Total patents analyzed: 396 • Violation rate: 64%
Generated February 22, 2026 • apex-core.org
USPTO patent class physics violation analysis
26 patents flagged under this pattern
Abstract본 발명은 고주파 추력기에 관한 것이다. 고주파 추력기는, 전자파를 생성하여 발진하는 전자파 출력 디바이스; 상기 전자파 출력 디바이스에서 발생하는 출력을 이용하여 복사 압력으로 추진력을 일으키는 추력 드라이브를 포함한다. 본 발명의 실시 예에서는, 전자기파의 복사 압력을 집속된 전극 구조를 통하여 증폭하여 추력을 발생시킬 수 있고, 전자기파의 복사 압력을 집속된 전극 구조를 통하여 증폭하여 추력을 발생시키므로 친환경적이다.
The patent describes a magnetic energy amplification device that claims to use energy from a magnetic generator to produce a larger output, constituting a classic over-unity claim. It violates the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) by implying energy creation, and the second law by suggesting perpetual amplification without an external energy source or entropy sink.
Abstract本发明涉及一种螺旋悬速器。其包括：螺旋框架，包括螺旋框架上的方向控制器和动力体系，所述方向控制器和动力体系的材质是外永磁铁内刚体空心结构，方向控制器牵引动力体系向一个方向性的高速旋转前行，永磁体结合悬速器内部能源体系防止外界能源信号干扰；螺旋框架，包括螺旋体系内部光感坐标和燃料放置区域和磁能密度反射器，所述磁能密度反射器和光感坐标器的铁芯是永磁体，所述磁能密度反射器和光感坐标器自行处理数据能源供给方向控制器，以方向控制器牵引动力体系高速旋转飞行。本发明的有益效果为：这种螺旋悬速器在使用时，用于用光感坐标体系自行处理信号能源变化使用，达到高速旋转前行和无信号能源干扰在空间区域高速移动。
The patent describes a 'winged hypersonic device' that claims to generate its own propulsion energy internally through vague 'data energy source' processing and magnetic feedback, with no clear external energy input. This violates energy conservation, as the described internal components cannot create net energy to power sustained high-speed flight. The language is heavily obfuscated with pseudo-technical terms masking the fundamental violation.
Initially from an electrical battery, which powers a magnetron to create a plasma. The system claims to receive supplemental energy from a 'rain of energizing neutrinos' (8) from the 'ether' (20), and to use a turbine and boiler system in a loop that appears to feed back to the battery.
The patent describes a spacecraft propulsion system that claims to extract supplemental energy from neutrinos and a mysterious 'ether,' while also suggesting a self-powering energy loop. This violates the First Law of Thermodynamics (energy conservation) as it posits a net energy source from a negligible interaction (neutrinos) and a non-existent medium (ether), and the described cycle suggests perpetual motion.
Abstract本发明公开了一种真空电驱动飞行器，包括电机组，所述的电机组上设有四个电机，所述的电机上设有旋转轴，所述的轴上设有键槽，所述的轴上设有通过键和键槽进行连接固定的齿轮，所述的齿轮所述的齿轮上固定连接设有连接杆，所述的连接杆上连接设有转动球，所述的电机组外侧设有壳体，所述的壳体上设有预留槽，所述的预留槽用于连接杆通过，所述的连接杆与转动球均为四个。本发明与现有技术相比的优点在于：使用电力驱动代替了燃料驱动，能够保证在太空中航行能够有更加充足的能量和更加轻质的重量，在使用过程中保证飞行器拥有充足的动能，电机带动连接杆进行旋转，旋转后连接杆即可带动转动球进行转动从而实现电能到动能的转换。
This 'vacuum electric propulsion aircraft' claims to generate net thrust using only internal rotating balls and mechanical linkages, violating Newton's third law by attempting to create propulsion without external reaction mass. The description suggests internal forces can produce net forward motion, which is physically impossible in a closed system.
Abstract작용한 힘과 물체의 상호작용에 의해서 물체가 이동되는 힘으로 작용한 힘이 재충전되도록 하면 힘의 크기는 손실로 인하여 크기가 줄어들게 되나 그 과정에는 충전되는 크기만큼 충격에너지가 발생하므로 그 충격에너지는 방향성이 있는 경우에는 물체에 운동에너지를 부여하게 됨으로 발생된 운동에너지는 물체가 부여된 운동에너지로부터 변위되는 관성을 연결된 기구를 통해 전달하여 손실을 보상하게 되면 작용한 힘은 원래 크기가 되므로 에너지보존의 법칙에 의하면 작용한 크기보다 줄어든 크기로 인해 잃어버린 크기는 극히 일부이며 발생하는 충격에너지는 작용한 크기에서 잃어버린 크기를 마이너스한 크기이므로 재작용에 필요한 손실을 보충하고도 넘치는 관성력을 이용할 수 있으므로 이러한 원리를 이용한 본 발명은, 압축기체가 팽창할 때에 작용한 힘으로부터 이동되는 물체의 관성을 이용하여 소실되는 힘을 보충하는 반복적인 작용으로 구동되는 가속기의 시스템과 에너지증폭장치에 관한 것으로, 가속기는 실린더의 진공패드로부터 기체유입을 방지하고 역류방지밸브를 통하여 내부기체를 배출하여 실린더내부가 항상 일정한 진공이 유지되게 하고 기체유입으로 피스톤이 움직일 때 기체의 유동저항을 최소화한 설계로 유입되는 기체내부에너지의 효율을 높여 크랭크축에 실린더를 통하여 기체에너지를 전달하게 한다. 이때에 관성의 법칙에서 힘이 전달된 회전하는 물체인 크랭크축은 그 크기만큼 되돌아오는 성질로 피스톤이 밀려서 실린더에 유입된 기체를 방출하는 양이 우주선에 충격을 주게 되므로 지탱할 곳이 없는 우주선은 충격에너지만큼 운동량이 발생하게 되고, 우주선이동방법과 같은 원호운동하는 회전자를 가진 운동에너지증폭장치는 기동을 위하여 스타트모터와 연결된 회전자를 통하여 크랭크축과 연결된 피스톤을 이동시켜 실린더에 진공이 되어야할 공간에 가동을 멈춘 시간동안 유입된 기체를 배출하여 진공상태가 되게 하고 피스톤이 기체팽창 힘으로 이동되는 시작점에 도달하면 오버러닝 클러치로 인하여 스타트모터 동력공급 속도보다 큰 기체팽창속도로 이동되어 크랭크축이 회전하여 가동되며, 우주선가속기에서는 물리적인손실로 크랭크축이 정지하여 실린더 내부에 잔존하는 기체를 에너지증폭장치로부터 에너지를 공급받아 배출해야 하지만 에너지증폭장치는 물리적인 손실로 정지되는 크랭크축 질량과 회전자의 질량은 작용한 힘에 질량은 비례하므로 잔여기체배출저항으로부터 크랭크축에 비해 회전자가 늦게 멈추는 회전자질량크기이면 피스톤을 끌어서 잔여 기체를 배출하여 작용한 힘은 원래 상태로 회복하고 기체가 유입되는 위치에 도달한 피스톤은 팽창되는 기체로 이동되어 행정을 반복하는 것이며 크랭크축의 관성으로부터 발생하는 반복적인 충격에너지는 결합되어 회전자속도가 증가하고 증가된 속도로 인한 충격에너지는 시간과 결합하는 에너지증폭장치를 이용하여 우주선을 가속시켜 원하는 공간지점으로 효율적으로 이동시키는 것이 본 발명의 기술요지이다.
The patent describes a complex system with moisture-absorbing materials and rotating components that allegedly amplify energy through cascading transfers, but identifies no external energy source to account for the claimed outputs. This violates energy conservation by implying net work can be extracted from internal cyclic processes without an external gradient or input.
Abstract本发明公开了一种应力波静态工质推进方法和推进装置。所述应力波静态工质推进方法是利用推进装置内应力介质传播应力波的速度不同，和/或利用推进装置内应力波传播距离不同，使所述推进装置在两个相对方向产生大小不同的作用力，从而推动所述推进装置朝向一个方向移动。该应力波静态工质推进方法能量损失小，成本低，污染少或基本无污染。
The patent describes a propulsion device claiming to generate net thrust by creating asymmetric internal stress wave propagation, which violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum. It uses vague wave mechanics terminology without specifying a legitimate external energy source or reaction mass, making it a form of reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Abstract본 발명은 우주선같은 고립계안의 장치로 한쪽으로의 추력을 발생시키는원리에 관한것으로서 작용과 반작용의 법칙으로 발생된 한쪽의 힘을 다른에너지로 변환해서 에너지 보존의 법칙에 의해서 그 변환된 에너지만큼힘의 불균형이 발생해서 추력을 얻는 원리에 관한것으로서 우주개발에활용가능하고 무소음 비행체 같은 기기를 만드는데 활용할수 있는특징이 있다.
The patent describes a system where magnetic fields are used to somehow amplify energy, claiming the output energy exceeds the control input. This violates energy conservation as no complete source for the additional energy is identified, and the mechanism described suggests energy creation from a closed system.
AbstractPatentanspruch Nummer 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die von der Pressluftdüse unten ankommende Luft unten immer wieder komprimiert wird und als Flüssigluft immer wieder durch das Presslufttriebwerk gelassen wird.
The device is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind. It describes a closed-cycle compressed air engine that recirculates and re-liquefies its working fluid, claiming to produce useful thrust while ignoring the fundamental energy input required to overcome thermodynamic losses, particularly the large energy cost of liquefaction.
Abstract본 발명은 제트엔진처럼 비행체 뒤쪽으로 배기가스를 내뿜어 추진력을 얻는 방식이 아닌 공간에 존재하는 물체를 끌어당길 때 발생하는 관성을 이용하여 지속적인 추진력을 얻는 비행체의 엔진에 관한 것이다.관성을 추진력으로 사용하고자 할 때 풀어야 할 문제는 끌어당긴 물체를 별도의 에너지를 사용하지 않으면서 원래의 위치로 되돌려 보내는 것이다. 그래야만 지속적으로 관성을 이용한 한 쪽 방향으로의 추진력을 얻을 수 있기 때문이다.이를 위해 본 발명은 회전하는 물체는 무게 중심이 회전 중심과 일치할 때 에너지 투입 없이 물체의 회전방향을 바꿀 수 있다는 점에 착안하여 원형 파이프(10) 내부에서 회전할 수 있는 자성체(20) 3개를 120°각도로 배치하여 무게중심을 회전중심에 일치시킨 후 코일(P1)로 동 자성체(20) 중 하나(a)를 잡아당겨서 관성에 의한 힘을 얻고 간격지지대(21)에 의해 회전하는 다른 자성체(c)가 2번 째 코일(P2)을 지날 때 회전운동을 방해하는 방향으로 잡아당겨 연속해서 같은 방향으로 관성에 의한 힘을 발생시킨다. 이와 같은 과정의 무한 반복을 통해 동일한 방향의 추진력을 지속적으로 얻을 수 있다.본 발명은 비행체의 속도에 상관없이 관성에 의한 힘을 얻을 수 있기 때문에 지속적인 가속이 가능하여 태양계 탐사 등 우주 여행에 필요한 높은 속도의 비행체 엔진으로 적합하다.
The device claims to generate mechanical work by extracting energy from ambient humidity. This is a thermodynamic violation because extracting net work from a single environmental reservoir (the moist air) without a lower-temperature sink or a compensating energy input is impossible under the laws of thermodynamics. The patent fails to identify a legitimate energy source or account for all energy inputs and outputs.
Abstract本发明涉及一种电热储能蒸汽火箭。其技术原理是：电加热火箭内部的电热储能块，再由电热储能块加热水，水温升高直到产生高温高压的水蒸汽。蒸汽达到设定的压力值时，压力控制阀打开，水蒸汽由喷管排出并产生动力推动火箭发射。火箭离地升空，即脱落并中断电源(也可在空中中断电源并分离电源线)。电热储能块在火箭升空后，依然散发热量加热水温，产生大量高温高压的水蒸汽，直到将火箭推升到预定高度。
The device is a proposed steam rocket powered by an electrically heated thermal mass. The patent claims it can continue ascending after disconnecting its power source, which violates conservation of energy. The finite thermal energy stored in the block cannot perpetually boil water to create thrust; it will cool, and pressure will drop, ceasing propulsion.
Abstract본 발명은 부력으로 상승되며 방향조정이 되는 우주선에 관한 것으로서 우주선의 앞과 뒤에 신축적인 헬륨 공기 주머니가 형성되고 앞과 뒤의 헬륨 공기 주머니를 각 각 분리해서 또는 연결 상태에서 헬륨 압축 공기에 의하여 헬륨 공기를 넣고 빼고 하던가 아니면 연결 되어 있는 경우에 에어 펌프에 의하여 헬륨 공기를 앞 또는 뒤로 보냄으로서 우주선 선체의 앞과 뒤 부분의 부력의 차이에 의하여 우주선의 상하의 방향 조정이 되도록 하는 것이고 좌우의 방향 전환에 관해서는 우주선의 좌와 우측에 신축적인 헬륨 공기 주머니가 형성되고 좌와 우측의 헬륨 공기 주머니를 각 각 분리해서 또는 연결 상태에서 헬륨 압축 공기에 의하여 헬륨 공기를 넣고 빼고 하던가 아니면 연결 되어 있는 경우에 에어 펌프에 의하여 헬륨 공기를 좌와 우측으로 보냄으로서 우주선 선체의 좌와 우측의 부력의 차이에 의하여 우주선의 좌우의 방향전환이 좌우 방향의 조정 날개에 의하여 조정될 때 더 용이하게 방향이 조절되도록 하는 것이다.
The patent describes a device where vibration energy is generated and amplified between interconnected units, purportedly leading to operational efficiency. It fails to identify any external energy source, implies energy creation within the system, and uses vague technical language that obscures the violation of energy conservation—the core physics issue is that it describes a self-sustaining or amplifying energy process without an external input.
Abstract使い捨てで高価なロケット燃料を要さず、太陽帆船等よりも数段、推進効率のよい特殊宇宙船類及びその機種の持続・永続的な気流循環式動力部等を複合的にも応用した宇宙エレベーター等の宇宙構造物を普く実現化させる。 図１～５及び図６～１０等で示した通り、ダクテッドファン類の風力などで移動し得る、形状が違う二体の各推進体を準備し、順次、その両体自体、作用反作用で打ち消し合うことなく、尚のこと、片方の一体から吹き出した推進剤をもう一方の受容体で、余すところなく受け止めつつ、合体的に最も接近させながら、適程に平行移動する。
The patent describes a propulsion system where multiple ducted fan units interact through complex airflow patterns to allegedly produce net thrust without reaction mass expulsion or external energy gradients, directly violating Newton's laws of motion and conservation of momentum. The description is technically obfuscated but fundamentally claims motion without equal and opposite reaction.
AbstractJusqu'à maintenant pour obtenir l'élevation des raquettes destinées à l' espace et pour vaincre la gravité terrestre sontes été nécessaire des engines assez volumineux et lourds , disont que ça était la prémiere fase de cette grande adventure que est la conquête de l'éspace. Avec la nouvelle systeme de propulsion à froid tout çela changera, en premier parce que regard la pollution , acoustique, fumé, co2 etc, tous se passera électriquement ça veux dire avec electro-magnetisme et idrogène, ou autre gaz très froids. Ça sera de grande soulagement pour tout le monde et pour la planet entière. Pour le décollage et atterrisage ne seront plus necessaire de lieux établie. Elle est très versatile, avec un simple joy-stick on peut la conduire. Pratiquemente tous changera , un nouveau temp s'annonce en ligne avec le sens actuel « new -age » tous séra plus simple, et surtout la gravité ne séra plus un problème cette grande lacune séra comblée souhaitons que ça se passera a brève terme, dans l'interesse de tous et surtout de la santé de notre Planete avec vraiment des coûtes très limités .
The claim violates fundamental physics by proposing near-light-speed space travel and gravity negation without a coherent energy source or reaction mechanism, while using obfuscatory technical language. It ignores conservation of momentum and energy, and the thermodynamic requirements for propulsion.
Claims to use a nuclear or chemical-heated turbine reactor to expel a working fluid (e.g., mercury), then recovers and reuses the expelled kinetic energy via a rotating cone and kinetic energy brake ring, condenses the fluid, and pumps it back to the reactor.
The device claims to be a propulsion system that expels mass for thrust but then recaptures most of its kinetic energy to reuse the same mass. This violates conservation of momentum and energy, as a net propulsive force requires the permanent expulsion of momentum-carrying mass. The described energy recovery would negate thrust, making sustained flight impossible.
Unclear. Mentions rocket engines, air propellers, MHD generators, and electromagnetic catapults, but no coherent primary energy source is specified. Implies energy extraction from ambient gradients or self-sustaining operation.
The 'Cosmic Apparatus' combines multiple propulsion and energy generation systems in a complex arrangement of channels, rings, and wings, but provides no coherent explanation of the primary energy source. The design suggests an attempt to extract net work from ambient conditions or create a self-sustaining system, which violates conservation of energy. The use of correct physics terms (MHD generator, rocket engines) in an incoherent configuration is characteristic of perpetual motion claims.
Abstract一种碟式飞行器的升力装置，是在一个圆环形的 管道中充满钠钾合金流体，管道上装有叶片轴流泵或 电磁泵，驱动流体沿管道流动。管道内横向装有一周 翼型叶片，叶片两端与管道侧壁连接，这时叶片不会 产生翼端涡流，诱导阻力和下洗流，叶片片升力仅仅 是由环流产生的，从而使叶片上的升力不会被管道抵 消并使整个系统产生净升力。
The device is a closed system claiming to generate net lift (an external force) solely by circulating fluid internally. This violates conservation of momentum (Newton's Third Law), as internal forces in a sealed system cannot produce a net external force on the system as a whole without ejecting reaction mass.
AbstractRaum- und Wasserfahrzeug im Format einer fliegenden Untertasse mit Auf- und Antrieb durch ein Aggregat von drei Scheiben, davon zwei umlaufenden Scheiben, getrennt durch eine mittlere feste Scheibe, ausgerüstet mit Hebeln, Vertiefungen und anderen Vorrichtungen zur Richtungsgebung der Luft- oder Wassermasse. Die Luft- oder Wassermassen werden durch die obere und untere umlaufende Scheibe, welche, angetrieben von Motoren, zwischen Kugellagerbohrern umlaufen, aufgenommen. Im Gefahrfall werden sie durch Haken geschützt, welche von der mittleren Scheibe geführt werden. Außer diesem Scheibenaggregat sind Antriebs- und Hilfsringe vorgesehen, wobei zum Kurswechsel Steuersperren an den umlaufenden Scheiben angebracht sind. Das Fahrzeug hat Spezialauspuffrohre zur Geräuschdämpfung in Gürtelform sowie feste Landestützen mit Einbohrvorrichtungen. Es sind Elektromotoren im System der Selbstversorgung vorgesehen, wobei die umlaufenden Scheiben Generatoren antreiben. Fig. 1.{Raum und Wasserfahrzeug, fliegende Untertasse, Auf- und Antrieb, Scheibe, zwei umlaufende, eine mittlere Scheibe, Hebel, Vertiefungen, Luft- oder Wassermasse, Haken, Steuersperren}
The patent's core violation is in Claim 4, which describes an impossible closed-loop energy system where generators recharge the very batteries that power the motors driving them, ignoring thermodynamic losses. While the mechanical disk system for lift/propulsion might function with an external power source, the claimed 'self-supply' system is a perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Unclear. The claim references a 'magnet ring' and a converter that feeds it energy, but provides no identifiable primary energy input (e.g., electrical, chemical, or ambient gradient). It implies manipulation of Earth's gravity and magnetic fields as a propulsion method without an external energy source.
The patent claims describe a propulsion system based on magnets and gravity manipulation without specifying any legitimate energy source or accounting for the energy required to generate lift and thrust. Proposing to extract net work from Earth's magnetic or gravitational fields without an external power input or a thermodynamic gradient to exploit is a direct violation of energy conservation.
AbstractLES MOTEURS A PISTONS DROITS DES PLANCHES 1.5.7.8 SONT AUTOPROPULSEURS; ILS DONNENT EN MEME TEMPS UN MOUVEMENT ROTATIF, LEURS VILBREQUINS RECOIVENT A LA FOIS L'ENERGIE DE L'ACTION ET DE LA REACTION, CE QUI PROMET UN RENDEMENT DOUBLE; L'AUTOPROPULSION S'EFFECTUE SANS PERTE DE MASSE, LES PISTONS ET LES VOLANTS CHARGES D'ENERGIE CINETIQUE CONSTITUANT LES POINTS D'APPUI. LES COMPRESSEURS PROPULSEURS PISTONS 5 PEUVENT ASSURER L'EPURATION DES GAZ BRULES, LES DESSUS DE PISTONS ET LES CULASSES ETANT REVETUS DE SUBSTANCES CATALYTIQUES. LES COMPRESSEURS PROPULSEURS DE LA PLANCHE 2 SONT MUNIS DE SOUPAPES QUI SUPPRIMENT LA REACTION; LES AUTRES MOTEURS MUNIS DE CES COMPRESSEURS PEUVENT EGALEMENT ETRE, OU NON, MUNIS DE CES SOUPAPES. LE MOTEUR A PISTONS LIBRES TORIQUES DE LA PLANCHE 4 A DEUX PISTONS MOTEURS-COMPRESSEURS, ET DEUX PISTONS ANTI-FORCES CENTRIFUGES. LE MOTEUR TORIQUE DE LA PLANCHE 6 EST MUNI D'EMBIELLAGES; LA PROPULSION EST REALISEE PAR DEUX PISTONS A DOUBLE EFFETS; DEUX MASSES ASSURENT L'EQUILIBRAGE. LES RESERVOIRS ANIMES D'UNE ROTATION ASSURENT UNE STABILITE GYROSCOPIQUE SANS ADDITION DE POIDS MORT.
The patent's core claim is for self-propelling engines that achieve 'double efficiency' by harnessing both action and reaction forces internally. This is a classic violation of Newton's laws and energy conservation, as internal forces cannot produce net work on a system. The mention of photovoltaic or atomic energy sources does not rectify the fundamental violation proposed in the mechanical design.
Electrical energy from an unspecified onboard source (e.g., battery) powers electromagnets.
The device is an internal reaction drive that uses electromagnets to move components back and forth. Since all forces are internal, the system's center of mass cannot accelerate, making it a classic 'perpetual motion' violation of momentum conservation.
Unclear. The primary claimed energy source appears to be the centripetal force generated by rotating masses, which is an internal, reaction force that cannot perform net work on the system's center of mass.
The device claims to generate linear propulsion by converting internal rotational forces, but centripetal force is a reaction force that cannot perform net work on a system's center of mass. The description implies creating useful linear force from an internal mechanism without an external energy source, which violates Newton's laws and energy conservation.
Ambient cosmic rays (kinetic energy of high-energy particles) and nuclear binding energy from deuterium fusion triggered by those cosmic rays.
The proposed system violates momentum conservation, as ejecting fuel packages imparts momentum opposite the intended thrust direction. The energy and reaction rates from cosmic-ray-induced fusion are astronomically insufficient to produce the claimed constant, high acceleration for interplanetary travel.
Claimed to be 'vacuum fluctuations' or 'virtual radiation' from free space, with amplification provided by an externally applied electromagnetic field.
The claim attempts to extract net momentum from the quantum vacuum ground state, which is impossible as it is in equilibrium and Lorentz invariant. The description uses correct quantum field theory terminology ('vacuum fluctuations', 'virtual particles') in a fundamentally incorrect way to suggest a reactionless drive, violating conservation of momentum.
Initially from a battery powering an electric motor to start rotation. The device claims to generate excess mechanical energy from the rotation itself via a feedback loop involving slowed light, time dilation, and increased centrifugal force, which then recharges the battery.
The device claims a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, generating excess energy from rotation via unphysical feedback involving 'slowed light' and relativistic time effects. It violates energy conservation and misapplies fundamental physics concepts to suggest impossible propulsion and self-charging.
Ambient atmospheric pressure gradient and unspecified 'natural forces' or 'outer space lake substance'.
The concept violates the conservation of energy, as lifting mass to space requires immense energy input not provided by the described passive pressure differential. The proposed conduit and mechanism ignore fundamental atmospheric physics and material science limits.
Unclear. Mentions motorized propellers, implying electrical input, but also references 'inertial dark matter surface of rotation energy' and claims 'free space resistance without cost'.
The device claims to be a closed-loop propulsion system that can produce net thrust in space by only manipulating an internal fluid, which directly violates conservation of momentum. Its descriptions rely on invented physics concepts and ignore the fundamental requirement that rockets must eject mass to accelerate.
111 patents flagged under this pattern
AbstractA propulsion system for an orbiting vehicle such as a low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite includes a set of surfaces over which a gas passes during orbital flight, and a plurality of electrodes on the surfaces. The electrodes are configured to create an electric field having a spatial field pattern in response to field signals, experienced by passing gas molecules as an oscillating field having a frequency on the order of a polarization-resonance frequency of the molecules to impart a propulsive traveling-wave dielectrophoretic force to the passing molecules. The electrodes extend over sufficient area to impart sufficient traveling-wave dielectrophoretic force to the gas to overcome aerodynamic drag and thereby sustain orbital flight of the vehicle. A power source applies the field signals to the electrodes, providing sufficient power to overcome power lost to aerodynamic drag and thereby sustain orbital flight.
The system claims to use electrical power to generate a traveling electric field that pushes on ambient gas molecules to produce thrust, overcoming drag. However, in the thermal equilibrium conditions of low-Earth orbit, imparting a net directional force to random thermal molecules without ejecting mass or creating a pressure gradient violates momentum conservation. It effectively attempts to create a net propulsive force from an internal energy conversion alone, which is impossible for a closed system interacting with an isotropic environment.
AbstractSystems and methods of interacting complex electric fields and static electric fields to effect motion are disclosed. An example method includes producing an action force having a reaction force perpendicular to the action force by interacting a relative velocity electric field based on charge of a moving first charged object and a static charge on a second charged object in a different inertial frame of reference. Another example method includes producing an action force having a reaction force perpendicular to the action force by interacting an acceleration generated electric field based on acceleration of a first charged object and a static charge on a second charged object in a different inertial frame of reference. Another example method includes producing an action force having a reaction force perpendicular to the action force by interacting a scalar electric potential and static electric field.
The patent claims describe a mechanism that violates Newton's third law and energy conservation by suggesting that interacting electric fields in different inertial frames can produce net forces and generate energy without an external power source. The use of relativistic electrodynamics terminology is obfuscatory and misapplied to imply a perpetual motion scheme.
Abstract本发明公开了一种运用在真空状态下的推进机构，涉及电磁驱动领域，包括底座、供电系统、电流方向转换器和若干弧形轨道，所述弧形轨道设置在底座上，弧形轨道内设有沿轨道径向分布的磁场，弧形管道内设置有若干电流方向相同，且垂直任一磁场方向的直导线，直导线由供电系统供电，电流方向转换器设置在直导线和供电系统之间，直导线之间固定连接，每个所述弧形轨道的两端均设置有与电流方向转换器通讯连接的用于检测带电导线的传感器，底座上位于弧形轨道端部处还有缓冲结构。通过磁场对带电的直导线进行加速，利用导线具有的动量和动能对底座进行撞击从而达到加速效果，本发明中所有的能量均来自电能，无需携带化石燃料和压缩空气。
The device is a proposed propulsion mechanism for vacuum operation using internal magnetic acceleration of a conductor. It fundamentally violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum, as it attempts to generate net thrust using only internal forces without expelling any reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
AbstractA system for propelling craft which is applicable in any environment. It employs an alternating magnetic field supplied by a coil. A parallel plate capacitor is situated so that the flux of the magnetic field flows between the plates of the capacitor. The capacitor is charged and discharged in synchronization with the alternating magnetic field. The changing magnetic field creates an electric field that applies a force to the charge in the plates which is then transferred to the body of the device. Any induced reactive electric force on the coil affects equally the protons and electrons in the wires of the coil creating the magnetic field, thus the force is non-reactive. At the same time, the changing electric field in the capacitor creates a magnetic field. The current in the coils and/or the surface current in the ferromagnetic material (if present) experiences a force from the magnetic field. The magnetic field created by these currents, however, has no free charge between the plates of the capacitor with which to react, thus this force is also non-reactive. The two forces are in opposite directions, but are not the same magnitude, thus the device is propelled in a single direction.
The device is an internal electromagnetic system claiming to produce a net, uni-directional force. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as all described forces are internal and must sum to zero, providing no net propulsion.
AbstractИзобретение относится к способам приведения в движение тел в различных средах, в т.ч. в космосе. В способе применены базовые устройства (БУ) с внутренними отражающими поверхностями пирамидальной или конической формы. В результате разницы в воздействии виртуальных частиц (фотонов) на внешние и указанные внутренние поверхности БУ ожидается появление движущей силы (благодаря эффекту Казимира). Данные БУ могут объединяться в сборки, располагаемые и ориентируемые в пространстве так, чтобы создавать как поступательное, так и вращательное движения тел. Технический результат изобретения направлен на создание вариантов универсального движителя простой конструкции, основанного на эффекте Казимира. 5 з.п. ф-лы, 9 ил.
This patent claims to generate propulsion using the Casimir effect, but misrepresents quantum vacuum fluctuations as a source of net directional momentum. The proposed device would violate conservation of momentum and energy by extracting net work from quantum vacuum equilibrium without an external gradient or energy input.
Abstract本发明涉及一种利用离心力驱动物体定向移动的装置。该装置包括：1.密封外壳，2.限制环，3.旋臂组，4.离心柱，5.可滑动旋臂，6.减速电机，7.高转速大功率电机，8.转轴，9.限制环固定结构。当离心柱(4)沿着限制环(2)内壁运动时，离心柱(4)在限制环(2)内壁的半圆和两个四分之一圆上做圆周运动时的频率一致，由公式F＝mω2r＝4mπ2f2r可知当离心柱围绕着转轴沿限制环内壁运动时在限制环内壁半圆上的离心力是在四分之一圆上的两倍，可滑动悬臂在相应位置的离心力比值也可以接近二比一，且力的作用时间相同，这样形成的力差可以达到驱动物体定向移动的目的。
The device uses internal centrifugal forces and a specially shaped constraint ring to create asymmetric forces, but as a closed mechanical system driven only by its motors, it cannot generate net directional motion or useful work beyond what is input electrically. This violates Newton's laws of motion (specifically, conservation of momentum) as internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
Electrical input to the circulation pump.
The system is a closed internal fluid loop. No matter how the fluid circulates internally, the net momentum of the vehicle-fluid system remains constant. The claimed net force is impossible, making this a reactionless drive that violates Newton's laws.
AbstractThis invention relates to propulsion systems. The Centrifugal Propeller is a dosed propulsion system with no external moving parts, other than a drive shaft, and has no external vents. The Centrifugal Propeller creates thrust by redirecting the reaction from centrifugal force so as to create directed thrust. The Centrifugal Propeller has significant advantages over other propulsion systems because it can be closed to the environment that it operates in. That means that it can operate in water, in air, or in outer space. It does not produce energy such as an electric motor but rather, converts that energy from a drive source such as an electric motor, into directed thrust. The invention's operation is not limited to closed environments. The Centrifugal Propeller will create thrust in any environment that its drive source will operate in. An electric motor can be completely closed to the environment it operates in and so would be the best source of power for the Centrifugal Propeller. Potential drive sources for the invention are: electric motors, internal combustion motors, turbines, and rockets. The Centrifugal Propeller will operate in outer space. An ideal match would be to use an electric motor running off of a nuclear generator, to turn the Centrifugal Propeller. In space the Centrifugal Propeller will continually accelerate and so space craft will have constant gravity while accelerating or decelerating. The Centrifugal Propeller will be used to propel and/or lift objects. It can be used to replace any current propulsion systems including but not limited to: cranes, jet engines, rocket engines, marine propellers and aircraft propellers.
The device is a closed system claiming to generate net thrust by manipulating internal centrifugal forces. This violates Newton's laws, specifically the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot produce net external force on its center of mass without ejecting reaction mass.
Abstract本发明涉及一种磁流体‑空气双向空间密度梯度变化推进器，主要由3套或3套以上磁流体‑空气双向空间密度梯度变化器(11)、外壳(13)、发电机组(14)、方向调节器(17)和控制系统组成，磁流体‑空气双向空间密度梯度变化器主要包括：气室(1)、气液分离器(2)、空压机(3)、气管总成(4)、磁流体(6)、电磁铁(7)和磁流体室(8)。利用磁流体制造一个空间密度梯度场，空气在磁流体中浮升的过程是空间密度梯度场收缩或扩张的过程，是推进器减质量或加质量的过程，通过调节电磁铁的磁场强度和/或气流的循环速度及循环方向，实现对推进器的运动状态进行有效控制，实现无工质飞行。
This device claims to achieve propulsion without expelling reaction mass ('无工质飞行'), which directly violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum. While it uses real components (electromagnets, compressors), the described cyclic process of air bubbles in magnetic fluid cannot produce net thrust in a closed system, making it a form of perpetual motion machine.
AbstractEin gattungsgemäßer Antrieb, bestehend aus einem, gegenüber dem Fahrzeug starren ersten Massenkörper (4) und mindestens zwei beweglichen Massenkörper (6, 7), soll so weiter entwickelt werden, der er eine hohe und bis zur Lichtgeschwindigkeit führende Beschleunigung aufweist. Diese Aufgabe wird dadurch gelöst, dass die beweglichen Massenkörper (6, 7) gleich groß ausgeführt sind und im Wirkungsbereich des starren Massenkörpers (4) so in Bewegung versetzt werden, dass sich die Massen der beweglichen Massenkörper (6, 7) verändern und impulsartig auf den starren Massenkörper (4) wirken.
The device is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to generate net thrust by moving internal masses in a cyclic fashion. This violates conservation of momentum. The claim of changing masses and achieving light-speed acceleration further violates conservation laws and relativistic physics, indicating a fundamental misunderstanding of propulsion mechanics.
AbstractEl acelerador de naves espaciales, es un sistema eléctrico de alto voltaje que alimenta a unos grandes solenoides (12) situados en la popa de la nave, de manera que se puede aprovechar la gran fuerza de los campos magnéticos inducidos en sus huecos, para empujar hacia adelante a la nave, -o, a un satélite artificial-, o, también, para frenarlos en la tarea de reentrada a la atmósfera terrestre o, a la de otro planeta.
The device is a textbook reactionless drive, attempting to generate thrust by pushing against an internal component attached to its own frame, which violates Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum. The additional claim that it produces electrical energy compounds the violation by implying energy creation.
AbstractUniversella farkoster (1,2) anordnade med viktreducerande behållare (3,4,6,13) som innehåller varierande mängder antimateria (8) med negativ massa ekvivalent med negativ energi enligt E = mc, som reducerar farkostens totalmassa till ett lämpligt värde. Därmed ges möjlighet att anordna farkoster mycket lätta, t.o.m. viktlösa, genom att anordna farkosterna med varierande, valfria innehåll av materia (1,2,3,4) samt antimateria (8). Farkosterna är avsedda att framföras i valfria medier som vatten, markplanet, luftatmosfären, kosmiskt vakuum, etc. Satelliter anordnade med viktreducerande behållare (3,4, 6) innehållande antimateria (8) är specialvarianter av den universella farkosten.
The patent is based on a core premise that is physically false: antimatter possesses negative mass and repulsive gravity. This violates established physics, including general relativity and conservation laws. The claims of mass cancellation to enable effortless propulsion are thermodynamically impossible.
AbstractDie Erfindung betrifft eine Vorrichtung mit zumindest einem ersten geladenen Ladungsspeicher (12) und zumindest einem zweiten geladenen Ladungsspeicher (14), wobei einer der Ladungsspeicher (12) negativ geladen und zumindest ein anderer (14) der Ladungsspeicher positiv geladen ist, wobei der erste Ladungsspeicher (12) eine Ladungsdichte aufweist, deren Betrag geringer ist als ein Betrag der Ladungsdichte des zweiten Ladungsspeichers (14), und der erste und zweite Ladungsspeicher (12,14) in einem Abstand zueinander angeordnet sind, der geringer ist als eine laterale Erstreckung der Ladungsspeicher (12,14), so dass eine elektrostatische Energie zumindest eines Teils der Ladungsträger des ersten Ladungsspeichers (12) negativ und vom Betrag her größer ist als ein Energieäquivalent der Masse der Ladungsträger des ersten Ladungsspeichers (12).
The patent claims a device where the electrostatic potential energy of some charge carriers is both negative and exceeds their mass-energy equivalent, which is physically incoherent. It further implies this configuration can be used for propulsion without an identifiable external energy source, violating conservation of energy by suggesting net work can be extracted from a static, pre-charged system.
AbstractAn article and device are provided comprising a switchable microstructure or nanostructure array of non-parallel conducting plates, supported by a plurality of shaped prismatic oxide stages upon layered conductive and substrate-base materials, for directly generating a lateral or transverse Casimir force. Illustrative embodiments include a device for switchable generation of lateral or transverse Casimir force components that work in an orthogonal direction to normal Casimir forces which can be externally switched on or off electronically, mechanically or thermally by using a semiconductor PN-junction or superconductor to produce a thrust for guidance, maneuvering and propulsion of a manned or unmanned space vehicle, or in other novel applications requiring generation of precisely switched or continuous forces.
The claim violates energy conservation. The Casimir effect is a conservative force arising from boundary conditions on quantum fields; it cannot be harnessed for net propulsion without expending at least as much energy to modulate the system as the work extracted, making it incapable of being a primary thrust source.
Abstract1. Устройство для обеспечения левитации аппарата, включающее устройство для создания силы взаимодействия с окружающей средой, отличающееся тем, что устройство содержит сверхпроводящую оболочку, внутри которой помещено сконцентрированное магнитное поле Земли, также имеет систему охлаждения этой оболочки, расположенную в аппарате.2. Устройство по п.1, отличающееся тем, что сверхпроводящая оболочка снабжена системой открытия и закрытия доступа магнитного поля Земли внутрь этой оболочки, сокращенно - система доступа поля.3. Устройство по п.1, отличающееся тем, что сверхпроводящая оболочка выполнена в форме трубы произвольной формы, а применяемый слой сверхпроводника использует эффект Мейснера.4. Способ для осуществления устройства по п.1, отличающийся тем, что аппарат вместе с устройством для обеспечения левитации поднимают на начальную высоту подъемным устройством, оптимально - аэростатом, дирижаблем, самолетом, ракетой; после чего начинают спуск аппарата с начальной высоты, причем в это время сверхпроводящая оболочка устройства открыта для доступа магнитного поля Земли внутрь оболочки, и при спуске к поверхности Земли внутрь сверхпроводящей оболочки поступает поток магнитного поля Земли, при этом происходит автоматическое накопление и концентрирование потока магнитного поля, деформация его магнитных силовых линий, и при достижении равенства силы от спускающегося аппарата и силы давления деформированного сконцентрированного магнитного поля Земли в оболочке аппарат прекращает падение и зависает на высоте левитации, от 0,1 км до 70000 км над поверхностью Земли.5. Способ по п.4, отличающийся тем, что на высоте л
The device claims to achieve sustained levitation by trapping and concentrating Earth's magnetic field inside a superconducting shell, then using the deformed field to produce an upward force. This violates energy conservation because extracting net mechanical work from a static magnetic field without an external energy source is impossible; it's a perpetual motion machine.
AbstractBeim winkschen Pyramidenantrieb handelt es sich um einen Wasserstoff/Sauerstoffantrieb, der den Schub auf Lichtgeschwindigkeit durch Explosion eines Gemisches von 50% Wasserstoff und 50% Sauerstoff in der Antriebspyramide (B) erzeugt. Das gesamte Raumschiff welches aus zwei Pyramiden besteht wird mit steuerbaren Raketentriebwerken, die ebenfalls mit Wasserstoff und Sauerstoff betrieben werden, zur Erdatmosphäre hochgebracht und nach Verlassen Zündung des winkschen Pyramidenantriebs, welches das Raumschiff auf Lichtgeschwindigkeit beschleunigt. Zum Herabbremsen auf normalgeschwindigkeit sind die Bremsdüsen (2). Er kann zur bemannten Raumfahrt auf den Mars und ins Weltall benützt werden
The device claims to use a chemical rocket (H2/O2) to accelerate a spacecraft to light speed, which is fundamentally impossible. Chemical propulsion is limited by the energy density of the fuel, and achieving relativistic velocities violates conservation of energy and momentum, as it would require infinite energy to reach c.
AbstractEn unik kompositspår som möjliggör existens av fullmassa på ena sidan medan nollmassa i den motsatta sidan. Med detta så kan man komma åt reaktionslösframdrivning som har den största användningen i rymdfart. Komposit spåren är en ny teknik för framdrivning av kroppar, detta sker då med utnyttjadeutav centrifilgkrafterria som uppkommer pga. massan. Spårens utförande beror påmassrörelsen av fluidet genom förskjutning av massan i en böjd bana och utnyttjacentrifilgkraften som uppkommer på den ena sidan och omvandla denna rörelse till linjDetta irmebär att man omvandlar roterande rörelsen ur centrifugkrafterna från de böjda spårentill en linjär rörelse för frarndrivning
The device is a closed system that attempts to generate net linear thrust by internally pumping fluid and harnessing centrifugal forces in curved sections. This violates conservation of momentum, as all forces and momentum changes are internal, resulting in zero net external force on the system. It is a classic claim for a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
AbstractThis novel engine is capable of steadily pushing a spacecraft through the vacuum of space without the need for any fuel burned or any high-velocity gases expelled to propel the vehicle forward. In each cycle, a moving ball comes to a stop and reverses its direction of movement; this cycle then repeats itself through impact collision, meaning the ball keeps bouncing off the engine's frame. In physics, this is called an elastic collision, whereby the ball transfers its momentum to the engine's frame and re-gains it by bouncing back. Akin to a "Newton's cradle", a set of stationary solid spheres/balls arranged symmetrically and held in place by wire ropes in the shape of a semi-circle (180 degrees) or a quarter-circle (90 degrees) act as the medium, through which the instantaneous energy of impact (impulse) of one dynamic ball is transferred to the other. For this closed cycle to continue to work indefinitely, two electromagnets are used to add enough kinetic energy to the dynamic balls in order to account for the energy losses in each cycle. By creating a perfectly elastic 'collision' between the dynamic ball and the engine's frame, both the momentum and kinetic energy of the ball are conserved. As a result, a net impulse (force applied over a period of time) is repeatedly added to the engine's frame and subsequently to the spacecraft, causing it to gradually gain momentum and accelerate.
The device is an internal momentum exchange system. All forces and impulses between the ball, frame, and stationary spheres are internal to the spacecraft, so they cancel out for the system as a whole. No net thrust can be generated on the spacecraft without expelling reaction mass, violating Newton's third law and conservation of momentum.
Abstract1. Способ сообщения движения космическому аппарату со сверхкосмическими скоростями, заключающийся в том, что движение космическому аппарату сообщают с помощью движителя, выполненного в виде устройства, генерирующего силу инерции, направленную в заданную сторону, причем при движении в плотных слоях атмосферы космическому аппарату сообщают скорость, при которой нагрев поверхности космического аппарата не превышает заданное значение, при движении в безвоздушном пространстве скорость космического аппарата увеличивают до заданного значения при ускорении, приемлемом для экипажа космического аппарата, при этом скорость движения космического аппарата при нерелятивистских скоростях рассчитывают по формуле ! , ! где V - скорость космического аппарата в м/с, ! a - ускорение космического аппарата в м/с2, ! t - время ускоренного полета при данном ускорении в с, ! а при скоростях полета, близких к релятивистским скоростям, величину скорости рассчитывают по формуле ! , ! где V - скорость космического аппарата в м/с, ! F - сила инерции, сообщающая движение космическому аппарату, в Н, ! C - скорость света в м/с, ! m0 - масса космического аппарата в кг, ! t - время ускоренного полета при данном ускорении в с. ! 2. Способ по п.1, отличающийся тем, что скорость космического аппарата в безвоздушном пространстве увеличивают при ускорении, равном по модулю ускорению свободного падения на Земле.
This patent describes a reactionless drive, a device that purports to generate net thrust from internal forces without expelling propellant. This is a direct violation of Newton's third law (conservation of momentum) and has no basis in established physics. The inclusion of relativistic formulas and thermal limits is technical obfuscation for an impossible core mechanism.
AbstractИзобретение относится к межпланетным и межгалактическим полетам. Космический аппарат (KA) содержит движитель для генерирования движущей внешней силы инерции без силового взаимодействия с окружающей средой и без потери массы KA. Этой силой воздействуют на KA и сообщают ему ускоренное движение - вплоть до скоростей, близких к скорости света. Для питания указанного движителя используется ядерная или солнечная энергия. KA имеет системы управления, связи, энерго- и жизнеобеспечения, рассчитанные на неоднократные вхождение KA в плотные слои атмосферы Земли и выход из них.
The patent describes a spacecraft that can accelerate to near-light speeds using a device that generates a directed 'force of inertia' without interacting with any external environment or losing mass. This is a direct violation of Newton's laws of motion and the conservation of momentum, constituting a reactionless drive, which is impossible in standard physics.
AbstractИзобретения относятся к управлению движением летательных аппаратов (ЛA) и предназначены, в частности, для выведения ЛA в космическое пространство, для осуществления полетов в атмосфере Земли, а также для использования при перемещении других транспортных средств. Согласно способу, подъемную (движущую) силу создают путем ускорения жидкости в радиальных каналах (8), выполненных во вращающемся теле (3) и искривленных в сторону, противоположную направлению ожидаемой подъемной силы. Один из вариантов движителя, реализующего способ, содержит корпус (1), внутри которого на опорах (2) установлен ротор (3). В его нижней части имеются окна (6) для прохода жидкости. Выше окон (6) установлена крыльчатка (7) для засасывания жидкости во внутреннюю полость ротора (3). Из этой полости происходит истечение жидкости через каналы (8) при вращении ротора (3). Каналы (8) заканчиваются соплами (9). Ротор (3) приводится во вращение двигателем (10).
The patent describes a rotating body with curved channels that accelerate fluid, claiming this creates a net lifting/thrust force. This is physically impossible for a closed system, as the internal fluid momentum changes produce only internal reaction forces, resulting in zero net external thrust—a violation of Newton's laws.
AbstractEin gattungsgemäßer Antrieb, bestehend aus einem, gegenüber dem Fahrzeug starren ersten Massenkörper (4) und mindestens zwei beweglichen Massenkörpern (6, 7), soll so weiterentwickelt werden, dass er eine hohe und bis zur Lichtgeschwindigkeit führende Beschleunigung aufweist. Diese Aufgabe wird dadurch gelöst, dass die beweglichen Massenkörper (6, 7) gleich groß ausgeführt sind und im Wirkungsbereich des starren Massenkörpers (4) so in Bewegung versetzt werden, dass sich die Massen der beweglichen Massenkörper (6, 7) verändern und impulsartig auf den starren Massenkörper (4) wirken.
This drive attempts to generate net thrust by oscillating masses internally within a spacecraft. This violates conservation of momentum, as internal forces cancel out and cannot produce acceleration of the vehicle's center of mass without expelling reaction mass. The claim of achieving acceleration up to light speed is physically impossible with this method.
AbstractA propulsion method employing gyroscopes (1,2) with electric motors (4) which are being moved along a closed path in the spacecraft. Rotation axis of the gyroscopes are rotated periodically relative to movement direction so that gyroscopic effect is only obtained during movement in one direction. Thereby a gyroscopic resistance difference is obtained and used as a propulsion force. Another application is to use gyroscopes connected to generators in order to decelerate a spacecraft, transforming the moment created in gyroscope during deceleration into the electrical energy, distribute it to the space as heat transfer by means of radiation through the heat resistant panels.
The system is a form of reactionless drive, attempting to create net linear propulsion through purely internal cyclic motions. This is impossible as it violates conservation of linear momentum; internal forces cannot produce a net acceleration of the system's center of mass.
AbstractИзобретение относится к космонавтике и может быть применено для полетов в атмосфере Земли, космосе и других средах. Подъемную силу по предложенному способу создают путем вращения диска с помощью реактивных двигателей со скоростью, превышающей число оборотов П-1258.86/R, где R - радиус окружности радиального центра тяжести. Летательный аппарат (ЛA) состоит из наружного (1) и внутреннего (3) полых дисков. Наружный диск (1) по внешнему периметру снабжен складывающимися полыми лепестками (22), а по внутреннему - зубьями. Внутренний диск (3) имеет радяально установленные реактивные двигатели, сопла которых на выходе из диска направлены по касательной к его периметру, в передние грани указанных зубьев. Диски посредством гидравлических подшипников и подшипников качения соединены с полой осью, в стенке (6) которой имеются люки. На верхней части оси смонтирована кабина (17), на нижней - картер (18) для воды, отсеки с оборудованием (19) и опоры (20). ЛA может комплектоваться дополнительными приводами, полые оси которых соедишпот общей рамой, на которой устанавливают функциональное оборудование. В качестве топлива для реактивных двигателей используют сжиженные кислород и водород.
The patent claims a method of creating lift for a flying apparatus solely by rotating a disk above a specific, arbitrarily defined rotational speed. This describes a closed system attempting to generate net propulsion without expelling reaction mass, directly violating conservation of momentum (Newton's third law). The use of precise but physically unjustified formulas and technical jargon obscures this fundamental flaw.
AbstractLe dispositif permet de faire avancer, décoller et manoeuvrer un engin quand l'utilisateur actionne un moteur (1) faisant tourner une bague (6) et (7) sur laquelle est maintenu des tiges (10) permettant de se lever par force centrifuge et ainsi exercer une pression conséquente sur un système de maintien (18) fixé sur une tige cylindrique (19) passant dans l'arbre creux (2) du moteur (1). La tige cylindrique (19) dispose d'une embase (27) sur laquelle est fixé un roulement conique (25) relié sous le moteur (1) par des vérins (24) permettants de régler la poussé des tiges (10) sur le système de maintien ( 16).Un bras (28) fixé au moteur ( 1 ) permet de fixer sur son embout un système (30) identique positionné perpendiculairement au système décrit précédement : II permet de manoeuvrer l'engin.
The device attempts to generate propulsion solely through internal centrifugal forces, which is a classic violation of Newton's laws of motion. Internal forces, no matter how arranged, cannot produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass. This is a form of perpetual motion/self-propulsion claim.
Unclear. Claims a 'repulsive fifth force' generated from a 'hyperbolic-electron state' created by electron-atom collisions, implying propulsion without reaction mass or clear external energy input beyond the electron beam.
The claim violates fundamental conservation laws by describing a propulsion method that generates a net force without expelling reaction mass. It is based on invented physics ('hyperbolic electrons', a 'fifth force') not supported by empirical evidence or standard theory.
AbstractLe dispositif permet de faire avancer, décoller et manoeuvrer un engin quand l'utilisateur actionne un moteur (1) faisant tourner une bague (6) et (7) sur laquelle est maintenu des tiges (10) permettant de se lever par force centrifuge et ainsi exercer une pression conséquente sur un système de maintien (18) fixé sur une tige cylindrique (19) passant dans l'arbre creux (2) du moteur (1). La tige cylindrique (19) dispose d'une embase (27) sur laquelle est fixé un roulement conique (25) relié sous le moteur (1) par des vérins (24) permettants de régler la poussé des tiges (10) sur le système de maintien (16).Un bras (28) fixé au moteur (1) permet de fixer sur son embout un système (30) identique positionné perpendiculairement au système décrit précédement : Il permet de manoeuvrer l'engin.
The device attempts to use internal centrifugal forces to generate lift and propulsion, which is physically impossible. Centrifugal forces within a closed system cannot create a net external force on the system's center of mass, violating Newton's laws of motion. The mechanism describes only internal stresses, not a means to interact with the external environment to produce thrust.
AbstractA propulsion system which is designed to be used on a payload platform such as a spacecraft, satellite, aircraft or ocean vessel. To operate the system, electrical power is required. However, during operation the system does not require fuel or mass to be expelled into the environment in order to move in space. The system is designed to operate in two operational modes: in mode 1 the system incrementally moves the payload platform forward with each operational cycle. In the first mode, the system starts out with zero momentum and after moving a small distance is again left with zero momentum. In the mode 2 operation the payload platform accelerates forward a discrete increment of velocity during each operational cycle. In this second mode of operation these increments of velocity are additive.
The system describes an internal mechanism (rotating weights) that, when operated on a free-floating platform, cannot produce net propulsion. Conservation of momentum dictates that the system's center of mass cannot accelerate by internal forces alone. The claim of moving 'without requiring fuel or mass to be expelled' is a direct violation of Newton's third law for propulsion in a vacuum.
AbstractAn electromagnetic propellant-less thruster comprises at least one electric current transmission line 5a, a means of producing electrical pulses (1, 2, 4a, 4b in figure 1) of short predetermined duration and predetermined rate, and an electromagnetic shielding means forming a plurality of volumes, each volume containing at least one segment / section of the electric current transmission line, the shielding means preventing electromagnetic fields in one volume interacting with electric current in different volumes. Ideally, the arrangement comprises two superconducting parallel wires 5a, 5b located within the shielding means 6a, 6b, while the electric pulse duration, and the duration between the pulses in the first and second wires are of picosecond duration. The electromagnetic thruster claims to operate by making one wire react off the field created by the other wire thereby creating a force vector, but wherein the field created by the second wire does not does not affect the first wire. The device does not require propellant, only electrical energy.
The device claims to produce a net thrust by having one wire react to the field of another while preventing the reverse interaction, which is physically impossible. Momentum cannot be created from nothing within a closed electromagnetic system, making this a propellant-less drive that violates Newton's laws.
AbstractRaumschiff mit Annihilationsantrieb, geladen mit Materie- und Antimaterieteilen, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Raumschiff mindestens zwei gleiche massive Materie- und Antimaterie-Massenteile (+M) bzw. (–M) hat und diese zusammen eine praktisch massenlose Masse besitzen.
The patent's core premise—that equal amounts of matter and antimatter can form a 'practically massless' composite object—violates the definition of mass in special relativity and the conservation of mass-energy. It misuses the concept of antimatter's properties to suggest a configuration that would annihilate instantly and could not provide net propulsion without expelling reaction mass.
AbstractA space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state is provided comprising a hollow superconductive shield, an inner shield, a power source, a support structure, upper and lower means for generating an electromagnetic field, and a flux modulation controller.A cooled hollow superconductive shield is energized by an electromagnetic field resulting in the quantized vortices of lattice ions projecting a gravitomagnetic field that forms a spacetime curvature anomaly outside the space vehicle. The spacetime curvature imbalance, the spacetime curvature being the same as gravity, provides for the space vehicle's propulsion. The space vehicle, surrounded by the spacetime anomaly, may move at a speed approaching the light-speed characteristic for the modified locale.
The device claims propulsion by creating a spacetime anomaly, which is a physically undefined process that circumvents conservation of momentum. It uses correct-sounding terms like 'gravitomagnetic field' and 'inflationary vacuum state' in a speculative, incorrect manner to obfuscate the lack of a real reaction mechanism.
AbstractA vehicle transport system including a torque platform with counter-rotating flywheels, whose axes of rotation are parallel to one another, is featured. One or more torque platforms are joined together with a platform rotating mechanism to rotate the platforms relative to the vehicle in which they are mounted. The combined mechanism is used to rotate the entire vehicle. Resistance of the counter-rotating flywheels to change in their axes of rotation provides rotational torque and rotation of the entire vehicle around the vehicle's center of mass. Successive increments of rotation in alternate rotational directions are coordinated with a transfer of mass to change the center of mass of the vehicle and are used to transport the vehicle. The successive angular motions of the vehicle around its changing center of mass achieves a resultant linear motion of the vehicle in the desired direction of travel.
The device is an internal mechanism that attempts to propel a vehicle by moving and rotating masses inside it. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot generate a net external force to accelerate its own center of mass.
AbstractA thruster for propelling and directing a vehicle without interacting with its environment without using propellant and particularly adapted for use in space, comprising rotating means having a pair of a first and a second axes of rotation, connectable to the vehicle such that each of the first and second axes of rotation extends opposite to each other with respect to a center of mass of the vehicle. The thruster is also provided with actuator means for actuating a first and a second rotational movement of the rotating means respectively around each of the first and second axis of rotation. The first rotational movement is actuated in a clockwise direction thereby generating a first reacting torque in a counter-clockwise direction that causes a pivotal movement of the vehicle around the first axis of rotation in the counter-clockwise direction. The second rotational movement is actuated in a counter-clockwise direction thereby generating a second reacting torque in a clockwise direction that causes a pivotal movement of the vehicle around the second axis of rotation in the clockwise direction. The thruster is also provided with a control mechanism to control and coordinate the actuator means to impart propulsion and direction to the vehicle. In a further embodiment, the thruster is enclosed. In a further embodiment, the thruster allows to spin the vehicle. A method for propelling and directing a vehicle without interacting with its environment is also disclosed.
The device uses internal rotating masses to generate opposing torques. While this can change the vehicle's orientation (attitude), internal forces cannot create a net external force for linear propulsion. This is a fundamental violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum for a closed system.
AbstractEin Antriebssystem zum Einsatz in Raketen, gekennzeichnet dadurch, dass die Bindungsenergie, freigesetzt bei der Annäherung von Ladung an Masse, genutzt wird, um eine Rakete zu beschleunigen.
The patent describes extracting 'binding energy' from electron-neutron interactions, which is not a real physical process. It violates energy conservation by implying a net energy output from bringing fundamental particles together without an existing potential well, and misuses physics terminology to obfuscate this.
Abstract【課題】 人類は重力を打消し空中に浮遊する乗物の夢を持ち、巨大な火柱を噴射してその反作用で飛行するロケットを考えた。何兆円の費用を使い何十人の命を失敗に合って焼き殺す悲劇を乗り越えてきた。【解決手段】 重力を打ち消す装置が本発明で、その為高速で回転する下向きのノズルから高速の水を射出させその反作用で重力を打ち消す浮遊力を獲得し、下向きのノズルから出た高速の水から得た合成ベクトル８方向の利用により、反作用で得た強大な浮遊力を、構造上の利点を利用して、削減されるのを大部分除去させ得たものである。【選択図】図３
The device attempts to use internal water jets to 'cancel gravity,' which violates Newton's laws. Reaction forces from downward water jets are internal to the system and cannot produce net upward force without expelling mass downward relative to an external reference frame. This is essentially a proposed perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
AbstractAuf dem Prinzip, dass Antimaterie negative Schwerkraft verursacht, beruhende Einrichtung (5) zum Antrieb von Raumfahrzeugen (1) mit negativer Schwerkraft, die mit Quellen elektromagnetischer Strahlung mit Frequenzen über 10·20· Hz, vorzugsweise über 10·24· Hz, versehen ist, die aus Antimateriekernen, wie Antiprotonen und Antineutronen, bestehen, wobei die Masse dieser Antimateriekerne größer als die Masse des Raumfahrzeuges (1) und die Anzahl der Kernbausteine der Antimateriekerne größer als 10·30· ist.
The claim violates fundamental conservation laws by proposing a propulsion system that generates net momentum without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field. Its core premise—that antimatter exhibits 'negative gravity'—is contradicted by experimental evidence and used to justify an impossible perpetual motion machine of the first kind (creating energy/momentum from nothing).
AbstractThis invention relates to propulsion systems for driving a space vehicle.The main element of the propulsion system is an elongated hollow tube that is open at one end and closed at the other end. Inside near the closed end there is a jet engine, a heater for raising the temperature of a gas, a gaseous substance, a gas compressor and a means of generating a directional force. The said force is directed towards the closed end of the tube. The means adapted to provide the said force may be electrostatic force, or it may be centrifugal force generated by spinning the whole unit. The said force causes the gas to collect at the closed end of the tube. The gas is first compressed and then heated to a high temperature in a container. Then the hot high-pressure gas is introduced to the jet engine, which directs the exhaust gas towards the open end of the tube. Two extra forces result, the main one being the push from the jet engine. The other force derives from the cooling gases circulating down the walls of the tube to the closed end of the tube, where a change in the direction of momentum causes an additional force. both extra forces are directed towards the closed end of the tube. There are no opposing forces because the other end of the tube is open to space.
The device is a reactionless drive, attempting to generate net thrust by manipulating fluids and forces entirely inside a container. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass using only internal forces, regardless of how gas is compressed, heated, or circulated.
AbstractBei dieser Erfindung handelt es sich um ein neues Verfahren der spontanen Überwindung von großen kosmischen Entfernungen. Das Verfahren beruht auf den Grundlagen der Forschungsergebnisse zu den quantenmechanischen Eigenschaften und Phänomenen der Photonen- und Teilchenverschränkung mit den daraus resultierenden Möglichkeiten der Teleportation. Hierfür wird ein Dimensionskanal von einer neuen Schwerkraftanlage aktiviert. Ein nicht fester Flugkörper wird mit Hilfe von monochromatischen-elektromagnetischen Wellen von einem geführten Antennensystem in der Atmosphäre ausgebaut und über den gebildeten Gravitationskanal teleportiert. DOLLAR A Die Steuer- und Ortungssignale werden mit Hilfe des von einem Gravitationszentraums ausgehenden Gravitationskanal teilweise getunnelt und durch die Polarisierung verschiedener verschränkter Teilchen verstärkt. DOLLAR A Eine spezielle Duplex Sendeanlage mit rotierenden Dipolen arbeitet als passiver Antrieb und als Steuersystem. Die Schwerkraftanlage, welche den Dimensionskanal aufrecht hält, arbeitet mit elektromagnetischen Schwerefeldern, welche über gepulste Gleichströme ein Gas-Plasma-Gemisch beschleunigt, welches seine Energie an benachbarte Hohlraumresonatoren abgibt, wo Mikrowellen erzeugt werden, welche die Magnetrone versorgen.
The claim violates fundamental physics by asserting macroscopic teleportation via quantum entanglement and the creation of gravitational/mass effects from vacuum polarization. It uses correct-sounding terms (entanglement, tunneling, gravitons) in incorrect, speculative ways that contradict conservation laws, relativity, and quantum mechanics, with no plausible energy accounting for the proposed effects.
AbstractVielseitige anwendbare gesteuerte und geregelte Antriebsvorrichtung, die Gegenstände oder Personen nach allen Richtungen befördern kann.
The device claims to propel or levitate objects using only synchronized electromagnetic forces between its internal transmitter and receiver coils. This violates Newton's laws of motion, as internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass. The claims for space propulsion and artificial gravity generation are physically impossible without an external reaction mass or energy gradient.
AbstractThis invention is a method for producing transient fluctuations in the inertial masses of material objects employing an effect that is a consequence of relativistic theories of gravitation. An extension of this method wherein pulsed thrust is applied sychronously with the mass fluctuations produced by the method to an object makes it possible to cause stationary changes in the object's apparent mass and weight and also to facilitate the transport of massive objects.
The patent claims a method to reduce an object's mass/inertia using electrical oscillations, enabling propulsion or weight change. This violates the conservation of momentum (reactionless drive) and the equivalence principle of General Relativity. The description uses correct-sounding relativistic terminology ('locally Lorentz-invariant theories of gravitation') to obfuscate a physically impossible core mechanism.
Unclear. Mentions a 'Vakuumbrenner' (vacuum burner) with a rotating core and fuel chambers, but no coherent energy input mechanism is described. The 'burner' operates in a vacuum, which contradicts combustion requirements.
The patent describes a complex aerial vehicle structure but centers its operation on a 'vacuum burner,' a combustion device claimed to work in a vacuum, which violates fundamental thermodynamics. The technical description obfuscates the lack of a real energy source or propulsion mechanism, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Unclear. The device appears to be a rotating nozzle assembly driven by electric motors (C, D, F, G). No primary energy source for thrust or 'burning' is identified. The name 'Vakuumbrenner' (vacuum burner) implies combustion, but combustion is impossible in a vacuum due to lack of oxidizer.
The patent describes a complex rotating mechanical assembly but provides no physically possible mechanism for a 'vacuum burner' to produce thrust or energy. It implicitly violates Newton's third law (no reaction mass for propulsion in a vacuum) and describes no actual energy source, making it a perpetual motion claim.
Electrical input to the lasers (implied but not specified). The claim suggests thrust is generated from the interaction of the two laser beams themselves.
The device is an attempted reactionless drive. It claims to generate thrust ('Schubkraft') from the interaction between two co-propagating laser beams, which is impossible under conservation of momentum. All photon momentum originates from the device, so net thrust on the device is zero without expelling those photons asymmetrically into an external environment.
Unclear. The primary input appears to be rotational energy supplied to a 'Reaktionsscheibe' (reaction disc) via a drive shaft. The claimed translation (thrust) is supposedly generated by a 'Translationsmedium' (translation medium) interacting with spiral channels on the rotating disc.
The device is a reactionless drive, attempting to generate net translational thrust (spacecraft propulsion) solely from internal rotating and channeling motions without ejecting any reaction mass. This directly violates the conservation of momentum, a cornerstone of classical physics.
Unclear. The device requires an input to rotate the 'Reaktionsscheibe' (reaction disc) via an 'Antriebswelle' (drive shaft), but claims to generate translational motion (thrust) for spacecraft without expelling reaction mass.
The device is a reactionless drive, attempting to produce spacecraft thrust solely through internal rotating components and fluid flows without expelling propellant. This directly violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, making it physically impossible to generate net thrust in this way.
Abstract(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるため要約のデータは記録されません。
The patent describes a device that allegedly creates a buoyant force ('floating force') solely by arranging magnetic fields within a plasma. This claims to produce useful mechanical work (lift) without an identifiable external energy source, directly violating the first law of thermodynamics. The use of correct physics terms (plasma, magnetic field) in an incoherent, non-quantitative context is a hallmark of pseudoscientific claims.
Unclear. Claims involve storing energy in a mass via acceleration, then recovering it, purportedly yielding a net 'energy saving' (Kosmos-Energie). The process implies energy output exceeds the net input, suggesting a violation of conservation.
The patent claim fundamentally violates established physics by asserting masses can be accelerated beyond light speed and that a cyclic process of acceleration and deceleration can yield a net 'energy saving.' It explicitly rejects special relativity and conservation laws, placing it in the realm of perpetual motion.
AbstractThe present invention relates to a method to produce and utilize propulsion forces on objects or devices by the controlled release of energy derived from absorbed radiation. The direction of the propulsion forces is controlled by controlling the rotation, configuration and composition of the absorber. Apparatuses are provided that comprise a rotating absorber and means to control the direction of the required thrust forces by adjusting the rotation, temperature, position of absorbing members, amount and kind of storing substance, by selective shading of the rotating absorber and re-directing the released energy once emitted.
The device claims to generate controlled thrust by absorbing and re-radiating ambient energy. However, the momentum imparted by absorbing radiation is exactly canceled by the momentum imparted when re-radiating it, resulting in zero net thrust. This is a fundamental violation of conservation of momentum.
Electrical input to the motor. The claim implicitly suggests additional energy is generated from the centrifugal forces of the tilting weight/disk.
The device is a motor-driven mechanical system with a tilting mass. Centrifugal forces are internal reaction forces within the system; their configuration cannot produce net thrust or excess energy. The claim violates Newton's laws by suggesting internal forces can create net propulsion or energy multiplication, constituting a classical perpetual motion violation.
Unclear. The claim describes a self-contained system of counter-rotating nested gimbal rings (cascades) with driven rotational masses, but does not specify an external energy input. The implied source is the internal drive of the rings, which would require energy from within the system.
The device claims to generate a net linear thrust from the internal rotation of masses within a closed, self-contained frame. This directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of linear momentum, as internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the system's center of mass.
Unclear. The patent describes a mechanism using centrifugal forces from rotating masses, but provides no explicit external energy input. The system appears to be a closed mechanical arrangement.
This 'centrifugal drive' attempts to generate net linear propulsion using only rotating internal masses. Centrifugal forces are internal forces that cannot produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass. The device, as described, violates Newton's laws of motion by suggesting a closed system can produce net external force without expelling mass or interacting with an external field.
Unclear. The only explicit input is the initial rotational energy to start the 'rotating mass system'. The claims suggest the 'small rocking swings' (rundlaufende Schaukeln) are operated by the centrifugal force field of the system itself, implying self-sustaining or amplified rotation.
The patent describes a motor that attempts to use its own centrifugal force field to drive auxiliary 'rocking swings' and modulate the radius of rotating masses, with the implication of sustained or amplified rotation. This is a classic over-unity claim, as it violates energy conservation by proposing a closed system that performs net work without an external energy source to overcome inevitable losses from friction and drag.
AbstractA space vehicle has lift-producing units 3 each comprising a plate 9 over which is blown a high speed air jet to produce a reduced pressure on its upper surface. A number of units 3 are mounted side by side on beams 4 in a sealed upper chamber 1 of the vehicle. Thrusters 5 on the vehicle side walls provide forward drive. <IMAGE>
The claim describes a 'self-lifting' craft using internal 'degravitating devices,' which is a physically undefined concept that implicitly violates Newton's laws by claiming to cancel all reactions. The description of a recycled airstream reducing energy loss suggests an incomplete energy accounting, as maintaining airflow against dissipative forces requires continuous energy input.
Abstract(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるため要約のデータは記録されません。
The patent claim describes a propulsion method where internal oscillators accelerate an object through a fluid or gas. This violates fundamental conservation laws (momentum and energy) as it claims the object can be propelled by purely internal actions without expelling reaction mass, constituting a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible for a closed system.
Unclear. The device appears to be an internal rotating/oscillating mass system intended to counteract gravity. Any claimed lift or propulsion would require energy input to accelerate and maintain the motion of the orbiting mass(es) M, but this input energy is not accounted for in the claims.
This patent describes a vehicle with an internal orbiting mass intended to overcome gravity. The concept violates Newton's laws of motion, as internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the vehicle's center of mass. It is a classic reactionless drive claim, which is physically impossible for a closed system.
Unclear. The text describes a system where a motor moves a part or ejects a fluid/gas from a reservoir to generate an impulse directly on the vehicle's mass, claiming to do so without generating an opposite reaction.
The claim describes a propulsion system that explicitly states it generates an impulse on the vehicle's mass without creating an opposing reaction. This is a direct violation of Newton's Third Law (conservation of momentum), a fundamental principle of physics. No mechanism within a closed system can produce net acceleration without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Electrical input to actuators (rotational and linear) that drive the system.
The device is an internal mechanism where all moving parts are attached to the vehicle frame. The forces between the oscillating/rotating masses and the guides are internal to the vehicle, so they cannot produce a net external force on the vehicle's center of mass. This violates Newton's third law and the conservation of linear momentum, making it a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible.
Electrical input to create/maintain electric field and surface charge. However, the claim implies a net propelling force on an isolated object in a vacuum without reaction mass.
The apparatus describes using asymmetric electrostatic pressure to generate a net force on an object in a vacuum. This is a propellantless thruster claim that violates conservation of momentum, as electrostatic forces are internal and cannot produce a net thrust on a closed system without expelling reaction mass.
Electrical input (67) powers rotor motors/generators. No other energy source is described. The system is claimed to be a self-contained, internal propulsion apparatus.
The device is a proposed reactionless drive, claiming to convert internal rotational motion into net linear thrust for space propulsion without expelling propellant. This directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, fundamental principles of physics. No internal arrangement of rotating masses, gyroscopes, or moving weights can produce a net force on a closed system's center of mass.
Electrical energy from a solar charging unit, used to power an electric motor that drives a turbine or propeller.
The device is a sealed system attempting to propel itself by moving internal air in a loop. This is physically impossible, as a closed system cannot generate net external thrust—the internal forces cancel out. It is analogous to a person sitting inside a car trying to push the dashboard to move the car forward.
Electrical energy stored in capacitors, discharged through a circuit containing a spark gap.
The device is an internal electromagnetic thruster with no external reaction mass. The repulsive forces between current elements are internal to the device, canceling out for net force. It violates Newton's Third Law and cannot produce net thrust in vacuum.
Electrical input to microwave generators. Implicitly claims to extract momentum from ambient dark matter, treating it as an unlimited, zero-cost reaction mass.
The device claims to generate propulsion by ejecting accelerated dark matter, but its described mechanism only creates phased microwaves inside a waveguide. It provides no physically plausible way for those internal EM fields to transfer net momentum to dark matter, or for that momentum transfer to result in a net thrust on the spacecraft, violating conservation of momentum. The claims of infinite specific impulse and using dark matter as a working medium are based on scientifically unsupported assumptions.
Unclear. Claim 8 explicitly references a 'perpetual energy source' as a power source for the propulsion coils, which is a non-existent, physics-violating concept. Other claims mention capacitive storage units providing high current, but the ultimate origin of that stored energy is not specified and is tainted by the perpetual energy claim.
The patent claim contains a fundamental physics violation by explicitly depending on a 'perpetual energy source' (Claim 8), which does not exist. While the core electromagnetic propulsion mechanism is valid in principle, the stated energy source and the implied 'galactic' scale of transportation are not supported by the described system and violate conservation laws.
Unclear. The 'propellant producing engine' presumably consumes fuel (chemical/electrical input) to generate high-pressure propellant. The claimed thrust mechanism, however, suggests generating net thrust by trapping this propellant internally, which is the core violation.
The device claims to produce thrust by blocking and trapping its own exhaust. This is physically impossible, as thrust requires ejecting momentum outward. Internal pressures cancel out, resulting in zero net force on the vehicle, violating Newton's Third Law and conservation of momentum.
Electrical input to the motor(s) driving the rotor(s).
The system describes internal magnetic interactions but claims they can produce net thrust on the entire device without expelling propellant or pushing against an external field. This is a direct violation of Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, making it a form of reactionless drive, which is impossible for a closed system.
Electrical input to the electromagnetic coils (implied). No propellant mass or external reaction mass is identified.
The device claims to produce spacecraft thrust by accelerating and directing magnetic flux out of a nozzle. Since magnetic fields carry momentum but not mass, expelling them cannot provide net thrust to the closed spacecraft system—it violates conservation of momentum. The inclusion of a power generation claim (Claim 8) further suggests an unphysical closed energy loop.
Electrical input to electromagnets and potential stored magnetic energy from permanent magnets. No external or ambient energy source is described.
The device claims to generate a net thrust for propulsion using only internal magnetic forces, with no expulsion of mass or momentum exchange with an external environment. This directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, making it a classical example of an impossible reactionless drive.
Electrical/thermal energy from the unspecified 'power source' is used to boil the working fluid.
The device is a closed system that recirculates all mass. To generate propulsion, a rocket must eject mass rearward. Internal pressure forces cancel out, resulting in zero net thrust. The claim violates Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum.
Electrical input to the electromagnetic radiation source. The claim implicitly suggests the device produces a net directional thrust (force) from this input without expelling any reaction mass.
The device claims to produce a unidirectional thrust by creating an asymmetric radiation pressure inside a closed cavity. This is a textbook violation of Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as internal forces cannot produce net acceleration of a system's center of mass. The use of advanced terminology like 'general relativistic metric tensor' is a misdirection that does not circumvent this fundamental principle.
Battery-powered electric motor. Claims to generate continuous rectilinear thrust and 'achieve weightlessness' from internal magnetic interactions.
The device is an attempted reactionless drive, claiming to produce continuous thrust using only internal magnetic forces powered by a battery. This directly violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as a closed system cannot accelerate its center of mass without expelling reaction mass. The description uses magnetic terminology in a vague, obfuscating manner to disguise this fundamental violation.
Electrical input from the motor. The claim of 'no fuel' refers only to propellant, but the device is an electrically-powered internal mechanism.
The device is an attempted reactionless drive. It claims to generate unidirectional thrust from internal motions by misapplying concepts like centrifugal force and non-simultaneous action/reaction. This directly violates Newton's laws of motion (conservation of momentum) for a closed system, making it physically impossible.
The primary energy source is the torque input from the power source (e.g., electric motor). The pressurized fluid also contains energy from its pressurization system. The claimed 'propulsion force' is said to arise from the Coriolis recoil forces generated internally by the interaction of the spinning discs and the radially moving fluid.
The device claims to generate a net propulsion force without expelling reaction mass, which directly violates Newton's third law and the conservation of linear momentum. The described Coriolis forces are internal and cannot cause the entire device to accelerate.
Claims to extract usable net force or torque from quantum vacuum zero-point energy via the Casimir effect, without an external energy input or thermodynamic gradient.
The device claims to produce propellant-less thrust or torque by harnessing Casimir forces, but these are internal forces that cancel out within any isolated system. It attempts to extract net work from the quantum vacuum's zero-point energy, which is in thermodynamic equilibrium, violating both conservation of momentum and the second law of thermodynamics.
Electrical energy from a battery (charged by solar collector) powers an electric motor to rotate a mass.
The device is an internal rotating mass, which cannot produce net thrust on a spacecraft in free space. All forces are internal and cancel out, violating conservation of momentum. This is a classic reactionless drive claim, which is physically impossible.
Electrical/mechanical power source providing torque to rotate the assembly and pressurize the recirculated fluid.
The device attempts to generate net propulsion using only internal Coriolis forces from a recirculating fluid, which is physically impossible. Internal forces, including Coriolis forces, cannot produce a net external force on a closed system's center of mass, directly violating conservation of linear momentum.
Electrical input to the laser and any motors/actuators. The system implicitly uses the internal energy of the device's power source.
The device is an internal optical system that cannot generate net thrust or rotation for its housing, as this would violate conservation of momentum. The use of correct terms like 'angular momentum' obscures the fundamental error of expecting an internal force to propel the whole object.
Electrical input to charge the capacitor and drive current through the coil.
The device claims to produce net thrust by internal electromagnetic forces alone, which is impossible as it violates conservation of momentum (Newton's third law). The description incorrectly argues that reaction forces can be negated by geometry, but all internal forces sum to zero within a closed system.
Unclear. Implied to be electrical input to create charges/fields, but the described mechanism for producing a net force (propulsion) suggests an attempt to extract work from internal system energy or from the interaction of fields without an external reaction mass or asymmetric external field gradient.
The claim describes an internal electromagnetic configuration intended to produce a net force (e.g., for spacecraft propulsion) without expelling propellant. This violates conservation of momentum, as internal forces cannot accelerate a system's center of mass. The use of terms like 'different inertial reference frames' obfuscates this fundamental violation.
Electrical input to linear induction motors to spin magnetic rings. The claim implicitly suggests the planetary rotation is an additional energy source for lift generation.
The device uses internal electric motors to spin rings, consuming energy. The claim that this arrangement amplifies centrifugal force to generate lift violates Newton's laws, as internal motions cannot produce a net external force on the vehicle. It is an attempt to create a reactionless drive using the Earth's rotation as a false external anchor.
Explicitly from an electric motor or other external driver to spin the structure. Implicitly, the claim suggests the system outputs propulsive force (anti-gravity) from this rotational input, implying an energy conversion.
The claim uses correct physics terminology (frame dragging, negative mass) in a fundamentally incorrect and speculative way to propose a propulsion mechanism that, by implying anti-gravity without a reaction mass, violates conservation of momentum and energy. The described effects are not supported by General Relativity or quantum field theory as applied.
Electrical or thermal energy input to the internal mechanism (e.g., motor driving a blower).
The device is a closed system claiming to produce net thrust. Internal forces, no matter how arranged, cannot create a net force on the container's center of mass—this violates conservation of momentum. It is analogous to sitting inside a car and pushing on the dashboard; you cannot propel the car forward.
Electrical input to the signal generator only. The claim implies the electromagnetic wave interaction with the waveguide's structure produces a net force (thrust) without expelling any reaction mass.
The system claims to produce a net thrust from an internal electromagnetic wave interacting with its own waveguide. This violates conservation of momentum, as it describes a reactionless drive with no external propellant or momentum exchange, making it a closed system that cannot accelerate its center of mass.
Unclear. Claims imply propulsion/guidance from interaction of spacecraft charge with Earth's magnetic field, but no primary energy source for charging, maintaining velocity against drag, or orbital insertion is specified.
The core claim violates fundamental electromagnetism and orbital mechanics. The Lorentz force from a static magnetic field cannot provide net energy or sustained centripetal force for circular motion; it only redirects existing momentum. The described system cannot achieve the claimed performance.
Unclear. The 'force generator' is implied to provide the rotational energy to spin the rings, but the claimed lift is purported to come from an interaction with the planetary rotation, not from the generator's work output.
The device describes a closed system of spinning rings. The centrifugal forces are internal and balanced; they cannot create a net external upward force on the vehicle's center of mass. This is a classic violation of Newton's laws, attempting to achieve propulsion without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field.
Unspecified. The claim implies the device can generate net upward acceleration (work) from the passive arrangement of atoms in a crystal, with no identified external energy input to account for the change in gravitational potential energy of the system.
The claim violates fundamental physics by asserting that a static arrangement of atoms in a crystal can deflect gravity to produce net upward acceleration, effectively creating lift or thrust without any energy input. This is impossible under conservation of energy and our understanding of gravity as a conservative force field.
Unclear. Claims to extract energy from 'scalar gravitational potential of celestial bodies' via mass fluctuations in dielectric material under an electromagnetic field.
The device claims to generate excess energy by cyclically changing the mass of a dielectric on a rotating arm, violating conservation of energy and momentum. It misuses legitimate physics terms like 'scalar gravitational potential' to obfuscate an attempt at a perpetual motion machine.
Unclear. Claims to use 'space vacuum' as both a collected medium and a reaction mass, but provides no identifiable external energy source. Implicitly suggests the system creates propellant from nothing.
The claim fundamentally misdefines 'vacuum' as a tangible fluid that can be collected and used as propellant, violating Newton's laws of motion. It describes an impossible process with no identifiable energy source or legitimate reaction mass, constituting a perpetual motion scheme.
Vague 'internal or external source of power generation' for moving the circulating weights. No identifiable external energy gradient (e.g., magnetic, aerodynamic, gravitational) is described to enable net levitation.
The device attempts to achieve levitation and propulsion solely through internal moving weights, which cannot produce a net external force on the vehicle (a 'reactionless drive'). This violates Newton's laws of motion and conservation of momentum. The description uses correct terms like 'centrifugal force' but applies them to an impossible mechanism.
Unclear and incomplete. The system's initial energy input is from an electric power source, but claims of lossless transmission and propulsion via internal momentum manipulation imply energy creation or violation of momentum conservation without an external reaction mass.
The patent describes systems for lossless power transmission and propulsion that directly violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of momentum. The use of advanced terminology like positron streams and relativistic circulation obfuscates fundamental physical impossibilities.
Electrical input to the drive system (coils) to rotate the enclosure.
The device is an internal momentum-canceling system. The centrifugal forces are internal and balanced; the pressure of the liquid against the cover is matched by an equal and opposite force on the base and walls, resulting in zero net thrust for the entire assembly, violating Newton's laws.
Electrical input to the rotation drive unit and gyroscope motor.
The device is a closed system that uses internal moving parts (an oscillating unbalanced weight and a gyroscope). Newton's third law dictates that internal forces cannot produce a net external force on the center of mass of the housing, making the claimed propulsion impossible without ejecting a reaction mass.
Electrical input to generate a magnetic field. Implicitly claims the Earth's geomagnetic field as an energy source for lift.
The device claims to generate lift via interaction with Earth's magnetic field without expelling mass, violating Newton's laws of motion. A static magnetic dipole in a uniform external field experiences torque, not a net translational force, making sustained levitation impossible as described.
Electrical input from frequency generator/amplifier and high-voltage transformer. Claims additional energy from undefined 'hyperspace' via 'wormholes'.
The claim violates fundamental physics by invoking non-existent entities (magnetic monopoles, hyperspace, wormholes) and undefined energy sources to produce propulsion without reaction mass or interaction with an external field, bypassing conservation of momentum and energy. The description uses correct-sounding terminology in a meaningless, speculative context.
Unspecified. The patent mentions generating gravitational waves and magnetic vortices but provides no identifiable energy input mechanism or quantification. Implicitly assumes energy can be extracted from or created by unspecified interactions with 'hyperspace'.
The described system violates fundamental conservation laws by proposing to teleport mass-energy without an identifiable, quantifiable energy source. It misuses terms from general relativity and quantum field theory ('gravitational waves', 'wormholes', 'negative energy') in ways completely disconnected from their theoretical meaning and practical engineering requirements.
Electrical or chemical energy from a motor/engine to spin masses.
The device is an internal momentum wheel; any centrifugal force in one direction is canceled by an equal and opposite force within the system over a full cycle. It cannot create a net external force to propel a vehicle without expelling reaction mass, directly violating Newton's laws of motion.
Electrical/chemical energy from the power source (e.g., radioactive isotope decay system) is converted by the ignition system into a directed energy beam (plasma stream).
The described drive system is an internal mechanism claiming to create a net external thrust by having an object it emits be attracted back to itself, which violates conservation of momentum. The use of vague, pseudo-technical terms obscures the fundamental physics violation.
Unclear. The description implies the propulsion force is generated internally by manipulating a circulating particle stream, with no explicit external energy input identified for the claimed net thrust.
The device is a classic 'reactionless drive' that attempts to generate net thrust through purely internal momentum changes. This violates Newton's laws of motion, as internal forces sum to zero and cannot accelerate the system's center of mass without expelling reaction mass.
The only identifiable energy inputs are the electrical power to the amplifier (1f), frequency generator (1g), and DC generator (1h). The claimed output is 'low-density hyperspace energy' from another dimension, which is not a recognized physical energy source.
The device claims to extract energy from a hypothetical 'hyperspace' by creating wormholes through cavitating oil bubbles, which violates energy conservation by positing an undefined external energy source. The description uses correct physics terms (cavitation, magnetic field, resonance) incorrectly to obfuscate a mechanism that has no basis in established physical law.
Unclear. The claim mentions high voltage electrostatic charging but does not specify an external power source for creating/maintaining the charges, rotation, or overcoming losses. Implicitly requires electrical input.
The described device claims to generate a net propulsive force ('lift') through purely internal electromagnetic arrangements and rotation, with no expulsion of momentum or interaction with an external field. This is a clear violation of conservation of momentum, making it a form of reactionless drive, which is impossible under Newton's laws and standard electrodynamics.
Unclear. Claims suggest propulsion/weight reduction from high-voltage electrostatic systems, implying energy output (propulsive force) exceeds electrical input energy, or that a coordinate transformation can cancel gravitational mass without an equivalent energy expenditure.
The claim violates core physics principles. It suggests generating propulsive force or reducing weight without a clear, compliant energy source, effectively proposing a reactionless drive. The theoretical explanation is a nonsensical mixture of advanced concepts that does not legitimately bypass conservation of momentum and energy.
Unclear. The device claims to create a propulsive force (and potentially generate electricity) by altering the mass density of a moving material via electric/magnetic fields or quantum tunneling, implying energy is extracted from the mass change itself.
The claim violates Newton's laws by proposing a reactionless drive—a closed system generating net momentum from internal changes. It misuses concepts like mass-energy equivalence and quantum tunneling to suggest a physically impossible mass redistribution that could create perpetual thrust or over-unity electrical generation.
Electrical input from the control and power module to spin gyroscopes and cluster disks. No other energy source is described, and the claimed 'anti-gravity' propulsion implies the generation of a net lifting force from internal rotations alone.
The device claims to produce lift and propulsion through internal gyroscopic motion alone, which violates conservation of momentum. Gyroscopes can reorient an object but cannot provide a net force to accelerate its center of mass without expelling reaction mass or pushing against an external field.
Electrical input from power supplies and mechanical input from the drive source for rotation.
The device claims to generate a gravitational force/field using only rotating electromagnetic components, which would create a propulsive effect without expelling reaction mass. This violates conservation of momentum. The description uses physics-like terms ('charge dipole', 'vibration') in a vague, non-standard way to obfuscate the lack of a credible mechanism for coupling to gravity.
Unclear. Implicitly from the rotational kinetic energy of flywheels, which itself must be supplied by an external power source. The claim suggests this stored rotational energy can produce a net upward force (anti-gravity) or thrust without a corresponding reaction mass or momentum exchange.
The core claim of achieving levitation or propulsion via internal flywheel rotation violates Newton's laws of motion. Centrifugal forces are internal and balanced; they cannot produce a net external force on the isolated system. Any thrust generated via atmospheric interaction (Claim 2) is a conventional, lossy reaction drive, not a new levitation principle.
Electrical input to create magnetic field and current in wire. Claims to convert this electrical energy into kinetic energy (thrust) with >50% efficiency.
The device describes a fixed magnet and fixed current-carrying wire inside a sealed container, claiming this configuration produces a net thrust to accelerate the container. This violates Newton's third law and conservation of momentum, as internal electromagnetic forces cancel out within a closed system. The efficiency claim is obfuscated, comparing to jet propulsion in a physically invalid way.
The propulsion means (6) provides the primary input energy to move the solid mass (5). The asymmetric drag profile and repulsion mechanism (spring or magnet) are claimed to create a differential energy conversion.
This device is a closed system where an internal mass is moved back and forth. The asymmetric drag and repulsion mechanisms only affect how energy is dissipated within the system; they cannot produce a net force or energy output greater than the input from the propulsion means, making it a form of perpetual motion machine.
Unclear. Claims to use electrical input to spin rotors, but implies generation of net thrust/acceleration without reaction mass or external gradient. Mentions inductive energy generation from rotating magnets, suggesting possible attempt at energy recycling.
The device attempts to create net linear thrust using only internal moving masses and braking mechanisms, which violates conservation of momentum. No external reaction mass or gradient is described, making it a reactionless drive, which is physically impossible for propelling an object's center of mass.
Unclear. Implied source is electrical current for the rings and static charges for the condensers. The claimed propulsive force is said to come from interaction with the Earth's static magnetic field, which is not an energy source that can be tapped for net work without an external gradient or a change in the field.
The claim violates fundamental mechanics by asserting that repelling or attracting the Earth's static magnetic field can produce net propulsion. A magnetic field is a potential field; you cannot 'push' against it to get a net reaction force for propulsion without an external energy source or expelling mass.
Primarily the on-board battery and generator. The claim implicitly attempts to use the Earth's electric field and the energy of a 'Bottom-up Discharge' as an external source, but the mechanism for extracting net work from this is invalid.
The device claims to generate lift by repelling from its own induced ground charge, which is an internal force and violates Newton's third law. The description uses correct-sounding terms (ionization, electromagnetic waves) in a nonsensical way to obfuscate a fundamental violation of momentum conservation.
Unclear. Mentions atomic reactors as components, but the core claim is that a specific arrangement of rotating masses (plasmas, fluids, turbines) in a 'synchronical movement' generates a directional acceleration principle, implying propulsion without reaction mass.
The device claims to produce directional acceleration (thrust) from internal rotating components powered by reactors, which violates conservation of momentum. It is a reactionless drive, a concept impossible under Newtonian and relativistic physics, dressed in complex but vague theoretical language.
The only explicit energy source is the 'drive mechanism mounted on the housing'. This is an internal actuator powered by an unspecified external source (e.g., electricity). The claim implies this internal force can generate a net thrust on the housing.
The described device is an internal reaction wheel system. Applying an internal torque to spin a rotor creates equal and opposite angular momentum in the housing, resulting in zero net linear thrust on the isolated system. It is a classic 'reactionless drive' claim that violates Newton's laws of motion.
116 patents flagged under this pattern
Solar radiation (primary), chemical energy from garbage incineration (supplemental).
The design incorporates a fictional gravity generator ('graviton'), violating known physics. While the solar-thermal and waste incineration thrust concepts have a real energy source, the claimed performance for high-speed interplanetary travel is implausible with a low-specific-impulse propellant like steam, indicating a fundamental misunderstanding of rocket propulsion.
Vague reference to 'outer space energy resources, such as sunlight' for powering the tunnel. No description of how sunlight is converted to the electrical energy needed for electromagnetic propulsion over interplanetary distances.
The described system violates fundamental principles of orbital mechanics, material science, and Newton's laws of motion. The concept of a fixed physical tunnel between planets is impossible, and the propulsion description lacks a coherent mechanism for providing thrust without violating conservation of momentum.
Electrical input to charge capacitors and power rotating/oscillating components. Implicitly attempts to use spacetime's gravitational energy or exotic matter effects.
The patent claims violate established physics by proposing that simple capacitor arrangements can generate the spacetime curvature required for an Alcubierre warp drive. General Relativity does not permit the generation of significant (or 'negative') curvature through such electrostatic configurations, and the required exotic matter cannot be substituted by oscillating charges.
Electrical input to microwave emitters and any systems for axial rotation.
The claim proposes reducing a craft's inertial mass—a fundamental property in mechanics—using microwave cavities and vibration, but provides no physically coherent mechanism or connection to established theory. The terminology is misapplied, creating a veneer of plausibility while describing an effect that would violate conservation of momentum and energy as currently understood.
Unclear. Claims imply manipulation of spacetime geometry via antimatter to enable travel, but no identifiable energy source or conversion process is described.
The claims directly contradict established experimental and theoretical physics regarding antimatter's gravitational interaction. The proposed propulsion method is described only through undefined geometric analogies with no identifiable energy source or mechanism, placing it in violation of known conservation laws and general relativity.
Unclear. Claims to use 'gravitational induction energy' generated by motion, rotation, oscillation, vibration, or radioactive injection of a 'gravitational inductor' at specific speeds/frequencies/wavelengths. No identifiable external energy source is specified.
The claim violates fundamental physics by proposing to generate net propulsion energy from internal motions ('gravitational induction') without consuming fuel or interacting with an external energy gradient. This constitutes a perpetual motion scheme, as it ignores conservation of energy and momentum, and misuses technical terms to obfuscate the violation.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 99% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 85% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 98% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 90% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
cached
This patent was flagged as a physics violation with 95% confidence. The claimed mechanism appears to violate fundamental physics principles.
79 patents with unclear or incomplete energy accounting
AbstractA spacecraft is propelled by a high energy beam propulsion device that emits a high energy beam, such as a neutron beam, from the spacecraft. The high energy beam propulsion device has a neutron beam source and a neutron beam generator that emits the neutron beam through a magnetic coil. The magnetic coil may be a discrete coil or extend over a length of the neutron beam length. The magnetic coil may be self-contained and utilize natural magnets or may be a powered magnet, wherein the magnetic field is produced by a flow of electrical current. The neutron source may be powered or self-contained and utilizes neutron emitting materials including Californium-252, Cesium-137, and Polonium-Beryllium.
The concept describes a reaction drive using emitted neutrons, which obeys Newton's third law. However, it is highly questionable due to impractical energy requirements, ineffective use of magnetic fields with neutral particles, and no credible mechanism for the claimed 'regulation' of the beam. It is likely non-viable, but not a fundamental physics violation.
AbstractA gravitational theory used to design spacecraft, the theory allows for lower power high payload space launches, low inertial acceleration in deep space. Software that governs the management and navigation of said designed space crafts.
The claim provides no details on the energy source or propulsion mechanism, relying solely on an unspecified new theory. Without a clear description of how energy is sourced, converted, and conserved, it is impossible to evaluate its thermodynamic validity, making it highly questionable.
AbstractEine Antriebsanordnung enthält eine um eine erste Achse drehbeweglich gelagerte Rotationsmasse; einen um eine zweite, senkrecht zur ersten Achse verlaufende Achse drehbeweglich gelagerten Lagerelement mit einem Lager zum Lagern der Rotationsmasse, einen um eine dritte, senkrecht zur zweiten Achse drehbeweglich gelagerten Schwingkörper mit einem Lager zum Lagern des Lagerelements, einen an dem Schwingkörper vorgesehenen Antrieb zum Erzeugen einer Drehbewegung des Lagerelements um die zweite Achse, ein Gehäuse mit einem Lager zum Lagern des Schwingkörpers, und eine gehäusefeste Bremse zum Abbremsen der Drehbewegung des Schwingkörpers, derart, dass bei jedem Bremsvorgang eine Antriebskraft auf das Gehäuse übertragen wird.
The device is a complex gyroscopic system where braking an oscillating body is claimed to transfer momentum to the housing. While internal momentum transfer is possible, it cannot create net propulsion in a closed system without expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field. The patent lacks a clear energy accounting that shows how net thrust is generated without violating conservation of momentum.
AbstractThe present invention refers to a device (1) for the generation of lift and comprising: - A rotor (2', 2'') rotating around a rotation axis (4), the rotor comprising a plurality of radial tracks (10) inside of which masses (15) are slidingly arranged so that, following the set in rotation of the rotor, said masses translate by centrifugal force along said tracks towards the periphery of the rotor; - A stator (3) arranged with respect to the rotor in such a way that, during the rotation of the rotor, the masses projected along the tracks towards the external part of the rotor are bound to follow a profile (18) of the stator (3); - And wherein the profile (18) of the stator is such that each mass (15), during the rotation of the rotor, varies its distance with respect to the rotation axis (4) of the rotor reciprocating along the radial track (10) in such a way that at least a first part of the masses is found at a distance (dl) from the rotation axis (4) that is greater with respect to at least a second part of masses so as to create a difference (Δ) of centrifugal force (F) along a direction.
The device uses a motor to spin a rotor with sliding masses constrained by a stator. While this creates asymmetric internal centrifugal forces, these are internal reaction forces that cancel out within the system. For the aircraft to experience lift, an external net force must act on it, which this internal mechanism cannot provide without pushing against an external medium like air.
AbstractAntriebsvorrichtung, vorzugsweise zum Antrieb von Transportmitteln, mit einem Brennraum, in dem Gase oder Flüssigkeiten erhitzt werden, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass an der Vorrichtung eine Laserresonatoreinrichtung angebracht ist, mit dem die Gase oder Flüssigkeiten im Brennraum erhitzt werden und die erhitzten Gase zur Erzeugung einer Bewegung dienen, wobei die von der Laserresonatoreinrichtung abgegebenen Laserstrahlen in den Brennraum gelangen und ihre Energien in einem offenem Keramikteil umwandeln, wobei der Antrieb mit nichtlinearen Laserstrahlen oder mit laserinduzierten Strömungen oder mit resonanzgesteuerten Laserströmungen betrieben werden.
The device describes using a laser to heat a propellant for thrust, which is physically possible in principle. However, the description is obfuscated with undefined, pseudo-technical terms and lacks a coherent mechanism, placing it in the realm of speculative invention rather than a clear, physically sound design.
AbstractWe could connect platforms to fiber optic cable(s) from below (insulated or not insulated with reflective materials, possibly magnified) large enough to power (and also push up) a platform to levitate - when there is no sun for alternate free power. The laser can 1) be used to send and receive data at high speeds (or the satellite/platform can use microwaves), 2) be used to power the satellite. The laser can have a pivot/swivel and targeting system;should platform veer a little from its hover position.We could also connect wind turbines (light spinning blades) connected by conducting cables at intervals all the way from the low orbital satellite down to the ground to generate power for laser or upwards to power the satellite's thrust.There could be mylar flapping wings, or helicopter blades, or four bladed helicopters or internal propellers.The platform could be made of the same material as microfiche or plastic or both.Calculator solar panels covering above and below face, surface of entire platform to convert sunlight to energy (light weighted) batteries.Additionally the bottom of the platform could also be made of calculator solar panels where land (ground level) surrounding the platform's location up above are below large rows of rotating (to aim possibly with RFID, RFIP GPS, micro chip - to direct the reflected sunlight directly at the platform's bottom solar panels) reflective (eg. mirrors) to reflect sunlight to the bottom of the platform (good for desert).If the platform's calculator's solar panels are wide enough the satellite may be able to maintain height.Then we could use 3 - D gyroscope as well as (micro chip to maintain same position), eg.when winds blow... and even lower back to ground when wind gusts are too strong.To power the lasers below we could build Gravity Chain Machines and/or solar or wind farms.This platform could be used as low orbital satellites.Or the platform could be used for elevator to space.We could use elastic tether and an
The concept proposes a levitating platform but obfuscates the primary energy source required to overcome gravity. It conflates methods for delivering electrical power to the platform (lasers, tethers) with methods for generating lift, while ignoring the colossal power difference between them. The accounting fails to show how the net energy input exceeds the potential energy gain and continuous loss, making sustained levitation unfeasible as described.
Unclear. The patent describes a propulsion force generation device ('推進力発生装置') but provides no explicit energy source. Implied electrical input to motors is likely, but no primary power source (batteries, fuel, external power) is specified in the claims.
The patent describes a complex mechanical navigation body with rotating lines, gimbals, and sealed containers, but fails to specify the energy source required for propulsion. While the mechanical arrangement itself doesn't inherently violate conservation laws, the omission of the energy source and propulsion mechanism makes the claims physically incomplete and questionable.
Electrical input to six independent drive motors (10-15) that rotate the masses and actuate the gimbal frames.
The device is a complex, motor-controlled dual-gyroscope system. While the described motions are kinematically possible, the claims in the method (claims 3-6) that these internal torque manipulations can produce a net linear motion of the entire system's center of mass violate the conservation of linear momentum. The energy source is clearly the motors, but the claimed output is physically impossible for a closed system.
AbstractA control device for an object includes a first wheel and a second wheel that rotate in opposite directions on a shaft affixed to a frame. The first and second wheels have openings to accept magnets that are free to slide up and down in the openings. As the wheels rotate, the magnets are urged outwards due to centrifugal force. The wheels have titanium sleeves fitted around the outer surfaces of the wheels, which have openings smaller in size than the openings of the wheels, so as to maintain the magnets within the openings even as the wheels rotate. Solenoid stations are provided around the wheels, and as a result of magnetic pulses provided from at least one of the solenoid stations, in synchronism with rotation of the wheels, a magnet is urged inwards to a center of the wheel in which it is disposed, to thereby result in a force vector that causes movement of the frame to thereby control the object.
The device uses electrical energy to move magnets within rotating wheels. The described 'force vector' likely results from an internal momentum transfer that cancels out within the closed system, not a net external thrust. The claim obscures this by focusing on 'weight distribution change' without a rigorous conservation of momentum analysis.
AbstractA propulsion system for a flying craft uses an air and water fuel source to provide propulsion thrust. The system includes two steam generating units, one attached directly to a compact turbine and the other connected to a compressor. The compressor compresses the steam from the latter steam generator, including excess steam from the turbine generator, and pumps it to a super-heated steam compression chamber. At the same time, the turbine generator powers another compressor to take in air from the atmosphere and pumps it into a super chilled compression chamber. After both the compressed super-heated steam and the compressed super chilled air have attained required pressure, volume and temperature, both gases are fed into an expansion chamber under appropriate control. The expansion chamber operates as a rocket booster and is equipped with an exhaust system made up of a main nozzle and several auxiliary thrust vectoring nozzles. Reactionary forces within the expansion chamber, caused by expansion of the chilled steam, cause thrust and generated heat. The generated heat heats the chilled compressed air within the gas expansion chamber, causing expansion of the chilled air, providing further thrust. The exhaust system controls exiting of the expanding gases to control and vector the thrust. Preferably, the heat source for the system is one or more nuclear reactors.
The system's energy ultimately comes from the nuclear heat source, so it doesn't violate conservation laws. However, its described operation is thermodynamically questionable, obscuring massive losses and omitting the energy cost of chilling, making its claimed performance and practicality highly dubious.
Unclear. The claims describe mechanical components (nozzles, shafts, electric motors, belts) but do not specify a primary energy input (e.g., fuel, electricity, external pressure gradient). The term 'burner' implies combustion, but no fuel, oxidizer, or ignition system is described.
The patent claims describe a complex mechanical assembly but fail to identify the fundamental source of energy required to perform work. The system appears to be driven by electric motors, making it a consumer of electrical energy, not a novel generator of propulsion from a vacuum. The omission of the energy source and the thermodynamic process makes the claims physically incomplete and questionable.
AbstractA spaceship is provided with a freely spinning propeller mounted on the front end. The propeller significantly reduces resistance to flight and also deflects space particles which might otherwise slow the craft. The sides of the spacecraft have ridges which are coated on the front side with radiation reflecting material and on the back side with radiation absorbing material. The resultant force of radiations being absorbed from the rear and reflected from the front propels the spacecraft forward.
The device does not explicitly violate energy conservation, as it attempts to use ambient radiation. However, it severely misrepresents the scale of the available forces; radiation pressure in interstellar space is utterly insignificant for spacecraft propulsion. The propeller serves no credible function in a vacuum, indicating a fundamental misunderstanding of the environment.
Unclear. Mentions 'NAS-Triebwerken' (NAS engines) and 'SUNEES' energy sources, but provides no description of their operating principle, fuel, or energy input. Possibly implies an unspecified novel propulsion system.
The patent describes a flight vehicle configuration but fails to define the core propulsion and energy systems (NAS, SUNEES), preventing any physics-based analysis of energy conservation or thermodynamic limits. The claims are structurally and operationally vague, placing it in the 'questionable' category due to insufficient information to assess validity.
Solar cells on deployable surfaces for onboard electrical systems. Primary propulsion claimed to be from 'coordinated centrifugal force components' generated by rotating masses driven by an electric motor.
The patent describes a flying vehicle with solar panels for electrical power, which is valid. However, its core propulsion claim—using internally generated, coordinated centrifugal forces for translation—violates conservation of momentum. Internal forces, no matter how coordinated, cannot produce net thrust on a closed system.
AbstractGreatly reduced cost of extraterrestrial transporation of strong items and materials is obtained through the use of impact into a crash-capturing-containing facility for deceleration. Cargoes from both the Earth and Moon can be cheaply crash-transported to a low earth orbit crash-load-capturing-satellite so that the satellite maintains a somewhat constant low earth orbit. By crash-capturing only lunar materials, the crash-containing satellite can also become a cargo-transporting satellite that travels from low earth orbit and delivers a much greater quantity of materials to a higher earth orbiting station that it started with. By crash-capturing only retrograde highly elliptically orbiting lunar material, that cargo-transporting satellite can be moved from a high earth orbit back to a low earth orbit.
The core concept of momentum exchange via high-speed capture is physically valid in principle, but the description in the abstract suggests a misunderstanding of orbital mechanics, implying net gains. The deceleration method, while not thermodynamically impossible, is an extreme engineering challenge that borders on physically impractical for the proposed velocities and mass scales.
Unclear. The patent references another application (P 31 00 032.0-22) for the fundamental motor design, but no primary energy input (electrical, chemical, etc.) is specified in the provided claims. The description focuses on phasing and control of multiple motors.
The patent claims describe a control system for phasing multiple motors but completely omit the description of the fundamental energy source and conversion mechanism, deferring to a separate patent. Without the core mechanism, it is impossible to perform energy accounting or check thermodynamic limits, making the claims inherently questionable from a physics compliance perspective.
AbstractThis invention relates to an all-electric generator yielding a motional electric field in the space surrounding the device, but requiring no mechanical movements of its parts in generating this field. The Theory underlying the production of such a field postulates that each moving electron constituting the current in a linear conductor carries with it a loop of magnetic field energy about it.
The device uses electrical input energy but describes a physically ambiguous process for generating an external electric field. The core claim of a 'motional' field without motion and the focus on magnetic flux cancellation without a clear energy conversion mechanism make it questionable and lacking a rigorous physics foundation.
Unclear from claims. Energy could come from: 1) Internal propulsion of 'exchange masses' (claim 4), 2) Initial kinetic energy imparted to the rotating/oscillating masses, 3) Potential energy stored in the elastic members. No primary external energy source is specified.
The patent describes influencing a flight body's motion by moving internal 'energy exchange masses' connected via elastic members. While internal moving masses can create oscillatory forces, generating a sustained net propulsion requires expelling reaction mass or interacting with an external field. The claims are vague on the energy source and the complete momentum balance, making the net effect questionable without violating Newton's laws, but the presentation obscures the core physics.
Incident microwave energy from an external source (presumably a ground-based or orbital transmitter).
The claim describes using intercepted microwave energy to produce thrust but is technically obfuscated; it does not specify a physically valid conversion mechanism. While radiation pressure can impart force, it is extremely weak for practical propulsion, and the claim's vagueness hides whether it implies a reactionless drive or a legitimate, albeit inefficient, method.
Electrical input to electromagnetic coils and to impart charge to particles (electrons/ions). The working fluid (charged particles) appears to be provided by the system itself, not from an external propellant tank.
The device appears to be a poorly described or obfuscated electromagnetic thruster (e.g., a type of magnetoplasmadynamic thruster or ion thruster) that requires electrical energy and onboard propellant. It does not explicitly violate conservation laws, but its description is physically incoherent, suggesting thrust from magnetic fields alone without clear accounting for the reaction mass, making its claimed operation questionable.
Primary energy from an Electrical Energy Source (EES) such as a battery, fuel cell, or gas turbine generator. The system uses this to power an electromagnetic wave generator (e.g., gyrotron) to heat a gaseous working fluid via resonant molecular excitation.
The patent describes an electrically-powered resonant RF heater for a gas flow, which is physically possible as a heating element. However, it is framed as a novel propulsor without providing the necessary energy accounting or performance metrics to prove it doesn't violate thermodynamic limits, relying on technical jargon to obscure a potentially ordinary heating process.
Electrical input from an external power supply to establish the voltage difference and electric field.
The patent describes an internal electrostatic configuration but fails to account for momentum conservation. For a rigid, isolated apparatus, internal electrostatic forces cancel, resulting in no net thrust. The claims use non-standard terminology ('divergence in E-field force') which obfuscates the missing momentum sink, making the core thrust-generation claim questionable.
Solar irradiance is the primary energy source, collected via a concentrator and optical transmission system, stored as thermal energy in a phase-change material (thermal capacitor).
The core concept of solar-thermal propulsion using a thermal capacitor is physically valid. However, Claim 8's wording suggests an 'increase' in operational power per unit area beyond available sunlight, which is a thermodynamic violation if interpreted as creating energy. This ambiguous claim requires scrutiny to ensure it describes only temporal concentration of power (storing and releasing), not a violation of energy conservation.
Solar radiation (primary), possibly auxiliary electrical power from body-mounted solar panels for heating during non-sun-pointing operations.
The core concept of solar thermal propulsion is physically valid, but the patent claims include vague, potentially misleading statements about temperature limits and lack clarity on energy sources during non-sun-pointing operations, requiring further scrutiny.
Electrical energy from the vehicle's power system (batteries, solar, etc.) to operate heating elements or energy sources that decompose/convert structural material.
The concept does not violate conservation laws, as the propellant's mass and energy come from the vehicle's structure and onboard power. However, it is physically questionable because 'extending mission life' is not automatically achieved by converting structure to propellant; the system's net performance depends on inefficient thermodynamic conversion and the propellant's quality, which are unanalyzed.
Electrical energy from an unspecified supply unit powers magnetic field generation. Claim 18-20 introduces an energy harvesting coil that recovers some induced current from the first magnetic field, feeding it back to the supply.
The patent describes a magnetic timing scheme with energy harvesting feedback, but the core propulsion claim lacks a valid physical mechanism for net thrust. The energy recovery system obscures the complete energy balance, as harvesting would inherently oppose the driving field and cannot result in a net gain or free propulsion energy.
Electrical energy to power the laser source, converting to coherent light (photons). Potentially ambient magnetic fields (magnetosphere) if claimed interaction is real.
The core concept of using laser light for propulsion via radiation pressure is physically valid, but the claims become questionable with the introduction of undefined and incorrect concepts like 'magnetically charged' light and propulsion via interaction with ambient magnetic fields without a coherent force mechanism.
Electrical power from nuclear or solar sources drives motors to spin large wheels containing fluid-filled tapered tubes.
The concept describes an electrically powered centrifugal thruster, which is not inherently impossible, but the claim's vague mechanism for generating net thrust from symmetrical, counter-rotating wheels is physically questionable. The terminology is non-standard and obfuscates the critical momentum balance, making it unclear if the system can produce net propulsion without violating conservation of momentum.
The primary energy source is ambiguous. The lighter-than-air gas (hydrogen/helium) provides buoyant lift, which is a potential energy derived from Earth's gravitational field and the density gradient of the atmosphere. The claim that this gas can be directed to 'power' the airplane/spacecraft suggests its use as a chemical fuel (hydrogen) or a pressurized working fluid, implying an internal energy source beyond just buoyancy.
The concept is not a fundamental physics violation, as using hydrogen for both lift and combustion is physically possible. However, the patent claims are presented in a way that suggests energy multiplication—implying the buoyant ascent somehow 'charges' the gas for free to be used later for propulsion, which ignores the separate energy required to compress or combust the gas. The physics is obfuscated by vague language.
Electrical input current (explicit). Potential ambient magnetic field (implicit, but unclear if it provides energy or just a configuration bias).
The device appears to be an electromagnetic actuator. The description uses correct physics terms (Lorentz force, magnetization) but the central claim of achieving a 'net' driving force is physically questionable for a closed system. Without a clear external reaction mass or an asymmetric interaction with an external field gradient, the net force on the device's center of mass should be zero, making its utility as a drive device highly suspect.
Ambient atmospheric kinetic/thermal energy (via ram scoop), chemical energy of 'loads' (presumably propellant), and possibly orbital/electrodynamic tether energy. Claims an 'interorbital circulation system' with 'energy restoration' of loads.
The method describes a circular energy system where 'loads' have their energy restored on other spacecraft for reuse, implying energy recycling without loss. This violates the second law of thermodynamics. While it attempts to use ambient atmospheric energy, the overall scheme lacks a clear, net external energy input to sustain the claimed circulation and compensation of losses.
Buoyant force from a vacuum-filled rigid vessel (lifting) and chemical energy from rocket propellant (final acceleration to orbit).
The proposed system confuses buoyancy principles. A vacuum chamber is not a buoyant lifting body because the immense structural mass needed to prevent atmospheric collapse outweighs the lifting benefit. While high-altitude launch assists are valid concepts (using balloons or aircraft), this specific vacuum-lift mechanism is not physically sound as claimed.
Unspecified. The patent mentions fields (magnetic, electric, electromagnetic, gravimetric) but does not identify the primary energy input required to create, sustain, or modulate these fields to perform work against gravity.
The claim describes using fields to levitate and manipulate objects without contact, but it fails to specify the source of energy required to perform the work of lifting or to explain how reaction forces are managed. While technologies like magnetic levitation (Maglev) are valid, they require clear energy inputs and are bound by conservation laws, which this patent obscures with vague terminology.
Electrical input to the anode to generate the electric field, and energy to operate the propellant provider. The 'external electron source' (cathode) also requires an energy input to emit electrons.
The patent describes a configuration of magnetic and electric fields for plasma propulsion but is technically vague and obscures the well-understood physics of such thrusters. While not claiming impossible performance, its obfuscating language and incomplete description of the energy and particle flow make it questionable, requiring scrutiny of any implied performance claims not included in this excerpt.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (70% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (80% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (75% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.
cached
This patent has questionable physics claims requiring further review (85% confidence). The energy accounting or mechanism description is unclear.