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim that violates energy conservation by treating static magnetic fields as a consumable energy source rather than a conservative potential field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Permanent magnets contain stored magnetic potential energy from their creation, but this is not a continuous energy source for doing work without an external input to change the magnetic configuration.
- System claims to generate electrical output while only using magnetic fields from permanent magnets as the input, violating energy conservation.
- Describes a configuration where a generator's own output somehow enhances the magnetic field to produce more output - classic feedback/over-unity claim.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed source is the hydrostatic pressure at the deep ocean inlet. However, this is not a usable energy source in the proposed configuration, as the pressure inside the pipe is in equilibrium with the pressure outside at the same depth.
AI Physics Analysis
The device violates the conservation of energy. The deep ocean pressure is not an independent energy source that can push water up a pipe to the surface; the water in the pipe is supported by the water below it, creating a balanced system. To generate flow, you would need to input energy to create a pressure difference, for example by pumping.
Specific Physics Issues
- Ignores that pressure in a static fluid is a function of depth, not an isolated force. The water inside the pipe at the inlet is at the same pressure as the water outside the pipe at that depth, creating no net pressure gradient to drive flow upward.
- The system is not a closed hydraulic system as claimed; the inlet is open to the deep ocean, so the pressure at the inlet is determined by the local hydrostatic head, not transmitted from the surface.
- No continuous energy gradient is established. For water to flow upward from the inlet to the surface, the pressure at the inlet must exceed the pressure at the outlet. This requires the inlet pressure to be greater than the local ambient pressure, wh
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'free energ
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims 'self-powered' and 'will not need any external energy', but initial compressed air and hydraulic fluid flow must be created by an external energy source. The description of a hydraulic pump compressing air creates a circular dependency with no primary energy input identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a perpetual motion machine. It claims to be 'self-powered' and produce net energy output without any external energy input, which directly violates the conservation of energy. The internal compression and fluid flow cycles cannot create more energy than was initially put into the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims net energy output with no external energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a system that purportedly renews its own energy indefinitely, implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The hydraulic pump compressing air requires energy input, which is not accounted for in the claimed 'self-powered' operation.
- Ambiguous mechanism: 'Renewing their own energy' is physically impossible without an external energy source.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on internal fluid/
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims a system
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like 'pressure
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind and solar energy captured by sails/panels on a rotating wheel, plus an unspecified connection to a claimed 'Amato perpetual hydraulic motor'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to output more energy than it inputs, which violates energy conservation. It misrepresents mechanical multiplication of force or speed as energy creation and references a 'perpetual' energy source, making it a textbook perpetual motion violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of producing more energy than it consumes (over-unity).
- Misapplication of lever/gear principles: mechanical advantage trades force for distance/speed, not creating energy.
- Invokes 'perpetual energy' as a component.
- Formula 'FORCE + SPEED = ENERGY' is physically nonsensical; energy is force * distance, and power is force * speed.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'ambient energy' (humidity and temperature gradients) and 'control energy' to produce more energy than input, suggesting energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly uses a small 'control' energy input to harness ambient humidity and temperature gradients, then feeds back part of its output to create more energy, resulting in a net energy gain. This violates energy conservation as it does not properly account for all energy inputs and describes a self-amplifying process impossible under thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > control input without properly accounting for all energy inputs from the ambient gradients.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies net energy creation from ambient conditions without a sufficient gradient or external work input.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct terms like 'humidity gradient' and 'temperature gradient' but describes a process where 50% of output is fed back to create a perpetual amplification.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (implicitly), but the primary, explicit input is the hydraulic power pack driving the pistons that push the pendulums.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from gravity, a conservative force, using pendulums pushed by a hydraulic system. The energy required to drive the pistons and operate the control system must come from an external source, which likely equals or exceeds any electrical energy generated, violating energy conservation if a net gain is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The hydraulic power pack is a major energy input not subtracted from the alternator's output.
- Gravity is a conservative force; net work cannot be extracted from a closed cycle in a constant gravitational field without an external energy input to reset the system.
- The device describes a complex mechanism but provides no analysis showing net energy gain relative to the energy used by the pistons and control systems.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex interactions between components (magnetic fields, conductive plates, rotating elements) but fails to identify a primary energy input. Mentions an 'input power source' (90) but suggests the system generates more energy than it consumes through unexplained magnetic and conductive interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device with rotating magnetic elements and conductive plates that allegedly produces more energy than is input, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The mechanism is obfuscated with complex interactions but lacks a legitimate external energy source, fitting the pattern of a perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting - outputs are described without quantifying all inputs.
- Implies energy multiplication or creation through magnetic/conductive interactions without a thermodynamic gradient.
- Describes complex cascading/stacking of components (multiple plates, fields) which suggests an attempt to circumvent conservation of energy.
- Uses technical terms (magnetic fields, conductive plates, rotation) in a vague, obfuscatory manner without a coherent working principle.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms (extracting net
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Compressed air (pressurized by an external source like wind or solar) is the explicit input. The claim implicitly suggests additional energy is extracted from the gravitational potential energy of the water/oil column and the buoyant force on the air-filled piston.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use buoyancy from compressed air to extract net work from gravity, but it ignores the energy required to reset the cycle. The claim of producing 10 times more electrical energy than needed to create the compressed air is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a complex pneumatic/hydraulic/gravitational engine. The work done to compress the air is the primary input. The upward motion of the piston is driven by buoyancy, which is paid for by the work done to push
- Misapplication of buoyancy/gravity: Buoyancy is not a source of energy; it is a force. To achieve cyclic operation, the air must be vented and the piston reset, which requires work against buoyancy and gravity to re-compress the air or to push the pi
- Violates thermodynamic limits for energy conversion: The claim of a net energy multiplier (output > input for the compressed air) is impossible for a closed-cycle system operating between two reservoirs (atmospheric pressure and the hydraulic pressur
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. No identifiable energy input mechanism described. Mentions 'integral turbines' and 'magnetic' but provides no coherent physical principle for energy generation.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim provides no physically coherent mechanism for energy generation, demands massive power output with no identifiable energy source, and is obscured by nonsensical, grandiose text that misuses institutional names. It fundamentally violates energy conservation by implying power generation without an adequate input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No description of energy conversion process
- Claims massive power output (1000 MW) with no defined input
- No thermodynamic cycle or energy source identified
- Text is incoherent and lacks any technical specifications
- Implies energy generation without fuel or an external gradient
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the initial electrical input to the motor (from battery or grid), with the system allegedly multiplying this power via rotating weights and a flywheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a textbook perpetual motion machine. Its self-sufficient mode violates energy conservation, and its claim of power multiplication via mechanical components ignores inevitable losses. No new energy source is introduced, making its claims thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output power (to generator and load) can exceed input power to the motor.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Proposes a self-sufficient mode where a battery powers a motor, which drives a generator to recharge the same battery and power an external load, a classic perpetual motion scheme.
- Misapplies mechanics: Implies rotating weights/lever/flywheel system can create or multiply energy, confusing momentum/kinetic energy storage with net power generation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat) and treats the mechanical system as lossless.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use ambient atmospheric pressure (30 kgf/cm²) and water pressure to generate more output pressure/work than input, suggesting energy extraction from a static pressure gradient without an external energy source to maintain it.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use ambient atmospheric and water pressure to generate more output pressure and work than is input, effectively attempting to extract net work from a static pressure gradient. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks an identified external energy source to sustain the claimed pressure multiplication and net work output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output pressure/work exceeds input without identifying the primary energy source sustaining the pressure gradient.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies creation of useful work from an equilibrium or static pressure environment without an external energy input to disturb that equilibrium.
- Misapplication of fluid mechanics: Suggests pressure can be multiplied or cascaded to produce net energy gain, ignoring that work done by a fluid requires a drop in its pressure/enthalpy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
No identifiable external energy source. Claims to operate without fuel or gravity, implying intent for self-sustaining/perpetual operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It describes an intricate mechanical system with gears, levers, and feedback loops but identifies no external energy input. Its stated goal of operating without fuel or gravity while preventing equilibrium directly contradicts the laws of thermodynamics, as no internal arrangement can produce net work without an energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) - no input to account for claimed continuous output.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics - claims 'feedback loops' prevent equilibrium to extract net work from an isolated system.
- Mechanical obfuscation: Complex gearing and levers cannot create energy; internal forces sum to zero net torque/work.
- Explicitly references prior failed 'perpetual motion' attempts while claiming success with similar principles.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output with
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses invented terminology
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy originates from an 'artificial rotary thermogravitation field' and the utilization of 'static potential-work,' but no identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, elevated heat source, pressurized fluid) is explicitly and coherently described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims impossible energy multiplication (7x torque, >1000x efficiency) by obfuscating the true energy source. It invokes pseudo-scientific concepts like an 'artificial thermogravitation field' to disguise a violation of the conservation of energy, as no sufficient external input is identified to justify the claimed outputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims torque magnification by 7x and efficiency >1000x without identifying a compensating energy input, violating energy conservation.
- Invokes 'thermodynamical oscillator' derived from solar system fields as an energy source without a mechanism for extracting net work from equilibrium gradients.
- Uses correct physics terms (e.g., 'law of inertial systems,' 'moment constancy') in a context that obfuscates the lack of a defined energy conversion process.
- Claims massive performance gains (1500x) compared to hydroturbines, far exceeding any thermodynamic limit for work extraction from a given water potential.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest extracting energy from 'magnetic fields', 'electric fields', 'gravity', 'temperature differences', and 'vibrations' simultaneously, with references to 'control input' and 'amplification' without specifying primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a device that purportedly generates or amplifies energy by combining extraction from magnetic fields, electric fields, gravity, thermal gradients, and vibrations. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, as it lacks a clear, quantified primary energy input and suggests 'amplification' that violates the First Law of Thermodynamics. The vague, multi-gradient harvesting without entropy sinks violates the Second Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input vs. output energy.
- Implies energy extraction from multiple ambient gradients without specifying how gradients are maintained or entropy is managed.
- Claims 'amplification' and 'energy multiplication' without identifying the external energy source powering the amplification.
- References a prior patent (10-2006-0108103) which appears to be a basis, suggesting a perpetual motion or over-unity device.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is the buoyant force of air/gas-filled sacks rising in water. The system requires energy to pump and compress the gas into the sacks at depth.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a buoyancy engine attempting to generate electricity. The fundamental flaw is that the energy needed to compress and pump the gas to the bottom of the water column to fill the sacks is greater than the buoyant work you can extract from their ascent, making it a net energy consumer, not a generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to compress and inject the gas into the sacks at depth is greater than or equal to the buoyant work extracted during ascent, when accounting for system losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to generate net electrical output, but the pumping work input will always exceed the mechanical work extracted from buoyancy.
- Ignores pressure-volume work: Filling a flexible sack with gas against the hydrostatic pressure at depth requires significant energy that is not properly accounted for in the output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use hydraulic cylinders (raising means) to lift masses against gravity, then allows them to fall to rotate a shaft. The hydraulic system's energy input is not specified, creating ambiguity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor that lifts masses and then uses their fall to generate rotation. This violates the conservation of energy because the energy required to lift the masses must be supplied from an external source and will always be equal to or greater than the energy recovered during their descent, resulting in a net energy loss, not generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required by the 'raising means' (hydraulic cylinders) to lift the masses is not compared to the work extracted from their descent.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies net energy generation from a cyclic process where masses are lifted and then fall, ignoring that the lift energy must be ≥ the gravitational potential energy gained.
- No external energy gradient identified: The system operates in a closed gravitational field, which is conservative. No net work can be extracted from a cyclic process in a conservative field without an external energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy gen
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a system where a compressed air motor drives an ORC turbogenerator, whose electricity drives a compressor to supply the same air motor. No primary external energy source (fuel, solar, wind, geothermal gradient) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate 'free' electricity by forming a closed loop where components supposedly power each other with surplus energy left over. This violates energy conservation, as the work needed to compress the air will always be greater than the work extracted from the expanding air and its waste heat, resulting in a net energy loss, not gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The described loop has no net energy input to overcome losses.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It implies a perpetual cycle producing useful work (electricity for a house, EV charging) from a closed loop with only waste heat recovery.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The ORC system requires a heat source and sink; the claim uses 'waste heat' from the air motor, but that heat originates from the compression work done earlier in the loop, creating a net loss cycle.
- The system is presented as a closed loop with net power output, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'free' elec
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be mechanical rotation from an external 'donator source' (e.g., engine, muscle). The device claims to multiply this input power/strength internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a passive mechanical linkage (eccentrics and levers). Such systems obey conservation of energy and cannot multiply power or energy; they can only transform torque and speed. The claims of energy multiplication directly violate the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'multiplication of power/strength' and 'multiplication of energy generated' which violates conservation of energy.
- Describes a passive mechanical transmission (eccentrics, levers) which cannot create energy; it can only trade force for distance or speed (conserving work).
- Vague mechanism ('displacement of the support point') for 'increasing power' without identifying an additional energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output powe
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using atmospheric pressure and a vacuum to drive a piston, with an initial battery-powered electric motor (1200W) to start a vacuum pump. The claim suggests the system will then sustain itself and generate excess electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It uses a battery-powered motor to create a vacuum, hoping atmospheric pressure will then do work to drive a generator. The generator's output is meant to sustain the vacuum pump and have excess left over, violating conservation of energy, as the work to create the vacuum always exceeds the work recoverable from the pressure difference.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The described system is a closed loop (vacuum pump powered by generator output) with no net external energy input after startup.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done by atmospheric pressure on the piston is paid for by the energy required to create/maintain the vacuum. The vacuum pump's energy consumption is the primary input, not a free source.
- Misunderstanding of atmospheric pressure: Atmospheric pressure is not an energy source; it's an equilibrium state. Work can only be extracted from it by allowing it to move to a lower pressure region (like a created vacuum), but creating that vacuum
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the electrical input to the motor. The device attempts to extract energy from a flywheel's rotational inertia, which is stored energy, not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a flywheel energy storage system misrepresented as a power source. The claim that the device outputs more power as a generator than it requires as a motor violates the First Law of Thermodynamics. The flywheel's kinetic energy is depleted during generation and must be replenished by the motor, requiring net energy input from an external source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims the motor/generator outputs full rated power as a generator while only requiring half its rated power as a motor to re-accelerate the flywheel.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores losses from friction, electrical resistance, and switching. The energy extracted during generator mode must come from the flywheel's kinetic energy, slowing it down.
- Misunderstanding of flywheel function: A flywheel is an energy storage device, not an energy source. The system is a motor-generator with a flywheel buffer, requiring net energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of 'output
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (flywh
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air (for compression) and initial pressurization of the air storage tank. The system claims the compressor is driven by buoyancy forces from the floats.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine by using buoyancy to power a compressor, but ignores the fundamental energy cost of resetting the cycle by forcing the buoyant objects back down into the water against their buoyant force. The net work from a closed buoyancy cycle is zero or negative when losses are included.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to submerge the buoyant bodies (against their buoyancy) to return them to the bottom of the tank is not accounted for. This work must equal or exceed the buoyant work gained during ascent.
- The system is a closed loop of energy conversion (buoyancy -> rotation -> compressor -> pressurized air -> levers) with no net external input after initial tank fill, implying perpetual motion.
- The compressor, levers, and rotation mechanisms all have inherent losses (friction, viscosity, heat). The system cannot sustain itself, let alone have excess output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions 'magnetic energy', 'electric energy', 'electric energy storage capacitor', 'magnetic energy storage', 'rotating magnetic field', 'permanent magnet', 'magnetic energy storage capacitor', and 'magnetic force magnetic energy', suggesting an attempt to extract work from magnetic fields without an identifiable primary energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex arrangement of magnetic and electrical components that appears designed to produce continuous rotation or electrical output without a clear, sustained external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme, directly violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Appears to describe a system of magnets, capacitors, and coils configured to produce a continuous output ('rotating magnetic field', 'electric energy')
- No clear primary energy input (e.g., electrical grid, battery, thermal gradient) is accounted for
- The described cascading/stacking of components suggests an attempt at energy multiplication or a self-sustaining system
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying a net energy output greater than the total energy input
- Violates the Second Law by suggesting a perpetual gradient can be maintained without an external energy source to compensate for losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of output energy ig
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies extract
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using a 'control magnet' to generate a 'main magnet' which then amplifies the 'control magnet' in a cyclic feedback loop, suggesting energy creation from the magnetic configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system where magnets cyclically generate and amplify each other's fields, implying a net energy gain from the magnetic configuration alone. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce output energy exceeding any identifiable input, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies energy amplification or multiplication via magnetic feedback without an external energy source
- Describes a cyclic process where a magnet generates another magnet which then amplifies the first, violating energy conservation
- No identifiable external input (electrical, mechanical, thermal, ambient) to account for the claimed energy output
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions magnetic fields, magnetic flux, and magnetic poles (N and S) interacting, but no explicit external energy input is identified. Implies energy is generated or amplified solely through magnetic interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce useful energy output by manipulating magnetic fields from permanent magnets alone, which is a classic perpetual motion scheme. No external energy source (electrical, mechanical, thermal, or environmental) is identified to account for the claimed output, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The described magnetic interactions cannot create net energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate or amplify energy using only permanent magnets and magnetic circuits without an identifiable external energy source.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a sustained energy flow or gradient from an equilibrium magnetic configuration.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes magnetic flux 'transfer' and 'amplification' leading to 'energy multiplication' without accounting for the work required to overcome magnetic reluctance or change flux linkages.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mixes mechanical dimensions (mm), weights (kg), and percentages, but no explicit energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, or ambient) is identified. It appears to claim energy generation from mechanical arrangements of unspecified components.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is physically incoherent, mixing dimensions, masses, and percentages in a way that suggests energy generation without identifying any energy source. It violates energy conservation by implying output exceeding any identifiable input, using obfuscated terminology and calculations that lack physical meaning.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Claims of energy output (e.g., 600000 units) without accounting for input energy
- Uses dimensions (mm) and masses (kg) in calculations that purportedly yield energy multiplication
- Apparent confusion between force/mass and energy/work
- Uses percentages (e.g., 100-20.8%) in a context that suggests over-unity efficiency
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claims suggest extracting work from a 'control magnet' to power a 'driving magnet' which then powers a 'generation magnet' in a cascading manner, implying energy multiplication without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading magnetic system where a 'control magnet' purportedly drives a 'driving magnet' which then powers a 'generation magnet' with amplified effect, implying energy multiplication. This violates energy conservation as it lacks a clear external energy source and describes a process that would create a perpetual motion machine by extracting net work from what appears to be a static magnetic arrangement.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies energy multiplication/cascading where output of one stage powers the next with amplification
- No identification of primary energy input (only mentions 'control magnet')
- Suggests creating a perpetual gradient or extracting net work from a static magnetic configuration without an external energy source or gradient to exploit
- Uses vague magnetic terminology ('control magnet', 'driving magnet', 'generation magnet') without specifying a legitimate energy conversion mechanism
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a device with magnets (N-pole, S-pole), a rotor, and a stator, suggesting an electromagnetic generator, but the abstract claims it can generate electricity from 'environmental energy and temperature' without an apparent external gradient or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a magnet-based generator that claims to produce electricity from ambient environmental energy without a clear, sustained external energy source or gradient. This violates the second law of thermodynamics, as it implies extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir (the environment) at equilibrium, which is impossible. The vague claims and incomplete energy accounting are hallmarks of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output from 'environmental energy' without specifying a measurable gradient or quantifying the input.
- Implies energy extraction from equilibrium: The description suggests generating electricity from ambient conditions without a clear, sustained thermodynamic gradient (like a temperature difference) to drive the process.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct terms (N-pole, S-pole, rotor, stator) but the overall description is vague and suggests a perpetual motion scheme of the second kind (extracting work from a single thermal reservoir).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests the initial rotational motion is provided by an external starter ('par tout moyen'), after which the device's own 'domesticated' centrifugal force from moving internal masses ('navettes') is claimed to power the reactors and the main output shaft independently.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. It claims that internal masses moving under centrifugal force can generate enough mechanical energy to both sustain their own motion and provide excess output power. This is impossible because centrifugal force is not an external energy source; any work done internally is balanced by work done on other parts of the system, with net losses to friction ensuring the system would stop without external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims reactors are 'tributaires de l'énergie mécanique ainsi produite pour eux-mêmes fonctionner' (dependent on the mechanical energy they produce to function), implying self-sustaining operation with negligible inpu
- Misinterprets centrifugal force: Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame; it cannot do net work on the system itself. It is a reaction force, not an independent energy source.
- Claims energy multiplication: Explicitly states 'l'énergie nécessaire aux réacteurs pour fonctionner est négligeable eu égard à la puissance de l'énergie qu'ils engendrent et qui est décuplée' (energy needed is negligible compared to the power genera
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'apparent C
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit inputs are the two motors (3) that reposition the arms. The claim implies the machine generates more energy than these motors consume by creating a permanent torque imbalance.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate net energy by using internal motors to reposition arms, claiming this creates a permanent unbalanced torque. This is impossible because internal forces cannot do net work on the system's center of mass or create a sustained net external torque; the energy required to reposition the arms will always equal or exceed any momentary gain from gravity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate a net energy output from a closed mechanical cycle using only internal repositioning of masses.
- Violates Newton's laws: A permanent torque imbalance in a rotating system cannot be created by internal forces alone; internal forces sum to zero net torque on the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical energy to run the two motors is the only clear input, but the output (to generators 5) is claimed to be greater.
- Misapplies static/dynamic analysis: The 'analytical-mathematical criteria' describe a configuration, not an external energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with multiple magnets and bodies, suggesting an attempt to extract work from magnetic interactions without an apparent external energy input. The only implied input is the initial arrangement of magnets.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of magnets arranged to supposedly amplify or generate energy. It violates energy conservation by implying that work can be continuously extracted from a static magnetic configuration without an identified external energy source to replenish the potential, constituting a magnetic perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear external energy input is identified.
- Describes extracting work from a static magnetic configuration, implying energy from a potential field without an accompanying dissipative process to restore the gradient.
- Claims 'energy amplification' or 'energy multiplication' through cascading magnets, which suggests output energy exceeding the input energy required to initiate the process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest motion is generated solely by permanent magnet interactions without external energy input, implying energy extraction from magnetic fields alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate motor/turbine rotation using only interactions between fixed and moving permanent magnets, implying energy extraction from magnetic fields without an external energy source. This violates energy conservation, as permanent magnet systems are conservative and cannot provide net work output without an external input to change the magnetic configuration against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of external energy input to sustain motion against losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies net work can be extracted from a static configuration of permanent magnets.
- Misapplication of magnetic interactions: Permanent magnets are conservative force fields; no net work can be extracted from them without changing the system configuration using external energy.
- Claims of cascade/stacking (Cascade) to multiply output energy without additional input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use buoyancy (浮力) of air-filled containers (バスケット) in water to drive mechanical motion through chains, belts, and turbines, but no external energy input is described beyond initial water filling.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a buoyancy-driven electrical generator using air-filled containers in water. It violates the first law of thermodynamics because buoyancy alone is not an energy source; the work required to submerge the containers equals the buoyant work they can provide, resulting in zero net energy output after accounting for losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net energy input. Buoyancy is a conservative force; lifting air-filled containers requires work to submerge them, which equals or exceeds the buoyant work gained.
- System describes complex mechanical linkages (chains, guide rails, cylinders, turbines) but lacks any mechanism to create a perpetual gradient or overcome dissipative losses.
- Claims 'continuous production of electricity' without explaining how energy is added to the system to compensate for electrical output and friction losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a rotating system with buoyancy chambers and 'center-of-gravity energy cylinders' in a liquid, implying an attempt to create a continuous imbalance from buoyancy and gravity alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'Perpetuum-mobile' and attempts to generate continuous drive energy solely from cyclical buoyancy and gravitational forces within a sealed fluid system. This is a classic perpetual motion machine, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to output useful work without an external energy source to replenish the system's state.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (continuous work output from a closed system with no external energy input).
- Incomplete energy accounting: describes 'left side' and 'right side' imbalances but ignores the equal and opposite work required to reset the chambers (e.g., submerge buoyant objects).
- Violates conservation of energy: claims net 'drive energy' is produced from internal rearrangements within an equilibrium system (liquid container).
- Misuses physics terms ('Schwerpunktenergie', 'Auftriebsenergie') to obfuscate the lack of a genuine energy gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The system claims to use the buoyant force of water to lift a mass, then converts the gravitational potential energy of that mass into electricity as it falls, using the impact energy to reset another mass into the buoyancy chamber.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity buoyancy engine. The buoyant force lifting the mass provides limited potential energy, but the system ignores the greater energy required to submerge a mass at the bottom against that same buoyancy to restart the cycle. Net energy cannot be produced, making it a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The work done by buoyancy to lift the mass is less than or equal to the energy extracted from its fall plus losses. The system cannot output more electrical energy than the input work required to submerge the mass agains
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the energy required to reset the cycle—specifically, to push a new mass into the bottom of the buoyancy chamber against water pressure and to submerge it, which would require work equal to or greater t
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The described cycle suggests a closed loop where the output electricity (from falling) and the impact energy are sufficient to reset the system, which is thermodynamically impossible due to friction, electrical losses, and
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air intake and electrical energy from alternators driven by the engine's own compressed air flow.
AI Physics Analysis
The design attempts to create a self-sustaining engine by using alternators on the internal airflow to power the heaters that drive the turbine. This is a closed energy loop that violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it provides no net external energy input. The alternators' load would inherently reduce the pressure/enthalpy of the air, leaving insufficient energy to both drive the turbine and sustain the heaters.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy loop: Alternators are powered by compressed air flow, which is created by work from the turbine, which is driven by heated air. This creates a closed energy loop with no net external input.
- Violates First Law: System claims to sustain its own heating using electricity generated from its own internal airflow, implying energy creation.
- Violates Second Law: Attempts to extract net work (turbine shaft power) from a single thermal reservoir (electrically heated air) without a colder sink for heat rejection.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'no fossil
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to generate kinetic/rotational energy solely from the release of a restrained heavy weight and gravity-driven belt, implying a net energy output from internal configuration changes without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce rotational energy output by releasing a restrained heavy weight, but it ignores the essential fact that the energy required to lift the weight and tension the belt in the first place must be supplied from an external source. No process is described to reset the mechanism without inputting at least as much energy as it outputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System attempts to extract net work from gravity alone without restoring the gravitational potential energy.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cycle where releasing a restraint causes motion to generate output energy, but no process to reset the system to its initial high-potential-energy state.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'kinetic energy' generated when the arrester is removed comes from the stored gravitational potential energy of the lifted weight/belt. Lifting that weight required an equal or greater energy input which is not descr
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'control magnetic field' (고정자 영구자석) and a 'superconducting magnetic field' (회전자 영구자석) interact through a 'magnetic element' (철심). It suggests the output energy from the superconducting magnet can be fed back to enhance the control magnet, implying energy multiplication without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic field interaction system that implies energy amplification or a self-sustaining loop. It fails to identify any external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described feedback mechanism is characteristic of a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies energy amplification or feedback loop without accounting for the energy required to establish and maintain the superconducting state.
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, thermal, etc.) is described. The system appears to use its own output as a reinforced input.
- Violates energy conservation by suggesting a magnetic field interaction can produce a net gain in usable energy without an external source to compensate for losses.
- Superconductors allow for lossless current flow but do not create energy; energy is still required to create the magnetic field in the first place.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with 'energy amplification' using 'energy amplification units' and 'energy amplification devices' that appear to feed energy back into themselves and to a 'load device'. No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is clearly identified. The description suggests energy is extracted from the environment ('ambient energy field') but the mechanism is not thermodynamically sound.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a self-amplifying energy system that claims to power a load by feeding amplified energy back into itself, with vague references to ambient energy. It violates the First Law (energy conservation) by implying creation of energy, and the Second Law by lacking a clear thermodynamic driver or entropy sink, fitting the pattern of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system claims to use 'energy amplification units' to feed energy back into itself and to a load, implying a net energy output greater than any controlled input without a clear, sufficien
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics. The described feedback loops and 'amplification' processes lack an identified entropy sink or a temperature gradient to drive useful work. It describes extracting work from what appears to be an equilibrium or s
- Incomplete energy accounting. The claims focus on internal 'amplification' and feedback between components, obscuring the initial source of energy and all loss pathways.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The core claim is
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The sys
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct-sounding ter
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract energy from gravity by using the potential energy of a mass at height to lift a portion of new mass to the same height, while releasing surplus as usable kinetic energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to use the potential energy of a falling mass to lift a new mass to the same height and also produce extra usable kinetic energy, which is impossible. In a closed cycle, the energy needed to lift the new mass equals the potential energy released by the fall, leaving zero net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to output more usable energy (kinetic) than the input gravitational potential energy, as it must also fully restore the initial condition (lift new mass).
- No net external energy input identified; gravity is a conservative force—cycling a mass in a gravitational field returns zero net work over a closed cycle.
- Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind: creating usable energy from a static gravitational field without an external gradient or fuel.
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The initial rotation is caused by manually pouring a measured quantity of fluid into receptacles at the top. The system then claims to use the wheel's rotation to pump that same fluid back to the top to sustain motion and generate electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a classic over-unity design. It attempts to use gravity acting on descending fluid to generate power, but then uses that same power to pump the fluid back up. Friction and electrical generation losses ensure the wheel will stop unless externally powered, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system output (electricity + losses) must exceed the input work to pump fluid against gravity back to the top. The described mechanism uses the wheel's rotation to power the pump, which is a net consumer of work from
- Violates energy conservation: The system is a closed loop. The energy to lift the fluid (potential energy) is provided by the descending fluid. The act of pumping it back up consumes at least as much work as was gained from its descent (plus losses),
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The design implies the wheel's rotation can both pump the fluid to sustain itself and generate excess electricity, which is impossible without an external energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex system of 'energy conversion modules', 'temperature gradient modules', 'energy storage modules', and 'energy amplification modules' with cascading connections, but fails to identify any primary energy input. The description suggests energy is being amplified or created through internal cascading processes.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where energy modules cascade and amplify energy for each other, but provides no clear primary energy input. This constitutes incomplete energy accounting, as the described internal feedback loops cannot produce net useful work without an external energy source, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, ambient).
- Describes cascading/amplifying energy between modules without accounting for input energy.
- Implies creation of a temperature gradient or electrical output from internal feedback loops without an external driver.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('energy amplification module', 'temperature gradient module') that masks the fundamental energy conversion process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical torque multiplication system using two 'rack and pinion' assemblies, suggesting the output torque/force is doubled without a clear, additional energy input to account for the increased output work.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism that appears to double output force/torque, claiming doubled output power. This violates energy conservation, as a simple mechanical linkage cannot create energy; any increase in output force must come at the expense of a proportional decrease in output displacement or speed, keeping input and output energy equal minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to double output force/torque (and thus output power P = ω * τ) without identifying a proportional increase in input energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a mechanical linkage but ignores the required increase in input displacement or decrease in input speed that must accompany a torque increase in a lever/gear system to conserve energy.
- Misapplication of torque formula: Uses T = f * r correctly but incorrectly implies the force 'f' can be doubled in the output without an energy cost, confusing force multiplication with energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex mechanical/electrical interactions between 'right-hand' and 'left-hand' energy devices, but no primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient) is explicitly identified. The system appears to claim energy is generated or amplified through geometric configurations and interactions between components.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex arrangement of interacting components but fails to identify any primary source of energy input. The claims suggest energy amplification or generation through geometric configurations and internal interactions alone, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The use of technical terms and complex mechanical descriptions obscures the absence of a legitimate energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input source described
- Claims of energy transfer and amplification without a source violate conservation of energy
- Complex geometric/mechanical descriptions obfuscate the fundamental energy accounting
- Implied creation of a 'high-energy field' or amplification without an input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of falling masses (cars). The device appears to be a mechanism to convert this gravitational work into output shaft work, while also using some output to drive the mechanism that resets the masses (via the linkage to the second gear/roll chain).
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate continuous output energy from the gravitational fall of masses, but it obscures the crucial fact that lifting those masses back to their starting height requires at least as much energy as was gained from their fall. The described linkages cannot circumvent this, making it a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses falling masses to generate output work, but the energy required to lift the masses back to their starting position (presumably via the second roll chain driven by the linkage) is not accounted for as an i
- Violates energy conservation: The description implies a cyclic process where falling cars drive an output shaft while also, through a linkage, driving the mechanism that returns the cars to the top. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the f
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes using a 'control input' to create a 'gradient' which then supposedly generates 'output energy' greater than the input. This suggests an attempt to extract net work from an equilibrium or self-sustaining system without identifying an external, high-quality energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract describes a system where a small control input creates a gradient, which is then used to generate a larger output, implying over-unity performance. This violates energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics, as it claims to extract net useful work without a clear external energy source to degrade.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified (e.g., thermal gradient, chemical, ambient).
- Claims 'output energy' greater than 'control input', implying energy multiplication without accounting for all inputs.
- Describes creating a gradient from a control input and then using that gradient to produce energy, a classic perpetual motion of the second kind (violating the second law of thermodynamics).
- The abstract is written in Korean, but the physics terms used ('gradient', 'output energy', 'control input') are arranged in a way that describes a closed-loop energy gain process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Mentions magnetic components (magnetic rotation elements, magnetic force elements, permanent magnets), rotation, and claims of energy multiplication, but no clear primary energy input is identified. Appears to suggest energy generation from magnetic interactions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system using magnetic rotation elements that claims to produce 360° of output rotation from a 180° input, effectively suggesting energy multiplication. As it lacks any clear external energy source and relies on arrangements of permanent magnets to generate sustained rotation and work, it constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.)
- Claims of energy multiplication (360° rotation from 180° input, stacking/cascading elements)
- Relies on permanent magnets and magnetic interactions as the sole apparent mechanism for sustained work output
- Violates energy conservation - system cannot output more useful work than the energy put into it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The explicit energy source is the motor in the driving unit. An implicit, claimed source is buoyancy from the water, which is a potential energy gradient (gravity acting on displaced water).
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from the buoyant force, which is a conservative force. The energy required to push the floating object back down into the water (against buoyancy) to complete the cycle will always equal or exceed the work gained from its buoyant rise, making the claimed 'increased power' a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses a motor to lift/rotate the 'unlimited orbit' against gravity and water drag, then claims to extract additional 'increased power' from buoyancy. Buoyancy is not an energy source; it is a conservative force
- Violates energy conservation: The description implies the output rotative force from the sprockets is greater than the input from the driving unit, suggesting energy multiplication. The buoyant force during ascent is offset by the work required to su
- Misapplication of buoyancy: Buoyancy provides an upward force, but to create a continuous orbital movement, work must be done to return the floating object to a submerged state, consuming at least as much energy as was gained during ascent.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'control input' or 'control energy' somehow extracts or amplifies 'ambient energy' from the surroundings (air, moisture, thermal gradients) to produce a larger 'output energy'. It suggests cascading/stacking stages to multiply energy without identifying a primary external fuel or gradient large enough to account for the claimed output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to use a small control input to extract and amplify ambient energy from its surroundings (air, moisture) to produce a larger output, including through cascading stages. This constitutes a classic over-unity or perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by implying net energy creation from an equilibrium or near-equilibrium environment without a sufficient external gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by implying energy multiplication or creation.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to extract useful work from an isothermal ambient environment without a sufficient entropy sink or a larger external gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'ambient energy' input is vaguely described and its quantitative availability is not assessed against the claimed output.
- Describes a cascading/feedback process that, if interpreted as a closed loop, would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim states it consumes no classical energy, implying no fuel or electrical input. The described mechanism (shock waves, springs, plates) suggests it attempts to extract net work from internal vibrations or stored elastic energy without an external, replenished source.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is claimed as a prime mover that produces mechanical/electrical power without any energy input, which directly and fundamentally violates the conservation of energy. The description of internal shock waves and springs cannot generate net work without an external energy source to initiate and sustain them against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims to produce phenomenal power with no energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by generating useful work (rotary motion, electricity) from an isolated system with no external energy gradient.
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, thermal, chemical, electrical) is described to replenish the internal vibrations or springs.
- Claims 'dégage peu de chaleur' contradicts the inevitable conversion of some work to waste heat in any real mechanism with friction or damping.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms ('onde
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical system with multiple shafts, semi-circular wheels, belts, and generators, but provides no explicit primary energy input. Implied energy appears to come from gravitational potential energy of unbalanced wheels, which would be a finite stored energy source, not a continuous generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex assembly of shafts, unbalanced wheels, and generators but fails to identify any continuous external energy source. The system appears designed to start from an initial imbalance and then sustain itself, which violates the first law of thermodynamics. Without an input, the described mechanical arrangement cannot produce net electrical output beyond its initial stored gravitational energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable continuous external energy input described
- System appears to rely on unbalanced/weighted wheels to initiate motion, implying extraction of work from a finite gravitational potential
- Claims of combining multiple generator units suggest cascading/stacking without accounting for increased load and losses
- Lacks description of how the system overcomes friction and other losses to sustain operation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on mechani
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses detailed mechanical
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is electrical input to the motor-fan (groupe moto ventilateur), which creates an air flow to drive a paddle wheel connected to an electrical generator. Claim 5 explicitly states the fan motor is powered at least partially by the generator's own output.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a system where a fan, powered by electricity, blows air on a turbine connected to a generator. The claim that the generator can power the fan and provide excess electricity violates the first law of thermodynamics, as it ignores conversion losses and creates an impossible perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a closed loop where output electricity is used to power the input fan, implying net energy production from internal circulation.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described configuration cannot produce net usable electrical output greater than the electrical input to the fan, minus inevitable losses from generator, motor, fan, turbine, and friction.
- Misapplication of energy conversion: The fan->airflow->turbine->generator chain adds multiple conversion losses, making net output less than input, not more.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial rotational input to the input shaft. The device claims to amplify force/energy by harnessing centrifugal force, which is a fictitious force in a rotating reference frame, not an independent energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a mechanical system that cannot amplify energy. The 'centrifugal force' it harnesses is not an independent energy input but a result of the work done by the initial rotational driver. Any configuration that returns output energy to the input (Claim 2) would lose energy to friction and cannot sustain itself, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'force or energy amplification' which implies output > input, violating energy conservation.
- Centrifugal force is not an external energy source; it is a kinematic consequence of the input work driving the orbital motion.
- Claim 2 explicitly describes a feedback loop where part of the output is used to power the input, suggesting a perpetual motion or over-unity device.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignor
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text references gravity and unbalanced weights, implying gravitational potential energy from falling masses, but provides no mechanism to reset the system (i.e., lift the weights back up) without external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate electricity from gravity using unbalanced weights, but provides no mechanism or external energy source to reset the weights to their starting positions. This violates energy conservation, as any work extracted would deplete the initial potential energy, after which the device would stop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No description of an external energy source to restore gravitational potential.
- Violates the 1st Law of Thermodynamics: Claims 'Cumulative Effects Theory' generates net force/energy from height/geometry alone.
- No thermodynamic cycle: Describes a static configuration of weights and wheels with no complete cycle to extract net work.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on reducing friction/inertia but ignores the fundamental need to input energy to lift masses against gravity.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims increased '
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity, but gravity alone is not an energy source; the system appears to use buoyancy of high-density balls in a fluid, requiring energy input to reset the system (pumping fluid, moving balls against gravity, operating valves).
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to generate energy using gravity-driven buoyancy of dense balls in a fluid, but it ignores the energy required to reset the system—returning balls to the bottom, operating valves, and overcoming friction. Since gravity alone cannot supply net energy without lowering mass, the design violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Gravity is a conservative force—no net energy can be extracted from a gravitational field alone without lowering a mass or changing potential energy.
- Buoyancy cycles require work to reset: moving dense balls back up against buoyancy force or pumping fluid to recreate pressure gradients.
- System describes automated valves, sensors, and controls which require external energy input not accounted for in the 'generator' claim.
- Describes a sealed system with no external energy gradient besides gravity, which cannot produce net work in a cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores energy nee
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (gravi
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract describes a process where an 'output' from one stage is fed back to the input of a previous stage, suggesting a self-sustaining or amplifying loop without an identified primary external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The described mechanism uses the output of a later stage to drive an earlier stage, creating a feedback loop. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creating or amplifying energy from within the loop itself, and the Second Law as it lacks an identified entropy sink or external driving gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication or feedback loop without entropy increase
- No identifiable net external energy input to sustain or amplify the process
- Incomplete energy accounting implied by the described cyclic feedback
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to be driven by an electrically-controlled hydraulic power unit (PH), implying an external electrical input. The claimed 'amplification' suggests the inventor believes the flywheel system itself generates additional energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim directly violates the conservation of energy by stating the mechanical output power on a shaft exceeds the input power. A flywheel cannot create energy; it can only temporarily store and return it with losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 2 explicitly states input power is less than output power on the same shaft, a direct violation of energy conservation.
- Flywheels store and release energy; they do not amplify or create power. Any 'amplification' is likely a transient torque effect, not a net gain in energy.
- No accounting for energy losses (friction, hydraulic, electrical). The description confuses power/force with energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to be driven 'on the basis of gravity' (auf der Basis der Gravitation), implying a gravitational potential energy source, but provides no mechanism for resetting or replenishing that potential. Mentions auxiliary charging from the grid, suggesting the primary claimed source is gravity itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a generator driven by gravity, which is a classic perpetual motion claim. To produce continuous electrical output, the system would need to cyclically convert gravitational potential energy, but the energy required to restore that potential (lift the masses) is not accounted for, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: A generator driven by gravity alone, without a replenished height differential or mass source, cannot produce net useful work indefinitely.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient maintenance: To extract continuous work from gravity, a mass must be cyclically lifted against gravity, requiring an equal or greater energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the essential input energy required to reset the gravitational potential (e.g., lifting masses).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from starter motor and/or natural wind. The device then attempts to use a portion of the generated mechanical power to drive blowers, creating an artificial airflow to drive the turbine and the main blades further.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a feedback loop where the generator's shaft powers blowers to create an artificial wind that is supposed to drive the turbine and blades more strongly, which in turn powers the shaft. This is a classic over-unity violation, as the energy to create the artificial wind must come from the system's net output, leading to a net loss, not gain. The magnetic levitation and Venturi tube are physically possible but do not circumvent the fundamental energy conservation violation at the core of the operating principle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Classical feedback loop violation: System uses part of generator output (via shaft) to power blowers that create airflow to drive the turbine/generator, implying net energy multiplication.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims blade-unit can rotate with 'even less wind speed energy' due to artificial pressure difference, ignoring that energy to create that difference comes from the system's own output.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implied operation suggests sustained or increased power output from using a fraction of output to drive input blowers, a net-positive feedback loop impossible in a closed system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. The primary input appears to be a circulation pump compressing fluid from a low-pressure zone to a high-pressure zone, but the claim of 'infinite energy' suggests an expectation of net energy output greater than the pump's input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system where a pump creates a pressure difference to drive a turbine. The pump's energy input must be greater than the turbine's output due to inevitable losses, making 'infinite energy' generation impossible. It violates the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'generating infinite energy', violating energy conservation.
- Describes a closed-loop pressure system with a pump; the work required to create/maintain the high-pressure zone via the pump must exceed any work extracted by the turbine vanes moving through it, per the Second Law.
- System lacks an identified external energy gradient; it is a self-contained circulator, implying perpetual motion of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the substa
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex arrangement of 'energy modules' (에너지 모듈) and 'energy transmission units' (에너지 전달 유닛) that appear to feed energy back and forth between each other, suggesting energy multiplication without an identifiable primary external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device where energy modules transmit energy to each other in a cyclical feedback configuration, with claims suggesting the output energy can exceed the control input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as no sufficient external energy source is identified to account for the claimed outputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input source (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Describes energy transmission between modules in a way that implies amplification or creation of net energy.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying a system can output more energy than is input from external sources.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('Y' path, transmission units, switching circuits) to describe what appears to be a feedback loop intended for energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract net work from gravitational potential energy of weights in a closed cycle, with possible auxiliary energy inputs from the rotation itself or external sources.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'gravitational engine' is a classic overbalanced wheel design, a well-known type of perpetual motion machine. The claim that an asymmetric arrangement of weights produces a continuous net driving torque violates the conservation of energy, as the gravitational force is conservative and does no net work over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims net output torque M = ΣM2 - ΣM1 - ΣM0 - ΣMh, where M2 (driving torque) is always greater than the sum of resisting torques, enabling continuous rotation. This describes a system that perpetually outputs more en
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by using an asymmetric wheel/lever system to generate net work from gravity alone over a full cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: While it mentions auxiliary devices and resisting torques (friction, air resistance), the core claim is that the gravitational driving torque inherently exceeds all resisting torques due to geometric asymmetry, which is
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on torque
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a closed loop of floating metal balls and water, with an electric motor used to initiate motion. The claimed net electricity output suggests the system is intended to generate more energy than the motor input, implying energy is extracted from the gravitational potential energy of the balls/water being lowered. However, the system must reset the balls/water to their initial high position, which requires at least as much energy as is gained during descent.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate net electrical work from a closed gravitational cycle, ignoring the fundamental energy cost of resetting the system (lifting the balls and water). The claimed continuous operation and electricity surplus directly violate the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes a closed cycle (balls fall, are returned) but claims net electricity output without identifying an external energy source sufficient to reset the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electric motor input is mentioned, but the significant energy required to lift the water and balls back to the top of the system (against gravity) to repeat the cycle is not accounted for.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The description suggests a self-sustaining cycle where falling weights generate electricity, and that electricity (or part of it) is used to run the system while producing a surplus, which is thermodynamically impossible w
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes manipulating magnetic fields (N ↔ S) and using magnetic flux to supposedly amplify energy, but no external energy input is explicitly identified. The implication is that energy is created from the magnetic configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system claimed to produce more energy output than input by manipulating magnetic fluxes, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). It is a classic 'magnetic perpetual motion' claim that ignores the work required to overcome magnetic forces during reconfiguration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims that manipulating 1 unit of magnetic flux can yield 2 or 3 units of output energy without identifying a compensating external energy input.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Suggests a perpetual or self-amplifying process using permanent magnets, which are equilibrium systems. No entropy sink or thermal gradient is described.
- Misunderstanding of magnetic work: Moving magnets against magnetic forces requires input work equal to or greater than any potential energy extracted. The described 'cascading' suggests energy multiplication from a finite source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to be powered solely by gravity and buoyancy, with energy 'imported from outside' via these forces, implying a perpetual source of work without an external gradient or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a 'powerless' perpetual motion machine driven only by gravity and buoyancy. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics, as these conservative forces cannot perform net work over a complete cycle without an external energy source to create a sustained gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Gravity and buoyancy are conservative forces; no net work can be extracted from them in a cycle without an external energy input to reset the system.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The device claims to operate without an external power source ('stromlos'), but for continuous operation, a sustained gradient (e.g., temperature, pressure, height differential) is required, which this system cannot maintai
- Misapplication of 'closed system': The inventor incorrectly argues that energy conservation only applies to closed systems, and that their device is an open system importing energy from gravity. However, in a cycle, the net work done by a conservativ
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (air/water) as primary source, with auxiliary heating from fuel combustion or electricity. Claims to recover and reintegrate all thermal losses back into the ambient source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a heat engine primarily powered by ambient temperature air or water. This is a direct violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as no net work can be extracted from a single thermal reservoir at equilibrium. The auxiliary heater is the real source of the required temperature gradient, but the claim of negligible losses and primary ambient energy use is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims operation 'without notable heat losses' which violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (entropy must increase).
- Ambient thermal energy is in equilibrium; extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir at a uniform temperature is impossible (Kelvin-Planck statement).
- The described system is a complex heat engine/heat pump hybrid, but its claimed high efficiency based on ambient heat as the primary driver suggests it attempts to circumvent the Carnot limit, which requires a temperature difference.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim that amb
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct components (
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. The text describes a complex arrangement of components (energy storage units, energy conversion units, energy transmission units, energy amplification units) with energy seemingly circulating and amplifying between them without an identifiable primary external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device where energy appears to circulate and amplify between internal components without a clear, sufficient external energy source. This constitutes incomplete energy accounting and suggests a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it implies energy output exceeding identifiable input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input source (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes energy amplification and circulation between internal components, implying energy creation.
- Uses vague terminology ('energy amplification unit', 'energy transmission unit') that obscures the actual energy conversion process.
- Implies a closed-loop system where energy output is fed back to sustain or increase the process, violating conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity from magnetic interactions between permanent magnets and electromagnets, with ambiguous references to initial energy from electricity, wind, or human power, then suggesting magnetic force amplification.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity using a system of permanent magnets and electromagnets, suggesting the magnetic interactions can be managed to produce more energy than is input. This is a classic over-unity magnetic motor claim. Any work extracted from magnetic forces is ultimately paid for by the work required to overcome those same forces to reset the system, making net energy generation impossible without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate more electrical output than the sum of identified inputs (electric, wind, human) by using magnetic interactions.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual or self-amplifying magnetic system that can do net work without an external energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Fails to account for energy dissipated against magnetic forces during the 'repulsion' and 'attraction' cycles. The work done to overcome magnetic repulsion to reset the system equals or exceeds any work extracted.
- Misapplication of magnetic shielding/neutralizing materials: Claims using 'neutralizing materials' to prevent magnetic resistance, which is physically impossible without expending energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electrical energy from magnetic fields and 'magnetic particle' interactions (N,S poles) without identifying an external energy input. Mentions 'control magnetic field' and 'working magnetic field' but no primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate more electrical energy output than the control energy input by manipulating magnetic fields, which constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It violates energy conservation by implying energy multiplication without identifying an external energy source to account for the excess output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims 1 unit of input energy produces >1 unit of output energy ('1 input energy → working energy').
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of useful energy from an equilibrium magnetic system without a temperature gradient or external work input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy vs. output energy; uses vague terms like 'magnetic particle (99)' and 'magnetic particle (77)'.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims suggest energy multiplication where 1 unit of input energy produces more than 1 unit of output energy, implying energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to output more energy than is input, which directly violates energy conservation. The description lacks any identifiable external energy source to account for the claimed energy multiplication, making it a perpetual motion claim of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 1 unit of input energy produces more than 1 unit of output energy ('1íì ì°ìíì')
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal gradient) to account for the extra energy
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Describes a system that appears to be a closed-loop energy multiplier
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The title translates to 'Motor devoid of its own energy source' and the description claims to operate without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a motor without its own energy source, which directly violates the law of conservation of energy. The complex mechanical assembly of gears, shafts, springs, and magnets cannot generate net work without an external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction and resistance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Claims to produce mechanical work without any identifiable energy input.
- Describes complex mechanical and magnetic interactions but provides no source for the initial energy to overcome friction and other losses.
- Appears to be a description of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim mentions separate driving of individual masses and potential energy, but does not specify an external energy input. The system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly states the device must always yield a mechanical efficiency greater than one (Wirkungsgrad > 1). This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) for a closed system. The description of rotating masses and potential energy does not circumvent the fundamental requirement that useful work output cannot exceed the total energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims a mechanical efficiency > 1 (η > 1)
- Violates conservation of energy: output work cannot exceed total energy input
- Incomplete energy accounting: no identification of all energy inputs and losses
- Claims 'ΣE_ges = E_kin + E_pot' for the system, which is standard, but then draws an impossible conclusion from it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a 'magnetic generator' (자기발전기) with components (coils, permanent magnets, rotating parts) that appear to extract electrical energy from magnetic fields without an identifiable primary energy input to sustain the claimed 40-50% output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic generator that claims to produce significant electrical output (40-50%) without a clear, sustained external energy input. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it attempts to extract net work from permanent magnets alone, a classic perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., mechanical work, thermal gradient, chemical fuel) to drive the system.
- Claims energy generation (40-50% output) from magnetic interactions alone, implying extraction of net work from a static magnetic field, which violates energy conservation.
- Describes a configuration of coils and magnets that appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (output > input).
- Uses vague terms like 'magnetic power' and 'magnetic amplification' without specifying the energy conversion process or losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from a battery, then purportedly from a generator (spule) on the rotating drum that powers the system and recharges the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a classic over-unity perpetual motion machine. It claims that a generator on the device produces more electricity than is needed to run its own pumps and recharge its starting battery, leading to self-sustained acceleration. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as the generator's output is powered by the device's own motion, which itself requires energy input to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims the generator produces more electricity than the battery and pumps consume, enabling self-sustaining acceleration.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: System claims net energy output greater than input, implying creation of energy.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (self-accelerating with no external energy input after start).
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, drag, pump inefficiencies).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (air/water) extracted via a heat pump, with initial electrical energy from a battery. The system claims to use this extracted heat to run a heat engine (e.g., Stirling) to generate electricity, part of which recharges the battery and provides external work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use a heat pump to 'upgrade' ambient heat to run a heat engine, but the work required to drive the heat pump always equals or exceeds the work the heat engine can produce from that upgraded heat, per Carnot limits. Claiming it can recharge its own battery and produce excess work from ambient heat alone is a classic violation of the Second Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a net work output from a single ambient temperature reservoir via a cyclic process.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical work input to the heat pump is ignored when calculating the net output of the overall system.
- The system's claimed closed-loop operation (battery recharged from generator output) implies a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity, but the actual energy input is the electrical motor driving the air compressor that operates the pneumatic cylinders.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. The electrical energy to run the compressor and control system is the only net energy input. Gravity alone cannot provide net work over a cycle. The system's losses ensure the electrical output from the dynamo cannot exceed the electrical input to the compressor motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims net electrical output > electrical input to compressor motor.
- Misunderstands gravity as an energy source: Shifting weights around a wheel only converts the input work (from the pneumatic system) into potential/kinetic energy changes; gravity is a conservative force providing no net energy over a cycle.
- The pneumatic system (compressor, cylinders) is powered by the motor. The work done to extend/retract the weights against centrifugal forces and friction consumes energy. This input energy must be greater than or equal to any rotational energy extrac
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'produit pl
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct concepts lik
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from a 'gradient' (물) to produce work, but appears to describe a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle where the output work is used to regenerate the input gradient, implying energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cyclical process where a gradient is used to produce work, and that work is then used to recreate or amplify the original gradient. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, violating both the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics by implying net energy can be extracted from an equilibrium or self-sustaining cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system describes using a gradient to produce work, then using that work to recreate or amplify the same gradient, suggesting a closed cycle with net energy output.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics. The process implies extracting work from a single thermal reservoir or gradient without a compensating lower-temperature sink, equivalent to perpetual motion of the second kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting. No primary external energy input (e.g., fuel, external heat source, electrical input) is clearly identified to sustain the cycle against losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. The device appears to use 'electromagnetic waves' (마그네틱) as both input and output, with claims of energy multiplication between stages. No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading system using electromagnetic waves that claims to produce more energy than it consumes, with specific ratios (e.g., 1:3) between stages. This violates energy conservation as it lacks a clear external energy source and implies over-unity operation without accounting for all energy inputs and thermodynamic losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication/generation without a clear external source
- Implied over-unity operation (output > input) through cascading stages
- No accounting for thermodynamic losses or entropy increase
- Vague mechanism for how electromagnetic waves are converted and amplified
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims pressure vessels (Druckluftspeicher) are 'permanent energy sources' that are 'non-consumable' and cyclically compressed to a working state, implying energy is created or extracted from a static pressure reservoir without an external input to re-pressurize it.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use pressurized air vessels as permanent, non-consumable energy sources to do cyclic work. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the work obtained from expanding air must be less than or equal to the work previously done to compress it. The description lacks a clear, sustainable external energy input, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'permanent' pressure vessels as a non-consumable energy source, violating energy conservation.
- Describes a cyclic process where pressure vessels are compressed and then do work, but lacks identification of the primary energy input to perform the compression.
- Suggests performance multiplication by coupling modules, implying energy output > total energy input (over-unity).
- System appears to be a pneumatic/hydraulic engine but posits a permanent pressure source, ignoring that work done by expanding air must be replenished by work input to re-compress it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on work ou
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Treats
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct engineering
Claimed Energy Source
Wind energy (primary claimed source) plus claimed energy from inertial forces (centrifugal and Coriolis) internal to the rotating system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device incorrectly treats centrifugal and Coriolis forces—which are inertial effects within the rotating frame—as external energy sources that can add net energy to the system. The only legitimate external energy input is the wind; all other described effects merely convert or redistribute that initial energy, with inevitable losses, violating energy conservation if claimed to provide net acceleration or extra output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Treats inertial forces (centrifugal, Coriolis) as independent energy sources rather than frame-dependent effects.
- Claims the magnetic mass system accelerates the rotor rotation, implying net energy creation from internal motions.
- Misapplies gyroscopic principles for energy generation.
- Suggests directional dependence (hemisphere) for a rotational mechanism, confusing Earth's Coriolis effect with a force internal to a rotating frame.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind energy (natural or artificial) plus initial electrical input to start the blower. Claims to later use generated electricity to power the blower, creating a self-sustaining loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use a blower to create wind, which spins a turbine to generate electricity, then uses part of that electricity to power the blower. This is a classic over-unity violation, as the electrical losses, friction, and generator inefficiencies ensure the system cannot sustain itself. The specific numerical claims of doubled rotation speed and quadrupled torque are physically unsupported and suggest energy creation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims turbine rotation speed is 'twice the blower wind speed divided by turbine circumference', implying mechanical advantage without energy source.
- Claims output torque is 'four times the blower output force multiplied by turbine radius', implying energy multiplication.
- Describes a system where generated electricity powers the blower that creates the wind, attempting a closed, self-sustaining energy loop.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes energy being generated, amplified, and transferred between components (energy blocks, energy sources, energy collectors) without identifying a primary external energy input. It suggests energy multiplication through cascading processes.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where energy blocks generate, transfer, and amplify energy among themselves, creating a cascading or regenerative effect that appears to produce net energy output without a clear, sufficient external input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes energy multiplication from internal processes alone, characteristic of a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input accounting
- Claims of energy amplification/regeneration without an external source violate conservation of energy
- Vague description of energy transfer mechanisms that could imply perpetual motion
- Uses physics terminology (energy, source, collector, amplification) in a confusing, non-standard way
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'vibration generator' (볼 리테이너) placed in a 'magnetic field' (단부 컵) generates additional vibration generators in the same field, which then produce 'electrical energy' (활주 블록). No primary energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device claims a vibration generator placed in a magnetic field can generate more vibration generators, which collectively produce electrical energy with no clear external energy input. This constitutes a textbook violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by describing a system that creates energy from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to initiate or sustain the process
- Implies energy multiplication (one vibration generator creates more of itself, all producing electricity) without an external source
- Violates energy conservation - output electrical energy has no accounted input
- Describes a self-replicating energy generation process, characteristic of a perpetual motion machine
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of magnets being lowered, with claimed 'free' restoration via buoyancy in a water column.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator using falling magnets, but it claims the buoyant return of the magnets is 'free.' This ignores the substantial energy required to reset the buoyancy transfer system (compressing air, operating valves, moving water). The net cycle cannot output more energy than is input to reset the system, making its claims of pure gain above 'break-even' a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system claims to use buoyancy to return magnets to the top without accounting for the energy required to reset the buoyancy system (e.g., compressing air, moving water, or resetting transfer chambers).
- Omits work input for system reset: The described air pressure transfer mechanisms, valves, and chambers require energy to operate and reset, which is not accounted for in the energy balance.
- Implies perpetual motion: The description suggests 'free' ascent via buoyancy and that any height increase above 'break-even' is pure gain, indicating a belief in net energy generation from a closed cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the weight-floater being lowered, initially provided by an external agent to lift/swing the water beam and reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a cycle where a weight is lowered to generate electricity, then returned to its starting position. No external energy source is identified to reset the system (swing the water beam vertical and lift the weight). The net work output per cycle is zero or negative, violating energy conservation. It is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system lacks a net energy input. The work done by the descending weight is less than or equal to the work required to reset the system (swing the water beam back to horizontal, lift the weight back into it).
- The description implies a continuous cycle without identifying the source of energy to repeatedly re-swing the water beam to vertical and re-insert the weight at the top.
- Buoyancy is used only to facilitate handling of the weight inside the water beam, not as a net energy source. The lifting of the weight against gravity during reset consumes the energy generated.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity (potential energy from falling objects) and buoyancy (for the return lift). However, the system is a closed loop where the objects are cycled.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic attempt at a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It uses falling objects to generate electricity, then uses buoyancy to return them to the top, claiming a continuous net output. The energy needed to reset the cycle (submerging the buoyant object at the bottom) is ignored, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core process describes a closed-loop gravity-buoyancy engine. The net energy to lift the object (via buoyancy or otherwise) back to the top must equal or exceed the gravitational potential energy gained from the fall, minus losses. The system can
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the energy required to create the buoyant lift (e.g., to submerge the object at the bottom against its buoyancy, or to manage the fluid medium). This input energy is not accounted for in the claimed el
- The description suggests electricity is generated both during the fall and potentially during the rise, obfuscating the primary energy input for the return path.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest electrical input to a 'magnetic energy amplifier' produces more output energy than input, implying energy extraction from ambient magnetic fields or unexplained amplification.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'magnetic energy amplifier' system where an output appears to exceed the control input, suggesting energy multiplication. Without identifying a legitimate external energy source (like a thermal gradient or fuel) and providing complete energy accounting, this violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The description uses technically vague language that obscures the fundamental source of the claimed excess energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting provided
- Implies energy multiplication (output > input) without identifying a legitimate external energy source
- Uses vague terms like 'magnetic energy amplifier' and 'amplification process' without a thermodynamically sound mechanism
- Describes a feedback loop that appears to violate conservation if net energy gain is claimed
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests an initial 'dinamotor' starts the alternator, which then disconnects, implying the system is intended to become self-sustaining. No primary external energy source (fuel, ambient gradient) is identified to account for the continuous electrical output and overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as an autonomous alternator that starts with a motor and then runs indefinitely with no fuel or external power. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, directly violating the conservation of energy. The term 'electrogravitational energy' does not refer to a legitimate, quantifiable energy source in physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims autonomous operation with no net energy input after startup.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, generating useful work (alternator output) without an equivalent energy input.
- Obscure 'electrogravitational energy' mechanism is not a recognized energy source in physics.
- System has inherent losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat) that require continuous energy input to overcome, which is not accounted for.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses pseudo-scientific te
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from magnetic interactions between N and S poles, with temperature differences (10-15°C vs 50-60°C) mentioned but not explained as the primary source. No clear external energy input identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy extraction system claiming output energy greater than input, violating conservation of energy. It attempts to generate work from ambient thermal/magnetic gradients without a legitimate heat engine or identifiable external energy source, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims energy multiplication (4 units input → 16 units output) without identifiable external energy source.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from magnetic systems in equilibrium or from ambient thermal gradients without a proper heat engine cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy vs. output energy; focuses on geometric arrangements and temperature differences without thermodynamic justification.
- Misuse of magnetic concepts: Describes complex N/S pole interactions and 'energy transfer' that suggests perpetual motion from magnetic fields.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Primary inputs are electrical energy to the heat pump (7) and heating element (9), and possibly ambient thermal energy. The system attempts to use buoyancy work from expandable containers and a steam turbine, driven by evaporation/condensation cycles.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. It uses electrical energy to run a heat pump and heater to create a vapor, then claims to extract useful work from that vapor via buoyancy and a turbine, condenses it, and repeats. The net work output cannot exceed the net energy input, violating the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses a heat pump and heater to drive evaporation, then claims to extract work from buoyancy and a turbine from the resulting vapor. This is a classic heat engine loop where the work output cannot exceed the ne
- Violates Second Law: The described cycle (evaporation→buoyancy/turbine work→condensation→return) is a heat engine operating between two temperature reservoirs. Its efficiency is fundamentally limited by Carnot. The patent implies extracting net work
- Perpetual motion pattern: The system uses work output (from turbine/buoyancy) to presumably help run components, while also using a heat pump/heaters in a closed loop. This creates a circular energy claim where output work appears to be generated fro
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use buoyancy and gravity as a constant force source for perpetual rotation, implying a closed system extracting net work from these conservative forces without an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve continuous rotation using only buoyancy and gravity within a closed fluid system. This is a classic perpetual motion machine, as the net work done by conservative forces over a closed cycle is zero, and no external energy source is identified to compensate for dissipative losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No net work can be extracted from gravity and buoyancy in a closed, cyclic system.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a closed fluid/mechanical loop with no external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction, viscosity, and turbulence.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
An external 'sufficient power source' (e.g., an electric motor) drives the large crankshaft. The claim is that the machine's internal mechanical arrangement (leverage via teeter-totter) then 'magnifies' this input power.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a passive mechanical linkage. Such a system cannot 'magnify' power or energy; it can only transmit and transform it with inevitable losses. The claim of output power exceeding input power directly violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy magnification (output > input) from a purely mechanical system with no external energy reservoir.
- Violates conservation of energy; a passive mechanical linkage cannot create energy.
- Misapplies leverage/mechanical advantage, which trades force for distance or vice-versa, keeping power (energy/time) constant or reduced due to losses.
- Claim that balanced components 'eliminate a lot of the initial force needed' confuses reducing vibration/unbalanced forces with reducing the net energy input required.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'magnified power' o
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a mech
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical terms (cr
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex arrangement of 'magnetic energy converters' (자기에너지변환기) and 'magnetic energy amplification devices' (자기에너지증폭장치) that appear to feed energy back into the system, suggesting an attempt to create a self-sustaining or amplifying loop without an identified primary external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of interconnected magnetic energy converters and amplifiers that feed energy back into the input, creating an apparent loop where energy is multiplied. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim of the first kind (violating energy conservation), as it lacks a clear, sufficient external energy source and describes an output that can exceed the controlled input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy amplification or multiplication through cascading/feedback loops
- No clear identification of a primary energy source (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient)
- System description implies output energy can exceed controlled input energy, violating conservation
- Mechanism described suggests extracting net work from a closed magnetic system without an entropy sink or external gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy of a weight, with an implied partial recovery and reuse of that energy via a flywheel to lift the weight again.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity gravitational perpetual motion machine. It claims to use energy from a falling weight to both generate electricity and partially lift the weight back up, creating a cycle with net energy output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the system lacks an external energy source to reset the weight's position after accounting for all losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims the flywheel's stored energy (from the weight's descent) can be partially used to lift the same weight back up, while also powering a generator for net electrical output.
- No perpetual energy source: After the initial weight fall, the system has no external energy input to restore the weight's height for continuous operation. The described mechanism suggests energy multiplication.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description ignores losses from friction, generator inefficiency, and gear losses, making the claimed cycle impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described initial input from an external engine or batteries, followed by claimed internal amplification from mechanical 'multiplier' linkages and diamonds.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims over-unity performance and the operation of a perpetual motion device. The described mechanical system, while complex, cannot create energy; it can only transmit and transform it with losses, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim that a single multiplier may 'yield more power than energy consumed'
- Claim that the device can regulate 'works for a perpetually moving device'
- Mechanical linkages ('diamonds') described as amplifying motion and force without an identifiable external energy input to sustain it
- No accounting for energy losses from friction, despite brief mention of lubrication
- Implies creation of useful work from a closed mechanical cycle with only an initial push
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focus on amplification ign
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Directly claims
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical descripti
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a 'vortex energy' device that appears to use a single initial energy input to generate a vortex, which then supposedly amplifies itself and produces excess output energy. No clear external energy source is identified beyond the initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vortex-based device that claims to produce more energy output than input, violating energy conservation. The description uses technical terms like 'vortex energy' without specifying a legitimate external energy source or respecting thermodynamic limits, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (output > input) without identifying an external energy source
- Violation of energy conservation - system cannot produce more useful energy than the total energy supplied
- Lack of thermodynamic limit analysis - no temperature gradients or work sources identified to justify excess energy
- Vague mechanism ('vortex energy') that does not specify how it overcomes Carnot or other efficiency limits
A - Incomplete energy accounting
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity as an external energy source, but the described system is a closed mechanical loop with no external gradient or replenishment. Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from it over a cycle in a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to use gravity in a closed loop of tubes and levers to sustain motion indefinitely, which violates energy conservation because gravity is a conservative force and cannot provide net work over a complete cycle without an external energy source like a height differential that is replenished.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system claims perpetual motion without an external energy input.
- Misunderstanding of gravity: gravity is a conservative force—net work over a closed cycle is zero.
- System is a closed mechanical loop: water sloshing in connected tubes with levers cannot create a net energy gain to overcome friction and restart the cycle.
- The patent text directly acknowledges the energy conservation law but incorrectly claims to bypass it by 'importing energy from outside' via gravity, without providing an actual external gradient or fuel.
A - Incomplete energy accounting (ignores that gravity alone
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms (perpetual motio
C - Technical obfuscation (uses correct term 'Erdanziehungsk
Claimed Energy Source
Primary energy source is ambiguous. It initially comes from steam (thermal/chemical energy from fuel). The claim suggests the generator can later be powered by a fraction of its own electrical output via traction motors, implying self-sustaining operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims a thermal power plant can become self-sustaining by using a fraction of its own electrical output to drive itself via traction motors, violating energy conservation. The freewheel mechanism does not create energy; it merely changes the drivetrain, and all electrical power for the motors must come from an external source or the plant's own fuel, making net efficiency always less than 100%.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claim 1 states a 'negligible part' of generated electricity runs the generator, implying net energy output > energy input from fuel.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores that electrical power to the WAG-9 loco traction motors is itself generated energy that must be accounted for as an input.
- Misunderstanding of freewheel function: A freewheel allows overrunning but transmits torque only one way; it cannot power the generator if the turbine is disconnected unless the motors supply all the torque and energy.
- Obscured perpetual motion: The described modification suggests the plant can run with steam cut off, powered only by its own electrical output loop, which is a classic perpetual motion scheme.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex arrangement of 'energy modules' (1st and 2nd stage) with 'energy collection plates' and 'energy transmission lines', but fails to specify any primary external energy input. It implies energy is somehow multiplied or cascaded between stages without an identifiable source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading energy system with no clear external energy source, implying that energy output can exceed input through internal arrangements. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, violating energy conservation. The use of technical jargon and vague mechanisms obscures the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified.
- Describes a process where a 1st stage energy module powers a 2nd stage module, which then appears to feed energy back or produce more energy, suggesting energy multiplication.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying creation of energy within a closed or poorly defined system.
- Uses obfuscated technical language (Korean patent text with terms like 'energy module', 'energy collection plate') to describe a process that lacks a coherent energy conversion mechanism.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy to run the vacuum pump, which creates a pressure differential. The claimed propulsive force comes from atmospheric air expanding into the partial vacuum to push the projectile.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum transfer system that cannot produce net thrust on the vehicle. Creating the vacuum requires energy, and the subsequent expansion of atmospheric air to push the projectile is an internal force that cancels out within the vehicle-air system, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal projectile motion cannot create net external thrust on the vehicle in a closed system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Work done by expanding air comes from the internal energy of the air itself, not an external source relative to the vehicle.
- Misapplication of momentum/impulse: Momentum gained by the projectile forward is canceled by equal and opposite momentum imparted to the air/vehicle system rearward during the filling process.
- The vacuum pump's energy cost to reset the system exceeds any conceivable net forward impulse.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe magnetic systems where 'induced magnetic elements' (막대자석) interact with 'permanent magnetic elements' (원통형영구자석) to produce motion or energy without a clear external energy input. Mentions 'polarity changes' and 'attraction/repulsion' but no primary power source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic interaction system that claims to produce useful work or motion through cascading polarity changes and attractions between magnetic elements. It violates fundamental physics by implying energy can be extracted or multiplied from the magnetic arrangements alone, with no clear external energy source to account for the work output, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes inducing motion/magnetic changes in elements which then supposedly drive further elements, implying energy multiplication without an external source.
- Violates thermodynamics: Describes creating or sustaining magnetic gradients and motions in a closed-loop manner, which would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy vs. output work. The description focuses on geometric arrangements and polarity interactions without specifying the energy cost of inducing changes.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims energy generation from a pressurized liquid-gas mixture undergoing vortex acceleration and rotor interaction, with mentions of 'energy recuperation' and external heating, but no primary energy input is specified. The high-pressure pump (up to 2500 bar) likely requires significant external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex fluid-mechanical system but fails to identify the primary source of energy. The high operating pressure (2500 bar) implies massive energy input is required, which is not accounted for in the claimed energy generation. The description uses correct fluid dynamics terminology but obfuscates the overall energy balance, suggesting a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear accounting of the primary energy input required to pressurize the mixture to 2500 bar.
- Claims 'energy recuperation' and 'recirculation' without specifying the source of net energy gain.
- Describes a complex vortex/rotor interaction but provides no mechanism that would yield net energy output greater than the input energy to sustain the high pressure and any heating.
- Implies energy extraction from a process that itself requires continuous, high-energy input to maintain pressure and flow.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a self-contained system claiming to generate electrical energy (회전력) using magnetic fields (무게) and a rotating component (차이), with no identifiable external energy input beyond initial electrical excitation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic rotational device claiming to generate electrical energy. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a clear, sustainable external energy source and describes a closed-loop system that would inevitably lose energy to losses, making continuous energy generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source to sustain claimed energy generation.
- Describes a closed-loop magnetic/rotational system that would lose energy to friction, resistance, and radiation.
- Implies energy can be extracted from a system while simultaneously using that extracted energy to maintain the system's operation, violating energy conservation.
- Uses vague terms like 'magnetic rotation' without specifying how it overcomes thermodynamic limits.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy gen
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest electrical input (0.25HP motor) but implies energy multiplication through mechanical arrangement without identifying any external ambient energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system claiming to produce more output power (3+ units) than input power (1 unit) through complex gear/lever arrangements, directly violating energy conservation. The description uses technical terms vaguely and lacks complete energy accounting, making it a perpetual motion claim of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy multiplication (1 unit input → 3+ units output) without accounting for all energy inputs
- Implies mechanical system can output more work than input work, violating conservation of energy
- Uses vague terms like 'force', 'power', 'torque' without proper quantitative definitions
- Describes complex mechanical interactions but lacks clear energy accounting
- Suggests cascading/stacking to increase output power without additional energy input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity from 'magnetic force energy' and 'magnetic flux' using permanent magnets and coils, with vague references to 'magnetic force energy conversion' and 'magnetic force energy amplification'.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a magnetic system claiming to generate electricity by converting and amplifying 'magnetic force energy' from permanent magnets. This violates the first law of thermodynamics because permanent magnets are not an energy source for continuous work extraction, and the described amplification and energy multiplication are impossible without an external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation - describes a system where magnetic energy from permanent magnets is supposedly converted and amplified to produce more electrical output than input without an identified external energy source.
- Permanent magnets are not an energy source; they are stores of potential energy that cannot do net work in a closed cycle without an external field change.
- Describes 'amplification' of magnetic force energy, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external energy input.
- System appears to be a permanent magnet 'generator' claiming to output more energy than required to overcome internal losses, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Claim 3 states the energy to drive the transport wheel is taken from the generator output, creating a closed loop. The only explicit external input is a battery for startup (Claim 4).
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a gravity-powered generator that claims to use its own electrical output to lift the balls back to the top, creating a self-sustaining cycle. This violates the conservation of energy, as the work needed to lift the balls is always greater than the work recovered from their descent due to inevitable losses. It is a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims to use generator output to power the lifting mechanism (transport wheel), creating a perpetual feedback loop.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to lift the balls against gravity to the upper point (P1) is not properly accounted for. The gravitational work extracted on the descent cannot exceed the work input for the lift, minus all losses.
- Ignores dissipative losses: Friction in bearings, gears, transport bands, air resistance, and generator inefficiency are not subtracted from the claimed net output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient water (buoyancy) and gravity. The device is a proposed buoyancy engine: a main body cycles up via buoyancy (taking in water) and down via gravity (expelling water via a pump), with a generator harvesting energy from the motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The energy to run the pump and overcome hydrodynamic drag during the expulsion of water at the bottom of the cycle is not accounted for, and will always consume at least as much energy as is recovered from the buoyant rise and gravitational fall, resulting in zero or negative net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the pump work
- Violates energy conservation: the work required to expel water from the main body at depth (against ambient pressure) equals or exceeds the gravitational potential energy gained during descent
- System operates in a closed cycle with no external, high-grade energy input; net work output is impossible
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe energy transfer between components (energy particles, energy sources, energy storage) but no identifiable external energy input. Implies energy multiplication through cascading transfers between components.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system with multiple interacting components that transfer 'energy particles' between themselves, claiming this leads to energy multiplication or self-sustaining operation. This violates energy conservation as no external energy source is identified, and the described cascading transfers imply energy creation rather than conversion with losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source
- Describes energy transfer loops that imply creation of energy
- Uses undefined terms ('energy particles', 'energy storage particles', 'energy source particles') that obscure actual physics
- Claims energy is transferred and multiplied between components without accounting for losses
- Implies perpetual or self-sustaining energy flow without degradation
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes 'amplifying' or 'multiplying' electrical power output by 2-4 times relative to the input, implying the primary source is the electrical input itself, with no mention of any other energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent directly claims a method to amplify electrical power by a factor of 2 to 4, which violates energy conservation. Without identifying an external energy source (like ambient heat, light, or fuel), this describes a classic over-unity device, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Direct claim of power multiplication (2-4x output vs input) without identifying a secondary energy source.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- No thermodynamic cycle or mechanism described that could justify an efficiency > 100%.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > control i
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims to extra
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract and claims refer to 'ambient heat' and a 'heat source' but describe a process where the device's own output heat is recycled to generate more electricity, implying a primary energy input from an unspecified external source is missing from the accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to use its own output or waste heat to generate its input power, forming a closed loop with no net external energy input specified. This violates the First Law (energy conservation) and the Second Law (cannot extract net work from an isothermal source). The use of correct-sounding thermal terms obscures a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description suggests using output heat to generate more input power, creating a circular energy flow without identifying a net external energy source.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: The process implies creating useful work from a single temperature reservoir (the device's own waste heat) or achieving a heat engine efficiency exceeding the Carnot limit.
- Vague mechanism: Terms like 'heat source', 'heat medium', and 'generator' are used without a clear, physically coherent system diagram or energy balance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe a rotating magnetic system (N/S poles, 360° rotation) that purportedly generates electrical output, but no primary energy input (electrical, mechanical, chemical, or environmental gradient) is explicitly identified or quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex rotating magnetic system but fails to identify any legitimate external energy source. The claims imply the system can generate electrical output from its own internal magnetic arrangements, which constitutes a perpetual motion claim violating the first law of thermodynamics. The description is technically obfuscated, making the energy accounting impossible to complete.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims imply energy generation or multiplication from a rotating magnetic assembly without an input driver
- System appears to be a closed electromechanical loop with no thermodynamic gradient to exploit
- Language suggests 'self-sustaining' or 'amplification' of energy, which violates conservation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system using 'electromagnetic waves', 'vibrations', 'electromagnetic field', and 'electromagnetic resonance' to supposedly generate electricity from ambient energy, but provides no identifiable gradient or thermodynamic source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electricity from ambient electromagnetic fields and vibrations, but fails to identify a usable thermodynamic gradient or explain how it extracts net work from what appears to be an equilibrium environment. The vague, jargon-heavy description and lack of a clear energy source strongly suggest a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or primary energy source is specified.
- Claims energy generation from ambient electromagnetic fields/vibrations without explaining how a net energy extraction is possible from equilibrium.
- Uses correct-sounding physics terms ('electromagnetic resonance', 'vibration', 'field') in a vague, obfuscatory manner without a coherent energy conversion mechanism.
- Implies energy multiplication or cascading without accounting for all inputs.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical assembly with sliding blocks, springs, levers, and weights, but no explicit external energy input is described. The described interactions suggest an attempt to create self-sustaining motion from internal component interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical device with levers, sliding blocks, springs, and weights that claims to generate oscillatory motion. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks any clear external energy source and implies self-sustaining motion from internal component interactions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Describes a complex mechanical linkage (levers, sliding blocks, springs, weights) that implies perpetual motion through internal feedback.
- Claims the main lever can produce oscillation when the sliding blocks move, suggesting energy multiplication without an external source.
- Uses springs and weights in a configuration that likely attempts to recycle energy indefinitely, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output motion is i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex cascade of 'energy generators' (에너지 생성기), 'energy amplification devices' (에너지 증폭장치), and 'working devices' (작동장치) that appear to feed energy back into the system, suggesting energy is created from within the loop without an identified primary external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a textbook perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims a cascading system where energy generators power amplification devices which in turn power other generators, creating a closed loop that purportedly outputs useful work. This violates energy conservation as it lacks a defined external energy input to compensate for inevitable losses, and the described feedback mechanism is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system claims to use the output of one energy generator to power an amplification device that then powers a second energy generator, creating a self-sustaining or amplifying loop wit
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The description implies a perpetual or over-unity process where energy is multiplied or circulated without degradation, missing any entropy increase or identification of a low-temperature reservoir for waste
- Incomplete and obfuscated energy accounting. The patent text uses technical terms (energy generator, amplification device, working device) in a circular, vague manner without quantifying inputs and outputs or specifying the form of energy at each sta
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial impulse only (no ongoing energy input). Claims to operate perpetually using gravity and internal moving parts (e.g., balls) to reset positions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly described as a perpetual motion machine of the third kind (running indefinitely without energy input). It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to sustain motion using only an initial impulse, ignoring inevitable energy dissipation from friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions. Gravity alone cannot provide net energy in a cyclic process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims to violate conservation of energy
- No continuous energy input to overcome friction and other losses
- Relies on gravity without a height differential to extract net work
- Internal moving parts (balls) cannot create energy; they only dissipate it via friction and inelastic collisions
- Assumes perfect momentum transfer without losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the motor (27) that rotates the container. The device claims to generate additional mechanical energy from the centripetal acceleration and Archimedes' buoyancy force acting on floats within the rotating liquid-filled container.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The motor supplies all energy to spin the system; the internal buoyancy and centripetal forces are part of a conservative system and cannot produce net energy. Any extracted 'output' energy comes directly from the input motor work, minus inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate net energy output greater than the input work to spin the container.
- Misinterprets buoyancy as an energy source: Buoyant force is conservative; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle in a uniform gravitational field.
- Ignores energy costs: The work required to spin the container and overcome fluid drag, friction in seals/bearings, and the work against buoyant forces during the float's compression cycle is not properly accounted for. The system is a complex mechani
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from a 288V hybrid vehicle battery. The description implies the system becomes self-sustaining, with a generator (driven by an air compressor, which is itself initially powered by the battery) subsequently powering the system and recharging the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-sustaining electrical generation system that runs without fuel after an initial battery start. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, as it violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The energy to overcome losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat does not originate from an identified external source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System describes a closed loop where a generator powers the motor that drives the compressor that turns the generator, with implied net output and battery recharge.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No primary external energy source is identified to sustain the cycle after startup. The air compressor requires continuous energy input.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (output energy exceeds input without an external source).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a system where a 'driving magnet' (구동자석) induces motion in 'driven magnets' (피동자석), which then feed energy back to amplify the motion of the driving magnet, implying a self-sustaining or amplifying loop without an identified external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system where driven magnets feed energy back to the driving magnet, creating an amplifying loop. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion scheme as it lacks a defined external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses, directly violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear primary energy source is specified.
- Describes a positive feedback loop (구동자석 → 피동자석 → 구동자석) that would, if lossless, create energy from nothing.
- Implies energy multiplication or a self-sustaining cycle without accounting for losses from friction, resistance, or magnetic hysteresis.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting a closed system can produce net work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of energy a
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract mentions 'input voltage' and 'output voltage' and claims to generate power from two 'power generation units' (동력발생추), but no primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient) is explicitly identified. The claim that 0.5kg of a 'power generation unit' can produce output suggests an implicit claim of energy generation without a clear external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electrical output from power generation units, but fails to identify any source of energy (e.g., fuel, ambient heat, light, chemical reaction). This constitutes a violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it implies creation of energy from nothing. The vague terminology and lack of quantitative energy accounting are hallmarks of a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described.
- Claims 'input voltage' and 'output voltage' generation without specifying the source of energy for the conversion.
- Implies energy generation from a static mass (0.5kg unit) with no described gradient or fuel.
- Violates energy conservation: output cannot exceed total energy input from all sources.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Focus on 'output > control
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Suggests extrac
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct physics terms (input
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims suggest energy multiplication through cascading 'magnetic fields' (무게추) where one field's output becomes input for another, implying energy generation from the magnetic interaction itself rather than an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading magnetic field system where one field's output energizes another, claiming this leads to cumulative energy generation. This violates energy conservation as it implies creating net energy from the magnetic interaction loop itself, with no external energy source identified to account for the claimed outputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies cascading magnetic fields can produce increasing energy outputs without accounting for the energy required to create/maintain the initial field.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Describes a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle with no identified external energy source or entropy sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy (e.g., to create the first magnetic field) vs. output energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use atmospheric pressure and gravity as the sole energy input, implying extraction of net work from the gravitational field and ambient atmospheric pressure without an external gradient or energy source to restore the system.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to produce continuous work from gravity and atmospheric pressure alone, but any work extracted during the downward swing of the weights must be paid back to lift them back up, resulting in zero net energy output over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce continuous rotational work from gravity alone without lowering a mass or creating a pressure gradient.
- Misunderstands gravity as an energy source: Gravity is a conservative force field; net work over a closed cycle in a uniform gravitational field is zero.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system's lead weights must be raised against gravity to complete a cycle, requiring at least as much energy as is gained during their descent.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Attempts to extract work from atmospheric pressure in equilibrium, which requires no net force on a closed cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes splitting water (H2O) into hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2), then recombining them to form water again, claiming this cycle generates useful energy. No primary external energy input (e.g., electrical, thermal, chemical, or ambient) is clearly identified as the driver for the initial electrolysis or the net energy gain.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate useful energy by electrolyzing water and then recombining the products, which is a closed loop. The energy required for electrolysis must always be greater than the energy recovered from recombination, making a net energy output impossible without an external, primary energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described process is a closed chemical cycle (H2O → H2 + O2 → H2O). In a complete cycle, the energy released from recombination cannot exceed the energy required for the initial spli
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The claim implies extracting net useful work from an isothermal, equilibrium chemical cycle without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere (e.g., no identified heat source and sink at different temperatur
- Incomplete energy accounting. The energy input for the electrolysis step is not quantified or specified. The output from the fuel cell or recombination step is presented as a net gain without subtracting this necessary input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. The text describes a system where a 'magnetic field unit' (자계 단위) receives 'magnetic energy' from a 'magnetic energy source' and, through interactions with 'magnetic field generation units' and 'magnetic energy generation units', claims to produce output energy that exceeds the input energy supplied to the system, implying energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy system that claims to produce more output energy than the input energy provided, achieved through cascading interactions between magnetic field units. This constitutes a clear over-unity claim, violating energy conservation. The description obfuscates the true source of energy and ignores the work required to establish and maintain the magnetic fields used in the process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication/over-unity (output > total input)
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary external energy source; ambient magnetic energy is treated as a free, limitless input without accounting for the work needed to create or sustain the magnetic field gradients.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation): The described cascading/stacking process claims to generate more energy than is supplied to the system.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implies extracting net useful work from an equilibrium or passive magnetic field without a compensating increase in entropy elsewhere.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex mechanical system of levers, chains, gears, flywheels, and magnets, but does not identify a primary energy input. Mentions of a 'Lichtmaschine' (generator) and battery suggest electrical energy may be involved, but the core claim appears to be that the lever system itself generates or amplifies force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'Multi force amplifier lever drive' using interconnected levers, gears, and flywheels. It lacks any clear description of an external energy source to enable net work output, implying the complex mechanical system itself can generate or amplify energy, which violates the conservation of energy. The obscure technical description is a hallmark of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net energy input described for the claimed force amplification.
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement (levers, gears, flywheels) which cannot create energy.
- Uses terminology ('Kraftverstärker' - force amplifier) implying energy gain without a source.
- Describes complex linkages but provides no thermodynamic or energy accounting analysis.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies mechanical
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses dense, complex mecha
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source described is the gravitational potential energy of elevated weights. The text implies this energy is somehow recycled or amplified by a 'balance system' and 'elevation method' to produce more work than input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered machine claiming to output more work than input, which is impossible. It attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by recycling gravitational energy, violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'produces about 60% work from the work, which we ensure by the gravity'—this is an incoherent statement suggesting energy multiplication.
- Proposes extracting net work from a closed cycle of weights using gravity and balances, violating conservation of energy.
- No external energy input (e.g., motor, environmental gradient) is identified to account for claimed continuous 'greater production'.
- The 'elevation method' is undefined but central to the claim, suggesting an attempt to reset weights without expending at least as much energy as gained in descent.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of a mass (M) being raised against gravity, initially stored via a spring (or compressed air/explosive). The device claims to use energy from water pressure (itself derived from the mass's fall) to reset the system and generate excess electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity claim. It describes a cyclic process where a mass falls under gravity to do work (raise water), then claims the energy recovered from that work is sufficient to reset the mass to its original height (requiring at least the same energy minus losses) AND produce excess electricity. This violates the first law of thermodynamics. The vacuum chamber only reduces air resistance losses but does not provide a new energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The energy to lift the mass back to its starting height must equal or exceed the mechanical energy extracted from its fall.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims the energy recovered from water pressure is sufficient to auto-power the device (compress spring, reset mass) AND run a generator, implying net energy output > input.
- No external energy gradient: The only explicit inputs are the initial spring energy and gravity. The system is a closed mechanical cycle with losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical/electrical gear system where a vehicle (1) moves back-and-forth on a platform (4), driven by an electric motor (20B). A large wheel (24) is said to sustain motion and power a generator (20) after an initial startup impulse from a battery or fuel motor. The text implies the generator powers the system's motor and provides excess electricity, suggesting a closed-loop energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly named a 'moto-contínuo' (perpetual motion) and claims to generate electricity for external use after a startup impulse. This directly violates energy conservation, as the continuous electrical output and system operation require an ongoing external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses, which the patent does not provide.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by implying a closed system can generate net electrical output greater than its internal losses.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by describing a perpetual motion machine ('moto-contínuo') that sustains itself and produces excess work from a single startup energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of an external, ongoing energy source to overcome friction, electrical resistance, and other dissipative losses.
- Mechanism relies on internal force transfers which cannot create net energy; any generator output is drawn from the system's kinetic energy, which would decelerate it without continuous input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'ambient temperature or humidity gradient' as input, but describes a cascading system where one energy conversion unit (17,18,19) powers another in a way that suggests energy multiplication without an adequate external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading system where energy conversion units appear to power each other in a loop, suggesting energy multiplication without a sufficient external energy source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a net energy output greater than the identifiable external input from ambient gradients.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent perpetual motion/energy multiplication through cascading units
- No clear accounting of all energy inputs vs. outputs
- System appears to use its own output to power earlier stages, violating energy conservation
- Vague description of how ambient gradients are harnessed to provide net usable work
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial rotational drive of the central disk. The device claims to extract additional usable energy from the inertia and centrifugal/Coriolis-driven motion of rolling balls, which is then fed back to reinforce the drive of the central disk and power external generators.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classical perpetual motion machine. The rolling balls gain kinetic energy solely from the work done by the motor spinning the central disk. Any attempt to use that ball motion to drive the disk or an external generator will create a load that slows the disk, requiring more input energy to maintain rotation. The system cannot produce a net energy gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims net energy output (to reinforce drive and external generator) greater than the initial rotational energy input.
- Misinterprets inertial and pseudo-forces: Centrifugal and Coriolis forces are frame-dependent, not energy sources. Work done on balls comes from the kinetic energy of the rotating disk.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a feedback loop where energy extracted from the balls' motion is used to 'reinforce' the drive of the primary system, implying energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'verstärken
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text appears to describe temperature differences (70°, 66°, 45°, 42°, 28°) and geometric dimensions (70mm, 48mm) being manipulated, but no explicit external energy input is identified. Implied source might be ambient thermal energy, but the mechanism is not physically coherent.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is physically incoherent, using numbers, angles, and dimensions in meaningless arithmetic operations to suggest energy production. It fails to identify any legitimate energy source or conversion process, violates energy conservation by implying output without quantified input, and uses technical obfuscation to mask the absence of a real physical mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Complete lack of identifiable energy input accounting
- Claims of energy output (100-37%) without specifying input work
- Uses angles and dimensions in arithmetic operations that have no clear thermodynamic meaning (e.g., 328281(+), 279039(-), 70mm/48mm)
- Appears to claim energy extraction or multiplication from temperature differences without a heat engine cycle or heat pump mechanism
- Text is technically incoherent, mixing numbers, symbols, and units in a nonsensical way for energy analysis
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a process where a 'control input' generates a 'working input' that is greater than the control input, and this working input is then fed back to amplify the control input. This suggests an attempt at energy multiplication or self-sustaining amplification with no clear external primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a process of energy feedback and amplification with no identifiable primary energy input, directly violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The use of garbled text and technical obfuscation prevents proper analysis but the core described mechanism is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy amplification/feedback loop without an external energy source to sustain it.
- Text is garbled/obfuscated (mix of Korean and symbols), making the energy conversion process impossible to identify or verify.
- Implies a system where output can be used to create a larger input, violating energy conservation if no external source is identified.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy multiplication through hydraulic/pump system interaction, implying output energy exceeds input energy without identifying an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims the pump's output energy exceeds the motor's input energy, which violates conservation of energy unless an external energy source is identified and accounted for. The described hydraulic system configuration cannot create energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Direct claim that pump output energy > motor input energy ('使泵机构的输出能量大于动力输出机构的输入能量')
- No identification of external energy source to account for claimed energy gain
- Implies creation of energy from mechanical/hydraulic configuration alone
- Violates energy conservation - system cannot output more useful energy than is input from all sources
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe a 'primary electromagnetic generator' (30) interacting with a 'secondary electromagnetic generator' (10) and 'resonance generators' to produce output power greater than input, with no identifiable external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where electromagnetic generators interact via resonance to produce output power, but fails to identify any external energy source. The claims imply a net energy gain from the internal coupling of components, which directly violates the law of conservation of energy. The description is technically vague and follows a classic overunity/perpetual motion pattern.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes energy transfer between generators resulting in net power gain without an external source.
- Implies creation of energy from internal resonance/coupling, violating conservation of energy.
- Uses obfuscatory technical terms ('resonance generator', 'electromagnetic generator assembly') without clear physical mechanisms.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Vague quantitative claims
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. The primary input is the 'Energiezufuhr' (energy supply - likely electrical/thermal) to the temperature regulator. The system also attempts to harness buoyancy forces and phase-change energy (liquid to vapor) as an internal process.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It attempts to create a perpetual cycle by combining buoyancy, phase changes, and a turbine, but it ignores the fundamental energy input required to drive the phase change from liquid to vapor. The energy outputs (turbine work, 'energy from condensation', buoyancy work) cannot exceed the energy input to the heater/temperature regulator, making it a violation of the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims energy generation from buoyancy and condensation without identifying the external energy source for the phase change and pressure increase.
- Violates 1st Law: The described cycle (liquid injection → vaporization → turbine work → condensation → return) cannot produce net work greater than the energy input required to vaporize the liquid and maintain the two temperature zones.
- Violates 2nd Law: The claim that the condenser 'erzeugt dabei verwertbare Energie' (generates usable energy) during condensation is misleading. Condensation releases heat, but using that heat for work requires a temperature difference to a colder sin
- Perpetual motion pattern: The system appears designed to be a self-sustaining cycle where work from the turbine and buoyancy is meant to exceed the input needed to run the pump/temperature regulator, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Single input shaft (1) driven by a prime mover (e.g., motor, engine). No other energy inputs (ambient, chemical, stored) are described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical linkage with a single input shaft. It claims to multiply power by using a larger output disk, which is impossible as mechanical systems cannot output more power than is input. The described geometry can trade speed for torque, but total power cannot exceed the input power from the prime mover, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims power multiplication via a larger output disk (16) without adding energy.
- Mechanism is a closed kinematic chain; any torque increase at output must come from a proportional reduction in angular speed or leverage, not create net power gain.
- Counterweights balance oscillating masses but do not add energy; they only reduce losses from vibration/inertia.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Implies 'power amplificati
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct mechanical terms (be
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary claimed source is the kinetic energy of a rotating mass (flywheel/rotor). The system uses an external power source to start, then claims the alternator powers a 'duty motor' which helps drive the system, suggesting a feedback loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The machine attempts to create a self-sustaining power generator by using a flywheel's kinetic energy to run an alternator, then feeding some power back to help drive the flywheel. This violates energy conservation, as the alternator load decelerates the flywheel, and the feedback loop cannot overcome the system's inevitable losses. It is a classical over-unity violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system description implies a closed loop where the alternator output powers a motor (duty motor) that contributes to driving the system itself, violating conservation by ignoring losses.
- No net external energy input after start: The description suggests the machine could sustain itself and produce excess power using only the initial kinetic energy of the rotating mass, which is impossible due to friction, electrical resistance, and o
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: The system appears designed to extract net work (mechanical power and electricity) from a single, finite energy reservoir (the kinetic energy of the flywheel) without an external gradient or input, equivalent to
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electromagnetic force from a 'current having a structural construction' within a magnetic field, implying energy generation without an identifiable external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electromagnetic force internally and use it directly for propulsion without any clear external energy input, constituting a perpetual motion scheme. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by proposing a net energy output from an undefined or internal source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, or ambient).
- Claims to use generated electromagnetic force as a direct external force for propulsion/acceleration, implying a closed loop of energy generation and use.
- Violates energy conservation: proposes to generate useful work (propulsion, acceleration, buoyancy) from an unspecified or internal source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Mentions 'magnetic energy', 'permanent magnet energy', and 'rotational energy' in a cyclical feedback loop without identifying a primary external energy input. Appears to claim energy generation from permanent magnets alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate usable energy (rotation, electricity) primarily through interactions between permanent magnets in a feedback loop. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, as it violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying the creation of energy from nothing. The description obfuscates the physics and fails to identify a legitimate external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by suggesting permanent magnets (a source of static potential energy, not usable work) can generate continuous net energy output without an external input.
- Describes a cyclical process where magnetic energy is supposedly used to generate more magnetic energy, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Uses vague, non-standard terminology ('magnetic energy rotation device', 'permanent magnet energy', 'rotational energy') in a way that obscures the energy accounting.
- Implies energy multiplication through cascading stages without identifying the source of the surplus energy.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electrical power from a 'magnetic body' using a 'magnetic energy concentration device' and 'power generation device' in a loop, suggesting energy is extracted from the magnetic system itself without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that appears to generate electrical power from an internal magnetic system and then uses part of that output to sustain the magnetic process, forming a closed loop with net output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks an identified external energy source and describes a self-sustaining energy multiplication process, which is impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described.
- Describes a closed-loop system where generated power is fed back to sustain or amplify the magnetic process, implying energy multiplication.
- Violates energy conservation by suggesting net power output from an isolated magnetic system without a gradient or fuel.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('magnetic body', 'magnetic energy concentration') that lacks clear physical definition in the context of energy generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary source is gravitational potential energy of balls falling through a tube. The system attempts to use a portion of the generated electrical output to lift the balls back to the top via a small motor and conveyor (variant c), creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. The electrical energy generated from falling balls is less than the energy required to lift those same balls back to the starting height, due to inevitable losses. Using a portion of the output to power the lift motor cannot result in a net surplus, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to use a small part of its output to power the ball-lift motor, implying net energy production from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done to lift the balls against gravity is not properly accounted for as the major input. The system cannot output more energy than the gravitational potential lost by the balls.
- Friction and electrical conversion losses are ignored, making the claimed self-sustaining operation impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
External electrical power to operate the air compressor, with claims of using 'non-flammable, clean, natural high-pressure compressed air' to generate valuable electrical energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where an electrically-driven air compressor feeds compressed air to a hydraulic system that drives a motor/generator. The generator's output is partially used to power the compressor, implying a self-sustaining or over-unity loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the total useful energy output cannot exceed the total energy input from the external electrical source powering the initial compressor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system's electrical output is claimed to power the compressor, creating a closed loop with no net external energy input.
- Violates energy conservation: The description implies generating more electrical energy than is consumed by the compressor, which is impossible without an external energy source.
- Misapplication of stored energy: Compressed air is an energy storage medium, not a source. The work done to compress the air must be less than the work extracted from it due to inevitable losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract 'free energy' (자유 에너지) from the environment using humidity gradients and unspecified 'X, Y, Z potentials', but the described mechanism suggests energy output exceeds all accounted inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to output more energy than is input by extracting 'free energy' from ambient humidity. This violates the First Law (energy conservation) as it lacks a complete accounting of all energy sources and sinks. It also violates the Second Law by implying net work can be extracted from what appears to be an equilibrium or passive environmental condition without a corresponding entropy increase, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output energy > control input energy without identifying and quantifying all ambient energy inputs.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies creation of energy from a single-temperature, equilibrium humidity source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Describes extracting useful work from a passive humidity gradient without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses vague terms like 'X, Y, Z potentials' and 'free energy conversion' without a clear, physically valid conversion process.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
No legitimate external energy source identified. The claim explicitly states no heat or any other form of energy needs to be added, implying the system is intended to create energy from nothing.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It describes two connected machines where work from one supposedly drives the other to produce a net excess of work, with no external energy input. This directly violates the conservation of energy; the internal air flow and expansion cannot create new energy to perform net external work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming net work output > work input without an external energy source.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by attempting to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'expansion work' on rotor 1 and the 'work' on rotor 2 are internal transfers; the system cannot produce net external work without an energy input.
- Assumes air flow between connected chambers can create a net energy gain, which is impossible in a closed, isolated system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit external energy input is the electrical power to the switchable electromagnet. The apparatus claims to generate net electrical power from the generator driven by the pendulum's swing.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. The assisting electromagnet is the only external input, but the description implies the generator can produce useful net power. This is impossible, as the electromagnet must supply all energy to overcome damping losses in the pendulum, air compression, and turbine, plus any extracted electrical energy. The internal air system only adds losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical input to the electromagnet is not compared to the generator output.
- Violates energy conservation: The system is described as a closed loop (pendulum swing compresses air to drive turbine to run generator) with only an assisting electromagnet. For sustained or amplified swings, the energy input to the electromagnet mu
- The compressed air loop is an internal loss mechanism (friction, turbulence), not a net energy source. It converts pendulum kinetic energy into turbine rotation with significant losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy multiplication through cascading magnetic flux concentrators and magnetic elements, implying output energy exceeds control input without identifying a primary external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy generator that claims to produce energy through cascading magnetic flux concentrators and specially arranged magnetic elements, suggesting energy multiplication without identifying any external energy source. This violates energy conservation as it implies creating energy from permanent magnet configurations alone, which cannot perform net work in a closed cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of energy multiplication through geometric arrangement of magnetic elements
- Implies creation of energy from magnetic configurations without thermodynamic cost
- Violates energy conservation - system appears closed with only magnetic components
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe a process where an initial input (1) causes a reaction (2) that generates a 'field' (3), which then feeds back to amplify the initial input and create a self-sustaining energy multiplication loop. No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is identified or quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-amplifying energy loop where an initial input triggers a reaction that creates a field, which then feeds back to amplify the input indefinitely. This is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine, violating both energy conservation (first law) and the law of entropy increase (second law), as it claims to produce net energy output without any defined external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by describing a positive feedback loop with net energy gain without an external source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics by implying a perpetual process that creates useful work from an equilibrium state.
- Uses vague, non-standard physics terminology ('field', 'energy multiplication', 'self-sustaining') without operational definitions or quantitative limits.
- Describes energy amplification/cascading without identifying the source of the additional energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'field' a
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with 'magnetic bodies' (자석체), 'magnetic force lines' (자력선), and a 'rotating body' (회전체) that appears to generate electricity. It suggests energy is produced from the interaction between magnetic bodies and a rotating structure, implying energy extraction from magnetic fields without an identifiable external power input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to generate electrical energy from magnetic interactions within a rotating assembly, with no clear external energy source identified to account for losses. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies net energy creation from a conservative magnetic field, and the second law, as it lacks a required energy gradient to perform useful work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes generating electricity ('발전') from magnetic interactions within a rotating structure without specifying an external energy input to overcome magnetic drag, friction, and electrical losses.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of useful work (electricity) from an equilibrium magnetic configuration, with no mention of a temperature gradient or other thermodynamic potential to drive the process.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy vs. output energy. Magnetic fields are conservative forces; no net work can be extracted from a closed loop in a static magnetic field without an external energy source to change the con
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The description of magnetic bodies inducing rotation that in turn generates electricity, which seems to power or sustain the system, is characteristic of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly stated as a small electric motor (0.03 kW). Implicitly, the system attempts to use gravity as an energy source by moving masses radially outward and inward on a circular chassis.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of perpetual motion machine. Moving masses in a closed cycle within Earth's gravitational field cannot yield net energy output, as the work required to lift or move a mass outward is always recovered (or lost to friction) when it returns. The claim of high output from a tiny input violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce 'beaucoup d'énergie' (a lot of energy) from a trivial 30W input by cycling masses in a gravity field.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a conservative field is zero.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to move the mass outward against centrifugal/gravity forces equals or exceeds any work recovered moving it inward.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests energy is generated from the buoyant force of gas-filled spheres rising in a liquid, with the system designed to reset the spheres 'without effort' to create continuous motion. No external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced/buoyancy-based perpetual motion claim. It incorrectly asserts that gas-filled spheres can be re-submerged in liquid 'without effort' during the system's tilt, ignoring the work required against buoyancy. Two such systems cannot mutually drive each other, as the total energy output would exceed the input, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims 'auto fonctionnel' (self-running) and 's'entraîner mutuellement' (mutually drive each other) imply perpetual motion.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work to reset the spheres (submerge them against buoyancy) is claimed to require 'no effort,' ignoring the energy needed to overcome buoyant force.
- No identifiable external energy source: The described motion (tilting, buoyancy) is a closed mechanical cycle with inherent losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is extracted from a 'magnetic field gradient' (영구기관) and a 'density gradient' (발전장치) to produce work, implying ambient energy harvesting, but the mechanism is not physically defined.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly extracts energy from ambient magnetic and density gradients to power itself and another copy, creating a multiplicative or self-sustaining effect. This violates energy conservation as it implies output exceeding all identifiable inputs, and the mechanism is described using obfuscated, non-operational technical language.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy accounting is incomplete and obfuscated.
- Describes a process where a 'motion device' (ìì§) uses extracted energy to power itself and another identical device, implying self-sustaining or multiplicative energy output.
- Uses vague terms like 'gradient', 'motion', and 'density' without specifying a concrete, thermodynamically valid conversion process (e.g., heat engine, osmotic power).
- Implies creation of a perpetual gradient or extraction of net work without a clear, maintained energy input gradient from the environment.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air pressure from blowers (electrically powered) and magnetic interactions between stationary and rotational magnets. The system's initial 'low-level' electrical power source is unspecified, implying self-starting from magnetic interactions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to generate excess power by using its own output to power blowers that drive its turbine, a closed loop that cannot produce net energy. Magnetic forces are conservative and cannot provide a continuous source of motional work. The overall claim of a self-contained generator producing excess power violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The blowers providing air pressure to the turbine blades require electrical input, which must come from the system's own alternator output, creating a parasitic load. No net energy gain is possible from this closed loop.
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims generation of 'excess electrical power' and acting as 'an energy source for other products' implies net energy output greater than total energy input. The magnetic interactions are conservative forces (no net w
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The description of a 'self-contained system' generating power 'greatly in excess of the system's needs' after an unspecified start-up describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent claims the output work of the turbine is greater than the input work to the pump, implying energy is extracted from the 'inner energy of the fluid'. However, the described process (pump → vortex sink → turbine → heating) appears to be a closed or open fluid cycle with no identified external energy source beyond the initial pump work.
AI Physics Analysis
The claimed device and method violate core thermodynamic laws. It asserts that a turbine can produce more work than a pump consumes in a fluid cycle, yielding net external work. This is impossible without an external energy source, as it would create energy from nothing. The described vortex and heating steps do not circumvent the requirement that net work output requires a net energy input from outside the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). Claims net work output (W_turbine > W_pump) from a cyclical process with no identified external energy input besides the pump work.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The process describes a temperature drop in the vortex sink and subsequent heating, suggesting it attempts to extract work from a single thermal reservoir (the fluid's internal energy) without a temperature
- Incomplete energy accounting. The 'heating' in step four is not quantified or sourced; if it comes from the ambient environment, it is an implicit energy input that must be included in the COP calculation.
- The 'vortex sink' is described as increasing translational momentum while decreasing temperature, but this alone cannot create a net increase in available energy (exergy) to produce excess work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Nutzarbeit
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims to generate electrical energy from a 'superconducting energy generation device' (초전도체의 마이스너 효과) using a 'vortex' (헤드) and 'magnetic field' (블럭), but lacks specification of an external energy input. Mentions 'HgBaCaCuO' superconductors and cascading stages, suggesting energy extraction from ambient magnetic fields or zero-point energy without thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to generate electrical energy using superconducting vortices and magnetic fields without specifying any external energy source or thermodynamic gradient. The proposed cascaded energy multiplication and extraction of net work from equilibrium systems directly violate the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., thermal gradient, mechanical work, chemical fuel, incident radiation).
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies net work extraction from an isothermal system (superconductor in equilibrium).
- Claims cascaded energy multiplication (ì¢ì° ë°ë³µì´ë) without an external driving potential, which is impossible.
- Uses superconducting materials (HgBaCaCuO) as an 'energy generation' source, misrepresenting their property of zero electrical resistance as an energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy gen
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex system of components (controllers, switches, paths) manipulating binary states (0 and 1), but no identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient) is specified. The process appears to be purely logical/state manipulation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a logical control system for manipulating binary states but provides no identifiable source of energy input. Any claim that this system generates useful energy output from its own internal state changes is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The obfuscated description is a hallmark of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described.
- Claims of generating 'power' or 'energy' from internal state manipulation alone violate conservation of energy.
- The description is a logical/control system diagram, not an energy conversion process.
- Text is technically obfuscated, mixing Korean and number references in a way that obscures the physical mechanism.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of energy o
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical-sounding t
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy of the fluid (its 'internal energy'), with an initial external energy input from a starter motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed to produce more turbine work than pump work in a cycle where the fluid is only heated by ambient temperature. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, as it claims to produce net work from a single thermal reservoir, violating both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net work output (Turbine work > Pump work) from a closed-cycle fluid process with only ambient heating, violating the First Law.
- Process describes extracting work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient fluid) and converting internal energy directly to work without a compensating heat rejection to a colder sink, violating the Second Law (Kelvin-Planck statement).
- Describes a self-sustaining cycle where the turbine drives the pump and provides excess external work, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed source is the atmospheric pressure doing work on a piston after a vacuum pump creates a low-pressure region inside the cylinder. The electrical input to the vacuum pump is the explicit energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims the work output from the piston driven by atmospheric pressure exceeds the work input needed to create the vacuum. This is impossible because the vacuum pump must expend energy to displace air against atmospheric pressure, and that energy input will always exceed the useful work you can extract from the piston's subsequent motion due to thermodynamic limits and losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The work done by atmospheric pressure on the piston during its downstroke originates from the energy used to create the vacuum. The pump must do work against that same pressure to evacuate the chamber, which will always
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The system is essentially a single-pressure heat engine with no temperature gradient, attempting to extract net work from a system in equilibrium with its environment.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Compares 'power consumed for suction' to 'power from piston lid' without considering that the piston's work is a one-time recovery of a fraction of the energy invested by the pump. For continuous operation, the pump must
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system with sliding blocks, counterweights, and curved tracks, claiming to produce kinetic energy from its own internal motions without any identifiable external energy input beyond initial activation.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical system that attempts to generate continuous rotational energy through internal weight redistribution along curved tracks. It violates energy conservation by claiming to produce net energy output without any external energy input beyond initial activation, essentially describing a mechanical perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is described
- Claims continuous rotation and energy output from internal weight redistribution alone
- System appears to be a closed mechanical loop attempting to create a perpetual imbalance
- Ignores energy losses from friction, sliding resistance, and mechanical inefficiencies
- Describes complex motions but provides no energy accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical power to run the water pump that lifts water from container B (bottom) to container A (top). The system attempts to use the gravitational potential energy of that water to turn a wheel and generator.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity violation. The pump, powered by external electricity, lifts water to create a height difference. The falling water then turns a generator. The losses from pump inefficiency, friction, and generator inefficiency guarantee the electrical output will be less than the electrical input to the pump, making it a net energy consumer, not a producer.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The pump must do work to lift water against gravity. The work done by the falling water cannot exceed the work input to the pump, and will be less due to inevitable losses (friction, pump/generator inefficiency).
- Perpetual motion logic: The description implies a closed-loop cycle where the falling water generates enough electricity to run the pump and have excess output, which is thermodynamically impossible.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The analysis ignores all losses (pump inefficiency, friction in wheel/bearings/chain, generator inefficiency, fluid drag).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the mechanical work applied to the driving gear via the effort gear and axle. No other energy sources (ambient, chemical, etc.) are mentioned.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a complex gear train that can provide torque multiplication (mechanical advantage), but it cannot produce more output power than input power. The claim that output is 'much higher than that of the input' while speeds and sizes of input/output gears are the same directly violates the conservation of energy, as power (energy per time) cannot be amplified without an additional energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'output much higher than input' while maintaining same speed and gear ratios, violating conservation of energy.
- Claims 'gain in turning effect' and 'excess power' without identifying an external energy source to account for the gain.
- Describes a passive gear train; no mechanism for energy multiplication beyond mechanical advantage, which trades force for distance/speed, not creating excess power.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/initial energy to start oscillations, then claimed to be sustained and produce net output via energy extracted from the pendulum's motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a pendulum system where energy generated from its swing is used to power a 'kick' that maintains the swing and also provides net usable energy. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to create energy from nothing within a closed loop, constituting a classic over-unity or perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a portion of the output energy can be used to maintain oscillations while still having a net usable output, implying a closed-loop energy multiplication.
- Violates the second law: Describes a system that, after initial start, extracts work from an oscillatory system while simultaneously using part of that work to sustain the oscillation against damping, with net leftover work. This is a perpetual motio
- Incomplete energy accounting: The method ignores all damping losses (friction, air resistance, electrical resistance, hysteresis). The 'kick' to maintain oscillations must add at least as much energy as is lost per cycle, plus any energy taken as out
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to generate electricity from ambient temperature differences and humidity gradients using 'magnetic quantum dots' and 'S·N·S' structures, but lacks specification of an external energy input. Implies energy multiplication through cascading processes.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electricity from ambient conditions (temperature, humidity) using obscure magnetic structures, implying it can produce more energy than it consumes. This directly violates energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract net work from an equilibrium or near-equilibrium environment without a sufficient, maintained gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying net energy output > total energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting work can be extracted from an isothermal environment without a sufficient thermal gradient.
- Uses pseudo-scientific terminology ('magnetic quantum dots', 'S·N·S structures') without clear physical mechanism.
- Describes cascading/stacking processes that imply energy multiplication, which is impossible.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical input torque applied to the worm(s). No external or ambient energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim that a gear arrangement can increase torque while maintaining the same rotational speed is a direct violation of energy conservation. In any passive transmission, mechanical advantage (increased torque) must come at the expense of reduced rotational speed, keeping input and output power equal minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that output torque is greater than input torque for the same RPM violates conservation of energy (Power = Torque × Angular Velocity).
- Implies mechanical advantage without corresponding speed reduction, which is impossible for a passive gear system.
- No mechanism described for creating energy; only a reconfiguration of standard worm/wormgear engagement.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output tor
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial 'input power' to the shaft. The device claims to use the force of a weight/pressure as an additional, sustained power source, but this weight is part of the system and its gravitational potential energy is finite, not an external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It attempts to use a weight's force to generate more energy than is input, but the weight's gravitational potential energy is finite. To operate continuously, the weight must be lifted back up, requiring at least as much energy as was gained from its descent, making perpetual motion impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy multiplication and perpetual motion, violating conservation of energy.
- Assumes a weight can provide continuous net work without being lifted back up, violating the 1st Law of Thermodynamics.
- Describes a mechanism that would require work to reset the weight's position to extract work from it again, ignoring the energy cost of this reset.
- Confuses force with energy; a sustained force does not equate to sustained net work output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'greater en
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to use 'gravity' and 'weight' to generate electricity, but the described mechanism appears to be a gravity-powered generator with unspecified input energy to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that uses a falling weight to generate electricity but fails to account for the greater or equal energy required to lift the weight back up, violating energy conservation. The description is vague and uses technical terms in a way that obfuscates the perpetual motion nature of the claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate more electrical output energy than the input energy required to lift the weight.
- No clear external energy source identified to reset the gravitational potential (lift the weight).
- Describes a cyclical system (weight falls, generates electricity, then is somehow reset) without accounting for the energy needed for the reset phase.
- Uses vague terms like 'gravity energy' and 'weight energy' as if they are net energy sources.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to suggest energy generation from mechanical rotation and weight interactions without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to be a 'four principles unlimited perpetual motion machine' that appears to generate energy through rotational interactions of weights. It violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying net energy output without an identifiable energy input, and uses complex, obfuscated calculations to mask this fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion ('unlimited perpetual motion machine')
- Incomplete energy accounting - no identifiable primary energy source
- Implies energy multiplication through cascading weights/rotations
- Uses obscure terminology and calculations that obscure the first law of thermodynamics
- No mechanism identified for overcoming friction and other losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe a system that generates electrical energy from some form of magnetic or electromagnetic interaction (using terms like 'magnetic energy flow', 'magnetic field', and 'magnetic energy source'), but no primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, ambient) is explicitly identified or accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electrical energy from magnetic interactions, but fails to identify any legitimate external energy source. The description is highly obfuscated with technical-sounding but vague magnetic terminology, and the core claim implies extracting net work from what appears to be a static magnetic configuration, which violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input source.
- Describes energy generation from magnetic interactions without a clear external energy source to sustain it, implying creation of energy from a static configuration.
- Uses vague terminology ('magnetic energy flow', 'magnetic energy source') that obfuscates the actual energy conversion process.
- Claims of generating power from what seems to be a closed magnetic system violate conservation of energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text mentions 'ambient energy' and 'vibration energy' but describes a mechanism where output energy appears to exceed all identifiable inputs, suggesting an attempt to extract net work from equilibrium.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to amplify ambient or vibration energy to produce a useful output exceeding the control input. This violates the First Law if all energy inputs are not accounted for, and the Second Law by implying net work extraction from an isothermal ambient environment without a compensating heat rejection to a lower temperature reservoir.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > control input without specifying the complete ambient energy source and its practical extraction limits.
- Violates Second Law: Implies creating a useful energy gradient or performing work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient temperature) without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Vague mechanism: Describes 'vibration energy' and 'resonance' leading to 'amplified output' without a coherent, thermodynamically sound conversion process.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a system where 'positive charge' and 'negative charge' interact to create 'positive and negative charges' that then produce 'electric current', suggesting a self-sustaining or energy-multiplying process without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a cyclic interaction between positive and negative charges that purportedly generates an electric current. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme, as it violates energy conservation by producing useful work without an external energy source and violates the second law by attempting to extract net work from an equilibrium charge configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a cyclic process generating electric current without specifying an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of useful work (electric current) from an equilibrium state of charges without a gradient or entropy sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy versus output energy; process described appears closed-loop.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from the fan's own airflow and magnetic interactions, implying a self-sustaining or amplifying loop without an identified primary external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a fan's airflow is used to generate electricity, which is then used to power the same fan, creating a self-sustaining or amplifying loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce more energy than is input, ignoring inevitable losses and lacking an identifiable primary energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent perpetual motion: System claims to use fan's airflow to generate electricity which powers the fan, creating a positive feedback loop.
- Violates energy conservation: Describes 'energy multiplication' where the output (airflow/electricity) is used to create more input, exceeding 100% efficiency.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary, external energy source that overcomes losses (friction, electrical resistance, etc.).
- Misapplication of magnetic principles: Describes using magnets to generate motion/electricity without consuming an energy source, akin to a static perpetual motion machine.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve arranging permanent magnets with N and S poles to create a 'magnetic energy generator' that appears to extract energy from magnetic interactions without an external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy generator using only permanent magnets arranged in specific orientations. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce energy from a static, conservative magnetic field with no external energy input, directly violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, mechanical, thermal, or ambient).
- Claims imply energy extraction from static magnetic fields, which are conservative force fields.
- Describes a configuration where magnetic interactions between permanent magnets are claimed to produce continuous energy output.
- Violates energy conservation as net work cannot be extracted from a system in thermodynamic equilibrium with no energy gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using 'atmospheric energy' to create 'amplified energy' and 'amplified atmospheric energy' that is then converted back to amplified energy in a cyclical manner, suggesting energy is being created or multiplied without an identified primary source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a process where atmospheric energy is somehow amplified and converted in cyclical stages, ultimately producing more energy than was initially input. This violates energy conservation as it lacks a clear, sufficient primary energy source and describes energy multiplication without thermodynamic justification.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent energy multiplication/cascading without accounting for all inputs
- Implies creation of energy from a single ambient source in a closed loop
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or work input to drive the claimed amplification cycles
- Vague mechanism that suggests output energy can exceed total input energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy multiplication from a 'control input' to a 'working input' via magnetic and electrical components arranged at 90-degree angles, implying energy extraction from the system's own internal configuration without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to use internal magnetic and electrical arrangements to generate more 'working input' energy from a smaller 'control input', operating in a closed loop. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim as it violates energy conservation by suggesting energy multiplication without an external source and lacks any identifiable thermodynamic gradient to drive the process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of primary energy input.
- Implies energy multiplication (8 working inputs from 4 control inputs).
- Describes a closed-loop system where outputs seem to feed inputs without thermodynamic gradient.
- Uses magnetic and electrical components in a configuration that suggests extracting net work from internal fields without an external energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'ambient heat' and 'vibration energy' as inputs, but describes a process where heat is converted to electricity and then used to generate more heat in a way that suggests energy multiplication without sufficient external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that claims to use ambient heat and vibration to generate electricity and then produce useful heat, implying an overall energy gain or a COP > 1 without identifying a sufficient external energy gradient or sink. This violates the First Law (energy conservation) and/or the Second Law (entropy must increase) of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to use ambient heat/vibration to produce electricity and then use that electricity to produce more heat than the original input energy.
- Violates Second Law: Describes a process that appears to extract net work or achieve a COP > 1 from a single thermal gradient without a proper heat sink, implying a reduction in total entropy.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Uses terms like 'heat engine' and 'heat pump' but describes a cascading/stacking process that obscures the true energy flow and likely conceals a violation of energy conservation.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use gravity, which is a conservative force field, not an energy source. No explicit input (e.g., fuel, ambient thermal gradient) is described to create a perpetual disequilibrium.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as an 'overbalanced endless chain motor' using gravity. Gravity alone cannot provide net energy in a cyclic process; lifting the chain to restore the 'overbalanced' state requires at least as much energy as is gained during descent, making this a classic perpetual motion machine claim that violates fundamental thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes extracting net work from a closed-loop gravitational system with no external energy input to restore the system's state.
- Violates the 1st Law of Thermodynamics: implies creation of energy from nothing ('gravity is free and limitless' as an energy source is a misconception).
- Violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics: proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, extracting work without an entropy increase or heat rejection to a lower temperature reservoir.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output with
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is not identified. The only explicit energy input is the gravitational potential energy of the object being lowered, which was initially gained via buoyancy work done by displacing the liquid.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine by using buoyancy to lift an object and gravity to lower it for power, ignoring that the buoyant lift itself consumes the gravitational potential energy of the displaced liquid. In a closed cycle with no external energy input, the net work output is zero, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system ignores the energy required to reset the cycle. The buoyant rise of the object in the tower requires the object to displace a volume of liquid downward. The gravitational potential energy gained by the object
- Violates conservation of energy: The patent describes a closed cycle (object returns to start) intended to produce continuous net work. This is impossible as it constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Misapplication of buoyancy: Buoyancy is not an energy source; it is a mechanism for converting gravitational potential energy from the fluid into potential energy of the object. The system's fluid level would drop over time as objects are removed fro
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor (4) that drives the rotation of the canopy (5). No other explicit or ambient energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor-driven rotating carousel with heavy pendulums. It claims to produce energy by converting acceleration, but the only clear energy input is the motor itself. The described mechanical interactions cannot generate net energy output exceeding the motor's input, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to convert acceleration into energy without identifying a net external energy source beyond the motor.
- Describes a rotating system with pendulums but provides no mechanism for net energy gain. The system is a driven oscillator/rotor.
- Implies energy output greater than motor input by 'converting' centripetal/gravitational accelerations, which are conservative forces within the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a process where 'positive energy' and 'negative energy' interact to produce 'positive energy' and 'negative energy' in a way that suggests energy multiplication without identifying any external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a circular energy conversion process using undefined terms like 'positive energy' and 'negative energy' that appears to produce more energy than it consumes, violating conservation of energy. The vague, self-referential description and lack of identifiable external energy source indicate a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims energy transformation that appears to create net energy from internal interactions
- Violates energy conservation by implying self-sustaining or amplifying energy conversion
- Uses undefined terms ('positive energy', 'negative energy') that obscure the actual physics
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from a motor/generator (3) and potentially an additional motor (7/20) to reset the system. The claimed energy output is from the generator during centrifugal force operation.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic centrifugal 'over-unity' machine. It claims to generate electricity from weights moving outward due to centrifugal force, but the energy to spin the frame and later retract the weights against that same centrifugal force will always equal or exceed any energy recovered, violating energy conservation. The design attempts to cleverly sequence motions but cannot escape this fundamental constraint.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system attempts to extract net energy from the motion of masses moving radially outward and inward under centrifugal force, a non-conservative pseudo-force that does no work in an inertial frame. The energy to mov
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a cycle but ignores the fundamental work-energy relationship in a rotating frame. The net work over a full cycle (extending masses and retracting them) must be zero or negative if losses are consider
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: Treating centrifugal 'force' as a real force that can do work to generate excess energy is a classic error. In an inertial frame, the only real forces are centripetal (from the radial guides/seils), which do no wo
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to generate power from vacuum-atmospheric pressure difference, with no external energy input beyond initial setup
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to generate continuous rotational power using only the pressure difference between vacuum and atmosphere, but it ignores the fundamental thermodynamic principle that creating/maintaining a vacuum requires work input equal to or greater than any work extracted from the pressure differential during expansion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net work from atmospheric pressure alone without maintaining a pressure gradient
- Describes a cyclic process that supposedly creates vacuum repeatedly without energy input
- Ignores work required to create/maintain vacuum against atmospheric pressure
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming continuous rotation from pressure differential without energy input to reset the system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The initial input is the gravitational potential energy of a weight (L) being lowered. The system claims to use compressed air generated by a compressor (C) driven by that weight to then lift the weight back up, while also extracting heat via a heat pump principle.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a perpetual motion machine. It claims to use a falling weight to drive a compressor, then use the compressed air to lift the weight back while also recovering heat, all with no external energy input. This violates energy conservation, as the energy required to lift the weight and provide useful heat must come from somewhere and will always exceed the work obtained from lowering it due to inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims the compressor uses no electrical power and runs constantly from the weight and its own produced compressed air, forming a closed loop to lift the weight and provide heat.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: It implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, where the energy output (lifting the weight, heating water) exceeds the single initial input from lowering the weight, with no external energy source
- Incomplete energy accounting: It ignores all dissipative losses (friction in bearings, gears, air resistance, heat loss in tanks, inefficiency of the compressor and air motor). The 'recuperated' heat is waste heat from the process, not a net energy g
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and unspecified. The claim relies on 'five natural forces' (undefined) acting in a liquid medium with different densities, and the 'phenomenon of Remanence' to generate perpetual motion without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly seeks a perpetual motion machine, claiming to generate continuous work from an undefined interplay of forces within a closed system. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it posits a continuous output with no clear, sustainable input, and the second law by implying no increase in entropy or energy degradation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims 'perpetual motion' as an output with no identifiable external energy input, violating conservation of energy.
- Claims operation 'without combustion, without pressure, without friction, and without heat' is thermodynamically impossible for a system performing work.
- Energy accounting is absent; formulas provided are nonsensical and do not relate to established physical laws.
- Misuses correct physics terms (potential/kinetic energy, remanence) to obfuscate a core violation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The system claims to extract energy from the vehicle's own motion via parasitic loads: aerodynamic drag from propeller/turbine generators and increased rolling resistance from wheel-mounted generators.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a classic 'fuel-saving' violation. The generators do not create new energy; they convert a portion of the vehicle's kinetic energy into electricity at a loss, increasing the total load on the primary engine. This cannot supplement net power and would instead reduce vehicle efficiency.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy accounting ignores that all generator outputs are parasitic loads on the vehicle's primary propulsion system.
- Net system efficiency must be less than 100%; generators increase drag/resistance, requiring more fuel/electricity from the primary engine/battery to maintain speed.
- Violates conservation of energy by implying a net gain from converting vehicle's kinetic energy back to electricity with losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is unclear. The described system appears to be a closed-loop mechanical cycle using gravity (weight dropping) and buoyancy (weight rising in water). The only explicit energy input mentioned is from a 'deceleration motor', but the system claims to generate net power from the cyclic motion.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a cycle using gravity and buoyancy to generate power, but it completely ignores the energy required to submerge the buoyant object or otherwise reset the system for the next cycle. The net work output over a complete cycle is zero or negative, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes a cycle where weights are lifted by buoyancy and then dropped by gravity to do work. The buoyant force lifting the weight requires it to be submerged, which in turn requires work to be done *again
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim ignores the energy required to reset the cycle—specifically, the work needed to submerge the buoyant weight or to prepare it for dropping. This is a classic 'buoyancy engine' perpetual motion fallacy.
- No identifiable external energy gradient: The system uses gravity (a conservative force) and buoyancy (which derives from gravity and density differences). Without an external input like a thermal gradient or a change in mass distribution, no net wor
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims suggest energy is generated from magnetic interactions between permanent magnets (S and N poles) arranged in a specific configuration, implying energy extraction from magnetic fields without an apparent external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate and amplify electrical energy solely through the arrangement and interaction of permanent magnets (S and N poles). This constitutes a clear violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce net energy output from a static magnetic field with no consumable energy input, and the second law as it implies a perpetual, entropy-decreasing process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate electrical energy from permanent magnet interactions alone.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual or self-sustaining energy multiplication process.
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or primary energy input.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('magnetic energy generator', 'energy amplification') without clear accounting.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes cascading energy conversion stages (energy storage devices, energy conversion devices, energy amplification devices) with claims of amplifying input energy through multiple stages, but no primary external energy source is identified beyond an initial control input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex cascade of devices claiming to amplify an initial control input into a larger useful energy output. This constitutes a violation of energy conservation, as it lacks any identifiable external energy source to account for the claimed net energy gain. The use of technical terms and multi-stage diagrams obfuscates the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility of the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source accounting
- Claims of energy amplification through cascading stages without new energy input
- Implies creation of useful work from internal feedback loops
- Violates energy conservation by suggesting output > total input
- Uses complex terminology (energy storage/amplification devices) to obscure the lack of an external energy source for the claimed net output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a closed-loop system where a motor (6) is powered by energy generators (15) which are themselves driven by the motor via speed variators and levers. Claims a gravitational motor (38) in claim 3, but the primary claim is self-powering feedback.
AI Physics Analysis
The device explicitly describes a motor powering generators that are supposed to power the same motor with greater output, a textbook violation of energy conservation. The use of levers and gears only transforms, not creates, energy. The gravitational element is an obfuscated attempt to suggest an external source, but the core claim is an over-unity feedback loop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims the generator mechanism's power is greater than that of the motor ("dont la puissance est supérieure à celle du moteur (6)") while being powered by that motor.
- Describes a system where the motor drives generators that power the motor, forming a closed energy loop with claimed net output.
- Uses mechanical advantage (levers, speed variators) to imply force multiplication, but this cannot create energy, only trade force for distance.
- The gravitational motor description is vague and suggests extracting continuous work from a static gravitational field without a compensating drop in potential energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The system's only
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the rotating masses transfer potential energy to springs/gases without losing their own kinetic energy, suggesting a system that performs work without an identifiable external energy input to replenish the masses' energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism where circulating masses allegedly compress springs or gases without losing their own kinetic energy, and where the compressed energy is fed back to re-accelerate the masses. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by implying work can be extracted without an external energy source to replenish the system's total energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to transfer high potential energy to other bodies 'without the own kinetic energy of the circulating masses being diminished'. This implies creation of energy.
- Violates the work-energy principle: Performing work (compressing springs/gases) necessarily requires an energy input; the masses must slow down unless energy is added.
- Perpetual motion mechanism implied: Describes masses being re-accelerated to their original start positions in recurring cycles via energy feedback, suggesting a closed cycle that sustains itself.
- Obfuscated thermodynamics: Claims 'highest possible total efficiency' without identifying the primary energy source or accounting for losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like k
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex interactions between components (magnetic bodies, rotating bodies, discharge gaps, etc.) but does not identify any primary external energy input. It implies energy multiplication through internal feedback loops.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system with magnetic and rotating components that appear to feed energy back into itself, suggesting energy multiplication without identifying any external source sufficient to account for the claimed outputs. The description is technically obfuscated and violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying net energy creation from internal feedback loops.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source accounting
- Describes energy feedback loops that suggest creation of energy from internal processes
- Uses vague terminology for energy conversion without specifying losses
- Implies output energy can exceed total input energy through cascading effects
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat or unspecified 'arbitrary heat potentials' (including feedback of heat from the system's own exhaust) is claimed as the primary input, with possible supplementary combustion in some configurations.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate excess mechanical/electrical energy from arbitrary, low-grade heat potentials by heating a flowing medium in a diffuser and using feedback from the exhaust. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, as it purports to extract net work from an isothermal reservoir or create a usable temperature gradient from its own waste heat, violating the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to generate a net 'flow energy surplus' from heating/cooling a compressible fluid in a diffuser without a sufficient external temperature gradient.
- Proposes a positive feedback loop where heat from the system's exhaust is fed back to the inlet, creating a perpetual gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work to create the initial flow and overcome losses is not properly accounted for against the claimed extracted surplus.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests using magnetic fields and rotation to generate electricity, but no primary energy input (electrical, mechanical, or ambient gradient) is explicitly identified. The system appears to claim it can generate power from its own magnetic arrangements.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic/electric generator that claims to produce output power through internal magnetic reorientations and switching, but fails to identify any external energy source to account for the electrical output. This constitutes a violation of energy conservation, as it suggests creating useful work (electricity) from an isolated system with no net energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input source
- Describes energy generation from internal magnetic reconfiguration without work input
- Implies perpetual or self-sustaining operation violating energy conservation
- Uses obfuscated language making energy accounting impossible
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system mounted on a horizontal roller, with a dense fluid or solid mass flowing between internal chambers. The implied energy source is the gravitational potential energy of the moving mass as the roller turns, and possibly an external torque to initiate rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to amplify torque by shifting a dense mass between internal chambers of different shapes on a rotating roller. This describes a mechanism for changing the center of mass, but provides no source for the energy required to perform that shift against centrifugal and gravitational forces. Any torque gain on one side of the cycle would be paid for by equal or greater work input elsewhere, making net amplification impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to generate different lever arm lengths (torque amplification) without identifying the energy input required to reconfigure the mass between chambers.
- Implied over-unity or perpetual motion: The description suggests a net gain in torque or work from a cyclical reconfiguration of a mass within a rotating system, violating conservation of energy.
- Missing entropy sink/energy dissipation: No accounting for energy losses from friction, fluid viscosity, or inelastic collisions during the mass transfer process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Claims compressed air, springs, or magnets as the 'driving force,' but the described systems are complex motion converters with generators and batteries, suggesting a closed-loop energy claim.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes engines that appear to claim to produce useful work (electricity via a generator) from stored energy (compressed air, springs, magnets) without a clear, sustainable external energy input to replenish that storage. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a closed system producing net work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for compressed air (compressor requires significant input energy)
- Springs and permanent magnets are energy storage devices, not sources; they deplete
- System describes generators and batteries, implying a claim of net energy output greater than input (perpetual motion)
- Mechanical complexity suggests energy losses (friction, heat) are not accounted for in net output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using 'ambient energy' (temperature, humidity, vibration) and 'stored energy' in a cascading 3-stage process to supposedly amplify energy, but no primary external source is clearly identified for the net output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to amplify energy using ambient sources in a cascading process, resulting in an output greater than the control input. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creation of energy, and the description uses vague, obfuscated technical language common in perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output greater than control input without specifying all ambient energy inputs quantitatively.
- Violates energy conservation: Implies energy multiplication through a 3-stage cascade ('3ì¡° ì¤ë¦°ëì 3ì¡° ìì§').
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Suggests extracting net work from ambient gradients without maintaining those gradients or accounting for entropy increase.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from a motor or battery. The inventor implicitly claims additional energy is generated by the rotating semicircular weights via a gravity-related mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed to be a self-power-amplifying engine that generates more energy than is input, explicitly aiming to violate the First Law of Thermodynamics. It misinterprets mechanical torque from unbalanced weights as a source of new energy, which is impossible in a conservative system. This is a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy amplification ('one third of power was increased') and cascading (operating a second engine with one-third the input) without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Asserts the First Law of Thermodynamics must be 'corrected strongly' and 'destroyed', directly opposing conservation of energy.
- Misapplies lever/mechanical advantage principles, confusing force/torque multiplication with energy creation.
- Description of weight shape and rotation to 'bring about a gravity' is physically nonsensical; gravity is a conservative force and cannot be harnessed in this manner for net energy gain.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Claims output > control in
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Proposes extrac
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses terms like 'torque', 'power'
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary energy source. Claims to generate mechanical power through gravity-assisted rotational motion and shifting center of mass, implying extraction of net work from gravitational potential energy without an external energy input to restore the potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-powered mechanical system claiming an efficiency greater than 1, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system attempts to generate continuous power from gravitational potential energy without an identified external energy source to restore the potential, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims mechanical efficiency > 1 (Qe = W_out / W_in > 1)
- Describes a system that appears to be a gravity-powered motor without an identified external energy source to reset the system's state
- Uses terms like 'permanent mechanical efficiency' which is thermodynamically impossible
- System relies on shifting center of mass and gravity to produce continuous rotation, suggesting perpetual motion of the first kind
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests energy is transferred between two rotating bodies (2a, 2b and 3a, 3b) via an unspecified mechanism involving a 'control rotating body' (1) and 'driving rotating body' (2). No explicit external energy input is described, implying the system might be claimed to generate or amplify energy internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a reversible energy transfer between rotating bodies without identifying any external energy source, strongly implying a violation of energy conservation. The mechanism claims to drive outputs from a control input in a cyclical manner that suggests energy amplification or perpetual motion, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of energy transfer and amplification without a source violate conservation of energy
- Mechanism described as 'reversible' suggests perpetual motion or over-unity energy transfer
- Ambiguous terminology obscures the actual energy conversion process
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a system where a 'magnetic body' (자성체) and 'magnetic force generator' (자력발생체) interact with a 'rotating body' (회전체) to produce rotation, implying energy extraction from magnetic arrangements without an identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic rotation device with no clear external energy source, implying that magnetic interactions alone can produce sustained rotation and work output. This violates energy conservation, as magnetic fields are conservative and cannot provide net energy without an external input to compensate for losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Describes a magnetic system that appears to produce continuous rotation/work from its own magnetic field configuration.
- Implies energy multiplication or self-sustaining motion without accounting for energy dissipation (e.g., friction, resistance, magnetic hysteresis).
- Uses vague terms like 'magnetic force generator' without specifying how it is powered or how its energy is replenished.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output rota
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system with weights, springs, and rotating components, but no external energy input is specified beyond an initial startup motor. The description suggests the system produces energy from its own operation.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a mechanical device with rotating components, weights, and springs that claims to produce energy from its own operation. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks any identifiable external energy source to account for the claimed energy output and to overcome inevitable frictional losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source to sustain motion or produce net energy output.
- System relies on internal redistribution of weights and spring compression, which cannot create energy.
- Mechanism describes weights being released to displace the rotor assembly, implying energy multiplication without an external input.
- Claims '平稳地运转而产生能源' (operate smoothly to produce energy) which violates conservation of energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims energy prod
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where magnetic fields (S and N poles) are arranged to supposedly induce motion and generate energy, implying energy extraction from magnetic fields without an apparent external energy input to sustain the process.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a magnetic energy system that appears to suggest sustained motion or energy generation from permanent magnet arrangements alone. This violates energy conservation, as static magnetic fields are conservative and cannot perform net work over a cycle without an external energy input to change the configuration or gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of primary energy input to create or maintain magnetic gradients.
- Implies extraction of net work from a static magnetic configuration, which is thermodynamically impossible without an energy source to deplete.
- Uses obfuscated language (Korean text appears to describe magnetic interactions and motion generation) making the actual energy conversion process impossible to validate.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied extraction of energy from magnetic fields without an external gradient or input. Claims appear to involve manipulating magnetic domains (N and S poles) to generate electrical output greater than input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system that claims to generate electrical energy by manipulating magnetic domains between N and S poles in a cyclic process, implying output exceeds control input without identifying any external energy source. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion scheme violating the first law of thermodynamics, as magnets in static configurations are not an energy source but stores of potential energy that cannot provide net work without an external gradient or input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying energy multiplication via magnetic domain manipulation
- No identifiable external energy source (thermal, chemical, mechanical input) to account for claimed net output
- Describes a cyclic process with magnets that allegedly produces net work without an entropy sink or external gradient
- Uses obfuscated language about magnetic 'force' and 'potential' conversion in a way that suggests perpetual motion
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system of three subsystems (potential giver, distributor/storage, and potential taker) but provides no identifiable primary energy input. It suggests the potential is 'transmitted energy' and can be of pneumatic, hydraulic, electromagnetic, or chemical nature, but does not specify an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device, termed a 'Potenzialisator', describes a configuration for performing work but fails to identify the source of energy required to create the initial potential or sustain the process. The abstract terminology and lack of a defined energy input suggest a system that would violate the first law of thermodynamics by producing work from an unspecified or internal source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input described
- Claims that useful work can be obtained from at least one system without explaining the source of that work
- Uses abstract terms like 'potential giver' and 'potential taker' that obscure the energy flow
- Implies a self-sustaining or amplifying system without a thermodynamic gradient to drive it
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests the initial kinetic energy input to the flywheel is 'tendente a 0' (tending to zero), and the system claims to exploit gravity. However, gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from a closed cycle in a gravitational field alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a proposed perpetual motion machine. It claims positive energy balance by exploiting gravity, but gravity cannot provide net energy in a cyclic process. The energy needed to actively create the accelerating reference frames (the claimed microgravity chamber) is ignored, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims output energy > input energy ('balance positivo de energía') without identifying a non-conservative external energy source.
- Misapplication of microgravity: Creating a local accelerating reference frame (microgravity chamber) requires energy input to maintain the accelerations (g and 2g). This energy cost is not properly accounted for in the output.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The flywheel is claimed to receive intermittent angular impulses while also driving a generator, suggesting sustained net work output from an initial input 'tending to zero'. This is thermodynamically impossible.
- Gravity is not an energy source: The device uses gravity within a cyclical mechanical process. In a complete cycle, the net work done by or against gravity is zero. Any energy extracted must come from the initial energy stored in the flywheel or from
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energía aplicada e
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like 'microgra
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes cascading energy conversion between 'energy devices' and 'control devices' with claims of output exceeding input, suggesting either hidden ambient energy harvesting or violation of conservation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading system of 'energy devices' and 'control devices' that purportedly generate more energy than is input, constituting a classic over-unity claim. The description is vague, lacks quantitative energy balances, and uses technical terms obfuscating the fact that it violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims of cascading/stacking devices to produce more energy than supplied without identifying all energy inputs.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies energy multiplication (output > total input).
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct-sounding terms ('energy device', 'control device', 'resonance') in a vague, non-quantifiable way to describe an impossible process.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve magnetic fields and rotation, but no explicit energy input is identified. Implicitly suggests extracting energy from ambient magnetic fields or creating a self-sustaining energy multiplication system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic rotation system claiming to produce more energy than it consumes (e.g., 2:1, 3:1 ratios), which violates energy conservation. The description lacks any identifiable external energy source to account for the claimed net energy output, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear accounting of input energy vs. output energy
- Describes a mechanism where magnetic field rotation appears to produce more energy than is consumed
- Claims of energy multiplication (e.g., 2:1, 3:1 ratios) without a thermodynamic source
- Appears to be a variant of a permanent magnet motor/generator claiming over-unity operation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravitational potential energy (weight moving up/down) and magnetic principles to generate kinetic energy from minimal input, but lacks clear accounting of the initial energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims a mechanical efficiency greater than 1, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described system, using magnets and gravity in an oscillating mechanism, appears to be a type of over-unity perpetual motion machine with no sustainable external energy input to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims mechanical efficiency > 1 (Qe = W_out / W_in > 1)
- Describes a system that supposedly generates 'stable and effective energy' from its own motion using magnets and gravity, implying perpetual motion
- No identifiable external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses from friction, air resistance, and magnetic hysteresis
- Violates conservation of energy: output cannot exceed total energy input from all sources
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient hydraulic pressure gradient in a liquid (e.g., water). The device attempts to extract work from the buoyancy force generated by mechanically compressing and expanding air-filled 'lungs' or 'bouées' within the fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a buoyancy engine that claims to produce continuous rotation by mechanically managing air pockets in a liquid. It violates the first law of thermodynamics because the work needed to compress the air pockets at depth equals or exceeds the work gained from their buoyant rise, resulting in no net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to compress the 'lungs' against water pressure during the 'diving' phase is ignored or obfuscated.
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation by cycling buoyancy, but the net work output over a full cycle would be zero or negative when accounting for compression work, friction, and viscous drag.
- Misapplication of buoyancy: Buoyancy is a conservative force field (gravity); creating a cycle that extracts net work from buoyancy variations alone is thermodynamically impossible in a closed system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial charge in the batteries (3). The system claims to sustain itself perpetually by using a portion of the generator's output to power the motor and recharge the same batteries.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a textbook perpetual motion machine. It describes a closed electrical-mechanical loop where a motor drives a generator to power itself and recharge its own batteries. This is impossible because each conversion step (electrical to mechanical, mechanical to electrical) loses energy to heat and friction, causing the system to stop without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming perpetual energy production with no external input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; every energy conversion (motor, generator) has losses (heat, friction), so the system's total energy must continuously decrease.
- The feedback loop (motor -> generator -> motor) is a classic over-unity design that cannot sustain itself, let alone produce excess power for external use.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implicitly) and gravity (explicitly) are claimed to create a temperature gradient without external work input, which is then converted to electricity via thermoelectric or heat exchange.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a method to generate electricity by creating a temperature gradient in a sealed, insulated vertical column under gravity alone, with the bottom becoming hotter than the top. This is a classic violation of the second law of thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract useful work from a single heat reservoir (the ambient environment) without a compensating colder reservoir, effectively describing a gravity-driven perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Claims to create a usable temperature gradient (hot at bottom, cold at top) in a sealed, insulated container under gravity alone, with no external work input or pre-existing gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Gravity is not an energy source for creating temperature gradients in equilibrium systems. The 'temperature difference element' is claimed to spontaneously develop a gradient, extracting energy from an isothermal environ
- Misapplication of physics: Suggests a sealed, insulated vertical column of gas/liquid/solid in gravity will develop a stable, usable temperature difference (hot bottom, cold top) for power generation, which contradicts thermodynamic equilibrium princ
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a complex system of components (20, 30, 40, 50, 70, 80) that move a 'magnetic body' (30) in a loop, claiming to generate electricity (60) that exceeds the control input. No primary external energy source (e.g., fuel, significant thermal gradient, ambient energy harvest) is identified. The described motion appears to be self-sustaining or amplified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that moves a magnetic body in a loop through various stages claiming to amplify its energy, ultimately generating electricity that exceeds the control input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, directly violating the first law (energy conservation) and second law (no entropy-free energy multiplication) of thermodynamics. The energy source is unclear and the described process is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes a closed loop where a magnetic body (30) is moved, processed to increase its 'kinetic energy' or 'rotational force', and then returned to the start, allegedly producing excess electrical output. This
- No identifiable net energy input: The only explicit input is a 'control input' to an initial generator (10). The system then claims the moving magnetic body's energy is amplified through stages (40, 50) and used to generate greater electrical output,
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The patent implies energy multiplication within a closed cyclical process (magnetic body loop) without a compensating increase in entropy or a connection to an external low-entropy energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient humidity gradient and electrical input to piezoelectric elements, but claims energy multiplication through cascading loops without accounting for all inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a humidity-based energy system using piezoelectric elements and feedback loops that claim to amplify energy. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creating net energy from ambient conditions without a sufficient external gradient or complete accounting of all energy inputs and losses in the cascading processes.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims cascading energy amplification (e.g., 'energy amplification loop') without identifying the ultimate source for the net gain.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies output energy can exceed total input energy through recursive feedback loops.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Suggests creating a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle from ambient humidity without an external gradient to drive net work extraction.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from ambient sources (humidity, temperature, vibration, etc.) through multiple 'energy amplification modules' (S1, S2, S3) that feed into a main module (M), but no complete accounting of input energy vs. output work. Implies energy multiplication from ambient gradients.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly extracts and amplifies energy from ambient humidity, temperature, and vibration gradients using multiple cascading modules. It fails to provide a complete energy accounting, implying that the total useful output can exceed the energy harvested from the ambient sources, which violates the first law of thermodynamics. The use of complex, self-referential module descriptions obscures the fundamental physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No quantitative energy balance provided
- Claims of 'energy amplification' from ambient sources without specifying the limiting conversion efficiency
- Implies cascading/stacking of energy extraction modules (S1, S2, S3) to produce net output greater than the harvested ambient energy, violating conservation
- Uses complex terminology (modules, collectors, amplifiers) in a way that obfuscates the fundamental energy conversion process and its limits
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes using 'gravity and buoyancy' (중력과 부력) and 'air pressure' (공기압) to generate electricity, implying extraction of work from ambient environmental gradients without an identified primary energy input to sustain the gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity by exploiting gravity and buoyancy using air pressure, but provides no credible mechanism for how the system's state is reset without consuming at least as much energy as it produces. The description of cascading units to increase output is a hallmark of perpetual motion claims that violate energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > control input without specifying the source of energy to reset the buoyancy/gravity cycle.
- Violates thermodynamic limits: Implies extracting net work from an equilibrium or pseudo-equilibrium state (air pressure, gravity field) without consuming a fuel or exploiting a maintained thermal/chemical gradient.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes cascading multiple units to amplify output, a classic sign of energy multiplication claims.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical linkage system (levers, gears, oscillating pendulums) but does not identify any external energy input. It implies the initial motion is self-sustaining and multiplied.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a purely mechanical linkage of levers and gears. It claims to output more work than is input, which directly violates the conservation of energy. No external energy source is identified to account for the claimed multiplicative gain, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims output force > input force while maintaining or increasing speed, violating conservation of energy.
- Claims output work (P*9.8*L*F) can exceed input work (P*9.8*L) with no added energy source.
- Describes a purely mechanical transmission system as 'autonomous' and capable of multiplicative gain without an identified prime mover.
- Uses formulas for mechanical advantage but misapplies them to suggest net energy gain rather than force/speed trade-off.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'force supé
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric pressure and gravitational potential energy of the floating body, with vacuum pump input energy to create pressure differential.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual lifting mechanism by using a buoyant body, a liquid column, and a vacuum pump. The energy required to create the vacuum and manage the system's fluid dynamics is greater than the gravitational potential energy gained from lifting the object, making it an over-unity energy violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to lift objects using a buoyant body that is less dense than the liquid but denser than air, implying it can be cyclically raised and lowered without net external work input.
- Proposes to extract net mechanical work (lifting) from a system that returns to its initial state, violating conservation of energy.
- Uses vacuum pump to lower pressure in a column, allowing liquid to rise and buoyant body to enter, but fails to account for the greater work required to evacuate the column against atmospheric pressure compared to the potential energy gain from lifti
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate power from gravitational potential energy of moving counterweights and leverage principles, but no external energy input is specified beyond initial setup. Appears to rely on internal redistribution of mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims mechanical efficiency greater than 1, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described mechanism uses moving counterweights and levers to supposedly amplify energy, but provides no sustainable external energy input to overcome inevitable frictional losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims mechanical efficiency > 1 (机械效率大于1)
- No identifiable external energy source to sustain motion against friction and losses
- Attempts to create net work from internal gravitational potential changes without restoring input
- Complex mechanical arrangement obfuscates the fundamental energy accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be an electric motor (Zusatzantrieb) used to move a sled to the top of a vertical circular track. The claimed output is electricity from a generator driven by the sled's descent.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator where a sled is moved around a vertical track. The electric motor input required to lift the sled to the top is ignored or obfuscated in the claims of independent energy generation. This results in a net energy violation, as the system cannot output more electrical energy than is input by the motor to overcome friction and restore the sled's height.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses an electric motor to lift/push a mass (sled + optional ball) to a high potential energy point, then converts gravitational potential energy back to electricity via a generator. Total output cannot exceed
- Violates energy conservation: The abstract claims energy generation 'independent of natural conditions' and implies a net energy output, which is impossible for a closed mechanical system.
- Missing entropy sink/Perpetual motion implication: The description suggests a cyclical process where the sled's motion generates electricity, but there is no identified external energy source to replenish the system's potential energy after losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system uses water as a 'fuel' and includes a water source, water treatment, an electrolyzer to produce hydrogen, a fuel cell, and an energy storage unit. The primary claimed input is water, but the electrical energy required to run the electrolyzer is not specified as an external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a system that electrolyzes water into hydrogen and oxygen, then recombines them in a fuel cell. This is a classic energy storage cycle, not a net energy source, as the fuel cell cannot output more energy than was consumed by the electrolyzer. Claiming water is the 'fuel' and the process is 'pollutant-free' masks the fundamental violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system claims to use water as its only fuel to produce net electrical energy and heat, implying it creates energy from water alone.
- The electrolyzer requires a significant electrical energy input (E_elec) to split water into H2 and O2. The fuel cell then recombines them to produce electrical energy (E_fc) and heat, where E_fc < E_elec due to irreversibilities. The system cannot b
- The description suggests the initial energy storage unit powers the components at startup, but provides no mechanism for that storage to be recharged solely from the water-fueled process, implying a closed loop that would deplete.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (elect
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract describes extracting energy from ambient sources (light, heat, vibration, magnetic fields, etc.) and converting it, but the mechanism for achieving net useful work output greater than the total energy input is not physically specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that appears to extract ambient energy from multiple sources to produce an output greater than its control input, which violates energy conservation. The claims are vague and use correct physics terms (like magnetic field, vibration, heat) but describe an overall process that suggests energy multiplication without a clear, thermodynamically permissible mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to generate output power greater than control input, implying energy multiplication.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Suggests a system can produce more useful energy than the total energy supplied from all sources (ambient + control).
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient to enable net work extraction from equilibrium.
- Vague description of conversion process prevents verification against thermodynamic limits (Carnot, Shockley-Queisser, etc.).
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text describes a complex arrangement of components (energy sources, energy accumulators, energy converters, energy amplifiers, etc.) that appear to feed energy back into the system, suggesting a closed-loop or self-amplifying process without identifying an external primary energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system of interconnected energy components that feed energy back into each other, claiming to produce useful output. It fails to identify a primary external energy source, strongly suggesting it violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying energy can be created or amplified within a closed loop. The use of technical-sounding but vague terms is a classic obfuscation pattern.
Specific Physics Issues
- Appears to describe energy amplification or multiplication within a closed system (components 1-6 feeding each other).
- No identification of an external, net energy input to sustain the claimed process.
- Claims suggest energy output can exceed control input, implying creation of energy from internal feedback loops.
- Language is highly obfuscated, making thermodynamic analysis of inputs and outputs impossible.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex mechanical/electrical system (with terms like 'rotating body', 'magnetic force', 'electric power', 'generator') but fails to identify any primary energy input. It appears to claim the system generates more output energy than input energy through internal feedback loops.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to use internal feedback and magnetic/mechanical interactions with the intent to generate more energy than it consumes, constituting a perpetual motion claim. It fails to identify any external energy source sufficient to overcome inevitable thermodynamic losses, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., fuel, external electricity, ambient gradient).
- Describes energy feedback loops (e.g., generator output powering the system's own motor) without accounting for losses.
- Implies energy multiplication or self-sustaining operation, violating conservation of energy.
- Uses vague, non-standard terminology (e.g., 'gravity and buoyancy power', 'rotating body', 'magnetic force') in a way that obfuscates the energy flow.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve 'magnetic force' and 'magnetic energy' conversion processes with apparent energy multiplication through cascading magnetic interactions, but no primary energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy conversion system with cascading interactions that allegedly produce output energy. It fails to identify any primary energy source, uses obfuscating technical language, and implies energy multiplication, which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes a process where magnetic energy is somehow multiplied or cascaded to produce output greater than input.
- Uses vague terminology ('magnetic energy', 'magnetic force', 'cascading') that obscures the actual energy conversion path.
- Implies creation of useful work from a system with no clear external energy gradient or source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a complex system with 'air density' manipulation, 'condensation', and 'evaporation' processes, but fails to identify any primary energy input. Mentions 'control input' but no quantified energy source for claimed outputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system involving air density, condensation, and evaporation but fails to identify any primary energy input, violating energy conservation. The use of technical terms without clear quantitative claims or energy accounting suggests an attempt to obscure the lack of a legitimate energy source for the claimed outputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting - no primary energy input identified
- Implies energy multiplication through cascading processes without source
- Uses vague terms like 'air density control' and 'condensation/evaporation cycles' without specifying the energy gradients driving them
- Describes ratios (4:1) of unspecified parameters implying energy gain without conservation law compliance
- No thermodynamic cycle or heat source/sink identified for claimed work output
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a rotating device that allegedly produces energy from a 'vacuum energy field' or 'zero-point energy' when rotated 360°, with claims of energy amplification or multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate excess energy simply by being rotated 360°, invoking vague concepts like a 'vacuum energy field'. This is a classic over-unity claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by asserting energy output greater than the rotational work input, with no legitimate external energy source identified.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output energy greater than the rotational input energy without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a usable energy gradient from an equilibrium state (pure rotation).
- Uses pseudoscientific terminology ('vacuum energy field', 'zero-point energy') in a context suggesting over-unity performance.
- No mechanism described for how rotation alone, without an external gradient (thermal, pressure, electromagnetic), generates net energy.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to electromagnets and rotational kinetic energy input to spin the structure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create net propulsion using only internal magnetic forces, violating conservation of momentum. The claim that the force on the moving magnet isn't transferred backward to the base is physically impossible—every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The rotational system and electromagnets merely convert input energy into internal vibrations and heat, not net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that force on moving magnet does not impart backward momentum to base violates Newton's Third Law.
- Implies net propulsion from internal magnetic forces without external reaction mass.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores that centrifugal 'replacement' of force requires continuous energy input to maintain rotation against losses.
- Misapplies centrifugal force concept; it is a constraint force, not an independent energy source that can be 'replaced' without work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve extracting energy from ambient air humidity or thermal gradients, but the description suggests energy multiplication/cascading effects that produce more output than input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading system of humidity/temperature devices claiming to produce more energy than input, violating energy conservation. The description is technically obfuscated with undefined terms and lacks complete energy accounting, making it thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting - no clear identification of all energy inputs
- Implied energy multiplication through cascading humidity/thermal devices
- Violates conservation of energy by suggesting net work extraction from an equilibrium or single gradient
- Uses obfuscated terminology making thermodynamic analysis impossible
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'vibration energy' from a 'vibration body' to produce output energy, but describes amplification of vibration energy (45-50 times input) without identifying an external energy source to enable this amplification.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a method to amplify vibration energy by a factor of 45-50 times, producing more output energy than the control input. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes energy multiplication without identifying an external source to account for the massive gain. The mechanism is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Output energy claimed to be 45-50 times the input energy without identifying a sufficient external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a usable energy gradient from ambient vibration without a lower-temperature sink or degradation of another energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary energy source enabling the 45-50x amplification.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes extracting energy from ambient sources (sunlight, wind, thermal gradients, humidity gradients, vibration) and using it to generate electricity, but the description suggests a process that outputs more energy than is accounted for from these inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that harvests multiple ambient energy gradients to produce electricity, but its language implies a cascading process that could output more energy than is collected from the environment, violating energy conservation. The lack of thermodynamic limits (like Carnot efficiency for heat engines) and the vague promise of high-efficiency conversion from equilibrium sources are classic red flags for perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to generate 'high-efficiency' electricity from ambient gradients without specifying the thermodynamic limits of these conversions.
- Implied energy multiplication: The abstract suggests cascading/stacking processes to produce output exceeding the harvested ambient energy.
- Missing entropy analysis: No description of the necessary heat rejection or entropy sinks required for any real thermodynamic cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text references ambient environmental energy and UFO technology, but no identifiable, quantifiable energy input is specified. Claims suggest energy multiplication from the environment without a clear gradient or source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes an 'unlimited power machine' that extracts energy from the ambient environment to produce more output than input, which directly violates the conservation of energy. References to UFO technology and vague physical mechanisms are classic markers of a perpetual motion claim disguised with technical-sounding but meaningless jargon.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying output energy can exceed total input energy.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying useful work can be extracted from an isothermal environment without a temperature or other gradient.
- No identifiable working principle or energy conversion process that respects thermodynamic limits.
- Claims 'unlimited power machine' and energy multiplication are fundamentally impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using ambient energy (sunlight, wind, thermal/humidity gradients, vibration) and 'stacking' or 'cascading' processes to supposedly amplify energy, but no primary, quantified external input is specified that can account for the claimed output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to amplify ambient energy (sunlight, wind, thermal gradients) through stacking/cascading to produce more output energy than the identifiable input, which directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics. The mechanism pretends to extract net work from equilibrium ambient conditions, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'energy amplification' and output exceeding control input without identifying all energy inputs.
- Violates the First Law (Conservation of Energy): Implies creation of energy through cascading/stacking processes.
- Violates the Second Law: Suggests extracting useful work from an isothermal ambient environment (no sufficient gradient) and creating perpetual gradients.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct physics terms (ambient energy, cascading) but describes a thermodynamically impossible net energy multiplication process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Primary electrical input to the electric motor (2500 W claimed). The system claims to generate excess energy from a mechanical gear/wheel assembly driven by this motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed to be an 'auto-generator' where a 2500 W electric motor drives a system of gears and wheels that spins a generator producing 5500 W, a net gain of 3000 W. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the generator's output cannot exceed the motor's input minus all system losses. The mechanical arrangement does not constitute a new energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims 5500 W output from generator while motor input is 2500 W, implying 3000 W net gain from internal mechanical motion.
- No secondary energy source identified to account for the excess energy.
- Mechanical gearing and flywheels cannot create energy; they only transform torque/speed, incurring losses.
- The analysis confuses rotational speed (RPM) with power (Watts).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Output > c
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (RPM,
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated or amplified through cascading interactions between magnetic arrays and rotors without a clear primary input. Mentions using ambient magnetic fields and interactions between permanent magnets.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device where magnetic arrays and rotors interact in a cascading manner, allegedly producing more mechanical output energy than input. This violates energy conservation, as permanent magnets alone cannot provide net work in a cycle; their fields are conservative. The description uses technical terms but describes a perpetual motion mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent creation of energy from permanent magnet interactions (violates conservation of energy)
- Claims of cascading/amplifying energy output without sufficient input
- No clear accounting for the energy required to overcome magnetic locking/cogging
- Vague mechanism that suggests extracting net work from static magnetic fields in equilibrium
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a system where components (coils, magnets, rotors) are arranged to supposedly self-sustain and amplify energy, implying energy is extracted from the system's own operation without a clear external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of coils, magnets, and rotors configured in a feedback loop, claiming it can self-sustain and amplify energy. This is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine, as it lacks any identifiable external energy source to overcome inevitable losses, directly violating the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, ambient gradient).
- Describes a feedback loop where the operation of one component drives another, implying perpetual motion or energy multiplication.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting a closed system can produce net work.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying a process can continue indefinitely without an entropy increase or external energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of self-sus
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests extracting additional energy from the 'environmental energy' (ambient heat) already present in the system's surroundings, implying a net energy gain from a single thermal reservoir.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that claims to use ambient environmental energy to produce a net gain in useful work or system energy. This directly violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract useful work from a single thermal reservoir (the ambient environment) without a temperature gradient to a colder sink, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Kelvin-Planck statement): It claims to produce net work (e.g., electricity) by interacting with a single thermal reservoir (ambient environment) without a colder temperature sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The abstract describes 'environmental energy' as an input but frames the output as exceeding the control input, suggesting energy multiplication from ambient heat without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- The described mechanism of using 'environmental energy and stored energy' to produce output that enhances the system's own energy state is characteristic of a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex mechanical arrangements (rotating components at 360°, 110° rotations, magnetic interactions, and energy transfers between components labeled 'magnetic body', 'storage body', 'input/output terminals') but does not identify a primary energy input. It implies energy is somehow multiplied or created through these internal interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex assembly of rotating magnetic components and terminals that claim to produce usable energy. However, it fails to identify any external energy source, implying that internal rearrangements and transfers can create net energy, which directly violates the conservation of energy. The mechanism is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input specified
- Describes internal energy transfers that suggest energy multiplication (output > input)
- Mechanism appears to claim to extract net work from a closed system of interacting components without an external gradient
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying creation of energy
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting a perpetual cycle without an entropy increase or external driving force
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on interna
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical-sounding t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using the 'force of gravity' (인력) to generate electricity, with vague references to 'gravity potential' (회전방법) and cascading/stacking mechanisms. No primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-based electricity generation method that claims output exceeding control input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because extracting work from a gravitational field requires lowering a mass; to repeat the process, the mass must be raised again using at least as much energy as was generated. The description obfuscates this necessary reset energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate more electrical output than the control input by extracting work from gravity without a corresponding drop in potential energy of a mass or system.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies creating a sustained energy gradient or extracting net work from an equilibrium state (gravity field) without an external energy source to reset the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on 'control input' vs. output while ignoring the energy required to lift or reset the mass against gravity, which is the actual energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'magnetic field' (지렛대) and 'magnet' (시소) interact with a 'coil' (중량물) to generate electricity. It suggests energy is extracted from the magnetic field itself or from ambient magnetic energy, implying a closed-loop system where output energy can exceed input energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to generate electrical energy from interactions between magnets and coils without a clear, sustainable external energy input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creating energy from a static magnetic configuration, and the second law as it suggests a perpetual source of useful work without an entropy sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies extracting net electrical work from a static magnetic field without an external energy source.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Describes a system that could perpetually generate electricity from an equilibrium magnetic configuration.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims energy generation from magnetic interactions without identifying the primary energy source that replenishes the magnetic field or drives the change in flux.
- Misapplication of electromagnetic induction: Induction requires a change in magnetic flux. The description suggests energy can be continuously extracted without an equal or greater input of work to sustain the flux change.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be from small temperature differences, using a combination of Papin pots (pressure cookers). Implicitly, ambient thermal energy is the proposed input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a heat engine that generates torque from small temperature differences. However, it fails to account for the necessary cold reservoir for heat rejection, making its operation as described a violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Any work extracted must come from a net heat flow from a hot source to a cold sink, not from a single ambient source or an unspecified gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of how the temperature difference is created or maintained.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: A heat engine cannot extract net mechanical work from a single temperature reservoir or from an isothermal environment without a compensating heat rejection to a colder sink.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle: The description is too vague, but 'Papin pots' suggest a pressure-based mechanism that would require an external heat source and sink to complete a cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is not specified. The only explicit source is the initial 'initiation energy' and periodic inputs to 'maintain rotation', implying the system is intended to run primarily on its own conserved or multiplied energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed-loop mechanical system that claims to generate electricity while requiring only minimal periodic energy input to maintain motion. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the electrical output and frictional losses must be continuously supplied by an external energy source, not merely 'conserved' from an initial input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to 'conserve present energy and limit further energy input' implies output work (generating electrical current) can exceed periodic input.
- Violates energy conservation: The described mechanism of a falling hub motivating others 'towards the rail section' suggests a perpetual or self-sustaining motion without an adequate external energy source to overcome losses.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The system is a closed mechanical loop; any work extracted (electricity) must come from an external input, not from re-circulating the same energy without loss.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient humidity (water vapor) is claimed as the primary energy source, with electrical input only for control. The system appears to use humidity gradients to generate electricity through unspecified 'energy conversion' processes.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that uses ambient humidity to generate electricity with output exceeding control input, but it fails to account for the energy extracted from the humidity gradient itself. Extracting net work from an isothermal vapor concentration gradient without a compensating process (like a heat sink or lower chemical potential sink) violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims electrical output greater than electrical control input without quantifying the energy extracted from the humidity gradient.
- Violates Second Law: Implies extracting net work from an isothermal humidity gradient without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Vague mechanism: No description of how water vapor condensation/adsorption generates electricity beyond the inherent chemical potential.
- No thermodynamic limit comparison: Fails to specify the maximum possible work extractable from the humidity difference relative to ambient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a rotating magnetic field (물래방아) and claims to generate electricity from it, but no primary energy input is specified. Mentions 24V 100W DC output, but no corresponding input is accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that appears to generate electrical output (24V 100W DC) from a rotating magnetic field, but fails to identify any primary energy input. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it suggests energy creation without a source. The use of technical terms in a vague, non-quantitative context is a hallmark of pseudoscientific claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- Claims output (24V 100W DC) without explaining input source
- Implies energy generation from a rotating magnetic field alone, which is not a primary energy source
- Language is vague and obfuscated, making energy accounting impossible
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve a primary input motor (B.LDC) powering multiple 'energy amplification' circuits (A-J) which then produce outputs claimed to be 30-40% greater than the input, with references to ambient energy harvesting and superconducting materials (MgB2), but no complete accounting of all energy inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a single input motor allegedly powers multiple circuits that produce a combined output exceeding the input by 30-40%, which directly violates energy conservation. While it references ambient energy and superconductors, it fails to provide a complete, quantifiable energy balance, relying on obfuscated technical descriptions to imply impossible energy multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims of 30-40% 'amplification' of energy from a single input motor to multiple output circuits violate energy conservation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ambient/thermal/vibrational energy inputs are mentioned but not quantified, making the net energy balance impossible to verify.
- Implies energy can be multiplied through cascading circuits without identifying a sufficient external energy source.
- Uses technical terms (superconductors, energy harvesting) in a context suggesting over-unity performance.
- Describes complex mechanical/physical interactions (rotational phases, resonance) but provides no credible mechanism to generate net energy gain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve magnetic interactions (S and N poles) and a rotating system, suggesting electrical input to drive a motor or electromagnets. The description implies energy is somehow multiplied or extracted from the magnetic configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic rotational system claiming to output 3.5 times more energy than input, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics. No ambient energy source is identified to justify the gain, making this a classic over-unity magnetic motor claim, which is impossible under conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output (3.5 units) from input (1 unit) without identifying the ambient energy source enabling >100% efficiency.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies energy multiplication (3.5x) from a closed magnetic/mechanical system with no external gradient.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Suggests net work can be extracted solely from arranging permanent magnets in rotation, which is a classic perpetual motion claim.
- Obfuscated description: Uses terms like 'magnetic potential' and 'rotation' but describes an impossible energy gain cycle.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a process where a 'vortex' or 'rotating magnetic field' (무게중심) is created from an initial input, which then supposedly amplifies itself and extracts energy from the environment (가속도) to produce excess output. No primary, quantifiable external energy source (e.g., thermal gradient, ambient RF, chemical fuel) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-amplifying vortex system claiming to produce excess energy from the ambient environment. It violates core physics principles by implying a perpetual positive feedback loop without a defined external energy source to sustain it, making it a textbook over-unity energy violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a self-sustaining and amplifying process (빨ë¼ì¡) without a clear, continuous external energy input to account for the claimed output.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a useful energy gradient (물체 충ë) and rotational work from an equilibrium or internally generated state without an entropy sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output energy exceeds the initial control input by harvesting ambient energy, but fails to specify the nature, density, and thermodynamic cost of tapping that ambient source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a process where a 'magnetic energy conversion device' receives input energy and then outputs more energy, which is then fed back to the input. The only external input mentioned is the initial control input, but the system claims to produce a larger 'magnetic energy' output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy conversion device that claims to produce more output energy than the control input energy, using a feedback loop. This is a classic over-unity claim that violates energy conservation, as it does not account for a sufficient external energy source to explain the alleged gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (output > input) without identifying an external ambient energy source.
- Describes a feedback loop where output energy is used to sustain or amplify the input, suggesting a perpetual motion scheme.
- Uses correct-sounding terms ('magnetic energy conversion', 'control input', 'feedback') in a context that implies over-unity performance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the electric motor driving the rotation of the tubular structure and the electricity to energize the electromagnets. The patent implies the centrifugal force on the movable magnets is a separate, self-replenishing source of 'weight' or force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create net propulsion using only internal forces, which is impossible per Newton's laws. It misrepresents centrifugal force as an independent energy source to be harnessed, ignoring that the rotational energy comes from an external motor. The core claim of asymmetric momentum generation from a closed magnetic system is a fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: The claim that a repulsive force on the fixed magnet propels the body forward, while the equal and opposite force on the movable magnet 'does not put any mechanical energy into the base... in a backwards direction' is imp
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats centrifugal force as a source of energy rather than a result of work input by the motor. The system's kinetic energy comes from the motor, and magnetic interactions merely convert it internally, with losses.
- Perpetual motion logic: Suggests the movable magnet's lost 'centrifugal weight... is replaced by the spinning action,' implying a circular energy recovery that violates conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from magnetic interactions between components (magnetic flux plates, magnetic flux units, positive/negative magnetic bodies) and from the rotation of magnetic bodies themselves, with no clear external energy input identified.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a magnetic-based apparatus that claims to generate electrical power. The description lacks any identifiable external energy source and implies energy can be extracted from the internal magnetic arrangements and interactions alone, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The feedback and regeneration mechanisms described are hallmarks of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes generating electrical energy (via coils) from magnetic fields without accounting for the work required to create, maintain, or change those magnetic configurations. It implies energy can be extracted
- Violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle where generated electricity is used to power components that supposedly enhance the magnetic fields, which then generate more electricity, constituting a perpetua
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input electrical power vs. output electrical power. The patent language focuses on geometric arrangements and magnetic pole orientations as the source of 'generated' power, ignoring the fundamental p
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using pressure in cylinders, but does not identify an initial energy source to create or maintain that pressure. It implies the pressure is self-sustaining or multiplied internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous rotation by 'multiplying' initial pressure and returning it to its source, which is a classic perpetual motion description. It violates energy conservation by suggesting infinite work from a finite input and obfuscates the lack of an energy source with vague, non-physical analogies.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims 'infinite multiplication' of an initial turn, violating energy conservation
- Describes a circular process that returns pressure to its place of formation while producing work, implying a perpetual cycle without loss
- Uses vague analogies (Solar System, atom) instead of physical mechanisms
- Claims pressure remains equal in each unit of time while producing work, contradicting the need for a pressure gradient to perform work
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes extracting energy from a 'vortex' or 'whirlpool' (중심) in a fluid, then using that extracted energy to amplify the original vortex, creating a self-sustaining or growing energy output. No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient) is explicitly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that extracts energy from a fluid vortex and feeds part of that energy back to amplify the vortex, purportedly creating a self-sustaining or growing energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it lacks a clear external primary energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction and viscosity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a positive feedback loop where energy extracted from a vortex is used to amplify the same vortex, leading to net energy creation.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a process that reduces entropy in a closed or cyclical system without an external high-quality energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'vortex' is treated as a perpetual source of energy without identifying the initial energy input that created and sustains it against viscous dissipation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using a 'control input' to generate a 'magnetic field' that somehow produces a 'magnetic force' which then generates output. It claims the 'net input' becomes zero, implying energy is created from the magnetic configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a magnetic system where, after an initial control input, the 'net input' is said to become zero while the system continues to produce output energy. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims to get useful work from a system with no ongoing energy input, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net input of zero while producing output (violates energy conservation)
- Describes a self-sustaining magnetic process with no identifiable external energy source
- Uses obfuscated language to imply energy multiplication from a magnetic field
- No thermodynamic gradient or identifiable energy input is specified to account for the output work
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe a system with permanent magnets, coils, and rotating components that supposedly generates more electrical output than the mechanical/electrical input required to operate it. No primary energy source (fuel, solar, thermal gradient) is identified beyond the initial input to the 'drive coil'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic motor/generator assembly that implies the generation of excess energy from permanent magnet interactions. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim of the first kind, as it violates the conservation of energy by suggesting a configuration that can produce more output energy than the total energy input required to initiate and sustain its operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a configuration of magnets and coils that implies energy multiplication or self-sustaining operation.
- No thermodynamic gradient identified: Attempts to extract net work from magnetic fields in permanent magnets, which are conservative fields in equilibrium, not an energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Output energy from 'generating coil' is compared only to a partial input to a 'drive coil', ignoring losses and the energy required to establish the initial magnetic configuration or overcome friction.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe energy transfer between 'vibration sources', 'vibration objects', and 'energy sources' without identifying a primary energy input. Suggests energy can be multiplied or created through interactions between these elements.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where vibrations and energy sources interact to supposedly produce more energy than is input, without identifying any external energy source to account for the claimed output. This violates energy conservation as it implies energy multiplication through internal interactions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes energy transfer between components as if it can create net energy.
- Implies energy can be amplified or multiplied through unspecified interactions, violating conservation.
- Uses physics terminology ('vibration source', 'energy source', 'resonance') in a vague, obfuscatory manner.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve extracting energy from ambient humidity/air (water vapor concentration gradient) through some form of electrochemical or concentration cell arrangement, with cascading/stacked units suggesting energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly generates electrical energy using humidity gradients and cascading cells, claiming outputs that can exceed inputs. This violates the First Law (energy conservation) by not accounting for the chemical potential energy of the humidity gradient being depleted, and the Second Law by implying net work extraction from an equilibrium-seeking process without a corresponding entropy sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims of output exceeding control input ignore the chemical potential energy of the humidity gradient being consumed.
- Violates Second Law: Implies extracting net work from an isothermal concentration gradient without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Energy multiplication/cascading: Suggests output from one stage can power multiple subsequent stages, implying COP > 1 without identifying a sufficient external energy source.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses terms like 'electrode', 'concentration', and 'cell' but describes a process that appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be the electrical energy for the 'Zusatzantrieb' (supplementary drive) motor (Claim 3) that moves the sled to the top of the circular track. The device attempts to generate electricity from the sled's gravitational descent, with an added mass ballast system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator that uses an electric motor to lift its own mass (and an added ballast) to a high point, then generates electricity as it descends. This constitutes a closed-loop system with no external energy source besides the initial motor input, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The claims of generating energy 'independent of natural conditions' while requiring electrical input for the supplementary drive reveal a fundamental violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical input to the supplementary drive motor is not compared to the generator's electrical output.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The system describes lifting a sled (and sometimes an added mass) to a high potential energy point using a motor, then using the gravitational descent to generate electricity. This is a classic 'lift and drop' over-unity s
- Missing entropy analysis: No mechanism to create a net energy gain from a closed gravitational cycle. The system is a gravity-powered generator with significant parasitic losses from its own lifting mechanism.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a method to amplify energy using a 'vortex energy amplifier' (반복이 압력차이) where a vortex structure (31-1, 31-2) is energized to cause an energy amplification effect in a main body (30). No primary external energy input is specified, implying the system itself generates or amplifies energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a vortex-based device that purportedly amplifies energy, but fails to identify any legitimate external energy source to account for the claimed amplification. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) and the second law, as it suggests creating useful energy from an internal structure without an adequate gradient or input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes energy amplification without identifying a sufficient external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of usable energy from an equilibrium state or a single thermal reservoir.
- Uses obfuscating terminology: 'Vortex energy amplifier', 'energy amplification effect', 'energy convergence' without clear physical mechanisms.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy amp
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses vortex and amplifica
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve extracting energy from humidity gradients (water vapor concentration differences) and using it to generate electrical output that exceeds input, but without accounting for all energy inputs from the environment.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly generates more electrical energy than is input by exploiting humidity gradients and cascading units. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it fails to account for ALL energy inputs from the environment, creating the illusion of excess energy output from nowhere.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output energy greater than control input without quantifying all ambient energy inputs (humidity gradient, thermal energy).
- Implied perpetual motion: Suggests cascading/stacking devices to multiply energy, violating energy conservation.
- Vague mechanism: Describes 'water vapor concentration' and 'ion movement' but lacks clear, quantifiable energy conversion process respecting thermodynamics.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims suggest mechanical energy is generated from a rotating system ("추" - likely torque/weight) and multiplied through multiple stages, implying energy output exceeds input without identifying any external energy source beyond an initial 0.25HP input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that claims to multiply a small input energy (0.25HP) by 30x or more through internal torque manipulation and cascading stages, violating conservation of energy. The description uses ambiguous terminology and geometric arrangements to suggest perpetual work output without any identifiable external energy source, making it a classic over-unity claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a process where 0.25HP input leads to multiplied energy output (30x, 4x) through mechanical arrangement without an external energy source.
- Violates thermodynamic limits: Implies a mechanical system can generate net work from its own internal motions (perpetual motion of the first kind).
- Incomplete energy accounting: Only mentions a small input power but describes cascading energy multiplication through 'ë§' (likely pistons/cylinders) and 'ì¶' (likely levers).
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses undefined terms (ì¶, í, ë§, ì¶) and describes angular displacements (0°→180°) to imply work extraction without energy dissipation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the system is intended to generate power from gravity and the shifting of internal weights (water) within tanks attached to a rotating chain. No external energy input (e.g., lifting the weights, creating an initial gradient) is described, implying the system is meant to be self-sustaining.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system using gravity and shifting weights to generate power. For it to run continuously and produce net electrical output, it would need to create energy from nothing, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The design omits the crucial energy input required to reset the weights each cycle, making it a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No identifiable net energy input to offset continuous electrical output.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Describes a mechanism (shifting weights in a loop) that appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- No thermodynamic gradient or fuel: The system lacks a described external energy source (e.g., fuel, solar, geothermal, pre-lifted mass) to drive the continuous motion and power generation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to reset the weights (e.g., lifting water back up or moving tanks against gravity in the cycle) is not accounted for, guaranteeing net losses, not gains.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims power generation wi
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve atmospheric water vapor (humidity gradient) and unspecified 'energy amplification' through cascading stages, suggesting extraction of work from ambient humidity without accounting for the energy required to create/maintain the humidity gradient or condensation process.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly amplifies energy using atmospheric water vapor and cascading stages, claiming specific output-to-input ratios (1:2, 2:4). This constitutes a perpetual motion claim because it suggests net energy output exceeds identifiable energy input, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics, and attempts to extract work from ambient humidity without a compensating low-temperature reservoir or entropy sink, violating the Second Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims of 'energy amplification' (1:2, 2:4 ratios) without identifying the primary energy input driving the process.
- Violates Second Law: Implies extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir (atmosphere) or from a humidity gradient without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Vague mechanism: Describes cascading stages and 'energy multiplication' but lacks a clear, physically possible conversion process (e.g., not a defined heat engine, heat pump, or osmotic engine).
- Perpetual motion pattern: Suggests output energy can exceed controlled input energy through internal recycling/amplification, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the primary energy input is the initial kinetic energy of the masses, which is then supposedly recycled and amplified through a process of deflection and spring compression.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a perpetual motion machine. It claims to extract useful energy from the centrifugal force of a deflected mass while simultaneously claiming the mass loses only a tiny fraction of its speed, violating conservation of energy. The proposed cycle of extraction and restoration cannot yield net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to extract significant energy from centrifugal forces during deflection while the deflected mass 'retains the greatest part of its kinetic energy'. The energy extracted (to compress springs) must come from the kin
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cyclic process where masses are repeatedly deflected, energy is extracted, and the masses are re-accelerated to their original speed using only the potential energy stored from the extraction step, enabling arb
- Misunderstanding of centrifugal force: Treats centrifugal force in a rotating reference frame as a source of usable energy that can be tapped without an equal energy cost to maintain the centripetal acceleration.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores that energ
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe a magnetic system where magnetic fields (N and S poles) are somehow manipulated to produce electrical output greater than input, with ambiguous references to environmental energy (possibly vibration or thermal gradients). No explicit primary energy source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy generator that claims to produce more electrical output than input by manipulating magnetic pole orientations. This violates energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract net work from a magnetic system without an external energy source to sustain the non-equilibrium state. The description follows classic perpetual motion patterns using magnetic obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a process where magnetic field manipulation yields more output energy than input energy.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of useful work from an equilibrium magnetic system without a clear entropy sink or larger energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'energy multiplication' through cascading magnetic interactions without accounting for all energy inputs required to alter magnetic configurations.
- Misapplication of magnetic principles: Suggests magnetic poles can be rearranged to perpetually extract energy, ignoring that magnetic work requires energy input to overcome magnetic forces and hysteresis losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using a 'control energy source' to create a 'gradient' in a 'resonant energy field' which then interacts with ambient energy to produce output greater than the control input. This suggests an attempt to harness ambient/background energy, but the mechanism is not physically coherent.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism where a small 'control' input creates a condition in a 'resonant energy field' that purportedly amplifies ambient energy to produce a larger output. This is a classic over-unity claim that violates energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics, as it lacks a legitimate, quantified external energy source and proposes extracting net work from an ambient state without a sufficient gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable, quantifiable primary energy input. The described mechanism of creating a 'gradient' in a 'resonant energy field' to amplify ambient energy lacks a defined physical basis.
- Implies energy multiplication or output exceeding total input (PATTERN A) without a legitimate thermodynamic gradient (like a heat engine's T_hot/T_cold).
- Uses obfuscated technical language ('resonant energy field', 'gradient', 'control energy source') without clear connection to established physics (PATTERN C).
- The core claim appears to be extracting net useful work from an equilibrium or near-equilibrium ambient state without a sufficient thermodynamic gradient, violating the second law (PATTERN B).
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex cascade of components (magnetic bodies, generators, converters, condensers, etc.) but does not identify a primary energy input. It appears to suggest energy is extracted, amplified, and fed back without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device with internal energy flows and feedback loops but fails to identify any external energy source. The described process of energy 'amplification' and self-sustenance, without consuming fuel or utilizing an environmental gradient, directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The mechanism is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes energy amplification and feedback loops that imply creation of energy.
- Uses vague terminology (magnetic bodies, condensers, converters) without specifying a thermodynamic process.
- Implies a system can sustain itself and produce excess work without an external gradient or fuel.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description fo
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical-sounding c
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'control input' (축) is applied to a 'control element' (기본추) which then causes a 'response element' (보조추) to feed energy back to the control element, allegedly creating a self-sustaining or amplifying loop. No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is explicitly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a control element and a response element interact in a feedback loop, claiming the response element's output can sustain or exceed the initial control input. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme, as it violates energy conservation by not identifying an external energy source to account for the net energy output and losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a feedback loop where output energy is used to sustain or amplify the input without an identified external source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a perpetual gradient or extraction of net work from an equilibrium state.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'output > control input' by focusing only on the 'control input' while ignoring the total energy input required to establish and maintain the described interactions.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use gravity and compressed air pressure, but describes a closed system with no external energy input to sustain the claimed cyclic operation. The initial compressed air in the tank and the gravitational potential energy of the water column are finite, one-time sources.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to create energy from gravity using a closed-loop system of compressed air, water, and pistons. However, it has no continuous external energy source to overcome losses, meaning its claimed cyclic operation would inevitably stop, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): The system lacks a continuous external energy input to replenish the compressed air and reset the water column. The described cyclic motion would dissipate energy as waste heat and friction,
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from an isothermal system (air pressure and gravity) at equilibrium with its surroundings without a temperature or chemical potential gradient.
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: Describes mechanical linkages and pressure transfers but ignores energy losses from friction, viscous drag in water/air, and heat dissipation during air compression/expansion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest using a '45T weight' (potential energy) to drive a system that outputs more energy than the input weight provides, implying energy multiplication without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a 45T weight is used to generate an output that can, in turn, drive two identical systems, effectively claiming a 2:1 energy multiplication. This is a classic perpetual motion claim that violates energy conservation, as it suggests creating net useful work from a single finite potential energy source without an external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy multiplication claim (output > input) without accounting for all energy inputs
- Implies creation of energy from within a closed system
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Vague mechanism bypassing thermodynamic limits for energy conversion
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with a 'magnetic array' (자석어레이), 'magnetic force amplification unit' (자력증폭유닛), 'magnetic force generator' (자력발생기), and a 'control unit' (제어유닛) that seems to create a self-sustaining or amplifying magnetic interaction loop, implying energy generation from the magnetic configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of magnetic components arranged in a loop that purportedly generates power. It identifies no external energy input, implying the magnetic configuration itself is the sole source, which directly violates the law of conservation of energy. This is a classic magnetic perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is specified.
- Describes a closed loop of magnetic interactions (between components 10, 20, 30, 40, 50) intended to produce 'output power', suggesting energy creation.
- Violates energy conservation: a permanent magnet system in equilibrium cannot do net work over a cycle without an external energy source to reset it.
- Uses obfuscating technical terms (magnetic force amplification, control unit) to describe what appears to be a perpetual motion scheme.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output powe
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions using 'ambient energy' and 'vibrational energy' from the environment, and describes a system with magnets and coils that appears to claim to generate more output than the control input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system using magnets and coils that claims to produce output energy greater than its control input by harnessing ambient vibrational energy. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creation of energy from an equilibrium environment without a sufficient, sustained gradient to perform net work, matching classic perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > control input without quantifying all energy inputs from the environment or the system's own initial state.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies energy multiplication or extraction of net work from an isothermal ambient environment without a sufficient gradient.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses technical terms (vibrational energy, magnetic interactions, 360° rotation) in a vague, non-quantitative way that does not define a clear, thermodynamically permissible cycle.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanism where components (8) and (9) generate a 'magnetic field' or 'magnetic force' that is somehow amplified and fed back to drive the system, suggesting a self-sustaining or over-unity process with no clear external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a system where magnetic components appear to generate and amplify force in a feedback loop to drive itself, with no identifiable external energy source. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying creation of energy from nothing within the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies energy amplification or feedback loop without an external source
- Lacks description of any primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient)
- Uses vague terminology ('magnetic field', 'magnetic force') in a context suggesting perpetual motion
- No accounting for energy losses (friction, resistance, heat)
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex device (동력장치) with multiple components (낙하에너지 획득부, 중량체, 피드백부, 동력변환부) that appears to use a magnetic field (중량체) to generate power (동력) from an unspecified initial input. No primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient) is explicitly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex magnetic apparatus claiming to generate power, but fails to identify any external energy source. The description is technically obfuscated, preventing a coherent thermodynamic analysis, and the implied mechanism suggests extracting net work from a magnetic system without an input, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input source described
- Claims energy generation from a magnetic field without explaining the energy source sustaining that field or the work done against magnetic forces
- Complex, obfuscated description prevents thermodynamic cycle analysis
- Implies energy multiplication or extraction from a static magnetic configuration, violating energy conservation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex mechanical/electromagnetic interactions between components (permanent magnets, electromagnets, rotating assemblies, stators, etc.) but provides no identifiable external energy input. It appears to claim that magnetic interactions between components can produce more output energy than input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device using permanent magnets and electromagnets in a complex arrangement, implying it can generate more energy than it consumes. It fails to identify any external energy source, making it a classic over-unity claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics. The description uses technical-sounding but vague mechanical and magnetic interactions to obscure the fundamental energy accounting flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Claims energy generation from magnetic interactions without accounting for energy required to establish magnetic fields or overcome magnetic locking.
- Implies energy multiplication through cascading magnetic systems, violating conservation of energy.
- Uses obscure terminology and complex mechanical descriptions that obfuscate the fundamental energy accounting.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Vehicle's kinetic energy (via aerodynamic drag from ram air) and the vehicle's battery (to overcome the system's internal losses and the drag it creates).
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a wind turbine mounted on a moving vehicle. The energy to spin the turbine comes from the vehicle's motion, which increases drag. The electrical output is always less than the extra propulsion energy needed to overcome that drag, resulting in a net loss to the vehicle's battery, not a recharge. It is a perpetual motion claim for the vehicle system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: System extracts energy from air flow created by vehicle motion, which increases the vehicle's aerodynamic drag. The net energy recovered is always less than the extra energy the vehicle's motor must expend to overcome th
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to recharge batteries while propelling the vehicle, implying a net energy gain. This is impossible as the system is a parasitic load on the vehicle's primary energy source (the battery).
- Misapplication of a flywheel: The flywheel stores rotational energy from the impeller, but that energy originally came from the vehicle's motion. It cannot create net energy for recharging.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a closed-loop system where energy from a 'control input' is somehow amplified by interacting with a 'resonant body' to produce a larger output, with no identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a control input to a resonant body results in an amplified output that is then fed back, creating a closed loop with net energy gain. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as it lacks any external energy source to account for the claimed amplification, fitting the pattern of an over-unity or perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to account for claimed amplification.
- Describes a process where energy circulates and is amplified within a closed system, violating energy conservation.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('resonant body', 'control input', 'amplified output') that describes energy multiplication without a source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex mechanical/fluidic system (Y-shaped pipe) that supposedly uses 'input energy' and 'ambient energy' to produce 'output energy' and 'excess energy', but no primary external energy source (e.g., electrical, thermal gradient, chemical) is explicitly identified or quantified. It implies energy multiplication from ambient sources without a usable gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to use ambient energy with a small control input to produce greater useful output, implying over-unity performance. It fails to identify a sufficient thermodynamic gradient or quantify all energy flows, violating the First Law (energy conservation) by suggesting net energy can be extracted from an equilibrium ambient state.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting: Inputs (control input, ambient energy) are not quantified against outputs (work, excess energy).
- Implies creation of useful work/output energy from an equilibrium ambient condition without a sufficient thermodynamic gradient.
- Describes a cascading/regenerative process that suggests energy multiplication (output > input) without identifying the compensating entropy increase or loss.
- Uses vague terminology ('ambient energy', 'excess energy') instead of measurable quantities (power, temperature difference, pressure).
- The described Y-pipe fluidic system appears to be a passive component; extracting net work from it without an external driver violates conservation of energy.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from the 'vibration energy of water' (무게차이) within a system where a water-filled container (금속체인) and a U-shaped pipe (U자형 튜브) create a circulating flow. No primary external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient) is explicitly stated, implying the system is intended to be self-sustaining or produce excess energy from the internal water motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to extract 'vibration energy' from circulating water within a closed apparatus. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by implying a continuous energy output without an adequate external energy source to compensate for thermodynamic losses from friction and viscosity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies continuous or amplified energy extraction from a closed-loop fluid system with no identified external energy source to overcome losses.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from an isothermal equilibrium (water in a container) or from a fluid circulation that would dampen due to viscosity and friction.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on output (vibration energy) without specifying the input energy required to initiate and sustain the claimed circulation and energy conversion.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy reduction originates from the vehicle's own forward motion (kinetic energy) or a separate motor to spin the unbalanced wheels. The system attempts to use the resulting centrifugal forces to reduce the vehicle's effective weight on the ground.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The centrifugal forces described are internal to the vehicle system; they cannot produce a net upward force to reduce the vehicle's weight on the road without an equal or greater reaction. The energy needed to spin the unbalanced wheels must be supplied, and any losses from this process will exceed any minuscule reduction in rolling resistance it might theoretically create.
Specific Physics Issues
- Misapplication of Newton's 3rd Law: Internal centrifugal forces are action-reaction pairs within the rotating system and cannot produce a net external force to lift the vehicle.
- Violation of Energy Conservation: The claim that reducing effective weight reduces energy consumption for maintaining speed ignores that the energy to create the centrifugal forces (to spin the masses) must come from the vehicle's engine or motion, i
- Confusion between 'weight' and 'rolling resistance': Rolling resistance is not simply proportional to weight in a way that can be circumvented by an internal oscillating force.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy-red
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes converting 'magnetic energy' to 'rotational energy' and back, with claims of energy multiplication through cascading magnetic/rotational systems, but no primary external energy input is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to convert magnetic energy to rotational energy and back in cascading stages, implying energy multiplication without a clear external source. This violates energy conservation as it suggests output exceeding input without accounting for all energy flows, matching patterns of incomplete energy accounting and technical obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified.
- Describes converting magnetic energy to rotational energy and back in cascading systems, implying energy multiplication.
- Claims of energy output exceeding control input without accounting for all energy flows.
- Uses correct-sounding physics terms (magnetic energy, rotational energy) in a context suggesting perpetual motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Mentions 'motive power' (동력) and various components (electromagnetic force generator, rotating body, magnetic field generator, etc.) but lacks explicit energy input accounting. Appears to claim energy extraction from ambient magnetic fields or gradients without identifying a true thermodynamic gradient or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex arrangement of electromagnetic and rotating components but fails to identify the primary energy source. The language is vague and obfuscatory, using correct physics terms in a way that suggests energy extraction from ambient conditions without a true thermodynamic gradient, violating the first law of thermodynamics through incomplete accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting - no quantification of input vs. output
- Implies energy multiplication or extraction from ambient fields without a consumable gradient
- Uses correct physics terminology (magnetic field, rotation, electromagnetic force) in a vague, cascading arrangement that obscures the first law
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle with defined hot/cold reservoirs or work input
- Claims 'motive power' generation without specifying the primary energy source that is being depleted.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests extracting energy from a 'control input' (17) to power a 'main device' (8), which then somehow generates more output energy than was originally input, implying energy creation or extraction from an unspecified ambient source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device where a small control input triggers a main device to produce a larger energy output, which is then fed back. This implies net energy generation without identifying an external source to account for the increase, directly violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The vague, self-referential description is characteristic of over-unity or perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output energy from the main device (8) is greater than the control input (17).
- Violates energy conservation: Implies energy multiplication or creation without identifying a sufficient external energy source.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct-sounding terms ('control input', 'main device', 'energy amplification') but describes a process where a small input triggers a larger output with no clear, thermodynamically permissible primary energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests energy is somehow multiplied or cascaded through interactions between components (like 'energy of the energy' and 'energy of the energy of the energy'), implying energy creation without a clear external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a process where energy is seemingly amplified or cascaded between components ('energy of the energy'), implying that more useful energy can be extracted than is supplied, without identifying a legitimate external energy source. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The use of vague, recursive terminology instead of standard physics is a hallmark of pseudoscientific claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of primary energy input.
- Implies energy multiplication or cascading without loss, violating conservation.
- Uses obfuscating terminology ('energy of energy') instead of standard physics concepts.
- Suggests a process where output energy can exceed total input energy through internal interactions.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest rotational magnetic input creates larger output energy through magnetic interactions, with part of output fed back to input. No primary external energy source identified beyond initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to produce more output energy than input energy through magnetic interactions and feedback, directly violating conservation of energy. The description suggests a perpetual motion machine where magnetic forces somehow create net energy, ignoring all loss mechanisms and thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation - claims output energy larger than input energy
- Implies energy multiplication through magnetic arrangement without thermodynamic gradient
- Feedback loop suggests perpetual motion capability
- No accounting for energy losses (friction, resistance, hysteresis, eddy currents)
- Uses magnetic forces as energy source rather than energy transfer mechanism
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the device generates a net increase in energy ('faire croître une certaine quantité d'énergie') using centrifugal force and gravity, but these are conservative forces. Any work extracted from gravitational potential (e.g., lowering a mass) would require equal or greater work to reset the system (e.g., raising the mass). The described mechanical linkages and pendulums do not constitute an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a net increase in energy using only centrifugal and gravitational forces, which are conservative. This is a direct violation of the law of conservation of energy, as it describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The complex mechanical interactions cannot generate energy, only transform or dissipate it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to 'grow' a quantity of energy.
- Centrifugal and gravitational forces are conservative; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle.
- Mechanism describes complex motion but identifies no primary external energy source to drive it.
- Claim of 'maximum efficiency' based on pendulum timing is thermodynamically ungrounded.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest electrical energy input is somehow multiplied or cascaded through unspecified mechanisms (MCM, RCM, ICM) to produce more output energy than input, implying energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a method to generate electrical energy where the output purportedly exceeds the control input through cascading conversion stages, but fails to identify any external energy source to balance the equations. The use of vague, undefined technical mechanisms and the implication of energy multiplication directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal) is specified to account for claimed output > input.
- Describes cascading/stacking of energy conversion stages (MCM, RCM, ICM) without explaining how this overcomes thermodynamic limits, implying energy multiplication.
- Uses obfuscating technical jargon (MCM, RCM, ICM, phase angles) without clear physical definitions or quantitative relationships to known conservation laws.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from the 'movement of air' (air flow) between two chambers, implying extraction of net work from an equilibrium or ambient condition without an identified external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity from air flow between chambers, but provides no identified external energy source to create and sustain that flow against losses. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, attempting to extract net work from an equilibrium thermal environment, which violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy to establish the claimed air flow or pressure gradient.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implies generation of useful work (electricity) from ambient air at uniform temperature/pressure without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Describes a complex system of chambers, electrodes, and flows without a clear, thermodynamically permissible primary mover.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'weight or volume factors' of objects to generate torque, but describes converting 'original torque to zero' and obtaining 'net torque' through some unspecified 'lever principle' and 'cooperative action'.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a mechanical system that claims to generate net output torque/energy by shifting an 'original torque to zero' and integrating torques across a boundary, which is a direct violation of energy conservation. The description is physically incoherent and uses obfuscated language to disguise what is essentially a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Describes obtaining a net output torque/energy from a system where the original input torque is shifted to zero.
- Violates Newton's third law: Implies creating a net force/torque from internal interactions without an external energy source.
- No identifiable external energy input: The described mechanism appears to be a closed mechanical system claiming to produce net work.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses terms like 'lever principle' and 'cooperative action' to describe an impossible energy multiplication process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests an electric motor powers a fan, which drives a generator to produce electricity, with no external fuel or energy input specified. This implies a closed-loop electrical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It proposes using an electric motor to drive a generator to produce electricity, forming a closed loop with no external energy input. This violates energy conservation, as the generator's output cannot exceed (and will be less than) the motor's input due to inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and waste heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation)
- No identifiable net energy input to the system
- System output (generator electricity) would be less than system input (motor electricity) due to losses
- Describes a self-sustaining or self-charging loop without an external primary energy source
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system (light bulb powered by electricity, shining on a solar panel to generate electricity) suggests the primary input is the electrical energy used to power the bulb, with no external ambient source like sunlight mentioned.
AI Physics Analysis
The system proposes using a light bulb and solar panel in a loop to generate electricity 'without any outside fuels.' This creates a closed energy cycle where losses from the bulb, panel, and generator are inevitable, making net electricity production impossible. It violates energy conservation by implying creation of energy from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation)
- Incomplete energy accounting: Electrical input to bulb is not compared to electrical output from solar panel
- No mechanism for net energy gain; system is a lossy closed loop (bulb → panel → generator)
- No external energy gradient identified to drive net work output
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit input is the initial electrical energy to the heating element. The claim implies this initial input is later recaptured and amplified to run the system perpetually.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed-loop system where electricity heats water to make steam, which drives a generator to produce electricity. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. Thermodynamic losses ensure the generator cannot produce enough electricity to both power the heater and provide a useful net output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system's output (electricity from generator) cannot exceed the input to the heating element minus losses.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Converting heat from the boiled water back to work via a steam engine is a heat engine cycle, limited by Carnot efficiency (<100%). Losses ensure net work output is less than electrical input.
- No perpetual external energy source identified. The water and tank are not energy sources; they are working fluids/containers.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex cascading interactions between components (generators, magnetic force devices, power storage devices, etc.) but fails to identify a primary external energy input. It appears to claim energy multiplication through internal feedback loops.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where various generators and storage devices interact in cascading feedback loops, purportedly producing a net 'motive power' output. It fails to identify any primary external energy source, making the system a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim that violates both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., fuel, sunlight, external electrical input).
- Describes energy outputs feeding back as inputs in a cascading manner, implying energy creation.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting net energy output can exceed total external input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying perpetual or over-unity operation without an external gradient to exploit.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of 'motive
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex, vague descr
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where 'magnetic energy' is somehow extracted, amplified, and fed back in a loop, with claims of generating output power greater than input. No primary external energy source (electrical, thermal, chemical, ambient gradient) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where magnetic energy is supposedly extracted, amplified, and recirculated to produce more output power than input, which violates the conservation of energy. The description is technically vague and obfuscated, failing to identify any legitimate external energy source to account for the claimed net gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication/regeneration without an external source
- Violation of energy conservation: output power claimed to be greater than input
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or mechanism to explain net energy gain
- Vague description of using magnetic fields in a loop to generate excess energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text references a battery for startup and a generator/lighting machine, but the core description implies the system's variable flywheels, levers, and a 'Gleichpolarantriebsteil' (homopolar drive part) with magnets are intended to produce more output work than the input work required to control them.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a mechanically over-complex system with no identifiable external energy source, implying that internal reconfiguration of flywheels, levers, and magnets can produce sustained net power output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- The description is fundamentally incoherent and lacks a defined energy conversion process.
- It implies mechanical and magnetic arrangements (variable flywheels, levers, radial control wheels, spiral rotors/stators with magnets) can generate sustained motive power without a clear primary energy input.
- The text suggests 'Vollausnutzung (des Antriebes)' (full utilization of the drive) through lever-arm longitudinal devices with pressure springs, indicating an attempt to recirculate or multiply energy internally.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient (thermal, chemical, potential) is described as the energy source for the claimed 'Mehrleistende' (increased performance).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The sys
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The claim uses numerous t
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The claim describes producing sustainable energy '24 hours per day everywhere available' without using fossil fuels, but provides no identifiable energy input mechanism (solar, wind, thermal gradient, chemical, etc.).
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates the first law of thermodynamics by promising continuous energy generation without identifying any energy source or input, effectively describing a perpetual motion machine. The vague, grandiose claims with no physical mechanism indicate a fundamental violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Implies continuous energy generation without an external gradient or fuel
- Claims of universal, 24/7 power without environmental burden suggest violation of energy conservation
- No thermodynamic process or conversion mechanism is specified
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from the interaction between two magnetic arrays (1,2) and a control magnet (5b), with output energy exceeding input energy. No primary external energy source is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic interaction system that appears to claim energy generation exceeding input, violating energy conservation. The description is technically vague and lacks clear identification of an external energy source, suggesting an attempt to extract net work from permanent magnet configurations without an energy gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication without clear external input
- Vague mechanism for generating excess energy from magnetic interactions
- No accounting for energy conservation in the described magnetic system
- Implies creation of energy from permanent magnet configurations
A - Incomplete energy accounting
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'magnetic energy' and 'gravitational energy' as inputs, but describes a process where magnets and gravity fields are used to generate more output energy than input, suggesting energy is being created from the magnetic configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'Magnet Engine' that claims to use magnetic and gravitational potential energy to produce continuous work. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as extracting net work from static potential fields without an external energy source to restore the system's state violates both the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The description is vague and uses correct physics terms incorrectly, obscuring the fact that the system cannot output more energy than is input to configure and reset it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies net energy output from a static magnetic/gravitational system without depleting an energy source.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Suggests a perpetual gradient can be maintained to do work without an external energy input to reset the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mention of energy required to overcome magnetic attraction/repulsion to reset the engine cycle.
- Misuse of terminology: Vague terms like 'magnetic energy' and 'gravitational energy' used as exploitable fuel rather than potential fields.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat energy (thermal gradient) and electrical input to the 'magnetic field generator' are claimed as inputs, but the system allegedly outputs more electrical energy than the control input, implying extraction of net work from ambient heat without a sufficient temperature gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that uses a magnetic field to interact with ambient heat energy, claiming to output more electrical energy than the control input. This constitutes a classic violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract useful work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient heat) without a compensating heat sink, which is impossible for a cyclic process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Claims to generate net work/output energy by using ambient heat energy without a sufficient temperature gradient to drive the process.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on 'control input' vs. output, ignoring the full energy input from the magnetic field generation system and the ambient heat source.
- Implies a perpetual motion machine of the second kind: Attempts to convert ambient thermal energy into useful work in a cycle without a cold sink, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system uses weights moved by gravity downward on belts, but these same weights are then mechanically lifted back up by powered transport wheels. The patent suggests at least one transport wheel is driven, possibly by a battery or by the system's own generated electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator with a closed loop of weights. It violates the conservation of energy because the mechanical work needed to lift the weights back to their starting height must equal or exceed the work extracted from their descent, making net energy production impossible without an external primary energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to lift the weights back to the top (against gravity) is not properly accounted for relative to the work extracted from their descent.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes a closed loop of weights. The net work output from the descending weights cannot exceed the work input required to return them to the top, minus losses.
- Implied perpetual motion: Claim 5 suggests a transport wheel is driven by the system's own generated energy, creating a self-sustaining loop without an external primary energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed source is the gravitational potential energy of the moving masses (masselottes) during their descent phase. The system also requires an input to the 'organe moteur annexe' (auxiliary motor) to move the masses radially, which, according to claim 5, is intended to be powered by the electrical output of the device itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity or perpetual motion machine. It attempts to generate net energy by cyclically changing the radius of rotating masses under gravity, but the energy required to lift the masses and overcome centrifugal force during the reset phase always equals or exceeds the work gained during the driving phase, making sustained energy production impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work extracted from the gravitational descent of the masses is less than or equal to the work required to lift them back up during the ascent phase, plus all system losses. The patent describes a closed cycle with
- Misapplication of inertia/centrifugal force: Inertial and centrifugal forces are frame-dependent and conservative in a rotating frame. Manipulating masses radially in a rotating system cannot produce net energy; the work done to move a mass outward a
- Perpetual motion scheme: Claim 5 explicitly states the auxiliary motor is powered by the generator output, creating a feedback loop intended to be self-sustaining, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from the bricks being lifted on the ascending side. The system's own operation must provide this lift.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a form of perpetual motion machine. It attempts to create continuous rotation by using hinged bricks to create an asymmetric weight distribution, but it ignores the energy cost of resetting each brick to the 'high-torque' position. The net work output, after accounting for lifting and flipping bricks, is zero or negative when considering conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to flip a brick from horizontal to vertical on the ascending side (against gravity and inertia) is not accounted for.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Claims net torque from weight asymmetry, ignoring that the torque from descending bricks is exactly countered by the torque needed to re-orient and lift bricks on the ascending side when friction is zero.
- Misapplication of lever principle: The horizontal bricks have a longer lever arm, but their weight does not create a perpetual imbalance; the system's center of mass does not shift to create continuous rotation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a process where a 'control input' of 3 units somehow yields an output of 100 to 1000 units of 'electric energy' from a 'generator', suggesting energy amplification without identifying a legitimate external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system where a small control input yields a vastly larger electrical output, which is a direct violation of energy conservation. The description is physically incoherent and fails to identify any legitimate external energy source that could account for the claimed amplification.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent energy multiplication (3 → 100-1000) violates conservation of energy
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal) is described to account for the massive output
- Process description is physically incoherent and uses technical terms (control input, generator) without a clear, lawful mechanism
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from the 'movement' or 'vibration' of a primary magnet, implying extraction of net work from ambient thermal motion or magnetic fields without an identified external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a moving magnet induces motion in other magnets to generate useful work, but fails to account for the energy needed to sustain the primary magnet's motion. This implies a perpetual motion scheme, violating energy conservation by suggesting net work can be extracted from a closed magnetic interaction system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the external energy source powering the claimed continuous motion of the primary magnet.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies a self-sustaining or amplifying system where motion/vibration of one magnet can induce motion in others to produce useful work without net energy input.
- Missing entropy sink: Describes a cyclic magnetic interaction that would inevitably lose energy to friction, resistance, and heat, requiring continuous external input to sustain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest electrical input (5V) drives a system that appears to extract energy from humidity gradients and ambient heat, but the described energy multiplication process lacks a coherent external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a small input voltage (5V) appears to trigger a cascading process involving humidity, capacitors, and thermal energy, ultimately producing more electrical output than the initial control input. This suggests a violation of energy conservation, as the accounting for all ambient energy inputs (humidity gradient, thermal gradient) is vague and the described energy multiplication lacks a thermodynamically sound mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent energy multiplication without a sufficient external gradient
- Incomplete energy accounting for humidity/thermal energy extraction
- Implied COP > 1 without clear identification of all low-grade energy inputs
- Vague mechanism for cascading/stacking energy gains that suggests violation of conservation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Claims suggest primary energy comes from a combination of initial battery power, ambient air compression, and gravity acting on the piston's weight.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use gravity and air expansion in a cycle to recharge its own batteries and produce excess work, which violates the first law of thermodynamics. Gravity is a conservative force, so using it to do work in a cycle requires at least as much energy to reset the system, which is not accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims two expansions (air and gravity) can recharge starting batteries and produce net work, implying energy output > energy input without an identified external source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats gravity as a source of usable work per cycle without restoring the system to its initial gravitational potential, creating a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Misapplication of thermodynamic cycles: An 'open cycle' still requires a net energy input; the described process lacks a sustained temperature or pressure gradient from an external source to drive continuous net work.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is garbled/nonsensical, but references 'Sin' (possibly meaning sine wave) and 'vibration' in the abstract, suggesting it may claim to extract energy from ambient vibrations without identifying a compensating energy source or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is corrupted and nonsensical, but the fragments suggest a vibration-based energy device. Without a clear, identified energy source or gradient, and with garbled terminology, it exhibits classic signs of an over-unity or perpetual motion claim that violates energy conservation by omitting necessary inputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is corrupted/unintelligible, preventing proper technical analysis
- No identifiable energy conversion process or input source
- If it claims 'vibration energy conversion', it fails to specify the thermodynamic gradient being exploited
- Implied perpetual motion if output exceeds all identifiable inputs
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use ambient humidity, temperature differences, and wind to generate electricity that is then used to create more humidity/temperature differences in a cyclic, self-amplifying manner.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that uses ambient energy to create a condition (humidity/temperature difference) which then generates electricity, and that electricity is used to recreate or amplify the initial condition. This describes a positive feedback loop with no net external energy input, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies energy creation or multiplication from within the system itself.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying energy multiplication or creation
- No identifiable net external energy input to sustain the claimed cyclic amplification
- Appears to be a closed-loop system claiming to output more work than the total energy input from ambient sources
- Missing entropy sink; system cannot create a perpetual useful gradient from equilibrium
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy (light, heat, humidity, vibration, wind, sound) is claimed to be collected and converted into electricity, with the output electricity then used to collect more ambient energy in a feedback loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that collects diffuse ambient energy (light, heat, vibration, etc.) to generate electricity, then uses that output electricity to power the collection of more ambient energy. This proposed feedback loop violates the first law (energy cannot be created) and the second law (you cannot extract net work from an equilibrium ambient bath without a larger external energy source or a significant thermal gradient to drive the process).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying a self-sustaining or amplifying loop where electrical output is used to collect the very ambient energy that created it.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics by proposing to extract net work from an isothermal, equilibrium ambient environment without a significant gradient or external fuel.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system's control input energy is not properly distinguished from the ambient energy input, creating the illusion of 'free' energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using a 'control input' to generate a 'water pressure' (314m water head) from a smaller input (100m), then using this pressure to generate electricity, claiming a 1000:1 output ratio. No clear primary energy source is identified beyond the initial ambiguous control input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a device that takes a small 'control input' to create a large water pressure, which is then used to generate electricity at a claimed 1000:1 ratio. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims to output vastly more energy than is input, without identifying any external energy source to account for the difference.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a 1000:1 energy output ratio, which violates energy conservation.
- Describes generating a higher pressure (314m head) from a lower pressure input (100m head) without an external energy source for the pressure multiplication.
- Uses vague terminology ('control input', 'water pressure generation', 'energy amplification') that obscures the actual energy conversion process.
- No identification of a primary energy source (e.g., fuel, elevated water source, thermal gradient) to justify the massive claimed output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics-like terms (
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to convert 'gravity' into energy with 100% efficiency, mentions ambient energy (sunlight, wind, thermal gradients), and references UFO technology, but provides no coherent, identifiable primary energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim of 100% efficient gravity-to-energy conversion is a direct violation of energy conservation. The description mixes vague references to ambient energy with impossible perpetual motion concepts, using obfuscated language and references to pseudoscientific concepts like UFO technology to mask the fundamental thermodynamic violations.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 100% efficient conversion of gravity to energy, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Proposes extracting net work from a gravitational field without a compensating decrease in potential energy or an external gradient.
- Uses scientifically undefined concepts ('gravity energy', 'UFO technology') as explanatory mechanisms.
- Describes cascading/stacking processes that imply energy multiplication without accounting for all inputs.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary claimed source is a 'Motor-Generator' (1) powered by batteries (12), with claims of 'überschüssige Energie' (excess energy) being fed back to recharge the batteries.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'flywheel motor' that claims to generate excess energy to recharge its own batteries while being fuel-free. This constitutes a closed-loop energy system with no identified external energy input, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The claimed 'excess energy' for self-charging implies an over-unity or perpetual motion mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claim 3 describes using excess energy generated by the system to recharge its own batteries, implying perpetual or over-unity operation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy input (e.g., fuel, external charging, ambient energy harvesting) is specified to justify the 'excess energy'.
- The system is described as 'kraftstofffrei' (fuel-free) but provides no alternative primary energy source beyond the internal battery-motor-generator loop.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy from a 'resonance energy amplification device' (200) that receives 'resonant energy' from a 'resonant energy source' (300), which itself seems to be excited by the initial device, suggesting a circular or self-amplifying process with no clear external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to amplify 'resonant energy' in a feedback loop to produce excess energy, with no identifiable primary energy source. This constitutes a clear violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by proposing a system where output energy exceeds all accounted inputs, characteristic of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent perpetual motion/self-amplification loop with no primary energy source identified.
- Violates energy conservation: output energy is claimed to be greater than the control input, implying energy creation.
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('resonance energy amplification', 'resonant energy source') to describe what appears to be an over-unity energy multiplication scheme.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be from the weight of heavy masses and rails acting through a system of cylinders, quadrilaterals, steel rings, shafts, gears, and pinion shafts. No external energy input or height differential is described to reset or lift the weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-powered generator using weights and gears, but it is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity solely from the downward force of its own components, with no described external energy input to reset the system, thus violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The described mechanism uses the static weight of components to allegedly generate continuous rotational motion and electricity without an external energy source to reset the system.
- No thermodynamic gradient or potential energy source: The weights are part of the apparatus; their gravitational potential energy is fixed unless they are lifted by an external input. The system lacks a described cycle to restore the weights' positio
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output (electricity) but ignores the required input energy to overcome friction, electrical losses, and to return masses to their starting positions to sustain motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'magnetic force device' (자력장치) generates electricity that is then fed back to power itself, with vague references to 'natural energy' (자연 에너지) and 'magnetic force' being amplified. No primary external energy source is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a magnetic device generates electricity, part of which is fed back to sustain its own operation, implying perpetual motion. It lacks a clear, sustainable external energy source and violates the first law of thermodynamics by suggesting energy can be created or amplified within a closed loop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Appears to describe a self-powered generator with feedback loop, violating conservation of energy.
- Claims energy amplification or multiplication through magnetic interactions without a clear external energy gradient.
- Uses obfuscated technical language (magnetic force devices, energy amplification) to describe what is effectively a perpetual motion scheme.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Output energy is suggested
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Implies extract
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses terms like 'magnetic force d
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest electrical input generates more electrical output via a 'resonance' process, implying energy multiplication without identifying an external source to account for the gain.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that appears to take an electrical input and produce a greater electrical output through a 'resonance' process, directly violating energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to account for the gain, making this a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (e.g., 6 input units producing 6 output units plus 6 additional 'resonance' units)
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal gradient) to account for output exceeding total input
- Violates conservation of energy: total output cannot exceed total input from all sources
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('resonance', 'energy amplification') without clear thermodynamic mechanism
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the gravitational potential energy of falling weights, but the system is closed and the weights are mechanically lifted back to their starting height by the device's own output.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity gravity wheel claim. The device is a closed mechanical loop where weights fall to produce work, but that same work must be used to lift the weights back to their starting position. Friction and losses ensure the lift requires more work than the fall provides, making continuous rotation with net power output impossible without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system claims to use a fraction of the work from falling weights to lift the same weights back up, with leftover work for external use.
- Ignores energy losses from friction, chain/bearing resistance, and mechanical transmission.
- Claims a mechanical advantage (12:1 demultiplication) reduces force needed to lift weights, but this necessarily increases the distance/energy input, not creating a net energy gain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Only considers the
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims involve extracting energy from humidity gradient (일정간격) and using it to generate electricity through cascading systems, but no clear primary energy input is identified. Implied ambient humidity gradient is the claimed source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that allegedly generates electricity from ambient humidity gradients using cascading stages, but it fails to account for the energy required to create or maintain the humidity differential. The described feedback loops and self-powered operation suggest a perpetual motion scheme that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Output electricity claimed without quantifying energy input from dehumidification process.
- Violates Second Law: Implies extracting net work from a single ambient humidity gradient without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Cascading systems (ìì¶ê³µê¸° ë°ìì¥ì¹) described without clear thermodynamic cycle or sink.
- Perpetual motion pattern: Suggests using generated electricity to power subsequent stages, creating a self-sustaining loop.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract describes a device that produces 5-15 times more output energy than input energy ('5배에서 15배'), implying energy multiplication without identifying an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims an energy output 5 to 15 times greater than the input without identifying an external energy source to balance the equation. This directly violates the conservation of energy, making it a perpetual motion claim of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of energy multiplication (5x to 15x output) violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal gradient) is described to account for the multiplied output.
- The mechanism ('이온교환막' / ion exchange membrane) is not a known primary energy source; it may facilitate energy conversion but cannot create energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text references converting 'gravity, artificial gravity/pressure' but describes a closed-loop gear train with no external gradient or fuel. The only explicit input mentioned is manual/hydraulic/pneumatic/magnetic pressure (Claim 6), but the core claim suggests a self-sustaining loop that adds usable energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed-loop gear train that claims to generate usable rotational energy from its own operation, with gravity or pressure as a vague source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it proposes a mechanical system that outputs more energy than is supplied from outside the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a closed-loop mechanical system that claims to output more usable energy than is input, violating conservation of energy.
- Describes energy being drawn from one side of a main gear to be reused on the other side to keep it rotating while 'adding usable energy'—a classic perpetual motion claim.
- No identifiable external, depletable energy source (like a height differential for gravity, a compressed gas reservoir, or a battery). 'Gravity' is not a source unless mass is falling through a distance.
- The description is mechanically obfuscated but reduces to a system with no net external driving force.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex gear interac
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity from 'vibrational energy' of a structure using a 'vibration energy conversion device' (진동에너지 변환장치), but the description suggests it aims to produce more output than the input required to initiate/maintain the vibration, implying energy amplification.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that vibrates a structure, harvests energy from that vibration, and uses part of the harvested energy to sustain the vibration while outputting the remainder. This is a closed-loop energy multiplication claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics, as it implies net energy creation from nothing after an initial input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system appears to use input energy to create a vibration, then claims to harvest more energy from that vibration than was input.
- Violates energy conservation: The described process of using harvested energy to sustain and amplify the vibration for continuous power generation is a textbook perpetual motion scheme of the first kind (output > input).
- No identified external, ambient energy source sufficient to explain claimed net gain. Structural vibration itself is not a source; it's a temporary store of input energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and incomplete. The text describes a complex system of 'energy modules' and 'energy amplification' using 'vibration energy' and 'resonance', but fails to specify a primary, external energy input sufficient to account for the claimed output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where energy modules are cascaded to produce a final output that exceeds the control input, which is a classic hallmark of a perpetual motion claim. The explanation relies on vague concepts like 'resonance amplification' without a complete, quantifiable accounting of all energy inputs and outputs, directly violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims of 'energy amplification' and 'output > input' without identifying all energy inputs (e.g., ambient thermal, vibrational).
- Violates energy conservation: The described process of cascading/stacking modules to produce a final output greater than the initial input implies energy creation.
- Misuse of physics terminology: Vague references to 'resonance', 'vibration energy', and 'amplification' obfuscate the actual energy conversion path.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to generate 'output energy' from 'input energy' using a complex cascade of components (energy conversion device, energy amplifier, energy storage device, energy circulation device) with feedback loops, suggesting energy multiplication without identifying a primary external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that appears to be a closed-loop energy amplifier, claiming to produce more output energy than is input by feeding energy back through cascading components. This violates energy conservation as it lacks a clear, sufficient external energy source and suggests perpetual motion of the first kind (creating energy from nothing). The use of complex, vague terminology is characteristic of obfuscated perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified.
- Describes a closed-loop system where output energy is fed back to amplify the input, implying net energy creation.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting a system can output more useful energy than the total energy input from all sources.
- Uses vague terminology ('energy amplification', 'energy circulation', 'converting potential energy to kinetic energy and back') that obscures the actual energy conversion path and losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a mechanism where a 60° rotation is somehow multiplied to 360° (6*60=360°) to produce one full rotation, implying energy generation or amplification from the rotation itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a rotational system that appears to claim a 60° input produces a 360° output (6x multiplication) through stacking, which violates conservation of energy. Without an external energy source, this constitutes a perpetual motion claim of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication (6*60=360° rotation) without an identifiable external energy input
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy - a system cannot perform net work on itself to amplify its own motion
- No thermodynamic process or energy conversion mechanism is specified to justify the claimed output
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The system claims to generate net energy from the gravitational potential energy of a metal piston sinking in a fluid and its subsequent buoyant rise, powered by compressed air generated from the sinking motion. This creates a closed loop with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It attempts to use a sinking weight to generate power and then use that power to re-lift the weight, creating a perpetual cycle with net energy output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the energy losses from friction, turbulence, and inefficiencies in the turbine, generator, and compressor ensure the system cannot sustain itself, let alone produce excess power.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work extracted from the piston's descent (via turbine/generator) is claimed to generate enough compressed air to fully re-lift the piston, plus have excess energy output. The energy to compress the air must come f
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: The described cycle implies energy creation, as the output (electricity/power) is not accounted for by an equal or greater input. The compressed air system is internal, not an external fuel.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim ignores all losses (turbine inefficiency, generator inefficiency, fluid friction, valve losses, air compression losses). The energy required to re-compress the air into the piston's cavity to create buoyancy is
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient humidity gradient (water vapor in air) and electrical input to unspecified components. The device claims to use humidity to generate electricity, which then powers further humidity extraction in a cyclic 'self-sustaining' manner.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that extracts energy from a humidity gradient to generate electricity, then uses that electricity to power further humidity extraction, aiming for a self-sustaining cycle. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy cannot be created) and the second law (a perpetual humidity gradient cannot be maintained without an external energy input to dry or humidify air).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims a cyclic process where electrical output from humidity gradient is used to power further extraction, implying net energy gain without an external source.
- Violates second law: implies a perpetual gradient can be maintained and used to do work without exhausting the gradient or accounting for entropy increase.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores energy required to condense/collect water from air, maintain humidity differentials, and overcome system losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a 'magnetic field generator' (자기장 발생기) producing a 'rotational magnetic field' (회전 자기장) that supposedly extracts energy from a 'magnetic field environment' (자장 환경). No primary energy input (electrical, chemical, mechanical, or ambient gradient) is explicitly identified or quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a rotational magnetic field and subsequent electrical energy solely from a passive 'magnetic field environment,' with no identifiable consumption of fuel, electrical input, or exploitable energy gradient. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme, violating both the First Law (energy conservation) and Second Law (no net work from equilibrium) of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a 'magnetic field generator' can produce a net energy output without a clear, sufficient primary energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implies creation of useful work (a rotational magnetic field and subsequent electrical generation) from an equilibrium 'magnetic field environment' without a consuming an energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'magnetic field environment' is treated as an infinite energy source rather than a field that requires energy to establish and maintain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims to extract energy from 'gravity and load' interactions, suggesting energy is generated from the system's own internal forces or from ambient environmental gradients without a clear external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-load interaction system that claims to produce usable energy output greater than the input, effectively creating a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It fails to identify a legitimate external energy source, violates conservation of energy by suggesting energy multiplication through internal feedback loops, and ignores the thermodynamic necessity of a net entropy increase.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a system where 'gravity energy' and 'load energy' interact to produce more output energy than input, implying energy multiplication.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Suggests creating a perpetual gradient or extracting net work from an equilibrium or self-contained system without an external energy source or heat sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on internal energy transfers (gravity, load, potential energy) without specifying the primary external energy input required to initiate or sustain the cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a 'magnetic field' (자기장) and 'magnetic force' (자력) being used to generate motion or energy, but no external energy input is specified. The description suggests energy is being extracted or multiplied from the magnetic system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device using magnetic fields to generate motion or energy, implying output greater than any clear input. This is a classic perpetual motion claim of the first kind, as permanent magnets alone cannot provide net work without an external energy source to change the magnetic configuration, violating both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Implies generation of useful work (가동) from a static magnetic system without an identified external energy source.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Suggests a perpetual or self-sustaining mechanism using permanent magnets to perform net work, which is impossible as magnets are conservative force fields.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mention of input energy to overcome magnetic potential barriers or to reset the system, focusing only on claimed output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from 'sinusoidal vibration' (sin곡선 운동) without identifying an external energy input gradient or fuel. The abstract references 'ambient energy' and 'vibration' but provides no thermodynamic gradient to exploit.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy from sinusoidal vibration without specifying a maintained external energy gradient. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by suggesting useful work can be extracted from ambient equilibrium vibrations without an identifiable, consumable energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input gradient specified
- Claims of generating energy from vibration without a maintained non-equilibrium source
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) if claiming to produce net work from an equilibrium system
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics if claiming to extract useful work from a single thermal reservoir or from ambient vibrations at uniform temperature
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is electrical energy to traction engines that pull cylinders. Claims to output electrical energy from generators driven by shafts impacted by those same cylinders.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an overly complex system where motors are used to keep cylinders in motion, and their momentum is then used to try to drive generators. This creates a lossy loop. The claim of generating electricity violates the conservation of energy, as the output cannot exceed the input needed to sustain the motion against friction and other losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: System uses motors to move cylinders, then attempts to extract work from their momentum via impacts to drive generators. This is a closed-loop energy conversion with inevitable losses.
- Violates energy conservation: The electrical output from the generators cannot exceed (and will be significantly less than) the electrical input to the traction motors, after accounting for friction, impact losses, and generator inefficiency.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force concept: Tilting rails does not 'damp out' or avoid centrifugal force; it provides a component of normal force to balance it, which is standard for banked tracks and requires no net energy input or output.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies a constant revolut
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics terms (centr
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex arrangement of components (1°, 2°, '무ê³' likely meaning 'electricity' or 'power', 'ë² ìë§' likely 'magnet') suggesting energy is somehow generated from the configuration itself, with references to magnets and rotation. No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, ambient) is clearly identified as the input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electrical power through a complex interaction of rotating magnets and components, but fails to identify any primary energy input. The description suggests a self-sustaining or energy-amplifying cycle, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input accounting
- Claims of energy generation ('ëìê°ë¤' - 'is produced') without a source
- Describes a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle which violates energy conservation
- Uses magnet-related terminology in a way that suggests extracting net work from a static magnetic field without an energy source
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The 'means to rotate said frame members' is the only explicit energy input. The device claims to generate 'linear impulses' (useful work/output) from the motion of masses being accelerated and retrieved.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an over-unity or reactionless drive claim. It attempts to generate a net linear force (impulse) solely through the internal manipulation of masses within a closed system, which violates conservation of momentum. Any linear impulse on the frame is canceled by opposite impulses during the mass retrieval/acceleration cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done to radially accelerate/retrieve the masses and to overcome associated forces (centrifugal, Coriolis, friction) is not accounted for. This work must come from the rotation motor, increasing its load.
- Violates Newton's Third Law: The 'linear impulse' is a net force on the frame. Internal acceleration of masses creates equal and opposite internal forces; no net external impulse can be generated without an external reaction (e.g., expelling mass or
- Misapplication of gyroscopic precession: Claim 7 suggests using precession to enhance effect, but precession forces are also internal reaction forces and cannot produce net thrust in an isolated system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial 'power source such as solar energy' used to drive the gears and tension the elastic member. The system then claims to generate multiple thrusts from internal momentum transfers and collisions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanism that cannot create net thrust on its host vehicle. All described collisions, rotations, and spring actions are internal forces that sum to zero change in the system's total momentum, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. It is a classic 'reactionless drive' fallacy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum: The system is a closed, internal mechanism. The net momentum change of the vehicle-host system must be zero unless it expels mass or interacts with an external field. All described forces (collisions, centrifugal fo
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims 'at least 4 distinct thrusts' from a single acceleration event imply net work/impulse output greater than the energy input, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes momentum transfers and 'thrusts' but ignores that internal forces cancel out for the system's center of mass. The elastic member and dampeners only redistribute internal energy, not create net propulsion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims multiple th
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system where weights are moved radially outward by an auxiliary force (Hilfskraft) via pistons or motors, and inward by a cam track. The claimed 'motor' implies net work output, but the energy source for the auxiliary force is not specified. It appears to be a closed mechanical system.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'weight force motor' is a classic overbalanced wheel mechanism. It describes a kinematic arrangement to create torque, but provides no physical source for the energy needed to reset the weights. The auxiliary force required to move weights outward consumes at least as much energy as can be recovered, violating energy conservation. It is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is a mechanism, not an energy source. The work required to push the weights outward against centrifugal force (and gravity, implied by the name 'Gewichtskraftmotor') will always be equal to or greater than
- No net energy gain from gravity/weights: In a closed cycle, the net work from conservative forces (gravity) is zero. The cam track and auxiliary force simply convert input work into a different form with inevitable losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent focuses on kinematics but ignores the energy input required for the 'Hilfskraft' (auxiliary force). Any claimed output must be less than this input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim describe
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described as internal combustion engines and 'atom' (likely meaning nuclear) for electricity and gas compression. The primary claimed lifting force is from centrifugal masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve sustained lift greater than the weight of its engines using rotating masses. This is impossible because centrifugal forces are internal and balanced; they cannot provide net lift or propulsion to the vehicle as a whole, violating Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an internal reaction force and cannot provide net lift or propulsion for a system as a whole.
- Claims masses can lift 'more than double the weight of the engines' for very long times, implying a net energy output greater than input.
- Mechanism to avoid 'dead points' (points morts) appears to be an attempt to circumvent the inherent cyclic work variation in piston engines, not a source of extra energy.
- Overall description is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, claiming to generate useful lift/work from a closed system of rotating masses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output (lif
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical input from a motor (the prime mover). The device claims to multiply the mechanical force/torque from this input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed to be a mechanical power multiplier, increasing output power by a factor of 4 for any motor while maintaining input speed. This is a direct violation of the conservation of energy. A passive gear mechanism can only transform torque and speed, not create power; output power must always be less than input power due to friction and other losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to multiply mechanical power (force x velocity) by 4 while keeping input rotational speed constant, which directly violates conservation of energy if input torque is not proportionally reduced.
- Describes a complex gear/rack mechanism but provides no physical principle for creating energy. Power output cannot exceed power input minus losses.
- Confuses force multiplication (like a lever or gear reducer) with power multiplication. A gear train can trade speed for torque, keeping power constant (minus losses), not increase it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'la puissan
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim appears to be that a magnetic system (N and S poles) interacting with a 'control magnet' and a 'movement magnet' can produce a continuous output of 'work' or 'energy multiplication' from the magnetic fields themselves, with no clear external input other than the initial configuration of permanent magnets.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic mechanism claiming to produce continuous output work. This is a classic violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it attempts to extract net work from a system with no external energy input to replenish the finite magnetic potential energy. It is a perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to produce continuous work from static magnetic fields without an external energy source or a diminishing gradient.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first and second kind by extracting net work from an equilibrium (or pseudo-equilibrium) system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes 'input energy' and 'output energy' but the input appears to be only the magnetic potential energy of the permanent magnet configuration, which is finite and cannot yield continuous output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest hydraulic pressure (40 L/min at 350 kgf/cm²) is generated and multiplied through cascading hydraulic components, but no primary energy input (electric motor, engine, etc.) is explicitly identified. Implied energy appears to be generated within the closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a hydraulic system that claims to generate and multiply hydraulic pressure and flow through cascading components without identifying any external energy source. The described torque and flow multiplications violate conservation of energy, as the system appears to be a closed loop claiming net energy output. The technical description obscures the fundamental physics violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input source described
- Claims of torque multiplication (e.g., 52.5 kgf-m to 210 kgf-m) and flow rate multiplication without accounting for input power
- System appears to be a closed hydraulic loop claiming to output more hydraulic power than is input
- Violates conservation of energy - cannot create net hydraulic work from nothing
- Uses obfuscated terminology and component interactions to mask energy source
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from an external source powers both the axle rotation and the internal motors that move the weights along the tracks.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from gravity, a conservative force, by using electrical energy to manipulate weights. Over a full cycle, the work done by gravity is zero, and the electrical energy input will always equal or exceed any mechanical output due to inevitable losses, making it a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to be 'gravity powered' but gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from a weight cycling in a gravitational field over a closed path.
- Implied over-unity: The description suggests the mechanical energy generated by the rotating arms (due to shifting center of gravity) exceeds the electrical input, which violates energy conservation.
- No thermodynamic limit provided; system is presented as a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy).
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a 'magnetic generator' (pm.890) that appears to claim to generate electricity using permanent magnets and a specific arrangement, implying energy output from the magnetic field itself without a clear, sustainable external input to replenish it.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a permanent magnet generator that implies energy multiplication or creation. Since permanent magnet fields are conservative and cannot be depleted to do net work over a cycle, any initial motion would cease due to losses, violating energy conservation. The description lacks a clear, replenishable energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary energy source to sustain the claimed generation.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies extracting net work from a static magnetic field (a conservative force field), which is impossible without an external energy input to change the field or system configuration.
- Uses obfuscating technical language and diagrams (referenced but not shown) to describe a mechanism that, if static, cannot perform net work over a cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract describes using 'ambient energy' to amplify 'main energy', but the mechanism is not specified. It appears to claim that ambient energy can be collected and used to amplify or multiply the output of a primary energy input without accounting for the source of the amplification work.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a method to amplify main energy using ambient energy, resulting in an output greater than the primary input. This directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) unless a quantified external energy source is identified and fully accounted for. The description is vague and uses physics terminology in a way that suggests energy creation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > input without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Violates energy conservation: Implies energy multiplication or creation.
- Vague mechanism: Uses terms like 'amplify' and 'resonance' without a thermodynamically sound physical process.
- No thermodynamic limit specified: No mention of efficiency bounds for the claimed amplification process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (weights falling) and initial motor input. The system implies the motor input can be less than the generator output due to the asymmetric weight mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'overbalanced wheel' concept. While the weights move in and out, creating an asymmetric moment, gravity performs equal positive and negative work on them over a full rotation, yielding no net energy. Any 'promotion' of rotation not accounted for by the motor input would violate energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'rotation promoting' implies net torque/energy gain from the weight mechanism alone.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described mechanism cannot create a continuous net positive work output from a closed cycle of the weights.
- Misapplies gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; the net work done by gravity on the weights over one complete rotation is zero if the path is closed.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert buoyancy and gravitational forces into continuous rotational motion, implying extraction of net work from gravitational potential energy and buoyancy without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous rotational energy by combining buoyancy and gravity. However, it describes a closed mechanical system where any motion would dampen to equilibrium. The unspecified 'control' needed to sustain motion would itself require an external energy input, violating energy conservation if that input is not accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- System attempts to create a continuous motion (Drehbewegung) from buoyancy and gravity alone.
- Describes a process where equilibrium is disturbed to create motion, but admits equilibrium would be re-established without control ("Ohne Steuerung... würde sich nach kurzer Zeit ein Gleichgewicht einstellen"). The control mechanism's energy source
- The 'halving of mass' via a pulley system does not change the net gravitational potential energy of the system. Lifting one mass by lowering another in a closed cycle results in zero net work.
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., a height differential in a fluid, thermal gradient, or imported fuel/electricity) to sustain the claimed continuous energy conversion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex mechanical/electromagnetic system with rotating parts (3-a, 2-a), magnetic components (8), and energy transfers between them, but fails to identify any primary energy input. It appears to claim energy multiplication through cascading interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-sustaining, cascading energy system with magnetic and mechanical components but identifies no external energy source. It implies energy amplification within a closed loop, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The mechanism fits the classic pattern of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes a closed-loop system where components (magnetic rotors 8) supposedly drive each other in a cycle, implying perpetual motion.
- Claims energy multiplication ('energy amplification') without accounting for losses or identifying an external energy reservoir.
- Uses correct-sounding physics terms (magnetic rotor, rotation, energy transfer) in a context that suggests violation of energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The entire descrip
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from an accumulator (battery) powering an electric motor and auxiliary compressor to charge an air reservoir to 2 bar. The device claims to then become self-sustaining, generating mechanical energy from the systematic shifting of the center of mass of weighted arms via gravity and centrifugal force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to produce continuous mechanical work after a brief start-up by cleverly shifting weights, but this internal rearrangement cannot create net energy. All energy for pneumatic control and overcoming friction must come from the initial battery, which will deplete.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to be a closed system producing net mechanical work after start-up, violating conservation of energy.
- Attempts to create perpetual imbalance/unidirectional torque from internal mass redistribution within a rotating frame, which is impossible in a closed system.
- No external energy gradient (e.g., fuel, ambient heat, elevated gravity source) is identified to sustain net work output after start-up.
- Pneumatic system for controlling arms consumes energy; claimed 'self-sustaining' operation lacks an identified energy source to replenish pneumatic losses and overcome friction.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests energy is somehow generated or amplified through interactions between components (magnetic elements, control inputs, and ambient energy), but no primary external energy source is explicitly identified. Implicitly, it may attempt to use ambient thermal or electromagnetic energy without a sufficient gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where control inputs appear to generate more energy than consumed, through cascading interactions of magnetic elements and ambient energy, without identifying a sufficient external energy gradient or respecting thermodynamic limits. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim disguised by complex, vague mechanisms.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear primary energy input accounting
- Describes energy amplification/cascading between components (e.g., 5 control inputs generating more outputs)
- Implies creation of useful work from an equilibrium or poorly defined gradient
- Uses obfuscated terminology (magnetic force vectors, control inputs, cascading) making energy flow impossible to track
- Lacks identification of entropy sink or thermodynamic cycle limits
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe energy generation from ambient conditions (humidity, temperature) and internal interactions between components, but no explicit external energy input is identified. Suggests energy multiplication through component stacking.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly generates electrical energy from ambient humidity and temperature, using internal component interactions that suggest energy multiplication. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by not accounting for all energy inputs and implying net energy extraction from an equilibrium environment. The description is technically vague and uses pseudo-mathematical relationships unsupported by physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting - output energy claims exceed identifiable inputs.
- Implies creation of energy from equilibrium conditions (humidity/temperature of ambient air) without a sufficient gradient to extract net work.
- Uses obfuscated technical language and numerical relationships (e.g., 5=2, 4=2) that lack physical meaning in an energy context.
- Describes cascading/stacking effects that purportedly amplify energy, violating conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a mechanical system where a rotating mass (MOMENT) is used to generate motion, but the text implies the device can generate its own rotational energy ('self-rotating') from this motion, indicating a claim of self-sustaining or over-unity operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system claiming to achieve 'self-rotating' operation, which implies it can generate its own motive energy. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a clear, sustained external energy input to overcome inevitable frictional and other losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'self-rotating' operation, implying energy generation without an identifiable external source.
- Describes using the moment/rotation of one component to drive the system, suggesting a closed energy loop with no net input.
- Lacks specification of an initial energy input or a maintained energy gradient to sustain motion against losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from an outside electric power supply, but the claim describes a system that becomes self-sustaining, with the power generating means 'continuously producing electric power even when the supply of the outside power is stopped' by 'sucking heat from an outside fluid'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system intended to become self-sustaining, generating its own power and propulsion after an initial start. This is a classic violation of energy conservation. The mechanism attempts to extract net work from ambient heat without a sufficient temperature gradient, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims the system can produce continuous electric power after initial start-up, using only ambient heat as input. This implies net energy creation.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a heat engine (turbine extracting work from a fluid stream cooled by a heat exchanger) that appears to operate from a single ambient temperature reservoir ('fluid of the normal temperature'), which is
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'fluid velocity increasing means' and propulsion force generation are described as producing output energy/pressure differences without clear identification of the equal or greater input work required to sustain the
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. The text describes complex interactions between components (magnetic fields, coils, plates, etc.) but fails to identify a primary energy input. Mentions 'control input' but suggests output exceeds this input, implying energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system with magnetic and electrical components but fails to account for all energy inputs, suggesting the output can exceed the control input. This is a classic sign of incomplete energy accounting, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The use of technical jargon without clear quantitative relationships further obscures the fundamental physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source accounting
- Claims output > control input without specifying ambient energy capture
- Uses technical terms (magnetic fields, coils, plates) in a vague, non-quantitative way that obscures energy flow
- Implies energy multiplication or cascading effects without thermodynamic justification
- Describes complex interactions but lacks clear mechanism for overcoming thermodynamic limits
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex arrangement of components (124, 125, 126, 127) that appear to feed energy back into the system, suggesting an attempt to create a self-sustaining or over-unity loop without identifying a primary external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where components feed energy to each other in a loop, claiming massive amplification (up to 300-fold) and unlimited rotation. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim as it lacks a defined external energy source and violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input is described.
- Describes energy circulation and amplification between components (e.g., 124, 125, 126) implying output > total input.
- Claims of achieving 'unlimited rotation' and energy multiplication (e.g., 10-fold, 12-fold, 300-fold) without an external source violate conservation of energy.
- The mechanism is described in obscure, non-technical terms that obfuscate the actual energy conversion process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of energy m
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex, vague descr
Claimed Energy Source
Initial impulse (3) starts the pendulum motion. The system claims to sustain and amplify this motion using opposing 'Schnapprollos' (snap rollers) with elastic bands, converting the oscillation into electricity via dynamos.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a pendulum-based generator that, after an initial push, claims to sustain its own motion and produce net electricity. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it provides no continuous external energy source to compensate for losses, making it a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- System lacks a continuous external energy input to overcome inevitable losses (friction, electrical load, air resistance).
- Describes a self-sustaining oscillatory system that purportedly generates net electrical output from an initial impulse, violating energy conservation.
- Mechanism of opposing rollers with bands suggests an attempt to create a positive feedback loop without an external power source, which is impossible in a closed system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims '4 Energieq
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions components like a 'generator' (자석), 'rotor' (안내홈), and 'magnetic body' (컨넥팅로드), but provides no explicit external energy input. The language suggests a self-sustaining or energy-multiplying system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a system that appears to generate a multiplied output force (4-fold) without a clear, sufficient external energy source, relying on internal magnetic and mechanical feedback. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies energy creation or multiplication from within a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.) is described.
- Claims to produce a 4-fold multiplication of force/power (4ì ë°°ì´í ê²), implying an output greater than input without a source.
- Mechanism described appears to use magnetic components and a rotor in a feedback loop, which cannot create net energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from an electric motor and accumulator (battery) via a hydraulic pump. The claim implies that once started, the system's own motion, through gravity acting on weighted arms and a centrifugal force imbalance, generates sustained rotational energy greater than needed to run its own control hydraulics.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a form of perpetual motion machine. It attempts to create continuous rotation by using a control system to asymmetrically deploy weights, but the energy required to reset the weights (via the hydraulic system) always equals or exceeds the gravitational work extracted. No net energy can be produced from conservative forces in a cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate net mechanical work from a closed cycle of gravity and centrifugal forces within a rotating frame, which are conservative forces.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a system where asymmetrically opening/closing weighted arms on a wheel creates a perpetual torque imbalance, extracting energy solely from gravity without a net change in potential energy of the weights.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The hydraulic control system required to open/close the arms consumes energy. The patent describes turning off the starter motor, implying the system runs autonomously, but provides no accounting for the energy needed to
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text is garbled/encrypted, but references 'output > control input' (1.57 times) and energy multiplication through cascading stages, suggesting an attempt to claim energy gain from an unspecified or ambient source without proper accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is presented in garbled text, a severe red flag for obfuscation. It explicitly references an output 1.57 times the input and a multi-stage cascading process, which are classic markers for perpetual motion or over-unity devices that violate energy conservation by hiding or misrepresenting the true energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is obfuscated/nonsensical, preventing proper analysis
- Mentions an output 1.57 times the input, implying COP > 1 without identifying an external energy source
- Describes a cascading/stacking process (stages 3-32), a common hallmark of over-unity claims meant to obscure the true energy flow
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'generator' (지ë ë) is powered to produce electricity, which is then used in a 'power generation device' (ì¥ì¹) that claims to output more power than was input, suggesting energy is being created or harvested from an unspecified/implied ambient source without proper accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a generator's output is fed back to power itself while allegedly producing excess 'additional output power.' This is a classic over-unity claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it does not identify any external energy source to account for the claimed net gain. The vague and circular description obscures the fundamental physics violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output power exceeding control input power without identifying all energy inputs.
- Implies energy multiplication or over-unity operation (output > input) which violates energy conservation.
- Uses obfuscated technical language (Korean patent text with vague terms like ìë ë°ì - 'additional output power') to describe a process that appears to create net energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text appears to describe a system where outputs (claims 18, 22) are fed back as inputs (claims 1, 2) to drive further outputs, suggesting a self-sustaining or amplifying loop without a clear primary external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system where energy outputs are fed back as inputs to perpetuate or amplify the process, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) unless a clear external energy source is identified. The abstract and claims are obfuscated with technical-sounding but vague Korean terms, preventing proper energy accounting and suggesting a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent violation of energy conservation through feedback/regeneration loops
- No identifiable primary energy input or gradient to drive the claimed processes
- Vague description of energy conversion mechanisms
- Text structure suggests energy multiplication (outputs becoming inputs)
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests ambient atmospheric air is the sole input, with energy for liquefaction and subsequent heating supposedly generated internally via 'Kunstgravitonen' and 'Kunstfotonen' collisions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly named a 'perpetuum mobile' and claims to liquefy ambient air and then re-heat it internally to produce thrust indefinitely. This violates both the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics, as it posits a closed cycle of energy generation without an external source. The use of fabricated particles ('Kunstgravitonen') for heating is a clear pseudoscientific obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims to produce liquid air and then heat it to drive a turbine or jet without an identified external energy source sufficient to overcome the massive work of liquefaction (compression/cool
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual process ('permanent erzeugt') that can run indefinitely without energy input, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Pseudoscientific Mechanisms: Relies on undefined, non-standard concepts like 'Kunstgravitonen' (artificial gravitons) and 'Kunstfotonen' (artificial photons) generating 0.5 MeV energy per collision, which is technobabble with no basis in established
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: Ignores the substantial energy required for the iterative compression and cooling of air to its liquid state, which must come from somewhere.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input: 'small electric motor' (19). Secondary claimed input: 'static thrust of levers' maintained by springs compressed by a mechanical jack (vérin). The springs/jack system is an internal, pre-stored energy source, not an external ambient input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a permanent driving force and electrical energy from a small motor and a 'static thrust' from pre-compressed springs. This is a classic over-unity claim, as the spring energy is finite and the total output cannot exceed the electrical input plus the stored spring energy, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'permanent driving force' and energy multiplication from a small motor input.
- Mechanism describes complex force transmission but provides no path for net energy creation. The static thrust from pre-compressed springs is finite stored energy, not a continuous source.
- System implies output mechanical energy can exceed electrical input + depletion of spring energy, violating conservation.
- No ambient energy gradient (thermal, pressure, etc.) is identified to justify extra energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'substantia
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy stored in hydrochloric acid (HCl). The process involves thermally dissociating HCl into H₂ and Cl₂, then using UV light to trigger recombination back to HCl, claiming this causes a sudden volume expansion to produce thrust.
AI Physics Analysis
The invention claims unlimited flight autonomy by recovering and reusing ejected hydrochloric acid propellant in a closed cycle. This violates the first law (energy conservation) and second law (entropy increase) of thermodynamics, as the energy needed to recover and reprepare the propellant would exceed any net thrust energy produced, making it a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of mass-energy: Claims 'practically unlimited flight autonomy' from a closed-loop recovery and reuse of the propellant fluid, implying a net energy output greater than input without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The described cycle (dissociation → expansion/recombination → condensation/recovery) would incur massive energy losses (heat, radiation, kinetic energy of exhaust). Recovering, condensing, and repressurizing
- Implausible energy gain: The UV light triggering recombination is presented as a catalyst, but the claimed 'enorme et très brusque expansion' suggests energy release exceeding the dissociation energy input, creating a perpetual motion machine.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the massiv
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient temperature gas and an initial energy input to create a pressure/density gradient. The device then claims to use turbines driven by gas expansion to power a heat-generating device, which in turn supplies heat to maintain or increase the gas pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that uses an initial pressure gradient to drive turbines. The turbines then power a heater to re-heat the gas, supposedly to maintain the pressure gradient for continuous operation. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce usable energy output from a closed cycle with only an ambient temperature source, violating both the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): The described feedback loop (turbine work → heater → gas pressure → turbine work) implies a net energy output greater than the initial input, with no identified external energy source to
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: It attempts to extract useful work (via turbines) from an isothermal expansion of gas at ambient temperature, which cannot produce net work in a cycle. The heat added by the 'energy converter' (35) would com
- Incomplete energy accounting: The analysis ignores all dissipative losses (turbine inefficiency, friction, heat losses). The ambient temperature is treated as a source of useful work without a colder reservoir for heat rejection.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'Output >
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a process where a 'generated magnetic field' or 'generated energy' is somehow used to create more of itself, suggesting a self-sustaining or amplifying loop without an identifiable primary external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a mechanism where generated energy or a magnetic field is used to generate more of itself, forming a closed loop with no clear external energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme, directly violating the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is specified
- Describes a process where output energy is fed back to create more output, implying energy creation
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (no process can be 100% efficient or create a perpetual gradient)
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a 'control input' (2) and a 'power source' (7), but the mechanism claims to use a 'control input' to generate a 'permanent magnet' (P) that then drives a motor (M) to produce output power, suggesting energy amplification without a clear primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device where a small control input appears to generate a magnetic configuration that drives a motor to produce output work, with no clear external energy source. This implies energy creation, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The vague, non-quantitative description and use of technical terms like 'permanent magnet' and 'power source' in a circular configuration are hallmarks of a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Output power from motor (M) is implied to be greater than the control input, violating conservation of energy.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (thermal, chemical, ambient) to justify net work output.
- Mechanism describes creating a 'permanent magnet' (P) via a control input, then using it to drive a motor—this suggests a perpetual motion scheme where a magnetic field is used to generate more work than was used to establish it.
- Vague, non-quantitative claims prevent proper thermodynamic analysis.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a process using a 'dielectric material' (D) to create a 'charge polarization' (P) and then uses this to generate a 'temperature difference' (T) and 'electric power' in a loop, suggesting energy extraction from the environment without a clear, identified thermodynamic gradient as the primary input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a cyclic process that allegedly generates electrical power and a temperature difference, starting only with a dielectric material. It fails to account for the initial energy required to establish the polarization and violates the second law of thermodynamics by implying net work can be extracted from an isothermal environment or a single thermal reservoir in a closed cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to generate electric power from a process initiated by a dielectric material, but does not identify the initial energy source to create the polarization or maintain the cycle.
- Violates Second Law: Implies a cyclic process that generates a temperature difference and electric power without a corresponding identified heat source/sink gradient or work input, suggesting a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses correct physics terms (dielectric, polarization, temperature difference) in a vague, non-quantitative description that suggests energy multiplication.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
A single external motor provides the input work via a propelling rocker (balancier propulseur) that pressurizes a hydraulic system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex hydraulic and lever system that claims to multiply the input force to produce a greater output energy. This is a direct violation of the conservation of energy, as it describes a passive force transformer, not an independent energy source. Any real force multiplication would result in a proportional decrease in displacement or speed, leaving output work equal to or less than input work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims force multiplication leading to greater output energy than input energy based on area ratios of pistons.
- Asserts the device has no motive force of its own but multiplies the force of the driving motor, implying an energy gain.
- Mechanism described is a complex force transformer; any increase in output force must come with a proportional decrease in displacement to conserve energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical/h
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes 'autogenic energy' and 'energy circulation loops' that supposedly generate and amplify energy internally through 'splitting and fusion of accumulated circulating flow energy' and 'impulses' from a 'neutral space', with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to initiate and promote its own 'autogenic energy' through internal circulation and amplification loops without identifying any external energy source, directly violating the First Law of Thermodynamics. The described processes of energy 'splitting and fusion' and internal impulse generation lack a thermodynamic gradient or entropy sink, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'autogenic energy' initiation and promotion with no external source
- Describes energy accumulation and amplification within closed circulation loops
- Refers to 'three-dimensional energy conversion' during 'splitting and fusion' of flow energy without a thermodynamic gradient
- Suggests internal impulses drive the system ('inner drive')
- Uses terms like 'energy circulation loops' implying perpetual recirculation without loss
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Vague reference to 'appropriate energy input' from 'suitable engines' attached to the system. No clear primary energy source is identified or quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create propulsion by internally accelerating and colliding a liquid mass. This violates conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate net thrust. The described energy recovery from 'nuisance' kinetic energy does not resolve this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'gravity override' and propulsion via internal mass acceleration without external reaction mass, violating Newton's third law.
- Describes converting internal kinetic energy of ejected liquid streams into heat via collisions, which cannot produce net thrust.
- Energy accounting is absent; no mechanism to explain how internal recirculation and dissipation of momentum creates net unidirectional force on the craft.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
No external energy source identified. Claims energy is generated from the machine's own motion via 'advantageous lever principle'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a classic perpetual motion machine, claiming a device that, once started, powers itself and produces excess energy using only internal mechanical advantage. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as no mechanism can output more useful energy than it consumes without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming net energy output from a closed system with no external input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Mechanical advantage (lever principle) cannot create energy; it only trades force for distance, with losses.
- Claims 'self-feeding' and providing excess energy without an energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests energy arises from the 'interaction between the Earth's gravitational field and the increasing moment of inertia of a moving mass.' This implies the gravitational field is the purported source of excess energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim contains a fundamental mathematical and physical error, confusing momentum with energy to falsely argue that the work needed to accelerate a mass is less than the kinetic energy it gains. This leads to the impossible conclusion of a perpetual energy surplus, directly violating the conservation of energy. No valid external energy source is identified.
Specific Physics Issues
- Fundamental confusion between momentum (p=mv) and energy (E=½mv²). The claim that 'p = mv ≈ E' is false.
- Misapplication of work-energy theorem. The claim that energy input scales with the square root of the acceleration distance is physically baseless.
- Ignores that the work required to accelerate a mass to a given velocity is exactly equal to its final kinetic energy (neglecting losses). No mechanism is provided for extracting more work than was input during acceleration.
- Asserts a net 'energy surplus' is inevitable with increasing speed, which directly violates conservation of energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'linear ene
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex mechanical/electrical interactions (rotors, stators, magnetic fields) but fails to identify any primary energy input. Mentions of 'infinite rotation' and 'self-powered' suggest it claims to extract net work without an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex assembly of rotors, stators, and magnetic fields claiming to achieve 'infinite rotation' and self-powering operation. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks any identifiable external energy source and implies perpetual motion. The use of technical terms obscures the fundamental violation of extracting net work from a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.)
- Claims of 'infinite rotation' and 'self-powering' imply perpetual motion
- Describes energy multiplication/cascading effects without accounting for conservation
- Uses technical terms (rotors, stators, magnetic fields) in a context suggesting over-unity operation
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind energy (for wind generators) and gravitational potential energy (for the transport wheel system). However, the device proposes to use its own generated electricity to pump water or lift ferromagnetic bodies to a height, then extract energy from their descent, creating a circular energy loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device combines legitimate wind turbines with a gravity wheel that is fed by mass lifted using the system's own generated electricity. This creates a closed loop where the output from the descending mass cannot exceed the input used to lift it, making the claimed 'lever force energy gain' a violation of energy conservation. The wind energy is legitimate, but the gravity wheel mechanism is a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a circular energy system: electricity generated is used to lift mass (water/ferromagnetic bodies) to create gravitational potential energy, which is then converted back to mechanical/electrical energy via the descending wheel. This is a net-
- Violates conservation of energy: The system cannot output more energy from the descending mass than was input to lift it, minus losses. Claiming to 'gain lever force energy' from this cycle implies energy multiplication.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats the gravitational potential energy of the lifted mass as a free input, ignoring the electrical energy required to create that potential.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of spherical masses rolling down inclined paths on a balance arm (seesaw). The system is cyclic, implying the masses must be returned to their starting height.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor that uses rolling balls on a seesaw. It violates the First Law of Thermodynamics because it fails to account for the energy required to reset the system (lift the balls back up). The complex linkage system cannot generate net work from the balls' cyclic motion alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No described mechanism to return the spherical masses to their initial height without inputting at least as much work as was gained from their descent.
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce electricity from a closed-cycle gravitational system without an external, sustained energy gradient.
- Implies perpetual motion: The abstract claims electricity production 'without any pollution' at extremely low cost, suggesting net energy output from an isolated apparatus.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a closed mechanical loop where cylinders are propelled by 'traction machines' on inclined circular tracks, with their motion then supposedly converted to rotary shaft output. No primary external energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is specified to power the traction machines or initially accelerate the cylinders.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed mechanical system that attempts to generate net energy from the momentum of its own moving parts. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because the energy required to maintain the cylinders' motion—via unspecified 'traction machines' and against inevitable losses—must equal or exceed any energy extracted. It is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- System lacks a defined net external energy input. The 'traction machines' that pull the cylinders would require significant energy input, likely exceeding any recoverable energy from the cylinders' momentum.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Attempts to use the cylinders' own 'impetus and angular momentum'—initially imparted by the traction machines—to generate net useful work via pistons/axes, violating conservation of energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes energy extraction from rolling cylinders but ignores the larger energy cost to maintain their motion against friction, air resistance, and to operate the traction machines.
- No thermodynamic gradient or fuel source identified to justify net energy production.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to involve extracting energy from a 'vortex' or 'spiral' structure in water, possibly from ambient thermal or chemical gradients, but no explicit, quantified input is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly generates energy from a water vortex structure, implying an output greater than its control input. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics unless all energy inputs (including ambient thermal, chemical, or potential energy from the water's initial state) are fully accounted for. The description is vague and uses physics-like terms without a coherent, quantifiable energy conversion mechanism that respects thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'output > control input' without specifying all energy inputs.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient to drive energy conversion.
- Vague mechanism: Describes a vortex/spiral structure generating energy without explaining the source of that energy or the work input to sustain the non-equilibrium state.
- Violates energy conservation if net energy output is claimed without an equal or greater input from *some* source (ambient, chemical, thermal).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a system where a 'vibrating plate' (진동판) and 'vibrating element' (진동요소) interact, possibly to generate electricity. No explicit external energy input is described, implying the system might claim to extract energy from ambient vibrations or its own internal motion without a sustained gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a system where vibration elements and a generator interact in a cyclical manner, implying the production of useful energy ('에너지 생산') without a clear, sustained external energy input. This constitutes a violation of energy conservation, as it suggests a closed system performing work indefinitely, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source or input is specified.
- Describes a closed loop of vibration and generation that suggests perpetual motion.
- Implies energy multiplication or creation ('에너지 생산' - energy production) without accounting for losses.
- Uses technical terms (vibrating plate, element, generator) in a context that suggests a self-sustaining cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial external electrical input to halogen lamps, then claimed to be sustained by a portion of the turbine's electrical output in a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed to become a perpetual motion machine after startup, using part of its electrical output to power its own heaters. This violates energy conservation, as losses ensure the feedback loop cannot sustain itself, and the second law, as it proposes a closed-cycle heat engine with no net external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): System claims to produce net commercial electricity while using only a portion of its own output to sustain its heat source, implying energy creation.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Described as 'mouvement perpétuel'. The system is a heat engine with a single ambient-temperature heat sink (condenser/collector). It lacks a sustained temperature gradient to perform net work once external inpu
- Incomplete energy accounting: The analysis ignores all losses (turbine inefficiency, generator losses, friction, heat losses from reservoirs). The electrical energy fed back to the lamps is necessarily less than the turbine's gross output, leaving in
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Initial rotation from a starter motor, then claimed to be sustained/supplemented by the mechanical system's own operation (electromagnet activation, spring releases, weight movements).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims the device, once started, produces more energy than it consumes, which is a direct violation of energy conservation. The described mechanism uses internal components (springs, electromagnets, weights) that cannot create net energy; they only convert or temporarily store it, with inevitable losses to friction and heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 5 explicitly states the system produces energy greater than the energy consumed (output > input).
- No identification of an external, replenishable energy source to account for the claimed net energy gain.
- System appears to be a complex mechanical oscillator/ratchet; all internal forces (springs, magnets, electromagnets, gravity) are conservative or require energy input, leading to net loss.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming perpetual net work output without an adequate external source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex arrangements of components (capacitors, coils, magnetic fields) with claims of energy transfer and amplification between them, but no primary energy input is identified. The language suggests energy is somehow created or multiplied within the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex arrangement of capacitors and coils claiming to transfer and amplify energy between them. Without any identifiable external energy source, this system constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the law of conservation of energy. The technical description obfuscates the fundamental physics violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Claims of energy transfer and amplification between components (capacitors 13 & 14, coils) without an external source violate conservation of energy.
- Describes a closed-loop or feedback system that allegedly produces more output than input, indicative of a perpetual motion scheme.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'output > control
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describes a sys
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct-sounding terms (capa
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described. Mentions a 'force onéreuse' (costly force) driving a flywheel, and atmospheric pressure acting on pistons. Implies recovery of waste heat from friction and compression.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous, economical work by intermittently applying atmospheric pressure and recovering all waste heat. This violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it implies a cycle that perfectly recovers dissipated energy (friction heat, compression heat) to perform useful work without a net external energy input from a true gradient, effectively describing an over-unity system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the 'costly force' input
- Implies continuous productive work from intermittent atmospheric pressure application without a sustained thermodynamic gradient
- Vague mechanism for 'recovering' heat to improve efficiency suggests bypassing the Second Law
- Claims to be a heater or compressor that is 'very economical' by recovering its own losses, approaching a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes using magnetic fields from a permanent magnet to generate electricity, implying energy output without a clear, sufficient external energy input to account for it.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes generating electricity using the magnetic field of a permanent magnet, which is a classic perpetual motion violation. A static magnetic field stores energy but cannot deliver net work without an external input to change the system's magnetic configuration or provide motion, as the magnetic force is conservative. The claim lacks any identified external energy source to account for the generated electricity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: describes generating electricity from a permanent magnet's field without depleting it or providing an equivalent energy input.
- Misunderstands magnetic fields: a static permanent magnet in equilibrium cannot perform net work on its own; work requires changing flux or motion against a force, which itself requires energy input.
- No thermodynamic gradient or identified external energy source to drive the claimed generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device uses electric motors to drive rollers on a curved control disc, which then rotates a shaft connected to a generator. The only explicit input is electrical power to the motors. Gravity and the asymmetric disc shape are implied as energy sources, but no external gradient (like a height change or fuel) is described to sustain the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It uses electric motors to move weights along an asymmetric path, hoping gravity will produce a net torque on the central shaft to drive a generator. This creates a closed loop where the electrical output cannot exceed the electrical input to the motors, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Electrical input to motors is used to allegedly generate greater electrical output via the generator, violating energy conservation.
- No net energy source identified: The asymmetric disc and gravity are part of a closed mechanical cycle; they cannot provide net energy output without an external input.
- Implied over-unity operation: The system appears designed to use a small motor input to control weights, hoping to extract more work from gravity than is input, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'converting
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes extracting energy from a 'control input' and ambient humidity to produce electricity, but the mechanism and complete energy accounting are not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes generating electricity from ambient humidity using a control input, but fails to account for all energy inputs and outputs in a way that respects thermodynamic limits. The vague, non-quantitative description and implication of output exceeding a partial input strongly suggests a violation of energy conservation or the second law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'output > control input' without quantifying all energy inputs (e.g., energy from the humidity gradient).
- Implies energy multiplication or creation: Suggests generating electricity from ambient conditions in a way that could violate the second law if not a properly bounded heat engine or mass transfer device.
- Obfuscated description: The text is vague and uses technical terms (control input, humidity, electricity generation) without a clear, quantifiable physical process or cycle.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a device with a 'rotating body' (내륜) and 'fixed body' (외륜) that somehow generates electricity from their relative motion, but no external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified. The only implied input is the initial rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity from the relative motion of two bodies without identifying any external energy source to sustain that motion against inevitable losses. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating energy conservation. The abstract description obscures this fundamental flaw with vague technical terminology.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate electrical output from a rotating body without identifying a compensating energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a system can perpetually generate useful work (electricity) from an initial rotation without an external energy source to sustain it against losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes output generation but ignores all input energy and loss mechanisms (friction, electrical resistance, etc.).
- Obfuscated description: Uses technical-sounding terms (ì주 ì¬ì´, íë ë ì¼, êµ´ë¦ì) without clear physical definitions or quantitative performance claims.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests energy is somehow extracted or amplified from the phase relationships between multiple 'magnetic bodies' (자계체) and 'magnetic flux bodies' (자속체) without a clear external input. Mentions of 180° and 90° phase shifts imply manipulation of magnetic fields, but no primary energy source (electrical, mechanical, chemical, or ambient) is explicitly identified or accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex arrangement of magnetic components with phase shifts but fails to identify any primary energy input. The system appears to claim that energy can be circulated and amplified between components indefinitely, which violates energy conservation. The use of magnetic phase terminology without a clear thermodynamic cycle or energy source indicates a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input source described.
- Claims of energy transfer and amplification between components without explaining the origin of the net energy gain.
- Uses terminology (phase shifts, magnetic bodies) in a way that obfuscates the fundamental energy conversion process.
- Implies a closed-loop energy multiplication system where output from one component feeds others, violating conservation if net gain is claimed.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from the grid via one or two electric motors. The claim implies that additional energy is generated by the action of gravity and centrifugal force on the weighted flywheels, leading to an 'energy gain' and increased rotational speed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. The initial energy comes from the grid, but the patent asserts that gravity and centrifugal force on the flywheels create an 'energy gain,' increasing rotational speed. Since these are internal, conservative forces within the system, they cannot perform net work over a cycle to add energy, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'energy gain' (energiewinst) from gravity/centrifugal force in a closed mechanical system.
- Implies a net increase in rotational speed and thus kinetic energy without an additional external energy input.
- Gravity and centrifugal forces in a rotating frame are conservative/internal forces; they cannot add net energy to the system.
- The system's total energy (electrical input + initial kinetic energy) can only decrease due to friction and other losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a closed-loop system where electrical input to electromagnets (1)(1') is claimed to generate motion in a rotor (2)(2'), which then supposedly generates more electrical energy through various couplings (3, 4, 4', 5, 6, 7, 8, 8', 9, 13, 13', 14, 15, 15', 16) to feed back into the system and produce excess output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex electromagnetic-mechanical system that appears to be a closed loop with feedback. It claims to produce a '무한대' (permanent or continuous) output, which violates energy conservation as no primary external energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, sunlight) is clearly identified and accounted for. The architecture suggests an over-unity or perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication in a closed loop without an identified external energy source.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Describes a complex cascade of components that appears to be an attempt to obscure the lack of a net energy input.
- No thermodynamic gradient or fuel source is identified to justify net work output.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > control i
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies extract
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses numerous components and coup
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical linkage (genouillère/knee-joint principle) that uses a small 'motor force' to produce a progressive power that can 'multiply itself practically to infinity' by cascading devices.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed to multiply a small input force 'practically to infinity' by cascading mechanical linkages, which is a classic violation of the conservation of energy. No external energy source is identified to account for the claimed multiplicative gain, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims power multiplication 'practically to infinity' which violates energy conservation.
- Describes a cascading system where one device's 'energy gain' drives the next, implying perpetual positive feedback without an external energy source.
- Mechanical linkages can only transform force/distance (trade-off via leverage), not create energy. The description suggests net energy output > input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes complex electrical interactions between multiple 'energy modules' (에너지 모듈) and 'energy amplifiers' (에너지 증폭기) suggesting energy multiplication or regeneration without identifying a primary external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of interconnected energy modules and amplifiers that feed energy to each other in a way that suggests amplification or multiplication of energy without a clear, sufficient primary source. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a net energy output greater than the net energy input, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input is specified (e.g., electrical grid, fuel, ambient heat gradient).
- Describes processes where energy output from one module appears to feed back to create a larger output in another, implying energy creation.
- Uses correct-sounding physics terms (positive/negative energy, amplification, modules) in a context that suggests a perpetual cycle or over-unity COP.
- Lacks quantitative efficiency limits or comparison to thermodynamic maxima (Carnot, etc.).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes using 'magnetic force' and 'gravitational force' to generate electricity, suggesting it attempts to extract work from ambient magnetic/gravitational fields without an identifiable external energy gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to use magnetic and gravitational forces to generate electricity in a cascading manner, implying output greater than input without identifying an external energy source to account for the generated work. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input accounting
- Implies energy extraction from equilibrium gravitational/magnetic fields without a consumable gradient
- Describes a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle ('stacking/cascading') which violates energy conservation
- Vague mechanism lacking entropy sink or loss description
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a cyclical process where energy appears to be transferred between components (e.g., from 'output 3' to 'output 1' and back) and mentions 'ambient temperature' and 'vibration', but no primary external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is explicitly identified to account for the claimed useful output.
AI Physics Analysis
The described mechanism lacks a clear, external energy source and instead focuses on cyclical energy transfers between internal components, implying energy creation or amplification. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The vague, repetitive, and self-referential description prevents proper physics analysis but is characteristic of over-unity claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net energy input source described.
- Process describes energy circulation and amplification between components without a clear external driver, suggesting a perpetual motion scheme.
- Claims of energy multiplication ('output 2' to 'output 3', 'output 3' to 'output 5') without an energy source violate conservation of energy.
- Text is technically obfuscated with repetitive, unclear references to outputs and transfers, making proper energy accounting impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a 'control input' and 'ambient conditions' (temperature, humidity, wind) but suggests the device generates more energy than its control input, implying energy is extracted from the ambient environment without a usable gradient or explicit conversion process.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that purportedly generates more energy than its control input by interacting with ambient conditions. This violates energy conservation because it claims to extract net useful work from an ambient environment without a sufficient thermodynamic gradient or identifiable external energy source, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output > control input without specifying the complete source of the excess energy.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation): Implies net energy creation from ambient equilibrium conditions.
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient: Extracting useful work from ambient air at equilibrium (no temperature, pressure, or chemical gradient specified) is thermodynamically impossible.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses technical terms ('ambient condition input device', 'control device', 'amplification device') without a clear, physically valid energy conversion process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The described work cycle is powered by the fluid pump (means for introducing/removing fluid) and gravity/buoyancy acting on the floats and weighted balls. No external energy input beyond the pump is specified, implying the system's own motions are intended to produce net excess work.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a closed cycle where the pumping of fluid and the shifting of weights are intended to generate continuous power. However, the energy required to pump the fluid (overcoming friction, lifting water, etc.) will always be greater than or equal to any work extracted from the lever and weight motions, resulting in zero or negative net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the pump work required to move the fluid between cylinders.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The described cycle suggests the transfer of weights creates an imbalance to assist or perpetuate motion, aiming for net work output from a closed cycle.
- Violates conservation of energy: The apparatus is described as a power generator, but the only explicit energy input (the pump) is not accounted for in the output.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electric drive motor (ME). The claimed amplification comes from converting the static weight of hanging masses (masselottes) into dynamic rotational force via their pendular motion as the cross rotates.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It uses a drive motor to spin a cross with hanging weights, claiming the pendulum-like motion of the weights generates excess energy to run a generator. However, the gravitational force is conservative and internal; in a complete cycle, the weights return to their starting position, yielding zero net work from gravity. Any generator output beyond losses would require more energy from the motor, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate more electrical output (via generator G) than the input to the drive motor, using only gravity and inertial forces in a closed mechanical loop.
- No net energy from static weight: In a steady rotational state, the gravitational force on the masses is conservative; no net work can be extracted per cycle from their weight alone.
- Missing entropy sink/energy gradient: The system operates in a thermal equilibrium environment with no external gradient (e.g., temperature, height, pressure) to exploit.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Implicitly treats the gravitational potential energy of the fixed-weight masses as a perpetual source of usable work, ignoring that this force is internal and cyclical.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'amplificat
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex interactions between magnetic arrays, rotors, and stators, but no explicit external energy input is identified. It appears to claim energy generation from magnetic interactions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy generation system with no clear external energy input, implying that magnetic interactions alone can produce net energy output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as permanent magnets are conservative systems that cannot perform net work without an external energy source to change their configuration or overcome magnetic hysteresis losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, mechanical, thermal, etc.)
- Claims of energy multiplication through magnetic interactions violate conservation of energy
- Describes a self-sustaining or amplifying magnetic system without an energy source
- Uses obfuscated technical language (Korean) making energy accounting impossible
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a feedback loop where a 'generating unit' (작동기구) powers a 'driving unit' (신축기구), which in turn powers the generating unit again, with mentions of a 'rotor' and 'output shaft'. No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient) is explicitly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The described mechanism suggests a closed-loop energy feedback system with no identifiable primary energy source, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The use of vague, technical-sounding language obscures the fundamental impossibility of extracting net work without an energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Appears to describe a self-powered loop with no net external energy input, violating energy conservation.
- Lacks identification of an ambient energy source to account for claimed output.
- Uses vague, obfuscated technical language that prevents proper thermodynamic analysis.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes a system
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The description is in Kor
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to be autonomous via 'permanent recovery of its own energy' using gravity acting on two identical sets of weights (4A and 4B). The only explicit input is gravitational potential energy from lowering one set of weights.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity gravity wheel. It claims that by using one falling weight to lift a second identical weight via a pulley system, it can perpetually recover its own energy. This is impossible because the work needed to reset the second weight to the top equals the work extracted from the first weight's fall, minus inevitable losses, leading to net energy dissipation, not generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a closed cycle where the falling weight (4A) does work to lift the other weight (4B) back to the top via a demultiplication system, with no external energy input to reset the system to its initial state.
- Violates the work-energy principle: The work required to lift weight 4B back to the initial height of weight 4A equals or exceeds the work extracted from weight 4A's fall, especially when accounting for friction and system losses. The demultiplicatio
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a mechanical cycle but ignores energy dissipated as heat via friction in chains, pulleys, and ejectors. No mechanism to add energy to overcome these losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'apparent C
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a wheel with deformable compartments connected to a liquid transfer chamber. The described mechanism suggests liquid is transferred from a closing compartment to an opening one via a shared chamber, implying the system is intended to be self-driving from internal fluid redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a hydraulic wheel that uses interconnected compartments to transfer liquid, aiming to create a continuous weight imbalance to drive rotation. As a closed system with no external energy input, it violates energy conservation. The work needed to close compartments and overcome friction would dissipate any energy gained from the falling fluid, preventing sustained motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit external energy input is described or required for operation.
- The mechanism describes fluid transfer creating an imbalance, but work against gravity/friction to reset compartments is not accounted for.
- The system appears to be a closed hydraulic loop, implying it attempts to extract net work from a cycle with no net external energy input.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies perpetual motion of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'entraineme
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'magnetic induction generator' that supposedly generates electricity from a 'magnetic induction field' alone, implying energy extraction from a static magnetic field or perpetual motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electrical power solely from a magnetic induction field, which is thermodynamically impossible as it would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. Extracting net work from a static magnetic field without an external energy input or a consumed gradient violates the law of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: No clear primary energy input is identified.
- Violates thermodynamic limits: Implies generation of electrical energy without an equivalent input of work or energy from a depletable source.
- Incomplete system description: No mechanism for maintaining the magnetic field against back-EMF/Lenz's Law losses is provided.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear - appears to claim energy generation from zero-point or vacuum fluctuations without identifiable external energy input
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to generate 3-5 times more energy than input through obscure 'negative-positive charge pair' manipulations and '0→0.2→0' transitions, which violates energy conservation as no legitimate external energy source is identified, and uses technically vague language characteristic of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy output (3-5 times input) without identifiable energy source
- Implies energy extraction from vacuum/zero-point without thermodynamic gradient
- Uses obscure terminology ('negative-positive charge pairs', '0→0.2→0 transitions') without clear physical mechanism
- No identifiable entropy sink or thermodynamic cycle
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to generate electricity (0.5-89V) from magnetic interactions between a 'control magnet' (5) and a 'generating magnet' (5-1), implying energy extraction from permanent magnet configurations without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly generates electrical voltage (0.5-89V) solely from the strategic arrangement of permanent magnets. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it claims to produce useful energy output without any identifiable energy input or consumption, effectively proposing a magnetic perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: proposes to generate electrical output from static magnetic fields without consuming an equivalent energy input.
- Misunderstands magnetic forces: permanent magnets in static configurations cannot do net work over a cycle; the energy to overcome repulsion/attraction equals or exceeds any recoverable energy.
- No thermodynamic gradient: the system describes static magnetic arrangements, not a non-equilibrium process (like a heat engine or generator with moving parts driven by external force).
- Obfuscated mechanism: description mixes magnetic pole alignment (N/S) with vague voltage generation claims without a clear, physically coherent working principle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims voltage/ene
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (magne
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a process where an initial input generates a 'force' that is then amplified and fed back, suggesting energy is created or multiplied within the system without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes an energy amplification and feedback loop without specifying an external energy source, violating energy conservation. The abstract and text are nonsensical or garbled, which is a hallmark of obfuscation, making a proper physics-based evaluation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Describes amplification and feedback of a 'force' or energy, implying energy creation.
- Complete lack of quantitative data prevents checking against thermodynamic limits.
- Text is partially garbled/obfuscated, making technical analysis impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a process where a 'control input' generates a 'primary wave' that is amplified and fed back, producing a 'gain output.' No primary external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is identified, suggesting an attempt to create energy from the system's own internal feedback.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a control input generates a wave that is amplified and fed back to produce a larger output, with no clear external energy source. This violates energy conservation, as it claims a net energy gain without accounting for the required input energy, fitting the pattern of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is specified, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- The described mechanism of amplification and feedback to produce a net gain output suggests a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind (creating energy from nothing).
- The abstract and claims are technically obfuscated, making a proper energy accounting impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system where a 'primary unit' (자석) receives a 'control input' (방향) and generates a larger 'output' (두 자석) that is fed back to power the primary unit and also produce useful work (영구기관). This suggests an attempt at a self-sustaining or energy-amplifying loop with no clear external, ambient, or stored energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a feedback loop where a unit's output is used to power itself and generate excess useful work, with no identifiable external energy source. This constitutes a clear violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims to produce net work from a system with no net energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent violation of energy conservation: The description implies the output of one stage is used to power its own input and produce excess work, forming a closed loop with net energy output.
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or external energy source is described to drive the useful work output.
- The language suggests energy multiplication or feedback that would circumvent the First Law of Thermodynamics.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'magnetic force generator' that supposedly produces energy from magnetic force rotation, with no identifiable external energy input beyond the initial configuration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy from magnetic rotation without an external energy source, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). Permanent magnets are not an energy source but store fixed potential energy; extracting continuous work from them without replenishment is impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source specified
- Implies generation of net energy from a static magnetic configuration (permanent magnets)
- Violates energy conservation - output work cannot exceed input energy
- Missing entropy sink/thermal loss mechanism for a claimed cyclic process
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Primary input appears to be a pneumatic cylinder (verin pneumatique) supplied by a compressed air reserve, which is itself charged by a rotary pump driven by the device's own output. This suggests a feedback loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device description creates a closed-loop pneumatic system where the mechanism's output is used to power a pump that recharges the compressed air supply driving it. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce autonomous motion and multiply power without an external, net energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction and heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the compressed air system
- Claim of 'autonomous movement' and 'power multiplication' implies net energy output greater than input
- Feedback loop (pump charges air reserve that powers the actuator) is classic perpetual motion architecture
- No identification of an external, net energy input to sustain the system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate propulsion force ('centrifugal force') from the vibration of a rotating container's wall, using an electric motor as the only explicit input. Implies extraction of net useful work (propulsion) from an internal vibration without an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net linear propulsion from internal vibrations within a rotating container powered only by an electric motor. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, violating Newton's laws by attempting to create momentum from internal forces alone, making it physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal forces in a closed system cannot produce net propulsion.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: Claims to generate linear thrust from internal rotational/vibrational motion without expelling mass.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Motor input energy is used to create rotation/vibration, but the claimed 'propulsion force' represents additional useful work output with no identified external energy source.
- Misuse of 'centrifugal force': A fictitious internal force in a rotating frame cannot produce net external thrust.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of balls, with electrical input for speed adjustment via electromagnets. Implicitly claims to extract net energy from gravitational interactions in a closed-loop rotating system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed-loop system where balls circulate under gravity, claiming continuous rotation and net electricity generation. This constitutes a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine, violating energy conservation as it claims to output more energy than is input, with no external gradient to drive net work extraction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims continuous rotation and power generation from gravitational interactions of balls in a closed system without an external gradient
- No identifiable net external energy input to overcome friction and losses
- Implies energy multiplication: electrical input for speed adjustment yields greater electrical output
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot output more useful energy than the total energy input into it
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanical system where a 'static force' interacts with a 'resistance-pivot' through an 'interposing structure' that is destabilized and transformed. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient) is identified. The only implied source is the initial 'static force,' which cannot provide continuous work output if it remains static.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that claims to produce work from a 'static force' via the destabilization of an interposing structure. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by not identifying any external energy source to sustain the claimed work output, and the second law by implying a cyclic process without losses. The description is obfuscated with non-standard terminology, masking a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes obtaining work from a 'static force' without an identifiable energy source or gradient.
- Violates thermodynamic limits: Implies a mechanism where a structure's transformation yields work without an external energy supply, akin to perpetual motion.
- Obscure mechanism: Uses vague, non-standard terminology ('organic cohesion,' 'functional disappearance,' 'dynamic spiral effect') that obscures the actual energy flow.
- No entropy sink: Describes cyclic transformation of an interposing structure without accounting for dissipative losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of work and
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (cr
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate 'positional energy' (位置エネルギー) from capillary action (毛管現象) by moving liquid from a lower reservoir to an upper reservoir via capillary materials, with no identified external energy input to sustain the flow or perform net work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy by using capillary action to move liquid from a lower to an upper position, creating 'positional energy.' This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as capillary action can lift liquid against gravity but cannot do so cyclically to produce net work without an external energy source to reset the system (e.g., evaporate the liquid). The system would reach equilibrium, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to create energy from a passive capillary flow system.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a spontaneous, continuous upward flow of liquid creating usable energy without an external driving potential or gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the energy source that overcomes gravity and viscous losses to move liquid upward and generate net energy output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate rotation from gravity alone using unbalanced weights that shift position periodically, with optional electromagnetic adjustment. No external energy input is specified beyond initial gravitational potential energy of the weights.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotational force from shifting weights, but provides no external energy source to reset the weight positions after each cycle. The net work output over a full cycle would be zero or negative due to friction and the energy required to lift the weights back to their starting positions.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation (output work) from a closed gravitational system with no external energy input to reset the weights.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting net work from a system in gravitational equilibrium.
- Mechanically impossible: Describes weights shifting to create imbalance and cause rotation, but provides no mechanism for how the weights are reset to their initial 'unbalanced' positions without expending more energy than gained from the rotation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output rotation >
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text describes mechanisms (rotating stars, fixed stars, rollers, sprockets, centrifugal force methods) but provides no identifiable primary energy input. Mentions 'power devices' and 'reaction force absorption' without stating what powers the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text describes mechanical devices for absorbing reaction forces and generating rotation, but fails to identify any external energy source. This suggests an attempt to extract net work from internal forces alone, violating energy conservation. The garbled text and lack of quantitative claims further indicate a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Claims to generate 'positive rotational force' from absorbing reaction forces, implying energy extraction from internal forces without an external gradient
- Uses vague mechanical arrangements (rollers, sprockets, fixed/rotating stars) with no thermodynamic or energy conversion principle stated
- Text is partially garbled/obfuscated, preventing clear technical analysis
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of steel balls, with an external energy input required to operate the conveyor that lifts them back to the top.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to generate continuous rotation from steel balls falling in a loop. However, the energy required to lift the balls back to the top via the conveyor always equals or exceeds the work extracted from their fall, making it a net energy consumer, not a producer. It violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The conveyor lifting the balls back to the top requires more work than can be extracted from their fall, due to inevitable losses.
- Violates energy conservation: The system claims to produce net rotational work from a closed cycle of falling and lifting masses, which is impossible without an external net energy input.
- The apparatus is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent ignores
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'magnetic energy generator' (영구기관 제) that purportedly generates energy from a 'magnetic field' (최초출원) without specifying an external energy input to sustain or change that field.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a magnetic energy generator, which typically implies an attempt to extract useful work from a permanent magnet's static field without an external energy source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as a magnet alone is not an energy source but a means of storing energy that was input during its magnetization.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is described to account for the claimed energy output.
- A static magnetic field is a conservative force field; extracting net work from it without altering the field or using an external gradient violates energy conservation.
- The description is too vague for proper energy accounting, but the core premise of a magnetic generator creating energy from a permanent magnet alone is fundamentally flawed.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests the system is 'without consumption of the causal force' and that the force is 'conserved' while being 'circularly destabilized'. It implies energy is generated from internal geometric transformations and reaction components without an external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by describing a system that destabilizes and transforms a 'causal force' to generate energetic potential without consuming that force. The obscure, self-referential geometry and internal feedback loops cannot create net energy, as there is no clear external energy source to account for outputs or overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims operation 'without consumption of the causal force' (energy)
- Describes a 'spiral phenomenon' generating 'energy potentiality' from internal component rearrangement
- Suggests a resultant force is 'dynamized' by the displacement of a resistant lever, implying energy amplification from internal feedback
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, electrical, environmental gradient) to account for claimed outputs.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be produced internally by the mechanism from two static antagonistic forces created by hydraulic cylinders. The only explicit external input is a manual pump to pressurize the hydraulic oil.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical transmission system. It claims to generate continuous rotational energy output from static hydraulic forces that are internally balanced. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as no net external energy input is described to overcome losses, and the system cannot create energy from internal force reactions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation and energy production from static, balanced hydraulic forces without a net external energy input gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes force multiplication and transmission but ignores that static, balanced forces in a closed mechanical system cannot produce net work.
- Misapplication of equilibrium: Claims the satellite pinions (8) remain in equilibrium regardless of force F3, yet simultaneously claims force F4 produces continuous rotation. These are contradictory states.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (air or water) is claimed as the sole input, with electrical/mechanical work input to the compressor being the only explicit energy cost.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a heat engine that claims to produce useful work (shaft or electrical) using only ambient environmental heat as its energy source. This is a classic violation of the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law, which forbids a cyclic process from converting heat from a single temperature reservoir into net work. The compressor work input inevitably equals or exceeds the turbine output when all losses are accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to produce net work from a single ambient temperature reservoir.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to run the multi-stage compressor with intercooling is not properly balanced against the work output from the turbine.
- The described two-circuit gas cycle with a mixing nozzle does not create a sustainable temperature or pressure gradient to drive a net work output from ambient heat alone.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to generate mechanical energy from the gravitational potential energy of a liquid transferred between two reservoirs at different heights, with no external energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a hydraulic perpetual motion machine. It uses two bucket chains—one with small buckets lifting water up, and another with large buckets descending—claiming the torque from the heavier descending buckets drives the system and produces excess energy. This is impossible because the gravitational work extracted from the descending water cannot exceed the work needed to lift the water that fills them, plus inevitable frictional losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System attempts to use its own output (water raised to upper reservoir) as the sole input to drive the lifting process.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: Claims net mechanical energy production from a closed hydraulic cycle with internal losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores energy required to lift water against gravity from lower to upper reservoir. The work done by descending large buckets must be greater than the work needed to lift the small buckets + system losses, which is impo
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a rotating magnetic field (2)(2') and a magnetic core (1) interacting with a discharge rod (A) to generate a 'discharge vortex' (B). No explicit external energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is specified, implying the device is intended to generate energy from its own internal magnetic configuration.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that appears to generate a continuous energy output ('discharge vortex') from an internal magnetic arrangement without any clear external energy source, directly violating energy conservation. The use of technical magnetic terms obscures the lack of a legitimate energy input, fitting the pattern of a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is described, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- The described mechanism of a magnetic field and core generating a continuous 'discharge vortex' and output work suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- The abstract and claims are too vague and obfuscated to perform any meaningful energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a device that produces output energy from a 'control input' but provides no identifiable primary energy source. Mentions 'ambient energy' but doesn't specify a gradient (thermal, chemical, pressure, etc.) that could be harvested.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that appears to generate useful energy output from a smaller control input, which violates energy conservation unless a specific, quantified ambient energy source is identified and accounted for. The abstract and claims are vague, using correct-sounding physics terms without specifying a legitimate thermodynamic gradient or conversion process.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input gradient specified
- Claim implies energy output from a control signal alone
- No thermodynamic cycle or conversion mechanism described
- Ambient energy harvesting requires a specific gradient to exploit, which is not defined
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy from changing the position of a rotating body's center of gravity, implying extraction of net work from a closed mechanical system without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be an 'inexhaustible engine' that generates energy solely by changing the center of gravity of a rotating body. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by asserting that useful work can be extracted from a system with no identifiable external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate energy from a purely mechanical configuration change without an external power source.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: proposes a system that creates energy from nothing ('無尽蔵方式' translates to 'inexhaustible method').
- Mechanically impossible: changing the center of gravity of a rotating body requires work input; it cannot be a net source of energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes generating thermal energy from 'massive objects moving in unison' without identifying any external energy input to initiate or sustain the motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that increases thermal energy by making massive objects move in unison. This violates core physics principles because it claims to generate energy (heat) from coordinated motion without identifying any external energy source to create that motion, effectively proposing a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The claim implies creating thermal energy from coordinated motion without accounting for the energy required to create and maintain that motion.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It suggests generating useful heat from an organized motion without an external energy source or a temperature gradient to drive the process.
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, ambient gradient) is specified to account for the 'increased thermal energy' output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanism where changing the angle of a 'crank' (likely a crankshaft or lever arm) causes the center of gravity to shift, purportedly converting gravitational potential energy changes into rotational motion. No external energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous rotational motion by shifting a weight internally to change its center of gravity. This describes a classic overbalanced wheel or gravity engine, which is a well-known type of perpetual motion machine. In a closed cycle, the energy gained from a falling weight is always less than or equal to the energy required to lift it back to its starting position, preventing net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Describes a system that appears to generate continuous rotational motion from internal weight-shifting without an identified external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting net work from a closed cycle of internal mass movement.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The gravitational potential energy change in one part of the cycle would be exactly canceled by the energy required to restore the mass to its starting position in a closed loop, resulting in zero net work output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate power by guiding two types of fluid through a spiral rotating body with multiple openings, but no identifiable external energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate power by guiding two fluids through a spiral rotating body, but provides no identifiable energy source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it attempts to extract useful work without any apparent energy input or thermodynamic gradient to drive the process.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism described
- Claims to generate power (動力を引き出す) without explaining energy source
- Appears to be a fluid flow system that would require external work input to sustain flow against friction
- Violates energy conservation - cannot extract net work without an energy gradient or input
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions input power being transformed into motive power with amplification, but no additional energy source is identified. The claim suggests output power greater than input power.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'motive power amplification machine' that claims to transform input power into a greater output power. Without identifying any external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal, etc.), this directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described mechanism appears to be a classic perpetual motion/over-unity claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation (output > input without identified external energy source)
- No thermodynamic gradient or ambient energy source specified to enable energy amplification
- Mechanism for 'motive power amplification' is not physically defined
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests mechanical power transmission through belts and pulleys from a motor to a generator, implying the motor's electrical input is the primary energy source, but claims of 'power multiplication' or 'dynamic increase' suggest an expectation of output exceeding input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical linkage (motor, belts, pulleys, generator) with no secondary energy source, constituting a closed system. Any claim that this configuration yields a net power gain violates the First Law of Thermodynamics. The garbled text further obfuscates the mechanism, preventing identification of a legitimate energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input beyond the initial motor. The described mechanism is a closed mechanical transmission system (motor → belts/pulleys → generator).
- Implied 'power increase' violates energy conservation. A generator driven by a motor cannot produce more electrical energy than is supplied to the motor, minus losses.
- The abstract is garbled/nonsensical, preventing clear technical analysis of any novel energy harvesting principle.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of weights, with human input to initiate motion. Claims to convert gravitational and rotational motion directly into electrical energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a system of levers, weights, and a generator that supposedly converts gravitational and rotational motion into electricity. This constitutes a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine, as it lacks a defined external energy source to replenish the gravitational potential of the weights after they fall, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The claimed 'centrifugal effect' and 'mutually assisting motion' do not create energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear external energy input to sustain motion against losses
- Implies continuous extraction of work from gravitational potential without restoring the weights to their original height
- Violates conservation of energy: electrical output must come from an external source, not from a closed system of weights and levers
- No thermodynamic limit specified; appears to be a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary: Electrical input from batteries or main supply. Implicit/Claimed: 'Intermittently-occurring flywheel power energy surplus' used to recharge batteries.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a motor-generator with radially oscillating masses. The claim that it creates an 'energy surplus' to recharge its own power source during 'current-interruption intervals' violates energy conservation. The oscillating masses and flywheel can only temporarily store and return energy with losses, not generate a net surplus.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy surplus from flywheel/pulsation masses that can partially recharge source batteries, implying net energy gain.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mechanism identified for creating a net energy surplus from the described resonant radial motion of masses.
- Violates conservation of energy: System cannot output more useful work (recharging batteries) than the total electrical energy input, minus losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control input' b
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies extract
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly, the electrical/mechanical input to the power input shaft. Implicitly, the device claims to extract additional useful work from the gravitational potential energy of shifting weights, but this is not an external energy source; it is part of a closed mechanical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system where shifting internal weights cannot create energy. The described 'additional torque' in response to load must come from the system's own kinetic or potential energy, ultimately requiring equal or greater input work, making it an over-unity claim that violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'additional torque' from shifting center of gravity of internal weights without an external energy gradient
- Implies energy output can exceed energy input by leveraging load variation, violating conservation of energy
- Mechanism describes a reactive torque adjustment, not an independent energy source; any temporary torque increase comes from stored kinetic/potential energy and reduces system speed or requires greater input work
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output torq
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a purely mechanical transmission system (gears, chains, pinions) intended to be driven by a conventional engine's output shaft (pignon d'arbre moteur a1). No novel energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical transmission that claims to multiply both force and speed without loss, which would result in output power exceeding input power—a direct violation of energy conservation. As a passive gear/chain system driven by a conventional engine, it cannot create energy and is thermodynamically impossible as described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to multiply both 'force pressure' and initial speed simultaneously without loss, violating conservation of energy.
- Describes a mechanical linkage but implies power gain (force × speed) can be multiplied beyond input power.
- Uses vague, non-standard terminology ('force pression', 'déragée', 'chaines anneaux') obscuring the actual energy flow.
- No mechanism for adding energy; a passive gear/chain system cannot output more power than is input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output > i
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical engineeri
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a system where components (coils, magnets, collectors) are arranged to generate power, but no primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, ambient) is explicitly identified or accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of coils and magnets arranged to seemingly generate power from its own output, with no clear external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, directly violating the law of energy conservation. The technical description obfuscates the fundamental lack of an energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims 'energy multiplication' and 'self-sustaining' operation
- Appears to be a closed system of magnets and coils claiming to produce net power output
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system with two 'energy generating parts' (6)(8) and components for 'generation, storage, and transmission' but provides no identifiable external energy input. Mentions 'zero potential difference' and 'self-sustaining' operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate, store, and transmit energy in a self-sustaining manner without identifying any external energy source, directly violating the First Law of Thermodynamics. The use of technical terms like 'zero potential difference' alongside claims of energy generation indicates a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims 'self-sustaining' generation and transmission of energy
- Implies creation of energy from a system with zero potential difference
- Uses correct-sounding physics terms ('potential difference', 'generation') in a vague, obfuscating manner
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'self-gravity' (자체중력) of a 15-ton mass to generate energy, implying extraction of work from a static gravitational potential without an external input to restore the potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy by utilizing the gravity of a 15-ton mass. This violates the conservation of energy because the work extracted from lowering the mass cannot exceed the work that was required to lift it in the first place. Without an external energy source to re-lift the mass, the system cannot produce continuous net output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying net energy extraction from a static gravitational field without an external input to reset the system.
- No clear mechanism for restoring the gravitational potential after work is extracted, making it a one-shot device or a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Vague quantitative claims (15-ton mass, 20m/40m heights) without specifying the energy input required to lift the mass against gravity.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output ener
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'self-gra
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text (in Korean) describes a device that claims to generate electricity from atmospheric moisture/humidity gradients, potentially implying extraction of work from ambient humidity without an identifiable primary energy input or maintained gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device generating electricity from atmospheric moisture, which strongly suggests an attempt to extract net work from an ambient, equilibrium source without a maintained gradient—a thermodynamic impossibility. The abstract and claims are vague, use technical terms obfuscating the core energy source, and lack the rigorous energy accounting required for a valid energy conversion system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No clear identification of the primary energy source driving the claimed electricity generation.
- Potential violation of the second law: Extracting net work from an isothermal, equilibrium atmospheric humidity condition is thermodynamically impossible without a maintained temperature or chemical potential gradient.
- Vague mechanism: Describes using moisture and a 'special membrane' but provides no physics-compliant explanation for sustained power output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'perpetual motion power source' (è¬å®ç¡éå
åå) and mentions 360° rotation and 'energy amplification,' but no identifiable external energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to be a perpetual motion power source, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The abstract and claims use technical-sounding but vague terms like 'vortex' and '360° rotation' to obscure the lack of a legitimate external energy input, making it a textbook example of an over-unity energy device.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion ('perpetual motion power source')
- Describes energy amplification or creation without a source
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or energy input mechanism
- Vague description of converting 'vortex' energy into usable power with no entropy sink
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is extracted from the 'environment' or 'ambient' through a 'special process' without specifying a measurable gradient or identifiable input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is presented in a mix of Korean and obscured text, making technical evaluation impossible, but the fragments suggest a device that extracts ambient energy. Without specifying a quantifiable energy source or gradient (like thermal, radiative, or chemical), such a claim inherently violates the First Law of Thermodynamics, as it implies energy output without adequate input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input accounting
- Vague mechanism claiming to extract and concentrate ambient energy
- Implies energy multiplication or creation without a source
- Text is partially obscured/untranslated, preventing technical analysis
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text is in Korean and appears to describe a device that generates electricity from a 'magnetic field' or 'magnetic flux' (중양의 앞력) to power a load, then uses the output to power the input, creating a self-sustaining or amplifying loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system appears to be a classic over-unity or perpetual motion claim: using output power to sustain input power in a closed loop. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a primary energy source to overcome inevitable losses from resistance, friction, and radiation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a closed-loop energy system where output powers input with no net external energy source
- Implies energy multiplication or creation from a static magnetic field
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, sunlight) to account for continuous output and losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes using a 'control input' to manipulate a 'residual magnetic field' to generate a larger output, suggesting an attempt to extract net energy from an ambient or permanent magnetic field without an identified external gradient or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism that uses a small control input to manipulate a magnetic field to produce a larger energy output, which is a classic hallmark of a perpetual motion machine. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying energy multiplication and the second law by attempting to extract useful work from what appears to be an equilibrium state without a consumable energy gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying output > total energy input
- Attempts to extract net work from a static magnetic field (no time-varying gradient or motion of a source)
- Lacks a clear, thermodynamically permissible primary energy source
- Uses obfuscatory language ('residual magnetic field energy', 'control input') common in perpetual motion claims
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a system where a 'control input' of 5 units yields a 'performance' of 5 units, but then claims that when the 'output' is 10, the 'control input' of 5 can be 'recovered', implying a net gain. No ambient or environmental energy source is explicitly identified to account for the apparent gain.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a system where a small control input appears to yield a larger output, from which the control input can be recovered, violating the conservation of energy. It fails to identify the primary source for the claimed excess energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a scenario where a control input of 5 yields an output of 10, from which the original 5 is 'recovered', resulting in a net output of 5 from no net input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary energy source. The system appears to use a 'control input' to gate or trigger a larger energy flow without accounting for the source of that larger flow.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Suggests energy can be multiplied or created from a smaller control signal, characteristic of an over-unity or perpetual motion claim.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes extracting energy from a 'magnetic field' that is 'generated' or 'induced' by a magnet, implying the magnet itself is the sole energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device that appears to generate energy from a permanent magnet's field alone, which violates energy conservation. A static magnetic field is not an energy source; you cannot extract net work from it without changing the field or introducing another energy input, as doing so would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of an external energy input to sustain the process.
- Implies extraction of net work from a static magnetic field, which is a conservative force field.
- Suggests energy multiplication ('output > input') without a defined thermodynamic gradient or fuel.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a motor (モーター) connected to a generator (発電機) that drives a drum (ドラム) which then appears to feed back to rotate the motor. No primary energy input (electrical, chemical, mechanical, or ambient) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a textbook perpetual motion machine. It claims a configuration where a generator powers a motor that drives the generator's input mechanism, forming a closed loop with no external energy source. This directly violates energy conservation and thermodynamic laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- System appears to be a closed loop where a generator powers a motor that drives the generator's input
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies creation of energy from nothing
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics as it describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent claims a 'fuel-free engine' (燃料不要エンジン) and describes a self-driving vehicle (自動車) with generators and propulsion systems, but provides no identifiable primary energy input to replace fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-driving vehicle with a 'fuel-free engine,' which is a direct claim of perpetual motion. It violates the First Law by proposing useful work output without an identifiable energy source and the Second Law by implying a closed system can continuously perform work. The technical details obfuscate this fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). Claims a 'fuel-free engine' performing work implies energy output with no clear energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics. Suggests a system that can do useful work (propel a vehicle) indefinitely without consuming an energy source or exploiting a thermodynamic gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting. Mentions generators and propulsion but omits the origin of the initial energy to run the generators or motors.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Fuel-free' claim
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical terms (eng
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description appears to be a complex mechanical assembly with tanks, balance tanks, rotating casings, shafts, and magnets, but no explicit energy input mechanism is identified. Any claimed output would imply energy from internal mechanical arrangements without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical device with rotating casings, tanks, balance tanks, and shafts, but identifies no source of energy input. The mechanism appears designed to use shifting weights/fluids to generate motion, which if claimed to produce net work without an external energy source, directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Complex mechanical arrangement suggests an attempt to create perpetual motion through internal weight/fluid shifting.
- Appears to be a gravity/fluid-based mechanism claiming to produce work without an energy source, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: No accounting for
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implied
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and contradictory. Claims to use a small internal combustion engine as a starter/auxiliary, then an electric motor to generate output power exceeding input, achieving 'self-sufficiency' and 'self-supplied energy'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that claims to generate more electrical energy than it consumes and achieve self-sufficiency, which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). It attempts to use its own reaction forces and rotational inertia as new energy sources, constituting a closed-loop energy multiplication scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims output power exceeds input power ('output power above input')
- Claims 'self-supplied self-sufficient energy' implying perpetual operation
- Proposes using 'reaction force' and 'remaining rotational output power' as new energy sources without identifying an external reservoir
- No identification of a primary external energy source; system appears closed
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear - claims to convert the weight of a heavy object into energy through rotation and hydraulic pressure transfer, with only a single energy input to initiate rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device that claims to convert the weight of an object into usable energy through rotation and hydraulic pressure, which violates conservation of energy. The system appears to be a perpetual motion machine that would extract net work from a closed system without an external energy source, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation - claims to extract more energy from a system than is input
- No identifiable external energy gradient to exploit
- Mechanism appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind
- Weight is a force, not an energy source - converting weight to energy requires a height differential (mgh)
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claims suggest propulsion from 'centrifugal force' or 'centrifugal propulsion' without identifying an external energy input. Mentions 'motor' but doesn't specify power source or energy conversion process.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a 'centrifugal propulsion device' that claims to generate thrust through rotating masses. The system violates conservation of momentum as centrifugal forces are internal to the system and cannot produce net thrust without ejecting reaction mass. No external energy source is properly identified to account for the claimed propulsion work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Appears to claim propulsion from rotating masses without reaction mass or external energy gradient
- Uses term 'centrifugal force' which is a fictitious force in rotating frames and cannot produce net thrust in an isolated system
- No identifiable external energy source to account for claimed propulsion work output
- Violates Newton's third law - no reaction mass or momentum exchange described
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions input gears and output gears but provides no identifiable external energy source. The mechanism appears to be purely mechanical with gears and levers, suggesting it claims to generate amplified output power from a smaller input power through internal mechanical arrangement alone.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a mechanical gear/lever system that claims to amplify force/power from input to output. Without any external energy source (like an engine, motor, or environmental gradient), such a system cannot produce more output work than input work, directly violating the conservation of energy. The description suggests perpetual motion of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims 'amplified force' (å¢å¹
) from input to output without an external energy source
- Purely mechanical gear/lever system cannot have output work exceed input work
- Violates conservation of energy - output power cannot exceed input power in a passive mechanical system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a device that uses a 'guide metal' to move along a rail, causing a main shaft to rotate automatically. No explicit energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is mentioned, implying the motion is self-sustained or initiated from an unspecified 'bias' or offset.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce automatic rotational motion from an initial 'bias' or offset, but provides no identifiable source of energy to perform work against friction and other inevitable losses. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it implies a perpetual motion mechanism of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to overcome friction and other losses.
- Claims 'automatic rotation' of a main shaft, suggesting work output without a clear, sustainable energy source.
- The description is too vague to identify a legitimate energy conversion process (e.g., heat engine, piezoelectric).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses technical mechanical
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate output power greater than input power using the 'special characteristics of a planetary gear mechanism' and internal 'combined action' of gears, with no identifiable external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to amplify input power using only internal gear interactions within a rotating body, directly violating the conservation of energy. No external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal, or ambient) is identified to account for the claimed increased output, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims output > input without identifying an external energy source.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of energy from internal mechanical interactions.
- No thermodynamic gradient or identifiable energy conversion process (e.g., heat engine, motor) that could justify power amplification.
- Obfuscated description using mechanical terms ('planetary gear', 'combined action') to suggest energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a mechanical configuration of fixed and rotating rails/coils that supposedly amplifies rotational force without identifying an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical device claiming to amplify rotational force without identifying any external energy source, which directly violates the conservation of energy. The configuration of fixed and rotating rails/coils cannot create energy, only convert or transfer it, making the claimed amplification physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified
- Claims 'amplification of rotational force' (回転力を強化) which implies energy output > energy input
- Mechanical configuration described cannot create energy, only transform or transmit it
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot amplify force/energy without an external power source
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a system where energy appears to be transferred between two unspecified components (물체(가) and 물체(나)), suggesting energy multiplication or creation without identifying any external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is garbled and nonsensical, but the structure suggests a claim of energy transfer or multiplication between two components without any clear external energy source. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a net energy output without a corresponding input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Implies energy can be transferred or multiplied between components without an external supply, violating conservation of energy
- Vague, non-scientific terminology prevents proper thermodynamic analysis
- Suggests a closed system can produce net work or energy flow
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial stored chemical energy in batteries (accus F). The system claims to become self-sustaining by using the generator's output to recharge the batteries that power the compressor's motor, creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a textbook perpetual motion machine. It describes a closed-loop system where losses from friction, heat, and inefficiencies in the compressor, turbine, and generator are inevitable. The output electrical energy cannot equal, let alone exceed, the input energy needed to run the compressor, making self-sustenance and net power export impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to provide electrical output with no external energy input after startup.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Every energy conversion (electrical to mechanical in motor/compressor, compression, expansion in turbine, mechanical to electrical in generator) incurs irreversible losses (friction, heat, electrical resista
- The claimed 'cycle perpétuel en circuit fermé' is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'sans aucun
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to gear motors (Getriebemotor) via a five-pole power rail and switchgear. The claim suggests additional energy is extracted from gravity via a mechanism of moving weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electrically driven wheel with internal moving weights. It violates the conservation of energy by implying that strategically moving weights using motors can harness gravity to produce a net energy gain or over-unity effect. Gravity is a conservative force; the net work done by it over any closed cycle is zero.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the gravity interaction
- Implied extraction of net work from a conservative force field (gravity) without an external gradient
- System returns weights to their starting position cyclically, resulting in zero net gravitational work over a full cycle
- Electrical energy used to move weights and overcome friction will always exceed any mechanical energy output from the wheel
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. Claims 'sans recours à aucune énergie classique' (without recourse to any classical energy) and describes a self-starting, perpetual rotary motion from internal mass redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classical perpetual motion machine claim. It describes a mechanism where off-center masses are moved to create an imbalanced wheel, but the work needed to reset those masses (via cams and against a ball brake) must come from the wheel's own rotation, leading to net energy loss. No external energy source is identified, making its claimed endless, self-starting motion a direct violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce indefinite motive power from a constant, small input power.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: system cannot perform net work on its surroundings without an energy source.
- Mechanism relies on continuous displacement of center of gravity to create torque, but resetting the masses (via cams and brakes) requires work that must come from the system's own energy, leading to inevitable dissipation and stop.
- Claims output power increases indefinitely with device size/weight while input power remains constant, which is energetically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest electrical input of 0.3-0.5 units produces 1.3-1.5 units of output, implying an external energy source is being tapped but not identified. Mentions 'negative plate' and 'positive plate' possibly forming a gradient, but no legitimate ambient source (thermal, chemical, etc.) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device where 0.3-0.5 units of input energy produce 1.3-1.5 units of output, a clear violation of energy conservation unless a significant external energy source is identified and quantified. The description is vague, uses technical terms (negative/positive plates, gradients) without a coherent physical mechanism, and obfuscates the true source of the apparent excess energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent energy multiplication (output > input) without a clear, quantified external energy source
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) if total energy inputs are not fully accounted for
- Lacks description of the fundamental energy conversion process to evaluate against thermodynamic limits (Carnot, etc.)
- Vague mechanism: mentions plates and gradients but no coherent physical principle for net energy gain
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim references 'ambient energy' and 'vibration' but provides no specific, identifiable source or gradient to extract net work from.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is too vague to analyze meaningfully but uses terminology suggesting energy multiplication from ambient sources without specifying a thermodynamic gradient or complete energy accounting. The abstract is missing, and the claims reference 'energy multiplication' which is a red flag for violation of energy conservation unless all inputs (including ambient energy) are properly quantified.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input gradient specified
- Claims 'energy multiplication' which implies creation of energy
- Vague mechanism lacking thermodynamic cycle description
- Implies output greater than controlled input without accounting for all energy sources
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes using kinetic energy, gravity, and centrifugal force, but provides no external energy input mechanism. The described process (accelerate, brake, return) suggests an attempt to extract net energy from a closed cyclic process.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a cyclic process (accelerate, brake with energy capture, return) using only internal centrifugal and gravitational forces. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to output net energy from braking without accounting for the greater input energy required for the initial acceleration and overcoming losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: cyclic process with claimed net energy output from braking
- Centrifugal force is not an energy source; it is a kinematic constraint
- Gravity is conservative; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle in a gravitational field
- The 'accumulation' phase requires energy input, which must exceed or equal the energy recovered during braking
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims to capture
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical system (rails, moving parts, weight) that supposedly increases rotational force from a 'bias' or 'deviation' (偏差). No external energy input (electrical, chemical, environmental) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to automatically increase rotational force through a mechanical arrangement and the addition of weight to a moving part, with no described external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it suggests creating useful work (rotation) from an internal configuration change alone, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described.
- Claims to increase rotational force/energy via mechanical arrangement and added weight alone.
- Implies energy amplification without an external input, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy from the rotation of a mass by continuously changing its moment arm length, implying extraction of work from an internal rotating system without an identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy by varying the radius of a rotating mass, which is a classic 'over-unity' violation. Changing the moment arm in a rotating system requires energy input (to move mass against centrifugal forces), and any energy extracted from the change in rotational speed cannot exceed this input, per conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy
- No identified external energy source to account for generated output
- Mechanism describes changing a moment arm to alter rotational inertia, which requires work input to move mass radially in a rotating frame
- Implies net energy extraction from a closed rotational system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text is in Korean and describes a system that appears to generate electricity from a 'vortex' or 'whirlpool' within a structure, with no clear, identifiable primary energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that generates electricity from an internal vortex structure without specifying any external source of energy to sustain that vortex or to be converted into electricity. This constitutes a classic case of incomplete energy accounting, as the system's output (electricity) has no defined input, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified.
- Claims to generate electricity ('ê°ë') from an internal vortex structure, implying energy creation rather than conversion.
- Complete lack of thermodynamic context (temperatures, pressures, gradients) to define a legitimate heat engine or other converter.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The description uses phys
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes using the gravitational potential energy of one mass to move another mass and cause the device to stand up or rotate, suggesting a closed system with no external energy input other than initial gravitational potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device appears to be a gravity-powered mechanism that claims to produce continuous or repeated motion (standing up, rotating) using only the internal rearrangement of masses. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks an identified external energy source to replenish the system after friction and other losses dissipate the initial gravitational potential energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy input is specified to reset the system or overcome losses.
- Implies perpetual or over-unity motion: The description suggests continuous or repeated motion (standing up, rotating) from a finite initial potential energy store.
- Violates conservation of energy: For continuous cyclic motion, energy output (kinetic + potential changes + losses) would exceed the finite internal energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions generating gravitational energy and reaction forces through movable counterweights, fluid pressure (oil/water pressure), air pressure, elastic forces, and torque devices, but provides no identifiable primary energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that claims to generate gravitational energy and amplify reaction forces using counterweights, fluid pressure, and torque devices. This constitutes a closed system with no clear external energy input, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying energy can be created from internal forces alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input specified
- Claims to 'generate gravitational energy' - energy is not generated, only converted
- Describes a system of forces and counterweights without a net energy source, suggesting a closed loop
- Implies energy amplification through reaction forces and fluid pressure without an external driver
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a central rotating part and a moving/rotating carriage on a track around it, suggesting mechanical interaction, but no explicit external energy input is identified. The claim implies the carriage receives stronger dynamic action than the central part and that this force is somehow augmented by levers and cranks.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system where a rotating carriage around a central axis purportedly gains stronger dynamic action than the central driver, which is then further amplified by levers and cranks. This configuration, with no clear external energy source, implies internal energy multiplication, which directly violates the conservation of energy. It is a classic perpetual motion claim disguised as a mechanical amplification device.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source (input) is described.
- Claims 'dynamic action' is strengthened and amplified between components, implying energy multiplication within a closed mechanical system.
- Describes a configuration of rotating parts and levers that, without an external input, suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creating energy from nothing).
- Violates conservation of energy: the system's total output work cannot exceed its total input work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis finds
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a magnetic motor using rotating magnets, fixed magnets, and solar cells, but no explicit external energy input is described. Any claimed output would have to come from stored magnetic energy, ambient energy (if solar cells are functional), or violate conservation laws.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic motion device with rotating and fixed magnets, combined with solar cells, but provides no credible mechanism for a sustained net energy output. Magnetic forces alone cannot produce continuous work without an external energy source, making this a classic perpetual motion claim violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear external energy input mechanism described.
- Relies on magnetic interactions which are conservative forces (no net work over a cycle without an external input).
- Claims of 'self-rotation' or sustained motion imply perpetual motion of the first kind (creating energy from nothing).
- Vague description obscures the actual energy conversion pathway.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy of weights, which is a finite, stored energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a gravity-powered machine that uses falling weights to drive a flywheel. However, it provides no physically viable method to return the weights to their high potential energy state without consuming at least as much energy as was generated during their fall, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism described to return weights to elevated position without expending more (or equal) energy than is gained from their fall.
- System implicitly claims a closed cycle where weights are lifted using energy from the flywheel, leading to net energy loss.
- Apparatus description suggests a self-sustaining or energy-multiplying cycle, which is impossible without an external energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy cost of
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies a perpe
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is the gravitational potential energy of the product (meat, vegetables, fruit) to be ground, loaded into buckets on one side of a pivoting arm.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity machine. It claims to run solely on the weight of the product being processed, but the grinding work and system reset (lifting the empty bucket) would dissipate the initial gravitational energy. For continuous operation, the energy needed to lift the empty bucket back to the high position must come from an external source, not from the descending load alone, which violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to perform grinding work using only the potential energy of the material being ground itself. The grinding process (friction, shearing, crushing) dissipates energy as heat and sound, requiring a cont
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: The system's operation, as described, would create usable work (grinding) from a single initial potential energy drop, with no external energy to reset the system (lift the empty bucket back up) for continuous oper
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the energy required to reset the system (lift the empty bucket) and the energy losses in the transmission mechanism (friction in pivots, gears, chains).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a process where a 100% input to a 'generator part' (인페라) produces a 100% output to a 'load part' (벨트), which then somehow powers the 'generator part' again, with only 10% of external power needed to sustain the system. This implies energy is being created or recycled without sufficient external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a system where a generator's output fully powers a load, which then seems to feedback energy to run the generator, requiring only a 10% external power input. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims to recover 90% of energy in a closed loop without accounting for inevitable losses to heat, friction, and other dissipative processes.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of a closed-loop energy system requiring only 10% external input to sustain 100% output, violating energy conservation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 90% of energy said to be 'recovered' (ì¬ì©) is not thermodynamically possible without losses.
- The description suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (output energy > input energy from external sources).
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the mechanical work from the 'pignon moteur' (drive pinion/gear). The claim implies additional energy is generated from the geometric arrangement of gears.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gear system that purportedly outputs greater force, pressure, and speed than the input drive gear provides. This is a direct violation of the conservation of energy, as a simple gear train cannot multiply both force and speed simultaneously; it can only trade one for the other.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a multiplicative increase in force, pressure, and speed from a simple gear train, which violates conservation of energy.
- A gear train can trade force for speed (or vice versa) at constant power (Power = Force x Velocity), but cannot increase both simultaneously from a single input.
- The description is a classic 'over-unity' or perpetual motion claim disguised as a mechanical advantage system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'force pres
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical power supplied to the motor and brakes. The device appears to attempt to generate electrical power from the generator, which is mechanically coupled to the same rotating system driven by that motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed electromechanical system where the only clear energy input is the motor. The described arrangement of flywheels, carriers, and brakes cannot produce net generator output exceeding this input, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind that violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a closed mechanical system with a motor driving a generator via a complex flywheel assembly. No external energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient gradient) is identified other than the motor's electrical i
- Violates conservation of energy: The arrangement suggests the generator's output could exceed the motor's input, which is impossible for a closed system. The inertial effects of the flywheels and carrier do not create energy; they only temporarily st
- Misapplication of inertia: Inertia is a property of mass, not an energy source. Braking and coupling rotating masses within the system only transforms or dissipates the energy initially supplied by the motor.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim references 'electromagnetic energy' and 'control input' but provides no identifiable external energy source. The description suggests output exceeding control input, implying energy generation without a source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device where electromagnetic energy output allegedly exceeds its control input, which directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The abstract is obscured and the claims are vague, using technical terms without specifying a legitimate energy source or conversion process.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input described
- Claim implies energy output > control input, violating energy conservation
- No thermodynamic process or gradient is specified
- Vague terminology prevents proper energy accounting
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a rotating mechanism (45°, 180°, 0° angles) and mentions 'air pressure' and 'rotation', but no explicit primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is identified. It appears to claim the device's own rotation generates additional rotational force.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a rotational device with no clear source of external energy, implying it can generate or amplify rotational energy from its own motion. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The description is technically vague and obfuscated, failing to account for all energy inputs and outputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Implies energy multiplication or self-sustaining rotation
- Violates energy conservation - output cannot exceed total input
- Uses technical obfuscation with angle descriptions but no clear energy conversion process
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests energy is somehow recirculated or amplified between components (e.g., 'control input' and 'output power'), implying the primary input is an initial electrical control signal, with no clear external energy source identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system where a 'control input' leads to an 'output power' that is recirculated, suggesting energy multiplication without an external source. The garbled text and lack of a clear, quantifiable energy input violate the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input accounting
- Implies energy amplification or recirculation violating conservation
- Vague mechanism lacking thermodynamic context (heat engine, heat pump, etc.)
- Text is partially garbled/obfuscated, preventing clear technical analysis
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to be a closed pneumatic loop with an external 'power source means' (g) to drive the vacuum pump, but the claim suggests the same air is cycled to continuously drive the turbine.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a closed loop where air expands through a turbine to produce work, then is pumped back to the high-pressure tank. This violates the first law of thermodynamics because the pump requires more work to re-compress the gas than the turbine can produce from its expansion, resulting in a net energy loss, not a sustainable propulsion source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system proposes to use a turbine to extract work from compressed air, then use a vacuum pump (powered externally) to re-compress the exhaust back into the tank, expecting net useful work output.
- Ignores thermodynamic losses: The turbine's work output must be less than the expansion work of the gas. The vacuum pump/compressor's work input to re-pressurize the gas must exceed that expansion work due to irreversibilities and the need to overcom
- Perpetual motion logic: The description implies a closed cycle where the gas pressure in the 'vacuum injected vessel' is maintained or restored by the vacuum pump, allowing the turbine to run continuously from a finite initial energy store.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex arrangement of components (coils, magnets, rotors) with ambiguous energy flow. It mentions 'control input' but suggests energy multiplication through cascading/stacking of magnetic systems, implying output exceeds all identifiable inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a cascading magnetic system that appears to produce more energy than is input, violating energy conservation. The description is vague and lacks quantitative analysis, but the implied mechanism of self-sustaining or multiplying energy through component interaction is thermodynamically impossible, falling into the category of a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear, complete accounting of all energy inputs and outputs.
- Describes a process where a magnetic system (4) is activated and then appears to drive itself and other systems in a cascading manner, suggesting perpetual motion or energy multiplication.
- Uses technical terms (coils, magnets, rotors) but in a vague, non-quantitative way that obscures the energy conversion process.
- Implies creation of a self-sustaining gradient or cycle without an external high-quality energy source to compensate for losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system that appears to use 'ambient energy' (유압 기계) to generate electricity, but the mechanism is not physically defined. It suggests extracting energy from the environment without a clear, thermodynamically permissible gradient or conversion process.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is written in garbled, non-technical language that obscures any real operating principle. It appears to describe a device that extracts ambient energy to produce electricity, but provides no valid thermodynamic pathway or identifiable energy source, strongly suggesting a violation of energy conservation. The obfuscated text is a hallmark of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable thermodynamic cycle or energy conversion mechanism is described.
- Claims of generating electricity from ambient energy without specifying a source gradient (thermal, chemical, etc.) or a sink.
- Language suggests energy amplification or cascading effects ('ìëíì¬', 'ì¤ë¦°ë í¼ì¤í¤'), implying output exceeding total identifiable input.
- The abstract and claims are largely unintelligible/obfuscated, preventing a proper energy audit.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device claims to generate mechanical energy using internal subsystems (pneumatic, hydraulic, electrical) that are powered by a portion of the generator's own output, suggesting a self-sustaining or amplifying loop with no identified primary external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It describes a rotor with internal mechanisms powered by its own rotation, which then purportedly amplify forces to drive the rotor further. This creates a positive feedback loop with no external energy source, directly violating energy conservation. The detailed mechanical description obfuscates the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility of the core claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to use a portion of the output to power internal subsystems that then 'amplify' impulses to create stronger kinetic energy, implying net energy gain from the system's own operation.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting net work from a closed mechanical cycle with no external energy gradient to exploit.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes internal force generation and amplification but does not identify the original, sustainable source of energy to overcome losses (friction, resistance, etc.).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract mentions using magnetic or electromagnetic energy in a rotary system, but the claims describe only a mechanical wheel-and-pin arrangement with no specified external energy input. The implied source is the initial force applied to wheel N1.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to multiply input power 'almost indefinitely' by cascading mechanical systems, which is impossible under energy conservation laws. A system of wheels and pins can only transmit and transform force/torque/speed within the constraint that input power ≥ output power minus losses, making indefinite multiplication a thermodynamic violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims indefinite multiplication of power by cascading systems, which violates energy conservation
- Describes a purely mechanical linkage (wheels and pins) with no novel energy source
- No mechanism described to generate net energy output greater than input
- Apparent claim of power amplification without accounting for all energy inputs and losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (water/medium weight), potentially supplemented by an external pump (Rücklaufdosierpumpe). The claim implies a self-regenerating cycle using gravity, tides, pressure, and vacuum.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity/pressure engine that requires work to be done to reset its working fluid to a high potential energy state. The patent text obscures this by implying the 'Rücklaufdosierpumpe' is part of a self-sustaining cycle, which is impossible. Any net energy output must come from an external source like flowing water (claim 3) or the pump's input, not from a perpetual regeneration of force within a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the pump work needed to reset the system (move fluid back to the high point).
- Claims 'regeneration' and continuous renewal of force from gravity/tides/vacuum without an external, sustained gradient.
- Implies a closed-loop system can produce net work from its own internal fluid motion, violating conservation of energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described. Primary claimed input is gravitational potential energy from a weight moved vertically. An electromagnet is powered by an accumulator (battery), which is supposedly recharged by 'magnetic flywheels' (volants magnétiques). The system appears to be a closed loop claiming to recharge its own battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to use a battery to initiate a process (moving a weight via an electromagnet) and then claims the gravitational descent of that weight can generate enough electricity to recharge the battery and produce excess power, violating energy conservation. The use of vague terms like 'magnetic flywheels' and cascading gears obscures the fundamental thermodynamic flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system claims to use a battery to power an electromagnet to move a weight, and then uses the gravitational fall of that weight to generate electricity to recharge the same battery, with net excess output. This is a c
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of energy losses (electrical resistance, friction, magnetic hysteresis, generator inefficiency). The 'magnetic flywheels' are an undefined component likely intended to obfuscate the energy source.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: The description implies energy creation, as a closed system cannot output more energy than is input without an external source. Gravity is not an energy source here; it's a conservative force requiring work t
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. The primary input is the electrical/mechanical energy driving the pump motor. The system appears to claim additional energy is extracted from the gravitational potential energy of the fluid column or the fluid's kinetic energy, but this is part of a closed or recirculating loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a classic over-unity violation. It uses a pump to drive a turbine/generator in a recirculating fluid loop. The energy to drive the pump must come from an external source, and the turbine's output will always be less than this input due to inevitable losses from friction, turbulence, and generator inefficiency. No new energy is created.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The pump consumes work to move fluid, the turbine converts fluid flow back to work, but total output (generator) cannot exceed the pump input minus losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent title ('energy multiplication') and recirculation loop (claim 2) suggest an expectation of net energy gain from the system's own operation.
- Misapplication of hydrostatic pressure: Submerging the pump intake (claims 3,4,6) provides static pressure, but no net work can be extracted from this equilibrium state in a closed cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract usable energy solely from the potential energy of masses in a gravitational field via a rotating mechanical system, implying a closed system that generates net work from gravity alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to develop usable energy by converting the potential energy of masses in a gravity field via rotation. This describes a closed mechanical cycle in a conservative field, which cannot produce net work output without an external energy input to restore the system's state, directly violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No accounting for the work input required to reset the system's configuration or lift masses back to their initial height.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies continuous energy extraction from a gravitational potential without an external energy source to restore the gravitational gradient.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: A rotating system of masses in gravity is a conservative field; net work over a closed cycle is zero.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Claims to use natural forces (water, wind, sun) or a mechanical/electrical motor as input, but the described mechanism purports to generate a multiplicative gain from its own internal kinematics.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims a 200x energy gain from its internal kinematics, with further multiplicative gains from cascading multiple units. This is a direct violation of energy conservation. Mechanical linkages like eccentrics and knee joints can only transform force and motion, not create energy. The admission that it seems to contradict conservation laws is a clear red flag.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims a 200x 'gain énergétique' (energy gain) from the mechanism itself.
- Describes cascading multiplication (2 CV -> 4 CV -> 8 CV -> 16 CV) which implies energy creation.
- Acknowledges the invention seems contrary to the principle of conservation of energy but proceeds anyway.
- Confuses force multiplication or mechanical advantage with energy creation. A lever or eccentric can multiply force at the expense of distance, conserving energy, not creating it.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Claims output energy > inp
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Describes a sys
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct mechanical terms (ec
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract work from the gravitational potential energy of a closed-loop water system. The water is pumped from a low point (collector) back to a high point (center of the rotating hollow body) to complete the cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a gravitational perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce continuous work from water flowing in a closed loop under gravity, but it ignores the fundamental requirement that pumping the water back to its starting height requires at least as much energy as is extracted from its descent.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is a closed cycle. The work extracted from water flowing outward and being redirected by nozzles cannot exceed the work required to lift the same water back to the center against centrifugal force and gravi
- Misinterprets gravity as an energy source: Gravity is a conservative force field. In a closed cycle, the net work done by gravity is zero. The device attempts to create a perpetual gradient using the rotation itself, which requires an external energy
- No net energy input: The described system (claims 6, 10) forms a closed hydraulic loop. The only explicit energy input is the initial gravitational potential of the water, which is depleted after one cycle unless work is input to restore it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim ignores
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described. Initial energy from a small motor and battery (accumulateur 9). Claims of sustained motion and free electricity imply energy is extracted from the kinetic system itself, with the small motor only providing maintenance.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is presented as a pendulum/flywheel system that, once started by a small motor, sustains its own motion and generates excess electricity. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to output more useful energy (domestic electricity, vehicle traction) than is input, violating the conservation of energy. The description lacks any identifiable external energy source to justify the claimed 'free' output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'gratuitement l'électricité' (free electricity) and that a very low-power motor maintains motion, implying net energy output > electrical input without identifying an external ambient energy source.
- Violates energy conservation: The system is described as a closed mechanical pendulum/flywheel system. No thermodynamic gradient (e.g., temperature, height, pressure) is identified to allow net work extraction beyond initial stored energy.
- Obfuscation of losses: No mechanism described to overcome inevitable friction, air resistance, and electrical losses in the alternator. The 'regulator' and 'variable couple' manage energy but cannot create it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air (implicitly) via a main motor (explicitly). The main motor drives two blower turbines to draw in air, which then drives two turbines. The system claims to use surplus energy to power the main motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-powering machine where a main motor drives blowers whose exhaust drives turbines to generate electricity, with surplus used to power the main motor. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce more energy than is input to sustain its own operation, violating the conservation of energy. No external energy source (like fuel, significant heat gradient, or ambient energy harvesting) is identified to account for the net output and losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The main motor is the only explicit input, yet it is claimed to be powered by its own surplus output.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input power vs. output power from the turbines. The system is a closed loop with no net external energy source after startup.
- Violates the Second Law: Attempts to create a self-sustaining cycle that performs work (charging a battery) without a net energy input from an external source or a significant thermal gradient to exploit.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed source is the buoyant force on a submerged body in a water column, with a secondary mechanism involving pressure changes via a weight on the water surface. The system attempts to extract net work from the cyclical rising and resetting of the buoyant body.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It extracts work from the buoyant rise of a body but ignores the equal or greater work required to reset the system by re-submerging the body and re-compressing the water column. Over a full cycle, the net energy output cannot exceed the net energy input, which is zero for this closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to reset the system (lowering the buoyant body against buoyancy, compressing the water column with the weight) is not properly accounted for against the work extracted during its rise.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is a closed-loop cycle (raise body, reset body, repeat). The net work output over one complete cycle would be positive only if the reset energy is less than the rise energy, which for a conservative force f
- Misapplication of Archimedes' principle: The buoyant force is a conservative force in this configuration. Extracting work from it in a cycle requires an external energy input to restore the initial state.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the gravitational potential energy of a large mass (P) that is repeatedly lifted. The lifting is allegedly achieved using a small amount of water in a lock system, with water pumped back to the upper reservoir using wind-powered pumps.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that attempts to generate energy by repeatedly lifting and dropping a heavy mass. The lifting process is obfuscated to appear efficient, but the energy required to prepare the system (filling the lock chamber) and to reset it (pumping water uphill using wind) must, by conservation of energy, equal or exceed the gravitational energy extracted from the falling mass. The wind pumps are the true energy source, making the complex buoyancy mechanism an inefficient middleman.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for lifting the mass (P). The system claims to lift a large mass using a water weight that is only a fraction of the mass, ignoring the required energy input to create the buoyant force via the lock's water column height
- Violates conservation of energy. The net work output from the falling mass cannot exceed the total energy input to lift it and to pump the water back to the upper reservoir. The wind pumps are the only external input, and their energy must account fo
- Misapplication of buoyancy/Archimedes' principle. Buoyancy provides an upward force, but to lift a floating object, you must displace a volume of water *equal to the object's weight*. The energy required is the work done to raise the water level agai
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the starter motor/battery (Claim 9) and the variable speed electric motor (Claim 7). The apparatus implies the eccentric rings with heavy balls are 'elements capable of causing the rotation of the shaft,' suggesting an internal, gravity-driven mechanism as a perpetual or amplifying energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a type of gravity wheel. The eccentric rings and balls constitute a closed mechanical system in a conservative gravitational field. Once started, it cannot produce continuous rotation or net energy output without an external energy source, as friction will dissipate the initial energy. The claims for 'continuous rotation' and 'recuperating energy' violate the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims imply continuous rotation or energy recuperation from the eccentric ring/ball system without identifying an external energy gradient to sustain it.
- Violates the First Law: The system, once started, suggests the balls rolling in eccentric rings can cause continuous shaft rotation and drive a generator for net energy output, implying creation of energy from a conservative potential (gravity).
- No thermodynamic gradient: The gravity field is static and conservative. Extracting net work from a mass in a closed loop in a conservative field is impossible without lowering the mass's center of gravity, which would require resetting the system us
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from mains or diesel generator to blower fan 1; later, electrical output from one generator is used to power blower fan 2. No other external energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to produce perpetual electrical output by using a portion of its own generator output to power the air blower that drives it, violating energy conservation. All losses are ignored, and no external energy source sustains the system after startup.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual creation of electric output (perpetual motion)
- Proposes to disconnect initial external power and use a portion of the generator output to power the system's own air blower, implying net energy output from a closed loop
- Ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, air drag, bearing losses, generator inefficiency)
- Misapplies Newton's third law as a means to add energy or assist rotation
- No thermodynamic gradient or fuel source to drive continuous net work output
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a swinging pendulum of large mass, with small electrical inputs to motors (claim 8) to compensate for friction and gravitational losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a pendulum-driven generator where small motors provide impulses to maintain the pendulum swing against losses, claiming this allows significant electrical output. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation by purporting to generate more output energy than the small motor inputs, with gravity and the pendulum's inertia incorrectly treated as an energy source rather than a cyclical energy storage.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims the pendulum's motion energy drives a generator for electricity output, but the only identified inputs are small motors to maintain swing. This is a classic over-unity claim.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system claims to output more electrical energy (via generator) than is input by the small motors, ignoring that the pendulum's energy comes from the initial motor impulses and gravity. No net energy can be extracted
- Misapplication of a flywheel: The flywheel (9) may smooth rotation but does not create energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest a rolling element with a mobile center of gravity moving on a circular path, with lower wheels driven by an electric motor. The output rotation is supposedly induced by the movement of the mobile mass (implying gravity/inertia), but an explicit motor is listed as an input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be an attempt to create a gravity/inertia-driven motor. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies extracting net work from a conservative gravitational field in a closed cycle. The electric motor input is acknowledged, but the claims suggest the output rotation is generated by the mass movement itself, which is impossible without an external, non-conservative energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses an electric motor to drive wheels (Claim 7), but the output rotation is claimed to be 'induced by the movement of the mobile mass' (Claim 8), implying energy generation from gravity/inertia alone.
- Violates energy conservation: The description suggests the rolling element's motion, driven by a shifting center of gravity, can produce rotational output work without a net external energy input beyond the motor's drive. Gravity is a conservative fo
- Obfuscated mechanism: The patent mixes correct terms ('center of gravity', 'inertia', 'rolling element') in a vague configuration that implies a perpetual motion or over-unity device where gravitational potential or inertial energy is harvested witho
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy, with an implicit input of energy to lift the weights against gravity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a type of gravity motor. While gravity can provide torque to rotate a drum, the work gained from the falling weights is exactly equal to (and in reality, less than) the work required to lift those same weights back to their starting position, resulting in zero net energy output. Claiming 'extra energy' violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim of 'extra energy' ignores the energy required to lift the weights back up to their starting position.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system cannot output more work than the input work used to reset the weights.
- Mechanism is a gravity motor: It attempts to extract net work from a conservative force field (gravity) in a closed cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly a low-powered electric motor (15-20W). Implicitly, the claim suggests the motor's work to reposition weights creates a larger rotational imbalance to drive the main rotary member, implying an energy gain from the imbalance correction.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor-driven mechanism. The motor's energy is used to reposition weights, creating an imbalance. The claim that the member then rotates to 'correct the imbalance' and produce useful output work is a violation of energy conservation, as no new energy is introduced; it is a closed mechanical system where output cannot exceed the motor's input minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system is a motor-driven mechanism where the only net energy input is the electric motor. The 'imbalance correction' is not an independent energy source; it is a mechanical consequence of the motor's work. The output
- Misapplication of imbalance: The imbalance creates a torque, but doing work against or extracting work from this torque requires an energy source. The motor provides the energy to create the imbalance condition; the subsequent rotation to 'correct' i
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description im
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism appears to be an internal mechanical linkage (double arms X pivoting at point C) intended to generate motion or work from its own reaction forces, suggesting a claim of energy from the device's internal operation alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a self-actuating mechanical linkage intended to generate 'free energy.' This is a classic perpetual motion scheme, as it lacks any external energy source and relies on internal reaction forces, which cannot produce net work. It directly violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, ambient).
- Describes a purely kinematic reaction force system, which cannot perform net work on itself without an external energy source.
- Implies creation of 'free energy' (énergie gratuite), a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified/implicit. Title claims 'creating unlimited energy' with no identifiable external source, implying energy generation from nothing or from an internal perpetual mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The title 'Machine creating unlimited energy' explicitly claims energy generation without an identifiable source, which directly violates the conservation of energy. Any device claiming to create energy from nothing is fundamentally impossible under established physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Title directly claims creation of unlimited energy, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- No identifiable energy input described, making energy accounting impossible
- Implies a perpetual energy source without a gradient or external supply
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The described system uses its own electrical output from a generator to power heaters that create steam to drive the turbine (Drehscheibe). The only external input implied is an initial energy to start the cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a self-powered engine that claims to use its own generator output to create the steam pressure that drives it. This violates energy conservation, as the generator's power is derived from the turbine, making it a lossy closed loop with no net energy input to overcome losses. It is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system claims the generator's electrical output provides the heating power to create the steam that drives the turbine that powers the generator, forming a closed loop with no net ex
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It describes a heat engine (steam turbine) but proposes to use its work output to recreate the necessary temperature gradient (by reheating the steam/water), ignoring the inevitable waste heat dissipation re
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim ignores
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title claims a machine with an efficiency greater than one, implying an output greater than the required input, but no explicit energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim of a machine with an efficiency greater than one is a direct violation of the law of energy conservation. Without a described external energy source, such a claim defines a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of efficiency > 1 violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- No identifiable process or energy gradient is described to enable work extraction.
- The claim inherently rejects the universal principle that no process can have a useful energy output exceeding its total energy input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial gravitational potential and kinetic energy of the rotating mass point (4). The system claims to use energy from the mass at its lowest point (normal force N) to store in a spring, then release that energy to help the mass overcome the top dead center, leading to self-sustaining or increasing oscillation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim: a mechanical oscillator that purportedly uses its own motion to store and release energy in a spring to sustain or amplify its swing, violating energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to compensate for inevitable frictional and dissipative losses, making perpetual or self-amplifying motion impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes a cycle where energy extracted from the mass's motion at the bottom is stored and then reused to propel it over the top, with claims of 'self-tätige Wiederholung' (self-repeating operation) and 'aufs
- Incomplete energy accounting: It ignores all dissipative losses (friction in bearings, pivots, air resistance, internal damping in the spring). The energy transferred to the spring comes from the mass's kinetic/potential energy, so releasing it back
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: The calculation N = G + Cf = 5G treats the centrifugal force as a constant external force adding to the weight. However, in an oscillating/pivoting system, the centrifugal force is not an independent energy source
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be an oscillating mass system driven by a rotating eccentric mechanism. The primary energy input is implied to be the initial rotational input to the eccentric, but the claim suggests it can sustain oscillation and even enter resonance, potentially generating thrust forces greater than the input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanically oscillating system driven by an eccentric. For it to generate sustained thrust or enter resonance without an external energy source feeding the oscillations, it would violate conservation of energy and momentum. The system is a closed mechanical loop with no identifiable external gradient or energy input to explain net thrust generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim implies a mechanical system can enter resonance and generate propulsive forces without a clear external energy source to account for the claimed output.
- No accounting for energy losses due to friction, damping, or radiation.
- The description suggests a closed mechanical system (oscillating mass + eccentric drive) could produce net thrust or excess work, violating Newton's laws for closed systems.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The system claims to use a battery to start a pump, which pressurizes fluid. A turbine generator then extracts energy from this pressurized fluid to power the pump motor and recharge the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The system violates the first law of thermodynamics. The turbine can only recover a portion of the energy the pump adds to the fluid. Using that recovered energy to drive the pump results in a net energy loss, making sustained operation without an external power source impossible. The battery would simply drain after startup losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by proposing a closed-loop energy recovery system where the turbine generator is powered by the pump's output. The energy extracted by the turbine must be less than the energy the pump added to the fluid, minus losses.
- The system description (Claims 4-6) implies sustained operation without external power, which is thermodynamically impossible. The battery is only for startup, and the turbine is claimed to power all components, creating a perpetual motion machine of
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: The analysis ignores that
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: The described o
Claimed Energy Source
Initial rotational input to the 'gyroscopic components' (claimed to be 'initially rotated to trigger motion'), with ambiguous claims of subsequent 'enhanced gyration' from track devices without clear external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to generate electricity from gyroscopic motion that becomes self-sustaining or enhanced after initial rotation, violating energy conservation. The described mechanical interactions cannot overcome inevitable friction losses, and the system implies perpetual motion without identifying a continuous external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims the system develops 'predetermined gyration energy' after initial input without accounting for energy dissipation.
- No mechanism to overcome friction losses: The described track system and dual-axis rotation would dissipate energy through friction, air resistance, and bearing losses.
- Perpetual motion implication: Suggests that initial rotation leads to sustained or enhanced gyration that can be converted to electrical output indefinitely.
- Misapplication of gyroscopic principles: Gyroscopic forces can redirect forces but cannot create net energy; precession requires continuous torque input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output electricity
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear primary energy source. The device appears to be a self-driving mechanism where a motor (馬達) drives a flywheel assembly (飛輪模組), which then supposedly drives the entire device being rotated. Claims suggest the motor provides different torque levels at different positions to maintain constant rotation speed of the flywheel.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to achieve autonomous rotation through a flywheel-driven mechanism where the driving motor's torque is varied based on flywheel position. However, it describes a closed mechanical system with no external energy source, effectively claiming the flywheel's rotation can sustain itself while driving the entire device - a clear violation of energy conservation as it describes a self-powered perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- System appears to be a closed mechanical loop where output work is claimed to drive the input
- Violates conservation of energy - net work cannot be extracted without an external energy source
- Flywheel cannot provide sustained net driving torque to its own driving mechanism without energy input
- Controller varying motor torque at different positions doesn't create energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be an electromagnetic system where a control block (14) switches an electromagnetic node (13) to generate magnetic force between it and a rotating magnetic node (12) attached to a shaft. No primary energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a drive device for a rotating shaft using magnetic and electromagnetic nodes controlled by a switching block, but fails to identify any external energy source. The abstract references an 'unstable electrogenerating system,' suggesting claims of energy generation or multiplication without proper energy accounting, violating conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims to generate rotational force via magnetic interactions without explaining energy source
- Implies self-sustaining or over-unity operation ('unstable electrogenerating system')
- Missing energy accounting for electromagnetic node operation and control system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use magnetic field generators interacting with permanent magnets to produce propulsion, but no identifiable external energy input is specified. Appears to rely solely on magnetic interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
This magnetic propulsion system claims to generate thrust and desired efficiency through complex arrangements of permanent magnets and magnetic field generators, but provides no identifiable external energy source. This constitutes a violation of energy conservation, as magnetic forces alone in a closed system cannot produce net work or propulsion without an energy input to create and maintain non-equilibrium conditions.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source (electrical, chemical, etc.)
- Claims propulsion and desired efficiency from magnetic interactions alone
- Implies net work can be extracted from a static magnetic configuration without an energy gradient
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot produce net thrust without an energy source
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a closed hydraulic/magnetic system claiming to generate energy through internal force multiplication and self-feeding cycles. The only explicit external input mentioned is ambient air suction for bellows pumps, which is not an energy source for net work output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed hydraulic system with magnetic actuators that claims to generate energy through internal force multiplication and self-feeding cycles. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation by implying net work output without an adequate external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and hydraulic inefficiencies.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: describes a closed-loop system where hydraulic fluid movement in S1 drives S2, which then drives S1 again, implying perpetual motion with net energy output.
- Incomplete energy accounting: magnetic actuators require electrical energy input to switch states; this input energy is not accounted for in the work output.
- Misapplication of force multiplication: hydraulic force multiplication trades force for displacement, conserving energy, not creating it. The system describes force multiplication as if it creates excess energy.
- No identifiable primary energy source: the system lacks a clear input of energy (fuel, external electricity, thermal gradient) to compensate for losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system (chain drive on triangular frame) claiming to generate electricity through 'automatic circulation' and 'sliding friction power' without identifying any external energy input. The abstract references 'water flows downhill' principle but describes no actual water flow or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to generate electricity through mechanical 'automatic circulation' on a triangular frame without identifying any energy source, directly violating energy conservation. The water flow analogy is misleading as no actual gravitational potential or other energy input is described, making this a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims 'automatic circulation' implying perpetual motion
- Mechanical system cannot generate net energy without input
- Violates conservation of energy - output electricity has no energy input
- References water flow analogy but implements mechanical chain system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate linear motion using electromagnetic elements (movable magnet, fixed magnets, coils, buffer elements) with electrical power supplied to coils, but suggests motion can be generated without proportional energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system using magnets and coils to generate linear motion, but provides no physically valid mechanism for net propulsion without violating Newton's third law or energy conservation. The energy source is ambiguous, and the described control of motion by buffer elements suggests an attempt to create net work from internal forces in a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear energy accounting for motion generation
- Implies generation of net linear motion/force from an oscillatory electrical input without an external reaction mass or field gradient
- System appears to be a closed electromagnetic assembly with no external energy source besides the supplied AC power
- Claims motion control/restoration by buffer elements without energy dissipation mechanism
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input appears to be an initial pendulum motion. The device claims to extract net work from the gravitational potential energy gain of rolling weights, which is not an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. It describes a pendulum mechanism that supposedly lifts rolling weights to a higher gravitational potential with each swing, using that gained energy to drive a generator. This violates energy conservation, as the energy required to lift the weights must come from the pendulum's initial motion, which will be depleted by friction and the lifting work itself.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to increase the gravitational potential energy of weights repeatedly via pendulum motion without an equivalent external energy input.
- No identifiable external energy source to overcome dissipative losses (friction, air resistance) and perform net work.
- Describes a closed mechanical system where the pendulum's kinetic and potential energy would be depleted by lifting the weights, leading to damping, not sustained or amplified motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'self-excit
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity from 'vapor pressure' and 'condensation' in a closed-loop system, suggesting extraction of work from ambient thermal energy without an adequate temperature gradient or external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that claims to generate electricity using vapor pressure and condensation cycles. It fails to account for the energy input required to regenerate the working fluid or maintain the pressure differences, effectively proposing a perpetual motion machine of the second kind that extracts net work from ambient heat without a temperature gradient, violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of input energy required to establish or maintain the claimed pressure/condensation cycles.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implies net work extraction from a single thermal reservoir (ambient environment) via condensation and evaporation cycles without a compensating heat rejection to a lower temperature sink.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Describes 'vapor pressure' and 'condensation' generating electricity but lacks a coherent description of how a sustainable pressure gradient is maintained to do net work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described. Claims to use renewable energy harvesters (wind, solar) to create rotational motion, which then lifts magnets to fall through coils via gravity. The abstract suggests 'accumulating harvested energy' to overcome a threshold, but the core claimed mechanism is gravity-driven magnet fall.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator at its core. While it mentions using wind or solar to initiate motion, the described power cycle—lifting a magnet and then letting it fall to generate electricity—cannot produce net useful energy. The energy needed to lift the magnet will always be equal to or greater than the energy recovered from its fall, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to lift the magnet against gravity to reset the system is not accounted for in the net energy output.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system implicitly claims to get more electrical energy from the magnet's fall through the coil than the mechanical energy required to lift the magnet back up (including all system losses).
- Misapplication of gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle is zero. The falling magnet converts gravitational potential energy to electrical energy, but that potential energy was first input by the lifting mechanism.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (solar, waste heat, geothermal, ocean thermal gradient) and chemical energy from fuels or hydration/dehydration reactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim directly violates the second law of thermodynamics by asserting 100% conversion of thermal energy to work. While it identifies real ambient thermal energy sources, its proposed mechanism misapplies the concept of buoyancy and fails to account for the full energy cycle, making it a perpetual motion claim of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 100% conversion of thermal energy to mechanical/electrical work, which violates the second law of thermodynamics.
- Uses 'flutuabilidade' (buoyancy) as a factor to 'increase efficiency,' but buoyancy itself is not an energy source; it is a force derived from a density gradient, and work extracted from it ultimately comes from the gravitational potential energy of
- Proposes a cycle (evaporation/sublimation/condensation) but lacks a clear, complete accounting of the work required to condense/despressurize the fluid and return it to the evaporator, which is essential for a closed cycle.
- Ambiguous mechanism suggests using the buoyant rise of vapor through a liquid to drive a turbine, but the work done comes from the expansion and buoyant force, which is ultimately limited by the available enthalpy drop and the Carnot efficiency betwe
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of 100% eff
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Asserti
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (evapo
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract explicitly states the device does not require external fuel, electricity, or other power sources to achieve power output. The only described energy input appears to be the initial manual setup of permanent magnets and conductors.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'power source device' using permanent magnets, conductors, and a flywheel that claims to output power without any external fuel or energy input. This is a direct violation of energy conservation (First Law) as it proposes a perpetual motion machine. The specific arrangement cannot provide sustained work output as all initial magnetic energy would be dissipated overcoming friction and resistance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by claiming useful work output with no identifiable energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The described arrangement of permanent magnets, conductors, and a flywheel cannot produce sustained motion without dissipating energy; it would settle into an equilibrium state.
- No mechanism for overcoming friction, electrical resistance, or other dissipative losses is provided or explained.
- Claims 'no noise, no pollution, avoids energy waste' while producing power is a thermodynamic impossibility for a closed system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial motor. The device claims to use a complex system of pulleys, steel cables, and 'force balance levers' to create a 'circular' or 'recyclable' motion that supposedly reduces the required lifting force by half while maintaining travel distance.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system that claims to lift a weight with half the force while maintaining the same lifting distance, which directly violates the work-energy principle. No external energy source is identified to compensate for the apparent reduction in required work, making this a perpetual motion claim of the first kind (energy out > energy in).
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'energy saving' (省力) without identifying an external energy source to offset the reduced force, implying force/distance trade-off is circumvented.
- Describes a multi-stage pulley/cable system that allegedly allows a weight to be lifted with half the force without reducing the distance, which violates the work-energy principle (Work = Force × Distance).
- The system appears to be a closed mechanical loop driven by a single motor, suggesting perpetual or amplified motion without an added energy source.
- Uses vague terms like 'force balance lever' (省力平衡杠杆) and 'output track tension weight' (输出轨道张力重锤) in a context that suggests energy creation or conservation violation.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of reduced force fo
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies a mecha
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical descripti
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes extracting power from compressed air circulation and recycling/feeding back the compressed air pressure. The only explicit input is the initial compressed air, but the system claims to recycle and feedback the pressure to enhance performance, implying a sustained process without a clear, sustained external energy input to re-compress the air.
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to generate power by circulating and recycling compressed air pressure. This describes a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it implicitly suggests generating net work from a closed-loop air system without accounting for the continuous energy input required to re-compress the air after it expands and does work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying a perpetual or self-sustaining power output from a finite store of compressed air.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting a cycle that can recycle pressure to perform net work without dissipating energy; any expansion of air to do work reduces its pressure, and restoring that pressure requires more work input than
- Incomplete energy accounting: the work required to re-compress the air to its original state after expansion is not accounted for in the described 'recycle and feedback'.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Compressed air from an air compressor (electrically powered) stored in tanks, used to create an unbalanced torque on a rotating system with weighted levers and counterweights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical system powered by compressed air. The patent abstract misleadingly claims it operates without water, wind, fuel, or sunlight, while the actual energy source is an electrically-driven air compressor. This constitutes incomplete energy accounting and creates a false impression of a novel energy source, violating energy conservation when the full system boundary is considered.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses compressed air as the apparent 'input', but the compressor requires electrical energy that isn't counted in the efficiency claim.
- No net energy creation: The mechanism describes a complex mechanical system (rotating shafts, gravity wheels, levers, compressed air jets) but provides no pathway for energy multiplication. The output electricity must come from the input compressor w
- Claimed independence from conventional sources: The abstract states it doesn't need water, wind, fuel, or sunlight, implying it runs on its own stored energy or ambient energy, but the only identified active input is compressed air from a powered com
- Ambiguous perpetual motion implication: The description suggests high efficiency and operation without continuous fuel input, which together imply over-unity performance if the compressor energy is not properly accounted for.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The device appears to be a mechanical system with rotating disks, rollers, and gears, but no external energy input (electrical, chemical, wind, thermal gradient, etc.) is described. The abstract suggests it converts 'small kinetic energy into larger kinetic energy' without identifying the source of the initial kinetic energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical assembly of rotating disks and gears that claims to aggregate small kinetic inputs into a larger kinetic output to drive a generator. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it provides no identifiable external energy source to overcome losses and produce net electrical output. The system, as described, constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to aggregate smaller kinetic energy into larger kinetic energy without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies energy multiplication (output > input) in a closed mechanical system.
- No identifiable prime mover: The 'self-driving device' has no described power source to initiate or sustain motion against friction and electrical load.
- Gear/roller systems cannot create energy: Mechanical advantage trades force for distance or vice versa, but total work output cannot exceed work input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest a system where a 'control magnetic flux' (11) and 'main magnetic flux' (01, 03) interact through a 'rotating magnetic body' (13) and 'stationary magnetic body' (09) to produce output work greater than the input, implying energy extraction from magnetic configurations without an identified external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system that allegedly produces continuous output work by cleverly arranging and switching magnetic fluxes. This constitutes a violation because it claims a net energy output without identifying an external energy source to replenish the magnetic potential energy, effectively describing a magnetic perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a system where magnetic interactions allegedly produce more output energy than input, with no external energy source (e.g., electrical, thermal gradient) identified to account for the excess.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual or self-sustaining cycle where magnetic potential energy is used and regenerated without losses, creating a net work output from an equilibrium system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on geometric arrangements (angles 0-180°, 225-360°) of magnetic fluxes to produce work, ignoring the energy required to establish and maintain magnetic fields and overcome dissipative losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use magnetic poles (N and S) arranged in specific angular configurations (60°, 360°, 180°) to generate rotational motion and output power, implying energy extraction from magnetic fields without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device using permanent magnets arranged in specific angular patterns (e.g., 60°, 360°) to allegedly generate rotational motion and output power. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to extract net work from a static magnetic field without an external energy source, constituting a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No identifiable external energy source to account for claimed output.
- Violates thermodynamics: Attempts to create perpetual motion using permanent magnets in a closed configuration.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes geometric arrangements of magnets but ignores the energy required to establish and maintain magnetic fields and overcome friction.
- Implies energy multiplication: Suggests arranging four magnetic poles in a specific way generates usable work from the magnetic field alone.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system using 'U'-shaped structures and humidity gradients to generate electricity, but fails to account for the primary energy input. It appears to claim energy generation from ambient humidity without specifying the energy source driving the humidity transport or phase change.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that allegedly generates electricity from ambient humidity using 'U'-shaped structures, implying output greater than controlled input. This violates energy conservation as it does not identify the primary energy source driving the process. The mechanism attempts to extract net work from an equilibrium or ambient gradient without a corresponding entropy sink, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by implying electricity generation without a clear, quantified energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting work can be extracted from an isothermal humidity gradient without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mention of the energy required to create, maintain, or regenerate the humidity gradient or the 'U'-shaped structure's function.
- Uses obfuscating technical language (e.g., 'energy multiplication', complex Korean descriptions of processes) to mask the fundamental energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air/gas compressed by an electrically/mechanically driven compressor. The patent text implies the atmosphere itself is the primary energy source, but the compressor work is the only explicit input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed-loop system where a compressor, heat engine, and turbine process a gas. The patent implies net power generation by 'tapping' atmospheric energy, but the compressor requires significant work input. Without an external high-temperature source (like combustion or solar heat), the system cannot produce net work from the isothermal atmosphere, violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The compressor's work input is not properly accounted for against the turbine/generator output.
- Implies net energy generation from a single-temperature atmospheric reservoir, violating the Second Law.
- Ambiguous claims of 'tapping' atmospheric energy without a temperature or chemical potential gradient to exploit.
- Vague efficiency improvements from mounting compressor and turbine on the same shaft do not overcome thermodynamic limits.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text references gravity and 'nature energies' related to gravity, but describes a closed mechanical system where weights are lifted and then released to produce rotation, implying the energy input is the initial lifting of masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-powered motor that claims to generate excess kinetic energy by creating a permanent mechanical disequilibrium. This violates energy conservation, as the net work extracted in a cycle cannot exceed the work input to lift the masses. The system is a classic over-unity claim disguised with complex mechanical arrangements.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'excess kinetic energy' generation from a permanent disequilibrium in a rotating system, which implies energy output > energy input.
- Proposes that asymmetric arrangement of masses creates a permanent torque/disequilibrium that drives rotation without an external energy source to reset the system.
- Uses the formula '-m.g.l < +m.g.l' to justify net torque, but this is a static torque inequality; for continuous rotation, the system must be cyclically reset, requiring work equal to or greater than the output.
- Claims to replace height 'h' with a real working path 'l' to obey energy conservation, but gravitational potential energy depends on vertical height (mgh), not path length.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Mentions 'atmospheric energy', 'vibrational energy', and 'electrical energy' but describes a process where electrical energy input appears to be amplified through unexplained interactions with atmospheric/vibrational energy, suggesting energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to use a small electrical input to extract and amplify atmospheric or vibrational energy, producing a larger electrical output. This violates energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics, as it effectively claims to create useful work from an ambient equilibrium source without a sufficient entropy sink, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a process where electrical input energy is used to extract atmospheric/vibrational energy, but the output electrical energy appears to exceed the input in a cyclic or cascading manner.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of a usable energy gradient (electrical output) from ambient atmospheric/vibrational energy without a corresponding lower-temperature sink or adequate input work, effectively a perpetual mot
- Incomplete energy accounting: Fails to quantify all energy inputs (control electrical energy, work to interact with atmosphere) and outputs, focusing on apparent amplification.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses terms like 'vibrational energy', 'atmospheric energy', and 'energy amplification' without a clear, physically valid conversion process (e.g., like a heat engine or wind turbine).
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The device claims to use an external axial force (mechanismo forze esterne) and an input pinion (pignone di ingresso) to drive the system. The claimed 'multiplication' suggests the output torque is greater than what the input torque and axial force could produce.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a mechanical torque multiplier where the output torque is independent of the input drive torque and generated solely by an axial thrust. This is a direct violation of the conservation of energy, as a passive mechanical system cannot create energy or torque from nothing; it can only transform force and motion at a fixed power (input force * input displacement rate = output torque * output angular velocity, minus losses).
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 3 explicitly states the resulting torque 'does not depend on the original torque of the input mechanical transmission' but only on the axial thrust received by the mechanism. This implies energy/torque output is decoupled from and can exceed th
- The device is described as a mechanical torque multiplier. In any passive mechanical system (gears, levers, screws), torque multiplication always comes at the expense of rotational speed or displacement, preserving energy (minus losses). The claim of
- The axial force and input torque are both energy inputs. The system cannot output more work (torque * angular displacement) than the work input from these two sources combined.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of water initially placed in the system, with no clear external energy input to restore the water to its elevated position after it falls.
AI Physics Analysis
This system is a water-based perpetual motion machine. It uses falling water to generate electricity, then attempts to use that electricity to pump the water back to the top. Due to losses, the generated electricity will always be less than the energy needed to pump the water back up, violating the law of energy conservation unless an external energy source is added.
Specific Physics Issues
- System describes a water cycle where water falls from a high container to drive turbines, then is pumped back up. The electrical output from the turbines is insufficient to power the pumps needed to restore the water's gravitational potential energy,
- No external energy source (e.g., solar, grid power, fuel) is identified to compensate for thermodynamic losses (friction, electrical resistance, pump inefficiency).
- Claims imply a closed-loop, self-sustaining system where generated electricity powers the pumps, which is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (violates energy conservation).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description fo
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The cor
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a closed loop: buoyant objects rise in a liquid column, are removed at the top, returned to the bottom via a see-saw mechanism, and re-inserted. No external energy input is specified, though claim 3 mentions the see-saw 'provides or generates a power source'.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The buoyant rise of objects gives temporary kinetic/potential energy, but resetting the cycle by returning the objects to the bottom requires at least as much energy as was gained, plus losses. With no external energy source specified, the system cannot generate net power and would stop.
Specific Physics Issues
- System lacks an identified net external energy input to sustain motion and overcome losses.
- The see-saw returning objects to the bottom would require work (lifting against gravity) equal to or greater than the potential energy gained by the objects during their buoyant rise, minus losses.
- Buoyant rise extracts gravitational potential energy from the system's liquid column; returning the objects resets this potential, requiring an energy input not accounted for.
- Friction, viscous drag, and other dissipative losses would drain any initial energy, leading to stoppage.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims a power sou
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described system attempting to use compressed air and waste heat from its own compressor to run an ORC turbine or Stirling engine, which then powers the compressor, creating a closed loop. External inputs include regenerative braking and solar panels.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's core claim of using waste heat from a compressor to run a generator that powers the same compressor is a textbook violation of energy conservation. While regenerative braking and solar panels are valid inputs, they are insufficient to explain the claimed 'unlimited range' and self-sustaining operation, which relies on an impossible closed energy loop.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core loop (compressor -> waste heat -> ORC/Stirling -> electricity -> compressor) is a classic perpetual motion scheme. The system's own waste heat cannot be used to generate more net energy than was consumed to create the compression.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy to initially compress the air must come from somewhere (battery). The ORC/Stirling cycle will recover only a fraction of that input energy as electricity, resulting in a net loss.
- Violates the First Law: The system claims to power its own compressor and recharge the main driving batteries indefinitely, implying energy creation.
- Violates the Second Law: Attempts to use a single temperature source (compressor waste heat) with ambient cooling to do useful work, ignoring the need for a sufficient temperature gradient and the degradation of energy quality.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use a 'control input' to generate 'free energy' and 'negative energy' from a vacuum capacitor (10) containing a 'free electron group (C)', which is then amplified and fed back, purportedly creating a self-sustaining cycle that outputs more energy than the initial control input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate more energy than is input by amplifying and feeding back energy from a capacitor containing 'free electrons,' with no identifiable external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses. This constitutes a clear violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., fuel, sunlight, thermal gradient).
- Claims of generating 'free energy' and 'negative energy' from a passive capacitor with an initial electron charge, violating energy conservation.
- Describes a feedback loop where output energy is recycled to power the device, implying perpetual motion of the first kind (energy out > energy in).
- Uses undefined, non-standard terms like 'free electron group' and 'negative energy' in a context suggesting energy creation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics-sounding ter
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a refrigeration/heat pump cycle (compressor work input) but claims the system can produce hydraulic/mechanical drive force autonomously, potentially using only its own conserved compression heat, implying net work output from a single thermal reservoir.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a refrigeration cycle but claims it can autonomously produce mechanical drive force, potentially using only its own waste heat. This violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it implies net work extraction from a single temperature gradient or the recycling of waste heat to perpetually sustain the cycle without sufficient external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'self-drive' using only previously rejected compression heat, ignoring that this heat is at a temperature near the hot reservoir and cannot be fully converted to work.
- Violates Second Law: Implies a cyclic process can produce net work by cooling a compressed gas, liquefying it, and then reusing the rejected heat to re-pressurize or drive the system, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
- Ambiguous process: The description of using a capillary tube and liquid state to create 'extremely potential drive pressure reinforcement' through slight later heat addition is thermodynamically vague and suggests energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed source is the gravitational potential energy of solid bodies (falling masses) in a closed loop. The system attempts to use buoyancy in a liquid-filled 'Auftriebsschacht' (lift shaft) to return the mass to the top, completing the cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a gravity-powered generator that uses falling masses to generate electricity and then relies on buoyancy to return them to the top. This is a classic over-unity or perpetual motion claim, as the energy needed to reset the system (lifting the mass net against gravity) always exceeds the energy harvested from the fall, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The energy required to lift the mass against gravity (minus the buoyant force) is greater than the electrical energy generated during its fall.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent ignores the work needed to move the mass from the bottom of the lift shaft back into the fall shaft at the top. Buoyancy only provides a partial upward force; net work input is required to complete the cycle.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: It describes a closed-loop system that purportedly generates electricity continuously without an external energy input, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electrical energy from magnetic interactions between N and S poles of permanent magnets, with apparent energy multiplication through magnetic flux manipulation and switching circuits. No clear external energy input is identified beyond initial configuration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electrical energy by manipulating interactions between permanent magnets via switching circuits, suggesting energy multiplication. This violates energy conservation because permanent magnets are static potential fields, not energy sources; any work extracted requires equal or greater energy input to reconfigure the system. The design is a classic magnetic perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate net electrical output without accounting for energy required to manipulate magnetic fields and operate switching circuits.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of useful work from an equilibrium magnetic system without an external energy gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on output from magnetic interactions while ignoring input energy needed to control the system's configuration and switching states.
- Misapplication of magnetic principles: Suggests magnetic poles (N/S) can be arranged to produce continuous net energy extraction from permanent magnets, which store finite energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct magnetic ter
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex interactions between components (light, heat, humidity, vibration, and electromagnetic energy converters) with claims of energy multiplication and cascading effects, but no primary energy input is clearly identified or quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system of interconnected energy converters (electromagnetic, thermal, humidity, vibration) with cascading feedback loops that imply energy amplification without a clear, sufficient primary energy source. The description is highly obfuscated with technical terms but lacks quantitative energy accounting, violating conservation of energy principles by suggesting output can exceed identifiable input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent claim of energy multiplication/regeneration without a clear external energy source
- Incomplete energy accounting - inputs and outputs are not quantified
- Implied over-unity operation through cascading components (c1, c2, c9, etc.)
- Vague mechanism claiming to convert ambient energy (light, heat, humidity, vibration) into usable work with unspecified efficiency and no thermodynamic limits acknowledged
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a system using 'electrical energy' and 'seal' mechanisms to capture CO2, but suggests energy multiplication through cascading/stacking processes without identifying a primary external energy source sufficient to explain the claimed outputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a CO2 capture system using electrical and sealing mechanisms, but its description of cascading processes and energy flows suggests an output greater than the identifiable input, violating energy conservation. Without a clear, sufficient external energy source, the implied self-sustaining or multiplicative operation is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description implies cascading/stacking processes that could create an illusion of output exceeding input.
- No clear identification of the primary energy input driving the CO2 capture and conversion work.
- Implied perpetual motion: The language suggests a self-sustaining or multiplicative energy process without a thermodynamic gradient or external power source.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: The system appears to claim to produce more useful energy (for CO2 capture/conversion) than is input, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims 'gratuit' (free) energy from internal pressure depression and gravity, with partial energy transfer from output back to input, suggesting a self-sustaining or over-unity process.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate 'free' kinetic energy by creating a cumulative internal pressure difference and exploiting gravity, with energy feedback from output to input. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes a net energy gain from nowhere, and the second law as it suggests creating useful work from an equilibrium source (gravity) without a corresponding entropy increase or external energy gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'gain énergétique sans apport extérieur de puissance' (energy gain without external power input)
- Describes creating a cumulative internal depression via centrifugal acceleration to harness 'all pressure forces' without accounting for the work needed to create/maintain that depression
- Proposes using a partial energy transfer from output to input to sustain/grow the process, implying net energy creation
- Attempts to use gravity as a perpetual source of work without a compensating decrease in gravitational potential energy of a mass.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text mentions 'ambient energy' and 'vibration energy' being 'converted' to produce more output energy than input, suggesting it claims to extract net work from ambient sources without a sufficient gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract describes a device that converts ambient and vibration energy to produce an output greater than its controlled input, which is a classic sign of incomplete energy accounting. It violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics by implying net energy can be extracted from ambient sources without a sufficient thermodynamic gradient or a corresponding waste heat sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output energy exceeds control input, ignoring total energy inputs.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies extracting useful work from ambient equilibrium or low-grade energy without a compensating entropy increase or larger energy degradation elsewhere.
- Vague mechanism: Describes converting ambient/vibration energy via a 'conversion process' but provides no physically valid pathway that respects thermodynamic limits.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex system with multiple 'energy amplification' stages (자성체, 승강체, 체인풀리, 구동풀리) connected in feedback loops, but no primary external energy input is identified. The system appears to claim to amplify or multiply energy internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a multi-stage system with internal feedback loops that claims to 'amplify' or 'multiply' energy. No primary external energy source is identified, and the described operation would require creating energy from within the system, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy). This is a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Describes cascading/feedback loops (e.g., output of one stage feeds another, which in turn feeds back) that imply energy multiplication without an external source.
- Uses terminology like 'energy amplification' (ìê¸°ë ¥ ì´ì©) which, in context, suggests output > total input, violating conservation of energy.
- The entire mechanism is described as a closed loop of energy conversion stages with no net input, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of 'energy amplific
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describes a sys
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex, specific technical
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes complex cascading energy conversions (motion force → electromagnetic forces → thermal energy → motion force again) with claims of amplification, but no primary external energy source is identified beyond an initial unspecified 'control input'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex system that claims to amplify 'motion force' through cascading electromagnetic and thermal conversions, ultimately producing more output than input. This violates energy conservation as no sufficient external energy source is identified, and the described mechanism suggests a perpetual motion scheme where energy is allegedly created within the cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Apparent perpetual motion/energy amplification cycle without an external source
- Incomplete energy accounting: Output energy claimed to exceed input without identifying all inputs
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Describes complex cascading conversions that obscure the fundamental energy source
- Claims of energy multiplication through unspecified 'amplification' mechanisms
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to operate perpetually after an initial battery charge, using only internal heat recovery from compression, friction, and a heat exchanger to sustain operation without further energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed system that, after an initial start, uses recovered heat from compression and friction to perpetually drive itself and produce excess work. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by creating energy from nothing, and the second law by lacking a cold reservoir to dump entropy, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net energy production (perpetual operation) after initial start, violating conservation of energy.
- Asserts that internal friction increases the total usable thermal energy, misapplying the first law.
- Proposes a closed-cycle heat engine that recovers and reuses all waste heat to drive itself, violating the second law (no entropy sink).
- Implies a heat pump cycle that powers its own compressor, which is thermodynamically impossible for net work output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy from environmental sources (temperature difference, humidity, vibration, sunlight) is claimed to be converted to electricity via a 'multi-energy harvesting device', but the description suggests output exceeds all identifiable inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a multi-energy harvesting device that appears to use ambient energy to power itself and produce excess output, suggesting a circular energy creation loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a net energy output greater than the environmental energy input harvested, and the second law as it suggests a perpetual gradient can be maintained.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims to generate electricity from ambient gradients without quantifying the input energy from those gradients or the conversion efficiency.
- Implies energy multiplication: Suggests the harvested energy can be used to power the same harvesting device in a loop, violating conservation.
- Violates thermodynamic limits: Implies a self-sustaining or amplifying cycle without an external high-quality energy source, akin to perpetual motion.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on falling masses, but the system is a closed mechanical loop. The only potential energy input is the initial gravitational potential energy of the masses when positioned high in the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It attempts to extract net work from masses falling in a gravitational field, but provides no mechanism to return them to their initial height without expending at least as much energy as was gained from their fall. The continuous cycle described violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work extracted from masses falling must be less than or equal to the work required to lift those masses back to their starting height. The patent describes a continuous cycle with no external energy input to reset
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The system claims the falling masses drive a generator and then are guided back up to fall again, creating a net energy output from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores the energy cost of lifting the masses against gravity during the 'remontée' (ascent) phase. Friction and other losses are not accounted for.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied to be a 'perpetual-mobil' (perpetual motion) device. The text suggests extracting energy from 'vibration' and 'thermal gradient' of the environment, but the core claim is a self-sustaining or over-unity system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly references a 'perpetual-mobil' (perpetual motion machine) and describes a system where the output exceeds the control input, indicating an over-unity claim. This violates energy conservation and thermodynamic limits, as no complete accounting for all energy inputs is provided to justify the claimed performance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly names 'perpetual-mobil' (perpetual motion machine) as the core device.
- Claims 'output > control input' without complete accounting of all ambient energy inputs.
- Describes a system that appears to generate net work from equilibrium or sustain itself indefinitely, violating the first and/or second laws of thermodynamics.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanical transmission system (levers, cranks, connecting rods, pinions) where an input force is applied, but claims the phenomenon is 'renewable without end' and produces a 'resultant in power' from the 'recurrent effect of the rupture' of a resistance. No external energy source (e.g., fuel, electricity, ambient gradient) is identified to replenish the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical linkage but claims it can produce a continuous, renewable power output from a static applied force. This directly violates energy conservation, as no external energy source is identified to sustain the motion or overcome inevitable frictional losses. The description relies on invented, non-physical effects to obfuscate this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims endless renewal of an energetic phenomenon without an identified external energy source.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies creation of a 'resultant in power' (output work/energy) from a static force without displacement, which cannot perform net work.
- Obfuscatory language: Uses invented, non-standard terms like 'Dynamic Spiral Effect (E.D.S.)' and 'immaterialized trace' to describe energy generation, masking the lack of a real energy conversion process.
- No thermodynamic cycle or gradient: Describes a static architectural equilibrium being destabilized, but provides no mechanism to extract net work from an equilibrium state.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'renewable
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical engineeri
Claimed Energy Source
Primary: Electrical battery. Claims: Additional energy from mass redistribution within rotor (shifting 'piston-like' masses radially) and 'reluctance effect' during current interruption, with partial battery recharging during a 'generator' phase.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce net useful work and partially recharge its battery by exploiting the internal redistribution of mass within a rotating system and electromagnetic 'reluctance effects.' This is a classic violation: internal forces cannot create a net energy gain. The described process of extracting 'braking energy' from preventing acceleration when masses are moved inward is physically impossible in a closed system, as it would require an external torque. The language is highly obfuscated to disguise a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy: Claims to extract 'braking energy' from preventing rotational acceleration when masses are moved inward, which is a net zero energy process in a closed system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'extensive compensation of other energy losses' with 'almost no involvement of ambient energy', implying net output > electrical input without a valid external source.
- Misapplies inertia: Moving masses radially changes the rotor's moment of inertia, conserving angular momentum and changing rotational speed. Extracting energy from this change without an external torque source is impossible.
- Obfuscates perpetual motion: Describes 'tensor rejuvenation' and parametric resonance to disguise a system that allegedly recharges its own battery while doing useful work.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of a rolling element, with an unspecified external push or a pivoting/oscillating track mechanism intended to return the element to its initial height.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor that attempts to generate energy from a weight rolling down a slope, then uses an oscillating track or external push to return the weight uphill without fully accounting for the energy cost of that return. This violates energy conservation, as the net work output over a full cycle cannot exceed the work input needed to restore the gravitational potential.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy required to return the rolling element to its initial height (via a push or by tilting the track) is not accounted for in the net output.
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate energy from descent while implying the return mechanism (oscillation, counterweight) does not consume an equivalent or greater amount of energy.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The described system (closed loop track, descent for power, oscillation for reset) is a classic attempt at a gravity-powered over-unity device.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to attempt to extract energy from the swinging motion of a lever (杠杆) induced by weight engagement/disengagement, with this motion then driving an energy storage device (集能装置). The only explicit inputs are control signals to the pushers (推动件).
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a mechanical system where controlled weight engagement causes a lever to swing, purportedly generating and storing net energy. However, the energy to move the pushers and engage/disengage weights must exceed any energy recovered from the lever's motion due to inevitable losses, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No primary energy input identified (e.g., electrical, chemical, ambient gradient).
- Claims to 'collect the kinetic energy of the lever's swing' (æ¶éæ ææå¨çå¨è½) as if it is a net energy source, but the swing is initiated by pushers using stored/input energy.
- The described mechanism (weights engaging/disengaging, changing lever arm length) is a zero-sum system when accounting for all forces; any energy output from the storage device must come from the work done by the pushers, minus losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: attempts to get more energy out of the storage device than is input to the pushers, with no external energy source.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy input to heating elements, plus chemical potential energy of water (hydrogen-oxygen bonds). The device claims to extract 'stored energy' from water during rapid vaporization.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic overunity claim. It uses electrical energy to heat and rapidly vaporize water under pressure, then uses the expanding steam to drive a piston/generator. The patent incorrectly claims the 'stored energy' released from water during vaporization exceeds the electrical input, violating conservation of energy. The process is simply an inefficient heat engine, not a source of net energy gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims output energy > electrical input energy, ignoring that the 'excess' energy comes from the chemical potential of water, not from a novel source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Implies a process where heating water to vaporize it releases more usable work (via a piston/engine) than the electrical energy required to supply that heat, which is thermodynamically impossible for a closed cy
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'stored energy' released is simply the latent heat of vaporization. Converting this thermal energy back to work is limited by Carnot efficiency, guaranteeing net loss.
- Misinterprets phase change: Rapid vaporization ('flash boiling') does not release 'new' energy; it requires input energy to overcome latent heat. The energy to drive a piston comes from this input heat, not from a magical reservoir.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claim states 'without primary energy input' and implies the system's own electrical output is recycled to run the compressors, with ambient air as the working fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a classic over-unity claim: it proposes to use generators to power compressors that drive a turbine to run those same generators, plus produce a 22 MW output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the inevitable losses from friction, heat, and electrical resistance mean the system cannot sustain itself, let alone produce excess power from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims operation 'without primary energy input', violating conservation of energy.
- Invokes undefined 'Reciprocity of Forces' principle to suggest unlimited energy generation.
- System is a closed loop of compressors and generators; losses (heat, friction, electrical) would cause it to stop without external input.
- Flywheel stores but does not create energy; it would slow down due to system losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct components (
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to rely on gravity acting on rolling balls within eccentric rings/tracks to induce continuous rotation. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, wind, etc.) is specified beyond a 'circular starter' and a vague 'energy recovery organ'.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion machine. It uses gravity acting on balls in eccentric tracks to try to create continuous rotation, but provides no mechanism to reset the balls to a higher potential energy state without expending more work than is gained, violating energy conservation. The 'energy recovery' and 'starter' do not resolve this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation without an identifiable external energy source to overcome friction and other losses.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting net work from a closed gravitational potential system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'energy recovery organ' is unspecified but cannot recover 100% of energy; losses are inevitable.
- The system is in a conservative force field (gravity). Any motion will dampen due to friction, requiring continuous energy input to maintain rotation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/obfuscated. Claims to convert rotational motion to linear motion via 'elastic propulsion mass bodies' and 'bilateral ramps' with no identifiable external energy input beyond initial motor rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that allegedly converts rotational motion to linear motion with continuous acceleration using unspecified 'elastic propulsion mass bodies' and bilateral ramps. It violates energy conservation by implying net work can be extracted without accounting for energy inputs, and uses obfuscated terminology to obscure the lack of a legitimate energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input accounting
- Claims continuous acceleration without energy source
- Appears to describe mechanical over-unity system
- Uses vague terms like 'elastic propulsion mass body' without clear physics mechanism
- Implies energy multiplication through unspecified interactions
A - Incomplete energy accounting
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit source is the external 'Antrieb' (drive) on the central cylinder. The description suggests the system might aim to generate or amplify rotational energy through counter-rotating disks with masses (balls) and weight-shifting hydraulic systems.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a mechanical system that, based on its description of counter-rotating disks with movable masses and a central drive, suggests the possibility of generating or amplifying rotational energy without a sufficient external energy source. This violates energy conservation, as any useful output (accelerated rotation) cannot exceed the work input from the initial drive, minus losses from friction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim implies a mechanism for acceleration or energy gain without identifying a corresponding external energy input.
- No thermodynamic limit specified: The device is described as a mechanical system but lacks a clear principle for how it could exceed 100% efficiency.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Terms like 'Ruhebeschleuniger' (rest accelerator) and descriptions of weight-shifting systems suggest an attempt to create a non-conservative force or net torque from an internal configuration, which is impossible in a closed sys
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text references magma, mantle, magnetic field lines, groundwater, and 'quantum energy algorithms' but provides no identifiable, quantifiable energy input mechanism. Claims suggest energy extraction from Earth's systems without specifying a thermodynamic gradient or work source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is scientifically incoherent, using physics terms in a meaningless, obfuscatory manner while claiming to solve global energy demand. It identifies no legitimate energy source or conversion process, and its core description violates fundamental principles of energy conservation by implying energy can be extracted from undefined 'perfect boundaries' and 'fluid compositions' without a thermodynamic gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy conversion process
- Violates energy conservation by implying energy extraction without a defined source or gradient
- Uses physics terminology incoherently (e.g., 'perfect boundaries mass and energy highest conserving', 'force Jean's fountains')
- Claims 'crucial relief from global energy demand' without a workable mechanism
- Mixes unrelated concepts (solar panels, nuclear plants, magnetic field lines) without physical connection
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a closed loop where the electricity generated is intended to power the hydraulic pump that raises the weights, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity by using a falling weight to turn a generator, then using that electricity to pump the weight back up. This is impossible because the energy required to lift the weight is always greater than the electricity generated by its fall due to inevitable losses, leading to rapid shutdown.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system lacks a net external energy input. The work to raise a weight must come from an external source, not from the energy generated by lowering the same weight.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The hydraulic pump, powered by the generator, is claimed to raise the weight that just fell, creating a cycle with no net energy loss.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, pump inefficiency, generator inefficiency). The output electricity cannot exceed, or even equal, the input work to the pump.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'self-suffi
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Initial external input to start orbital motion; claims subsequent self-sustenance and net output via feedback of output energy to input.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a proposed perpetual motion machine. It attempts to use centrifugal force from orbiting masses to generate rotation, then feeds some output energy back to maintain the motion, implying net energy generation from a closed mechanical system. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as centrifugal forces within a system cannot create net energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by proposing a closed mechanical loop that returns output energy to drive its own input while claiming net useful output.
- Centrifugal force is a kinematic constraint, not an independent energy source; it cannot perform net work on the system's center of mass.
- Mechanism describes a complex gear train but provides no accounting for inevitable energy losses (friction, air resistance, hysteresis).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor during the powered half-cycle. The device implicitly claims gravitational potential energy from the motor rotor's descent as a *net* energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use gravity to 'reset' the motor's position for free, but the potential energy to lift the motor rotor must be paid for by the motor during the ascent. The descent cannot return more useful work than was used to lift it, making the claimed 'energy saving' from this cycle a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The descent phase uses gravity to 'rewind' the motor's position, but this does not add net energy to the system. The potential energy gained during the ascent is exactly the energy that must be dissipated/used to lower i
- Violates conservation of energy: The claim of 'energy saving effect' and driving a shaft continuously implies net work output greater than the electrical input, which is impossible. The system is a complicated way of intermittently driving a load wit
- Misunderstanding of gravity as an energy source: Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle in a gravitational field alone.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravitational potential energy from descending containers, but the system requires energy to lift mass (water/weights) back to the top to reset the cycle. The patent describes a closed-loop mass transfer system (claims 7-9) but does not identify an external energy input to perform this lift.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator that uses descending containers to turn a wheel. However, to make it continuous, mass must be moved from the bottom back to the top. The energy needed to lift this mass against gravity is not accounted for, making the described closed-loop system a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The net work to cycle the mass (e.g., water) from the bottom storage back to the top reservoirs is equal to or greater than the electrical energy generated by the descending mass.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a closed system with internal mass transfer but ignores the energy required to refill the top reservoirs (Claim 8-9).
- Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind: Aims for continuous output without an identified net energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. A motor provides the initial input, but the claims suggest the device generates 'internally created' thrust or propulsion from 'internal relativistic differential of forces' and 'energy...exchanged between the axes,' implying energy output exceeding motor input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses a motor as an initial energy input but claims to generate net thrust or propulsion from internal force differentials, violating conservation of momentum. The description obfuscates classical mechanics with misapplied relativistic terminology to suggest an impossible internal source of net external force.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'internal energy creates an internal differential' that results in external acceleration without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Invokes relativistic effects for a mechanical device with no indication of relativistic speeds (v << c).
- Misapplies concepts of relativity and variable time/distance in a classical rotational mechanics context.
- Claim 5 is incomplete but suggests a misunderstanding of angular momentum conservation and inverse-square laws.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'exclusively powered by the force or energy of gravity' acting on internal weights. No external energy input (e.g., lifting weights, environmental gradient) is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a mechanism to 'manage' gravity using shifting weights and locks, but it is a closed mechanical system with no external energy input. To produce continuous shaft work, the weights must be cyclically lifted, requiring more energy than can be recovered from their descent. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to generate net energy output from a closed gravitational interaction with internal weights.
- No energy input mechanism: Weights must be lifted against gravity to reset their position, requiring at least as much energy as can be extracted during their descent.
- Misinterprets gravity as an energy source: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a fixed gravitational field is zero.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initial battery energy, with claimed internal energy recovery/recycling loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that attempts to use a portion of its own work output to power a sub-system that recharges its initial energy source, while also producing net external electrical output. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as the total useful energy outputs (external electricity + battery recharge) cannot exceed the initial energy stored in the batteries minus all inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims to use a portion of the output shaft work to run a compressor, which then powers a secondary hydraulic motor and alternator to recharge the initial batteries, while also producing net 'output electricity'.
- Incomplete energy accounting: All losses (electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, thermal) are ignored. The work extracted to run the compressor and subsequent systems necessarily reduces the net work available from the primary shaft.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: The described configuration suggests the system can do useful work (generate output electricity) and simultaneously do the work to recharge its own source, exceeding 100% round-trip efficiency.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary explicit input is the driving device (e.g., electric motor). The claimed source of 'output' energy is the gravitational potential energy of the circumferential body, which is not an independent source but is established and recovered by the driving device.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to output more energy than is input by continuously recovering and releasing gravitational potential energy. This is impossible because lifting a mass to restore its potential energy requires at least as much work as can be extracted from its descent, making the system a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claim states 'output energy is greater than the input energy'.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats recovered gravitational potential energy as a new energy input, ignoring that it was originally provided by the driving device.
- No thermodynamic mechanism for net energy gain: System is a closed mechanical loop; lifting/recovering mass in gravity requires at least as much energy as is released.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Human kinetic input via a loading bar/lever, stored temporarily in wound springs.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a hand-cranked spring-powered generator. The user's muscular work is the only ultimate energy source. The claim that it can generate 'large amounts' of electricity without external fuel violates energy conservation, as the electrical output cannot exceed the human energy input, which is severely limited.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'large amounts of electricity well over 1000 watts' can be generated without an external fuel source, implying a net energy gain.
- The device is fundamentally an energy storage (spring) and conversion (dynamo) system; the output electrical energy cannot exceed the input mechanical energy from the user minus losses.
- The description confuses power (watts) with total energy, and suggests the system can generate more energy than is put into it by the operator.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of high output w
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like 'kinetica
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from generator to drive motor, with claimed partial feedback loop from generator output back to motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a self-sustaining or energy-amplifying system by feeding generator output back to its drive motor. This violates energy conservation, as internal redistribution of swinging masses cannot provide net energy beyond initial input. All generator output is ultimately sourced from the motor's work, making net energy production impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- System describes a closed-loop energy feedback: generator supplies partial power to operate the drive motor that drives the system. This implies net energy extraction from a system being driven by its own output.
- No external energy input is described beyond the initial start-up. The mechanism of swinging weights and tracks appears designed to harvest gravitational potential energy, but in a closed rotating system, this cannot provide net work per cycle.
- The device is presented as a torque-amplifying flywheel system but lacks any identified external, sustainable energy source to account for generator output exceeding motor input plus losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'generator
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implied
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (low-potential warmth) and electrical/mechanical work to drive the compressor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to be a heat engine, but its hot and cold reservoirs are created using work from the compressor itself. The net work output from the steam engine cannot exceed the work input to the compressor, making the claim of 'essentially bigger' output a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed output energy 'essentially bigger' than compressor input violates energy conservation.
- System is a heat engine operating between two temperatures created by the compressor's work; the net work output cannot exceed the work input to create the temperature difference.
- Incomplete energy accounting: the work to run the compressor is the primary input, but ambient heat is not a usable input without a pre-existing temperature gradient.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed source is the gravitational potential energy of the weight. However, the device requires an 'energy feedback device' (oil motor, electric motor, etc.) to maintain the vibration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electrically or pneumatically driven oscillator with a ratchet mechanism. The 'energy feedback device' is the true energy input, required to sustain motion against losses. The system cannot output more useful work than is supplied by this external source, making its core claim of gravitational energy conversion a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system is a driven oscillator. The energy feedback device must supply all energy lost to friction, damping, and the claimed output work. The weight's gravitational potential energy is not a net source; it cycles with
- Misapplication of 'weightless' and 'overweight' states: These are dynamic conditions in an accelerated frame, not sources of extractable net energy.
- Claims energy conversion from gravity without a net lowering of the weight's center of mass. For gravity to do net work, the weight must descend through a net height over a cycle.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: The claim focuses on outpu
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims gravity is the 'fuel,' but describes using a fraction of the generated energy to give the mass a 'push' or 'boost,' implying a closed-loop system with energy feedback.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate power using gravity as fuel by using a fraction of its output to re-accelerate the falling mass. This is a textbook violation of energy conservation, as the net work extracted over a complete cycle must be zero without an external energy input to restore the gravitational potential.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Proposes extracting net work from gravity in a closed cycle without restoring the gravitational potential.
- Violates 1st Law: Suggests output energy can exceed the net input by using generated energy to re-accelerate the mass.
- No thermodynamic limit identified; claims 'negligible friction' but ignores necessity of an external energy source to reset the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims mass is 'fu
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The primary explicit input is electrical energy to power the rail car (counterweight). The claimed output is electricity from a generator turned by a falling drive weight. The system attempts to use the gravitational potential energy of the raised drive weight, but that energy was provided by the electrically-powered counterweight.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity from gravity, but the gravitational potential used is created by an electrically-powered component. The system's losses (friction, electrical resistance) ensure the electrical output will always be less than the electrical input, providing no net energy gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The electrical input to move the counterweight is ignored when calculating the net electrical output from the generator.
- No net energy gain mechanism: The work done by gravity on the falling drive weight cannot exceed the work done to lift it, minus all losses. The system is a complex, lossy energy converter, not a generator.
- Violates energy conservation: The description implies a loop where a counterweight raises a drive weight, which then falls to generate electricity, with no external energy input to sustain the cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described initial input from a magnetic accelerator, battery-operated electric motor, or wind vanes. The claim suggests the output energy is multiplied by the device's internal configuration of rotating masses and magnets.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to multiply kinetic energy by a factor of 125 using only internal masses and magnets, which is a direct violation of energy conservation. The described magnetic interactions and centrifugal forces are internal and cannot produce net work greater than the initial input energy from the starter motor or accelerator.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming a 125x multiplication of force/energy from rotating masses.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source identified to justify the claimed energy multiplication.
- Relies on internal magnetic forces and centrifugal effects, which are conservative or result from the initial input, to create a net gain.
- Describes a closed system (vacuum chamber) where energy cannot be sourced from the ambient environment.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Only explicitly mentioned energy input is the applied rotational energy to the input gears. No other energy source (chemical, thermal, ambient) is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a directional force that is a multiple of the applied rotational energy, which is a direct violation of the conservation of energy. Mechanical advantage can trade force for distance, but cannot create energy or amplify horsepower beyond the input power.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that output directional force is a multiple of applied rotational energy violates conservation of energy.
- Mechanical advantage can increase force at the expense of distance/speed, but cannot multiply energy or 'horsepower'.
- No mechanism described for sourcing the additional energy required for the claimed multiplication of output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'generated
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the motor (claims 2/5) or magnetic levitation system (claims 3/6) that mobilizes the weight. The claimed 'power generation' is the rotation of the cam, which is driven by the rocking of the elliptical track.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a motor-driven mechanism, not a power generator. The energy to rotate the cam comes entirely from the motor that moves the weight. Due to friction and other losses, the useful work from the cam will be less than the electrical energy supplied to the motor, violating no laws but making the 'power generation' claim misleading.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a complex mechanism, not an energy source. The motor's work to move the weight against friction and to lift it on the track is converted into rocking motion and cam rotation, with inevitable losses.
- Claims 1 and 4 imply 'power generation' from the cam rotation, but this is just a transduction of the motor's input energy. No net energy gain is possible; output ≤ input.
- The term 'mechanical advantage' is misapplied. Mechanical advantage trades force for distance or vice versa, conserving energy, but does not create it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description fo
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Inventor: Arvind A. DayaAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2011-07-20
USPTO Abstract
Small AC power plant device comprises of three long parallel rigid arms. Primary function the rigid power arms is, ratcheting and reciprocating uniformly to turn a gearbox continuously, reduce torque and maintain rpm. Longer the rigid power arms, less torque required to turn the generator. One end of each rigid power arm is the attached with two sets of ratchet mechanisms on both sides along with one way clutch bearing on a common shaft. All three rigid power arms are attached to the same said shaft. Positive movement of the each rigid arm individually turns the said common shaft that is coupled to a gearbox whereby the generator continuously. Other end of the rigid power arms are attached to crankshaft or upright conveyer or ball screw assembly type of mechanism. This devices advantage is it maintains the required 50 Hz/60 Hz. and produces energy at zero pollution and low consumption.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor-driven generator. The claim that the input motor requires only one-third the torque of the generator output implies a net energy gain of 3x, which is impossible as it violates the conservation of energy. The described ratcheting and gearing mechanisms can only transmit and convert energy, not create it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that the driving motor requires 'a third of torque than that is required by the generator' implies energy output > energy input, violating conservation of energy.
- Mechanism is described as converting reciprocating motion to rotary motion via ratchets and a gearbox, but no novel energy source is introduced. Any gearbox or lever system trades force for distance, preserving work (energy), not creating it.
- Phrases like 'produces energy at zero pollution and low consumption' and 'enormous torque to overcome' are qualitative and obfuscate the fundamental energy balance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity and inertia, with energy extracted from the pendulum's swing via an asymmetric force arm design. No external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a perpetual motion machine. It explicitly claims an efficiency greater than 100% by asserting the work done during a descending swing is greater than the work required for the ascending swing, which is impossible in a closed cycle under gravity. No external energy source is identified to justify continuous operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims mechanical efficiency > 1 (over-unity).
- Asserts 'descending work greater than ascending work' in a closed cycle, violating conservation of energy.
- Claims to operate continuously and eternally, implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- No identifiable external energy source; gravity is a conservative force, providing no net energy over a cycle.
- Proposed mechanism of changing center of gravity with fluid would itself consume, not generate, net energy in a cycle.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: Claims output > input, ign
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Attempts to ext
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct terms like 'center-o
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied source is gravitational potential energy of the first fluid in the storage vessel, but the description suggests a cyclic process where fluids are exchanged without an identified net external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a fluid exchange process to drive an energy generator but fails to account for the energy required to reset the system to its initial high-potential state. The described flow from the storage vessel could produce work once, but for continuous operation, work must be input to pump the first fluid back up or compress the second fluid, violating conservation of energy if net output is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting for the full cycle
- No identified primary energy input to restore the initial state of the storage vessel (high potential fluid)
- Apparent attempt to generate net work from a closed fluid exchange cycle
- Missing description of how the 'evacuated' second fluid is returned to its source against pressure to complete the cycle
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims imply energy is created from the process of splitting a stored energy batch into smaller parts, with no external energy input identified to account for the claimed increase.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's core claim—that splitting a stored energy batch (weight, compressed gas, battery charge) into smaller parts yields more total energy than was initially stored—directly violates the conservation of energy. The described processes are standard energy storage and extraction methods, and the proposed mathematical relationships have no basis in established physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming total output energy from small batches exceeds input energy to the large batch.
- Misapplies or invents mathematical relationships (e.g., 'square root of the work batches', 'large batches use proportionally less energy').
- Confuses energy storage/extraction with energy creation. No mechanism explains how splitting a stored quantity creates net new energy.
- Misunderstands electrical energy storage (Claims 8-9); reconfiguring batteries from series to parallel changes voltage/current but not total stored energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'total ener
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses invented terminology
Inventor: Chin-Hui Chiang, Hsin-Jung ChiangAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2010-05-11
USPTO Abstract
A power generation system includes a base, a loading driving unit, and an adjusting unit. The base includes a sidewall. The load driving unit includes a platform, a first gear, a second gear, a roller, a motor, a first connection member and a second connection member. One end of the platform of the load driving unit is pivotally connected with the sidewall of the base. A heavy load is disposed on the platform. The loading driving unit applies a force on the first gear and then generates a moment of force to the second gear. A kinetic energy output from the motor is transferred from the first gear to the second gear. Due to the kinetic energy and the moment of force, the second gear has an output power greater than the input power that is transferred from the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract explicitly claims the second gear has 'an output power greater than the input power that is transferred from the motor,' which is a direct violation of the conservation of energy. The described mechanism appears to attempt to harness the gravitational potential energy of the heavy load without accounting for the energy required to reset the load's position, constituting a classic over-unity claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that output power from second gear is greater than input power from motor violates energy conservation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: system uses motor to lift/position a heavy load via platform/gears, but gravitational potential energy of that load is not counted as a system input.
- Mechanical arrangement (gears, platform angle) cannot create energy; it can only transform or transmit it, always with losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is an electric engine (8 in claim 1, 77 in claim 2). The hydraulic or mechanical transmission systems are internal, not energy sources.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an over-unity machine. Its only clear energy input is the electric motor driving the system. The complex internal transmissions (gears, pulleys, floats) cannot create more energy than the motor consumes, making claims of substantial electricity generation a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1: Implies two electricity outputs from one electric motor input, with no external energy gradient (like a height difference for the hydraulic floats). The floats move due to machine rotation, not an independent hydraulic head.
- Claim 2: Describes a complex pulley/wheel system driven by one electric motor, claiming it generates electricity 'in large quantity' with no justification for a net energy gain.
- Both claims violate energy conservation by implying the system's useful electrical output can exceed or significantly multiply the electrical input to the drive motor.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims focus on internal m
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to cre
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be independent of external power or fuel. Primary energy input is ambiguous: either electrical energy from motors (which are powered by the generator's output) or potential energy from lifting spheres using those motors. The ocean wave variant claims to use wave motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The core device (Claim 1) is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine. It uses motors to lift spheres, then harvests less energy from their descent than was required to lift them, while claiming to power itself and have excess output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The ocean wave attachment describes a real energy source but is conflated with the invalid self-powered claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: The system in Claim 1/4 claims the generator powers its own motors and provides external power, violating energy conservation. The motors must do work to lift spheres against gravity; the gravitational potential en
- Incomplete energy accounting: The analysis ignores all losses (friction in ramp, gearbox, generator inefficiency, motor inefficiency, air resistance). The output energy is falsely presented as exceeding the control input.
- The ocean wave variant (Claim 2) is a separate, potentially valid energy harvester, but its coupling to the perpetual motion mechanism of Claim 1 invalidates the overall claim of a self-powered generator.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control input' -
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extracting net
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to exploit 'stagnant gravity-hydro-static tension' in a body of liquid, implying extraction of work from a static pressure field without the consumption of a fuel or the use of a thermal/height/pressure gradient to drive a flow.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate mechanical work by exploiting the static pressure in a stagnant body of water. Since the water is stagnant and in equilibrium, there is no continuous energy gradient to harness. Any work extracted would quickly deplete the minor potential energy from initial piston positioning, after which the system would stop, violating the claim of an 'inexhaustible' source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming to produce net work from a static equilibrium system (a stagnant liquid body).
- Misinterprets hydrostatic pressure as a source of usable energy rather than a balanced force condition.
- No identifiable external energy input or gradient to sustain motion; system would reach equilibrium and stop.
- Describes 'inexhaustible energy source' which is a perpetual motion claim.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting (ignores that hydrostatic p
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms (extracting net
C - Technical Obfuscation (uses invented terms like 'hydro-g
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the external power device (e.g., grid or battery) used to run the man-made wind generator (air compressor). The system proposes to use a portion of the generated electricity to power this compressor.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity violation. It uses an electric compressor to create wind to spin a turbine-generator. The proposal to use the generator's output to power the compressor ignores the fundamental inefficiencies in both steps (compressor and generator), guaranteeing net energy loss. No external ambient energy source (like natural wind) is integrated to make up the deficit.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System proposes to use generated electricity to power its own wind source, creating a closed loop with inevitable losses.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Attempts to create a self-sustaining or net-gain system by using work output to drive its own input, ignoring entropy generation and losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 8 and the system description imply feedback of generated power to the compressor, ignoring that the generator's output is always less than the mechanical work input to the fan.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to be a self-perpetuating system requiring no external energy input after initial start, with energy apparently generated internally by the flywheel-fluid system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to be a perpetual motion machine. The jet reaction force from recirculated fluid cannot add net energy to the system—the pump needed to return fluid to the center consumes at least as much energy as the jets produce, plus losses from friction and turbulence. The system would quickly slow down without continuous external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims continuous operation without fuel or external energy input
- Misunderstands centrifugal force as an energy source rather than an internal force
- Claims 'linear increases in RPM result in exponential increases in energy to the power of 4' - energy increases with v², not v⁴
- No accounting for energy losses from fluid friction, viscous drag, bearing friction, nozzle inefficiencies, or pump work
- Recirculation pump requires net energy input to overcome system losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind energy (primary) and electrical input to the motor (secondary). The system claims to use generated electricity to power the motor, creating a self-sustaining or amplifying loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is fundamentally a wind turbine array on a rotating platform. For net power output, the energy must come from ambient wind overcoming the drag of the spinning generators. The described feedback loop, where generator output powers the motor to increase rotation, violates conservation of energy unless the ambient wind input is sufficient to cover all losses and provide the net output, which the patent text obscures by emphasizing the internal loop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying a positive feedback loop where generator output can power the motor to increase rotation, which in turn increases generator output, without sufficient external energy input.
- Misinterprets kinetic energy storage in a flywheel as a net energy gain mechanism. The motor's work to spin the mass is stored as kinetic energy, but extracting it via the generators slows the rotation.
- Confuses relative wind speed induced by rotation with ambient wind energy. For net power output, the system must extract energy from ambient wind overcoming the drag of the generators, not just from the motor-driven rotation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description su
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'gravity' alone, but no specific, sustained gradient (like a height difference) is described to provide a continuous net energy input. The machine is described as operating independently without fuel or external renewable sources.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim explicitly describes a perpetual motion machine that outputs more energy than it inputs, which directly violates the law of conservation of energy. Gravity is a conservative force; you cannot extract net work from it in a closed cycle without an external, replenished gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce more energy than it consumes.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy) that operates indefinitely without an external energy source to replenish losses.
- No mechanism to account for inevitable energy losses (friction, electrical resistance, drag, etc.), which would cause any system to stop.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the system's own hydraulic pressure, generated by pistons driven by the flywheel's rotation, is used to power the hydraulic motor that drives the flywheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed hydraulic system where the flywheel's rotation compresses pistons to generate pressure, which then powers a hydraulic motor that turns the same flywheel. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce useful work (running a generator) with no external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction, fluid viscosity, and heat dissipation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No primary external energy input is identified to overcome losses.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies a self-sustaining cycle where work output (to generator) is derived from work input generated by the same system.
- Missing entropy sink: System has friction, fluid resistance, and other losses but no identified energy source to compensate.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind (primary), plus an internal mechanical system (compound unit with gravity wheel and swingable weights) intended to generate additional power.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to use a portion of the wind-generated power to drive an internal gravity-based mechanism, claiming this creates an additional main power output and a feedback loop to sustain blade rotation. This violates energy conservation, as the internal mechanism cannot output more useful work than the energy input from the wind minus system losses, making the 'eternal' operation claim a perpetual motion violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'eternal and continuous' operation, implying perpetual motion.
- Describes a feedback loop where an 'auxiliary power output' from the wind turbine is used to drive a gravity mechanism, which then purportedly generates 'another main power output' to drive the generator and also feedback to rotate the fan blades con
- No new energy source is introduced by the swinging gravity wheels; they merely convert potential/kinetic energy from the system itself, incurring losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The initiating force is the only explicit input. The claim that centrifugal force is then used to rotate the wheels suggests an attempt to extract net work from the system's own motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that, after an initial push, claims to use its own centrifugal force to sustain and generate power. This violates energy conservation, as centrifugal force is not an energy source but a manifestation of inertia; sustaining rotation against friction requires continuous energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial effect, not an energy source; it cannot do net work on the system creating it.
- No persistent external energy input is described after the initial 'initiating force'.
- The apparatus is described as a closed mechanical system with losses, implying it would coast to a stop.
- The description suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (output energy > input energy).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'using cent
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'moving machine' (e.g., wheeled car, trolley, or drive motor) requires an external power source, implying the system is a complex generator drive train, not a primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system to turn a generator, but fails to specify the original source of energy to power the 'moving machine' that drives it. The suggestion of using generated electricity to power the drive motor would create an unsustainable feedback loop, violating energy conservation. The apparatus is a complicated generator coupling, not a source of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No primary energy source is identified. Claim 28 states the drive motor receives power 'from an external source or from electricity generated by said alternator/generator'. The latter configuration suggests a feedback loop, which cannot provide net e
- The abstract and title claim production 'without usage of any raw materials' and 'eco-friendly manner', which obfuscates the fundamental need for an energy input.
- The system is described as an energy conversion device (mechanical to electrical) but lacks specification of the original source of the mechanical energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description ig
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient water pressure and gravity, with control energy required for valve/pump operation (not specified). The claimed net output energy is supposedly generated from the engine's cyclical movement in water.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed cycle that returns to its starting position while claiming to generate net energy output. The energy required to operate the valves and pumps to move water/air, overcoming friction and hydraulic resistance, is not accounted for. In a uniform gravitational field and constant aqueous environment, no net work can be extracted from such a cycle, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of energy input to operate valves, pumps, or control mechanism to alternate chamber filling.
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims 'generating energy output' from cyclical motion in a closed loop (returns to starting position) without a net external energy gradient.
- Implied perpetual motion: The described cycle (move, generate output, return to start) in an equilibrium aqueous environment cannot yield net work without an external, non-conservative energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be the magnetic potential energy of permanent magnets, but the description suggests a system that uses magnetic forces to create continuous motion and output energy without an identifiable primary input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use permanent magnets arranged to create 'continuous movement to produce energy.' This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as the magnetic potential energy is finite and cannot provide net energy output without an external energy input to reset the system against dissipative losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to produce energy from 'continuous movement' initiated by permanent magnets, which are a finite energy source for doing work.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Describes a mechanism for 'continuous movement' without an energy input to sustain it against losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the input energy required to move magnets, reset pistons, or overcome losses. Treats magnetic forces as a perpetual energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy from an external source (outside power or battery) to start the compressor. The system then claims to run by using generator output to power the compressor that re-fills the tank that drives the motor that powers the generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes a closed energy loop where the generator is meant to power the compressor that supplies its own air source. Due to inevitable losses from friction, heat, and thermodynamic inefficiency, the energy required to compress the air will always exceed the energy recovered from expanding it. Therefore, the system cannot sustain itself and provide net external power, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a closed-loop with no net external energy input after start-up. The compressor work required to re-pressurize the tank must be greater than or equal to the work extracted by the air motor (due to losses in both components and thermodyna
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) for a closed system. The described steady-state operation implies energy multiplication.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of a 'se
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the electric motor. The description implies a feedback loop where the hydraulic system returns energy to the shaft, but this is not an independent source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed hydraulic circuit with two pumps on one motor shaft. The physics of such a system shows the hydraulic feedback cannot increase the net torque or speed; it only creates internal forces that ultimately load the motor. The claim of performance increase violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a closed hydraulic loop with two pumps on a common shaft. No external hydraulic gradient or reservoir is described to do net work on the shaft.
- The claim that the smaller pump rotating faster increases the torque/speed of the motor violates conservation of energy. The torque required to drive the larger pump must be supplied by the motor; any pressure fed back to the smaller pump creates a r
- The system is effectively a single shaft with two fluid-coupled loads. It cannot produce a net power gain or 'increase' the motor's output beyond the electrical input minus losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'increased
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from battery or household AC to start the motor. The system then claims to use its own output (from an alternator/generator) to recharge the battery and power the motor continuously.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed-loop system where a motor powers a generator that is supposed to recharge the motor's power source indefinitely. This is a textbook perpetual motion machine, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The hydraulic components and configuration details do not circumvent the fundamental requirement for a continuous external energy input to overcome system losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual motion of the current' and a 'continuous electrical cycle' that sustains itself regardless of load, which violates energy conservation.
- No external, ongoing energy input is described after the initial start-up; the system is described as a closed loop.
- The 'plurality of hydraulic networks' with increasing piston diameter is a mechanical advantage scheme that cannot create energy; it trades force for distance, preserving work (minus losses), not multiplying it.
- The system ignores inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, heat, and hydraulic inefficiencies, which would drain the initial stored energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output energy incre
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describes a cla
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'hydraulic networ
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the 'drive unit' which moves the weight. The claim implies gravitational potential energy provides the net output work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The drive unit must supply all the energy to move the weight, and losses from friction ensure the system cannot output more energy than the drive unit inputs. Gravity cannot provide net energy over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is a closed mechanical loop. The work done by gravity over a full cycle is zero.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The energy required to move the weight back and forth (overcoming inertia, friction, and lifting it against gravity on the upward swing) must equal or exceed any rotational energy extracted from the beam's oscillation.
- Misapplication of gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from it in a cyclic process without an external, non-conservative input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'reciprocat
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of masses on the device, plus unspecified 'little of starting energy'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous power by cleverly arranging swinging arms in a gravity field, but it is a classic over-unity gravity wheel. The net work done by gravity on masses moving in a closed cycle is zero. The energy required to reset each arm (fold it inward) to its starting position will always equal or exceed the energy gained during its downward swing, preventing perpetual net power output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims continuous net energy extraction from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Violates 1st Law: No external energy input to reset the system after each swing arm cycle.
- Violates 2nd Law: Implies a mechanism to create a perpetual torque imbalance without an external energy source to reset the arms.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done to lift/fold the arms on the 'negative torque' side is not properly accounted for against the work generated on the 'positive torque' side.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests the engine's rotation is created solely by displacing the center of gravity of traveling weights on a rotor, implying a perpetual or self-sustaining motion from gravitational potential energy without an identified external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The described engine attempts to create continuous rotation by shifting weights to displace a rotor's center of gravity. This is a classic overbalanced wheel design, which cannot produce net work because the gravitational torque gained on one side is always less than or equal to the torque required to reset the weights on the other side, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No mechanism described to return weights to a higher gravitational potential energy state to sustain rotation.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Proposes a mechanism to extract net work from an isothermal gravitational field without a compensating entropy increase.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes motion creation but ignores the energy cost of lifting weights or resetting the system against gravity.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Inventor: Chu Fu LinAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2008-08-04
USPTO Abstract
A centrifugal driving electricity generation system for energy conservation comprises a kinetic energy driving system powered with electric energy or fuel energy, an impelled rotary system, a gearing wheel group system, at holder, and a power generation system. In the principle of contrast between centrifugal and application of force, the lower kinetic energy driving system drives the impelled rotary system from a centrifugal terminal to make an effect of centrifugal force, which amplifies multiple times the original energy of kinetic energy driving system and makes the system link with a gearing wheel group system through an axis portion of the impelled rotary system to drive the higher power generation system to operate at a high speed for power generation at a rating rotation speed. Thus, the lower kinetic energy driving system may be used to drive the higher power generation system to generate electricity for achievement of energy conservation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a centrifugal mechanism that 'amplifies multiple times the original energy' to drive a generator, implying energy multiplication. This is impossible as centrifugal forces are reactive and cannot create net energy; the system is a lossy mechanical linkage where output electrical energy must be less than the input energy to the motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'amplifies multiple times the original energy' which violates energy conservation.
- Centrifugal force is an inertial effect, not an independent energy source; it cannot amplify net input energy.
- System describes a mechanical linkage (gears, rotary motion) with no novel external energy input, implying over-unity output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial potential energy stored in elevated masses, supplemented by external electrical energy to cover frictional losses. The system claims to primarily run on gravity by recycling kinetic energy between descending masses and braking vehicles.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a violation because it claims near-perpetual operation from a one-time energy input, which is impossible due to continuous frictional losses. While gravity-powered rail systems exist (e.g., funiculars), they are not perpetual; this patent's description of eternal, self-sustained oscillation while only minimally covering losses contradicts the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims rolling masses can run 'eternally' and be 'practically perpetual' after a 'one time initial charge', ignoring continuous frictional dissipation.
- Violates 2nd Law of Thermodynamics: Describes a near-perfect energy recycling system where kinetic energy from braking is converted back to potential energy with losses only made up externally. This omits inevitable losses in every conversion (gears,
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'practically almost entirely based on gravity' while acknowledging external energy for friction. This obfuscates that the external input must equal total system losses, which for a transportation network are subst
- Implied over-unity efficiency: Language suggests a major portion of transportation energy is saved by this 'self-sustained' oscillation, implying the gravity potential energy is used repeatedly without proportional input to reset it.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary energy input is the battery, which is charged by a battery charger connected to an unspecified external power source.
AI Physics Analysis
This describes a motor-generator loop powered by a battery. The system cannot produce more electrical energy than is supplied to the battery charger from the external grid or another primary source. Any claim of net electricity generation for a building from this closed loop violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a classic motor-generator loop with no net energy gain. The motor consumes electrical energy from the battery to spin the wheel, and the generator converts some of that mechanical energy back to electricity. Total output energy cannot excee
- The description implies the battery charger runs continuously, suggesting the system's net electricity output is intended to exceed the input from the charger, which violates energy conservation.
- No novel ambient energy source (wind, water, thermal gradient) is described to justify net generation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim ignores
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The description is vague
Inventor: Craig Howard ZeyherAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2008-05-28
USPTO Abstract
This invention relates to the use of transmissions in combination with gyroscopically based drive systems. The advantage of which is the ability to modulate the rotor or gyros rotational rate of spin semi autonomously from the precessional rate and effect a greater transfer of power while doing so. In addition the use of a transmission or transmissions helps create a back force in the gyroscopic system which results in a more effective drive.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that attempts to use a transmission to extract 'high speed or high power' rotation from gyroscopic precession. This violates energy conservation, as precession itself is not an energy source; the gyroscope's spin energy will be depleted by friction and the work extracted, causing the system to stop unless energy is continually added from an external source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Precessional motion is not a source of energy; it is a torque-induced change in orientation. The system will lose rotational kinetic energy to friction and the work done against the 'back force'.
- Claims of 'greater transfer of power', 'high speed or high power rotor rotation', and 'greater continuity of drive' suggest energy amplification or sustained motion without an identified replenishing energy input.
- The description confuses kinematic relationships (speed/torque conversion via transmission) with the creation of net usable work from a gyroscopic system that is not being actively driven.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims imply outpu
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
Claimed Energy Source
Initial external mechanical input to the driving wheel. The system attempts to use a portion of the generated electrical/mechanical energy to compress a medium (air/liquid) for later use.
AI Physics Analysis
This system is a classic over-unity violation. It diverts a portion of the generated mechanical energy to compress a medium, storing some energy. When the main drive stops, it uses that stored energy to try to restart the process. This is simply an inefficient battery (pressure storage) with inevitable losses; each cycle would lose more energy than it gains, preventing continuous operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims to use output energy to store energy and then use that stored energy to restart/continue generation after primary input stops, implying indefinite operation from a finite initial input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done to compress the medium in the pressure reservoir is subtracted from the net useful electrical output. Releasing this medium to drive the fan wheel cannot return more work than was stored, resulting in a net
- Implies perpetual motion: The description suggests the system could operate 'continuously' after the initial driving force stops, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external energy source.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is implied but not specified; the described mechanism (weight, liquid, inflatable bags) suggests the system is intended to be self-sustaining or require 'little input'.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a mechanism for sustained oscillation and energy generation but fails to identify an external energy source to overcome friction and damping. The described interactions suggest a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit or identifiable external energy input to sustain oscillations against damping.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; work extracted via generator must be sourced from initial potential/kinetic energy or ambient input, neither is adequately defined.
- System appears designed to use internal state changes (bag inflation/weight motion) to perpetuate motion, violating conservation by implying creation of net energy from a closed cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from the 'initiative electric motor' connected to the first crankshaft. The description suggests the system's output is intended to be powered by energy 'increasingly acquired' and forwarded through the leverage mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate increasing energy through a leverage mechanism, which is impossible as levers conserve energy, not create it. The proposed feedback loop to power its own motor while producing excess electricity directly violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims energy multiplication through mechanical leverage arrangement.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies a mechanical system can output more useful energy (to dynamo) than is input (from motor) without an external energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes feedback loop (claim 5) where generated electricity powers the input motor, implying net excess, but ignores all losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat).
- Misapplication of leverage principle: Leverage trades force for distance (or vice versa), conserving work (energy), not multiplying it.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of water pumped to an elevated reservoir. The primary input is the electrical energy required to pump the water back to the top.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered water turbine system, but for continuous operation, water must be pumped back to the top. The energy required to lift the water against gravity (plus all system losses) will always exceed the electrical energy generated by the water falling, making it a net consumer of energy, not a self-supported generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system ignores the energy required to pump the water back to the topmost reservoir.
- Violates energy conservation: The claim implies net power generation from a closed cycle, which is impossible as pumping losses, generator inefficiencies, and friction ensure the pumping energy > generated energy.
- Misapplication of 'speed-increasing' sections: These convert pressure/head to velocity but do not create energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent describes 'self
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. It suggests a combination of initial rotational kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy (as the arm falls), and magnetic repulsion. However, the magnetic field is a conservative force, and gravity is already accounted for in the pendulum-like motion. No net external energy input is identified to sustain rotation against losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use magnetic repulsion to perpetually boost a rotating arm, but because magnetic forces are conservative, any push gained is paid back when the arm later approaches the same magnet. This violates energy conservation, as it claims to generate electricity without an identified net external energy source to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Magnetic repulsion force is conservative; energy gained from repulsion on one side is lost when overcoming it on the approach.
- Violates conservation of energy: The design implies a perpetual or self-sustaining rotation where magnetic repulsion only adds net positive work per cycle, which is impossible in a closed system with conservative forces.
- No entropy sink/energy dissipation mechanism identified to allow a continuous cycle; generator extraction increases damping, requiring continuous net energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'propelling
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial electricity used to power the drive unit(s). The patent implies this input can be sourced from the generator's own output or a grid, creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a system that attempts to generate electricity by using a generator to power the motor that drives the generator. This violates conservation of energy, as every conversion step loses energy to heat and friction, making it impossible to sustain the system and produce a net excess for the grid.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system's net electrical output cannot exceed its net electrical input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Any conversion process (mechanical to electrical, electrical to mechanical) incurs inevitable losses (friction, resistance, heat).
- The description is a classic 'over-unity' or perpetual motion scheme where a generator is used to power the motor that drives it, with excess power claimed for the grid.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'zero pollu
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses standard mechanical
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'cost-free' and derived solely from gravity acting on unbalanced rotating masses, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce unlimited rotational energy by cleverly switching unbalanced masses, but gravity alone cannot provide net energy over a complete cycle. The energy to lift the masses against gravity in one part of the cycle must come from the system itself, leading to inevitable losses and stopping.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims 'unlimited balanced rotation' and 'cost-free rotational energy' without an external energy source to replenish losses.
- Misinterprets gravity as an energy source: gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle is zero. The system describes a mechanism to manage torque, not a source of energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores all energy losses (friction, air resistance, inelastic collisions in the connecting mechanism).
- Claims 'weightlessness' and variable 'specific gravity' are physically incoherent in this context; mass and gravitational acceleration are constant.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output torque w
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'specific gravity
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be the vehicle's motion/wheel rotation, but claims the magnet repulsion 'creates electricity... and eliminates drags', suggesting energy is generated from the magnetic interaction itself without an identifiable external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity from the repulsive force between magnets placed on a rotating wheel, stating this eliminates drag. This is impossible because the repulsive force between magnets is conservative; no net energy can be extracted from it. Forcing like poles together requires energy input from the vehicle, and any electricity generated would create magnetic drag on the wheel, increasing the vehicle's energy consumption.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate electricity from magnet repulsion without accounting for the energy required to overcome that repulsion.
- Violates Newton's 3rd Law: Implies magnetic repulsion can be used to generate power without an equal or greater opposing work input.
- Incomplete system boundary: Fails to account that forcing magnets together (like-to-pole) requires work; any electricity generated comes from that work, not from the magnets themselves.
- Misunderstanding of Lenz's Law: Any induced current in a generator creates a magnetic field opposing the motion (drag). Claiming it 'eliminates drags' is physically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of balls being lifted, ultimately supplied by the device's own rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity machine that violates the conservation of energy. The gravitational energy gained by lifting the balls to the platform must come from the wheel's rotation, leaving no net energy for useful output after accounting for inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a closed mechanical loop. The work required to lift the balls back to the platform (against gravity) must equal or exceed the work extracted from their descent.
- The description implies the wheel's rotation both provides useful output *and* powers the elevator to reset the system, which is impossible without an external energy input.
- Friction and other losses are not accounted for, making sustained operation with net energy output impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'outputs mo
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent mentions an 'effective source of power, like turboset-self-booster' but the core claim describes the axial-flow impeller working 'at itself, for itself, in actual series with itself' to provide 'pressure rising and constant operative energy self-accumulation'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed fluid loop where an impeller circulates the fluid. The claims of 'energy self-accumulation' and generating thrust far exceeding a conventional engine of the same power input violate the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system cannot create a net increase in fluid pressure and kinetic energy for thrust without an external energy input greater than the losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'energy self-accumulation' and 'self-amplifying' pressure rise without an identified external energy input to overcome losses.
- Asserts a pressure ratio of 7.5-10.5 and thrust 280% of a conventional same-power jet engine, implying more useful work output than the required input power.
- Describes a closed-loop fluid system where an impeller drives fluid in a circle, yet expects to extract net high-pressure thrust from the loop without continuous, sufficient external work input to overcome viscous dissipation and generate the claimed
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'self-a
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air (wind) and latent heat of water vapor condensation. Claims imply net kinetic energy increase from cooling alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims the fluid exits with higher kinetic energy than it entered, solely by being cooled in a duct. This violates energy conservation: cooling releases latent heat, but that energy cannot be converted to net increased bulk flow kinetic energy without a work input or a heat sink lower than the ambient temperature, which are not provided.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates 1st Law: Claims ejected fluid has higher kinetic energy than intake fluid without identifying sufficient external energy input to account for the increase.
- Violates 2nd Law: Implies creating a usable kinetic energy gradient solely by cooling a fluid in a duct, extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient air).
- Incomplete energy accounting: Cooling via mist injection uses latent heat, but this energy conversion cannot result in a net increase in the fluid's mechanical (kinetic) energy without a heat engine cycle operating between two temperatures.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only gravity and buoyancy in a closed cycle, with no external fuel. Implicitly requires an external energy source to reset the buoyancy condition (e.g., to submerge the rotor at the bottom or to remove it from the buoyant medium at the top).
AI Physics Analysis
The 'Trick Dam' describes a closed cycle where an object falls through air/void and then is floated up through a liquid. To complete the cycle, the object must be moved from the liquid back to the top of the air channel, which requires work equal to or greater than the energy gained from the fall, making it a net energy loser. It is a classic perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to generate continuous power from a conservative force (gravity) in a closed cycle with no net height change.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting net work from a cycle in a uniform gravitational field.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores the work required to transfer the rotor from the descent channel (dense medium) to the ascent channel (buoyant medium) against buoyant forces or to submerge it.
- Buoyancy is not an energy source; it is a force resulting from a pressure gradient. To utilize it cyclically, energy must be expended to alter the rotor's position relative to the buoyant fluid.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy from the car's motor to move the car along the lever. The device attempts to use the gravitational potential energy of the car and the return counterweight in a cyclical manner.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to multiply force or energy by cycling weights, but the electrical input to move the car must at least equal any work output, plus losses. The description omits the energy needed to reset the system, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims of 'force multiplying' ignore that the electrical motor must supply the energy to lift the car against gravity to its starting position on the lever.
- No net work output mechanism: The system is a closed loop of gravitational potential energy exchanges; any work extracted from the main shaft would come at the expense of the system's energy, requiring equal or greater input to reset.
- Misuse of 'force multiplying': While a lever multiplies force, it trades it for distance, doing no extra work. The described transformations (linear to dynamic, dynamic to linear) do not create energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the principal motor, with a claim that recovered electrical energy from the recovery motor (acting as a generator) can equal or exceed the additional input needed to drive the principal motor when the generator is coupled.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a motor driving a shaft coupled to a generator. Claim 6 suggests the system can achieve unity or greater efficiency, meaning the generator's electrical output can equal or exceed the extra electrical input needed to drive the motor under the generator's load. This violates energy conservation, as the generator's output is necessarily less than the extra mechanical work it extracts, which is less than the extra electrical input required due to motor and generator inefficiencies.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 6 explicitly states the additional energy input to the principal motor can be less than or equal to the energy generated by the recovery motor, implying a net energy gain or unity system efficiency.
- The system is described as a simple motor-generator coupling on a single shaft. The generator extracts mechanical work from the shaft, which must increase the load on the principal motor, requiring more electrical input. Thermodynamic limits dictate
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of outpu
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses standard terms (reco
Inventor: Westley E ElkinAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2006-09-01
USPTO Abstract
To do work a power device needs to supply a given supply of torque, and until this measure of torque is supplied the desired performance will not be met. In a gasoline engine the desired torque/horsepower is compensated with higher factors due to the inefficiencies of that system to reach the desired torque until peaking at an expressed rpm. However, the electric motor reaches the desired torque at a greatly reduced rpm, and continues supplying that torque at any rpm above that base rpm. The combination of batteries, electric motors, controllers, connectors, gearing, and generators as system devices along with the use of the following facts, and formula, a ratio of interpretative algorithms can be obtained to procure the resultant outcomes. 1.) One of the individual torque components of an electric motor is BREAKDOWN TORQUE, which is described as âThe maximum torque a motor will develop at rated voltage without a relatively abrupt drop or loss in speed.â 2.) The gasoline engine BREAKDOWN TORQUE is reached at X rpm's, which are supplied by the manufacturer that has tested their product with a dynamo. Ft.lb. Gasoline engine torque=gt Electric motor horsepower=EH electric factor-EF=1.12934 sqrt(gt)*CEF=EH The common, but not exclusive use for this system is to extend the range of an electrical system that does not draw its source of power from a stationary point such as a city power company. This formula and device can be modified to be the sole power source for residential as well as commercial applications. A typical application installed in a moving vehicle could follow the following diagram. A battery bank supplies power to an electric motor (M1), which supplies torque to a generator (G1) that supplies power to another electric motor (M2), which supplies power to another generator (G2) that supplies power to an electric motor (M3), and a battery charger that supplies charging power for the battery bank, and power to run the first electric motor. The (M3) motor then supplies the power to move the vehicle.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's core claim of chaining motors and generators to 'reduce depletion of the battery bank' while doing useful work violates the first law of thermodynamics. Each conversion step loses energy to heat, so the system cannot sustain itself or significantly extend range beyond the initial battery energy minus total losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 5-8 describe a system where a battery powers a motor driving a generator, which then powers another motor driving another generator, implying reduced battery depletion. This is a classic 'over-unity' or perpetual motion scheme where energy is
- The 'reduction formula' (sqrt(gt)*1.12934) is presented without derivation or physical basis, obscuring the core thermodynamic violation.
- The system ignores the fundamental inefficiencies of each conversion step (battery->motor->generator->motor->generator). Total output useful work cannot exceed the initial energy stored in the battery.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores conversion
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (torqu
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the actuator/motor moving the elastic member. The claim implies this motion creates a swaying bar motion that moves carriages up and down, suggesting a net power output greater than the actuator input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical linkage that uses an actuator to move an elastic member, purportedly to create a swaying motion that moves carriages. This describes a closed mechanical system with no identified external energy source besides the actuator itself, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The claim violates energy conservation by implying net power generation from internal motions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Actuator work input is the only identified energy source, yet the system is described as 'power generating'.
- Implied over-unity: The described mechanism suggests moving an elastic member laterally changes its moment to 'sway the bar', creating vertical motion of carriages. This is a closed mechanical loop with no external energy gradient to exploit.
- No thermodynamic cycle or ambient energy source identified to justify net power generation beyond the actuator's input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses on a mec
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The described s
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the electrical input to the liquid pump. The system proposes to use the generator's output to power its own pump, creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim. The system's generator cannot produce more electrical energy than is consumed by its pump, due to inevitable losses in every conversion step (electrical to fluid kinetic, to mechanical rotation, back to electrical). The feedback loop, where the generator powers the pump, would result in rapid energy dissipation and system halt.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics).
- System output must power its own input plus overcome all losses (friction, electrical resistance, fluid drag, etc.).
- No net external energy input is described to sustain the operation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial energy to spin the container and accelerate the fluid. The claim implies the system can output more energy than this input solely through the recirculation and pressurization of its own fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system claiming to output more energy than is input by recirculating its own fluid. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as the centrifugal pressure is not a new energy source but energy converted from the initial spin input, with inevitable losses making net gain impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims 'energy output in excess of energy input' and 'substantially exceeding the power needed for continuous operation'.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: No external energy source is identified to account for the claimed excess output.
- Misunderstands centrifugal force: It is a kinematic constraint, not an independent energy source. The pressure/energy in the fluid comes from the work done to spin the container.
- Ignores losses: Friction, viscous drag, turbulence, and bearing losses in the recirculation path are not accounted for, guaranteeing net energy loss.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'Potentia
Claimed Energy Source
Initial battery energy only; claims perpetual operation with no external energy input after startup.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to start from a battery and then run perpetually by using generators powered by the motor they are driving, ignoring all losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat. This is a classic over-unity claim that violates both the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming net power output from a closed loop with only internal losses.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics; any conversion (motor→generator) has losses (friction, resistance, heat).
- System lacks an external energy source; the described feedback loop cannot sustain itself, let alone power external devices.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'energy-free' and '
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a perp
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy is implied but not explicitly stated. The described system attempts to use gravitational potential energy (rollers falling) and buoyant potential energy (rollers rising) in a closed cycle, with a claim that the operational energy required is 'very small and almost negligible.'
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed loop where rollers fall under gravity to do work and then rise via buoyancy. However, to complete the cycle, work must be done to move the roller from the buoyant rise path back to the high gravitational potential starting point. This required work is not 'negligible' and, if fully accounted, would equal or exceed the work output, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a closed mechanical-buoyancy loop. The net work to lift a roller out of the liquid at the top and place it on the gravity wheel is not accounted for, and must equal or exceed the work extracted from its des
- Violates conservation of energy: The abstract claims the energy required for the entire operation is negligible, implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (output > input).
- Missing entropy sink/irreversibilities: Friction, viscous drag in the liquid, and energy losses in valves and linkages are ignored but are inevitable and would dissipate the system's mechanical energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial charge in the battery. The system describes a closed loop where the battery powers a motor, which drives a generator, which recharges the battery while also powering an outlet.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to create a self-sustaining loop where a battery can power a motor to drive a generator that recharges the same battery and also powers an external outlet, with no external energy input. This is impossible due to inevitable energy losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat, which violate both the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by implying a closed-loop system can produce net useful work (outlet power) without an external energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Every energy conversion (battery to motor, motor to generator, generator to battery) incurs irreversible losses (heat, friction, resistance). The system lacks an external energy source to overcome these loss
- Incomplete energy accounting: The analysis ignores all conversion losses and treats the system as lossless.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the electrical energy to run the axial-flow propeller pump. The system is a closed loop, implying no external energy gradient (e.g., height difference, temperature difference) is being utilized.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It places a pump and turbines in a closed fluid loop. The pump's work input must overcome all system losses; the turbines can only extract a portion of that input, resulting in a net loss, not a 'self-boosting' gain of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The pump drives the turbines, which are claimed to produce useful work. In a closed, lossy system, the turbine output cannot exceed the pump input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The system is described as a self-booster providing 'high energy ratio,' implying it can produce more work than is supplied, which is impossible for a closed-loop fluid system.
- No external energy source is identified. The 'high density operative liquid' is an energy carrier, not a source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'high energ
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Initially from the chemical energy stored in the two DC batteries. The claim implies the system will generate additional electrical energy internally via unspecified 'charging components' driven by the fan motor's shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use its own motor shaft to drive components that recharge its batteries with more energy than the system consumes. This is impossible as it violates energy conservation; the recharging process would draw more power from the motor, increasing the load on the batteries and leading to a net loss, not a gain. The system cannot output work and simultaneously fully recharge its own energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims the charging components can 'deliver more energy than needed to operate system' from a finite initial energy store.
- Violates the second law: proposes a self-charging system that performs work (fan, charging) without an external energy input, effectively a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores all losses (motor inefficiency, electrical resistance, friction, charging losses). The 'charging components' are not an energy source.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implicitly) and potential energy of the counterweight system. The described work output appears to come from the magnetic attraction without accounting for the energy required to move the ground-level magnet, operate the magnetic shield, or reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from permanent magnets alone, which is impossible as magnetic forces are conservative. The described cycle ignores the energy required to separate the magnets and reset the system, violating conservation of energy. It is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes extracting net work from a closed magnetic cycle without an external energy input to reset the magnetic interaction. The work done by magnetic attraction to lift the counterweight must be less than o
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of the energy needed to move the ground-level magnet laterally, move the magnetic shield, or overcome friction. The system ignores that permanent magnets are conservative force fields—net work over a cl
- Misapplication of counterweight: The counterweight's gravitational potential energy is part of an internal energy storage/release cycle, not a net energy source. The system cannot produce positive net work output from this internal cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to split 'energy molecules' in a battery to generate increased energy, but no identifiable external energy input is described. Implicitly suggests energy can be created from within a closed battery system.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates fundamental physics by asserting that splitting an 'energy molecule' can generate new energy to overcome losses and enable perpetual motion. This directly contradicts energy conservation, as no external energy source is identified, and the proposed mechanism is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to generate new energy from splitting a nonexistent 'energy molecule'
- Violates Second Law by proposing perpetual motion without an external energy source or gradient
- No identifiable entropy sink; claims to offset all losses including friction indefinitely
- Uses scientifically meaningless term 'energy molecule' as a core mechanism
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from water being lifted to an upper tank. The system's own description implies water is drained at the bottom and refilled at the top, requiring an external energy input for pumping.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a gravity-powered generator, but it implicitly requires water to be lifted to an upper tank to create the gravitational potential energy it uses. The energy needed to pump that water is greater than the electrical energy the system can generate, making it a net energy consumer, not a producer.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent omits the energy required to pump water back to the upper filling point.
- Violates energy conservation: The net work output (electricity) cannot exceed the work input to lift the water against gravity.
- System is a net consumer: The generator's output is fundamentally less than the pumping energy input due to inevitable losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguously described as 'gravity' and 'weight storage from any additional source or structure'. The primary proposed input is the gravitational potential energy of weights, with pendulums as an intermediate conversion mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that attempts to extract net electrical work from gravity using pendulums and falling weights, but it fails to account for the energy required to reset the system. Gravity is not an energy source; it is a conservative force. The proposed mechanisms, if fully traced, would either require more energy to reset the weights than they produce or would stop once the weights have fallen, constituting a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The description implies a system where pendulums generate electricity, but the pendulums themselves require continuous input power (from turbines or gears powered by falling weights). The total electrical output cannot e
- Perpetual motion logic: Claims 2, 3, and 7 suggest using a weight to power turbines/gears to power pendulums to generate electricity, implying a circular or self-sustaining energy flow with no net external input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Treats gravity as an energy source rather than a conservative force field. The system extracts energy from lifted weights, but the patent provides no mechanism for resetting the weights (lifting them back up) without con
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary claimed source is the continuous rotation of links driven by repositioning internal blocks, implying energy is extracted from the motion itself. Electrical input to the driving motors is mentioned but not accounted for in the energy output.
AI Physics Analysis
The mechanism describes a system of links and sliding blocks intended to rotate continuously and generate energy. This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by asserting net energy output from a closed mechanical cycle with no identifiable external energy source beyond the unaccounted-for motor inputs.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims continuous rotation and energy generation without identifying a net external energy input.
- Violates Thermodynamic Limits: Implies a mechanism (shifting masses) can produce net work in a cycle without an external gradient or energy source.
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: Mentions driving motors but ignores their energy consumption relative to the claimed generated output.
- Perpetual Motion Mechanism: Describes a closed system of moving masses intended to sustain motion and do work, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy from battery powers a fluid pump. The pump's fluid flow spins a flywheel, which spins a generator. The claimed system attempts to use the generator's output to both power the pump and recharge the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a classic over-unity system. After an initial battery start, it claims the electrical generator can produce enough power to run the fluid pump and recharge the battery, with surplus for external use. This is impossible because the generator is powered by the pump via the fluid and flywheel, creating a closed loop where energy losses ensure the system cannot sustain itself, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a closed loop (battery -> pump -> fluid -> flywheel -> generator -> battery). All losses (generator inefficiency, pump inefficiency, friction, fluid drag, electrical resistance) are ignored.
- Violates energy conservation: The claim implies the generator's output can sustain the pump and recharge the battery, resulting in net usable power from a system with no external energy input after startup.
- Misapplication of flywheel and gears: Flywheels store kinetic energy but do not create it. Gears trade speed for torque, but do not create energy. Their inclusion does not circumvent the need for a net energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the gravitational potential energy of the carrier and carried object. The system claims to generate electricity while also resetting the table's position and moving the carrier to the next cylinder.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to create a perpetual cycle where the weight of an object generates electricity via air compression, but then also uses the same air flow to reset the system for the next cycle. This violates conservation of energy, as the electrical output and system reset cannot both be powered solely by the object's one-time descent; energy is not created from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The electrical output from the pneumatic generator, plus energy lost to friction and waste heat, must come from a net decrease in the system's total energy. The only plausible source is the gravitational potential energy
- Incomplete energy accounting: No mechanism is described to input the energy required to lift the carrier/object back to its initial height after it has descended, which is necessary for continuous cycling. The described 'restoration' and 'raising' of
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: The system describes a cycle that purportedly outputs useful electrical work while returning all mechanical components to their initial state, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
No legitimate energy source is identified. The claim is for a closed system that recycles its own energy output as its sole input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a 'perpetual recycling energy device' that powers itself and other equipment indefinitely with no external fuel. This is physically impossible because any real system has losses to heat and friction, meaning it would run down without a continuous external energy input to replenish those losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming indefinite operation with no external energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying a perpetual process with no increase in entropy and no energy degradation to waste heat.
- The system, as described, is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy).
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > control in
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims to extra
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the device's own internal components (weights, springs, adjusting motors) are intended to create sustained motion, implying energy is generated by the mechanism itself rather than supplied from an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The mechanism describes a self-sustaining lever system that supposedly accelerates and swings consistently to generate net energy output. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks any described external energy input to overcome inevitable frictional losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims consistent swinging/acceleration without an energy source violates conservation of energy
- Adjusting members (motors) would require energy input not accounted for
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement with internal losses
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests ambient forces, but the described mechanism implies the system creates a vacuum with 'less force than it naturally is required' and uses this to lift more mass than was used to create the vacuum, implying energy amplification.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim—creating a vacuum with less force than thermodynamically required and using it to perform more work—directly violates the conservation of energy. The described system aims to generate continuous rotational motion from an internally created, self-sustaining imbalance, which is impossible without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims vacuum can be created with less force than required, implying output work > input work.
- Violates thermodynamic limits on work required to create a pressure/vacuum gradient.
- Proposes a mechanical imbalance that generates net rotation without a net external energy input, a form of perpetual motion.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The described system suggests the primary energy input is an initial electric starter motor, which drives a generator. The system then claims to use part of the generator's output to run a compressor, whose pressurized vapor drives a turbine to power the same generator, with surplus power for external use.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to create a self-sustaining power loop where a generator powers a compressor, whose output then drives the same generator. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as the inevitable losses from friction, heat, and electrical resistance mean the generator cannot produce enough power to run the compressor and also supply a net external output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes a closed-loop where the generator's output is used to power a compressor, whose output then drives the turbine to power the same generator. This is a classic self-powered loop with no net external en
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The compressor-turbine-generator loop involves energy conversions (electrical->mechanical->pressure->mechanical->electrical) each with inherent losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat). The system cann
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description focuses on 'energy lag time' and accumulation but ignores all dissipative losses. The compressor work input must be less than the turbine work output for net power, which is impossible in a closed, lossy
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'stepping up the vo
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describes a cyc
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanical system (disc lever with movable fulcrum) but does not identify a primary energy input. It implies the system uses its own configuration to produce "above average" work from an input, suggesting energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanical lever system that allegedly produces 'above average work' compared to a conventional system for the same input distance/time. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as mechanical advantage trades force for distance, not creates energy. The system cannot output more useful work than the energy supplied to it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'above average efficiency' and 'above average amount of work' without defining a complete energy balance.
- Suggests a variable output force can yield more work in the same distance/time than a comparable conventional system, violating conservation of energy for a closed mechanical system.
- Uses vague terms like 'changing mechanical advantage' and 'variable velocity ratio' to imply net work output > work input, which is impossible without an external energy source.
- Describes 'equilibrium seeking forces' and cycles that 'selectively stop and change direction' without identifying the energy source for sustained motion or overcoming losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on output
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy from twelve 12V batteries. Claims of supplemental energy from generators driven by the car's wheels and by wind interacting with the vehicle.
AI Physics Analysis
The design violates the first law of thermodynamics. Generators on the wheels extract energy from the car's motion, which creates drag and consumes more battery energy than they can produce. The system cannot sustainably recharge itself while driving from its own motion or from on-vehicle wind turbines, as those are parasitic loads.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: system claims to generate more electrical energy from wheels/wind than is required to overcome the load and losses of driving those generators.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores that generators driven by wheels create a braking load, consuming more energy from the batteries than they can return.
- Ambiguous and inconsistent voltage/current specifications that do not form a coherent power balance.
- Implies a perpetual-motion-like system where the vehicle's motion is used to generate electricity to sustain its motion.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'force producing device' is the only explicit input, but its energy source is not specified. The title mentions 'potential energy,' but no potential energy gradient (e.g., elevated mass, compressed spring) is described as an input to the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical linkage but fails to identify the primary source of energy. The 'force producing device' is an unexplained input, and the system's motion would quickly stop due to friction and generator load unless continuously powered by this device. The design implies energy multiplication is possible through mechanical arrangement, which violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'force producing device' is an unspecified black box. Its energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is not counted against the generator's electrical output.
- Violates conservation of energy: The described mechanism is a complex Rube Goldberg machine that merely transmits and converts energy from the force device to the generator. It cannot produce net energy output greater than the energy input to the for
- No thermodynamic process identified: The system is a mechanical linkage, not an energy converter. It cannot extract energy from an equilibrium state or create energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the primary input is the 'spent energy', but suggests the system can output more energy than this input by leveraging gravitational and buoyant forces. This incorrectly treats gravity and buoyancy as energy sources rather than conservative force fields.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is a classic over-unity (perpetual motion) violation. Gravitational and buoyant forces are conservative; in a complete cycle, the net work extracted from them is zero. Any energy gained in one part of the cycle must be paid back to reset the system, making net energy multiplication impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the law of conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics).
- Misinterprets gravitational potential energy and buoyant force as infinite energy sources. To complete a cycle, the system must do work *against* gravity/buoyancy to reset, negating any net gain.
- No thermodynamic limit is cited; the claim of 'more energy than energy is spent' is a direct perpetual motion claim.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy require
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims net work
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be none: 'The rotating device of the invention does not need any energy.' Implied source is gravitational potential energy from repositioning mass within the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to rotate continuously without energy input by using hooks to bind chain sections, creating a perpetual weight imbalance. This is a classic over-balance wheel design, which cannot produce net work as the energy needed to lift and reposition the bound sections equals or exceeds any work output, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims continuous rotation without an energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a mechanism to extract net work from an isothermal system (gravity field) without creating a sustained gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores that energy must be expended to reset the binding/unbinding mechanism to create the weight imbalance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device claims to be 'autonomous' and uses a 'Horizontal Converter of gravitational energy,' but the described mechanism is driven by a compressed fluid system (pneumatic/hydraulic cylinders). The ultimate source of energy for compressing the fluid is not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity autonomously by converting gravitational energy via a swinging frame, but the described driver is a compressed fluid system. The energy required to compress that fluid is not accounted for, and gravity alone cannot provide net energy in a cyclic process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims autonomous electricity generation without identifying a primary energy input.
- Misapplication of 'gravitational energy': Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a system returning to its initial state without an external input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work to compress the fluid (the apparent input) must exceed the electrical output plus all losses.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests electrical energy from a battery is used to power solenoids, which drive a crankshaft to turn a generator, which then supposedly recharges the battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to use a generator, powered by the engine's own output, to fully recharge its battery, ignoring all inevitable energy losses due to resistance, friction, and thermodynamic inefficiencies. No external energy source is identified to compensate for these losses, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying a closed-loop system where output work can fully recharge its own input source
- No primary external energy source is identified (e.g., fuel, ambient heat, sunlight)
- Inefficiencies (Joule heating in solenoids, friction, generator losses, battery charge/discharge losses) are ignored, making net-positive energy impossible
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms (perpetual motio
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial rotational force from the connected 'rotating device'. The claim implies the apparatus itself generates 'additional rotational force'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to amplify rotational force, implying it outputs more mechanical energy than is input from the driving motor. This violates conservation of energy, as the described internal sliding and rotating of rods can only redistribute or dissipate energy through friction, not create new energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to 'amplify' rotational force/energy without identifying an external energy source.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies energy output (rotation) can exceed energy input.
- Mechanism describes internal configuration changes but provides no thermodynamic gradient or external energy input to justify net work increase.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'amplifying
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the small motor (7) turning the spiral spring (1). The system claims to output more energy (via the descending weights on the pulley driving a generator) than this input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity claim. The small motor does work to lift balls against gravity via the spiral. The descending balls on the pulley cannot do more work than was required to lift them, due to inevitable losses. The system violates the conservation of energy by claiming a net power gain from a closed mechanical cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims output power > input power with no other identified energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores energy losses from friction, rolling resistance, and collisions in the spiral lift, transfer mechanisms, and pulley system.
- Misapplies centrifugal force: Centrifugal force in the rotating spiral does not add net energy; it merely redirects the balls outward, requiring work from the motor to maintain rotation.
- Perpetual motion claim: Implicitly suggests a closed-loop system where lifted weights generate more power than needed to lift them, enabling self-sustained operation or net power output.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'power to move the
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a mech
Claimed Energy Source
The electrical input to the water pump, which pressurizes and circulates the water. The system is explicitly closed-loop/recirculating.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion violation. It proposes using a pump to pressurize water to spin a turbine-generator, but then recirculates the same water. The generator cannot produce more energy than the pump consumes, making the system a net consumer of energy, not a producer.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed loop with a pump driving a turbine-generator. The generator's output cannot exceed the pump's input due to losses from friction, turbulence, and generator inefficiency.
- Claims 3 and 8 describe a 'perpetual power concept' where the only explicit energy input is the pump, which the generator is supposed to power, creating a logical loop that violates energy conservation.
- The comparison to steam or internal combustion is misleading, as those are prime movers extracting energy from a fuel, while this system is a lossy secondary converter.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'perpetual power' a
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a perp
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'pressurized wate
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claims suggest a system that runs without fuel, implying extraction of energy from an undefined source or violation of conservation laws.
AI Physics Analysis
The claims directly violate the first law of thermodynamics by stating multi-megawatt systems can run 'without fuel,' implying energy creation. No legitimate ambient energy source (solar, geothermal, etc.) is identified that could provide such power densities, making this a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a 1 MW gas turbine can run 'without fuel' (violates energy conservation)
- Claims to provide heating, hot water, and all electrical power for a home from an unspecified primary energy source
- No description of the actual energy conversion process or input
- Output power claims (1-3 MW) are massive with no commensurate input described
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the motor-flywheel that drives the rotor at constant angular velocity. The spring-crank mechanism for repositioning also requires energy input, though not explicitly quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a net lifting force using only internal moving masses and a clutch, which is physically impossible. Internal forces in a mechanical system cannot produce sustained external work or net acceleration of the system's center of mass—this violates conservation of momentum and energy. The motor must supply all the energy for any lift achieved.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system claims to generate a net force for lifting a payload using only internal inertial forces (Coriolis and centrifugal). In a closed system, internal forces cannot produce net momentum or sustained lift against gravity.
- The clutch mechanism selectively engages only the 'upward' force component, attempting to rectify an oscillating force into a unidirectional lift. This violates Newton's third law—the reaction forces during the non-clutched (downward) phase must act
- Energy accounting is incomplete. The work done lifting the payload against gravity must come from the motor and spring, not from 'compound forces' which are internal. The system describes a mechanism for force rectification, not an energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'net altern
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical power to the controllable electric motor driving the disc rotor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity claim. It uses an electric motor to spin a rotor containing liquid, then tries to extract work from the pressurized liquid to run a generator. This is a closed loop with no external energy input besides the motor, so the generator's output cannot exceed the motor's input, making net power generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim implies using centrifugal pressure to drive a hydraulic motor and generator, but the work extracted from the liquid's motion must come from the motor driving the rotor. No additional energy source is described.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes a single energy conversion chain (electric motor → rotor → liquid pressure → hydraulic motor → generator → electricity). The electrical output from the generator cannot exceed the electrical input
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: Centrifugal force is not an independent energy source; it is a kinematic effect that requires work input to maintain rotation against fluid drag and other losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description focuses on
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics terms (centr
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'Reaction Force Energy' and 'transformation of the available energies' but provides no identifiable external energy input. Implies energy is generated from internal mechanical interactions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a 'continuously active motor' with no clear external energy source, relying on an undefined 'Reaction Force Energy' from internal mechanical interactions. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to generate useful mechanical work without an energy input to balance the output.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Claims 'non-stop' motion implies perpetual operation without energy input
- Uses undefined term 'Reaction Force Energy' as a primary energy source
- Claims to generate mechanical energy without specifying what energy reservoir is being depleted
- Admits device is 'not yet fully functional' while asserting it is mathematically and mechanically sound
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use air, sand, and water as 'power sources', with references to gravity force, water force, and air force. The described system appears to be a complex mechanical arrangement of pistons, tanks, and clutches, suggesting an attempt to create a self-sustaining or over-unity device using internal energy exchanges.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous clean energy using only internal exchanges of air, sand, and water forces. It lacks any clear, sustainable external energy input, and its described operation suggests an attempt to create a perpetual motion machine, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The use of complex, vague terminology obfuscates the fundamental physics violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., fuel, external electricity, significant thermal gradient).
- Claims of producing 'continuous' energy from internal exchanges violate conservation of energy.
- System description implies creation of net work from internal cycles without an external source, a form of perpetual motion.
- Vague mechanism; 'air, sand, and water' are not energy sources but mediums—energy must come from a gradient (e.g., height for water, pressure for air) which is not established as sustainably replenished.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system's primary electrical output is claimed to come from a water turbine driven by water pumped from a tank. The pumps require an external energy input not specified, creating a closed loop where the output is used to power the system's own components (LEDs).
AI Physics Analysis
The system violates the first law of thermodynamics. It describes a loop where water pumps lift water to drive a turbine that generates electricity, but the significant energy input required to run the pumps is omitted. Without an external source, this is a classic perpetual motion scheme of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the power source for the water pumps.
- Circular energy claim: The system's generated electricity powers LEDs, but the input work to lift the water (to drive the turbine) is not accounted for.
- Violation of energy conservation: The description implies net energy generation (for LEDs) from a process where the prime mover (pumps) lacks a defined external input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Inventor: George GanimianAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2003-01-13
USPTO Abstract
An electric power generator harvesting the gravitational pull of the Earth, having a platform member, an electric generator housing slidably positioned on the platform member, the electric generator housing coupled to an axle having a rotor gear, an endless belt having tread members, a drive wheel, and an idler wheel, wherein the rotor gear is in mating contact with the tread member of the endless belt. Change of orientation of the platform member along a horizontal longitudinal axis causes the electric generator housing to slide on the platform member while the counter motion of the rotating endless belt maintains position of the electric generator housing on the platform member. As a result of rotation of the axle, electric power is generated by turbine generator located inside of the electric generator housing. Some of the generated electric power could be utilized to supply the needed power for rotation of the drive wheel rotating the endless belt. Hence, the electric power generator is capable of being self-sustaining.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to be a self-sustaining generator by using gravity, but it internally recycles energy. The work needed to tilt the platform and overcome losses is ignored, making the 'self-sustaining' claim a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System lacks a net external energy source. Tilting the platform creates a potential energy change for the sliding housing, but this energy is internally sourced (likely from the 'means for changing' the angle).
- Claim of self-sustenance (using output to power the drive wheel) violates energy conservation. Losses from friction, generator inefficiency, and belt drive will always exceed any recoverable energy.
- The described motion is internal and reciprocal. For the housing to slide and generate electricity, work must be done against it (e.g., tilting the platform). This work input is not accounted for in the 'self-sustaining' claim.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use gravity, compressed springs, and hydraulic pressure as 'power sources' but describes a closed mechanical/hydraulic system with no external energy input to replenish springs or maintain pressure gradients.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to use internal forces (levers, springs, hydraulics) within a closed system (a vehicle body) to generate net forward thrust or rotational work, which violates conservation of energy and Newton's laws. No mechanism is described to replenish the energy initially stored in the springs or hydraulic system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to produce net work from internal forces (springs, hydraulic pressure) without an external energy source to reset them.
- Violates first law of thermodynamics: Describes a closed system (vehicle body, levers, hydraulic cylinders) that supposedly generates continuous motion and useful work (to drive a vehicle or generator) with no net energy input.
- Mechanically impossible: Claims the force in the 'forward direction' is greater than in the 'reverse direction' due to lever geometry and hydraulic advantage, ignoring that internal forces in a closed system sum to zero (Newton's 3rd law). No net thr
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims multiple 'p
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is ambiguous. The driving device (e.g., motor, engine) provides the initial rotational energy. The centrifugal device is claimed to add an 'inertia effect' to drive the shaft, but this is not an independent energy source; it is part of the rotating system powered by the driving device.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a centrifugal device can drive the transmission shaft, leading to more output energy than input energy. This is impossible as centrifugal forces are internal and cannot provide net motive power. The described system violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming energy multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that 'energy generated by the driven device is greater than energy consumed' violates energy conservation.
- Centrifugal force is an internal, radial force within a rotating system; it cannot apply a net torque to accelerate the shaft it is mounted on.
- The system description suggests a feedback loop where the driven device (e.g., generator) charges a battery that powers the driving motor, implying a perpetual motion scheme.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes using 'ambient energy' (sunlight, wind, thermal gradient, humidity gradient, vibration) and converting it, but the mechanism and accounting are obfuscated. Claims suggest output energy exceeds the identified control input, implying an unaccounted source or violation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that supposedly concentrates and converts various ambient energies (thermal, humidity, vibration) into usable power with output exceeding input. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) unless all ambient energy inputs are fully and quantitatively accounted for, which they are not. The description uses correct physics terms ('ambient energy') but in a vague, obfuscating way typical of perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'output > control input' without specifying all ambient energy inputs quantitatively.
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism: Implies generating useful work from ambient energy in equilibrium without a sufficient gradient or entropy sink.
- Vague quantitative claims: No numbers for efficiency, COP, or power output to verify against thermodynamic limits.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a cascading process (moisture → dew → 3-phase vapor → V-vortex → moisture) that allegedly produces power from ambient moisture and temperature differences, but no primary external energy input is clearly identified. It appears to claim energy extraction from ambient conditions without a sufficient thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cascading cycle that claims to generate power from ambient moisture and dew formation, which is thermodynamically impossible as it attempts to extract net work without a sufficient external energy gradient or fuel source. It violates both energy conservation and the second law by implying a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Describes a cyclic process that purportedly generates power from ambient moisture/dew without consuming a higher-quality energy source or maintaining a sufficient thermal/chemical gradient.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual or self-sustaining cycle that extracts net work from an isothermal or equilibrium moisture source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy (e.g., heat required for evaporation, work for compression/pumping) vs. electrical output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text mentions ambient temperature gradients (30°C) and 'energy multiplication' but provides no coherent mechanism for energy input. References to F-22 and 1500°C suggest possible confusion with combustion or external heat sources, but no legitimate source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that allegedly produces significant power (3000W) from ambient temperature gradients, using confusing and incoherent physics terminology. It violates the First Law by implying energy creation and the Second Law by suggesting useful work can be extracted from a single thermal reservoir without a temperature differential to drive a heat engine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims output (3000W) from an unspecified input, implying energy creation
- Appears to claim extraction of work from a single thermal reservoir (30°C ambient) without a colder sink, violating the Second Law
- Uses obfuscated terminology and incoherent technical descriptions
- Mentions 'energy multiplication' which is a perpetual motion red flag
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS (extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION (mixed Korean/English, vag
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied to be generated from the device's own motion without external input, described as 'unlimited motive power generation' and 'perpetual motion'.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to achieve perpetual motion and generate unlimited power through self-sustaining rotation and force amplification cycles. It violates fundamental conservation laws by proposing energy output without identifiable external input and describes thermodynamically impossible mechanisms for continuous operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion ('無限動力回転体', '永久運動')
- Describes self-sustaining rotation and power amplification without an external energy source
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to generate unlimited energy
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics by proposing a system that can do work indefinitely without an energy gradient or entropy increase
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/gravitational potential energy of the floaters (buoys) within the rotating machine. The only explicit input is the initial work to set the machine in motion, after which it claims to sustain itself and generate excess electricity.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a buoyancy-based perpetual motion machine. While the rising buoys can do work, an equal or greater amount of work is required to re-submerge them to complete the cycle, resulting in a net energy loss. The design cannot generate excess electricity without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is a closed mechanical loop with no external energy input to replenish the gravitational potential energy lifted by the buoys.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: It claims to produce net work from an isothermal environment (the water bath) without a temperature or chemical potential gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to submerge the buoys (against buoyant force) is not accounted for, and must equal or exceed the work gained from their rise.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent mentions 'expansion and/or contraction devices' (hydraulic, electromagnetic, mechanical, or springs) operated remotely, implying an external energy input, but the description is obfuscated. The core claim suggests the system is driven by a 'sympathetic resonance' and 'potential difference' from a differential equation, implying self-sustaining operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a violation of energy conservation. It claims to generate significant power output using vaguely described internal forces and resonance, while the only identified energy inputs (to the expansion devices) are obscured. The description suggests a self-sustaining or over-unity mechanism, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting. The 'vector forces' and 'precessional' engagement are described as generating shaft torque and spin, but the work output is not balanced against the input to the expansion/contraction devices.
- Violates conservation of energy. The text implies the system can provide 'equal or improved power output' from torch batteries to base load applications, suggesting over-unity or self-sustaining operation without a sufficient, identified primary ener
- Uses correct physics terms incorrectly ('precessional', 'vector forces', 'potential difference', 'sympathetic resonance') in a vague, non-quantitative way to describe an energy-generating mechanism.
- The governing device negates the driving force to regulate speed, but there is no description of how net positive work is extracted without continuous energy input to reset the 'fly arms'.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'improved p
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'differen
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial charge in the 12V battery. The system claims to recharge this battery from its own generator while also producing surplus electrical energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This system is a classic over-unity claim. The generator's output is fundamentally limited by the work input from the motor, minus all system losses. It cannot recharge its own power source and produce surplus energy, as this creates energy from nothing. The mention of friction does not excuse the violation of conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system claims a net energy output (surplus) from a finite initial energy store with no external input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Every energy conversion (motor, generator, flywheel) incurs losses (friction, electrical resistance, heat). The generator cannot produce more energy than the motor consumes from the battery, let alone rechar
- Incomplete energy accounting. It ignores all conversion losses and treats the flywheel as a source of energy rather than a temporary storage device with losses.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests rotation is initiated and maintained by internal mechanical interactions (vector forces, cam followers, counter-balances) without identifying an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system with no external energy source. It claims to generate sustained rotation and power output solely through internal interactions, which violates the conservation of energy. The use of complex, misapplied terminology cannot circumvent the fundamental requirement for an energy input to perform work and overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is described (e.g., electrical, chemical, stored potential).
- Claims to provide power output from internal mechanical rearrangements alone, implying creation of energy.
- Uses vague, pseudo-scientific terminology ('equation of differential equations that supports the existence of elementary particles', 'positive/negative sine to the differential equation') to obfuscate the lack of a power source.
- Describes a closed mechanical system with no means to overcome inevitable frictional losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'stand alo
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy, but the described cyclical process lacks a net external energy input to reset the system. The apparent source is the capsules falling in air and rising in water.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual cycle where capsules fall to generate energy and then float back up for free. However, to complete the cycle, the capsules must be moved from the top of the water-float tube back to the top of the air-fall tube. This requires work against gravity equal to or greater than the energy extracted from the fall, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System requires net work to lift capsules back to starting height, which is not accounted for.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on falling/rising capsules but ignores energy needed to move capsules from the top of the water column (end of float-up) back to the top of the air column (start of fall).
- Misapplication of buoyancy: Buoyant rise is not 'free energy'; it is paid for by the work done to submerge the object (against buoyancy) in the first place. The cycle cannot be closed without external work.
- Implied perpetual motion: Claims cyclical generation from gravity alone, which is a hallmark of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
No legitimate external energy source identified. Claims to generate energy solely from internal configuration of gravity, magnetism, and centrifugal forces within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate clean energy from internal magnetic and gravitational interactions, but these are conservative forces that cannot provide net energy over a complete cycle. The design ignores energy dissipation and violates fundamental conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) by claiming to produce net work without energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics; system is intended to operate perpetually without an entropy increase or external gradient.
- Centrifugal force is not an external force but a kinematic effect; it cannot do net work on the system.
- Magnetic and gravitational forces are conservative; net work over a closed cycle is zero.
- Friction and other dissipative losses are acknowledged but not accounted for in energy balance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The title and abstract describe a mechanical system that 'naturally' produces electricity, implying energy generation without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanical system producing electricity 'naturally' with no identifiable external energy source, violating energy conservation. Any mechanical system generating electricity must have an energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, wind, etc.), which is completely absent from the description.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Implies generation of electrical energy from a mechanical system without an external driving energy gradient
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as presented
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of balls being lifted, but the described mechanism uses the falling balls to power the lifting of the same balls, creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel/lever variant that attempts to use rolling balls to create continuous oscillation, claiming the motion can be sustained once started. It violates energy conservation because the work required to lift the balls back to their starting height (via the lever's motion) must come from an external source, not from the falling balls themselves after accounting for losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Perpetual motion of the first kind (energy creation)
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy input described to overcome friction and losses
- The system claims to sustain its own motion by using the falling balls to reset the lever, which then lifts the balls again—a net energy loop with no external source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is incomplete/truncated, but the structure suggests claims of energy generation or amplification without a clear, identified primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent excerpt is structurally suspicious and incomplete, showing a pattern of obfuscation with truncated text and labels ('EMI') that avoid a clear physical description. Without a defined energy input or a plausible thermodynamic mechanism, any claim of useful work output would violate energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting (no identifiable inputs)
- Claims structured as 'EMI' (possibly 'Embodiment') suggest a device description without a defined thermodynamic cycle or energy gradient
- No identifiable work input or ambient energy harvesting mechanism specified in the provided text
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. No explicit energy source is described in the provided text. The claim structure suggests an electromagnetic or energy conversion device, but the total energy input is not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims lack any description of an energy source or input, presenting only a numbered list of claims with no technical content. This structure is characteristic of devices that violate energy conservation by omitting the source of the output energy, making proper physics analysis impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- No quantitative performance claims to analyze against thermodynamic limits
- Structure implies energy generation/conversion without a defined source
- Incomplete system description prevents proper energy accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided text contains no description of any energy input, only placeholder labels (EMI1.1, EMI2.1). No explicit or implicit source is defined.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no substantive physics or engineering description—only section labels and placeholders. With no defined energy source, conversion process, or outputs, it is impossible to perform a compliance analysis. The structure resembles obfuscation, presenting a framework without content, which inherently violates the requirement for a complete energy accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Complete absence of energy accounting
- No defined system or process to analyze
- Claims are placeholders with no physical content
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions an initial 6 kg input force applied to a pedal or lever (nummer I), but the analysis claims this force is multiplied through a system of gears, levers, and 'resistance cylinders' without an identifiable external energy source to account for the multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical system that claims to multiply an input force (6 kg) into a larger output force (24 kg) through internal leverage and gears without any additional energy input. This violates the conservation of energy, as a simple machine can only trade force for distance, not create energy. The analysis commits the fundamental error of analyzing forces in isolation from their displacements.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims force multiplication (6 kg -> 16 kg -> 24 kg) without accounting for the required energy input or the work-energy principle.
- Describes a complex mechanical linkage but provides no mechanism to circumvent the conservation of energy; any force multiplication must come with a proportional reduction in displacement (or vice-versa).
- The system appears to use internal reaction forces (e.g., against a fixed body 'vast lichaam nr V') to generate claimed higher forces, which is a classic hallmark of an over-unity or perpetual motion machine misunderstanding.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis focus
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The des
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a rotating machine with gears and toothed rails, implying mechanical input, but the title claims to create energy freely ('creant gratuitement l'energie'). No explicit external source (electrical, chemical, environmental gradient) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim's core premise of creating energy freely violates the first law of thermodynamics. The described mechanical system lacks any declared external energy source, suggesting an attempt at a perpetual motion machine. The vague and fragmented description obscures the necessary physics analysis.
Specific Physics Issues
- Title claims creation of energy ('gratuitement'), a direct violation of energy conservation
- No identifiable primary energy input to drive the described mechanical system
- Vague, incomplete description prevents proper energy accounting
- Implies a self-sustaining or energy-multiplying rotary mechanism
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text fragment suggests a mechanical system (gears, vertical motion) but provides no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim explicitly states the goal of creating 'free energy' and describes mechanical components without identifying any legitimate energy source. This is a direct violation of energy conservation, as a system cannot perform net work without an energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- Claims 'creant l'energie gratuite' (creating free energy)
- Mechanical description implies work output without clear work input
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient water source (lake) and gravitational potential energy of water and internal weights. The device appears to be a hydraulic/pneumatic system using water columns, pistons, bottles, and counterweights in a cyclical process.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to produce continuous energy from a water source and internal weight movements, but the described cyclical process lacks an identified external energy source to overcome losses and reset the system to its initial high-potential-energy state. It therefore violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims continuous, renewed, and repeated operation without identifying a net external energy input to reset the cycle.
- Implies perpetual motion: Describes a cycle where water and weights move to produce energy, but the description suggests the system will reach equilibrium without an external pump or energy input to restore the initial hydraulic/potential energy stat
- Vague mechanism: The description is fragmented and unclear on how the pistons, tubes, bottles, and counterweights are arranged to yield net work output greater than the work required to reset the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the mechanical energy output is generated solely from the gravitational potential energy of weights ('masses-poids') being repositioned within a rotating system, with no identified external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical weight-shifting engine claiming to produce electrical energy. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes a closed cycle of weights that allegedly produces net work (100 kgm) without any external energy input to reset the mechanism. The described attachment/detachment system would itself require energy input not accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims a net positive work output (100 kgm) from repositioning weights in a closed cycle
- Implies perpetual motion by using the system's own motion to reset the weights
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot output more work than the work input to lift/reset the weights
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is vaguely implied via magnetic attraction and inertia, but the claim explicitly states operation 'sans aucun apport d'énergie' (without any energy input).
AI Physics Analysis
The claim directly violates the first law of thermodynamics by stating a moving body produces more energy than required to create its motion, and explicitly describes a motor that functions without any energy input. The described mechanism attempts to use inertia and permanent magnets to create perpetual motion, which is impossible as it lacks a net external energy source and ignores dissipative losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy output > energy input without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Asserts system operates with 'no energy input' while producing energy, violating conservation of energy.
- Relies on perpetual motion of a wheel using inertia and magnets to overcome gravity/friction without loss.
- Misapplies inertia as a source of net energy gain rather than a temporary store.
- Proposes extracting net work from magnetic gradients without accounting for energy needed to reset the system (e.g., separating magnets).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions only rotating components (main rotor, disk rotors, bob rotors, prop rotors) but provides no specification of an external energy input to drive this complex mechanical system. The implied source is the motor(s) spinning the rotors, but this is not explicitly stated as an input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a collection of spinning rotors with no stated external energy source or mechanism to interact with an external medium (like air or a field). Internal spinning masses cannot produce net levitation or propulsion for the device's center of mass, as this violates conservation of momentum. It is a classical 'reactionless drive' concept, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy input accounting - system describes complex motion without specifying work/power input.
- Implies generation of net levitation/thrust from purely internal rotational motions, violating Newton's third law (action-reaction) for a closed system.
- No mechanism described to create a net external force; internal spinning masses produce internal forces that cancel out.
- Violates conservation of momentum - system cannot create a net upward or horizontal momentum for itself without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focus is on claime
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions transforming energy from different available sources and refers to an 'original source of energy,' but the core claim is the amplification of an original power/force without accounting for the energy required for that amplification.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical 'power amplifier' or 'multiplier' that claims to produce a greater output force than the original input force, leading to a self-sustaining or perpetual cycle. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as the claimed amplification lacks an identifiable external energy source to account for the increased output work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'force multiplication' and 'power amplification' resulting in a greater output force than input force without a clear, additional energy source.
- Describes a 'perpetual movement' apparatus and implies a self-sustaining or multiplicative cycle.
- Uses obfuscated technical language ('multiplicateur de puissance', 'amplificateur de puissance') to describe what is, in essence, a mechanical over-unity device.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to operate with 'aucune énergie' (no energy). Implied buoyancy from floaters possibly containing helium or oxygen, but no external gradient or fuel source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate power (for a generator or boat propulsion) without any energy input, directly violating the conservation of energy. The described buoyancy mechanism cannot produce continuous net work in a closed cycle, as the work done by a floater rising is canceled by the work required to submerge it elsewhere in the cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming output power requires no energy input.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source identified to sustain continuous rotation and power generation.
- Buoyancy is a conservative force in a closed fluid system; net work over a cycle is zero without an external displacement of the fluid or change in the gravitational potential energy of the system.
- Claims 'auto-sustaining' generator is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions an external power source (11) and hydraulic motors, but the core claim is to generate energy via shifting weights to create a 'lever force' that presumably outputs more work than is input.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity claim disguised as a mechanical lever system. It attempts to generate continuous power from shifting weights, but the energy required to lift the weights back up (whether by chain, hydraulic motor, or spring) will always be at least equal to the work gained from their fall, resulting in zero net energy output or a net loss due to friction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system attempts to create a perpetual imbalance (lever force) by resetting weights, but the work required to lift and reset the weights against gravity equals or exceeds any work extracted from their descent.
- No net energy source: The described mechanism (tubes, weights, chains, springs, gears) merely manipulates gravitational potential energy internally. The hydraulic motor or external starter is the only true input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on the 'force de levier' output while obfuscating the greater work needed to restore the weights to their starting positions.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The described energy source is ambiguous. The primary input appears to be a push from a cylinder (7) on a small wheel or eccentric (2, 3, 6), which then forces a larger wheel (1) to rotate. The system implies the output rotation of the large wheel is greater than the input work from the cylinder, but no independent external energy source (e.g., compressed air, fuel, electricity for the cylinder) is clearly accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system that uses eccentrics, levers, and gears in a closed loop. It implicitly claims to produce sustained rotational power from an initial push, violating energy conservation as it lacks a continuous external energy source to overcome losses. The mechanism describes a form of perpetual motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done by the pushing cylinder is the only explicit input, but the claim implies this small input can produce a larger rotational output via mechanical advantage and linkage.
- Violates conservation of energy: The mechanism describes using one wheel/eccentric to push and turn a larger wheel, which is then linked back to force the small wheel/eccentric to turn. This describes a closed loop with no net external energy input t
- Misapplication of mechanical advantage: Gears and levers can trade force for distance, but cannot create net energy. The description suggests a perpetual or self-sustaining rotation is possible from an initial push.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravity and manual/electrical input to lift balls/weights, with claimed 'net power' from leverage, gravity, and centrifugal force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net useful work from gravity and centrifugal force by cycling masses, but it ignores the fundamental energy input required to restore the gravitational potential of the weights. The claim that rolling a weight uphill requires far less force than lifting it vertically is a misunderstanding of work; the work against gravity remains mgh regardless of path. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'net power' from gravity without restoring the gravitational potential of the lifted masses
- Assumes rolling a weight up an incline requires negligible force compared to lifting vertically, ignoring that the work done against gravity is the same (mgh)
- Proposes a self-sufficient or net-power-producing system by cycling masses in a gravitational field, violating conservation of energy
- Uses centrifugal force as a power source, which is not an independent energy source but requires input work to spin the system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the input shaft (23) driven by an external motor. The patent implies 'natural forces of gravity' and the weight of the floating gear provide additional energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to increase output torque and horsepower compared to its input by using gravity and a floating gear's weight. Since the gear's weight is part of the system and gravity is a conservative force, no net energy can be extracted over a complete cycle. The claim of overcoming all losses and increasing force violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims increased output torque/horsepower compared to input, implying energy gain or multiplication.
- Attempts to use gravity/weight of floating gear as a perpetual energy source within a cycle, violating conservation of energy.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source (like a falling weight) is described to justify the claimed increase; the floating gear's weight is part of the system and cannot provide net work over a cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'increases
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (convection) is implied as the primary input, but the description is vague. Electrical input from batteries is mentioned for a heating coil.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate useful electrical power from convection, but provides no accounting for the external energy source needed to create and maintain the necessary temperature gradient. The feedback loop and lack of a clear, sufficient primary energy input indicate a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear, quantified energy input described to initiate or sustain convection.
- Claims of generating electricity to run loads (TV, pump, toaster) and store excess in batteries without identifying a sufficient external energy gradient.
- Implies a self-sustaining system where a fraction of output is fed back (to a heating coil), suggesting a perpetual motion scheme.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text references 'Gravity' and 'Magnetic Hill' optical illusions, suggesting a claim to extract useful work from gravity or magnetic anomalies without an identifiable external energy input to sustain the motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The 'invention' is described with incoherent text and bases its premise on known optical illusions ('Magnetic Hill'), not a physical energy source. Any machine claiming to produce continuous work from gravity alone violates the conservation of energy, as gravity is a conservative force; net work over a cycle is zero without an external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is largely garbled/nonsensical, preventing technical analysis of a mechanism.
- References 'Magnetic Hill' (a well-known optical illusion where a downhill slope appears uphill) as a basis, indicating a fundamental misunderstanding of the energy source.
- Implies a perpetual or over-unity system using gravity/conveyors without specifying an external energy input to reset the system or overcome losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of uphill m
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses fragmented, unreadab
Claimed Energy Source
The only described source is the gravitational potential energy of 'falling weights' within the unbalanced wheels. The system is closed, implying this energy is internally recycled.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to run perpetually by internally recycling the gravitational potential energy of its own weights. This is impossible because any work extracted from the falling weights requires more energy to reset those weights to their original high-potential positions, leading to a net energy loss, not gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes a closed system performing net work without an external energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, extracting usable work from an internal, non-replenishing potential.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores energy losses to friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions during the locking/unlocking and weight resetting processes.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electric motor input (explicit), with implied extraction of additional energy from the spinning drum's centrifugal force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electric motor driving a weighted drum and an alternator. The centrifugal forces are internal and symmetric, providing no net energy gain. For the system to be 'self-sustaining,' the alternator's output would need to power the motor with surplus left over, which is impossible due to conservation of energy, as losses ensure total output is always less than the motor's electrical input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'completely self-sustaining' with no perpetual energy source.
- Asserts a smaller motor can drive an alternator to produce more usable power than the motor consumes, violating energy conservation.
- Describes the centrifugal drum as providing 'force' to help spin the alternator, but this force is not an energy source; it is a reaction force requiring energy input to maintain rotation against bearing friction and alternator load.
- No accounting for energy losses from friction, electrical resistance, or air drag.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores that the m
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the input motor driving the shaft with the distorted elliptical magnets. However, the mechanism purports to generate additional 'force' or 'power' via magnetic repulsion between permanent magnets to multiply torque.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims torque multiplication without a corresponding increase in input power or decrease in output speed, directly violating conservation of energy. The magnetic forces are internal and cannot provide net energy to increase the output work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate a larger output torque from a smaller input torque at a constant speed ratio, which implies increased output power (Torque * Speed) without increased input power.
- Permanent magnets are conservative force fields; no net work can be extracted from their static fields alone. The repulsion forces are internal and cannot add net energy to the system.
- The return of levers by tension springs consumes energy, making the system a lossy magnetic-mechanical oscillator driven by the input motor.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'converting
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the machine's own rotating weights, when repositioned, can generate more torque than is consumed to reposition them, creating a net excess from within a closed system. No external energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient gradient) is identified for sustained operation.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The internal mechanism for resetting the weights consumes at least as much energy as the weights produce, resulting in zero net work. The system cannot accelerate a load or sustain itself without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a closed system can produce net usable work (torque to drive a load) indefinitely.
- Violates Newton's 3rd law: The internal mechanism for rotating the weights 180 degrees must apply an equal and opposite torque on the main shaft, canceling any net gain.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work needed to rotate the weights against the machine's rotation is not properly accounted for as an energy input to the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only the gravitational force of weights that are part of the machine, with no external power input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce clean energy using only gravity from its own internal weights and springs, with no external power. This describes a closed system that purportedly creates net work from internal rearrangements, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described resetting of weights via springs cannot create a net energy gain per cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce net energy output from a closed system of weights and springs.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes to create a perpetual gradient from an equilibrium system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores that energy stored in springs comes from initial gravitational potential, which is depleted and cannot be replenished without external work.
- Mechanism describes a self-resetting, cyclic machine with no net energy input, which is impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, with energy stored/released via springs, with no external power input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce clean energy using only the gravitational force of its own internal weights, with springs assisting to reposition weights. This describes a closed system attempting to perform net work indefinitely, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce net useful work (compress springs, rotate wheel) using only gravity from weights that are part of the closed machine.
- No identifiable external energy input. The system's weights and springs are internal components; gravity acts on them, but in a closed cycle, the net work from a conservative force like gravity over one cycle is zero.
- The described mechanism (using springs to push 'negative' weights to become 'positive') is thermodynamically incoherent and suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to produce energy using 'rotational lever force' and 'gravity force' from a mechanical system, implying energy generation from internal mechanical interactions without a clear external primary energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a purely mechanical gear system that claims to produce energy using levers and gravity. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks any identifiable external energy source to compensate for inevitable frictional losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement with no identified external energy source to overcome friction and losses.
- Misapplication of lever principle: Levers and gears transmit/transform energy; they do not create it. 'Rotational lever force' is not an energy source.
- Ambiguous role of gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from it in a cyclic process without lowering a mass, which is not described.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims energy prod
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the primary intended source is gravitational potential energy from shifting weights, possibly with an initial input from a starter motor. No external, sustainable energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient gradient) is clearly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system attempting to extract net work from gravity using levers and scissors mechanisms to shift weights. Since gravity is a conservative force, no net work can be extracted over a complete cycle without an external energy input to reset the system, violating the conservation of energy. The description lacks a credible, sustained energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system describes using levers and scissors mechanisms to move weights, claiming to produce 'pure energy' or act as a 'power multiplier' without identifying a net energy input to sustain the motion.
- Violates conservation of energy: The claim of being a 'power multiplier' that produces net output energy from an initial start implies creation of energy from within the system's closed mechanical cycle.
- No perpetual gradient: The gravitational field is conservative. Cycling weights around a clock face returns them to the same potential energy, with no net work extractable over a full cycle without an external input to reset the mechanism.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only gravitational force from weights that are part of the machine, with no external power input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce clean energy using only gravity from its internal weights and springs, with no external power input. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the system's total mechanical energy (gravitational potential + spring potential + kinetic) can only decrease due to losses, not produce net useful work indefinitely.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce net energy output using only internal weights and springs.
- No perpetual gradient: system operates in a closed gravitational potential with no external energy source to reset the weights.
- Energy dissipation from friction, spring hysteresis, and other losses is ignored.
- Describes using springs to push weights to advantageous positions, but compressing/tensioning springs requires work that must come from the system's own decreasing gravitational potential.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'sans utili
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to claim energy production from magnetic levitation without identifying any external energy input. The described system uses permanent magnets and ferromagnetic plates to create a stable levitation state.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a magnetic levitation system using permanent magnets and ferromagnetic plates, but then asserts it can 'produce pure energy.' This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics, as no external energy source is identified to account for the claimed energy output. The system is a conservative arrangement from which no net work can be extracted without an external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to 'produce pure energy' but describes only a static magnetic arrangement with no energy input.
- Implies work can be extracted from a conservative magnetic field without an external gradient or energy source.
- Describes 'frictionless' movement of magnets, suggesting perpetual motion is possible by extracting energy from the system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims energy prod
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the input motor (32). The device is described as a mechanical torque multiplier, implying it uses gearing to increase output torque from a given input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical gear train. Gears can multiply torque, but only by reducing rotational speed, keeping input and output power equal (minus frictional losses). Claiming this arrangement produces excess energy or doubles power is a fundamental violation of the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to 'double the torque' of a motor to produce 'clean energy without pollution', implying energy multiplication or creation.
- A pure mechanical gearing system cannot increase power (energy per unit time); it can only trade torque for rotational speed, keeping power constant minus losses.
- The description suggests output power can exceed input power, which violates the conservation of energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Only explicitly mentioned energy source is an input motor (32). The device claims to double torque/power using a gear system, implying energy output greater than input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gear system that can trade speed for torque, but it incorrectly presents this kinematic transformation as a multiplication of power or energy. No additional energy source is identified, so any claim of increased output power violates the conservation of energy. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'double the torque' or multiply power without identifying an additional energy source.
- Describes a kinematic gear arrangement (planet gear 12 rotating around fixed sun gear 13) which can change torque/speed ratios but cannot create net energy.
- Implies useful power output (to generator) exceeds input power from motor, violating conservation of energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on torque
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the input motor (32). The device claims to double the torque from this motor using a gear system, implying energy multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical gear system that claims to double torque and thereby produce 'clean energy without pollution.' This violates the conservation of energy, as gears cannot create energy; they only transform torque and speed. The claim represents a classic perpetual motion violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'double torque' without accounting for corresponding reduction in speed or increase in input energy, violating conservation of energy.
- Describes a gear system (fixed and mobile gears) but provides no mechanism for creating net energy gain; gears only trade torque for angular velocity.
- Implies functional perpetual motion or over-unity by suggesting a multiplier that increases power output without increased input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'doubli
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the input motor. The device is described as a 'power multiplier' that doubles torque, implying output power exceeds input power without an additional external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a kinematic gear arrangement (resembling a planetary system) misinterpreted as a power multiplier. In reality, gears trade torque for speed; they cannot create energy. Doubling the output torque would exactly halve the output speed, leaving input and output power equal minus losses, not greater.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to double torque/power from a single motor input, violating energy conservation.
- Describes a kinematic mechanism (epicyclic/planetary gear train) but misinterprets its function as a power multiplier rather than a torque/speed trade-off.
- Asserts the mobile gear makes two revolutions for one revolution of the motor input, suggesting a fixed gear ratio, but then claims this results in doubled torque without accounting for the corresponding halving of speed required by gear kinematics t
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'doubli
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies a motor provides initial input, but claims the gear system multiplies torque/power, suggesting the output mechanical work exceeds the input work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical gear system that claims to double the torque or power of a motor. This violates conservation of energy, as gears can only transform torque and speed, not create energy. The output work cannot exceed the input work from the motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to double torque/power from a single motor input without an additional energy source.
- Misunderstands mechanical advantage: Gear systems trade speed for torque (or vice versa), conserving power (Power = Torque × Angular Velocity), not multiplying it.
- No thermodynamic process identified; pure mechanical system cannot have efficiency >100%.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'multiplica
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is stated to be a motor. The device is described as a mechanical torque/rotation multiplier.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gear train, a passive mechanical transmission that cannot create energy. The claim of doubling torque or output speed violates conservation of energy, as a gear system can only transform speed and torque while keeping input power equal to output power minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to double torque/rotation without accounting for the required energy input. A gear system can trade speed for torque (or vice versa) while conserving power (Power = Torque * Angular Velocity), not multiply it. The description suggests the outp
- No mechanism for generating net energy; the motor supplies all work. The system is a passive transmission, not an energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim focuses
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
An input motor (hydraulic or other) drives an input shaft (7). The device claims to multiply the input torque via an eccentric gear mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical torque multiplier using eccentric gears. It claims to achieve high torque multiplication while recovering the original input speed via a pump system, which would result in a net mechanical power gain, violating conservation of energy. No external energy source is identified to justify such a gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims torque multiplication by 10-30x without proportional reduction in output speed when connected to a pump system, implying net mechanical power output > input.
- Describes a mechanical linkage (eccentric gears) as creating a rotational 'lever' force, but any torque increase from gearing inherently reduces angular speed, conserving power (Power = Torque × Angular Speed). The text suggests a method to circumven
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim 'Produire de l'énergie sans pollution' implies net energy generation, but the only identified input is the motor driving shaft 7. No ambient energy source is described to justify an output greater than this inp
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is a motor (e.g., electric) driving input shaft 7. The device claims to multiply the input torque via a mechanical lever system and a hydraulic coupling.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical torque multiplier. While gear systems can trade speed for torque, they cannot increase power. The claim of multiplying force by 10-30x without a permanent, proportional loss in output speed indicates a violation of the conservation of energy, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims torque multiplication of 10-30x without proportional reduction in rotational speed, implying power (torque * angular velocity) output > power input.
- Mechanism described is a complex gear/hydraulic system that cannot create energy; any torque increase must come at the expense of proportional decrease in rotational speed to conserve power.
- The description focuses on force/torque multiplication while dismissing the speed reduction ('on perd toute la force'), but then implies the hydraulic stage recovers the lost speed, attempting to circumvent the power conservation law.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly claims
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the motor driving shafts 7 and 9. The device is described as a mechanical gear and eccentric cylinder system intended to drive a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is presented as a mechanical system where a motor's input power is multiplied to produce a larger output to a generator, with no identified external energy source. This violates the conservation of energy, as it claims to produce more useful work than the input work supplied.
Specific Physics Issues
- The description implies a mechanical power output (to a generator) greater than the mechanical power input from the motor, constituting a mechanical over-unity claim.
- No secondary energy source (e.g., thermal gradient, ambient energy) is identified to account for any claimed excess output.
- The mechanism (oscillating cylinder pushing fluid to drive another cylinder) is a closed mechanical-hydraulic system subject to friction and losses; it cannot create net energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims to 'produce
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical power to the 10-unit motor. The device claims to also harness the 'reaction force' (recoil) from the motor's stator as a second, free input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical perpetual motion machine. It incorrectly treats the reaction torque on a motor's stator—which is an internal force that merely stresses the device's frame—as an independent source of mechanical power that can be added to the rotor's output, violating Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: The reaction force on the stator is an internal force within the motor-plate system, not an independent source of usable work.
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims 20 units of output work from a 10-unit input, implying creation of energy from nothing.
- Misapplies Force/Moment Analysis: Attempts to sum the torque from the rotor and the reaction torque on the stator as if they are independent and additive, when they are an action-reaction pair that sum to zero internally.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the electrical power to the motor. The inventor claims the motor's 'reaction force' (torque on the stator) is an additional, untapped source of power that can be harnessed without additional energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to double output power by using a motor's 'reaction force,' but this force is not an independent energy source. Harnessing it directly opposes the motor's operation, requiring more input energy to maintain the same rotor torque, in direct violation of Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: The 'reaction force' on the stator is not a separate, additive force but the equal and opposite reaction to the force applied to the rotor. Harnessing it creates an equal reaction load on the motor's mounting, requiring t
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims the system outputs 20 units of torque/force from a motor input of 10 units, implying an efficiency >100% without identifying a new energy source.
- Misapplies Static Torque Analysis: The demonstration with torque wrenches (Figures A/B) shows a static, reactionary torque balance, not a net power multiplication in a dynamic, working system.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the seed being lifted (by an elevator or manual labor). Ambient kinetic energy from wind/descent is not a net source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator with a return mechanism. The energy ultimately comes from the elevator or person lifting the seed, not from gravity alone. The system violates energy conservation because the lifting work required exceeds the electrical energy recoverable from the descent, making it a net energy consumer, not a generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- System requires more energy to lift the seed than can be harvested from its descent due to inevitable losses (friction, aerodynamic drag, generator inefficiency).
- The elevator or manual lifting is the primary energy input, not 'gravity' or the seed's design.
- The description presents gravity as the 'only fuel', obfuscating the essential lifting work input.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to a motor; no other energy source is identified or described. The system is a closed mechanical-electrical loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to output twice the electrical energy it consumes, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described system is a closed loop with a motor driving a generator; any torque or gear multiplication trades speed for force and cannot create net energy. The apparent 'gain' results from ignoring the complete energy balance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generator produces double the electricity the motor consumes, violating energy conservation.
- Describes a closed system with no external energy gradient to exploit.
- Assumes mechanical leverage (torque multiplication) can create excess electrical energy without an equal or greater energy input.
- No accounting for inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind (if externally powered) OR electrical input from a fan powered by the generator's own output (if self-powered).
AI Physics Analysis
The design claims a chain of turbines can act as fans to sustain and amplify a wind current, extracting net electrical work. This is impossible because each turbine extracts energy from the airflow, slowing it down; it cannot simultaneously add more energy than it extracts to power the next turbine. A self-powered fan creates an energy loop that cannot produce excess output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a 'perpetual wind current' can be maintained and amplified by turbines acting as fans, extracting net work without sufficient external energy input.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Proposes a chain where each turbine adds energy to the airflow to spin the next, creating a positive feedback loop without an external source to overcome losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system's own electrical output is proposed to power the initial fan, creating a closed loop where total output cannot exceed total input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary input is an electric motor (or hydraulic/pneumatic motor). The device claims to use mechanical gearing (a lever-arm system) to multiply the input power from this motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical gear system driven by a motor. It claims the gearing arrangement allows a generator to produce twice the power the motor consumes, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy). No additional energy source is described to justify the gain, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims output power is twice the input power ('produire deux fois plus de puissance que le moteur en consomme').
- Describes 'énergie gratuite' (free energy) as an output.
- Proposes a purely mechanical system with no additional, external energy source to account for the multiplied power.
- Violates the conservation of energy; a passive gear train cannot create energy, only transform torque and speed, with losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'Output > c
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Initial motor input (electrical/chemical) spins primary flywheel. No external ambient energy source is identified or described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a net gain of kinetic energy solely through the internal coupling and decoupling of two flywheels, which is impossible in a closed system. It misapplies conservation of momentum and violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as no external energy source is described to account for the claimed 'spontaneous' energy increase.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'spontaneous gain of kinetic energy' from internal coupling of two flywheels, violating conservation of energy.
- Misapplies conservation of momentum (quantity de mouvement) to imply energy creation.
- Proposes a closed, cyclic system where output energy can exceed initial input, with no identified external energy source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims the primary motor's input power is the only explicit energy source, but the device allegedly outputs twice that power from the generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim that a generator produces twice the electricity the motor consumes is a direct violation of energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to account for the extra output, making this a classic over-unity (perpetual motion) claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims generator produces twice the electrical power the motor consumes.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Proposes a mechanical system with >100% efficiency, extracting net work from a single energy source without an external gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of an external energy source (e.g., ambient thermal, chemical) to justify the doubled output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the primary motor (20). The device claims to use this motor to drive a mechanical system (gears, arms) which then drives a generator, with the stated goal of returning half the generated power to the motor and half as free output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a textbook violation of the first law of thermodynamics. It claims a mechanical gear system can double the electrical power from a motor, producing twice as much power as it consumes, which is impossible as it creates energy from nothing within a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy multiplication: generator produces twice the power the motor consumes.
- Violates conservation of energy; output cannot exceed total input.
- Describes a closed-loop power system (motor -> multiplier -> generator -> motor) with net excess power, which is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- No identification of an external energy source; ambient energy is not mentioned or utilized.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests the primary input is electrical energy to a motor, but the device is described as producing twice the electrical energy it consumes, implying an internal or external source is not accounted for.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce twice the electrical energy its motor consumes, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The description uses mechanical terms like levers and gears but provides no plausible external energy source to justify the net energy gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of output > input (2x) violates conservation of energy
- No identifiable external energy source (ambient, chemical, thermal) to account for the excess energy
- Mechanical leverage and gearing cannot create energy, only transform force/distance/speed
- Vague description avoids quantitative analysis of forces, torques, and power at each stage
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the motor (20) applying torque to gear 1. The device appears to be a mechanical gear assembly with no external energy source besides the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical gear train that claims to double the output torque relative to the motor's input torque. This violates the conservation of energy, as gears can trade torque for speed, but cannot increase mechanical power. The analysis ignores the corresponding reduction in output speed required by the gear ratios, presenting an impossible energy gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'double the torque' (from 30 lb-ft to 70 lb-ft) without accounting for corresponding reduction in angular speed or increase in required input power.
- Asserts gear ratios and mechanical linkages produce a net gain in output torque relative to input, violating conservation of energy.
- Ignores the fundamental gear trade-off: increased torque comes at the expense of proportional decrease in rotational speed, keeping power (torque × angular velocity) constant or less due to losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output torq
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motor (210), possibly with battery/generator startup. Claims to use mechanical gearing on a rotating arm.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims a motor can drive a generator on a rotating arm to produce 2-5 times more electrical power than the motor consumes, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). No external energy source is described to justify the multiplied output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of power multiplication (e.g., 3000W motor producing 6000W+ from generator 220)
- No secondary energy source identified to account for extra output
- System is a closed electromechanical loop with claimed output > input
- Violates energy conservation - net energy cannot be created within the described system
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary electrical input from a motor; claims to use mechanical gearing to multiply power.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use a motor driving a gear system to spin a generator, producing 2-3 times more electrical energy than the motor consumes. This is a direct violation of energy conservation, as the generator's output cannot exceed the mechanical work supplied by the motor, which itself is less than the motor's electrical input due to inefficiencies.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims output energy (electricity) is 2-3 times greater than the input energy consumed by the motor.
- Asserts the system can produce 'free energy' (énergie gratuite).
- Describes a closed mechanical/electrical system with no external energy source besides the motor's input.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Mechanical gearing can trade force for speed or vice-versa, but cannot create net energy; generator output is always less than mechanical input due to losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use an electric motor as the primary input, but asserts the system outputs 2-3 times more electrical energy from the generator than the motor consumes.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical gear system with a motor and generator on a rotating arm. It claims to produce 2-3 times more electrical energy than the motor consumes, which is a direct violation of energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to justify the claimed excess output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims energy multiplication (output > input) without identifying an external energy source.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Mechanical gearing can multiply torque or speed, but not create net energy; generator output is always less than mechanical input due to losses.
- Describes a closed electromechanical system with no ambient energy harvesting mechanism.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims energy comes from mechanical multiplication via a gear system, with the only explicit input being the primary motor. Implicitly suggests the system outputs more electrical energy than the motor consumes, implying energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce three times more electrical energy than the input motor consumes, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). Mechanical gearing cannot create net energy; it only transforms torque and speed within the constraints of input power minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy (output > input)
- Claims a generator can produce 3x the electricity the motor consumes
- Ignores losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat
- Mechanical gearing can multiply torque or speed, but not create net power
- Confuses power/force/torque with energy
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial 'small motor' powered by electricity from a battery. The system claims to generate more electricity from this input via mechanical advantage from pulley systems.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an over-unity claim. It attempts to use mechanical advantage from pulleys to generate more electrical energy than is consumed, ignoring that pulleys conserve energy, not create it. The proposed feedback loop to power its own motor with excess output violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims to use a portion of the generator's output to power the motor driving the system, with excess for external use, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Mechanical advantage (pulleys) trades force for distance, providing no net energy gain. Friction and other losses make the system's net output less than the input.
- The system's core premise is a closed loop where the output is intended to fully sustain the input plus provide surplus, which is thermodynamically impossible.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > control i
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric energy and low-potential heat from external sources (e.g., natural water bodies). The description suggests using compressed gas, with part of the engine's output power used to run the compressor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a method to transform ambient atmospheric and low-grade thermal energy into mechanical work, using part of the output to compress gas for its own operation. This constitutes a closed cycle with no net external energy input sufficient to overcome thermodynamic limits, violating the second law of thermodynamics by implying a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims transformation of ambient/low-grade energy into mechanical work without identifying a sufficient thermodynamic gradient or sink.
- Implies energy multiplication: Suggests using part of the engine's output to compress gas for its own operation, creating a positive feedback loop.
- No identifiable net external energy source: The described cycle appears closed, attempting to extract net work from an isothermal or equilibrium ambient source.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert atmospheric potential energy into electricity using atmospheric pressure to drive a linear generator's return motion, with an additional kinematic link to provide 'supplementary power'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device attempting to extract useful electrical work from atmospheric pressure alone. Since atmospheric pressure is an equilibrium state, not an energy gradient, any work done against it in one part of a cycle must be fully supplied in another part, preventing net energy output. The described 'additional power' mechanism suggests an attempt to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: No identified external energy gradient to exploit. Atmospheric pressure is an equilibrium force, not an energy source.
- Missing entropy sink: Proposes to extract net work from an isothermal pressure system without a compensating process.
- Obfuscated perpetual motion: The 'supplementary power' from the kinematic link suggests energy multiplication without an external input.
- Incomplete accounting: Claims 'additional power' transmission without specifying the source of that energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to reuse residual energy (waste heat/vapor) from a high-temperature (1000°C) ceramic turbine engine using hydrogen fuel, with an added water injection and magnetohydrodynamic electrolysis stage to allegedly recover energy from the water vapor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as an 'autogenerator' that reuses its own residual energy, primarily through electrolysis of its high-temperature exhaust vapor. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim of the second kind, as it attempts to recycle waste heat to perform useful work (like producing hydrogen) without a compensating external energy input or a sufficient entropy sink, violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes electrolysis of high-temperature water vapor using energy from the process itself, implying a closed-loop energy recovery that would violate the Second Law.
- No identifiable net external energy input for the claimed 'autogeneration' and 'reutilization' cycle.
- Magnetohydrodynamic electrolysis at high temperature does not circumvent the substantial energy input required to split water (H2O → H2 + 1/2 O2).
- The system appears to attempt to use waste heat to perform high-grade work (electrolysis) without a sufficient thermal gradient to a cold sink, defying Carnot limits.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input described is the gravitational potential energy of the levers, which is part of a closed cycle within the system. The mechanism claims to use a portion of the rotational force from one descending lever to lift another lever back to its starting position.
AI Physics Analysis
The mechanism claims to sustain rotation and produce excess energy by using the gravitational fall of one lever to reset another lever to its starting height. This is a direct violation of energy conservation, as the energy required to reset the system cannot be less than the energy gained from its descent, making net energy production impossible without an external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes a closed cycle where the energy to reset a lever to its high potential energy state is claimed to come from the work of another descending lever, with surplus energy leftover. This is impossible w
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: It describes a mechanism that aims to perform useful work while operating in a cycle with what appears to be a single thermal reservoir (ambient temperature), effectively a perpetual motion machine of the fi
- Incomplete force/power analysis: The description of forces from the 'rampe spiraloïde' (spiral ramp) ignores the reaction forces and the work needed to guide the lever. The force required to lift a lever vertically is not simply a 'portion' of the ro
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim 'une par
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The cor
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims 'free continuous mechanical energy' from 'heavy masses' with no external energy input described. Implied source is gravitational potential energy of internal masses, but no mechanism to reset or restore that potential is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous mechanical energy using only internal heavy masses and guiding cams. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as the finite gravitational potential energy of the masses cannot provide continuous output without an external energy source to reset the system, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims continuous output without continuous input.
- No thermodynamic cycle described; system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement.
- Gravitational potential energy of internal masses is finite and cannot provide continuous output without being restored by an external source.
- Mechanism describes oscillation and guidance of masses but lacks an energy source to overcome friction and losses.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'free' ener
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity and terrestrial attraction, but the described system is a closed mechanical loop with no external gradient or energy input to sustain motion against losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate unlimited energy from gravity within a closed mechanical cycle, ignoring that the work gained from descending weights is less than the work required to reset them, and that friction will irreversibly dissipate the system's initial energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to provide energy 'without consuming any'.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; a closed system with internal weights and pistons cannot produce net work indefinitely as it will reach equilibrium and be stopped by friction.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The initial gravitational potential energy of the weights is the only source, and it will be depleted and cannot be fully restored without external work (the 'counterweight' mechanism itself consumes energy).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The described system appears to be a closed loop: steel balls fall from an upper reservoir to turn a water wheel (roue à aubes), then are lifted back to the upper reservoir by a centrifugal turbine. The turbine is stated to be driven by the wheel itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to create a closed cycle where the work generated by falling balls is used to lift those same balls back up, which is thermodynamically impossible due to inevitable losses. No external energy source is identified to compensate for these losses or provide net work output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to use its own output (wheel rotation) to power the mechanism (turbine) that restores its input (lifting balls). This is a closed-loop energy system with no external net energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: It proposes a perpetual process that circulates mass to produce net work without an external energy source or a significant thermal gradient to exploit.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description ignores all losses (friction in the wheel, turbine, and conduits; aerodynamic drag; mechanical inefficiencies). The work needed to lift the balls against gravity will always exceed the work extracted from
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be mechanical work to turn the crankshaft, with magnetic fields (from permanent magnets and steel components) claimed to provide additional acceleration and inertia compensation, implying energy extraction from static magnetic fields.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims a minimum 50% energy gain, implying over-unity performance. It attempts to use static magnetic fields to asymmetrically assist motion in a cycle, but permanent magnets are conservative fields; they cannot provide net energy over a complete cycle without an external energy source to reset or change them, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net 'energy gain' of 50% without identifying an external energy source to justify it.
- Implies that static permanent magnetic fields can do net work on a system in a cycle without the field itself being depleted or an external gradient being maintained.
- Suggests magnetic 'compensation of inertial mass' during upward motion, which is a non-standard, vague concept that does not circumvent the need for energy input to lift mass against gravity.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Input work to turn crankshaft vs. claimed electrical output and unaccounted magnetic work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a low-power electric motor driving a system of gears, pulleys, and a drum to lift a weight, then recovering the potential energy when the weight falls. The claimed 'autonomous' and 'free energy' nature suggests the output energy is expected to exceed the electrical input to the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic over-unity claim. The gear and pulley system provides mechanical advantage, meaning a small force over a large distance can lift a large weight a small distance, but the WORK (energy) input equals the potential energy gained by the weight, minus inevitable losses. Recovering the energy when the weight falls cannot yield more energy than was initially supplied, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to generate significant output energy (from falling weight) from a smaller motor input via 'power multiplication' through gears and pulleys.
- Misunderstands mechanical advantage: Gears and pulleys trade force for distance (or vice versa), conserving energy (minus losses), not multiplying power or creating an energy surplus.
- No identified external energy source: The system is described as closed except for the small motor input, with no ambient gradient (thermal, chemical, etc.) to exploit.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of 'power multiplic
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Proposes a cycl
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy from repeatedly lifting solid masses against buoyancy, with the apparent intent to extract more work from their fall than was required to introduce/submerge them at the base of the column.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of buoyancy engine. The critical flaw is that submerging the low-density masses at the bottom of the column requires work input equal to or greater than the gravitational work that can be extracted when they rise and fall. The description ignores this input, making net energy production impossible in a closed cycle, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system requires work to submerge the low-density solid masses at the base of the fluid column against their buoyant force. This input work is not accounted for in the claim of net energy output.
- Violates conservation of energy: The work extracted from the gravitational fall of the masses cannot exceed the net work input required to reset the cycle (submerge the masses). The system is a gravity/buoyancy engine operating in a closed cycle with
- No perpetual gradient: The system lacks an identified external, sustainable energy source (e.g., thermal gradient, moving fluid) to drive the cycle.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial stored chemical energy in the battery, converted to electrical energy to power heating resistors, which boil water to produce steam.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic violation of thermodynamics. It proposes a self-sustaining system where a battery powers a steam turbine that recharges the same battery while also providing useful heat and electricity. This is impossible because the energy generated by the turbine can only come from the battery's initial stored energy, and each conversion step (electrical->thermal->mechanical->electrical) loses a substantial fraction as waste heat, making net energy multiplication impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system claims a dynamo coupled to the turbine recharges the battery that powers the steam generation. This creates a closed loop where the electrical output from the dynamo must be greater than the electrical input to the resistors to be self-sus
- It violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying net energy output (heating, hot water, lighting) from a finite initial battery without an external energy input.
- It violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The process involves converting electrical energy (high-grade) to heat to mechanical work and back to electricity, with each step incurring significant losses (Joule heating, turbine inefficiency, generat
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: The claim ignores that the
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Proposes a perp
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a 'base matter' in a reservoir whose weight drives a turbine, then is returned to the reservoir via a worm gear, where it 'becomes energy again.' This implies a closed-loop gravitational system with internal regeneration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed system where a weight drives a turbine and is then returned to its starting height, with claims of energy regeneration and net power output. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as the energy required to reset the system (lift the weight) equals or exceeds the work extracted from its fall.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims energy regeneration ('l'énergie qui se régénère') and that used matter 'redevient énergie' without an external input.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: proposes a system extracting net work (2/3 of 'base energy' as 'acquired energy') from what appears to be a single, constant gravitational potential.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The weight of the 'base matter' provides potential energy, but lifting it back to the reservoir to repeat the cycle requires at least as much energy as was gained from its descent.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The described system appears to rely on the gravitational potential energy of water/oil pumped into an elevated circumferential tube. The pump's energy input is not quantified, but is required to lift the fluid against gravity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It ignores the fundamental energy input required by the pump to lift the water back to the top of the wheel to repeat the cycle. The claimed cumulative heating to boiling is impossible because the gravitational potential energy available in each fall is finite and comes from the initial pumping work; it cannot be reused to perform additional work or create new thermal energy on subsequent cycles without additional input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims the same mass of water falling repeatedly can generate net work and heat the water to boiling without an external energy input.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Asserts kinetic energy from a 10m fall (which is converted from gravitational potential energy) can cumulatively increase temperature without accounting for the energy needed to reset the system (pump the wat
- Misapplies energy conversion: The 0.002°C temperature rise from a 10m fall is a one-time conversion of potential energy to thermal energy via viscous dissipation; this energy is not available to do work AND heat the water cumulatively.
- Perpetual motion claim: Implies the wheel can continue turning and heating water to boiling (500 revolutions) using only the initial pumping energy.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient fluid (water) and gravitational potential energy, but the described mechanism attempts to create a perpetual buoyancy gradient without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a buoyancy engine attempting perpetual motion. It incorrectly claims that leverage can overcome the fluid pressure at depth to refill the buoyant chambers with less energy than is gained from their ascent, violating conservation of energy. The net work output over one complete cycle, accounting for compression work and losses, would be zero or negative.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system ignores the work required to compress the gas in the reservoirs at the bottom of the wheel against fluid pressure.
- The leverage mechanism does not create energy; it only trades force for distance. The work done to close an empty reservoir at the top is less than the work needed to open and fill a reservoir at the bottom against hydrostatic pressure.
- No continuous external energy source is identified to account for system losses (friction, viscous drag, hysteresis). The described cycle is a closed loop claiming to output net work (rotation) from a single initial buoyancy imbalance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed source is the gravitational potential energy of water descending on one side of the belt. However, the system attempts to recycle this water by pumping it back to the top using mechanical compression from the belt's own motion, creating a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a perpetual motion machine. It attempts to use the weight of descending water to generate power while simultaneously using that motion to pump the same water back to the top. The energy needed to lift the water back up is greater than or equal to the energy gained from its fall, resulting in zero net energy output when accounting for inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work required to lift water against gravity back to the top must equal or exceed the work extracted from its descent. The system provides no external energy input to perform this lift.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The compression roller is claimed to provide pressure to 'lift' the water, but this roller is driven by the belt, which is itself turned by the descending water. This is a closed loop with no net energy input.
- Friction and losses ignored: All mechanical systems have friction, viscous drag, and valve actuation losses, which would dissipate the system's kinetic energy.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims water transfer 'req
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy from battery bank. Claimed perpetual source is the system's own electrical output fed back to power its motor, with no identified external, replenishable energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine. It proposes using a motor to drive a generator to power the same motor plus an external load. This is impossible because every energy conversion step (motor, generator, inverter) loses significant energy as heat. The system cannot recharge its batteries and power an external load indefinitely; it would rapidly run down.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): System claims to power its own motor from its own generator output while also providing a net external power output (1-20MW). This requires creating energy from nothing.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: No identified thermodynamic gradient or source of free energy (e.g., fuel, ambient heat differential) to convert. The system is a closed electrical/mechanical loop with inevitable losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a feedback loop but ignores all losses (Joule heating, friction, windage, inverter/alternator inefficiencies). The battery, once depleted, cannot be recharged to its original state by the system it powers.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'self-suffi
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the stored chemical energy in the lithium batteries. The water turbines attempt to recover a portion of the kinetic energy lost by the vessel to the water (drag).
AI Physics Analysis
This is a perpetual motion scheme. The turbines act as brakes, converting some of the boat's kinetic energy back into electricity, but this process always creates more drag than the electrical energy recovered. The system cannot recharge its own batteries to power continued motion, as that would create energy from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a classic regenerative braking attempt for a boat, but it cannot net charge the batteries. The turbines extract energy from the water flow, which is created by the vessel's propulsion. This extraction increases the drag on the vessel, r
- The description implies the turbines can recharge the batteries that power the propulsion, creating a self-sustaining loop. This is thermodynamically impossible as it violates energy conservation; the system cannot output more useful work (propulsion
- Incomplete energy accounting: It counts the turbine's electrical output as a 'gain' without accounting for the increased propulsion energy input required to overcome the additional turbine drag.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions an 'input power source engine or motor drive' (Claim D) but also suggests 'self-fueling' generators and vehicles, implying energy generation without an external fuel source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to multiply mechanical input energy using levers and wheels to create 'self-fueling' systems. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as levers trade force for distance and cannot create energy. The claims describe a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'mechanical input is multiplied' by levers and wheels, violating conservation of energy.
- Describes 'self-fueling' electric generators and vehicles, which are perpetual motion machines of the first kind.
- Uses lever mechanics (a force/ distance multiplier) incorrectly as an energy multiplier.
- Vague description of how continuous operation is maintained without net energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims of multipli
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy from 'gravitational motion' of a weight (7) moving horizontally, theoretically 'without work' against the force of a counterweight (6), using a sphere rolling down an internal ramp to partially lift the weight.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce 'ecological energy' without fuel by using a weight's horizontal motion to trigger a lifting mechanism via an internal rolling sphere, implying a cyclical process that generates net energy. This is a classical perpetual motion claim of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it lacks an identified external energy source to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate ecological energy without fuel consumption, implying a net energy output greater than input.
- Proposes a mechanism where a weight moving horizontally (doing no work against gravity) triggers motion that lifts it again, suggesting a perpetual motion cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary energy input. The described motion (sphere rolling, weight lifting) would dissipate energy through friction and require continuous input to sustain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions solar energy input, but the core claim is that initial energy is 'multiplied' to power motion in space, air, and sea, implying energy amplification without an adequate external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim explicitly states the multiplication of initial energy to power motion in space, air, and sea, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). No legitimate external energy source or gradient is described to justify this amplification, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy multiplication ('πολλαπλασιάζουμε την αρχική ενέργεια') which violates energy conservation.
- Proposes a mechanism to power motion in a vacuum (στερεά) and other environments from a finite initial input, suggesting perpetual motion.
- Lacks identifiable thermodynamic cycle or gradient to enable work extraction; no entropy sink described.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract describes a complex hydraulic-electrical system with components for "peristrophic kinetic energy" and a "flywheel," but no primary energy input (e.g., fuel, electrical grid, solar) is explicitly stated. The claim it does not use "wet combustion and atmospheric oxygen" suggests it is not an internal combustion engine, but the ultimate source of energy to sustain motion is not identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a complex hydraulic-electrical system claiming to produce 'peristrophic kinetic energy' without a clear primary energy source. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion machine claim, violating both the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics by implying it can sustain or regenerate its own motive power indefinitely.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system description implies a closed-loop hydraulic system with a motor and generator, which cannot produce a net energy output greater than its input without an external energy sourc
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The system appears to be described as a self-sustaining or over-unity device, which is impossible as it would create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting. The abstract lists components (flywheel, hydraulic motor, generator) but does not specify the initial energy input or how losses from friction, electrical resistance, and hydraulic inefficiencies are overcome.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the device's motion is initiated and sustained by the force of a weight inside a section of a spring, implying a conversion of gravitational potential energy into rotational motion. No external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, environmental gradient) is described to reset the system or compensate for losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a wheel set into motion by a weight in a spring, undergoing a specific rotational path and supposedly returning to its starting point to repeat the motion. This constitutes a claim for a self-sustaining, cyclical machine with no identifiable external energy input to compensate for inevitable losses, which is a classic violation of the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy).
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim describes a cyclical motion but does not identify an energy source to overcome friction and other dissipative losses each cycle.
- Implies perpetual or self-sustaining motion from a single initial gravitational potential energy input.
- No thermodynamic process or gradient (e.g., heat flow, sustained pressure difference) is defined to perform continuous work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on mechani
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind or running water, combined with an unspecified 'dynamic energy' stored in spheres/cylinders within the structure that is claimed to not be consumed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a wheel with arms, cylinders/spheres, and tubes, claiming to possess and convert a non-consumed 'dynamic energy' into electricity from a tiny wind or water input. This directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to output more useful energy than is input, with no complete accounting for the source of the 'dynamic energy'.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'dynamic energy' that is not consumed but easily converted to kinetic energy violates energy conservation.
- No identifiable primary energy source or gradient to drive continuous electricity generation.
- Structure description suggests a static mechanical arrangement with no clear mechanism for energy input beyond ambient sources, implying energy multiplication.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy from 'heavy motion' of spheres rolling down a track and through a hatch, implying gravitational potential energy conversion without an identified external input to restore the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes spheres rolling downward through gravity to generate energy, but provides no mechanism to return them to their initial height without consuming at least as much energy as produced. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation by claiming continuous energy output without an identified external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified primary energy input to restore gravitational potential of spheres
- System appears to be a closed-loop gravity-powered mechanism with no external work input
- Claims 'ecological energy' without fuel but doesn't account for energy needed to return spheres to initial height
- Describes continuous motion and energy generation from a fixed articulation point (9)
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'prototype motor' that provides 'free, inexhaustible and absolutely ecological production of electric current' and can power vehicles and devices, implying energy generation without a defined external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a motor that generates electrical energy to power other machines with no defined source of input energy, directly violating the law of energy conservation. It is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce net energy output without a corresponding energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (continuous work without energy source).
- No identifiable energy conversion process (e.g., chemical, thermal, ambient) is specified to account for the claimed electrical output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'free' and
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from a 2 kg weight descending an inclined plane (35°). The system appears to be a mechanical arrangement of plates, rings, and pins intended to create motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'μηχανικόν αεικίνητον' (perpetual motion machine). It uses a weight on an incline to initiate motion in a system of plates and pins, implying sustained or multiplied output. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics, as it claims to produce more work than the gravitational potential energy supplied by the initial weight.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The output work is claimed to exceed the input from the descending weight.
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies a perpetual or self-sustaining motion mechanism after an initial start.
- No identifiable external energy source beyond the initial gravitational potential energy.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a 'motionless anti-gravity engine of the void' with two concentric drums and wing-like structures, implying it generates energy from its own rotation against a gravitational field or vacuum, with no explicit external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy or produce an anti-gravity effect using only rotating drums with airfoils, with no specified external energy input. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as maintaining rotation against friction and generating any net lift or thrust requires continuous energy input that the patent does not account for.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, ambient gradient).
- Claim implies energy generation or anti-gravity effect from rotation alone, violating conservation of energy.
- Mechanism described (asymmetric airfoils on rotating drums) cannot create a net force or energy output without an external energy source to overcome drag and friction.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a closed-loop water system (pump, turbine, generator, reservoir) where the generator's electrical output is fed back to power the pump. No external energy input (like fuel, solar, or an initial height differential) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a classic over-unity violation. It uses a generator to power the pump that drives its own turbine, forming a closed loop with no external energy source. This directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation), as losses ensure the generator cannot produce enough power to sustain the pump and provide excess output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system appears to be a self-powered loop where the generator output is used to run the pump that supplies the turbine, with no net external input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: It describes a cyclic process intended to produce net electrical output without a corresponding net input of high-quality energy or a heat sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: All losses (friction, electrical resistance, turbulence) are ignored. The output from the generator must be less than the mechanical work input to the turbine, making it impossible for the generator to fully power the pu
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'output > c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'magnetic energy' combined with Earth's gravity, implying a system that extracts net work from permanent magnets and gravitational potential without an external energy input to reset the cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as an autonomous motor using permanent magnets and Earth's gravity. Since permanent magnet fields are conservative and gravity is a conservative force, no net work can be extracted over a cycle without an external energy input to reset the system, violating energy conservation. The claim of sustained rotation is a textbook perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A system with permanent magnets and gravity alone cannot produce continuous rotation without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: No entropy sink or thermal gradient is described to drive a heat engine; it claims 'autonomous operation'.
- Mechanically impossible: A magnet and ferromagnetic material (like the 'granazi' on an 'alysida') in a static arrangement will find an equilibrium position, not produce continuous rotation.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'magnetic energy' used is potential energy from the magnet's field alignment, which cannot do net work over a cycle without an input to reset the magnet's state relative to the ferromagnetic material.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use compressed air from a storage tank (2) to drive a hydraulic motor (11), with ambiguous references to 'reusing' compressed air and obtaining 'multiple times' the input energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to produce multiple times more energy than it consumes by reusing compressed air, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics. The compressed air tank contains finite stored energy; any work extracted reduces its pressure, and 'reusing' it cannot create new energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy output is multiple times the input energy (specifically mentions reducing initial consumption to 1/12)
- No identifiable external energy source beyond the initial compressed air storage
- Implies energy multiplication through air reuse without thermodynamic justification
- Violates energy conservation - system cannot output more work than the stored energy in the compressed air
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be from the buoyancy of submerged objects (embola) within a liquid-filled container, potentially combined with mechanical advantage from levers. No primary external energy input (e.g., electrical, thermal gradient) is specified, suggesting an attempt to extract net work from a static gravitational/buoyant potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system purportedly generating electricity using buoyancy and mechanical advantage within a sealed, liquid-filled chamber. It violates the first law of thermodynamics, as it attempts to create a continuous cycle of work output without identifying an adequate external energy input to reset the system, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system appears to be a closed buoyancy engine. Lifting the 'embola' (presumably buoyant objects) from the bottom to the top to restart the cycle would require at least as much energy as is gained from their descent/b
- Violates thermodynamic limits for a perpetual motion machine: The description suggests a continuous cycle of buoyant force generating work without an external energy source to reset the system, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kin
- Vague mechanism: The description of 'teleoscopic' embola that can change volume is technically obfuscated. Even if volume changes, the energy to compress or expand them must be accounted for.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims operation without fuel (κούσιμα) and continuous motion initiated by a regulator, implying energy generation from internal mechanisms without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a machine claiming to generate significant power through continuous motion without fuel or external energy input, which directly violates energy conservation. The description of a 'hidden force' within the machine and perpetual base oscillation suggests a classic perpetual motion claim with no legitimate energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) - claims continuous operation and generation of 'great power' without identifiable energy input
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics - suggests perpetual motion through 'hidden force' of the machine itself
- No identifiable gradient or energy source to drive continuous motion
- Vague mechanism description with no quantitative energy accounting
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/gravitational potential energy from a heavy disc (flywheel) and counterweight. The system appears to be a mechanical oscillator or gravity motor, where the rotation of the disc and the oscillation of a counterweight are intended to drive a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system with no identified external energy source. It attempts to generate electricity solely from the gravitational potential energy of its own components, which is a finite internal store. Once this initial energy is dissipated as waste heat and electrical output, the system must stop, making claims of continuous generation a violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The abstract describes a mechanical linkage but does not identify an external energy input to sustain motion against friction and electrical generation losses.
- Implies perpetual or over-unity operation: The description of a heavy disc and counterweight suggests an attempt to create a self-sustaining system that extracts net work from a static gravitational field, which is impossible.
- No entropy sink/thermal gradient: The system is described as purely mechanical with no identified heat source or sink, violating the Second Law for any claimed continuous energy output.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use magnetic energy converted via hydraulic pressure, but the described electrical input to the electromagnets is the only explicit source. The system appears to claim to generate high-pressure fluid flow output from a smaller electrical input, suggesting an unaccounted energy source or an over-unity claim.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a high-pressure hydraulic output from a minimal electrical input, implying an efficiency greater than 100% without identifying a legitimate external energy source like a pressure or thermal gradient. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The high-pressure output is not reconciled with the electrical input to the electromagnets.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies generation of significant hydraulic work from a minimal electrical current, suggesting COP > 1 without identifying a legitimate external energy source.
- Mechanism obfuscation: Vague description of 'magnetic energy conversion' and 'recycling' of hydraulic fluid does not constitute a valid secondary energy input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be an electric motor, but the description implies a mechanical system (gears, cams, flywheels) that multiplies force/power without an identified external energy source to account for the claimed multiplication.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanical system that allegedly multiplies electrical power. Since mechanical systems cannot create energy, any increase in output force must come with a proportional decrease in speed, keeping power constant. The claim of power multiplication therefore violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'multiplication' of power/force via a mechanical system without an increase in input energy or a decrease in output speed, violating energy conservation.
- Describes a complex gear/cam/flywheel system but provides no mechanism for creating energy; such systems can only trade force for speed (or vice versa) at constant power (Power = Force x Velocity).
- The abstract is in Greek and is garbled/truncated, making the exact mechanism obscure, but the core claim of power multiplication is a thermodynamic red flag.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical engineeri
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a mechanical system (axle, rod, weight, discs, rollers) where a driver (7) moves a rod (2) horizontally, which somehow forces an axle (5) to rotate. No explicit energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is mentioned. The only implied input is the initial work from the driver.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a mechanical linkage with no identifiable external energy source. For it to generate sustained rotary motion as a 'generator,' it would need to extract energy from somewhere. Since none is specified, it implicitly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting work can be produced from a closed mechanical system without an energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting. The system appears to be a closed mechanical linkage.
- Implies a rotational output (axle 5) driven by a reciprocating horizontal input (rod 2), but no mechanism to overcome friction or generate net work beyond the input.
- Lacks any identifiable external energy source (ambient or otherwise) to account for sustained or amplified output.
- Describes a kinematic constraint (rod forcing axle rotation) but provides no thermodynamic basis for energy multiplication or self-sustenance.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim of a 'ge
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The sys
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'continuous winding mechanism' that self-winds via its own winding cycles, implying a perpetual source of energy from the mechanism's own operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-sustaining winding mechanism for a watch. It claims continuous operation through internal winding cycles, which is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine. No external energy source (e.g., human motion, temperature change, winding) is specified to account for inevitable energy losses, making it a violation of fundamental conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy source is identified.
- The description suggests a system that, once initiated, sustains its own operation indefinitely through internal cycles.
- This implies the creation of energy or work from a system in equilibrium, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- It also ignores the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as all real mechanisms have friction and dissipative losses that require a continuous energy input to overcome.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use river water properties (weight, purity, divisibility, presence in large quantities) and a hydraulic system converting 'weight into torque' to generate electricity, implying extraction of energy from water without a defined thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes generating large amounts of electricity from river water using its inherent properties and a hydraulic system, but fails to identify the primary energy source or a sustainable thermodynamic gradient. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it suggests creating energy from a substance already in equilibrium.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input gradient (thermal, chemical, potential, kinetic).
- Claims 'large quantities of Electrical Energy' from water's intrinsic properties, not from an external energy source.
- Implies energy generation from a substance in equilibrium with its environment.
- Hydraulic transformation of 'weight into torque' is not an energy source; it's an energy conversion mechanism requiring an input.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Suggest
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex hydraulic system with three electromotors, gears, and pistons, but does not identify a primary energy source beyond the electrical input to the electromotors. Mentions of converting 'rotational force' into hydraulic pressure suggest an attempt to create a self-amplifying energy loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a complex hydraulic mechanism driven by electric motors. The description suggests the small input force from the motors is transformed via pistons into a larger output force, implying creation of energy from within the closed system. This violates the conservation of energy, as the output hydraulic work cannot exceed the electrical input work minus losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system appears to use electromotors to drive hydraulic pumps/pistons, which then supposedly create a larger hydraulic pressure to do work. No external energy source (beyond the initial electrical input) is identified
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies the rotational force from small electromotors is transformed and amplified via pistons of different diameters to produce a larger output force in a larger hydraulic circuit, suggesting energy m
- No thermodynamic gradient identified: The system describes mechanical/hydraulic transduction but posits no external gradient (thermal, chemical, potential) from which to extract additional net work.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies an initial driving force is applied to a central shaft, which is then transmitted and multiplied through a system of gears and levers on a 'polyspastos' (pulley block/gear system). No external energy source beyond the initial input is described, yet a multiplication of output work is claimed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a complex gear/lever/pulley system that claims to multiply the initial input power to produce a greater output work. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as mechanical transmission systems cannot have an efficiency greater than 100%. The output work cannot exceed the input work, regardless of the complexity of the mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'multiplication of the initially provided power' and generation of work 'in series', which implies energy output exceeds energy input without an additional energy source.
- Describes a mechanical transmission system (gears, levers, pulleys) which can trade force for distance, but cannot create energy or multiply work. The work output is fundamentally limited by the work input minus losses.
- Uses obfuscating technical language ('kinetic transmission medium', 'movement transmission with polyspastos') to describe what appears to be a complex gear train, masking the core violation of energy conservation.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output wor
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest motion is generated by magnetic fields between magnets and by 'mass weight force', implying energy extraction from permanent magnets and gravitational potential without an identifiable external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims autonomous operation using energy from magnetic fields between magnets and mass weight, which is thermodynamically impossible. Permanent magnets in static configuration cannot provide net work without an external energy source to change the system's state, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes extracting net work from static magnetic fields (permanent magnets) without an energy source to overcome magnetic potential barriers.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: suggests creating a gradient or perpetual motion from an equilibrium state (magnets at rest).
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'magnetic field energy' and 'mass weight' are not energy inputs unless a gradient (like dropping a mass or changing magnetic configuration with external work) is explicitly powered.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/ambiguous. Claims to use magnetic field energy between magnets and 'mass inertia force' as primary energy sources, implying extraction of net work from static magnetic fields and inertial mass without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism claiming to generate autonomous motion using energy from static magnetic fields and mass inertia. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it proposes extracting net work without consuming an external energy source or degrading an energy gradient. The described system is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes extracting net work from static magnetic fields (no time-varying flux, no consumed magnet), violating energy conservation.
- Claims 'mass inertia force' as an energy source, which is not a source but a property requiring external energy input to change motion.
- Describes energy transfer to a 'receiver flywheel' without identifying the ultimate, depleted primary energy reservoir.
- Uses vague terminology ('mixed energy provision', 'inertia force') that obscures the fundamental energy accounting.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output from
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is derived from magnetic fields between magnets and from the weight of a mass, implying a closed system that extracts net work from internal forces without an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism claiming autonomous operation using magnetic fields and gravity within a closed, stable medium. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, as it lacks an identifiable external energy source and violates the first law of thermodynamics by suggesting net work can be extracted from internal conservative forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy input specified (e.g., electrical, thermal gradient).
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims autonomous operation in a stable medium, implying perpetual motion.
- Mechanism uses internal magnetic forces and gravity, which are conservative; no net work can be extracted from a system in equilibrium.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex hydraulic/atmospheric pressure system with tanks, conduits, and wings, but the claimed electrical energy generation appears to be driven solely by the motion of axles, which is itself supposedly powered only by the movement of water within the closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed hydraulic system claiming to generate electrical energy. It violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying a net energy output without an identifiable external energy source to overcome losses, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No external energy input (e.g., pump, height differential, heat source) is specified to sustain the claimed continuous water circulation and electrical generation.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies a perpetual or self-sustaining cycle where water movement generates electricity to power the system's own circulation, a classic over-unity claim.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Uses technical terms (tanks, conduits, wings, generators, axles) in a vague arrangement that cannot be reconciled with standard pump-turbine or hydraulic generator physics.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a central axis with peripheral arms holding metallic weights on a fixed circular guide, implying a gravitational or inertial mechanism, but no explicit external energy input is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The described mechanism appears to be a gravity wheel/perpetual motion machine variant where metallic weights are positioned around a central axis to create continuous rotation. Without an external energy source, this violates conservation of energy as internal weight redistribution cannot produce net work output indefinitely.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims 'great power output' without specifying input
- Mechanism appears to be a closed system attempting to create perpetual motion via asymmetric weight distribution
- Violates conservation of energy - cannot generate net work from internal rearrangements alone
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is derived from a magnetic field and the weight of a mass, implying a system that extracts work from ambient magnetic fields and gravity without a compensating energy input or a dissipating gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as an autonomous engine powered by magnetic fields and the weight of a mass. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce continuous work without an identifiable external energy source to replenish the magnetic field or reset the gravitational potential, violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the energy source for creating/sustaining the magnetic field or for resetting the mass's gravitational potential.
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies continuous operation (autonomous) from static magnetic fields and gravity, which are conservative force fields. Extracting net work from them without an external energy source to change the system's configurat
- No thermodynamic cycle described: For a heat engine, no hot/cold reservoirs are identified. For a mechanical system, no source of energy to overcome losses is specified.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert 'dynamic energy from magnets inside a magnetic field or from the weight of a mass or other force' into continuous motion, implying extraction of work from ambient magnetic fields or gravity without an explicit, depletable input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-operating motor that claims to convert ambient magnetic or gravitational force into continuous mechanical work. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a defined, depletable energy source to compensate for losses, and the second law as it implies extracting net work from an equilibrium state without a temperature or potential gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of how a sustained magnetic or gravitational gradient is maintained to provide net energy input.
- Violates conservation of energy: Describes a mechanism for continuous motion without identifying the source of energy to overcome losses (friction, resistance).
- Implies a perpetual motion scheme: A 'self-operating' device that generates continuous kinetic energy from static fields or forces in equilibrium is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a closed container of liquid with internal emboli (bubbles or floats) that somehow store and return energy from the liquid's upward motion, implying energy extraction from the liquid's movement without an identified external gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a closed container of liquid with internal floating elements. It claims these elements can store and return energy from the liquid's motion to perpetuate rotation, which constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing). No external energy source is identified, directly violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, thermal, chemical, ambient).
- Describes a closed system where internal components (emboli) supposedly store and return energy from buoyancy, implying perpetual motion.
- Violates conservation of energy: system claims to generate continuous motion without an energy source.
- Violates the second law: implies extraction of net work from an isothermal liquid in equilibrium.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output motion clai
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes a 'self-sustaining motor' that supposedly generates its own charging power from its operation, implying energy creation or a closed-loop system with no net external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'self-sustaining motor' that claims to generate its own operating and charging energy, which is a classic perpetual motion claim. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it posits a closed system producing net work without an external energy source. The use of complex, vague terminology obscures the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies perpetual motion or over-unity operation (output energy used to fully recharge its own source).
- No identifiable primary external energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, sunlight).
- Violates energy conservation by suggesting a closed system can sustain itself and produce excess usable energy.
- Uses obfuscating technical language ('monomeric instantaneous thrust', 'palindromic motion', 'self-sustaining') without clear thermodynamic process.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the device generates energy from the 'rotary mechanical force' created by the continuous rotary motion of secondary levers, implying energy is extracted from the motion of internal masses without an identified external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that claims to generate energy from the continuous rotary motion of internal levers and masses, creating a persistent force imbalance. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to produce net energy output without any identifiable external energy input, directly violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims energy generation from internal mechanical motion alone
- Implies creation of a persistent force imbalance (vacuum on one side) from internal mass arrangement
- Violates conservation of energy by suggesting net work output without energy input
- Describes a self-sustaining or energy-multiplying mechanism
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from 'free fall kinetic energy', 'buoyancy', and 'hydrostatic reaction' within a closed rotating cylinder system, with partial output power used to maintain the process via 'useful pneumatic energy'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce net mechanical energy by combining buoyancy, internal free fall, and hydrostatic reaction in a closed rotating cylinder, using part of its output to sustain its own operation. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation by extracting net work from internal conservative forces without an external, sustainable energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: proposes a system where a partial output is fed back to sustain the process, implying net energy production from internal cycles.
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'free fall' and 'buoyancy' forces within a closed, rotating system are conservative or cyclical; no net work can be extracted over a full cycle without an external energy gradient.
- Misapplication of principles: 'hydrostatic reaction' and internal 'free fall' cannot provide net rotational work without an external source like a height differential or pressure gradient not sustained by the system's own output.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be an inertial mechanism converting oscillatory motion to unidirectional motion, implying the input is mechanical vibration/oscillation. No explicit external energy source is described, suggesting it may claim to extract net work from internal inertial forces or ambient vibrations without a maintained gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical device converting oscillatory motion to unidirectional motion for vehicle propulsion and energy generation. It violates core physics principles by implying net work can be extracted from internal inertial forces without an external energy source to maintain oscillations, effectively suggesting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The energy accounting is incomplete, omitting the necessary input to sustain motion against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the primary energy input driving the oscillations.
- Implied extraction of net work from inertial forces within a closed system, violating Newton's laws (no external force for net acceleration).
- Mechanism description suggests conversion of bidirectional oscillation to unidirectional motion without energy cost for rectification, which inherently dissipates energy.
- No thermodynamic limit analysis provided; claims of energy generation for vehicles imply over-unity performance.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims 'fuelless' and converts 'predetermined mass to stored kinetic energy' suggest energy is extracted from mass itself (E=mc² conversion implied but not stated) or from an unspecified ambient source, while also claiming 'self-sustaining' operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a fuelless, self-sustaining generator that converts mass to kinetic energy with exponential gain, which directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The claim to circumvent Lenz's Law to avoid losses during operation further violates the Second Law, as it implies eliminating electromagnetic reaction forces without an energy cost.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: 'exponential energy gain' and 'self-sustaining' with no clear external energy input.
- Violates 2nd Law: Claims to abrogate Lenz's Law to eliminate electromagnetic braking during acceleration, implying elimination of reaction forces/losses without an entropy sink.
- Misapplication of physics: 'Converts a predetermined mass to stored kinetic energy' is vague; if it means converting rest mass energy, this requires nuclear reactions, not a mechanical turbine.
- Perpetual motion claim: A 'fuelless' device that generates net electricity from a finite mass, while also being 'self-sustaining', is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting: 'Output > control input' p
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Extracting net
C - Technical Obfuscation: Uses correct terms ('Lenz's Law',
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the radial fans (implicit). The system claims to use these fans to force air through a closed-loop duct to drive wind turbines.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed-loop system where fans are used to drive air to spin turbines. This is fundamentally a motor driving a generator with significant fluid friction losses in between. The electrical output from the turbines cannot exceed the electrical input to the fans, violating the principle of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed-loop air circuit. No net external work can be extracted from circulating air in a closed, isolated system due to friction and thermodynamic losses.
- The fans (energy consumers) and turbines (energy generators) are coupled within the same closed loop. The fans must overcome the drag and resistance imposed by the turbines and ducts.
- The work extracted by the turbines will always be less than the work input to the fans, resulting in a net energy loss, not gain.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The claim implicit
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the hydraulic pump (5). The system claims to generate rotational torque (and thus electrical power via generator 8) from the movement of fluid through a coiled tube (wężownica) that is only half-filled in its starting position.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed hydraulic system driven by a pump. It claims the fluid's flow through a rotating coiled tube generates usable shaft torque for a generator. This describes a self-driving mechanism where the pump's work is supposedly amplified to produce greater net work output, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). No external energy gradient (like heat, height differential, or external pressure) is identified to justify net energy production.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The pump's input power is not compared to the generator's output power.
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies the fluid's motion in the coil creates a continuous net torque on the rotating shaft, suggesting work output greater than the pump's work input, with no other energy source identified.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The system is a closed hydraulic loop. The pump does work to move the fluid, and that fluid motion is claimed to create rotational force on the same shaft system, effectively trying to recycle energy to produce excess work.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Title claims 'free electrical energy' but describes only a compressed air energy storage (CAES) system, which is a storage device, not a source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a compressed air energy storage device but labels it a 'free energy power plant.' Any work from the pneumatic motor must come from energy previously stored by the compressor; losses ensure less output than input. Claiming it produces 'free' energy is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Title claims 'free energy' which violates energy conservation
- System described is purely a storage loop (compressor, tank, pneumatic motor) with no net energy input specified
- Implies energy can be generated or multiplied within a closed storage cycle, which is impossible due to losses
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The described device appears to use compressed gas introduced into a liquid to create buoyant force on spherical blades, which then rise, and subsequently fall due to gravity, inducing rotational motion. The ultimate energy source is ambiguous but implied to be the compressed gas input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of buoyancy engine. The energy required to compress and introduce the gas into the liquid at the bottom will always be greater than the mechanical work extracted from the rising and falling blades due to inevitable losses from drag, friction, and the thermodynamic work of gas compression. It cannot produce net useful energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work to compress the gas is not accounted for in the energy output.
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to generate continuous rotational motion (and thus electricity) from a cyclic buoyancy/gravity process, ignoring the significant energy losses from fluid drag, friction, and the need to reset the sys
- Effectively describes a gravity/buoyancy engine, which cannot produce net work in a closed cycle as the work done by buoyancy is canceled by the work required to submerge the object or re-introduce the gas.
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Claims to add a 'new, additional start-braking drive' to existing wind turbines to provide 'stable gravitational drive', but provides no identifiable external energy input beyond the wind itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes adding a 'start-braking drive' to a wind turbine's blades to create a 'stable gravitational drive', but provides no physical mechanism for this drive to add net energy to the system. Braking dissipates energy as heat, and a 'gravitational drive' requires a source of gravitational potential energy, neither of which is identified. This suggests an attempt to extract net work without a clear, compliant external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a 'gravitational drive' without defining an energy source or gravitational potential gradient to exploit.
- Claims 'continuous work generation' from a system that adds a braking mechanism, which would inherently dissipate, not add, energy.
- Lacks any description of how the added drive mechanism is powered or how it overcomes energy dissipation from braking.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The device appears to be a mechanical system using hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders and heavy weights (100-200 kg) arranged on a rotating shaft. No external energy input (e.g., fuel, flowing water, wind, electrical input to pumps) is clearly identified. The rotation seems to be driven by the cyclical raising and lowering of these weights via the cylinders.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate electricity from a cyclical weight-lifting mechanism but fails to identify the source of energy required to repeatedly lift the weights against gravity. The system, as described, would violate the conservation of energy, as the energy needed to reset the mechanism (pressurize cylinders to lift weights) would always be greater than or equal to the energy recovered from their fall, resulting in zero or negative net output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Conservation of Energy: The system description implies a continuous rotation and electrical generation without a clear, sustainable external energy input. The work required to reset/raise the weights must equal or exceed the work extracted f
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: The patent ignores the energy needed to pressurize the hydraulic/pneumatic fluid to 20-40 MPa to extend the cylinders and lift the weights. This input energy is not accounted for in the output.
- Perpetual Motion Mechanism: The described arrangement of weights and cylinders on a rotating shaft, with functions reversing every 180 degrees, suggests an attempt to create a self-sustaining cycle that extracts net work from gravity—a classic over-u
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to use an electric motor (2CV ≈ 1.5 kW) to drive four three-phase generators via a gear system, with batteries and an inverter. The text mentions 'auto alimentação' (self-feeding) and connection to the electrical grid, suggesting a loop where generator output powers the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an electrical network with a motor driving generators, but fails to identify a primary, external renewable energy source. The implied 'self-feeding' loop violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the system's output cannot exceed its input, and losses ensure it would run down without an external power supply.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No primary renewable energy source (solar, wind, etc.) is specified to power the initial motor.
- Violates energy conservation: The described arrangement suggests a motor-generator feedback loop that would have net losses due to friction, electrical resistance, and heat.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The system lacks an identified external energy input to overcome inevitable losses, making sustained operation impossible.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of liquid initially in the elevated recipient (6). The description suggests the system will somehow cycle the liquid back up to restart the process without external work input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered water turbine, which can generate electricity from water falling from a height. However, the claim that a 'depression' created by the outflow will suction water back up to restart the cycle without external energy input violates the conservation of energy. The net work needed to lift the water back to its initial height equals or exceeds the electrical energy generated during its fall.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system requires work to return the liquid from the basin (13) back to the elevated recipient (6) to sustain the cycle. The 'depression' (suction) created cannot perform net positive work to both generate electricity
- Violates conservation of energy: The description implies a continuous cycle where gravity-driven flow generates electricity, and the resulting 'depression' somehow lifts the fluid back to the starting height without compensating energy input.
- Misapplication of suction: Suction (depression) is not an energy source; it is a pressure differential. Moving liquid from the basin up into the recipient requires work to increase its gravitational potential energy, which must come from outside the
A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The prime mover is the explicit input, but the claim suggests 'internal energy' creates a differential that is 'equalized by an external acceleration of the total mass,' implying an attempt to extract net work from the system's own motion or from an unspecified ambient gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes an internal mechanical rearrangement that allegedly forces an external acceleration and energy export. This violates Newton's laws (specifically, conservation of linear and angular momentum) as internal forces cannot accelerate the system's center of mass or produce net external work without an external energy input. The language is obfuscatory, masking a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Vague mechanism ('internal energy creates an internal differential') with no identifiable thermodynamic gradient or energy source.
- Claim that 'internal energy is transferred to the exterior' suggests energy output exceeding the prime mover's input without a secondary, accounted-for source.
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy; accelerating the total mass center requires an external force/reaction, not an internal rearrangement.
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to generate continuous electricity solely from the gravitational potential energy of a weight falling, then using part of the generated electricity to reset the weight to its initial height.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a classic over-unity gravitational generator: a weight falls to produce electricity, then part of that electricity is used to lift the weight back up. This violates energy conservation, as the lifting energy must always exceed the usable energy generated during the fall due to inevitable losses. The claim that only 40% of output is needed for reset is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to use <40% of generated electricity to reset the weight, implying >60% net energy output from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Ignores energy losses: No accounting for friction, electrical resistance, generator inefficiency, or motor inefficiency during reset.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cycle where gravitational work generates electricity, then electricity lifts the weight, creating an energy multiplication loop.
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system using pistons and cylinders, but no explicit energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is described. It claims to operate from 'air pressure' without explaining how a pressure gradient is created or maintained.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'air pressure motor' describes a sealed mechanical system but provides no identifiable source of energy to initiate or sustain motion against friction and other losses. It implicitly suggests extracting net work from an equilibrium air pressure environment, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by lacking an energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source to create or sustain motion
- Implies perpetual motion from a single pressure chamber without a maintained gradient
- Missing entropy sink - no mechanism to account for energy dissipation from friction or other losses
- Incomplete energy accounting: describes mechanical components but not what drives the cycle
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests using gravitational potential energy and atmospheric pressure to drive a perpetual hydraulic arm-lifting cycle, implying energy is extracted from the weight of the arms and the atmosphere without an external, depletable source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed hydraulic system where arms use their own weight and atmospheric pressure to lift each other cyclically. This is a classic perpetual motion machine, violating energy conservation as it claims to generate electricity without an external, depletable energy source to compensate for losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Describes a cyclic system where hydraulic arms lift each other, purportedly using their own weight and atmospheric pressure. This is a closed-loop system with no net external energy input to overcome inevitable losses
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting net work from a system in equilibrium (gravity and atmospheric pressure are static potentials, not usable without a gradient or a
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description focuses on the motion of the arms but ignores the energy required to reset the system (e.g., to open valves, overcome fluid resistance, or lift arms against gravity during the 'downstroke' phase).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest the device uses gravitational potential energy of a falling mineral cylinder inside a barrel, along with air compression/decompression, to generate electricity via two turbines. An electric motor is used to reset the system (rotate barrel 180°).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator claiming to produce net electricity. It violates the first law of thermodynamics because the energy required to reset the heavy cylinder to its high potential energy state (via the electric motor) must be greater than the electrical energy generated during its fall, due to inevitable losses from friction, turbine inefficiency, and generator losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The electrical output from the two turbines during the fall/reset cycle cannot exceed the electrical input to the motor that resets the system, plus losses.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cycle where gravity-driven fall generates electricity, then a motor resets the position, implying net energy output without an external source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on energy generation during fall but ignores the equal or greater energy required to lift the heavy cylinder against gravity during the 180° rotation reset.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Attempts to extract net work from a closed gravitational cycle (lifting and falling the same mass in Earth's gravity field).
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient environmental heat is implied as the primary energy input, with some external work input for compression mentioned but not fully quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cyclic process claiming to produce cooling or work primarily from ambient environmental heat. This directly violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law, which forbids a net work output from a single heat reservoir. The internal steps of separation, mixing, and compression cannot circumvent this fundamental limit.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing to extract net work or cooling from a single ambient temperature reservoir without a lower temperature sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The process describes using 'environmental thermal energy' during isothermal expansion (Claim 6) to do work, which is thermodynamically impossible without a temperature gradient.
- The described cycles (e.g., mixing, separating, compressing) appear designed to obscure the fact that the net work output claimed would exceed the net work input, creating a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on interna
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from a motor to drive mechanical oscillation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal moving mass system. While the motor consumes energy to create oscillations, the centripetal forces involved are internal to the device-body system. No net external force (thrust) can be generated on the device's center of mass without ejecting reaction mass, violating conservation of momentum. This is a classic reactionless drive claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net propulsion (thrust) in free space using only internal moving masses.
- Confuses centripetal force (an internal, center-seeking force) with a net external force for propulsion.
- Implies a violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum by suggesting a closed system can accelerate its center of mass without expelling reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device requires an external energy input to rotate the components and move the weights, but the claim implies this input can generate a net directional force (thrust) on the device itself without a corresponding reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes an internal mass-moving mechanism and incorrectly claims it can produce a net directional force on the entire device. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which violates conservation of momentum. Internal forces, no matter how arranged, cannot accelerate the center of mass of a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (conservation of momentum). A net internal force cannot produce a net external force on a closed system.
- Misinterprets centripetal force as an external net force. Centripetal force is an internal, center-seeking constraint force that sums to zero within the system.
- No mechanism described for momentum exchange with an external environment (e.g., expelled mass, electromagnetic field).
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to laser only. Claims imply generation of novel force fields (nuclear, gravitational, inertial) from circular photon propagation without an external gradient or identifiable energy conversion mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The claims propose generating profound gravitational, inertial, and nuclear field effects using only a laser beam bent into a circle. This requires coupling low-energy photons to the strongest known force fields without an energy source or mechanism, directly violating conservation laws and well-established principles of general relativity and quantum field theory.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism provided for coupling photon momentum/energy to nuclear forces or spacetime curvature (gravity/inertia).
- Claims violate equivalence principle (modifying inertial mass independently).
- Claims of modifying relativistic time dilation and length contraction via a circular laser path are not supported by general or special relativity.
- Energy accounting is absent; the described setup cannot be a source for the massive energies required to affect gravitational or nuclear fields.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is the downward weight of an on-board object and/or manual hand/foot pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
The invention attempts to use the weight of an onboard object to propel the vehicle. Since the weight force is internal to the vehicle system, it cannot create a net external force to accelerate the vehicle's center of mass without an external reaction (like pushing off the ground). This violates Newton's laws and the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Weight is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from lowering and raising an object in a cycle within the vehicle's reference frame.
- The system is described as closed and manual, with no external energy input (non-combustive, non-electric). The only usable energy is the initial potential energy of the weight or the driver's muscular work.
- Force multiplication (e.g., via hydraulic pistons) trades force for distance, conserving energy, not creating it. It cannot produce net propulsion for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a purely mechanical system with rotors and arms. The only explicit energy input is the initial work to set the rotor and arms in motion. It implicitly claims to generate a net propulsive force (thrust) from internal motions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of a reactionless drive, attempting to create net thrust through internal moving parts alone. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the conservation of linear momentum, as it claims to produce a net external force without an equal and opposite external reaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for internal forces. The forces described are internal to the device/vehicle system and cannot produce net translation of the center of mass.
- Violates conservation of momentum. The claim suggests generating linear momentum from a system that initially has zero net linear momentum, without expelling any reaction mass.
- Incomplete force analysis. The claim focuses on canceling forces in one direction but implies a net force arises in another, which is impossible for a closed mechanical system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient environmental motion (initial sway) and gravity. The description implies the machine's own reciprocating motion, amplified by a pendulum and impacts, is the primary driver.
AI Physics Analysis
The described machine is a mechanical oscillator that claims to sustain and amplify its own motion using internal impacts and gravity to generate electricity. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it proposes a net energy output without a corresponding net energy input to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net external energy input after initial start. System is a closed mechanical oscillator with losses.
- Claims 'increasing the motion of the machine' and 'gives the pendulum greater momentum every time' through internal impacts violate conservation of energy.
- Gravity is a conservative force; it cannot add net energy per cycle to a closed system. It only converts potential to kinetic energy back and forth.
- Friction, air resistance, and generator load will continuously drain energy. No mechanism described to replace these losses from an external source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Describ
Claimed Energy Source
The claim implies the system's continuous rotation is powered solely by gravitational force acting on falling weights, with no external energy input to reset the system's gravitational potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel design, a form of perpetual motion machine. Gravity is a conservative force, meaning no net energy can be extracted from a weight cycling back to its starting height. The described weight transfers cannot create a continuous energy output without an external input to lift the weights, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to convert 'infinite amount of Gravitational Force' into useful work without an external energy source to lift the weights back to their initial height.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cyclic transfer of weights between wheels, but the net work to lift a weight against gravity to the 'top' of the second wheel must equal or exceed the work extracted from its fall.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores that gravitational force is conservative; the net work done by gravity over a closed cycle is zero. To produce continuous output, energy must be supplied from outside the system to recreate the initial potential
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use two 'antagonistic natural fluidic energy sources' identified as Archimedes' buoyancy pressure and gravitational force, with a 12V battery for control electronics and a pump to return fluid to the main reservoir.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed hydraulic system attempting to generate continuous work by coupling buoyancy and gravity. Since both are conservative forces and the fluid loop is closed, no net energy can be extracted per cycle. The pump required to reset the system consumes energy, leading to an overall energy deficit, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed fluid loop with no external thermodynamic gradient or net energy input.
- Archimedes' buoyancy and gravity are conservative forces; in a closed cycle, net work over one complete cycle is zero.
- The submerged pump consumes energy to return fluid to the elevated reservoir, which likely exceeds any intermittent work extracted from piston motion.
- The device attempts to create perpetual motion by using gravity and buoyancy against each other in a loop, violating conservation of energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'antago
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a magnetic drive device with stationary and rotating magnetic arrays but provides no explicit energy input mechanism. Implied source is magnetic potential energy from the arrangement, which is a finite, non-replenishing internal store.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce rotational shaft power to drive a machine using only arranged permanent magnets. This constitutes a permanent magnet motor, which cannot deliver net useful work indefinitely as it extracts energy from a finite magnetic potential, violating energy conservation. No mechanism to input energy to sustain the motion is described.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy input mechanism specified (electrical, mechanical, thermal, or ambient).
- Implies sustained rotation and useful work output from a static magnetic configuration, violating conservation of energy.
- Magnetic systems are conservative; no net work can be extracted from a closed, static magnetic arrangement without an external energy input to overcome hysteresis/eddy losses and restore the potential.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy, but with no mechanism to create or sustain a non-equilibrium gradient. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system that uses levers and weights. Once started, it will settle into a balanced state where the gravitational torque on one side equals the torque on the other, producing no net work. To run continuously, it would need an external energy input to reset the weights, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind if such input is not acknowledged.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input described to reset the system or create a perpetual imbalance.
- Relies on a fixed arrangement of levers/wheels and weights, which will reach a state of static equilibrium or a repeating cycle with zero net work output per cycle.
- Claims 'significant' torque production without identifying the source of energy to lift the weights against gravity to restore the initial condition.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from power source (150) drives rotation and electromagnetic field. Claimed propulsive force is said to arise from internal mass redistribution within the rotating system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate directional thrust by internally shifting mass in a rotating disc. This is physically impossible for an isolated system, as it violates conservation of linear momentum. All forces involved (centripetal, piezoelectric) are internal and cancel out, producing vibration but no net propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. The described mechanism is an internal force: redistributing mass within a rotating, isolated system cannot produce a net external force (thrust) on the system's center of mass.
- Misapplication of centripetal force. Centripetal force is a constraint force internal to the system (frame on disc). Imbalances create oscillating internal stresses, not net propulsion.
- Confuses dynamic imbalance (internal vibration/bending moments) with net external force generation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert terrestrial gravitational energy into mechanical work, implying extraction of net energy from a static gravitational field without a compensating decrease in potential energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity from gravity alone, but a static gravitational field is not an energy source; to produce continuous work, a mass must be cyclically lowered and then raised again, with the raising requiring at least as much energy as was gained from the lowering.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A static, conservative field like gravity cannot be a net source of energy; work extracted requires a mass to fall through a potential difference, after which the device must be reset using at least that same amount o
- No identifiable external energy input or gradient to drive continuous motion. The described mechanism of balls in tubes on a rotating chain is a closed system with no net gravitational torque.
- Omits the energy required to lift the metal balls back to their starting height to complete the cycle, which equals or exceeds any work output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes only the
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from an external source (e.g., solar power) to the motor and the magnetic coils/electromagnets.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal, closed system. All magnetic and mechanical forces described are internal action-reaction pairs. Since no momentum is expelled from the system (like air, ions, or a magnetic field gradient), the center of mass cannot accelerate, making it a reactionless drive that violates Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The system describes internal forces (motor, magnets, iron bar) all acting within a closed frame. No external reaction mass or field is expelled, so the system cannot produce a net external force for pro
- Incomplete force accounting. Claims that forces 'negate' or are 'absorbed' to leave only one directional force are physically incorrect. All internal magnetic and mechanical forces sum to zero within the system.
- Misapplication of circular motion. The claim that 'its own displacement force is zero' for circular motion is irrelevant; the net internal force from the rotating components is also zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (force
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial rotation of the worm gear (138) via the input shaft (110). The claim implies that the gravitational potential energy of the top weighing plates (134), manipulated by the mechanism, can produce continuous kinetic energy output greater than the input.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a mechanically complex attempt at a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous kinetic energy by using gravity on unbalanced weights, but any work extracted comes from lowering the weights, which must then be raised again using at least as much energy, making net energy generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous energy generation from a persistent imbalanced state without an external energy source to maintain that state.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from a system in thermal equilibrium (gravity field) without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Gravitational potential energy is not a source; it's a conservative field. Lifting the plates to create imbalance requires work equal to or greater than the work extracted on the downstroke in an ideal, frictionless syst
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is vaguely implied (gravity, magnetic repulsion), but the primary claimed source is a 'perpetual motion' mechanism where magnets and a pendulum sustain motion indefinitely without an external, consumable energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The invention explicitly claims to be a perpetual motion machine, which is impossible as it violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described magnetic and pendulum system cannot generate net energy output without an external energy source to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual motion' explicitly, violating energy conservation.
- Magnets provide a static force field, not a continuous energy source; motion in such a field is not perpetual due to friction and damping.
- System lacks a clear, sustainable energy gradient to perform net work against dissipative losses.
- Claim that robot derives energy from the machine it operates is circular logic for startup.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the rotating motor that spins the bloc arm. The claim implies that the centrifugal force generated by this motor-driven rotation can produce additional net rotational kinetic energy at the gearbox/output shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The centrifugal force is an internal reaction force within the rotating system; it cannot create net energy. The motor supplies all the energy, and any torque generated on the output shaft is matched by an opposing torque on the input, preventing net energy multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating reference frame, not an independent energy source. It is a reaction force that cannot do net work on the system's center of mass.
- The mechanism describes a closed mechanical system where the motor provides all the work to spin the mass. Any torque generated on the 'torque arm' due to centrifugal effects is an internal force pair; the reaction torque acts back on the motor/rotat
- The system violates Newton's Third Law and the conservation of energy. The output energy at the gearbox cannot exceed the input energy from the motor, minus losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/initial gravitational potential energy of pendulums. The system describes a closed mechanical loop where pendulum motion is claimed to drive continuous rotation of a main disk, which in turn drives the pendulums.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-powered system where pendulums and a rotating disk are mechanically coupled in a closed loop. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it implies sustained motion without an external energy source to overcome inevitable losses. Gravity alone cannot power a continuous cycle in a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System describes a closed loop where pendulums drive a main disk and the main disk's rotation supports the pendulums' continuous motion with no net external energy input.
- Implies perpetual motion: Claims 'continuously rotating manner' for pendulums driven by gravity, but gravity is a conservative force; net work over a cycle in a closed system is zero.
- Missing entropy sink/energy dissipation: No accounting for friction, air resistance, or other losses that would damp the motion, requiring continuous energy input to maintain.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert gravitational potential energy and magnetic energy into electricity, but the described mechanism lacks a clear, sustained external energy input to reset the system. It appears to rely on internal magnetic repulsion and gravity without an external power source to overcome energy losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity permanently from gravity and permanent magnets, but these are conservative forces that cannot provide net energy over a cycle. The system will inevitably lose energy to friction and electrical resistance and stop, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No identified net energy input. Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Describes a system that would produce continuous work without a corresponding energy source or entropy increase.
- Magnetic forces are also conservative in this context; permanent magnets alone cannot provide a continuous source of energy as they do no net work over a cycle.
- System will settle into equilibrium (minimum energy state) and stop, requiring more energy to reset it than is produced.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly treats
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests movement of the pumping frame relative to the shell induces fluid movement, which then generates a centrifugal force that can 'independently move the pump assembly'. This implies a self-sustaining or net propulsive force from an internal fluid motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim violates Newton's laws. A closed internal fluid circuit cannot generate a net force to move the entire assembly because all internal momentum changes sum to zero. This is analogous to trying to lift yourself by pulling on your own hair.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1 states the generated centrifugal force is 'capable of independently moving the pump assembly'. This suggests net momentum generation from an internal, closed fluid system, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- A closed fluid circuit (no external discharge per Claim 5) cannot produce a net external force on its container. Internal fluid motion creates equal and opposite reaction forces that cancel within the assembly.
- The description implies energy extraction from the fluid's motion to produce net work (movement of the entire assembly) without an identified external energy input or reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient magnetic potential energy (permanent magnets). No external energy input is described to initiate or sustain motion against losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate continuous electricity using only fixed permanent magnets. Since magnetic forces are conservative and the system is closed, it cannot produce net work over a cycle, violating energy conservation. It would settle into an equilibrium position, not sustained rotation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System describes a closed magnetic configuration with no time-varying fields or energy input. The repulsive force between magnets is conservative; no net work can be extracted over a full rotation as the magnetic potential energy at the start and end
- The angled magnet face creates a tangential force component, but an equal and opposite restoring force/energy barrier exists on the opposite side of the rotation, leading to a stable equilibrium or oscillation, not continuous rotation.
- Any rotational kinetic energy converted to electricity would quickly deplete, stopping the device. It lacks a mechanism to replenish the system's energy against resistive losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air, described as 'air libre' (free air). The claim is that the device extracts mechanical work from ambient air without requiring a fuel or a thermal, pressure, or humidity gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a perpetual motion machine that extracts unlimited mechanical work from ambient air without any fuel or energy gradient, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) and the second law (requires a gradient to perform work). The description is a classic case of over-unity energy generation from a single thermal reservoir.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpétuel' and 'surproduction sans limite' which imply infinite energy output.
- No identifiable energy gradient (thermal, pressure, chemical) is described to drive the system. Ambient air in equilibrium cannot perform net work.
- Claims output can drive two alternators of any power 'sans limite', directly violating conservation of energy.
- Describes converting 'l'énergie de l'Air libre' into rotational motion without a sink or a dissipative process to create a non-equilibrium state.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient fluid environment (buoyancy via Archimedes' principle and gravitational potential energy). Claims to directly intake and use potential energy from the fluid environment.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous mechanical work by cycling masses using buoyancy and gravity, but it is a closed system with no external energy input to overcome dissipation. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy input mechanism described
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement of masses, rails, and pulleys
- Claims to produce net mechanical work from buoyancy/gravity alone without an external gradient or fuel
- Buoyancy and gravity are conservative forces; cycling masses in a closed loop results in zero net work over a cycle
- Energy spent to submerge floaters or reposition masses will equal or exceed any work extracted
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the gravitational potential energy difference arising from the geometric orientation of two identical fluid reservoirs. An auxiliary input is electrical heating to create a buoyancy effect.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The geometric arrangement of the cones does not create a perpetual source of gravitational energy. In a closed loop, the heater's electrical input would be the true energy source, and the system's net output cannot exceed this input, violating its claim of being a power generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim violates energy conservation. The geometric orientation (one cone 'top up', the other 'top down') does not create a perpetual potential energy difference in a closed, isothermal loop. The center of mass of the entire system fluid does
- The system is described as a closed loop with 'cyclical use of the fluid, so without consumption thereof.' To sustain flow and power a turbine, energy must be continuously input to reset the fluid's state, which the heater attempts to do. However, th
- The description confuses static hydrostatic pressure differences with a sustainable, circulating flow that can do net work. In a closed, connected system at equilibrium, flow will stop once pressures equalize.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, with no external energy input other than the initial potential energy of the weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to extract usable energy solely from gravity by having two weights alternately lift each other through a mechanical linkage. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation by purporting to produce net work from a closed cycle with no external energy input beyond the system's initial potential energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a weight descending can lift another weight of equal mass with double or quadruple the force, implying net work output without an external energy source.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cyclic process where weights alternately lift each other, with no accounting for energy losses (friction, drag).
- Misapplies force multiplication: Confuses force (via levers/gears) with energy. Increasing force via mechanical advantage reduces displacement, keeping work (force × distance) input ≤ output when losses are considered.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric air, with kinetic energy of gas molecules attributed to solar radiation. The claim is that pressure-volumetric work of the ambiance against low static pressure in a nozzle provides the input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. It claims to generate electricity by extracting energy from the random molecular motion of ambient air, reducing its temperature while increasing its pressure as it returns to the same environment, which directly violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to extract net work (electricity) from a single thermal reservoir (the ambiance) with no temperature gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'decreased stagnation temperature and increased stagnation pressure' of outflow relative to inflow for an adiabatic system, which is impossible without work input.
- Misapplication of gas kinetics: The random kinetic energy of ambient air molecules is not convertible to directed, useful work without a heat sink (violates Kelvin-Planck statement).
- The described process (acceleration then deceleration in rotor extracting net energy) would require the outflow to have lower total enthalpy than inflow, which cannot occur spontaneously for flow returning to the same ambient state.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct fluid dynami
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of eccentric masses. The device attempts to create a continuous torque imbalance by using one-way clutches/ratchets and eccentric masses to make gravity act asymmetrically on a rotating assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It uses ratchets and eccentric masses in an attempt to create a perpetual torque imbalance, but the center of mass of the entire system cannot be perpetually offset. Once the masses complete a full cycle, no net work can be extracted without lowering them from a height, which the patent does not describe. It violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed-cycle gravitational system cannot produce net work without an external energy input or a change in the gravitational potential of the masses (e.g., lowering them).
- Violates the principle of static equilibrium for rigid bodies: The center of mass of the entire rotating system will settle at the lowest point. Any initial imbalance will dissipate after one rotation, and ratchets/clutches cannot create a perpetual
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a mechanism but provides no analysis of energy inputs (e.g., who or what resets the eccentric masses against gravity to create a perpetual imbalance?).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly claims
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational force alone, with no external energy input required.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy and perform lifting work using only gravity, a conservative force. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates the conservation of energy by producing net work from a system that returns to its initial state.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming to generate net energy from a conservative force field (gravity).
- Proposes to create a continuous cycle (perpetual motion) by manipulating mass distribution, ignoring that net work over a closed cycle in a conservative field is zero.
- Claims to lift mass without external energy input, which would require work to be done against gravity without an energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electrical or mechanical energy from an unspecified source, possibly implying extraction from ambient thermal energy or electrical fields without an identifiable gradient or fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent directly claims a 'perpetual electric motor' and describes devices that purport to generate electrical or mechanical work without an identifiable external energy input, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The use of technical terms about electrodes, materials, and circuits obfuscates the core violation: claiming a system that produces net work from equilibrium or from its own internal energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual electric motor' (вечный двигатель электрический) which is a direct perpetual motion claim
- Describes generating electrical energy against an applied voltage without identifying the primary energy source
- Suggests operation as a refrigerator/generator combination with net output
- Uses vague terms like 'special conducting material' and 'penetration of electric field to some depth' without specifying a legitimate energy conversion mechanism
- Applies to both mechanical work and electrical generation, violating first law in both cases
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate rotation from centrifugal forces acting on unbalanced masses within the rotor, implying energy extraction from the system's own inertia/motion without external input.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion machine claim. It attempts to use shifting masses or fluid flow to create a perpetual net torque via centrifugal forces, but internal forces cannot produce net work on the system. It violates energy conservation and Newtonian mechanics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input identified to sustain rotation against friction and other losses.
- Violates Newton's first and third laws: Internal forces (centrifugal) cannot create a net torque on the system's center of mass.
- Perpetual motion claim: 'Вечный двигатель вращения' translates to 'perpetual rotation engine'.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes mechanisms for creating unbalanced centrifugal forces but ignores the energy required to create/maintain the mass displacement.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description is purely mechanical, suggesting it is intended to be a self-contained mechanism that generates propulsion or useful work without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical linkage with no specified source of energy. It appears to be an attempt to create propulsion or mechanical advantage through internal forces alone, which violates conservation of energy and momentum. Such a system cannot produce net thrust or useful work without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., fuel, electricity, wind).
- Describes a complex arrangement of levers, wheels, and pivots that appears to be a closed mechanical loop.
- Implies the generation of net thrust or work from internal forces only, violating Newton's 3rd law and conservation of momentum.
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy conversion process is described to enable work extraction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (latent heat of vaporization from water) and gravitational potential energy of water. The device appears to attempt to use facilitated evaporation to create a continuous hydraulic head difference.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a hydraulic turbine that uses facilitated evaporation, ostensibly to allow continuous operation by preventing water table re-equilibration. This implies creating a sustained hydraulic head and extracting work without an adequate external energy source to replenish the potential energy of the water, violating the first law of thermodynamics. While evaporation is real, it cannot power a turbine in a net-positive manner without a corresponding external energy input (like solar thermal energy driving the hydrological cycle) that is not functionally integrated here.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies continuous operation by preventing re-equilibration of water levels (aquifer levels), suggesting a perpetual hydraulic head without an external energy source to restore it.
- Claims improved performance via interaction with wind and sun, but this ambient energy is insufficient to account for the implied continuous generation of hydroelectric power from a static water source.
- Core concept of using evaporation to sustain a continuous flow through a turbine violates conservation of energy; the work extracted from the falling water must be less than the energy required to restore the water to its initial height or maintain t
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary energy source is magnetic repulsion between permanent magnets. The auxiliary motor is acknowledged as an input, but the apparatus appears designed to use magnetic forces to produce net rotary power output.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus attempts to generate continuous rotary power by creating an asymmetric force cycle using only permanent magnets and a modulating shield. Since magnetic forces from permanent magnets are conservative, no net work can be extracted over a closed cycle. The energy to overcome repulsion on one part of the cycle would equal or exceed any work gained elsewhere, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net work from a conservative magnetic field (no time-varying field or external energy gradient).
- The 'demagnetizing' mechanism and 'repulsive force unequal structure' appear to be an attempt to create an asymmetric force cycle using only permanent magnets, which is impossible in a conservative field.
- The system lacks a clear, external, non-magnetic energy input to account for the claimed continuous rotary power output beyond the auxiliary motor.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The auxiliary moto
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motors (1, 2, 3, 4) is the only explicit source. The claim implicitly suggests the rotating masses (masselottes) create a 'useful centripetal force' that could provide net propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses motors to spin internal wheels with masses, claiming this creates a 'useful centripetal force' for propulsion. This violates Newton's laws—internal forces cannot produce net acceleration on a system's center of mass. It is a classic reactionless drive attempt, which is impossible in standard physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy gradient identified for net propulsion
- Centripetal force is an internal force within the rotating system; it cannot produce net thrust on the isolated device
- System is closed except for electrical input; any force generated by moving internal masses is balanced by opposite internal forces (Newton's 3rd Law)
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy from asymmetrical mass distribution on a rotating frame, but no external energy input is described to create or maintain the asymmetry against dissipative forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic unbalanced wheel or 'overbalanced wheel' perpetual motion machine. It claims that an asymmetrical mass distribution on a rotating frame will cause continuous rotation by itself, exploiting gravity. This is impossible because any initial torque will be countered by an opposing torque as the wheel rotates, leading to oscillation and stop, not sustained motion. No external energy source is identified to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation from a static, unbalanced mass configuration without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Proposes a system that spontaneously creates a non-equilibrium state (persistent imbalance) to do work without an external gradient or input.
- Mechanically flawed: A static unbalanced wheel will oscillate and settle into a stable, lowest-energy orientation, not undergo continuous rotation. Friction and air resistance will dissipate any initial motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors rotating rods with masses. No external or ambient energy source is described; the system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanical system of rotating masses. It claims to produce a constant propulsive force, which is impossible because internal forces in a closed system cancel out, providing no net thrust to the vehicle's center of mass. This violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a net propulsive force from an internal, balanced rotating mass system without expelling mass or interacting with an external medium.
- Describes complex acceleration/deceleration cycles of internal masses but provides no mechanism for momentum transfer to create net thrust on the vehicle.
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum: a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass by rearranging internal parts.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from Tesla coil (400 kV). Implicitly claims to convert this electrical energy into net directional momentum without a reaction mass, violating Newton's third law.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a sealed container with an internal electric field acting on its gas. All forces generated are internal to the system, so the center of mass cannot accelerate. The 'directional pressure bias' is impossible in a sealed container, as any local force is balanced by an opposite reaction force elsewhere on the container walls, resulting in zero net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'reactionless propulsion' which violates conservation of momentum.
- Proposed mechanism (aligning nitrogen inversion via electric field) cannot create a net directional pressure bias in a sealed container; internal forces cancel.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external interaction is described that could provide a net thrust for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors (2,3,4,5, etc.) that spin rods with masses. No external or ambient energy source is claimed or described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses internally spinning masses to generate centrifugal forces. These are internal forces that cancel out within the system and cannot create a net external force for lift or propulsion ('anti-gravity'), violating Newton's laws of motion and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'anti-gravity' effect from purely internal centrifugal forces, which are internal to the system and cannot produce net translation or lift.
- Describes complex acceleration/deceleration cycles of rotating masses, but all forces are internal reaction forces that cancel out within the system (Newton's 3rd Law).
- No mechanism or energy gradient is described to couple the internal motions to an external force like gravity or produce a net external thrust.
- Violates conservation of momentum; the center of mass of a closed system cannot accelerate by internal forces alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system with water tanks, floats, connecting rods, and counterweights, claiming to rotate automatically without oil or electricity input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve continuous rotation without any external energy input (oil or electricity), which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described mechanical system of water tanks, floats, and counterweights constitutes a closed system with internal forces that cannot produce net work indefinitely due to friction and energy dissipation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is described
- Claims 'automatic rotation without oil or electricity' implying perpetual motion
- System appears to be a closed mechanical assembly with internal moving parts and counterweights
- No thermodynamic gradient or ambient energy harvesting mechanism is specified
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent references a 'SingEden system of clean energy' (another patent application) as the prime mover, but the core claim is that the hydraulic system itself produces a 'reaction force that is greater than the action force' and achieves 'net travel gain'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a net propulsive force by manipulating a fluid within a closed loop, which is impossible. The 'reaction' force on the system from accelerating fluid in one direction is exactly canceled when that fluid is decelerated or redirected at the 'catcher'. No net external force can be generated without ejecting mass externally. The stacking claims compound this violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction pairs are always equal and opposite)
- Violates conservation of momentum
- Proposes extracting net propulsive force from an internal, closed-loop fluid system without an external reaction mass
- Claims 'force achieved... is in the same direction' from stacked pairs, implying force multiplication without added energy input
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
PATTERN C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies initial force from lever arms creates a feedback loop intended to sustain motion, with no external energy input specified after initial start.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-sustaining feedback loop that moves 'perpetually' after an initial input, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The complex gearing and claims of asymmetric resistance do not provide a mechanism to generate net work without an ongoing energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual' motion until force is withdrawn
- Describes a feedback loop intended to sustain itself without net energy input
- No identifiable external energy source to overcome friction and other losses
- Mechanism relies on wheels encountering 'less resistance outwardly than inwardly'—a vague claim that cannot generate net work
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to rely solely on inertial masses (solid or liquid) arranged to create an asymmetric torque, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'perpetual rotation engine' using shifting inertial masses to generate torque. This is a classic overbalanced wheel design, which cannot produce net work indefinitely as it violates conservation of energy. No external energy source is identified to overcome friction and other losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual rotation' (вечный двигатель вращения) without identifying an energy source.
- Describes mechanisms for shifting inertial masses to create torque, implying net work can be extracted from a closed system.
- No thermodynamic cycle, energy gradient, or external input is described to sustain motion against losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on an unbalanced, rotating mechanical system. No external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, wind, thermal gradient) is described or implied.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor claiming permanent rotation from an internal imbalance. This violates the conservation of energy, as gravity is a conservative force. Any work done lifting weights internally is exactly recovered when they fall, resulting in zero net energy output after accounting for inevitable friction losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net work from a conservative force field (gravity) in a closed cycle.
- System operates in a gravitational potential but returns to its initial configuration periodically, resulting in zero net work over a full cycle.
- Describes a 'permanent rotation' from an internal weight-shifting mechanism, which constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate usable torque/moment from a system 'constantly in disequilibrium' due to gravity acting on weights, implying a perpetual or self-sustaining energy source from an internal weight imbalance.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a drive constantly in disequilibrium, generating usable torque from gravity acting on internal weights. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to produce net energy output without an identified external energy input to sustain the claimed disequilibrium, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate net work from a closed mechanical system with gravity as the only external field.
- Violates thermodynamic equilibrium principles: A static, unchanging gravitational field cannot provide net energy to a cyclic process; the system would reach equilibrium.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identified external energy input to reset the 'disequilibrium' after each cycle. The work done by gravity on the descending weight would be exactly canceled by the work required to lift it back to its starting positio
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to be a mechanical assembly (flywheels, alternators, pulleys) intended to be driven by an unspecified initial input. The abstract mentions using forces from hydroelectric, wind, nuclear plants, etc., but the claims describe a self-contained module with alternating motion by gravity, suggesting an attempt to generate net energy from internal motions.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a perpetual motion machine. It uses internal components like flywheels and gravity-driven alternating motion in an attempt to generate electrical energy, but provides no mechanism to replace the energy extracted by the alternators, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Perpetual motion mechanism implied: 'deslocamentos alternados e constantes por gravidade' suggests using gravity within a closed system to produce constant alternating motion without an external energy source to replenish potential energy.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary energy input to sustain the motion against friction and electrical load. Flywheels store, not create, energy.
- Violates energy conservation: Implies continuous generation of 'energia potencial' from the internal motion of its own components (flywheels, alternators) without a net external input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy of gas molecules at equilibrium temperature. Claims imply extracting work or creating temperature gradients from an isothermal system without external work input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to act as a macroscopic Maxwell's Demon, creating temperature differences and performing useful work from an initially isothermal gas system. This directly violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it proposes extracting ordered energy from thermal equilibrium without an external energy input to power the 'sorting' mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1 violates the Second Law by proposing a nozzle that spontaneously segregates fast and slow molecules from an equilibrium gas, acting as a Maxwell's Demon without specifying an energy cost for measurement/operation.
- Claim 2 suggests creating a temperature differential between a porous disk and a gas by sliding them isochorically, implying energy extraction from a single thermal reservoir without work input.
- The system appears to attempt net energy extraction from thermal fluctuations at equilibrium, which is thermodynamically forbidden.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric pressure differential, implied to be a static source that is not depleted.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate useful torque or thrust from ambient static pressure without depleting the energy source, which is thermodynamically equivalent to extracting net work from an isothermal system at equilibrium. The explicit claim of a 'reactionless drive' directly violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to convert static pressure into net torque/thrust without depleting the pressure source or energy gradient.
- Describes a 'reactionless drive', violating Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Mechanism purports to create a net force from an equilibrium pressure environment without an external sink or cyclic change in system state.
- Vague, incoherent mechanical description obscures the actual energy conversion pathway.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the gravitational potential energy of the moving cylinders/pistons themselves, with the device allegedly sustaining motion via a fluid transfer between paired piston units.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion machine in a chain-driven hydraulic disguise. The gravitational work done by a mass descending on one side is precisely canceled by the work needed to lift its paired mass on the ascending side. The internal fluid transfer creates no net energy, making sustained motion impossible without external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is closed and cyclical. The work extracted from a mass falling on one side is exactly equal to the work required to lift the same mass on the other side, minus losses. The fluid coupling adds no net energy.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: The description implies sustained or amplified motion from an initial input, with no external energy source to overcome friction and other losses.
- Misapplication of buoyancy/hydraulic principles: The fluid is merely transferred between connected volumes; no external pressure gradient (like a height difference in a fluid column) is created to provide net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the internal power source (e.g., electric motor, hydraulic pump) that rotates the impact generators (arms with weights). The backstop provides an initial fixed reference point.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to accelerate a vehicle by using an internal motor to swing a mass and then stop it against a part of the vehicle itself. This is an internal force and cannot create net momentum for the vehicle as a whole, violating Newton's laws. The presence of a backstop only matters for an initial push-off, not for sustained acceleration as described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum for an isolated system. The internal stop is fixed to the frame, so the impact of the arm on the stop is an internal force. The net momentum of the system (frame + arm) remains zero; the frame cannot achieve net tran
- Violates Newton's third law. The force from the stop that decelerates the arm is equal and opposite to the force accelerating the frame, resulting in zero net impulse when integrated over the entire acceleration/deceleration cycle.
- The backstop is a red herring. While it provides an initial external reaction, once the device leaves the backstop, it becomes an isolated system, and the described mechanism cannot produce net acceleration.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electric motor input. The device claims to convert this rotational energy into net linear thrust via internal mass interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim. The described internal collisions cannot produce net thrust on the device as a whole because all forces are internal and cancel out. For the device to accelerate forward, it must expel mass rearward (like a rocket) or push against an external medium.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The described mechanism uses internal forces (mass impacting internal ramp) to generate net external thrust, which is impossible for a closed system.
- Incomplete force accounting. The impulse from the mass hitting the ramp is an internal force; an equal and opposite reaction force acts on the rotating disk/gear assembly, canceling any net thrust.
- Misapplication of impulse. The vector description confuses internal momentum transfer with net external momentum generation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
No external energy source is specified. The device appears to rely solely on the gravitational potential energy of its own internal weights, which is a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic overbalanced wheel design. The patent describes a mechanical system with offset weights that attempts to create a perpetual torque imbalance to drive rotation. However, in a closed system, the center of mass cannot be perpetually offset, and any initial imbalance will settle to a stable, balanced equilibrium, violating energy conservation if it claims to produce continuous output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed mechanical system cannot produce net work or sustained rotation without an external energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The described mechanism (odd-numbered star, guide, eccentric weights) is an attempt to create a perpetual torque imbalance from a static configuration, which is impossible in equilibrium.
- No mechanism to reset the weights' positions without expending at least as much energy as gained from their falling/moving.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device claims to generate mechanical energy from inertial masses on a rotating rotor without identifying any external energy input. Implied source is the rotational inertia of the system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'perpetual rotation engine' claims to generate mechanical energy using inertial masses on a rotating rotor without any external energy source. This directly violates conservation of energy and thermodynamic laws, as no configuration of masses on a rotor can produce net work without energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion ('вечный двигатель вращения')
- No identified external energy input
- Attempts to use inertial masses to generate net torque/rotation without energy input
- Violates conservation of energy
- Violates first and second laws of thermodynamics
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity and buoyancy, but the described mechanism attempts to create a perpetual torque imbalance from a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous rotational energy by cleverly shifting masses using hydraulics and buoyancy. However, gravity is a conservative force, meaning the net work done by it over any closed path is zero. The energy needed to reset the mass positions (the 'hydraulic' part) will always equal or exceed any energy gain, resulting in a net loss. This is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: attempts to extract net work from a conservative force (gravity) in a closed cycle.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: no temperature gradient or external energy input to drive continuous motion.
- Mechanism describes shifting masses radially during rotation to create a persistent torque, but the work required to reposition the masses (against centrifugal and gravitational forces) equals or exceeds any net work output from the system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims imply energy is extracted from or compensated by gravitational potential energy without an external input to restore the initial state.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a pendulum system that allegedly sustains its own motion by converting gravitational force, which is a conservative force. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, extracting net work without an external energy input to compensate for dissipative losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies a pendulum can be sustained indefinitely by converting gravitational force on a liquid into acceleration of a solid body, violating energy conservation.
- Claims motion against gravity can perpetually set other substances in motion without an identified external energy source.
- Suggests gravity's equalizing effect on liquid surfaces can maintain pendulum motion, misrepresenting gravity as an energy source rather than a conservative force field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is a vertical force (weight of a mass like sand or water in a central container) applied to a complex system of levers, gears, and wheels. The system appears designed to convert this static weight into continuous rotational motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine claim. It attempts to generate continuous rotational motion from a fixed weight using a complex gear train, violating the conservation of energy. Once the weight descends and its potential energy is converted, the system would stop unless external work is done to reset it.
Specific Physics Issues
- The device is a complex mechanism with no identified external energy input beyond an initial potential energy (weight). It describes a closed mechanical system intended to produce sustained rotation from a static load, which implies perpetual motion
- The description lacks any thermodynamic cycle or gradient (e.g., heat flow, chemical reaction) to drive continuous work output. The weight, once lowered, would need to be reset, requiring at least as much energy as was generated, violating energy con
- The mechanism uses obfuscating terminology ('force distribution', 'lever types') to imply a mechanical advantage that can produce net work, but any advantage only trades force for distance, not energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, via dynamic reconfiguration of masses on levers to create a persistent unbalanced state.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotation by internally shifting weights, but this requires work to be done against gravity to reconfigure the system. The net work output over a full cycle is zero or negative when accounting for losses, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input is described to reset the system or overcome friction.
- Violates the 1st Law: Claims net mechanical energy output from a closed gravitational potential system.
- Mechanically flawed: The center of mass of the entire rotating system cannot be perpetually displaced to create continuous torque without external work input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest 'self-excited perpetual flow' and 'inertial mass' as energy sources, implying extraction of net work from gravitational potential and elastic rebound without identifiable external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'self-excited perpetual flow' device claiming to operate indefinitely using inertial mass and elastic rebound, which directly violates energy conservation. The description uses technical-sounding but physically incoherent terms to obscure the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility of extracting net work without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - claims perpetual motion without energy input
- Violates second law of thermodynamics - suggests continuous motion without entropy increase or losses
- Mechanism description is physically incoherent - combines gravity, elastic rebound, and 'super-long elastic rods' in a way that cannot yield net energy output
- No identifiable gradient or external energy source to sustain claimed 'permanent flow'
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest spontaneous, perpetual flow of 'extremely heavy inertial mass fluid' driven by imbalance and rebound effects without any identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical system claiming to achieve perpetual, spontaneous fluid flow and motion from inertial mass and rebound effects alone. It violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying continuous motion without an energy source, and uses obfuscated technical language to obscure this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism
- Claims of 'spontaneous flow' and 'perpetual non-resting motion' violate conservation of energy
- Describes complex mechanical oscillations and rebounds as if they create net energy
- Uses vague terms like 'inertial force' and 'rebound impact' to imply energy generation
- Implies motion can be sustained indefinitely from initial imbalances without energy dissipation
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical system using buoyancy, gravity, and leverage, implying the goal is to extract net work from gravitational potential energy without an external, non-conservative energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to 'more effectively convert' gravitational force using levers, buoyancy, and shifting reference points. This describes a mechanism attempting to generate net mechanical work from gravity alone, which violates energy conservation as gravity is a conservative force. No external energy source is identified to sustain the claimed amplification.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies effective conversion/amplification of gravitational force, which is conservative and cannot yield net energy gain in a closed cycle.
- Claims of 'weight-neutral' mirrored swing positions suggest a system designed to reset without the energy penalty required to lift masses against gravity.
- Leverage and buoyancy can only redirect or temporarily store energy, not create it. The system lacks an identified external, high-grade energy source to overcome losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest thrust is generated solely by shifting masses in a rotating system, implying internal energy conversion without external reaction mass or energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described 'centrifugal drive' attempts to generate net thrust by moving masses within a rotating system. This is physically impossible for a closed system, as internal forces cannot accelerate the system's center of mass—a direct violation of Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal mass shifting cannot produce net thrust on a closed system.
- No identifiable external energy source or reaction mass for propulsion.
- Confuses internal centrifugal forces (which sum to zero net force on the system's center of mass) with net external thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient work fluid (air) at ambient temperature, plus electrical input to compressor and optional superheating systems (induction, electromagnetic).
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim describes a machine that takes in work fluid from the ambient, processes it, and releases it colder than ambient while producing net work. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, as it aims to produce work from a single thermal reservoir (the ambient environment) in violation of the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net work output from a single ambient temperature source via an open cycle.
- Asserts isothermal compression without specifying how the heat of compression is removed.
- Implies the fluid is released colder than ambient after expansion, suggesting net cooling without an external energy sink, violating the Second Law for a cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Only explicit input is the initial rotational energy from the drive element (2) to spin the rotation element (1). The device appears to attempt to extract additional work from the centrifugal force of a shifting weight (3) that creates an imbalance, while the weight is constrained by a stationary side frame (12).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a centrifugal drive that uses a shifting weight to create a temporary imbalance, purportedly to drive loads. However, the motion and forces of the weight are internal to the rotating system. Any work extracted from the weight's interaction with the stationary frame must come from the rotational kinetic energy initially imparted by the drive motor, leading to net energy loss, not gain. It cannot produce excess work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy
- Attempts to generate net work from a periodic internal redistribution of mass in a rotating frame without an external energy gradient
- The shifting weight's motion relative to the rotating element is driven by centrifugal force, which is a fictitious force dependent on the rotation itself; no net energy gain is possible from manipulating it internally
- The stationary side frame will exert reaction forces on the shifting weight, doing work on it and dissipating energy, ultimately damping the system
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical system (a modified cross-loop mechanism replacing a Cardan gear pair) that claims to be in constant disequilibrium, generating torque from this disequilibrium for energy production. The only plausible energy input implied is gravitational potential energy from the weight of components, but the system's operation suggests a continuous output without a corresponding depletion of a potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a gear system in constant disequilibrium, generating usable torque and accelerated rotation from rest. This describes a perpetual motion machine, as it purports to create energy from an internal configuration without an external, depletable energy source, directly violating the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims accelerated rotation from rest and continuous energy generation without an identifiable external energy source being consumed.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Describes a system in 'constant disequilibrium' that supposedly sustains itself and produces work, acting as a perpetual motion machine of the first and second kind.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Focuses on internal torque imbalances without specifying how the initial gravitational potential (if any) is restored to allow continuous operation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a motor driven by a 'torque-strong motor' and claims to generate energy from gravity via 'mass overhangs' and gear systems, implying gravity is the primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate energy using gravity-driven masses and gears, but gravity alone in a closed system cannot provide net energy output. Any work extracted would come from the system's initial energy, which would then stop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims to generate net energy output from a closed gravitational system with no external gradient.
- Violates 1st Law of Thermodynamics: Implies creation of energy from an equilibrium potential field (gravity).
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain perpetual motion.
- Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a uniform gravitational field is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a gravity-driven gear motor, implying it aims to extract net work from gravitational potential energy of its own masses without an external gradient or replenishment.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered gear motor claiming to generate electricity continuously. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because any work extracted from lowering masses must be less than or equal to the work required to reset those masses to their initial positions, resulting in zero net energy output without an external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate energy (electricity) as a 'Dauerläufer' (perpetual runner) using gravity without identifying a replenished energy source.
- Violates thermodynamic limits for engines: No identified temperature gradient or high/low potential energy reservoir to drive a cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes mechanical components and torque but ignores energy inputs needed to reset the system against gravity to perform net work over a cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravitational force alone, described as an eternal, divine gift. No other energy input (electrical, chemical, ambient gradient, stored) is acknowledged.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce unlimited autonomous power using only Earth's gravity, which is a conservative force field. To do continuous work, a system must have an energy source or operate within a cycle that includes a net input of energy, which this patent explicitly denies. This constitutes a clear violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A system cannot perform net useful work (e.g., powering electric motors) using only a static gravitational field without an external energy source or a decreasing potential.
- No thermodynamic gradient or cycle described: A static gravitational field is a conservative force field. To extract continuous work, a mass must cycle between different potential energies, requiring work input to reset the cycle (e.g., lifting the m
- Claims autonomous operation without fuel, batteries, or environmental inputs imply a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing).
- The described mechanism (chain on inclined plane) cannot generate net power; friction losses would dissipate any transient motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output (pow
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of moving weights, with no external input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate energy solely from gravity, a conservative force. For continuous operation, the weights must be lifted against gravity, requiring an energy input equal to or greater than the output, violating energy conservation. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism described to restore weights to a higher potential energy state without inputting equal or greater work.
- System implies continuous energy generation from a conservative force (gravity) in a closed cycle.
- Claims 'always with the same efficiency' without accounting for energy losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a passive mechanical system with wheels, tubes, and rolling metal balls. No explicit external energy input is described. The title suggests it is meant to 'check' if mechanical energy violates conservation, implying it is presented as a test apparatus, but its described configuration suggests an attempt to create a persistent torque imbalance.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a passive mechanical system with no declared energy input, yet its geometry suggests an intent to generate a persistent unbalanced torque. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as any motion would cease due to losses, and no external source is identified to overcome them.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim implies a mechanism where balls rolling in tubes on wheels of different diameters could create a perpetual torque imbalance on a common shaft, violating conservation of energy.
- The system lacks any identified external energy input (e.g., a motor, weight drop, spring, or environmental gradient).
- Any initial motion would dampen due to friction; sustaining or amplifying motion would require an external energy source not accounted for.
- The description uses angles and lever arms to suggest a continuous net torque, which is thermodynamically impossible in a closed, passive system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the electromagnet/actuator (battery) provides the force to move the asymmetric mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create net thrust by reciprocating an asymmetric shape in air, relying on higher drag in one direction than the other. Over a full cycle, the momentum imparted to the air in one direction must equal the momentum in the opposite direction, resulting in zero net thrust for the isolated system, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net thrust (reaction force) from a reciprocating motion in a single medium (air) by exploiting a drag asymmetry.
- Assumes the reaction force from air resistance during the high-drag stroke is not fully canceled by the force required to return the mass during the low-drag stroke, implying net momentum can be created in a closed system.
- Ignores Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for the system (device + air) over a complete cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravity acting on the machine's components (implicitly). No external energy input is described, implying the device is intended to extract net work from gravity alone in a closed cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered 'automatic cyclic operation' machine, which is a form of perpetual motion machine. It attempts to use a weight and pulley system to generate continuous motion from gravity alone, violating the first law of thermodynamics as it provides no external energy source to replenish the system's potential energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'automatic cyclic operation' (自动循环è¿è½¬) with no external energy input.
- Relies on 'force difference principle' (力差原ç†) between large and small wheels to sustain motion, which is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion concept.
- No mechanism to reset the system's potential energy; gravity is a conservative force.
- The system is in a closed loop with its environment (Earth's gravity field), attempting to extract net work from an equilibrium state.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent mentions electrical input to drive the system, but the described mechanism claims to convert rotational kinetic energy into linear momentum without any external reaction mass or gradient, implying a closed system producing net momentum.
AI Physics Analysis
The described 'gravitational drive principle' is a closed mechanical system of three masses. Its claim to produce continuous linear acceleration from internal motions alone directly violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum), as the center of mass of an isolated system cannot accelerate without an external force.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims continuous acceleration from constant energy input without expelling reaction mass, violating Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Describes a closed system of masses where the center of mass cannot accelerate without an external force.
- Claims the ability to exceed light speed, violating special relativity.
- Mechanism suggests creating a net linear impulse from internal motions alone, which is impossible for a system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the floating body (implicitly) and initial rotational energy if manually started. No continuous external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to produce continuous rotation of two wheels in opposite directions using only the gravitational pressure of a floating body trapped between them. This violates energy conservation as it attempts to extract net rotational work from a static gravitational potential without any external energy input to overcome inevitable frictional losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input mechanism specified
- Claims continuous rotation from gravitational pressure alone
- Ignores friction losses in bearings and rolling contacts
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot produce net work without energy input
- Asymmetric wheel grooves do not create a perpetual torque imbalance
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims electromagnetic wave input is directly converted into a gravitational field and rotational effects, implying energy conversion from electromagnetic to gravitational/kinetic energy without a clear, physically valid mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates fundamental physics by proposing a direct, technologically useful conversion of electromagnetic waves into gravitational fields and propulsive forces without reaction mass, which contradicts conservation of momentum and has no basis in established theory. The terminology ('gravitophotons', 'artificial gravity') is used in a speculative, non-standard way characteristic of pseudoscientific claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No known mechanism in established physics (General Relativity or quantum field theory) for converting electromagnetic waves into a 'gravitational field' or 'gravitophotons' as described.
- Claims creation of 'artificial gravity' and force fields for propulsion without reaction mass, violating conservation of momentum.
- Proposes direct conversion of electromagnetic energy to motion/gravitational field energy without addressing the extreme weakness of the gravitational interaction or the monumental energy scales required.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity. However, gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a uniform gravitational field is zero. The description implies the system extracts net work from its own internal mass redistribution within a rotating frame.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate power using gravity by cleverly shifting arms and masses, but gravity alone cannot provide net energy over a complete cycle. The complex mechanical description obfuscates the core violation: energy output is claimed without an identified external, non-conservative energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: attempts to extract net work from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Misapplication of 'permanent neutralization principle of the forces affecting the center of gravity' - in a rotating system, the center of mass cannot provide sustained net torque without an external energy input.
- Claims 'stored potential force' as 'very great additional force' that can be reused, implying energy creation from internal configuration changes.
- Ignores that shifting masses internally in a rotating system requires work; claimed output work exceeds any plausible external input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be from 'reaction force' of fluid circulating in closed channels, with initial energy input to start circulation from various possible sources (solar, nuclear, magnetic, etc.)
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to produce net propulsion by circulating fluid in closed channels, which violates conservation of momentum. Internal fluid motion cannot generate net thrust on an isolated system regardless of how the fluid is circulated, as all reaction forces cancel internally.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law for internal forces in a closed system
- Claims net propulsion from internal fluid motion without external reaction mass
- Ignores conservation of momentum for isolated system
- Implies perpetual or amplified motion from internal circulation
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the weighted tube segment (ballast) within the fluid-filled wheel. This is a closed system with no external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system where the only energy source is the initial gravitational potential of a weighted tube in a fluid. It describes an oscillating or ratcheting motion, but to achieve continuous rotation, it must perpetually restore the weight to a higher potential energy state using only energy from its own motion, which violates energy conservation. Frictional losses will stop it.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed mechanical/fluidic system with no external energy gradient or input.
- Proposed continuous rotation requires net extraction of work from the system's internal gravitational potential, which is finite and will be depleted.
- Friction and viscous losses in the fluid and bearings are not accounted for and will dissipate the initial potential energy.
- Mechanism describes a self-excited oscillation that is mistakenly interpreted as a continuous source of rotational work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, with no external energy input beyond initial potential energy of weights in a gravitational field. The device purports to generate continuous rotational power from gravity without consuming fuel or requiring an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate continuous mechanical work (torque) solely from gravity without any net external energy input, which directly violates energy conservation. The described '360-degree gravity torque differential' is a physically impossible construct for a closed system in a uniform gravitational field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims perpetual output (370 N·m) from a closed gravitational system with no net energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: claims to create a continuous torque imbalance (360-degree 'gravity torque differential') that perpetually drives rotation without an external gradient or sink for entropy.
- Mechanically impossible: describes a configuration where gravity, a conservative force, is claimed to produce net work over a closed cycle, which is forbidden by the work-energy theorem.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to recover energy lost to friction via magnetic attraction/repulsion, implying a closed system with no external energy input after initial start.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It asserts the pendulum will exceed its starting height each cycle using only internal magnetic forces, violating energy conservation. Magnetic forces are conservative and cannot provide net energy to overcome friction indefinitely.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims pendulum exceeds its starting height each cycle without external energy input.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: No entropy sink; system claims to perpetually overcome friction and air resistance.
- Misunderstands magnetic forces: Magnetic attraction/repulsion is conservative; no net energy can be extracted over a full cycle in a closed system.
- Mechanical losses (friction, air resistance, eddy currents, sound) are unaccounted for and would dissipate energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores all dissip
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use buoyancy (floating force) from a 'buoyancy expansion cylinder' and mechanical balancing mechanisms to generate continuous rotational motion. No explicit external energy input is described, suggesting the system attempts to extract net work from buoyancy forces in a closed cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system using buoyancy cylinders and a balancing mechanism to allegedly produce continuous oscillatory or rotational motion. As buoyancy in a constant environment is a conservative force, no net work can be extracted over a complete cycle without an external energy input, making this a perpetual motion scheme that violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create perpetual motion via a buoyancy-driven system with a mechanical balancer.
- No identifiable net external energy input to sustain continuous 180/360-degree oscillation or rotation.
- The described 'mechanical balance mechanism' appears designed to create an imbalance to drive rotation, but any work extracted would come from the system's initial potential/kinetic energy, not from a sustained external source.
- Buoyancy is a conservative force in a static fluid; net work over a closed cycle in an isothermal, constant-density fluid is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air (Claim 7) and its internal molecular kinetic energy, with a claimed feedback loop from a generator to drive secondary blading.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to extract useful work from ambient air while allowing exhaust pressure to equal or exceed intake pressure, violating the need for a pressure drop to perform work. The feedback loop architecture is characteristic of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 9 explicitly states the total pressure at the exhaust can be equal to or greater than at the intake, implying net work extraction without a pressure or temperature gradient.
- The 'feedback loop' (generator powering blading 5) suggests an attempt to use part of the output work to drive the process, creating a perpetual motion architecture.
- The 'extractor unit of the kinetic energy difference of the atomic particles' implies extracting energy from the internal thermal motion of the gas, which is impossible without a heat sink, violating the Second Law.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the rotation of the central axis (1) is driven by an imbalance of weight/force from the rotating arms (2,3) in their chambers (4,5), implying a perpetual motion mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system where rotating arms create a weight imbalance that purportedly drives the continuous rotation of a central axis, generating useful output. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it claims to produce net work without an external energy input to replenish losses from friction and other dissipative forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input is specified
- Claims to generate 'more economical flow' (net output) from an imbalance created by its own geometry
- Describes a closed mechanical system with no apparent source of energy to overcome friction and generate net work
- Uses terms like 'weight asymmetry' and 'imbalance' to suggest self-sustaining rotation
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
The patent implies the system's own mechanical input (from an external motor) is the only explicit energy source. It claims to generate a net unidirectional 'Fliehkraftüberschuss' (centrifugal force surplus) or acceleration force from internally varying the radius or angular velocity of masses on a closed path.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classical 'reactionless drive' concept. The internal manipulation of masses creates equal and opposite internal forces that cancel out, producing zero net external force on the system's center of mass. It cannot generate a net propulsion force or excess energy without an external reaction mass/energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal forces in a closed system cannot produce a net external force (center of mass acceleration).
- Misinterprets centrifugal force as an external force: Centrifugal force is a fictitious, inertial force that cannot be harnessed for net propulsion or work output on the system's own frame.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims of generating electricity or propulsion ignore that any net force/work output must be directly supplied by the input motor, with losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes mechanical components (giant plates, elastic steel sheets, oscillating bodies) but provides no identifiable external energy input. Implies perpetual motion through 'spontaneous perpetual flow' and 'seeking balance points'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is semantically incoherent and describes a system claiming 'spontaneous perpetual flow' without any identifiable energy input, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The description uses technical-sounding terms in a meaningless way, characteristic of perpetual motion claims disguised by obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source
- Claims 'spontaneous perpetual flow' which violates conservation of energy
- Describes seeking equilibrium points to generate motion, implying extraction of net work from an equilibrium state
- Text is semantically incoherent, making physical analysis impossible
- Mentions 'extremely heavy inertial mass fluid' with no thermodynamic gradient to drive flow
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
PATTERN C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes complex mechanical assemblies with springs, levers, and fluid flow, but no identifiable external energy input. Implied energy source appears to be internal mechanical potential energy from springs/gravity that would require resetting.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is semantically incoherent and describes a system claiming to produce 'self-excited permanent flow' and motion from internal mechanical arrangements without any identifiable external energy input. This violates energy conservation as it implies perpetual motion from internal potential energy without replenishment, while the technical obfuscation makes the claims physically unanalyzable.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of 'permanent flow' and 'self-excited' motion without energy source
- Implies continuous motion from internal potential energy without replenishment
- Text is semantically incoherent, making physical analysis impossible
- Mentions 'extremely unbalanced' states producing motion without explaining energy restoration
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
PATTERN C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy from the motor/engine. Magnetic potential energy from the magnet configuration, which is an internal conservative force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a net linear force on its main body using only internal magnetic forces and rotation, which is impossible for an isolated system as it violates conservation of momentum. The description confuses fictitious centrifugal forces with real external forces to obfuscate the violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of generating unidirectional momentum without a reaction force, violating Newton's Third Law.
- Misuse of 'centrifugal force' as a real, external force that can propel the system.
- Internal magnetic forces (attraction/repulsion) are action-reaction pairs; they cannot produce net momentum for the isolated system.
- Energy accounting ignores that any net motion of the main body requires an exchange of momentum with an external object (e.g., air, ground).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The patent claims energy comes from converting potential energy (stored in batteries, pressurized fluids/gases, or fuel mixtures) into kinetic energy by reducing the center-of-mass distance of rotating masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's foundational principle—that reducing the radius of rotating masses increases their kinetic energy to produce useful work—directly contradicts conservation laws. While the device uses real energy sources (fuel, pressurized fluid), the claimed conversion mechanism is physically impossible, making it a perpetual motion scheme of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim that reducing the radius (center-of-mass distance) of a rotating mass increases its kinetic energy violates the conservation of angular momentum. For a fixed rotational speed, reducing radius decreases rotational kinetic energy (1/2 I
- The described mechanism suggests a net energy gain from the radial motion itself, which is impossible. The system is a complex internal rearrangement of masses; any work output must come from the stated potential energy sources (fuel, pressurized flu
- The claims of superior efficiency (lower fuel consumption, etc.) compared to established engines, based on this flawed principle, are thermodynamically suspicious without a coherent mechanism that accounts for all energy inputs and losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The fun
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract net work from the gravitational potential energy of masses (M1, M2) that are part of the closed system, cyclically reset by the device's own hydraulic output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered hydraulic machine that claims to produce useful energy by cycling internal masses. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it attempts to generate net work from a closed system with no external energy input to reset the gravitational potential of the masses, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed system cannot provide net work by cycling its own internal masses. The energy to lift a mass in the system must come from an external source.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a system where hydraulic fluid is moved by gravity-driven rods, which then powers cylinders to reset the positions of the masses, creating a cycle with no net external energy input.
- Missing entropy sink/irreversibility: The system ignores inevitable losses from friction, hydraulic resistance, and viscosity. No thermodynamic gradient is maintained from an external reservoir.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only gravitational potential energy from weight shifts within the rotating wheel itself, with no external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity wheel that uses internal shifting masses to try to create a perpetual imbalance and torque. This is impossible because gravity is a conservative force; the net work done by gravity on the system's center of mass over a full rotation is zero. Internal rearrangements cannot produce net external work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System is closed with respect to gravity (a conservative force). Net work over one cycle is zero.
- Attempts to create a perpetual torque by using internal mass redistribution, which cannot result in net angular acceleration of the center of mass.
- Misapplication of lever principle: Internal forces cannot create net external torque on the system. The center of mass motion dictates net external work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The device is a passive mechanical assembly (wheel, bearings, belt, weights) with no explicit energy input. The title suggests testing whether mechanical energy can arise spontaneously.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a passive mechanical device intended to test if mechanical energy can spontaneously generate. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as no energy input or gradient is present to produce sustained motion. The system would, at best, exhibit damped oscillations until stopping.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by proposing a system where mechanical energy could 'arise by itself' (von selbst entstehen).
- No energy gradient, input, or storage mechanism is described.
- The configuration (weights on a belt around a wheel with bearings) is a conservative system; any motion would be damped by friction, not sustained or amplified.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device is described as a test to see if mechanical energy can arise by itself ('von selbst entstehen'). No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified or implied in the mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device's stated purpose is to test for the spontaneous creation of mechanical energy, which directly contradicts the law of energy conservation. As a passive mechanical assembly with no identified external energy input, it cannot produce net work and is based on a thermodynamically impossible premise.
Specific Physics Issues
- The patent's purpose is to test if mechanical energy can be created spontaneously, which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- The described mechanism (wheel, bearings, belt, weights) is a passive mechanical arrangement with no identified energy source to overcome friction and generate net work.
- The device appears to be a static mechanical assembly with no process for energy conversion from an external source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The fun
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied perpetual motion. The device appears to be a mechanical system with counterweight balls (储能球) arranged around a rotating assembly, suggesting it might attempt to generate net output from gravitational potential energy redistribution without external input.
AI Physics Analysis
This appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The patent describes a complex mechanical system with counterweights and rotating assemblies but provides no legitimate external energy source. The symmetrical arrangement of identical weights cannot produce net work, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- System uses identical counterweights arranged symmetrically - no net gravitational gradient to exploit
- Claims energy savings and reduced environmental pollution without specifying energy source
- Complex mechanical arrangement suggests an attempt to create a self-sustaining or over-unity device
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The text describes complex mechanical structures (springs, levers, fluid channels) but provides no identifiable external energy input. Implied energy appears to come from internal mechanical oscillations and fluid flow without an external driver.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanically complex system claiming to generate self-sustaining fluid flow and oscillation without any external energy input, directly violating conservation of energy. The text is linguistically nonsensical, using technical terms in incoherent ways that obscure the fundamental physical impossibility of the claimed perpetual motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims 'self-excited' perpetual fluid flow and mechanical oscillation without an energy input
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot sustain motion indefinitely without energy input
- Violates second law of thermodynamics - claims to create perpetual unbalanced motion from internal configurations
- Text is linguistically incoherent, making technical evaluation impossible
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system (rotating axis with masses and a ring weight) claiming to generate power from gravity alone, implying extraction of net work from a conservative force field without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system with masses arranged on a rotating axis. It claims to be a 'gravity-dependent power generation device,' which implies generating useful work from gravity alone. This violates energy conservation because gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted over a cycle without an external, non-conservative energy input or a consumption of potential energy from a pre-existing gradient (like a mass falling from a height and not being reset).
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net energy from a conservative gravitational field without an external energy input or a compensating loss elsewhere.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (e.g., falling mass from a height, thermal gradient) to drive continuous work output.
- The system, if rotating, would settle into a state of minimum potential energy; any oscillation or motion would dampen due to friction, requiring continuous energy input to sustain.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied to be self-sustaining from 'elastic force' (弹力) conversion to 'supporting force' which then generates kinetic energy for perpetual motion. No external energy input is specified, suggesting the device is claimed to generate its own motive energy from internal elastic elements.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'perpetual motion machine' that claims to convert elastic force cyclically into kinetic energy and electricity without any external power source. This directly violates the laws of thermodynamics, as it implies the creation of energy from nothing and the elimination of all dissipative losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming perpetual motion without an identifiable external energy source.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a mechanism that can do work indefinitely without an energy gradient or entropy increase.
- The described mechanism of converting elastic force to supporting force to kinetic energy in a cycle implies energy creation or a zero-friction system, both impossible.
- Claims output (electricity via a generator) without accounting for the energy required to reset the elastic elements or overcome friction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on a mass (the Stangen-Balken-Konstruktion). This is a potential energy source, but the described mechanism attempts to create continuous rotation from a single, constant gravitational force without a cyclic restoration of potential energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotational energy from the constant force of gravity on a mass, but provides no mechanism to reset the mass's height. Therefore, after one cycle, the system's potential energy is depleted and it stops, violating energy conservation if it claims continuous output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to continuously output rotational energy ('kontinuierlich Rotationsenergie in das System eingebracht wird') from a static gravitational force without an external input to reset the system's potential
- Violates the 1st Law of Thermodynamics: It describes a mechanism (involving a screw, spring, and chain drive) that purportedly generates net work from a constant weight, which is impossible. The downward force of gravity can do work once, but to repe
- Misapplication of torque concepts: Claims 'absolut reines Drehmoment M' from a downward gravitational force on a nut, ignoring that for continuous rotation, the nut would need to travel the entire length of the screw and then be reset to the top.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity via mass overhangs, but no external gradient or energy input is described. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate usable energy solely from gravity using an arrangement of gears and weights. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as gravity alone in a closed system cannot provide net energy output due to energy conservation. The description lacks any external energy source to sustain motion against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source to overcome friction and other losses.
- Claims 'Dauerläufer' (perpetual runner) and energy output without input violates conservation of energy.
- Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a uniform gravitational field is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravitational attraction (gravity). No other energy inputs (electrical, chemical, thermal, environmental gradient) are described or implied.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity solely from gravity, but describes only an internal mass redistribution mechanism. Without an external energy source like a fuel, a lifted weight that falls, or a thermal gradient, the system cannot produce net work output per cycle as it would violate energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes a closed mechanical system extracting net work from a static gravitational field without an external energy source or a decreasing potential.
- Violates thermodynamic limits for engines: no temperature or potential gradient is identified to drive a cycle; gravity alone is a conservative force field, not an energy source.
- Mechanism describes a redistribution of masses (sliding arms, cams, eccentric core) but provides no path for net energy gain per cycle; system would settle into a state of minimum potential energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests weights (βάρη) are moved cyclically by internal mechanisms, implying conversion of potential/kinetic energy within a closed system, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous motion through cyclic redistribution of internal weights without any external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating energy conservation. The description uses mechanical terminology but describes an impossible energy creation mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims continuous motion from internal weight redistribution without energy addition
- Implies perpetual motion through cyclic weight movement without losses
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot produce net work without energy input
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Vague quantitative claims
Claimed Energy Source
An energy supply (2) powers a matter flow accelerator (1) that circulates matter in a closed loop. The claimed anti-gravity/levitation force is purportedly generated by the centrifugal force of this circulating matter.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic reactionless drive, attempting to use internal circulating mass to generate a net external force. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the conservation of momentum, as internal forces in a closed system always sum to zero and cannot propel or levitate the system itself.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal centrifugal forces in a closed system cancel out and cannot produce a net external force or lift.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: The device claims to generate a continuous reaction force (levitation) without expelling mass, creating momentum from nothing.
- Incomplete force accounting: The centripetal force required to curve the matter flow is provided by the device structure itself, resulting in zero net internal force on the device.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy from the descent of a weighted beam-rod structure, with energy stored in spiral springs and then released to produce rotational output.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'gravity motor' describes a mechanism that lowers a mass to wind springs and produce rotation, but provides no physical means to reset the mass to its original height without inputting at least as much energy as was gained. It is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim that violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to produce continuous rotational output from a single descent of a mass. After the mass descends and stores energy in springs, work must be done to reset the mass to its initial height, requiring at
- No net energy source: Gravity is a conservative force. Lifting the mass against gravity to reset the cycle requires input energy equal to or greater than the gravitational work extracted during descent, neglecting losses.
- Perpetual motion claim: The description implies a self-accelerating system ('Beschleunigung des Gesamtsystems') and continuous energy output to a working machine from a cyclical process with no external energy input to reset the driving mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of the water mass, but with a mechanism that claims to create a perpetual imbalance.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract continuous work (kinetic energy) from gravity and a liquid's properties alone, without a consumable energy gradient or external input. It describes a system that perpetually seeks but never achieves equilibrium, which violates conservation of energy as it would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a continuous rotation from a static, conservative force field (gravity).
- Describes a system that seeks but never finds equilibrium, implying perpetual motion without an energy gradient.
- Assumes the liquid's center of mass can be perpetually displaced relative to the system's support, ignoring that the system will find a stable equilibrium point where the potential energy is minimized.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy of a rolling weight within a rotating carrier. However, the system is a closed mechanical arrangement with no external gradient or replenishment of this potential energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate continuous rotational energy solely from the gravitational potential energy of an internal weight. This is impossible because the weight must be reset to its starting height within the system, consuming all energy gained from its descent due to friction and losses, violating energy conservation. It is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- The device is a closed mechanical system with no external, replenishable energy input. The initial gravitational potential energy of the weight is finite.
- After one full rotation (or less), the weight must be lifted back to its starting position relative to the carrier, requiring at least as much energy as was gained from its fall, neglecting losses.
- The description implies a continuous, sustained rotation from a single, internal weight shifting, which is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described assembly appears to be a mechanical system (cogwheels, windable component, mass components) that is intended to generate a net drive force from an asymmetric path, with an external motor mentioned only to initiate or assist motion (Claim 6). The primary claimed energy source is ambiguous, suggesting an attempt to extract net work from an internal, unbalanced mass distribution on a closed loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion machine in a more complex mechanical guise. The asymmetric path with masses cannot produce continuous net output work because the forces are conservative and cyclic; any gain in one direction is exactly offset by a loss in the other over a full revolution, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system describes an asymmetric contour (different radii in opposite directions) with masses on a flexible component. In a closed loop, the net work done by gravitational or centrifugal forces on the masses over on
- No perpetual gradient: The internal mass redistribution cannot create a sustained net torque or 'drive force' without an external energy input. The system is an attempt at a gravity- or inertia-based perpetual motion machine.
- Misapplication of mechanics: The asymmetric path does not circumvent the requirement that for a conservative force field (like gravity in a closed loop), the net work around a closed path is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravity acting on unbalanced masses (mass overhangs). The device appears to be a mechanical system intended to generate energy solely from gravitational torque on asymmetrically arranged masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy using gravity acting on unbalanced masses in a continuous runner. Since gravity is a conservative force, any work done by gravity to move a mass in one part of the cycle is exactly recovered (as potential energy or negative work) when the mass returns to its starting position, resulting in zero net energy output. The system violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input identified beyond gravity in a conservative field.
- Attempts to extract net work from a closed-loop cycle in a gravitational potential field, violating conservation of energy.
- Gravity is a conservative force; the net work done by gravity over any closed cycle is zero.
- The system, as described, is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, with no external energy input described. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement of masses and plates.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous rotational energy solely from gravity acting on offset masses. This is impossible because gravity is a conservative force; in a closed cycle, the net work done by gravity is zero. The system lacks an external energy source or a thermodynamic gradient to drive continuous motion, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate continuous rotational energy from a static gravitational field with no height variation or external input.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Gravity is a conservative force field; net work over a closed cycle in a uniform field is zero.
- Implied perpetual motion: The described 'couple' from offset centers of gravity would, after one full rotation, produce a counter-torque that stops the system, requiring external energy to reset.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims no energy source; implies energy is extracted solely from permanent magnet configurations.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'magnetic motor which uses no energy source' and claims to produce work from permanent magnets alone. This is a classic perpetual motion machine claim, directly violating energy conservation, as a conservative magnetic field cannot continuously output energy without an external input or a consumed gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce work without any energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- No thermodynamic gradient or fuel; static magnetic fields are conservative forces and cannot do net work over a closed cycle.
- Description is physically incoherent, mixing arbitrary numbers and undefined terms ('magnetic turbines', 'cranks (tornados)') without a clear, viable mechanism.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a purely mechanical system with no specified external energy input. The abstract mentions 'energy output' but provides no source for input energy.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical device claiming to output energy, but fails to identify any external energy source. The system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly, which would violate the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) if it produced net energy output without input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source specified
- Claims 'energy output' from a closed mechanical system
- Describes complex mechanical interactions (gears, levers, steel balls, guide grooves) without explaining how energy is introduced or replenished
- Implies a self-sustaining or energy-producing mechanism without an external gradient or fuel
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical assembly with an inclined drive shaft, linkages, springs, and rotating masses, but does not identify any external energy input. The implied source is the internal motion and centrifugal forces of the system itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system that claims to generate propulsion solely through the internal interaction of rotating masses, springs, and linkages. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the conservation of momentum, as a system cannot generate a net external force using only its internal forces without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input is specified or implied.
- Claims to generate 'propulsion' or 'movement' (Fortbewegung) from an internal, unbalanced centrifugal force configuration.
- Attempts to use springs and a rocking lever to create a net force vector (Resultierenden r1 und r2) from a rotating system, violating Newton's third law for internal forces.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'magnetic repulsion force to cancel counterweight force' and 'unbalanced gravity on the main wheel frame' to produce continuous motion. Implies gravity and magnetic forces provide net energy input without an external energy source to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a gravity wheel attempting to use unbalanced masses and magnetic repulsion to achieve continuous motion. Since gravity is a conservative force, no net work can be extracted over a complete cycle without an external energy source, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to use unbalanced gravity (a conservative force) in a wheel to produce continuous rotation, which is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Claims magnetic repulsion is used to 'cancel' counterweight forces to reduce resistance, but any energy gained from gravity on one side is exactly paid back when lifting the mass on the other side in a closed cycle.
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., electrical, thermal gradient) to compensate for inevitable losses from friction, magnetic hysteresis, or other dissipative forces.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on canceli
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the rotational kinetic energy supplied to the disk via the shaft. The claimed 'generated force' is implied to be a net output force from the system's housing.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a closed mechanical system. The asymmetric guide forces are internal; for every force on the housing, there is an equal and opposite force on the rotor, increasing the torque needed at the drive shaft. It cannot generate a net output force or useful work greater than the rotational energy input, as this would violate Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a closed mechanical assembly. The off-center guide creates asymmetric constraint forces, but these are internal reaction forces. No net external force or work can be generated on the housing without an equal and opposite reaction on the
- The description suggests harnessing an 'imbalance of force' for net work output, which violates Newton's third law and the conservation of energy for a closed system. The input shaft work must account for all output work plus losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of balls placed on wheels, with claimed self-sustaining operation using partial output to maintain motion
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to be a gravity-driven perpetual motion machine that uses 40% of its output to sustain itself while producing excess electricity. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce net energy output without any external energy input beyond initial ball placement. No mechanism exists to restore the gravitational potential energy of the balls without external work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion without external energy input
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot output more energy than initial gravitational potential energy stored in balls
- No mechanism to restore balls to higher potential energy without external work
- Fails to account for friction and other losses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies mechanical work is generated solely from the internal reconfiguration of a balanced lever system, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate useful mechanical work (an 'Ascending Load Torque') through the internal reconfiguration of a balanced lever system. Since the system starts in equilibrium and no external energy input is described, this constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the conservation of energy. The complex geometry does not create energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net mechanical work from a system initially in static equilibrium.
- No identifiable external energy input to account for the claimed 'Ascending Load Torque' and extended effort arm.
- Violates conservation of energy: internal reconfiguration of a balanced system cannot produce net work output.
- Misapplication of lever principles; torque gains in one part of a closed system are offset by losses elsewhere.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (liquid in sealed chambers) and gravitational potential energy (liquid height variation during rotation). Claims no external fuel.
AI Physics Analysis
The system describes sealed chambers containing liquid where height variations during rotation supposedly convert potential energy to kinetic energy continuously. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as no external energy source is identified to restore the liquid's height/potential energy after each cycle. The claims of operating without fuel while producing work violate energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - claims to convert potential energy to kinetic energy cyclically without an external energy input to restore the potential gradient
- No thermodynamic gradient is maintained - system would reach equilibrium after initial rotation dissipates energy
- Describes a closed system (sealed chambers with liquid) that allegedly produces continuous work from internal fluid sloshing, which is impossible
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The description suggests the propulsive impulse arises from the variation of normal forces on oscillating supports, with the reaction acting on Earth. The only explicit input appears to be the work done to oscillate the supports.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an attempted inertial propulsion drive. It claims to generate a net directional impulse by internally shifting weight and reversing the motion of supports. This is physically impossible because internal forces cannot accelerate the center of mass of a closed system; it violates Newton's laws and momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction) for a closed system. The internal oscillation of supports cannot produce a net external force on the center of mass without expelling mass or interacting with an external field asymmetrically.
- Violates conservation of momentum. Claims a net linear impulse from purely internal cyclic motions, which is impossible for a system with no external reaction mass.
- Misapplies the concept of impulse. The impulse on a support during direction reversal is an internal force pair; the net impulse on the entire system's center of mass sums to zero over a cycle.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Claims to extra
C - Technical obfuscation: Uses correct terms like 'impulse'
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Claims to use pressurized static fluid, with pressurization from 'natural causes such as gravity' or mechanical compressors/pumps. The core claim is that the device can produce net thrust or work from this static pressure without an equal and opposite reaction.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce net thrust or mechanical work using only internal static fluid pressure, which is impossible. In a closed, pressurized container, internal forces balance perfectly, resulting in zero net force on the container. To generate propulsion, you must expel mass (like a rocket) or push against an external medium, both of which obey Newton's Third Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). A container with internal static fluid pressure experiences zero net force; pressure forces on the internal walls sum to zero vectorially.
- Misinterprets the role of geometry. A slanted surface (cone/prism) converts normal pressure force into a vector component, but the opposite-facing surface provides the balancing reaction force.
- Confuses static equilibrium with net propulsion. A pressurized vessel in equilibrium cannot propel itself without ejecting mass (rocket) or interacting with an external medium (propeller).
- Claims 'no net reactionary thrust' or 'no net reactionary effect on the frame' are physically impossible if the device is producing a net external force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'reaction
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert gravitational force, but gravitational potential energy requires a net lowering of mass in a gravitational field. The described limited bi-directional rotation (15°-41°) suggests no continuous descent, implying the system attempts to extract work from a conservative force in a closed cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate mechanical energy from gravity through a limited, repeating rotational cycle. Since gravity is a conservative force, it cannot do net work over a closed cycle where the system returns to its initial configuration. The described motion offers no path for a continuous drop in potential energy, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net work from gravity without a net change in the system's center of mass.
- Describes a 'repetitive cyclic movement' where the wheel returns to its initial position, violating the condition for gravity to do net work in a cycle.
- Confuses torque/momentum with energy creation; angular momentum and flywheels can store but not create energy.
- Claims 'increasing speed' and 'excess torque generated' without identifying an external energy input to sustain increases against losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use internal energy to accelerate a mass, then attempts to transfer that mass's kinetic energy back to the vehicle as useful propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'inertia drive' describes accelerating an internal mass and then capturing its kinetic energy to propel a spacecraft. This is impossible in a closed system because the initial acceleration of the internal mass imparts an equal and opposite momentum to the spacecraft frame, which is not recovered during the 'braking' phase. No net momentum change can occur without expelling mass externally.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction)
- Assumes a closed system can generate net momentum
- No external energy source identified for net acceleration
- Misunderstands conservation of momentum in inertial frames
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial manual input via lever arm; thereafter claims to sustain motion via internal mechanical feedback without additional energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system that, after an initial lever input, forms a continuous feedback loop to sustain motion indefinitely. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce useful work without an ongoing energy source, and the second law as it lacks an entropy sink for dissipative losses like friction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a self-sustaining mechanical feedback loop (perpetual motion) after initial impulse.
- Asserts motion continues 'until the force is removed' implying indefinite operation from finite input.
- Misapplies concept of 'path of lesser resistance' to imply net work can be generated from an internal, closed mechanical system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a closed-loop fluid system driven by a motor (10), with fluid circulating between a Tesla-type turbine (1) and a straight radial pipe (2) to supposedly generate thrust P = (1/2)ρπω²r⁴ without external environmental input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a sealed, motor-driven fluid circulation system that generates substantial net thrust. This violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) as a closed system cannot produce net external force. The energy accounting is incomplete, ignoring that all thrust energy must ultimately come from the motor, with efficiency always less than 100%.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum: The system is described as closed and sealed, yet claims to produce net thrust. In a closed system, internal fluid motion cannot produce net external thrust.
- Violates energy conservation: The claimed thrust equation P = (1/2)ρπω²r⁴ suggests thrust depends only on fluid density and turbine rotation, ignoring that the motor must supply all energy to both move the fluid and overcome all losses. No external e
- Perpetual motion implication: The description suggests fluid is re-injected into the turbine with its relative axial velocity (W2p) restored, forming a 'closed circuit' that supposedly preserves the thrust applied to the turbine. This implies a susta
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct fluid dynami
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the gravitational potential energy of a liquid within the machine's own cylinders, redistributed by free pistons as the assembly rotates. No external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous rotation and power by maintaining a permanent imbalance of liquid weight in its quadrants through internal pistons. This describes a closed system with no external energy source, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to do useful work indefinitely without an input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is a closed mechanical loop with no external energy gradient to exploit.
- No sustainable gradient: The described permanent weight imbalance in quadrants cannot be maintained without an external input, as moving the liquid/pistons to reset the imbalance would require work equal to or greater than the output.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: Claims to generate continuous rotational work (revolutions, force, power) from an internally redistributed weight, constituting a net energy creation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Appears to attempt to extract net work from a closed fluid system using a weight's gravitational potential energy, with fluid being recycled through valves and chambers. No external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a closed system with a weight moving up and down, connected to a fluid system with valves. It appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, attempting to generate net power from gravitational potential energy in a cyclic process without any external energy input, which violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source
- System appears to be a closed fluid loop with a moving weight
- Attempts to use the weight's motion to pump fluid, which then supposedly helps move the weight again
- Violates conservation of energy - net work cannot be extracted from a closed system without an external input
- Fluid pumping and valve operation would incur losses greater than any work extracted from gravity
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Vague quantitative claims
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to be a mechanical arrangement of gears, a wheel with buckets, and balls of different weights (heavy ball weight = 2× light ball weight). The description suggests a cyclic process where heavy balls roll into buckets on the wheel rim, rotate the wheel, then drop out and return to the starting point via a track.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a mechanical system that uses heavy and light balls in a cyclic process to supposedly drive a wheel continuously. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks any external energy input to sustain motion against losses, and the second law as it describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input is specified or implied. The system describes a closed mechanical cycle with internal weight redistribution.
- The claimed operation is a perpetual cycle: heavy ball drives wheel → ball drops out → returns to start → repeats. This violates conservation of energy.
- Friction, air resistance, and impact losses are ignored. No mechanism compensates for these inevitable energy losses.
- The system attempts to create net work from an internal, unchanging potential energy gradient that resets itself without external input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignor
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity (potential energy of masses/magnets), with a small electrical input to provide millisecond pulses to move masses from bottom to top.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity gravity motor. It claims to use small electrical pulses to reset masses (lift them), while gravity's pull on those masses during descent generates more output work. This is impossible in a closed cycle, as the energy required to lift the masses equals or exceeds the gravitational potential energy released, resulting in a net loss, not a gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a closed cycle where gravity provides the net driving torque, violating energy conservation.
- Assumes the electrical energy needed to lift the masses (against gravity) to reset the system is less than the gravitational work output, creating a net energy gain.
- No ambient or external energy gradient (e.g., flowing water, temperature difference) is identified to justify the conversion; gravity alone in a conservative field cannot provide net work over a cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the system is intended to be self-sustaining via a mechanical feedback loop, with the only explicit input being an initial force on the lever arms.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical gear and chain system that, once initiated, claims to sustain a 'continuous feedback loop' without a continuous external energy source. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the system's inevitable frictional and mechanical losses would dissipate the initial energy input, causing it to stop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion ('continuous feedback loop is sustained until the force is removed').
- No identifiable external energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction, gear meshing, chain drive, and bearing resistance.
- Mechanical system described would have efficiency < 100%; any feedback loop would decay without continuous energy input.
- The 'discharging wheel' in later claims is described as adding 'resistance', confirming the system has losses, yet earlier claims imply sustained motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the liquid in the outer vessel (VE) and the weighted inner vessel (VI). The system is a closed, isolated mechanical system with no external energy input other than an initial displacement.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic attempt at a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It is a closed mechanical system relying solely on gravity and buoyancy. While these forces can create oscillatory motion, energy will inevitably be lost to fluid friction and mechanical resistance, causing the motion to cease. The claim of perpetual, autonomous oscillation violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'mouvement perpétuel' (perpetual motion) explicitly.
- Describes a closed, oscillating system with no mechanism to replenish energy lost to friction, viscous drag, and inelastic collisions.
- Attempts to use buoyancy and weight shifting to sustain motion, but all forces are internal and conservative; net work over a cycle is zero.
- The system will dampen and stop due to energy dissipation, violating the claim of autonomous, perpetual oscillation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim is to transform gravitational force into work, implying a system that extracts net energy from a static gravitational field without establishing or replenishing a gradient (e.g., lowering a mass).
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to transform gravitational force into continuous mechanical movement or electricity without any described external energy input or mass displacement to create a usable gradient. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: No identifiable external energy input to replenish the system.
- Violates thermodynamic limits: Implies a mechanism to do work from a single thermal reservoir (Earth's gravity field in equilibrium).
- No entropy sink or cyclic process described to allow continuous operation.
- Ambiguous mechanism: 'Compound leverage' with springs and balances is a passive arrangement that cannot generate net energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only gravity acting on the external vessel (VE) and Archimedes' buoyancy force acting on the internal vessel (VI). No external energy input beyond initial setup.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a proposed perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotation using only gravity and buoyancy within a closed fluid system, with no external energy input. This directly violates the first law (energy conservation) and second law (no cyclic process can produce net work from a single thermal reservoir) of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims 'mouvement perpétuel' (perpetual motion) with no net energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a cyclic process that extracts net work from an isothermal system (liquid at uniform temperature).
- Mechanism relies on internal weight shifting to create imbalance, but restoring that imbalance for the next cycle dissipates energy (via fluid drag, friction, inelastic collisions).
- The system is in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment (no thermal gradient, no external fuel, no external potential difference), so no net work can be continuously extracted.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity force and internal mechanical reconfiguration (springs, shifting loads) within a rotating system, with no external energy input other than an initial rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate power using gravity and internal mechanical actions, but gravity is a conservative force—any work done by gravity in one part of the cycle is exactly undone in the return path, resulting in zero net energy output per rotation when accounting for inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate net power from gravity in a closed cycle.
- Misapplies the concept of 'permanent neutralization of forces' to circumvent the need for continuous energy input.
- Claims 'very great additional force' is stored and reused, implying energy creation from internal reconfiguration without loss.
- System operates in a rotating frame, but gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted per cycle from gravity alone in a closed mechanical system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest generation of a persistent 'external force' and acceleration of the device's own masses from internal torque manipulation, with no identified external energy input beyond the initial inertial flywheel rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a persistent, non-decaying external force by manipulating internal torques and centrifugal forces from flywheels. This is a clear violation of Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum), as a closed system cannot produce a net external force on itself. The description suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of a persistent external force without decay from internal torque manipulation
- Implies net acceleration of the device's total mass from purely internal forces (violating conservation of momentum)
- No identifiable external energy source to sustain a continuous external force
- Uses terms like 'gravitational force generator' and 'utilitarian external force' without a coherent physical mechanism
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical engineeri
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a cyclical process where component A interacts with component C to produce force, which then causes components A and B to separate and return to their original positions, repeating the cycle. No external energy input is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-repeating mechanical cycle where internal components interact to produce motion and force without any external energy input. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, directly violating the law of energy conservation. The cyclical process claims to generate work from internal interactions alone, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Describes a closed, self-sustaining cyclical process that appears to generate net work from internal interactions
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors (main axle motor and gyro motor). No external environmental energy source identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net linear propulsion using only internal rotating masses and torques, violating Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum. All forces and torques are internal to the device, so the center of mass cannot accelerate without an external reaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net propulsion via internal gyroscopic torques without external reaction mass.
- Internal forces sum to zero; cannot produce net linear momentum change for the isolated system.
- Gyroscopic precession generates internal reaction forces, not net external thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
No legitimate external energy source identified. The device claims to generate energy from its own internal configuration (gravity, buoyancy, magnets) without an external gradient or input, implying creation of energy from nothing.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device claiming to be a perpetual motion generator, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The proposed mechanisms—gravity, buoyancy, and magnets in a closed system—cannot provide a continuous net energy output as all losses would eventually stop the motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion (mouvement perpétuel) and energy creation
- No identifiable net external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and drag
- Attempts to use gravity and buoyancy in a closed loop, which cannot yield net work over a cycle
- Uses magnets, which are conservative force fields and cannot provide net energy gain
- Proposes stacking/cascading chains to 'increase performance' without adding an external energy source
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly assumes
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to generate continuous rotation and torque solely from the gravitational flow of mercury within sealed, fixed chambers arranged in a wheel. No external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a known type of perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotation and electrical output by using mercury flow within sealed chambers to create a permanent weight imbalance, which is physically impossible for a closed system as it would violate conservation of energy and the laws of mechanics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims perpetual motion from an internal, static mass redistribution.
- Violates Newton's laws: net torque cannot be generated from a fixed, symmetric distribution of mass around an axle. The center of mass of a sealed, static system cannot provide continuous torque.
- Misapplies 'centrifugal principle': describes mercury flowing from inner to outer ring to create permanent imbalance, but in a sealed, rotating system, the fluid would reach equilibrium, eliminating the claimed perpetual imbalance.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of a weight being lowered. This is a finite, stored energy source that is depleted as the weight descends.
AI Physics Analysis
The device converts gravitational potential energy into electricity, which is physically valid. However, for continuous operation, the weight must be returned to the top, requiring at least as much energy as was generated, violating energy conservation if net output is claimed. It is a gravity battery, not a perpetual energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- System lacks a mechanism to reset the weight to its starting height without inputting at least as much energy as was generated during descent.
- Describes a single-use device or one requiring external energy input for reset, making it a battery (energy storage), not a generator (energy source).
- Claims imply continuous operation but describe only the energy extraction phase, violating energy conservation for any cyclic process.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claims describe only mechanical linkages and feedback loops with no identified external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, or ambient). The described system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system with gears and levers but specifies no external energy input. For it to function as a 'motor,' it must draw energy from an external source. The described internal feedback loops cannot produce net work, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, which violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is described.
- System relies on internal mechanical feedback loops with no net input.
- Claims imply sustained or initiated motion from internal forces alone, violating conservation of energy.
- Complex gearing and levers do not create energy; they only transmit and transform it, always with losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the centrifugal force from a rotating mass (Wirkkörper1) acting on another movable mass (Masse2) generates usable torque, suggesting the system's own internal motion is the sole input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described machine attempts to generate usable torque solely from the internal centrifugal forces of its own rotating components, with no external energy source. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as internal forces cannot produce net work on a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's 3rd Law: The centrifugal force on the movable mass is an internal reaction force; it cannot produce a net external torque on the system.
- No external energy input is specified. The described mechanism is a closed system of interacting masses.
- The claim of 'maximum efficiency' and generating 'usable torque' from internal forces describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Initial manual input to lever arms controlling the comet wheel. The claim implies this initial input creates a perpetual feedback loop, with no subsequent energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to run perpetually after an initial push, extracting useful work (via power take-offs) while ignoring all energy losses from friction, air resistance, and wear. This directly violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming perpetual motion from a finite initial input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; any real gear system has friction, wear, and energy dissipation, requiring continuous energy input to overcome losses.
- The described 'feedback loop' is a kinematic arrangement of gears; it cannot generate net energy or sustain motion against losses. It is a zero-work mechanism at best.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational force, but the described mechanism attempts to extract net work from a closed-loop gravitational interaction without an external gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel/chain design. While gravity pulls masses outward on the descending side, an equal and opposite force is required to return them inward on the ascending side within the closed loop. The net work over one full cycle is zero or negative due to friction, violating energy conservation. It is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming a continuous motion can be initiated and sustained (perpetual motion)
- Attempts to create asymmetric torque from symmetric gravitational potential in a closed cycle
- Ignores that the work done by gravity to move a mass outward on the descending side is exactly equal and opposite to the work required to move it inward on the ascending side, plus losses
- No external energy input (e.g., a height differential from a fuel source, thermal gradient, or pre-lifted mass) is identified to sustain the cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output (kin
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed primary energy source is an external heat source (10/4) supplying thermal energy to a working medium via a heat exchanger.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a heat engine with 'theoretical efficiencies of ONE' (100%), which is thermodynamically impossible as it violates the Carnot limit. The described device lacks a clear mechanism for rejecting waste heat to a cold reservoir, a fundamental requirement for any heat engine to perform net work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'theoretical efficiencies of ONE' (100%) for a heat engine, which directly violates the Carnot limit (η ≤ 1 - T_cold/T_hot).
- The description is a closed-loop heat engine with no identifiable cold sink or mechanism for heat rejection, violating the Second Law requirement for a temperature difference to produce net work.
- The system appears to recirculate a medium between a chamber and a heat exchanger without a cycle that includes a low-temperature compression phase, making it thermodynamically incomplete.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claimin
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system's energy input is implied to be the work done to expand/contract cells (e.g., pistons), but the claim asserts this can shift mass 'without generating net force'.
AI Physics Analysis
The system's central claim—shifting mass internally without generating net force—is a direct violation of Newton's laws. A closed system cannot use internal mass movements to propel itself, as this would create momentum from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1's core premise of shifting mass without generating a net force violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. To accelerate fluid mass within a closed system, an equal and opposite reaction force must act on the system's container.
- The proposed application to 'drive a vehicle forward' using internal shifting mass as a 'reaction mass' is impossible for a closed system. Internal forces cannot produce net external propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The device is described as a self-contained mechanical system with no external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, or elevated gravitational potential). It claims to initiate and sustain motion solely through the internal transfer of masses between compartments and reservoirs.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a classic perpetual motion machine. It attempts to maintain continuous rotation and produce useful work (turning a generator) through an internal redistribution of masses, with no external energy source to replenish the system against inevitable losses from friction and drag. This directly violates the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce net work from a system with no energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, which would create energy from nothing.
- The described cyclic transfer of masses cannot create a permanent imbalance or continuous motion without an external energy source to reset the masses to a higher potential energy state.
- Friction and other dissipative losses are acknowledged but not accounted for with an energy input to overcome them.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanical connection between rotating elements (wheels/shafts) where force from one half is said to support the force in the other half, implying internal force transfer without an identified primary external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vehicle where wheels or rotating shafts are connected so that force from one assists the others, claiming this creates supportive force transfer. This is a classical perpetual motion violation, as internal forces cannot produce net acceleration; they sum to zero. The system lacks an identified external energy source to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims force from one rotating element (e.g., front wheel) can support/assist another (e.g., rear wheel) via a connection, implying a perpetual or self-reinforcing cycle without energy input.
- Violates Newton's 3rd Law: Internal forces within a system cannot create a net force to propel the vehicle; they cancel out.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source is identified to perform net work against dissipative forces like friction and air resistance.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to derive net rotational energy solely from the gravitational potential energy and inertial motion of its own internal masses, with no external energy input other than an initial rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classical perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate continuous rotation by cleverly shifting internal weights using gravity, but internal forces and a conservative gravitational field cannot produce net work over a cycle. Any initial rotation will dampen due to friction, with no external energy input to sustain it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System cannot produce net work from its own internal conservative force (gravity) in a cycle.
- Violates Newton's 3rd law: Internal forces cannot create a net external torque on the system's center of mass.
- Misapplies momentum: 'Variazione della quantità di moto' is an internal transfer, not a net gain.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Gravity is a conservative field; no energy source is tapped.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to constant-speed motors driving eccentric flywheels, with potential additional input from a vibration damper (electromagnets/springs).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a reactionless drive, claiming to produce net thrust without expelling propellant. This directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, making it physically impossible for a closed system to accelerate its center of mass using only internal moving parts.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'rückschubfrei' (reactionless) propulsion violates Newton's Third Law (conservation of momentum).
- Internal moving masses (flywheels) cannot generate net thrust on a closed system without expelling reaction mass.
- System attempts to create a net force through asymmetric inertial forces, which cancel out internally.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Primary electrical input from overhead line (Oberleitung). The patent describes a 'rückschubfreies Triebwerk' (reactionless drive) intended to generate a net thrust from internal moving masses without external reaction, and proposes to recapture 'excess power' via regenerative braking.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's central claim is a 'rückschubfreies Triebwerk' (reactionless drive) that purportedly produces thrust from internally rotating/oscillating masses. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. The system then claims to recapture 'excess' power from this impossible thrust via regenerative braking, which would create a net energy gain, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Core mechanism is a reactionless drive, which violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Claims 'excess power' can be continuously generated during constant-velocity travel and fed back to the grid, violating energy conservation.
- Describes generating a net force from internal moving masses in a closed system, which is impossible without an external reaction mass or field.
- Proposes extracting more electrical energy (via regenerative braking) than is electrically input to maintain motion, implying perpetual motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the motor is self-sustaining or initiated by an initial force on the comet legs, with no identifiable external energy input (fuel, electrical, environmental gradient).
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a complex mechanical linkage but identifies no source of energy to overcome inevitable losses, implying it can sustain motion indefinitely from an initial push. This directly violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion without an external energy source, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Describes a complex kinematic linkage but provides no mechanism to overcome inevitable energy losses from friction, gear/sprocket inefficiencies, and deformation.
- The 'feedback mechanism' via rings and fixed star shafts is purely kinematic and cannot create or multiply energy; it only transmits and redirects forces.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use gravity as an energy source, implying extraction of net work from a conservative force field without an external gradient or energy input to restore the system's state.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity by exploiting a difference in acceleration between two linked pendulums in a gravitational field, with its own power drawn from the output. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it violates energy conservation by attempting to extract net work from a conservative force without an external, depletable energy source to offset the output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net energy from a gravitational field alone, which is conservative.
- Claims 'Differenzenergie' is generated between two pendulums, suggesting energy creation rather than conversion.
- System's 'Eigenbedarf' (own power requirement) is supplied from the generated output, implying self-sustaining operation with net excess.
- No identifiable external, non-ambient energy input to compensate for electrical output and losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanism where a radially movable mass moves along a closed guiding path relative to a fixed pivot point. No external energy input (e.g., gravitational field, motor, spring, pressure differential) is specified to sustain the motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a kinematic mechanism with no specified source of energy to overcome losses. It claims to generate usable rotation from 'potential energy' without explaining how that potential is created or replenished, directly violating energy conservation. This is a classic hallmark of a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism described.
- The system appears to be a closed mechanical loop with a mass moving along a path. Without an external potential gradient (like gravity) or input work, any motion would dampen due to friction and dissipative losses.
- Claims to generate 'usable rotational motion' from 'potential energy' but does not specify the source, depletion, or restoration of that potential energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'powered solely by force of gravity'. No external energy input (e.g., lifting a weight, an initial height differential, or an external motor) is described to reset the system or create a non-equilibrium condition.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a purely mechanical system powered only by gravity. Since gravity is a conservative force, any work extracted during one part of the cycle must be paid back to lift the weights against gravity to reset the system. The patent provides no mechanism for this reset without external energy input, making it a perpetual motion machine that violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system claims to generate net energy/torque from gravity alone without an external energy source to restore the gravitational potential.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Gravity is a conservative force; extracting net work from it in a closed cycle is impossible.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes mechanical leverage and torque transfer but ignores the energy required to manipulate locks, move weights, or reset the system to its initial state.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a wheel with wings/chambers containing flowing mass (granulate, sand, or liquid). The implied source is gravitational potential energy from the mass shifting within the wheel, but no external input or environmental gradient is specified to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The 'Massekraftrad' describes a wheel with internal flowing mass intended to create perpetual imbalance and rotation. This is a classic overbalanced wheel design, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because the internal mass redistribution cannot cyclically create a net torque without an external energy source to reset the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified external energy input to sustain motion
- Relies on internal mass redistribution to create perpetual imbalance, violating conservation of energy
- No mechanism to reset the mass to a higher potential energy state without work input
- Classic overbalanced wheel concept, which cannot produce net work cyclically
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be exclusively powered by the force of gravity, implying a closed mechanical system extracting net work from a conservative potential field.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a classic over-balance wheel or gravity control device, which cannot produce net energy output. Gravity alone is not an energy source; to produce continuous work, the system would need an external input to repeatedly restore the weight to a higher potential energy state, which it does not describe.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to generate continuous torque/motion from gravity alone without an external energy source to reset the system's configuration.
- Misunderstands gravity as an energy source: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a gravitational field is zero.
- No accounting for energy input: The described 'management' of locks and support points does not introduce energy; it only redirects forces within the system. The work needed to lift or reposition the weight to create an imbalance is not identified.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on force r
Claimed Energy Source
No identifiable external energy source. The description implies the system is self-sustaining through internal mechanical feedback loops.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly described as providing 'perpetual motion... without the need of fuel' and relies solely on internal mechanical feedback. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to produce net work without any energy input, and the second law as it has no mechanism to overcome entropy generation from friction and other dissipative losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual motion' without any energy input
- Describes complex mechanical feedback loops with no net energy source
- Implies mechanical work output without accounting for energy dissipation from friction, wear, and other losses
- System appears to be a closed mechanical loop with no thermodynamic gradient to exploit
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity via rotation of partially-filled hollow bodies and displacement of liquid by weights, but no external energy input is specified to reset the system or overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from gravity alone by cycling weights and liquid between containers. This is impossible because gravity is a conservative force; the net work done over any closed cycle in a conservative field is zero, and real-world losses from friction ensure a net energy deficit.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The described cyclic process of rotating containers and displacing liquid cannot produce net energy output.
- No external energy input identified to perform the work of lifting weights or rotating the system against friction and restoring initial states.
- System operates in a gravitational potential field; any work extracted in one part of the cycle must be paid back to reset the weights/liquid positions, resulting in net loss due to inefficiencies.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device requires an external input to rotate the lever arm or directly drive the mass along its path. The claim suggests this input can be less than the net propulsive force output, implying energy generation from internal mass motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a reactionless drive, a form of perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce a net directional thrust by cyclically moving a mass along a rotating arm. However, in a closed system, the internal forces sum to zero over a cycle, producing no net external force. This directly violates Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The system is an internal, closed mechanical system. Moving a mass radially inward and outward during rotation creates changing centripetal forces, but the net force and impulse over a complete cycle is
- Asserts a net propulsive force (thrust) from an internal cyclic motion without expelling reaction mass, which is impossible for a system with fixed external boundaries in classical mechanics.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to radially displace the mass against centrifugal/centripetal forces and to accelerate/decelerate it tangentially to maintain constant angular velocity about the pivot is not accounted for in the claim
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on folding/deploying flaps (alerones) to create constant rotational motion from an initial imbalance.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. While cleverly designed to shift weights via internal mechanisms, gravity alone cannot provide net work over a complete cycle. The energy required to reset the flaps and internal components (against springs, friction, and gravity itself) will dissipate any initial energy, causing the system to stop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims continuous motion without an external energy source beyond initial configuration.
- No thermodynamic gradient: gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a uniform gravitational field is zero.
- Mechanism describes energy redistribution, not energy input: the internal mechanism (balls, rods, springs) merely transfers and dissipates energy, requiring more work to reset than gained.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on kinemat
Claimed Energy Source
Gravity (weight) and initial mechanical input only. No external energy input beyond initial potential/kinetic energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a type of overbalanced wheel or gravity engine that uses shifting weights to attempt perpetual or self-sustaining rotation. This violates energy conservation because any work extracted comes from the initial gravitational potential energy of the weights, and the system cannot reset itself without external energy input to overcome friction and restore the weights to their higher potential energy positions.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to use weight/gravity to create perpetual or self-sustaining wheel motion
- Reciprocating mechanisms and sliding components imply energy dissipation through friction
- No external energy input described to overcome losses
- Implies net work extraction from a conservative gravity field without restoring energy
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be an externally powered linear motor/generator, but the described mechanism implies extracting net work from gravity by manipulating a chain of masses through a constrained path to create an 'accumulated potentiated force vector flux'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use an external motor to manipulate masses in a gravitational field to generate an amplified 'force vector flux,' implying net energy extraction from gravity alone. Since gravity is a conservative force, no net work can be extracted over a complete cycle without an external, non-conservative energy source, making this a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Implies a closed-loop gravitational system can produce net energy output.
- Misapplies heat pump analogy: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a gravitational field is zero.
- Proposes 'force accumulation' mechanism that is thermodynamically impossible without an external gradient to exploit.
- Lacks identifiable high- and low-potential energy reservoirs required for a genuine heat-pump-like cycle.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the gravitational potential energy of the weights. The apparatus is a balanced structure, implying no net gravitational torque exists to drive continuous rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract continuous work from a gravitational field using a balanced rotating structure. This violates energy conservation, as a balanced system in a conservative field cannot produce net work over a cycle without an external, non-conservative energy input to reset it.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system lacks a sustained energy input. Once the balanced weights rotate, they simply exchange potential and kinetic energy in a cycle with losses.
- It describes extracting net work from a conservative force field (gravity) with no external gradient or time-varying change to the system's configuration or environment.
- The claims imply a perpetual torque source from a static, balanced mass arrangement, which is impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to generate renewable energy using pulley forces, equilibrium, and gravity. Gravity is the implied energy source, extracting work from a gravitational potential difference.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy using pulleys, equilibrium, and gravity. This is a classic violation of energy conservation and the second law, as it attempts to extract continuous work from a gravitational potential without an external energy input to restore the system's state. A system in equilibrium cannot perform net work on its surroundings.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes extracting net work from a system in equilibrium, violating the second law of thermodynamics.
- No clear, sustainable input of high-grade energy to reset the system; gravity alone in an equilibrium configuration cannot produce continuous output.
- Incomplete energy accounting: the work gained from lowering a mass must be less than or equal to the work required to lift it back up, neglecting losses.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
A - Incomplete Energy Accounting
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use permanent magnet interactions between a rotating base and a piston-crank mechanism, suggesting energy is extracted from magnetic forces without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to produce continuous rotational power using only permanent magnet interactions between moving parts, with no identifiable external energy input. This violates energy conservation as permanent magnets alone cannot provide net work output without an energy source to overcome magnetic hysteresis and friction. The description uses technical terms (piston, crank, cylinder) but describes a magnet-based over-unity device.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.)
- Claims continuous rotation and power output from permanent magnet interactions alone
- Implies energy can be extracted from static magnetic fields without doing work against them
- No thermodynamic cycle or energy gradient identified
- Appears to be a magnetic perpetual motion machine
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from a starter motor (Claim 4). The device then claims to sustain or amplify motion using a complex mechanical arrangement of springs, masses, and rotating wheels, implying extraction of net work from internal reactive forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an over-unity claim. After an initial start by an electric motor, it purports to generate sustained or amplified acceleration using only internal spring-mass oscillations and rotating frames. This is impossible as internal forces cannot produce net external acceleration or net work output, violating Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's 3rd Law: Internal forces (spring-mass oscillations) cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims to produce 'acceleration without recourse to gravity' using only internal, initially-imparted energy.
- No external energy gradient is identified to perform net work after the initial start. The orbital mechanism merely redirects internal momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The device appears to be a purely mechanical system claiming to be a 'perpetual motion machine' (永动机) with no identifiable external energy input beyond an initial 'power input device' that is not described.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a complex mechanical assembly labeled as a 'perpetual motion machine.' It violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics by proposing a closed system that can sustain motion indefinitely without an external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses from friction and other dissipative forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion (æ°¸å¨æº) in the title and description.
- Describes a complex mechanical transmission system with springs, gears, and levers but provides no mechanism to overcome friction or thermodynamic losses.
- No identifiable primary energy source; system appears closed and mechanical.
- Attempts to use gravity and spring forces in a cyclical manner without accounting for energy dissipation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a rotating magnetic system that generates electricity, but no primary energy input (electrical, mechanical, chemical, or ambient gradient) is identified to initiate or sustain the claimed 360° rotation and power generation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system claimed to generate power through 360° rotation, but provides no identifiable source of energy to overcome losses or initiate motion. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it suggests extracting net work from a closed magnetic system without an external energy gradient, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims perpetual rotation and power generation without an energy source
- Appears to describe a system where magnetic interactions alone produce net work, violating conservation of energy
- Uses obfuscated terminology ('magnetic power generation', '360° rotation') without a clear thermodynamic driver
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, with no external gradient or energy input described. The device attempts to create a perpetual asymmetric torque using weights that pivot only on one side of the wheel.
AI Physics Analysis
This describes a gravity wheel/perpetual motion machine. Gravity is a conservative force, meaning no net work can be extracted from a weight cycling in a closed path without an external energy source. The claimed continuous rotation and ability to perform useful work violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming continuous rotation without an external energy source
- No thermodynamic gradient or potential difference is maintained
- The described mechanism (weights pivoting on one side, remaining central on the other) would not produce net torque over a full rotation in a conservative gravitational field
- Claims output work (powering ships, trains, generators) with zero input energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use "倍增吸引力" (multiplicative attraction) from the "白炽灯效应" (incandescent lamp effect) as the main energy source for an electromagnetic motor. This appears to be a fabricated or misapplied physical principle, not a legitimate energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a motor powered by 'multiplicative attraction' from a misnamed 'incandescent lamp effect,' which is not a real energy source. The complex arrangement of magnets, non-magnetic bearings, and geometric shapes cannot produce net work without an external energy input, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Claims energy from '倍增吸引力' which is not a recognized source of usable work in physics.
- Describes complex magnetic and geometric structures but provides no mechanism to overcome conservation of energy.
- Appears to be a magnetic motor attempting to extract net work from permanent magnets alone, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct-sounding but
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanical system requires an external energy input to vary the radius while maintaining constant linear speed, but this is not specified. The claim implies the non-constant centripetal force can be manipulated to produce a net unidirectional force for propulsion, suggesting an attempt to extract net work from an internal cyclic motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a reactionless drive attempt. Varying the orbital radius creates a time-varying centripetal force, but the net impulse over a full cycle is zero in a closed system. To produce a sustained unidirectional force violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to generate a net directional force (propulsion) from an internal, cyclic variation of a centripetal force.
- Maintaining constant linear speed while changing radius requires work input (radial force over distance), which is not accounted for.
- The system, if isolated, cannot produce a net external force on its center of mass (Newton's third law).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on manipul
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest a magnetic system that extracts energy from permanent magnets without an apparent external energy input, implying energy is generated from the magnetic field itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic rotor system that claims to produce output energy. Since permanent magnets are static potential fields, extracting continuous net work from them alone violates the first law of thermodynamics. The system lacks a clear, sustainable external energy input to account for the claimed output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying net work can be extracted from a static magnetic field without an external energy source.
- Describes a mechanism (rotor with magnets) that would require energy input to overcome magnetic attraction/repulsion to achieve continuous rotation, but claims output energy.
- Uses magnetic pole terminology (N, S) in a way that suggests a perpetual motion scheme where magnets alone drive motion indefinitely.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. No explicit energy input described. Implied mechanical input through rotation, but claims suggest self-sustaining motion from unstable equilibrium.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to operate through an 'unstable equilibrium' mechanism that would produce continuous rotation without an identifiable energy source, directly violating energy conservation. The complex mechanical description obscures the fundamental impossibility of extracting net work from any static equilibrium configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims mechanical equilibrium is in unstable state
- Implies continuous rotation without energy input
- No identifiable external energy source
- Describes complex geometry but no thermodynamic driver
- Violates conservation of energy - cannot extract net work from equilibrium alone
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent claims energy is produced with no energy consumption ('one jeglichen Energy verbrauch'), implying perpetual motion from the shifting of Glysantin fluid within rotating blades.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, claiming to generate electricity perpetually from the internal shifting of fluid (Glysantin). This violates both the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics, as no external energy source is identified and internal rearrangements cannot produce net work indefinitely against dissipative forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming net energy output with zero input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics; internal redistribution of fluid in a closed system cannot provide net work to overcome friction and generate electricity indefinitely.
- Relies on a gravity-driven fluid shift to create an imbalanced wheel, a classic overbalanced wheel design long proven non-functional as a perpetual motion source.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (e.g., wind, thermal, ambient) is harnessed; the described motion is claimed to be self-sustaining.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a rotating mechanism with multiple concentric rotating elements (rings, disks) of different sizes, connected by linking elements. It mentions energy being 'absorbed' and 'transferred' between elements via 'interaction sections', but provides no identifiable external energy input. The description suggests the mechanism might be intended to self-sustain or amplify motion internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex rotating mechanical assembly but fails to identify any external energy source. The claims about energy absorption, transfer, and accumulation between the moving parts suggest an expectation of sustained or amplified motion from internal interactions alone, which directly violates the conservation of energy. No mechanism can perform net work without an energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified.
- Claims of energy absorption and transfer between moving parts without a gradient or external input.
- Implies sustained or amplified rotation from internal interactions alone, violating conservation of energy.
- Mechanism described as 'decorative or entertaining', yet discusses energy accumulation and transmission in a way that suggests a power generation capability.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (co
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors. The abstract also references the Earth's gravitational field and the 'aether' as sources for propulsion, with the latter being a non-physical concept.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce inertial propulsion (net linear force) using only internal gyroscopic motions and ambiguous references to gravity and the aether. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the conservation of linear momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass using only internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims propellant-less propulsion without equal and opposite reaction in the Local Inertial Frame, violating Newton's Third Law.
- Invokes 'aether' as an energy source/medium, which is not a recognized concept in modern physics.
- Implies the device can generate net linear momentum from internal motions (gyroscopic precession) without exchanging momentum with an external object.
- Confuses the role of gravity; while it can provide a torque for precession, it cannot provide a net, sustained linear force on a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The explicit input is the motor (electric, hydraulic, thermal, etc.). The device implicitly claims to extract additional energy from gravitational potential energy changes of internal masses as they move in a rotating, off-center cylindrical housing.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a type of unbalanced mechanical oscillator. While clever mechanical design can create variable inertia or torque, gravity is a conservative force. Over a complete cycle, the net work extracted from gravity is zero, meaning the motor must supply all energy for motion and claimed output, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to transform gravitational energy into kinetic energy as a net gain, but the gravitational field is conservative. The work done by/against gravity over one full cycle of the masses is zero.
- No perpetual gradient: The system operates in a closed loop. Any gravitational potential energy gained by a mass on one part of the path must be expended to lift it back to its starting point.
- Incomplete accounting: The motor's input work is used to overcome friction and accelerate masses. Any kinetic energy extracted from the moving masses cannot exceed the motor's input work minus losses, as gravity is not an external energy source in th
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy of the liquid and gas, plus gravitational potential energy from the liquid's hydrostatic pressure gradient. The device attempts to convert this ambient thermal energy into mechanical work via a cyclic compression/expansion process of gas-filled elements moving in a liquid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of buoyancy engine that attempts to use compressible elements and a connecting gas circuit to create a perpetual imbalance, extracting net work from the ambient heat of the surrounding liquid. This violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law, as it aims to produce work from a single thermal reservoir without a colder sink, making it a thermodynamic impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by attempting to extract net work from a single thermal reservoir (the ambient liquid).
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to compress the 'downward moving' elements is not properly accounted for against the buoyancy work gained from the 'upward moving' elements.
- The described closed gas circuit connecting rising and falling elements suggests a perpetual motion scheme where internal gas pressure differences are used to drive motion without an external high-temperature source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of water partially filling S-shaped containers attached to a wheel. The implied source is the weight imbalance created by the water shifting within the containers as the wheel rotates.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'overbalanced wheel' variant, attempting to generate perpetual rotation from a fixed mass of water sloshing in S-shaped containers. In a closed system under gravity, any initial imbalance will quickly reach equilibrium, making continuous net work extraction impossible as it violates energy conservation by creating work from a static potential.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input gradient specified (e.g., flowing water, descending water source).
- System appears to be a closed, static arrangement of containers partially filled with water and air.
- Relies on a permanent weight imbalance from internal fluid sloshing to generate continuous rotation, which is impossible in a closed, conservative gravitational field without an external driver.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system with 'magnetic force units' and 'repulsive force units' arranged at 120° angles, claiming to generate energy through their interaction. It appears to suggest energy extraction from magnetic arrangements without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system that attempts to generate energy solely from the interaction of arranged magnetic and repulsive force units, which is thermodynamically impossible as it violates energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to sustain the claimed output, making it a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified.
- Claims of energy generation from static magnetic configurations violate conservation of energy.
- Arranging permanent magnets cannot produce net work without an external energy input to change the configuration.
- The description of 'repulsive force' and 'magnetic force' units interacting to produce continuous energy is a classic perpetual motion scheme.
- The 120° angle and temperature differentials mentioned (10°C, 5°C) are insufficient and vague as thermodynamic drivers.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'magnetic
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be an internal mechanical system (gyroscopes moving back and forth within a centrifuge) with no specified external energy input, implying it intends to generate net thrust from internal motions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'reactionless propulsion' device using oscillating gyroscopes inside a centrifuge. This is a classical violation of Newton's laws of motion, as internal forces cannot produce net external thrust on a closed system. The claim of generating unidirectional thrust through internal mass manipulation is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for a closed system. Internal mass movements cannot produce net external thrust.
- Violates conservation of momentum. The description suggests creating unidirectional thrust without expelling reaction mass.
- Confuses concepts: 'forced precession' and 'weight shift' are internal forces that sum to zero net force on the system's center of mass.
- Ambiguous energy accounting: No specification of the power source driving the gyroscopes, their oscillation, or the centrifuge.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implicitly) and gravitational potential energy of the fluid. The device appears to be a buoyancy-driven system where hollow bodies (Hohlkörper) on a ring are acted upon by buoyant forces in a liquid-filled container, aiming to create a continuous imbalance.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a buoyancy motor, a classic type of perpetual motion machine. It claims continuous energy generation by exploiting buoyant forces in a fluid, but it provides no mechanism to reintroduce the buoyant elements into the bottom of the container without expending at least as much energy as is gained, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system describes a continuous rotation (ununterbrochene Energieerzeugung) driven solely by buoyancy in a static fluid, implying perpetual motion.
- No identified external energy input to reset the cycle: For continuous rotation, work must be done against gravity to submerge the buoyant bodies, which requires more energy than is gained from buoyancy.
- Claims 'Ungleichgewicht' (imbalance) from a neutrally buoyant ring in a homogeneous fluid, which is thermodynamically impossible in equilibrium; any motion would dampen out.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes output (
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device is described as a 'gravity motor' and includes an external drive unit (Claim 6) to start it and 'return the excess torque'. This suggests the primary claimed energy source is gravitational potential energy from weights, but no mechanism for resetting the system or creating a sustainable gradient is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate energy (electricity) from gravity alone using an oscillating/rotating weight system, but provides no mechanism for restoring the gravitational potential without inputting at least as much energy as is extracted. The admitted need for an external drive unit confirms it is not a source of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed-cycle gravity engine cannot produce net work. Any work extracted from falling masses requires equal or greater energy to reset those masses to their initial positions.
- No sustainable energy gradient: The system operates on a 'horizontal base plate' (Claim 9), implying no external, replenished height differential to drive continuous motion.
- Claim 6 admits an external drive unit is needed, indicating the system is not a prime mover but requires an energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal/gravitational energy (implicitly claimed). No explicit external energy input identified; the device attempts to create a persistent torque imbalance from internal fluid redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion machine. Shifting fluid internally cannot create a sustained net torque because the work needed to move the fluid uphill against gravity (or against pressure in the air/water version) always equals or exceeds any temporary rotational energy gain. The system, as a whole, remains in equilibrium.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation and electrical generation without an external energy source.
- Violates Newton's first and third laws: Attempts to create a net internal torque from shifting masses/fluids within a closed system.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: A system with balanced initial weights cannot spontaneously develop a persistent rotational imbalance through internal fluid transfer alone.
- Ignores work required to move fluid: The energy needed to pump fluid/air between bags is not accounted for and would equal or exceed any momentary torque gain.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on momenta
Claimed Energy Source
A motor provides the only explicit input energy to rotate the shafts and masses. Claims imply an 'internal relativistic differential' or internal energy conversion creates additional net thrust or propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal rotating mass system driven by a motor. Its claims to produce net thrust or external acceleration violate conservation of momentum, as no internal rearrangement of masses can create a net force on the device's center of mass. The use of relativistic terminology is misapplied and does not circumvent this fundamental law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 2-5 assert the device generates net thrust or external acceleration from internal motions alone, violating conservation of momentum.
- Invokes relativistic and variable time/distance concepts incorrectly to justify energy/momentum gain from a closed mechanical system.
- Claims 'energy and momentum are exchanged between the axes' to produce external force, which is impossible for an isolated system with no external reaction mass or field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'relativi
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a device with multiple rotating bodies (rotors) and a weight, suggesting mechanical energy conversion, but no explicit external energy input is identified. The abstract mentions 'utilizing gravity and rotational force' which implies extracting work from a gravitational potential without a corresponding drop in that potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanical system intended to generate energy by utilizing gravity and rotation, but provides no credible external energy source to account for the claimed output or to overcome inevitable losses. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) to sustain motion.
- Describes a system of rotating bodies and a weight that appears to be self-sustaining or generating excess energy, violating conservation of energy.
- Lacks description of energy losses (friction, drag, etc.) and how they are overcome.
- Uses vague terminology ('gravity and rotational force') without specifying the energy gradient being exploited.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (gravi
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input implied is the initial rotational energy to spin the sprockets. The device claims to generate net torque/force from the interaction of centrifugal force and linear motion of masses (N) within the sleeves.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate useful work (torque) solely from the internal motion of masses driven by centrifugal force within a rotating system. This is physically impossible as centrifugal force is not an external energy input; it is a kinematic effect. The system cannot produce a net output torque greater than the input torque required to spin it, violating conservation of energy and angular momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame, not an external energy source. It cannot do net work on the system as a whole.
- The described mechanism (balls sliding radially under centrifugal force, being stopped and released) is an internal rearrangement of mass. Any torque generated in one part of the cycle will be opposed by an equal and opposite torque in another part,
- Claims of 'net force' and 'net torque' from this internal motion violate Newton's Third Law and the conservation of angular momentum for an isolated system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'pure and simple gravity' (pesanteur). The device is described as starting on its own after assembly brakes are released, implying a perpetual source of work from a static gravitational field.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The device claims to generate electrical energy using only gravity as a source, which is impossible because gravity is a conservative force. Over any complete cycle, the net work extracted from a mass in a gravitational field is zero unless energy is input to reset the system, which the patent explicitly claims is not needed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A static, conservative force field like gravity cannot be a net source of energy. The system returns to the same gravitational potential each cycle, yielding zero net work.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Claims to produce useful electrical work without an external energy input or a compensating decrease in internal energy of another system.
- Mechanism obfuscation: Describes a complex cam/paddle system to create an imbalanced torque, but the work done to retract paddles against gravity/centrifugal force will always equal or exceed the work gained from their extension in a gravity field ov
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical e
Claimed Energy Source
Internal acceleration mechanism (unspecified) provides initial kinetic energy to the masses. The claimed propulsion comes from a retarding mechanism that absorbs part of the masses' kinetic energy to produce net thrust on the entire system.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic reactionless drive claim. The device uses only internal moving parts and forces. No external reaction mass is expelled, and all momentum changes are internal, so by Newton's laws, the center of mass of the entire system cannot accelerate. The described braking and acceleration cycles create internal forces that cancel out, producing zero net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction). The system is closed and internal forces cannot produce net momentum change.
- Violates conservation of momentum. The retarding mechanism applies an internal force to slow the masses; the equal and opposite reaction force acts on the system itself, resulting in zero net external force.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work done to re-accelerate masses after braking is not accounted for in net thrust calculation.
- Assumes asymmetric momentum transfer from internal masses to the frame is possible, which is impossible for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on a singl
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat from a thermal reservoir (T1) is claimed to be converted into mechanical work, with an auxiliary heat reservoir (T2) that can be created once and remains unchanged.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. It claims to achieve efficiencies above the Carnot limit and to produce net work by extracting heat from a single temperature reservoir (the environment), which is impossible according to the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law. The angular momentum argument obfuscates the fundamental thermodynamic violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to extract net work from a single temperature reservoir (T1).
- Claims efficiency can exceed the Carnot limit (1 - T1/T2) for a heat engine operating between T1 and T2.
- Proposes a cycle that allegedly cools the working medium from T2 back to T1 using a heat pump (WP2) dumping heat into T2, with an overall energy gain from the cold reservoir T1.
- Misapplies conservation of angular momentum to imply a net energy gain from thermal expansion/contraction alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy through cyclic magnetic repulsion between permanent magnets (super strong permanent magnet body and support permanent magnet body), with no external energy input described other than initial mechanical positioning.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to achieve continuous motion and energy generation using only permanent magnets arranged to create cyclic repulsion. Since magnetic forces from permanent magnets are conservative, they cannot perform net work over a complete cycle without an external energy source, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The description matches classic perpetual motion machine designs that have been repeatedly proven impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims to 'manufacture energy' through cyclic motion driven solely by magnetic repulsion
- Permanent magnets are conservative force fields; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle using only permanent magnets
- System lacks any identifiable external energy input (electrical, thermal, chemical, ambient)
- Describes a 'permanent magnet perpetual motion machine' which is thermodynamically impossible
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions the rotating masses are 'mit Energie von außen angetrieben' (driven by energy from outside), but the core claim is that this configuration generates a net directional thrust (Antriebskraft) from the rotational energy itself, implying a conversion of rotational kinetic energy into linear momentum without an external reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate directional thrust for vehicles using only internally rotating and moving masses. This violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass using purely internal forces. It is a classic reactionless drive claim, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. The system is described as generating a unidirectional force (Vektor) on the total machine from internal rotating/oscillating masses, with no external medium to provide an equal and opposite reaction.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force. Centrifugal force is a fictitious, inward-directed force in a rotating reference frame. It cannot produce a net external force on a closed system; internal centrifugal forces sum to zero within the system.
- Implies creation of net work from an internal energy redistribution. The controlled movement of masses (liquid, granules) consumes work, but the claimed output is a propulsive force exceeding what is possible from internal momentum exchange alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
No external energy source is identified. The system is described as a 'perpetual motion machine' and relies on internal mechanical feedback, implying it claims to generate work from its own configuration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly described as a perpetual motion machine, claiming to produce useful work via internal mechanical feedback with no external energy source. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as any work output and frictional losses would inevitably drain the system's initial energy, stopping it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion (weight motor) explicitly.
- No identified external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Proposes a feedback loop to sustain motion and perform work, violating conservation of energy.
- Mechanical system with no source to overcome inevitable frictional losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from lowering a weighted boom/arm. The system appears to use moving weights on a pivoting structure to generate hydraulic pressure and torque.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to generate continuous rotation solely from the gravitational fall of weights, with no identifiable external energy source to reset the weights to their initial height. This violates the conservation of energy, as the net work output over a complete cycle cannot exceed the net energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- System describes extracting continuous rotational work from the gravitational lowering of a weighted arm. No clear mechanism for resetting the arm to its initial high-potential-energy state using less energy than was generated during the lowering pha
- Claims of force amplification via levers and hydraulic pressure do not circumvent energy conservation; the work output cannot exceed the gravitational potential energy lost by the weights.
- The description of achieving 360° rotation by adding offset elements suggests a perpetual motion scheme where one falling weight triggers the next, with no net external energy input to restore the system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest mechanical energy transformation, but the described system of generators/motors facing each other and driving one another implies a closed loop with no external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent's key claim describes a generator and motor assembled face-to-face driving each other, which is a classic perpetual motion scheme violating the First Law of Thermodynamics. The mixing of atomic and mechanical terms is scientifically incoherent and obscures the lack of a genuine energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 4 describes a generator/motor pair driving each other, creating a closed energy loop with no net external input.
- No identifiable primary energy source (chemical, thermal, potential, etc.) is specified.
- The text mixes mechanical and subatomic terminology ('élément mécanique électron, proton, neutron') in a vague, non-operational way.
- The core claim is for continuous electric current production from an unspecified mechanical transformation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (elect
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical arrangement of wheels, arms, curved grooves, and spheres, but provides no explicit energy input. The only implied input is an initial rotation, suggesting the device is intended to generate electricity from its own continued motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a kinematic mechanism with no stated external energy source. Its description suggests it is intended to produce electrical energy from its own rotational motion, which would violate the conservation of energy. The phased wheels and sliding spheres can only redistribute or dissipate energy, not create it.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is described.
- The mechanism (phased wheels, sliding spheres) is purely kinematic and cannot create energy.
- The claim implies sustained or amplified rotation from an initial input, violating conservation of energy.
- No thermodynamic process or gradient is identified to justify energy generation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'only the power of the physical gravity' without any external gradient (e.g., falling mass, changing gravitational potential).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gravity engine that produces continuous rotational work using only gravity without any fuel or external energy gradient. This violates the conservation of energy, as a static, uniform gravitational field cannot perform net work over a cycle without an external source to change the system's potential energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to transform gravity's vertical force into continuous rotation without an external energy source to reset the system.
- No description of how the system creates a net work output from gravity alone; gravity is a conservative force.
- Implies perpetual motion by extracting usable work from a static gravitational field without a cyclic change in potential energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies energy comes solely from the magnetic forces of permanent magnets arranged to produce continuous rotation, with no external energy input other than an initial start.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'self-feeding magnetic motor' using only permanent magnets. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce continuous mechanical work without an external energy source, directly violating the law of conservation of energy. Magnetic forces are conservative and cannot provide net work over a cycle without an external input to reset the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A system of permanent magnets is a conservative field. Net work over a closed cycle is zero.
- No identified external energy input to overcome magnetic potential barriers or to perform the work of moving magnets apart after attraction.
- Claims 'autoalimentado' (self-feeding) implies perpetual output from a static magnetic configuration, which is impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is an electric motor (2,3) that accelerates a rotating assembly containing a movable mass (8) and an elastic force storage element (10).
AI Physics Analysis
This is a reactionless drive claim. The device uses an internal motor to move an internal mass, asserting that the sequence of inelastic and elastic collisions within the system produces a net thrust. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass through internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction) for a closed system.
- Claims to generate a net thrust impulse (2mv) from internal motions only.
- The described 'inelastic impact' and 'elastic impact' are internal forces; the center of mass of the entire device cannot accelerate by internal forces alone.
- The system attempts to create a non-zero net momentum change (thrust) without ejecting reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a rotating disc with air chambers submerged in a fluid, purportedly generating continuous rotation from alternating pressure forces on the chambers. No external energy input (e.g., fluid flow, thermal gradient, or external work) is described to sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a mechanism intended to generate continuous rotation and increasing power when multiple units are coupled, but it lacks any described source of energy to overcome inevitable frictional and viscous losses. It attempts to create perpetual motion from internal pressure variations in a submerged system, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to overcome friction and viscous drag
- Claims continuous rotation from internal pressure variations without an external gradient
- Implies net work extraction from a static fluid system in equilibrium
- Buoyancy balancing mechanism does not provide energy; it only addresses a design constraint
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes motion a
Claimed Energy Source
The claim suggests energy is extracted from the magnetic field and gravity. However, the magnetic field is conservative, and gravity is a conservative force. The described motion is a closed loop, so the net work done by these conservative forces over one cycle is zero.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a rotor with magnets moving in a closed path under gravity and magnetic repulsion. Since both forces are conservative, the net energy gained over a full rotation is zero, and any energy output must come from an initial push. The claim of converting these forces to useful kinetic energy violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by implying net energy can be extracted from a closed-loop interaction with conservative fields.
- Ignores that the work done against magnetic repulsion on one part of the path must be supplied back to the system on the return path, plus losses.
- Fails to identify an external, non-conservative energy input to sustain motion against friction and provide net output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (heat) supposedly converted to electricity via unspecified 'thermoelectric conversion' and LED/light interactions, with claims of amplifying/regenerating the thermal gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to convert ambient thermal energy directly into electricity using thermoelectric elements and LED/light interactions in a regenerative feedback loop. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, as it purports to do useful work by cooling a single heat reservoir, violating the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Claims to generate electricity from a single thermal reservoir (ambient heat) without a temperature gradient to drive the thermoelectric conversion.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a system where 'thermal energy' is converted, amplified, and fed back, creating a regenerative loop that would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
- No identifiable net energy input: The system appears to extract useful work (electricity) solely from ambient thermal energy at uniform temperature, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies energy mul
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to extract energy from gravitational potential energy and geometric path differences, implying a perpetual source from the Earth's gravity field without an external gradient or replenishment.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate usable mechanical energy perpetually by creating a permanent imbalance using gravity and geometric path differences. This violates energy conservation, as gravity is a conservative force—net work over any closed cycle is zero. The described mechanism cannot produce a continuous energy output without an external, depleted energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create a permanent imbalance/over-unity device using gravity as an energy source without a compensating drop in potential.
- Ignores conservation of energy: net work from a closed cycle in a conservative gravitational field is zero.
- Confuses geometric path length differences with net work; work done by gravity depends only on vertical displacement, not path shape.
- Claims 'extraordinary efficiency' >100% by misapplying lever arms and moments in a cyclic process.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Free' energy outp
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational energy, but the described configuration provides no sustained gravitational potential energy gradient to exploit.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a balanced wheel supported at one end of its horizontal axis. Gravity pulls straight down on its center of mass, creating no unbalanced torque to initiate or sustain rotation. To produce continuous rotation, the system would need to cyclically lower mass, which requires an external energy input to reset.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is in static equilibrium; gravity acts through the support point, creating zero net torque about the flywheel's center of mass.
- No mechanism to reset or cycle the gravitational potential (e.g., lifting mass) is described, violating energy conservation.
- Claims 'rotational energy only from gravitational energy' implies perpetual extraction of work from a single, static gravitational field, which is impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity (Earth's gravitational field) acting on a falling solid body, with no other explicit input. Implicitly suggests extracting net work from a constant gravitational potential without restoring the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy solely from a body falling under gravity. To operate continuously, the body must be lifted back up, consuming at least as much energy as was produced. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying a net energy output from a closed cycle in a conservative force field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: To generate continuous energy, the falling body must be returned to its initial height, requiring at least as much energy as was gained from the fall.
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy source is identified to sustain a cycle. Gravity alone in equilibrium is not an energy source.
- Claims to work 'without wind, without sun, at night' imply a perpetual energy source, which is impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to harness 'cosmic energy' and induce additional weight/mass in matter through mechanical means, but provides no identifiable, quantifiable energy input. Implicitly suggests extracting energy from equilibrium (matter itself or a cosmic background) without a gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates fundamental conservation laws by asserting that a mechanical device can increase the mass of matter and generate net electrical output from an undefined 'cosmic energy' source. The described system uses internal motors to drive components, suggesting it is a consumer, not a producer, of net energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates mass-energy conservation (claims to increase mass/weight of matter without adding mass-energy)
- No thermodynamic gradient identified for energy extraction
- Mechanism described appears to be a closed system with internal motors driving rotors, implying net electrical input, not output
- Invokes undefined concepts ('cosmic energy', 'Bipolarity of the Universe', dark matter/energy) in place of standard physics
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the motor's operation is driven by an asymmetric center of gravity and 'cradle gap' created by the gear/sprocket configuration, suggesting it is intended to be a gravity/perpetual motion machine.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical assembly intended to generate continuous rotation from an unbalanced weight distribution. It lacks any described external energy source, and its proposed operation would violate the conservation of energy by creating work from a system in equilibrium, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Claims rely on an asymmetric center of gravity to produce continuous motion, which violates conservation of energy.
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement with no means to reset potential energy without external work.
- Complex gearing and lever arms do not create energy; they only convert or transmit it, always with losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract indefinite work from gravity alone by maintaining a 'steady barycentre decentralization' (permanent imbalance) in a rotating wheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce indefinite work by maintaining a permanent imbalance in a rotating wheel, using gravity as the sole energy source. This is a classic perpetual motion machine violation, as any work extracted would lower the system's center of mass, and restoring that imbalance requires equal or greater work input from an external source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims output work > input work for self-feeding, enabling indefinite operation.
- Violates thermodynamic limits for mechanical systems: proposes a mechanism that perpetually converts gravitational potential energy without an external energy source to reset the system.
- Mechanically impossible: a 'steady position of utmost unbalance' in a rotating system cannot be maintained without periodic work input to lift masses against gravity, restoring the potential energy being drained.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal gradient (hot and cold fluid inlets). The device claims to convert this heat flow into mechanical rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is fundamentally a heat engine operating between a hot and cold source. Its claims of autonomous rotation and cascading for increased efficiency, without a clear mechanism to bypass the Carnot limit, constitute a thermodynamic violation. The description uses correct terms like 'heat exchanger' but obfuscates the core energy conversion problem.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism described to circumvent the Carnot limit for a heat engine. The described process (heating/cooling liquid to create continuous movement) is a heat engine.
- Claims of 'autonomous' rotation and 'reusing heat...to increase efficiency' suggest an attempt to extract net work from a single thermal gradient with efficiency exceeding thermodynamic limits.
- Vague description of the working cycle; lacks identification of the complete thermodynamic cycle, entropy sink, or how unidirectional flow is maintained without external work input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the 'Anfangsdrehmoment' (initial torque) applied to the drive shaft. The claim suggests this initial torque, after setting masses in complex rotation, produces a 'Drehmoment-Überschuss' (torque surplus/excess) on the same drive shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims an initial torque applied to a drive shaft causes internal masses to rotate, and that this internal rotation generates a surplus torque on the same drive shaft. This is a direct violation of the conservation of angular momentum and energy, as it describes a closed system producing net output from internal motions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy. The system is described as closed after the initial torque input, yet claims to generate a net torque surplus on the primary axis from internal motions.
- Implies a net internal torque can be generated on the system's own axis without an external reaction. The complex rotations of masses around intersecting axes are internal motions that cannot create a net torque on the system as a whole.
- No external energy source or gradient is identified to account for the claimed surplus output. The system appears to be a mechanical arrangement intended to produce more rotational work out than was put in.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravity acting on masses within the device, with no other input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to permanently convert Earth's gravitational force into useful rotational work by cleverly moving masses inside a wheel, but it ignores that lifting the masses back to their starting point requires at least as much energy as is gained from their fall, plus losses. No external energy source is identified to overcome these inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to extract net useful work from a conservative force field (gravity) without an external energy source or gradient.
- No thermodynamic limit provided; attempts to create perpetual motion from a static potential.
- Mechanism describes using part of the motion energy from falling masses to return them to their starting point, which is inherently lossy due to friction and the work-energy theorem. Any real system would have losses, causing it to stop.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract energy from gravitational potential energy of a liquid medium within a rotating wheel, implying a continuous, asymmetric distribution of mass to generate perpetual torque.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a form of perpetual motion machine. The gravitational potential energy of the liquid is an internal energy of the system. Once the liquid settles to its lowest state, no further net torque can be generated, violating energy conservation. The fixed partition cannot maintain the asymmetric mass distribution needed for continuous rotation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed system cannot provide net work from its internal potential energy indefinitely.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Proposes a mechanism to do work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient temperature) with no lower temperature sink.
- Mechanically flawed: A fixed partition in a rotating wheel would equalize the liquid distribution over one half-rotation, eliminating the claimed asymmetric mass distribution and torque. Any initial imbalance is a one-time energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'Dauerrota
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate unidirectional inertial force from rotational oscillations without external force interaction, implying energy from internal motions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a unidirectional inertial force through rotational oscillations without interacting with the environment, which directly violates Newton's laws of motion and conservation of momentum. This is a classic reactionless drive claim that physics prohibits because internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's First Law (inertia) - claims to produce net force without external reaction
- Violates Conservation of Momentum - system claims unidirectional force without expelling mass or pushing against external frame
- Misapplication of centrifugal force - centrifugal force is frame-dependent and cannot produce net thrust in isolated system
- Energy accounting missing - no clear input energy source for claimed unidirectional output force
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity, but gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a uniform gravitational field is zero.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate rotational power using only gravity and internal mechanisms. As gravity is a conservative force, it cannot provide net energy over a cycle without an external input like a height differential or other energy source. The description of stored forces and permanent movement indicates a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes extracting net work from gravity alone without an external energy gradient.
- Describes complex mechanisms (springs, switches, arms) but provides no path for energy input to overcome losses.
- Claims 'storing a potential force' and 'very great additional force' from internal operations, violating energy conservation.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
A - Incomplete energy accounting
Claimed Energy Source
Initial external torque to start rotation, then claimed self-sustaining rotation from unbalanced centrifugal forces with blocking mechanism
AI Physics Analysis
This device describes a rotating system with masses that redistribute due to centrifugal force and blocking mechanisms, claiming this creates continuous unbalanced torque. However, once started, there is no external energy input to overcome friction losses, and the internal mass redistribution cannot create net work from the system's own rotation without violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy input mechanism after initial start
- Attempts to create perpetual unbalanced torque from internal mass redistribution
- System would settle into equilibrium configuration with no net torque
- Energy dissipation from friction/air resistance not accounted for
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear; implied to be gravity alone, which is a conservative force. No external energy gradient (e.g., a height difference for weights to fall through) is described as being replenished.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce continuous 'free' power by using movable weights on a wheel, but gravity alone cannot provide net energy over a cycle. The wheel would settle into equilibrium, and any energy extracted would quickly stop it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims 'renewable free energy' with no identifiable net energy input.
- Gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle using only gravity and movable masses on a wheel.
- System describes an 'off-balance' wheel, which is a static imbalance. Once rotated to its heavy side down, it will oscillate and stop due to friction, not produce continuous power.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy from external environment, with claimed transformation/redistribution via a working agent in a gravitational or artificial quasi-potential field created by rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to take ambient thermal energy and, using a rotating working fluid in a gravitational/artificial field, redistribute it into high- and low-temperature reservoirs to do useful work. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, as it attempts to extract useful work from a single thermal reservoir without a colder sink, directly violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Claims to redistribute thermal energy from a single-temperature external environment to create high and low energy levels without an external work input or a true temperature gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the energy input required to create/maintain the rotation or artificial potential field.
- Ambiguous mechanism: 'Working agent' in a closed volume allegedly creates a useful thermal gradient from an isothermal environment, which is thermodynamically impossible for net work extraction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the machine's sole energy input is the gravitational potential energy of its own internal weights, implying it is intended to be a self-sustaining gravity-powered motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gravity motor that expects constant torque from overhanging masses. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce work without an external energy source to replenish the gravitational potential of the falling weights, directly violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input is described to reset the system's gravitational potential.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Claims a 'constant torque' from an isolated system with no maintained gradient.
- Mechanically, any work extracted from falling weights would reduce the system's total energy, requiring external work to lift the weights back up to repeat the cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (heat) from the environment, with an initial cooling input to create a pressure gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'atmospheric heat engine' violation. It claims to generate useful electrical work by creating a gas flow using only ambient heat. The required cooling to sustain the pressure gradient consumes at least as much work as the generators can produce, violating the Second Law. It is a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Claims to extract net work from a single thermal reservoir (the ambient environment) by using a portion of the extracted work to sustain the cooling needed to maintain the flow.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The initial cooling and the continuous cooling at the top of the vertical section (to maintain the pressure differential) require work input. This work input is supposedly generated by the propellers in the flow, creatin
- No perpetual gradient: The described process aims to create a sustained pressure-driven flow using only ambient heat, which is thermodynamically impossible without a sustained temperature difference between two reservoirs.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The analysis ignor
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied self-contained system with water tubing, centrifugal device, kinetic-to-potential energy converters, and piston/cylinder assembly. No external energy input is specified, suggesting the device is claimed to generate useful energy from its own internal motions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'continuously self-moving engine creating useful energy' using only internal components like water tubes, centrifugal devices, and pistons. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as it claims to produce net energy output without any external energy input to compensate for inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) - claims to be 'self-moving' and 'creating useful energy' with no identified external energy source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics - describes conversion between kinetic and potential energy within a closed system, which will lose energy to friction, heat, and other irreversibilities, not sustain or amplify motion.
- Incomplete energy accounting - no quantification of input energy, losses, or output. System appears to be a complex Rube Goldberg machine with no net energy gain mechanism.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output > c
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a piston/cylinder system with a claimed 'pressure level regulator' system of flexible-walled cavities filled with fluid/gas that supposedly equalizes pressure on both sides of the piston while limiting its movement.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a piston-based 'engine' where a regulator system equalizes pressure on both sides of the piston, which by definition eliminates the net force needed to do work. It proposes a self-contained mechanism to produce motion without any external energy source, directly violating Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: A net force on a piston requires a pressure differential. The described system of cavities allegedly equalizes pressure on both sides, eliminating the very gradient needed to produce net work.
- Violates Conservation of Energy: The abstract claims the device is 'bezoporny' (frictionless), but a frictionless engine still requires an energy input to perform work. No external energy source (fuel, heat gradient, electrical input) is identified.
- Perpetual Motion Mechanism: The core claim is a force-producing device (двигатель - engine/motor) with no apparent energy input and a mechanism that nullifies the pressure differential needed for its operation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes a mechan
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical oscillator system (lever with weight, springs, and magnets) that supposedly generates power from its own motion. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, ambient) is described. The implied source is the initial push from the 'pushing member' and potential energy from magnets/weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system with levers, weights, springs, and magnets that allegedly generates power from its own oscillation. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it describes power extraction without any ongoing external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction and damping. The use of magnets does not provide a net energy source over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net external energy input after initial start-up
- System will lose energy to friction, air resistance, and internal damping in springs/magnets
- Attempts to use permanent magnets to sustain or amplify motion violate energy conservation (magnetic force is conservative over a cycle)
- The 'energy collection device' at the lever end implies power extraction without compensating energy input
- Mechanical resonance does not create energy; it only temporarily stores and releases it with losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent claims to recycle latent heat of condensation completely and achieve unit efficiency (η=1) in distillers, implying a closed-loop internal energy recovery with no net external heat input required.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly states its novelty is 'incompatible with the Second Law of Thermodynamics' and claims unitary efficiency by completely recycling condensation heat. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, as it claims to achieve perfect cyclic conversion of heat into work or perfect internal heat recovery without a net external energy input or a cold sink to dump waste heat, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims incompatibility with the Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Claims unitary efficiency (η=1) for a distiller/heat engine, implying perfect conversion of heat into work or perfect internal heat recycling without loss
- Claims 'heat gains' from high to low temperature that increase efficiency beyond standard cycle limits, suggesting a violation of the Clausius statement
- Describes work and heat as exact differentials (state functions) within the cycle, which is fundamentally incorrect for heat in a thermodynamic process
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system requires energy input to spin the rotor and to actuate the hydraulic pressure system to move fluid/mass. The claim implies this input can produce net translational motion of the entire structure without a corresponding reaction mass or external force, suggesting an internal momentum-generating mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create translational motion by internally shifting mass within a rotating system. This violates conservation of momentum, as internal forces cannot produce a net external force on a closed system. The described mechanism is a form of reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. An isolated system cannot change its own center of mass velocity by internal forces alone.
- Violates Newton's third law. Internal redistribution of mass creates equal and opposite internal forces, resulting in zero net external force on the system.
- Energy accounting is incomplete. Input energy to spin the rotor and actuate the hydraulic system is required, but the claim implies useful translational work output without specifying an external reaction force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy from shifting fluid mass within a closed hydraulic system attached to a wheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate continuous rotation by internally shifting fluid mass using gravity, but gravity is a conservative force. Over a full rotation, the net work done by gravity on the fluid in a closed cycle is zero, so no net energy can be extracted to sustain motion against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is closed and operates in a cycle. The gravitational potential energy of the fluid is part of the system's internal energy state. No external energy gradient is maintained to perform net work over a full cycle.
- The described weight imbalance is claimed to be perpetual and self-sustaining, driving continuous rotation. This requires the system to output net work (rotation) without an equivalent net input of energy from outside the closed system.
- Friction and hydraulic losses would dissipate any initial motion. The design attempts to create a perpetual imbalance, which is impossible in a conservative force field like gravity over a closed cycle.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Extracting net
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be buoyancy forces from pistons changing size in a liquid, with no external energy input other than immersion in a static liquid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous rotation and useful work solely by being immersed in a liquid, using buoyancy forces from pistons that change size. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it attempts to extract net energy from a system in thermodynamic equilibrium without an external energy gradient, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims continuous rotation and work output from a single, static energy reservoir (liquid at uniform gravitational potential).
- No thermodynamic gradient: system is in equilibrium with a uniform liquid bath; no temperature, pressure, or chemical gradient is described to drive a cycle.
- Buoyancy is a conservative force: net work over a closed cycle in a uniform fluid is zero. The described mechanism of changing piston size and connecting pairs cannot create a perpetual torque.
- Incomplete energy accounting: ignores energy required to change the volume/displacement of the pistons (e.g., to compress gas, move floats, or flex spiral tubes).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output wor
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'gravity energy' from weights moving on tracks. However, gravity is a conservative force; the net work done by gravity over any closed cycle is zero. The only possible input is the initial gravitational potential energy stored in the weights, which will be depleted.
AI Physics Analysis
The machine is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. Gravity cannot be used as a continuous source of energy in a closed system because it is conservative; the weights would eventually come to rest as their initial potential energy is converted to waste heat. The claim violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce energy without an external energy input.
- Uses gravity in a closed cycle with no means to restore the system's potential energy.
- Describes a mechanism that, once started, would lose energy to friction and air resistance, requiring continuous input to sustain motion.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source (e.g., ambient heat) is identified to perform net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text describes using 'ambient temperature' to generate power, suggesting extraction of work from a single thermal reservoir without a temperature gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims to generate power using ambient temperature, which directly violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. A heat engine cannot produce net work by exchanging heat with a single temperature reservoir; a temperature difference is required.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Kelvin-Planck statement).
- Claims to generate useful work ('power') from ambient temperature alone.
- No identifiable temperature gradient or high/low temperature reservoirs for a heat engine cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting - no clear primary energy input besides ambient heat.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions four electric motors (15) as components, suggesting electrical input, but the abstract claims a constant torque from mass overhangs, implying gravity as a perpetual energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classical perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate constant torque via gravity-driven mass overhangs, violating energy conservation. Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a fixed gravitational field is zero without an external energy input to restore the system's initial state.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a constant torque from mass overhangs, which suggests extracting net work from a conservative gravitational field without an external gradient or energy input to reset the system.
- No mechanism described to lift masses back to a higher potential energy state without inputting at least as much work as is gained during descent.
- The system appears to be a complex arrangement of gears, cranks, and weights attempting to create perpetual motion from gravity alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat from the environment, possibly at low temperatures using refrigerant fluids. The patent explicitly claims to use 'free' energy exchanges with the external environment.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent directly and explicitly claims to achieve 100% efficient thermal cycles and a form of perpetual motion of the second kind by misinterpreting phase diagrams of liquid-vapor mixtures. It violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which forbids a cycle whose sole effect is the conversion of heat from a single reservoir into work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims unitary (100%) or greater efficiency for a thermal cycle.
- Claims cycles can operate without condensation and convert all absorbed heat into mechanical work.
- Directly references achieving the 'second type of perpetual motion' (a Maxwell's demon-like device extracting work from a single thermal reservoir).
- Misapplies Gibbs phase rule and state equations for mixtures to argue around the Second Law.
- Asserts that positioning cycles partly below ambient temperature makes energy exchanges 'practically free', ignoring that work extraction from a cold reservoir requires work input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device includes a motor (Claim 9) to drive a crank, which then moves a lever. The only other potential source mentioned is gravity, via a 'gravitational balancing unit' (Claim 10). The system appears to be a closed mechanical loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'gravitational aggregate' where a motor-driven crank moves a lever, implying the extraction of useful work from a gravity-influenced mechanical cycle. This violates energy conservation because gravity is a conservative force—the net work done by gravity over any closed cycle is zero. Any work output must come from the motor input, minus inevitable losses, making the device a net consumer of energy, not a generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy input from gravity in a closed cycle
- Motor-driven crank implies electrical input is primary energy source
- Gravitational balancing unit suggests an attempt to create a non-conservative gravitational effect, which is impossible
- Claims imply conversion of pendulum/crank motion into useful work without accounting for all losses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on unbalanced masses, implying a continuous torque from a static gravitational field without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity engine claiming to produce continuous torque from overbalanced masses. In a uniform gravitational field, the center of mass of any closed system cannot be perpetually lowered; internal forces and torques sum to zero over a full cycle, preventing net energy extraction. This is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed mechanical system in a conservative gravitational field cannot produce net work over a cycle.
- No identifiable external energy input to create a perpetual disequilibrium.
- The described mechanism (masses on rotating disks with cranks/gears) is a classic overbalanced wheel, which cannot produce continuous net torque as internal forces cancel.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a closed mechanical system with moving masses (balls/rollers) inside rotating blades, guided by fixed return elements. No external energy input is described beyond an initial spin.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system with moving masses inside rotating blades and fixed guides. It claims to generate rotational energy, implying sustained or increased rotation from the internal mass motion alone. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation, as no external energy source is identified to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate rotational energy without an external energy source.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a system where masses are cyclically moved outward and guided inward, purportedly creating a continuous torque imbalance to sustain/generate rotation.
- No entropy sink or identified thermodynamic gradient to drive the process.
- Ignores energy losses from friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions in the guidance mechanism.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions gravity but provides no mechanism for how energy is extracted from a gravitational potential without an external energy input to reset the system. The text conflates it with solar/wind but treats TGTEI as a separate primary generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim describes a 'Tall Gravity to Electricity Invention' that purportedly generates electricity, but provides no physically possible mechanism. Extracting net energy from a gravitational field alone violates conservation of energy, as you cannot get more work out of lowering a mass than you put into lifting it, unless an external energy source (like solar pumping water uphill) is specified and accounted for, which it is not.
Specific Physics Issues
- No description of the working mechanism for 'Tall Gravity to Electricity'.
- Implies continuous electricity generation from gravity without specifying the source of energy to lift the mass against gravity to restore the potential.
- Violates energy conservation: extracting net work from a static gravitational field without an external input is impossible.
- The claim is embedded among other valid technologies (solar, wind, battery exchange) in an obfuscating manner.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claim 2 states the engine 'produces its own power and consumes its own power/energy' (自己产生 自己消耗动力或能é‡), suggesting self-contained energy generation without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims explicitly reject the conservation of energy and describe a self-powered engine, which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics. The description uses vague, contradictory mechanical effects to obfuscate the fundamental impossibility of its core claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly states it does not obey the law of conservation of energy (ä¸éµå®ˆèƒ½é‡å®ˆæ定律)
- Claims to produce both 'saving force and saving distance' and 'consuming force and consuming distance' simultaneously, which is a contradictory and undefined mechanism.
- Describes an engine that powers itself, implying perpetual motion of the first kind (creation of energy).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The claim is for an internal, 'rotationally portable potential energy source' (e.g., springs, gravity) that is claimed to apply an 'undiminishing' force, implying a source of infinite energy or a mechanism to recycle energy without loss to produce net work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate continuous rotational energy using only internal forces (like springs or gravity), with no external energy input to replenish the finite internal potential energy, directly violating the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'undiminishing force' and generation of 'perpetual rotational kinetic energy'
- No external energy input described; device is claimed to be self-sustaining using only internal potential energy
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming continuous energy output without an equal input
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; any internal potential energy is finite and will be depleted, and the system cannot perform net work on itself cyclically without losses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use permanent magnets arranged to create motion, with optional external charging from solar, wind, water, etc. The core claim appears to be that magnetic interactions alone can sustain motion and produce useful work.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a motor/turbine powered by interactions between fixed and moving permanent magnets, implying it can produce sustained rotation. This is a classic magnetic perpetual motion machine, as permanent magnet fields are conservative and cannot provide net energy output without an external energy source, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying net work can be extracted from static permanent magnet configurations without an external energy input.
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy source identified for the primary claimed motion. Permanent magnets are conservative fields; no net work can be extracted from them alone.
- Describes a self-sustaining or triggered motion using fixed and moving magnets, which is a classic magnetic perpetual motion scheme.
- Claims about magnetic field interactions causing continuous rotation ignore that magnetic forces do work at the expense of the system's potential energy, which is finite.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The description fo
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use Earth's gravity as an external energy source, but gravity is a conservative force. The system's configuration (tipping tubes with fluid) is intended to create a perpetual cycle from gravitational potential energy alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to use gravity—a conservative force—to create continuous motion without an external energy input, directly violating the law of conservation of energy. The system will inevitably stop due to friction as its initial gravitational potential energy is dissipated.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming to extract net work from a closed gravitational potential cycle.
- Ignores that gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a conservative field is zero.
- No mechanism to overcome friction losses continuously without an external energy input.
- The system's internal redistribution of fluid cannot create a net energy gain; it will settle into an equilibrium state.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Vague and undefined. Claims energy is supplied from a 'Universal Fundamental Energy Source (UFES)' formed by 'Smallest Complex Particles (SCP)', but provides no mechanism for extracting usable work from this source without violating established conservation laws.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim explicitly seeks a perpetual motion machine ('2nd class permanent motion'), which is a direct violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). It attempts to justify this by inventing new universal particles and energy sources without providing a testable, physically coherent mechanism for energy extraction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims a '2nd class permanent motion' (perpetual motion)
- Proposes new fundamental particles and forces (SCP, UFES, NFF) without empirical basis or connection to known physics
- Claims to circumvent the First Law of Thermodynamics by drawing unlimited energy from a universal field
- Uses invented, undefined terminology (CAC, SQF, MFH) in place of testable physical mechanisms
- No quantitative analysis or limits provided
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Explici
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Creates a complex lexicon
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the working mass driver (impeller or MHD driver). The device is a closed system with no external reaction mass or environmental energy gradient input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a closed system that claims to produce net thrust by circulating and accelerating its internal working mass. The internal forces during turns cancel out, resulting in zero net external force on the device—it cannot propel itself without ejecting mass externally or interacting with an external field. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' violation of Newtonian mechanics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for a closed system.
- Claims net thrust from internal momentum changes within a sealed plenum.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction to produce a net external force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy from motors to accelerate internal masses within a closed chamber.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed system where internal moving parts collide to produce a net linear impulse on the vehicle. This directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum for a closed system, as the total momentum of the system (vehicle + internal masses) must remain constant without external interaction. No mechanism can produce net thrust from purely internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net linear impulse on a closed system from purely internal interactions
- Asserts a 'special consequence of momentum conservation' yields a net external impulse without mass ejection
- Describes a mechanism where internal collisions between bodies and chamber walls produce a non-zero net momentum transfer to the vehicle enclosure
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system requires energy to turn the wheel and operate the conveyor screw, but the claim implies a net unidirectional propulsion force is generated from the centrifugal mechanism itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an attempted reactionless drive, which is impossible under Newtonian mechanics. The internal redistribution and ejection of mass cannot create a net external force on the system as a whole; momentum is conserved. The description confuses internal stresses with net propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The internal centrifugal force on the belt is balanced by an equal and opposite force on the wheel/hub. No net external force is created.
- Incomplete force accounting. The ejection of mass downward/outward at point (n) creates an equal and opposite momentum change on the system, canceling any momentary upward impulse.
- Misinterprets centrifugal force as an external force. Centrifugal force is a fictitious, inward-seeking force in the rotating frame; in the inertial frame, it is the mass's inertia requiring centripetal force from the belt/wheel.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity or buoyancy, but the described mechanism is an internal redistribution of mass with no external gradient or energy input to sustain it.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a long-disproven perpetual motion machine. It claims to use internal mechanisms to create a perpetual imbalance, but the work required to lift and reset the internal masses will always equal or exceed the work gained from their descent, violating energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to power the internal mechanisms.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to output 95% of a weight's potential as kinetic energy while using only 5% to run its internal mechanism, implying net energy creation.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: attempts to create a perpetual imbalance and extract net work from an equilibrium system (gravity field) without an external energy source.
- Mechanically impossible: Internal lifts, compressors, and valves require work to move mass against gravity within the wheel. This work must come from the wheel's rotation, creating a loss greater than or equal to any potential gain from redistributin
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'consumes l
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity from vehicle load weight, but system is a closed mechanical loop with no external gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
This describes a gravity-driven wheel that claims to convert the weight of its own load into rotational motion through an internal hydraulic/mechanical system. This violates energy conservation because the gravitational potential energy of the load cannot decrease in a closed loop without an external input - the wheel would quickly reach equilibrium and stop. It's essentially an overbalanced wheel perpetual motion machine with hydraulic obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System attempts to use its own weight as an internal energy source to drive itself
- No external energy input or height differential to create a sustainable gravitational potential gradient
- Mechanical/hydraulic transmission cannot create net energy; internal forces sum to zero
- Describes a self-driving wheel using its load - classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion concept
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies extracting net energy from gravity via an unbalanced weight system ("Cumulative Effects Theory"), but no external energy input to reset the system or create a sustained gravitational potential gradient is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate electricity by using unbalanced weights and a tall stack of wheels, but provides no external energy input to maintain the imbalance. Once the weights move to their lowest point, the system stops, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate electricity from gravity without an external energy source to restore the gravitational potential.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Implies creation of energy from an equilibrium configuration.
- No mechanism described to create a perpetual unbalanced force; any initial imbalance will reach equilibrium after one cycle.
- Vague 'Cumulative Effects Theory' is not a recognized physical principle and suggests stacking or geometry can create net energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
External engine or motor powers the rotation of the disks and the positioning of the ramps.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum transfer machine. While the motor provides energy to spin internal masses, any impulse from deflecting them radially is balanced by an equal and opposite reaction on the drive mechanism, resulting in zero net external thrust. It attempts to create propulsion without expelling reaction mass, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce a net linear force (thrust) from internal momentum exchanges within a closed system.
- Describes a mechanism that can only produce internal reaction forces, resulting in zero net momentum change for the system's center of mass.
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a rotating mass (32) and a lever system (36) are used to generate torque, but no external energy input (electrical, chemical, environmental gradient) is identified to sustain the motion or overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system that appears to use internal lever actions from a rotating mass to generate torque on the main rotor, aiming for self-sustaining or amplified rotation. This violates energy conservation as it lacks an identified external energy source to perform net work and overcome inevitable losses, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate output torque/work without a clear, sustained energy input.
- Violates Newton's laws: Implies a lever system (36) can generate a net torque on the main rotor (31) from its own motion, suggesting a reactionless drive or internal momentum transfer that cannot produce net work.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a system where a rotating component's own motion is used to create a torque on itself to perpetuate or amplify rotation, which is impossible without external energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on torque
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert heat differences into mechanical work, but explicitly states the goal is to exceed the Carnot efficiency limit for heat engines, implying the primary input is thermal energy from a temperature gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim explicitly and directly violates the second law of thermodynamics by stating its purpose is to achieve efficiencies greater than the Carnot limit for converting heat into mechanical work. The description uses complex, non-standard terminology to obscure the fundamental thermodynamic impossibility of its core claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims to achieve efficiencies greater than the Carnot limit, which is a direct violation of the second law of thermodynamics for heat engines.
- Describes a complex process but provides no coherent mechanism to circumvent fundamental thermodynamic limits.
- Uses obfuscating terminology (e.g., 'Abkühlungskraftmaschinen', 'Volumensdruckwandler', 'Unterdruckkühler') without a clear, physically valid energy conversion cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent claims a 'power source' provides electrical/microwave power to a 'mass change object', but the proposed mechanism for generating thrust is the purported time-varying inertial mass itself, not a reaction against an external propellant or field.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a net thrust by cyclically changing an object's inertial mass during different parts of its motion. This violates conservation of momentum, as it proposes creating a net force without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field. The 'inertial mass change' mechanism is not recognized in physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Core claim of 'inertial mass change' via localized power in a vacuum is not supported by established physics (General Relativity equivalence principle).
- Proposed thrust generation violates conservation of momentum. Net force cannot be created by cyclically varying an object's inertial mass during different acceleration phases without an equal and opposite momentum change in another system.
- No identifiable external reaction mass or field interaction to satisfy Newton's third law.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity via 'Cumulative Effects Theory' - a tall stack of unbalanced weights/levers on a chain driving many small wheels.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate electricity by cycling unbalanced weights in a tall structure, but provides no external energy source to reset the weights to their starting height. The 'Cumulative Effects Theory' describes an arrangement that cannot produce net energy output, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net energy input. Gravity is a conservative force; cycling masses around a closed loop extracts zero net work.
- Claims 'increases in totalling net forces' and accumulation of 'overbalanced' forces violate energy conservation. The system is intended to be self-sustaining/perpetual.
- Confuses force/torque with energy. While a tall column of unbalanced levers might create a large static torque, sustaining motion requires continuously lifting masses against gravity, consuming the very energy supposedly generated.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert gravitational force to energy, implying extraction of net work from a static gravitational field without an external, consumable energy source to lower a mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. While shifting fluid can create a temporary imbalance, resetting the system to begin a new cycle requires at least as much energy as was gained, resulting in zero net energy output over a complete rotation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No net work can be extracted from a system in a conservative field (gravity) over a cycle.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: The described mechanism (shifting fluid via piston) requires work input to move the piston and overcome friction/viscosity; this input is not accounted for.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: The device is described as a source of power, implying continuous energy output without an equal energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the input shaft torque from a motor. The device claims to extract additional energy from centrifugal forces generated by rotating masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use centrifugal force to amplify torque and reduce the energy required from the drive motor for the same output work. This is impossible because centrifugal force in a fixed mechanical system is not an independent energy source; it is a reaction force. Any apparent torque increase would come from the system's own inertia and would be transient, or would require gearing that trades speed for torque, not a reduction in input energy. The core claim violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is a kinematic constraint, not an independent energy source. It is a reaction force that arises from the centripetal acceleration required to keep the masses moving in a circular path. This force is radial and cannot directly create
- The claim that 'the energy expenditure of the drive is reduced' for the same output torque implies a net gain in mechanical work or a reduction in input power for the same output power, violating conservation of energy.
- The system is described as a closed mechanical linkage. Any torque 'amplification' at the output for a given input speed would require a corresponding reduction in output speed (conservation of power: Power = Torque × Angular Velocity), not a reducti
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's rotational energy, but the described mechanism (a pipe with intake at a smaller Earth radius and outlet at a larger radius) does not actually extract energy from Earth's rotation. The system attempts to use the centrifugal potential difference in a rotating frame, but the working fluid (water) is already co-rotating with the Earth.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to pump water to a higher elevation or generate electricity by harnessing Earth's rotation using a simple pipe. However, in the rotating frame of the Earth, the water is already in equilibrium; moving it radially outward requires input of energy to increase its angular momentum, which this passive structure cannot provide.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum. To pump fluid outward against the centrifugal potential, work must be done ON the fluid. The Earth's rotation alone cannot cause spontaneous net flow from a lower to a higher radius in a closed, co-rotating
- Misapplication of Euler's turbomachinery equation. This equation describes energy transfer between a rotor and a fluid, not extraction from a planet's rotation via a static structure.
- No external energy input identified to overcome viscous losses and maintain flow. The system is presented as a self-sustaining pump.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient fluid environment (implied thermal gradient or fluid motion), but claims to generate net upward motion/force from relative rotation between surfaces without external work input
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to generate continuous upward motion through relative rotation between surfaces in a fluid, creating pressure differences that supposedly drive further motion without any external energy input. This violates conservation of energy and Newton's laws, as it attempts to extract net work from a closed system with no identifiable energy source beyond initial motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law - claims pressure differences can generate net force without reaction
- No identifiable external energy gradient to drive continuous motion
- Attempts to extract net work from fluid interactions without accounting for energy dissipation
- Describes relative motion creating pressure differences that supposedly drive more motion (circular causality)
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the system is self-sustaining or powered by its own weight redistribution via the teetering motion, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It uses an intricate arrangement of chains and sprockets to leverage internal weight shifts, but provides no external energy source to overcome inevitable frictional losses, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input. System appears designed to extract net work from internal weight shifts without an external gradient.
- Claims 'spin reaction' and 'recover their former tooth-to-chain position perpetually' implying sustained motion without energy input.
- Complex gearing and leverage only transmit/transform energy, not create it. System will stop due to friction losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravity alone, with no other explicit energy input. The system describes weights moving in a cyclical pattern, implying internal energy redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity using only Earth's gravity, with weights moving in a repeating cycle. This violates the conservation of energy because gravity is a conservative force; no net work can be extracted from a closed cyclical process without an external energy source or a net lowering of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes net energy extraction from a conservative force field (gravity) without an external energy source or a decreasing potential.
- No thermodynamic gradient or fuel identified. Gravity is a potential field, not an energy source; to extract net work, the system's center of mass must lower, which is not described as a one-way process.
- Describes a perpetual cycle where weights are lifted and lowered internally, with 'community production' suggesting energy multiplication, which is impossible in a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > in
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims mention electric motors and solar power, but the described lift/thrust mechanism is purportedly generated internally by gyroscopes without reaction mass expulsion or interaction with an external medium.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce lift or thrust using only internal gyroscopic forces, which violates Newton's laws of motion. A gyroscopic system can reorient itself or exert internal stresses, but cannot create a net external force on its center of mass to hover or accelerate without expelling reaction mass or pushing against an external medium.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). A gyroscope can produce internal torques and precessional forces, but cannot generate a net external force on its center of mass without an external reaction force.
- No mechanism described to convert rotational/gyroscopic motion into sustained net vertical lift.
- Claims of high-speed flight in all environments (air, water) with the same quiet mechanism defy fluid dynamics and conservation of momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the rotational kinetic energy of the Earth, extracted by a channel (positioned along a meridian) where seawater enters at a smaller Earth radius and flows to a turbine at a larger radius.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate power from Earth's rotation by flowing seawater through a radial channel. This is physically impossible for steady operation because extracting rotational energy requires applying a net torque to slow the Earth's spin, which the described system cannot do. It misunderstands centrifugal forces and violates conservation of angular momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates angular momentum conservation: Extracting energy from Earth's rotation requires a net torque on the Earth, slowing its spin. The described setup provides no reaction mass or momentum exchange mechanism to apply this torque.
- Misapplies Euler's turbomachinery equation: This equation describes energy transfer *within* a rotating device, not extraction from the planet's rotation itself.
- No actual energy gradient identified: The proposed flow from smaller to larger radius in a rotating frame would require work input (like pumping against centrifugal force), not produce work output.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Ignores the massive work required to move water radially outward against the centrifugal potential in the rotating frame of the Earth.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity (Earth's gravitational field), but no persistent gradient or disequilibrium is created. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement of weights and linkages.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of perpetual motion machine. Gravity alone cannot provide a continuous source of energy to a closed mechanical system because it is a conservative force; the net work done by gravity over any closed cycle is zero. To generate electricity, energy must be input to lift the weights against gravity, which the patent description obscures.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes to extract net useful work (electricity) from a closed system interacting only with a static gravitational field.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a cycle in a closed system is zero.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes weights being lifted and falling, but ignores the energy required to reset the system (lift weights). The described 'sharing' of energy between linkages does not create a net surplus.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of matter (water or iron balls) being lowered on one side of an endless belt. The system attempts to recycle the matter by returning it to the top via a separate conveyor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator that cycles mass (water/balls) downward to produce work, then returns it to the top. This is a closed system. The energy gained from the descent is always less than the energy required for the ascent plus losses, making continuous net power generation impossible. It violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed-loop gravity engine. The work extracted from lowering the mass is less than the work required to return the mass to the top to restart the cycle, when all losses (friction, conveyor power, generator inefficiency) are accounted for.
- Claims 'dauerhaft zur Verfügung steht' (permanently available) for the pulling force, implying continuous net work output from a fixed amount of mass in a cycle, which violates energy conservation.
- The description obfuscates the energy input needed to return the empty containers and the mass to the top. The 'eigenständigen schnell laufenden Förderband' (independent fast-running conveyor belt) is a major, unaccounted energy consumer.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on the 'to
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from inertial/gravitational effects via asymmetric mass velocities within a rotating system, implying energy generation from the system's own motion without an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism that claims to generate usable energy from a rotating mass by creating an internal velocity asymmetry. This setup lacks an external energy source and proposes a self-sustaining force from internal motion alone, directly violating the conservation of energy and Newton's third law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by proposing a self-sustaining rotation that outputs energy without an identified external energy input.
- Proposes a gravitational/inertial effect (via an undefined coefficient Gi*) that creates a net force from a system's internal motion, equivalent to a reactionless drive.
- No thermodynamic gradient (e.g., thermal, gravitational potential) is identified to drive energy extraction; the claimed mechanism operates in a closed loop.
- The described velocity splitting (v1 + kv2 vs v1 - kv2) is an internal kinematic arrangement that cannot produce a net external force or energy surplus without violating Newton's laws.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity (falling masses) and buoyancy (rising masses). No external energy input is described to reset the system; the buoyant rise is powered by the same gravitational fall.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. The energy gained from masses falling on one side is exactly equal to (or less than, due to friction) the energy needed to return those masses to the top, whether by buoyancy or mechanical means. Buoyancy does not create energy; it merely transfers it from the fluid's gravitational field. The system violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- System forms a closed cycle with no net energy input. The work extracted from falling masses equals the work required to lift them against gravity, minus losses. Buoyancy is not an energy source; it converts gravitational potential energy from the fl
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational force, but no external gradient or energy input is specified to reset the system. Gravity is a conservative force field, not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert gravitational force to energy, but gravity alone is not an energy source; it's a conservative field. Any work extracted by lowering a mass requires equal or greater work to lift it back up, violating energy conservation if net output is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Attempts to extract net work from a closed gravitational potential without an external energy input to restore the initial state.
- No identifiable thermodynamic gradient or fuel to drive continuous energy conversion.
- Describes a system where a moving fluid (or weight) shifts a center of mass to create an imbalance, but work done to reset the system would equal or exceed any output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a magnetic interaction between a magnet on a connecting rod and an iron segment on a wheel/crank assembly, with no explicit external energy input mentioned.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a wheel driven by the magnetic attraction between a magnet on a connecting rod and an iron segment on the wheel. This constitutes a closed magnetic system with no identified external energy input, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The internal magnetic forces cannot produce continuous rotation without an external energy source to reset the system or create a non-conservative cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- System describes a magnet pulling on an iron segment to rotate a wheel/crank, which then moves the magnet away, creating a cyclical motion with no identified net energy input.
- No source of energy to overcome magnetic hysteresis, friction, or other losses is specified.
- The claim implies sustained rotation from internal magnetic forces alone, which is a closed system with no external gradient to exploit.
- Materials with 'very low magnetic conductivity' (likely meaning low magnetic permeability) would weaken the intended magnetic attraction force, making the proposed motion less effective, not more.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The text claims the motors are 'perpetual' and 'run with Magnetism,' implying energy is generated without an external source, violating energy conservation.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a 'perpetual motor' that produces more energy than it consumes and powers a spacecraft indefinitely without fuel. This directly violates the conservation of energy and the laws of thermodynamics, making it physically impossible. The use of terms like 'magnetism' and 'sonic' obfuscates the lack of a legitimate energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion (motor runs 'on its own' and produces more electric current than it uses)
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics (no entropy increase or thermal gradient specified)
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, sunlight)
- Assumes energy can be created from nothing within a closed system
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the system generates 'levitation forces' and propulsion from internal rotational and precessional motion alone, with no identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to create continuous propulsion ('levitation forces') for spacecraft using only internal gyroscopic precession, which violates conservation of momentum. Coriolis forces are internal and cannot provide a net external force to accelerate the system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net unidirectional force (levitation/propulsion) from purely internal gyroscopic motions.
- Coriolis forces are inertial/fictitious forces that cannot do net work on the system's center of mass in a closed cycle.
- Energy balance condition (E∥(ω) = E⟂(V)) describes internal energy distribution, not an external energy source for propulsion.
- Violates Newton's third law; a system cannot propel itself by internal forces alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's rotational kinetic energy, but no mechanism to extract energy from this inertial reference frame without an external torque or reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from the Earth's rotation using internal gyroscopic forces, which violates conservation of angular momentum. All torques described are internal to the system (Earth + device), so no net energy can be extracted without an external reaction or a changing moment of inertia relative to the stars. This is a classical perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy source identified
- Device is part of the Earth's rotating frame; internal gyroscopic torques are internal forces that cannot produce net work on the system
- Misunderstanding of gyroscopic precession as an energy source
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest energy is generated from the 'rotation of the Earth' itself, implying extraction of work from the Earth's rotational kinetic energy without an external energy gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a 'superconductor motor/generator' powered by the Earth's rotation. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it proposes creating useful energy from the Earth's rotational inertia alone, which is not an available energy gradient for doing work. It also ignores the conservation of angular momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: proposes extracting net work from the Earth's rotation without an external energy source to create a usable gradient.
- Violates angular momentum conservation: extracting rotational energy would change Earth's angular momentum without an equal and opposite reaction.
- Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind: generating energy from a single thermal reservoir (Earth) without a colder sink.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is not specified. The title and claims explicitly state 'ohne Brennstoff' (without fuel), implying no chemical input. The only plausible source is initial gravitational potential energy of the weights and pendulum, which will be depleted.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system with no identified external energy source. It claims to generate and store power without fuel, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system's initial energy will be dissipated, and it cannot produce net useful work indefinitely.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to be a 'force/power device without fuel' (Kraftvorrichtung ohne Brennstoff).
- Describes a closed mechanical system (lever, running weights, pendulum, springs) with gearing to an energy storage device.
- No external energy input is described to replenish the system's energy, which will be lost to friction and other dissipative forces.
- The system will inevitably come to rest as its initial mechanical energy is converted to waste heat.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from gravity, but describes a system of weights on belts moving between three positions. No external energy input (like lifting weights) is described to create or maintain a gravitational potential gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate electricity from gravity alone by moving weights in a cycle, but provides no mechanism to restore the weights to their higher potential energy state without consuming at least as much energy as is produced. This violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System attempts to extract net work from a conservative force (gravity) in a closed cycle.
- No identifiable external energy input to reset the system. Lifting a weight 'when needed' would require energy from the system's output, creating a loss.
- Describes a 'community production' of energy from three arms, suggesting a belief in energy multiplication from internal configuration alone.
- Gravity is not an energy source; it is a potential field. To extract energy, mass must fall from a higher to a lower potential, requiring an initial input to raise it.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'output
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravity, but no persistent energy gradient or external input is described to reset the system. Gravity is a conservative force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity solely using Earth's gravity. However, gravity is a conservative force—any work extracted from a weight falling must be paid back to lift it to its starting position, resulting in zero net energy per cycle. The description is a classic perpetual motion machine claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Gravity alone cannot provide net energy; work done by gravity on a descending weight is exactly equal to the work required to lift it back up, resulting in zero net energy over a cycle.
- The description of weights moving on belts in a cycle suggests a closed-loop mechanical system with no external, non-conservative energy input.
- The claim of extracting 'kinetic energy' from the center implies perpetual motion of the first kind (energy from nothing), violating energy conservation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the quantum vacuum zero-point field, with the Casimir effect proposed as the mechanism for extracting usable work or force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to manipulate zero-point energy to produce propulsion, generate power, or reduce mass. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the quantum vacuum ground state is not an energy source from which net work can be extracted; the Casimir effect describes a static force, not a continuous energy supply.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by proposing to extract net work from the quantum vacuum ground state, which is an equilibrium state.
- Misinterprets the Casimir force (a conservative, gradient force) as a source of unlimited propulsive thrust or continuous energy generation.
- Claims of mass reduction via vacuum manipulation lack a coherent mechanism within established physics.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use 'pulseurs' (pushers) to rotate a disk with vanes, and an 'energy recuperator' driven by the axle returns energy to the pushers to create continuous motion. No primary external energy source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a self-sustaining rotary device where energy from the rotating axle is partially recovered and fed back to the pushers that drive the rotation. This constitutes a closed energy loop with no identified external energy source, directly violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The system would inevitably stop due to losses, making continuous motion impossible as described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 4 describes a closed-loop energy recovery system intended for continuous motion, implying perpetual operation without an external energy input.
- No thermodynamic gradient, fuel, electrical input, or ambient energy harvest is specified as the primary driver.
- The description suggests energy multiplication ('la longueur du fouet augmente l'énergie au niveau de l'axe') and feedback ('une partie de l'énergie et récupéré et renvoyer dans Les pulseurs'), creating a circular energy path.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The system's 'outp
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy from masses rolling on a closed track, but the system is closed-loop with no external energy input to reset the masses to a higher potential energy state.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The described closed-loop track and telescoping levers merely redistribute gravitational potential energy within the system; friction and losses will stop it. There is no external energy source to reset the masses to a higher potential, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed-loop gravitational system cannot produce net work without an external energy input to lift the masses.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Claims perpetual motion by having one mass lift another in a cycle with no net loss.
- Mechanism describes energy redistribution within the system, not net energy extraction from gravity. The track shape (egg-like) does not create energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores energy los
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the frequency generator to create a standing electromagnetic wave within the resonant cavity.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed electromagnetic system where all parts are mechanically connected. Internal forces between the standing wave and the thruster cannot produce a net external force to propel the vehicle, as this would violate conservation of momentum. It is a form of a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed net force violates Newton's third law and momentum conservation. The system is a closed electromagnetic cavity; internal EM interactions cannot produce a net force on the system's center of mass.
- No external asymmetric interaction or momentum sink is described. The thruster is mechanically coupled to the cavity walls, making the force an internal reaction pair.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; the claimed 'propellant-free' thrust implies momentum generation without expelling reaction mass, which is impossible for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy from lifting the mobile inertia wheel (160) and gravity rotation belt (120) via the stop base (170). The device is a single-use gravity motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered mechanism with no provision for an external energy input to reset its initial state. It converts a finite amount of gravitational potential energy into rotational kinetic energy once, violating energy conservation if claimed as an 'automatic' or sustained rotation system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims automatic rotation but only describes a one-time conversion of stored gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy.
- No mechanism for energy input to reset the system: The mobile wheel and belt fall a 'predetermined height' and are not returned to their initial elevated position.
- Implies perpetual or sustained motion from a finite energy reserve without an external energy source to replenish it.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the device begins spinning when pressure is applied to cross-members, suggesting initial mechanical input, but the abstract references previous perpetual motion attempts and the mechanism appears designed to sustain motion indefinitely without an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanically complex linkage with no specified external energy source. Its description as a 'weight motor' and its connection to prior perpetual motion attempts indicates an intent to generate sustained motion from internal weight shifts, which violates energy conservation. Any initial motion will decay due to friction.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net external energy input to sustain motion.
- Complex mechanical linkage does not create a perpetual energy gradient.
- System will reach equilibrium due to friction and losses, violating claim of sustained motion from initial actuation.
- Design attempts to use internal weight redistribution and leverage in a closed loop, which cannot produce net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravity, but gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from a gravitational field alone in a closed cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous acceleration and torque using only gravity and internal weight movements, which is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. Since gravity is a conservative force, any work done lifting a mass must be paid back when it falls, resulting in zero net work over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims 'positive acceleration' and net torque from gravity without an external energy input or a descending mass.
- Misunderstands conservative force: Gravity cannot provide net work over a complete cycle; the device must return to its initial state, resulting in zero net work.
- No identifiable energy gradient or input: The described rocking/swinging of weights in a closed system cannot create a continuous accelerating torque.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy of gas molecules (kinetic energy from thermal motion). The device attempts to create a pressure or concentration gradient using asymmetric molecular passages without an external energy input to sort the molecules.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a passive membrane designed to sort gas molecules based on their direction of approach, aiming to create pressure or concentration gradients from ambient thermal motion. This is a classic Maxwell's Demon setup, which cannot perform net useful work without an external energy source to reset the demon's mechanism, thus violating the second law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to operate as a Maxwell's Demon without an energy input for measurement/operation, violating the second law.
- Claims to create useful work (pressure, vacuum, direct drive) from an isothermal system at equilibrium.
- Assumes a passive, static membrane can create a sustained directional flow from random thermal motion, which is thermodynamically forbidden.
- The described self-regulation (molecule count equalizing) admits the system reaches equilibrium, negating claims of sustained net work output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert gravity into usable energy via a mechanical system with weights on a lever, but no external energy input is described to reset the system against gravity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to extract usable energy from a weight moving in a gravitational field, but the energy required to reset the weight to its initial high-potential-energy position equals or exceeds the energy gained during its descent, resulting in zero net energy output for a closed cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: System claims to autonomously move and deliver energy without an identified external energy source.
- No mechanism to create a perpetual energy gradient: Lifting a weight requires work input equal to or greater than the potential energy gained. The described reset mechanism uses the system's own weights, implying a closed cycle with net energy loss.
- Misunderstanding of gravity as an energy source: Gravity is a conservative force field; no net work can be extracted from a weight cycling in a closed path in a uniform gravitational field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims autonomous
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy of the gas (kinetic energy of molecules). The device claims to create a pressure/density gradient from an initially equilibrium gas using only a passive geometric structure.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a passive membrane that, through geometry alone, purportedly sorts gas molecules by their approach angle to create a pressure difference. This is a classic violation of the Second Law, as it claims to extract useful work from the random thermal motion of an isothermal gas without an external energy source or a thermal gradient to drive the process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by attempting to create a pressure/temperature gradient from a single thermal reservoir without work input.
- Misinterprets the Maxwell's Demon thought experiment; real implementations require measurement and feedback, consuming energy to reset the demon's memory.
- Claims net useful work (direct propulsion, electricity generation, lift) from a passive membrane in equilibrium, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim states the machine produces force 'without any consumption of energy' and that 'nothing is spent', implying it requires no energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims the machine produces useful force 'without any consumption of energy,' which is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The described mechanism cannot generate net work without an energy input, making it a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of energy creation from nothing (violates conservation of energy).
- Describes a mechanism ('recovering beats', 'furrow turn into force') that allegedly produces net work without an identifiable energy source.
- No thermodynamic gradient, fuel, or external input is described to power the perpetual motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the device begins moving when 'up or down pressure is applied to either of the cross-members,' suggesting an initial manual input, but the overall design and naming ('weight motor', 'god-wheel') imply a goal of sustained or self-sustaining motion without an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical assembly with no described source of energy to overcome inevitable frictional losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The intricate gearing and chains merely redistribute forces and cannot create net energy, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain motion.
- Complex mechanical linkage does not create a net energy gradient.
- System will reach equilibrium and stop due to friction losses.
- Claims of working 'in virtually any medium' and attitude suggest a belief in gravity-independent operation, which is impossible for a weight-based motor.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses many specialized, no
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the buoyant force (Archimedes' principle) acting on pressurized fluid (gas) containers submerged in a denser liquid. A secondary, vague mention of solar energy to heat the gas is included.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by using a buoyancy force in a closed cycle. The net work from buoyancy over a full rotation is zero, as the work needed to submerge the empty containers and re-compress the gas equals or exceeds the work extracted during ascent. The added mention of solar energy does not rectify the core violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a closed cycle. The work gained from buoyancy on the ascending side is exactly canceled by the work required to submerge and re-compress the gas on the descending side, neglecting losses.
- The claim of reusing the discharged pressurized gas to drive additional, smaller wheels (Claim 5) suggests energy multiplication without an identified external input to re-pressurize the gas.
- Using solar energy to heat the gas (Claim 4) introduces a real but separate thermal input, conflated with the perpetual-motion-like buoyancy engine claim.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on the buo
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy of a vehicle/weight on a sloped track.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to provide perpetual motive force using gravity on an undulating track. However, on a closed track, the energy gained going down a slope is exactly spent overcoming friction and regaining height on the subsequent up-slope, with no net energy output. The claim of infinite energy violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'infinite rail gravity motive energy repeatedly continually and forever' which violates energy conservation.
- System lacks a mechanism to restore the vehicle/weight to its initial height without external energy input greater than or equal to the output.
- Describes a closed-loop track (circle, long circle) where net elevation change is zero, so no net gravitational work can be extracted per cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies a net axial force (thrust/levitation) is generated solely from the internal rotational energy inputs driving the main rotor and the peripheral lifting rotors, with no external reaction mass or environmental gradient identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanical system that claims to produce a net thrust force from rotating components alone. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate a net external force without ejecting mass. It is a form of mechanical perpetual motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: The described mechanism is a closed system of rotating masses. Internal forces sum to zero; no net external force (thrust) can be generated without expelling reaction mass.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: Claims to produce linear momentum (axial force) from purely rotational internal motions, creating momentum from nothing.
- Incomplete Force Analysis: The 'induced force' is claimed without identifying the external body against which the system pushes to achieve reaction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the weights, but the described mechanism attempts to create a perpetual imbalance of torque without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a type of perpetual motion machine. While gravity provides the force, the mechanism cannot create a continuous net torque imbalance over a full rotation. The work needed to reset the weights (move them inward on the upstroke) always equals or exceeds the work gained from their outward motion on the downstroke, resulting in no net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation and net energy output from a closed gravitational system.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Mechanically flawed: The described shifting of weights along rails during rotation would, over a full cycle, result in zero net work. The work done by a weight moving outward on the downstroke is exactly canceled by the work required to pull it inwar
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to operate solely on gravity with no other energy input, implying a perpetual energy source from a static gravitational field.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a well-known impossible perpetual motion machine of the first kind. Gravity is a conservative force; in a closed cycle, the net work done by gravity is zero. The described mechanism cannot create a continuous energy output without an external energy source, directly violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate continuous work (rotation, electricity) from a conservative force (gravity) without an external energy gradient or input.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: system outputs useful work without any net energy input.
- Mechanism describes shifting masses radially on a wheel to create imbalance, but this is a classic overbalanced wheel design that cannot produce net work over a full cycle in a conservative field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output > co
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical system (rotating weights in a cylinder) but provides no explicit external energy input. The implied source is the centrifugal force generated by the rotation of the weights themselves, which is not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net propulsion or rotation by periodically adding and removing weights from a rotating system. This violates conservation laws because centrifugal force is not an energy source; manipulating the weights requires energy input equal to or greater than any claimed output. The system describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force, not an energy source
- No mechanism to input energy to sustain or increase rotation
- Process of removing/adding weights would require work against centrifugal forces, consuming energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the system generates net propulsion or motion from internal mass movements alone, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce universal propulsion while keeping all forces internal, which is a direct violation of Newton's laws of motion. A system cannot accelerate its center of mass without an external force, regardless of internal mass rearrangements.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) by claiming all forces remain internal yet producing external propulsion.
- Violates conservation of momentum. Net momentum change of a closed system's center of mass is zero without external forces.
- Describes complex internal mass motions but provides no mechanism to create a net external force without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the system's own weight or initial pressure on the 'teeter truck' is meant to drive perpetual motion without an external, replenished energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a weight motor designed for perpetual motion, claiming the drive wheels are 'forced to fall... perpetually' and generate usable energy. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it proposes continuous work output without an identifiable, replenished energy input to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming 'spin function is perpetuated' and 'forced to fall... perpetually'.
- No identifiable external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction, bearing resistance, and chain/sprocket inefficiencies.
- Mechanism attempts to create a non-equilibrium state (continuous motion) from an equilibrium setup using only internal forces and geometry.
- Claims of 'efficient usable energy' generation without specifying an input power source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motor(s) that spin the wheels.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a controllable directional thrust force by internally manipulating unbalanced rotating masses. This is a classic reactionless drive claim that violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate net momentum on its center of mass through internal forces alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of a net external propulsive force from internal moving masses without reaction mass.
- Proposes to neutralize 'unwanted forces' internally to leave a net external force, violating Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Mechanism describes creating timed imbalances (unwucht) in rotating systems, but any internal force generation produces equal and opposite internal reaction forces.
- No identifiable external energy gradient or reaction mass to justify a net thrust output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to add forces from 'recherches d'équilibres' (searches for equilibrium) to manual or electric motor input. No identifiable external energy source beyond the initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate or amplify energy from internal weights or springs seeking equilibrium, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). No external energy source is identified to justify the claimed addition of forces, making it a perpetual motion scheme of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming to add forces without an external energy source
- Seeks to extract useful work from a system's internal search for equilibrium, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external gradient
- No mechanism described that could create a net energy gain; any internal weight/shifting would dissipate energy, not add it
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses vague terms like 're
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests the 'weight of the floating elements... is what motivates its spin,' implying an attempt to extract net work from a system's internal gravitational potential energy without an external gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a motor motivated by the weight of its own floating components, with no external energy input specified. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation. The complex mechanical description cannot circumvent the fundamental requirement for an external energy source to perform net work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts perpetual motion by extracting work from a closed system's internal configuration (weight of floating elements) without an external energy source.
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, electrical input, applied thermal gradient).
- Mechanism describes complex gear interactions but provides no thermodynamic process to justify sustained net energy output.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming motion from an internal, non-depleting source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from batteries to accelerate a rotating mass within the vehicle. Claims to recover kinetic energy during deceleration of the mass via regenerative braking (generator).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum transfer system. The described centrifugal and centripetal forces are internal reaction forces that cancel out within the vehicle, providing no net external force to propel it. Regenerative braking can only recover a portion of the energy used to spin the mass, not create a net propulsive energy surplus.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for internal forces. The centrifugal and centripetal forces described are internal to the vehicle system and cannot produce net linear propulsion.
- Energy recovery from decelerating an internal mass cannot exceed the energy used to accelerate it (due to losses), so it cannot provide a net energy gain for propulsion.
- Confuses inertial reference frames. Forces on the rotating mass are balanced by equal and opposite forces on the vehicle structure, resulting in zero net external force for propulsion.
- Claims of 'near contactless' motion ignore that an external reaction force (e.g., friction with ground/water, air/water thrust) is required to accelerate the vehicle's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity and 'stored potential force' from internal mechanisms, but gravity is a conservative force that cannot provide net energy over a cycle in a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. Gravity alone cannot provide net power output in a closed cycle, as it is a conservative force. The description of internal force redistribution creating 'additional force' violates energy conservation, as no external energy source is identified to compensate for inevitable frictional losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Relies on gravity as a perpetual energy source without an external gradient or input
- Claims 'permanent neutralization principle of the forces affecting the center of gravity' which is physically nonsensical
- Describes internal force storage and release as 'very great additional force' without an external energy input
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient heat, wind) to overcome dissipative losses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (heat from the surrounding air). The device claims to extract work from this via a spontaneous gas aggregation process, followed by expansion cycles.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to perform isothermal compression spontaneously using only ambient heat, then extract work via expansion. This is a textbook violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to produce net work from a single thermal reservoir at uniform temperature, which is impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a 'spontaneous isothermal gas aggregation' equivalent to compression without work input, violating the Second Law.
- Asserts a net work output from an isothermal compression/expansion cycle using only a single ambient temperature reservoir.
- Proposed molecular wall interaction mechanism cannot create a pressure or density gradient (net directional flow) in equilibrium without an external energy input or pre-existing gradient.
- The described three-phase cycle (0-1-2-0) claims to produce net work from heat extracted at a uniform ambient temperature, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the stated electric engine. No other energy inputs are described or implied.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal arrangement of rotating masses and gears. Newton's laws dictate that the center of mass of a closed system cannot accelerate by internal forces alone. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim that violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'non-reactive propulsion' which implies net momentum generation without expelling reaction mass, violating Newton's third law.
- Describes a purely internal system of rotating eccentric masses and gears. Internal forces cancel out, producing no net external force for propulsion.
- No interaction with an external medium (air, water, field) is described to provide a reaction. The system is a closed mechanical assembly.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a 'Gravitationskammer' (gravity chamber) and a high-pressure pump feeding the motor, implying the pump's work is the primary input. However, the title and claims suggest the device is a 'Gravitations-Trägheitsmotor' (gravity-inertia motor), implying it extracts work from gravitational or inertial forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described with obfuscating technical jargon but lacks a coherent explanation of its energy source. A motor claiming to operate on a 'closed cycle' using gravity and inertia, while being fed by a pump, is a classic hallmark of a perpetual motion machine, as it suggests creating useful work from an internal, non-depleting force, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core operating principle is not explained, making energy accounting impossible.
- Claims of a 'closed cycle' extracting work from gravity/inertia without a persistent gradient violate the conservation of energy.
- The terminology ('electrohydrodynamic gravity-inertia motor') is a technobabble amalgamation with no clear, physically coherent process.
- No thermodynamic limits or efficiency calculations are provided, only geometric specifications.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses a string of correct-
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract net work from gravitational potential energy in a closed system via an unbalanced wheel/oscillating bar mechanism, implying perpetual or self-sustaining motion.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'gravitational energy motor' is a classic overbalanced wheel design. It attempts to generate continuous rotation by using shifting counterweights, but gravity is a conservative force. The net work over a closed cycle in a conservative field is zero, making this a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input is described to reset the system or overcome friction.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a permanent disequilibrium and continuous rotation from a conservative force field (gravity).
- Mechanism relies on shifting masses to create an imbalance, but the work required to lift the counterweights/short arms on the ascending side equals or exceeds the work extracted from the descending side in a full cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on unbalanced masses, but the system is a closed mechanical arrangement with no external energy gradient to exploit.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a long-disproven perpetual motion machine. Gravity acts downward consistently, and while masses can be arranged to create temporary imbalance, the center of mass of the entire system cannot be perpetually offset to produce continuous rotation without external energy input. The net work over a full cycle is zero.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create perpetual motion from a static gravitational field
- No net energy input identified - gravity is a conservative force
- System returns to initial state after one full cycle, resulting in zero net work
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming continuous mechanical output from a fixed configuration
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
A - Incomplete energy accounting
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (heat) from the environment, claimed to be converted to electrical energy without a sufficient temperature gradient or external work input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to extract ambient thermal energy and convert it to useful electrical work in a cyclical process. This directly violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to produce net work from a single temperature reservoir without a compensating heat sink, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by claiming to produce net work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient heat).
- Describes a cyclical process that appears to extract and concentrate ambient thermal energy to do work, which is thermodynamically impossible (a form of perpetual motion of the second kind).
- Incomplete energy accounting: the described 'concentration' of thermal energy would require work input greater than or equal to the work output, based on Carnot limits.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the weights, with initial input required to start motion. No external energy input is described beyond the initial potential.
AI Physics Analysis
This apparatus is a variant of an overbalanced wheel, a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The described geometry and sliding weights cannot create a persistent net torque because the gravitational force is conservative; the work done to lift a weight on one side is exactly equal to the work that can be extracted when it falls on the other, minus losses. The system violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Device is an overbalanced wheel variant; net torque over a full cycle sums to zero in a conservative field.
- No mechanism to create a persistent gravitational potential gradient; system is closed and cyclical.
- Friction minimization does not overcome the fundamental energy conservation constraint; it only reduces losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary energy input appears to be the rotational drive mechanism. The claimed 'linear force' is presented as a novel output from internal elastic interactions, not from an external linear energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a method to generate a net linear force from a purely rotating system using internal elastic deformations. This is a direct violation of Newton's laws—specifically, conservation of momentum—as internal forces cannot produce a net acceleration of a system's center of mass. The use of invented physics terms obscures this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction pairs are internal to the system; net linear force cannot be generated from internal forces alone)
- Violates conservation of momentum (system cannot generate a net linear force on itself without an external reaction)
- Vague, non-standard terminology ('energy power field', 'elastic index') obscures the actual physics
- Claims to create a unidirectional force from a rotating system using only internal impulses, which is impossible for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism uses weights, springs, rods, and rails to create an imbalance, but no external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, environmental gradient) is identified to reset the system or compensate for losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a variant of an over-balance wheel, attempting to generate continuous rotation from shifting internal weights. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) as it claims to produce useful work without an identifiable energy source to replenish losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source to sustain motion.
- Relies on shifting weights and springs to create perpetual imbalance, which is a classic over-balance wheel design.
- Ignores energy dissipation from friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions.
- System will reach equilibrium and stop; no mechanism to extract net work without an input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
External energy input to drive the rotors and control the motion of the 'Richtmasse' (guide mass).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum-canceling system (two counter-rotating assemblies). The described centrifugal forces are internal and balanced; they cannot produce a net external force or thrust to propel the vehicle without violating Newton's third law (conservation of linear momentum).
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a unidirectional, static centrifugal force (Fz) to produce net thrust without external reaction mass.
- Asserts that because the guide mass has zero angular velocity relative to the machine base, its centrifugal force acts as a net impulse on the entire machine.
- Ignores internal force cancellation; the centripetal force required to keep the guide mass on its circular path is an internal reaction force within the machine, providing no net external force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the only energy input is the initial rotational acceleration of the weights, with claims of energy recuperation during deceleration and net energy production from centrifugal force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net energy from centrifugal forces, which are frame-dependent inertial effects, not an independent energy source. In a complete cycle, the work needed to spin the mass and move it outward equals or exceeds any energy recovered during deceleration, violating energy conservation if net output is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is not an energy source; it is a kinematic constraint or inertial effect that does no net work in a closed cycle.
- The system describes a cycle: accelerate weights outward, decelerate to bring them inward. The energy recovered during deceleration cannot exceed the energy invested during acceleration, minus losses.
- The claim implies extracting net energy from the centrifugal force itself, which is a fictitious force arising from the rotation. No external energy gradient (thermal, potential, chemical) is identified to enable net work output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Text references cosmic principles (Taiji/Yin-Yang), solar system motion, and electromagnetic forces but provides no identifiable, measurable energy input mechanism. Implies energy generation from 'relative motion' of cosmic poles without a thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an energy generation system based on metaphysical cosmic principles (Taiji/Yin-Yang, Bagua diagrams) and abstract 'relative motion' rather than identifiable physical energy inputs. It violates thermodynamics by implying useful work can be extracted from philosophical concepts of cosmic equilibrium without a measurable energy gradient, using obfuscated terminology that mimics but does not follow physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input accounting
- Claims of energy generation from abstract cosmic 'relative motion' without a gradient
- Uses metaphysical/philosophical concepts (Taiji, Bagua) as physical energy sources
- Language suggests perpetual motion (energy from 'equilibrium' or 'stillness')
- No quantitative performance metrics or testable energy conversion process
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only described energy inputs are initial gravitational potential energy from weights and possibly elastic energy from springs. The claim of indefinite motion implies no subsequent energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce indefinite oscillatory motion using only weights and balances. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as any real system will lose energy to friction and come to rest unless energy is continuously supplied, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'mouvement de va et viens pendant une durée indéterminée' (indefinite oscillatory motion) with no continuous energy input.
- Describes a system seeking equilibrium, which is a state of minimum energy and zero net motion.
- No mechanism to overcome energy dissipation from friction, air resistance, or inelastic collisions.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy input is electrical power to spin the gyroscopes/spheres and rotate the gimbals/activate electromagnets. The claim implies the resulting propulsion force is a net output not derived from interaction with an external medium, suggesting an attempt to use internal momentum changes as a reactionless drive.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to provide propulsion independent of any external medium by using internal gyroscopic or spherical masses. This is a classic reactionless drive, which violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. No internal configuration of spinning masses can produce a net force on the vehicle's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction). A propulsion system requires momentum to be expelled to an external environment to generate net thrust.
- Violates conservation of momentum. The described system is a closed, internal mechanical/electromagnetic system; any internal forces and momentum changes will cancel out, resulting in zero net thrust on the vehicle.
- Misapplication of gyroscopic effect. Gyroscopic precession generates internal torques, not a net linear force on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from balls moving downward, with no identified external energy input to restore the balls to their initial height.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert gravitational energy into continuous mechanical rotation, but for the balls to keep moving and the loop to keep turning, the balls must be lifted back to their starting height. This lifting requires at least as much energy as is gained from their fall, making continuous net energy extraction impossible without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to extract net mechanical work from a closed gravitational system.
- No mechanism described to return balls to their starting height without expending at least as much energy as gained from their descent.
- System appears to be a closed loop with balls 'rattling' - any rotation would be damped by friction and losses, not sustained or amplified.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests mechanical energy from unbalanced weights/rotating systems, but no external energy input is specified. Implied attempt to create net force/energy from internal mass redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net force or 'gravity' through complex mechanical arrangements of weights and rotating systems without any external energy input, violating conservation of energy and momentum. Internal redistribution of mass cannot create net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims 'unbalanced synchronous combined force system' implying net force generation from internal configuration
- Complex mechanical arrangement suggests attempt to create perpetual motion or gravity-like force without energy expenditure
- Violates Newton's laws - internal forces sum to zero in isolated system
- No thermodynamic gradient or external field identified as energy source
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
PATTERN A - Incomplete energy accounting
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'gravity force' alone. The only explicit input is the gravitational potential energy of the slidable elements (e.g., spheres) within the Earth's gravitational field.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor, which is a classic example of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to produce continuous mechanical energy from gravity alone, but to do so, the sliding elements must be cyclically returned to their starting higher potential energy position, which requires more energy than the device can output, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System operates in a closed loop with no external gradient or energy input to reset the masses to a higher potential energy state.
- Extracting continuous rotational work from gravity requires a cycle where masses are lifted against gravity, which this patent does not describe or power.
- The described mechanism (sloping stator, intercepting elements) would itself require work to operate against friction and to reset the positions of the spheres, consuming the generated energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract net work solely from the gravitational potential energy of its own weights, implying a closed system with no external energy input other than initial gravitational configuration.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'gravity motor' claims to generate a continuous surplus of torque by cleverly arranging weights, cams, and levers. However, it is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to produce net energy output from a closed gravitational system without an external energy source to replenish the weights' positions, directly violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a continuous 'Drehmomentüberschuss' (torque surplus) without an identified external energy source to reset the system.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: A closed system cannot perform net work on its surroundings indefinitely.
- Mechanism attempts to create perpetual motion of the first kind by using internal cam/lever arrangements to supposedly create a permanent torque imbalance from gravity.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on mechani
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the potential energy of weights, but the system is closed with no external input to restore the weights to their initial high-potential-energy state.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine. The weights can only produce work by losing potential energy, and the energy required to lift them back up to restart the cycle must equal or exceed the work produced, making continuous operation without external energy input impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system claims to output work (power a generator) while recycling weights with no external energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- The recycling mechanism (chain hoist, conveyors) itself requires work input, which must come from the system's own output, creating an inevitable energy deficit.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the variable speed electric motor, which provides angular impulse to the cylinder.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a 'reaction-less mover' that generates a net horizontal force using only internal forces (static friction and inertia). This is a direct violation of Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its own center of mass using internal forces alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to create net horizontal force without external reaction (violates Newton's 3rd Law).
- Describes a closed system producing net momentum change from internal forces (violates conservation of momentum).
- Mischaracterizes static friction as a source of net propulsion; friction is an internal force in the described system and cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Only explicit input is mechanical rotation of the primary shaft (1). The device claims to produce net thrust without external reaction mass or environmental interaction.
AI Physics Analysis
This inertial propulsion device attempts to generate net thrust using only internal moving masses and gears. This is physically impossible, as a closed system's center of mass cannot accelerate by internal forces alone, directly violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Claims 'thrust without taking support on the environment'.
- Internal moving masses cannot produce net momentum change of the device's center of mass.
- No external energy source or momentum sink identified to enable net propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert a static gravitational field into continuous rotational work, implying extraction of net energy from a conservative potential field without an external energy gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device meant to generate continuous rotation from gravity alone by using a fluid-induced imbalance. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as a static gravitational field cannot provide net energy over a closed cycle without an external input or a compensating decrease in potential energy elsewhere (like a falling weight). The claimed self-sustaining mechanism constitutes a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A static, uniform gravitational field is a conservative force field. Net work over a closed cycle in such a field is zero.
- Describes a self-sustaining imbalance: Claims the rotating system maintains its own imbalance via fluid displacement, suggesting perpetual motion of the first kind.
- No identified external energy input: The system appears to use its own rotation to pump fluid to sustain an imbalance, creating a positive feedback loop with no source of energy to overcome dissipative losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'conversio
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the power supply to the electric motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create net propulsion (an external force) solely through the cyclic motion of internal masses and gyroscopic effects. This violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) as there is no external reaction mass or environmental interaction to provide the required momentum exchange. The electrical energy input is converted to internal kinetic energy and waste heat, not to net thrust for a vehicle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to be an 'unsupported propeller' implying net thrust without external reaction mass.
- Proposes to generate directional propulsion through internal inertial forces and gyroscopic precession, which cannot produce net momentum change in a closed system.
- Cyclic acceleration/braking of internal masses cannot create sustained net external force; internal forces cancel over a cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical configuration but does not identify any external energy input. The only implied source is an initial spin-up, after which it claims to provide 'uninterrupted power'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical flywheel system. Without an external energy source, it cannot provide 'uninterrupted power' as it will inevitably slow down due to friction and other losses, violating energy conservation. The configuration may store energy efficiently but cannot generate net power output.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified energy input mechanism
- Claims 'uninterrupted power' without explaining how losses are overcome
- Describes minimizing friction but cannot eliminate it
- System will lose rotational energy to bearing friction, air/vacuum residual drag, and internal damping, requiring continuous energy input to maintain rotation
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover (external motor) input energy to accelerate fluid and overcome system losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system that accelerates fluid internally and then recaptures its energy. This cannot create a net propulsive force for anti-gravity or propulsion, as it violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. The prime mover's energy is wasted as heat, not converted to useful thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of 'unidirectionally acting inertia-reactive force' for anti-gravity propulsion, implying net thrust without expelling mass or interacting with an external medium.
- Proposes converting expelled fluid's kinetic energy to thermal energy and venting it, then recirculating the fluid. This describes a closed internal momentum cycle.
- Internal momentum changes in a closed system cannot produce a net external force (Newton's third law). The system's center of mass cannot accelerate without external interaction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to drive motor (rotates armature) and to electromagnets/screw motors (controls weights).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system attempting to produce net lift or thrust through internal momentum transfers. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass using only internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a net lift (reaction/impact force) from internal momentum changes in a rotating frame.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction to produce a net external force.
- Internal forces (centripetal, recoil) sum to zero within the system; cannot produce net thrust or lift in free space.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air pressure and gravity acting on a liquid, with an externally maintained vacuum chamber. The device appears to be a gravity/pressure motor attempting to extract work from atmospheric pressure differences.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity pressure/gravity motor that ignores the energy required to maintain the vacuum chamber. The described cyclic operation, using a shifting weight to control media flow between chambers at different pressures, cannot produce net useful work as it lacks an external energy source to compensate for losses and maintain the pressure gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy source identified; vacuum chamber requires continuous energy input to maintain against leaks
- Device attempts to create perpetual motion by using a weight to control valves/vacuum, implying cyclic operation with no external energy input after start
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to be an 'Energiewandler' (energy converter) but describes a closed system with only ambient pressure and gravity as inputs, which cannot produce net work in a cycle
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use 'magnetic flux' and 'magnetic potential' to generate electricity, but appears to describe extracting energy from a permanent magnet's field without an external energy gradient or input to replenish it.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electrical power by repeatedly converting the magnetic potential energy of a permanent magnet. This is a classic violation of the first law of thermodynamics, as it attempts to extract net work from a system in equilibrium (the magnet's static field) without an external energy source to sustain the output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying continuous extraction of electrical energy from a static magnetic field without depleting it or requiring an external energy input.
- Describes 'converting' magnetic potential energy into electrical energy in a closed-loop cycle, which is thermodynamically impossible as a permanent magnet's field is in equilibrium and cannot perform net work over a cycle.
- Uses obfuscating language ('magnetic flux potential', 'converted magnetic potential') that misapplies correct physics terms to describe an energy multiplication process.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only apparent energy input is the initial rotational kinetic energy imparted to the system. The device claims to extract useful mechanical work from the centrifugal/inertial forces of masses moving radially in a rotating frame.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity or perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate net mechanical work solely from the inertial forces within a rotating system, violating conservation of energy. The radial motion of the masses is powered by the system's own rotational kinetic energy, which would be depleted by any net work extraction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce net work from internal forces in a closed rotating system.
- Misidentifies source of work: Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame, not an independent energy source.
- No external energy input described to replenish the system's energy as work is extracted.
- Internal mass redistribution (radial motion) consumes energy from the system's rotation; any work output during outward motion is less than or equal to the work input during the subsequent forced inward motion, resulting in zero net work per cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims appear to describe a magnetic system (N/S poles, fixed magnets, magnetic repulsion/attraction) that supposedly generates continuous rotational motion and output work from magnetic forces alone, with no clear external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic system that claims to generate continuous rotational motion and output work through complex magnetic interactions and regeneration, but provides no legitimate external energy source. This constitutes a magnetic perpetual motion machine, violating energy conservation as it attempts to extract net work from a conservative magnetic field without an external gradient or input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain motion against losses
- Describes a magnetic system attempting to produce continuous rotation/regeneration, implying perpetual motion
- Violates conservation of energy - output work cannot exceed input energy
- System appears to rely on magnetic gradients in a closed loop, attempting to extract net work from a conservative force field (magnetism)
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit source is the energy input to the drives that rotate the disks. The claim implies a net acceleration of the entire apparatus from internal rotational momentum manipulation, suggesting an internal source of linear momentum.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve self-acceleration without external reaction by manipulating internal angular momenta. This is a direct violation of the conservation of linear momentum, as internal forces cannot produce a net force on a system's center of mass. The claim describes a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. An isolated system cannot generate a net center-of-mass acceleration from internal forces alone.
- Violates Newton's third law. The description suggests creating a net thrust ('rückstoßfrei' - recoilless) by arranging internal torques/angular momenta, which is impossible for a closed system.
- No identifiable external reaction mass or asymmetric interaction with an external field to explain a net force.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient water pressure and gravitational potential energy of the spherical weights. The device attempts to create a continuous torque imbalance on a wheel by using water pressure to move weights within cylinders.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate power by using water pressure to shift weights inside cylinders on a wheel, but the system is in equilibrium with the surrounding water. There is no external, consumable energy source (like a temperature or pressure gradient) to tap, so any rotation would quickly stop as frictional losses dissipate the initial potential energy of the weights.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy gradient to exploit; system is in hydrostatic equilibrium.
- Proposed mechanism for continuous rotation violates conservation of energy; any work extracted would come from the initial gravitational potential of the weights, which would quickly be exhausted.
- Pressure exchange conduit between opposing cylinders would equalize pressure, preventing a sustained imbalance to drive rotation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The claim is that potential energy is converted to rotational energy, but the described mechanism (springs connecting two weighted rims on a wheel) is a closed, internal system with no external energy input beyond an initial push.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic over-unity or perpetual motion attempt. It uses internal masses and springs on a wheel to try to create a perpetual imbalance, violating energy conservation. Without an external energy source like a slope, wind, or motor, all rotation will cease due to friction and losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The device is described as converting potential energy to rotational energy, but it is a wheel with internal, moving masses and springs. Any motion will be damped by friction and internal losses, leading to a stop. No
- Perpetual motion implication: The title and claims describe 'conversion of potential energy to rotational energy' without specifying a source for replenishing that potential energy. The asymmetric spring attachment appears designed to create a perpet
- Incomplete energy accounting: It ignores all dissipative losses (bearing friction, air resistance, internal hysteresis in the elastic outer tire and springs). The output rotational energy cannot exceed the initial input energy minus these losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses only on a
Claimed Energy Source
Gravity acting on the weight of the middle 'floating' shaft assembly. The device attempts to use this gravitational potential energy to generate continuous rotational motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a type of gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. While gravity provides an energy source, the mechanism describes a closed cycle that would require the floating shaft's weight to perpetually drive rotation without its center of mass ever decreasing, violating conservation of energy. The complex gearing masks the fundamental impossibility of getting net energy output without an external, replenished potential.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: A closed-cycle mechanism cannot extract net work solely from a system's own weight in a constant gravitational field without lowering its center of mass.
- No sustained energy gradient: The 'float' shaft's weight provides a constant downward force, but for continuous rotation, the shaft's center of mass would need to continuously fall, which is impossible in a closed loop.
- Misapplication of gear ratios: Torque multiplication via gears trades force for distance; it cannot create energy. The described feedback loop suggests an attempt at self-sustaining motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use 'heat obtained from the atmospheric temperature' with no temperature gradient, implying extraction of work from a single thermal reservoir at ambient temperature.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a form of perpetual motion machine of the second kind. It claims to produce practical mechanical power using only ambient temperature heat, which is thermodynamically impossible as it requires no temperature difference to drive a heat engine. The described phase-change cycle cannot yield net work output from a single thermal reservoir.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Kelvin-Planck statement): cannot produce net work by cooling a single thermal reservoir.
- The described temperature difference is created internally by phase change of a volatile liquid, but the system's 'liquefying' and 'vaporizing' chambers are both at ambient temperature, preventing a sustained, useful pressure gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: the work to reset the system (e.g., pumping liquid, operating valves) is not addressed, and net work output over a cycle is impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert gravity into mechanical energy. Gravity is a conservative force field, not an energy source. The system's only plausible energy input is the initial gravitational potential energy of the unbalanced masses, which is finite and will be dissipated by losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert gravity into usable mechanical energy through internal force impulses. However, gravity alone is not an energy source; it's a conservative field. Any work done comes from lowering masses, and the system cannot sustainably output more energy than the initial potential energy stored in those raised masses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: implies continuous extraction of net work from a static gravitational field without an external energy source or a lowering of masses.
- Violates thermodynamics: describes a system that would perpetually accelerate or maintain motion by internally redirecting forces, which is impossible due to friction and other losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: describes complex mechanical interactions but does not identify an external energy input to replenish losses or sustain 'increasing speed' cycles.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on interna
Claimed Energy Source
Internal actuator energy (implicit) and possibly gravity (ancillary force). No external reaction mass or environmental gradient is identified as the source for net momentum change.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system using only internal moving parts. The claim that internal timing can make one internal force greater than another to produce net propulsion violates Newton's laws—internal forces sum to zero and cannot create a net external force on the system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net momentum change for a closed system (body + internal moving masses).
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for an isolated system.
- Describes timing forces to make 'initial force greater than receiving force', which is impossible for internal forces within the system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the rotation is generated solely by the repulsive force between static, like-charged magnetic fields, with no identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous rotational work from fixed magnetic repulsion alone, with no external energy input to sustain motion. This is a classic violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Magnets are not 'charged' as positive or negative; they have poles. The described setup of static, fixed magnetic fields cannot produce continuous rotation.
- A fixed repulsive force from a stationary magnet to a magnet on a rod would create a torque that moves the rod to an equilibrium position and then stops, not continuous rotation.
- No mechanism or energy input is described to reset the system or break symmetry to allow continuous work extraction.
- The system, as described, would extract mechanical work (turning a ship's screw) from a static magnetic configuration, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex mechanical system with rotating parts (rotors, stators, bearings) and mentions a 'temperature condition (K)', but provides no identifiable external energy input. It appears to claim the system's own motion generates energy that is fed back to sustain and amplify itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex rotational apparatus with internal feedback mechanisms but fails to identify any external energy source. It implies the system can sustain and amplify its own motion, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by suggesting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The description is technically obfuscated, making the energy flow impossible to trace.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified.
- Describes a self-sustaining or amplifying rotational system without an external driver, implying perpetual motion.
- Uses obscure terminology and complex mechanical descriptions that obfuscate the fundamental energy accounting.
- Implies energy multiplication through internal feedback loops without a compensating energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Correct physics terms (te
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the primary input is the gravitational potential energy of the weighted wheel and baton, but the claim implies energy is generated from 'horizontal compression' of a fluid-filled tube by the wheel's weight, without a net drop in the wheel's center of mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate energy from the weight of a wheel compressing a tube, but for the wheel to keep moving and compressing the tube, work must be continuously done to lift its weight, which the system cannot supply from its own output without violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system description implies continuous rotation and electrical output without an identifiable net external energy input to replenish the wheel's gravitational potential.
- Misapplication of 'horizontal compression': Compressing a fluid tube horizontally with weight still requires the wheel to do work against the tube's resistance; this work must come from a drop in the wheel's gravitational potential energy or an exter
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The proposed feedback loop (turbine powers motor to rebalance/rotate wheel) cannot be net positive, as generator and motor losses ensure decay.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms ('comp
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to be 'auto fonctionnel sans apport d'énergie' (self-functioning without energy input). Implicitly attempts to use gravitational potential energy of weights and liquid in a cyclical manner with no external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a closed system of weights and liquid that supposedly creates an imbalance to drive continuous rotation without any external energy input, directly violating the conservation of energy. The described force imbalance is based on a misunderstanding of internal versus external forces in a mechanical system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous operation (basculement/rotation) without energy input.
- Violates 1st law of thermodynamics: System cannot output net work (entraîner un tube) without an energy source.
- Flawed force analysis: Claims weight of upper weight + liquid above it becomes greater than lower weight, ignoring that the supporting structure must supply the reaction force for this 'added' weight. This is an internal force, not a net external for
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: Attempts to create a cycle where gravitational potential is somehow amplified or recycled without loss.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Completely ignores
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or mechanical input to rotate the leading link (O1A) and its slider (N).
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate a net directional force (thrust) from internal rotating masses and Coriolis forces. In a closed mechanical system, internal forces cancel out, producing no net external thrust. This is a classic violation of Newton's laws and conservation of momentum, akin to a 'reactionless drive'.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net unidirectional Coriolis force from an internal rotating system, which is impossible in a closed system.
- Asserts that the sum of Coriolis force components over one rotation is non-zero, violating Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum.
- Misapplies formulas for Coriolis and centrifugal forces, treating internal relative motions as a source of net external thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical system with rotating weights, springs, and gears, ostensibly powered by gravity and centrifugal forces. No external energy input (e.g., motor, wind, falling water) is clearly identified as the primary driver.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate electricity by cleverly arranging weights, springs, and levers to create a perpetual imbalance, but gravity alone cannot provide net energy over a complete cycle. The energy needed to lift the weights or pre-tension the springs must come from an external source, which is not accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: System claims to generate net energy from gravity and internal centrifugal forces in a closed loop.
- No identifiable external energy gradient: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a gravitational field is zero.
- Misunderstanding of centrifugal force: It is an inertial/kinematic effect, not an independent energy source. Energy to create rotation must be supplied externally.
- System appears designed to create a perpetual imbalance, attempting to extract continuous work from a single potential energy source without replenishment.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or chemical energy from the unspecified 'motive means' (e.g., motor, actuator) to accelerate the weighted members.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes moving internal masses in a cycle to produce propulsion without ejecting any reaction mass. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim that violates Newton's laws—specifically, conservation of momentum. No net external force can be generated on the vehicle's housing by internal movements alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net propulsion from internal moving masses with a restored center of mass, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Assumes an 'energy barrier' to motion can be asymmetrically overcome by internal forces, which is impossible for a closed system.
- No external reaction mass or medium interaction is described to provide a net external force; all forces are internal.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the motor's rotation is initiated and sustained solely by the weight/pressure of the floating planetary shaft assembly on the gears, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system with no external energy input. The internal weight forces and gear interactions cannot produce sustained net work, as friction would dissipate any initial motion, violating energy conservation. It constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to overcome friction and losses.
- Mechanism describes a closed kinematic loop; any initial motion would be damped by friction, requiring continuous energy input to sustain.
- Claims perpetual motion ('perpetuate the process') without an energy source.
- Force from weight/pressure is static and internal; it cannot create net work in a cycle without an external gradient or input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motor driving conveyor system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed internal mechanical system. All forces described (centrifugal, contact with stationary path) are internal forces. Newton's third law dictates that internal forces cannot produce a net external force (thrust) on the system's center of mass without ejecting reaction mass. The claim of propellantless propulsion for space vehicles is a direct violation of conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net propulsive thrust without external reaction mass, violating Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Claims to generate larger net propulsive force than its own weight for flight/hovering, implying internal momentum generation.
- Misapplies centrifugal force as an external net force; centrifugal forces are internal to the rotating system and cannot produce net thrust on the isolated system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions consumption of helium gas (non-flammable) but provides no mechanism for how this gas provides energy input. Describes a complex mechanical arrangement of 133 truck wheels, metallic balls, strings, and belts, implying energy is generated from centrifugal/attraction transformation.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device lacks any clear source of input energy and proposes a transformation between centrifugal and 'attraction' forces within a closed mechanical system to produce work, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The garbled, incoherent description further indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.).
- Claims to transform centrifugal force to 'attraction energy' with no thermodynamic basis.
- Appears to be a closed mechanical system with no external gradient to exploit.
- Helium gas consumption is mentioned but its role in energy conversion is undefined and non-energetic (non-flammable).
- Text is garbled and incoherent, preventing meaningful analysis of a working principle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (centr
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from motors (main motor, base unit motor) to rotate drive discs and masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes complex internal motions but is fundamentally a closed system on wheels. Newton's third law dictates that internal forces cancel, preventing the generation of net external thrust. This is a classic 'self-driving' violation of momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed 'directional impulse' and 'self-drive' implies net linear propulsion from internal motions only.
- System is closed relative to its environment; internal forces (centrifugal, reciprocating) sum to zero and cannot produce net acceleration of the apparatus's center of mass.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; all work done comes from onboard motors, with no external energy gradient identified to justify net propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the bodies, with no external input described. The system appears to be a closed mechanical loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system with bodies moving in a loop under gravity. By flipping the bodies at specific points, it attempts to generate a continuous net torque. This violates the conservation of energy, as the work required to lift the bodies against gravity cannot be recovered from the downward fall, resulting in a net energy deficit for a closed cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create a persistent torque/rotation by manipulating the orientation of bodies in a gravitational field without an external energy source.
- The described flipping of bodies to make the 'trailing side become the leading side' suggests an attempt to create an asymmetric force profile to sustain motion.
- No mechanism to replenish the gravitational potential energy extracted as the bodies move downward; the upward movement would require equal or greater work input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initial spring potential energy (if pre-charged) and initial kinetic energy (if started). No sustained external energy input is described, yet continuous output is claimed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system using springs and offset masses. It claims to generate energy on demand with virtually no input energy, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics. Any rotation will cease as the initial stored energy is converted to work and dissipated by friction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate energy 'bedarfsabhängig' (as needed) while requiring 'weitgehend keine Antriebsenergie' (largely no drive energy).
- System is a closed mechanical assembly with springs and masses. After initial energy is dissipated by friction and work output, it will stop.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient heat, imposed motion) is identified to sustain the claimed continuous energy generation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output > i
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the electrical motor driving the rotation of the mass. The claim implicitly suggests that by selectively braking the rotating mass at certain points in its circular path, a net centrifugal force (and thus propulsion) can be generated without reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'reactionless drive' that violates Newton's laws of motion. Asymmetric braking of a rotating mass cannot produce a net propulsive force on the isolated system's center of mass because centrifugal forces are internal and sum to zero. Propulsion requires interaction with an external medium or expelled reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an internal, frame-dependent force within the rotating system. The vector sum of centrifugal forces in a closed rotating system is always zero, regardless of asymmetric braking. Braking converts rotational kinetic energy to heat,
- The proposed device violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum). It claims to produce linear momentum (thrust) without expelling any reaction mass, which is impossible for a closed system.
- The energy accounting is incomplete. The electrical input provides the rotational kinetic energy. Any net force on the device's center of mass would require an external interaction (e.g., pushing against the ground, air, or expelled mass).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on manipul
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests motion and energy output arise spontaneously from internal forces in a closed system during extension/compression cycles, implying no external energy input is required.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed system where internal fluid circulation and elastic deformation are claimed to produce net motion and usable energy. This is impossible because internal forces sum to zero within a closed system, preventing it from accelerating its own center of mass or providing net energy output without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics).
- Violates conservation of momentum (Newton's Third Law).
- Describes a closed system with no external energy gradient to drive net motion.
- Internal forces in a closed system cannot produce net acceleration of its center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover (motor) provides the initial rotational energy. The device appears to claim to generate a net directional thrust (propulsion) from internal mass movements within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an inertial propulsion claim, attempting to create net thrust by moving masses internally. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate a net external force on its center of mass through internal motions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim implies generation of net linear momentum from an internal, cyclic redistribution of mass, violating conservation of momentum.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described to provide the necessary impulse for propulsion.
- Energy accounting is absent; all work to move masses comes from the prime mover, with no source for excess thrust energy.
- Mechanism attempts to create a non-zero net force over a cycle from inertial forces, which sum to zero in a closed system (d'Alembert's principle).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be buoyancy and gravity acting on the same body, but these are conservative forces in a closed system with no external gradient or energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create perpetual rotation using only buoyancy and gravity on a partially enclosed wheel in a fluid. This is a classic buoyancy-driven 'overbalanced wheel' variant. Since the system is in hydrostatic equilibrium with no external energy source, any rotation would cease due to viscous drag and the work required to move the enclosure through the fluid, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes extracting net work from a system in hydrostatic equilibrium (fluid and wheel at rest).
- Buoyancy and gravity are internal, conservative forces; net work over a cycle in a closed fluid system is zero.
- No identified external energy input (e.g., thermal gradient, changing fluid density, or external displacement) to drive perpetual motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use water's 'vibration' or 'resonance' (수소물분자) to generate electricity, implying extraction of energy from ambient molecular motion without an identified thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to amplify electrical energy using water molecular vibrations and resonant cascading, purportedly generating more output than input. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it seeks to extract useful work from ambient molecular motion at equilibrium, violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The description lacks a clear, quantified external energy source to create the necessary non-equilibrium condition.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing to extract net work from equilibrium thermal motion.
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'Output > input' claims are implied but ambient energy input is not quantified or shown to create a usable gradient.
- Proposes energy multiplication through cascading/stacking stages (3 단 증폭기), which cannot create net energy if the system is closed.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity by 'utilizing humidity and temperature' and 'converting' ambient conditions, implying extraction of net work from an equilibrium or near-equilibrium environment without a sufficient thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electricity by utilizing ambient humidity and temperature, which is thermodynamically impossible as it suggests extracting net work from what appears to be a single environmental reservoir without a sufficient entropy sink. The vague language and lack of a clear, legitimate energy conversion process indicate a violation of the Second Law.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying net work can be extracted from a single thermal reservoir (ambient air) without a colder sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., chemical, solar, significant thermal gradient) to justify claimed electrical output.
- Obfuscated mechanism: Vague description of 'converting' humidity and temperature into electricity without specifying a legitimate process (e.g., evaporative cooling, hygroelectricity) that respects thermodynamic limits.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity as the sole energy source, implying extraction of net work from a conservative force field without an external gradient or energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce usable energy from gravity alone by creating a constant differential of moments of force. This is a classical perpetual motion claim, as it attempts to extract net work from a conservative force field without an external energy source or a thermodynamic gradient to drive the motion, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create a perpetual torque differential using gravity and offset masses/levers.
- No identifiable external energy input to reset the cyclical position of the centers of gravity (CG).
- Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a static gravitational field is zero.
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement with no thermodynamic gradient to exploit.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric pressure, which is a static force field in equilibrium, not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim attempts to generate locomotion or power from atmospheric pressure alone, which is a static, equilibrium force. You cannot extract net work from an isothermal pressure field without an energy gradient (like a pressure difference to drive flow) or an external energy input to create and maintain a vacuum. The described system violates Newton's laws when considered as a whole, isolated system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create a net force from a static, uniform pressure field, which is impossible.
- A 'Vacuum Chamber' (VC) is a structure, not an energy input. Creating/maintaining the vacuum requires energy input not accounted for.
- Forces from atmospheric pressure on a closed container sum to zero net force (vector sum). Restricting deflection of one surface creates internal stresses, not a net external force for locomotion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest ambient humidity is converted to electrical energy via unspecified 'humidity gradient' mechanisms, implying extraction of net work from an isothermal equilibrium system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electrical energy by converting ambient humidity, which is an isothermal, equilibrium process lacking the necessary thermodynamic gradient (e.g., a difference in chemical potential or temperature) to perform net work. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion violation of the second law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient).
- Claims imply energy generation from ambient humidity without a consumable fuel or a maintained thermodynamic gradient (e.g., temperature, concentration).
- Apparent violation of the second law: extracting net work from a single, isothermal reservoir (ambient air with humidity) is impossible.
- Mechanism description is vague and obfuscated, preventing proper energy accounting.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests energy is generated from the interaction between a magnet and a magnetic field (magnet and magnetic substance), implying extraction of work from a static, conservative magnetic field without an external energy input or a dissipating gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate or amplify electrical energy solely through the arrangement of permanent magnets and magnetic materials. This violates the law of conservation of energy, as a static magnetic field is conservative and cannot perform net work in a cycle without an external energy source to change the configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net work from a permanent magnet and a magnetic material in a closed, static configuration, which is a conservative system with no net energy gradient to exploit.
- Claims 'energy amplification' or generation from magnetic interactions alone, violating energy conservation as the magnetic potential energy is fixed and no external input (e.g., motion, changing field) is clearly identified to supply the output ener
- Uses vague terminology ('energy amplification', 'magnetic field energy') that obfuscates the need for an initial energy input to change the magnetic configuration and perform work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (air temperature) claimed to be converted to electrical energy without an external temperature gradient or work input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that claims to generate electrical power solely from ambient air temperature without requiring a temperature difference or external work input. This is a direct violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the second kind by extracting useful work from a single thermal reservoir.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Kelvin-Planck statement): Claims to produce net electrical work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient air).
- No identifiable temperature gradient or external work input to drive the energy conversion.
- Describes a mechanism where a 'temperature difference' is somehow generated internally from isothermal conditions to produce power, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or mechanical input to the motor that accelerates the flywheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a proposed reactionless drive, attempting to generate net linear thrust using only internal forces. This is a direct violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. No net thrust can be produced on a closed system by accelerating internal masses, regardless of how the flywheel is mounted or braked.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction). The claim that the reaction force from accelerating the flywheel does not act on the vehicle's frame because the 'axis is force-neutral' is false. Internal forces in a closed system cannot produce net ac
- Misunderstanding of conservation of momentum. The linear momentum of the vehicle-flywheel system must be conserved. Accelerating the flywheel in one angular direction imparts an opposite angular reaction on the motor/vehicle, resulting in zero net li
- The generator on the opposite side would create an equal and opposite braking force, canceling any claimed thrust from the motor side over a complete cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initial rotational energy is imparted to the flywheel by a secondary motor. The claimed sustained operation after motor shutoff suggests gravity as the primary energy source, but the described mechanism cannot create a net positive torque from gravity in a closed cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel variant. While the cam can shift weights to create an instantaneous torque imbalance, the work required to reset the weights (moving them inward against centrifugal force or via the cam) over a full rotation equals or exceeds any gravitational work output. The claim of sustained autonomous rotation violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims the system becomes self-driving ('automoteur') after initial spin-up, implying net energy output > energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from a conservative force (gravity) in a cyclic process with no external gradient or sink.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes positive and negative torques from weight positions but ignores that the net work over one full rotation in a symmetric gravitational field is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on instant
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system requires an input to spin the weights and change their radial distance, presumably electrical or mechanical work. The claimed thrust is generated internally without expulsion of reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a directional propulsive force using only internal rotating weights. This is a classic reactionless drive, which violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. No internal manipulation of masses can produce a net thrust on the vehicle as a whole.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed generation of net propulsive force without external reaction violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Internal moving parts can only produce oscillating forces on the object's frame, which time-average to zero net thrust in a closed system.
- The description suggests 'additionally or differentially combining' internal forces to create a net external force, which is impossible for a system with no external interaction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The claim implies energy is produced from the motion of a mass initiated by 'partially shielding' or reducing a gravitational field, with no external energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce energy by shielding gravity to set a mass in motion, which violates the conservation of energy. Shielding gravity is not physically possible with known materials, and any cyclical manipulation of a mass in a gravitational field requires at least as much energy input as is gained in output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce energy without identifying an external energy source to perform the 'shielding' work.
- Violates Newtonian gravity/General Relativity: there is no known mechanism to 'shield' or reduce a gravitational field in a way that creates a net force or extracts usable work from a static potential.
- No thermodynamic process defined: the claim describes no gradient (thermal, pressure, chemical) or energy conversion process that could be analyzed against known limits.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (weights falling). No external energy input is described; the system's motion is purportedly sustained and generates output solely from the asymmetric arrangement of its own weights.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic overbalanced wheel design. The asymmetric force on the descending and ascending sides does not translate to net energy output, as the work needed to lift the weights back up (even closer to the axle) equals or exceeds the work gained during their descent. The system, as a closed loop, cannot produce usable energy without an external power source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system is described as a closed mechanical loop that outputs usable energy without an identified external energy source.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: The design attempts to create a continuous torque imbalance (greater moment on the down-going side) without accounting for the energy required to reset the arms to the collapsed position on the upward segment.
- Ignores work input: Lifting the weights in the collapsed position (even at a reduced radius) still requires work against gravity. The net work over a full cycle, accounting for friction and the reset mechanism, is zero or negative.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'high effic
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (implicitly from Earth's gravity field) and kinetic energy of the rotating system. No explicit external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to extract ('ontzetten') gravitational and motion energy using radially movable ballast masses in a rotating system with different density media. This describes a mechanism attempting to create perpetual motion by exploiting gravity, a conservative force, which cannot yield net energy output over a cycle without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to extract net work from a conservative force field (gravity) in a closed cycle, violating energy conservation.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy source is identified to sustain continuous motion against losses.
- The mechanism of using movable masses in a rotating frame and media of different densities suggests an attempt to create a perpetual torque imbalance, which is impossible in a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest extracting energy from the 'resonance' of inertial fields (centrifugal and gravitational forces), which are conservative forces, not energy sources.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to boost performance by resonating centrifugal and gravitational fields. Since both are conservative forces within the system, this constitutes an attempt to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to justify a net power increase.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 3 implies creating 'resonance' between centrifugal force and gravity to increase power output. This suggests energy extraction from a closed loop of conservative forces, violating energy conservation.
- Centrifugal and gravitational forces are frame-dependent or potential forces; they cannot be placed in 'resonance' to generate net energy.
- The system appears to be a mechanical flywheel/planetary gear system with no identified external energy input. Claim 5 describes storing and releasing rotational energy, not generating excess energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims gravity as the sole energy source, implying extraction of net work from a static gravitational field without a compensating decrease in gravitational potential energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous rotation using gravity as the sole input, but the described system of offset weights and gears is a closed mechanical loop. For the wheel to perform net work, the center of mass of the weight system must continuously fall, which is impossible in a closed cycle without an external input to reset the weights. This is a classic overbalanced wheel, a long-disproven perpetual motion concept.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No mechanism to lower masses to create a sustainable potential energy gradient.
- Violates thermodynamic laws: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (energy from nothing).
- Mechanical obfuscation: Complex gearing cannot create a net torque imbalance from a closed system of weights in a constant gravitational field.
- Missing entropy sink: No process to account for the inevitable dissipation of energy as heat from friction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover (motor) input only. The system claims to generate a unidirectional propulsive force from internal mass movements within a closed, vehicle-mounted frame.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system where all parts are attached to a common frame. Moving masses cyclically within it can only create oscillating internal forces, not a net external thrust. This directly violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net internal force (thrust) from cyclic internal mass movements, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- System is described as mounted to a single machine base frame, making it a closed system with no external reaction mass or environmental interaction.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; all work to move masses comes from the prime mover, with any 'unidirectional force' being an internal reaction force that cancels out within the system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover motor (explicit), but claims to generate unidirectional propulsive force from an imbalanced rotor system without reaction mass or external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a net propulsive force (helicopter-like lift) solely by cyclically shifting masses within a rotating rotor, powered only by an internal motor. This violates conservation of momentum, as internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the center of mass of a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to create a net unidirectional propulsive force (lift/thrust) from an internal, cyclic mass redistribution within a closed system.
- Asserts that overcoming centrifugal force to retract masses in one segment creates a net force, violating Newton's third law (action-reaction).
- Proposes to counteract torque with a counter-rotating assembly but still claims net linear momentum generation from internal motions.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (e.g., air, magnetic field) to react against for net propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the system's output energy originates from the centrifugal force itself, which is not a source of energy but a kinematic effect resulting from the energy input used to spin the mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device violates energy conservation. Centrifugal force is not an energy source; it is an effect created by spinning a mass. Any energy 'retrieved' by allowing weights to move outward comes from the kinetic energy of rotation, which was initially supplied by an external motor. The system would slow down, and net energy output cannot exceed the input energy used to spin it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame, not an independent energy source.
- To create and maintain rotation (and thus centrifugal force), work must be input to overcome friction and accelerate masses.
- The system describes no primary energy input (e.g., motor to spin the device) or gradient to exploit.
- Relieving force to bring a weight inward would require work against centrifugal force or a reduction in rotational speed, consuming the system's rotational kinetic energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on heavy masses (crowns). The system attempts to use the shifting weights of two counter-rotating masses, linked by a pendulum system, to create perpetual rotational motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. In a uniform gravitational field with no external input, the system's total mechanical energy is constant. Any motion will eventually cease due to friction, as the shifting masses cannot create a net torque imbalance over a complete cycle to both sustain motion and perform work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed gravitational system in a uniform field is conservative. Net work over one full cycle is zero.
- No external energy gradient is identified or utilized. Gravity alone is not an energy source; it is a potential field.
- The described mechanical coordination and 'constant transfer of weight' cannot create a persistent torque imbalance to overcome friction and do work.
- Claims of 'increasing energy efficiency' and lack of a 'stable equilibrium point' suggest a belief in self-sustaining motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly assumes
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors spinning gyroscopes and rotating the platform.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal rotating assembly with no external interaction or expelled reaction mass. Conservation of linear momentum dictates that such a closed system cannot generate net thrust to propel itself, making the claimed propulsion a violation of Newton's laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net reactive force (momentum) is produced without an external reaction mass.
- Internal torques and angular momenta sum to zero in a closed system; no net linear momentum can be generated.
- Describes a closed, rotating assembly of gyroscopes which cannot produce a sustained, unidirectional thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient fluid's internal thermal energy (heat). Claims to convert this heat directly into net propulsive work without a temperature gradient to a colder reservoir.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to propel itself by converting the internal heat energy of the surrounding fluid into thrust, cooling the fluid in the process. This is a textbook violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it purports to do useful work using a single thermal reservoir. The description of momentum changes is also inconsistent with the conservation of momentum required for net propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Claims to extract net work (propulsion) from a single thermal reservoir (the ambient fluid) via an isentropic process, which is impossible.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes momentum changes and pressure forces but treats the cooling of the fluid as the *source* of propulsion energy, ignoring that this cooling is a result of work extraction, not a driver that can create a net thrus
- Contradictory fluid dynamics: Describes momentum changes that would inherently require a net rearward momentum change in the fluid (a jet) to generate forward thrust, yet explicitly states there is 'no rearwardly directed jet'.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on interna
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to an electric motor, which spins a central shaft and attached flyweights. The claimed 'energy source' is the kinetic energy stored in the accelerated circular motion of the flyweights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an attempted reactionless drive, which violates conservation of momentum. It claims to convert the rotational energy of internal flyweights into net translational thrust for a spacecraft, which is physically impossible because all forces involved are internal to the system. No external energy source or reaction mass is identified to justify the claimed propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) by claiming the flyweight can be pushed inward by an obstacle 'without giving a recoil (impulse) to the central axis'.
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. The device attempts to generate net translational thrust (for spacecraft) from purely internal, rotating components, which is impossible in a closed system.
- Incomplete energy accounting. The claim that energy given to the obstacle is 'fed back' by the motor as angular momentum obfuscates the fact that the motor must supply all energy for both maintaining rotation and allegedly producing thrust, with inev
- Misapplication of centrifugal force. Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame; it cannot be used as a net external force to perform work on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Mentions 'prime energy input of suitable motors' but does not specify the ultimate source (e.g., electrical, chemical). The claimed 'unidirectional force' is presented as an output from a system that asymmetrically loads a rotating mass with liquid, implying the force is generated internally without a corresponding external reaction.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to create propulsion by asymmetrically loading a rotating rotor with liquid, generating a net 'unidirectional force'. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. No internal mass manipulation can produce net thrust for a vehicle without ejecting mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The device describes creating a net 'unidirectional force' from an internal mass redistribution, which is impossible for a closed system to achieve propulsion.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum. The claim implies generating net linear momentum from a cyclic internal process with no external mass ejection or interaction.
- Incomplete force analysis. The centrifugal forces from the asymmetrically loaded liquid are internal stresses within the rotor system; their vector sum, when integrated over a full rotation, is zero for a steady-state cycle, producing no net thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex terminology
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use heat from a single external source (e.g., sea, ambient environment).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a 'unit efficiency' plant that completely converts heat from a single source into useful work. This is a direct violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as no cyclic process can convert heat entirely into work without rejecting waste heat to a lower-temperature reservoir. The described coupling of cycles does not circumvent this fundamental limit.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'unit efficiency' (η=1) which violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
- Describes a coupled absorption refrigerator and heat engine cycle that purportedly results in 'total recovery' of input heat as work, which is thermodynamically impossible.
- The system appears to be a composite heat engine attempting to extract work from a single temperature reservoir, forbidden by the Kelvin-Planck statement.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (absor
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes mechanical transitions and external forces being applied and removed, but does not identify a primary energy input. It suggests 'extra energy' is generated from the repetition of transitions within a closed structural system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classical perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate 'extra energy' mechanically from the internal cycling of a structural system, violating conservation of energy. The invocation of 'quantum force' is a misdirection unrelated to the described mechanics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims 'extra energy' is produced from internal transitions with no net energy input.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Suggests a cyclic process can generate net work without an external energy source.
- Vague mechanism: 'Quantum force' is invoked without explanation and is unrelated to the described mechanical transitions.
- Perpetual motion: Describes 'infinite repetition' of transitions generating torque and extractable energy, which is impossible in a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses the term 'quantum fo
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim explicitly states the objective is to exceed the Law of Conservation of Energy, implying no conventional energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is identified. The described mechanism suggests an attempt to extract useful work (fluid compression/force transfer) solely from the horizontal movement/pivoting of a weight, without a clear external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim explicitly seeks an exception to energy conservation, which is a fundamental violation of physics. The described mechanism of pivoting a weight horizontally cannot generate the energy required to compress fluid and perform useful work without an external input. The use of terms like 'New Law of Natural Balance' and vague geometric descriptions obfuscates the core energy accounting failure.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim to violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.
- No identifiable external energy input to account for the claimed output of fluid compression/force transfer.
- Mechanism confuses force/motion geometry with energy creation; horizontal pivoting of a weight does not create energy to perform compression work.
- Lacks any thermodynamic process or gradient that could be harnessed for net work output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the spacecraft's power system to drive an electric motor (11) and electromagnets (6).
AI Physics Analysis
This is a reactionless drive claim. The mechanism uses rotating and reciprocating masses entirely internal to the spacecraft. Since momentum must be conserved, the sum of all internal forces is zero, and no net thrust on the vehicle can be generated. It is a classic violation of Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- The described device is an internal, unbalanced rotating mass system. The net linear momentum imparted to the spacecraft over a full cycle is zero, as all internal forces sum to zero (Newton's Third Law).
- The device attempts to create a net thrust by timing the release/retraction of centrifugal masses, but any impulse in one direction during release will be exactly canceled by an opposite impulse when the mass is retracted or when the rotating assembl
- No external reaction mass or momentum exchange with an external field is described, violating conservation of momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, with no other explicit input. The device attempts to create a 'false equilibrium' by having ascending weights follow a shorter path than descending weights.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. Gravity is a conservative force, meaning the net work done by it on an object moving through a closed cycle is zero. The described mechanism of different path lengths cannot produce continuous rotation without an external energy input, directly violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to extract net work from a conservative force field (gravity) in a closed cycle.
- No identifiable external energy input to overcome the work done against gravity on the ascending path.
- The 'shorter path for ascending weights' does not change the net gravitational work over a full rotation; the force of gravity is conservative and path-independent.
- The system will settle into an equilibrium position with no continuous rotation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The primary explicit energy input is the motor (17) driving the turbine (3). The claim suggests the device moves due to centrifugal thrust 'without taking support from the medium', implying the internal liquid's centrifugal force is the net propulsive output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system that uses a motor to spin an internal fluid. The described centrifugal 'thrust' is an internal force that cancels out within the device, so it cannot create net propulsion for the vehicle as a whole. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically conservation of momentum, making it a form of reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal centrifugal forces are internal stress forces that cancel out within the closed system. No net external force can be generated to propel the device as a whole.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims motion from centrifugal thrust of liquid, ignoring that accelerating and managing the liquid's flow requires work from the motor. Any propulsive force would be an internal reaction, resulting in zero net momentum
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: Centrifugal force in a rotating reference frame is not a real external force that can perform net work on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to capture 'gravific energy' from Earth's rotation and orbital motion, but describes a mechanical system with oscillators, a floating globe, water levels, and counterweights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity by capturing 'gravific energy' from Earth's rotation using oscillators and floats. This is a violation of energy conservation, as it attempts to extract net work from a conservative gravitational field without a compensating decrease in the system's potential energy or an external energy source. The description uses physics-like terms ('oscillator', 'equilibrium', 'gravity') to obscure a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes extracting net work from Earth's gravitational field without an external energy gradient or fuel.
- Misunderstands gravity and rotation: Earth's gravitational field is conservative; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle in a static field. The Earth's rotation provides no usable energy gradient to the described stationary apparatus.
- Describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind: aims to produce electricity from a system with no identifiable external energy input beyond initial setup.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be an inertial drive or gravity engine using asymmetrically weighted flywheels and springs inside rotating bodies. The only explicit energy input mentioned is the initial 'Inbetriebsetzung' (starting operation). It implies sustained rotation and power output from internal mass redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate continuous rotation and useful work (to drive a generator) solely through the internal motion of asymmetrical flywheels and springs within rotating bodies. This is a classic overbalanced wheel or inertial drive concept where internal conservative forces cannot create a net external torque or energy output, violating conservation laws. The initial energy input is quickly dissipated by friction and bearing losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy
- No sustained external energy input identified to overcome losses
- Claims motion generation from internal moving masses without reaction mass or external torque
- Internal forces (springs, centrifugal) are conservative and cannot provide net work over a cycle
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes using a lever mechanism to 'cancel gravitational energy' on one side of a rotating system, implying the goal is to extract net work from gravitational potential energy without an external, depletable energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotation by using an internal lever to 'cancel' gravity on one side, creating a perpetual imbalance. This violates the conservation of energy, as the work needed to lift weights or cancel gravitational force must come from an external source, not from the system's own internal configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create a perpetual imbalance in a gravitational field without an external energy source.
- Claims to 'cancel gravitational energy' on one side to create a perpetual torque, violating conservation of energy.
- Mechanism describes transferring energy within the system (lever lifting a rod) but provides no primary energy input to sustain motion against losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'output >
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'drive means' (e.g., solenoid switches) presumably consumes electrical energy to initiate internal relative motion. No external environmental energy source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a net impulse (acceleration from rest) by converting some internal linear momentum into angular momentum via flywheels. This violates the conservation of linear momentum, as internal forces cannot change the center-of-mass velocity of an isolated system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of net impulse (center-of-mass acceleration) from purely internal forces, violating conservation of momentum.
- Claim that converting some internal kinetic energy to rotational energy within a closed system creates a momentum difference, which is impossible.
- System described operates with all components internal to the frame; no reaction mass or external field interaction is described to provide a net external force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system using gravity and weights on balance rails to drive a generator cylinder, implying the energy source is gravitational potential energy from the falling weights. However, no mechanism for resetting the weights to their initial high-potential-energy state is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity using gravity and weighted balance rails. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it describes only the energy-releasing phase of a cycle. To operate continuously, the weights must be lifted against gravity, requiring at least as much energy as the generator produces, making it a net energy consumer, not a producer.
Specific Physics Issues
- No described mechanism to restore the gravitational potential energy of the weights after they fall, violating energy conservation.
- Implies a continuous cycle of work extraction from gravity without an external energy input to lift the weights.
- Lacks a complete energy accounting cycle; describes only the energy extraction (downward motion) phase.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims imply the device generates directed propulsion from internal centrifugal forces alone, with no external reaction mass or clear energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net directional thrust using only internal rotating masses, violating Newton's laws of motion. Internal centrifugal forces cannot produce a net external force on a closed system; this is a classic reactionless drive fallacy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Claim states 'no centrifugal counter-impulse on the vehicle' while generating directed thrust.
- Centrifugal force is an internal, radial force within a rotating reference frame. Net vector sum of internal forces in a closed system is zero.
- Claims to produce continuous propulsion ('stetige Antriebskraft') without expelling reaction mass, which is impossible for a vehicle in a vacuum or against an external medium.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a gravity-powered generator using weighted rods on balance rails to drive a generator cylinder, implying it extracts energy solely from gravitational potential energy without an external input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-powered generator that uses descending weights to produce electricity but provides no mechanism or energy source to return the weights to their initial height. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, directly violating the conservation of energy. Continuous operation would require more energy to reset the system than it could possibly generate.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear external energy input to restore gravitational potential after weights descend.
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate electricity from a closed-cycle gravity system without an identified source of work to lift the weights.
- Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (outputs energy without an equivalent input).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes motion a
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. No explicit energy input is described. The mechanism appears designed to generate rotation from internal forces and geometry alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical assembly with no specified source of energy. Its described operation relies on internal force resolution to produce shaft rotation, which violates conservation of energy. The complex geometry and force analysis cannot create net work without an external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, electricity, ambient gradient).
- Claims of 'active rotation forces' derived from internal force resolution without an external driver.
- Describes a closed mechanical system with internal reactions; net work output requires external energy input.
- Force components labeled 'active' and 'inactive' suggest an attempt to circumvent Newton's 3rd law and conservation of energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical d
Claimed Energy Source
Conventional engines (combustion, electric, etc.) provide input power to accelerate masses along a closed-loop track.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed internal mass accelerator. While internal forces and momentum changes can occur, the net force on the vehicle's center of mass must be zero unless momentum is expelled externally. This describes a reactionless drive, which violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net thrust from internal momentum exchange in a closed system
- Ignores Newton's third law: internal forces sum to zero for the system as a whole
- Confuses internal centrifugal forces with net external thrust
- No external reaction mass or momentum sink identified
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric gas is the claimed primary input, with an external drive unit acting as an 'energy taker' or transmitter of power generated by the rotor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gas flow machine that purportedly generates enough power from ambient air expansion and re-compression to overcome all its own system losses, implying net energy extraction from an isothermal atmosphere. This violates the second law of thermodynamics, as it attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the second kind by generating useful work from a single thermal reservoir without a compensating entropy increase elsewhere.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim states the rotor generates power that 'overcompensates for all system losses/negative power' of the gas flow machine, implying net power output from ambient gas expansion/compression cycle without an external temperature or pressure gradien
- The described cycle (gas enters, expands, exits, re-compresses 'due to its own dynamics', returns to original pressure) suggests an attempt to extract net work from an isothermal, isobaric environment.
- No identifiable external high-grade energy source (fuel, heat gradient, electrical input for compression) to drive a net output that exceeds all system losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies the rotor'
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the rotary drive mechanism. The apparatus attempts to generate a net translational force (useful work) from internal motions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum management system. While it can create oscillating inertial forces, it cannot produce a sustained, net translational force on its frame without expelling mass or interacting with an external field. The claim of a 'substantially translational force' from asymmetrical internal acceleration violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a net translational force from purely internal momentum exchanges.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described that could provide the necessary momentum change for a net force.
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy is the implied primary input, with a vague mention of 'supplemental energy' to maintain operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The described cycle is a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. It attempts to use internal heat exchange to create a sustainable pressure gradient to drive a turbine, extracting net work from the ambient environment without a temperature difference to an external cold sink. This violates the second law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core cycle attempts to use a compressor to re-heat turbine exhaust, creating a pressure/temperature gradient to feed the turbine again, without a net external energy input.
- The system lacks a net external heat source; it attempts to extract work from a single ambient temperature reservoir, violating the Kelvin-Planck statement of the second law.
- The heat exchanger between the turbine exhaust and compressor is an internal heat transfer that cannot increase the total available energy of the closed cycle; it merely shifts entropy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The 'supplemental
Claimed Energy Source
Implicitly from an external motor/power source that spins the gyrostat wheel and drives the toppling/rotating mechanisms. No novel energy source is claimed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net thrust through a sequence of internal gyroscopic motions. However, conservation of linear momentum dictates that the center of mass of an isolated system cannot accelerate by internal forces alone. The described precessional forces are internal reaction pairs and cannot produce net external thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce net unidirectional thrust (linear momentum) from internal cyclic motions of a rigid body system.
- Ignores conservation of linear momentum: internal forces and torques cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- Precessional forces are internal reaction forces between the gyrostat and its support structure; they sum to zero for the isolated system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initial potential energy (e.g., raising the roller to start position) and/or manual input to overcome friction. No external continuous energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a purely mechanical system with no identified continuous energy source. Its claim of 'largely loss-free' periodic conversion between potential and kinetic energy implies sustained or perpetual motion, which is impossible due to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. All real systems dissipate energy, so the claimed performance violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'periodic and largely loss-free conversion of potential to kinetic energy' which implies negligible energy dissipation.
- Describes a closed mechanical system with no continuous energy input, implying it could sustain periodic motion indefinitely.
- Mechanism (roller on cylindrical surface with rings/masses) cannot create energy; any motion will decay due to friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the centrifugal force of rotating unbalanced masses (Wuchthalbscheiben) is harnessed as a directed propulsion force. The only explicit input would be the electrical/mechanical energy to spin the rotors.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a directed propulsion force using only internal rotating masses, explicitly stating there is no counter-impulse. This is a direct violation of Newton's third law and the conservation of linear momentum. No internal force can produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'no counter-impulse' (kein Gegenimpuls) violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Claim that propulsion is generated 'without ejection of friction-coupled support mass' suggests an attempt to create a reactionless drive, which is impossible for net momentum change in a closed system.
- The system is described as internal (rotating masses within a vehicle), so any centrifugal force is an internal force that cannot produce net translation of the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions deflagrations, detonations, compressed gas, and electrical inputs, implying chemical or electrical energy is the primary source. However, the core claim centers on recovering and redirecting internal reaction forces and momentum to produce net propulsion without expelling mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve propulsion ('autopropulsion') for a vehicle by manipulating internal masses, pistons, and flywheels without expelling any reaction mass. This directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate net external force through internal movements alone. The description is a classic example of a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'autopropulsion' (self-propulsion) without losing mass, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Asserts that internal forces (e.g., on cylinder heads, from flywheels, from reversing piston motion) can be summed to produce a net external force on the vehicle.
- Describes mechanisms that only manipulate internal momentum, which cannot create net thrust for a closed system.
- Misapplies the concept of a 'point d'appui' (fulcrum) as something that can be increased internally to enable reaction propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the electromagnetic primary drive (Claims 4-6) that accelerates and maintains the circulation of the guided masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic reactionless drive claim. It attempts to generate a net thrust by creating an asymmetry in centrifugal forces within a closed-loop path. However, all forces involved are internal to the system; Newton's third law dictates that the net internal force is zero, and the system's center of mass cannot accelerate without expelling mass or pushing against an external object. The electrical input merely overcomes friction and maintains motion, but cannot produce the claimed net external thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a net thrust/driving force (Fs) from an internal, closed-loop centrifugal force imbalance, which is impossible in a closed mechanical system.
- Centrifugal forces are internal, constraint forces. Their vector sum around any closed loop is zero; no net external force can be generated without an external reaction.
- The claimed coefficient k>2 and force equation Fs = m_s1*v1^2/r1 - m_s2*v2^2/r2 suggests a miscalculation where the masses (m_s1, m_s2) are treated as independent, but they are the same physical masses in different parts of the cycle. The system's ce
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes arranging components N(S) and S to create a 'magnetic field generator', but provides no identifiable external energy input (electrical, mechanical, chemical, or ambient). The implied source appears to be the magnetic configuration itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes creating a magnetic field generator solely by arranging components in a specific N-S pattern, with no stated energy input. This violates the law of energy conservation, as magnetic fields contain energy that must be supplied by an external source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit or implicit energy input is specified.
- Claims to generate a magnetic field or energy from a static arrangement of components, implying creation of energy from nothing.
- Violates energy conservation; establishing or maintaining a magnetic field requires work input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the motor turning the shaft (rotary motion). The apparatus claims to convert this rotary motion into a net linear propulsion force for the entire apparatus.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic reactionless drive claim. Moving or tilting internal masses cannot create a sustained net force on the apparatus's center of mass because every internal action has an equal and opposite internal reaction, canceling out. The motor's energy is wasted on internal movements and friction, not converted to net propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. Internal movements of masses cannot produce a net external force on the center of mass of a closed system without an external reaction force.
- Misapplication of gyroscopic principles. Precession forces are internal and reactionary; they cannot provide sustained, directional net thrust in free space.
- Energy accounting is incomplete. The work done to move the weights radially and overcome friction is supplied by the motor. Any claimed 'propulsion' is an internal force pair, not net thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy of a weight positioned at a distance from the wheel's axis. The claim implies this single input of stored potential energy can produce continuous rotation exceeding one full revolution without additional external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a form of perpetual motion machine. The initial gravitational potential energy of the weight is finite. While clever weight-shifting can extend motion slightly, friction and losses ensure the system cannot complete a full revolution and return to its initial state without net energy input, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A finite initial potential energy is claimed to produce continuous motion without an external energy source to reset the system.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: The device is described as a closed mechanical system with no external gradient to exploit; internal weight redistribution cannot produce net work over a cycle.
- Misapplication of inertia: Inertia is not an energy source; it only conserves momentum. The description treats it as a force that can be harnessed to do net work over a cycle.
- Implied perpetual motion: The abstract states the wheel can complete and exceed a full revolution 'sans poussée aucune de l'extérieur' after an initial release, suggesting sustained motion from a finite energy store.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies the device generates a net propulsive force from internal rotating masses without specifying an external energy input. The only implied input is the initial energy to spin the rotors.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to propel a vehicle by generating internal centrifugal forces. This is a classic reactionless drive violation: internal forces sum to zero and cannot produce net external acceleration. The system's center of mass cannot be moved by forces entirely internal to the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
- No external reaction mass or momentum sink identified.
- Describes using resultant force on the housing to propel a vehicle, which is impossible for a closed system using only internal moving parts.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a purely mechanical system with weights, a rotating wheel, and a fixed cam track, implying the intended source is internal gravitational potential energy of the weights and their motion, with no identified external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system where weights on a rotating wheel interact with a fixed cam. It claims this interaction causes permanent rotation of an output shaft. This is a classic overbalanced wheel design, which cannot produce net energy output as the center of mass of the weights cannot perpetually remain on one side to create continuous torque without an external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims 'permanente Drehung' (permanent rotation) without an external energy source.
- No mechanism to add energy to the system; weights moving in a closed track cannot create net positive work over a cycle.
- System is a closed mechanical oscillator; friction and losses will dissipate any initial kinetic energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent mentions 'power units' (1 and 11) which presumably supply the initial mechanical input, but the claims imply this input can generate levitation or horizontal motion without any external reaction.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a purely mechanical gear system. Its claims to produce levitation or horizontal motion without any external reaction medium directly violate Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum and the action-reaction principle). No internal arrangement of gears can create a net external force on the device itself.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of producing thrust/levitation without any reaction violates Newton's Third Law.
- Claim of producing horizontal motion without transmitting power through the wheels or interacting with the environment (e.g., water) suggests a closed system doing net work on its center of mass, violating conservation of momentum.
- Mechanical gearing alone cannot create a net force or lift in a closed system; it only transmits and transforms forces internally.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a closed system with internal moving parts (mass on a spring, electric motor, flywheel). Claims suggest net propulsion or energy gain from internal inertial forces alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a device that, as an isolated system, can produce a net internal force and gain kinetic energy solely through controlled internal motions. This directly violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum for an isolated system) and the conservation of energy, as it purports to extract net work from a system with no external energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a non-zero net internal force in an isolated system, violating Newton's 3rd Law and conservation of momentum.
- Asserts energy gain W = ∫ F_R · V dt from internal motions, implying net work from a closed system.
- Misapplies concepts of inertia and delayed reaction to circumvent action-reaction symmetry.
- Proposes that time-varying internal forces on bodies of different masses can produce a net average force, which is impossible for a system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description appears to describe a mechanism where a rotating body (15) interacts with a fixed body (11) to cause a rotating body (8) to generate electricity, suggesting energy extraction from rotation without a clear external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system where rotation leads to electricity generation without any clear source of energy input, strongly implying a perpetual motion mechanism. The garbled text further obfuscates the operating principle, preventing a coherent physics-based analysis that could identify a legitimate energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient).
- Describes a rotating body causing another to rotate and generate electricity, implying energy creation or a perpetual motion scheme.
- Complete lack of thermodynamic context or limits.
- Text is garbled/obfuscated, making technical analysis impossible while preserving the structure of a patent claim.
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms (extract
PATTERN C - Technical obfuscation (text appears corrupted or
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors (primary and secondary) from an unspecified power source (likely batteries or generator).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'free-bodied' internal system attempting to achieve net translation by only moving internal weights. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot change its own center of mass velocity using only internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. The device is a closed system (free-bodied frame) attempting to achieve net lateral displacement by only manipulating internal moving masses and rotations.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described to provide the necessary momentum change for the center of mass.
- Claims 'non-reactive drive' implying propulsion without expelling mass, which is impossible for a closed system in vacuum/space.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The device requires a conventional motor to drive the toothed rings (Zahnkränze). The claimed thrust is supposedly generated internally by the motion of masses with variable angular velocities.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system intended to produce thrust without reaction, which is a direct violation of Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. No external energy or momentum source is identified that could explain a net force on the vehicle, making the claimed propulsion physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of 'rückstoßfreien Vortriebskräften' (reactionless propulsion forces) which violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described to produce net thrust. Internal moving masses cannot create a net force on a closed system.
- The mechanism describes changing radii and angular velocities of masses, but any internal force pairs cancel out within the system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text (in Korean) describes a 'gravity automatic machine' or 'permanent gravity machine' that appears to use gravity and imbalance/offset weights to generate motion, suggesting it claims to extract net work from a gravitational potential without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-based automatic machine, which is a classic perpetual motion claim. Any machine solely using gravity and imbalances in a closed cycle cannot produce net work, as lifting the weights to reset the cycle requires at least as much energy as is gained during descent, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim implies a mechanism that uses gravity and imbalanced weights to produce continuous or excess work.
- No clear external energy source is identified to restore the gravitational potential or overcome losses.
- The system, as implied by the title and fragmented description, fits the pattern of a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to drive motors (and possibly electromagnets) to rotate mass structures.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus claims to generate a net thrust (linear momentum) solely through the internal motion of its parts. This is a classic violation of Newton's laws—specifically, conservation of momentum—as internal forces cannot accelerate the center of mass of a closed system. It is a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net linear thrust from an internal, cyclic redistribution of mass. This violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of linear momentum for a closed system.
- The described mechanism (transitioning rotating masses between balanced/unbalanced states) cannot produce a net force on the apparatus as a whole. Internal forces sum to zero.
- No external reaction mass or momentum sink is identified or implied.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies an internal mechanism (rotating masses) is intended to generate a net thrust force (Vortriebskraft) without any specified external energy input or reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a reactionless drive, attempting to generate net thrust solely through the asymmetric cyclic motion of internal masses. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass by rearranging its internal parts.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy source identified for net thrust.
- Describes an internal momentum redistribution system, which cannot produce net thrust on a closed system (violates Newton's 3rd law/ conservation of momentum).
- Claims 'zwangsläufig' (inevitably) results in a net propulsive force from cyclic internal motion, which is impossible for a system with no external interaction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies energy is generated internally through 'recycled forces' and 'constant rotation thrust' without an external input, suggesting a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical gear system that claims to produce continuous, unlimited rotation and energy by 'recycling' forces internally. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to create energy from nothing within a closed mechanical system, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual motion ('constant rotation thrust over an unlimited period')
- Claims energy is 'continuously recycled... without ever consuming it'
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.)
- Describes a purely mechanical system with gears and levers, which cannot generate net energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the two motor systems (one to rotate the frame, one to rotate the weight relative to the frame).
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate a net directional force from purely internal rotations. The vector sum of all centrifugal/inertial forces over a complete cycle is zero, providing no net thrust. This violates Newton's laws, specifically conservation of linear momentum for a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net unidirectional thrust (linear force) from a purely rotating system in a closed cycle.
- Centrifugal force is a radially outward, inertial force dependent on the instantaneous position of the mass relative to the axis of rotation. Its vector sum over a full cycle of the described motion is zero.
- The device describes a specific kinematic phase relationship but does not create a sustained force gradient or momentum asymmetry in the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the driving means (40) that synchronously rotates the two main bodies. The device claims to generate a net propulsion force from internal mass movements.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a closed mechanical system. The described internal mass movements, while complex, cannot create a net force on the device's center of mass, as this violates conservation of momentum. It is a form of reactionless drive, which is impossible under Newtonian physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a net linear force (propulsion) from purely internal, cyclic motions within a closed system.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described to satisfy Newton's third law for net momentum change.
- The 'whiplike action' is an internal force; the center of mass of the isolated system cannot accelerate by internal forces alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a closed mechanical system with no external energy input described. The term 'energy conserving' suggests it is intended to generate or multiply energy internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system with shifting weights. While it may temporarily change its rotational dynamics, it cannot create or conserve net energy without an external input. It violates the first law of thermodynamics by implying sustained operation or energy multiplication from internal motions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy source identified; system is purely mechanical and passive.
- Claims 'energy conserving' without specifying source of conserved energy, implying perpetual motion.
- Mechanism describes shifting weights to change moment of inertia, but this cannot create net energy; energy is merely redistributed within the system with losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly, the mechanical input from the driving motor/engine. Implicitly, the patent describes a mechanism where a rotating body's center of mass moves radially in and out during rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism where rotating masses have an oscillating radial motion. While this can create varying internal forces, it cannot generate a sustained net force or excess energy. The system is driven by a motor, and all dynamic forces are reactive and balanced over a cycle, making claims of altering 'absolute centrifugal force' for net output a violation of Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to alter the 'absolute value of centrifugal force' to achieve an unbalanced net force or torque, which is a misapplication of Newton's laws in a rotating frame.
- The described oscillating center-of-mass motion is internally driven by the mechanism itself; any radial force variation is reactive and cannot produce net useful work exceeding the input without violating conservation of energy.
- The system is presented as a closed mechanical assembly with no external energy gradient besides the prime mover.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert 'gravity and buoyancy energy' during gas compression/expansion, implying energy extraction from gravitational potential changes of a body in a gas-filled container.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed system where compressing a gas changes a body's buoyancy, causing motion claimed to release 'free energy.' This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because the work needed to compress the gas and reset the system equals or exceeds any work output, and gravity is a conservative force providing no net energy over a cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The system is closed. Work done to compress the gas equals energy input. Any change in the body's buoyant force and gravitational potential energy is part of an internal cycle; net work extracted over a full cycle cannot
- No external energy gradient identified: The system lacks a sustained external thermal gradient (for a heat engine) or another external power source. Gravity is a conservative force—net work around a closed path in a gravitational field is zero.
- Misinterprets buoyancy as an energy source: Buoyancy is not an energy source but a force resulting from a pressure gradient in a fluid. Changing a body's buoyancy via compression requires work input; the subsequent motion merely converts some of that
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'free ener
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical input from an external power source drives the rotation of the gyroscope assembly about axis XOX'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a net thrust (a net external force) solely through the internal, cyclic motion of a gyroscope. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot produce a net force on its center of mass without ejecting reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of a net thrust force from internal, cyclic motions of a gyroscope.
- No external reaction mass or momentum sink identified.
- Internal forces in a closed system sum to zero; no net momentum change is possible without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes various engine and propulsion mechanisms (free-piston engines, compressors, electric motors) but does not specify a primary energy source capable of supporting the claimed performance. It implies chemical fuel but makes impossible energy output claims relative to input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent makes explicit, quantitatively impossible claims (propulsion to light speed, 1000x efficiency over rockets) that directly violate conservation of energy and relativistic physics. It uses technical mechanical descriptions to obfuscate these fundamental violations.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims propulsion to the speed of light using mechanical/chemical systems, which violates relativistic mechanics and energy conservation.
- Claims fuel consumption '1000 times less than a rocket' for similar performance without identifying a commensurate external energy source.
- Proposes achieving escape velocity and interstellar travel with atmospheric/mechanical engines, ignoring the rocket equation and the energy scale of interstellar travel.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes internal masses moving in closed systems without combustion or external energy input, implying propulsion from internal momentum exchange alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a net thrust (coordinated force in one direction) solely through the synchronized motion of internal masses within a closed system, with no external energy input or expulsion of reaction mass. This directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, making it a classical example of an impossible reactionless drive.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum (internal forces cannot produce net thrust in a closed system)
- No identifiable external energy input or reaction mass
- Claims 'elimination of every pivot point' and generation of coordinated thrust in one direction from symmetric internal motions, which is impossible for a closed system
- Uses undefined constants (CF 4=0.25, CF 3=0.3) and vague geometric transformations ('pivots moved to infinity') without physical justification
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (ta
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the machine's own weighted arms, descending under gravity, provide the input energy. No external energy source (e.g., electrical, wind, human winding) is specified to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical system where weighted arms descend under gravity to turn gears and produce output work. However, it lacks any described mechanism to return the arms to their raised position, which would require an input of energy equal to or greater than the output. Therefore, it violates the conservation of energy by implying continuous operation without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified net external energy input.
- Claims to use levers and gears to create a rotating output from descending arms, but provides no mechanism to return the arms to their initial high-potential-energy state without consuming at least as much work as was generated.
- The system, as described, would settle into an equilibrium state with arms at the bottom, requiring external energy to reset.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate 'new energy' from the interaction between water and air (humidity) on a membrane, implying extraction of net work from ambient air-water vapor equilibrium without an identified external gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device where water and air interact on a membrane to supposedly generate new energy. This violates core thermodynamics, as extracting net work from an equilibrium air-water vapor system without an external driving gradient (like a temperature or concentration difference) is impossible. The claim of creating energy from this interaction is a perpetual motion violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by implying net energy extraction from an isothermal equilibrium system (air and water at the same temperature).
- No identifiable external energy input gradient (thermal, chemical, pressure) to drive the claimed energy conversion.
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'new energy' generation suggests output > total input, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'new en
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor rotating the body. The claim implies the generated 'propulsion force' is a net external force on the vehicle, not derived from an interaction with an external medium (e.g., ground, air, magnetic field).
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to propel a vehicle using only internal moving parts. This is impossible as the internal forces, no matter how configured, cannot produce a net external force on the vehicle's center of mass, violating Newton's laws and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net propulsion of a vehicle from internal moving masses, violating conservation of momentum.
- The described forces (centrifugal/gyroscopic) are internal to the vehicle-body system; they cancel out and cannot produce net translation.
- Device attempts to create a net force from a periodic, unbalanced internal mass distribution, which averages to zero over a cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims imply creation of permanent disequilibrium without specifying an external energy input. Mentions hydraulic force or lever applied to upper part, but no explanation of how this force is sustained or powered.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a rotating system claiming to create permanent disequilibrium to function as a motor, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external energy source. It makes sweeping claims about replacing all engines while providing no physical mechanism that respects energy conservation or thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (fuel, electricity, ambient gradient) specified
- Claims 'creation of a permanent disequilibrium' which violates the second law of thermodynamics without an external driver
- Implies a self-sustaining motor with no input energy accounting
- Claims universal replacement of all engines without performance limits or efficiency calculations
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the drive means to rotate the central body.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internally balanced rotating system. All forces generated by moving the pendulum masses are internal reaction forces, which cancel out over a full cycle. No net directional force can be produced on the device's housing without ejecting mass or interacting with an external field, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim implies generation of a net directional force (thrust) from an internal, balanced mechanical system with no external reaction mass or momentum exchange.
- System is internally symmetric; all forces are internal reaction forces between components, resulting in zero net force on the apparatus enclosure (Newton's Third Law).
- Energy accounting is incomplete; any oscillatory motion of masses consumes input work via spring hysteresis and friction, dissipated as heat.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy source is the initial input to spin the centrifugal devices. The patent describes a purely mechanical apparatus that claims to produce a continuous unidirectional net force on its main frame.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to generate a continuous unidirectional force using only internal moving masses. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the conservation of linear momentum. No internal arrangement of moving parts can produce a net external force on a closed system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction)
- Attempts to create a net external force from an internal, cyclic mechanism
- No provision for momentum conservation - the system's center of mass cannot accelerate without an external reaction force
- Implies creation of linear momentum from a closed system with only internal moving parts
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a conventional engine/motor providing rotational input to the described mechanical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a proposed reactionless drive, aiming to create net thrust from internal moving masses without expelling propellant. This directly violates the conservation of linear momentum, a cornerstone of classical physics. No mechanism described can circumvent the requirement for momentum exchange with an external environment.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate 'reactionless thrust' (rückstoßfreien Schubkräfte) for propulsion of spacecraft.
- Attempts to produce a net linear force (thrust) from purely internal moving masses and rotating components.
- Violates Newton's third law (conservation of linear momentum) for a closed system.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described to justify momentum change of the vehicle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanism where components (4',5') interact with components (4,5) to create a 'magnetic force and electromagnetic wave' generator, but no explicit external energy input is identified. The description suggests energy is generated from the interaction itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that purportedly generates magnetic forces and electromagnetic waves through internal component interactions alone, with no clear external energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim of the first kind, directly violating the law of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source (input) is described.
- The mechanism appears to claim generation of useful energy (magnetic force and electromagnetic waves) from an internal arrangement without an external gradient or input, implying creation of energy.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text (in Korean) describes a 'gravity automatic machine' (중차 자동기) that appears to claim to generate motion or work from a weight imbalance or gravity alone, without a clear external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gravity-powered automatic machine. For any gravity-based system to perform continuous work, an external energy source is required to lift the weights and restore the gravitational potential. The patent lacks this, making it a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by implying a perpetual or self-resetting motion from gravity
- No identifiable primary energy source to overcome losses and reset the weight imbalance
- Lacks description of how the system creates a sustainable gradient without external work input
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical grid input to an initial motor. The claim suggests additional energy is generated by the action of gravity and centrifugal force on weighted flywheels.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce an energy gain from gravity and centrifugal force acting on a rotating flywheel. This is impossible because both are conservative forces in this context; they cannot add net energy to the system. The only energy input is the initial motor, making any claimed 'energy gain' a violation of the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims 'energiewinst' (energy gain) from gravity/centrifugal force without an external gradient.
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame; it cannot do net work on the system to increase its total energy.
- Gravity is a conservative force; no net energy can be extracted from it in a closed cycle by a flywheel system. The weighted flywheel's gravitational potential energy changes cyclically, with zero net work over a full rotation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests operation 'by gravitation' or 'by pressure', implying the device is intended to generate continuous motion from either gravitational potential energy of internal counterweights or an applied pressure. No external fuel, electrical input, or environmental gradient (like a heat source) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'motor' operating by gravitation or pressure, but provides no account for an external energy source to overcome inevitable losses. A closed system using internal counterweights cannot produce continuous net output, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a mechanism for continuous motion without an identified sustainable external energy input.
- If 'gravitational', it implies a closed-loop system extracting net work from its own internal weights, violating conservation of energy.
- If 'pressure', it lacks specification of the pressure source; if self-contained, it faces the same conservation issue.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
An external motor or device (as stated in the claim) provides the initial rotational input to the main axis.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system driven by an external motor. Its claim to generate usable 'rectilinear kinetic energy' from an internal asymmetry in a rotating frame, independent of the environment, violates conservation of energy and momentum. No net work can be extracted from a closed, cyclical mechanical system without an external energy gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to 'isolate' rectilinear kinetic energy independently of the external environment, implying energy extraction without an external gradient.
- Describes a non-homogeneous motion of balance weights, suggesting an asymmetry that creates a net rectilinear kinetic energy output greater than input.
- Proposes converting an internal asymmetry in a rotating system into net usable work without an external sink or gradient, violating conservation of momentum in a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be solely from permanent magnets, with no external energy input (electrical, fuel, ambient gradient).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a motor powered solely by permanent magnets with no other energy input, which is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. Magnetic forces are conservative; no net work can be extracted from a closed cycle of magnetic interactions without an external energy source to change the magnetic configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce useful work from a static, non-depleting source.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a mechanism to extract net work from a system in thermodynamic equilibrium (no temperature or potential gradient to drive motion).
- Permanent magnets are sources of potential energy, not infinite energy. Doing work against magnetic forces requires energy input to reset the system, creating a cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover (e.g., electric motor, engine) provides rotational mechanical input to the drive shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create net thrust by moving an internal weight asymmetrically. This is impossible for a closed system as the internal forces cancel over a complete cycle, violating conservation of momentum. No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is used.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net propulsion (unbalanced force) from an internal, cyclic motion of a mass.
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. The device is a closed system; accelerating a weight in one direction creates an equal and opposite force on the frame, which cancels out over a complete cycle.
- The asymmetric speed claim is a kinematic red herring; impulse (force*time) or momentum change over a full period is zero for any periodic internal motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on a rotating mass within a tilted/vertical stator tube, with no external energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity motor claiming to produce continuous rotation from a rolling mass. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as gravity is a conservative force; cycling a mass in a closed loop extracts no net energy. The system lacks an external energy input to replenish the mass's potential energy, making it a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce continuous rotational work from a static gravitational field with no energy input to reset the system.
- Misunderstands gravity as a source of usable work without an external gradient or change in potential. A mass rolling in a closed system cannot produce net continuous output.
- Description suggests 'se met en rotation' (sets itself in rotation) from a vertical position, implying perpetual motion of the first kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be an internal power source (e.g., battery, engine) used to 'shoot' or propel the balls electromagnetically, but not explicitly stated.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic 'reactionless drive' concept that violates conservation of momentum. The internal bouncing of masses creates balanced internal forces that cancel out, resulting in zero net force on the vehicle as a whole. It cannot propel a vehicle without expelling mass or interacting with an external environment.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces cannot produce net propulsion of a closed system.
- Incomplete momentum accounting. The momentum imparted to the balls in one direction is balanced by equal and opposite momentum on the frame during the 'shooting' phase.
- No external reaction mass or interaction, making it a form of 'reactionless drive' which is impossible for net momentum change.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanism with radially movable masses in a rotating system, but provides no explicit energy input. Implied input is the work required to move the masses radially against centrifugal/Coriolis forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a reactionless drive, attempting to generate net linear thrust or rotation via internal mass motions alone. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. No external energy source or reaction mass is identified to permit net propulsion, making it a classical perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum and energy
- Claims to produce a constant thrust (Claim 3) from an internal mass redistribution without external reaction
- No identified net external energy input for sustained propulsion
- Internal motion of masses requires work; any net thrust would require an equal and opposite momentum change elsewhere in the system
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanism with radially movable masses in a rotating guide, implying the radial motion of the masses is powered by an unspecified external source (claim 4 mentions electromagnetic, crank, hydraulic, or pneumatic drives). The claim suggests net thrust/rotation can be generated from internal mass motions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create propulsion or rotation by moving masses internally while keeping the system's center of mass stationary relative to the axis. This is physically impossible for a closed system, as it violates conservation of linear and angular momentum. No external energy or momentum source is identified to justify the claimed net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim implies generating a net rotational force or thrust by purely internal mass redistribution. This is a classic reactionless drive concept, which violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described as the source of momentum change. The system is closed.
- Energy accounting is absent. The work needed to radially accelerate the masses against centrifugal forces and any friction would equal or exceed any net rotational work output, per the work-energy theorem.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Conventional prime mover (electric motor, combustion engine, etc.) provides rotational input to a mechanical system of rotating masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net thrust for propulsion using only internal rotating masses and centrifugal forces. This violates Newton's third law (conservation of linear momentum), as no external reaction mass is expelled. The prime mover's input energy will be dissipated as internal vibration, deformation, and heat, not as net propulsion for the vehicle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net thrust (linear force) solely from centrifugal forces of rotating masses within a closed system.
- Centrifugal force is an internal, reaction force within a rotating frame; it cannot produce net external thrust on the vehicle housing the mechanism.
- The system appears to be a variant of a reactionless drive, attempting to create linear momentum from internal cyclic motions without expelling reaction mass.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Rotational mechanical input to the main shaft (2), presumably from an external motor. The device is a closed system containing a fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system, meaning it cannot exchange momentum with anything external. Internal forces, no matter how arranged, will sum to zero within the system, producing no net thrust on the device as a whole. This violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum).
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a net axial thrust (propulsive force) from a rotating shaft within a closed, fixed container.
- No external reaction mass or momentum exchange with an external environment is described.
- Internal fluid circulation and pressure differentials cannot produce a net force on the container (Newton's third law).
- The system attempts to create a unidirectional force from internal cyclic motions, analogous to a car trying to push itself forward by sitting inside and pushing on the dashboard.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
External rotary drive input to spin the disk. The load head applies a constant downward force via a flexible shaft onto the cam.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is an internal mechanism that claims to convert rotary motion into a net linear thrust. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of linear momentum, as all described forces are internal to the platform system. No net external force can be generated to move the platform.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed generation of a net linear force (unidirectional motion) from an internal mass redistribution violates conservation of momentum. The system is closed with respect to linear momentum; internal forces cannot produce a net external thrust.
- The 'unbalanced centrifugal force' described is an internal reaction force between components. For every force in one direction on the platform, there is an equal and opposite force on another internal mass (the cam/disk/piston assembly).
- The constant force from the load head is a vertical force, but the claimed output is a horizontal linear motion. There is no described mechanism to convert this vertical preload into sustained horizontal work without violating energy/momentum conserv
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a configuration where two 'energy generating units' (ì¢ì°ê³ì) are connected in a way that the output of one feeds the other, creating a 'circular energy flow' (ì°ì¸¡ë°©í¥) that purportedly results in a 'permanent energy generator' (ì¤ìë ¥ í°-ë¹). No primary external energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a system where two energy-generating units are connected in a loop, with the output of one feeding the other to create 'permanent' energy generation. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, as it violates energy conservation by implying a net energy output without a corresponding net energy input to sustain it against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Describes a closed-loop energy system with no net external input, implying energy creation.
- No identifiable source of energy to overcome inevitable losses (friction, resistance, heat).
- Claim of 'permanent' operation implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors driving rotating platforms and clutches/brakes. The claimed thrust is purportedly generated internally by the reaction of a centrifugal mass against a piston's reaction force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system attempting to generate net linear thrust using only internal moving parts. This violates Newton's laws—specifically, conservation of momentum—as internal forces cannot accelerate the system's center of mass. The described timing of accelerations and reactions does not circumvent this fundamental principle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create net linear thrust from purely internal forces, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for a closed system.
- The described mechanism (accelerating/decelerating a rotating unit to time the reaction with a centrifugal mass) cannot produce a net thrust on the housing without an external reaction mass.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; all forces described are internal action-reaction pairs that cancel out within the system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
External rotational mechanical input to spin the masses. No other energy source is described or implied.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum-canceling system. Spinning masses create equal and opposite centrifugal forces at any instant; clever linkage cannot create a net external force without violating Newton's laws. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which is physically impossible for a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal centrifugal forces in a closed system cannot produce a net external thrust.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: Claims to generate a unidirectional thrust vector without expelling reaction mass.
- Incomplete force analysis: Centrifugal force is an internal, frame-dependent force that sums to zero in the system's center-of-mass frame.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate energy from a mass undergoing circular constrained motion with a lever arm that tends to incline toward the rotation axis, assisted by an electric motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a mass on a lever arm undergoes circular motion, claiming it generates energy. This is a classic over-unity claim: the electric motor provides the only clear energy input, while the described mechanical configuration cannot create energy. The system would be subject to friction and conservation of energy, making net energy generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source besides the electric motor input
- Claim implies net energy generation from a mechanical configuration without a thermodynamic gradient
- Mechanism describes a centripetal/centrifugal force system which cannot produce net work in a closed cycle
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be extracted from Earth's rotational kinetic energy via gyroscopic forces from a rotating flywheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims to generate energy by using gyroscopic forces from a flywheel to extract Earth's rotational energy. This violates angular momentum conservation because a closed, torque-free system (flywheel + Earth) cannot have its rotational energy altered without an external influence. The gyroscopic torques described are internal and reactive, incapable of performing net work to generate usable power.
Specific Physics Issues
- Gyroscopic forces are internal constraint forces within the device-Earth system; they cannot perform net work on the system to extract energy without an external torque.
- No mechanism described to create a non-conservative torque from Earth's rotation that would allow net energy extraction.
- Energy extraction from Earth's rotation would require a reaction torque on Earth, slowing its spin; the described tilting mechanism provides no such coupling for sustained net work output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system using a counterweight (5), a weight (13), and a 'kraftspendendes Kraftelement' (force-providing element, such as a buoyant body or spring). No external energy input is described. The claimed operation suggests it generates a net force imbalance to drive motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system with no external energy input. Its described operation relies on an internal force (from a spring or buoyant body) being applied against a fixed part of its own frame in a non-conservative way during part of the cycle, purportedly creating a net driving force. This violates conservation of energy, as internal forces cannot perform net work over a complete cycle to sustain motion against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy. The description claims that on the upward path of the carriage only gravitational forces act, while on the downward path an additional upward-directed pressure acts via the rod (11) against the fixed upper rail (3), w
- The 'neutralization' of the upward force against the fixed frame cannot create net work. Any force the rod exerts on the fixed rail is an internal force within the system and does no net work on the carriage over a complete cycle. The system is a clo
- The device is described as a 'Krafterzeuger' (force/power generator) but lacks an identified external energy source. The buoyancy or spring elements are internal energy storage, not sources.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses complex mechanical a
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to claim it can generate net linear momentum/thrust from internal cyclic motions of rotating or oscillating masses, implying an internal source of propulsion without external reaction mass or an identifiable external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a reactionless drive, attempting to produce net linear thrust solely through internal manipulations of rotating or oscillating masses. This directly violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum), as internal forces cannot accelerate a system's center of mass. No external energy source or momentum sink is identified to make the claimed propulsion possible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum). Internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the center of mass of a closed system.
- Claim 1 misapplies gyroscopic precession. Precession is a torque-induced change in angular momentum direction, not a source of net linear force.
- Claim 2 involves changing the radius of rotating masses. The inertial forces during radius change are internal and cyclic, yielding zero net impulse over a full cycle when analyzed from the center-of-mass frame.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only identified potential source is gravitational potential energy from shifting weights, but the system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement with no external, sustainable energy input to reset the weights or overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed mechanical system that uses shifting weights and gravity to produce variable power and rotation. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it lacks any identified external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses from friction and to reset its internal weights, implying it could run indefinitely on its own initial configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims variable speed and power output from a closed gravitational system with no clear external energy input.
- Implies sustained rotation from an initial disequilibrium of weights without explaining how the disequilibrium is perpetually maintained against friction and other losses.
- No identification of an energy source to perform the net work required to lift weights back to a higher potential energy state within the cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes using moving masses on a circular path to generate acceleration of the overall system, implying the internal inertial forces of the masses are the sole driver. No external energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
This describes a reactionless drive, which is impossible for a closed system. The inertial forces of masses moving internally are balanced within the system and cannot produce a net acceleration of the system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for internal forces
- Violates conservation of linear momentum for a closed system
- Attempts to use inertial (fictitious) forces to generate net thrust
- No identifiable external energy source or momentum sink
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the motor rotating the main drive shaft. The claim suggests that the arrangement of eccentric rotating bodies generates a net centrifugal force in one direction, implying this force can be harnessed for propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to generate net propulsion from purely internal moving masses. This violates Newton's laws of motion—specifically, conservation of linear momentum—as internal forces cannot accelerate the center of mass of an isolated system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating reference frame; it is radial and cannot produce a net translational force when integrated over a full rotation in an isolated system.
- The system is internal to the vehicle. For the vehicle to accelerate, it must exert a net external force on its surroundings (e.g., via wheels on ground, propeller on air). Internal moving parts cannot create a net external force on the vehicle's cen
- The claim of a 'surplus' of centrifugal force in a constant direction violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient environmental heat (air, water, ground) is claimed as the sole input, with no identified higher-temperature reservoir to create a necessary thermodynamic gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a heat engine that extracts mechanical work solely from ambient environmental heat. This directly violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law, as it purports to produce net work in a cycle by exchanging heat with a single reservoir, with no higher-temperature source to create the necessary temperature difference for a heat engine to operate.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by attempting to produce net mechanical work from a single ambient temperature reservoir.
- No identified source of high-temperature heat to drive a heat engine cycle; the described mixing and compression processes require net work input.
- Claims to function simultaneously as a heat engine and a refrigerator, extracting heat from a cold reservoir and expelling it as work to the environment, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the mechanical input to drive the two cylinder wheels (5,6) via the drive shaft (9). The device claims to generate a net thrust (Vortriebskraft) from this internal rotation of components and fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a closed hydraulic system with internally rotating parts. It claims to generate a net thrust for spacecraft, but it cannot because it does not expel any reaction mass. Internal forces and momentum changes cancel out, resulting in zero net external force on the vehicle, violating Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (conservation of momentum). The described system is a closed, internal fluid circulation mechanism with no external mass ejection or asymmetric external field interaction.
- No external reaction mass is expelled to generate net thrust. Momentum generated in one direction by internal moving parts is canceled by equal and opposite momentum elsewhere inside the device.
- Incomplete force accounting; internal forces sum to zero for the whole assembly, producing no net external thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be solely from the gravitational potential energy of a shaped mass (rotor) and its center-of-gravity offset, with no external input specified other than initial setup.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gravity motor that uses a shaped rotor with an offset center of gravity to achieve autonomous, self-sustaining rotation. This is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine, as it claims to generate continuous rotational force from a fixed gravitational potential without an external energy input to overcome inevitable losses, directly violating the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a self-sustaining rotational motion ('autonomous motion') from a fixed gravitational potential without an external energy source to replenish losses.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a mechanism can perpetually convert gravitational potential into rotational work without an entropy sink or external gradient to drive it.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes using gravity to create motion but ignores energy dissipation from friction, air resistance, and other losses that would stop the rotor.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate continuous rotational force from gravity using multiple weights arranged on a rotating body, with speed adjustment via electromagnetic force that is then converted to electrical energy. No primary external energy source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotation and electricity solely from the arrangement of weights, violating energy conservation. The electromagnetic adjustment and conversion to electricity obfuscates the fact that no net energy is added to the system to sustain motion against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate continuous rotation and electricity without an external energy source to replenish the system's potential energy.
- Violates second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from a gravitational field in equilibrium (no sustained gradient).
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a system where weights shifting position create continuous torque, implying a cycle that returns to its initial state with net energy output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions 'permanent magnet', 'positive/negative conductive bodies', 'elastic body', and 'box containing rare earth ions', but provides no identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, or ambient). The 'permanent magnet' suggests a static magnetic field, which is a potential energy store, not a continuous source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly titled a 'permanent motion machine' (perpetual motion machine). The described configuration of magnets, conductors, and an elastic body with ions provides no clear, sustainable external energy input to perform work against losses, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The claim falls into the classic perpetual motion pattern.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism described.
- Claims to be a 'permanent motion machine' (perpetual motion) in the title.
- Appears to attempt to generate energy from a static arrangement of magnets and conductors without a consumable energy gradient.
- Lacks description of any load or energy output mechanism to evaluate conservation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity-driven rotation converting to electricity, but mechanism appears to extract net work from gravity without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous rotation and electricity solely by shifting weights in a gravitational field, which is a classic overbalanced wheel/perpetual motion machine. Gravity alone cannot provide net work over a cycle without an external energy source to reset the system, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: describes a self-sustaining rotation driven by shifting centers of mass, implying perpetual motion.
- No identifiable external energy source to overcome friction and losses.
- Mechanism attempts to create continuous rotation from a static gravitational field, which is impossible without an external gradient or input.
- Claim 4 suggests using generated electricity to adjust the rotation, creating a circular energy argument.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the motor system (6) driving the rotor (1) at constant angular velocity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create net propulsion by manipulating internal centrifugal forces, violating Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. An isolated system cannot accelerate its center of mass using only internal forces, making this a form of reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce net propulsion (thrust) for a vehicle in a vacuum or atmosphere from an internal rotating mass system.
- Centrifugal force is an internal, reaction force within the rotating frame; the net force vector on the isolated system's center of mass is zero.
- No external interaction or momentum exchange (e.g., expelled mass, electromagnetic field interaction) is described to generate net thrust.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
A motor (explicit input) drives a rotor/flywheel system. The device claims to generate translational propulsion via elastic collisions between a flywheel-mounted wheel and a platform/damper assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an inertial propulsion scheme that claims to generate net linear motion from internal rotating and colliding parts. This violates conservation of momentum, as internal forces cannot accelerate the system's center of mass. It is a classic reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The described mechanism attempts to create net linear momentum from an internal rotating mass without expelling mass or pushing against an external body.
- Incomplete energy accounting. Claims translation energy of the platform is transferred to the whole structure, but the platform is part of the structure; this is an internal force that cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
- Misapplication of 'elastic collision' physics. An elastic collision between components of a closed system conserves momentum internally but cannot create net external propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is garbled/nonsensical (Korean characters appear corrupted). The only potentially meaningful fragment suggests extracting energy from 'ambient temperature' or a 'temperature difference'.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is corrupted and nonsensical, which itself is a major red flag. The only interpretable fragment hints at generating energy from ambient temperature, which, if done without a thermal gradient to exploit, is a thermodynamic impossibility (violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law).
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is corrupted, preventing technical analysis of the mechanism
- If it claims to generate energy solely from ambient temperature without a thermal gradient, it violates the Second Law
- No identifiable input energy source is described
- The abstract and claims are nonsensical, suggesting obfuscation or a corrupted submission
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. No explicit energy input is described. The system appears to rely on internal compression/release cycles of 'fuseaux' (spindles/sleeves) without specifying an external power source to drive the compressors, suggesting an attempt to create a self-sustaining compression cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a compression system with 'full compressor spindles' and 'empty spindles' in a cycle, but provides no identifiable external energy source to drive the compression work. The language suggests a self-sustaining compression process, which would violate the first law of thermodynamics as compression requires net work input that must be dissipated as heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims imply compression work can be performed without net energy input
- System describes compression and release cycles but provides no mechanism to overcome thermodynamic losses
- Lack of quantitative performance data prevents verification, but the described perpetual cycle violates energy conservation
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text references a static force and gravity (via a suspended mass), but the described mechanism claims to generate a perpetual, self-renewing motion from a single initial force application.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism that claims to produce endless mechanical energy from a static force, which violates the fundamental physics principle that work requires force through a distance. The description is obscured by invented terminology but clearly outlines a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'force without displacement' can produce work, violating work-energy principle (work = force * displacement).
- Describes a 'perpetual alternation' and 'renewal without end' powered only to overcome 'negligible friction', a hallmark of perpetual motion.
- Uses obfuscating, non-standard terminology ('destabilization', 'evolutive triangular structure', 'spiral effect') to describe an energy multiplication process.
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain the claimed endless motion against real-world losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The patent describes a mechanical system where rotating masses on rotating platforms are driven by an unspecified external power source. The claimed propulsion force is generated internally from the motion of these masses relative to the vehicle.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to create net propulsion using only internal moving parts, which violates conservation of momentum. A closed system cannot accelerate its own center of mass through internal forces alone, regardless of how clever the mechanical arrangement appears.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a net linear propulsion force from purely internal rotating masses without external reaction mass
- Violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) - internal forces cannot accelerate the center of mass of an isolated system
- No complete energy accounting for the input power needed to spin the masses and platforms versus the claimed output propulsion work
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to utilize Earth's gravitational potential energy, but provides no mechanism for creating or maintaining an energy gradient. Implied to be a self-sustaining or over-unity system using gravity.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a motor powered by Earth's gravity, which is a conservative force. Extracting continuous work from a static gravitational field without an external energy source or a changing potential violates energy conservation. This represents a classic perpetual motion scheme of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism to sustain motion
- Implies extraction of net work from a static gravitational field without a compensating decrease in potential energy
- Lacks description of how energy is replenished after conversion
- Violates conservation of energy if claiming perpetual or amplified output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims 'centrifugal force' and 'flywheel' generate 'centrifugal power' naturally during rotation, implying energy is created from the motion itself without an identified external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims a rotating flywheel generates 'centrifugal power' that acts as an internal force while also producing a net external propulsion force. This violates Newton's third law and energy conservation, as internal forces cannot create net acceleration of a system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Claims a flywheel generates 'centrifugal power' as an internal force that simultaneously acts as propulsion, implying net work output from a closed rotational system.
- Forces are internal: Centrifugal force in a rotating frame is an inertial/constraint force; it cannot do net work on the system's center of mass to produce linear propulsion.
- No identifiable external energy gradient: The description suggests the rotational motion itself creates a usable net external force, which is impossible without an external reaction mass or field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe a self-sustaining rotational motion where a 'flywheel' shape generates 'centrifugal force' naturally, and this centrifugal force simultaneously acts as an internal force driving the system while also acting as an external force to rotate the flywheel itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a closed loop where a rotating flywheel's own centrifugal force is purported to drive its continued rotation. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as it violates Newton's laws by asserting an internal force can produce net external work, with no identifiable external energy source to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). An internal force cannot produce net external work on the system it is part of.
- Violates Conservation of Energy. Describes a mechanism where the output (rotation) is driven by a force (centrifugal) that is itself a consequence of the rotation, creating a circular causality with no external energy input.
- Confuses frame of reference. Centrifugal force in a rotating frame is not a real external force that can do net work on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Claims propulsion force generation via 'reverse rotation' of multiple proximate substances, implying energy creation from relative motion without an external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes generating propulsion force solely through the reverse rotation of multiple proximate substances, which constitutes a closed system attempting to produce net work from internal motions without any external energy source. This is a clear violation of the conservation of energy and Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims generation of propulsion force from relative rotation of substances without a gradient or fuel
- Violates conservation of energy - net work output without energy input
- Violates Newton's third law - propulsion without reaction mass or external field interaction
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied to be 'centrifugal force' from a rotating body, which is a fictitious force in a rotating reference frame and cannot be harnessed as a net energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a propulsion device that claims to generate a unidirectional thrust by cleverly applying centrifugal force from a rotating mass. Since centrifugal force is not an external energy source but a kinematic constraint force, any net thrust would imply the device is a reactionless drive, violating Newton's laws of motion and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a net propulsive force from centrifugal force without an external energy input or reaction mass.
- Centrifugal force is an inertial reaction force in a rotating frame; it cannot do net work on the system's center of mass.
- Describes a mechanism where a reaction force from the rotating body is applied to the prime mover in a way that avoids counter-torque, suggesting a violation of Newton's third law and conservation of angular momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor driving the lower member(s).
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a constant linear force (thrust) from internal rotating masses. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of linear momentum for a closed system, as there is no expelled reaction mass or external environmental interaction to provide a net external force.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a constant unidirectional resultant (linear) force from purely internal rotating masses.
- Internal centrifugal forces in a closed mechanical system sum to zero over a cycle; no net linear momentum can be generated without external reaction.
- The 'damping means' and skewed axes create internal vibrations/friction but cannot circumvent conservation of linear momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors driving the frame rotation and weight movement. No external or ambient energy input is claimed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert internal centrifugal forces into a net unidirectional force on the carriage. This is impossible for a closed system as it violates conservation of linear momentum. The electrical input energy will be dissipated as heat and vibration, with no net propulsion generated in isolation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force within a rotating reference frame and cannot produce a net external force on an isolated system.
- The described mechanism attempts to use internal mass redistribution to generate a net linear impulse, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- The system is closed; all forces are internal between the carriage, frame, and moving weight. No reaction mass or external field gradient is utilized.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a system where a 'rotor' (2) rotates a 'tube' (1), a 'valve' (3) is installed, a 'rotating body' (5) is connected to a 'rotating power generator' (5'), and a 'power generation coil' (6) is installed. No explicit external energy input is described, suggesting an attempt to generate power from internal arrangements alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a closed arrangement of rotors, valves, and generators without specifying any external energy source. Such a system cannot produce net useful work, as any internal motion would be subject to friction, electrical resistance, and other losses, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is specified.
- The description implies a closed mechanical/electrical system with no external energy source to overcome losses.
- The arrangement suggests an attempt to generate net power from internal motion, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a rotating body (3) with a protrusion (3') and a rotating weight (5) that engages with a lever (4'), but no explicit energy input is identified. The claim of generating 'additional rotational force' and 'continuous rotational motion' suggests an attempt to extract net work from the system's own motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a purely mechanical system with rotating components and weights but fails to identify any external energy source. The claims of generating additional rotational force and continuous motion from the system's own configuration constitute a classic perpetual motion claim, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims of generating additional rotational force/continuous motion imply energy creation
- System appears to be a closed mechanical assembly with no gradient or fuel
- Violates conservation of energy - cannot have net work output without energy input
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat from a 'hotter body' (external heat source) is used to vaporize a working fluid. The claimed energy output comes from harnessing the kinetic energy of the vapor and the potential energy of the condensed liquid, with the condensation allegedly forced by centrifugal or gravitational fields in insulated nozzles.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a heat engine that cools vapor to a liquid/solid state using only centrifugal or gravitational force in insulated nozzles, creating a recoverable pressure and height difference. This is thermodynamically impossible because condensing a vapor requires removing latent heat to a cold reservoir, which an insulated system cannot provide. The design violates the Second Law by attempting to produce work from heat without a net rejection of waste heat to a lower temperature environment.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: The core claim is that an insulated nozzle, using only a centrifugal or gravitational field, can cool a vapor to a liquid and then solid state without rejecting heat to an external cold reservoir. This is im
- Incomplete Energy Accounting: The system is described as a closed loop where the condensed liquid is returned to the heated enclosure. The only explicit external input is the initial heat. The work extracted from the turbines and hydraulic turbines w
- Misapplication of Physics: Confuses the role of force fields. While a pressure gradient can be created (e.g., in a centrifuge), this does not replace the thermodynamic requirement for heat rejection to condense a vapor. The insulated nozzle cannot be
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent mentions internal/external drive motors, energy storage (chemical/electrical cells), and the possibility of classical propulsion aids, but the core claim is generating net linear thrust from centrifugal forces in a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce net linear thrust solely through the internal motion of rotating/planetary masses, which violates Newton's laws of motion. Centrifugal forces are internal and cannot propel a closed system's center of mass without an external reaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an internal, reaction force within a rotating system. It cannot produce a net external force on a closed system's center of mass.
- Claim of 'aangrijpingsloos' (without reaction/contact) movement violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Energy accounting is absent; no analysis of input energy to motors vs. claimed net thrust output.
- Mechanism describes canceling forces in some parts of rotation and summing them in others, which is impossible for generating net linear force from internal mass movements over a complete cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent explicitly claims 'mouvement perpétuel' (perpetual motion) and states that if power is applied at point M, the power at wheel 6 is greater than the power at wheel 4, implying energy creation or multiplication without an identified external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly claims to achieve perpetual motion and an output power greater than an input power using only a system of levers and gears. This is a direct violation of the law of conservation of energy, as no external energy source is identified to account for the claimed continuous motion or power amplification.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of perpetual motion violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Claim that output power exceeds input power ('LA PUISSANCE DE LA ROUE 6 EST SUPERIEURE A LA PUISSANCE DE LA ROUE 4') violates energy conservation.
- Mechanical system of levers, gears, and cranks cannot create net energy; it can only transmit or transform it with losses.
- No identifiable external energy source (e.g., chemical, thermal gradient, ambient) is described to sustain motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a static force that initiates an alternating instability/stability cycle, implying the system's own internal configuration provides energy without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanical system that purportedly generates endless motion and energy from a static force and internal state changes alone, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by lacking an identifiable external energy source to perform work and overcome inevitable losses like friction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'mouvement sans fin' (endless motion) from a static force
- Describes energy generation from alternating stable/unstable states without an external energy input to reset the cycle
- No identifiable external energy source (e.g., electrical, chemical, ambient gradient) to account for work output and overcome losses
- Implies a perpetual cycle of destabilization and stabilization without net energy dissipation
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanism using rotating masses to generate a net centrifugal force vector, implying propulsion without propellant. The energy to spin the masses must be supplied externally (e.g., an electric motor), but the claim is that this internal force can produce net external thrust.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to use internal rotating masses to generate net thrust. This violates Newton's laws of motion and conservation of momentum, as internal forces cannot produce a net acceleration of a system's center of mass without an external reaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The centrifugal force is an internal force within the vehicle system; for the vehicle to accelerate, it must expel reaction mass or interact with an external field. No external reaction is described.
- Violates conservation of momentum. The system claims to generate linear momentum from an internal cyclic motion, which is impossible for a closed system.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force. Centrifugal force in a rotating reference frame does not create a net external force on the vehicle's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claimin
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe a system of rotating weights arranged to produce a net centrifugal force in one direction, suggesting an attempt to extract net work from internal motions without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system of rotating masses configured to allegedly produce a net unidirectional centrifugal force. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, violating Newton's laws of motion. No external energy source is identified, and the claimed net force from internal motions is physically impossible for a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal centrifugal forces in a closed system sum to zero.
- No identifiable external energy input (thermal, electrical, chemical, or ambient gradient).
- Claims 'unidirectional centrifugal force' which is impossible for a closed mechanical system.
- System appears to be an attempt at a mechanical over-unity or reactionless drive.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests mechanical amplification via opposing forces on a central axis, but no primary energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, or environmental) is identified. The system appears to claim generation of rotational force without an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'power amplification machine' that uses opposing forces on a central axis to generate rotation, but fails to identify any external energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it suggests net mechanical work output without energy input, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims rotational output from internal opposing forces without net external work input
- Implies mechanical energy amplification violating conservation of energy
- Missing entropy sink or thermodynamic cycle
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical linkage system where rotating one link causes another link to rotate, purportedly generating 'centrifugal force' as a driving force without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate propulsion solely from the rotational motion of linked components, with centrifugal force magically becoming a net driving force. This is a classic perpetual motion claim as it provides no external energy source to account for the claimed useful output, directly violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate propulsion/driving force ('推力発生') from the internal configuration and rotation of links alone.
- No identifiable external energy input: The description suggests a closed mechanical system where motion of one part drives another, with no source of energy to overcome losses or do net work.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: Centrifugal force is a fictitious force in a rotating reference frame; it cannot be harnessed as a net external driving force for a system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title translates to 'Permanent motion mechanism by gravity and buoyancy', suggesting an attempt to extract net work from the gravitational potential energy of a fluid and a floating piston/cylinder system without an external energy input to reset the cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a perpetual motion machine based on gravity and buoyancy. Such a system cannot produce net work output over a complete cycle because the work required to submerge the piston (against buoyancy) equals or exceeds the work gained during its ascent, violating energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to break this symmetry.
Specific Physics Issues
- The described system (piston moving in fluid) is a classic case of a buoyancy engine. To achieve 'permanent motion', it must cyclically reset the piston's position, which requires work input equal to or greater than the work extracted from the buoyan
- No identifiable external energy source (thermal gradient, pressure gradient, chemical, electrical) is mentioned to drive the cycle. The system appears to be in equilibrium with its environment.
- The claim of 'permanent motion' (永久運動) directly contradicts the first and second laws of thermodynamics for an isolated or closed-cycle system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests weights (ウエイト) moving on inclined paths/guides, implying gravitational potential energy changes, but no external energy input is specified to reset the system or overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a gravity-powered motor using weights on inclined guides. It violates the conservation of energy because, in a complete cycle, the net work done by gravity is zero, and no external energy source is described to replenish the system's potential energy, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described to sustain motion.
- System appears to rely on coordinated motion of weights on inclined paths to drive rotation, suggesting a gravity-powered mechanism.
- No mechanism to restore weights to their initial higher potential energy state without external work input.
- Violates conservation of energy - net work cannot be extracted from a closed cycle in a conservative gravitational field without an external energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use the gravitational potential energy and acceleration of one weight to move another weight to a lower position, generating energy to create rotation. No external energy input is specified, implying a closed system extracting work from gravity alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that uses falling weights to move other weights and generate rotational motion, implying it can sustain or produce energy from gravity alone in a closed cycle. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it claims to produce useful work without an external energy input, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate rotational energy from a closed gravitational system without an external energy source.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: implies creation of energy (perpetual motion of the first kind).
- Mechanism description suggests using the fall of one weight to lift another, which in a lossless system could cycle, but cannot generate *net* work for external use without an external input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims describe a mechanical system where an object undergoes non-uniform circular motion (changing angular velocity from minimum to maximum and back) within a rotating system, with the motion synchronized to integer multiples of the rotation period. The system appears to claim to generate rotational force (torque) from this internal motion without a clear external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a mechanical system that appears to be a closed assembly of rotating and oscillating masses. It suggests this internal motion can generate a sustained net rotational output or be used in a feedback loop to drive itself, which violates conservation of energy. No external energy source is clearly identified, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is specified for the claimed 'inertial propulsion mechanism'.
- The system describes internal relative motion within a rotating frame but claims to generate a net output torque/rotation. This suggests an attempt to extract net work from internal momentum exchanges without an external gradient.
- Claims 5-8 describe feedback loops where output rotation is fed back as input, suggesting a perpetual motion scheme.
- The abstract is garbled/nonsensical, preventing clear technical analysis of the proposed mechanism.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The text is a mix of Japa
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor driving the lower member(s).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum machine. The centrifugal forces of its rotating parts are internal and balanced; they cannot create a net external force to propel the system as a whole without violating Newton's third law. The energy input only creates internal vibrations and heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of a constant unidirectional resultant (linear) force from purely internal, rotating masses.
- Centrifugal forces from rotating masses are internal to the system and time-average to zero; they cannot produce a net external force (thrust) on a closed system.
- The described mechanism (skewed axes, damping, point contact) only rearranges internal forces and moments, creating vibration, not net propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim appears to describe a 'magnetic energy device' (자기에너지 장치) that generates energy from a 'magnetic field' (자장), implying it extracts useful work from a permanent magnet or magnetic field without an identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a magnetic energy device that claims to generate energy. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it lacks a clear energy source, and the second law because you cannot extract net work from a static magnetic field—a fundamental principle of electromagnetism and thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: No clear source for the claimed generated energy.
- Violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics: Implies extracting net work from a static magnetic field (a conservative force field) without an energy gradient to drive the process.
- No thermodynamic cycle or identified input energy (thermal, electrical, mechanical, chemical, or ambient gradient) to convert.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'gravity converter' that uses a positional shift and longitudinal connection in constant alternation to produce work, implying extraction of net work from a gravitational potential without an external energy input to restore the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gravity converter producing continuous work through cyclic positional shifts. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, as it offers no identifiable external energy source to compensate for the work output, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The vague, non-technical description is characteristic of over-unity gravity motor proposals.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to produce continuous work without identifying an external energy source to replenish the gravitational potential.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: It implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, extracting net work from an equilibrium or cyclic gravitational interaction without an entropy sink or compensating process.
- No thermodynamic cycle defined: The description of 'constant alternation' and 'continuous work' lacks a defined cycle where energy is input to reset the system to a higher potential energy state.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The patent abstract explicitly states "SANS CONSOMMATION D'ENERGIE, HORMIS CELLE DES FROTTEMENTS" (without energy consumption, except that of friction). The implied source is the initial rotational kinetic energy of the ring, with no net external input to sustain propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic reactionless drive, attempting to generate net linear momentum from internal cyclic motions. This violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum) as it claims to produce a net external force without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims continuous propulsion from an internal, rotating mass with no net external energy input.
- Attempts to create a sustained net force (thrust) from purely internal cyclic motions, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- The described springs and shifting mass only redistribute internal forces; the center of mass of the entire system cannot accelerate without an external reaction force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical work input to the adiabatic compressor. The system claims to use ambient temperature (To) as a cold source and to extract heat from it.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a cycle that claims a heat pump coefficient of performance (COP) exceeding the Carnot limit, which is thermodynamically impossible. Furthermore, it proposes using this device in a loop with a heat engine to produce net work from ambient heat, constituting a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a heat pump COP > 1/(1 - T_cold/T_hot), which is the inverse of the Carnot efficiency. For a heat pump, the Carnot limit is COP ≤ T_hot/(T_hot - T_cold). The claimed limit is incorrectly stated and the proposed cycle cannot exceed the correct
- The described cycle (adiabatic compression, isobaric cooling, isothermal expansion) is incomplete for a heat pump; it lacks an explicit heat absorption phase from the cold source. The isothermal expansion at ambient To is claimed to absorb heat from
- Claim 5 suggests coupling this 'heat pump' as the hot source for a heat engine, with ambient as the cold source, to produce net mechanical work from ambient heat. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, violating the Kelvin-Pl
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a complex arrangement of components (generators, rotors, stators, magnetic fields) but provides no identifiable primary energy input. The description suggests energy is somehow generated or multiplied through magnetic interactions without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device with interconnected generators and magnetic fields but fails to identify any external energy source. The system appears designed to be self-sustaining or energy-amplifying, which directly violates the conservation of energy. This is a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input (electrical, mechanical, chemical, or ambient).
- Describes a system of generators and magnetic fields that appears to be self-sustaining or energy-multiplying.
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying creation of energy from nothing.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract usable work solely from the gravitational potential energy of masses at rest within the device itself, with no external energy input or environmental gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion machine claim. It attempts to generate continuous rotation from the internal rearrangement of weights, but the total gravitational potential energy in the system is fixed. Once the weights settle, the machine stops, and restarting it requires external work to re-create the initial imbalance, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: system's internal gravitational potential energy is finite and cannot be perpetually extracted to produce net work without resetting the masses, which requires equal or greater energy input.
- No sustainable energy gradient: The device is a closed mechanical system. Once the weights move to their lowest potential energy configuration, rotation stops. To continue, work must be done to lift the weights back up, consuming all previously gener
- Misinterprets 'difference of weight': A static imbalance in a closed system can produce initial torque, but only until the system reaches equilibrium. Sustained rotation requires a continuous, external energy source to maintain the imbalance.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'free energ
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical configuration (rotating masses undergoing precession) but provides no identified external energy input. The implied source is the internal rotational and precessional motion itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate directed propulsive forces using only internal rotating and precessing masses within a vehicle, with no specified external energy input. This constitutes a classical reactionless drive, which violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. No net thrust can be generated from purely internal motions in a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input specified
- Claims to generate 'directed individual forces' (thrust/net work) from an internal kinematic configuration alone
- System appears to be a closed mechanical assembly with no connection to an energy reservoir or gradient
- Violates Newton's laws for internal forces in a closed system (net internal force sum is zero)
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a gravity-powered rotating machine using eccentric weights and rollers, but no external energy input is specified. It seems to claim continuous rotation from gravitational potential energy alone.
AI Physics Analysis
This appears to be a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine that claims rotation through eccentric weights and rollers. Without an external energy source to reset the system's gravitational potential, it violates conservation of energy as any motion would quickly dampen to equilibrium.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input mechanism
- Implies continuous work extraction from gravity without restoring energy
- Violates conservation of energy - system would settle into a stable equilibrium
- No thermodynamic cycle or gradient to drive perpetual motion
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate power using magnetic fluids (ferrofluids) held in a magnetic field from permanent magnets, electromagnets, or superconducting magnets, with rotating bodies partially immersed in the fluid. No external energy input is described beyond the static magnetic field.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device that purportedly generates motive power by placing a rotating body partially inside a magnetic fluid held in a static magnetic field. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce work without any identifiable external energy input, violating energy conservation. The use of technical terms like magnetic fluids and superconducting magnets obfuscates the core violation: extracting net energy from a system in equilibrium.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to drive rotation or generate net power.
- Appears to claim extraction of work (rotation/power) from a system in static equilibrium (fluid held in a magnetic field).
- Violates conservation of energy: a static magnetic field from permanent magnets cannot do net work on a system over a cycle.
- Describes complex layering of magnetic and non-magnetic fluids but provides no thermodynamic gradient or mechanism to convert ambient energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to claim generation of 'reactive force energy' from 'underground shock waves' created by the Earth's gravity acting on a rotating body containing multiple 'exhaust pipes'. No explicit external energy input is described, implying the system extracts net work from gravity alone in a closed configuration.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a self-generating energy device where gravity-induced motion inside a rotating apparatus purportedly creates 'reactive force energy.' This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, as it claims to generate net energy from a closed system interacting only with gravity, violating both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate 'reactive force energy' from a rotating system with moving parts, implying net energy output without an equivalent energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting usable work from the Earth's gravitational field without an external gradient or energy source to sustain the motion and overcome losses.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes a mechanism ('exhaust bodies' moving due to gravity during rotation) but ignores all dissipative losses (friction, air resistance, inelastic collisions). The described motion would dampen without continuous ext
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanism using 'eccentricity' and a rotating rail to cause automatic rotation of a main shaft, implying a self-sustaining or over-unity device with no explicit external energy input identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that uses eccentricity and a rotating rail to automatically rotate a main shaft. This implies a self-sustaining mechanism with no clear external energy input, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind that violates the conservation of energy. The geometry alone cannot provide a continuous source of energy to overcome inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified to overcome friction and other losses.
- The described mechanism (eccentricity, rotating rail) suggests an attempt to create perpetual motion from an initial condition or internal geometry alone.
- The system, if isolated, would extract net rotational work from a static configuration, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'automatic
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim mentions using 'gravity and inertia' along with 'centrifugal force' in a 'natural rotation device', but provides no identifiable external energy input. The description suggests extracting work from a system's own motion and gravity without an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'natural rotation device' using gravity, inertia, and centrifugal force, implying it can operate or produce work without an external energy source. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it describes a closed system performing work without an energy input, and the second law as it lacks a described entropy sink or thermal gradient.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Implies sustained or amplified rotation using only internal forces (gravity, inertia, centrifugal force)
- Lacks description of an energy gradient to drive work extraction
- Appears to be a closed system claiming to produce work from its own configuration
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Vague quantitative claims
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description appears to be a mechanical rotating system with vanes, chambers, and gears, but no explicit energy input mechanism is identified. The title suggests 'self-starting' or 'self-operating' (始動), implying operation without external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex rotating assembly with vanes and chambers but provides no identifiable source of energy input, while the title suggests self-operation. This constitutes a classic perpetual motion claim, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a closed system can produce net work indefinitely without an energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- Claims 'self-starting' and 'heavy rotation' suggesting perpetual motion
- Complex mechanical arrangement with no thermodynamic gradient or external power source specified
- Appears to be a closed mechanical system claiming to sustain its own rotation
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
PATTERN C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use gravity to rotate a main shaft, but appears to extract continuous rotational energy from a system where gravity provides only a conservative force field with no continuous energy input gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use gravity to continuously rotate a main shaft via an arrangement of gears and balances. This is a classical perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as gravity alone cannot provide net work over a cycle without an external energy source to change the system's potential energy state. The description lacks any identifiable energy input to compensate for losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input identified to overcome friction and losses for continuous rotation.
- Misapplication of gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a gravitational field is zero without an external energy source to reset the system.
- No thermodynamic limit analysis: Claims continuous rotation and power output without specifying an energy source to replenish the system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes mechanic
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to convert gravitational potential energy into rotational kinetic energy using a 'teko' (likely a typo for 'teeter' or 'lever') principle, but provides no external energy input mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device that allegedly converts gravitational potential into rotational work without any external energy input or lowering of a mass, which violates energy conservation. The abstract is vague and the technical description uses obfuscated language, but the core claim is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claims to substitute 'gravity ratio' for rotational force, implying energy extraction from gravity alone
- Violates conservation of energy as a closed system with gravity cannot produce net work without lowering a mass
- Process described would be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied to be extracted from gravitational potential without an external gradient or input. The device appears to be a rotating body with unbalanced weights arranged to maintain rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'perpetual motion device' where unbalanced weights on a rotating body are claimed to generate and sustain rotation. This is a classic overbalanced wheel design, which is thermodynamically impossible as it violates conservation of energy by purporting to create work from a static configuration without an external energy source to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims perpetual motion without an identifiable external energy source
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: implies a system can do work indefinitely without an entropy increase or energy input
- No mechanism to overcome friction or other dissipative losses
- Claims rotation is induced and sustained solely by an unbalanced weight configuration on the rotating body itself
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanism using magnets and weights arranged on a rotating arm, implying energy is extracted from magnetic repulsion/attraction and gravity without an identifiable external energy input to sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The described mechanism uses permanent magnets and weights on a rotating arm, attempting to create sustained rotation. Since permanent magnets and gravity are conservative force fields, no net work can be extracted from them over a cycle without an external energy input to reset the system, violating energy conservation. This is a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net energy input to overcome losses (friction, magnetic hysteresis, air resistance).
- Describes a self-sustaining rotational mechanism using permanent magnets and gravity, which would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Energy accounting is absent; the system appears to claim to generate continuous rotation from internal conservative forces (magnetic and gravitational potentials).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanism where applying force in one direction on a constrained object causes motion in the opposite direction, suggesting an attempt to extract net work from internal constraints without an identifiable external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism that appears to violate Newton's laws by claiming rotation can be achieved when equal forces in the same rotational direction are applied to an object that supposedly cannot rotate. This suggests an attempt to extract net work from a system with no clear external energy source, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction)
- Attempts to create motion from internal constraints without external energy input
- Describes a system where force is applied but the object cannot rotate, yet rotation is somehow achieved
- No identifiable external energy gradient or input to perform work
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified 'Uniform Force Field' (Champ de Forces Uniforme). The claim states the device is placed and oriented in this field, which causes forces in the blocks, leading to rotation. No identifiable external energy gradient (e.g., gravitational, magnetic, fluid flow) is specified, implying the field itself is the perpetual source of motive power.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve autonomous rotation by cleverly arranging masses (blocs) within a uniform force field. However, in a uniform field like gravity, internal rearrangements of mass cannot produce a sustained net torque on the system's center of mass, as all internal forces cancel. This describes a perpetual motion machine that violates conservation of energy and momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's First Law: A net torque cannot arise from internal forces and configurations alone within an isolated system in a uniform field.
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims autonomous rotation and power output without an identifiable external energy input or consumption of an energy gradient.
- Incomplete Force Analysis: In a truly uniform force field (e.g., gravity in a small volume), the center of mass of the system experiences a net force but no net torque. Any internal mass redistribution cannot create a perpetual net torque about the c
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the onboard motor (1) to drive the mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net propulsion by internally canceling the 'negative amplitude' of a reciprocating mass. This is a clear violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass using only internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce net unidirectional thrust without reaction against the ambient medium (violates Newton's third law/conservation of momentum).
- Mechanism purportedly 'cancels' the negative amplitude of an oscillating mass to create net momentum from an internal moving part.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is identified to balance the momentum of the vehicle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The claim explicitly states 'ne demandant aucun apport d'énergie' (requiring no energy input) and describes a self-sustaining mechanical imbalance.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic attempt at a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate usable motive force without any energy input by maintaining a permanent mechanical imbalance. This is impossible because any work output would dissipate the system's energy, and the internal cam mechanism cannot reset the weights without consuming at least as much energy as is gained from their falling, due to conservation of energy and inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce usable work from no energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by attempting to create a perpetual gradient (permanent disequilibrium) from an equilibrium system with no external energy source to reset the mechanism.
- The described cam mechanism to shift weights radially will itself require work input to overcome centrifugal/centripetal forces and friction; this work is not accounted for and would dissipate any initial imbalance.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'magnetic energy device' that purportedly generates energy from a 'magnetic field' alone, with no explicit external input mentioned. This suggests an attempt to extract net work from a static magnetic field, which is not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a device that appears to generate energy solely from a magnetic field, which violates the first law of thermodynamics. A static magnetic field is not an energy source; you cannot extract net work from it without changing the field or introducing another energy input, such as motion or an external current.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying energy generation from a static magnetic field without an identified external energy input.
- Static magnetic fields are conservative force fields; no net work can be extracted from them in a cycle.
- The description is too vague for proper energy accounting, but the core claim is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'oscillatory means' (e.g., rotating weights) requires an internal energy input to create the alternating force pulses, but the system claims to produce net directional thrust from these internal oscillations.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to propel a vehicle by manipulating internal moving masses. The net force from internal forces within a closed system is zero; it cannot create sustained directional thrust without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law for internal forces
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction for propulsion
- Attempts to generate net linear momentum from purely internal cyclic motions
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Rotational kinetic energy input (presumably from an external motor) is claimed to be converted into a unidirectional translational force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a unidirectional force from internal rotating masses, which is impossible for a closed system as it violates conservation of momentum. Any force produced on the machine housing would be canceled by an equal and opposite reaction force from the internal moving parts, resulting in zero net external thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law: A system of internal masses cannot produce a net external force on its container without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
- Center of mass of a closed system (machine + rotating masses) cannot accelerate without an external force. The claim that the center of mass of the rotating masses remains displaced relative to the rotation center is a kinematic constraint, not a sou
- Energy accounting is incomplete: If a net translational force is produced, work is done (Force × Distance). The claimed rotational input energy would need to account for this work output plus all losses, implying the device is just an inefficient act
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover (external engine) provides rotary power to the central shaft and rotor. The device claims to generate additional directional propulsive force from the internal motion of weighted swing arms.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'reactionless drive' attempt. The forces generated by moving weights inside the sealed machine are internal; for every force in one direction, an equal opposite force acts on another part of the machine, resulting in zero net propulsion for the vehicle as a whole.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for internal forces
- Attempts to create net linear momentum from an isolated system of internal forces
- Centripetal/centrifugal forces are internal to the rotating system and cannot produce net propulsion
- The 'directional force on the rotor' described is an internal reaction force that sums to zero for the entire machine
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors that rotate the spheres and spin the gyroscopes. No external reaction mass or environmental energy gradient is utilized.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is an internal momentum exchange device. While locking gyroscopes can create complex internal torques and vibrations, these forces sum to zero within the isolated craft. It cannot produce a net external force for propulsion without ejecting mass or interacting with an external field, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- System attempts to generate net linear impulse from internal torques in a closed system, violating conservation of momentum.
- Precessional torques are internal forces; locking a gyroscope generates an equal and opposite reaction torque on the support structure (the craft).
- The described 'compensation' mechanism merely reorients the axis internally, which cannot cancel the net linear momentum of the isolated craft.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to convert gravitational potential energy into continuous kinetic energy via a specific arrangement of four weights on a semi-ellipsoidal ramp, implying gravity is the sole input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. While gravity is a constant force, it is conservative. For continuous rotation, the system's center of mass must perpetually fall, which is impossible in a closed-cycle mechanical system. The described weight-shifting mechanism cannot produce net torque over a full cycle without an external energy input to reset the weights, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims continuous rotational motion from a constant gravitational field with no external energy input to reset the system.
- Asserts a definitive mechanical solution for perpetual motion from gravity alone.
- Describes a system where centers of gravity of weight pairs exchange positions to sustain motion, implying no net work is required to lift weights against gravity to restore initial potential.
- Violates the conservation of energy: to have continuous output, the system's center of mass must continuously fall, but in a closed loop, the net change in center of mass height is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be the rotational kinetic energy of the spinning body, but the claim suggests momentum is created from an inertial coupling with the rest of the Universe without ejecting reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a propulsion system that creates momentum without ejecting mass, which directly violates the conservation of momentum. Internal forces, like a percussive impact on a rotating part, cannot produce a net force on the vehicle's center of mass in empty space.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction) by claiming to create net momentum without ejecting mass or interacting with an external field.
- Violates conservation of momentum. A closed system (vehicle + spinning mass) cannot change its own center-of-mass momentum through internal forces.
- The described 'inertial coupling' and 'radial percussion' are undefined and provide no mechanism to generate a net external force.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'sans apport d'énergie extérieur' (without external energy input). Implicitly, the only possible source is the gravitational potential energy of the sliding weights, which is part of a closed, cyclical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a well-known perpetual motion machine concept. It claims to generate continuous useful power solely from the internal rearrangement of its own weights, violating conservation of energy. No external energy source is identified to compensate for losses or sustain the claimed continuous rotation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims to produce power without external energy input, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Describes a self-motivated, continuous rotation from an initial disequilibrium, implying perpetual motion of the first kind.
- Attempts to create continuous work output from a fixed, internal configuration of weights and springs, with no external gradient to sustain it.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests usable energy is produced by regularly disturbing the balance of a balancing system, implying energy extraction from the disturbance process itself without identifying an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce usable energy by internally disturbing a balancing system, which is a classic violation of energy conservation. Without an external energy source, any work done to disturb the balance would consume at least as much energy as could be recovered, resulting in zero net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is described.
- The mechanism ('regularly disturbed balance') implies a closed system from which net work is extracted, violating conservation of energy.
- The description is functionally equivalent to a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, claiming to produce usable energy from internal disturbances without an input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to linear motors and electromagnets (explicit). No other energy inputs are identified, implying the system aims to generate lift (work against gravity) from this electrical input alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'reactionless drive' violation. Centripetal forces are internal to the system and cancel out; they cannot create net lift. The claim that tilting these internal forces produces external thrust misunderstands Newtonian mechanics, attempting to get something from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum. Internal forces (centripetal forces from the linear motors) cannot produce a net external force (lift) on a closed system.
- Misinterprets centripetal force as a 'free' force that can be vectorially added to oppose gravity. Centripetal force is an internal constraint force, not an external propulsive force.
- The system is described as 'closed,' yet claims to produce net upward thrust. This is impossible; for the system to accelerate upward, it must expel momentum downward (e.g., air, exhaust).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity, but the description suggests an attempt to create a perpetual imbalance without an external energy source to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel or gravity engine, a form of perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous force using only gravity and levers without any energy input, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). No internal rearrangement of weights can produce net work without an external source to reset the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate force without any energy input ('nimmt keine bisher bekannten Energien auf').
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: attempts to extract continuous work from a static gravitational field without a compensating decrease in potential energy.
- Mechanically impossible: describes a system where an 'always one-sided loaded wheel' creates continuous torque without the weights ever being lifted against gravity to restore the initial potential energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'Montagev
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the input work to spin the arms and operate the mass transfer mechanism. The claim implicitly suggests the device can generate a net linear force from its own internal motions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system that manipulates internal masses. While this can create oscillating forces on the axle, conservation of momentum dictates the net force over a complete cycle is zero, providing no net propulsion. It is a reactionless drive concept, which violates Newton's laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame; it cannot do net work on the system's center of mass.
- The described mass transfer creates a time-varying force on the axle, but the net impulse over a full rotation is zero in an isolated system (Newton's 3rd Law).
- The 'imbalanced centrifugal force' is a reaction force between the mass and the arm; for net propulsion, momentum must be expelled from the system, which this closed system does not do.
- The 'means for canceling a component' suggests an attempt to circumvent the cancellation of oscillating forces, which is impossible without an external reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be autonomous, implying no external energy input. The only apparent energy source is gravitational potential energy of sliding masses, which is part of a closed mechanical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system claiming to generate permanent torque and usable power solely from the cyclical motion of masses in a gravitational field. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to output continuous work without an external energy source, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed mechanical loop with no external energy input.
- Gravitational potential energy changes are cyclical; net work over a cycle is zero in a conservative field.
- Claims 'permanent torque' and ability to power a home after gearing, violating energy conservation.
- Describes using inertia/hydraulics to 'recycle' motion, but this cannot create net energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The patent explicitly claims it uses no external energy ('il n'utilise aucune énergie extérieure'), implying the rotational motion is self-sustaining from an internal permanent disequilibrium.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed as a rotary friction motor that requires no external energy and produces continuous rotation and useful work (electricity). This is a direct violation of the conservation of energy, as it claims to output useful energy indefinitely without any input, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims continuous rotary motion without any energy input, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Claims the angular trajectory for useful work (330°) is less than the angular trajectory for rotation (360°), implying energy gain from within the system.
- Relies on a 'permanent disequilibrium' of its own components, which in an isolated system would reach equilibrium and stop.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract suggests the gravitational field enables rotation during one cycle, while the magnetic field makes the energy balance positive. No explicit external energy input is described, implying the device extracts net work from the gravitational and magnetic fields without consuming an external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device with an asymmetric flywheel (magnetic arm) rotating in gravitational and magnetic fields to produce a positive energy balance. This is a violation of energy conservation, as a conservative field (gravity) cannot provide net work over a cycle, and a static magnetic field cannot continuously add energy to the system. The device is a form of perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims a positive energy balance without identifying an external energy input to offset losses.
- Misunderstands fields: A static, uniform gravitational field is conservative and cannot perform net work over a closed cycle. A static magnetic field alone also cannot do net work on a magnetic moment over a cycle.
- No thermodynamic gradient: The device appears to attempt to extract net work from equilibrium fields (Earth's gravity and a magnet), which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the motor driving the vertical rotor. The device claims to generate useful propulsion or displacement from the inertial/centrifugal forces of rotating massive bars.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to generate net propulsion solely by manipulating internal moving masses. This violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum) as internal forces cannot produce a net external force on a system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to use inertial/centrifugal force for net propulsion. Inertial forces are internal to the system and cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass without an external reaction (violating Newton's 3rd law).
- The described mechanism (rotating bars, gears) only manipulates internal mass distribution. In a closed system, this cannot create sustained net translation or propulsion.
- No external energy gradient or momentum sink is identified to allow for net displacement.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity alone, which is a conservative force field. No external energy input (e.g., changing potential energy via lifting mass, thermal gradient, or chemical fuel) is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy solely by exploiting gravity with an offset axle, creating an imbalanced lever. However, gravity is a conservative force, meaning any work extracted by lowering a mass must be paid back to lift it again, resulting in zero net energy over a complete cycle. This is a classic violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (energy from nothing).
- Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a constant gravitational field is zero.
- The described asymmetry in lever distance does not overcome the need to return the mass to its starting height, which requires at least as much work as was gained during descent.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the motor that spins the arms. The device claims to generate net linear thrust from internal mass redistribution under centrifugal force.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic reactionless drive claim. The device uses internal moving masses to try to create a net linear force. Since all forces are internal (centrifugal forces act between the rotating arms and the masses), the center of mass of the entire system cannot accelerate. No net thrust is possible without expelling reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal forces cannot produce net external thrust on a closed system.
- Attempts to create a non-zero net force vector from purely internal, cyclic motions.
- Misinterprets centrifugal force as an external force that can be harnessed for propulsion.
- No external reaction mass or momentum exchange with the environment.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The system appears to be a rotating flywheel with a mechanism (eccentric and lever) to vary its center of mass. The only explicit input is the rotational energy imparted to start the flywheel. The claim implies linear propulsion is generated internally from this rotation without an external reaction mass or momentum exchange with an external environment.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create linear propulsion solely through internal mass redistribution within a rotating flywheel. This is a classic reactionless drive, which is impossible as it violates conservation of momentum. No net force on a closed system's center of mass can arise from internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. A closed system (the device) cannot generate a net linear force on its center of mass using only internal motions, regardless of how the center of mass of a sub-component is varied.
- Violates Newton's third law. For the main system to accelerate linearly, it must exert an equal and opposite force on something external. The described mechanism provides no external reaction.
- Incomplete energy accounting. Any linear kinetic energy gained by the main system would have to come from the rotational energy of the flywheel, reducing its speed. This is not a propulsion method but an inefficient momentum transfer within the syste
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a closed-loop fluid system in a rotating hollow cylinder with spiral channels and nozzles, claiming to harness gravitational force. No external energy input (e.g., pump, height differential, thermal gradient) is specified to create or maintain the fluid motion relative to the rotating frame.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate usable mechanical work solely from Earth's gravity using a closed-loop fluid in a rotating drum, but provides no external energy input to compensate for losses or to explain how a net circulatory flow is initiated and sustained. The energy for any output torque would have to come from the initial spin of the rotor, which would then slow down due to fluid friction and drag.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce usable mechanical energy from gravity alone in a closed system with no net change in the system's gravitational potential energy.
- No identified energy gradient: The system is closed and rotating. For the fluid to flow continuously from the inside to the outside of the channels, work must be done against centrifugal forces or a pressure gradient must be maintained by an external
- Misapplication of Newton's third law: The redirection of fluid jets (claim 2) may create torque, but the energy for accelerating the fluid and overcoming viscous losses must come from somewhere, not from the static gravitational field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Implicitly, the rotational kinetic energy of the arms and masses, supplied by an unspecified external motor or prime mover.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic reactionless drive attempt. It uses internal mass shifting to try to create a net linear force, but this violates conservation of momentum. No external reaction mass is expelled, so the center of mass of the entire device cannot accelerate solely through internal rearrangements.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The device attempts to generate a net linear force (thrust) from internal motions without expelling mass.
- Centrifugal force is an internal, center-seeking constraint force within the rotating frame. It cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- The described mass transfer creates changing internal forces, but the linear momentum of the system's center of mass remains conserved and unchanged in the absence of external forces.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest a 'closed energy circuit' with 'complete entropy recuperation' and 'self-building through time-energy integration', implying energy is generated or recycled within the system without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims a closed system that fully recovers entropy and self-builds energy over time, which directly violates the First Law (energy conservation) and Second Law (entropy increase) of thermodynamics. The description uses complex, non-standard terminology to obscure these fundamental violations.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'complete entropy recuperation', which violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
- Describes a 'closed energy circuit' with 'self-building' energy, violating energy conservation.
- Uses obfuscating terminology ('time-energetic self-building', 'natural counter-coupled technological system arrangement') that lacks physical definition.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of weights on levers. The device attempts to create a continuous torque imbalance by reconfiguring weighted levers on a looped belt between two rollers.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic overbalanced wheel design disguised with belts and levers. It attempts to create a perpetual torque imbalance using gravity alone, which violates the conservation of energy. The energy required to reset the levers to their 'folded' position on the ascending side negates any net energy gain from their extended position on the descending side.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce continuous shaft work without an external energy input to reset the system.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: The described mechanism is a gravity wheel/overbalanced wheel variant, a classic perpetual motion machine concept.
- No net torque generation: The work required to lift/collapse the levers on the ascending side equals or exceeds the work gained from their extended position on the descending side when friction is accounted for.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be electrical energy to accelerate mass bodies (e.g., steel balls) into circular motion and to operate subsystems. The patent suggests energy recovery during braking, but this is a partial recovery of the system's own invested energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes an internal mechanism to accelerate and decelerate masses in a cycle to produce net thrust or motion. This violates conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate net linear momentum from internal forces alone. Any motion would require expelling reaction mass externally, not recirculating it.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a closed-cycle system where masses are accelerated, ejected, decelerated, and returned to the start, implying net thrust or work output from an internal process.
- The description of canceling torque with a counter-rotating system is valid, but the claim of generating useful propulsion or work from this cyclic internal mass manipulation violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for a closed syste
- Energy recovery during braking (Claim 10) cannot be 100% efficient, leading to net energy loss per cycle unless an external energy source is added, which is not described as the net input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on a falling mass (fallkörper) inside rotating containers, implying conversion of gravitational potential energy into useful work without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a falling mass inside rotating containers to create volume change and presumably work, but provides no mechanism to restore the mass's height without inputting at least as much energy as was gained. This is a classic gravity-powered perpetual motion claim that violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear external energy input to restore the gravitational potential of the falling mass after it has done work.
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement where the work done by the falling mass in one part of the cycle would require equal or greater work to lift the mass back to its starting position, violating energy conservation.
- Claims of 'Schwerkraftumwandler' (gravity converter) suggest perpetual extraction of work from a gravity field without an external gradient or fuel.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be an external motor providing rotational force to spin mass bodies in circular paths. Claim 3 suggests energy recovery from braking, implying a closed-loop or regenerative system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a ballistic drive that attempts to generate net thrust by manipulating masses internally within a vehicle. This is a classic reactionless drive, violating conservation of momentum. The suggestion of recovering braking energy to power the motor further indicates an over-unity or closed-loop energy violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for internal forces. The described mechanism uses internal moving masses to generate net thrust in a closed system, which is impossible.
- Claim 3 implies energy recovery from braking to power the drive motor, suggesting a perpetual motion scheme or over-unity energy recycling.
- The claim of operation in a vacuum and zero-gravity environment confirms it is presented as a reactionless drive, which violates conservation of momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only identified potential source is gravity acting on displaced masses ('satellites'). The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement intended to generate continuous rotary motion from internal weight redistribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to provide continuous rotary motion using gravity and a geometric arrangement of masses. This describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it attempts to generate useful work from a closed, conservative force field without an external energy source to replenish the system's state, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'mouvement continu rotatif' without an identified external energy input.
- Relies on geometric arrangement of centers of gravity to create a perpetual imbalance, which is impossible in a closed conservative field like gravity.
- No mechanism to reset the system or account for energy dissipation (friction, drag).
- Describes a system that would reach equilibrium and stop, not provide constant energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy (Earth's gravity field). The device attempts to create a net energy gain by asymmetrically using buoyant forces during up/down motion on an inclined plane.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to gain energy by using buoyancy asymmetrically in a gravity field, but gravity is a conservative force—the net work done over any closed path is zero. The detailed mechanism obfuscates the fact that resetting the device for continuous operation would require at least as much energy as it allegedly produces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to extract net work from a conservative force field (gravity) in a closed cycle.
- Misunderstands buoyancy: Buoyancy is not an independent energy source; it is a result of gravity acting on fluid pressure gradients. The work done by/against buoyancy sums to zero over a closed cycle.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system ignores the work required to reset the mechanism (e.g., re-engaging/disengaging connections, compressing springs).
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: The claim of 'excess energy' implies creation of energy from nothing within a gravitational potential.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the device generates net propulsion from internal moving masses without an external energy source or reaction mass. Any initial energy input (e.g., from the mentioned linear motor) would be consumed by losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes using internally moving/circling masses to generate net linear propulsion. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' concept that violates conservation of momentum. Internal forces cancel out, producing no net acceleration of the system's center of mass without ejecting reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
- No external energy source or reaction mass identified for sustained propulsion.
- Claims 'straight-line motion impulses' that move the entire apparatus from internal cyclic motions, which is impossible for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use 'terrestrial attraction' (gravity) as the sole energy input to create a perpetual rotary motion from a permanent disequilibrium between two opposing sets of forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotation by creating a permanent imbalance in a gravitational field, but gravity is a conservative force; any work extracted in one part of the cycle must be repaid when the masses return to their starting positions, resulting in zero net work per cycle when losses are accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'perpetual rotary motion' without an external energy source.
- Attempts to create a permanent disequilibrium and net torque from a conservative force field (gravity).
- No mechanism to account for energy dissipation (friction, drag).
- System's center of mass will eventually reach a minimum potential energy state, halting motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract net work from gravity and fluid pressure alone, implying a perpetual motion source where the system's own weight and internal fluid pressure provide continuous rotational output without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device that supposedly uses its own weight and internal fluid pressure to pump liquid and drive continuous rotation, extracting energy from gravity and pressure propagation. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as it lacks an external energy source to account for the net work output, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to pump fluid and rotate a cylinder using only the system's own weight and internal pressure, which are not net energy inputs.
- Misapplies Archimedes' principle: buoyancy (being lighter than displaced fluid) provides an upward force, but to do continuous work, the system must be cycled, which requires external work to reset its position.
- No identifiable external energy gradient: the described cyclic operation in a rotating cylinder lacks a source of energy to overcome losses and perform net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes 'equal constant forces' applied to each rod, but does not specify the origin of these forces. The described mechanism appears to attempt to convert a static, unidirectional force into continuous rotational work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate continuous rotation and usable torque by cleverly manipulating constant forces and springs, but for a complete cycle, the energy stored in the springs must be returned, yielding zero net work output unless an external energy source is identified, which it is not.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to produce continuous rotation and usable torque from constant, unidirectional forces without an identifiable external energy input or gradient.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: The description suggests a force imbalance causing rotation, but for a closed loop cycle, the net work from constant conservative forces is zero.
- Mechanically dubious: The 'negation' of force imbalance via springs stores and returns energy within the system, resulting in no net energy gain per cycle for continuous output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical assembly of three gears, a holder, and weights, but does not specify any external energy input. The only implied input is the initial rotation from a motor (7), but the claims suggest the system itself is the 'Rotationsantrieb' (rotation drive).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system of gears and weights with no specified external energy source. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) because it claims to be a 'drive' but provides no mechanism to add energy to overcome inevitable losses from friction, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source to sustain motion against losses.
- System appears to be a purely mechanical arrangement of gears and offset weights, which cannot generate net energy.
- Claims imply a self-sustaining or motive rotational output without explaining the energy input to overcome friction and other dissipative losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input appears to be the motor driving the gyroscopes ('Antrieb'). Any claimed 'linear driving force' output is implied to be generated by combining and manipulating gyroscopic precession forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a net linear propulsive force by combining disturbances in multiple gyroscopes. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as gyroscopic forces are internal and cannot produce net thrust on a closed system without an external reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a universal linear driving force from gyroscopic forces, which are internal reaction forces and cannot produce net linear momentum or continuous thrust in an isolated system.
- Suggests 'stacking' gyroscopes to increase force output without accounting for a proportional increase in required input energy.
- Describes manipulating gyroscopes to steer force vectors, implying the creation of a reactionless drive or a means to extract net work from internal torques.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim states the vehicle is driven 'without the effect of external forces' via motors operating inside the vehicle. The only explicit energy source is the electrical/chemical energy supplied to the internal motors to spin the rotors.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to propel a vehicle using only internal, counter-rotating masses. This is physically impossible because internal forces cannot create a net external force on the vehicle's center of mass. It violates Newton's laws and conservation of momentum. While changing rotation speeds can induce gyroscopic torques to change the vehicle's orientation, it cannot provide sustained linear acceleration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces cannot produce a net external force to accelerate the vehicle's center of mass.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum. Spinning internal rotors creates angular momentum, but the total linear momentum of the closed system (vehicle + rotors) remains zero.
- No external reaction mass or force interaction (e.g., with ground, air, or electromagnetic field) is described to provide propulsion.
- Confuses control of orientation (which is possible via gyroscopic torques) with net propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Atmospheric pressure differential acting on a wobbling plate inside a partially evacuated chamber. The device uses a motor to rotate the chamber relative to the plate, exposing different sections of the plate to atmospheric pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate mechanical energy by cyclically exposing parts of a wobbling plate to atmospheric pressure within an evacuated housing. However, the atmosphere at constant pressure and temperature is not a source of available work in a closed cycle; the work needed to create the vacuum and operate the control mechanism will always equal or exceed any work output, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). The system attempts to extract net mechanical work solely from an isothermal pressure reservoir (the atmosphere) without a compensating energy input or a lower-pressure sink.
- No thermodynamic gradient is maintained. The device is in thermal equilibrium with its environment; atmospheric pressure is not an energy source from which net work can be extracted in a cyclic process.
- The work required to create/maintain the vacuum and to rotate the chamber relative to the plate is not properly accounted for against the claimed output work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: The patent focuses
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system with hydraulic chambers, a fall pipe, and an auxiliary drive, but no external energy input (e.g., fuel, wind, flowing water, electrical input) is specified. The only potential source is the initial gravitational potential energy of the 'Zusatzgewicht' (additional weight).
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a rotating frame with hydraulic chambers, a weighted fall pipe, and an auxiliary drive, but provides no identifiable source of energy to overcome losses and generate net output. It constitutes a closed mechanical system, implying perpetual motion of the first kind (energy from nothing), which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain intermittent energy generation.
- System description suggests a closed mechanical-hydraulic loop; any motion will be damped by friction, viscosity, and other losses.
- Claims 'intermittent energy generation' without explaining how energy is replenished to overcome losses and perform net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input appears to be the initial energy stored in the 'Andruckfedern' (pressure springs). The description suggests a mechanism where weights are moved 'quickly forward and slowly back' to generate propulsion impulses.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to generate net propulsion impulses through internal motions alone. This violates the conservation of momentum, a fundamental law of physics. Without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field, no net thrust can be produced for a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input is described to reset the system or overcome losses.
- The mechanism to generate net thrust from internal moving masses violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) for a closed system.
- The 'quick forward, slow back' motion implies a net force, but for an isolated system, the time-averaged force is zero. To produce net thrust, mass or momentum must be expelled from the system.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Claims input from conventional motors (electrical, Otto, or Diesel) but implies the system generates a unidirectional net impulse force from internal weight movements, suggesting propulsion without reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system using asymmetrically moving weights to generate a unidirectional impulse force for propulsion. This directly violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum), as a closed system cannot produce a net external force through internal mass movements alone. The energy source for motion is a conventional motor, but the claimed useful output is impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims generation of a net directional impulse force from purely internal moving masses, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Suggests 'frequency increase' of centrifugal force component can create a bundled, dynamically effective force for independent propulsion, which is physically impossible for a closed system.
- Proposes 'independent propulsion of the whole' from coordinated internal motions, implying a reactionless drive.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly stated as an external rotatable source (electric motor, gas engine, or turbine) driving the central shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanism driven by a motor. It claims to generate net directional thrust by manipulating internal weights and springs, but internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the vehicle (Newton's third law). This is a classic reactionless drive violation of momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net directional thrust from purely internal moving masses in a rotating frame, violating conservation of momentum.
- Describes a mechanism where internal forces (centrifugal, spring) are rearranged to produce a net external impulse, which is impossible for a closed system.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction (e.g., air, water) is described as necessary for the claimed propulsion.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a 'commande double' with 'moteur modulant' (modulating motor), suggesting an external electrical or mechanical input is required to maintain operation. No other energy source (chemical, thermal, ambient) is specified. The system appears to be a purely mechanical arrangement of cylinders, rods, masses/pistons, and bearings.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical 'continuous motion' system with no clear source of energy to overcome inevitable frictional and other losses. The mention of an external modulating motor suggests it requires an input, but the overall claim implies self-sustained operation, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input is described to overcome losses.
- The mechanism is described as 'mouvement continu' (continuous motion), implying sustained operation without a net energy input, which violates conservation of energy.
- The text is fragmented and describes only mechanical linkages (helicoidal star arrangement, hollow shafts, rods, bearings) without explaining how a net torque or power output is generated from a smaller input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: The cla
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The description uses mech
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions an 'ovoïde light' (egg-shaped light) as enabling motion, but provides no identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.). The system appears to be described as self-sustaining once started.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a system for continuous motion without identifying any external energy source to compensate for inevitable losses due to friction and other dissipative forces. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified.
- Claims continuous motion and rotation of wheels, cylinders, shafts, and masses without explaining how energy losses (friction, air resistance, etc.) are overcome.
- The mechanism is described in vague, structural terms without a clear energy conversion process.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Vehicle-mounted prime mover (e.g., engine, motor) provides rotational energy to the drive shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal reaction mechanism that cannot produce net thrust on its enclosing vehicle. Drawing masses inward requires work against centrifugal force; releasing them allows that stored energy to be recovered. Over a full cycle, the internal forces cancel, resulting in no net propulsion—a classic violation of momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is not an external force; it is an inertial effect. Net thrust cannot be generated by manipulating masses within a closed system.
- The described cyclic motion (drawing mass inward, letting it move outward) will produce equal and opposite internal forces over a complete cycle, resulting in zero net momentum change for the vehicle.
- The system attempts to create a net axial thrust from purely rotational and radial internal motions, violating Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The claim describes an external drive mechanism (Antriebs-Aggregat) that provides the initial rotational input. However, the device purports to generate a net unidirectional thrust force (Schubkraft) from the asymmetric centrifugal forces of masses undergoing double rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system claiming to produce a net thrust force from internal rotating masses. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically conservation of momentum, as it describes a reactionless drive. No external energy source can make this possible; the net external force from internal motions in a closed system is always zero.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The described net 'thrust' is an internal force within the closed mechanical system; for the system to accelerate an external object, it must expel mass or interact with an external field.
- The asymmetry in centrifugal force vectors on opposite sides of the main axis is a kinematic description, not a source of net external force. The net force integrated over a full cycle of the mechanism will be zero.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force, which is a frame-dependent inertial (fictitious) force, not a real force that can perform net work on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily electrical input to the blower (Gebläse) that drives airflow, with a claimed secondary conversion of the air's internal (thermal) energy into kinetic energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use a blower to move ambient-temperature air through a nozzle, converting the air's internal thermal energy into extra kinetic energy to drive a turbine for net power output. This is thermodynamically impossible because extracting work from the thermal energy of a single temperature reservoir violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The system would require a heat source and sink to perform such a conversion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law: Claims to convert the internal (thermal) energy of ambient-temperature air into additional kinetic energy and useful work without creating or utilizing a thermal gradient.
- Violates the Second Law: Attempts to extract net work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient air at a uniform temperature). This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
- The described geometry (converging-diverging duct with a turbine at the throat) cannot generate net power from isothermal flow; the blower input must exceed any turbine output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of falling weights inside the rotating cylinder.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a buoyancy-assisted gravity engine. The falling weights provide the initial energy to move a piston and extend buoyant bodies, creating rotational torque. However, for continuous rotation, the weights must be cyclically lifted against gravity, requiring at least as much energy as they provide when falling. The patent describes no external energy input to reset the system, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- System extracts net rotational work from internal falling weights without an external energy input to reset the weights to their initial high-potential-energy position.
- Buoyancy bodies provide asymmetric torque but do not constitute an independent energy source; they merely convert/displace gravitational potential energy.
- No mechanism described to return the fall weights to their starting height after they descend, violating energy conservation for continuous operation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'Atmosphärenüberdruck-Luft' (atmospheric overpressure air), implying extraction of work from ambient atmospheric pressure alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate power (centrifugal force) using only ambient atmospheric air pressure, which is a thermodynamic equilibrium state. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the second kind, as it purports to do useful work without any external energy gradient or sink, directly violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir (the ambient atmosphere) without a temperature or pressure gradient to an external sink is impossible.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identifiable external energy input gradient (e.g., temperature, pressure, chemical) to drive the 'rotor'. Ambient atmospheric pressure is an equilibrium state, not a usable energy source for net work output.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: Centrifugal force is not an energy source; it is a kinematic effect. Generating it requires an energy input to spin the rotor in the first place.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses a technical-sounding
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions counterweights, ball bearings, gears, and a rope/pulley system, suggesting a purely mechanical arrangement with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical machine with gears, bearings, and counterweights, claiming 'free power generation.' Without an external energy source, any work output would violate the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the internal redistribution of weights cannot produce net energy over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable source of energy input described
- System appears to be a closed mechanical assembly with counterweights and gears
- Claims 'free power generation' which implies energy output without corresponding input
- Relies on internal weight redistribution which cannot produce net work in a cycle
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system describes a wheel with cylinders, pistons, and masses arranged radially, but no external energy input (e.g., fuel, electrical, thermal gradient) is specified. The title suggests it is intended to be a 'continuous motion' system.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a mechanical assembly with no declared source of energy. Any motion will decay due to friction, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The title and design imply a perpetual motion machine, which is impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Implies perpetual motion from an internal mechanical arrangement
- Mechanism will lose energy to friction and bearing resistance, requiring an input to sustain motion
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title and abstract explicitly claim 'mouvement perpétuel' (perpetual motion) and 'énergie supplémentaire' (extra energy) beyond that needed to overcome friction, implying energy creation from nothing or from the machine's own operation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device's core claim is the creation of perpetual motion and supplementary energy, which directly violates the conservation of energy. No external energy source is identified to account for the claimed extra output, making it a textbook example of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of perpetual motion violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Claim of generating 'extra energy' beyond overcoming internal friction implies net energy output > energy input, which is impossible for an isolated system.
- No identifiable external energy source (thermal gradient, ambient energy, fuel, etc.) is described to account for the claimed supplementary energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on equal weights with different lever arms, implying a net torque from a conservative field without an external energy input or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic attempt at a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It uses levers and sliding weights to try to maintain an imbalance, but gravity is a conservative force; the work done by gravity on one part of the cycle is exactly undone when the weights return to their starting positions, resulting in zero net work output over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to create perpetual motion using gravity, a conservative force, as the sole energy source.
- Mechanism describes varying lever arms to create imbalance, but system will reach equilibrium; no net work can be extracted over a cycle.
- Ambient or input energy (e.g., to reset the mechanism) is not accounted for.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'output >
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanism using hinged or movable masses to generate a 'continuously acting, unidirectionally directed centrifugal force' but does not identify any external energy input. The implied source is the internal motion/reconfiguration of the masses themselves.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce continuous unidirectional thrust using only internal moving masses and centrifugal forces. This is physically impossible because internal forces cannot create a net external force on a system's center of mass—doing so would violate conservation of momentum. It is a classical perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is a kinematic constraint force in a rotating reference frame; it cannot do net work on the system's center of mass over a closed cycle.
- The system attempts to create a net force from internal motions, violating Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum for an isolated system.
- No external energy input (e.g., fuel, electricity, ambient gradient) is specified to sustain the claimed continuous unidirectional force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The claim implies the machine itself creates perpetual motion and additional energy beyond what is needed to overcome friction, suggesting no identified external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent title and summary explicitly claim perpetual motion and the creation of additional energy from nothing, which directly violates the fundamental law of energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to sustain the motion or generate the claimed surplus work, making the device physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of 'mouvement perpétuel' (perpetual motion) violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Claim of creating 'énergie supplémentaire' (additional energy) from nothing violates the First Law.
- No mechanism described to account for inevitable energy losses from friction, air resistance, or other dissipative forces.
- No thermodynamic gradient or external energy input is identified to sustain motion or generate excess work.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Title suggests energy is 'created' by a reaction, implying a violation of energy conservation. No explicit or implicit external source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim of 'creating energy' is a fundamental violation of the law of energy conservation. No legitimate energy conversion process or external source is described, making the device thermodynamically impossible as presented.
Specific Physics Issues
- Title claims to 'create' energy, which violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- No identifiable energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, ambient) is described.
- No thermodynamic process or limits are defined, making compliance impossible to assess.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claimin
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes cyclic acceleration/deceleration of masses/rotors and manipulation of fluid mass, but does not specify the external energy input required to perform this cyclic work against inertia and friction.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a reactionless drive. Generating a sustained net thrust by only manipulating internal masses or cyclically accelerating rotors violates conservation of momentum. While Claim 1 mentions expelling fluid, it is described as happening after the net force is produced, indicating the claimed thrust does not fundamentally rely on momentum exchange with expelled propellant.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: The described mechanism aims to produce a net external force (thrust) on the device by manipulating internal masses/fluids, without expelling reaction mass in a fixed direction (except in Claim 1's expulsion, which is aft
- Incomplete force accounting: Cyclically changing centripetal force creates oscillating internal stresses, but the time-averaged net external force from a closed system is zero unless momentum is ejected.
- Claim 3 suggests 'coupling moments' cancel, but accelerating/decelerating rotors in opposite directions creates a net torque on the device unless countered by an external reaction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the electric motor rotating the shaft. Additional energy is required for the hydraulic cylinders to shift the shaft and potentially to rotate the frame member.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system. While internal forces can be created by shifting weights, Newton's third law dictates that for every internal 'thrust' in one direction, an equal and opposite internal force cancels it out, resulting in zero net external thrust for propulsion. It violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim describes generating a net thrust (useful work) from an internal redistribution of rotating masses. This is a closed system with no external reaction mass or asymmetric external force field, violating Newton's third law and conservation of
- The mechanism attempts to create a directional force by varying the effective radius of centrifugal masses, but any such force is internal and cyclic, resulting in zero net momentum change for the system's center of mass.
- The description implies 'thrust' can be generated for propulsion without expelling mass or pushing against an external body, which is thermodynamically impossible for a self-contained device.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system where rotors (driven by electric motors or fluid jets per claims 6-9) are made to spin and simultaneously precess (orbit) around a central support. The claimed linear thrust is supposedly generated solely from this internal motion.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a reactionless drive claim. The described mechanism uses internal spinning and precessing masses, but in a closed system, internal forces cancel out and cannot produce net external linear thrust. It violates conservation of momentum, a cornerstone of classical physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (conservation of momentum). The device is a closed system with no external reaction mass or field interaction to produce net linear thrust.
- No identifiable external energy gradient to exploit for propulsion. All energy inputs are internal (electricity/pressurized fluid).
- Describes an internal moving mass system which cannot create net center-of-mass acceleration in free space.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the 'Antriebs-Gewicht' (drive weight) and 'Nutz-Gewicht' (load weight). The claim suggests using a smaller or equal weight to lift a larger or equal weight.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system (a rotating arm assembly with weights) that claims a smaller weight can lift a heavier one, resulting in more useful energy from the fall of the heavy weight than is required to reset the system. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as it attempts to create a net energy output from gravity alone with no external energy input to sustain the cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate increased force from a smaller force, violating conservation of energy.
- Misapplication of lever law; ignores that work (force × distance) must be conserved, not just torque balance at an instant.
- Implies net energy gain from a gravitational system with no external input, a form of perpetual motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests the device generates thrust/propulsion (Vortriebskräfte) from the asymmetric modification of gravity fields via the counter-rotation of two dense masses. No external energy source for this net thrust is identified beyond the motors spinning the masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a closed system that generates propulsive thrust by internally rotating masses to asymmetrically modify gravity fields. This violates the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot change its own center-of-mass motion through internal forces alone. The proposed gravitational effects are not supported by established physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum. The device is described as an 'abgeschlossenes System' (closed system), yet claims to generate linear and rotational thrust internally without expelling reaction mass.
- Misapplication of general relativity concepts. It incorrectly posits that rotating masses can 'bend' or asymmetrically modify a gravitational field in a way that produces a net force on the closed system's center of mass.
- No credible mechanism for coupling internal angular momentum to external linear momentum. The described effects (Äquipotentialkreisversatz, Feldlinienablenkung) do not, under established physics, allow a closed system to propel itself.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct-sounding ter
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial rotary motion of the wheel. The system attempts to generate unidirectional thrust from internal mass movements within a rotating frame.
AI Physics Analysis
This device is a classic 'reactionless drive' attempt. Accelerating masses inside a rotating wheel creates internal forces that sum to zero across the entire system. It cannot produce net unidirectional thrust as it violates conservation of linear momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces within a closed system cannot produce net thrust.
- Violates conservation of momentum. The system describes creating a net linear momentum from purely rotational input with no external reaction mass.
- Misinterprets reaction forces in rotating frames. Forces from accelerating masses internally are balanced by opposite forces on the wheel structure.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Title suggests 'mechanically self-acting and hydraulically actuated', implying a system that operates autonomously without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent title and description claim a 'mechanically self-acting' machine, which is a direct claim of perpetual motion or over-unity operation. No external energy source (e.g., fuel, electrical input, ambient heat gradient) is identified, meaning the claimed operation would violate the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Title claims 'self-acting' (selbsttätige), implying perpetual motion or energy generation from nothing.
- No identifiable external energy source is described in the provided abstract/claims.
- Proposed combination of mechanical and hydraulic systems for 'weight lifting devices' suggests an attempt to create a closed-loop system that outputs work without net energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests acceleration is generated by gyroscopic precession, which would require an external torque input to sustain the precession. No explicit energy source (e.g., motor, fuel) is identified to provide this input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes using gyroscopic precession to accelerate a vehicle without an equal external reaction force, which directly violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. Internal gyroscopic forces cannot produce net acceleration of a vehicle's center of mass; an external energy source and reaction mass/field are required.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law: A net force on the vehicle requires an equal and opposite external reaction force. The claim that the 'counterforce' is converted into precession and does not act on the vehicle is incorrect; internal forces (between gyro
- Misunderstanding of gyroscopic forces: Gyroscopic precession requires an applied torque and results in internal reaction forces. It cannot generate a net external force to accelerate a closed system without expelling mass or interacting with an exter
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain the claimed continuous acceleration.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a self-contained mechanical system using weights on a rotating assembly that interact with a fixed ramp (Auflauffläche). No external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vehicle propelled by moving weights on a rotating arm that contact a fixed ramp on the vehicle itself. This is a closed system where all forces are internal. Newton's third law dictates that internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass, making the claimed propulsion impossible without an external energy source or reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified external energy input to overcome friction and losses.
- Implies net propulsion from internal mass redistribution, violating Newton's 3rd law for a closed system.
- Mechanism suggests extracting useful work (motion of the vehicle) from internal motions without an external reaction mass or energy gradient.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Implicitly, the electrical/mechanical energy input to rotate the masses, operate the mass transfer means (pumps/pistons), and overcome friction. No external reaction mass or environmental gradient is claimed as the primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim. Shifting masses inside a closed system creates equal and opposite internal forces that cancel out, producing no net thrust on the frame. It violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The apparatus is an internal system; shifting masses creates internal forces that sum to zero for the frame as a whole.
- No net external impulse can be generated without ejecting reaction mass. The unbalanced centrifugal force is an internal stress, not a net propulsive force.
- Energy accounting is incomplete. Work done to move liquid radially inward/outward and against centrifugal forces will equal or exceed any potential net translational kinetic energy gain.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a weight moved by specially shaped cam discs and a magnet moved quickly into a coil and slowly back, implying mechanical input is the only explicit source. No external energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient) is mentioned to sustain the motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a classic over-unity or perpetual motion claim. It describes a mechanical system (weights, cams, a magnet moving in a coil) intended to generate electrical current, but provides no source of energy to maintain the motion against inevitable losses from friction, resistance, and radiation. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to overcome inevitable losses (friction, electrical resistance, air drag).
- Describes a reciprocating mechanical system (weight, magnet) that would lose energy with each cycle unless driven.
- Implies generation of electrical 'impulse current' from the magnet's motion without accounting for the work required to move the magnet against magnetic forces.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on the out
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device is a purely mechanical system with rotating guides and sliding masses. Any net thrust would require an external energy input to overcome internal friction and to accelerate the system's center of mass. The patent describes no external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a mechanical device using rotating guides and sliding masses to allegedly produce directed thrust. It is a classic reactionless drive concept, which violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. No external energy source is specified to justify a net force output, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The described mechanism attempts to generate a unidirectional thrust ('Schubes') using only internal moving masses.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum. A closed system cannot generate net linear momentum through internal motions.
- Incomplete energy accounting. Any claimed thrust output would require an input of work to move the masses against inertial and frictional forces, with no source for that work identified.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of weighted carts moving on guided paths within rotating arms. No external energy input is described; the system appears to be self-sustaining through the cyclical motion of the weights.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a gravity-powered machine claiming continuous operation. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) as it describes a closed system with no external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction and other forces, making it a form of perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous operation without an external energy source.
- No accounting for energy losses: Friction and other dissipative forces are mentioned but not as an energy sink requiring input.
- Mechanism attempts to create a perpetual gradient: The motion of weights is used to drive rotation, which in turn is supposed to reset the weights, forming a closed loop with no net energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly claims
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implicit. The description suggests a mechanical arrangement of pistons, cylinders, tubes, and weights connected across a hollow pipe, implying intended operation from internal weight/pressure redistribution without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described machine appears to be a mechanical arrangement intended to revolve perpetually using only internal weight redistribution. This violates energy conservation as it lacks any external energy source and would constitute a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.)
- Implies sustained rotation from internal weight/piston arrangement alone
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot produce net work without an energy source
- No thermodynamic gradient or entropy sink described
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input described is an impulse to the pendulum weight at the end of each cycle. The device appears to be a complex mechanical system (pendulum, gears, ratchet, spring) intended to generate continuous output from this initial or periodic impulse.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system with no identified external energy source. It will inevitably stop due to friction and losses, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (violating energy conservation) if claimed to produce continuous net output power.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy input mechanism described. The 'means for imparting a force' to restart the pendulum is not specified and would itself require energy.
- System will lose energy to friction, air resistance, and internal losses in the spring and gears with each cycle.
- The device is described as a closed mechanical system with no external energy gradient to exploit; it cannot output more work than the energy put into the initial impulse and the periodic re-engagement.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Vehicle motor provides rotational input to a mechanism (crank-slider or universal joint) that drives an eccentrically mounted flywheel/oscillator assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mass-shifting mechanism intended to produce vehicle thrust. It violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate net linear momentum through internal motions alone. This is a classical reactionless drive claim, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net thrust from internal moving masses without external reaction mass
- Implies propulsion is created by asymmetric inertial forces within a closed system
- No external energy gradient or reaction mass identified to satisfy momentum conservation
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the drive motor. The device attempts to generate net momentum via asymmetric collisions between internal masses and a fixed collision element.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a reactionless drive proposal. The device uses only internal moving parts and asymmetric collisions, but in a closed system (the spacecraft), all internal forces cancel. No net momentum can be imparted to the spacecraft's center of mass without ejecting mass, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum for a closed system. The described mechanism (one mass colliding while the other does not during a cycle) cannot produce a net external force on the spacecraft without ejecting reaction mass.
- Internal forces cancel out. The coupled, counter-moving masses ensure equal and opposite momentum exchanges internally.
- No external reaction mass is expelled, which is required for rocket-free propulsion in space.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract mechanical energy from gravity and reduced pressure, but no external energy input is specified. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement with buoyancy chambers, cables, and generators.
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to generate electricity through a closed-loop system of buoyancy chambers, weights, and cables without any external energy input. It violates the first law of thermodynamics by claiming to extract net work from gravity alone, and the second law by not accounting for energy dissipation through friction and other losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source (gravity is not an energy source, it's a conservative field)
- System appears to be a closed-loop buoyancy/weight mechanism attempting perpetual motion
- Violates conservation of energy - claims to generate electricity without energy input
- Uses buoyancy without creating/maintaining density gradients through external work
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
PATTERN A - Incomplete energy accounting
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor driving the initial shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to generate net propulsion using only internal moving masses and varying rotation speeds. Centrifugal forces are internal forces; their vector sum over a complete cycle is zero, providing no net thrust to the system's center of mass. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the third law and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net unidirectional thrust from internal centrifugal forces, which are internal reaction forces that sum to zero within a closed system.
- Asserts action and reaction forces can be decoupled or made to act on different planes to avoid cancellation, violating Newton's third law.
- Proposes extracting net propulsion from an isolated system's internal motions without an external reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'Fn*Baly' force is claimed to appear from rotating and fixing an object to an axis, suggesting it is a novel force generated from rotation without an identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes physically impossible claims: a new unlimited force from rotation violating Newtonian mechanics, incorrect geometric formulas contradicting calculus, and impossible satellite orbits. It uses correct-sounding terms to obfuscate fundamental violations of conservation laws and established mathematics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of a new unlimited force (Fn*Baly = a.v²) appearing from constrained rotation, violating Newton's laws (no reaction force identified).
- Claim of a new formula for sphere surface area (π²R²) and volume (1/3 π²R³) that contradicts the mathematically proven standard formulas (4πR² and 4/3 πR³).
- Orbital mechanics claim for satellites in a plane parallel to the equator but not through Earth's center is physically impossible for stable orbits under gravity.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. Implied input is the rotational energy supplied to the flywheels (1,4) to spin them. The system appears to attempt to generate a net translational thrust from internal centrifugal forces of rotating masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, using rotating weights and flywheels to try to create a net centrifugal thrust. This is physically impossible because all forces involved are internal to the system; they sum to zero and cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass without violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal forces cannot produce net external thrust on a closed system.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: Claims to produce a net 'unbalanced thrust' (spinta risultante sbilanciata) without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of how the claimed net thrust relates to energy input to the flywheels and the inevitable losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions two counter-rotating carousels (Vx1, Vx2) but provides no identifiable external energy input mechanism. It claims to generate enormous thrust (6.57 billion N vs. 25 million N for a 'strongest rocket') from an internal rotating system, implying energy generation or multiplication without a source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a textbook perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate enormous propulsive thrust using only internal, counter-rotating masses, violating Newton's laws of motion and conservation of energy and momentum. No valid external energy source or reaction mass is identified, making it physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction): Internal rotations cannot produce net external thrust in a vacuum without expelling reaction mass.
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims massive thrust output without describing a commensurate energy input.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: Describes a closed system generating net linear momentum from internal motions.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force: Centrifugal force is an internal, frame-dependent force that cannot propel the system's center of mass.
- Confuses concepts: Mixes propulsion with magnetic bases and artificial gravity in a non-physical way.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (centr
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be an internal mechanical system (rotating eccentric masses) powered by an unspecified external energy input (likely electrical or mechanical) to spin the masses. It claims to generate net directional thrust via asymmetric inhibition of centrifugal forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device using rotating internal masses to generate thrust. This is impossible because internal forces, no matter how asymmetrically inhibited, cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass. It is a classic reactionless drive claim that violates Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces in a closed system cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
- Claims 'Sum of all forces over a cycle is always zero' yet proposes to extract net thrust via 'one-sided internal inhibition'—this is a logical contradiction for a closed system.
- Proposes scaling thrust arbitrarily by increasing rotational speed or mass, ignoring that the energy input required to achieve those parameters must come from an external source and that internal momentum sums to zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to work on 'principle of motion of cosmic bodies in the Universe' but describes only mechanical linkages, gears, and inertial masses. No external energy input specified beyond potential initial motor to start rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to create additional rotational torque using only internal moving masses and gear trains, invoking cosmic principles without a physical energy source. This is a classical over-unity claim that violates conservation of energy and angular momentum, as no external energy input is identified to account for the claimed additional output.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy source for claimed 'additional rotational moment'
- Describes complex mechanical motion (epicyclic/spiral trajectories) but provides no mechanism to generate net energy output
- Implies creation of rotational energy from inertial masses moving in a prescribed path without external work input
- Violates conservation of angular momentum - system cannot create its own additional torque without external input
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'gravitational energy', implying a closed system where the perpetual rearrangement of internal weights provides net rotational work output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravitational perpetual motion machine. The described mechanism of shifting weights can create a temporary imbalance, but to complete a cycle and continue rotating, energy must be expended to lift the weights back up, resulting in zero net work output. The claims of continuous power generation violate the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input is described to reset the system's internal configuration after each cycle.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Claims to extract net work from a system in gravitational equilibrium without an external gradient or sink.
- Mechanism is internally conservative: The gravitational potential energy change of the sliding weights sums to zero over one full rotation in a closed path, providing no net torque.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the drive motor. The device claims to generate a larger output torque on the driven shaft from a smaller input torque by using centrifugal force from rotating masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to amplify torque using a clever lever mechanism, but this violates Newton's Third Law and the conservation of energy. The output work cannot exceed the input work provided by the drive motor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: The claim that 'the counterforce is supported at the shaft and thus no counter-torque arises on the drive shaft' is impossible. The centrifugal force on the mass is an internal force; the reaction force must act on the dr
- Violates conservation of energy and angular momentum: Claiming output torque is 'many times greater' than input torque at the same rotational speed implies power (torque * angular velocity) is created from nothing.
- Misinterprets centrifugal force as an external energy source. Centrifugal force in a rotating frame is not an energy input; it is a kinematic result of the drive motor's work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract energy from gravitational potential energy by creating a 'permanent disequilibrium' through geometric path differences (arc vs. chord) and asymmetric weight distributions, implying a continuous, unbalanced torque from gravity alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, claiming to generate unlimited work from gravitational potential energy alone by using asymmetric geometric paths to create a permanent torque imbalance. This is impossible in a conservative field like gravity, as the net work over any closed cycle is zero, directly violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims unlimited kinetic energy from a closed gravitational system.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a mechanism to extract net work from an isothermal, equilibrium gravitational field without an external gradient or sink.
- Misapplies geometry: the difference in path length (arc vs. chord) for weights on a rotating system does not create a perpetual torque imbalance; net work over a closed cycle in a conservative field is zero.
- Obfuscates the energy source: uses terms like 'nature energies related to gravity' and 'implosion principle' to suggest tapping a limitless ambient source without specifying a legitimate gradient.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The device is described purely as a mechanical assembly of gears, flywheels, and a lever ('satellite'), with no identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical device but fails to identify any source of energy input. It claims to generate work using only gears, a lever, and flywheels, which are energy storage components, not sources. This constitutes a violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy input source is identified or described.
- Claims to 'generate work' from a passive mechanical arrangement, implying energy creation.
- Flywheels are for energy storage, not generation; they require an initial energy input.
- The system, as described, would be a closed mechanical loop with inevitable frictional losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'output >
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravity (a conservative force) and an 'artificially created constant force' as the sole energy source, with no external input or energy gradient described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly described as a perpetual motion machine powered by gravity and an unspecified artificial constant force. Since gravity is a conservative force and no external, non-conservative energy source is identified, the claim directly violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims 'mouvement perpétuel' (perpetual motion).
- Gravity alone cannot provide net work over a cycle; it is a conservative force.
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, electrical grid).
- The 'artificially created constant force' is undefined and, if internal, cannot create net energy.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/initial rotational energy (implicitly claimed to be self-sustaining or amplified via internal weight shifting without an external energy gradient).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a form of perpetual motion machine. Shifting weights internally cannot create a sustained net torque because the energy required to move the weights inward/outward equals or exceeds any temporary torque gain, leading to energy loss overall. The claim that imbalances keep the rotor rotating violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims rotation is maintained by imbalances created by moving weights, implying a net positive work output from internal rearrangements.
- No identifiable external energy input (thermal, electrical, potential gradient) to overcome friction and other losses.
- Describes a closed system where internal mass redistribution is claimed to sustain or increase rotation, violating conservation of energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: 'Output > control
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the system uses a load (70) and gravitational force to maintain rotation, implying the load's gravitational potential energy is the intended input, but the mechanism claims to operate in 'permanent non-equilibrium'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gravitational motor operating in permanent non-equilibrium, which is a thermodynamic impossibility. Gravity is a conservative force; to extract continuous work, masses must continuously lose potential energy by moving downward, which the described mechanism does not account for in a sustainable way, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims operation in 'permanent non-equilibrium' without a maintained external energy gradient.
- Mechanism describes complex interactions of pulleys, balls, and loads but provides no complete energy accounting.
- Implies sustained rotation from a load/gravity alone, which is a closed-loop energy extraction from a conservative force field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy from air at ambient temperature, with no identified temperature gradient or higher-grade energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to create a very low-temperature cold sink (tens of Kelvin) from ambient air using an unspecified 'accelerator,' then use ambient air as the hot source to drive a heat engine. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the second kind, attempting to extract useful work from a single thermal reservoir, which is thermodynamically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to run a heat engine with both hot and cold sources derived from ambient temperature air, violating the Second Law.
- Claims a 'cooler' reduces gas temperature by a factor of 10 and doubles pressure without an external energy input, violating the First Law (energy conservation).
- Proposes extracting net work (electrical, mechanical) from a single-temperature equilibrium environment.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient atmospheric pressure and buoyancy (Archimedes' principle) acting on floats/buoys inside a partially submerged tube. No explicit external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a buoyancy engine that tries to generate continuous rotation from the constant hydrostatic pressure difference between air and water. This is thermodynamically impossible because the buoyant force is a conservative force field; submerging the float to reset the cycle requires at least as much energy as is gained during its ascent, violating energy conservation for net work output.
Specific Physics Issues
- System attempts to extract net work from a static equilibrium pressure gradient (hydrostatic pressure) without consuming an energy source.
- The buoyancy force is conservative; net work over a closed cycle for a float entering and exiting the tube is zero when accounting for the work required to submerge the float against buoyancy.
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain motion against dissipative losses (friction, drag, electrical generation).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanism using inertial forces from masses moving on constrained paths, implying the input is the work to move the masses via an 'Antriebseinheit' (drive unit). It suggests a net acceleration of the entire device can result from the directed inertial forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic reactionless drive attempt. The internal inertial forces from moving masses sum to zero for the system's center of mass. No configuration of internal cyclic motions can produce a net external force without violating conservation of momentum, making the claimed net acceleration physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction). Internal inertial forces within a closed system cannot produce a net external force or acceleration on the system's center of mass.
- Proposes extracting net propulsion from cyclic internal motions, which is impossible for a system not expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work input to move the masses against constraints and inertia is the only true energy source; any claimed net acceleration implies creation of kinetic energy from internal forces alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity and buoyancy, but the described mechanism is a closed system with no external energy gradient to exploit for sustained net work output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity/buoyancy-driven wheel that claims to generate continuous useful torque without an external energy source. This is a classic attempt at a perpetual motion machine, as the internal rearrangement of masses in a closed system cannot produce net work over a complete cycle, violating both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate continuous torque without an external energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to create a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (over-unity).
- Mechanism relies on shifting masses in a wheel, which cannot produce net torque over a full cycle in a conservative gravitational field.
- Buoyancy in a sealed, gas-filled chamber provides no net energy; it is an internal force that cannot drive continuous rotation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be self-running from gravity-induced weight imbalance, with no external energy input other than the ambient gravitational field.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a form of perpetual motion machine. Gravity is a conservative force, meaning the net work done over any closed cycle is zero. The described mechanism cannot create a sustained weight imbalance to produce net work without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy; system attempts to create a perpetual, unbalanced torque from a conservative force field (gravity).
- No mechanism to reset pendulums without doing work against gravity, completing a cycle with net zero work.
- Claims output (generator) from a closed system in a static potential, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a single heat source (thermal energy input). No cold sink or other explicit energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce mechanical work using only one heat source, which directly violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law. A heat engine requires a temperature difference to operate; a single source cannot produce net work in a cycle. The described phase change process is also thermodynamically inconsistent.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: claims to convert thermal energy from a single heat source into mechanical work without rejecting heat to a lower-temperature reservoir.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to compress/condense the gas and to 'scrape' the liquid is not accounted for in the energy balance.
- The phase change cycle described (liquid→gas via heating, gas→liquid via decompression) is physically inconsistent. Condensation (gas→liquid) typically requires heat rejection, not just decompression.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Ignores the energy
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors that rotate masses (flywheels) around multiple axes
AI Physics Analysis
This device attempts to generate net thrust using only internal rotating masses and Coriolis forces, which violates conservation of linear momentum. Coriolis forces are fictitious forces that arise in rotating reference frames and cannot produce net external force on a closed system. The claim represents a form of reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net thrust via internal Coriolis forces without external reaction mass
- Attempts to create net linear momentum from purely rotational internal motions
- Ignores conservation of linear momentum - internal forces cannot produce net thrust on a closed system
- Coriolis forces are fictitious/internal forces that cannot produce net external force
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied to be internal weights changing distance from axis without external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a 'nature-independent' drive unit using weights on levers to turn an axle, with the weights changing their distance from the axis each revolution. This is a closed mechanical system with no stated external energy source, implying it could produce net work from its own internal configuration, which violates the conservation of energy. The motion would inevitably cease due to friction, with no energy input to replenish it.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described.
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement of weights and levers.
- Changing the radial distance of weights requires work input against centrifugal/gravitational forces.
- No thermodynamic gradient or environmental energy source specified to drive continuous motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
A single motor provides the input energy to rotate the masses and mechanisms.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic reactionless drive attempt, using synchronized rotating masses to supposedly generate a unidirectional thrust. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot produce a net external force without ejecting reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a unidirectional, reactionless force (net thrust) from a closed, internal mechanical system.
- Attempts to vector centrifugal forces to produce a net external force without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction) and conservation of momentum for a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a mechanical system with weights, levers, and gears, but no external energy input (e.g., motor, wind, human power) is specified. The mechanism appears designed to use the motion of its own components (like an 'Antriebsgewicht' or drive weight) to perpetuate motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical linkage with no described source of energy. It uses weights, levers, and cranks but provides no mechanism to input energy to overcome inevitable losses from friction and resistance. Such a system, if intended to run continuously or amplify work, would violate the conservation of energy (First Law of Thermodynamics).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described.
- System appears to be a complex mechanical linkage with no source of energy to overcome friction and other losses.
- Claims of facilitating work ('erheblich erleichtert') suggest an expectation of sustained or amplified motion without an energy source, implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be Earth's gravity acting on movable weights within a rotating double-lever system. No other explicit or implicit energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous torque and drive a generator using only gravity acting on weights in a cyclic machine. This violates the conservation of energy because gravity is a conservative force; in a closed cycle, the net work done by a conservative force is zero, providing no net energy output without an external, non-conservative input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes to extract net work from a conservative force field (gravity) in a closed cycle, violating conservation of energy.
- System lacks a described external energy input to reset the weights' positions, implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Claims constant torque from a constant gravitational field with symmetrical, cyclic motion, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external gradient or input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the device uses an unbalanced mass (дебалансный груз) whose inertial force interacts with its centrifugal force during turning to create acceleration. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.) is explicitly mentioned. The implied source is the internal motion of the mass, which is not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The 'inertial engine' claims to generate acceleration and sustained motion solely through the internal movement and redirection of an unbalanced mass. This violates energy conservation, as redirecting the mass requires energy input equal to or greater than any kinetic energy gain. The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims acceleration and sustained motion without identifying an external energy input.
- Misapplication of inertia and centrifugal force: These are not energy sources; they are properties of moving bodies. Changing the trajectory of a mass requires work input.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a cycle of 'run-up' and trajectory change that allegedly provides acceleration, implying energy can be extracted from the system's own motion indefinitely.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests using the buoyant force of compressed gas to partially offset a load or create a net driving force, implying an attempt to extract useful work from an internal pressure/buoyancy interaction without a clear external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system attempting to generate net work or 'self-drive' using internal buoyancy and pressure forces from compressed gas. This is a classic violation of conservation of energy, as no net work can be extracted from internal forces in a closed system. The garbled text and misuse of physics terms further indicate a fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to use internal buoyancy forces within a closed system to generate net work, violating Newton's 3rd law and conservation of energy.
- Confuses force (buoyancy) with a source of energy. Buoyancy is a conservative force; net work over a cycle in an isolated system is zero.
- Text is garbled and incoherent, but the core concept describes using gas pressure differentials to create a 'technical lift' for 'performance increase' or 'self-drive', which is thermodynamically impossible without an external input.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanical system requires an external energy input to drive the circular and radial motions of the mass, but the claim implies these motions generate a net directional force (thrust) from within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system where a mass moves in a circle while also being moved radially to generate Coriolis forces. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim. Physics dictates that internal forces, including Coriolis forces, cannot produce a net external force on a closed system's center of mass, as it violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The Coriolis force is an inertial/centrifugal effect internal to the rotating frame; it cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- Incomplete force accounting. The mechanism to radially move the mass inward and outward will create equal and opposite radial reaction forces on the driving apparatus, canceling any net impulse.
- Misapplication of Coriolis acceleration. Coriolis effects describe apparent forces within a non-inertial rotating frame and do not create a net external force vector for propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a gravity wheel using liquid redistribution in compartments to create a persistent torque imbalance. The only explicit input is gravitational potential energy from the liquid, but the system is cyclic.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a variant of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (overbalanced wheel). The described mechanism of opening and closing compartments to redistribute liquid aims to create a permanent weight imbalance, but the work required to move the liquid and operate the doors, plus friction, will equal or exceed any net torque generated over a full rotation, resulting in no net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by attempting to create a continuous torque imbalance from a static gravitational field.
- No external energy input is described to reset the system or overcome friction.
- The mechanism (opening/closing compartments based on position) attempts to create a perpetual imbalance, a classic overbalanced wheel design.
- The liquid's center of mass will not provide net positive work over a full cycle when all forces (pressure, weight, hinge forces) are accounted for.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implicitly assumes
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate 'gravitational kinetic energy' from weak gravitational fields via rotation of a body, implying extraction of net work from a static or equilibrium gravitational potential without an explicit external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate kinetic energy solely from a weak, static gravitational field by rotating a body. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as a conservative force field like gravity cannot be a source of net work without an associated decrease in potential energy (e.g., mass falling). It describes a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: proposes to generate kinetic energy from a static gravitational field without consuming an equivalent energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind by extracting net work from a conservative force field in equilibrium.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The mathematical expression provided (G•B•ε•c•ω•R^2•m) mixes constants and variables but does not identify an external energy input to be converted.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the weight of a 'teko' (likely a flywheel or eccentric mass) drives a crank's rotation, implying energy is extracted from gravitational potential energy or inertial motion without an identified external input to reset or sustain the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism where a weight ('teko') drives a crank to produce continuous rotation without any clear external energy input to reset the system or overcome losses. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it implies a closed system can produce net work indefinitely.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain motion
- Claims continuous motion ('é£ç¶') from an internal weight-driven mechanism
- Implies perpetual or over-unity operation without an energy source
- Lack of quantitative efficiency or loss accounting
PATTERN B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
PATTERN C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract unlimited energy from gravity alone, specifically from the weight's gravitational potential energy, without any external input or gradient to replenish it.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-powered motor that claims to rotate permanently by cleverly shifting weights. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it purports to create useful work from nothing but an isolated gravitational field, violating both energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims perpetual rotation from a single gravitational potential well.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a mechanism to do work indefinitely without an external energy source or entropy sink.
- Describes a self-sustaining, weight-driven machine that would eventually come to rest as potential energy is converted to waste heat.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from atmospheric pressure variations and gravity using a 'vacuum mechanism' to create a 'permanent machine' that generates electricity indefinitely.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to generate electricity permanently from atmospheric pressure and gravity using a vacuum mechanism, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by proposing a perpetual motion machine. The description lacks any identifiable sustainable energy input to compensate for electrical output and energy losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by claiming perpetual electricity generation without an identifiable external energy input
- Claims 'permanent mechanism' with no wear, implying no entropy increase or energy dissipation
- Attempts to extract net work from atmospheric pressure/gravity gradients without maintaining the required thermodynamic disequilibrium
- Uses obfuscatory terminology like 'primary unit energy' without clear physical definition
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes converting a 'gravity ratio' between left and right into rotational energy, implying extraction of work from a static gravitational potential difference without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes extracting rotational energy from a left-right gravity difference, which is fundamentally a perpetual motion scheme. A static gravitational potential cannot provide continuous net work output without an external energy source to reset the system, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The use of ambiguous terminology further obscures the violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation by implying continuous extraction of work from a fixed gravitational potential
- No clear mechanism to restore the 'gravity ratio' after energy extraction, making continuous operation impossible
- Uses undefined terms ('gravity ratio', 'æ¯è»') that obscure the actual energy conversion process
- Appears to be a gravity-based perpetual motion scheme
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial compression of springs, which is stored elastic potential energy. The device claims to be 'auto-transformative,' using its own rotation to re-compress the springs via a feedback mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic mechanical over-unity or perpetual motion claim. It uses springs and levers in a feedback loop, but the work required to re-compress the springs must come from the system's own output, leading to inevitable energy dissipation and stopping. No external energy source is identified to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Output work from spring expansion must be less than input work to compress them due to losses.
- No net external energy input: The feedback mechanism (claims 7-8) uses work from the output wheel to re-compress the springs, which consumes the very work produced, guaranteeing net energy loss per cycle.
- Perpetual motion claim: The title 'auto-transformative energy machine' implies self-sustaining operation or net work output without an external energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical system of levers, cams, rollers, and a flywheel, implying the input is manual rotation or an external motor, but no primary energy source is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system of levers and cams that 'generates force' but fails to identify any external energy source. The description suggests the mechanism itself, through clever timing and geometry, can produce a net motive force, which is thermodynamically impossible as it would create energy from the internal arrangement of parts alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Mechanism appears designed to generate a net force/output from internal reconfiguration alone
- Implies perpetual or amplified motion without an added energy source
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot output more useful work than the energy put into it
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of descending weights, with no identified external or replenishing input.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic overbalanced wheel design that uses asymmetrical levers and weights. It claims to be a motor but provides no external energy input to lift the weights back to their starting height, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind that violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Device is a gravity-powered motor (overbalanced wheel variant).
- No mechanism to return weights to a higher potential energy state without expending at least as much work as gained in descent.
- Claims reduced friction but does not address the fundamental need to reset the system, violating energy conservation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear and contradictory. Mentions 'héliogaz' (possibly helium gas), air, charcoal, and a pendulum, but also explicitly describes multiple subsystems as 'perpétuel' (perpetual motion). No primary, external energy source is clearly identified or quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex machine with multiple subsystems, several of which are explicitly labeled as 'perpetual motion.' The design lacks a clear, sustained external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction and other dissipative forces, violating the first law of thermodynamics. The combination of vague energy sources (héliogaz, charcoal) with explicitly perpetual mechanisms indicates a fundamental violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claims of perpetual motion ('système perpétuel', 'actionné perpétuellement', 'mouvement perpétuel')
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of input energy to overcome friction, losses, or to reset systems.
- Mechanisms (e.g., rolling cylinder, two-wheel system, inclined planes with balls) appear designed to create net work from gravity or internal motions without an external gradient.
- Combines disparate systems (charcoal engine, pendulum, gas/air system) without a coherent energy flow diagram, obscuring the net energy balance.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from a descending mass. The system attempts to recover the mass in a 'reduced' or 'decomposed' state to reset the cycle with minimal energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered machine that claims to produce net work by lowering a mass and then returning it to its starting point in a 'reduced' state. This violates the conservation of energy, as the energy required to reset the system must always equal or exceed the work output from the descent, preventing perpetual operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work output from the descending mass must be less than or equal to the gravitational potential energy lost. The energy required to 'reform' and lift the mass back to its starting point (including any decomposition
- Implies a mass that can be decomposed for the return journey, suggesting an attempt to circumvent the energy cost of resetting the system. No external, sustainable energy source is identified to power this reset.
- The claims describe using the work to compress air/water for later use, but this is just an energy transfer/storage method, not a source. The core cycle is energetically closed.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim states the device creates a 'supplément d'énergie' (supplement of energy) at each cycle and runs 'sans le secours d'aucune force étrangère' (without the help of any external force). This implies energy is being generated from within the closed mechanical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It asserts it creates its own supplemental energy and runs continuously without any external power source, which directly violates the conservation of energy. The described mechanism of shifting weights cannot produce net work over a complete cycle to overcome its own losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to create supplemental energy.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; any real machine has friction and dissipative losses, requiring a continuous external energy input to overcome them and maintain motion.
- The described mechanism of moving weights along levers is a classic overbalance wheel design, which cannot produce net work in a cycle as the center of mass of the system cannot be perpetually displaced.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Perpetu
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism (an offset crankshaft connected via rods to equal weights on oscillating levers) suggests an attempt to create a self-sustaining or over-unity mechanical system from internal weight redistribution alone, with no identified external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a purely mechanical device with offset cranks and oscillating weights but provides no external energy input. Such a system cannot produce net motive force, as any motion would be damped by friction, and it attempts to violate the first law of thermodynamics by creating energy from internal rearrangements.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is described.
- The system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly with internal moving parts, implying it is intended to generate net work from its own configuration.
- This would violate the conservation of energy, as internal forces cannot produce net work on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system of wheels with sliding weights on extensible rails, claiming to produce motive force without fuel or fluids. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, ambient) is identified. The implied source is the gravitational potential energy of the weights, but this is internal to the system and cannot provide net continuous output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel design, a form of perpetual motion machine. It attempts to generate continuous rotational work using only internal sliding weights and levers, with no external energy input. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as the system cannot output more work than the energy initially stored in its configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous motive force output with no identifiable external energy input.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: System cannot perform net work on its surroundings without an energy source.
- Perpetual motion mechanism: Describes a closed mechanical system (weights, rails, wheels) that allegedly sustains and accelerates itself.
- No thermodynamic gradient: No temperature difference, pressure difference, or external field (beyond static gravity) is utilized to drive the process.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on interna
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a hydraulic motor using cylinders containing air or water, with pistons driven by a gear system. The abstract suggests it might claim to produce rotary motion from the imbalance between air-filled and water-filled cylinders.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel or gravity motor. It claims to produce continuous rotary motion solely from the weight difference between air-filled and water-filled cylinders arranged around a wheel. This violates the first law of thermodynamics, as the potential energy of the water is finite and not replenished by the described mechanism, making continuous work output impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim (Claim 6) implies extracting continuous rotary work from a static weight imbalance created by having some cylinders filled with water and others with air. This describes a gravity/perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- No external energy input is described to reset the system (e.g., to pump water back into the upper cylinders or compress air). The system would reach equilibrium after one cycle.
- The mechanism for alternating cylinder filling (Claims 4, 5) is vague and lacks a described energy source, suggesting it is intended to be driven by the machine's own output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is not specified; the system appears to be a closed-loop water wheel with moving masses controlled by springs and hooks, suggesting it intends to generate net work from internal mass redistribution alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel design, using moving masses along spokes controlled by springs and hooks. Since all forces are internal and conservative, no net energy can be extracted—it is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy input identified—closed-loop fluid and internal moving masses cannot create net work
- System attempts to use controlled mass positions to create perpetual torque imbalance, violating conservation of energy
- Internal forces (springs, hooks) are conservative; net work over a cycle is zero
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The claim describes a device that initiates and sustains motion itself, implying the sole input is the buoyant force of a fluid on a rotating ring, with no external energy source identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims describe a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, which claims to produce useful work continuously from a closed fluid-buoyancy system with no external energy input. This directly violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims 'voortdurende beweging' (perpetual motion)
- Asserts self-starting and continuous operation under load without an external energy input
- No identifiable source to overcome inevitable energy losses (friction, viscous drag, turbulence)
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) and the Second Law (entropy increase).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the external work required to spin the disc (Claim 1: 'een middel om deze schijf... te doen wentelen'). The device claims to 'utilize centrifugal force' to generate additional useful work from the motion of hinged bodies ('lichaampjes') guided by a non-circular track.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a type of perpetual motion machine. Centrifugal force is not an external energy source; it is a manifestation of the disc's rotation. Any attempt to extract net work from the motion of the hinged bodies will slow the disc's rotation, requiring equal or greater energy input to sustain it, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame, not an independent energy source. Any work extracted from the radial motion of the hinged bodies against the guide track comes from the rotational kinetic energy of the disc, re
- The described mechanism (bodies hinged to a rotating disc, guided by a fixed, non-circular track) is a classic 'overbalanced wheel' or 'centrifugal engine' concept. The net work done by centrifugal forces on the bodies over one full rotation is zero,
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Allegedly gravity acting on adjustable trapezoidal-section weights attached to rotating arms. The only explicit input is the initial rotational impulse to start the disk.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a gravity-powered motor, a classic class of perpetual motion machine. It attempts to generate continuous rotation by manipulating weights around a wheel, but in a uniform gravitational field, the net work done by gravity over any closed path is zero. The device would quickly settle into a state of no net torque, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce continuous mechanical work (motor) from a closed-cycle interaction with a conservative force (gravity).
- No net torque generation: The described mechanism (locking arms radially on one side, allowing free swing on the other) cannot create a sustained, unbalanced torque over a full rotation in a uniform gravitational field.
- Missing entropy sink/energy gradient: Operates isothermally with no external gradient (e.g., heat flow) to drive continuous work extraction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to use solar panels to power a motor, but the description suggests the system uses magnetic repulsion between magnets on rotating weights and stationary magnets on an outer frame to allegedly amplify motion or maintain rotation with minimal input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use permanent magnets arranged on rotating weights and a stationary outer ring to create sustained or amplified rotation. Since magnets are conservative force sources, no net work can be extracted over a complete cycle without an external energy input, making this a classic violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System appears designed to use permanent magnet repulsion to do work without an external energy source, violating conservation of energy.
- Claims of 'impact-induced repulsion' and magnetic configurations to 'maximize repulsive force' suggest an attempt to create a magnetic perpetual motion machine.
- No thermodynamic cycle or energy gradient is identified; magnets alone cannot provide net work in a closed cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to use internal energy to accelerate a mass, then attempts to transfer that mass's kinetic energy back to the vehicle during deceleration.
AI Physics Analysis
This describes a reactionless drive that attempts to generate net momentum by internally accelerating and then 'capturing' a mass. In a closed system, the momentum imparted to the mass during acceleration is exactly opposite to the momentum imparted to the vehicle, which is reversed during 'capture', resulting in zero net change. It violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Accelerating a mass internally requires expending momentum/energy from the vehicle itself, resulting in zero net momentum change for the isolated system.
- Assumes energy can be gained from a closed cycle of internal acceleration and deceleration, violating conservation of momentum and energy.
- Claims velocities can sum to exceed the original speed without an external energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to a motor, which stores energy in a rotating flywheel (mass 3) and a spring (elastic force storage 10). The claimed thrust is generated internally by alternating inelastic and elastic collisions of an internal mass (8).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum-canceling system. The alternating inelastic and elastic collisions between the internal mass and the device's structure can only produce oscillating internal forces, resulting in zero net thrust on the isolated system. It violates the conservation of momentum, a cornerstone of classical mechanics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (momentum conservation) for a closed system.
- Attempts to generate net momentum (thrust) through purely internal forces.
- Misapplies collision physics: internal collisions between components of the same system cannot change the system's center-of-mass momentum.
- The analysis confuses internal momentum transfer with net external impulse.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The power source provides time-varying electrical/microwave power to a component (capacitor, inductor, waveguide) in a vacuum. Claims imply this input power somehow reduces inertial mass, enabling net thrust from an accelerator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate thrust by varying an object's inertial mass with time-varying power, then accelerating it during low-mass phases. This violates conservation of momentum, as net momentum cannot be created from internal energy changes alone. No reaction mass is expelled, making it a reactionless drive, which is impossible under Newtonian and relativistic mechanics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum. Claims inertial mass can be varied via time-varying power in a vacuum, enabling net acceleration without equal/opposite reaction.
- No mechanism linking time-varying power to a change in inertial mass. Inertial mass is a property of matter-energy content, not an externally adjustable parameter via power cycling.
- Proposed operation suggests creating net linear or rotary momentum from an internal energy input alone, a textbook violation of Newton's third law.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the initial rotational motion imparted to the masses. The device claims to generate a unidirectional translational force (net work) solely from internal inertial and centrifugal forces within a closed mechanical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of mechanical perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce a net translational force by cleverly organizing rotating masses, but internal forces, no matter how arranged, cannot propel the system's center of mass without an external reaction. This directly violates Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net translation from purely internal forces, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- No external reaction medium or gradient is identified; system is described as independent of the ambient environment.
- Centrifugal and inertial forces are internal to the rotating frame; they cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest propulsion force is generated internally from a fixed quantity of working mass circulating through a pressurized chamber, with acceleration/deceleration creating opposing momentum vectors that allegedly combine to produce net thrust.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net thrust by circulating a fixed quantity of working mass within a closed pressurized chamber, accelerating and decelerating it to create opposing momentum vectors that allegedly combine to propel the device. This violates conservation of momentum for a closed system, as internal momentum changes must sum to zero and cannot produce net external thrust without expelling reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for a closed system
- Implies internal momentum changes can produce net external thrust without expelling mass
- No clear external energy input described to account for claimed thrust output
- Temperature decrease of working mass during acceleration suggests unaccounted energy loss
- Vague description of how 'two opposite momentum vectors' combine to produce net thrust
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to drive unit (rotating armature) and to electromagnets/screw motors (for recoil/impact generation).
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate lift through internal momentum exchanges within a rotating system. This is physically impossible, as internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass. It is a classic reactionless drive claim that violates Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal forces (recoil/impact between components on the same rigid armature) cannot produce a net external force (lift) on the system.
- Misinterprets centripetal force: This is an internal constraint force, not a source of net thrust.
- Incomplete momentum accounting: Momentum changes from 'recoil' are balanced within the isolated rotating system, resulting in zero net momentum transfer to the platform.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest the device can be an 'autonomous motor' and a 'thermo-mechanical converter' that moves vehicles 'without pushing against air or ground' and converts thermal energy to mechanical energy, implying it generates net work from internal motions or ambient heat without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be an autonomous motor and a converter of thermal energy to mechanical work, but its description relies on internal synchronized rotations to produce a net force or work output. This violates conservation of momentum (for propulsion) and the second law of thermodynamics (for heat conversion), as it lacks an external energy source or a thermal gradient to drive the claimed energy conversion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'autonomous motor' with no identifiable external energy input
- Proposes conversion of thermal energy to mechanical work without specifying a temperature gradient (heat reservoir and sink)
- Suggests vehicle propulsion without reaction mass (violates Newton's third law)
- Complex mechanical synchronization described as creating a net 'differential centrifugal force' to produce work, which is internally balanced in a closed system
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Fuel from compartment 13 powers engines to sustain flywheel spin (Claim 1, Abstract). Auxiliary motor sustains rotation, main motor supplies inertial energy (Claim 6).
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to achieve propulsion or levitation by exchanging a flywheel's rotational energy for translational kinetic energy via gyroscopic precession. This is a violation of conservation of momentum, as a closed system (the vehicle) cannot generate a net force on its own center of mass using internal forces, regardless of how gyroscopes are manipulated.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims exchange of flywheel kinetic energy for translational motion/levitation without an external reaction mass.
- Proposes using gravity as a 'priming force' to generate a net horizontal or upward propulsion force, violating Newton's third law.
- Implies gyroscopic precession can produce a sustained net force on a closed system's center of mass.
- Suggests a specific 'magic angle' (32-33 degrees, Claim 5) for optimal effect, which is not supported by gyroscopic dynamics.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claim 3 specifies a combustion engine (internal combustion engine) as the primary energy source. An independent motor (40) drives the rotating platform with centrifugal masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a reactionless drive, attempting to create net thrust by using internal moving masses to 'resist' an internal combustion force. Since all forces are internal, the system's center of mass cannot accelerate, violating conservation of momentum. The combustion energy is wasted, not converted to net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposed mechanism attempts to generate a net one-directional thrust (Schub) on the frame from internal forces.
- System uses centrifugal masses to 'resist' the thrust from the combustion engine's piston, claiming this resistance transfers a one-sided impulse to the frame.
- This describes a reactionless drive: the internal combustion force acts between the piston/cylinder and the centrifugal masses, but all these components are part of the isolated vehicle/system. No external reaction mass (e.g., expelled exhaust, exter
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy input is the work required to spin the two counter-rotating arms and their masses. The device attempts to create a net linear force by transferring a mass between these arms at specific points in the rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an overbalanced wheel variant using centrifugal force. It is a closed mechanical system where all forces are internal, making it impossible for the system's center of mass to accelerate and produce net linear motion without an external reaction force, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. The system's center of mass cannot accelerate by internal forces alone.
- The claimed 'unbalanced centrifugal force' is an internal force within the rotating frame. In the inertial lab frame, all forces are balanced when the arms counter-rotate symmetrically.
- The mechanism to transfer mass requires work against centrifugal forces, which will equal or exceed any purported net output work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions motor-generators within flywheels, suggesting electrical input, but the description implies the device's own inertial motion is the primary energy source for propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve 'self-contained inertial vehicular propulsion' by manipulating internal flywheels and oscillators. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. No internal rearrangement of mass can produce a net external force on a system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes extracting net propulsion from internal inertial forces, which cannot produce net center-of-mass acceleration in a closed system.
- Describes combining and realigning internal motions to create a 'timely gradient vector sum motivating thrust drive', which is a mechanism for reactionless propulsion.
- Uses vague terminology ('inertial reluctance', 'mutual reciprocal separation', 'timely gradient vector sum') that obfuscates the fundamental impossibility of generating net thrust from internal moving parts alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electric engine (explicit), but claims imply generation of additional kinetic energy/traction from internal mass redistribution and gyroscopic effects without an external reaction mass or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate 'non-reactive propulsion' via internal eccentric mass motions, which is impossible as it violates conservation of momentum. The electric engine is the only clear energy source, but the description implies the internal mechanics create net traction or increasing rotational energy beyond what the engine supplies.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'non-reactive propulsion' violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Describes transforming 'additional momentum' into kinetic energy, implying momentum is generated internally.
- Suggests system can recompose discs at 'gradually increasing angular speed' without corresponding energy input from the engine.
- Uses terms like 'gyroscopic drift' and 'barycentre repositioning' in a context suggesting net force generation from internal motions alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim mentions engines to rotate the wheels and electromagnetic pulses for power, implying electrical/chemical input, but the described mechanism suggests the intent is to extract net work from unbalanced rotating masses without an adequate external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an isolated mechanical system of rotating unbalanced wheels. Internal forces and torques sum to zero, so it cannot produce net acceleration or sustained work output without an external energy source, violating conservation of energy and momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net external force or torque can be generated by an isolated system of rotating masses. The center of mass of the entire system will not accelerate without an external reaction.
- The described 'force vector orbit' and 'unbalanced condition' cannot produce sustained net work output. Internal forces cancel out.
- Claim implies energy extraction from a closed mechanical configuration, violating conservation of momentum and energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
External motor to spin the rotor disc. The claimed lift force is intended to be generated internally by the asymmetric motion of sliding masses within the rotating system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to create a net lifting force by asymmetrically moving masses within a rotating frame. This is physically impossible for an isolated system, as internal forces cancel out and cannot produce a net external force on the center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (internal forces cannot produce net external force on a closed system).
- Centrifugal force is an internal, radially outward force within the rotating frame. Asymmetric mass distribution creates internal stress, not net external lift.
- The system's center of mass cannot accelerate solely through the rearrangement of its internal parts.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The rotor (likely driven by an electric motor) provides the rotational energy input. The device attempts to generate a net directional impulse (traction) by asymmetrically modulating centrifugal/Coriolis forces via variable arm lengths and decoupling.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an inertial propulsion scheme, a classic violation of momentum conservation. No internal manipulation of rotating masses can produce a sustained net force on the device's center of mass without ejecting mass externally. The energy input from the motor will only result in internal vibrations and/or rotation, not net traction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) and conservation of linear momentum. The system is internal; modulating internal forces (centrifugal/Coriolis) cannot produce a net external force on the device's center of mass without an external reacti
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'impulses prevalent in a single direction' implies net thrust. The energy for any net momentum change must come from the motor/rotor, but the description suggests this input is used to create an asymmetric inertia
- Misapplication of inertial forces: Centrifugal and Coriolis forces are fictitious forces in a rotating frame; they describe motion but cannot be 'composed' to produce a net external force on an isolated system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
The explicit energy source is the 'power source' (batteries or fuel) powering the individual flywheel motors and the main drive motor. No other energy inputs are described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex motor-driven gyroscopic assembly that consumes energy from its power source. Gyroscopic forces are reactive and conservative; they cannot be arranged to produce a net energy output. The claim of it being a 'prime mover' suggests over-unity operation, which violates energy conservation as no external energy gradient is utilized.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism for net energy output is described; the device is purely a complex consumer of electrical/chemical energy.
- Gyroscopic forces are conservative; they create torques perpendicular to applied rotations but do not generate energy. The described configuration only creates internal forces and consumes energy to overcome bearing friction and air resistance.
- The claim of 'application as prime mover' implies net work output, but the system lacks any described gradient (thermal, potential, etc.) from which to extract net energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'exclusively powered by the force or energy of gravity' acting on internal weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy solely from gravity acting on its own weights. Since gravity is conservative, any work done by lowering a weight must be exactly equal to the work required to lift it back up, resulting in zero net energy output over a cycle. This is a classic perpetual motion violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a fixed gravitational field is zero.
- No external energy input described to reset the system (e.g., to lift weights or re-engage mechanisms).
- System appears to be an overbalanced wheel variant, attempting to create perpetual torque by shifting a center of gravity, which cannot yield net energy output.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy from batteries (#9 and #11) powers electromagnets (#2) and conductive linings (#6). No external or ambient energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce self-propulsion in a closed system using only internal electromagnetic forces, which would violate conservation of momentum. All described components are internal to the system, so any forces between them cancel out, producing zero net thrust. The patent abstract explicitly states it challenges conservation of linear momentum, making it a clear violation of fundamental physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims to violate conservation of linear momentum (Newton's Third Law)
- No mechanism described that could produce net thrust in a closed system
- Energy accounting is incomplete - all forces are internal to the described device
- Confuses internal electromagnetic forces with net external propulsion
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be exclusively the force of gravity acting on a weight within the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate energy exclusively from gravity acting on an internal weight, which is impossible. For the system to complete a full cycle and produce continuous torque, the weight must be returned to its starting height, requiring at least as much energy as was gained during its descent, resulting in zero net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to generate net energy from a closed mechanical cycle using only an internal weight.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: No external energy input is identified to reset the system's state after each cycle.
- Mechanically incomplete: The description of 'managing' gravity to create a perpetual torque is physically impossible without an external energy source to lift the weight.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on torque
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to be 'exclusively powered by the force or energy of gravity'—a conservative potential field. No external energy gradient (e.g., lifted weights, falling water, thermal gradient) is described as an input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate energy solely from gravity, but gravity is a conservative force—you cannot extract net work from it over a complete cycle without an external energy source to reset the system (e.g., lifting the weights). This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate net work from gravity alone without an external energy source to reset the system.
- No mechanism to restore gravitational potential: weights must be lifted against gravity to complete a cycle, requiring more energy than can be extracted during descent.
- System operates in a closed loop with gravity, a conservative force—net work over a cycle must be zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (to
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied source is gravitational potential energy from off-centered weights and elastic potential energy from springs, but no external energy input is described to reset the system or overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It attempts to generate continuous rotation using internal weights and springs, but provides no external energy source to reset its internal state against friction and losses. The described motion would dampen and stop, violating energy conservation if it produced net work output.
Specific Physics Issues
- System claims to generate continuous rotational motion from internal, non-replenished potential energy stores.
- No mechanism described to lift the weights or recompress the springs to create a sustainable cycle.
- Violates conservation of energy by implying net work output without a corresponding net energy input.
- Friction and other dissipative losses would bring the system to rest, requiring energy input to maintain motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'simult
Claimed Energy Source
An external electrical or mechanical energy source powers a motor to spin an impulse wheel submerged in oil within a sealed container.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce propulsion in a vacuum without expelling any mass, which is a direct violation of Newton's laws of motion. The internal forces described will sum to zero, providing no net thrust to the vehicle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1 explicitly states the device can accelerate in a vacuum without expelling any reaction mass, which violates Newton's Third Law and the conservation of momentum.
- The described internal mechanism (spinning wheel in oil separated by a membrane from a gas chamber) cannot generate a net external force on the container. All forces are internal and cancel out.
- The claim of operation 'equally in vacuum' contradicts the description requiring a 'fluid' (oil) and a pressurized gas chamber, suggesting confusion between internal working fluid and external reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy, but the described mechanism attempts to create a perpetual imbalance without an external energy input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system under gravity, a conservative force. It describes shifting an internal mass (piston/fluid) to create a perpetual imbalance for rotation, but provides no external energy source to reset the internal components against gravity to complete a cycle. Therefore, it cannot produce net energy output and violates the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The device describes a closed system (rotor, piston, internal fluid) where gravity acts as a conservative force. Net work over one complete cycle must be zero.
- No external energy input identified to reset the position of the piston/weight/fluid after a half-cycle, which is necessary to create continuous rotation.
- Attempts to create a perpetual off-center mass distribution using internal components, which is impossible in a closed system under gravity alone.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the fluid and weights, which is a finite, non-replenishing internal store. The system is closed and isolated from an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered mechanism with no external energy input. After the initial fall, the system's center of mass is lower, and work must be done against gravity to reset the fluid and weights to their starting heights to begin a new cycle. The patent claims this reset occurs automatically via fluid transfer, which violates energy conservation as it would require creating potential energy from within the isolated system.
Specific Physics Issues
- System attempts to create sustained rotation from a single initial gravitational potential energy input.
- No mechanism to reset the gravitational potential of the masses/fluid after a half-cycle without external work input.
- Claims 'oscillate during rotation to help the rotating mechanism rotation' suggests an internal, lossless feedback of energy to sustain motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be the electrical input to spin the apparatus and its internal gyroscope. Claims suggest the system redirects Earth's gravity (a conservative force) to produce a net directional force.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates Newton's laws of motion and the conservation of momentum. Gyroscopic forces are internal; they cannot propel the system's center of mass without ejecting mass. Using gravity as a 'redirected' force for propulsion is impossible without an external reaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Angular momentum is a conserved quantity; it cannot be 'made directional' to produce a net linear momentum change for a closed system.
- Gravity provides a force, not an energy source for propulsion. A system in a uniform gravitational field cannot extract net work or produce sustained acceleration from the field alone.
- Precession forces are internal to the system; they generate equal and opposite reaction forces, resulting in zero net force on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (gyros
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial rotational energy to spin the rotors. The claim implies the act of moving weights outward under centrifugal force and transferring them between rotors generates net usable power, which would require an internal energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to generate usable power solely from the centrifugal force of its own rotating parts, with no external energy input. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as any power extracted would slow the rotors unless replaced from an outside source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The described mechanism does not identify an external energy input to sustain or increase rotation against losses.
- Centrifugal force is not an energy source; it is a kinematic effect within a rotating frame. Moving a mass outward in a rotating system requires work input against the centrifugal potential, it does not generate net work.
- The weight exchange process, involving capture/release mechanisms, will incur significant energy losses due to friction, impacts, and air resistance.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from the gravitational field by deflecting it using atomic lattice structures, implying a perpetual source of work without an identified compensating energy depletion or gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim attempts to generate electricity by statically 'deflecting' gravity using crystal lattices, which violates energy conservation. Gravity is a conservative force; you cannot extract net work from a static gravitational field without lowering a mass in that field, and the proposed mechanism has no identified energy source or thermodynamic cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes modifying/deflecting a conservative force field (gravity) to do net work without an opposing potential gradient.
- Assumes gravity 'flows' through a medium and can be lensed by atoms like light, contradicting General Relativity where gravity is spacetime curvature, not a propagating fluid.
- No mechanism identified for how deflecting field lines extracts energy; deflecting a conservative field around an object does not reduce the potential energy available for work in a cycle.
- Violates the principle of conservation of energy: generating electricity from a static gravitational field with no moving parts or consumed fuel implies creation of energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. Implied to be internal electrical/mechanical energy to spin gyroscopes and rotate arms, but claims net linear/rotational impulse without external reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net translation or rotation of a spacecraft using only internal moving parts (gyroscopes and arms). This is impossible because internal forces, including gyroscopic torques and inertial pseudo-forces, always sum to zero for the system as a whole, providing no net external force to accelerate the center of mass. It is a form of reactionless drive, violating Newton's third law and momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear and angular momentum
- Internal forces cannot produce net translation of the system's center of mass
- "Pseudo forces" (inertial forces) are coordinate artifacts and cannot produce net external force on a closed system
- Confuses internal torque generation with net external thrust
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claims imply the linear acceleration force is generated internally from the spinning mass's angular momentum via forced precession, with no explicit external energy input for the net linear acceleration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a net linear force (thrust) by internally wobbling a spinning mass while its center is fixed. This is impossible because internal forces cannot accelerate the system's center of mass; it violates conservation of linear momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. The system's center of mass is fixed, so internal forces (forcing precession) cannot produce a net linear acceleration of the system's center of mass.
- Misinterprets gyroscopic forces. Forced precession generates internal reaction torques and forces, but these sum to zero within the isolated system. No net 'rectified' linear thrust is possible.
- Incomplete energy/force accounting. The energy to force the precession and spin the mass is input, but the claim suggests this generates a separate, useful net linear force on the frame.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity, but the description implies a closed system attempting to extract net work from a conservative potential field without an external gradient or energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate 'perpetual energy' by transforming gravity into buoyancy to create an overbalance. This is a classic violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it describes a closed system attempting to extract net work from a conservative gravitational field. No external, non-conservative energy source is identified to sustain motion against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim of 'perpetual energy' violates conservation of energy.
- Attempts to use buoyancy (a force dependent on gravitational potential) to create a net torque in a closed rotating system, which is impossible as the system's center of mass cannot continuously fall.
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., thermal gradient, moving fluid source). Gravity alone in a closed mechanical system cannot perform net work over a cycle.
- Confuses force/torque multiplication with energy creation. While a lever can increase force, the work input equals work output minus losses.
- Vague mechanism; lacks complete energy accounting for the full cycle of the 'loads', 'middle', and 'liquid' subsystems.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies internal energy from flywheel rotation/oscillation is somehow converted into net vehicular thrust without an external reaction mass or energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce net vehicular thrust using only internal moving parts (flywheels), which is impossible for a closed system as it would violate conservation of momentum. The complex language obscures the fundamental physics error: you cannot push your car forward by sitting inside and pushing on the dashboard.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). A self-contained system cannot generate net linear momentum.
- Claims 'closed loop' motion can produce a 'superior centripetal inertial thrust drive'—centripetal force is internal and cannot propel the center of mass.
- Uses obfuscatory language ('timely gradient vector sum', 'mutual reciprocal mass motion energy transactions') to describe what is essentially an internal momentum exchange.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism implies propulsion is generated solely by internal tension forces within a static string anchored to the object itself and to a fixed external point, with no external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a self-contained system where internal tension in a string is supposed to propel the object to which it is anchored. This is physically impossible because internal forces within a system cannot create a net external force to accelerate the system's center of mass. It is a classic violation of Newton's laws of motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (internal forces cannot produce net external force on a system)
- No identifiable external energy source or conversion process
- The 'propellable object' is part of the system, so internal tension forces sum to zero net force on the object's center of mass
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/atmospheric heat as a single thermal reservoir, supplemented by unspecified chemical reaction energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract explicitly states the device is intended to violate the zeroth and second laws of thermodynamics, which is a definitive red flag. The described chemical cycle lacks an identified external energy source to reset its reactions, implying a perpetual motion scheme. The technical claims obfuscate this core violation with complex, poorly-defined components.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly claims to operate 'contrary to 0th law of thermodynamics' and 'contrary to 2nd law of thermodynamics' by pumping heat from cold to hot without energy input or using a single heat source.
- Describes a 'continuous cycle' driven by chemical reactions where the heat from a reversible reaction is claimed to be greater than that of an irreversible one, enabling perpetual operation without a net energy input.
- Lacks a complete energy accounting for the chemical reaction system; the energy to reset the mono-directional reaction (B+C→BC) is not credibly sourced, implying creation of energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motors rotating the shaft and the groups of rods/weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses internal rotating masses and claims this creates a net force for propulsion. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of linear momentum, as all forces are internal to the system and cancel out. No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described to provide thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net force for propulsion from internal moving masses, violating conservation of momentum.
- System is a closed, internal mechanism; forces/torques are internal and cancel, producing no net external force for propulsion.
- Confuses precession (a torque-induced axis change) with the generation of a net linear force.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to spin via 'force of gravity' and produce energy from the 'nature of the motion,' implying a closed system that extracts net work from a conservative gravitational field without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a form of perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce continuous energy from gravity alone, which is impossible because gravity is a conservative force; in a closed cycle, the net work done by gravity is zero, and the system will not accelerate continuously.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed-cycle system cannot extract net work from a conservative force field like gravity.
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics: Claims to produce more energy output than is input, with no identified external energy source.
- Mechanism is physically impossible: Describes 'weights that either accept or deny the force of gravity'—gravity cannot be selectively accepted or denied in a way that creates a perpetual torque.
- No thermodynamic gradient: Lacks a high- and low-potential energy reservoir to drive continuous motion; the wheel would reach equilibrium.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient fluid flow (wind/water) provides initial fluid force; magnetic interactions between permanent magnets are incorrectly claimed as an additional energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use a conservative magnetic field (permanent magnets) as a perpetual source of aiding torque, which violates energy conservation. While fluid flow provides a real energy input, the claimed additive magnetic force cannot provide net energy over a complete rotation without an external source to reset the magnetic system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Magnetic force between permanent magnets is conservative; no net work can be extracted over a closed cycle.
- Device attempts to use magnetic repulsion/attraction to add rotational energy without an external energy input to reset the magnetic potential.
- Claims imply magnetic force provides continuous aiding torque without accounting for the opposing torque encountered when magnets separate or realign on the return path of the cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of a descending weight, with energy storage/release via a spring.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered oscillator, not an engine. The gravitational work extracted as the weight descends is stored in the spring and then used to complete the rotation, but no energy is provided to lift the weight back to its initial high potential energy position to start the next cycle. Perpetual motion is implied, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed mechanical oscillator with losses; net work per cycle is zero or negative.
- Spring energy storage and release is a conservative force; no net energy is added to the system.
- Claim of 'overall rotational torque caused by gravity' ignores that the weight must be returned to its starting height, consuming at least as much energy as was gained from its descent.
- The described 345° descent and 15° spring-assisted push constitutes one cycle; resetting the weight to the top position requires external work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Accounts for energ
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be from an external source (solar panels, turbine, etc.) powering motors that move and reorient gyroscopes.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a form of reactionless drive, which is impossible under Newtonian mechanics. The gyroscopic forces described are internal to the spacecraft; cycling them creates no net external force to propel the vehicle's center of mass, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction). The described 'resistance force difference' at the gyroscope bearings is an internal force within the vehicle; it cannot produce a net external force on the vehicle's center of mass.
- Misapplication of gyroscopic precession. Precession torques are internal and require equal and opposite reaction torques on the vehicle's frame, resulting in zero net linear impulse.
- Confuses reaction forces at bearings (internal constraint forces) with net external propulsion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy of water in a container, with claimed conversion via buoyancy force differences between extended and folded arms.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce constant rotation and useful work solely from buoyancy forces in a closed container of water. Since buoyancy is a conservative force and the water environment provides no sustained energy gradient (like changing water level or temperature), the system cannot output net work without an external energy input, directly violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a closed loop with no net external energy gradient to exploit. Buoyancy forces are conservative; net work over one complete cycle in a uniform fluid is zero.
- Claims 'does not need any other type of force to stimulate it' and 'can function permanently' describe a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing).
- Mechanism of arms extending/folding appears to be powered by the device's own motion, creating a self-driving loop with no identified external, non-conservative energy input.
- Energy losses from friction, drag, and mechanical hysteresis are not accounted for and would stop the device.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Initial rotary drive force (e.g., electric motor) provides input energy. The patent implies the vectored linear force (net thrust) is an additional output generated internally.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a net linear force (thrust) on its enclosed system using only internal moving masses and magnetic repulsion. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which violates conservation of momentum. No internal rearrangement of masses and forces can produce a sustained net external force on a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce a net vectored force (thrust) on a closed system without expelling mass or reacting with an external medium, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Describes 're-directing forces within a closed system' to produce a net external force, which is impossible for an internal, non-propulsive mechanism.
- Energy accounting is incomplete: the input rotary energy is converted to internal motions and magnetic repulsion forces; any net linear impulse on the system enclosure must sum to zero over a cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy input to motor-generators, which is then converted to rotational and linear kinetic energy in the flywheels.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve 'self-contained inertial propulsion' and 'reaction-less' thrust by moving internal flywheels. This is a direct violation of Newton's laws of motion; a closed system cannot generate net linear momentum from internal forces alone. The complex, vague description obscures a fundamental violation of momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'reaction-less' propulsion, violating Newton's third law (conservation of momentum).
- Attempts to generate net linear momentum from internal motions alone, impossible in a closed system.
- Uses obfuscatory terminology ('inertial reluctance', 'motivation kinetic energy', 'dynamic propulsion backrest') to mask a classic over-unity/perpetual motion scheme.
- Proposes differential accelerations of internal masses to produce net thrust without external reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the system's own internal mass redistribution (via springs, gears, and 'jump-up' of masses) is intended to be the sole driver of continuous rotation, implying a closed-loop energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic attempt at a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It claims to generate continuous rotational energy by cleverly shifting masses internally, but any work done to lift a mass against gravity must be supplied from outside the system. The claim of a force lifting a mass heavier than what created the force is a direct violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous rotation from internal mass redistribution without an external energy input.
- Violates thermodynamic limits for perpetual motion: Attempts to create a persistent one-sided torque from a system's internal configuration changes.
- Mechanically impossible: The described 'pulling force capable of lifting a unit of mass that is lighter than the unit of mass needed to create said pulling force' is a direct claim of mechanical over-unity.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to drive motors for the eccentric rotors.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum exchange system; for every forward impulse, there is an equal and opposite internal impulse, resulting in zero net force on the apparatus center of mass. Claiming it can propel itself in free space violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net linear propulsion in free space from an internal, oscillating mass system (violates conservation of momentum).
- Claims 'loses substantial weight while running without losing mass'—a physically incoherent statement.
- Claims 'five-times the efficiency of conventional propulsion systems' without identifying a reaction mass or external force, implying over-unity performance.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit source mentioned is electrical input to motors controlling gyroscopes. The claim implies the system can generate net thrust/directional motion from internal forces alone, with no reaction mass or external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net directional thrust using only internal gyroscopic torques, which violates Newton's laws of motion. Internal forces, no matter how arranged, cannot produce a net external force on a system's center of mass. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal torques and gyroscopic precession are action-reaction pairs that sum to zero net force on the system's center of mass.
- Claims to produce net thrust in any environment (including vacuum) without expelling mass, which is impossible for a self-contained system.
- Misapplies gyroscopic principles. Gyroscopic forces are internal and cannot produce net translation of the system's center of mass.
- Vague reference to 'overcoming accelerated Gravity's weight' suggests a belief it can create lift/force without an equal and opposite external reaction.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms (torqu
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy to run the pump.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed system where all forces are internal between the vehicle and its circulating fluid. Per Newton's laws, internal forces cannot produce a net external force (thrust) to accelerate the vehicle's center of mass. This is a classic violation of momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net thrust from an internal, closed-loop fluid circulation with no external momentum exchange.
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. For a closed system (vehicle + fluid), the center of mass cannot accelerate by internal forces alone.
- The varying cross-section creates asymmetric internal fluid forces, but these forces sum to zero within the vehicle-fluid system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient 'disorderly thermal energy in the air' (i.e., ambient heat at a uniform temperature).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a closed loop that uses ambient heat to vaporize a refrigerant, drive a turbine for power, and then uses that power's exhaust to run a compressor to re-liquefy the refrigerant. This violates the Second Law, as it attempts to produce net work from a single temperature source without a colder reservoir to reject waste heat, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by attempting to extract net work from a single thermal reservoir (ambient air).
- The described closed loop (evaporator → turbine → compressor → liquefier → evaporator) has no net external energy input to sustain it; work from the turbine is used to run the compressor and pump, with claimed net electrical output.
- The 'positive feedback structure' and use of exhaust compression to drive liquefaction describes a system with internal losses, requiring continuous net energy input to overcome entropy generation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies output > c
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (via dissolved gas concentration gradient) and gravitational potential energy of the movable elements.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate electricity by using the expansion of dissolved gas to create buoyancy. However, the energy for this expansion ultimately comes from the thermal energy of the water, and to operate cyclically, the gas must be re-dissolved or re-compressed. This reset step would require at least as much energy as gained in the expansion, violating the second law of thermodynamics. The system is effectively an unworkable buoyancy engine.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core mechanism relies on extracting net work from an isothermal expansion of dissolved gas without an identified compensating energy input.
- The system appears to be a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, attempting to use the ambient dissolved gas in water as a limitless source of work without consuming the concentration gradient or an external heat source.
- The described cycle (descent, gas transfer, ascent) lacks a clear, thermodynamically valid process to reset the gas concentration/pressure in the first compartment to its initial state without performing work equal to or greater than the work output.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claims suggest extracting energy from a system by manipulating action-reaction timing, implying energy is taken from 'whatever would make the reaction' without identifying an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claims describe physically impossible mechanisms: action and reaction cannot be temporally separated to extract net energy, as this violates Newton's Third Law and energy conservation. The device appears to be a type of reactionless drive or over-unity machine with no legitimate external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction are simultaneous and equal)
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Claim of removing energy between 'action' and 'reaction' implies a violation of conservation of momentum and energy
- Mechanism described would require a closed system to produce net energy
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be the rotational input energy to spin the masses, but the claim suggests this input can produce a net directional force (thrust) without an equal and opposite reaction.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net propulsion by creating 'asymmetrical centrifugal forces,' which is a violation of Newton's laws of motion. Internal forces, no matter how arranged, cannot produce a net external force on a closed system; this is a classic hallmark of an impossible reactionless drive.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum). A system of internal moving masses cannot produce a net external force on its container without ejecting reaction mass.
- Centrifugal force is an internal, reaction force within the rotating system. Asymmetry does not create a net external force vector over a full cycle.
- Claim of propulsion in a vacuum without expelling propellant is impossible under conservation of linear momentum.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to high-speed motors and actuators. The claim implies the system can produce motive torque while canceling the majority of the reaction torque on its support.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce useful torque on an output shaft while reducing the reaction torque on its support by 90-95%, which directly violates Newton's Third Law. The internal manipulation of gyroscopic torques cannot eliminate the net external reaction; the system's center of mass must experience equal and opposite forces for any net thrust or torque produced.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction pairs).
- Claims to 'inactivate' or cancel internal torques, implying a net external torque can be produced without an equal and opposite reaction on the stator/support.
- Misapplies gyroscopic precession; precession torques are reaction forces that must be supported by the structure.
- Mathematical decomposition of torque vectors does not eliminate the net reaction impulse on the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy to accelerate/decelerate the internal mass and to operate the brake system. The patent implies the vehicle's connection to Earth during a 'charging cycle' is an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an attempted reactionless drive. It claims to produce net thrust by selectively braking and accelerating an internal mass, which violates conservation of momentum. The description of a 'charging cycle' involving Earth obfuscates the fundamental impossibility of generating net propulsion from purely internal forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum. The device attempts to generate a net thrust on a vehicle by applying internal forces only, which is impossible in a closed system.
- The 'charging cycle' description confuses momentum exchange with energy storage. Pushing against Earth stores momentum in the Earth-vehicle system, not a reusable 'thrust potential' that can later be expended in isolation.
- Claims of generating non-zero net thrust from a system where internal forces sum to zero (e.g., claim 8) are physically impossible.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Gravity acting on sliding weights. The only explicit input is the gravitational potential energy of the weights as they cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. The device describes a closed cycle where weights are moved outward on one side and inward on the other to create an imbalanced torque. However, in a complete rotation, the work needed to lift and reposition the weights against gravity equals or exceeds any work extracted during their fall, resulting in zero net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The machine claims to produce continuous net rotational work from a closed cycle of weights in a gravity field.
- No external energy input described to reset the system. Lifting weights in the 'lift zone' to a higher potential energy state requires more work than is extracted in the 'drop zone'.
- The 'force transfer means' and geometry cannot create a net torque imbalance; the average torque over a full cycle in a conservative field is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor (drive means) is the explicit source. The device claims to convert this rotary input into a unidirectional net linear force (thrust) without expelling reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an inertial propulsion scheme. The cyclic motion of internal masses creates oscillating forces, but these forces sum to zero over each complete cycle, producing vibration but no net thrust. It attempts to generate linear momentum from nothing, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). The described 'unbalanced centrifugal force' is an internal force within the closed system; the time-averaged net force on the center of mass is zero.
- Claims a net propulsive force from purely cyclic internal motion, which is impossible for a system not interacting with an external medium or expelling mass.
- Misinterprets transient internal inertial forces (centrifugal pulses) as a net external thrust.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
The rotating device (motor) provides the input energy to spin the arm and masses, and to do work against the guide forces to extend/retract the telescoping portions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal reaction machine. While the rotating motor can create internal vibrations and shifting momentum, the center of mass of the entire system cannot accelerate without expelling mass (like a rocket) or pushing against an external medium (like a propeller). The claim of a net linear force violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is a radially outward, frame-dependent inertial force in a rotating reference frame. The vector sum of these radial forces over a full rotation of a closed system is zero, producing no net linear thrust.
- The described mechanism attempts to create a net force by making the centrifugal force asymmetric in different directions, but internal forces (centrifugal forces and guide reaction forces) are action-reaction pairs within the system. They cannot pro
- The apparatus is an internal momentum redistribution device. Any momentary linear impulse in one direction is canceled by an equal and opposite impulse within the same cycle when the asymmetry reverses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the electrical input to the motor-generator means. The device claims to internally accumulate and redirect kinetic energy from flywheels to produce net propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim. It attempts to use internal moving masses (flywheels) to generate net propulsion without expelling propellant, which violates the conservation of momentum. No internal manipulation of kinetic energy can produce a net external force on a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (momentum conservation): The claim that rotational energy can be accumulated 'without causing a negative reaction force' is impossible. Any internal force used to accelerate a component in one direction must produce an equ
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: The system is entirely self-contained. For the vehicle to gain net linear momentum, it must expel mass rearward (action-reaction). Internal moving parts cannot produce net propulsion.
- Incomplete/Incorrect Energy Accounting: Claims of using 'accumulated' kinetic energy as a 'main source' for propulsion obfuscates that this energy was initially provided by the motor. No net work can be extracted beyond what is input, minus losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient vibrations or initial potential energy in elastic elements and gravity field; no continuous external input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an overbalanced lever/spring mechanism with no continuous external energy source. It will quickly dampen to rest due to friction and internal losses, violating the first law of thermodynamics by claiming sustained 'fuel-free' motive power.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified continuous energy input to overcome inevitable losses (friction, damping, sound).
- Relies on internal redistribution of potential/kinetic energy, which will decay to equilibrium.
- Claims 'fuel-free motive power' implying perpetual or net energy output without an external gradient.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent mentions magnetic coupling and levitation but provides no explicit primary energy input. The system appears to be treated as internally closed, with thrust purportedly generated solely from internal resonant motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce directed thrust (net external force) through internal resonant oscillations and centrifugal effects while canceling all internal reaction forces. This is a direct violation of Newton's laws of motion—specifically, conservation of momentum—as a closed system cannot generate net momentum on itself. The description uses terms like 'resonant,' 'magnetic levitation,' and 'centripetal force' in a context that obfuscates this fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) by claiming to cancel recoil forces internally while producing net thrust.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum. Net thrust on a vehicle requires expulsion of momentum to an external system.
- Incomplete energy accounting. 'Amplified' thrust at resonance implies energy gain without identifying an external energy source to power the amplification.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force as a net external force. Centrifugal force is an internal, frame-dependent force within a rotating system and cannot produce net thrust on a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Initial gravitational potential energy of the raised movable heavy wheel and metal belt, stored by the user/arrestor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered machine that converts a finite store of gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy. It violates the conservation of energy by implying continuous, automatic operation ('automatic rotating mechanism') without any described source of energy to reset the system to its initial high-potential-energy state after each cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is a one-shot gravity motor with no described mechanism to reset the heavy components to their initial height.
- Claims 'automatic' and implies continuous rotation, but the described cycle extracts a finite amount of stored potential energy and then stops.
- No external energy input is described to lift the heavy wheel and belt back to the raised position to repeat the cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implies
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor device to spin the tops and rotate the assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal, symmetric mechanical system. All forces and torques generated by the spinning tops are internal to the system and cancel out, producing no net external thrust. This violates conservation of momentum, a cornerstone of classical physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed thrust generation mechanism ('couple of forces' from tops) is not a net external force on the system.
- Internal gyroscopic forces are balanced and cancel within the symmetric assembly, producing no net momentum change.
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum by claiming propulsion without expelling reaction mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or mechanical input to spin the rotary platform(s). The claim implies the device's own internal centrifugal forces are the source of the net propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net propulsion by manipulating internal centrifugal forces, but these are internal reaction forces that cancel out over a full cycle. For the device to accelerate, it must expel mass (propellant) or interact with an external field; it cannot create net momentum from internal motions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an internal, center-seeking constraint force within the rotating system. It cannot produce a net external force on the isolated system.
- Altering the radius of gyration requires work input against centrifugal forces; any net momentum change over a full cycle will be zero due to Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- The 'static means' (wall) is part of the device. Forces between the masses and this wall are internal to the device and cannot propel the device as a whole.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy from a weight belt, but the system is a closed mechanical loop with no external gradient or input to restore the gravitational potential that is expended.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind. Gravity alone cannot provide continuous power in a closed loop because the energy required to return the weights to their starting height equals or exceeds the energy gained from their fall, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The machine claims to produce continuous torque/power from gravity alone, but lifting the weights back up on the other side of the loop requires at least as much energy as is gained from their descent.
- No net energy source: The system is in equilibrium; gravity is a conservative force, so a closed cycle in a constant gravitational field yields zero net work.
- Perpetual motion claim: The description implies sustained power output without an external energy input to reset the system's state.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies a net 'thrust force' is generated solely from the asymmetric motion of weights on a circulating belt/chain, with no identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a closed mechanical system where weights move asymmetrically around two pulleys. This internal motion cannot produce a sustained net thrust force without an external energy source, as any force in one direction would be countered by an equal internal reaction, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for an isolated system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net directional thrust force from an internal, cyclic reconfiguration of masses.
- No mechanism to input energy to sustain the claimed force against reaction forces/losses.
- Implies a net force (and thus net work) can be generated from a closed, internal mechanical cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Prime mover input (Claim 8) to maintain rotational velocity. The claimed net linear force is intended to be generated from the internal manipulation (adding/rejecting fluid) of the rotating system's mass distribution.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. You cannot get a net push in one direction by moving parts around inside a sealed box; the internal forces always cancel out. The prime mover only overcomes friction but cannot create the claimed net external thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal mass redistribution cannot create a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: Claims a net linear impulse (force over time) from a closed, cyclic process with no external reaction mass.
- Incomplete force accounting: While perpendicular forces are canceled (Claim 2), the radial centripetal forces from the fluid mass are internal and sum to zero. Accelerating the fluid within the system requires forces that are internal reaction pairs.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to solenoids (explicit). Implicitly, the kinetic energy of the rotating armature and the mass of the plungers.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create net motion (lift) using only internal forces, which violates Newton's laws of motion. It is a form of reactionless drive, which is impossible in classical physics as it would allow a closed system to accelerate its center of mass without external interaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes to generate net lift/thrust via internal, cyclical momentum exchanges (recoil/impact) within a closed rotating system.
- Ignores Newton's third law: internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; electrical input is used to create internal motion, but any net directional force would require expulsion of mass or interaction with an external field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'drive' (likely an electric motor) provides input energy to move the work masses. The claimed 'thrust force' is implied to be generated internally by the motion of these masses, not by expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external medium.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to generate a net thrust force through the internal movement of masses. This violates conservation of momentum, a fundamental law of physics, as it provides no external reaction to the purported thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). An internal, cyclic motion of masses cannot produce a net external thrust force on a closed system.
- No identifiable external reaction mass or momentum sink (e.g., expelled air, emitted photons).
- The description is a complex mechanical arrangement obfuscating the core claim of generating net thrust from internal motions.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motor spinning the rotor and weight (implicit). No external propellant or ambient energy gradient is harnessed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal rotating mass system. Internal forces, including centrifugal forces, cannot produce net thrust on the device's center of mass without expelling reaction mass. This is a classic violation of Newton's laws of motion, making propellantless propulsion impossible as described.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction).
- Centrifugal force is an internal force within the system; net vector sum over a full cycle is zero.
- Claims 'unbalanced centrifugal force' is a misnomer; internal forces cannot produce net thrust on a closed system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motor rotating the assembly and to the mechanism moving weights radially.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net linear thrust by internally moving masses in a rotating frame, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. All forces involved are internal, so the center of mass of the isolated system cannot accelerate without an external reaction force.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce a net linear thrust (sustainable imbalance) from an internal, cyclic mass redistribution in a rotating frame.
- Centrifugal force is a frame-dependent, radially outward inertial effect; modulating it symmetrically around a circle cannot create a net external force on the isolated system.
- The described action-reaction forces (from accelerating weights inward/outward) are internal to the system and cancel over a full cycle, producing no net momentum change.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The 'energy introduction mechanism' (e.g., a motor) provides the rotational kinetic energy input. The apparatus claims to convert this rotation into a net linear force (thrust) on the system's housing via internal reaction forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internally driven, closed mechanical system. The forces described are all internal action-reaction pairs; they cannot produce a net external force on the apparatus as a whole. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim that violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law for internal forces: The described 'unbalanced centripetal forces' are internal to the system. The reaction forces between the rod/guide and the housing cancel over a full cycle, yielding zero net external force.
- Misapplication of moment of inertia: The claim that a difference in 'moment of inertia of the ends' creates a net force is a category error. Moment of inertia is a rotational property, not a direct source of linear momentum.
- Implies creation of momentum from an internal, cyclic motion without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
Claimed Energy Source
The initial spin input to the main wheel. The claim implicitly suggests a continuous, self-reinforcing force from the rotating system itself after initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic example of an overbalanced wheel, an attempted perpetual motion machine. The internal centrifugal forces cancel out over a full rotation, providing no net thrust. To accelerate the device in one direction would require an external reaction force, violating Newton's laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal forces (centrifugal forces on weights) are balanced within the system and cannot produce a net external force.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum: A closed system cannot generate a net linear momentum from its own internal motions.
- Misinterprets Centrifugal Force: It is a fictitious, internal force in a rotating frame, not a net external force for propulsion.
- The described imbalance is cyclical, not unidirectional, over a full rotation.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the compulsory rotation of the main rotating body. The apparatus attempts to generate a net propulsion force (unbalanced centrifugal force) from an internal, cyclic redistribution of masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system where the only energy input is the torque rotating the assembly. The internal shifting of weights cannot create a sustained, directional net force (propulsion) as this would violate conservation of momentum. The claimed propulsion is impossible without an external reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is a closed mechanical assembly with a single rotary input. The internal guide member and moving body only redistribute mass radially, but cannot create a sustained net external force (thrust) without an equal and opposite reaction on the
- The claim implies the generation of a net directional force (propulsion) from a rotating frame using only internal motions, violating Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum.
- The energy accounting is incomplete; any transient force from mass redistribution would be cyclical and cancel over a full rotation, with no net work output beyond the rotational input work minus losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to actuators (implicit). No external propellant or environmental interaction claimed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses internal rotating masses to generate opposing reaction torques, which can change the vehicle's orientation but cannot create net linear thrust. This is a classic violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for a closed system, confusing attitude control with propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of linear momentum. Internal torques cancel; no net external force for propulsion.
- Confuses rotational reaction torques (for attitude control) with generation of linear translation.
- System is a closed, internal mechanism. Net center of mass cannot accelerate without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'first drive means' is the only explicit input, implying an external motor or energy source to spin the gears. The claimed output is 'linear force and motion' (propulsion).
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net linear thrust (propulsion) solely through internal rotating masses. This is impossible for a closed system as internal forces cancel, violating conservation of momentum. No external energy source or reaction mass is identified that could explain net propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame, not an independent energy source. It cannot be 'converted' to net linear thrust for propulsion.
- The system is an internal mechanism. For a closed system (vehicle + mechanism), internal forces and motions cancel out, producing zero net momentum change (Newton's third law).
- Claim of 'unidirectional motion' from an internal rotating mass violates conservation of momentum. Any forward impulse in one part of the cycle is countered by an equal backward impulse in another.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the torque (−Tc) applied to initiate rotation. The claim implies net propulsion (locomotive force) can be generated from internal motions within a closed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes an internal mechanism that purports to generate net propulsion for a closed system using only internal mass movements and Coriolis forces. This is a direct violation of the conservation of linear momentum, as internal forces cannot accelerate the system's center of mass. The use of the term 'non-inertial Coriolis force' and the invented 'reverse Coriolis force' obfuscates this fundamental impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum. Internal forces, including Coriolis forces (which are fictitious forces dependent on the chosen rotating frame), cannot produce a net external force on a closed system's center of mass.
- The described 'reverse Coriolis force (fc′)' as a 'reaction' is physically incoherent. Coriolis forces are not Newtonian action-reaction pairs; they are frame-dependent effects.
- The method attempts to generate net translation from purely cyclic internal motions, which is impossible for a closed system without expelling mass.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the internal power motor (71) and directional control motor (62).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a proposed reactionless drive, attempting to create net propulsion using only internal moving parts. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically the conservation of linear momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass using internal forces alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net locomotion (center-of-mass acceleration) of a closed system using only internal forces, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Misapplication of Coriolis force, which is a fictitious force dependent on a rotating reference frame and cannot produce a net external force on a closed system.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction (e.g., with air, magnetic field) is described to provide thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to spin the rotor. The claimed 'propellantless propulsion force' is alleged to arise from internal unbalanced centrifugal forces of the contained fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal, closed system. All centrifugal forces are internal action-reaction pairs; their vector sum is precisely zero, producing no net force on the device's housing. This is a classic reactionless drive claim that violates Newton's laws and momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces in a closed system cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- Violates conservation of momentum. Claims to generate linear momentum without expelling reaction mass.
- Incomplete force accounting. The centrifugal forces on the fluid are balanced by equal and opposite reaction forces on the rotor/housing, resulting in zero net internal force vector sum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to spin rotor and energize electromagnets; no external or ambient energy source is described for the claimed net directional force.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes an internal rotating system using magnetic fields to manipulate a fluid mass. This cannot produce a net external thrust force because all forces involved are internal, violating conservation of momentum. It is a form of reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (action-reaction) by claiming a net internal force can produce external propulsion.
- Centrifugal forces are internal to the system; their vector sum is always zero in a closed system.
- No mechanism described to break momentum conservation; the device is an internal mass-shifting system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claimin
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is ambiguous but implied to be an electrical motor (claim 5) powered by batteries (claim 3). The device claims to use this input to generate a 'centrifugal force' that can move the vehicle, suggesting an internal force is being harnessed as a net thrust.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a mechanism using rotating masses inside a vehicle. Internal centrifugal forces cannot create net thrust on a vehicle because they are internal reaction forces that cancel out. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' concept that violates conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to use internal centrifugal forces to generate net thrust for vehicle propulsion, which violates Newton's third law (action-reaction).
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described; the system is closed/internal.
- Implies energy multiplication: input from a motor/battery creates a centrifugal force that can build up to provide greater output thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Motor or hand crank input to spin the drive gimbal (Claim 2, 3). The system claims to generate a 'precession force' that can propel an object, implying net linear momentum from internal rotating components.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to use internal gyroscopic precession to generate a net linear force for propulsion. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which violates Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum. No internal configuration of spinning masses can propel a system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net linear force (propulsion) from purely internal angular momentum exchanges. This violates conservation of linear momentum for a closed system.
- Precession forces in gyroscopes are internal torques and reaction forces. They cannot produce net linear propulsion of the system's center of mass without an external reaction mass or field.
- The description suggests the device can generate a unidirectional 'precession force' parallel to a platform, which would constitute a reactionless drive.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Extracting net
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the rotational motor and change-state actuator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a net thrust to propel a body uphill or against gravity using only internal moving parts. This is impossible because internal forces, no matter how orchestrated, cannot create a net external force on the system's center of mass, violating conservation of momentum. The electrical input will only result in internal vibrations and waste heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net unidirectional thrust (center-of-mass acceleration) from purely internal mass redistribution, violating conservation of linear momentum.
- Apparatus is a closed system with respect to external mass interaction; internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- The description confuses internal reaction forces with net external thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy is not identified. The sole described input is the magnetic potential energy of the permanent magnets, which is a conservative, non-depleting internal energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a magnetic mechanism intended to produce continuous rotation ('autogenic energy') without an external energy source. Since magnetic forces are conservative and the system has no identified external input, it cannot perform net work over a cycle without violating energy conservation, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'autogenic energy' (self-generated) without an external energy input.
- Describes a mechanism intended to produce continuous rotation using only magnetic interactions and inertia, implying net work extraction from a closed, conservative potential field.
- The system lacks an explicit energy input to overcome losses (friction, air resistance, eddy currents).
- The magnetic force is conservative; the net work done over a closed cycle in a conservative field is zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Rotational mechanical input applied to the input member/carrier cage. No other energy sources (ambient, chemical, etc.) are described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system that claims to produce a net directional force (linear thrust) from only a rotational input. This violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum) as internal forces cannot create a net external force on the system's center of mass without ejecting reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate a unidirectional 'directional force' (net linear thrust) from pure rotational input with no external reaction mass.
- Describes a closed mechanical system with internal moving masses (eccentrics). Internal forces sum to zero in the center-of-mass frame.
- No mechanism to break Newton's Third Law; any linear impulse generated in one part of the cycle is canceled by an equal and opposite impulse in another part.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor and a pressurized fluid (air/steam) supply. The claimed thrust is generated internally from the rotation of the wheel and the interaction of the mass blocks with the fluid pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum canceler. The described internal movements of masses and fluid pressures can create internal forces, but for the entire apparatus to experience a net thrust (accelerate its center of mass), it must expel mass rearward. Since it is a closed housing, this is impossible, making it a form of perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims net unidirectional thrust from an internal, cyclic process with no external reaction mass, violating Newton's 3rd law (conservation of momentum).
- Implies creation of a constant net force from a closed system's internal forces, which is impossible without ejecting mass.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; any thrust-like impulse from internal mass movement would be canceled over a full cycle, resulting in zero net momentum change for the system's center of mass.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use only gravitational force from the object's own weight, with no external power source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate horizontal motion using only an object's weight, violating energy conservation. To move horizontally, the object's center of mass must lower, converting gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy; the patent describes internal mechanisms that cannot provide net external work without this overall lowering.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Attempts to create horizontal motion from a static gravitational potential without lowering the object's center of mass.
- Violates Newton's 3rd law: The described 'counter force' and 'diversion' mechanism cannot create a net horizontal force in an isolated system.
- Incomplete system analysis: The described hydraulic or unbalanced wheel mechanisms are internal to the system; they cannot create a net external force or sustained incline without an external energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'automatic
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the motor that rotates the armature. Additional energy is required by the drivers (solenoids) to move the weights radially against centrifugal/centripetal forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, which is impossible under Newtonian mechanics. Moving internal weights cyclically cannot produce a sustained net force on the vehicle's center of mass without ejecting mass or interacting with an external field, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net force on the axis for propulsion, which violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum). The device is an internal system; moving internal masses cannot create a net external force on the vehicle's center of mass.
- The 'motion restrainer' (claims 4-6) is an attempt to circumvent Newton's third law by selectively impeding motion, but this restraint force is internal and cannot result in net acceleration.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; work done by solenoids to move weights radially is internal energy conversion, not a source of net momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate thrust from centrifugal force using an electrical motor and hydraulic system, implying the primary input is electrical energy from batteries. No external ambient energy source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use centrifugal force to generate net thrust for vehicle propulsion. However, centrifugal forces are internal to the rotating system; they cannot produce net external force on the vehicle without an external reaction mass (like a rocket expelling mass). This is a classic violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating reference frame and cannot be used to generate net thrust on a closed system.
- The device is described as a closed mechanical system; any force generated in one direction will have an equal and opposite reaction force within the system, resulting in zero net external thrust.
- The description suggests 'building up' centrifugal force to move the vehicle, implying energy output (vehicle kinetic energy) exceeds electrical input, violating conservation of energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or mechanical input to spin the rotatable structure and the gyroscopic masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an attempted reactionless drive. It uses internal gyroscopic motions to try to generate net linear thrust without expelling mass, which directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum. No internal force, regardless of complexity, can accelerate a system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce net linear momentum (thrust) from an internal, cyclic redistribution of angular momentum within a closed system.
- Misinterprets gyroscopic precession as a source of net external force. Internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
- Describes shifting the 'center of rotation' internally, which cannot create a net external force on the vehicle.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Vague reference to converting 'vehicle onboard power' into rotational inertia. No clear, identifiable external energy source or gradient for propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate net linear thrust or levitation solely through internal momentum exchanges (e.g., transforming driven torque into reaction force). This is a classic violation of Newton's laws—specifically conservation of momentum—as it attempts to create a net external force from an internal, closed-system process. The use of obfuscating pseudo-physical terminology cannot circumvent this fundamental principle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to transform angular inertia into linear inertia for net propulsion, violating conservation of momentum.
- Claims to produce 'reaction torque from standard motor and engine driven torque' for net thrust, which is impossible in a closed system.
- Proposes 'inertial levitation' without an external reaction mass, violating Newton's third law.
- Uses terminology like 'gravitational force field based technology' and 'inertial beam wave' without connection to established physics.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be an external electrical input to the acceleration/cyclotron system, but the claimed propulsion mechanism itself suggests extracting net momentum from an internal, cyclic mass change.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim is a reactionless drive, which directly violates the conservation of momentum. The proposed mechanism of oscillating relativistic mass to generate net thrust is physically invalid, as the momentum of the system remains zero throughout each cycle when analyzed completely.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum (reactionless drive claim).
- Misapplies relativistic mass increase (mass is velocity-dependent but momentum is already conserved in SR; cyclic change yields zero net momentum transfer).
- Confuses relativistic mass with gravitational mass or 'propulsive mass'.
- Suggests faster-than-light travel via semantic obfuscation ('average velocity', 'singularity').
- Adds unrelated, vague concepts like nuclear fusion (Claim 6) without coherent integration.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a closed mechanical system where internal masses (sliding elements) are moved along an asymmetric track. Any initial energy input to start the motion is not specified. The claim implies the internal motion itself generates a net directional thrust.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate directional thrust by moving internal masses along an asymmetric circular track. This is a classic reactionless drive concept, which is physically impossible because internal forces cannot create a net external force on a system's center of mass, violating Newton's laws and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal forces in a closed system cannot produce net external thrust.
- Violates Conservation of Momentum. The system's center of mass cannot accelerate using only internal forces.
- Misapplication of centrifugal force. Centrifugal force is a fictitious, inward-directed force in a rotating frame; it cannot be harnessed for net propulsion in an isolated system.
- Incomplete force analysis. The asymmetric track will create varying internal reaction forces on the housing, but these will sum to zero over a full cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claimin
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the propulsive force is generated internally from the motion and 'resistance' of substance C, with no external energy input specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a propulsive force (net thrust) without expelling reaction mass, which directly violates conservation of momentum. The described internal motions and 'resistance' forces are internal to the system and cannot produce a net external force on the apparatus as a whole.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction)
- Claims to generate net momentum change in a closed system
- No identifiable external energy gradient or input to produce net thrust
- 'Resistance exhibited by the substance C' is an internal force, which cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses geometric descriptio
Claimed Energy Source
Electric motor provides rotational kinetic energy to counter-rotating disks and thrust masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net linear thrust using only internal moving parts and springs. Since all forces are internal to the system (motor, disks, masses, ramp), the center of mass cannot accelerate without an external reaction. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' violation of Newton's laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) for internal forces
- Claims net linear impulse from internal cyclic motions without external reaction mass
- Misapplies impulse-momentum principle; internal forces sum to zero for the isolated system
- Spring compression/release is an internal energy transfer, not a net external force source
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the rotational work done by the 'drive axle' on the rotating disk. The 'mass accelerators' also require an external energy input to activate.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate directed linear thrust (a net force) from internal rotating and reciprocating masses. This is impossible for a closed system as it violates conservation of momentum; all internal forces cancel, producing no net thrust on the device's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'converting inertial...energy into linear motion' is a red flag; inertia is not an energy source.
- The described mechanism appears to be an attempt to create a net linear thrust (force) from an internal, rotating frame without expelling reaction mass, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Energy accounting is absent. Any linear impulse generated by accelerating internal masses one way would be canceled by decelerating them or by reaction forces on the housing, resulting in zero net thrust for a closed system.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Attempts to pro
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is 'rotational energy' supplied to the main axial (h). The claim implies this rotational input generates a net propulsive force from a 'self-contained' system, suggesting an internal conversion without reaction mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a fully enclosed propulsion system that generates net thrust solely from internal momentum transfers ('wave impacts'), which is impossible under Newton's laws. A self-contained system cannot accelerate its center of mass without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field. The description uses physics-sounding terms ('wave impact', 'kinetic force transfer') to obscure this fundamental violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). A truly self-contained system cannot generate net momentum without expelling some form of reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
- No identifiable external energy gradient or reaction mass. The 'wave impact' and 'transferring kinetic forces from one body to the next' describes internal momentum transfers, which cannot produce net thrust on the enclosed system.
- Incomplete energy accounting. Claims 'self-contained wave based propulsion' from rotational input, implying COP > 1 for propulsion without specifying an external sink or gradient.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title 'moteur pesanteur' (gravity motor) suggests it aims to extract work from gravity alone, which is a conservative force. This implies the only possible energy source is the initial gravitational potential energy of its own components, with no external input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
A device claiming to be a 'gravity motor' that produces useful work inherently violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). Gravity is a conservative force; the net work done over any closed cycle is zero unless energy is added from an external source to reset the system's configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- A system cannot produce continuous net work from gravity without an external energy input to lift the masses back to their initial height, completing a cycle.
- The claim describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creates energy from nothing) or the second kind (attempts to extract net work from a single thermal reservoir/equilibrium state).
- The description is far too vague ('en substance comme décrit') for any proper energy accounting, but the core concept of a 'gravity motor' for sustained output is fundamentally flawed.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only identified inputs are an initial turn and a limited amount of water, which is reusable. No external gradient (e.g., height difference for the water, thermal difference, ambient energy harvesting) is specified to provide ongoing energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device that, after an initial start, runs indefinitely using only reusable water and no fuel. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine, as it produces useful work (electricity) without any net input of energy, directly violating the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming continuous work ('once turned will continue to work of its own') without an identified ongoing energy source.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by suggesting a perpetual motion mechanism with no source of energy to overcome inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and other dissipative forces.
- The description is functionally equivalent to a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism appears to be a closed mechanical system (pendulum, counterweight, synchronized eccentric elements) with an 'ignition system' and 'energy recovery system'. No external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, environmental gradient) is specified to sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system starting from stable equilibrium with no clear external energy source. For it to produce sustained oscillatory motion and recover net energy, it must violate the conservation of energy, as all real systems have losses that require an external input to overcome.
Specific Physics Issues
- System is described as starting from stable equilibrium, implying no net potential or kinetic energy gradient to initiate sustained motion.
- Claims oscillatory motion and energy recovery without identifying an external energy source to overcome inevitable losses (friction, damping).
- Lacks a thermodynamic driver; a closed mechanical system in stable equilibrium cannot produce net work output without an energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focus is on intern
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent claims the device creates new forces without requiring pre-existing forces, possesses its own principle of movement for ~50 years, and its operation is not the result of any calorific effect (steam, fuel explosion). No identifiable external energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device ('Autoturbine') that claims to produce mechanical work, heat, and electricity for decades without any fuel, external energy input, or exploitable energy gradient. This is a direct and explicit violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it purports to create energy from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate motive force, heat, and electric light without any identifiable energy input.
- States the device 'creates new forces' instead of using pre-existing ones, directly violating conservation of energy.
- Claims operation for ~50 years without fuel or external energy source, constituting a perpetual motion claim.
- No thermodynamic gradient, chemical reaction, or ambient energy harvest is described as the energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to use gravitational potential energy (Earth's attraction) via levers, implying a closed system where weights lift each other to produce net rotational work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use levers and gravity to achieve 'eternal motion' by having one equal weight lift another, producing net rotation. This violates energy conservation, as no external energy source is identified to overcome losses, and the system cannot output more work than the gravitational potential energy available from its initial configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Asserts weight I can lift an equal weight G, causing wheel A to rotate more than wheel B, implying net work output without an external energy input.
- Attempts to use geometric arrangements of levers and cables to create a perpetual motion cycle where gravitational potential is recycled without loss.
- Ignores friction, energy dissipation, and the fact that lifting a weight with another equal weight in a closed system results in zero net work or a loss due to inefficiency.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be exclusively mechanical with no fuel consumption, deriving motion from the reaction/detente of springs or the fall of weights, and the force of levers. Only lubrication oil is needed.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a purely mechanical engine that runs without fuel, powered only by springs and weights. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as the energy initially stored in the compressed springs or raised weights will be depleted, and the described mechanism provides no physically valid method to restore that stored energy without an equal or greater external work input, violating both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation) - claims continuous output without an identifiable external energy input.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics - proposes a mechanism to extract net work from an internal, finite energy store (compressed springs/raised weights) without a method to reset the system without external work input.
- Incomplete energy accounting - the initial compression of springs or lifting of weights (the only stated energy source) is not accounted for in the operational cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Propose
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Describes an outpu
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a purely mechanical system (ramps, wheels, metal balls, pendulums, counterweights) with no identified external energy input. The description implies it is intended to be self-sustaining.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is explicitly described as a perpetual motion apparatus. It is a closed mechanical system with no external energy input, meaning it cannot perform work indefinitely without violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). All described motion would cease due to dissipative losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- The title and description claim 'mouvement perpétuel' (perpetual motion).
- No external energy source is described or implied.
- The system is a closed mechanical arrangement of ramps, balls, and levers, which will inevitably lose energy to friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions.
- The described motion (balls rolling, pendulums swinging, carts moving) cannot generate net energy to overcome its own losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
No external energy source is described. The machine appears to rely solely on internal redistribution of its own masses via springs and guides, implying it is intended to be self-moving from an initial input.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic overbalanced wheel design, a form of perpetual motion machine. The internal shifting of masses cannot create a continuous net torque because any torque generated in one direction during part of the cycle is counteracted by the work needed to reset the masses to their starting positions, resulting in zero net work output per cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce continuous rotation without an external energy input.
- Violates Newton's laws: internal redistribution of masses cannot create a net external torque on the system's center of mass.
- Perpetual motion of the first kind: claims to move by its own means indefinitely after starting.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be internal springs and gear interactions only, with no external energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a mechanical system of gears, crankshafts, and springs where springs closing are claimed to open another spring, purportedly generating continuous motion. This is a classic perpetual motion claim of the first kind, violating energy conservation as internal springs cannot reset each other indefinitely without an external energy source to overcome losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source; device appears to rely on springs being reset by other springs in a cycle.
- Violates conservation of energy: springs closing cannot provide more energy than was used to open them, due to friction and losses.
- System is closed and cyclical with no external gradient or input to overcome inevitable thermodynamic losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of identical weights, with no external input described to reset or elevate them.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor using two identical weights arranged to produce torque on a horizontal shaft. It violates energy conservation because it claims to produce continuous rotation while overcoming passive resistances, but provides no external energy source to restore the gravitational potential of the weights after they descend. This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism to restore the gravitational potential of the weights after they fall.
- Claims to overcome passive resistances (friction) and produce continuous rotation using only the internal arrangement of two identical weights.
- System appears to be closed with respect to gravity; weights simply exchange positions to produce torque, but net work cannot be extracted from a system in gravitational equilibrium.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims energy is created by permanent tension in springs arranged on a rotating plate, with no external input required after initial setup.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate constant, permanent energy solely from the tension of springs on a rotating plate, requiring no external energy input after construction. This is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the conservation of energy. Springs are energy storage devices, not energy sources.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation): Claims to create permanent energy without an external energy source.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics: Claims a perpetual, constant energy output without an entropy sink or energy gradient to exploit.
- Springs store energy, they do not create it. The described mechanism would simply convert stored elastic potential energy into work until the springs are discharged, requiring energy input to re-tension them.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (sp
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text explicitly states operation 'zonder aanwending van enigerlei brandstof, of andere gebruikelijke middelen' (without use of any fuel, or other common means). It mentions a 'drijfkrachtvracht' (driving force load) placed on shoulders and arms, but this appears to be part of the machine's internal configuration, not an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is claimed to be a self-moving machine that creates a new driving force without any fuel or external energy source, scaling to produce any desired power. This directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to generate useful work from nothing. The complex mechanical description obfuscates the absence of a genuine energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims self-motion and creation of a new driving force without any fuel or external energy input.
- Describes a complex mechanical system (rotating shaft, rays, arms, hammers, levers, connecting rods) but provides no thermodynamic gradient or energy source to overcome friction and losses.
- Asserts ability to produce any desired quantity of driving force by scaling, implying infinite energy generation from a finite, isolated device.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Output > control i
Claimed Energy Source
The device requires mechanical energy input to rotate the driver plate, which is the explicit energy source. The claim implicitly suggests that by manipulating the geometry (offsetting axes), a net unidirectional centrifugal force can be generated to oppose gravity or provide propulsion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system where all forces (centrifugal and tangential inertial) are internal. No net external force or thrust can be generated on the device's center of mass by merely reconfiguring internal moving parts, as this violates conservation of linear momentum. The claim of anti-gravity or propulsion is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law: Internal centrifugal forces in a rotating system are internal stresses and cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
- Misunderstands centrifugal force as a real external force. In an inertial frame, it is a fictitious force resulting from inertia.
- Claims to generate a persistent directional force from an internal, rotating mass system without an external reaction mass, violating conservation of momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input appears to be the initial rotational motion of the masses. The text implies the device generates acceleration and sustained rotation from the imbalance of masses, with no mention of an external energy source like fuel, electricity, or an ambient gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The described mechanical engine claims to produce acceleration and rotation solely from the shifting of its own masses in a cycle. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, as the work needed to move the masses against centrifugal force is not supplied by an external source, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims acceleration and sustained motion from an imbalanced rotating system without an external energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Implies net work can be extracted from a system in a cyclic process (masses moving in and out) without a compensating energy input or entropy increase elsewhere.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Describes low-friction rolling but ignores that moving the masses radially inward/outward against centrifugal forces requires work, which must be supplied.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient heat from Earth's mantle, atmosphere, and oceans (claimed). The device, called an 'infraktrice', purportedly extracts usable work from scattered, 'bound' ambient thermal energy without requiring a temperature gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent claim directly violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It proposes a device (infraktrice) that performs as a heat engine without a temperature gradient, claiming to extract useful work directly from the ambient thermal energy of the environment. This is a textbook example of a perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicitly rejects the necessity of a temperature gradient for a heat engine, which violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
- Claims energy never degrades into unusable 'entropic waste heat', contradicting the entropy principle.
- Implies a method to convert ambient thermal energy directly into work (a perpetual motion machine of the second kind).
- Misinterprets Carnot's theorem as a 'mere logical syllogism' rather than a fundamental physical limit.
- Uses a flawed thought experiment (giant space mirror) to argue that dissipated heat can always be reconcentrated, ignoring the work required to do so.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct physics term
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied electrical input for electromagnetic excitation and cryogenic cooling for superconductors, but claims of generating/controlling inertia and 'amplification of angular momentum' suggest an expectation of extracting net energy/work from the system's internal relativistic electron motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate controllable inertia and anti-gravitational effects through relativistic electron circulation in superconductors, purporting to amplify angular momentum. This violates fundamental conservation laws (angular momentum, energy) by suggesting internal electron motion can produce net external forces or torque multiplication without equal and opposite reaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of angular momentum: Claims 'amplification of angular momentum' and 'cancellation of opposite torques' via selective energizing, which would create net angular momentum from nowhere.
- Misapplies relativistic mass increase: Electron mass dilation at relativistic speeds is an inertial frame-dependent effect, not a source of new, controllable macroscopic torque or 'quantum angular momentum'.
- Violates Newton's third law: Internal electron circulation cannot produce a net external force or 'anti-gravitational' effect on the system's center of mass.
- Thermodynamic obfuscation: No identifiable useful work output mechanism that doesn't require greater energy input for electron acceleration, cryogenics, and precession/rotation drives.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the motorized shaft input. The claim implies that the centrifugal force generated by the rotating rectangular pieces creates an additional torque that multiplies the input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to use internal centrifugal forces acting as levers to increase output torque. Since centrifugal force is an internal, inertial reaction force within the rotating system, it cannot create net work or increase the system's power output beyond the motor's input. This violates conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies energy/torque multiplication from internal centrifugal forces, which are reaction forces and cannot do net work on the system itself.
- Violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of energy: internal forces cannot create a net increase in output torque or power.
- Misinterprets centrifugal force as an external driving force rather than an inertial reaction force within the rotating frame.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests the device is powered by 'masses+élastiques' (masses and springs/elastics) and gravity, with the user providing an initial physical action. It claims to produce energy 'sans aucuns carburants' (without any fuel).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system using masses, springs, ratchets, and gears that claims to produce high-power perpetual motion and generate electricity without fuel. This is a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it claims to create energy from nothing within a closed system after an initial input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'mouvement perpétuels hautes puissances' (high-power perpetual motion) and creating energy from nothing.
- Describes a mechanism where elastic elements and masses 'combattre' (fight) each other and gravity to produce continuous electricity, implying a closed system that generates net work.
- Suggests force multiplication 'par un nombres de fois illimité' (an unlimited number of times) through stacking, which would violate energy conservation as force multiplication always trades force for distance.
- Uses ratchets and gears to rectify motion, but provides no identified external energy source to reset the elastic elements or masses, implying extraction of net work from an equilibrium system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Explici
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct mechanical t
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim appears to be a 'gravity engine' implying extraction of net work from gravity alone, but no external energy input (e.g., a height differential from an external source, ambient energy harvesting) is described or identifiable in the corrupted text.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim text is corrupted and unreadable, but the title 'Gravity engine' describes a classic perpetual motion device of the first kind. A closed system cannot extract net work from gravity alone, as it is a conservative force, violating energy conservation. The garbled text further prevents any legitimate technical review.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is completely corrupted/garbled, making technical analysis impossible.
- Core premise of a 'gravity engine' typically implies extracting perpetual work from a conservative force field without an external gradient or energy input.
- No identifiable mechanism to reset the system or create a non-conservative cycle using gravity alone.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The text is garbled/nonse
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim explicitly states 'ne nécessitant aucune énergie' (requiring no energy). The described mechanism appears to be a buoyancy-based system using floats on rods, with a guidance system to control rotation. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce mechanical and electrical power without any energy input, which directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation). The buoyancy mechanism, even if guided, cannot produce net work in a closed cycle without an external energy source to reset the system, as the work done by rising floats would be canceled by the work required to submerge them.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims operation with zero energy input ('aucune énergie')
- Proposes to generate continuous mechanical work (rotation) and subsequently electricity from an internal buoyancy mechanism with no identified external energy source
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy source is described to overcome friction and other losses
- Implies a self-sustaining generator ('alternateur auto suffisante') which constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The claim explicitly states the motor 'ne requière aucune énergie' (requires no energy). The described mechanism uses shifting weights/liquids, implying an intent to extract net work from gravity or internal mass redistribution alone.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'ecological motor' is a perpetual motion machine. It claims to produce useful work (rotation, electricity) without any energy input, which directly violates the law of energy conservation. The internal shifting of weights or mercury cannot create a continuous power output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce work with zero energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. A closed-cycle system cannot perpetually redistribute mass to produce net work; internal forces cancel out, leading to equilibrium with no net output.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (thermal, chemical, potential) to drive the system. Gravity is a conservative force; cycling weights around an axis in a sealed container yields zero net work per cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The claim is for a motor that requires 'aucune énergie' (no energy). The described mechanism uses shifting weights on rods within a guided track, which is an internal rearrangement of mass, not an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This 'self-sufficient motor' is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It describes a mechanical system with shifting weights but identifies no external energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction, air resistance, and electrical generation. Its claimed operation directly violates the laws of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce work from no energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; any motion would be damped by friction and air resistance, requiring continuous energy input to sustain.
- The mechanism describes a non-conservative system (changing weight positions) but provides no source of energy to reset the cycle against friction and to perform net external work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output (rot
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The claim explicitly states the system requires 'aucune énergie' (no energy) and operates solely with floats in a liquid, implying it is a self-sustaining motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a motor powered only by floats in a liquid, requiring no energy input. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating energy conservation. The mechanism of guiding floats cannot create net energy; it can only convert or redirect an existing input, which is absent here.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to produce work from no energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics by proposing a mechanism to extract continuous work from an isothermal system (floats in a liquid) with no external gradient or energy source.
- No identifiable source to replenish energy lost to friction, viscosity, and other dissipative forces.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title and text reference 'gravity force' and levers/cylinders to 'increase or decrease the gravity force,' implying an attempt to extract net work from a static gravitational field without a sustained external gradient or input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a gravity-powered motor, which fundamentally violates the conservation of energy. Gravity is a conservative force; to get continuous work from it, a mass must be continuously lowered from a height, requiring an equal or greater amount of energy to reset it to its initial high-potential state.
Specific Physics Issues
- Attempts to use gravity as a perpetual energy source without a compensating drop in potential energy
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., fuel, ambient heat gradient, lifted mass) to reset the system
- Mechanism describes torque and transmission but not how the gravitational force is cyclically harnessed without net input work
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Extracting net
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the machine is operated solely by 'the falling weights of the unbalanced wheels' acting inside the machine, with no external energy input besides an initial load on the output shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-contained machine that generates torque solely from internally falling weights, claiming continuous operation with no energy cost. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy), as it proposes a perpetual motion machine that creates energy from nothing. The 'load' required to start it cannot serve as the system's energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to run perpetually ('cost nothing to run', '24 hours a day') by internally cycling weights, extracting net work from a closed system.
- No identifiable external energy gradient: Describes a self-contained mechanical system with no connection to an external energy source like fuel, wind, or a thermal gradient.
- Confused causality: Claims the machine cannot start without a load on the output shaft, implying the load is somehow the energy source, which is backwards. A load dissipates energy, not supplies it.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on a metal ball rolling inside a deformed circle/wheel. The system purportedly uses less power to lift the ball on the right side than the power generated by the ball descending on the left side.
AI Physics Analysis
The 'Moteur Arel' describes a gravity-powered wheel that claims to produce more energy from a ball descending on one side than is needed to lift it on the other, due to a special shaped track. This is a direct violation of the conservation of energy, as gravity is a conservative force and the net work over any closed cycle is zero. No external energy source is identified to account for the claimed net output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy by claiming net power output from a closed gravitational cycle.
- Assumes a path-dependent shape can create a perpetual imbalance in a conservative force field (gravity).
- No identification of an external energy input; gravity alone in a closed cycle cannot produce net work.
- The description of 'positive' and 'negative' sides implies energy generation from lifting and lowering the same mass in a cycle, which nets to zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Only considers the
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on shifting weights, but the described mechanism suggests the system is intended to produce continuous rotation and net energy output from its own internal weight redistribution without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-operated mechanical system with no external energy input. It attempts to use levers and sliding scissors to perpetually redistribute weights to create an imbalance, but in a complete cycle within Earth's gravitational field, the net work done by gravity is zero. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No external energy source identified; system appears to be a closed mechanical assembly.
- Describes weights moving closer to and farther from the axis during rotation, implying a cycle intended to produce continuous net torque, which is impossible in a conservative gravitational field.
- Violates conservation of energy: the work required to lift weights closer to the axis (reducing potential energy) is not accounted for in the claimed energy production.
- Uses lever/scissor mechanisms to redistribute mass, but any gain in torque on one side of the cycle is necessarily offset by a greater loss on the other side.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on 'energy
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy source appears to be gravitational potential energy from weights (4, 5) being lowered. The text suggests a mechanical system using levers, scissors, rails, and weights to generate continuous motion, implying it is self-sustaining or produces net energy output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system using levers and weights with no identifiable external energy input. It claims to produce 'clean' and 'free' energy for electricity and desalination, which is impossible as the system's internal gravitational potential energy is finite. Once expended, the machine would stop, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, ambient gradient).
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement of levers, scissors, and weights.
- Implies continuous work output (electricity generation, water desalination) without an external energy source to replenish the gravitational potential.
- Violates conservation of energy: a system cannot output more useful work than the net decrease in its internal potential energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the primary intended input is an initial starter motor, but the claimed operation implies the system generates 'pure energy' from its own internal weight-shifting mechanism, with gravity as the only apparent external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a mechanical system using levers, scissors, and shifting weights, allegedly to produce 'pure energy' or act as a 'power multiplier.' This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to generate net energy output from gravity without a corresponding net drop in potential energy, violating the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce 'pure energy' (net output) from a closed mechanical system using gravity and levers.
- Describes a weight-shifting mechanism (scissors, levers) that seems intended to create a perpetual imbalance to drive rotation, extracting work from gravity without lowering a net center of mass.
- Lacks identification of a sustainable external energy input to reset the system's state; gravity alone in a closed cycle cannot provide net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (le
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies the primary energy source is gravity acting on shifting weights, but the system is claimed to be a 'power multiplier' that can run and produce 'pure energy' without using weights, suggesting an attempt to generate net energy from internal motions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic attempt at a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine. It uses levers and scissors mechanisms to shift weights, but this internal rearrangement cannot create a continuous net energy output, as gravity is a conservative force. The claim of being a 'power multiplier' producing 'pure energy' directly violates the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims to produce 'pure energy' (net output) from internal mechanical redistribution of masses.
- No external energy source identified: Gravity is a conservative force; cycling weights cannot provide net energy gain per cycle.
- Violates thermodynamic limits for a perpetual motion machine: Attempts to create a work output without a corresponding high-to-low potential energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the primary intended source is gravity acting on shifting weights, with an initial starter input. No external energy gradient (like a falling mass, compressed spring, or temperature difference) is clearly identified as a sustained input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine. It attempts to generate continuous output work ('pure energy') using only internal levers and shifting weights, with no provision for an external energy source to restore the system's potential energy each cycle. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes to generate 'pure energy' or act as a 'power multiplier' using only internal weight redistribution and lever/scissor mechanisms.
- Implies a closed system can produce net work from gravity alone without a net decrease in the system's potential energy (no overall weight drop).
- Lacks a defined, sustainable external energy input to reset the mechanism each cycle. The starter only initiates motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (le
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim implies energy can be extracted from permanent magnets in levitation without friction, suggesting the system's own magnetic fields are the purported source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce energy using permanent magnets in a shielded configuration, asserting motion without friction or restraint. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as permanent magnets are conservative systems; no net work can be extracted from their static fields without an external energy input to change the configuration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce 'pure energy' from a static magnetic configuration.
- Claims motion 'without friction and with little or no restraint' from a conservative magnetic field, which is impossible for a closed system as it would allow perpetual motion.
- Incomplete energy accounting: describes magnetic shielding/levitation effects but presents them as a source of net usable work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses correct terms like '
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to operate using only permanent magnet repulsion/attraction forces, with an initial electric motor (60) for positioning adjustment only. Implicitly claims the system's continuous rotation is powered solely by magnetic forces without ongoing energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a permanent magnet motor, which claims to produce energy using only magnetic forces. This is a classic violation of the first law of thermodynamics, as the magnetic field is conservative and cannot provide net energy output over a cycle without an external energy source or gradient to exploit.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A system of permanent magnets is a conservative field. Net work over a closed cycle in a static magnetic field is zero.
- No identified external energy gradient to exploit. Magnetic potential energy is internal and fixed.
- System description suggests extracting continuous rotational work from magnet-magnet interactions alone, which is thermodynamically impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies 'produire
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text mentions an 'Antriebsmaschine' (drive machine) but claims its reaction force is redirected via gyroscopic precession, implying the vehicle's acceleration is not powered by this machine's energy output in a conventional way.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim attempts to use gyroscopic precession to circumvent Newton's third law, asserting that the reaction force from a drive machine can be transformed into precessional motion instead of opposing the vehicle's acceleration. This is a classic violation of momentum conservation; internal forces (like those between a vehicle and its gyroscopes) cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Misapplication of gyroscopic forces as 'external' forces to the vehicle system
- Claim that reaction forces can be 'redirected' via precession to avoid canceling the action force, violating Newton's third law
- Misinterpretation of conservation of momentum and energy, suggesting the precession motion requires the vehicle to accelerate to balance energy, rather than the drive machine supplying the energy for both
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to transform 'energy of interaction of the proper axial moment of impulse of the technical means with its surrounding gravitational field' into movement energy, implying extraction of work from a gravitational potential without an external energy input or a compensating decrease in that potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device that can start, stop, and move in any direction in a gravitational field without energy consumption, which directly violates the conservation of energy and momentum. The description uses complex physics terms incorrectly to obfuscate the fact that it proposes a perpetual motion mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims movement 'without energy consumption'
- Violates Newton's laws: implies creation of momentum from a static, central force field without reaction mass or external torque
- Misuses physics terminology ('axial moment of impulse', 'gravitational field energy') in a vague, non-operational way
- Claims omnidirectional controlled motion in a gravitational field without an identifiable, quantifiable energy source
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a 'purely mechanical apparatus' using centrifugal force devices, implying the input energy is the initial mechanical work to spin the devices. No external ambient energy source (e.g., fuel, electricity, environmental gradient) is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate a continuous unidirectional force using only internal centrifugal mechanisms. This is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim that violates Newton's laws of motion. For the main frame to experience a net force, momentum must be conserved by ejecting reaction mass (like a rocket) or interacting with an external field. Internal forces alone cannot propel a system's center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Internal centrifugal forces are internal to the system and cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass without expelling mass (reaction mass).
- Implies creation of a unidirectional net force from purely internal interactions, which is impossible for a closed system.
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain the claimed continuous propulsion against external loads or friction.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms (extracting net
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the device's own weight and the weight of rails are used to generate rotation, implying a closed system where gravitational potential energy is somehow recycled without an external input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate electricity using weight pressure, but describes a closed mechanical system with no external energy source to lift the weights or create a sustained gradient. This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as a system cannot perform net work on its surroundings using only its internal static weights without an external input to reset the system's state.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to replenish gravitational potential energy
- Implies continuous rotation from a static weight, violating conservation of energy
- Mechanism description is too vague to identify a legitimate energy conversion process
- No thermodynamic cycle or gradient is described to enable net work output
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy input described is gravity acting on levers. No external energy input (e.g., motor, wind, thermal gradient) is mentioned to reset the system or overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce motion using levers and gravity, but provides no mechanism to return the levers to their initial high-potential-energy state without external work input. This describes a gravity-powered perpetual motion machine, which violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to create energy from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism to restore levers to a higher potential energy state after they fall, violating energy conservation
- System appears to extract continuous work from gravity without an external energy source to reset the cycle
- Friction and other losses are unaccounted for, making perpetual motion impossible
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'without any expenditure,' implying no energy input. The only implied source is gravity acting on weights, which is a conservative force and cannot provide net work in a cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor claiming to generate work with no energy input. This is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating energy conservation. Gravity alone cannot supply net work over a complete cycle without an external energy source to reset the system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) by claiming to generate work without any energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics; a system using gravity in a cycle returns to its initial state, yielding zero net work.
- No mechanism to create or sustain a non-conservative force field or energy gradient to extract net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions pressure from cylinders (3) and (4) and spaces (7) and (8) acting through arms (1) and (2) on a rotary module, but provides no identifiable external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal, etc.). The term "conservative force" in the title suggests a claim of extracting usable work from a closed-loop, conservative force field, which is impossible.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a motor powered by a 'conservative force' with no clear external energy input. This directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as a conservative force in a closed cycle yields zero net work. It is a classic perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is described.
- Claims operation based on "conservative force," which by definition (e.g., gravity, spring force) cannot provide net work over a closed cycle.
- The mechanism description lacks any thermodynamic gradient or energy input to overcome inevitable losses (friction, resistance, heat).
- The system is described as a motor but appears to be a closed mechanical system with no fuel, electrical input, or environmental energy harvesting mechanism.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system (mobile track, eccentric shaft, connecting rods, inertia masses, and springs) appears to be a closed mechanical system with no stated external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical assembly but provides no clear source for the energy it claims to generate. As a closed system with inevitable frictional losses, it cannot produce net useful work indefinitely, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is described.
- System appears to be an attempt at a mechanical over-unity or perpetual motion device.
- Energy losses from friction (bearings, sliding track), internal damping, and air resistance are inevitable and would stop the motion without input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on internal masses, but the described mechanism attempts to create a continuous torque from a static gravitational field without an external energy gradient or lowering of masses.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic overbalanced wheel design. It claims to produce continuous rotation by using fixed supports to unbalance a wheel with sliding masses. However, gravity is a conservative force; the wheel will settle into an equilibrium position where the torque sums to zero, as the internal redistribution of masses cannot create a perpetual net torque without lowering the system's center of mass, which it does not do cyclically.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy (perpetual motion machine of the first kind).
- Attempts to create a continuous unbalanced torque from a fixed, conservative potential field (gravity).
- The supports that 'lighten' the masses on one side merely redirect forces internally; the net gravitational force on the wheel's center of mass remains zero in a complete cycle, producing no net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism (counterweights on guides, liquid, and angular displacement) suggests an attempt to create a perpetual or over-unity machine using shifting masses, with no identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a type of unbalanced wheel or shifting counterweight mechanism. Such systems cannot produce net work output as the center of mass cannot be perpetually displaced to create torque without an external energy input, violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy source (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.)
- Mechanism describes motion but not the source of energy to overcome friction and losses
- Implies net work can be generated from a cyclic rearrangement of internal masses without an external gradient
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air at atmospheric pressure, compressed by a compressor which is itself driven by the engine's output shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an engine that uses its own output to power a compressor that supplies its air input, forming a closed loop. This violates energy conservation, as the system has no external energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction, heat, and exhaust.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system proposes a feedback loop where the engine drives a compressor to supply itself with compressed air, constituting a closed energy cycle with no net external input.
- It claims to function 'without any input of energy,' which directly violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- The compressed air used for engine work represents stored energy; using engine output to create that stored energy results in a net loss due to inefficiencies, making sustained operation impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only described mechanism is the movement of a dense liquid within balanced, freely rotating wheels. No external energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, or initial potential energy from winding/lifting) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes wheels with internal fluid that shifts position to create imbalance, but provides no source of energy to sustain the motion. The cyclic motion of the fluid, by itself, cannot produce net work without an external input, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy; system appears designed to produce continuous rotation from internal fluid motion without an external energy source.
- No thermodynamic gradient or explicit energy input to drive the perpetual eccentric/re-centering cycle of the fluid.
- The mechanism (rapid eccentric movement, slow re-centering) suggests an attempt to create a net torque from an internal, cyclic process, which is impossible in an isolated, conservative system.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Attempts to ext
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be a 'new source of energy' based on Earth's gravity, implying extraction of net work from a conservative force field without an external energy gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to be a new energy source based on Earth's gravity using drums and a chain with weights. This describes a closed mechanical system attempting to extract net work from a conservative gravitational field, which violates energy conservation. No external energy input or sustainable gradient is identified to overcome the zero-net-work cycle of gravity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle is zero.
- No thermodynamic gradient (e.g., height differential, falling mass from a reservoir) is described to sustainably drive the mechanism.
- The system (endless chain with weights) appears to be a closed mechanical loop, which cannot produce net useful work without an external energy input.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the 'élément moteur adéquat' (adequate motor element) that drives the rotation. The device claims to generate a net directional displacement (thrust) from this rotational input without interaction with an external medium.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a reactionless drive, attempting to produce a net directional thrust from purely internal motions in a rotating system. This violates Newton's laws of motion, specifically conservation of momentum, as it claims to displace its center of mass without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field or medium.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). A net force on the system requires momentum exchange with something external.
- Attempts to create a net force from purely internal cyclic motions, which is impossible for a closed system (center of mass theorem).
- Misinterprets centrifugal force as a real external force that can propel the system. Centrifugal force is a fictitious force in a rotating frame; internal stresses cancel out when averaged over a full cycle.
- Claims 'sans transmission ni contact avec le milieu ambiant' (without transmission or contact with the ambient medium) while asserting a net displacement, which is a textbook definition of a reactionless drive.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical configuration of rotating masses but does not specify any external energy input. Implied energy would come from whatever motor rotates the masses, but the claim suggests this input produces 'propulsion without reaction' (anti-gravity).
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to achieve propulsion without reaction, which directly violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum. A system of rotating symmetric masses, no matter their arrangement, cannot generate a net linear force on its center of mass without ejecting mass or interacting with an external field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction) by claiming propulsion without any reaction mass or momentum exchange.
- Violates conservation of momentum. Net momentum of a closed system cannot change without external forces.
- No identifiable gradient or asymmetry to produce a net directional force from rotating symmetric masses.
- Mechanism described (symmetric masses rotating around individual and common axes) cannot produce a net linear force in an isolated system.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the gravitational potential energy of rolling masses. The system appears to be a closed mechanical loop with no external input to reset the masses to their higher potential energy state.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered motor. While cleverly timed mass transfers create an imbalance, the system lacks an external energy source to reset the gravitational potential of the masses. The work needed to lift a mass against gravity is always greater than or equal to the work gained from its descent, making sustained net power output impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The work extracted from masses rolling down is less than the work required to lift them back to their starting height, resulting in a net energy deficit.
- No external energy input described to re-lock the mass at the 'future starting point' which is at a higher gravitational potential.
- Friction and other losses would further reduce any net output, making sustained operation impossible.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract mentions benefiting from constant solar or nuclear energy, but the described mechanism (rotating masses) suggests the input is mechanical work to spin those masses. The claim implies this mechanical arrangement can generate a directed constant force (artificial gravity) as an output, seemingly from the rotation geometry itself.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert mechanical rotation into a directed constant force (artificial gravity). This is a violation of Newton's laws of motion; internal forces cannot produce a net external force on a system's center of mass. The mention of solar/nuclear energy is an obfuscation, as the described mechanism itself is purportedly the source of the novel force.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies generation of a net directional force (artificial gravity) from an internal, symmetric mechanical action without a corresponding external reaction or gradient.
- Confuses centripetal/centrifugal effects (which are frame-dependent and produce internal stresses, not a net external force) with the creation of a true gravitational field or a net propulsion force.
- No mechanism provided for how rotating masses in a closed system produces a net constant force on the system's center of mass, which would violate Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input implied is an initial torque to start the large disk. The device claims to use gravity and an 'extended disequilibrium regime' to drive rotation, suggesting it aims to extract continuous work from gravity without an external energy source to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered mechanical system claiming to maintain continuous rotation. It violates energy conservation because the gravitational force is conservative; over a full rotation, the net work done by gravity on the masses is zero unless an external energy source lifts them. The described fixed mass displacement would not produce sustained rotation, making this a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No clear source for the continuous output work.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: A system in a static gravitational field cannot provide net work over a cycle without an external energy input to restore the potential energy of the masses.
- Mechanically impossible: The gearing system (claim 1) is said to keep masses in a constant position relative to horizontal as the disk rotates. This would create a fixed, unbalanced weight distribution, which, if frictionless, would cause the disk to
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Aims to
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy, but the described mechanism provides no sustainable gradient or external input to reset the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert 'gravitational energy' into continuous mechanical rotation using sliding masses on a disk. However, gravity is a conservative force; the net work done by gravity over any closed cycle is zero. To produce continuous output, the system would need an external energy source to lift the masses, which is not described or accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: A closed system of masses on a rotating disk cannot produce net rotational work without an external energy input.
- No sustainable gravitational gradient: The masses move on a closed path; lifting them against gravity to reset their position requires at least as much energy as is gained during descent.
- Missing entropy sink: The system describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, extracting net work from a conservative force field without an external driving gradient.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described system appears to be a mechanical arrangement of rotating eccentric elliptical gears and flywheels, implying the initial energy input is from a conventional motor. No external or novel energy source is identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to generate propulsion or excess work solely through internal momentum transfers between rotating eccentric gears and flywheels. This violates conservation of energy and momentum, as no external energy gradient or reaction mass is identified to produce net thrust or power output beyond the initial motor input.
Specific Physics Issues
- System describes accelerating and decelerating flywheels via eccentric gears, implying an attempt to create a net inertial propulsion or over-unity effect from internal momentum exchanges.
- No mechanism for net energy gain is described; energy conservation dictates work done accelerating a flywheel must come from the motor, and deceleration returns energy (minus losses).
- Claim of 'propulsion inertielle' suggests extracting net linear momentum or work from a closed, oscillating rotational system, violating conservation of momentum and energy.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes mechanical arrangements (levers, sliding counterweights, parallelism) but provides no explicit external energy input. Implicitly, any initial rotational energy would be dissipated by friction, requiring continuous external work to sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes only internal mechanical components (levers, sliding counterweights) rearranging themselves, which cannot produce a continuous net torque to drive a horizontal wheel without an external energy source. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim of the first kind, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Claims 'improvement of forces' and 'benefit to the driving wheel' suggesting net mechanical work output without corresponding energy input
- Mechanical rearrangement alone cannot provide sustained net work against losses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim references 'propulseurs utilisant la force centrifuge' (propulsion using centrifugal force) and 'ailes tournantes' (rotating wings), implying an internal mechanical system as the sole energy source for propulsion. No external energy input (e.g., fuel, external power, ambient gradient) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device attempts to use internal centrifugal forces from rotating masses or wings to generate net propulsion. This is a classic reactionless drive concept, which is impossible as it violates conservation of momentum. No external energy or momentum source is identified to enable the claimed thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an internal, kinematic constraint force within a rotating system. It cannot provide net thrust or momentum change to the system's center of mass.
- Claiming to achieve propulsion or 'supprimer le mur du son' (break the sound barrier) via purely internal rotating masses or wings violates Newton's third law and conservation of linear momentum.
- No identifiable external energy source or reaction mass is described to enable net propulsion in a vacuum ('engin spatial' implies spacecraft).
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests extracting net work from the inertial motion of rotating masses within the device itself, implying energy is generated from the system's own internal motion without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce motional or electrical energy by cyclically moving masses outward and inward in a rotating system, asserting the inward return requires 'no energy expenditure.' This is a classic violation of energy conservation, as inertia is not an energy source but a property, and resetting the cycle always requires energy input equal to or greater than any output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy (1st Law of Thermodynamics).
- Misinterprets inertia as a source of energy rather than a property of mass.
- Claims 'rapprochement sans la moindre dépense énergétique' (approach without the slightest energy expenditure) is impossible—any centripetal force to pull a mass inward requires work.
- Confuses fictitious centrifugal force in a rotating frame with a real force that can do net work in an inertial frame.
- The described cycle cannot produce net energy output; any work extracted during the mass moving outward would require equal or greater work to reset the mass inward.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes organizing multiple centrifugal forces into a single-axis resultant force for propulsion. No explicit energy input is described, implying the device generates a net propulsive force from internal motions alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes 'inertial propulsion' using organized centrifugal forces, which is a classic perpetual motion/actionless drive concept. Internal forces, regardless of how they are organized or timed, cannot produce a net external force on a closed system, as this violates conservation of momentum. The description uses correct physics terms ('centrifugal forces') but applies them to an impossible outcome.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). A closed system cannot generate net momentum change through internal forces.
- No identifiable external energy source or momentum sink. 'Propulsion without external reaction' is impossible.
- Centrifugal forces are internal and cancel out within the system; their vector sum is zero. Organizing them cannot create a net external force.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be terrestrial gravitational energy, but described mechanism is a closed-loop system with no external gradient or energy input to sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It claims to produce continuous mechanical/electrical energy solely from Earth's gravity using a closed-loop system of balls and tubes. Since gravity is a conservative force and the system operates in a cycle, the net work extracted over one complete cycle must be zero, violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: Claims continuous energy output (24/7) from a system with no net energy input.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract net work from a gravitational field in a closed, equilibrium cycle.
- Mechanism describes a non-conservative use of gravity: Gravity is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle is zero.
- System would require energy to reset the position of the balls/tubes to create an imbalanced state, which would equal or exceed any work extracted.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims output ener
Claimed Energy Source
Initial unequal distribution of liquid and potential energy from that liquid's weight. No sustained external input is described; the system is closed after the initial charge.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed hydraulic-mechanical system that claims to produce continuous motion from an initial unequal liquid distribution. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it purports to do useful work indefinitely without an external energy source to replenish the initial potential energy, which will be dissipated by losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Assumes continuous reciprocation and rotation from a single initial imbalance in a closed system.
- No mechanism to restore the initial potential energy gradient after the system reaches equilibrium.
- Fails to account for energy dissipation through friction, fluid viscosity, and inelastic collisions.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
None identified. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement of weighted wheels, gears, chains, and flywheels with no external energy input described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a closed mechanical system intended to sustain its own motion indefinitely. This is impossible as it violates energy conservation; all real systems lose energy to friction and require an external input to maintain motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- Proposes to sustain motion without an energy source, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Ignores inevitable energy losses from friction, air resistance, and inelastic collisions in the gear train.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the drive motor (9). The claimed thrust is generated internally by the motion of weights along a stationary guide, with no external reaction mass or environmental energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a classic reactionless drive attempt. The internal mechanism cannot produce net thrust on the vehicle because all forces are internal to the system, violating conservation of momentum. The drive motor's energy will be dissipated as heat and vibration, not as net propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Device attempts to generate net linear thrust from purely internal cyclic motions within a closed system.
- No external reaction mass (air, expelled material) or environmental gradient is utilized to produce the claimed propulsive force.
- Internal forces between the rotating assembly, sliding weights, and stationary guide sum to zero, producing no net external thrust on the vehicle (Newton's Third Law).
- Any momentary force from a weight pressing against the guide is countered by an equal and opposite reaction force on the guide's mount, canceling net momentum gain.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
Claimed Energy Source
External power source applied to shaft 11 to rotate disc 13, which propels rollers (mobile mass) around an endless curved channel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system where internal masses move along curved paths. Internal forces cancel out, producing no net external thrust. To propel itself, a system must expel momentum (e.g., exhaust mass); this device does not, violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Device appears to be a closed mechanical system with internal moving parts. For net thrust (a net external force) to be produced, momentum must be expelled from the system. The described mechanism contains no expulsion of mass or interaction with an
- The curved path and motion of internal masses would create internal centripetal forces that cancel out within the system casing. No net external force is generated from internal motions alone (Newton's third law).
- Claim implies generation of a unidirectional thrust from purely rotational/cyclic internal motion, which violates conservation of momentum.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the motor rotating the main axle and the sub-axles. The device claims to generate a net linear thrust from purely rotational inputs, implying an internal reactionless mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic example of a claimed reactionless drive. It attempts to generate net linear thrust through purely internal, rotating motions, which violates conservation of momentum. No external reaction or expelled mass is described, making it physically impossible for the isolated system to accelerate its center of mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims a net linear thrust (force) along the axis of the main axle without expelling any reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
- Violates Newton's third law (conservation of linear momentum). The described internal motion of inclined, rotating discs cannot produce a net force on the isolated device's center of mass.
- Incomplete force accounting; internal forces from the discs on their supports cancel out when summed over a full cycle.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the magnetic field of permanent magnets alone, with no external energy input after initial setup.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. A static arrangement of permanent magnets cannot continuously accelerate another magnet to produce useful electrical work, as the system will reach a magnetic equilibrium with no net force. Any induced current in the coils would create a drag force, slowing the magnet until it stops.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to generate electrical output indefinitely from a closed system of magnets with no energy input.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: proposes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Ignoces energy dissipation: rotation would be damped by magnetic hysteresis, eddy currents (from coils), and friction, leading to stop.
- Misinterprets magnetic force: a static arrangement of magnets will find an equilibrium position, not provide continuous acceleration around a loop.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Claims 'high curre
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a mechanical system using a 'flywheel' (μοχλός = lever) and claims to generate reciprocating motion, but provides no identifiable external energy input. The description suggests an attempt to create sustained motion from an imbalanced lever system without an external power source.
AI Physics Analysis
This describes a mechanical system claiming to generate reciprocating motion using levers without any identifiable energy input, which violates conservation of energy. The text focuses on mechanical advantage in one part of a cycle but ignores how the system resets without energy input, making it a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- Implies sustained reciprocating motion from an imbalanced mechanical configuration alone
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot produce net work without energy input
- Describes a static mechanical advantage (lever) but no mechanism to reset the system cyclically without energy input
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses mechanical terms (le
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests motion is generated by a 'heavy body' (βαρυτικό σώμα) arranged on levers/shelves around a rotating assembly. This implies a gravitational potential energy source, but the system is described as 'self-moved' (Αυτοκινούμενη), indicating no external input to reset the potential.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered mechanism with no described external energy input to reset the driving weight. It will stop once the weight's potential energy is exhausted, violating the first law of thermodynamics if claimed to be self-sustaining. This is a classic over-unity/perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system claims to be 'self-moved' or self-sustaining, implying perpetual motion.
- It uses a heavy body to induce rotational motion via an asymmetric arrangement, but provides no mechanism to return the mass to its initial higher potential energy state to sustain the cycle.
- The energy accounting is incomplete. The initial gravitational potential energy of the heavy body is the only identifiable input, which would be depleted as the system operates, converting to work and friction losses.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims imply motion is generated solely by magnetic interactions without external energy input, suggesting extraction of work from permanent magnets in equilibrium.
AI Physics Analysis
This magnetic motor claims to operate without consuming any external energy, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). Permanent magnets in static configurations cannot provide net work output without an external energy source to reset the system or overcome magnetic hysteresis losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input (electrical, thermal, chemical, or ambient gradient)
- Implies perpetual motion from permanent magnet configurations
- Violates conservation of energy - claims operation without energy consumption
- Violates thermodynamics - no entropy sink, extracts net work from equilibrium system
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text (in Greek) claims to produce kinetic energy perpetually using only the system's internal dynamic forces due to weight, without consuming any other external energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system claimed to produce perpetual kinetic energy using only internal forces from weight, explicitly stating it violates the law of a unified mechanical system without consuming other energy. This is a direct violation of energy conservation and the laws of thermodynamics, constituting a classical perpetual motion claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims perpetual generation of kinetic energy without an external energy source
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics (no entropy increase or thermal gradient specified)
- Describes a 'unified mechanical system' that operates without energy input, which is impossible
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use ambient temperature difference to generate a larger temperature difference, implying extraction of work from a single thermal reservoir or creation of a gradient without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims to use ambient thermal energy to create and maintain a temperature difference larger than the environment's, effectively acting as a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. This directly violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it implies creating useful work or a usable gradient from a single thermal reservoir without an external energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: A heat engine cannot use ambient thermal energy to create a sustained, usable temperature difference larger than the ambient gradient it started with, without an external work input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description suggests 'concentrating' the working medium to create a larger temperature difference, which would require work input not accounted for.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Uses terms like 'concentration' and 'simultaneous operation' but provides no physically valid cycle (e.g., reverse heat engine/heat pump) that could achieve the claimed result.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests the mechanism converts the 'dynamic energy of the metallic weight (31)' into kinetic energy without consuming any other form of energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract explicitly claims to violate the conservation of energy for an isolated mechanical system by converting internal forces into perpetual kinetic motion without an external energy input. This is a definitive description of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Explicit claim that the law of the isolated mechanical system is 'abolished' or circumvented.
- Claim of converting internal forces into kinetic energy without those forces diminishing, which violates conservation of energy.
- Claim of perpetual (αενάως) operation without an external energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses physics terms (inter
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to use weights (βαρύτητας = gravity) and a rack system to force spheres to move in a circular path, with the output supposedly taken from high-pressure hydraulic fluid. No primary energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is specified to reset the system or overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a gravity-driven mechanical-hydraulic system that claims to produce work output. However, it provides no mechanism or energy source to reset the system (e.g., lift the weights back up), making it a perpetual motion machine that violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The work extracted must come from an initial store of gravitational potential energy, which would be depleted without an external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input to sustain motion against friction and other losses
- Implies continuous work extraction from a gravity-driven system without restoring the gravitational potential
- Violates energy conservation: output work would require an equal or greater input work to reset the positions of the weights/spheres
- System description suggests a closed mechanical cycle with net work output, which is impossible without an external energy source.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on the out
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims energy from 'dynamic of magnetic field between magnets' and 'mass weight', implying conversion of magnetic potential energy and gravitational potential energy into sustained work without an external input to restore the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism using magnets and a reciprocating mass weight to produce autonomous work. It lacks any clear external energy source to reset the system or overcome losses, implying it can extract net work indefinitely from internal magnetic and gravitational potentials—a classic violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input to sustain motion
- Implies perpetual extraction of work from static magnetic fields and a fixed mass
- System appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement with no external gradient to drive continuous work output
- Violates conservation of energy as described; motion would dampen and stop without an external input
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions conversion of dynamic energy (e.g., from masses, magnetic fields, springs) into kinetic energy with continuous rotation, but no primary external energy input (e.g., fuel, electricity, ambient thermal gradient) is specified. The mechanism appears to rely on internal interactions and geometry.
AI Physics Analysis
The described mechanism claims to achieve autonomous operation and energy conversion through internal component interactions and specific geometry, but it identifies no source of energy to overcome inevitable dissipative losses. This constitutes a perpetual motion claim of the first kind, violating the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable net external energy input described.
- Claims continuous rotation and energy conversion from internal components (masses, magnets) without an energy source to replenish losses.
- Describes a kinematic arrangement but provides no thermodynamic accounting for losses to friction, resistance, or radiation.
- Implies sustained motion from internal forces alone, which cannot produce net work.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Focuses on kinemat
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions conversion of 'dynamic energy' from masses, magnetic fields, springs, etc., into motion, but provides no identifiable primary energy input. The system appears to claim continuous motion from internal components without an external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes an autonomous motor that operates by converting the 'dynamic energy' of internal components like masses and springs into continuous rotary motion. This violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it lacks a defined external energy source, and the second law as it implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input specified
- Describes continuous rotary motion without a source to overcome losses
- Implies energy conversion from internal components (masses, springs) without depletion or an external gradient
- Lacks description of an entropy sink or mechanism to overcome friction/resistive losses
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the rotation of the main shaft (1) is caused by the motion of auxiliary rotors interacting with fixed and mobile crowns/rings, implying the device is intended to be self-sustaining or powered by its own internal reactive forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a rotary motor that appears to derive its driving force solely from the internal interaction of its rotors and gears with fixed and mobile rings. This constitutes a closed system with no external energy input, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, which violates the law of conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input is described.
- The mechanism describes complex internal gear interactions but provides no source of energy to overcome friction and other losses.
- The description implies the generation of net rotational work from internal forces alone, which violates Newton's 3rd Law (action-reaction pairs are internal and cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass).
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests the mechanical energy increase originates from the 'floating condition' and synergistic arrangement of three circular sections, implying energy generation from internal configuration without an identifiable external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to increase mechanical energy in a rotating wheel through a special internal arrangement of masses. This directly violates the conservation of energy, as it proposes to create useful work (additional propulsive force) from a passive, internal configuration without any identifiable external energy source to account for the claimed increase.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Conservation of Energy: Claims an 'incremento de energia mecanica' (increase in mechanical energy) without specifying an external energy source to account for this increase.
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics: Implies a net gain in useful work (propulsive force) from an internal mechanical arrangement alone.
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy input identified: The 'floating mass' and 'resilient mass' describe a passive mechanical configuration, not an energy converter.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Claims
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests extracting work from a wheel with an asymmetrical, spiral-shaped attachment, implying a gravity-powered mechanism without an external energy gradient to sustain it.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a wheel with a spiral-shaped attachment claimed to work with a 'Gravity Turbine.' It describes a purely mechanical modification with no external energy input, implying it could produce net work from its own configuration, which violates the first law of thermodynamics. The vague reference to gravity without a sustainable gradient suggests a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy input described
- Implies continuous work extraction from a closed mechanical system (wheel with fixed attachment)
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot output net work without an energy source
- No thermodynamic gradient (thermal, gravitational, chemical) is specified to drive the claimed 'Gravity Turbine'
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms
C - Technical obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be the gravitational field. The device appears to be a closed system with a rotating cylindrical float inside a liquid-filled, rotating cylindrical tank on a circular track, suggesting an attempt to create a perpetual imbalance or torque from gravity alone.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert gravitational field energy into continuous rotational motion without an external energy source. This is impossible as gravity is a conservative force; in a closed cycle, the net work done by gravity is zero. The system, once started, would lose energy to friction and stop, violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: No external energy input is described to overcome friction or sustain motion.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: Attempts to extract useful work (rotational motion) from an isothermal gravitational potential without a compensating entropy increase or a true thermodynamic gradient.
- Mechanically flawed: In a closed, rotating system in equilibrium, no net torque can be generated from internal buoyancy changes as the center of mass of the system cannot be perpetually displaced by internal forces.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Attempt
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implicitly) and an external force (electromagnetic or internal) to manipulate the system. The claimed primary source is buoyancy force from liquids (water to mercury), which is a conservative force derived from gravity and density differences.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to extract net work from buoyancy in a static fluid, which is impossible as buoyancy is a conservative, position-dependent force. Any complete cycle returns the system to its initial energy state, yielding zero net work, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. The mention of an external electromagnetic force to 'force' positions admits the need for an external energy input not accounted for in the output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Buoyancy is a conservative force; net work over a closed cycle in a static fluid is zero.
- The system requires an external force ('wymuszone położenie') to operate, indicating it consumes more energy to reset/reposition components than it can extract from buoyancy.
- Attempts to convert a vertical buoyant force into continuous rotary motion violate the gradient requirement for net work extraction; the fluid is in hydrostatic equilibrium.
B - Thermodynamically Impossible Mechanisms
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a self-driving device where a weight (counterweight) is moved at an appropriate moment along individual elements (KL), implying internal weight redistribution as the sole energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-driving engine powered only by shifting an internal weight. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, as it claims to produce net work without an external energy source, directly violating the law of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes a self-driving (samonapędzający) mechanism with no identified external energy input.
- Relies on internal weight shifting to generate perpetual motion, violating energy conservation.
- No thermodynamic gradient, fuel, or ambient energy source is specified to overcome losses.
B - Thermodynamically impossible mechanisms: Attempts to ext
A - Incomplete energy accounting: 'Output > control input' p
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a mechanical rotor moving on divergent rails with 'infinite motion' but identifies no explicit external energy input to overcome losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as achieving 'infinite motion' through a mechanical rotor on rails, which is a classic perpetual motion claim. No energy source is identified to sustain motion against friction and other dissipative forces, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'infinite motion' which implies perpetual motion without an energy source
- No identifiable mechanism for energy input to compensate for inevitable frictional and other losses
- Vague mechanical description lacking a clear energy conversion process or gradient to exploit
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity acting on shifting weights. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, thermal gradient, etc.) is described. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity turbine that attempts to generate continuous rotation by shifting weights. This is a perpetual motion machine design, as it claims to produce net work from gravity alone in a closed cycle, violating the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation). The internal mechanism to reset the weights would itself consume the energy generated, leading to net loss.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy input described; system uses internal weight redistribution.
- Mechanism attempts to use a weight on one side to rotate the turbine and then uses part of that rotation to reset/reposition the weight via 'special worm wheels' (koła ślimakowe).
- This describes a classic overbalanced wheel, a known perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
- Energy losses from friction, bearing resistance, and impact are not accounted for and would dissipate any initial motion.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text suggests the device extracts usable energy from an internal force imbalance created by combining Newtonian mechanics and quantum mechanics, implying energy generation without an identifiable external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim violates the law of conservation of energy by proposing a machine that generates useful energy from an internal, permanent force imbalance, which is impossible. It misuses the terminology of Newtonian mechanics and quantum mechanics to obfuscate this core violation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Fundamental misuse of physical laws: Newton's third law (action-reaction) is a cornerstone of mechanics and is not suspended by quantum mechanics.
- Vague, incoherent mechanism: Descriptions like '(i = +2)', 'forces (+2) have no counterforce', and '(0) = (+2)' are physically meaningless.
- No identifiable energy input gradient (thermal, chemical, potential, etc.) to perform work.
- Appeals to quantum mechanical paradoxes ('having your cake and eating it') as a justification for violating classical conservation laws.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or mechanical input to rotate the main shaft and swingable shafts.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a type of reactionless drive. It uses internal rotating and swinging masses to try to generate a net directional force on its enclosure. This violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) as it provides no external reaction mass or environmental interaction to push against. The energy input only overcomes internal friction; it cannot create net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to produce a net directional force (thrust) on a vehicle from purely internal moving parts, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- Attempts to use internal centrifugal/gyroscopic forces to create net external propulsion, which is impossible in a closed system.
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described; all motion is internal to the device.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravity, with a small electrical motor input only to overcome starting inertia.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a form of perpetual motion machine. Gravity is a conservative force, and the cyclical motion of the weights around the wheel cannot produce a continuous net torque or energy output. The motor input is acknowledged, but any claim of sustained power generation from this closed system violates energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Device attempts to extract net work from a conservative gravitational field with no external gradient or cycling of mass.
- System operates in a closed loop; the gravitational potential energy of the weights is cyclical, not a net source.
- Any work output beyond initial motor input would imply creation of energy from the static gravitational field.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Implied to be the electrical/mechanical input powering the initial rotation and the mechanism forcing the precession. However, the claim suggests this input can be leveraged to produce net linear acceleration of the frame of reference (useful work) without an equal external reaction.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce net linear acceleration (a propulsive force) from purely internal motions of a spinning mass. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which violates conservation of linear momentum. No internal mechanism, including gyroscopic precession, can accelerate a system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's third law (conservation of linear momentum). A system's center of mass cannot accelerate without an external force. Forced precession creates internal torques and forces that sum to zero within the system.
- Misinterprets gyroscopic dynamics. Precessional forces are reaction forces; they are internal to the system comprising the spinning mass and its mounting frame. No net linear force is generated on the isolated system.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial energy to 'speed up' the masses. The claim implies the 'retarding mechanism' absorbs part of the kinetic energy to propel the entire system, suggesting the system's own internal kinetic energy is being converted to net translational momentum.
AI Physics Analysis
This is a proposed reactionless drive. The mechanism uses only internal forces and moving masses, which cannot generate net propulsion for the system's center of mass because momentum must be conserved. The description of using absorbed kinetic energy for propulsion suggests an attempt to recycle energy to create net work without an external energy source or reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of momentum. Internal forces cannot produce a net change in the center-of-mass momentum of an isolated system.
- Violates Newton's third law. The retarding mechanism applies forces to the masses, but equal and opposite forces are applied to the mechanism (and thus the vehicle body), resulting in zero net impulse.
- Incomplete energy accounting. The claim that absorbed kinetic energy is used for propulsion implies energy recycling or creation of net work from an internal energy store without an external reaction mass or gradient.
- The 'mirror image' symmetry and timing of braking cannot circumvent the fundamental law that internal forces sum to zero.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy input is the rotor driving the counter-rotating masses. The system claims to generate a net directional impulse (thrust) from internal motions, implying energy output as useful mechanical work.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to generate net linear momentum from purely internal cyclic motions. This is impossible for a closed system, as it violates conservation of linear momentum. The energy input to the rotor and arm-varying mechanism would simply result in internal vibrations or rotations, not a net directional thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum. Internal forces (centrifugal, Coriolis) within a closed system cannot produce a net external force or sustained impulse in one direction.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work needed to vary the arm length and control the masses is not accounted for in the claimed net directional output.
- No external reaction mass or environmental gradient is identified to justify a net thrust.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text mentions applying wind pressure/pressure difference forces and using a 'ducted fan' type wind force for movement, but describes a process where two moving bodies (of different shapes) generate a 'propulsive force' (air/gas) from one body that is received and stopped (absorbed) by the other body without reaction forces canceling, enabling parallel movement.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a propulsion system where internal aerodynamic interactions between two bodies supposedly produce net thrust without external reaction, directly violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. The description is obfuscated with technical terms but describes a form of reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates Newton's Third Law (action-reaction). Describes generating propulsive thrust from one body and absorbing it in another without an equal and opposite external reaction, implying net internal momentum generation.
- Violates conservation of momentum. The system claims to achieve translation without expelling mass externally or interacting with an external medium in a net way.
- Incomplete energy accounting. No clear primary energy source identified for sustaining the claimed circulatory airflow and propulsion.
- Thermodynamically dubious mechanism. Suggests a closed system can produce sustained directional motion using internal aerodynamic interactions.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be gravitational potential energy, but described as a self-sustaining hydraulic system where arms A/B and C/D alternately lift each other using hydraulic pumps powered by the descent of the other arm.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system attempts to create a perpetual motion machine where hydraulic arms alternately lift each other using gravity, violating energy conservation. No external energy source is identified to overcome inevitable losses from friction, hydraulic resistance, and pump inefficiencies, making sustained operation physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - system claims to use gravitational potential gained from lifting to power subsequent lifting without external input
- No net energy input identified - system appears to be a closed hydraulic loop with claimed perpetual motion
- Hydraulic losses (friction, viscosity, pump inefficiency) would dissipate energy, making sustained operation impossible
- Gravitational potential energy is not created; it must come from work done against gravity by an external source
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING
Claimed Energy Source
Claimed to be 'sustained gravitational energy' converted via controlled weight differential changes and reciprocal pressure, but no identifiable external energy input mechanism is specified. Implied perpetual extraction of work from Earth's gravity without consumption of a potential gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous electricity by converting Earth's gravitational potential energy into organized motion without ever depleting the potential or requiring an external energy input to reset the system. This is a classic perpetual motion claim, violating both energy conservation and the second law of thermodynamics, as it proposes to extract net work from a static, equilibrium field.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims continuous mechanical/electrical output without consuming an energy source or depleting a potential.
- Violates 2nd law of thermodynamics: proposes to extract organized work from Earth's gravitational field (an equilibrium potential) without an entropy increase elsewhere.
- No mechanism for reset: a weight differential system requires energy input to reset the weights to their starting positions to achieve cyclic motion.
- Ambiguous conversion process: 'reciprocal pressure from controlled weight differential change' is not a physically defined energy conversion mechanism.
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Extract
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses terms like 'sustaine
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions 'Mecho-Voltaic Cells' (likely piezoelectric or similar) and 'hydro powered tower', but these are not integrated into a coherent primary energy input for a mass transport system. The description implies motion is generated or sustained by internal mechanisms without a clear, sufficient external power source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is physically incoherent, using a flood of jargon to describe geometric arrangements without specifying a viable energy source or respecting fundamental mechanics. Its implied operation suggests an attempt to create complex motion without adequate power input, violating energy conservation principles.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input accounting for a large-scale transport system.
- Claims of 'overlapping folding structure', 'shifting in spoiler nature', and 'removing the differentiated inertia' suggest mechanisms intended to circumvent conservation of momentum and energy.
- Extremely vague and incoherent technical description prevents any meaningful thermodynamic or efficiency analysis, but the implied goal of self-sustaining or internally-powered complex motion is suspect.
PATTERN C: Technical Obfuscation - The claim is a dense, nea
PATTERN A: Incomplete Energy Accounting - The system's metho
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests the input is rotational kinetic energy imparted to a disc/weight. Any claimed weight reduction or gravity influence would require an external energy source not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes influencing gravity or reducing weight through rapid rotation of a mass, which is a form of 'anti-gravity' or reactionless drive concept. It violates Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) and general relativity, which states local mass-energy determines curvature; internal motion alone cannot cancel a system's weight. The vague terminology and lack of identified external energy source are hallmarks of pseudoscientific claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes gravity influence/weight reduction via rotation without identifying an external energy gradient or reaction mass.
- Implies creation of a non-conservative force (affecting weight) from an internal rotational motion, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
- No mechanism provided for how 'superschnelle Rotation' (superspeed rotation) or a co-rotating current in a spiral net couples to the gravitational field or spacetime metric in a way that reduces weight without expending momentum/energy.
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Title suggests gravity and flywheel mass as drivers, but no mechanism or explicit external energy input is described in the provided text.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent submission contains no claims or technical description, but the title alone describes a 'gravity-driven flywheel mass drive,' which is a classic hallmark of a perpetual motion machine. Without a described mechanism to reset the gravitational potential (e.g., an external energy input), any such device would violate the conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No claims or description provided to analyze
- Title implies a gravity-driven flywheel mass drive, which suggests an attempt to extract continuous work from gravity without restoring the system (perpetual motion of the first kind)
- Complete lack of energy accounting or thermodynamic process description
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims suggest self-sustaining flow of 'extremely heavy inertial mass fluid' driven by imbalance and rebound effects without identifiable external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a device claiming to generate perpetual, self-sustaining motion of extremely heavy fluid through imbalance and rebound cycles without any identifiable energy source. It violates energy conservation by implying continuous motion without input and uses obfuscated technical language to describe what appears to be a perpetual motion machine.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism
- Claims of perpetual motion without energy source
- Violates conservation of energy
- Uses physics terminology incoherently (inertial mass fluid, rebound cycles, amplification)
- Implies energy extraction from gravitational potential without restoring input
A
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The system appears to be a gravity engine that extracts net work from the gravitational potential energy of adjustable weights, but the energy required to adjust the lengths and masses (e.g., pumping fluid, extending arms) is not accounted for as a primary input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic overbalanced wheel, a known impossible perpetual motion machine. The energy needed to change the arm lengths and masses (e.g., pumping fluid upward) will always equal or exceed the gravitational work gained from those changes, resulting in zero or negative net energy output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: The net work output from shaft rotation must be less than or equal to the work input required to adjust the arms and masses. The patent describes no external energy source for these adjustments, implying a perpetual moti
- Incomplete energy accounting (PATTERN A): The system's operation (extending arms/adding mass on one side, retracting/removing mass on the other) requires significant energy input to lift and move mass against gravity and centrifugal forces. This inpu
- Thermodynamically impossible mechanism (PATTERN B): It attempts to create a persistent torque imbalance to drive rotation solely by manipulating its own components, which is equivalent to extracting net work from a single thermal reservoir (Earth's g
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. Title suggests 'eternal cycle' (Ewigenkreislauf) implying perpetual motion or energy generation without external input.
AI Physics Analysis
The title 'Elektroauto mit dem Ewigenkreislauf' (Electric car with the eternal cycle) describes a system that would need to violate the first law of thermodynamics. Without any technical claims describing an external energy source, it implies perpetual motion, which is impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Title implies a closed system producing continuous work (electric car with eternal cycle)
- No patent claims or technical description provided to identify a legitimate energy source
- Concept of 'eternal cycle' for propulsion fundamentally violates energy conservation
B
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy and buoyancy, but with no external input to reset the system. The described cycle purports to run perpetually from internal water transfer.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine claim. It describes a cyclical process using gravity and buoyancy but ignores the energy needed to reset the system (e.g., moving water uphill against gravity). Any real implementation would lose energy to friction and fluid resistance, causing it to stop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: The system claims to produce net work from a closed cycle of gravity and buoyancy without an external energy source.
- Violates the second law of thermodynamics: It describes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, implying work extraction without an energy input.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to lift water against gravity to reset the capsules (e.g., pumping water back up) is ignored or assumed to be provided by the system's own motion with no losses.
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is the buoyant force on air-filled buckets submerged in a liquid. The system attempts to create a continuous cycle by injecting air at the bottom to displace water (creating buoyancy) and releasing air at the top to allow the bucket to sink.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a buoyancy engine that ignores the significant energy input required to inject and compress the air into the submerged buckets. This compression work, needed to overcome hydrostatic pressure, is greater than the mechanical energy recovered from the buoyant rise, making it a net energy consumer. It violates the second law of thermodynamics by attempting to extract net work from an isothermal reservoir.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the air injection/compression work
- Violates conservation of energy: net work extracted from a single thermal reservoir (the liquid) without a temperature gradient
- The work required to inject and compress air into the bottom buckets equals or exceeds the mechanical work gained from their buoyant rise
- System is a closed-loop buoyancy engine, which is thermodynamically equivalent to attempting perpetual motion of the second kind
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims energy comes from 'gravity bias' and 'springs' working together on a vertical transmission chain, suggesting perpetual motion from internal configuration without external input.
AI Physics Analysis
This device claims to achieve perpetual automatic operation through an arrangement of springs on a vertical chain, creating an alleged 'gravity bias' that drives continuous motion. It violates both energy conservation (no external energy input) and the second law of thermodynamics (extracting work from an equilibrium system), making it physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy - claims 'perpetual automatic operation' with no external energy input
- Violates second law of thermodynamics - claims to extract net work from equilibrium system
- Incomplete energy accounting - ignores friction losses, spring hysteresis, and damping
- Mechanically impossible - claims springs automatically extend/retract to create continuous bias without energy input
- Misuses physics terminology - 'gravity bias' is not a recognized energy source
A
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The title 'Magnetkraftmaschine' (Magnet Power Machine) suggests an attempt to generate power from permanent magnets alone, implying energy extraction from a static magnetic field without an external gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The device title suggests a 'magnet power machine,' which is a classic perpetual motion claim. Permanent magnets are not an energy source; they are sources of a conservative field. Any machine attempting to extract continuous net work from them alone violates energy conservation, as it would require creating energy from a system in equilibrium.
Specific Physics Issues
- No patent claims or operational description provided for analysis
- Title implies a device extracting net work from permanent magnets
- Permanent magnets are conservative potential fields; no net work can be extracted from them in a cycle without an external energy input to reset the system
- Violates the first law of thermodynamics if claiming to output more energy than is input to create/maintain the magnetic field
B
Claimed Energy Source
No energy source identified or described. Claims explicitly state 'Geen toevoer van energie' (No supply of energy).
AI Physics Analysis
This patent claim explicitly states it requires no energy input while providing constant energy output, which directly violates the law of energy conservation. It describes a classic perpetual motion machine, making it physically impossible according to fundamental thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Direct violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation)
- Claims 'kosteloos, constant... energie' (free, constant energy) with no input
- No mechanism described to create energy from nothing
- Implies a perpetual motion machine of the first kind
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims imply generation of thrust/anti-gravity from internal rotation and electromagnetic induction of superconductors, with electrical input for motors and cooling. No identified external gradient or fuel to explain net momentum/thrust generation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate inertia control or anti-gravity through rotating superconductors, implying creation of net momentum/thrust without external reaction or an identifiable energy gradient. This violates conservation of momentum and angular momentum, using quantum mechanical terms in a speculative, non-standard way unsupported by established physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Invokes 'mass dilation' from relativistic electrons as mechanism for generating net momentum/thrust without reaction mass
- Claims 'controllable macroscopic quantum angular momentum' that can influence gravity without clear coupling to established physics
- Proposes 'amplifying or canceling out angular momentum' which violates conservation of angular momentum if net external torque is generated
- No identifiable entropy sink or thermodynamic gradient to drive purported anti-gravitational effect
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to two motors: one to spin the centrifuge, one to spin the offset rod.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate a net linear force (thrust) from purely rotational motion in a closed system, violating Newton's third law (conservation of momentum). The buoyancy forces in the rotating fluid are internal and centripetal, providing no net external force over a complete cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- System claims to convert rotational forces to a net linear force (thrust) in a closed, rotating reference frame without an external reaction mass.
- Buoyancy force in a rotating fluid is a centripetal force, directed radially inward toward the axis of rotation. It cannot produce a net linear force averaged over a full rotation.
- The described asymmetric immersion of the ball creates a time-varying radial force on the rod, but this force is periodic and centripetal. No mechanism is described to rectify this into a unidirectional linear force.
B
Claimed Energy Source
Claims to extract energy from Earth's gravitational and magnetic fields by using asymmetrically placed, sliding weights in a circular path, implying perpetual motion without an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind, claiming to produce useful work indefinitely from the Earth's fields without consuming an external energy source or operating within a thermodynamic gradient. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by asserting continuous motion and energy output without an adequate input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates conservation of energy: claims to produce energy from a closed system (weights moving 'ohne Einflussnahme von außen')
- Confuses/conflates gravity and magnetic fields as interchangeable energy sources
- No thermodynamic gradient or energy input described to sustain motion against losses
- Mechanism describes a non-conservative positional variation but provides no net energy input per cycle
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. A 'gravity engine' typically implies attempting to generate useful work solely from a gravitational field, which is a conservative force field in equilibrium, not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device title suggests an attempt to extract net energy from gravity alone, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external input or energy gradient. The lack of any technical details strongly indicates a violation of energy conservation, fitting the pattern of a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Gravity alone is not an energy source; it is a potential field. To extract net work, a mass must cycle between different potential energies, requiring an external input to reset the system (e.g., lifting the mass).
- Any claimed perpetual or over-unity operation violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation).
- The abstract and claims are listed as unavailable, preventing any assessment of a proposed mechanism, which is a major red flag.
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a closed loop where a motor drives a generator whose output powers the same motor, implying no external energy input after startup.
AI Physics Analysis
The system claims to be self-sufficient by using a motor to drive a generator that powers the same motor. This is a textbook violation of the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation), as it ignores the inevitable energy losses to heat and friction. No perpetual net work can be extracted from such a closed loop.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: Output of generator cannot exceed input to motor (minus losses).
- No net external energy source identified to overcome inevitable losses (friction, resistance, heat).
- Describes a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text is garbled/nonsensical, containing Korean characters and symbols that do not form a coherent technical description. No identifiable energy input is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent claim text is garbled and nonsensical, making technical analysis impossible. This pattern of obfuscation is a hallmark of attempts to disguise pseudoscientific claims, as no coherent physical mechanism or energy source can be identified for evaluation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable energy conversion process described
- Text is corrupted or obfuscated, preventing any physics-based evaluation
- No quantitative claims to assess against thermodynamic limits
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
The only explicit energy source is the initial 'moyen quelconque' (any means) to rotate the piece U. The claim implies the generation of 'force vive' (kinetic energy/vis viva) from the cyclic radial motion of the masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a closed mechanical system where the only stated input is the rotation of the central piece. The cyclic radial motion of internal masses cannot create net kinetic energy or a sustained directional force without an external energy source, violating conservation of energy. It attempts to extract net work from a system in internal dynamic equilibrium.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims to generate net kinetic energy ('force vive') from an internal, cyclic redistribution of masses within a rotating system.
- No external energy gradient or input is described beyond the initial rotation. The system is a closed mechanical assembly.
- The guided radial motion of the masses would require varying centripetal forces, consuming work from the driving axle; any 'force' generated would be an internal reaction force, not net usable output.
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions a 'magnetic field' (유체통) and 'magnetic force' (유체를) but provides no identifiable external energy input. The claim suggests output energy can exceed input energy, implying energy creation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a magnetic device where the output energy purportedly exceeds the control input, violating energy conservation. It uses correct physics terminology (magnetic field/force) to obfuscate a classic perpetual motion claim of getting more energy out than is put in, with no identifiable source for the excess energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified.
- Claim implies energy multiplication (output > input) without accounting for all inputs.
- Describes a mechanism where magnetic force seems to produce net work without an apparent energy gradient or consumption.
- Uses technical terms (magnetic field, force) but describes an impossible energy gain.
A
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text mentions compressed air ('Pressluft') and water lines ('Wasserleitung'), suggesting potential energy stored in pressurized air or water pressure as input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims are physically incoherent and do not describe a viable working principle for an engine. The text is corrupted and vague, stating the invention doesn't yet exist and making contradictory claims, failing to define a complete energy conversion process that can be evaluated for thermodynamic compliance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1 states the motor is characterized by the fact that it does not yet exist in a comparable framework, which is not a physical operating principle.
- Claim 3 states that with a counterpart, sliding instead of wheels, the result would be 'gleich Null' (equal to zero), implying a contradictory or nonsensical performance claim.
- No description of how energy is converted, efficiency, or work output. The claims are incoherent and do not form a comprehensible physical mechanism.
- Text appears corrupted/obfuscated (e.g., 'Mössingen', 'daÃ'), hindering technical analysis but not obscuring the lack of a working principle.
C - Technical Obfuscation: The claims are vague, incoherent,
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title 'Machine creant l'energie' (Machine creating energy) and the single claim fragment suggest the device is claimed to generate energy from nothing or neutralize a reaction to produce net energy without an identifiable external source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent title directly claims to create energy, which violates the first law of thermodynamics. The provided claim fragment is technically obfuscated and incomplete, offering no legitimate energy source or conversion process, fitting the pattern of an over-unity energy generation claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Title implies energy creation ex nihilo, violating conservation of energy
- Claim fragment is incomplete and incoherent ('neutralisant totalement la réaction'), providing no valid mechanism
- No identifiable energy input described, implying a perpetual motion machine of the first kind
A
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim text is corrupted/nonsensical, containing random characters and fragments ('Therphenit AG.Glarus/Sch.weiz'). No identifiable energy input is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent claim is not a coherent technical description but appears to be corrupted data or obfuscated text, making scientific analysis impossible. Presenting nonsensical text as a technical claim is itself a violation of the requirement for a physically meaningful disclosure.
Specific Physics Issues
- The presented text is gibberish and contains no analyzable physics description.
- No mechanism, energy input, or conversion process can be identified from the corrupted claim.
- The lack of coherent technical content prevents any meaningful energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis.
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent claim is empty (no title, abstract, or claims). Therefore, no energy source is identified or described.
AI Physics Analysis
The submission is an empty template with no technical content to analyze. This constitutes 'Technical Obfuscation' (Pattern C) as it presents a framework for a claim but provides zero substantive physics or engineering details, making proper energy accounting and thermodynamic analysis impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- No physical system or process is described for analysis.
- No energy inputs or outputs are defined.
- No thermodynamic context is provided.
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is empty, offering no description of any energy input, conversion process, or system boundaries.
AI Physics Analysis
The submission contains no substantive technical information, only placeholder text. This complete lack of a describable mechanism, while presented as a patent claim, is inherently obfuscatory and prevents any meaningful physics analysis, defaulting to a violation of the requirement for a testable scientific claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No information provided for energy accounting.
- No thermodynamic process described to evaluate against limits.
- Complete absence of technical details prevents any physics-based assessment.
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unidentifiable. The claim text is corrupted/obfuscated nonsense, preventing identification of any legitimate energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent claim is not a technical description but appears to be corrupted data or deliberate obfuscation, making meaningful physics analysis impossible. Since no coherent mechanism is described, it cannot comply with fundamental conservation laws by default.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is completely garbled and contains no discernible physics, engineering, or energy concepts.
- No process, mechanism, or energy flow can be parsed from the provided 'claims'.
- The submission fails to constitute a coherent technical disclosure for analysis.
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text references 'environment energy superimposed dynamics (EESD)' and 'Earth's gravitational and magnetic field' but provides no identifiable, quantifiable input mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The text is a word salad of technical-sounding terms with no coherent physical model. It fails to specify any energy source or conversion process, making energy accounting impossible, and uses obfuscated language that suggests overcoming energy shortages without respecting thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy conversion process
- Claims of 'maximally direct energy flowing' and 'negative backpressures' without physical mechanism
- Language is semantically null - uses physics terms without coherent meaning or quantitative relationships
- Implies overcoming thermodynamic limits ('combat energy shortage') without a stated source
- Proposes 'cosmological nullity' and 'boundaries perfection' as principles without connection to conservation laws
C
A
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claims describe operational concepts (Cold Fueling, Displacement Stacking) but do not identify a primary energy input. The device is described as both an engine and a pump, implying it could produce net work from an unspecified source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claims present novel terminology but fail to identify a coherent energy source or respect the fundamental thermodynamic distinction between a work-consuming pump and a work-producing engine. The description is obfuscated by invented concepts, making it impossible to analyze as a valid physical system without violating energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input or gradient specified for the 'engine' operation.
- Claims of similar efficiency for both pump and engine modes with no component changes is thermodynamically suspicious; a pump consumes work to move fluid/create pressure, an engine produces work from a fluid/pressure gradient.
- The core thermodynamic principle ('Cold Fueling') is not a standard concept and its description is vague, mandating storage in compounds that 'phase below ambient temperature' without explaining the energy conversion cycle.
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: Uses invented terminology
PATTERN A - INCOMPLETE ENERGY ACCOUNTING: Implies a device c
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to use water in a closed system to drive a dynamo without consuming water, implying a perpetual or self-sustaining process with no identified external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a closed system using water to drive a generator without consuming water or identifying any external energy source. This directly violates energy conservation, as it implies creating useful work (electricity) from nothing. The system lacks a thermodynamic gradient to exploit, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). No identifiable external energy input to a closed system claiming to produce net electrical output.
- Violates Second Law of Thermodynamics. Proposes to generate work (drive a dynamo) from an isothermal, closed water system with no temperature or pressure gradient to exploit.
- Incomplete energy accounting: 'water for driving the dynamo' is not an energy source; kinetic or potential energy of water must come from an external input.
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is corrupted/truncated, showing only placeholder tags (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) and page numbers. No functional description, mechanism, or energy input is provided.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no technical description, only placeholder text and page number tags. This prevents any physics analysis and strongly suggests an attempt to appear legitimate while concealing the actual (likely non-functional or violative) mechanism. A legitimate patent must disclose the invention to be analyzed.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable technical content. The submission contains only structural placeholders with zero substantive physics or engineering description.
- Cannot perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis due to missing information.
- The format suggests an attempt to mimic a patent structure without providing the required technical disclosure.
C - Technical Obfuscation: The use of correct-seeming struct
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The provided patent excerpt is empty of any technical description, claims, or abstract, making energy source identification impossible.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no technical information—only empty titles and placeholder labels—which is a form of technical obfuscation (Pattern C). Without a described mechanism or energy inputs, it is impossible to validate compliance with physics laws, but the structure strongly suggests an attempt to obscure a non-functional or invalid concept.
Specific Physics Issues
- Insufficient information for analysis. No physical mechanism, inputs, or outputs are described.
- Cannot perform energy accounting or thermodynamic limit analysis due to missing technical content.
- The submission format suggests obfuscation—placeholder text (EMI1.1, etc.) is presented instead of a technical disclosure.
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided text contains no substantive description of the invention, only placeholder text and formatting markers. No energy input or conversion process is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The submitted text is not a patent claim but appears to be template placeholder text and formatting instructions. Since no technical description exists, it is impossible to verify compliance with physics laws, but the presentation itself obstructs analysis, which is a hallmark of obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable claim or description provided.
- Impossible to perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis.
- Insufficient information to identify a working principle.
C - Technical Obfuscation: The text is composed of non-infor
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is incomplete and contains only placeholder text (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) and page number markers. No actual energy source, mechanism, or device description is provided for analysis.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text is not a functional patent claim but appears to be a corrupted template or placeholder document. Since no physical system, energy source, or conversion process is described, it is impossible to perform a physics compliance analysis. The submission itself violates the basic requirement of describing an invention.
Specific Physics Issues
- No physical system or process described
- No energy inputs or outputs defined
- No mechanism to evaluate against thermodynamic laws
- Text appears to be a template or corrupted submission
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The provided patent text contains only placeholder labels (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) and page number markers with no substantive description of any energy input, conversion process, or power source.
AI Physics Analysis
The submitted 'patent claim' contains no technical description, only template placeholders and page numbers, making substantive analysis impossible. Presenting empty templates as a patent claim is a form of obfuscation that prevents proper scientific evaluation and inherently violates the requirement for a complete and clear disclosure of an invention's operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- No working principle or mechanism explained
- Claims are placeholders with zero technical content
- Impossible to perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis due to missing information
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is incomplete and contains no substantive description of an energy input, conversion process, or identifiable power source.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text is not a functional patent claim but appears to be a placeholder or template with no technical content. Without a description of a device, process, or energy source, it is impossible to validate and defaults to a violation of the requirement for a physically analyzable claim. The structure suggests technical obfuscation via absence of information.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- No thermodynamic process or mechanism defined
- Claims are presented as labels (EMI1.1, EMI2.1) without physical content
- Insufficient information to perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is corrupted placeholder text ('EMI1.1', '<Desc/Clms Page number 1>') with no description of any device, process, or energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text is not a patent claim but corrupted placeholder data, making a physics analysis impossible. Submitting such non-information as a technical claim is itself a violation of the analytical framework's requirement for a coherent physical proposal.
Specific Physics Issues
- No functional device or process described to analyze
- No energy inputs or outputs defined
- No thermodynamic process or mechanism specified
- Text is placeholder/gibberish, preventing any physics analysis
C - Technical Obfuscation: The submission uses the structure
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided text contains only placeholder labels (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) and page number references with no substantive description of an energy source, input, or conversion mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no technical content—only labels and page numbers—which is a form of obfuscation that prevents any meaningful physics analysis. A device or process cannot be evaluated for thermodynamic compliance if its operating principles are not disclosed, but presenting a framework that implies claims (EMI1.1, etc.) without substance is a hallmark of pseudoscientific proposals.
Specific Physics Issues
- No physical system or process is described for analysis.
- No energy inputs or outputs are defined.
- No thermodynamic cycle, working substance, or conversion principle is specified.
- The 'claims' are empty placeholders, making energy accounting and thermodynamic limit analysis impossible.
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is incomplete and contains only placeholder labels (EMI1.1, EMI2.1) and page number references with no substantive description of an energy input mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no technical description, only placeholder text and page references, which is a hallmark of obfuscation. Without a described mechanism or energy source, it is impossible to perform a physics analysis, but the structure suggests an attempt to claim a result without disclosing a physically valid process.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- No physical process or mechanism defined
- Incomplete text prevents any energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided text is corrupted placeholder/garbage data ('EMI1.1', 'EMI2.1', etc.) with no description of a device, process, or energy inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The submitted 'patent claim' contains no technical description, only corrupted placeholder text and structural tags. A device that cannot be described cannot be analyzed for energy conservation, making any performance claim inherently unverifiable and functionally equivalent to a violation, as it obscures the fundamental physics required for assessment.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable claim or device description provided.
- Text appears to be non-functional template or corrupted data.
- Cannot perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis on null input.
C - Technical Obfuscation: The submission uses structural ma
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The provided patent text is incomplete and contains no description of any energy input mechanism, conversion process, or identifiable external energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent text is essentially blank, containing only formatting placeholders and no technical description of a device or process. A patent claim with no described mechanism cannot be evaluated as physically valid, as it provides no information to perform energy accounting or assess thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy input described
- No thermodynamic process defined
- No work output mechanism specified
- Incomplete technical disclosure prevents any energy accounting
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unidentifiable. The claim text is corrupted/nonsensical, containing no discernible description of an energy input, conversion process, or mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text is not a valid patent claim but appears to be corrupted data or encoding artifacts, making scientific analysis impossible. Presenting nonsensical text as a technical claim is itself a violation of the analytical framework.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable physics content
- Text appears to be corrupted data or encoding garbage
- Cannot perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis on non-information
C - Technical Obfuscation: The presented 'claim' is not a co
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided text contains no description of any energy input, conversion process, or identifiable energy source. The claims appear to be placeholder text (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) with no technical content.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no technical description, only placeholder labels and formatting notes, making a physics analysis impossible. This structure is characteristic of obfuscation where substantive claims are absent, preventing any validation of energy conservation or thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy accounting possible due to missing technical description
- No identifiable thermodynamic process to analyze
- Claims section contains no substantive physics or engineering content
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The provided text contains no description of any energy input mechanism, system components, or process.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no substantive technical description, only formatting placeholders and warnings. This complete absence of a defined mechanism or energy source prevents any meaningful physics analysis, but the presentation mimics a technical document without content—a hallmark of obfuscation. A device with no described energy source cannot perform work.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy conversion process described
- No inputs or outputs defined for energy accounting
- Claims section is empty or contains only placeholder text
- Impossible to perform any thermodynamic analysis due to complete lack of technical content
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text provided is incomplete and appears to be placeholder formatting (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) with no description of any actual device, process, or energy input mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text is not a functional patent claim but appears to be template placeholder text or a corrupted submission. Since no device, process, or energy flows are described, it is impossible to perform a physics compliance analysis. The submission format itself is a technical obfuscation, presenting the appearance of a patent without substantive content.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- No system or process defined for analysis
- Incomplete patent submission prevents energy accounting
- Cannot assess thermodynamic limits without a described mechanism
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent claim text is corrupted/truncated and contains no discernible description of an energy input mechanism. The fragments 'EMI1.1', 'EMI2.1', 'EMI3.1' suggest electromagnetic interference or induction, but no functional system or energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The submitted 'patent claim' is not a coherent technical description but appears to be corrupted placeholder text or a truncated file, containing no operable device or process to analyze. Since no functional mechanism is described, it fails to define an energy source, making it impossible to comply with conservation laws by default. The formatting suggests obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- No system or process defined to analyze
- Text appears to be placeholder/corrupted data, preventing any physics-based analysis of a real claim
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is incomplete and provides no description of any energy input mechanism, system boundaries, or explicit power source.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent excerpt contains no substantive technical description—only placeholder text and claim labels—making proper energy accounting impossible. Presenting claims without any description of the energy source or conversion mechanism inherently violates the requirement for a complete physical accounting, falling under Pattern A (Incomplete Energy Accounting) and Pattern C (Technical Obfuscation).
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input described
- No system boundaries defined for energy accounting
- Claims (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) are presented without any supporting physical mechanism or process description
- Complete absence of thermodynamic context or conservation law consideration
A
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unidentifiable. The text appears to be corrupted or obfuscated, containing no coherent description of an energy input mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent claim text is not coherent English or any recognizable technical description; it appears to be corrupted, obfuscated, or nonsensical. Since no valid physical system, energy source, or process can be identified, it fails the fundamental requirement of describing a testable apparatus that complies with conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No discernible energy input described
- No identifiable energy conversion process
- Text is garbled/nonsensical, preventing any physical analysis
- No quantitative claims to evaluate against thermodynamic limits
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The document consists of
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is empty of any technical description, claims, or abstract. No energy inputs, conversion processes, or outputs are specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The submitted 'patent claim' contains zero technical information—only empty headings and page number placeholders. This structure prevents any meaningful energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis, which is a hallmark of obfuscation. A legitimate patent disclosure must describe a concrete apparatus or method to allow for physics-based evaluation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No technical content to analyze. The submission consists only of placeholder labels (e.g., EMI1.1, <Desc/Clms Page number X>) with no substantive physics, engineering, or energy claims.
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is corrupted/truncated and contains no identifiable energy source description. The only discernible content is placeholder text and numbering (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.).
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no technical description, only corrupted placeholder text and numbering. A submission with no identifiable mechanism, energy source, or process cannot be evaluated as physically valid and represents a fundamental failure to describe a working system.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable energy conversion process described
- No inputs or outputs defined
- No thermodynamic context provided
- Text appears to be formatting placeholders, not a functional claim
C - Technical Obfuscation: The submission uses patent-like f
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The provided text contains only placeholder markers (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) and page number references with no substantive description of any energy input, device, or process.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text is not a patent claim but a corrupted template with placeholder text and page number markers. Since no device, process, or energy flows are described, it is impossible to perform a physics compliance analysis. The submission itself violates the basic requirement of presenting a testable technical claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- No physical system or energy conversion process described
- No energy inputs or outputs identified for analysis
- Text appears to be a corrupted or placeholder patent template with no technical content
C - Technical Obfuscation: The submission uses the structure
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/unspecified. The provided patent text is incomplete and contains no description of any energy input mechanism, process, or source material.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text contains no analyzable physics. It consists only of a title, an empty abstract, and placeholder claim labels with no descriptive content, making it impossible to identify a legitimate energy source or conversion process. This structure is characteristic of obfuscation or an incomplete submission.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy input described
- No energy conversion process defined
- No thermodynamic context provided
- Claims appear to be placeholders (EMI1.1, EMI2.1) with no substantive content
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is corrupted/truncated and contains no discernible description of an energy input mechanism. The text appears to be placeholder/gibberish (e.g., 'EMI1.1', '<Desc/Clms Page number 1>').
AI Physics Analysis
The submitted 'patent claim' contains no meaningful technical description, only corrupted placeholder text and page number markers. Without a description of a device or process, it is impossible to perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis, but the presentation itself is a violation of meaningful scientific disclosure.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy conversion process described
- No quantitative claims to evaluate
- Text structure is nonsensical and contains no technical content
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unidentifiable. The text is corrupted/garbled, containing no coherent description of an energy input, conversion process, or power source.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' is not a coherent technical document but appears to be corrupted data or placeholder text, rendering physics analysis impossible. The garbled output fails to describe any device, energy source, or process to evaluate.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable physics or engineering claims can be extracted from the provided text.
- The document appears to be corrupted data or placeholder text, not a functional patent claim.
- Without a coherent mechanism, energy accounting and thermodynamic analysis are impossible.
C - Technical Obfuscation: The text is nonsensical and uses
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is incomplete and contains only placeholder labels (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) and page number markers. No actual description of an energy source, mechanism, or inputs is present.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided 'patent claim' contains no substantive technical information—only section labels and page numbers—making a proper physics analysis impossible. Presenting a non-functional placeholder as a patent claim is itself a violation of the requirement for a complete and enabling disclosure, falling under technical obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- No analyzable physical system described
- No energy inputs or outputs defined
- No mechanism or process explained
- Incomplete technical disclosure
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent text is incomplete and provides no description of any energy input mechanism, system components, or operational principles.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent text is structurally incomplete, containing only placeholder tags and section headers with no substantive technical description of any device or method. This prevents any meaningful physics analysis, but the presentation mimics a technical document while conveying zero information—a hallmark of obfuscation. Without a described mechanism, no valid energy source can be identified.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source described
- No system or process defined to analyze
- Insufficient information to perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis
C - Technical Obfuscation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Text appears to describe a mechanical system with wheels, drive belts, and water, but no explicit primary energy input is identifiable. Mentions of 'automatic' operation suggest a self-sustaining claim.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is heavily corrupted and unreadable, which is itself a major red flag. The fragments suggest a mechanical system intended to run automatically, which, without a clear external energy source, would constitute a perpetual motion machine violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is corrupted/obfuscated, preventing clear technical analysis
- Implies automatic, self-sustaining operation without an identifiable external energy source
- No measurable performance metrics or energy accounting provided
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title 'Vliehkraftantriebes zur energie-erzeugung' (likely a misspelling of 'Fliehkraftantrieb' meaning centrifugal force drive) suggests an attempt to generate energy from centrifugal forces or rotational inertia, implying a closed system with no external energy input beyond an initial impulse.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device purportedly generating energy from centrifugal force, which is a fictitious force within a rotating reference frame and cannot perform net work on the system itself. Any such device would either slow down as it outputs energy (consuming its own rotational kinetic energy) or violate the first law of thermodynamics by creating energy from nothing.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Centrifugal force is a kinematic constraint, not an energy source
- System would extract net work from its own motion, violating energy conservation
- No thermodynamic gradient or ambient energy harvesting mechanism specified
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text is garbled and contains fragments suggesting electrical input, a rotating disk ('DISK'), and magnets, but no coherent description of a primary energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text is corrupted and unintelligible, which is a hallmark of obfuscation. The fragments that are decipherable point towards a generator system, but with no valid description of an external energy source, making it a likely violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Text is largely nonsensical/obfuscated, preventing proper analysis
- Fragments imply energy generation ('GENERATOR') without a clear input
- Mentions 'EFFICIENCY' and 'OVER UNITY' which are red flags for perpetual motion claims
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The claim is presented in
PATTERN B - THERMODYNAMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE MECHANISMS: Implied
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims to generate electricity from gravitational potential energy of weights, but no described mechanism for resetting the system or inputting external energy to lift the weights again.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a gravity-powered generator using falling weights to turn a generator. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) because once the weights fall, an equal or greater amount of energy must be expended to lift them back up to repeat the cycle. The description lacks any external energy input for this reset, making it a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy cycle described
- Implies continuous rotation from falling weights without an energy input to restore the weights to their initial height
- Violates conservation of energy - system cannot output more work than the gravitational potential energy initially stored, and that energy is depleted without a restoration mechanism
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests converting gravitational potential energy of weights into electricity, but provides no mechanism for resetting the system (lifting the weights back up) without external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a gravity-powered generator that extracts energy from descending weights. This violates the first law of thermodynamics because lifting the weights back to their starting position requires at least as much energy as is generated during their descent, resulting in zero net energy output for a complete cycle. It is a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy cycle described
- Implies continuous generation from falling weights without accounting for the greater energy required to reset the weights
- Violates conservation of energy by suggesting net work can be extracted from a closed gravitational system
- Lacks any identifiable external energy input to sustain the claimed generation
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim states energy is generated 'durch Verlagerung von Masse' (by displacement of mass) and that no external energy needs to be supplied, implying the device is intended to be a closed system that generates its own energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a self-rotating generator that creates energy from mass displacement without external input, constituting a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It violates energy conservation, as the internal rearrangement of mass in a closed system cannot produce net work output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (Energy Conservation). A closed system cannot perform net work without an external energy input.
- Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. 'Verlagerung von Masse' within a closed system cannot produce a continuous net force or torque; internal forces cancel out.
- No identifiable external energy gradient (thermal, chemical, potential, etc.) is described to drive the generator.
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests rotation is generated solely by the arrangement of rings containing heavy balls, with no explicit external energy input mentioned.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to generate continuous rotation using only an arrangement of eccentric rings containing heavy balls, with no external energy input described. This constitutes a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, directly violating the law of conservation of energy, as it proposes to produce work (rotation) from no apparent energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism described
- Implies continuous rotation without an energy source, violating conservation of energy
- Mechanism (eccentric rings with heavy balls) cannot generate net torque or sustained rotation in a closed system
- System would settle into a stable, low-energy equilibrium position
B
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from motors to rotate masses. The claim implicitly suggests extracting a net propulsive force from the centrifugal force generated by these rotating masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate net spacecraft propulsion using only internal centrifugal forces from rotating masses. This is a classic reactionless drive concept that violates Newton's Third Law and the conservation of momentum. No net external force can be produced, making it a physical impossibility for propulsion in a vacuum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an internal, reaction force within the rotating system. It cannot produce a net external force or net momentum change for the entire isolated system (the spacecraft).
- For every 'push' in one direction from a mass, there is an equal and opposite internal force on the rotating structure, resulting in zero net thrust.
- The system obeys Newton's Third Law: the center of mass of an isolated system cannot accelerate by internal forces alone.
B
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from burners (16) vaporizing mercury inside a rotating closed chamber.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to generate propulsion by creating a rotating imbalance (balourd) via internal phase changes of mercury. This violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically conservation of momentum) as a closed system cannot produce a net external force on its center of mass. The description uses correct physics terms (condensation, vaporization, balourd) but applies them to an impossible propulsion mechanism.
Specific Physics Issues
- The described mechanism (condensation creating an imbalance/balourd) cannot produce a sustained net force for propulsion. The system is a closed, rotating reference frame; any internal mass redistribution creates a temporary imbalance, but the vapori
- The energy input is explicitly from burners, making it a heat engine. The output is claimed as useful propulsion work. No thermodynamic cycle (e.g., Carnot) is described, and the conversion of heat to directed mechanical work via an imbalanced rotati
- The system lacks a reaction mass or momentum exchange with an external medium (air, water, ground), which is necessary for net propulsion of a vehicle. Internal shifting of mercury cannot propel the vehicle as a whole.
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear/implied to be from magnetic interactions alone, with claims of no energy consumption.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert magnetic forces into kinetic motion without consuming any energy, which directly violates the first law of thermodynamics. Magnetic systems are conservative force fields; no net work can be extracted from a static magnetic configuration without an external energy source or a changing gradient. The description fits a classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Violates energy conservation: claims transformation of magnetic forces into kinetic energy without energy input
- No identifiable external energy source or gradient to drive motion
- Implies perpetual motion from static magnetic configuration
- Misrepresents magnetic forces as a source of energy rather than a means of force transmission
A
B
C
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text (in Greek) describes converting wave motion into continuous rotation, implying energy is extracted from ocean surface height variations (wave energy). However, the description is vague and the mechanism for achieving 'continuous rotation' from oscillatory motion is not physically specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a mechanism to transform wave oscillation into continuous rotation but provides no physically coherent explanation for the conversion. While wave energy is a valid source, the description is technically obfuscated and, in the context of perpetual motion patents, strongly suggests an attempt to disguise a mechanism that would violate energy conservation by implying a perfect, lossless conversion from an oscillatory input to a rotational output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Mechanism for converting oscillatory motion to continuous, unidirectional rotation is not explained and likely violates energy conservation if claimed to be lossless or self-sustaining.
- No complete energy accounting provided. The input is wave energy, but the efficiency of conversion and all losses (friction, electrical, etc.) are not addressed.
- The abstract suggests a simplicity and economic advantage that often accompanies over-unity or perpetual motion claims, though not explicitly stated.
PATTERN C - TECHNICAL OBFUSCATION: The text uses correct-sou
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from provided text. Title translates to 'Energy storage with a positive energy balance,' implying output > input, which suggests either an unaccounted ambient source or a violation.
AI Physics Analysis
The core claim describes an energy storage system with a positive energy balance, which is thermodynamically impossible for a pure storage device. It violates energy conservation (Pattern A) by implying creation of energy, and is a classic perpetual motion claim (Pattern B) unless it harnesses an external, unidentified ambient source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'positive energy balance' for an energy storage device directly implies energy output > total energy input, violating the First Law of Thermodynamics.
- No process or mechanism is described to justify where the excess energy originates.
- As a storage device, its maximum efficiency is <100%, making a positive net balance impossible without an external, unaccounted energy input.
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the 'drive machine' (likely an electric motor) that sets the rotational system into motion. The claim implicitly suggests that repositioning masses radially using a magnetic component will generate a net drive force, implying an energy output greater than the motor's input.
AI Physics Analysis
The described assembly attempts to generate a net drive force by internally moving masses in a rotating frame, which violates conservation of momentum and energy. The 'drive machine' provides the only clear energy input, and internal mass redistribution cannot create a net propulsive force for the closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- The system is described as a closed rotational assembly with moving masses. Repositioning masses radially within a rotating frame requires work input against centrifugal forces. The magnetic component, while not rotating, still exerts forces that do
- The claim suggests a net motive force can be generated from the asymmetric radial motion of masses within the system. In a closed system, the center of mass cannot accelerate itself. Any internal force to move a mass inward will produce an equal and
A
B
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 100% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 100% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 100% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind/pressure differentials (implicitly). The control system's energy source for managing the pressure differential is unspecified.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a wind turbine in a duct. It is physically valid only if the pressure difference is provided by an external source like wind or a fan powered separately. The patent is questionable because it omits the energy source for the control system and is vague on whether the controlled pressure differential consumes more energy than the turbine generates.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy source for the control system is not defined. If the control system uses external power to create or enhance the pressure differential (e.g., by moving ducts), this is an energy input not accounted for in the output.
- The claim describes managing airflow but does not specify the origin of the primary pressure gradient driving it. If the apparatus merely harvests an existing natural wind/pressure gradient, it is a wind turbine variant. If it claims to generate a ne
Claimed Energy Source
External heat source (5) provides thermal energy to the primary medium heating heat exchanger (10). The system appears to be a complex thermal power cycle attempting to recover and reuse waste heat.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an overly complex thermal cycle with many internal heat recovery loops. While an external heat source is identified, the description is obfuscated and makes a vague efficiency claim without demonstrating how it circumposes the Carnot limit for a heat engine operating between a given hot source and ambient cold sink.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete thermodynamic description obscures net energy flow.
- Claim of increased efficiency at 'fairly low temperature' is vague and lacks justification against Carnot limit.
- Complex arrangement of heat exchangers and a 'residual heat utilising part-unit' suggests possible attempt at internal energy recycling which cannot improve net efficiency beyond fundamental limits.
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly an external energy source (e.g., grid electricity, battery) powers a motor which drives the system. No novel or additional energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is fundamentally a motor driving a generator through a complex mechanical linkage. The energy source is explicitly an external electrical input, making it a net consumer of power, not a sustainable generator. The complex design and terminology obscure this basic fact, raising significant questions about its claimed purpose.
Specific Physics Issues
- The description is mechanically complex but obfuscates the fundamental energy conversion path. The 'hoop assembly' and 'guide arm' appear to be an elaborate mechanism to convert the motor's rotation into generator rotation, implying a standard motor-
- Claims of 'sustainable' and 'renewable' generation are misleading if the primary input is standard grid electricity. The system is a consumer of electricity, not a net producer.
- The patent text focuses on mechanical arrangement but avoids quantitative performance claims (e.g., efficiency, output vs. input power), which is a red flag.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the kinetic energy from the rocking/swaying motion of a boat on water (or a simulated motion on land driven by an electric motor).
AI Physics Analysis
The boat-based system is a parasitic energy recovery device that increases vessel drag, making it questionable as a net benefit. The land-based version is clearly not a generator, as it requires an electric motor input to function, making it a net consumer of energy. The patent language obfuscates this fundamental flaw.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system on a boat extracts energy from the boat's rocking, which is motion imparted by waves. This extraction acts as a damper, slowing the boat's motion. The energy generated comes at the direct expense of the boat's
- The land-based version explicitly uses an electric motor to create the simulated rocking motion. This is a net energy loss system, as the motor's electrical input must be greater than any electrical output from the generators due to conversion losses
- The description of inertial discs and torque multiplication suggests an attempt to amplify motion, but this cannot create net energy. Any 'multiplication' comes from trading force for distance or vice-versa, not from creating energy.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical gear assembly but does not specify any prime mover or energy input. It appears to be a passive transmission/control mechanism that would require an external motor or engine to function.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical gear assembly but fails to identify any energy source or active control mechanism. While it doesn't explicitly violate conservation laws, it makes functional claims ('control angular velocity') without explaining how this control is powered or actuated, suggesting incomplete system description rather than physical impossibility.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source identified
- Claims to 'control angular velocity' but mechanism is purely kinematic/geometric with no active control elements described
- Appears to be a complex gear train without a defined input power source or actuator
Claimed Energy Source
Initial first force applied to the prime mover (e.g., a lever). No other explicit energy inputs are described, though the system's geometry suggests it may be designed to convert potential energy or leverage mechanical advantage.
AI Physics Analysis
The device describes a mechanical system for force amplification, which is physically possible through leverage (trading force for distance). However, the patent language is ambiguous about energy conservation, specifically claiming acceleration without additional force, which risks implying a violation of Newton's laws if interpreted as a net energy gain. The core physics is likely valid but presented in a questionable manner.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of acceleration 'without an additional force applied' is ambiguous and potentially misleading.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description focuses on force amplification but does not account for the work (force × distance) input vs. output.
- The mechanism appears to be a complex lever/piston arrangement; any force amplification must come at the expense of distance, preserving work (energy) input, which is not explicitly addressed.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the connected motor. The system appears to be a mechanical transmission device that may store and release kinetic energy via rotating unbalanced masses (weights on rods) and ratchet mechanisms.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is described as a mechanical transmission between a motor and a load, using unbalanced rotating masses and ratchets. While not explicitly violating energy conservation, the claim is written so vaguely that it's impossible to verify if it could function as described without hidden energy inputs or perpetual motion concepts. The core claim of reducing motor duty cycle for the same output requires careful energy accounting not provided.
Specific Physics Issues
- The description is mechanically vague and grammatically confusing, making energy flow analysis difficult.
- Claims about reducing motor duty cycle are not clearly linked to a specific, physically valid mechanism for energy conservation.
- Potential confusion between reducing motor 'on-time' and actually reducing total energy input to achieve the same rotational output.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the central motor (rotates turntable) and to individual drive units/linear thrusters on each spoke (moves masses radially).
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses motors to spin a turntable and slide masses inward and outward in a specific pattern. While this creates a time-varying centripetal force distribution, it is an internal rearrangement in a rotating frame. No external energy source or reaction mass is described that could produce net thrust or continuous rotation without the input work from the motors. The description avoids a clear energy/output analysis, making it questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim implies a 'centripetal force differential' will produce a net useful effect (e.g., torque, propulsion) without specifying the energy source for this net effect. The system's energy input is clearly the motors,
- Conceptual obfuscation: 'Centripetal force differential' is not a standard term for net work or thrust. The described mass-shifting is a cyclic internal rearrangement in a rotating frame. In a closed system, the center of mass does not translate, and
- Implied over-unity possibility: The patent abstract and claims focus on creating a force asymmetry but do not specify the useful output or perform a complete work/energy balance. This structure is typical of attempts to generate net motion from inter
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the acceleration unit (electromagnetic coils or driving wheel) provides the initial kinetic energy to the mass. The claimed energy source is ambiguous regarding whether net useful work output is extracted from the deceleration process.
AI Physics Analysis
The described device appears to be an electrically driven mass circulating in a loop. Without a clear mechanism for extracting more useful work than the electrical energy input, it is not an 'engine' in the thermodynamic sense. The patent's ambiguity and focus on 'force redirection' raise concerns about an implied but physically impossible net energy gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes decelerating the mass in a second segment but does not specify if this deceleration recovers energy (e.g., via regenerative braking) or simply dissipates it as waste. If energy is recovered, the syst
- Ambiguous purpose and net output: The patent lacks a clear description of useful work extraction. The title 'engine' implies net work output, but the claims only describe accelerating and then decelerating a mass on a loop.
- Potential violation implied: If the claim is that deceleration in the 'second direction' (anti-parallel to acceleration) produces a net force or work greater than the input, it would violate Newton's third law and conservation of momentum/energy.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a conversion chain (hydraulic cylinder -> pump -> rack -> gear -> shaft -> gearbox -> generator) but does not specify the primary energy source that drives the hydraulic pump. The system appears to be a complex transducer, not a prime mover.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an energy conversion chain but fails to identify the original source of energy. Without a specified input like fuel, pressurized fluid, or an external force, the system has no energy to convert, making its claimed function physically incomplete and suspicious.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified primary energy input (e.g., fuel, wind, flowing water).
- System is a closed loop of energy conversion with no starting point.
- Claims 'controlled electrical energy production' but describes only a transmission system.
- Gearbox increases mechanical energy 'by increasing it'—misstates that gearboxes transmit and trade torque for speed, but cannot create energy.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the 'kinetic energy source (1)' which drives the rotating friction component. The pump (4) also requires an energy input to circulate the fluid. The system converts this input mechanical/electrical energy into thermal energy via friction in the fluid.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is fundamentally a friction heater, not an energy producer. It consumes more energy (to spin the rotor and pump the fluid) than the useful heat output it provides, making it an inefficient heating device. The patent's framing as a 'production' system is physically misleading.
Specific Physics Issues
- The patent describes a system for 'energy production' but the described mechanism is purely an energy converter (mechanical to thermal), not a net producer. The abstract and title imply generation, but the system appears to be a heater with extra ste
- No thermodynamic limit is exceeded, but the claim of 'production' is misleading as it omits the necessary input work to drive the kinetic source and pump against viscous losses.
- Efficiency is likely very low, as friction-based heating is a dissipative, not generative, process.
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from combustion in the endothermic engine, supplemented by electrical energy from an external source via the electric motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be an attempt to create a reactionless or internal-momentum-based thruster, which violates conservation of linear momentum. While the hybrid energy inputs (fuel and electricity) are clear, the claimed method of converting this energy into a net directional thrust using only rotating and radially moving masses within a closed system is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed mechanism for generating net propulsive thrust from rotating/varying masses is unclear and not justified by Newtonian mechanics. A rotating system with internal moving parts cannot produce a sustained net thrust on its enclosure in free space
- The description is mechanically complex and obfuscates the fundamental force analysis. The 'pusher' implies a reactionless drive or a drive that generates thrust from internal motions alone, which violates conservation of momentum.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; while energy inputs (fuel, electricity) are mentioned, the claim is for a thrust-generating device, not just an energy converter. The core physics issue is momentum, not energy.
Claimed Energy Source
External power source drives an input shaft with cams and a spur gear, which oscillates two masses via rods. Springs and shields are claimed to reduce losses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses an external power source, so it does not inherently violate energy conservation. However, the claims are vague and suggest force multiplication without clarifying the energy trade-offs, leading to questionable physics accounting. The patent focuses on protection, not a working principle demonstration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed 'increase the vertical forces' is vague and suggests force amplification without a clear energy source.
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantitative analysis of input power vs. output force/work.
- Mechanism description implies possible over-unity or free energy interpretation, though not explicitly stated.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. The device requires an external input to drive the counter-rotating shafts (claims 1-2). Potential energy sources could be the initial motor input, magnetic interactions, or spring potential energy, but no primary energy source is explicitly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system with rotating weights and magnets but fails to account for the fundamental energy source required for sustained operation. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the design suggests an attempt to generate propulsion or work from internal motions, which cannot yield net output without violating conservation of momentum and energy. The vague description and focus on internal force generation without clear input/output accounting make it highly questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims describe a complex mechanical/magnetic system but do not specify the net energy input or output.
- Ambiguous mechanism for net propulsion or work extraction: The system uses rotating masses with radially movable weights, suggesting an attempt to create an imbalanced centrifugal force or inertial effect. In a closed system, such internal motions ca
- Potential confusion between momentum/force within the system and net external thrust/work: The counter-rotation may cancel angular momentum but not necessarily enable net energy gain.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy from servo motors (12) driving a toothed ring (11) to rotate an inclined platform (2) with offset rotating masses (1, 1a). The control unit (13) manages motor input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a complex mechanical system that transforms and redirects torque via offset rotating masses and a moving axis. While it does not explicitly violate energy conservation (energy source is the motors), the claims of 'force amplification' are presented in a vague, non-standard way that obscures the fundamental energy accounting, making its purported performance questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'force amplification' without clarifying it is torque/force transformation, not energy amplification.
- Uses vague term 'paradox of the cone' (likely a kinematic paradox) as a principle without rigorous mechanical explanation.
- Implies a self-sustaining or amplified force output, but energy input is solely from the servo motors; no novel energy source or over-unity mechanism is described, yet the presentation suggests anomalous gain.
Claimed Energy Source
External mechanical input (presumably from a rotating shaft or linear motion) is implied but not explicitly stated. The device appears to be a passive mechanical component intended to guide or transmit forces within a bearing assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a geometric shape for a bearing component but invokes a non-standard 'cone paradox' principle. As a passive mechanical guide, it cannot create energy, but the vague language and reference to an obscure principle obscure its actual function and raise flags about the underlying physical claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims reference 'paradoxo do cone' (cone paradox) which is not a standard, well-defined physical principle, suggesting a possible misunderstanding of mechanics.
- The description is purely geometric/kinematic with no energy accounting. It claims to 'conduzir a força obtida' (conduct the obtained force) without explaining the source of that force or any potential energy gains.
- No quantitative performance claims (efficiency, force multiplication) are made, making thermodynamic evaluation impossible but raising questions about the implied purpose.
Claimed Energy Source
Primary energy input is from an auxiliary renewable energy source (e.g., solar, wind) used to run a compressor motor, storing energy as compressed air. The system then converts the stored pneumatic energy back to electricity via linear generators.
AI Physics Analysis
The core concept of storing renewable energy as compressed air and reconverting it to electricity is physically valid. However, the patent language is obfuscated, contains vague claims about 'recycling' energy, and lacks clear efficiency accounting, making the overall system's claimed performance questionable and impossible to verify against thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete/confusing energy accounting: The claim of 'high density energy is generated by recycling gas' is vague and suggests possible misunderstanding of energy conservation. Recycling gas does not generate new energy.
- Obfuscated mechanical description: The description of the drive bar, sleeves, and pulley system is convoluted and makes it difficult to analyze efficiency and losses.
- Ambiguous performance claims: The dual-mode switch and description of operations lack quantitative efficiency metrics, making thermodynamic assessment impossible.
- The water extraction is a minor byproduct of compressing humid air and does not represent an energy source.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the electric motor (14), which is the sole explicitly stated energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The system appears to be an internal moving mass on a cart, powered by an electric motor. For an isolated system, internal forces cannot create net momentum; the described asymmetric motion would only cause the cart to oscillate around its center of mass, not propel it forward continuously. The claim of net propulsion suggests a misunderstanding of Newton's laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim that asymmetric mass motion (fast forward, slow backward) causes net forward impulse implies net momentum generation without an external reaction mass or force.
- Violates Newton's third law for a closed system: The internal moving mass cannot produce a net force on the system's center of mass without expelling mass or pushing against an external medium.
- Misapplication of 'impulse of force': The description confuses internal momentum transfer with net propulsion.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient fluid pressure (liquid or gas) acting on free-hanging membranes in hypobaric chambers, with control input to manage internal chamber pressure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses controlled pressure differentials across membranes to generate directional force from ambient fluid pressure. While not explicitly violating conservation laws, the claims are vague about the control energy input required to manage the hypobaric chambers, making net energy gain or efficiency claims impossible to evaluate. The design appears to be an overly complex way to convert controlled pneumatic/hydraulic energy into linear motion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'generation of controlled motive force' but doesn't specify the energy source for the pressure control system (9).
- Ambiguous net work output: The device appears to convert ambient fluid pressure into directional force via controlled pressure differentials, but the control energy input is not quantified against claimed output.
- Mechanism complexity obfuscates the fundamental energy transfer path from the control system to the output.
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from fuel combustion in the piston cylinder. The mechanism is a purely mechanical linkage between piston and crankshaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a non-standard connecting rod geometry claiming it increases force. As a passive mechanical linkage in an engine, it cannot create energy or increase work output; it can only trade force for displacement within the constraints of conservation of energy. The claims suggest a violation of this basic principle of simple machines.
Specific Physics Issues
- Implies mechanical advantage (force multiplication) can be created without an equivalent trade-off in displacement or speed, violating conservation of energy for a simple machine.
- Misapplication of lever arm principles to a fixed kinematic chain; the force transmitted from piston to crankshaft is constrained by geometry and cannot exceed the input force for a given angular position without violating work conservation (Force_ou
- Claims suggest increased force output from the piston's motion itself, which is the energy input, not an independent source of leverage.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies an external 'force' is applied to the carriage to initiate motion, but the system's operation and claims about changing the center of gravity suggest an attempt to use internal weight redistribution to assist climbing, which does not constitute a net external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system for moving a carriage up an incline using pivoting and a shifting center of gravity. However, it fails to clearly identify the external energy source required to increase the carriage's gravitational potential energy. The described motion suggests a reliance on internal weight shifting, which cannot net lift the system's own center of mass without an external input, making it functionally a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the primary energy input to raise the mass against gravity.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Claims that changing the center of gravity assists in moving the carriage up the incline, which, if interpreted as a source of net upward work, violates conservation of energy.
- No thermodynamic limit violation per se, but a fundamental mechanics violation: Internal redistribution of mass cannot provide net work to raise the system's own center of mass.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the actuator (prime mover) that drives the swinging motion, which is then converted to electrical power via a generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is essentially an electrically powered motor (actuator) driving a swing, with a generator attached. While it physically functions, it cannot produce net useful electrical power because the generator's output will always be less than the power required to run the actuator, due to inevitable losses. The patent language obfuscates this fundamental energy deficit.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim describes a device that uses an actuator to drive a swing to then drive a generator, but provides no analysis of net energy output versus the electrical input to the actuator.
- Likely net energy loss: The system is a motor (actuator) driving a mechanical oscillator, which then drives a generator. Friction and conversion losses at each stage guarantee the electrical output will be less than the electrical input to the actuat
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily the external heat source, with potential contributions from gravitational potential energy (if gravity-fed) or an external pump. The claimed mechanism is the conversion of heat into work via a transient pressure wave cycle.
AI Physics Analysis
The system appears to be a complex heat engine where an external heat source drives a liquid cycle, and work is extracted via pressure waves. While not an explicit perpetual motion machine, the patent lacks the rigorous energy accounting needed to prove its net efficiency is thermodynamically possible, relying on obfuscated wave mechanics instead of clear first-law analysis.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system's net work output must be compared to the total energy input from the heat source and any pump/gravity system. The patent does not provide this analysis.
- Ambiguous efficiency: The described mechanism of using reflected pressure waves to do work is a form of heat engine, but its claimed or maximum possible efficiency relative to the Carnot limit is not addressed.
- Vague operational cycle: The description of how the transient wave is generated, how work is extracted, and how the liquid returns to the source to complete a sustainable cycle is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly stated motors (diesel, electric, etc.) provide the input energy to rotate the slotted arms and move the masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system with rotating eccentric masses driven by motors. While it does not explicitly claim energy generation or over-unity performance, its purpose is unclear and it provides no energy accounting, making proper physics evaluation impossible. It is questionable due to technical obfuscation without a clear functional claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim is purely a mechanical description with no performance claim (e.g., efficiency, output work). No energy output is defined, making thermodynamic analysis impossible.
- The complex path for eccentric masses suggests an attempt to manipulate inertial forces, but without a defined purpose or output, it cannot be evaluated for energy conservation.
- The system is an energy consumer (motors) with no specified useful work output, so it cannot be a 'violation' but is incomplete for analysis.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input from the AC network drives a motor (2) which spins a flywheel (7). The flywheel's rotational kinetic energy is then converted back to electricity by a generator (3).
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be an electrically-driven flywheel system with an overly complex mechanical transmission. While not explicitly claiming to violate energy conservation, the design suggests an attempt to achieve a beneficial inertial or pulsed effect without a coherent physical principle to improve net efficiency beyond that of a standard motor-flywheel-generator system, which will always have net losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims describe a complex mechanical transmission system (closed-loop belt/chain with inner/outer faces, auxiliary rotors, idler gear) but provide no physical principle for how this arrangement could result in net energy gain or conversion efficiency
- The abstract states it is to be inserted 'between two points of an AC network,' implying it may function as a power conditioner or storage device, but the claims lack any control circuitry or clear purpose for the pulsed contact mechanism.
- The specified 'power transmission ratio substantially equal to 1.2' (Claim 3) and the heavy flywheel (Claim 10) suggest an attempt to manipulate inertial effects, but no mechanism for overcoming motor/generator losses (friction, resistance, hysteresi
Claimed Energy Source
Batteries/solar cells (Claim 4) powering an electric motor (Claim 1), possibly combined with a combustion motor. The motor drives 'impact thrusters' in a circle via a gear mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an internal rotating and impacting mechanism but provides no physically valid explanation for how it generates net thrust in the vacuum of space. Without ejecting reaction mass or interacting with an external medium/field, it cannot produce a net force on the spacecraft, making it a questionable reactionless drive concept.
Specific Physics Issues
- No description of the fundamental mechanism for generating net thrust in a vacuum. 'Impact thrusters' striking a 'receiving rotor' suggests an internal momentum exchange, which cannot produce net external thrust without ejecting reaction mass.
- Claim 2 suggests regulating thrust by adjusting the 'braking resistance' of the receiver, which implies dissipating energy internally rather than converting it to useful propulsive work.
- The system appears to be a closed, internal mechanism with no mention of expelling propellant or interacting with an external field, violating Newton's third law for propulsion in space.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claim. Presumably electrical input to magnetic acceleration/braking systems, but potential implicit claim of recovering/reusing inertial energy from the steel ball's motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is technically obfuscated (Pattern C), using correct physics terms ('magnetic braking', 'acceleration', 'inertia') but describing a vague mechanism where internal momentum changes are symmetrically canceled. This obscures the fundamental issue: propelling a spacecraft requires expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field; internal momentum transfers net to zero. Without a clear external interaction or energy source description, the system appears to violate Newton's laws if net propulsion is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Insufficient detail to perform energy accounting. Claim describes a symmetric magnetic braking 'counterpart' intended to cancel directional movements (Y-axis displacements) of the spacecraft, suggesting a possible claim of momentum/energy recovery or
- Vague mechanism for how magnetic braking of an internal steel ball on a track translates to net propulsion or acceleration of the external spacecraft. Newton's third law concerns are prominent.
Claimed Energy Source
Manual input via handle (24) on hollow carrier (23). The device is a complex gear train intended to convert an applied radial force into output torque on shaft (35).
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a complex, likely inefficient, gear system. While not explicitly claiming energy creation, the obscure description and focus on 'conversion' without clear purpose or efficiency bounds make it questionable. It mechanically must obey conservation of energy, but its design suggests potential for misleading claims of mechanical advantage without loss.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit energy source beyond manual input, but claims imply a 'conversion' which could be misinterpreted as creating energy.
- Extremely complex mechanical description obscures the fundamental force/torque/gear ratio relationships, making efficiency analysis impossible from the claim.
- The term 'force-to-torque conversion' is mechanically standard (like a lever), but in this context, the complexity and lack of stated purpose raise flags about implied over-unity or amplification.
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical input from the electric motor (1). The device appears to claim energy recovery/amplification through kinetic energy transfer between two flywheels containing moving granular masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses an electric motor to spin flywheels, then claims this allows development and accumulation of kinetic energy to drive a generator. This implies energy multiplication without identifying a source for the added energy beyond the initial motor input, violating conservation of energy. The granular mass inside the flywheels does not create a new energy source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'recovery' and 'accumulation' of kinetic energy without specifying a source for net energy gain beyond the initial motor input.
- Implied over-unity: The description suggests the system can develop and accumulate kinetic energy to power a generator, implying output > input, but provides no mechanism for sourcing that extra energy.
- No identified ambient energy input: The granular mass inside conical recipients may redistribute, but this is an internal, lossy conversion with no external gradient to exploit for net work.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests using centrifugal forces from rotating liquids as a drive. This implies an external energy input is required to initially rotate the liquid and overcome losses, but the patent abstract does not specify this input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes using centrifugal forces from rotating liquids as a drive, but fails to account for the energy required to create and maintain that rotation against frictional and other losses. While not explicitly impossible, the incomplete description suggests a risk of 'free energy' misunderstanding where the centrifugal force is misinterpreted as an energy source rather than a kinematic effect.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the primary energy input to create and sustain the rotation.
- Ambiguous mechanism: 'Utilization of centrifugal forces' describes a phenomenon, not an energy source. Centrifugal force is a kinematic result of rotation, not an independent source of energy.
- No thermodynamic context: Does not state what work is extracted from or how efficiency is defined.
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of masses (loads) moving on eccentrically mounted guides/rails attached to a rotating disk. Possibly supplemented by magnetic repulsion/acceleration.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a gravity-driven turbine using eccentrically mounted guides with moving masses. While gravity is a valid energy source, the description implies the system can continuously accelerate its rotation through clever mass motion, suggesting over-unity behavior without clarifying the net energy input from lowering masses versus the work required to reset them. The physics is obscured by complex mechanical descriptions.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description suggests rotational speed increases when loads move outward (adding to rotational inertia) and also when they move inward (via 'inertial push'), implying continuous acceleration without clear primary ener
- Ambiguous perpetual motion mechanism: Claims that loads moving by gravity 'add speed to rotation' in both directions of radial travel, which would require net energy input not accounted for.
- Vague quantitative performance: No efficiency calculations or comparison to theoretical limits.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical gear/lever system ('Rotationsgetriebe') but does not specify any primary energy input (e.g., motor, human force, wind, stored energy). It implies the system itself generates rotational motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim describes a mechanical assembly but fails to identify any external energy input, which is the fundamental requirement for any machine to perform work. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the omission of an energy source combined with broad application claims makes it highly questionable and suggestive of a perpetual motion concept.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source is specified.
- Describes a configuration of levers, rollers, and a 'broken main axis' but provides no working principle that explains how it initiates or sustains motion.
- Claims of use 'on land, water, and in the air' suggest a motive power source, but none is declared, implying the device itself is the source of continuous motion.
Claimed Energy Source
Wind energy captured by an intake funnel/duct at the front or roof of the vehicle.
AI Physics Analysis
The system attempts to use a wind turbine on a moving vehicle to generate hydraulic or electrical power for propulsion. This is fundamentally a drag-based system where the extracted wind energy comes from the vehicle's kinetic energy, increasing drag and creating a net loss if used for primary propulsion. It omits the critical initial energy source needed to overcome this inherent drag penalty.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses the vehicle's own motion to create relative wind, which is a form of energy recirculation.
- No clear mechanism for net energy gain: The wind captured is generated by the vehicle moving through still air, creating drag. Extracting useful work from this relative wind increases drag, requiring more propulsion energy from the primary source, wh
- Ambiguous primary energy source: The claim describes a 'hydraulic vehicle drive generated by wind power' but does not specify the original source of energy to accelerate the vehicle to a speed where the wind turbine becomes effective.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is electrical power to the motor (1). The system is a mechanical transmission (pinion, crown gear, perimeter shafts) driving an electrical generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor-generator set with a specific mechanical transmission. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the patent provides no efficiency analysis or performance data. The complex gear train will incur significant losses, making the overall system efficiency less than 100%. The vagueness and focus on geometry rather than energy performance are questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- No quantitative performance claims are made, making thermodynamic evaluation impossible.
- The description focuses on a specific mechanical arrangement but provides no efficiency analysis.
- The use of 'perimeter shafts' and intermediate wheels suggests a complex gear train, which inherently introduces mechanical losses (friction, bearing losses).
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor (3) which winds/loads the torsion spring (2). The 'recuperador' (5) appears to be a mechanical impactor/percussion device connected back to the motor, intended to recover some energy during the spring's discharge.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor-driven torsion spring system with a mechanical feedback mechanism. It does not explicitly violate energy conservation, as the primary energy source is clearly the motor. However, the vague claims of 'energy recuperation' and the complex arrangement without quantitative efficiency data make its purported advantage physically questionable. It will inevitably have net losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent implies 'aprovechamiento' (utilization/advantage) but does not specify if net energy output exceeds input.
- Ambiguous function of 'recuperador' (5): Described as a 'percussion impulsor' (cam/lever) that strikes the spring's end. Its connection to the motor suggests it might feed energy back, but mechanical impacts and friction are lossy, not regenerative.
- No quantitative performance claims (COP, efficiency) provided to assess against thermodynamic limits.
- System is essentially a motor charging a spring with a complex mechanical feedback mechanism; overall efficiency will be less than 100% due to losses in motor, spring hysteresis, friction, impact losses, and clutch operation.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the input force driving the motor shaft (Claim 1d), which is presumably electrical or mechanical work from an external motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical system that uses a rotating weight. While not explicitly claiming perpetual motion, its description of converting a small input to a larger output force without clear trade-offs raises red flags for incomplete energy accounting. The output work must ultimately come from the input motor, and the system cannot have an efficiency greater than 100%.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim of converting a 'small input force to a larger output force' while maintaining a constant speed ratio suggests a mechanical advantage without an obvious trade-off in displacement or time, which is suspicious.
- The device purports to use centrifugal force from a rotating weight to produce a useful output force. Centrifugal force is an inertial (fictitious) force in a rotating frame; it is not an independent energy source. Any output work must come from the
- The mechanism described (linear motion of the rotation center, engagement/disengagement of stoppers) likely involves complex dynamics where the input motor does work against inertial forces and any output load. The net work output cannot exceed the n
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or mechanical input to the gas compressor(s). The compressed gas stores the input energy as potential energy (pressure).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a compressed gas energy storage system, not an engine. It requires an external compressor to input energy. The patent is structurally valid but questionable because it claims to be an 'engine' while omitting the critical mechanism to convert stored pressure back into useful work, leaving its actual operation and net efficiency undefined.
Specific Physics Issues
- The patent describes a storage and release mechanism, not an energy source. It lacks a description of how net positive work output is achieved.
- The claims focus on structure but omit the energy conversion cycle or how work is extracted from the pressure vessels to the shaft.
- No thermodynamic process (e.g., expansion through a turbine, piston) is specified to convert the stored pressure energy into useful shaft work.
Claimed Energy Source
The electrical input to the pump is the primary energy source. The system appears to be a closed-loop fluid circuit where the pump pressurizes fluid in alternating vessels to drive a turbine.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a closed-loop fluid circuit powered by a pump. While the turbine manifold design allowing bidirectional flow for unidirectional rotation is mechanically plausible, the overall system's claim as a 'power generation system' is highly questionable. Without an external energy source, the turbine cannot produce more useful work than the pump consumes, making net power generation impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent abstract describes a cycle where a pump forces fluid back and forth through a turbine to generate electricity. The work output from the turbine must be less than the work input to the pump, minus losses from f
- Ambiguous net energy balance: The system is described as a 'power generation system,' but no external energy gradient (e.g., thermal, gravitational, chemical) is identified. The only explicit work input is from the pump, suggesting the turbine's outp
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily the gravitational potential energy of the liquid source (if gravity-fed) or the input work of a pump, supplemented by a heat source that adds thermal energy to the returning liquid.
AI Physics Analysis
The system does not clearly violate conservation laws, but its description obscures the primary energy input. The useful work from the transient pressure wave must be less than the energy required to establish the initial liquid flow and create the wave. The added heat source does not obviously create a net power gain without a complete thermodynamic cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system uses a transient pressure wave (water hammer) to drive a component, but creating that wave requires a rapid change in momentum, which itself consumes energy from the initial liquid flow or an external actuator
- Ambiguous role of heat source: The heat source adds thermal energy to the returning liquid, but this is not clearly coupled to a thermodynamic cycle (e.g., a heat engine) that would convert that heat into useful work. It may simply be a loss or an un
- Vague performance claim: 'Substantially immediate maximum liquid flow velocity' is a performance goal, not an energy source. The system appears to be an elaborate method for harvesting energy from a pressure transient, but the fundamental input energ
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air pressure/ram air during flight provides compression work; electrical heaters for gas expansion; electrical actuators for valve control. Primary energy appears to be electrical input for heating and control systems.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a complex mechanical system using ram air compression and electrical heating to potentially produce thrust or work, but the description lacks complete energy accounting and uses physics terminology ('unstable equilibrium') in questionable ways. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the mechanism's energy sources and sinks are not clearly defined against thermodynamic constraints.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'unstable equilibrium' as operating principle without clear energy gradient
- Uses ram air compression but electrical heating for expansion - net energy balance unclear
- No quantitative efficiency or COP claims provided to evaluate against thermodynamic limits
- Mechanism description is complex but lacks clear thermodynamic cycle definition
- Appears to attempt extracting net work from ambient air via heating without a clear low-temperature sink
Claimed Energy Source
External electric motor provides rotary input to spin counter-rotating disks with spring-loaded thrust masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a motor-driven internal mechanism. While it can create internal vibrations and forces, it cannot generate net linear propulsion for the vehicle it's attached to without ejecting mass or pushing against an external medium, as this would violate conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that each impact produces a forward impulse 'with a force equal to the force used to radially accelerate each thrust mass' is misleading. The radial acceleration force is internal to the device; net forward thrust requires a net change in momen
- The described mechanism appears to be a complex internal momentum transfer. For every action on the ramp (thrust mass pushed in), there is an equal and opposite reaction on the rotating disk assembly, likely canceling net momentum gain when averaged
- No clear path for net momentum generation. The system is a closed, motor-driven mechanism with no external reaction mass or asymmetric external force field.
Claimed Energy Source
Compressed gas (presumably from an external compressor or stored reservoir). The claim suggests the mechanical system itself can generate a force greater than the linear input force applied to its hammering elements.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a complex mechanism for converting compressed gas energy into rotation, but the claim of internal force generation greater than input force suggests a misunderstanding of energy conservation. Without a complete energy balance comparing the work extracted from the compressed gas to the useful rotational output, the system's true efficiency and feasibility cannot be assessed.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim states shuttle elements 'create an opposing force greater than this linear force' which implies energy amplification within the system.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The compressed gas input energy is not quantified or compared to the rotational work output.
- Mechanism description is highly complex and obfuscated, making it difficult to trace energy flow and identify loss mechanisms.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. The device includes a motor to drive the pendulum (Claim 6), implying an electrical input, but the patent's title and claims suggest it is a device 'for generating electrical energy' without clarifying if the motor's input is the sole energy source or if it claims to generate net excess energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical linkage between a pendulum and a generator but fails to account for the primary energy input. The inclusion of a motor to drive the pendulum suggests it is a consumer, not a net producer, of energy, yet this is presented ambiguously within a 'power generation' device claim.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of input power vs. output power.
- Potential perpetual motion implication: A pendulum-driven generator system, if intended to be self-sustaining or produce net excess energy from its own motion, would violate energy conservation.
- Ambiguous operational principle: The mechanical arrangement (pendulums, wheels, counterweights) does not constitute an independent energy source.
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of a falling piston (mass) is converted to compressed air energy. An electric winch at the top resets the piston, requiring an external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered air compressor, which is physically possible. However, the description omits the critical comparison between the input winch energy and the output compressed air energy, and the text implies scalable net electricity generation, which suggests a misunderstanding of the system's net efficiency.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes the compression cycle but does not compare the electrical energy needed to lift the piston via the winch to the energy stored in the compressed air.
- Implied over-unity suggestion: The final sentences suggest using the compressed air to generate electricity broadly, implying a net energy gain without analyzing the system's round-trip efficiency, which must be <100% due to losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description suggests a rotating wheel with a weight and a generator, implying potential conversion of gravitational potential energy or kinetic energy from an initial input. No primary energy source (e.g., fuel, external mechanical work, ambient gradient) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanical arrangement but fails to specify the origin of the energy needed to spin the wheel and overcome inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and drag. Without this, the system cannot be evaluated for compliance with energy conservation, making it fundamentally questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the initial energy input to start and sustain rotation.
- Ambiguous mechanism: The description of a generator rotating on a wheel with a hanging weight does not define a sustainable energy conversion cycle.
- No thermodynamic limits are addressed, but the core issue is a lack of a defined source to overcome losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to two motors: a 'Wellenmotor' (15) to rotate the arm around the central shaft, and a 'Stellmotor' (17) to tilt the gyroscope's spin axis.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses internal motors to spin a gyroscope and move an arm, attempting to generate net thrust. However, as a closed system (aside from its electrical input), it cannot produce net momentum or 'autark' propulsion without violating Newton's laws of motion. The energy for any motion comes solely from its batteries/motors.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for claimed 'autark' (self-sufficient) propulsion
- Claims imply net thrust generation from internal forces only, violating Newton's third law
- Complex gyroscopic precession control likely consumes more energy than any potential net translational work output
- No identified external energy gradient (e.g., ambient field) to exploit for net propulsion
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous mix of solar panels (80% of current from sun) and a turbine/generator system extracting energy from ship's motion through water, possibly supplemented by a generator from the sea (claim 3). No clear primary energy input accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a shipboard system combining solar panels and turbines, but its claims of generating 'unlimited current' to strengthen propulsion are vague and lack a complete energy balance. It appears to suggest extracting energy from the ship's own motion through water to then boost propulsion, which would incur net losses, making the overall energy accounting questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'unlimited current' and combining multiple energy sources without quantifying inputs/outputs.
- Vague mechanism: 'Turbine current production' from ship's stern while moving implies extracting energy from propulsion system, creating a parasitic load.
- Ambiguous claims: 'All the current will be distributed... to strengthen the ship's propulsion' suggests a perpetual motion-like feedback without identifying net energy source.
Claimed Energy Source
Fluid (medium) kinetic/flow energy provided to the system via an inlet channel. Claim 2 adds an electric drive motor to spin the converter wheel.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a turbine-converter wheel assembly for a fluid medium. While not explicitly violating physics, Claim 2 introduces ambiguous language about the converter wheel accelerating the turbine wheel, which, combined with the lack of defined energy inputs and outputs, creates a risk of misinterpretation as a perpetual motion or over-unity device. The physics is incomplete, not impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 2 suggests the converter wheel, once spun by the medium, can accelerate the turbine wheel. This implies a feedback or energy multiplication loop without a clear, accounted-for primary energy source for the acceleration.
- The description is purely mechanical and lacks thermodynamic context (e.g., pressure, enthalpy drop) to evaluate efficiency limits.
- The functional principle (converter wheel accelerating the turbine wheel that initially drove the medium flow) is ambiguous and suggests potential for misinterpretation as a self-accelerating or over-unity system.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the electrical or hydraulic power supplied to the linear actuators (4) to move the masses (100) radially. The gravitational potential energy of the masses is an internal, cyclical energy store, not a net source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanism that uses actuators to reposition sliding masses on rotating plates to influence torque. While mechanically possible, the patent description implies a continuous net gain in useful work without accounting for the full energy input required to operate the actuators against centrifugal and gravitational forces, making its claimed performance questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a mechanism to 'generate useful torque' but does not compare the work input to the actuators against the mechanical work output. The cyclical resetting of the mass position requires work input agains
- Implied over-unity: The description focuses on generating continuous torque by resetting the mass position, suggesting the system can produce more output work than the input work needed to slide the mass, which would violate energy conservation.
- No thermodynamic limit violation per se, but the claimed 'torque multiplication' is mechanically possible only with a corresponding increase in input energy or decrease in output speed (power conservation). The patent text omits this critical trade-o
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from a manually lifted 10 kg weight descending 1.8 meters.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is fundamentally a gravity-powered generator, but its claimed performance (lighting for 30 minutes from a 10kg weight dropping 1.8m) appears implausible without violating energy conservation, as the electrical output likely exceeds the gravitational potential energy input when accounting for inevitable losses. The vague 'self-winding' mechanism suggests incomplete energy accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims energy output (30 minutes of lighting) exceeds plausible input from described weight drop
- No accounting for conversion losses (friction, generator inefficiency, electrical losses)
- Implies energy multiplication through unspecified 'self-winding' mechanism
Claimed Energy Source
Initial pressurized fluid from a compressor unit (electrical input) or flue gases (thermal/chemical energy). Claim 7 suggests a feedback loop where a portion of generated electricity powers the compressor.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a fluid-driven turbine that requires an initial pressurized fluid source. The physics is valid locally, but the patent's description of a feedback loop to power the compressor is questionable without a rigorous net energy analysis, as it risks implying a perpetual motion scheme if losses are not fully accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 7 describes a potential feedback loop without a clear analysis of net energy gain. The system's overall efficiency is not specified, and the loop risks being a net energy consumer if compressor input > turbine output.
- The aspirator tube (claims 8-10) adds complexity but does not introduce a new primary energy source; it entrains ambient fluid using the pressure drop created by the primary fluid's expansion.
- The thermally insulated enclosure (claim 11) may reduce losses but does not itself constitute an energy input.
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified external input energy (renewable, industrial, or domestic) is used to lift spherical masses via Archimedes screws, storing gravitational potential energy. The system also claims to store energy by lifting its entire internal structure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex gravitational potential energy storage system, not a power source. While the mechanical description is plausible for storage, the patent lacks rigorous energy accounting and efficiency analysis, creating ambiguity. It does not explicitly violate conservation laws but uses technical detail that could obscure the fundamental fact that output energy cannot exceed the input energy used to lift the masses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes energy storage and conversion but does not quantify input energy required vs. output energy recovered.
- Implied but unstated losses: Friction in screws, guides, turbines, and mechanical transmission will cause significant losses.
- Ambiguity on net efficiency: The description focuses on the storage/conversion chain without acknowledging that output work must be less than input work due to inevitable losses.
- Potential confusion between energy storage and energy creation: The multi-cell stacking and structure lifting could be misinterpreted as energy multiplication.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the external 'drive machine' (Claim 1) which provides the initial rotational motion. The patent implies that a net 'drive force' (F) is generated from the system's own motion, suggesting an attempt to extract additional energy from the internal mass movement.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a rotating system with radially movable masses forced inward/outward during rotation. While mechanically possible, the claim of 'generation of a drive force' is ambiguous and suggests an attempt to extract net work from the system's own internal motions, which would violate energy conservation. The energy accounting is incomplete, focusing on geometry while obscuring the work inputs needed to move the masses radially.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent claims 'generation of a drive force' but does not specify if this force is an output greater than the input from the drive machine.
- Implied over-unity operation: The mechanism describes forcing mass components to a smaller radius during part of the cycle, which would require work input (centripetal force). The patent is vague on whether the net work from radial mass motion exceed
- No thermodynamic limit violation per se, but the described cyclic motion of masses in a rotating frame, if intended to produce net energy, would be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. Potential energy from lifting a sled unit via an unspecified 'Hubeinrichtung' (lifting device) is converted to electricity via linear-to-rotary motion and a generator. The primary energy input for the lifting device is not described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanism for converting the potential energy of a mass on an inclined rail into electricity via a generator. However, the patent fails to account for the primary energy input required to repeatedly lift the mass or pivot the rail to the higher position, creating an incomplete energy balance that could misleadingly suggest net energy generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes an energy conversion chain (potential → kinetic → electrical) but does not specify the source of energy to reset the system (lift the sled or pivot the rail back to the higher position).
- Apparent perpetual motion risk: The system could be misinterpreted as generating net energy from the cyclical motion of the sled, ignoring the greater energy required to lift the mass against gravity to restore the initial high potential energy state
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical assembly (generator, counterweight, expansion element) possibly intended to be driven by an external motor (Claim 5 mentions connection to a motor). However, the description suggests the expansion element drives the counterweight which interacts with the generator, creating potential feedback loops without clear primary energy input accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical-electrical system with feedback connections but fails to clearly identify the primary source of energy that drives the expansion element or motor. The arrangement suggests an attempt to create power amplification through mechanical interactions, which risks violating energy conservation if all inputs are not properly accounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the primary energy input to the 'expansion element' or the motor.
- Ambiguous feedback loop: The generator, counterweight, and expansion element are connected in a way that suggests possible intent for self-sustaining or amplified operation without an external source.
- Vague performance claims: The title 'Power Enhancement Device' implies output > input, but no quantitative relationship or efficiency is provided to assess against thermodynamic limits.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from provided text. Title translates to 'Electromagnetic field-based free energy generation device' suggesting claims of extracting energy from ambient electromagnetic fields without clear input accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent title suggests energy generation from electromagnetic fields without identifying a clear, adequate energy source or conversion mechanism. This pattern typically involves incomplete energy accounting where ambient energy is claimed as a source without quantifying its availability or the device's extraction efficiency relative to thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit energy input identified
- Title suggests 'free energy' which implies energy extraction without adequate source
- No thermodynamic process or conversion mechanism described
- Ambient EM fields typically contain negligible usable energy density for practical generation
Claimed Energy Source
Input mechanical work to rotate the rotor assembly, with potential for inertial effects from eccentric masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical system using rotating eccentric masses. While the mechanism itself may function, the patent's structure and the series-connection claim strongly suggest an implied but physically impossible amplification of mechanical power, as it identifies no external energy source beyond the initial input work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim structure suggests an attempt to create a mechanical over-unity or multiplier effect, but no explicit energy source beyond the initial input is described.
- The series arrangement (Claim 9) is a classic pattern for claiming power amplification without identifying a new energy input.
- The use of stops (Claim 6) to prevent reverse motion indicates a ratcheting mechanism, which cannot generate net energy but can only temporally redistribute torque, often with significant frictional losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system with a generator, counterweights, and an extension element. The primary energy input is implied to be from a motor (e.g., from a connected automobile), but the claims suggest a 'power enhancement' effect without specifying an external energy source for that enhancement.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical assembly with a generator, moving counterweights, and an extension element, but provides no complete energy balance. The title and claims imply a power gain ('enhancement') without identifying a source for the additional energy, which is a hallmark of incomplete accounting. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the structure invites misinterpretation as a free-energy device.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'enhancement' claim implies output power > input power without identifying a source for the extra energy.
- Ambiguous mechanism: The interaction between the generator, counterweights, and extension element is described structurally but not energetically. It suggests a mechanical feedback or resonance system that could be misinterpreted as creating energy.
- No thermodynamic limit violation is explicitly stated, but the title 'Power Enhancement Device' combined with vague claims raises red flags.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The rotary actuator is the explicit input, but the patent abstract and claims do not specify the actuator's energy source (e.g., electric motor, hydraulic, pneumatic). The 'energy network' context is vague.
AI Physics Analysis
The described assembly is a standard epicyclic (planetary) gear system, which is a valid mechanical transmission. However, its framing within an 'energy network' and the lack of a specified primary energy source for the actuator make its intended application and energy accounting questionable. It does not inherently violate physics but is vulnerable to being misrepresented as an energy multiplier.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is described as a transmission/gear assembly, not an energy source. Claims about rotation multiplication (claims 2-4) describe kinematic relationships, not energy creation, but the 'energy network' application
- Ambiguous purpose: The patent title and abstract mention 'energy network' and 'power transmission,' creating ambiguity about whether this is presented as a mere mechanical transmission or as a device for generating/net energy gain.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a rotor with radially adjustable swing weights, controlled by motors or electromagnets. The primary energy input is implied to be electrical power to the control motors/electromagnets, but no external energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient gradient) is specified for net power generation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system with controlled moving masses on a rotor, but provides no identifiable source of energy to achieve net power output. The energy to control the swing weights likely equals or exceeds any net torque generated, making this a system that consumes, not produces, net energy unless an external source is specified.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear source of net energy input described. The system uses controlled motors to adjust swing weights, implying electrical energy consumption.
- Claims describe a machine that can be connected to a generator, but the patent text lacks any thermodynamic or energy accounting analysis to explain how net positive work is achieved.
- The mechanism (adjusting radial positions of masses on a rotor) suggests an attempt to create an imbalanced torque, but the energy required to reposition the masses against centrifugal and inertial forces must come from somewhere.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'prime mover' is the only explicit energy input, but the system's purpose (likely electrical generation via moving magnets and coils) is not stated. The claim describes a complex mechanical assembly with multiple motors, gears, and turbines.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a mechanically complex device but fails to specify its net energy input versus output, making proper thermodynamic analysis impossible. The mixing of turbine and generator terminology without a clear energy flow diagram is a hallmark of obfuscation, requiring significant scrutiny.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of system output (e.g., electrical power) versus the total input power to the prime mover and the secondary drive system motors.
- Ambiguous function: The claim mixes turbine-like components (with expansion chambers and air inlets) with electrical generation components (magnets and coils), obscuring the primary energy conversion path.
- No performance metrics: Without claimed efficiency or output, thermodynamic limits cannot be assessed, but the complexity suggests high frictional and electrical losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Title suggests an 'electric motor, air/current drive' but no claims or description are provided to identify the primary energy input or conversion process.
AI Physics Analysis
The submission contains no substantive claims or description, only a title and a note stating no claims are present. This lack of detail prevents proper energy accounting and thermodynamic analysis, falling under technical obfuscation. Without a described mechanism, it is impossible to validate compliance with physical laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No operational description provided
- No energy accounting possible
- Title implies a hybrid or novel drive system without mechanistic explanation
- Missing quantitative performance claims
Claimed Energy Source
Internal spacecraft energy for ejection, and internal energy of the smart propellant device for its controlled return trajectory (likely chemical, electrical, or reaction mass).
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is essentially a spacecraft throwing and then catching its own mass. While the ejection provides an impulse, the recapture/impact provides an equal and opposite impulse, resulting in zero net momentum change for the total system (spacecraft + device). For net propulsion, the device must interact with something external (e.g., expelling mass against the environment) during its return phase, which is not clearly specified.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the return phase. The claim implies net propulsion from an internal reaction mass cycle.
- Momentum conservation analysis is ambiguous. The recapture/impact of the device would impart an equal and opposite momentum change to the spacecraft, negating the net gain from the initial ejection, unless the device expends additional independent re
- The system appears to be a closed momentum system using only internal masses, which cannot provide net propulsion to the system's center of mass.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. Input energy must be supplied to drive the first rotor, overcoming friction and inertia. No novel energy source is described; it is a complex mechanical transmission.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex, multi-rotational mechanical system. While such a transmission could theoretically alter torque/speed ratios within conservation laws, the abstract's language suggests 'increasing power' in a way that implies incomplete energy accounting. Without a clear violation in the claims themselves, the framing is highly questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims imply selective increase of rotational speed or power without clear accounting for the source of additional energy or torque.
- Abstract mentions using centripetal acceleration to increase speed/power, which is a red flag—centripetal force is a constraint, not an energy source.
- The complex geometry may create variable inertial effects, but net work output cannot exceed work input minus losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical linkage but does not specify an energy input. Implicitly, initial rotational energy must be imparted to either the disk, shaft, or bearing ring to initiate motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a kinematic mechanism that can transfer and redirect motion, but it cannot 'generate' rotation without an external energy source. The patent fails to account for the energy required to initiate and sustain motion against inevitable frictional losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identified energy input source
- System is a passive mechanical linkage with no inherent driving force
- Claims imply 'generation' of rotation without explaining how energy is added to overcome friction and maintain motion
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical energy from the vertical motion of the vehicle chassis induced by traveling over uneven terrain or through turns.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a regenerative suspension device, not a violation of energy conservation. However, its presentation as a 'charging system' is questionable because the energy it captures is parasitic, coming from bumps that already cost the vehicle's motor energy to overcome. The net effect is likely increased energy consumption, not a continuous charge.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy source is parasitic loss from the vehicle's primary motion, increasing overall drag.
- System adds mass and mechanical complexity, incurring efficiency losses in conversion (alternator, friction).
- Claim of 'continuous electric charge' is misleading; net energy gain for the vehicle's propulsion battery is highly unlikely.
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from combustion in the central chamber. The abstract also mentions exhaust gas energizing batteries, implying an attempt at energy recovery.
AI Physics Analysis
The core concept is a combustion engine, so energy conservation isn't inherently violated. However, the claims of 'frictionless' operation and using exhaust to energize batteries are presented without complete energy accounting, making the net efficiency and practical benefit unclear. The design adds complexity likely to incur significant parasitic losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Ambiguous energy accounting: Claim of 'frictionless' operation via pneumatic bearings uses exhaust gas energy that could otherwise contribute to shaft work, potentially reducing net output.
- Vague performance claims: No quantitative efficiency or COP provided, making thermodynamic limit check impossible.
- The description of using exhaust to 'energize batteries' is technically vague; if it implies generating electricity from exhaust flow, that's a parasitic load on the engine's useful work output.
- Complex flow paths and 'microturbine' reversing flow may introduce significant flow losses not accounted for.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is ambient wind energy (both natural wind and relative wind from vehicle motion) and secondary sources like solar panels, regenerative braking, and grid charging.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a vehicle with an onboard wind turbine. While capturing natural wind energy while parked is valid, using the turbine while moving harvests energy from the vehicle's own motion, which creates drag. The net effect is an energy loss, as the turbine's generation cannot exceed the extra propulsion energy needed to overcome the added drag.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the 'air generated by the vehicle's own displacement'
- Extracting energy from the vehicle's own motion creates a net drag force, increasing the propulsion energy required by more than the energy recovered (turbine acts as a brake)
- Potential implication of a perpetual motion scheme if the system is claimed to fully or significantly recharge the vehicle's battery from the drag it creates
Claimed Energy Source
Initial electrical energy from at least one battery powers a hydraulic pump, which drives the system. The alternator is intended to recharge the battery(s).
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a system where a battery powers a pump to drive a mechanical gear train that turns an alternator. Without an external fuel or energy input, the system cannot output more electrical energy to recharge its battery than it consumes, due to conservation of energy and losses. The patent text obfuscates this by only describing the energy conversion path, not the net source.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net energy source identified; system appears to be a closed electrical-hydraulic-mechanical loop.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims describe energy transfer but not a source to overcome inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and hydraulic inefficiencies.
- Implied operation suggests the alternator's output could recharge the battery that powers the pump, which is a classic perpetual motion architecture.
Claimed Energy Source
Input mechanical energy from a motor shaft (albero motore). The device appears to be a mechanical transmission system that uses eccentric masses and gravity to modify torque and angular velocity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical transmission that likely converts between torque and speed within standard mechanical power conservation limits. However, the language around 'constant torque' with speed variation independent of it, combined with the use of gravity and series cascading, creates ambiguity that suggests possible over-unity implications not supported by explicit physics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of transferring energy with 'constant torque' and corresponding angular velocity variation 'independent of said torque' is mechanically ambiguous and may imply a non-conservative energy relationship.
- The description suggests using gravity (gravità) of eccentric masses to create angular excursions, implying potential energy from the Earth's gravitational field is an input, but this is not explicitly accounted for in the energy balance.
- Cascading multiple units in series (claim 7) without clarifying energy losses per stage raises concerns about implied multiplicative gains.
Claimed Energy Source
The cyclical tilting or gyratory motion of the surface, presumably driven by an external mechanical force (Fl to F4). The patent abstract mentions 'receives cyclically varying mechanical forces' but does not specify their origin.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanically complex generator that converts a cyclical tilting motion into electricity. It does not inherently violate energy conservation, as it requires an input force to tilt the surface. However, the patent is questionable because it obscures the primary energy source and focuses on an optimization control system, which could be misinterpreted as creating energy rather than efficiently harvesting an external mechanical input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a control system to maximize power output by positioning the wheel at the point of maximum slope, but does not specify the energy source for the cyclical tilting motion. The system appears to be a co
- Potential for obfuscation: The focus is on an optimization control loop, which could create the misleading impression of 'generating' energy rather than converting a clearly identified input.
- The added weight (claim 8) suggests an attempt to increase inertial effects, but does not create energy.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title suggests gravity, but the claims contain no technical description of the device, its inputs, or its energy conversion mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The document contains no technical description of a device, only legal and procedural claims. While the title hints at a gravity-based energy source, the complete lack of operational details prevents any physics-based validation, placing it firmly in the 'questionable' category.
Specific Physics Issues
- No technical claims or operating principles provided for analysis.
- No energy accounting is possible.
- Claims are purely legal and procedural, with no physics content.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described machine appears to be a mechanical system with movable weights on a rotor, controlled by motors (Claim 3). The primary energy input is presumably electrical power to the control motors. No external energy source (e.g., fuel, ambient gradient) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system with radially adjustable weights on a rotor, controlled by motors. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the design focuses on manipulating centrifugal/gravitational forces without identifying a net energy source. Any work output would be less than the electrical input to the control motors, making it a complex motor-driven system, not a prime mover.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a mechanism but makes no performance claims. However, the core concept of adjusting radial weights on a rotating system suggests an attempt to create a net torque imbalance. Any useful work extracted
- Potential implication of over-unity: The patent title 'Kraftmaschine' (power machine) and focus on weight manipulation without specifying an external prime mover often appears in attempts to circumvent conservation of momentum/energy by incorrectly a
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily from external pumps supplying fluid/gas under high pressure (10^6 to 250×10^6 Pa). Possibly supplemented by rotational kinetic energy of a pre-swirled vortex flow. Claim 9 ambiguously references connection to an external mechanical energy consumer or a 'self-sufficient' electrical energy production means.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a vortex turbine converting high-pressure fluid flow into rotational work. However, the claims are vague on efficiency and the ambiguous reference to 'self-sufficient electrical energy' in Claim 9, combined with a lack of quantitative input-output comparison, suggests incomplete energy accounting and potential obfuscation of a standard pumped hydro/turbine system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The high-pressure pump work input is the dominant energy source but is not quantified against claimed output.
- Ambiguous 'self-sufficient' claim suggests possible over-unity or perpetual motion implication.
- Vague mechanism for energy extraction: Describes vortex formation and rotor rotation but lacks clarity on how net energy gain is achieved beyond converting pump work.
- Pressure range (up to 250 MPa) suggests significant input power required, making efficiency claims critical but absent.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is ambiguous. The device uses a motor (M) to drive the system, and a separate 'power supplying means' (A) such as an alternator, compressor, or pump, which is presumably meant to be driven by the turbine's output shaft to provide power back to the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a turbine system with a motor and a power-supplying unit (like an alternator) connected through gears and pulleys. The configuration strongly suggests a closed-loop energy feedback system with no clear, sustained external energy input to overcome inevitable losses from friction, electrical resistance, and heat, making it physically questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claims describe a mechanical feedback loop but do not identify the net external energy input. The system appears to be a motor driving a load (like an alternator) that then powers the same motor, which is a classic p
- No thermodynamic limit is exceeded because no performance claim (e.g., efficiency, COP) is made, but the described configuration suggests an intent for self-sustaining or over-unity operation without specifying an external fuel or energy source.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the kinetic energy of water flowing past the vessel's hull during navigation, and the vessel's own propulsion system when stationary via the auxiliary propeller.
AI Physics Analysis
While extracting energy from water flow during navigation is physically possible (like a towed generator), it comes at the cost of increased drag and thus increased fuel consumption for the main propulsion. The claim of generating useful power when the vessel is stationary using an onboard propeller to drive a turbine is thermodynamically flawed, as it describes a net-loss energy conversion loop, not a power source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Severe incomplete energy accounting: The auxiliary propeller, when used to start the turbine while the vessel is anchored, consumes energy from the vessel's power system. The net power generated would be less than the power consumed by the propeller
- Potential violation of conservation of energy for stationary operation: The system claims to generate power when anchored by using a propeller to drive water into a turbine. This is a net energy loss system (propeller motor -> water flow -> turbine g
- Increased drag: Turbines placed on the hull will increase hydrodynamic drag during navigation. The power extracted from the water flow is taken from the vessel's kinetic energy, effectively increasing fuel consumption for the main engines.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient radiation (e.g., sunlight) absorbed by a fluid within a reflective spherical cavity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a solar thermal collector, but the description of a stationary part creating fluid spin and the vague claim of releasing fluid 'to perform work' obfuscates the actual energy conversion process. While it may absorb radiation, the claimed mechanism for generating useful work is physically unclear and lacks a complete thermodynamic cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear mechanism for net work output; radiation absorption heats fluid, but no thermodynamic cycle or gradient is described to convert that heat to work.
- Stationary 'spinner' with curved groove cannot impart spinning motion without itself moving or an external energy input to the fluid.
- Incomplete energy accounting: work from fluid release would come from internal pressure, but pressure increase requires energy input (radiation) and has thermodynamic limits.
- Vague on the 'work' performed; releasing a fluid is not a generator output without a turbine or piston to extract energy.
Claimed Energy Source
External drive source (15) provides rotational kinetic energy to the masses and powers the crank mechanism that changes their radial distance.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system with masses undergoing coordinated radial and rotational motion. While the mechanism itself is physically possible to build, the core claim of 'generating a force vector' is vague and questionable. Without a clear violation of momentum conservation, it likely describes an internal reaction force or vibration, not a net propulsive force without an external reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for net force generation
- No analysis of momentum conservation for the claimed 'force vector'
- Vague claim of 'generating a force vector' without specifying if it's an internal reaction force or a net external thrust
- Mechanism describes complex motion but lacks proof of net momentum transfer to the frame over a cycle.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism appears to be an overbalanced wheel where weights swing outward at the top and inward at the bottom, presumably to create a continuous torque imbalance. The only explicit energy input mentioned is the initial rotational motion of the rotor. No external prime mover (e.g., electric motor, engine) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a motor based on a gravity-assisted overbalanced wheel, a classic concept that cannot produce net useful work without an external energy source. The system's own motions (swinging weights, extending pieces) dissipate energy through friction and impacts. Without a clear, sustained external energy input, it implicitly violates energy conservation by suggesting continuous operation from a cyclic gravitational interaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary energy input to overcome friction and maintain motion.
- Implied perpetual motion: The design suggests a self-sustaining torque from gravitational potential energy changes, but the system is cyclic with no net energy gain per cycle when accounting for all forces and losses.
- Mechanism consumes energy: The act of swinging weights radially and operating extension pieces (claim 5) requires work input against centrifugal and inertial forces, which is not accounted for.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided text contains no description of the device's operation, energy inputs, or mechanism. The title 'Hybrid-Hebelmotor' suggests a hybrid lever-motor, but no functional details are given.
AI Physics Analysis
The submission contains no patent claims or technical description, only placeholder text stating no claims are present. This complete lack of operational details prevents any meaningful physics analysis, making it impossible to verify compliance with conservation laws. The vague title without supporting details is a hallmark of questionable proposals.
Specific Physics Issues
- No technical information provided to analyze
- No energy accounting possible due to missing claims/description
- Title implies a hybrid system but mechanism is unspecified
Claimed Energy Source
Initial manual input to start pendulum motion; thereafter, the device appears to claim sustained operation from the pendulum's reciprocating motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical motion converter (pendulum to linear pump), not a true power generator. It lacks a specified, sustained energy input to maintain motion, implying it could run indefinitely from its own oscillations, which violates energy conservation due to inevitable frictional losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear, sustained energy input described to overcome friction and damping losses.
- Mechanism is a motion converter, not a power generator; it cannot create net energy.
- Claims imply power generation from an oscillating system without specifying an external energy source to maintain oscillations.
Claimed Energy Source
An external 'predetermined force' pulling the thrust bearing/thrust cylinder upward along the central axis.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a mechanical linkage that converts an upward linear pull into platform rotation. It does not explicitly violate conservation laws, as the rotation is driven by an external force. However, the claim is questionable because it presents a simple force-transmission mechanism as a novel 'rotation generating apparatus' without specifying any source of energy gain, efficiency improvement, or useful function beyond the input work supplied.
Specific Physics Issues
- The description is purely kinematic/geometric; it lacks any energy or power analysis.
- The mechanism appears to convert a linear pulling force into rotational torque via an angled arm, but no efficiency or loss mechanisms are discussed.
- No explanation of why this specific geometry would be advantageous or produce net work output beyond the input work of the pulling force.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism appears to be an oscillating seesaw/balance beam with a sliding weight. The initial energy to start the oscillation must come from an external source (e.g., a push, an electric motor to move the weight). The claims are vague about what sustains the motion and whether it is intended to be self-sustaining or a driven mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical oscillator (seesaw with sliding weight) but is critically vague about its energy source and whether it is claimed to run autonomously. Without a clear, sustained external input, such a system would dampen and stop due to friction, violating no laws but raising red flags for incomplete physics analysis. The description of spring compression via sliding is mechanically possible but obfuscates the required work input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the initial energy input or a sustained energy source to overcome friction and damping.
- Ambiguous claims about spring compression via sliding (Claim 3) without clarifying the energy cost of the compression process.
- Vague functional description: The patent describes a kinematic mechanism but does not specify its energy source or efficiency, leaving open the interpretation of a possible over-unity or perpetual motion claim.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical transmission (using rolling cylinders and a belt pulley) but the patent text does not specify the primary energy source. It implies an external source (like an automobile engine) drives the belt pulley.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical transmission component, not an energy source. It does not explicitly violate physics laws because it makes no performance claims, but its vague and grandiose title paired with the lack of any specified energy input makes its purpose and novelty questionable from a physics perspective.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source is identified or described within the device itself.
- The description is purely mechanical/structural with no energy conversion process explained.
- Claims are vague regarding performance, efficiency, or any novel energy advantage.
Claimed Energy Source
Motor powered by an external power source (electrical/chemical). The system uses gears and levers to transform torque and speed.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is a complex torque converter, not an energy multiplier. It uses gears and levers to increase output force, but this must come at the expense of output speed or distance, keeping output energy less than or equal to input energy minus losses. The language is technically vague and risks implying a violation of energy conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'force multiplication' is ambiguous and conflates torque multiplication with energy conservation.
- No quantitative performance claim, but the description implies an energy gain is possible ('multiplication of force' in a context suggesting output > input).
- Mechanical design (impact wheels, levers, racks) cannot create energy; it can only trade force for distance/speed per work conservation (Work = Force × Distance).
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from mass pieces moving radially in a rotating frame, with an external actuation element (rollband) controlling their positions.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system that converts between rotational kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy of internal masses. It does not inherently violate conservation laws, but the patent description is questionable because it omits the energy input required to control the mass positions via the actuation element, creating a risk of misinterpretation as a perpetual motion or over-unity device.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the actuation element's work input
- Implied possibility of net energy gain without specifying the source for the control system's energy
- Ambiguous overall efficiency; system appears to be a complex mechanism for transferring/converting energy, not a source.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implied), but the description is unclear. The device appears to be a type of heat engine or thermal hydraulic system, suggesting the input is a thermal gradient (heat source and sink). However, no explicit source (e.g., fuel, solar, waste heat) or sink is defined.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex thermal-hydraulic system but fails to clearly identify the required thermal gradient or energy input, making proper thermodynamic analysis impossible. The language is technically vague and uses stacking of systems in a way that could obscure the true net energy balance, raising strong suspicion of an over-unity or perpetual motion claim disguised as a novel heat engine.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the required temperature difference (T_hot, T_cold) to drive the thermal-fluid-mechanical conversion.
- Vague thermodynamic cycle: The description of 'energy converters' with conductors and insulators suggests a attempt at a Stirling-like or Ericsson-like cycle, but the method for creating a sustained pressure/flow gradient from heat is not physically
- Ambiguous net work output: Claims of connecting 'positive/negative mechanical energies' into 'one positive energy' on a shaft obfuscates the actual net work balance. This could hide internal circulation of energy with no net gain.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. The device uses a 'first driving means' and 'second driving means' (possibly expanding gas or electromagnetic drive) to apply forces F1 and F2 to an inertial mass. The ultimate electrical, chemical, or stored energy input is not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system using internal forces on an inertial mass to potentially produce directed motion of the housing. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the energy accounting is incomplete, omitting the source and total input energy. The design risks creating the illusion that internal force manipulation alone can produce net external thrust without Newton's third law being satisfied via an external reaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claims describe a mechanism for generating directed motion but do not specify the net energy input or perform a full cycle energy balance.
- Potential confusion of internal vs. external forces: The system applies forces F1 (off-center) and F2 (at center of mass) to a mass within a housing. For the housing/system to experience net motion, there must be a net external force on the system, w
- Ambiguous performance: No efficiency or COP is claimed, but the mechanism's description could be misinterpreted to suggest creating net momentum from internal forces alone.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes mechanical engagement features (treads, grooves) for a chain/tether system, but does not specify the primary energy source driving the system. The title suggests 'gravity', implying potential energy from a height, but this is not described in the provided text.
AI Physics Analysis
The text describes a mechanical component (a textured chain) but provides no system context or energy source to evaluate. As a standalone claim for generating electricity from gravity, it is incomplete and unanalyzable, making its validity questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy conversion process or source is defined.
- The description is purely of a mechanical engagement mechanism with no system context.
- Claims of 'flexibility, via collapsing (GP 0.01%)' are quantitatively vague and lack physical definition.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described machine appears to be a system of coupled pendulums with hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders. The energy input is not explicitly stated but implied to come from the cylinders, which themselves require an external energy source (hydraulic pump or compressor).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical linkage system (pendulums, cylinders, flywheel, generator) but fails to specify the original source of energy to drive the cylinders. Without this, it's impossible to evaluate efficiency or conservation. The design is not inherently impossible but is presented in a way that obscures the complete energy pathway, making its claims questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the primary energy source for the drive cylinders.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Claims to generate electricity but describes only a transmission/coupling mechanism (pendulums to flywheel to generator). The system appears to be a complex mechanical energy storage/transfer device, not a source.
- Potential obfuscation: Using pendulums and flywheels (common in legitimate energy storage) without clarifying the net energy input creates risk of 'free energy' misinterpretation.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind energy (via windmills) and gravitational potential energy (from a tall structure with a chain/weight system). The description suggests combining these two sources.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent text describes mechanical features for combining windmills with a tall gravity-based system but fails to specify the fundamental energy conversion process for the gravity component or provide a complete energy balance. The focus on mechanical details without a clear physics model for the core 'gravity to electricity' claim makes it questionable and requires significant scrutiny.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No clear mechanism or analysis showing how wind and gravity inputs combine or sum. The system appears to be a hybrid but lacks a defined primary energy conversion process.
- Vague quantitative claims: Mentions '0.05%' for bearings but no performance metrics (efficiency, power output) or thermodynamic limits for the gravity-to-electricity conversion.
- Ambiguous mechanism: The 'tall gravity to electricity' core process is not described. It is unclear if it is a gravity battery (storing wind energy) or a claimed perpetual/over-unity device combining the two sources.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to electromagnets only. No other explicit energy sources mentioned.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a basic electromagnetic actuator with one fixed and one moving electromagnet, but provides no mechanism for energy conversion or sustained operation. While not explicitly violating conservation laws, it lacks sufficient detail to assess its function as an engine rather than a simple electromagnetic device consuming electrical input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy conversion mechanism described
- No explanation of how motion is sustained or work is extracted
- Appears to be a simple solenoid/electromagnet arrangement with no inherent energy multiplication
- Missing thermodynamic context for claimed engine operation
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a system using inertial forces from masses moving on constrained paths to produce net acceleration. The only explicit energy input mentioned is from 'Beschleunigungsmittel' (acceleration means) and 'Antriebseinheit' (drive unit), but their nature and energy source are unspecified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device intended to propel a vehicle by cyclically moving internal masses. While internal forces can create vibrations, they cannot produce a sustained net acceleration on a closed system's center of mass, as this violates conservation of momentum. The energy source for the drive unit is not clearly defined, but the fundamental claimed effect is physically impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim of generating a net directional acceleration from purely internal inertial forces violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum for a closed system.
- The described mechanism appears to be a variant of a 'reactionless drive' or 'inertial propulsion' device, which is impossible without ejecting reaction mass.
- No external reference frame or reaction mass is identified to balance the claimed net momentum change of the vehicle.
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from a liquid column (condenser higher than evaporator) combined with thermal energy from ambient environment (acting as heat source/sink for the refrigeration cycle).
AI Physics Analysis
This appears to be a heat pump or refrigeration cycle where a turbine replaces an expansion valve. The electrical output from the turbine comes from the gravitational potential energy of the liquid column, but creating and maintaining that column requires compressor work. The net system output cannot exceed the net work input without violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as it implicitly claims to extract useful work from ambient heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is a modified refrigeration/heat pump cycle. The net electrical output must be less than the work input to run the refrigeration cycle compressor, unless ambient thermal energy is being converted to work, whic
- Obfuscated heat engine: The described 'turbine-generator' extracts work from the liquid pressure drop, but maintaining that pressure head requires the refrigeration cycle's compressor to do work against gravity. The claim of 'recovering energy otherw
- Vague performance: No quantitative efficiency or COP is given, making thermodynamic limit comparison impossible.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the heating elements, plus ambient air intake. Claims 3-4 suggest a recirculation loop for expanded air back to the heating chamber.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is fundamentally an electrically heated air engine. While the primary energy source is clearly electrical, the described recirculation of expanded air without a clear cooling and compression phase makes the thermodynamic cycle incomplete and questionable. It does not explicitly violate conservation laws but describes an implausible or inefficient cycle by omitting critical steps.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Recirculation of expanded air (Claim 3) suggests a closed or semi-closed cycle. The net work output must come from the electrical heating input, but the description implies pressure/expansion work is generated from this
- Ambiguous thermodynamic cycle: It describes heating air to increase pressure and expand it, but lacks details on how the air is cooled or re-compressed to complete a cycle. The recirculation of 'expanded air' back to the heating chamber is thermodyna
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions 'vibration energy' and 'magnetic energy' but lacks specification of an external gradient or input source. Possibly attempts to harvest ambient energy from iron's magnetic properties or vibrations, but mechanism is vague.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a 'vibration energy harvesting device' using magnetic energy from iron, but fails to specify the external energy source driving the harvest or provide a complete energy balance. The claims are structurally vague, using correct physics terms like 'magnetic energy' and 'vibration' but without a clear, thermodynamically sound mechanism, making it impossible to verify compliance with conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input energy vs. output.
- Ambiguous conversion mechanism: Claims to generate energy from 'vibration' and 'magnetic energy' of iron without describing a thermodynamic gradient or work input.
- Vague performance claims: Mentions dimensions (1.3-1.6mm thickness, 2.0-7.0mm width) but no efficiency, power output, or COP.
- Implies energy generation from passive magnetic properties without an external changing field or motion source.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy from a single 'warmtereservoir' (heat reservoir), with cooling possibly provided by an unspecified sink or by the adiabatic expansion/compression of a gas mentioned in claim 4.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to convert heat from a single heat reservoir into work, which is a classic description of a perpetual motion machine of the second kind. While the patent describes a physical mechanism involving metal expansion and a regenerator, it lacks a clear, compliant thermodynamic cycle because it does not identify a cold sink for waste heat rejection, making net work production from a single temperature source impossible.
Specific Physics Issues
- Proposes converting heat from a single reservoir into work, which violates the Kelvin-Planck statement of the second law of thermodynamics.
- The described cycle (cooling at decreasing length, heating at constant length, expanding at original temperature) is thermodynamically incomplete; no clear mechanism for creating a *net* temperature gradient to drive a cycle is specified.
- Relies on thermal expansion/contraction of a metal, but for net work output, heat must be rejected to a colder reservoir, which is not explicitly identified.
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of movable masses within a rotating body, with an external actuation element (e.g., roll band) controlling their radial position.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical system that uses movable masses and gravity to shift between potential and rotational energy. However, it fails to account for the energy required by its actuation element to control the masses, and it presents no mechanism for generating net energy. It describes a lossy energy storage/conversion system, not a source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The actuation element (12) must do work to move/restrain the masses against centrifugal force and gravity. This input work is not quantified or compared to any claimed output.
- No net energy gain mechanism: The device describes a controlled transfer between potential and rotational kinetic energy, but provides no pathway for a net energy increase. It appears to be a complex, lossy flywheel/regulator.
- Implied perpetual motion: The abstract and title suggest a reversible converter, but the description focuses on controlling mass movement without identifying an external, sustainable energy source to overcome losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The claim mentions electricity *may* be used to heat the water, but does not definitively state the primary energy input (e.g., fuel combustion, electrical resistance heating, geothermal, solar thermal).
AI Physics Analysis
The described process is the basic Rankine cycle used in all steam power plants, which is physically valid. However, the claim is questionable because it fails to specify the primary energy source, leaving open the possibility of misinterpretation as a self-powered or over-unity device.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim describes a generic steam turbine cycle but does not specify the source of heat, making thermodynamic analysis impossible.
- No performance claims are made, so it cannot be assessed against thermodynamic limits, but the vagueness obscures whether the system is a net consumer or producer of energy.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system with a rotating disk, multiple pendulums with weights, springs, and a push rod driven by a motor. The energy source is implied to be the motor, but the claims suggest the rotating motion of the disk can drive a generator, creating a potential feedback loop.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical assembly with rotating pendulums, springs, and a reset mechanism. The patent text is obfuscated and implies the rotating motion can drive a generator, but it fails to account for the energy required to operate the internal mechanisms (moving weights, deforming springs). The system cannot output more useful work than the energy input to the motor driving it, making its claimed operation as a power source highly questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system describes a rotating disk that moves pendulums, which in turn stretch/compress springs and are reset by a push rod. The work done to move the weights against gravity and deform the springs must come from the m
- Ambiguous perpetual motion mechanism: The detailed description of pendulum orientations and spring states during rotation (Claim 4) suggests an attempt to create a non-conservative force field or imbalance that could perpetually drive the disk. Howev
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the 'conventional energy source' (e.g., an engine or motor) driving the prime shaft. The device is a mechanical fluid pump/compressor.
AI Physics Analysis
The core mechanism is a complex multi-cylinder pump, which could legitimately increase fluid pressure or flow rate at the cost of increased input torque. However, Claim 9's explicit assertion of multiplying energy 'into multiple folds' is a direct violation of the conservation of energy, rendering the overall claim questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 9 asserts energy multiplication 'from 2 times to 200 times', which is a violation of energy conservation if interpreted as creating energy.
- The description is mechanically vague and obfuscated, making it impossible to verify the claimed pressure/flow boost relative to the input torque and power.
- No thermodynamic limit is explicitly violated in the pumping mechanism itself, but the quantitative energy claim is physically impossible.
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The abstract mentions 'utilizing the force of gravity,' but the control system (Claim 1) requires energy input to extend/retract the members and maintain potential energy. The primary energy input is likely electrical/hydraulic to the control system, with gravity acting as a periodic force, not a net energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an actively controlled mechanism, not a passive gravity engine. To produce net rotary output, the control system must supply energy to extend/retract the weights against inertial and gravitational forces. The patent description is physically questionable because it implies gravity provides net work without clearly accounting for the control system's energy input, creating a risk of misinterpretation as a perpetual motion device.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent claims to 'convert a linear input to a rotary output' but does not specify the energy source for the control system's work to extend/retract the weight against centrifugal force and gravity.
- Ambiguous 'potential energy' maintenance: Claim 1 states the control 'tends to maintain the potential energy' during part of the cycle. This implies energy input/output management by the control system, not a passive gravity engine.
- Implied over-unity possibility: The abstract's phrasing suggests extracting net rotational work from gravity by clever timing, which is impossible without an external energy source to reset the system.
Claimed Energy Source
The patent claims an external 'drive' (Antrieb) from a stator or an additional drive device, which is the explicit energy input. The mechanism involves an eccentric mass rotating with a non-uniform angular velocity profile.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is externally powered, so it's not a perpetual motion machine. However, its claimed function as an 'inertial drive' suggests generating net thrust from internal mass motions alone, which violates conservation of momentum. The patent describes a specific motion profile but provides no valid physics principle to achieve this claimed propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- The patent describes a kinematic motion profile but provides no physical principle for how this motion generates a net unidirectional force or thrust. It appears to be an unbalanced rotating mass (eccentric rotor) whose acceleration profile is contro
- The claim of an 'Inertialantrieb' (inertial drive) suggests propulsion from inertial forces alone, which violates Newton's third law if the stator and rotor are part of the same isolated system. Any net momentum change must be expelled to an external
- The detailed phasing of constant velocity and acceleration segments is a control scheme, not an energy source. It does not circumvent the conservation of momentum.
Claimed Energy Source
Compressed air stored in a tank, with the compression event described as a 'single time investment'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses compressed air as a legitimate energy source, but the description suggests a misunderstanding of energy conservation by implying sustained acceleration from a finite store. The system will only run until the compressed air's stored energy is exhausted.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim implies constant rotation with increased acceleration from a finite stored energy source, which violates conservation of energy if interpreted as a perpetual or self-accelerating system.
- Ambiguous on how 'constant rotation with increased acceleration' is sustained as the compressed air tank depletes.
- Lacks technical detail on energy conversion efficiency, losses, and the thermodynamic limits of expanding compressed air to do work.
Claimed Energy Source
Human mechanical work (manual operation of hydraulic levers) compressing ambient air via foot pumps.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a human-powered air compressor driving a turbine. While not inherently impossible, the description lacks any energy accounting, making its claimed performance and utility questionable. The system obeys conservation laws only if the human input work exceeds the turbine's output work, but the patent language suggests an over-unity implication by omission.
Specific Physics Issues
- No quantitative efficiency analysis; energy losses in pumps, air compression, turbine, and gearing are ignored.
- Implies continuous high-speed air jet from stored pressure without accounting for the work needed to replenish the pressure chamber.
- Gearbox increases rotation speed but not power; output power cannot exceed input power minus losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a multi-cylinder engine air-fuel ratio control method using feedback from exhaust gas sensors. Energy presumably comes from chemical energy in fuel, but the description focuses on control algorithms rather than energy accounting.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a control method for multi-cylinder engine air-fuel ratios using exhaust gas sensor feedback. While the control method itself doesn't inherently violate physics, the complete lack of energy accounting and efficiency claims relative to thermodynamic limits makes it questionable. Without specific performance claims, it's impossible to determine if it respects conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit energy accounting provided
- Claims focus on control methodology without specifying thermodynamic context
- Vague about how 'air-fuel ratio control' relates to overall efficiency limits
- No comparison to thermodynamic maximums for internal combustion engines
Claimed Energy Source
Kinetic energy of a flowing fluid (wind or air flow relative to a moving vehicle).
AI Physics Analysis
The device extracts energy from wind or vehicle motion, which is valid. However, its core claim of a novel 'dual action' mechanism generating two equal forces from one flow is poorly explained and seems to misapply fluid dynamics concepts, making its purported advantage questionable rather than proven.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims of 'dual push and pull force' and 'two forces of equal magnitude' from a single directional flow are physically unclear and likely misrepresent fluid dynamics.
- The description is mechanically vague and lacks a clear, testable working principle for the claimed dual-action augmentation.
- Quantitative performance claims (e.g., output per RPM) are absent, preventing comparison to thermodynamic or Betz limits for wind energy extraction.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical or mechanical energy from an unspecified 'appropriate motor' driving a centrifugal fan.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses a motor to spin a fan, so it has a clear energy source. However, its claimed propulsion mechanism—generating forward thrust solely via an internal low-pressure zone while expelling air laterally—is physically dubious. It appears to misunderstand how pressure forces and momentum conservation actually produce net thrust in a vehicle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed thrust mechanism is ambiguous and appears to confuse internal pressure differentials with net external force.
- No clear Newton's Third Law action-reaction pair is identified for propulsion in a vacuum or still air.
- Describes creating an internal longitudinal depression (low pressure), but for net forward thrust, the device must impart net rearward momentum to the air. Expelling air laterally, as claimed, would not directly generate forward thrust via pressure d
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of water or other mass (rainwater, rocks, earth) lifted to mountain summits, presumably by natural weather cycles or unspecified means.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a gravity-based energy storage/generation system but fails to account for the primary energy input required to lift the mass to elevation. The claimed tenfold efficiency gain over hydroelectricity is a red flag, as it suggests energy multiplication. The core concept is physically valid as a storage method, but the presentation implies a net energy gain without an identified source.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No description of the energy input required to lift the 'kinetic mass' (water, rocks) to the mountaintop. The system appears to be a gravity energy storage system (like pumped hydro), but the input work for lifting is no
- Ambiguous efficiency claim: Claims a tenfold increase in energy efficiency per ton of water compared to hydroelectricity, which is thermodynamically suspicious unless it refers to a different system boundary.
- Vague mechanism: Describes adding ballast to vehicles and cable cars to generate electricity on descent, but does not specify how the ballast is returned uphill without consuming at least as much energy as is generated.
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of the pistons/fluid, converted via rotation of the device. The system appears to be a gravity engine where the weight of pistons on the descending side displaces fluid to the ascending side.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered mechanical system. While it might rotate initially or if given a push, it cannot produce sustained net work output. The gravitational work done by descending masses is exactly consumed by lifting the opposing masses, minus inevitable losses, resulting in no net energy gain and eventual stoppage.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work to lift the pistons/fluid on the ascending side must come from the gravitational fall on the descending side. No net energy gain is possible from this closed cycle.
- Implied perpetual motion: The description suggests continuous rotation from internal weight redistribution, which would violate conservation of energy as it lacks an external energy input to overcome losses.
- Missing entropy sink: Friction (piston seals, bearings, fluid viscosity) and other dissipative losses are not accounted for, making sustained motion impossible without external work input.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a rotating unit handling bulk material (schüttfähiges Medium). The only explicit energy input mentioned is gravitational force (Claim 10). The device is intended to drive an electricity generation unit (Claim 9), implying it is meant to produce net energy output.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a rotating aggregate that moves bulk material, lifts it, and uses its gravitational fall to generate electricity. However, it fails to identify the external energy source required to perform the work of lifting the material in the first place. This creates an incomplete energy balance, suggesting the system might be misinterpreted as producing net energy from gravity alone, which is impossible without an external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear primary energy input is specified to initiate or sustain rotation.
- Claim 10 suggests the device is driven by the gravitational force of the bulk material itself, which is not an external energy source but a conservative force field.
- The system describes moving material from a lower reservoir to a higher one (Claim 6) and then using its fall to generate electricity, but no energy input for the lifting phase is identified.
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to lift the material against gravity is not accounted for in the described cycle.
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of ballast (earth/rock) loaded at a high elevation and unloaded at a low elevation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device extracts energy from gravity by lowering mass, which is physically valid. However, the patent description only details the energy generation half of the cycle. To be a net generator, the energy required to return the empty troughs and/or the ballast back to the top must be less than the energy generated during descent, which is not analyzed and is highly questionable for such a mechanically complex system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy cost of resetting the system (moving ballast back to the top) is not accounted for.
- Energy losses from friction, generator inefficiency, and moving the massive empty belt/spindles are likely significant and may exceed the generated output.
- The system is essentially a gravity engine with an unspecified, external method for returning the ballast to the high potential energy state.
Claimed Energy Source
Primary energy input is from the motor (electric, pneumatic, or hydraulic), which drives the system. The claimed 'power supply' (alternator, compressor, pump) is driven by the system's own mechanical output.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical transmission system where a motor drives gears that also drive an alternator or compressor. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the ambiguous terminology around 'power reduction' and the closed-loop energy flow suggest a misunderstanding of conservation of energy, making the claims questionable and prone to misinterpretation as a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim of a 'power reduction wheel' reducing power on the alternator/compressor/pump is mechanically vague and suggests a misunderstanding of power transmission. Power (energy/time) is conserved in ideal gearing; reduction gears trade speed for to
- The system description implies a closed-loop energy path (e.g., motor drives wheels, wheels drive alternator). Without an external energy source beyond the initial motor input, the alternator's output cannot exceed the motor's input minus losses.
- The abstract's phrase 'reduce the power (P) on the means for supplying power (P)' is physically nonsensical. Power is a rate of energy transfer, not a load that can be independently 'reduced' on a generator while maintaining its output.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor (for rotation) and to the electromagnets (for retraction). Centrifugal force is not an energy source; it is a kinematic effect from the rotational kinetic energy provided by the motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electrically-powered rotating system with internal moving parts. The described operation cannot produce net propulsion, as all forces are internal and balanced within the system. The claim of 'propulsion' is physically unfounded.
Specific Physics Issues
- No mechanism for net propulsion is described or implied by the actuator motion.
- The described cyclic motion (radial in/out) is internal to the rotating frame and cannot create a net external force (violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum).
- The claim title 'Propulsion system' suggests an external thrust output, but the physics described only accounts for internal energy conversion and forces.
Claimed Energy Source
Input electrical/mechanical work to spin the counter-rotating assemblies and to radially displace the masses via the control mechanisms (Kulisse/Co-Kulisse).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical system using counter-rotating masses with adjustable radial positions. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, it strongly implies the generation of a net linear force (thrust) from purely internal rotations, which would be a reactionless drive if isolated. Without clear energy accounting and system boundaries, its claimed functionality is physically questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- The patent describes a mechanism to convert rotary motion into a linear force, but provides no efficiency analysis or energy accounting. The claim of generating a 'linear force' suggests a net thrust or propulsion capability from an internal rotating
Claimed Energy Source
The energy input is implied to be from an external drive motor ('Antrieb') on the central axis that rotates the two counter-rotating discs. The device is a mechanical system for accelerating projectiles.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical projectile accelerator using counter-rotating discs. Its claim of being completely recoilless is physically questionable, as ejecting a mass imparts net linear momentum to the system's center of mass, violating Newton's third law if 'recoilless' is taken literally. The energy accounting is incomplete but the core violation is kinematic, not energetic.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'rückstoßfrei' (recoilless) is ambiguous and potentially misleading. Newton's third law requires that the linear momentum imparted to the projectile is balanced by an equal and opposite momentum change in the device. The claim suggests inter
- The description is purely kinematic and lacks any energy or efficiency analysis. While the mechanism might manage angular momentum internally, it cannot circumvent the conservation of linear momentum or the energy required for acceleration.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes transferring kinetic energy between masses or to springs/generators, implying an initial external force accelerates a mass, but the overall system's energy source for sustained operation is not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism where accelerating a mass and then transferring its kinetic energy is claimed to create a directed force component, but the description is physically vague and suggests an attempt to generate a net force within a closed system, which would violate conservation of momentum. The lack of a clear, specified external energy source for continuous operation raises fundamental concerns.
Specific Physics Issues
- Vague mechanism for 'directed force component' creation that appears to circumvent Newton's third law (action-reaction).
- Claims of 'impulse splitting or conversion' to create a force component opposite to the acceleration force without a clear, physically valid mechanism.
- Implies a net force can be generated internal to a system without an equal and opposite external reaction, violating conservation of momentum.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient energy gradients: primarily wind or fluid flow (to create external underpressure), plus heated medium (hot gases/liquids) and potential gravitational energy from liquid column.
AI Physics Analysis
The device uses external underpressure (e.g., from wind) and a heated medium to presumably drive a flow through a turbine via a liquid column. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the patent language is vague and omits the necessary accounting of the energy required to create the underpressure and heat the input medium, making its net efficiency claims impossible to evaluate against thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system appears to use external underpressure (from wind or fluid flow) and a heated medium as inputs, but the claim structure suggests these are treated as 'free' or multiplicative rather than as primary energy input
- Ambiguous thermodynamic cycle: No clear description of how the underpressure, heated medium, and liquid column interact to produce net work greater than the energy required to create the underpressure and heat the medium.
- Potential confusion between work extraction and energy conversion: The 'implosion' concept may obfuscate that the useful work from the turbine ultimately comes from the kinetic energy of the wind/fluid creating the underpressure and/or the thermal en
Claimed Energy Source
Rotational mechanical input from an external prime mover applied to the 'circular rotational force input member'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex rotating mechanism that manipulates internal centrifugal and inertial forces. However, for it to produce a sustained net directional force (thrust) on its mounting frame, an equal and opposite external reaction force is required, which is not identified. The energy source is the rotational input, but the claimed net unidirectional output is physically questionable without violating conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of producing a 'net unidirectional force' suggests a net translational impulse or thrust from a purely rotating system, which violates conservation of momentum unless interacting with an external reference (e.g., a fixed frame).
- Incomplete dynamic analysis: Forces described are internal reaction forces between components; for a closed system, the net force on its center of mass must be zero.
- Ambiguous 'power stroke' description obfuscates the source of any net directional force, which must ultimately come from the input torque on the frame.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient/initial mechanical input (implied). The described apparatus (weights, air pumps, tubes, balls, water pool) suggests an attempt to use gravity-driven weight movement and buoyancy/air displacement to create or sustain rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a rotating display with a complex mechanism of weights, air pumps, and a water pool, but fails to specify an external energy source. The implied operation suggests a gravity/buoyancy cycle that cannot produce sustained net rotation without violating energy conservation, as losses are inevitable and unaccounted for.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit primary energy input identified (e.g., motor, wind, manual crank).
- Apparatus description implies a complex mechanism intended to extract net work from a closed cycle of gravity and buoyancy, which is thermodynamically impossible without an external gradient.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Any initial rotation would be damped by friction, drag, and hysteresis in the pumps/bellows; the system lacks a described mechanism to add net energy to overcome these losses.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is the unspecified motor that rotates the armature. Additional electrical energy is required to power the solenoids/drivers that move the weights radially.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanism that cannot propel a vehicle in isolation, as it violates conservation of momentum. All forces are internal between the weights, armature, and vehicle structure, resulting in zero net force on the vehicle's center of mass. The energy input simply creates internal motion and waste heat.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of net force on axis for propulsion is problematic for a closed system. Internal moving parts cannot create a sustained net external force on the vehicle's center of mass without an external reaction mass.
- Energy accounting is incomplete. The work done by solenoids to move weights radially, plus motor work to rotate armature, must equal the kinetic energy of the vehicle plus all losses. No mechanism for net momentum gain is physically justified.
- The 'motion restrainer' suggests an attempt to circumvent Newton's third law by selectively impeding vehicle motion in certain directions, which is not possible for an isolated system.
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly stated as a 'power source' driving the primary rotor. This is the only identified energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a driven mechanical system, so its energy source is clear. However, the claims are physically ambiguous, suggesting a sustained oscillation 'without any external activation' and a resulting 'net force' without completing the energy balance. This raises strong questions about whether it implicitly claims output work exceeding input energy, which would violate conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims 'net force' from 'changes of momentum' without specifying if this force does useful work. If it does, the energy for that work is unaccounted for.
- Ambiguous claim of self-sustained oscillation: 'enabled to oscillate continuously... without any external activation' suggests a passive, sustained motion once initiated, which may imply negligible energy loss or a perpetual oscillation, which is non
- No thermodynamic limit analysis: The device is a complex mechanical system; its maximum efficiency is less than 100% due to friction and other losses. The description implies a specific geometric configuration might produce a net force, but any usefu
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Claims mention conventional or nuclear energy sources (Claim 2) and capacitors that are charged at one angle and discharged translationally at another angle (Claim 1). The primary energy input is not specified; it could be from the mentioned external sources, but the charging/discharging mechanism of the rotors is ambiguous.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device with rotors and capacitors charged at one angle and discharged at another, but provides no complete physical mechanism or energy balance. The claims are technically vague, failing to specify how net useful work is produced without violating conservation of energy, placing it in the 'questionable' category requiring significant scrutiny.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the capacitor charging/discharging cycle on the rotors.
- No description of the energy conversion process or work output, making thermodynamic analysis impossible.
- Vague mechanism: 'translatorisch entladbar' (discharged translationally) does not specify a clear, physically coherent method for generating net thrust or work.
Claimed Energy Source
External rotary input to spin the wheels; the apparatus is a mechanical transmission system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system to transform rotary input into a reciprocating linear force. While not an explicit energy generator, its physics are questionable if intended to produce net linear motion without an equal and opposite reaction, violating conservation of momentum. The vague claims and lack of efficiency analysis warrant scrutiny.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim is for 'converting' motion, not generating energy, but mechanism is complex and likely introduces significant internal friction and inertial losses.
- No quantitative performance claim, but the description suggests an attempt to create a unidirectional linear force from rotating masses, which may imply an expectation of a net force or 'inertial propulsion' without external reaction—a violation of N
Claimed Energy Source
The 'drive means' provides the initial electrical/mechanical energy to spin the discs and rotate the assembly. The claimed 'pulsatile force' is generated from the internal gyroscopic dynamics, not from an external ambient source.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a complex driven gyroscopic system. While the described forces may exist, the patent provides no analysis showing that the useful work from the 'pulsatile force' could exceed the continuous input power required to maintain the spinning and rotation against losses, making its efficacy as a 'prime mover' highly questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims a 'pulsatile force' for useful work but does not compare its magnitude to the continuous input power required to maintain the complex, forced gyroscopic motion.
- Potential for obfuscation: Describes a mechanism to generate a force, but the net energy output is not quantified relative to the total energy input needed to overcome friction, air resistance, and internal stresses from the periodic forcing.
- The system is a driven, non-conservative mechanism; any extracted work must come at the expense of increased input power to the drives.
Claimed Energy Source
External 'powering means' (e.g., motor) to rotate the central shaft and the armlet relative to the arm. The device is a complex mechanical system converting this input work into oscillating forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanically complex rotating system powered by an external motor. While its kinematics may produce interesting oscillating forces, the patent's language suggests a misunderstanding that these inertial forces can be harnessed for net work output beyond the input work, which would violate energy conservation. The physics is obscured by vague claims about force concentration and resultant forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims of 'net resultant force' and force cancellation are vague and suggest an attempt to harness or concentrate centrifugal/centripetal forces for net work output without a clear external gradient.
- The description implies the device can produce a unidirectional force or useful work from a rotating frame, which typically cannot exceed the work input needed to drive the rotations.
- No thermodynamic limit is explicitly violated, but the language ('concentrating centrifugal force', 'net resultant force') suggests an incomplete energy accounting where oscillating inertial forces might be misinterpreted as a net energy gain.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor (31) that drives the rotating body (1). The claimed 'propulsive force' is presumably generated by the interaction of the rotating, unbalanced mass with the periodic tilting of its axis.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a motor-driven, unbalanced rotating mass whose axis is periodically tilted. While the internal forces and motions are complex, the system is a closed mechanical system powered by an electric motor. Any net propulsive force claimed is highly questionable, as internal momentum changes should cancel out, yielding no net external thrust without an external reaction mass. The description lacks a complete momentum/energy analysis.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the claimed net 'propulsive force' (Antriebskraft).
- No specification of how this force performs net work on the environment or vehicle.
- High potential for internal reaction forces to cancel any net thrust when fully analyzed (violation of Newton's third law).
- The system appears to be a complex gyroscopic system where energy input goes into changing angular momentum vectors, not into creating net linear momentum.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim describes a mechanical arrangement of pistons (Kraftkolben, Gegenkolben) but provides no information on the primary energy input (e.g., fuel combustion, compressed air, thermal gradient).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim only describes a mechanical configuration of pistons without specifying the source of energy or the thermodynamic cycle, making a proper physics analysis impossible. It references another patent application (P 41 01 721.8) for critical context, which is not provided. Without knowing the energy input, it cannot be assessed for thermodynamic validity.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source identified
- No thermodynamic process or working fluid specified
- Claims are purely mechanical/structural with no performance metrics to evaluate
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim suggests using an 'air centrifuge' to create a pressure differential that provides drive. The energy must ultimately come from an external input to spin the centrifuge, but this input is not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a device that converts energy but fails to specify the original source of that energy. While an air centrifuge can create a pressure differential, the work needed to spin it must come from somewhere else, making this a conversion system, not a primary energy source. The description is incomplete, not inherently impossible, but raises immediate questions about energy accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the primary energy input to power the air centrifuge.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Creating a pressure differential with a centrifuge requires work input; using that differential to produce drive is a conversion process with inherent losses.
- No thermodynamic context: The claim describes a conversion device, not an energy source, but presents it as a universal drive machine.
Claimed Energy Source
External torque source (e.g., electric motor or beamed electromagnetic wave motor) provides rotational mechanical energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce a net linear impulse (thrust) from internal rotating and oscillating masses without expelling reaction mass. This violates conservation of momentum for a closed system. While it requires an external torque input, the described conversion mechanism is physically incoherent for generating net propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Mechanism for generating net linear impulse from internal moving masses is not explained and appears to violate Newton's third law for a closed system.
- Claim of 'uni-directional linear impulse output' suggests a reactionless drive or internal momentum cancellation scheme, which is impossible for a system with no external reaction mass.
- Energy accounting is absent; the conversion from rotary torque to claimed linear impulse lacks a coherent physical principle for net momentum generation.
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy of water stored in a dam, transferred via buoyancy and moving weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a complex water/weight machine powered by the dam's water. The fundamental issue is that the work needed to raise water into the upper cylinder (or to lower it from the lower cylinder) against atmospheric pressure and to overcome hydraulic losses will equal or exceed the mechanical work extracted from the lever and crank, resulting in net loss, not generation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the work required to pump water into/out of cylinders
- Apparent attempt to create a self-sustaining cycle using moving weights without a clear net energy gain
- System likely requires more energy to move the water than is recovered from the lever/crank motion.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy source is ambiguous. The system includes an 'Energiespeicher' (energy storage device, e.g., spring, weight) which provides an initial input, but the claims suggest the mechanism's geometry (variable lever arm, knee-joint action) may somehow amplify or sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex dynamic gear/linkage system with an energy storage device. While the mechanism itself does not explicitly violate physics, the claims are structured to highlight geometric advantages in a way that obscures the complete energy cycle, leaving the source for sustained operation unclear and open to misinterpretation as a perpetual motion device.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims describe mechanical advantage and 'supporting' force flow, but do not specify an ongoing external energy input to recharge the energy storage. The system appears to be a complex linkage that merely transforms and
- Potential implication of over-unity: The language ('unterstützt den Kraftfluss' - supports the power flow) and focus on variable lever arms and geometry could imply an attempt to get more work out than is stored, which is impossible without an extern
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the hydraulic system (working cylinders 30-33) which must be powered by an external pump/motor. The device is a complex mechanical linkage designed to convert the linear/pivoting motion of the hydraulic actuators into rotational motion of a generator shaft via a sled on a guided track.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanically complex motion converter, not an energy source. It requires an external hydraulic system to drive its actuators, and this input energy will always be greater than the electrical energy output from the generator due to inevitable losses. The patent fails to specify this primary input, making its claims as a 'stromerzeugungsvorrichtung' (electricity generating device) incomplete and misleading.
Specific Physics Issues
- No specification of the hydraulic system's power source. The description focuses entirely on the motion conversion mechanism, creating an illusion of a self-contained generator.
- The complex mechanical system (pivoting frame, sliding sled, telescoping arm) will have significant frictional and inertial losses, likely resulting in a net efficiency far below 100%.
- The claim implies energy generation but omits the essential input energy required to drive the hydraulic cylinders, which is the true source of the generator's output.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to multiple motors driving yokes and flywheels/discs.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex gyroscopic system powered by electric motors. While it can generate internal gyroscopic torques (precessional moments), these are reaction forces within the system and cannot produce net propulsion or useful work output exceeding the electrical input without violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claimed 'precessional moment' is an internal gyroscopic torque, not a net external force/thrust without an external reaction.
- No mechanism described to convert internal angular momentum changes into net propulsion or useful work exceeding input energy.
- Apparatus is a closed system; any precessional torque on the axis is reacted by the mounting/structure, yielding no net propulsive force.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions 'Rückstoß' (recoil/thrust) on turbine blades, implying a working fluid or gas flow, but the primary claimed mechanism is the addition of rolling metal balls in a ring duct to increase thrust and act as a flywheel. No primary energy input (e.g., fuel, steam, wind, pressurized gas) is explicitly identified.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is described as a turbine but lacks a clear source of energy input (like steam, gas, or water flow). Its claimed performance boost comes from internal rolling masses, which cannot generate net thrust or increase work output without an external energy source, suggesting incomplete energy accounting and conceptual confusion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim that rolling balls increase thrust pressure on turbine arms violates Newton's 3rd law unless an external force accelerates them. Internal circulating masses cannot create net thrust or increase work output in a
- Confused mechanism: Mixes concepts of gyroscopic stabilization, flywheel energy storage, and thrust generation without a clear primary energy conversion pathway. Flywheels store energy, they do not create it.
- Ambiguous operation: The description lacks a defined working fluid, pressure gradient, or thermodynamic cycle to perform as a turbine.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the drive means rotating the flywheels.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanism where all forces are balanced. The vibration isolation unit cannot filter oscillating internal forces to produce a net thrust without violating conservation of momentum. It is a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible for a closed system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim suggests generation of a net unidirectional force from an internal, balanced oscillating system, which violates Newton's third law unless momentum is exchanged with an external body.
- Apparatus is a closed system (housing, flywheels, masses, tracks); internal forces sum to zero. Isolating the housing cannot create a net external force.
- Misapplication of gyroscopic effects; precession forces would be internal and cyclical, not net unidirectional.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a mechanical system using radially sliding masses controlled by electromagnetic, hydraulic, pneumatic, or crank drives. The patent text does not specify a primary energy input, implying the radial motion of the masses might be the sole energy input for generating rotational thrust.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism with radially sliding masses designed to keep the system's center of mass stationary while allegedly producing thrust. This suggests an attempt to create a reactionless drive for vehicles, which violates conservation of momentum. While the radial drives require an energy source, the primary physics issue is the implied generation of net force from internal motions alone.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim describes a mechanism to generate thrust/rotation by moving masses radially while keeping the system's center of mass stationary relative to the axis. This suggests an attempt to create a net force/torque witho
- Ambiguous net work source: The radial drive mechanisms (electromagnetic, hydraulic, etc.) require energy input to move the masses against centrifugal forces. The patent does not clarify if the useful rotational work output is greater than this input
- No thermodynamic limit violation per se, but a fundamental mechanics issue: A system cannot produce a net internal force on its own center of mass. For a vehicle to accelerate, it must expel reaction mass (like a rocket) or interact with an external
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly stated motors (electric, combustion, or other) provide the energy to spin the gyroscope and to change its axis orientation, speed, and direction of rotation.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a controlled gyroscope system but makes a vague, overarching claim that it can alter the position or motion of connected bodies, which strongly suggests propulsion without expulsion of mass. While it identifies motor inputs for energy, the central claimed effect appears to violate conservation of linear momentum if interpreted as a closed system generating net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 1 suggests the gyroscopic device can change the position or motion of connected physical bodies, implying propulsion or force generation without a clear external reaction mass or momentum sink. This is a classic problem of internal momentum man
- The description is purely kinematic and geometric, lacking any analysis of forces, torques, momentum conservation, or energy balance. It claims a result (changing position/motion) without specifying the physical mechanism by which net momentum is imp
- The more complex designs (Claim 3, spherical rotor) add control complexity but do not fundamentally address the conservation of linear momentum.
Claimed Energy Source
Rotational mechanical input from an external motor or engine, transferred via the drive means (input shaft or socket).
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a mechanical system that converts rotary input into internal vibrations or impulses. While not explicitly violating energy conservation, its ability to produce useful net thrust is highly questionable because it lacks a clear mechanism for momentum exchange with an external environment, which is required for propulsion.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 2 suggests the compressed resilient member acts on the thrust means in a way that 'the drive means is caused to rotate'. This implies a reactive torque from the thrust means back to the drive means, which could create an internal force loop wit
- The description is purely kinematic; it lacks a clear analysis of momentum conservation. For net thrust, the apparatus must impart net momentum to an external medium (e.g., air, water) or react against an external body. The mechanism described appear
- The abstract mentions 'maintaining thrust' which is vague. Sustained thrust requires continuous net external reaction, not just internal energy transfer.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim mentions 'electromagnetic waves' and 'vibrations' in the environment, suggesting ambient energy harvesting. However, no specific mechanism or gradient (thermal, RF, mechanical) is defined, and the energy input is not quantified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is too vague to analyze properly, using correct physics terms ('electromagnetic waves', 'vibrations') without a clear, quantifiable mechanism. This pattern of obfuscation prevents a proper energy accounting and thermodynamic limit check, making the claim questionable rather than demonstrably valid or violative.
Specific Physics Issues
- No complete energy accounting provided
- No thermodynamic process or efficiency limit specified
- Vague description of how ambient energy is converted to useful output
- Abstract and claims are non-specific and appear incomplete or obfuscated
Claimed Energy Source
The claimed energy source is ambiguous. The apparatus appears to be a mechanical system powered by the work required to pump fluid into/out of the cylinders and air into/out of the floats. The buoyancy and gravitational forces are internal, not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus describes a mechanism that converts controlled buoyancy into rotation, but it fails to identify the primary energy input. The work needed to pump the fluid and manage the air pressure will always be greater than the useful mechanical work extracted due to inevitable losses, making it a net consumer, not a generator, of power.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to pump the water and compress/vent the air is not accounted for in the output.
- No net energy source identified: Buoyancy and gravity are conservative forces; cycling them requires net energy input to overcome losses.
- The system is essentially a complex hydraulic/pneumatic actuator; the crank output cannot exceed the work input to the pumps/compressors.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. The described mechanism suggests potential energy from a liquid head (height difference) in the transfer chamber (17) could drive fluid transfer between compartments, possibly converting gravitational potential into rotational motion. No explicit external energy input is described, implying the system might be intended to run from an initial liquid level gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a rotational device using interconnected liquid-filled compartments, but fails to specify the primary energy input. The mechanism appears to rely on a liquid level in a transfer chamber to drive fluid aspiration between compartments, potentially suggesting conversion of gravitational potential into motion. Without a clear, sustained energy source to overcome losses, it risks violating conservation of energy by implying a self-sustaining cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of how the initial liquid level in the transfer chamber is established or maintained.
- Ambiguous work cycle: The described fluid aspiration between compartments during rotation suggests a buoyancy or pressure-driven process, but the net energy output vs. losses (friction, viscous dissipation) is not addressed.
- Potential perpetual motion implication: The abstract and claims describe a self-sustaining rotational drive from fluid transfer without identifying an external energy source to compensate for losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Explicitly states external energy input is required, which can be 'muscular or mechanical' (e.g., a human or motor). The device is a mechanism to transform this input energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent explicitly requires an external energy source, so it does not directly claim perpetual motion. However, its foundational premise—that a specific mechanical arrangement of masses can maintain a disequilibrium to produce usable energy from an input—is mechanically dubious and suggests a misunderstanding of energy conservation in gravitational systems. The claims are vague and lean towards the over-unity narrative.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'minimum of braking due to friction' and 'practically unlimited weight' of masses are vague, non-quantitative engineering optimizations, not physics violations.
- The core claim of maintaining a mass imbalance relative to the axis of rotation over time to produce recoverable energy is mechanically ambiguous. In a closed system, any such imbalance would oscillate or require continuous work to maintain against g
- The description suggests the output energy is derived from the rotation driven by the external input, but the language implies the configuration itself enables a favorable energy production for a given input, which is a hallmark of over-unity thinkin
Claimed Energy Source
Kinetic and potential energy from flowing water (domestic or natural currents) and the gravitational potential energy of a descending mass (12).
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to harvest energy from water flow, but its described cycle is incomplete. The key falling mass that drives the generator must be lifted again, consuming at least as much energy as it produces (minus losses), creating a net energy deficit unless the water input provides all necessary reset work, which is not clearly demonstrated.
Specific Physics Issues
- Unclear energy accounting: The system uses a descending mass (12) to drive the generator. This mass must be reset/raised, requiring an input of energy that is not described in the cycle.
- Force amplification via hydraulic pistons (P1, P2) does not amplify energy or power; it trades force for displacement, conserving energy (minus losses).
- The tilting receptacle (7) mechanism likely captures only a small fraction of the water flow's kinetic energy, with most energy spent resetting the mass and receptacle against gravity.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the electromagnets and computer control system; magnetic potential energy from permanent magnets on the rim.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a motor using controlled electromagnets to interact with a rim of permanent magnets, but it fails to account for all energy inputs and outputs. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the vague description and focus on geometric ratios instead of energy balance make it questionable and require scrutiny of its net energy flow.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description focuses on geometry and control but does not specify the net energy input vs. output.
- Ambiguous role of permanent magnets: The system uses both electromagnets (consuming power) and permanent magnets on the rim, but the claim does not explain if/how energy is extracted from the permanent magnets' field.
- No thermodynamic limit comparison: No efficiency or COP is stated, making it impossible to verify against theoretical limits.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device appears to be a rotating assembly with three weights arranged at different radial positions around a rotating shaft, but no explicit energy input mechanism is described in the provided text.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract and claim are vague and written in Japanese, making technical analysis difficult. The described rotating device with three weights lacks a clear, identified source of energy input. Any claimed speed increase would require external energy, suggesting a potential violation of energy conservation if such input is omitted or obscured in the claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism specified
- Claims of 'speed increase' without explaining the source of the required kinetic energy
- Ambiguous description that could imply extraction of work from a static configuration of masses without an external driver
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions weights, a shaft, and rotation, but no explicit energy input mechanism is described. Any motion would require an initial energy input or energy from an ambient gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical assembly with weights and a shaft but provides no clear source of energy to initiate or sustain motion. Claims of permanent or self-sustaining motion would violate energy conservation. The vague, non-quantitative description and use of terms like 'permanent motion' are hallmarks of questionable perpetual motion claims.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input mechanism described
- Claims about 'permanent motion' or self-sustaining rotation without an energy source violate conservation of energy
- Mechanical description is vague and lacks quantitative performance claims or efficiency calculations
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim references 'ambient energy' and 'vibration energy' but does not specify a measurable, quantifiable source or gradient (e.g., specific thermal, mechanical, or electromagnetic input).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is too vague to assess properly. It suggests using ambient/vibration energy to produce output exceeding a control input, which is only possible if that ambient energy is properly accounted for as a real input. Without specifics on the energy source, conversion process, and performance numbers, it cannot be validated and fits patterns of incomplete accounting and obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: Claims output greater than control input without specifying the magnitude and source of the ambient energy input.
- Vague quantitative claims: No performance metrics (e.g., COP, efficiency) provided for comparison to thermodynamic limits.
- Ambiguous mechanism: The described 'vibration energy' is not linked to a sustained non-equilibrium gradient to extract net work from.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gas kinetic energy and thermal energy, with mechanical input implied but not clearly specified. The device appears to be a type of turbine/compressor system using moving flow channels.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex gas flow machine but fails to clearly identify the primary energy source driving the system. While the individual aerodynamic and thermodynamic processes described (expansion, inertial recompression) are not inherently impossible, the overall energy balance is obscured, and the claims suggest a self-sustaining or over-unity process without specifying the necessary input work.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No clear specification of the primary energy input driving the rotor(s).
- Ambiguous process: Claims to use gas expansion and its own inertia to overcome back pressure and achieve recompression, but the thermodynamic cycle is not defined.
- Vague performance claims: No quantitative efficiency or COP is given, making thermodynamic limit verification impossible.
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from fuel in a two-stroke internal combustion engine. The device appears to be an oscillating flywheel system driven by combustion cycles.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a fueled internal combustion engine modified to oscillate a flywheel, not a perpetual motion machine. However, the patent claim is questionable because it describes an oscillating system but does not clearly explain how this produces net propulsion or useful work beyond the engine's own cyclical operation, suggesting possible confusion about momentum conservation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Vague description of how net propulsion or useful work is extracted from an oscillating flywheel
- No clear mechanism for converting oscillatory rotational motion into unidirectional propulsion or net work output
- Ambiguous claim about 'inertial propulsion' without specifying the reaction mass or momentum conservation pathway
- Potential confusion between internal oscillatory forces within a system and net external thrust
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified external motor or prime mover required to drive the crankshaft and gear system. No novel energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system of rotating/pivoting massive bars but provides no physics basis for how this generates net propulsion. It uses correct mechanical terms (crankshaft, connecting rod, gears) but the application to 'inertial propulsion' is technically obfuscated, as internal motions cannot produce net thrust on a closed system without expelling reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source identified for the claimed 'propulsion'
- Mechanism describes kinematic motion but not a net force or thrust generation
- Claims imply inertial propulsion (reactionless drive) which violates Newton's third law unless interacting with an external field/medium
- System appears to be a complex rotating/oscillating mass mechanism with no clear path to net directional force
Claimed Energy Source
Initial pressurization of a gas (compressed air or pressure gas) acting on a piston in a pressure vessel, which pressurizes hydraulic oil in a closed loop. The system appears to be a pneumatic-hydraulic converter with a mechanical amplifier.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex pneumatic-hydraulic converter but fails to account for the continuous energy needed to sustain operation. The implication of a 'one-time' pressurized gas supply driving a closed-loop system indefinitely, without identifying an external energy source to compensate for losses, violates energy conservation. The design is mechanically detailed but thermodynamically incomplete.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a closed fluid circuit but does not specify the energy source for the pump (7) or the mechanical amplifier (6). Their operation would require an external energy input.
- Ambiguous perpetual motion risk: The description 'nach einmaliger Zufuhr Pressluft oder Druckgas' (after a one-time supply of compressed air or pressure gas) suggests the initial gas charge might be intended to drive the system indefinitely, which is
- No thermodynamic limit analysis: The system combines pneumatic, hydraulic, and mechanical stages without stating efficiencies or acknowledging cumulative losses from friction, heat, and leakage.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description implies a mechanical input (rotational effort) drives an 'acceleration element' which pushes 'volets' (flaps/paddles) to create propulsion, but no primary energy source (engine, motor, human power) is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes an internal mechanical arrangement but fails to identify the system's source of energy or explain how it overcomes the need for external reaction mass/force interaction. The vague, self-referential mechanism suggests possible obfuscation rather than a clear violation of conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable external energy source described
- Vague mechanism claiming to transform alternating/reciprocal motion into continuous advance without explaining how
- Claims elimination of external mechanical organs (e.g., propeller, oar) without a clear alternative propulsion mechanism that interacts with the external medium
Claimed Energy Source
Primary energy input is electrical power to the variable speed motor. Claims 2, 4, and 5 suggest a feedback loop where the generator's output partially or fully powers the input motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The system as a simple fan-driven wind turbine is physically valid, but the described feedback loop configurations are highly questionable. If the generator's output is used to power the input motor, the system cannot produce net power to an external load without violating conservation of energy, making it a potentially closed-loop perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting in feedback configuration: The system's net output to an external load is not clearly distinguished from the power recirculated to drive the input fan.
- Potential violation of energy conservation if the system claims to power its own motor and an external load from a closed-loop airflow without a net external energy input.
- Vague quantitative performance claims; no efficiency or COP is stated, but the feedback loop description implies possible over-unity intent.
Claimed Energy Source
The input energy is the rotational kinetic energy imparted to the masses. The claimed directional force is generated by modulating the radial positions of rotating masses via a cam system, consuming work to move the masses against centrifugal forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create a net directional force by internally shifting rotating masses. However, for an isolated system (like a spacecraft in vacuum), this cannot produce sustained propulsion as momentum must be conserved. The energy source is the motor spinning the masses, but the claimed continuous force suggests a misunderstanding of internal vs. external forces.
Specific Physics Issues
- The abstract claims a continuous unidirectional force is generated. In a closed system, the internal modulation of mass positions can only produce oscillating forces or a net zero average force over a cycle (Newton's third law).
- No external reaction mass or environmental interaction is described, which is necessary for net propulsion in space.
- The energy required to radially displace the masses against the centrifugal potential likely equals or exceeds any useful work extracted from the resulting imbalance.
Claimed Energy Source
Unspecified. The patent describes a configuration of thrust units but does not identify the source of energy for propulsion (e.g., chemical fuel, electrical batteries, nuclear). It refers to 'Antriebsaggregate' (drive units) without defining their energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a geometric arrangement of thrusters for vehicle control but fails to specify the fundamental energy source for propulsion or how the thrust is generated, making its performance claims unverifiable and physically incomplete. While the control scheme may be mechanically possible, the core propulsion principle is not explained.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source identified for the thrust units.
- Claims of 'optimal flight times for any flight distance' are vague and unsubstantiated.
- Describes complex maneuvering but lacks fundamental propulsion physics.
- Mentions 'centrifugal force principle' but does not explain how this generates net thrust for propulsion.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. Implied external energy input may be required to shift the center of mass or generate fluid jets, but not explicitly stated.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system with a rotating mass and adjustable geometry but does not identify an energy source. If intended to produce net propulsion or work without an external input, it would be a violation. As written, it is questionable due to the omission of energy accounting while using terminology suggestive of a motive device.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims describe a device with a rotating mass whose center of mass can be shifted off-axis and then 'remains in a certain position in relation to the axis of rotation.' This could describe a system precessing or a control mechanism, but no energy sou
- If presented as a source of net work or propulsion without an external energy input, it would violate conservation of momentum and energy. The claims focus on geometry and adjustability, not on energy conversion or input.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The 'Kraftgeber' (force generator) appears to be an internal mechanism (oscillator, gyroscope, jet drive, or mass moving on a track) that applies a force to machine parts. No external energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is explicitly specified, though claims mention natural/artificial gravity fields.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device with moving parts and a force generator but fails to identify the ultimate source of energy input required to drive the system. The claims focus on internal force application and manipulation, using correct physics terms (gyroscope, acceleration, gravity fields) in a vague configuration that obscures the energy accounting, making it impossible to assess thermodynamic compliance.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input source for the 'Kraftgeber'.
- Claims describe applying variable forces to machine parts via internal mass movements, suggesting a possible confusion between internal force transfer and net energy generation.
- Vague language about using gravity or centrifugal force without specifying how a net energy gradient is created or sustained.
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from combustion of fuel (pressure air and fuel) in the swinging arms, plus initial rotational input to start the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex rotating mechanical system with combustion chambers in swinging arms. While it explicitly uses fuel combustion as an energy source, its proposed method of generating net thrust by selectively firing jets at a specific point in a rotating frame is mechanically dubious and lacks a clear explanation for how it avoids being a reactionless drive or violating conservation of momentum. The description focuses on kinematics, not the net force balance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Mechanism for net thrust generation is unclear and likely relies on unbalanced centrifugal forces.
- Claims suggest the jet nozzles only fire at the point of greatest radius, implying an attempt to extract net work from a rotating frame without a clear external reaction mass or momentum sink.
- Complex gearing and motion (double rotation rate of arms vs. carrier) may obfuscate the fundamental source of net momentum change for propulsion.
Claimed Energy Source
External 'means for rotating said shaft' provides the initial rotational kinetic energy. The device attempts to convert a portion of this rotational energy into a net linear impulse via asymmetric centrifugal force variation.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanism where all forces sum to zero; it cannot create a net propulsive force on its own enclosure. The input energy from rotating the shaft will be dissipated by internal work and friction, not converted into sustained unidirectional motion of the device as a whole.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of producing a 'propulsive force' or 'unidirectional motion' suggests net external linear impulse, which would violate Newton's Third Law for an isolated system.
- The internal forces from varying the radius of gyration and interacting with the eccentric cam track are all action-reaction pairs within the device; no net external force is generated for propulsion.
- Energy accounting is incomplete: work done against/with centrifugal forces and cam friction will dissipate the input rotational energy, with no mechanism for net energy gain.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The primary input is presumably electrical energy to the motor-generator. The system involves batteries mounted on a rotating flywheel, suggesting potential energy exchange between kinetic (flywheel) and chemical (batteries) storage, but no external ambient energy source is specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical arrangement for moving energy between batteries and a flywheel but fails to identify a net energy input source or a specific thermodynamic conversion process. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the vague description and lack of complete energy accounting make its physical viability questionable without further clarification of how it achieves useful work output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claims describe a configuration for moving/transforming energy but do not specify a net energy source. The system appears to be a closed loop of motor, generator, flywheel, and batteries.
- No thermodynamic process identified: The patent describes a mechanical/electrical arrangement but not a specific energy conversion process (e.g., heat engine, regenerative braking) that would define its limits.
- Vague functional claim: 'Machine for the regulated change of location or form of energy or substance' is overly broad and non-specific about how it achieves useful work output greater than input.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanical system with rotating bodies (Kraftaufnahmekörper) in filled housings, but provides no specification of the primary energy input (e.g., electric motor, fluid flow, external torque). The claimed conversion of torque into directional forces suggests an input of rotational energy, but its origin is not defined.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical force conversion system but fails to specify the primary energy input, making proper energy accounting and thermodynamic analysis impossible. The vague, non-quantitative claims and undefined system boundaries prevent evaluation against physical laws, though no explicit violation is stated. The description suggests a conventional mechanical transmission, but the lack of clarity renders it questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy input source specified
- Claims of 'force conversion' and 'pressure generation' without a clear thermodynamic or mechanical context to evaluate efficiency or limits
- Ambiguous mechanism makes energy accounting impossible
- Vague references to 'pressure equalization' and 'substances' without defining the working fluid or its energy state
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor, which imparts rotational kinetic energy to the rod and weights.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is internally powered by a motor, so it is not a perpetual motion machine. However, its claimed ability to generate a net 'driving thrust' for displacement using only internal moving parts and deflectors is physically impossible, as it would violate conservation of momentum. It is a reactionless drive concept.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'transforming kinetic energy into a driving thrust' is vague and implies a net propulsive force from an internal moving mass, which is impossible for a closed system.
- The deflector, by urging the weights radially inward, does internal work on the system; any resulting 'thrust' would be an internal reaction force, yielding zero net displacement of the device's center of mass in space.
- The description suggests the apparatus could cause its own displacement (per the abstract), which violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for an isolated system.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from claims. Likely a conventional internal combustion or pneumatic motor, but the claims only describe mechanical configuration, not the origin of the driving force (fuel, compressed air, electricity, etc.).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a kinematic mechanism (a motor without a crankshaft or connecting rods) but provides zero information about the energy source, conversion process, or efficiency. Without this, it's impossible to assess compliance with conservation laws or thermodynamic limits, making the claim fundamentally incomplete from a physics analysis perspective.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source or conversion process is specified.
- Claims are purely structural/kinematic, making thermodynamic analysis impossible.
- Lack of quantitative performance claims prevents comparison to theoretical limits.
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from fuel (implied but not specified) provides initial compression heat. Water injection uses the heat of compression for flash evaporation, converting thermal energy to expansion work.
AI Physics Analysis
This patent describes a motor using water injection to harness heat from compressed air for expansion work. While not an explicit perpetual motion device, its claims are framed around extracting work from compression heat without fully accounting for the energy input needed to create that compression, making its net efficiency claims ambiguous and physically incomplete.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent focuses on water volume relative to 'theoretical evaporable amount' from compression heat, but does not specify the primary fuel/energy source for the initial compression. The system appears to be an internal
- Ambiguous efficiency claims: Injecting water to utilize waste heat from compression can improve efficiency, but the claims imply maximizing work from this heat without clarifying the total system energy input. The theoretical limit is the available e
Claimed Energy Source
Chemical energy from fuel combustion (implied explosion) inside the cylinder.
AI Physics Analysis
The described double-piston engine appears to be an internal combustion engine, so its energy source is valid. However, the claims about force balancing and stress relief are technically obfuscated—the described mechanism is unclear and does not convincingly explain how it would improve efficiency or output beyond a standard engine, raising questions about its actual thermodynamic or mechanical advantage.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'Gegendruck' (counter-pressure) and 'Ausgleichsdruck' (balancing pressure) relieving stress on cylinder heads and bearings is vague and mechanically unclear.
- No clear mechanism for how an 'explosion' acting on two opposed pistons in one open cylinder provides a net, usable torque output to the crankshaft.
- Incomplete mechanical and thermodynamic analysis; the description suggests force balancing but does not explain how this translates to net work output without losses or internal cancellation of forces.
Claimed Energy Source
Presumably electrical or mechanical energy from the main rotating grill spit ('automatisch-rotierenden Grillspieß') to which the device is attached. May also use waste heat from the grill.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is for an attachment to a rotating grill spit for roasting green coffee beans, but provides no technical details on the energy conversion process. While the concept of using existing rotational energy and waste heat is plausible, the complete lack of quantitative information and reliance on a vague description prevents proper physics analysis, making it questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Insufficient technical detail to perform energy accounting.
- Unclear thermodynamic process for roasting coffee beans (requires significant heat input).
- Vague claim makes performance and efficiency impossible to evaluate against thermodynamic limits.
Claimed Energy Source
External work input to 'slowly advance' (cock) the inertia member against the actuating means, storing potential energy in the stressed system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to store energy during a slow 'cocking' phase and release it quickly, but momentum conservation dictates the impulses during cocking and release cancel over a cycle, resulting in no net propulsion. It describes an internal reaction, not an external propulsive force.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim is ambiguous about net momentum transfer. The 'slow cocking' and 'fast release' cycle likely results in zero net impulse on the base/body over a full cycle due to conservation of momentum. The 'reactive force' during cocking cancels the impulse
- No mechanism described to break momentum symmetry. The system appears to be an internal momentum transfer device, not a propulsion source.
- Vague 'actuating means' obscures the energy transfer and force paths.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from provided text. The title suggests a movable/swiveling tabletop, implying manual human input or an unspecified motor.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent text is corrupted and unreadable, making a proper physics analysis impossible. The title describes a mechanical furniture item which is likely manually operated and thus not a physics violation, but the garbled claims prevent any definitive assessment of its operation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Insufficient technical information to perform energy accounting.
- Abstract and claims are corrupted/garbled text, preventing analysis of the actual mechanism.
- Cannot identify the energy conversion process or compare to thermodynamic limits.
Claimed Energy Source
Primary energy input appears to be a conventional vehicle motor (Fahrzeugmotor) driving a driveshaft. The mechanism uses a universal joint (Kreuzgelenkkupplung) and oscillating/swinging components to generate thrust forces.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system using oscillating components to generate thrust, but it does not explain the fundamental physics of how internal oscillations can produce net vehicle propulsion without violating Newton's third law. The technical obfuscation of mechanical details without a clear energy or momentum source makes it questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim lacks a clear physical principle for net thrust generation from oscillating masses
- No energy accounting for how internal oscillations produce net external propulsion without reaction against an external medium
- Description focuses on mechanical linkages without identifying the source of the propulsive energy gradient
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided text is garbled and contains no technical description of an energy source or conversion process. It appears to be a fragment of a patent application cover sheet (Anlage zum Antrag) referencing a tool and machinery company.
AI Physics Analysis
The input is not a usable technical claim or device description. It is a corrupted or incomplete fragment, likely a cover page reference, containing no physics to evaluate. It is flagged as questionable because it provides no substantive information to assess.
Specific Physics Issues
- No technical description of the device or process to analyze.
- Insufficient information to perform energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis.
- Text is corrupted/nonsensical ('lochbandeisen', garbled characters), preventing technical evaluation.
Claimed Energy Source
Thermal gradient between the first working fluid and the surrounding environment (or a second working fluid). The claimed rotation is driven by a combination of: 1) magnetic forces on the working material due to its temperature-dependent permeability under an applied magnetic field, and 2) fluid dynamic forces from the working fluid flowing past the fin structure.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to attempt to harness a thermal gradient via a thermomagnetic effect, which is physically plausible in principle. However, the patent description obfuscates the energy inputs by conflating the fluid flow (which itself requires energy to sustain) with the thermal-to-mechanical conversion, making it impossible to assess true efficiency or verify compliance with thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent claims rotation is due to BOTH the temperature difference AND fluid flow through the fins, but the fluid flow itself requires an external pressure/pumping work input not accounted for as an energy cost.
- Ambiguous primary mechanism: It conflates a possible magneto-caloric or thermomagnetic effect (which extracts work from a heat gradient) with direct fluid momentum transfer (a turbine). The energy contributions of each are not separated, risking doub
- No thermodynamic limit specified: While a thermomagnetic cycle (like a Curie engine) is theoretically possible with efficiency bounded by Carnot, the description mixes it with fluid mechanics, obscuring the actual conversion path and maximum possible
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind kinetic energy is the primary source. The system also requires electrical energy to power the fan/motor (Claim 12) that supplies compressed air to the nozzles. The energy for air injection is drawn from a remote location (Claim 4), likely the grid or an on-site generator.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is physically plausible as a method of airflow control, but its claim of 'enhancing performance' is questionable from a net energy perspective. Without proof that the turbine's increased output exceeds the energy needed to power the injection fans, it cannot be claimed as a net-positive enhancement system. It is an energy transfer/conversion system, not a source of new energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for net system gain. The patent describes using energy (fan/motor) to condition airflow to improve turbine performance, but makes no quantitative claim of net energy output > total energy input.
- Potential for net energy loss if the work done to compress and inject air exceeds the incremental gain in turbine output.
- Vague performance claims ('enhancing', 'improving') without thermodynamic bounds or efficiency limits.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient mechanical energy (pendulum motion initiated by adjustable weight) potentially supplemented by electrical input to the electropermanent magnet or linear drive for 'reinforcement'.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a pendulum-based machine with an active 'reinforcer' element. The description omits a clear accounting of the energy input required to power the electropermanent magnet or linear drive, making it impossible to evaluate efficiency or conservation. Without this, claims of net power output from the generator are questionable, as the reinforcer likely supplies the necessary work to sustain motion against losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The 'reinforcer' (electropermanent magnet/linear drive) is described as part of the structure but its energy input is not quantified or acknowledged as a net power input.
- Ambiguous operation: The system appears to use a driven pendulum/lever mechanism where the 'reinforcer' provides timed assists, but no clear primary external energy source is identified to overcome losses.
- Potential confusion between energy recycling and net power generation: The one-way rotary motion of the output shaft suggests rectified pendulum motion, but sustaining oscillation requires compensating for damping.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim references converting potential energy to kinetic energy within a system's operational state, but does not specify the origin of the initial potential energy or any external energy input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is vague and lacks a clear physical mechanism. It describes force amplification and efficiency increases through conversion of potential to kinetic energy, but fails to account for the source of the initial potential energy, creating risk of an implicit perpetual motion or over-unity claim. The language is technically obfuscated, preventing proper thermodynamic analysis.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No identification of the primary energy input source.
- Vague mechanism: 'Mechanical devices as force-amplifying accessories' lacks a defined physical operating principle.
- Ambiguous efficiency claim: 'Optimization and increase of energy efficiency' is not quantified or compared to a thermodynamic limit.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the drive elements (motors) that cause the mass to rotate and move along a path. The patent mentions feeding from auxiliary machines or the electrical grid.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electrically driven mechanical system, not a source of new energy. The term 'inertial energy' is a misnomer; inertia itself is not an energy reservoir that can be tapped for net work output. The system will consume more electrical energy than it could possibly output as mechanical work.
Specific Physics Issues
- The core claim of converting 'inertial energy' into local mechanical energy is physically vague and misleading. Inertia is a property, not an energy source.
- The described device is a complex electromechanical system. Any mechanical energy output must be less than the electrical energy input to the drive motors, minus losses.
- The patent implies a novel energy conversion process but describes only a driven mechanism with no clear, independent energy input from inertia or the environment.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. Mentions electrical propulsion, fuel containers, and other energy carriers, but the primary claimed propulsion mechanism is a 'magnetic traveling field' acting on magnetic rails, with no explanation of the energy source for generating this field or the fuel's purpose.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex vehicle using magnetic rails and a traveling field for motion, but fails to specify the origin of the energy required to create and sustain the magnetic fields. The use of correct physics terms (magnetic traveling field) in a vague, functionally opaque manner, combined with unspecified 'fuel containers,' indicates incomplete energy accounting and technical obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the 'magnetic traveling field' propulsion system.
- No description of how the magnetic field is generated or its power source.
- Vague claim that the housing corresponds to the shape of a 'temperature field' with no explained physical function.
- Apparent conflation of magnetic forces with a propulsion method that lacks a clear reaction mass or energy conversion pathway.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the work done by the 'Stellglied-Antrieb' (actuator drive) to tilt the axes of the rotating masses. The masses are also spun up to rotation, requiring an initial energy input. The patent suggests the actuator can be disengaged, and centrifugal forces return the axes to parallel.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical oscillator coupling rotation and precession. While not explicitly claiming perpetual motion, the language in Claim 3 about the system resetting itself 'due to mass forces' is ambiguous and risks implying a free source of motive work. The net useful 'hub' output cannot exceed the work input from the actuator and motors spinning the masses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 3 suggests the actuator can be disengaged and the system will return to its starting configuration 'due to the mass forces from rotation about the central axis.' This implies a cyclic, self-resetting motion that could be misinterpreted as a sou
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to periodically tilt the axes against gyroscopic torques and centrifugal forces is not compared to the claimed 'hub' (lift/thrust) output. The system is a complex dynamic coupling, not an energy source.
Claimed Energy Source
The energy source is not explicitly stated but implied to be the mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, or electromagnetic means (Claim 3, 4) used to impulsively accelerate the rotating masses. The system appears to be a closed electromechanical device drawing energy from an external electrical or mechanical input.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a device using accelerated rotating masses to generate directional forces. While the energy source for acceleration is conventional, the core claim of generating net propulsion from internal mass movements in a closed system violates conservation of momentum. This aligns with Pattern B (thermodynamically impossible mechanisms) as it attempts to extract net momentum from an isolated system.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim describes generating directed forces and moments via impulsive angular acceleration of rotating masses. The primary issue is the implication of producing a net directional thrust or propulsion from internal moving parts in a closed system,
- The description focuses on controlling the timing and intensity of accelerations to determine the direction and magnitude of output forces, suggesting the belief that asymmetric internal acceleration profiles can create a net external force without e
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to actuators (pressure fluid cylinders/hub magnets) that radially shift flywheel masses, plus a primary motor to rotate the rotor assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal momentum-transfer system using shifted rotating masses. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, it lacks a clear physical explanation for how this cyclic internal motion generates net propulsion for a vehicle without expelling reaction mass, making its efficacy highly questionable. The energy to move the masses radially ultimately comes from the vehicle's own power supply.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim implies net propulsion is generated by the inertial forces of the shifting masses, but the work to radially accelerate/decelerate those masses must come from the system's own energy input.
- No thermodynamic limit violation per se, but the described mechanism is a complex internal momentum transfer system unlikely to produce net external thrust without reaction mass or external field interaction.
- Ambiguity on whether claimed 'propulsive force' is a net external force or an internal oscillating reaction force.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to a motor-pump group (moto-pompe) that lifts water from a lower reservoir to maintain a constant water level in an upper cylindrical reservoir.
AI Physics Analysis
The system uses a pump to maintain a constant water level, which consumes energy. The claim that operating valves alone produces forward or reverse motion is physically questionable without identifying the source of energy for that motion. It appears to be an attempt to extract useful work (motion) from a maintained static pressure head without accounting for the continuous energy input required to maintain that head, suggesting incomplete energy accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system's claimed forward/reverse motion is driven by manipulating valves connected to the constant-level reservoir, but the energy for any useful mechanical work (motion) must ultimately come from the pump's electric
- Ambiguous mechanism: The description lacks the necessary detail to perform a proper energy balance. It is unclear if the 'marche AVANT/ARRIERE' is the motion of the vehicle/system itself or a fluid flow, and what work is being performed against what
Claimed Energy Source
Potential gravitational energy from a 'falling motion' (mouvement de chute). The claim suggests converting this falling motion into continuous rotation, implying a cyclical or reset mechanism is required to restore the falling object's height.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to transform a falling motion into continuous rotation. For this to be valid and not a perpetual motion machine, the system must have an external energy source to repeatedly lift the falling mass. The claim's vagueness regarding this reset mechanism makes it questionable under energy conservation laws.
Specific Physics Issues
- No description of the energy input to restore the 'falling motion' to its initial height, which is necessary for continuous operation.
- The term 'continuous rotation' (mouvement de rotation continu) implies sustained output without a clear, sustained input of energy from outside the system.
- Lacks technical details on how the reset phase (lifting the mass) is powered, which is critical for assessing net energy balance.
Claimed Energy Source
Springs (spiral veeren) wound by an external agent. The mechanism appears to be a complex gear train designed to convert the linear/rotational energy of unwinding springs into a sustained rotational output of a central 'bewegingswiel' (movement wheel).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a spring-driven mechanical gear train. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the patent language is mechanically complex and obfuscates the core thermodynamic fact: all useful work output comes from the finite energy initially stored in the springs, minus inevitable frictional losses. The design suggests an attempt to create sustained or sequenced motion, but without a perpetual energy source, it cannot produce net work beyond its wound spring capacity.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claims focus on mechanical arrangement but lack quantitative efficiency analysis or output work measurement.
- Implied continuous motion: The complex gearing with 'uitnemingen' (notches/gaps) suggests an attempt to create a sequence of driven motions that may imply sustained output from a finite energy store without clarifying the re-winding cycle.
- Ambiguous net work: The description centers on force transmission and direction of rotation, not on net work output versus the energy initially stored in the springs.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a complex rotary engine with a 'motor ring', levers, and a regulating cam/pulley system, but provides no explicit energy input mechanism (e.g., electric motor, combustion, external torque). Motion is 'provoked by' the motor ring, but the ring's own energy source is not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an intricate mechanical linkage system but fails to specify the source of energy that drives it. Without a defined energy input (like fuel, electricity, or an applied external force), the system cannot perform work. It appears to be a mechanism for motion transmission, not an energy source, making its claim as a 'motor' incomplete and questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable primary energy input described.
- Mechanism appears to be a complex linkage system that merely transmits/converts motion, not a prime mover.
- Lacks description of how the initial 'motor ring' receives energy to drive the flywheel and shaft.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear from provided text. Claims 3 and 4 are dependent on claim 1, which is not provided. The title suggests an 'aero-hydraulic motor' which could imply energy from compressed air or a fluid pressure gradient.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided patent fragment is insufficient for a proper physics analysis. Without the core independent claim (claim 1) describing the working principle and energy inputs, it is impossible to verify compliance with conservation laws or thermodynamic limits. The dependent claims only describe mechanical mounting details.
Specific Physics Issues
- Insufficient information to perform energy accounting. Dependent claims lack the core operating principle from independent claim 1.
- Cannot assess thermodynamic limits or efficiency without the fundamental mechanism description.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient gravitational potential energy, converted via the cyclical sinking and rising of buoyant bodies and attached masses in a fluid. The system is intended to be self-sustaining or over-unity.
AI Physics Analysis
The device attempts to create continuous rotation by coupling buoyant bodies with heavy masses in a fluid. While the mechanical arrangement might create an imbalance, the work needed to submerge the buoyant bodies will always equal or exceed the work gained from the descending masses, preventing perpetual motion or over-unity output.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work required to submerge the buoyant bodies (against buoyancy) is not accounted for relative to the work extracted from the descending masses.
- Implied perpetual motion: The description suggests a continuous rotation is generated by the cyclical motion, implying net work output without a net energy input.
- No clear external energy source identified; the system appears to be a closed hydraulic/mechanical loop.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The described mechanism is a purely mechanical assembly (eccentric shaft, sliding elements, ring). Any output work must come from an external torque applied to the input shaft or from potential energy (e.g., falling weights). The claims do not specify an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical geometry but provides no information on its energy source or purpose. While the mechanism itself does not explicitly violate physics, the lack of energy accounting and functional context makes its claimed utility questionable and open to misinterpretation as a passive motion generator.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source is identified or described.
- The claims describe only a kinematic geometry, not an energy conversion process.
- Without a defined input, claims of useful output (implied by patenting a 'mechanism') are incomplete.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to synchronized motors rotating the masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus uses motors to spin masses along complex symmetrical paths. While the energy source is clear, the core claim of developing a 'unidirectional force' resultant from purely internal motions is a textbook violation of conservation of momentum. No internal configuration can produce a net force on its own enclosure without ejecting reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of a 'unidirectional force resultant' suggests a net force or impulse in one direction over a cycle, which violates Newton's third law for a closed internal system.
- The geometric description of the paths is complex but does not circumvent conservation of momentum. Any inertial force in one direction during part of the cycle must be canceled by an equal and opposite force in another part of the cycle for the syst
- The claim implies a reactionless drive or propellantless propulsion effect without an external reaction mass.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. The primary input is heat supplied to a 'heat capsule' from an 'external source', but the nature and magnitude of this source are unspecified. The device appears to be a heat engine using compression/expansion of a working medium.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is fundamentally a heat engine, so its efficiency is limited by the Carnot cycle. The claim is questionable because it uses vague terms like 'volumetric amplifier for amplifying energy' which implies creating energy, and it fails to properly account for all energy inputs, focusing only on the mechanical process.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim 'powered by compression and expansion' obfuscates the true external heat source.
- Vague 'volumetric amplifier for amplifying energy': This suggests energy multiplication without a clear, lossless mechanism, which is thermodynamically suspect.
- No thermodynamic cycle or efficiency limits are acknowledged; the description implies simple conversion of heat to work.
Inventor: Michael Rogler KildevaeldAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2011-12-12
USPTO Abstract
In embodiments of the present invention improved capabilities are described for a turbine system that combines capturing airflow via turbine blades to turn a shaft with rare earth magnet drive of the shaft. The rare earth magnetics are disposed in two rings to generate rotational energy that turns the shaft.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is primarily a wind turbine, which is valid. However, the description of a 'rare earth magnet drive' is physically ambiguous. Fixed magnets cannot provide sustained rotational drive to a shaft without an external energy input to change the magnetic configuration; they create a potential field, not a power source. The application to electric vehicles is highly questionable as it implies over-unity regeneration.
Specific Physics Issues
- Ambiguous 'magnetic drive' mechanism suggests potential for perpetual motion misunderstanding.
- No clear description of how fixed magnets provide net positive torque without energy input.
- System as described for electric vehicle (Claim 2) implies regenerative capability exceeding 100% efficiency if intended to maintain battery charge while propelling vehicle.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. An 'energy source' and 'energy input mechanism' are mentioned but not specified. The system appears to be a hydraulic transmission/transformer with different input and output network lengths.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a hydraulic transmission system but fails to specify the original energy source or make explicit over-unity claims. The description is mechanically plausible as a force/flow transformer, but the vague terminology and incomplete energy pathway require scrutiny to rule out implied energy multiplication.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the primary energy source (e.g., electrical, chemical, mechanical).
- Vague performance claims: Implied energy transfer/transformation without stated efficiency or output.
- Ambiguous mechanism: Different hydraulic network lengths suggest a possible attempt at force/velocity transformation, but no clear violation without specific performance claims.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor; no other energy sources are described or implied.
AI Physics Analysis
The core gear train likely functions as a valid, if inefficient, transmission, but Claim 3's suggestion of series connection for 'maximum output' strongly implies a belief in energy multiplication, which violates energy conservation. The poor quality of the writing further obscures the actual intent.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim 3 suggests connecting systems 'in series to achieve maximum output', which is ambiguous and could imply energy multiplication or an output greater than the motor's input, violating conservation of energy.
- The abstract and claims are poorly written and self-contradictory (e.g., 'ratio of the radius of C1 to C1'), obscuring the actual mechanism.
- No performance metrics (efficiency, output power) are given, making thermodynamic assessment impossible, but the series-stacking claim raises immediate red flags.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The device requires an external input to 'propel said rotating masses' (Claim 4), but the abstract and claims do not specify the nature of this prime mover (e.g., electric motor, engine). The claimed 'directional force' is presented as an output without clarifying if it is a reaction force, a vibration, or a net thrust.
AI Physics Analysis
The device description is physically ambiguous. While varying the speed of rotating masses can create oscillating forces, producing a sustained unidirectional force (thrust) from an internal, closed mechanical system without expelling mass violates Newton's laws of motion. The patent lacks clarity on the reaction mass/force pair and the complete energy pathway.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim of 'converting rotary motion into a directional force' suggests a net force (thrust) may be generated without an equal and opposite reaction on the device's frame, which would violate Newton's third law.
- Vague mechanism: Varying the speed of counter-rotating masses can create a time-varying net centripetal force, but averaged over a full cycle, the net linear momentum imparted to the system's center of mass is zero in a closed system. To produce a su
- No specified energy input for the claimed force output, leading to potential misinterpretation as a reactionless drive.
Claimed Energy Source
Initial mechanical energy to compress the spring, stored as elastic potential energy. Magnet provides an additional force field, but its energy is not consumed in the classical sense; it's a conservative field.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a passive mechanical-magnetic system that achieves a force equilibrium, not an active power source. It conflates creating a constant force with generating usable power. While not explicitly violating energy conservation (as no perpetual motion cycle is detailed), the framing as a 'power source' is physically misleading.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim describes a static force equilibrium, not an energy source. The magnet and spring create a combined force field, but no mechanism for extracting net work is described.
- The term 'power source' is misleading. The system, as described, is a passive arrangement that stores energy input during compression. Any work extracted would come from that initial compression or the magnetic field, both finite.
- The analogy to gravitational force is superficial. Gravity is not emulated as a power source; it's a force. The system does not explain how to achieve sustained power output.
Claimed Energy Source
Initial energy is stored as compressed air in the first pressure vessel, charged by an intermittent compressed air source. The system attempts to recover and re-pressurize exhaust air via a booster pump and heat exchanger into a second pressure vessel.
AI Physics Analysis
The primary energy source is compressed air, which is valid. However, the described recovery system to re-pressurize exhaust cannot create a net energy gain and likely introduces significant losses. The claim of extended run time from a single charge is questionable without violating conservation of energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the booster pump's input work
- Ambiguous and likely thermodynamically lossy recovery cycle
- No net energy gain is possible; the recovery system will consume more energy than it returns
- Vague claim of 'running for an extended period on a single charge' without quantitative basis
Claimed Energy Source
The auxiliary drive unit is the only explicitly stated energy input. The mechanism describes a system of levers, springs, and dampers driven by this auxiliary unit, suggesting potential energy storage and release within the mechanical system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a complex mechanical system driven by an auxiliary motor. While the mechanism itself does not explicitly violate energy conservation, the description is vague and lacks the quantitative analysis needed to rule out misleading claims of excess work output from internal energy shuffling. It raises red flags for potential obfuscation.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent text does not quantify input from the auxiliary drive versus output from the shaft, making efficiency claims impossible to evaluate.
- Ambiguous mechanism: The description of 'buffered' or 'damped' driving via springs/pistons suggests energy is being stored and released, but the net work output relative to the auxiliary input is not specified.
- Potential for misleading interpretation: The name 'leverage motor' and the complex mechanical interaction could be misinterpreted as creating energy through mechanical advantage, which does not violate conservation but could be presented as such.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the electric machine establishes initial rotor spin. Mechanical power from the external 'vector of motion' (e.g., oscillating, slow-moving input) is claimed to be converted via gyroscopic precession and a rolling raceway mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical-electrical system for motion conversion but uses vague, obfuscating language and provides no quantitative performance claims or complete energy accounting. While not explicitly violating conservation laws, the incomplete description and technical obfuscation pattern make its physical validity and utility highly questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy accounting is incomplete. The claim describes a conversion method but does not specify the efficiency or account for all losses (bearing friction, electrical losses, slip in the roller/raceway).
- The description is mechanically complex and vague on quantitative performance. It's unclear if the claimed 'conversion' of incompatible motion is simply a mechanical transmission effect with inherent losses, or if it implies an efficiency >100%.
- The repeated claim text and incomplete Claim 2 suggest a poorly constructed patent, which often accompanies obfuscated or overclaimed physical principles.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is explicitly from an external actuator (Claim 3). The device is a mechanically oscillating system (pendulum/teeter) that converts this actuator input into electrical output via generators engaged with the wheel rim.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a driven mechanical oscillator. While the claims literally require an actuator (an energy input), the language and apparatus design focus on 'optimizing' oscillation to produce electrical power, a pattern often used to imply excessive output efficiency. The physics is valid only if the actuator's input energy exceeds the total generator output and losses, which is not explicitly guaranteed in the description.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting in abstract and claims: The description focuses on 'optimizing teetering operation' and generating electrical output, but does not explicitly state that the electrical output is necessarily less than the actuator input.
- Potential implication of self-sustaining or over-unity operation: The structure (oscillating assembly, weights for optimization, actuator applying timed pulses) is classic in 'free energy' claims, suggesting the goal is to minimize actuator input rel
- No thermodynamic limit violation in the literal claims, but the overall apparatus pattern is suggestive of attempting to circumvent conservation laws through mechanical resonance and timed impulses.
Claimed Energy Source
External power source connected via the input connection. The device is a mechanical gear system claiming to multiply power/torque.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanical gear assembly. While it can function as a torque multiplier (a legitimate speed reducer), the patent's abstract uses the physically misleading phrase 'creating additional torque,' which, if interpreted as generating more power than is input, would violate energy conservation. The claim is questionable due to this ambiguous phrasing.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of 'creating additional torque' or being a 'power multiplier' is ambiguous and suggests a possible violation of energy conservation if interpreted as output power > input power.
- The description implies a mechanical advantage system (torque multiplier/speed reducer), but the language ('creating additional torque') is physically misleading. Torque can be increased only by a corresponding decrease in rotational speed, keeping m
Claimed Energy Source
Gravitational potential energy from raising a mass (the buoyant means) within a fluid, with the energy to raise it coming from the work done to add/remove the second fluid (e.g., air).
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a buoyancy-driven gravity engine. Its net energy output is fundamentally limited by the work required to inflate and deflate the buoyant device underwater. The patent claim omits the source and accounting for this input energy, making its viability as a net power generator highly questionable without further specification.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent does not specify the energy source for the 'means for adding and/or removing a fluid'. The work required to compress and pump the second fluid (air) against water pressure is not accounted for.
- Ambiguous efficiency: The system is a type of gravity engine. The net energy output cannot exceed the work input to manipulate the buoyancy, minus inevitable losses from friction, fluid drag, and generator inefficiency.
Claimed Energy Source
Potential energy from the vertical movement of weights (primary and equalizing weights). This is a stored energy source that will be depleted as the weights descend.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a gravity-powered generator that converts the potential energy of falling weights into electricity. While the conversion process itself may be physically valid, the patent description is incomplete as it presents no mechanism to restore the weights to their initial height. For continuous operation, the energy required to reset the system would exceed the electrical energy generated, violating energy conservation if net energy output is claimed.
Specific Physics Issues
- No description of an external energy input to reset the system (e.g., lift the weights back up).
- The patent describes energy extraction from a one-time descent, implying a finite, non-replenishing source.
- Claims focus on conversion efficiency (pulleys, gears) but ignore the fundamental need to input more energy to reset the system than can be extracted from its descent.
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical input from a motor or prime mover via the input shaft/unit.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a complex gear transmission. While the kinematic condition of a non-spinning free gear is mechanically possible, the claims of reduced loading and improved output efficiency are vague and not supported by a mechanism that violates standard conservation of energy. It transmits, but does not create, energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of improved output efficiency is vague and unquantified.
- Gear train configuration (free gear not spinning) suggests kinematic constraint but does not inherently reduce energy consumption.
- Complex mechanical description obfuscates the fundamental energy balance; gear trains transmit and transform torque/speed but cannot create net energy.
Claimed Energy Source
Primarily chemical energy from fuel-oxidant reaction, supplemented by heat from external primary and secondary heat sources. The working fluid (low-boiling-point substance) is heated and pressurized, then expanded into a low-pressure chamber.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex heat engine using chemical and thermal energy inputs, but its abstract makes a problematic claim of output exceeding input. The detailed claims describe a multi-stage heating and expansion process, but without rigorous system boundaries and energy balances, the claim of superior performance is questionable and risks violating the first law of thermodynamics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Abstract claims output energy 'significantly greater than the inputted energy' without defining system boundaries.
- Incomplete energy accounting: Input energy includes chemical energy of fuel/oxidant AND external heat from primary/secondary sources, but this is not clearly quantified against mechanical output.
- Vague mechanism: 'Extremely quickly change the physical state' to generate 'great amount of mechanical energy' lacks thermodynamic cycle definition.
- Apparent suggestion of energy multiplication via sequential heating and rapid expansion without a clear sink for the entropy increase.
Claimed Energy Source
The 'drive means' is the explicit energy source. However, the method's description implies the generation of specific force patterns (e.g., for propulsion or artificial gravity) from this input, suggesting an attempt to create a net useful force or motion output.
AI Physics Analysis
The method describes a complex, driven motion of a single rigid body. While not an explicit energy creation device, its claimed applications (like propulsion) suggest an attempt to generate net forces from internal motions, which would violate conservation of momentum unless interacting with an external environment. The physics is obscured by geometric complexity.
Specific Physics Issues
- The claim is purely kinematic/geometric, describing a complex motion of a rigid body. It does not inherently violate energy conservation, as all energy comes from the drive means.
- The primary issue is the implication of utility ('forces generative', 'propulsion') without a clear physical mechanism for how these internal, cyclic motions generate a net external force or useful work without an external reaction mass or environmen
- The description is obfuscated with geometric parameters (N, K) but lacks a dynamical analysis showing how these motions sum to a net effect.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the actuator (implicitly), which applies force to the pendulum mass. The pendulum's motion is not a primary energy source but a mechanical intermediary.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanism where an actuator forces a pendulum, whose motion is then converted to rotary motion to drive a generator. This is physically possible only if the actuator's energy input exceeds the generator's electrical output plus all losses. The patent's failure to explicitly account for the actuator's power source makes the energy flow ambiguous and the claims questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent does not specify the source of energy for the actuator, creating ambiguity.
- Potential for misinterpretation: The system could be misconstrued as generating more energy from the pendulum than is input to the actuator, which would be a violation.
- The description focuses on mechanical transmission (drive train, clutch) but is silent on the net energy balance.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Likely intended to be the expansion of compressed gas (stored energy), but the claim language is unclear. Mentions 'calorific energy' in the abstract, suggesting possible combustion or external heat input.
AI Physics Analysis
The claims describe a mechanical arrangement but fail to specify the complete energy cycle. The source of energy to compress or re-compress the gas is not addressed, making it impossible to verify conservation of energy. The description is technically obfuscated, not explicitly violating physics but hiding the critical energy input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of how the gas is compressed or heated to provide the working energy.
- Vague mechanism: Claims describe connection/disconnection of freewheels but not how this creates net work from the gas expansion cycle.
- No thermodynamic cycle defined: Cannot assess efficiency or limits against Carnot or other benchmarks.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to excitation transducers (piezoelectric, shakers, etc.) is the explicit source. The patent implies ambient vibrational energy or internal structural energy could contribute, but this is not clearly stated.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes using controlled vibrations within a rotating structure to create propulsion, but provides no physical mechanism for how this generates a net external force. It appears to attempt to create momentum from internal motions alone, which violates conservation of momentum unless there is an unmentioned interaction with an external medium or field.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear mechanism for net propulsion force generation from internal vibrations alone.
- Incomplete energy accounting: propulsion force would require net momentum transfer to an external medium or reaction mass, which is not described.
- Claims imply directional force can be created solely from conditioned internal vibrations of a closed system, which violates conservation of momentum unless external interaction is specified.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The only explicit energy input mentioned is a 'predetermined force' pulling at an attachment point. No source for this force is specified (e.g., motor, weight, spring). The description implies the force initiates motion, but the apparatus's ability to generate or amplify rotational movement is not explained with a clear energy input mechanism.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical linkage but fails to specify the source of energy required to drive the claimed 'generating and amplifying' of motion. It appears to be a mechanism that might transform force or motion, not create energy, but the language is vague and invites interpretation as an energy multiplier, which would violate conservation laws without a clear external input.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy conversion process or source for the 'predetermined force'.
- Claims of 'generating and amplifying' rotational movement without describing an energy input that exceeds losses.
- Mechanical description suggests a complex linkage, but no analysis of work input vs. work output; likely a force transformer (like a lever) with losses, not an amplifier of energy.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical energy from an external power source, delivered to rotation motors and mass displacement motors.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an electrically powered mechanical system, not a perpetual motion machine. However, its claim as a 'centrifugal propulsion engine' is highly questionable because internal mass movements in a closed rotating system cannot create net external thrust. It would vibrate but not propel itself linearly without expelling reaction mass.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of imparting linear force (thrust) to the assembly is ambiguous. In a closed system, internal mass movements cannot produce net linear momentum or sustained propulsion without an external reaction mass.
- Energy accounting is incomplete for a 'propulsion' claim. The electrical input energy is converted to rotational kinetic energy and work to move masses radially. Any net linear impulse would be cyclic and internal, canceling over full cycles unless m
- The description focuses on generating force but does not specify the external reaction (e.g., expelling mass, pushing against a medium) required by Newton's third law for net propulsion.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous. Mentions solar, wind, heat, electrical, and nuclear as possible external supplies, but the core claim centers on a 'Turbo Hydrogen engine' with 'recycling of un-combusted gases' and energy recovery from vehicle motion, suggesting a primary reliance on internal energy cycling.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent claim is written in a confusing, non-standard manner that obfuscates the actual energy flows. While it lists legitimate external energy sources, its core description of a hydrogen engine with gas recycling and internal energy recovery, framed as an 'almost-perpetual' system, strongly suggests a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of energy conservation, making its physical validity highly questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incoherent and obfuscating terminology (e.g., 'yoshino time machine', 'control system means... comprising... time, space')
- Vague description of the hydrogen engine's 'recycling' process, which could imply reusing reaction products without an external energy input for recombination
- No clear thermodynamic accounting for the complete cycle of hydrogen production, storage, and combustion
- Claim structure suggests an attempt to create a self-sustaining or near-perpetual system using internal energy recovery.
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical energy from live loads (wind on structures, vehicle weight on roads, ship motion, engine vibrations, elevator movement, etc.)
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes parasitic energy harvesting from existing structures and vehicles, which is physically possible but questionable in its net benefit. The primary physics issue is incomplete accounting: the energy 'generated' comes from increased mechanical load on the host system (e.g., more drag on a bridge, more fuel burned by a car), not from an ambient source without cost. The description obscures these inevitable losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: System extracts energy from structures/vehicles, increasing their drag or load, but this parasitic loss is not acknowledged as the primary energy input.
- Implied efficiency claims are vague; extracting energy from pressure waves 'with minimal movement' to minimize friction suggests unrealistic near-lossless energy transfer.
- Complex mechanical/hydraulic transduction chain (Bourdon tubes, gears, pistons, racks) will have significant cumulative losses, likely making net energy recovery negligible or negative relative to the increased energy demand on the host system.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the center motors (to spin the swinging arms/flywheels) and to the actuator assemblies. No external ambient energy harvesting is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal mechanism that shuffles masses. While it may create internal oscillating forces, it cannot generate net linear propulsion for its center of mass in free space because it lacks any interaction with an external environment to exchange momentum, violating Newton's third law. The energy source is clear, but the claimed conversion to directional motion is physically incomplete.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of converting rotational energy into 'directional, linear energy induced motion' is vague and suggests net propulsion from an internal reaction mass.
- System appears to be a closed, internal mechanism. For net linear momentum of the device's center of mass, momentum must be exchanged with an external environment (e.g., expelled mass, friction with a surface, magnetic field). The described pawls and
- The 'actuator assembly for pulling the torque carriages backward... to neutralize the reverse energy' acknowledges internal reaction forces but does not resolve the fundamental need for external momentum transfer for net propulsion.
Claimed Energy Source
The ultimate energy source is ambiguous. The claims imply the pressurized air is the input, but pressurized air requires an external compressor powered by electricity or fuel. The patent does not specify the primary energy source for creating the pressurized air.
AI Physics Analysis
The concept describes a compressed air energy storage and recovery system, not a primary power source. It is thermodynamically valid only if the compressor's energy input is fully accounted for, which the claims fail to do. The efficiency cannot exceed that of the complete compression-expansion cycle.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is described as an 'air-driven' generator, but the work done by expanding air comes from the energy previously stored in it by a compressor. Net system efficiency must include the compressor's energy consumpti
- Claim 8 is misleading: It states the only restriction is the compressor's PSI, ignoring that the compressor's input power is the true restriction. The system is a compressed air energy storage (CAES) loop, not a source of primary energy.
- Comparative efficiency claims (Claims 1 & 7) are unsubstantiated without a full system boundary analysis including compression losses, turbine efficiency, and generator losses.
Claimed Energy Source
Kinetic energy of the ambient air relative to the moving vehicle. The device extracts work from the airflow created by the vehicle's motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is physically possible as a wind generator, but its utility for net energy gain on a vehicle is highly questionable. The generator creates drag, increasing the load on the vehicle's primary motor. The system will always lose more energy to increased drag than it recovers, making it an inefficient regenerative braking system for air resistance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The device creates aerodynamic drag, increasing the energy required from the vehicle's primary battery. The net energy gain is likely negative.
- The system is effectively a regenerative brake for air drag, but with inherent conversion losses (wind turbine, generator, battery charging).
- The claim implies net power generation for the vehicle, ignoring that the drag force created is a net loss to the vehicle's propulsion system.
Claimed Energy Source
External power mechanism driving the transmission shaft (presumably an electric motor or engine).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is driven by an external power source, so energy conservation isn't directly violated. However, the claimed working principle—that internal centrifugal forces from an eccentrically rotating mass can produce a net thrust to propel the entire vehicle—is a classic violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for an isolated system. The forces described are internal and cancel out.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that centrifugal force produces a net forward thrust is mechanically dubious. Centrifugal forces in a rotating frame are internal and symmetric; they cannot produce a net external force (thrust) on the isolated system without an external reacti
- Vague description of how asymmetric forces sum to a net directional thrust. The mechanism appears to be an internal mass redistribution, which cannot propel the vehicle itself (akin to trying to lift oneself by pulling on one's bootstraps).
- No quantitative performance claim, making thermodynamic limit comparison impossible, but the core proposed working principle violates Newton's laws for closed systems.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to the motor, which is converted to rotational kinetic energy of the bodies.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes internal centrifugal forces, which cannot produce a net external force on the device itself without ejecting mass or interacting with an external field, violating Newton's third law. The description is technically obfuscated, using correct terms ('centrifugal force', 'inertia force') but implying an impossible net thrust from a closed rotating system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim describes generating a 'force' as a 'resultant to centrifugal forces' without specifying the external reaction needed for a net thrust or propulsion.
- Centrifugal forces are internal to the rotating system; their vector sum is zero in a closed system, producing no net external force.
- Vague mechanism for controlling direction and magnitude of a net external force without clear conservation of momentum compliance.
Inventor: Ricardo Gabriel Vanella, Horacio Marcelo Fabián Pacheco, Ciro Alejandro RodrÃguezAssignee: IndividualFiled: 2014-05-06
USPTO Abstract
The device includes components that, through an associated work, are capable of transforming mechanical energy into electric energy, using inertial and gravitational effects. The device includes a base structure with an axial part, to which a rotary support structure is rotatably mounted, moved through a driving means that drives its spinning movement over the axial part. An electric generators system and a rotating guidance system is mounted to the rotary support structure, and an inertial rotation structure that includes an inertial load is rotatably mounted to the rotating guidance system. The inertial rotation structure drives the electric generators. An operating method by which the device is started up and its electric generators system is operated is also provided.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a complex mechanical system that converts input mechanical work from a driving unit into electricity via generators. However, the language suggests an attempt to extract 'free' energy from gravity and inertia, which are not energy sources. Without a full energy balance showing the input to the driving unit, the claim is questionable and likely violates energy conservation if it implies net output exceeds net input.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim of transforming 'mechanical energy into electric energy' is trivial; the key question is whether the electrical output exceeds the mechanical/electrical input to the driving unit. The description lacks a closed
- Ambiguous mechanism: 'Influenced by a gravitational effect' suggests using gravity to drive the inertial mass, but gravity is a conservative force. Any work extracted from lifting/lowering the mass against gravity must be paid for by the driving unit
- Potential for obfuscation: The combination of 'inertial' and 'gravitational' effects, without a clear non-conservative energy source, is a hallmark of over-unity claims where the input work to initiate motion is ignored.
Claimed Energy Source
External drive source (Claim 7) provides input energy to rotate masses and operate crank mechanisms.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system with oscillating masses, but from a physics perspective, a closed system with symmetric, counter-moving internal masses cannot produce a sustained net external force (thrust) without expelling reaction mass. The energy input from the drive source is converted into internal kinetic energy and waste heat, not a useful net force vector as implied.
Specific Physics Issues
- No net force vector generation is physically justified; the described motion of symmetric, counter-moving masses likely results in oscillating internal forces summing to zero net external force over a cycle.
- Energy accounting is incomplete; the method describes complex accelerations/decelerations which will incur significant frictional and inertial losses, requiring continuous energy input for zero net propulsion.
Claimed Energy Source
Internal spacecraft power for ejection and for propelling/controlling the smart device's return trajectory. The net impulse on the spacecraft comes from the exchange of momentum with the ejected and recaptured mass.
AI Physics Analysis
The described cycle of ejecting and recapturing a mass does not, by itself, provide net propulsion to a spacecraft in free space, as momentum conservation dictates the net impulse over a full cycle is zero unless the device gains momentum from an external source. The patent's claims are physically questionable without specifying such an external interaction.
Specific Physics Issues
- Momentum conservation analysis is incomplete; recapture of the device imparts an opposite impulse, largely canceling the initial ejection gain unless the device is propelled back using its own internal energy.
- No clear net momentum gain mechanism. For a closed system (spacecraft + device), the center of mass remains unchanged unless the device interacts with an external body (e.g., a planetary gravitational slingshot, which is not claimed).
- Claim of capturing kinetic energy on recovery is internally consistent but does not create net propulsion; it merely recovers some of the energy expended to launch the device.
Claimed Energy Source
Initial rotational kinetic energy input to the flywheel (from an unspecified external motor/prime mover). The magnets/ferromagnetic blocks may add or subtract energy via magnetic forces depending on their positioning.
AI Physics Analysis
The apparatus is a mechanically complex flywheel system with timed magnetic interactions. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, it lacks a complete energy accounting framework. The described forces will alter the flywheel's motion, but any net rectilinear force output ultimately comes from the initial rotational energy input and the work done by moving the magnets/blocks, likely resulting in a net loss, not a gain.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The patent describes a mechanism to vary rotational speed and create rectilinear force, but does not specify the net energy input vs. useful work output. The cyclic speed variation suggests energy is alternately stored i
- Ambiguous net effect: The magnetic interactions (attraction/repulsion) are position-dependent and will do work on the flywheel. The net work over a cycle depends on the timing and hysteresis of the magnetic forces; it could be a net loss, a net gain,
- No thermodynamic limit violation per se, but the description is consistent with a non-conservative magnetic system that could, in principle, dissipate the flywheel's energy if not carefully controlled.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanism for fluid flow and float motion driven by a pressure control assembly, but does not specify the external energy source required to operate that pressure control assembly (e.g., to move the piston/diaphragm or to create/maintain the low-pressure source).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes an oscillating fluid system that appears to generate work from float motion, but it fails to account for the energy required to create the pressure changes that drive the fluid flow. Without an external energy source for the pressure control assembly, the system would violate energy conservation, as the work output cannot exceed the work input needed to operate the pressure valves or piston.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The work output from the actuator is described, but the necessary energy input to the pressure control assembly (to reduce/increase pressure in the second body portion) is not specified.
- Implied perpetual motion: The description suggests the float's motion can generate energy, which is then presumably used to run the pressure control assembly, creating a cyclic system with no stated external input.
- Missing entropy sink: The system involves pressure changes and fluid flow, which generate heat and viscous losses. No mechanism is described to compensate for these dissipative losses to sustain oscillation.
Claimed Energy Source
Initial input from 'muscular force or other motive power' applied to the main movement shaft (1). The system uses flywheels (3, 10, 11, 12) to store and release rotational kinetic energy.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex mechanical system using flywheels and gear trains to store and transfer rotational kinetic energy. While it can temporarily deliver power higher than the instantaneous input by releasing stored energy, it cannot sustainably produce more work than the total energy initially supplied by the user or prime mover. The claim of increased performance is misleading without clarifying this energy trade-off.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claims 'increase in performance from a minimum main movement power to a considerably higher power' without specifying the source of the additional energy.
- Uses multiple flywheels and gear systems but provides no mechanism for net energy gain beyond the initial input.
- Lacks quantitative analysis of losses (friction, gear inefficiencies, bearing drag) which would dissipate the stored kinetic energy.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent text is incomplete and contains no substantive description of the device, its inputs, or its operating principles.
AI Physics Analysis
The submitted text is corrupted or consists entirely of placeholders (e.g., 'EMI1.1', '**ATTENTION**'), providing no technical description of a device or process. Without a coherent description of the system's operation, inputs, and outputs, a proper physics analysis is impossible, making any performance claims inherently questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Insufficient information to perform energy accounting
- No thermodynamic process identified
- Claims and abstract are placeholders or corrupted text
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The provided patent claim text is incomplete and contains only placeholder labels (EMI1.1, EMI2.1, etc.) with no descriptive content about the device's operation or energy inputs.
AI Physics Analysis
The provided text is a template or placeholder with no actual technical description of a device, making proper physics analysis impossible. The use of a formal structure without content is inherently questionable and prevents evaluation of energy conservation or thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- No technical description provided for analysis
- Cannot identify energy conversion processes
- Cannot perform energy accounting or thermodynamic limit checks due to missing information
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the electrical/mechanical work done by the 'drive mechanism' to rotate the shaft and accelerate the masses. The control member may also require energy input to constrain the radial motion of the masses.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a mechanism that can convert rotational input into an asymmetric centrifugal force, creating internal linear forces. However, the patent description does not provide a complete energy balance, making it impossible to evaluate if it claims an efficiency >100%. The net useful work output cannot exceed the work input from the drive motor, minus all losses.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim focuses on generating a 'linear force' as an output but does not compare it to the total rotational input power required to maintain the motion against the asymmetric loads and friction introduced by the contro
- Potential obfuscation of net work: Generating a unidirectional force (thrust) in a rotating frame is possible (e.g., like a vibrating system creating directed motion), but extracting net useful work from this internal force without an external reacti
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to a 3000W inverter, which powers a compressor to produce compressed air. The compressed air drives pistons connected to a crankshaft via lever arms.
AI Physics Analysis
The described system is a standard pneumatic motor driven by an electrically-powered compressor. While not explicitly claiming over-unity, the abstract emphasizes 'force advantage' without completing the energy balance, creating a misleading implication that the mechanical advantage of levers somehow circumverts the energy input. The system will output less useful mechanical work than the electrical energy supplied to the compressor.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The claim focuses on 'force advantage of lever arms' but does not account for the fundamental energy conversion chain (electrical → mechanical work of compression → stored pneumatic energy → mechanical work from pistons)
- Implied over-unity or COP>1: The description suggests a continuous rotation driven by this system, but no output work or efficiency is quantified against the 3000W input. The 'advantage' from levers provides force multiplication, not energy multiplic
- No thermodynamic limit analysis: The system is essentially an air motor. Its overall efficiency is limited by compressor inefficiency, pneumatic losses, and mechanical friction, and will be significantly less than 100% of the electrical input.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The abstract describes converting a 'unidirectional constant energy' into rotary motion via an oscillating annular plate connected to double-acting pistons and a rotating distributor. The primary energy input driving the initial oscillation is not specified.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical-pneumatic transmission system but fails to specify the primary source of energy that drives the initial oscillation. It is therefore impossible to perform energy accounting or check thermodynamic limits. The device appears to be a converter, not a generator, but its claims are too vague to assess properly.
Specific Physics Issues
- No explicit energy input source identified (e.g., electrical, hydraulic, pressure differential).
- Mechanism describes energy conversion and transmission, not generation. The 'unidirectional energy' is undefined.
- System appears to be a complex mechanical transmission/pneumatic converter, not a prime mover. Without a defined input (e.g., pressurized fluid, linear actuator), it cannot be evaluated for thermodynamic validity.
Claimed Energy Source
The primary energy input is the electrical or mechanical power supplied to the motor driving the central elliptical gear. The system appears to rely on the kinetic energy of rotating flywheels, which are themselves driven by the motor through the eccentric gear interactions.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex mechanical system of eccentric gears and flywheels but provides no clear physics principle for how it generates useful propulsion output. The claim of 'inertial propulsion' is a technical obfuscation, as inertial forces within a closed system cannot produce net acceleration without violating Newton's third law. The system likely just converts the motor's input into oscillating kinetic energy with no net thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- No clear mechanism for generating net propulsion or useful work beyond the motor's input. Claims about 'inertial propulsion' are vague and lack a defined energy output. The description of maximum angular velocity of the arms being in the same directi
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The patent abstract mentions two propulsion systems (piston engine and centrifugal force from rotating masses) but does not specify the primary energy source (e.g., chemical fuel, electrical battery). The centrifugal force system is implied to be a propulsion method, not an energy source.
AI Physics Analysis
The described vehicle uses a conventional piston engine for lift/maneuvering and a centrifugal force system for primary propulsion. The centrifugal propulsion claim is highly questionable, as centrifugal forces are internal and cannot provide net thrust to accelerate a vehicle without an external reaction. The abstract lacks a clear energy source description and makes vague, superior performance claims for an unphysical propulsion method.
Specific Physics Issues
- Centrifugal force is an internal, reaction force within a rotating system. In a closed system, it cannot produce net translational thrust or propulsion without expelling mass or interacting with an external field. Using it for primary propulsion sugg
- Claim of 'more economical, silent, and long-duration' propulsion from a centrifugal system is vague and lacks a defined mechanism that conserves momentum.
- No energy accounting or efficiency comparison between the two systems is provided to justify the performance claims.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The claim mentions a 'centrifugal force propulsor' but provides no description of the primary energy source (e.g., fuel, battery, nuclear reactor, external beamed power) required to generate and sustain the centrifugal motion and overcome drag in all listed media (water, air, space).
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is technically incomplete and vague, focusing on improvements without specifying the fundamental energy source or a coherent physical mechanism that obeys conservation of momentum, especially for operation in a vacuum. This pattern of technical obfuscation makes a proper physics compliance analysis impossible with the given information.
Specific Physics Issues
- No energy source identified for propulsion.
- No mechanism described for how a single 'centrifugal force propulsor' can efficiently operate in such radically different media (dense water vs. vacuum of space) without a massive, specified power input.
- Claim of operating 'in the vacuum of space' with a centrifugal device suggests a possible misunderstanding of Newton's Third Law; a centrifugal mechanism internal to the vehicle cannot produce net thrust in a vacuum without ejecting reaction mass.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The system appears to be a mechanical assembly of rotating asymmetric flywheels and gears. The primary energy input must be external torque applied to rotate the system, but the description implies a net positive inertial force is generated without accounting for the energy required to create and control the variable center of gravity.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical system using rotating asymmetric flywheels to vary their center of gravity. While such a system can create oscillating internal forces, generating a sustained net propulsive force (thrust) from purely internal motions violates conservation of momentum. The description lacks any identified external energy source or momentum sink, making its claimed 'positive intensity' resultant force highly questionable.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the energy input required to spin the flywheels and drive the gear system.
- Ambiguous claim of 'positive intensity' resultant force: This suggests a net propulsive force, but internal forces in a closed mechanical system sum to zero unless momentum is exchanged with an external environment (e.g., expelling mass).
- Implies generation of a net directional inertial force from an internal, cyclic mass redistribution, which is a classic reactionless drive concept violating Newton's third law if claimed to produce net thrust without external reaction.
Claimed Energy Source
Electrical input to motor 1, which provides rotational kinetic energy to the system (frame and internal rotating mass).
AI Physics Analysis
The device is an internal rotating mass system. While it can create oscillating internal forces, Newton's third law and conservation of momentum dictate it cannot produce a sustained, directional net force (thrust) on its enclosure or vehicle without ejecting reaction mass. The energy source is clear, but the claimed useful output violates fundamental mechanics.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim of producing a net directional force (thrust) from purely internal moving masses violates conservation of momentum for a closed system.
- Apparatus is an internal reaction wheel/rotating mass system; any force generated on the mounting frame 2 in one direction must be balanced by an equal and opposite force on another part of the internal system over a complete cycle, resulting in zero
- Description suggests the force direction can be varied, implying a steerable net thrust from internal motions alone, which is impossible for an isolated system.
Claimed Energy Source
An initial external heat source (F) applied to the first unit, with claims of reusing added heat in subsequent units via heat exchangers.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim describes a series of turbines using heat exchangers to reuse heat, but it lacks the necessary physics details to account for all energy flows and entropy. The abstract's suggestion of reusing heat after a 'steady state' without a clear cold reservoir is thermodynamically suspicious and requires rigorous scrutiny of the complete energy balance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting for the heat source's total input vs. total work output across the series
- Vague description of the 'steady state phenomenon' and how heat is 'reused' without degradation
- No identification of the cold reservoir or entropy sink, making Carnot efficiency limits impossible to evaluate
Claimed Energy Source
The primary claimed energy source is the gravitational potential energy of a liquid column (head pressure). Secondary energy inputs include electrical power for refrigeration/heat exchange systems to maintain the liquid state and manage temperature gradients.
AI Physics Analysis
The system is not a perpetual motion machine, as it implicitly uses environmental temperature gradients and gravity, but its description suggests over-unity performance by focusing on a single work extraction step while ignoring the larger energy costs of maintaining the cycle. The net work output, if any, would come from a low-grade heat engine or heat pump cycle, bound by Carnot limits, not from 'free' gravitational energy.
Specific Physics Issues
- Energy accounting is incomplete: The work extracted from the liquid head must be less than or equal to the work required to pump the refrigerant back to the condenser height and reject its heat. The system appears to be a complex heat engine or heat
- The description of preventing flash-off via sub-cooling implies significant energy expenditure to maintain a liquid phase for the turbine, which is not accounted for in the net output.
- Claim of 'recovering energy otherwise lost by a TEV' is misleading; a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TEV) is a throttling device that performs an isenthalpic process where no recoverable work is theoretically available in a standard cycle. A turbine r
- The suggestion of generating 'renewable power only' via seasonal heat exchange between condensers and evaporators describes a system attempting to extract net work from ambient temperature gradients, which is a heat engine subject to the Carnot limit
Claimed Energy Source
Ambiguous mix of claimed inputs: internal combustion engines, biofuels, geothermal, wind, wave, solar, hydraulic. Suggests combining two types (e.g., wind and mechanical) to compensate for intermittency.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is vague and lacks a clear energy balance. It lists many possible energy inputs but describes no specific device or cycle, making thermodynamic analysis impossible. The text suggests combining energy sources to overcome intermittency, which is not inherently invalid, but the lack of quantitative details and the promotional language about overcoming serious disadvantages raise flags for incomplete accounting.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of inputs vs. outputs.
- Vague mechanism: Describes 'rotation and inversion' but no clear energy conversion process.
- Implies overcoming intermittency of renewables without specifying storage or how net energy is increased.
- Claims reduced disadvantages (like lack of wind) are not as serious as oil/gas scarcity, implying substitution without energy cost analysis.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind kinetic energy, converted via a rotating vane (στρόβιλος) to drive an electrical generator. The system includes a motor to maintain the vane's rotation, implying a possible hybrid input of electrical energy to sustain motion.
AI Physics Analysis
The device appears to be a wind turbine with an auxiliary motor. The description is vague but implies the aerodynamic forces from rotation could increase rotation speed, suggesting a feedback loop that, if claimed to produce net excess energy, would violate energy conservation. Without clear performance data, it is questionable and requires scrutiny of the complete energy balance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The description suggests the aerodynamic force created during rotation increases the rotational speed and kinetic energy of the vane. This implies a positive feedback loop where the device's own rotation generates more d
- Vague quantitative claims: No efficiency, power input/output, or COP numbers are provided to assess against thermodynamic limits.
- Ambiguous role of motor: The motor is said to 'maintain the rotational motion,' which could mean it only compensates for losses (valid) or is part of a self-sustaining or over-unity claim (invalid).
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient wind energy (air current) and water flow energy, though the description is unclear about whether these are separate inputs or a combined atmospheric/water gradient system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a system generating electricity from wind and water currents, which is physically possible, but the language is vague and makes implicit claims about simplicity and operation with minimal input that suggest incomplete energy accounting. Without clear efficiency figures or a detailed mechanism, it raises questions about whether it claims to extract more energy than is physically available from the ambient gradients.
Specific Physics Issues
- Vague description of the energy conversion mechanism
- Claim that it works with 'even small' air currents suggests potential over-unity or incomplete energy accounting
- No quantitative performance data or efficiency relative to thermodynamic limits
- Ambiguous relationship between wind and water energy inputs
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The text describes a 'mechanical accumulator' for energy storage, possibly using gravitational potential energy from elevated land masses (islands as 'peaks of submerged mountains'), but does not specify the primary energy input to charge the system.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent abstract describes a mechanical energy storage system but ambiguously suggests it can also function as a generator. It fails to identify the original source of energy to create the stored potential, relying on vague geographical references and microtechnology. This incomplete energy accounting makes it impossible to evaluate against thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No description of the energy input required to create the stored potential energy.
- Vague mechanism: Describes using 'microtechnology' and the shape/weight of 'loads' but provides no physical principle for energy generation.
- Ambiguous claims: Mentions operation as a 'generator' without specifying the energy conversion process or source.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The title and abstract (in Greek) refer to 'improving the performance of electricity generating stations,' but no specific mechanism or additional energy input is described. The claim of increased output efficiency through 'application of resonance' is vague.
AI Physics Analysis
The claim is too vague to analyze properly but raises immediate red flags. It promises increased efficiency for power stations through 'resonance' without specifying an energy source for the improvement, suggesting a possible attempt to obfuscate a violation of energy conservation or thermodynamic limits.
Specific Physics Issues
- No identifiable energy source for the claimed efficiency increase.
- Use of the term 'resonance' without a clear physical mechanism for net energy gain.
- Abstract is too vague for proper energy accounting or thermodynamic analysis.
Claimed Energy Source
External rotational work input to spin the platform. The telescoping radial elements may store/release elastic potential energy, but no ambient or additional energy source is described.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical rotating system with telescoping arms but does not claim to output more energy than is input or violate conservation laws directly. However, it is questionable because it frames a complex kinematic motion as creating a 'differential centripetal force'—a concept with no clear useful energy output—suggesting an implied but unstated anomalous effect, typical of over-complicated mechanisms presented as novel prime movers.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim implies creation of a differential centripetal force, but centripetal force is a constraint force, not a primary energy output. System appears to be a complex rotating mechanism where radial elements move in/out, potentially creating an imbalan
- No useful work output is specified. The abstract describes a kinematic arrangement but not an energy conversion process.
- The description is purely kinematic/geometric; it lacks any analysis of forces, energy, or power required to move the telescoping elements against centrifugal forces and inertia.
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical input torque applied to the input yoke (jarzmo wejściowe). This is a purely mechanical gear system.
AI Physics Analysis
The device is a complex epicyclic gear system. As a passive mechanical transmission, it can trade speed for torque (or vice versa) while conserving power (minus frictional losses). The title's claim of being a 'torque amplifier' is misleading if it suggests a net power gain, but the described mechanism itself is a valid, though intricate, speed reducer/torque multiplier.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim describes a complex epicyclic (planetary) gear reducer but uses terminology ('wzmacniacz momentu' - torque amplifier) that suggests a gain in power or energy, which is impossible with passive gearing. The abstract lacks quantitative performance
- No explicit violation of conservation laws in the described mechanism, but the title and premise imply torque amplification without the corresponding required increase in input power or decrease in output speed, which would violate energy conservatio
Claimed Energy Source
Mechanical input torque applied to the input shaft. The device is a complex epicyclic (planetary) gear train intended to amplify torque.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a complex epicyclic gear system claiming to amplify torque. Without explicit power accounting, such claims are questionable because true torque multiplication in a passive gear train always comes with a proportional decrease in rotational speed, keeping input power equal to or greater than output power. The description lacks the necessary efficiency and kinematic ratio data to confirm it doesn't imply over-unity performance.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim implies torque amplification without corresponding reduction in angular velocity or increase in input power, which would violate energy conservation if true.
- Insufficient quantitative data to verify power balance (input power = torque_in * ω_in vs. output power = torque_out * ω_out).
- Complex gear geometry may create an illusion of gain through mechanical advantage, but ultimate output power cannot exceed input power minus losses.
Claimed Energy Source
External engine or motor powers the rotation of the counter-rotating disks via a gear assembly.
AI Physics Analysis
The device claims to produce linear thrust by internally accelerating masses, but this violates conservation of momentum. The energy source is an external motor, but the described mechanism cannot generate net propulsion as it is an internal reaction. The claim confuses internal forces with net external thrust.
Specific Physics Issues
- Claim that radial acceleration of thrust masses produces a net linear impulse on the device violates Newton's third law (action-reaction). The force used to radially accelerate the mass is internal to the device.
- No mechanism described to create a net external force vector from internal cyclic motions. The system's center of mass cannot accelerate without external interaction.
- Vague description of 'impulse ramps' and their engagement suggests internal momentum transfers that sum to zero for the closed system.
Claimed Energy Source
Initial battery charge provides propulsion; wind generator attempts to harvest energy from ambient wind and vehicle-induced airflow to recharge battery.
AI Physics Analysis
The concept describes a vehicle using a wind generator while moving, which is physically possible but thermodynamically questionable as a net energy source. The generator would act as an air brake, converting vehicle's kinetic energy into electricity, ultimately requiring more energy from the battery to overcome the added drag than is recovered, making it a lossy regenerative system rather than a perpetual motion scheme.
Specific Physics Issues
- Potential for incomplete energy accounting: The wind generator extracts energy from the vehicle's slipstream, which increases the vehicle's aerodynamic drag. The electrical energy recovered is unlikely to exceed the additional propulsion energy requi
- No quantitative performance data provided to assess net energy gain.
- System is a regenerative braking analog for aerodynamic losses, not a primary energy source.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient thermal energy (implied) and electrical input (implied), but poorly specified. The abstract suggests using the temperature difference between 'cold energy' and 'hot energy' to generate electricity, implying a heat engine or thermoelectric process.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes using temperature differences to generate electricity, which is thermodynamically possible in principle (like a heat engine). However, the claims are vague, lack complete energy accounting, and use obfuscated language, making it impossible to verify if the claimed performance respects thermodynamic limits. It raises red flags but doesn't explicitly violate conservation laws based on the provided text.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No quantification of input vs. output energy.
- Vague mechanism: Describes using temperature gradients but lacks technical detail on the conversion process.
- Ambiguous performance claims: Suggests generating electricity from ambient gradients without specifying efficiency or power output relative to the gradient size.
- Language barrier: Korean text contains technical obfuscation; key terms are unclear in translation.
Claimed Energy Source
Ambient air/gas compressed by an electrical/mechanical compressor, with the compressed gas serving as the working fluid in a heat engine. The ultimate energy source is the electrical/mechanical input to the compressor.
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a compressor feeding a turbine/heat engine but fails to identify the primary high-temperature energy source required for the heat engine to produce net work output greater than the compressor's input. It appears to be an incomplete description of a standard Brayton or similar cycle, not a new energy source, making its performance claims vague and thermodynamically unclear.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: The system is described as a compressor feeding a heat engine/turbine, but no primary high-temperature heat source is identified. The compressor's work input is the only clear energy input.
- Ambiguous efficiency claims: Claims of 'substantial' efficiency enhancement and 'overall improvement in efficiency' without specifying how a temperature gradient is created or maintained.
- The system appears to be a closed-loop Brayton or similar cycle, but the description omits the essential external heat addition (combustor, solar receiver, nuclear heat) required for a heat engine to produce net work.
Claimed Energy Source
Unclear. The description mentions hydraulic cylinders and pistons applying force to a lever system, but does not specify the primary energy input (e.g., electricity to pumps, stored pressurized fluid, or an external mechanical force).
AI Physics Analysis
The patent describes a mechanical-hydraulic system to drive a generator but fails to identify the original source of energy. While levers and hydraulics can transmit force, they cannot create energy. The vague description and lack of defined input make it questionable, as it appears to be an energy conversion/transmission system misrepresented as a generation system.
Specific Physics Issues
- Incomplete energy accounting: No specification of the power source for the hydraulic actuators.
- Ambiguous mechanism: The description of 'simple lever class I' and compound levers does not explain how it generates net power rather than just transmitting/converting it with losses.
- No thermodynamic limit violation is explicitly claimed, but the system's purpose as a 'power generation system' implies an output without a defined input.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (90% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (20% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (20% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (30% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (60% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
Claimed Energy Source
cached
AI Physics Analysis
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.